5 Mistakes To Avoid When Using Technology in Recruitment
5 Mistakes To Avoid When Using Technology in Recruitment
5 Mistakes To Avoid When Using Technology in Recruitment
technology in recruitment
Discover key insights for leveraging technology in recruitment without compromising
human touch. Learn to balance AI capabilities with essential interpersonal skills, ensuring
data privacy, adapting to tech advancements, and fostering diversity and inclusion.
Why do we call them mistakes when technology is a boon? After all, technology has only
minimized the repetitive manual tasks for recruiters!
Although the picture seems brighter, technology can sometimes become painful when you use
it incorrectly.
There are five pressing mistakes you need to avoid when using technology when hiring a new
employee.
Contents
• 1. Relying too heavily on AI
• 2. Neglecting human interaction
• 3. Lack of data privacy and security
• 4. Failing to adapt to changing technology
o You’ll lose the competitive edge
o You’ll have limited access to talent
o Your recruitment processes will be inefficient
o You’ll incur high recruitment costs
o You’ll offer a poor candidate experience
o Example #1:
o Example #2:
• 5. Ignoring diversity and inclusion
• Wrapping up
For example, recruiters can use ChatGPT in their recruitment process. Here are a few ways
you can do so, from a real recruiter’s tips published on LinkedIn:
• Draft interviewer training guides by expanding on your ideas and rewriting sentences in an
understandable way
• Generate hiring ads by taking prompts for the exact job role the recruiter wants to hire for
But, this temptation to rely heavily on AI has notable drawbacks:
• It lacks the empathy and understanding that human recruiters bring to hiring processes.
• It relies on historical data, which can increase biases.
• It minimizes the innovative approaches to finding and attracting talent.
• It cannot offer a personalized experience to candidates
• It might reject unconventional candidates who don’t fit the predefined criteria.
In a new paper, Mona Sloane, a senior research scientist at NYU Center for Responsible
AI, found that AI systems built to measure personality were not reliable testing instruments.
Although AI has been revolutionizing the recruitment world, the major problem with using AI is
that companies don’t want to reveal the tools they’re using and vendors don’t want to reveal the
things inside that tool, i.e., what kind of technology the software has, Sloane writes.
This eventually results in making biased hiring decisions, which impacts the overall hiring
process.
2. Neglecting human interaction
Hiring is not just about filling positions. It’s also about understanding candidates’ aspirations,
dreams, and nuances. It’s also about whether the candidate fits the company’s culture or not.
Unfortunately, technology cannot assess any of this.
• Companies can foster a personal connection between candidates and the organization. This
lets the candidates gauge the company’s culture and values
• You can analyze the candidate’s character when you meet them personally. This will help
you understand whether the candidate is a right for the organization, or not
• You can analyze human intelligence elements like empathy, and compassion for work in the
candidates. Human recruiters connect with the candidates on an emotional level, which AI
cannot
• You can assess a candidate’s interpersonal skills, culture fit, and overall potential
Here’s the thing: the hiring process seems like a never-ending game. But for candidates, the
biggest turn-off is interacting with chatbots when they want to be seen and heard by the
recruiters.
Sure, it reduces delays and streamlines the hiring process. But, it can unintentionally create
impersonal interactions:
• Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS): They pre-screen resumes through semantic search.
But, they can sometimes ignore nuanced qualifications or achievements. This leads to
impersonal candidate assessments. Not all ATSes are built the same, however – learn how
Workable ensures a positive candidate experience even with the use of technology.
• Chatbots: They are used for initial candidate interactions. But, they can provide scripted
responses, lacking the human touch and genuine engagement.
• Virtual interviews and online assessments: They lack the personal connection and face-
to-face meetings. This affects the interviewer’s ability to evaluate the candidate’s personality
and cultural fit.
Although automation and technology can impact the hiring process negatively, here are a few
examples of how a few tech companies have successfully combined automation with
personalized interactions:
• Encrypt your emails: Add a note in your emails letting the candidates know that the
information shared between both of you is safe and secure. For example, use Google’s
Gmail platform, which provides inbuilt email encryption.
• Use an email client: Streamline your communication by selecting a reliable and secure
email client for your business needs.
• Choose the right ATS and candidate feedback tool: Make sure to collect only relevant
candidate information.
• Use regulatory frameworks as benchmarks: GDPR and ISO are some of the data
security standards you must comply with.
Install and update security software: Use anti-virus and anti-malware software, and update
the data regularly.
• Train your staff: Educate your team on the steps to take when a data breach happens.
Also, share with them the necessary solutions to protect the sensitive data.
• Secure your website: Use Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) technology. This way, you can
encrypt the link between the applicant’s browser and your server.
Limit the access to candidate information: Provide access to team members involved in the
hiring process. For example, the finance team and the receptionist.
For example, ZALORA, a fashion e-commerce brand, was using traditional methods to hire
employees. They would go through each developer profile manually. This way, they would get
ten applications. For this, they would spend an hour interviewing them. This would lead to 20%
of candidates being selected.
For Zalora’s team, this meant a waste of time. Naturally, they were lagging due to their manual
recruiting process.
However, when the company leveraged recruitment software, it hired 35 developer candidates
for different job openings in 2018. Their time-to-interview was reduced from 30 to 14 days.
Naturally, Zalora’s hiring process accelerated after the implementation of recruitment software.
You’ll have limited access to talent
Imagine hiring employees manually without the use of technology. You wouldn’t be able to
screen each candidate and identify whether they have the relevant skills, or not. Instead, you
can screen only a few of them. In this process, you’re likely to miss out on other candidates
who *actually* had the talent but you failed to screen them because of your manual efforts.
For example, Workable’s AI-powered feature, AI Recruiter, searches thousands of public online
profiles in seconds to find candidates who match the skills and requirements listed in your job
description. Additionally, integrating an email lookup tool into this process can significantly
streamline communication.
Once potential candidates are identified, the email finder can quickly gather their contact
information, allowing for swift and direct outreach. This not only saves time but also ensures
that no talented candidate slips through the cracks due to missing contact details.
Naturally, it will help you access a wider pool of talent and build your talent pipeline, which you
would have not been able to do otherwise.
Your recruitment processes will be inefficient
Without technology, businesses have to rely on manual data entry. This is time-consuming and
usually prone to errors. When you integrate technology into your recruitment process such as,
for example, learning management systems (LMS), it enables real-time collaboration. This
allows recruitment teams to streamline their workflow.
For example, Hilton, a hotel chain, had a longer time-to-hire of 42 days with their traditional
hiring practices. According to the Society of Human Resources, the average time to hire an
employee is 36 days. This means Hilton was spending more than average time in hiring —
making their hiring processes inefficient.
A recent Forbes article states that some organizations lost $1.3 million a year. Reason?
Inefficient business processes and not leveraging technology.
You’ll offer a poor candidate experience
Candidates expect a streamlined, efficient process. Without technology, you may take more
time to screen and interview the candidate. When candidates have to wait longer to know about
their application status, they feel frustrated and disinterested. This is why only two in 10
candidates rate their candidate experience as excellent.
But you can change this scenario by staying updated with the changing recruitment trends.
Here’s how:
• Attend online and offline events and conferences: Network with fellow recruiters and HR
professionals. With interactive sessions, panel discussions, and networking opportunities,
you’ll gain knowledge about the new changes and trends in the recruitment industry.
• Follow industry experts on social media: Follow thought leaders in HR and recruitment
space on social media platforms. For example, LinkedIn and Twitter. These experts share
valuable insights and best practices on their social media channels. Read their posts to gain
knowledge about the latest industry trends.
• Network with other HR and recruitment professionals: Connect with HRs and recruiters
on social media. Also, join Slack communities
like #People, Peoplegeeks, HackingHR, HRtoHR, and so on.
Companies are now understanding the importance of technology. So, many tech-oriented
recruitment companies are shifting their traditional work approach. They are opting for an
automated hiring system. Here’s the proof:
• 53% of companies conduct competency-based interviews, and 40% use video interviews to
get top talent.
• 68% of recruiting professionals say that the best way to improve recruiting performance
over the next five years is by investing in new recruiting technology.
• 78% of employers that use an ATS said that recruitment technology makes finding great
talent easier than ever.
Let’s delve more into this and understand how companies have been maximizing the use of
technology.
Example #1:
Rootquotient, a product engineering company, was growing at a higher pace. They wanted to
scale their volume of hiring. While resume-level filtering worked for them during smaller hiring
volumes, it became difficult for them to do so when the demand increased.
They faced three challenges: a large pool of candidates, availability of questions on online
channels, and time-consuming manual screening.
Solution: They used a recruiting tool called HackerEarth that provided them with a technical
coding assessment platform. With the help of this platform, RootQuotient could set up a
questionnaire with a library of coding questions that HackerEarth provides.
The recruitment would start with an MCQ test that filtered out 20% of candidates. These top
20% of candidates were then invited to the next interview round.
Result: The company hired 25 technical team members in a year and reduced its time to hire
by half.
Example #2:
Redswitches, a tech company, struggled with hiring freelance writers for their company.
Although the company used LinkedIn and job portals like Naukri to source writers, they used to
get bombarded with candidates who were not the right fit. Plus, sifting through job applications
manually was a tedious task for the recruiters.
Solution: They used Workello, a skill-testing platform that provided the company with tools to
target the right audience and relevant candidates.
Case in point: Amazon built a computer program to review job applicants’ resumes. This tool
used artificial intelligence to give candidates scores ranging from one to five stars. But, it had a
big flaw. It discriminated against women candidates. The tool couldn’t rate candidates for
software developer jobs and other technical posts based on their gender. This led to an
increase in bias in recruiting.
Such biases hamper the hiring process and credibility of your organization. So, if you want to
create a balanced work culture in your organization, maximize diversity and inclusion in your
hiring process.
To avoid biases creeping into the recruitment system, use the following strategies:
Wrapping up
No doubt, AI is a boon for the recruitment industry. However, it’s better not to rely on artificial
intelligence completely.
Like the miscellaneous advantages it brings to you, it also brings the technological nuances
like:
Higher data security risks like breaches of candidate data like their email address, bank details,
and so on.
Biases in the hiring process lead to evaluating the candidate based on gender parameters
unless they are optimized for gender neutrality.
Eliminating human interactions and relying completely on automation can lead to an impersonal
candidate experience.
It’s better to have a combination of both worlds: automation and the human element.