Etextbook 978 0393614190 Give Me Liberty An American History Seagull Fifth Edition Vol 2
Etextbook 978 0393614190 Give Me Liberty An American History Seagull Fifth Edition Vol 2
Etextbook 978 0393614190 Give Me Liberty An American History Seagull Fifth Edition Vol 2
★
★ C O N T E N TS ★
“ W H AT
1 5 ★ I S F R E E D O M ? ” : R E C O N ST R U CT I O N ,
1 8 6 5 – 1 8 7 7 564
The Meaning of Freedom 566 ★ Voices of Freedom From
Petition of Committee in Behalf of the Freedmen to Andrew Johnson
(1865), and From A Sharecropping Contract (1866) ... 576 ★ The
Making of Radical Reconstruction 579 ★ Radical Reconstruction
in the South 590 ★ The Overthrow of Reconstruction 594
16 ★ A M E R I CA ’ S G I L D E D AG E , 1 8 7 0 – 1 8 9 0 603
FREEDOM’S
1 7 ★ B O U N DA R I E S , AT H O M E A N D A B R OA D ,
1890–1900 649
viii ★
18 ★ THE PROGRESSIVE ERA, 1900–1916 691
SAFE
1 9 ★ F O R D E M O C R ACY: T H E U N I T E D STAT E S A N D
WO R L D WA R I , 1 9 1 6 – 1 9 2 0 734
An Era of Intervention 737 ★ America and the Great War 742
★ The War at Home 746 ★ Who Is an American? 755 ★
Voices of Freedom From Woodrow Wilson, War Message to Congress
(1917), and From Eugene V. Debs, Speech to the Jury before Sentencing
under the Espionage Act (1918) ... 756 ★ 1919 767
FROM
2 0 ★ B U S I N E S S C U LT U R E TO G R E AT D E P R E S S I O N :
T H E T W E N T I E S , 1 9 2 0 – 1 9 3 2 779
The Business of America 782 ★ Business and
Government 789 ★ Voices of Freedom From Lucian W. Parrish,
Speech in Congress on Immigration (1921), and From Majority Opinion,
Justice James C. McReynolds, in Meyer v. Nebraska (1923) ... 792 ★
The Birth of Civil Liberties 795 ★ The Culture Wars 799 ★
The Great Depression 810
The First New Deal 821 ★ The Grassroots Revolt 830 ★ The
Second New Deal 835 ★ A Reckoning with Liberty 838 ★
Voices of Freedom From Franklin D. Roosevelt, “Fireside Chat”
(1934), and From John Steinbeck, The Harvest Gypsies: On the Road to
the Grapes of Wrath (1938) ... 842 ★ The Limits of Change 845 ★
A New Conception of America 852
FIGHTING
2 2 ★ F O R T H E F O U R F R E E D O M S : WO R L D WA R I I ,
1 9 4 1 – 1 9 4 5 861
Fighting World War II 864 ★ The Home Front 873
Visions of Postwar Freedom 880 ★ The American
C O N T E N T S ★ ix
Dilemma 884 ★ Voices of Freedom From League of United Latin
American Citizens, “World War II and Mexican Americans” (1945), and
From Charles H. Wesley, “The Negro Has Always Wanted the Four
Freedoms,” in What the Negro Wants (1944) ... 888 ★ The End of
the War 898
THE
2 3 ★ U N I T E D STAT E S A N D T H E C O L D WA R ,
1 9 4 5 – 1 9 5 3 905
Origins of the Cold War 908 ★ The Cold War and the Idea
of Freedom 917 ★ The Truman Presidency 922 ★ The
Anticommunist Crusade 927 ★ Voices of Freedom From
Joseph R. McCarthy, Speech at Wheeling (1950), and From Margaret
Chase Smith, Speech in the Senate (1950) ... 936
24 ★ A N A F F L U E N T S O C I E T Y, 1 9 5 3 – 1 9 6 0 940
26 ★ T H E T R I U M P H O F C O N S E RVAT I S M , 1 9 6 9 – 1 9 8 8 1030
x ★ CONTENTS
27 ★ F R O M T R I U M P H TO T R AG E DY, 1 9 8 9 – 2 0 0 1 1071
28 ★ A N E W C E N T U RY A N D N E W C R I S E S 1109
Suggested Reading A-1
The Declaration of Independence (1776) A-23
The Constitution of the United States (1787) A-27
Glossary A-47
Credits A-81
Index A-83
C O N T E N T S ★ xi
★
L I ST O F M A P S , TA B L E S , ★
AND FIGURES
MAPS
C H A P T E R 15 C H A P T E R 19
The Barrow Plantation 570 The Panama Canal Zone 738
Sharecropping in the South, The United States in the Caribbean,
1880 575 1898–1941 740
Reconstruction in the South, Colonial Possessions, 1900 741
1867–1877 599 World War I: The Western Front 745
The Presidential Election of Prohibition, 1915: Counties and
1876 600 States That Banned Liquor before the
Eighteenth Amendment (Ratified
C H A P T E R 16 1919, Repealed 1933) 751
The Railroad Network, 1880 607 Europe in 1914 773
U.S. Steel: A Vertically Integrated Europe in 1919 774
Corporation 610
The Industrial West 619 C H A P T E R 21
Indian Reservations, ca. 1890 626 Columbia River Basin Project,
Political Stalemate, 1876–1892 631 1949 819
The Tennessee Valley Authority 827
C H A P T E R 17 The Dust Bowl, 1935–1940 828
Populist Strength, 1892 655
The Presidential Election of 1896 659 C H A P T E R 22
xii ★
C H A P T E R 23 C H A P T E R 27
Cold War Europe, 1956 913 Eastern Europe after the Cold
The Korean War, 1950–1953 915 War 1075
Immigrant Populations in Cities and
States, 1900 and 2010 1090
CHAPTER 24
The Interstate Highway Origin of Largest Immigrant
System 948 Populations by State, 1910 and
2013 1093
The Presidential Election of
1960 980 The Presidential Election of
2000 1104
C H A P T E R 25
The Vietnam War, 1964–1975 1007 C H A P T E R 28
U.S. Presence in the Middle East,
1967–2015 1115
C H A P T E R 26
Center of Population, Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza
1790–2010 1034 Strip 1117
The Presidential Election of Percentage of Population Below the
1980 1058 Poverty Line, 2014 1141
The United States in the The Presidential Election of
Caribbean and Central America, 2012 1150
1954–2004 1067
MA PS ★ xiii
TA B L E S A N D F I G U R E S
C H A P T E R 16 C H A P T E R 25
Table 16.1 Indicators of Economic Figure 25.1 Percentage of Population
Change, 1870–1920 606 below Poverty Level, by Race,
1959–1969 998
C H A P T E R 17
Table 17.1 States with over 200 C H A P T E R 26
Lynchings, 1889–1918 668 Table 26.1 The Misery Index,
1970–1980 1045
C H A P T E R 18 Figure 26.1 Real Average Weekly
Table 18.1 Immigrants and Wages, 1955–1990 1046
Their Children as Percentage of
Population, Ten Major Cities, C H A P T E R 27
1920 698 Table 27.1 Immigration to the United
Table 18.2 Percentage of Women States, 1961–2010 1091
Workers in Various Occupations, Figure 27.1 Unemployment Rate by
1900–1920 700 Sex and Race, 1954–2000 1095
Figure 27.2 Women in the Paid
C H A P T E R 19 Workforce, 1940–2010 1101
Table 19.1 The Great
Migration 765
C H A P T E R 28
Figure 28.1 Portrait of a
C H A P T E R 20 Recession 1132
Table 20.1 Selected Annual
Immigration Quotas under the 1924
Immigration Act 804
C H A P T E R 21
Figure 21.1 Unemployment,
1925–1945 845
xiv ★ TABLES A N D F I G UR ES
★
ABOUT THE AUTHOR ★
★ xv
★
PREFACE ★
xvi ★
Borderlands is a more complex idea that has influenced much recent histor-
ical scholarship. Borders are lines dividing one country, region, or state from
another. Crossing them often means becoming subject to different laws and
customs, and enjoying different degrees of freedom. Borderlands are regions
that exist on both sides of borders. They are fluid areas where people of differ-
ent cultural and social backgrounds converge. At various points in American
history, shifting borders have opened new opportunities and closed off others
in the borderlands. Families living for decades or centuries in a region have
suddenly found themselves divided by a newly created border but still living
in a borderland that transcends the new division. This happened to Mexicans
in modern-day California, Arizona, and New Mexico, for example, in 1848,
when the treaty ending the Mexican-American War transferred the land that
would become those states from Mexico to the United States.
Borderlands exist within the United States as well as at the boundaries
with other countries. For example, in the period before the Civil War, the
region straddling the Ohio River contained cultural commonalities that in
some ways overrode the division there between free and slave states. The
borderlands idea also challenges simple accounts of national development in
which empires and colonies pave the way for territorial expansion and a future
transcontinental nation. It enables us, for example, to move beyond the catego-
ries of conquest and subjugation in understanding how Native Americans and
Europeans interacted over the early centuries of contact. This approach also
provides a way of understanding how the people of Mexico and the United
States interact today in the borderland region of the American Southwest,
where many families have members on both sides of the boundary between
the two countries.
Small changes relating to these themes may be found throughout the
book. The major additions seeking to illuminate the history of the West and of
borderlands are as follows:
Chapter 1 now introduces the idea of borderlands with a discussion of
the areas where European empires and Indian groups interacted and where
authority was fluid and fragile. Chapter 4 contains expanded treatment of
the part of the Spanish empire now comprising the borderlands United States
(Arizona, California, New Mexico, Texas, and Florida) and how Spain endea-
vored, with limited success, to consolidate its authority in these regions. In
Chapter 6, a new subsection, “The American Revolution as a Borderlands Con-
flict,” examines the impact on both Americans and Canadians of the creation,
because of American independence, of a new national boundary separating
what once had been two parts of the British empire. Chapter 8 continues this
theme with a discussion of the borderlands aspects of the War of 1812. Chap-
ter 9 discusses how a common culture came into being along the Ohio River
PRE FA C E ★ xvii
in the early nineteenth century despite the existence of slavery on one side
and free labor on the other. Chapter 13 expands the treatment of Texan inde-
pendence from Mexico by discussing its impact on both Anglo and Mexican
residents of this borderland region. Chapter 14 contains a new examination of
the Civil War in the American West.
In Chapter 16, I have expanded the section on the industrial west with new
discussions of logging and mining, and added a new subsection on the dis-
semination of a mythical image of the Wild West in the late nineteenth cen-
tury. Chapter 17 contains an expanded discussion of Chinese immigrants in
the West and the battle over exclusion and citizenship, a debate that centered
on what kind of population should be allowed to inhabit the West and enjoy
the opportunities the region offered. Chapter 18 examines Progressivism,
countering conventional narratives that emphasize the origins of Progressive
political reforms in eastern cities by relating how many, from woman suffrage
to the initiative, referendum, and recall, emerged in Oregon, California, and
other western states. Chapter 20 expands the treatment of western agriculture
in the 1920s by highlighting the acceleration of agricultural mechanization
in the region and the agricultural depression that preceded the general eco-
nomic collapse of 1929 and after. In Chapter 22 we see the new employment
opportunities for M exican-American women in the war production factories
that opened in the West. In Chapter 26, there is a new subsection on con-
servatism in the West and the Sagebrush Rebellion of the 1970s and 1980s.
Chapter 27 returns to the borderlands theme by discussing the consequences
of the creation, in the 1990s, of a free trade zone connecting the two sides of
the M
exican-A merican border. And Chapters 27 and 28 now include expanded
discussions of the southwestern borderland as a site of an acrimonious battle
over immigration—legal and undocumented—involving the federal and
state governments, private vigilantes, and continuing waves of people trying
to cross into the United States. The contested borderland now extends many
miles into the United States north of the boundary between the two nations,
and southward well into Mexico and even Central America.
I have also added a number of new selections to Voices of Freedom, the
paired excerpts from primary documents in each chapter. Some of the new
documents reflect the stronger emphasis on the West and borderlands; oth-
ers seek to sharpen the juxtaposition of divergent concepts of freedom at par-
ticular moments in American history. And this edition contains many new
images—paintings, broadsides, photographs, and others—related to these
themes, brought to life in a vibrant, f ull-color design.
Americans have always had a divided attitude toward history. On the one
hand, they tend to be remarkably future-oriented, dismissing events of even
xviii ★ PREFAC E
the recent past as “ancient history” and sometimes seeing history as a burden
to be overcome, a prison from which to escape. On the other hand, like many
other peoples, Americans have always looked to history for a sense of personal
or group identity and of national cohesiveness. This is why so many Americans
devote time and energy to tracing their family trees and why they visit histori-
cal museums and National Park Service historical sites in ever-increasing num-
bers. My hope is that this book will convince readers with all degrees of interest
that history does matter to them.
The novelist and essayist James Baldwin once observed that history “does
not refer merely, or even principally, to the past. On the contrary, the great
force of history comes from the fact that we carry it within us, [that] history is
literally present in all that we do.” As Baldwin recognized, the force of history
is evident in our own world. Especially in a political democracy like the United
States, whose government is designed to rest on the consent of informed cit-
izens, knowledge of the past is e ssential—not only for those of us whose pro-
fession is the teaching and writing of history, but for everyone. History, to be
sure, does not offer simple lessons or immediate answers to current questions.
Knowing the history of immigration to the United States, and all of the ten-
sions, turmoil, and aspirations associated with it, for example, does not tell us
what current immigration policy ought to be. But without that knowledge,
we have no way of understanding which approaches have worked and which
have not—essential information for the formulation of future public policy.
History, it has been said, is what the present chooses to remember about the
past. Rather than a fixed collection of facts, or a group of interpretations that
cannot be challenged, our understanding of history is constantly changing.
There is nothing unusual in the fact that each generation rewrites history to
meet its own needs, or that scholars disagree among themselves on basic ques-
tions like the causes of the Civil War or the reasons for the Great Depression.
Precisely because each generation asks different questions of the past, each
generation formulates different answers. The past thirty years have witnessed
a remarkable expansion of the scope of historical study. The experiences of
groups neglected by earlier scholars, including women, A frican-Americans,
working people, and others, have received unprecedented attention from his-
torians. New subfields—social history, cultural history, and family history
among them—have taken their place alongside traditional political and dip-
lomatic history.
Give Me Liberty! draws on this voluminous historical literature to pres-
ent an u p-to-date and inclusive account of the American past, paying due
attention to the experience of diverse groups of Americans while in no way
neglecting the events and processes Americans have experienced in common.
It devotes serious attention to political, social, cultural, and economic history,
PRE FA C E ★ xix
and to their interconnections. The narrative brings together major events and
prominent leaders with the many groups of ordinary people who make up
American society. Give Me Liberty! has a rich cast of characters, from Thomas
Jefferson to campaigners for woman suffrage, from Franklin D. Roosevelt to
former slaves seeking to breathe meaning into emancipation during and after
the Civil War.
Aimed at an audience of undergraduate students with little or no detailed
knowledge of American history, Give Me Liberty! guides readers through the
complexities of the subject without overwhelming them with excessive
detail. The unifying theme of freedom that runs through the text gives shape
to the narrative and integrates the numerous strands that make up the Amer-
ican experience. This approach builds on that of my earlier book, The Story of
American Freedom (1998), although Give Me Liberty! places events and personal-
ities in the foreground and is more geared to the structure of the introductory
survey course.
Freedom, and the battles to define its meaning, have long been central
to my own scholarship and undergraduate teaching, which focuses on the
nineteenth century and especially the era of the Civil War and Reconstruc-
tion (1850–1877). This was a time when the future of slavery tore the nation
apart and emancipation produced a national debate over what rights the for-
mer slaves, and all Americans, should enjoy as free citizens. I have found that
attention to clashing definitions of freedom and the struggles of different
groups to achieve freedom as they understood it offers a way of making sense
of the bitter battles and vast transformations of that pivotal era. I believe that
the same is true for American history as a whole.
No idea is more fundamental to Americans’ sense of themselves as individ-
uals and as a nation than freedom. The central term in our political language,
f reedom—or liberty, with which it is almost always used i nterchangeably—is
deeply embedded in the record of our history and the language of everyday
life. The Declaration of Independence lists liberty among mankind’s inal-
ienable rights; the Constitution announces its purpose as securing liberty’s
blessings. The United States fought the Civil War to bring about a new birth of
freedom, World War II for the Four Freedoms, and the Cold War to defend the
Free World. Americans’ love of liberty has been represented by liberty poles,
liberty caps, and statues of liberty, and acted out by burning stamps and burn-
ing draft cards, by running away from slavery, and by demonstrating for the
right to vote. “Every man in the street, white, black, red, or yellow,” wrote the
educator and statesman Ralph Bunche in 1940, “knows that this is ‘the land of
the free’ . . . ‘the cradle of liberty.’”
The very universality of the idea of freedom, however, can be misleading.
Freedom is not a fixed, timeless category with a single unchanging d efinition.
xx ★ PREFACE
Indeed, the history of the United States is, in part, a story of debates, disa-
greements, and struggles over freedom. Crises like the American Revolution,
the Civil War, and the Cold War have permanently transformed the idea
of freedom. So too have demands by various groups of Americans to enjoy
greater freedom. The meaning of freedom has been constructed not only in
congressional debates and political treatises, but on plantations and picket
lines, in parlors and even bedrooms.
Over the course of our history, American freedom has been both a reality
and a mythic ideal—a living truth for millions of Americans, a cruel mockery
for others. For some, freedom has been what some scholars call a “habit of the
heart,” an ideal so taken for granted that it is lived out but rarely analyzed. For
others, freedom is not a birthright but a distant goal that has inspired great
sacrifice.
Give Me Liberty! draws attention to three dimensions of freedom that have
been critical in American history: (1) the meanings of freedom; (2) the social
conditions that make freedom possible; and (3) the boundaries of freedom that
determine who is entitled to enjoy freedom and who is not. All have changed
over time.
In the era of the American Revolution, for example, freedom was primar-
ily a set of rights enjoyed in public a ctivity—the right of a community to be
governed by laws to which its representatives had consented and of individu-
als to engage in religious worship without governmental interference. In the
nineteenth century, freedom came to be closely identified with each person’s
opportunity to develop to the fullest his or her innate talents. In the twenti-
eth, the “ability to choose,” in both public and private life, became perhaps
the dominant understanding of freedom. This development was encouraged
by the explosive growth of the consumer marketplace (a development that
receives considerable attention in Give Me Liberty!), which offered Americans
an unprecedented array of goods with which to satisfy their needs and desires.
During the 1960s, a crucial chapter in the history of American freedom,
the idea of personal freedom was extended into virtually every realm, from
attire and “lifestyle” to relations between the sexes. Thus, over time, more and
more areas of life have been drawn into Americans’ debates about the mean-
ing of freedom.
A second important dimension of freedom focuses on the social conditions
necessary to allow freedom to flourish. What kinds of economic institutions
and relationships best encourage individual freedom? In the colonial era and
for more than a century after independence, the answer centered on economic
autonomy, enshrined in the glorification of the independent small p roducer—
the farmer, skilled craftsman, or shopkeeper—who did not have to depend on
another person for his livelihood. As the industrial economy matured, new
PRE FA C E ★ xxi
conceptions of economic freedom came to the fore: “liberty of contract” in the
Gilded Age, “industrial freedom” (a say in corporate d ecision-making) in the
Progressive era, economic security during the New Deal, and, more recently,
the ability to enjoy mass consumption within a market economy.
The boundaries of freedom, the third dimension of this theme, have
inspired some of the most intense struggles in American history. Although
founded on the premise that liberty is an entitlement of all humanity, the
United States for much of its history deprived many of its own people of free-
dom. N on-whites have rarely enjoyed the same access to freedom as white
Americans. The belief in equal opportunity as the birthright of all Americans
has coexisted with persistent efforts to limit freedom by race, gender, and
class and in other ways.
Less obvious, perhaps, is the fact that one person’s freedom has frequently
been linked to another’s servitude. In the colonial era and nineteenth century,
expanding freedom for many Americans rested on the lack of freedom—
slavery, indentured servitude, the subordinate position of women—for others.
By the same token, it has been through battles at the boundaries—the efforts
of racial minorities, women, and others to secure greater f reedom—that the
meaning and experience of freedom have been deepened and the concept
extended into new realms.
Time and again in American history, freedom has been transformed by
the demands of excluded groups for inclusion. The idea of freedom as a uni-
versal birthright owes much both to abolitionists who sought to extend the
blessings of liberty to blacks and to immigrant groups who insisted on full
recognition as American citizens. The principle of equal protection of the law
without regard to race, which became a central element of American freedom,
arose from the antislavery struggle and the Civil War and was reinvigorated
by the civil rights revolution of the 1960s, which called itself the “freedom
movement.” The battle for the right of free speech by labor radicals and birth-
control advocates in the first part of the twentieth century helped to make
civil liberties an essential element of freedom for all Americans.
Although concentrating on events within the United States, Give Me Lib-
erty! also situates American history in the context of developments in other
parts of the world. Many of the forces that shaped American history, including
the international migration of peoples, the development of slavery, the spread
of democracy, and the expansion of capitalism, were worldwide processes not
confined to the United States. Today, American ideas, culture, and economic
and military power exert unprecedented influence throughout the world. But
beginning with the earliest days of settlement, when European empires com-
peted to colonize North America and enrich themselves from its trade, Ameri-
can history cannot be understood in isolation from its global setting.
xxii ★ PREFACE
Freedom is the oldest of clichés and the most modern of aspirations. At var-
ious times in our history, it has served as the rallying cry of the powerless and
as a justification of the status quo. Freedom helps to bind our culture together
and exposes the contradictions between what America claims to be and what
it sometimes has been. American history is not a narrative of continual pro-
gress toward greater and greater freedom. As the abolitionist Thomas Went-
worth Higginson noted after the Civil War, “revolutions may go backward.”
Though freedom can be achieved, it may also be taken away. This happened,
for example, when the equal rights granted to former slaves immediately after
the Civil War were essentially nullified during the era of segregation. As was
said in the eighteenth century, the price of freedom is eternal vigilance.
In the early twenty-first century, freedom continues to play a central role
in American political and social life and thought. It is invoked by individuals
and groups of all kinds, from critics of economic globalization to those who
seek to secure American freedom at home and export it abroad. I hope that
Give Me Liberty! will offer beginning students a clear account of the course of
American history, and of its central theme, freedom, which today remains as
varied, contentious, and e ver-changing as America itself.
A C K N OW L E D G M E N TS
All works of history are, to a considerable extent, collaborative books, in that
every writer builds on the research and writing of previous scholars. This is
especially true of a textbook that covers the entire American experience, over
more than five centuries. My greatest debt is to the innumerable historians on
whose work I have drawn in preparing this volume. The Suggested Reading list
at the end of the book offers only a brief introduction to the vast body of histor-
ical scholarship that has influenced and informed this book. More specifically,
however, I wish to thank the following scholars, who generously read portions
of this work and offered valuable comments, criticisms, and suggestions:
A C KN O W L E D G ME N T S ★ xxiii
Aram Goudsouzian, University of Memphis
Michael Harkins, Harper College
Sandra Harvey, Lone Star College–CyFair
Robert Hines, Palo Alto College
Traci Hodgson, Chemeketa Community College
Tamora Hoskisson, Salt Lake Community College
William Jackson, Salt Lake Community College
Alfred H. Jones, State College of Florida
David Kiracofe, Tidewater Community College
Brad Lookingbill, Columbia College
Jennifer Macias, Salt Lake Community College
Thomas Massey, Cape Fear Community College
Derek Maxfield, Genesee Community College
Marianne McKnight, Salt Lake Community College
Jonson Miller, Drexel University
Ted Moore, Salt Lake Community College
Robert Pierce, Foothills College
Ernst Pinjing, Minot State University
Harvey N. Plaunt, El Paso Community College
Steve Porter, University of Cincinnati
John Putman, San Diego State University
R. Lynn Rainard, Tidewater Community College
Nicole Ribianszky, Georgia Gwinnett College
Nancy Marie Robertson, Indiana U niversity—Purdue University Indianapolis
John Shaw, Portland Community College
Danielle Swiontek, Santa Barbara Community College
Richard Trimble, Ocean County College
Alan Vangroll, Central Texas College
Eddie Weller, San Jacinto College
Andrew Wiese, San Diego State University
Matthew Zembo, Hudson Valley Community College
AC KN O W L E D G ME N T S ★ xxv
quizzes and outlines; Sarah England Bartley, Steve Dunn, and Mike Wright
for their alert reads of the U.S. survey market and their hard work in helping
establish Give Me Liberty! within it; and Drake McFeely, Roby Harrington, and
Julia Reidhead for maintaining Norton as an independent, employee-owned
publisher dedicated to excellence in its work.
Many students may have heard stories of how publishing companies
alter the language and content of textbooks in an attempt to maximize sales
and avoid alienating any potential reader. In this case, I can honestly say
that W. W. Norton allowed me a free hand in writing the book and, apart from
the usual editorial corrections, did not try to influence its content at all. For
this I thank them, while I accept full responsibility for the interpretations pre-
sented and for any errors the book may contain. Since no book of this length
can be entirely free of mistakes, I welcome readers to send me corrections at
[email protected].
My greatest debt, as always, is to my family—my wife, Lynn Garafola,
for her g ood-natured support while I was preoccupied by a project that con-
sumed more than its fair share of my time and energy, and my daughter, Daria,
who while a ninth and tenth grader read every chapter as it was written and
offered invaluable suggestions about improving the book’s clarity, logic, and
grammar.
Eric Foner
New York City
July 2016
N O RTO N I N Q U I Z I T I V E F O R H I STO RY
Norton InQuizitive for history is an adaptive quizzing tool that improves stu-
dents’ understanding of the themes and objectives from each chapter, while
honing their critical-analysis skills with primary source, image, and map anal-
ysis questions. Students receive personalized quiz questions with detailed,
guiding feedback on the topics in which they need the most help, while the
engaging, gamelike elements motivate them as they learn.
H I STO RY S K I L LS T U TO R I A LS
The History Skills Tutorials feature three modules—Images, Documents, and
Maps—to support students’ development of the key skills needed for the his-
tory course. These tutorials feature videos of Eric Foner modeling the analysis
process, followed by interactive questions that will challenge students to apply
what they have learned.
ST U D E N T S I T E
The free and e asy-to-use Student Site offers additional resources for students
to use outside of class. Resources include interactive iMaps from each chapter,
author videos, and a comprehensive Online Reader with a collection of histori-
cal longer works, primary sources,
novellas, and biographies.
EBOOK
Free and included with new cop-
ies of the text, the Norton Ebook
Reader provides an enhanced
reading experience that works on
all computers and mobile devices.
Features include intuitive highlighting, note-taking, and bookmarking as well
as pop-up definitions and enlargeable maps and art. Direct links to InQuizitive
also appear in each chapter. Instructors can focus student reading by sharing
notes with their classes, including embedded images and video. Reports on
student and class-wide access and time on task allow instructors to monitor
student reading and engagement.
RESOURCES FOR INSTRUCTORS
All resources are available through www.wwnorton.com/instructors.
N O RTO N C O U R S E PAC KS
Easily add high-quality digital media to your online, hybrid, or lecture course—
all at no cost to students. Norton’s Coursepacks work within your existing
Learning Management System and are ready to use and easy to customize. The
coursepack offers a diverse collection of assignable and assessable resources:
Primary Source Exercises, Guided Reading Exercises, Review Quizzes, U.S.
History Tours powered by Google Earth, Flashcards, Map Exercises, and all
of the resources from the Student Site.
N O RTO N A M E R I CA N H I STO RY D I G I TA L A R C H I V E
The Digital Archive offers roughly 2,000 additional primary source images,
audio, and video files spanning American history that can be used in assign-
ments and lecture presentations.
T E ST BA N K
The Test Bank is authored by Rob-
ert O’Brien, Lone Star College–
CyFair, and Tamora M. Hoskisson,
Salt Lake City Community Col-
lege, and contains more than
4,000 multiple-choice, true/false,
short-answer, and essay questions.
I N ST R U CTO R ’ S M A N UA L
The Instructor’s Manual contains detailed Chapter Summaries, Chapter Out-
lines, Suggested Discussion Questions, and Supplemental Web, Visual, and
Print Resources.
L E CT U R E A N D A RT P OW E R P O I N T S L I D E S
The Lecture PowerPoint sets authored by Allison Faber, Texas A&M University,
and Ben Williams, Texas A&M University, combine chapter review, art, and maps.
GIVE M E
LIBERTY!
★ AN AMERICAN HISTORY ★
S E AGU L L F I F T H E DI T ION
“ W H A T I S F R E E D O M ? ”:
RECONSTRUCTION
1865–1877
FOCUS QUESTIONS
• What visions of freedom did the former slaves and slaveholders pursue in the
postwar South?
• What were the sources, goals, and competing visions for Reconstruction?
• What were the social and political effects of Radical Reconstruction in the
South?
• What were the main factors, in both the North and South, for the abandonment
of Reconstruction?
O
n the evening of January 12, 1865, less than a month after Union forces
captured Savannah, Georgia, twenty leaders of the city’s black com-
munity gathered for a discussion with General William T. Sherman
and Secretary of War Edwin M. Stanton. Mostly Baptist and Methodist minis-
ters, the group included several men who within a few years would assume
prominent positions during the era of Reconstruction that followed the Civil
War. Ulysses S. Houston, pastor of the city’s Third African Baptist Church, and
James Porter, an episcopal religious leader who had operated a secret school for
black children before the war, in a few years would win election to the Georgia
564 ★
legislature. James D. Lynch, who had been
born free in Baltimore and educated in New
Hampshire, went on to serve as secretary of
• CHRONOLOGY •
state of Mississippi. 1865 Special Field Order 15
The conversation revealed that the black
Freedmen’s Bureau
leaders brought out of slavery a clear defini- established
tion of freedom. Asked what he understood Lincoln assassinated;
by slavery, Garrison Frazier, a Baptist minister Andrew Johnson becomes
president
chosen as the group’s spokesman, responded
that it meant one person’s “receiving by irre- 1865– Presidential Reconstruction
1867 Black Codes
sistible power the work of another man, and
1866 Civil Rights Bill
not by his consent.” Freedom he defined as
“placing us where we could reap the fruit of Ku Klux Klan established
our own labor, and take care of ourselves.” The 1867 Reconstruction Act of 1867
way to accomplish this was “to have land, and Tenure of Office Act
turn it and till it by our own labor.” Frazier in- 1867– Radical Reconstruction
sisted that blacks possessed “sufficient intelli- 1877 of 1867
gence” to maintain themselves in freedom 1868 Impeachment and trial of
President Johnson
and enjoy the equal protection of the laws.
Sherman’s meeting with the black leaders Fourteenth Amendment
ratified
foreshadowed some of the radical changes
1869 Inauguration of
that would take place during the era known
Ulysses S. Grant
as Reconstruction (meaning, literally, the re-
Women’s rights
building of the shattered nation). In the years organization splits into
following the Civil War, former slaves and two groups
their white allies, North and South, would 1870 Hiram Revels, first
seek to redefine the meaning and bound- black U.S. senator
“W H AT I S FREEDO M ? ”: R E C O N S T R U C T I O N ★ 565
temporary, swept away during a campaign of violence in the South and the
North’s retreat from the ideal of equality. But Reconstruction laid the founda-
tion for future struggles to extend freedom to all Americans.
All this, however, lay in the future in January 1865. Four days after the meet-
ing, Sherman responded to the black delegation by issuing Special Field Order
15. This set aside the Sea Islands and a large area along the South Carolina and
Georgia coasts for the settlement of black families on f orty-acre plots of land.
He also offered them b roken-down mules that the army could no longer use.
In Sherman’s order lay the origins of the phrase “forty acres and a mule,” that
would reverberate across the South in the next few years. By June, some 40,000
freed slaves had been settled on “Sherman land.” Among the emancipated
slaves, Sherman’s order raised hopes that the end of slavery would be accompa-
nied by the economic independence that they, like other Americans, believed
essential to genuine freedom.
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.