Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 357 views

    Elise Second Supplement To Engoron Complaint

    Uploaded by

    Washington Examiner
    Elise Stefanik submits a supplemental complaint to the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct against Judge Arthur F. Engoron regarding his handling of the case New York v. Trump. She alleges Judge Engoron placed an unconstitutional gag order on President Trump and engaged in election interference. Stefanik urges the Commission to consider her previous complaints of inappropriate bias and illegal misconduct by Judge Engoron and stop this miscarriage of justice.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Elise Second Supplement To Engoron Complaint

    Uploaded by

    Washington Examiner
    357 views1 page
    Elise Stefanik submits a supplemental complaint to the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct against Judge Arthur F. Engoron regarding his handling of the case New York v. Trump. She alleges Judge Engoron placed an unconstitutional gag order on President Trump and engaged in election interference. Stefanik urges the Commission to consider her previous complaints of inappropriate bias and illegal misconduct by Judge Engoron and stop this miscarriage of justice.

    Original Description:

    Elise Second Supplement to Engoron Complaint

    Original Title

    Elise Second Supplement to Engoron Complaint

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Elise Stefanik submits a supplemental complaint to the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct against Judge Arthur F. Engoron regarding his handling of the case New York v. Trump. She alleges Judge Engoron placed an unconstitutional gag order on President Trump and engaged in election interference. Stefanik urges the Commission to consider her previous complaints of inappropriate bias and illegal misconduct by Judge Engoron and stop this miscarriage of justice.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    357 views1 page

    Elise Second Supplement To Engoron Complaint

    Uploaded by

    Washington Examiner
    Elise Stefanik submits a supplemental complaint to the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct against Judge Arthur F. Engoron regarding his handling of the case New York v. Trump. She alleges Judge Engoron placed an unconstitutional gag order on President Trump and engaged in election interference. Stefanik urges the Commission to consider her previous complaints of inappropriate bias and illegal misconduct by Judge Engoron and stop this miscarriage of justice.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    Elise Stefanik

    Post Office Box 500


    Glens Falls, New York 12801
    (518) 336-5232

    January 19, 2024

    New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct


    61 Broadway, Suite 1200
    New York, New York 10006

    Re: Judicial Complaint Against Judge Arthur F. Engoron


    Supreme Court, New York County
    Case Name: New York v. Trump
    Index No.: 452564/2022

    Dear Commission Members:

    More than two months ago on November 10, 2023, I submitted a judicial complaint
    against Judge Engoron for his inappropriate bias and judicial intemperance against President
    Trump in New York v. Trump. I supplemented my complaint on November 17, 2023, which
    detailed illegal political donations and other illegal, biased misconduct by Judge Engorgon and
    his staff. I received an acknowledgment of both letters.

    I am supplementing again my judicial complaint against Judge Engoron with the factual
    allegations made by President Trump and his co-defendants in the attached October 28, 2023
    letter to the New York Court of Appeals. The Court dodged addressing a crucial issue, which
    has ramifications for all New Yorkers. Simply stated, it is unacceptable that any judge in
    America would place an unconstitutional gag order on a defendant. If there is anyone who
    must have the constitutional right to speak out against the judge, court staff, prosecutor, and
    process, it is a defendant going through a process he believes has been politicized and
    weaponized against him. Illegally gagging a presidential candidate–Judge Engoron’s election
    interference–is shocking and appalling. This undermines the public’s faith and confidence in
    our New York courts.

    Thank you for your prompt consideration of this judicial complaint against Judge Arthur
    F. Engoron, including today’s supplement, for his inappropriate bias and judicial intemperance
    in New York v. Trump (452564/2022). Judge Engoron’s political show trial is coming to a close,
    and I urge your office to stop this grotesque miscarriage of justice.

    Sincerely,

    Elise M. Stefanik

    Enclosure (October 28, 2023 Trump Letter to New York Court of Appeals)

    You might also like