Introduction

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 12

Introduction

Social cognition and Social neuroscience


Master Seminar WiSe23/24
Seminar Instructor
Dr Michael Edem Fiagbenu
(FSU-Jena)

1
Seminar outline

What is social cognition and social neuroscience?


What is the history of social cognitive neuroscience?
What are the available neuroscience techniques?
What are the expectations/topics of the seminar?

2
Ø What is social cognition?
• how we think and feel about ourselves and others
• the process of gathering information about ourselves and others and
using the information to make and guide our social decisions
• “the mental processes by which we make sense of our social worlds”
Quin (2003)

Ø What is social cognitive neuroscience?


• the interface between the nervous system, self and social interactions
• identifying the brain regions involved in social cognition
• the use neuroscience tools to study social cognition
• e.g., fMRI, EEG, TMS, lesions studies
3
Review of neuroscience
Areas of the brain involved in music training in children
research tools (Sachs et al. 2017)
(Liebermann, 2010)

Blood oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) fMRI

Detects magnetic properties of oxygenated blood


flowing to active brain areas involved in tasks and
takes a snap-shot of the areas
• non-invasive technique
• detects where (spatial resolution) there is brain
activity 4
https://www.academia.edu/621621/Social_cognitive_neuroscience
Review of neuroscience Types of EEG waves
research tools
(Liebermann, 2010)
Electro-encephalograhy (EEG)

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-
biological-sciences/brain-waves
https://kids.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frym.2020.00096
Detects electrical activity or “brain waves” from
groups of neurons firing in the outer layer of the cortex
• non-invasive technique
• detects when (temporal resolution) brain activity occur 5
Review of neuroscience
research tools
(Liebermann, 2010)
Lesion studies

Vaidya, Pujara et al., 2019

Phineas Gage

Infer behaviour and psychological processes from damaged


brain areas
• invasive technique; detects where activity occurs
• can establish causal relationship between brain and behaviour
• rare used, because human lesions are rare 6
https://www.academia.edu/621621/Social_cognitive_neuroscience
Review of neuroscience
research tools
(Liebermann, 2010)
Transcranial Magnetic stimulation (TMS)

Vaidya, Pujara et al., 2019

Electromagnetic pulses are used to stimulate and inactivate


neurons in the cortex
• non-invasive technique; detects where activity occurs
• can establish causal relationship between brain and behaviour
• common procedure to induce temporary lesions
7
https://www.tobergmann.de/methods/ https://www.academia.edu/621621/Social_cognitive_neuroscience
Review of neuroscience
research tools
(Liebermann, 2010)

8
Vaidya, Pujara et al., 2019
Reflection question

1. Compare and contrast the different invasive and non-invasive


neuroscientific techniques.
2. What are the strengths and limitations of each of the
techniques?
3. What is meant by temporal and spatial resolution of
neuroscientific techniques?

9
The goals of social cognition
and social neuroscience
• “to identify the mental structures and processes that permit humans
to navigate their social worlds successfully by understanding the
psychological states (beliefs, emotions, goals, and so on) and traits
(stable dispositions) of the persons they encounter and with whom
they are interdependent”
Bodenhausen & Todd (2010)

• to understand and “control“ our behaviours and those of others


• to examine the processes that occur at the interface of self and others
Liebermann (2007)
10
Reflection question

Allthough neuroscientific methods have advanced our


understanding of the neurobiological origins of human behaviour
and social relations, some ”neurosceptics” who have questioned
whether such methods can really unravel the complexities and
intricacies of human behaviour even improve our everyday lives.
What are you views on this issue? Discuss some arguments for and
against neuroscepticism.
Rachul C, Zarzeczny A. The rise of neuroskepticism. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2012 doi:
10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.12.008. Epub 2012 Jan 20. PMID: 22261321.
Klein, E. (2011). Is there a need for clinical neuroskepticism? Neuroethics, 4(3),
251–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-010-9089-x
11
Reflection question

Discuss the historical origins social neuroscience?


(see Lieberman, 2010; 2012)

12

You might also like