Modern History Ebook

title: DEN_MH_5e_10462 format: 280mm x 217mm spine: 15mm CMYK
1
KEY FEATURES OF
on the World Trade Center, a few blocks away, on 11 September 2001.

Church Street, New York City, covered in ash and litter after the terrorist attack
MODERN
HISTORY
5TH EDITION YEAR 11
celebrate Fidel Castro and his rebel army’s victory in the Cuban Revolution.
Jubilant crowd gathering on the streets of Havana, Cuba, on 1 January 1959 to
YEAR
11
ISBN 978-0-19-031046-2
9 780190 310462
visit us at: oup.com.au or
contact customer service: [email protected] Bruce Dennett | Stephen Dixon | Bernie Howitt | Angela Wong
cyan magenta yellow black

DEN_MH1_5e_10462_CVR_SI.indd All Pages 9/10/2017 2:05 PM
1
KEY FEATURES OF
MODERN
HISTORY
00_DEN_MH1_5e_10462_TXT_SI.indd 1 2/10/2017 1:15 PM

1
KEY FEATURES OF
MODERN
HISTORY
5TH EDITION YEAR 11
Bruce Dennett | Stephen Dixon | Bernie Howitt | Angela Wong

1
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research,
scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered
trademark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries.
Published in Australia by
Oxford University Press
253 Normanby Road, South Melbourne, Victoria 3205, Australia
© Bruce Dennett, Stephen Dixon, Bernie Howitt, Angela Wong 2018
The moral rights of the author have been asserted
First published 2000 as Key Features of Modern History
Second edition 2003
Third edition 2005
Fourth edition 2008
Fifth edition 2018
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system,
or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford
University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence, or under terms agreed with the
appropriate reprographics rights organisation. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope
of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above.
You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any
acquirer.
National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication data
Key features of modern history / Bruce Dennett; Stephen Dixon; Bernie Howitt; Angela Wong
5th edition
ISBN 978 0 19 031046 2 (paperback)
Includes index.
For secondary school age.
History, modern—textbooks.
World history—textbooks.
Dixon, Stephen, 1950– author.
Howitt, Bernie, author.
Wong, Angela, author.
Reproduction and communication for educational purposes
The Australian Copyright Act 1968 (the Act) allows a maximum of one chapter
or 10% of the pages of this work, whichever is the greater, to be reproduced
and/or communicated by any educational institution for its educational purposes
provided that the educational institution (or the body that administers it) has
given a remuneration notice to Copyright Agency Limited (CAL) under the Act.
For details of the CAL licence for educational institutions contact:
Copyright Agency Limited
Level 15, 233 Castlereagh Street
Sydney NSW 2000
Telephone: (02) 9394 7600
Facsimile: (02) 9394 7601
Email: [email protected]
Edited by Natasha Broadstock
Typeset by OUPANZ
Proofread by Jocelyn Hargrave
Indexed by Tina Hutchings
Printed in Hong Kong by Paramount Printing Company Limited
Disclaimer
Indigenous Australians and Torres Strait Islanders are advised that this publication may include
images or names of people now deceased.
Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and for information only.
Oxford disclaims any responsibility for the materials contained in any third party website
referenced in this work.

CONTENTS
Using Key Features of Modern History 1 ............vi
PART A INVESTIGATING MODERN HISTORY

– THE NATURE OF MODERN HISTORY
Chapter 1 3.4 The role of evidence, interpretation

and perspective in the construction
The Investigation of Historic of historical accounts ........................... 40
Sites and Sources: the Trenches of the
3.5 The role of selectivity, emphasis and
First World War and the Archaeology omission in the construction of
of Fromelles......................................... 4 historical accounts ............................... 46
1.1 Introduction ............................................ 6

Chapter 4
1.2 The nature and importance of archives
to historians ........................................... 8
History and Memory:
Autobiography .................................. 49
1.3 The reconstruction of historic sites:
the Western Front .................................10 4.1 Introduction .......................................... 50
1.4 The contribution of archaeological 4.2 History and memoir ............................. 52
and scientific techniques in the
4.3 The contribution of oral history to
investigation of the past ........................13
understanding the past ........................ 55
4.4 Expressions of collective memory ....... 57

Chapter 2
The Contestability of the Past:
Chapter 5
Pearl Harbor ...................................... 17
The Representation and
2.1 Introduction ...........................................18 Commemoration of the Past:
2.2 The attack at Pearl Harbor .................... 21 Film, Television and History ............ 61
2.3 How historians test hypotheses
5.1 Introduction .......................................... 62
about the past ...................................... 24
5.2 The need for critical analysis of film and
2.4 The role of sources and evidence in
television representations of the past.. 64
the evaluation of different theories and
remembrances of the past................... 27 5.3 Investigating the ways that films represent
and commemorate the past................. 66
Chapter 3
The Construction of Modern Histories: Chapter 6
the Holocaust .................................... 31 Historical Investigation ................... 73
6.1 Introduction ........................................... 74
3.1 Introduction .......................................... 32
6.2 The process of historical investigation . 75
3.2 Different types of histories .................. 34
6.3 Historical investigation: the sinking
3.3 The historical context of the
of the Titanic ........................................ 83
Holocaust ............................................. 36

PART B INVESTIGATING MODERN HISTORY – CASE STUDIES
Chapter 7 Chapter 11
Terrorism ........................................... 94 The Boxer Rebellion in China ....... 173
7.1 Introduction .......................................... 96 11.1 Introduction ......................................... 174
7.2 What is terrorism? ............................... 98 11.2 The aims and membership of the
‘Righteous and Harmonious Fists’ ......178
7.3 Have they acted as terrorists? ............100
11.3 The nature and extent of the
7.4 The four waves of terrorism ................106
Boxer Rebellion ...................................181
11.4 The implications of the rebellion

Chapter 8
for China and the Qing dynasty...........186
The American Civil War .................113
8.1 Introduction ......................................... 114 Chapter 12
8.2 Slavery and human rights.................... 118 The Origins of the Arab–Israeli
8.3 The causes of the Civil War .................120 Conflict ............................................. 189
8.4 The course of the Civil War .................124 12.1 Introduction .........................................190
8.5 The immediate consequences and 12.2 Arab nationalism and Zionism:
legacy of the Civil War.........................130 origins and aspirations ........................193
12.3 The nature of Arab–Israeli tensions:

Chapter 9 the First and Second World Wars ........195
The Decline and Fall of the 12.4 Responses to the question of
Romanov Dynasty .......................... 133 a Jewish homeland post–Second
World War .......................................... 204
9.1 Introduction .........................................134
9.2 The development of opposition

to the Romanovs .................................139
9.3 The fall of the Romanov dynasty.........145
Chapter 10
The Cuban Revolution ................... 153
10.1 Introduction .........................................154
10.2 The historical context of the

Cuban Revolution ................................158
10.3 The nature and course of the Cuban

Revolution ...........................................163
10.4 The aftermath of the revolution...........167
10.5 Historical debate: what is the legacy

of the Cuban Revolution? ....................170

PART C THE SHAPING OF THE MODERN WORLD
Chapter 13 Chapter 15
The First World War ..................... 212 The Age of Imperialism ............... 263
13.1 Introduction ....................................... 214 15.1 Introduction ...................................... 264
13.2 The outbreak of war in 1914 .............. 220 15.2 The historical context of
nineteenth-century imperialism ....... 265
13.3 Experiences of soldiers in key battles
on the Western Front ........................ 224 15.3 The nature of the Age of
Imperialism....................................... 267
13.4 The changing nature of war
by 1918 .............................................. 228 15.4 Ideas driving imperialism: nationalism,
Christianity and the idea of
13.5 The impact of war on civilians ........... 233
a superior race ................................. 272
13.6 Victory and peace .............................. 240
15.5 Australia: a ‘settler colony’ ............... 275
13.7 The nature and legacy of the First
15.6 Global resistance and the resilience
World War and its influence
of Indigenous groups ....................... 280
on modernity ..................................... 242
15.7 The legacy of imperialism ................ 282
Chapter 14 Glossary .......................................................... 285
The French Revolution .................245
Index ................................................................ 290
14.1 Introduction ....................................... 246
Acknowledgements ....................................... 293
14.2 The causes of the revolution ............. 252
14.3 The nature of the French Revolution .....256
14.4 The legacy of the French Revolution

and its influence on modernity .......... 260
C ON T E N T S vii

SUCCESS FOR EVERY YEAR 11 MO
New South Wales’ most trusted modern history series has been updated for the new Stage 6
USING KEY FEATURES OF
MODERN HISTORY 1 Modern History syllabus. The first of a two-volume series, Key Features of Modern History 1
offers complete support for Year 11 teachers and their students, providing unparalleled depth and
coverage and a range of new chapter features that will give students of all abilities the best chance of
achieving success in Modern History.
Key enhancements:
> All content has been explicitly aligned to the new Modern History Stage 6 syllabus (Year 11).
> Subject experts Bruce Dennett, Stephen Dixon, Bernie Howitt and Angela Wong have developed
comprehensive, engaging and appropriately levelled content.
> Unambiguous language is used throughout the book, with plenty of visuals to engage students
and support learning.
> obook assess provides comprehensive student and teacher digital support including answers to
every question in the book, class tests, videos and more.
‘Focus questions’, ‘Key concepts and
12 The Origins of
skills’, and ‘Learning goals’ are clearly
stated at the beginning of each chapter
the Arab-Israeli to guide teachers and students through
Conflict the content.
Three Jewish children on their
way to Palestine after being
released from the Buchenwald
Concentration Camp at the end of
the Second World War
FOCUS QUESTIONS
Explanation and communication
A successful investigation into
1 What is the historical origin any aspect of the Arab-Israeli Historical investigation
and significance of Palestine? conflict should be able to and research
2 What is the historical basis of effectively communicate that it It is crucial that you learn to
the conflict between Arabs has taken a balanced approach. recognise and deal with potential
and Jews in the Middle East? One clear checkpoint should bias. You must investigate the
be ensuring that your sources origins and provenance of
3 What role has Britain played reflect a range of viewpoints and
Content includes up-to-date case

in the Arab-Israeli conflict? sources and, most importantly,
perspectives on the issue you are their historical context. Critical
examining. analysis of all sources will ensure
KEY CONCEPTS AND SKILLS Historical interpretation a successful investigation.
This chapter brings into sharp
studies, maps and rich visual and

Analysis and use of sources
focus the question of how LEARNING GOALS
Due to the lengthy historical
historians arrive at balanced
background to the Arab-Israeli > Analyse a range of sources
interpretations of events. As you
conflict, you will come in contact to recognise perspective
explore aspects of this issue, you
with a wide range of sources in
written source material.

will be accessing the viewpoints and bias.
your studies. It is essential that
of those who may be promoting > Understand the origins of the
you not only utilise a range of
personal agendas. You will need Arab-Israeli conflict.
sources, as you would in any
to assess personal perspectives
historical study, but also analyse > Understand how historical
and the way they can impact
those sources to ensure you events and forces can impact
upon the useful and validity of
recognise their perspective and the present.
sources.
any potential bias.
30/08/2017 11:52 am
9.3
189
12_DEN_MH_5E_10462_TXT_2pp.indd
9.2b Understanding and using the sources

1 Why was the October Manifesto introduced, according to Source The fall of the Romanov dynasty
17? What changes were agreed to by Nicholas?
2 According to Source 18, did Trotsky view the Tsar’s desire RUSSIA’S SOUTH-WEST FRONT LINE, 1916 War was declared between Germany and
for reform as genuine? Do Trotsky’s comments suggest that
Russia in August 1914, and at first it seemed
revolutionary activity would increase or diminish after the issuing of
the October Manifesto? Explain your answer. Petrograd that the First World War would save the
3 The following questions refer to Source 19. B A L T I C Romanov throne, not destroy it. Political
a Which political parties did Lenin and Kerensky belong to? S E A
differences were put aside as Russians joined
to fight the common enemy in defence of
b Which groups wished to retain the Tsar as head of state?
the homeland. Volunteers hastened to join
c State two policy differences that help explain why the
Bolsheviks and Mensheviks disagreed with each other. RUSSIA the army, and the Tsar blessed the troops as
SOURCE 20 Moscow residents celebrate the
October Manifesto.
they left for the front. Even urban discontent
Gumbinnen Mogilev
– which had been expressed in an increasing
Margin glossary
Tannenberg Masurian number of political and economic strikes
Political developments following the 1905 Revolution Lakes in the first half of the year – vanished. No
GER Warsaw strikes of any kind were recorded in the
Front Line, Decemb
Nicholas disliked the October Manifesto. He had hoped to buy peace with concessions MA
NY month of August 1914.
definitions help
and, feeling betrayed when strikes and protests continued, he returned to the methods of Brusilov’s Offensives,
an autocrat. In the countryside, loyal troops moved through the villages with a campaign 1916 and 1917
of hangings and floggings to subdue the rebellious peasants. On 16 December 1905, the The role of the First World
St Petersburg soviet was closed and 190 of its members arrested. A general strike in Moscow
War in the collapse of the
students to quickly
AUSTRIA–HUNGARY Galicia
er
led to street fighting from 21 December 1905 until 2 January 1906, resulting in defeat for the
1
Romanov dynasty
91
strikers and the deaths of more than 1000 workers.

6
Nicholas had bitterly resented having to concede to a Duma, and tried to reassert his N At first, Russia’s campaign on the south-
position by issuing a series of Fundamental Laws on 2 May 1906. These confirmed the Tsar’s
and easily find

Fundamental Laws B L A C K
west front seemed a story of unstoppable
a decree from the right to appoint his own ministers, legislate by decree and have complete control over foreign S E A
Tsar in 1906 that success. The Austrians were pushed back
ostensibly confirmed
affairs. Laws passed by the Duma would require his approval. An Imperial Council, with half
in Galicia, and the Germans were defeated
the October of its members appointed by the Tsar, would share power with the Duma. 0 200 400 600 km
at Gumbinnen. Then came the German
the meaning of
Manifesto, but also
The elections for the first Duma in 1906 and the second Duma in 1907 produced SOURCE 21 This map shows Russia’s south-west frontline in 1916, including
asserted his power response. At Tannenberg in August 1914,
over the Duma parliaments that were critical of the government, and both were dissolved by Nicholas after the location of the offensives led by Brusilov in 1916 and 1917. the Germans inflicted a heavy defeat on
only a few months. Before the third Duma, Nicholas altered the electoral law to ensure that the
the Russians. Masses of prisoners, stores
representation of peasants, small landowners and urban dwellers was drastically reduced. The
unfamiliar terms, to
and guns were taken, and the Russian
resulting Duma was a submissive and conservative body. It was allowed to serve its full term
commander, Vladimir Samsonov, shot
from 1907 to 1912, as was the fourth and final Duma from 1912 to 1917.
himself. In September, another heavy defeat
While the Dumas met, the prime minister, Peter Stolypin, carried out a policy to repress at the Masurian Lakes confirmed the end
aid understanding.
the revolutionary elements, while offering limited land concessions to the peasants. This of the advance against the Germans and
two-pronged approach was designed to consolidate the position of the Tsar by removing his the beginning of a three-year attempt
revolutionary opponents and winning the loyalty and gratitude of the peasants. to hold back the German advance into
Russia’s western provinces. There were some
9.2b Check your learning campaign successes against the Austro-
Hungarian Army, spearheaded by Russian
1 What do you understand by the term ‘revolution’? Do the events of 1905 merit the
description of ‘revolution’? Why or why not?
General Aleksei Brusilov, but the optimistic
mood that had greeted the war changed to
2 The events of 1905 have been called a ‘dress rehearsal’ for the Russian Revolution of 1917.
What lessons might revolutionaries have drawn from the events of 1905?
one of increasing disillusionment.
SOURCE 22 Russian boy soldiers are guarded by German troops after their
capture at the Battle of Tannenberg, 1914.
144 K E Y F E AT UR E S OF MODE RN HIS T OR Y 1 Y E A R 11 CH A P T E R 9 T HE DECLINE AND FA L L OF T HE ROM ANOV DYNAST Y 145
09_DEN_MH_5E_10462_TXT_2pp.indd 144-145 30/08/2017 12:02 pm
viii K E Y F E AT UR E S OF MODE R N HIS T OR Y 1 Y E A R 11 KEY FEATURES OF MODERN HI

11 MODERN HISTORY STUDENT
Many chapters feature a ‘Profile’ which Whatever the final figure, ‘Bloody Sunday’
people towards the Tsar. Instead of ‘Little
traditional belief that the Tsar and the
had a profound effect on the attitude
Father’, he became ‘Nicholas the Bloody’.
people were linked in a common bond
of the
The
– a view that
Nicholas himself liked to foster – was
allows for more in-depth learning about

shattered forever.
SOURCE 14
a historically significant person, event

Along the Nevsky Prospect … came
row upon row of orderly and solemn
dressed in their best clothes … We had faced workers all
already reached the Alexander Gardens,
side of which lay the Winter Palace square, on the other
when we heard the sound of bugles,
the cavalry to charge. The marchers the signal for
came to a halt … in front, on the right,
was a detachment
or phenomenon.
of police, but since they showed no sign
of hostility, the procession began moving
then, however, a detachment of cavalry again. Just
rode out … The first volley was fired
second was aimed at the crowd … Panic in the air, but the
stricken, the crowd turned and began
‘Understanding
direction … It was quite clear that the running in every
authorities had made a terrible mistake;
misunderstood the intentions of the they had totally
crowd … the workers went to the palace
intent. They sincerely believed that without any evil
when they got there they would kneel
would come out to meet them or at down and the Tsar
least appear on the balcony.
SOURCE 15
A. Kerensky, The Kerensky Memoirs:
Russia and History’s Turning Point, 1965
and using the
I have heard the assembled crowd accused
sources’ questions
of nothing worse than jeering at the
the officers, and using language to them troops, hustling
that will not bear repetition, although
said, armed with knives, pieces of piping, they came, it is
sticks, and some even with revolvers.
I do know that the commanding officer
of the infantry … twice warned them
adding that if they did not, he would to disperse,
throughout
be compelled to fire on them … the
would go right in among the people officers, on foot,
and try to reason with them, seeming
their power to persuade the people to to do everything in
disperse peaceably.
Robert McCormick, the US Ambassador
in St Petersburg, in Michael Bucklow
and Glenn Russell,
each chapter
Russia: Why Revolution?, 1987
15.3 Understanding and using the sources
of the Belgian Congo? The major products the Company 9.2a Understanding and using the sources
1 Analyse Source 6. What is it implying about King Leopold II’s control
under Belgian control and traded in were cotton, silk, spices, tea
Research the treatment of the indigenous peoples of the Congo
enhance student
and opium. The latter was eventually Read the accounts by A. Kerensky
discuss whether the attitude shown in Source 6 is justified. and Robert McCormick of the Bloody
of Imperialism. to bring it into conflict with China Sunday march. In what ways do
2 Analyse Source 7 and explain what point it is making about the Age in the Opium Wars. The Company, these differences?
these accounts differ? How do you
account for
Source 8 could change international trade
3 Explain how steamships such as that shown in displaying the inherent ‘logic’ of
and increase the value of European colonies.
understanding of
nineteenth-century imperialism,
9.2a Check your learning
demanded to be able to sell Indian
15.3 Check your learning opium in China to pay for the Chinese 1 Research the living and working
conditions of industrial workers in Russia,
tea it was selling in England. Twice, around 1900.
1 What percentage of the planet did European countries control by 1914? after China banned the sale of opium
how to use and

imperialist
a Use a mind map or other graphic
organiser
2 Create a flow chart that explains the two-way trade process that enriched to its citizens, wars were fought to Explain the main grievances of the
to summarise your findings.
ensure the Company had the right to industrial working class.
countries in the nineteenth century. 2 Research the system of agriculture
an imperialist country. in Russia, around 1900.
3 Identify a specific example of imperialism that benefited the trade of sell opium to the Chinese.
a Explain the main grievances of Russia’s
For around 150 years, from the
critically analyse
Research its impact on the population of the colonised country. peasants.
colonised by b Refer to Source 12, and find two
4 Conduct research to identify which areas of the planet had not been 1620s, the Company transported further sources of evidence about
farming methods in
Russia, around 1900. Analyse these
Europeans by 1914. slaves to support its economic sources for their reliability
expansion.
SOURCE 10 An artist’s impression of an official of the East India
historical sources.
The Company effectively ruled Company riding in a procession in India
India on behalf of the British crown
from 1834. Resentment of the
CH A P T E R 9 T HE DECLINE AND FA
THE EAST INDIA COMPANY Company’s imperialist actions in L L OF T HE ROM ANOV DYNAST Y
141
15.3 PROFILE
India eventually resulted in the

Although the spreading of Christianity Indian Mutiny of 1857. As a result of 09_DEN_MH_5E_10462_TXT_2pp.indd
141
and ‘civilised’, Western ideals were used this conflict, the British Government
30/08/2017 11:50 am
to justify imperialist expansion, these were took formal control of India in 1858,
not the core reasons behind colonisation. and seized the Company’s Indian
At the heart of imperialism was always the possessions, its administrative powers
desire to secure profit for business owners and its armies.
and shareholders. Nowhere was this more The Company lost all its power. It
evident than in the activities of the East was finally dissolved in 1873, after over
India Company. 300 years as a spearhead of English
Known by a range of names during its imperialism.
years of operation, the East India Company
was essentially an English private company
formed to take advantage of new trading SOURCE 11 A woman smokes an opium pipe in modern-day China.
‘Check your learning’ questions are
opportunities after the defeat of the
Spanish Armada of 1588. In this conflict,
England broke the monopoly (total control)
Spain and Portugal had enjoyed in the East 15.3 PROFILE TASKS
given for each topic.
Indian spice trade. 1 Which event paved the way for the establishment of the East India
Company?
Conflict with the Dutch in what was would have been
2 Research the Indian Mutiny and outline why the East India Company
then called the Dutch East Indies (now resented by Indians.
SOURCE 9 Tom Hollander as Cutler Beckett, Chairman of the Indonesia) saw the Company focus its help a historian
East India Trading Company, in Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead 3 Analyse Source 10 and explain how it could be used as evidence to
attention in India in the early seventeenth the Indian
Man’s Chest (2006). The avaricious company in this film was based understand the relationship between the East India Company and
century, while also pursuing interests in the
on the real East India Company, with the pirates representing population.
Persian Gulf, South-East Asia and East Asia.
freedom from imperialist powers.
CH A P T E R 15 T HE AGE OF IMPERIA LISM 271

270 K E Y F E AT UR E S OF MODE RN HIS T OR Y 1 Y E A R 11
30/08/2017 12:03 pm
15_DEN_MH_5E_10462_TXT_2pp.indd 270-271
obook assess
Key Features of Modern History 1 is supported by a range of
engaging and relevant digital resources via obook assess.
Students receive:
> a complete digital version of the Student book with
notetaking and bookmarking functionality
> targeted instructional videos by one of Australia’s most
experienced Modern History teachers
> interactive auto-correcting multiple-choice quizzes
> access to work assigned by their teacher, such as reading,
homework, tests and assignments
> the ability to use their cloud-based obook anywhere, anytime on any device.
In addition to the student resources, teachers also receive:
> detailed course planners and teacher notes
> answers to every question in the Student book
> printable (and editable) class tests with answers
> the ability to set up classes, set assignments, monitor progress and graph
results, and to view all available content and resources in one place.
N HISTORY STAGE 6 YEAR 11 C ON T E N T S ix

The drama 12 Years a Slave (2013) is based on the real life story of Solomon
Northup, an African-American man who was kidnapped and sold as a slave
to various plantations in the American South in the mid-1800s.

PART A
Investigating
Modern History
– The Nature of
Modern History
Chapter 1 The Investigation of Historic Sites and
Sources: the Trenches of the First World War
and the Archaeology of Fromelles 4
Chapter 2 The Contestability of the Past:

Pearl Harbor 17
Chapter 3 The Construction of Modern Histories:

the Holocaust 31
Chapter 4 History and Memory: Autobiography 49
Chapter 5 The Representation and Commemoration

of the Past: Film, Television and History 61
Chapter 6 Historical Investigation 73

1
The Investigation
of Historic Sites and
Sources: the Trenches
of the First World War
War graves at the Thiepval
Memorial to the Missing of the
Somme, France
and the Archaeology

FOCUS QUESTIONS
1 What is the nature, range
of Fromelles
and importance of archives
to researchers of modern
history?
2 How valid are reconstructions
of historic sites as a source of
historical understanding? Historical interpretation
3 How have archaeological When you investigate a topic as
and scientific techniques, large as the trenches of the First
historic sites and oral World War, you will be exposed
to a variety of interpretations, You may consider whether
testimony contributed to our
as well as developing your own. you could create models
understanding of modern
Assess each interpretation or reconstructions that can
history?
for accuracy and validity by effectively communicate your
examining the sources it relies own historical understanding.
KEY CONCEPTS AND SKILLS upon, and by looking at what
has been excluded from the LEARNING GOALS
investigation.
Trench warfare was a major > Understand the wide range of
component of the First World Historical investigation different sources that support
War. There are a wide variety and research the study of modern history.
of sources that can be analysed When you visit a museum or
> Develop an appreciation
to develop an understanding reconstructed historical site,
of the role of archaeology
of the nature and impact of you have to consider carefully
and science in the study of
trench warfare in this war. These the role it can play in a historical
modern history.
include written sources from investigation. It may be a useful
participants in the war, such as stimulus for developing valid > Investigate the range of
letters, diaries and poems; visual historical questions, but you sources available to assist
sources such as photographs and must always consider the validity understanding of the nature
drawings; and even the trenches of any museum exhibits or of trench warfare in the First
themselves. reconstructions as sources. World War.

1.1 Introduction
This chapter focuses on the investigation of historic
sites and sources related to the trenches of the
First World War (1914–18). The principal location
of these trenches is known as the Western Front.
The Western Front is not, however, a single site;
rather, it is a series of different sites in France and
Belgium. Here, the armies of France, the United
States and the British Empire – which included
Australia – fought bloody battles along a line of
trenches that stretched from the Belgian coast to
Switzerland.
The Western Front is unusual as a historic site, SOURCE 1 A Muslim grave with French and
Algerian flags at the National Necropolis
both because of its geographical size and because of
and Ossuary in Douaumont, France. The site
the impact of the events that took place there. is a tribute to French and Algerian soldiers
who died on the Verdun battlefield during
the First World War.
THE WESTERN FRONT, 1915
NETHERLANDS
Ostend
Nieuport Antwerp
BRITAIN
Calais Ghent
Brussels Cologne
Boulogne Ypres
Aachen
Neuve Chapelle
E N G L I S H Loos BELGIUM
GERMANY
Rhi
Mons
Douai
ne
C H A N N E L Arras
Ri Vimy Ridge
er
Riv
v
Riv
So m
r
er
Bapaume
le
me
os
el
Amiens Peronne M
Me
FRANCE u se LUXEMBOURG
Ri
Compiègne v
er
r
ve
Ri Soissons Rheims
se
Oi
Château Thierry Verdun Metz LOR
RA
Châlons St Mihiel IN
E
Paris
e
r Sein Rive Nancy
Rive rM Strasbourg
arn
e
L E GE ND Epinal
N
E
Points of attack with gains

ACS
Trenches line Mulhouse

AL
German occupied
0 80 km SWITZERLAND
(neutral)
SOURCE 2 This map of the Western Front in 1915 shows the extent of the trenches line, which stretched from the Belgian coast
to Switzerland.

One hundred years after the end of the war, the scars are still visible on parts of the landscape.
The trenches, war memorials, museums and military cemeteries – where row upon row of
headstones stretch across the countryside – offer different versions of the story of the Great
War. All the countries and all the families whose loved ones were involved in the war have their
own special sites and their own special memories. Each country devotes special care to its own
significant sites from the Western Front.
For the French, the Western Front was the site of the blood and sacrifice of a generation who
fought to defend their home soil. For the British, it was the graveyard of the best of a generation.
For many Germans in the 1920s and 1930s, it was the birthplace of their mythical ‘Front
Generation’ – maimed (both mentally and physically) by war and unable to adjust to civilian life.
More than being sites of remembrance, reconstructions of sites along the Western Front
seek to provide visitors with an authentic experience of the war. Throughout this chapter, you
should consider how authentic a reconstruction of such a place can be.
SOURCE 3 A recreation of a First World War dressing station (first aid post) at the Romagne ‘14–‘18
Museum in Romagne-sous-Montfaucon, Lorraine, France
1.1 Check your learning

1 Which countries were involved on the Western Front?
2 List some of the visible remains of the First World War that are still accessible.

1 Identify artefacts in Source 3 that could be from the First World War. What would a historian
do to assess their authenticity?
2 What historical understanding can you draw from Source 2?
3 As a student of modern history, how could the grave shown in Source 1 and the
reconstruction in Source 3 help you understand what happened on the Western Front?
CH A P T E R 1 T HE IN V ESTIGATION OF HISTORIC SITES AND SOURCES 7

1.2 The nature and importance
of archives to historians
Archives are places where public records and other historical documents are kept. Your school
may have its own archive, celebrating the school and past student achievements. Most countries
have a national archive, housing a wide range of sources that outline the history of the country
through official records. Museums, such as the Australian War Memorial, have archives
relating to their area of research.
Archives are a valuable source of
information for historians and, as technology
has developed, archives have become
increasingly digitised and made available
on museum websites. Researchers and the
general public have more ready access to
archival material than ever before. Historians
investigating the First World War spend much
of their time in archives, looking at letters,
diaries, maps, official reports, plans and
orders. Many archives also include recorded
interviews with eyewitnesses and those who
served in the war. These oral histories were
often recorded after the war ended, and
were later transcribed, to become part of the
SOURCE 4 ‘Chateau Wood’ by Frank Hurley, 1917 written record.
Photography was well established as a
oral history means of recording events by the First World War and photographs have become important
the collection and
evidence in the process of reconstructing sites on the Western Front. Australian Frank Hurley
study of historical
information using became known as ‘the mad photographer’ for the risks he often took while photographing
sound recordings battles, such as Passchendaele in Belgium. Many of his photographs have become part of the
of interviews
with people
Australian War Memorial’s archive.
who remember
past events SOURCE 5
Wednesday: Rain, rain, more rain – it just poured and the mud is appalling – we slop around in
gumboots with about 14 lbs [6.3 kg] of mud and straw and stuff attached to our boots … several
flashes of lightning – very bright indeed – and such heavy rain.
Staff Nurse Christine Erica Strom, Australian Army Nursing Service (AANS), taken from her diary,
which is located in the Australian War Memorial’s archives, Canberra

1 Explain how Sources 4 and 5 can help you understand the role of archives in historical research.
2 How would Source 5 help a history student who had been asked to use primary sources in
explaining what it was like to serve in the First World War?

One of the most comprehensive archives for First World War studies is the Liddle
Collection at Leeds University in the UK, founded in the 1970s by British historian Peter
Liddle. Liddle had collected oral histories from First World War veterans from both the UK
and Australia, including Australians who had served at Gallipoli and on the Western Front.
Liddle’s interest in these stories stemmed from a desire to preserve stories for future generations
that, if not recorded, could be lost forever.
In 1978, British historian Denis Winter published Death’s Men: Soldiers of the Great War,
which was based on diaries and private letters from soldiers. Winter felt that ‘both during and
after the war the individual voices of the soldiers were lost in the collective picture’. He believed
that there had been a neglect of the perspective of the individual soldier. Winter acknowledged
one of the most important but often neglected truths of producing history: it is the vast variety
of experiences that make up any story. From his interviews, Winter wrote what might be called
a history from the ‘bottom up’. Aside from a brief period just after the war, this perspective
had been largely neglected, despite there being an abundance of materials that gave accounts of
trench warfare from the first days of the war in 1914, until after the armistice in 1918. armistice
the agreement
made by opposing
The contribution of oral testimony to an understanding of life sides in a war to stop
fighting
in the past
Many historical accounts rely heavily on oral testimony. In fact, the Liddle Collection at Leeds
University is almost entirely based on oral testimony, and the Australian War Memorial’s oral
testimony collection is vast. These testimonies have provided historians with important insights
into the times, emotions and perceptions of those with firsthand experience of life in the
trenches.
Like all historical sources, however, such testimonies cannot be taken at face value. They
need to be considered critically and approached first in terms of their context. This means
considering who produced them, and when and why they were produced; and only then
considering the content of what is being said. In other words, the key to using oral testimony is
the same as using any historical source. First look at the context, and then look at the content.
The best way to understand the power and significance of oral history in understanding SOURCE 6
life in the past is to listen to recordings. The Australian War Memorial’s collection is an ideal Poppies adorn
place to start. Its archives hold recordings of firsthand accounts of fighting at Gallipoli, as well the Roll of
Honour walls at
as on the Western Front. These testimonies allow you to establish a sense of empathy with the
the Australian
soldiers of the First World War, as you hear them describe their experiences, and reflect on their War Memorial in
survival and the changes war wrought on them. Oral history keeps memories alive long after Canberra. The War
the participants have passed on. Memorial holds an
extensive archive
of First World War
1.2 Check your learning records.
1 What are archives? Why are they useful for historians?

2 Describe the Liddle Collection. How could its contents provide a different perspective on
the First World War than other official records?
3 Create a table with two columns that outlines the risks and advantages of using oral
histories to develop historical understanding of a topic.

1.3 The reconstruction of historic
sites: the Western Front
Today, some of the sites of the Western Front
have been left as places of reflection, while
others have seen trenches reconstructed to
give visitors some understanding of what it
looked like in 1916.
For young nations, such as Australia,
New Zealand and Canada, key events of
the First World War are often referred to as
their ‘coming of age’. In relation to Australia
and New Zealand, it is the 1915 campaign
at Gallipoli in Turkey that has the greatest
meaning. Anzac Cove in Gallipoli has become
an important focus of commemoration, and
plays a significant role in the history and sense
of identity for both countries. The Western
Front – particularly the sites of Beaumont-
Hamel and Vimy Ridge – plays a similar role
in Canada’s history and sense of identity.
SOURCE 7 The 19 240 Shrouds of the Somme exhibition, Exeter, England, These two sites are examples of different
on the 100th anniversary of the first day of the Battle of the Somme. Each approaches to reconstruction.
figurine represents one British life lost in first four hours of the Battle of the
Somme, 1 July 1916.
Beaumont-Hamel
dominion In 1916, Newfoundland, Canada, was still a dominion of the British Empire (it would not
a territory of a
sovereign or become a Canadian province until 1949). As such, it answered Britain’s call for troops to fight
government in the First World War and sent a battalion of 800 men to Europe.
Beaumont-Hamel, 120 km south-west of the Belgian border, was the battleground of the
battalion
a large body
first day of the Battle of the Somme. The Somme – which has become a symbolic representation
of troops of the Great War, particularly for the British – was in fact a series of battles that were fought
between 1 July and 18 November 1916, near the Somme River, 160 km north of Paris.
SOURCE 8
Soldiers leaving
a trench to attack
during the Battle
of the Somme

The first day of fighting, 1 July 1916, was one of the worst in the history of the British
Army in terms of casualties. The Somme was designed by the British to be an offensive battle
to break the stalemate on the Western Front. It did not go according to plan. The attack stalemate
a situation where
was preceded by a week-long bombardment of the German trenches, in which one and a half
neither side is able
million shells were fired. This artillery attack was intended to destroy the German barbed wire to gain an advantage
and wipe out the front-line trenches. However, this aim was not achieved. The Germans were
aware of the impending attack and prepared for it by digging huge underground chambers,
12 m below the ground, to enable them to shelter from the bombardment. The result was that
the battle lasted significantly longer than planned. The impact of four and a half months of
intense conflict left major scars on the French landscape.
The Canadians were part of the third wave of soldiers attempting to cross no man’s land and no man’s land
seize the German trenches at Beaumont-Hamel on that first day. Of the almost 800 men that the area between
the trench systems
left their trenches at 8.45 a.m., most would be dead or dying within the first 20 minutes of the of opposing armies;
advance. At the next morning’s roll call, only 68 men could respond. A total of 324 were killed soldiers were unlikely
to return from
or missing, and a further 386 were wounded, many so severely that they would die shortly after.
this area
This was a devastating blow for such a small dominion, and 1 July remains an official day
of remembrance in Newfoundland. The site of the battle at Beaumont-Hamel has also become
a significant memorial, and the Beaumont-Hamel Newfoundland Memorial is one of only two
National Historic Sites of Canada outside of Canada itself.
Rather than try and reconstruct the trenches, the Canadian Government has left them as
winding scars in the landscape (see Source 9). Visitors are able to walk through the trenches the
Newfoundlanders left, and reflect on the huge sacrifice of lives that occurred on the morning
of 1 July 1916.
SOURCE 9 English school students visiting First World War trenches of the Battle of the Somme at the
Beaumont-Hamel Newfoundland Memorial, France

Vimy Ridge
On 9 April 1917, at Vimy Ridge in northern France, all four divisions of the Canadian
Expeditionary Force fought together for the first time, successfully driving the German
forces back and capturing the high ground. Today, Vimy Ridge is the site of a memorial to
the 60 000 Canadians who gave their lives in the First World War: the Canadian National
Vimy Memorial.
In contrast to Beaumont-Hamel,
the decision was made by the Canadian
Government to reconstruct the trenches
at Vimy Ridge, using concrete sandbags
(concrete moulded to look like sandbags)
to ensure the safety of the many visitors
that flock to the site each year.
Historical reconstructions cannot place
us back in the reality of the First World
War, but, when they are built accurately
and with care, they can allow for a degree
of authenticity. They can give visitors the
opportunity to walk through and stand
in the same places that their ancestors
did, and gain both insight and historical
understanding of the experiences those
people endured.
SOURCE 10 Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau walks through a

trench at Vimy Ridge on 9 April 2017, the 100th anniversary of the Battle of
Vimy Ridge.

1 What historical understandings can be gained by the school students visiting sites such as
Beaumont-Hamel, as shown in Source 9?
2 Compare Sources 9 and 10. Explain how they show different approaches to the preservation
and reconstruction of historic sites.
3 To what extent could Sources 9 and 10 be regarded as sources by historians investigating
the First World War?

1 How long did the Battle of the Somme last?
2 Describe what happened on the first morning of the Battle of the Somme.
3 Why are the battle sites of Beaumont-Hamel and Vimy Ridge so significant for Canadians?
4 Discuss the value of reconstructing historical sites. Outline the arguments for and against
reconstructions.
01_DEN_MH1_5e_10462_TXT_SI.indd 12 5/10/2017 9:28 AM

1.4 The contribution of archaeological
and scientific techniques in the
investigation of the past
Australian and British historians and archaeologists have focused on sites in the Somme region
to gain a better understanding of trench life and the experiences of ordinary soldiers in the First
World War. The most significant of these undertakings was the 2009 excavation of mass graves
at Pheasant Wood near Fromelles, France, close to the Belgian border.
The challenges of surveying trench sites

Battlefield archaeology can add an extra dimension to our understanding of war, as it gives us
a unique insight into the experiences of soldiers. However, the excavation of trenches along the
Western Front has sometimes been made difficult by the postwar construction of memorials
and monuments where battles were once fought. While these can be of great emotional
topography significance for soldiers and their families, memorials alter the original military topography
the arrangement and can contribute to the destruction of significant historical artefacts.
of the natural and
artificial physical Fortunately for archaeologists, the Somme has provided a surprising number of artefacts;
features of an area rather than monuments, the ongoing challenge here has been the decomposition of many
of these artefacts. Archaeologists and historians have cross-referenced remains (for example
shreds of uniforms, identifying badges and ammunition) with archival records (for example
photographs and oral testimonies) to develop a deeper understanding of what occurred at sites
such as Fromelles.
SOURCE 12 An archaeologist
at work, recovering human
remains and historical artefacts at
SOURCE 11 A First World War mass grave at Fromelles Pheasant Wood

Interestingly, even the most well-preserved trenches can cause problems for archaeologists
stratigraphic dating using stratigraphic dating techniques. Stratigraphy – the method of dating artefacts by their
the geological relationship with the levels at which they were found, with the oldest artefacts on the bottom
method of dating
objects by their and the most recent on top – is not always useful when studying trenches. In fact, in the
position in the trenches the traditional stratigraphic picture was often reversed, as troops along the Western
stratigraphy – or Front would frequently dig themselves deeper underground and throw their waste up onto the
layering – of rocks
and sediment surface. The stratigraphy was further confused by the massive artillery explosions that blew
enormous craters in the ground and completely rearranged the topography.
Excavations of trenches have been further complicated by the fact that after the war, farmers
who attempted to reclaim their farmland would simply take all the mounds of debris above
ground and shovel them into the trenches to fill them in. Hence traditional stratigraphy cannot
be trusted, and other means have had to be used to determine the true origins of artefacts.
Aside from the dangers of drawing false conclusions, archaeologists working in the trenches
face physical dangers. Even a hundred years after the Western Front was an active battlefield,
archaeologists have still come across unexploded shells and gas cylinders. For this reason, all
archaeological work has had to be done with professional bomb disposal experts and other
personnel on site.
Forensic examinations and DNA analysis at Fromelles

For the Australians, one of the most significant places on the Western Front is Fromelles, the
site of one of the bloodiest battles of the Great War. Here, Australia suffered more than 5000
casualties in one night, between 19 and 20 July 1916, in what is sometimes called Australia’s
greatest military disaster. Of these casualties, hundreds of soldiers remained missing for over
90 years, until a geophysical survey of the area, commissioned by the Australian Government
SOURCE 13 in 2007, located an unmarked mass grave at Pheasant Wood in 2008. According to the
Private Thomas Australian War Memorial, the excavation revealed 250 bodies, of which 203 were thought
Cosgriff, 59th by archaeologists to be Australian (due to remnants of clothing or location of the bodies etc).
Battalion, of Albert After teams of osteoarchaeologists removed the soldiers’ remains, DNA samples were taken
Park, Victoria,
aged 20, was
from their teeth and bones. These were then matched with DNA from relatives of soldiers in
one of the many Australia. By mid-2015, 144 of the 250 bodies had been positively identified, and each of these
Australians killed was confirmed to be Australian. The lost soldiers were identified through a combination of
at Fromelles in July anthropological, archaeological, historical and DNA information.
1916. His remains
were positively
identified through 1.4 Understanding and using the sources
DNA testing.
Analyse Sources 11, 12 and 13. Explain how each source can help you understand more about
geophysical
the role and value of archaeologists in developing historical understanding of modern history.
relating to the use
of instruments to
study the physics 1.4 Check your learning
of the earth in
inaccessible areas 1 Who conducted the search for unidentified Australian bodies at Pheasant Wood near
Fromelles in 2008?
osteoarchaeologist 2 Outline some of the difficulties facing archaeologists excavating First World War battlefields.
a specialist in the
study of human 3 Research the Australian and British troops’ aim at the Battle of Fromelles. How successful
skeletal remains were they?

VILLERS-BRETONNEUX
1.4 PROFILE
Villers-Bretonneux, near Amiens in
northern France, was the site of a
significant engagement that was critical
in the outcome of the First World War.
In 1918, the German Army launched a
carefully planned offensive in an attempt
to win the war before growing numbers
of American troops arriving on the
Western Front could overwhelm them.
This attack, known as the Ludendorff SOURCE 14 The Australian national rugby team, the Wallabies,
Offensive, broke through the British and visits the Victoria School, following a commemorative service at the
French lines and was close to succeeding Australian National Memorial in Villers-Bretonneux.
in its aim. Australian troops were involved
in halting the German advance, and one
of the key sites in this battle was the small
town of Villers-Bretonneux. More than
2000 Australians were killed or wounded,
while the cost to the Germans was
estimated at more than 10 000.
The people of Villers-Bretonneux
continue to honour the considerable
effort made by the Australian troops to
prevent Germany from breaking through
the French lines. Today, Australians
visiting the town can have a cup of coffee SOURCE 15 French children tend the graves of Australians killed in
at Café le Anzac or Café le Kangaroo, battle on the Western Front, Adelaide Cemetery, Villers-Bretonneux.
and watch the local primary school, the
Victoria School, celebrate Anzac Day. The school houses the Australian National Memorial,
and has also erected a sign in its playground that reads ‘Do not forget Australia’.
Sites such as Villers-Bretonneux make a major contribution not only to the historical
understanding of individuals, but also to a broader national understanding of identity. They
can provide a focus for historical memories and understanding that help shape a broader
historical narrative. Although Gallipoli has dominated Australia’s historical memory, as
historical understanding of Australia’s role in the First World War has expanded, Western
Front sites such as Villers-Bretonneux have risen in significance.
1.4 PROFILE TASKS

1 How do sites such as the memorials at Villers-Bretonneux and Vimy Ridge contribute to
historical understanding?
2 Investigate the role Australia played in the battle at Villers-Bretonneux. How important
was it for the outcome of the war?
3 Discuss why Australian sporting teams such as the Wallabies would travel to Villers-
Bretonneux. How could historians use Source 14 to help them understand the contribution
of Villers-Bretonneux to any historical narrative of Australia and its place in the world?

CONCLUSION Traditionally, archaeology has been seen as the domain of ancient history. As this
chapter about the Western Front in the First World War has shown, however, it also has
a crucial role to play in helping us understand modern history. The so-called Great War
destroyed large areas of the French countryside, but the skills of archaeologists have
allowed for the reconstruction of some of the trenches along the front.
Reconstruction has emerged as a popular way of accessing the past in the twenty-
first century. It can take the form of preserving trenches or recreating areas, such as the
dressing station shown in Source 3. In each case, the aim is to allow people from the
present to experience aspects of the past.
Reconstructions contribute to our historical understanding of the past, but,
like all sources, have to be analysed carefully. They may give a researcher a greater
understanding of the experiences of participants, or simply allow them to ask historical
questions, such as what sort of lighting would be available in a field hospital, or how
surgeries could be performed there.
Science too is making a significant contribution to our understanding of the past.
After the physical discoveries of archaeologists showed the way at Fromelles in France,
DNA testing was used on the remains exhumed from the mass graves of Fromelles.
Here, modern science allowed 144 Australians, who had been buried unnamed in
unmarked graves, to be identified and buried with dignity and recognition. More than
providing closure to families whose relatives had been lost to history, DNA analysis
also allowed historians to gain a deeper and more complete understanding of the
Battle of Fromelles. Perhaps, in time, that greater understanding will lead to enhanced
recognition of the role of Fromelles and other Western Front sites in the development of
Australia’s national identity.
SOURCE 16 Australian soldiers stand in front of a wall bearing the names of fallen First World War
soldiers at a dawn service at the Australian National Memorial in Villers-Bretonneux, France.
FOR THE TEACHER

Check your obook assess for the following additional resources for this chapter:
Answers Teacher notes Class test assess quiz
Answers to each Useful notes and Comprehensive test Interactive
Check your learning, advice for teaching to review students’ auto-correcting
Understanding and this chapter, including skills and knowledge multiple-choice
using the sources syllabus connections quiz to test student
and Profile task in this and relevant weblinks comprehension
chapter

2
The Contestability
of the Past:
Pearl Harbor
When you are dealing with a
contested topic such as the
bombing of Pearl Harbor, it is
critical that you provide evidence
KEY CONCEPTS AND SKILLS and examples to support
your interpretation. When
Historical interpretation communicating your findings, it
One of the roles of historians is will be essential to plan a method
to interpret events and sources. that makes it very clear that
The events at Pearl Harbor have you have conducted sufficient
challenged historians because research to show you understand
much of the information comes the significance of your sources.
The American flag flying at the
from Japanese and American
USS Arizona Memorial,
perspectives. Even historians
Pearl Harbor
may have their interpretation It is vital that you examine
of events influenced by their carefully the origin and intent
FOCUS QUESTIONS national origins. of the sources you are using to
develop your own interpretation.
1 How do the different Historical investigation
interpretations of the attack and research
Developing a range of questions
LEARNING GOALS
on Pearl Harbor in 1941
illustrate the concept of to guide an investigation is an > Understand the nature of
contestability in history? important step towards success contestability in history.
in history. It is critical that you
2 What do the sources and > Identify the different
develop questions that guide
historians say about the historical interpretations of
you towards a well-reasoned
bombing of Pearl Harbor? the bombing of Pearl Harbor
and well-supported conclusion.
3 How do the sources and A good starting point here is to and the reasons for them.
evidence help historians ask what you would like to know > Discuss the contested
evaluate different theories about the bombing of Pearl interpretations of Pearl
about the bombing of Pearl Harbor, and perhaps develop a Harbor and assess their
Harbor? mind map from that question. validity.

2.1 Introduction
As a student of history, you analyse and evaluate contested interpretations and representations
Allied Powers of the past. This implies that historians will not always agree on why events occurred, or what
the coalition
of countries in those events mean. History is often contested, with differing historical interpretations around
opposition to the any given event. This is the case with the Japanese attack on the US naval base at Pearl Harbor,
Axis powers in the
Hawaii, during the Second World War.
Second World War;
they included Britain, Japan’s surprise attack on the US Navy’s 7th Fleet on 7 December 1941 was a defining
the Commonwealth moment in twentieth-century history. The event triggered a dramatic response from the US
and France, which
were joined by the Government and a change in the United States’ view of its place and role in the world. Before
United States and Pearl Harbor, the United States had stood apart from the conflict between the Allied Powers
the Soviet Union
and the Axis Powers that had been ongoing in theatres of war in Europe and North Africa
in 1941
since 1939. It was Pearl Harbor that led the United States into the Second World War, moving
Axis Powers it away from a position of isolation from world affairs to the position it has held since after the
the coalition war, the role of international leader of the Western, capitalist world.
of countries in
opposition to the
In this chapter, we will use the bombing of the US naval base at Pearl Harbor to illustrate
Allied powers in why it is important to examine contested interpretations, and the sources and evidence they
the Second World are based on, before coming to a conclusion. As you examine the attack on Pearl Harbor, and
War; they included
Germany, Italy the events that followed as a result, you will confront a range of viewpoints and interpretations.
and Japan From these you will develop your own interpretation, using sources and evidence to support
you through the process.
capitalism
an economic system
in which businesses
and industry are run
for profit by private
owners, rather
than run by the
government
SOURCE 1 An aerial view of the USS Arizona Memorial, Pearl Harbor, with the sunken battleship just
visible under the surface

Understanding the context: the background to Pearl Harbor
The Japanese economy had suffered during the Great Depression in the 1930s, and its Great Depression
industries lacked key resources, such as oil and rubber. Japan’s invasion of China in 1937 a period of severe
economic downtown
was seen as an immediate solution to these problems. In 1940, Japanese Prime Minister that began in the
Yosuke Matsuoka had announced the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere, with United States and
quickly spread
the idea of creating a bloc of Japanese-occupied Asian nations that were free of Western
around the world
influence. If realised, the scheme would have replaced Western imperialism with Japanese during the 1930s
imperialism, allowing Japan to access resources from the Asian countries they would and 1940s
dominate.
These expansionist policies reflected the rise to power of aggressive military leaders
in Japan. The most significant of these was Hideki Tojo, a general who became prime
minister in October 1941. It was he who ordered the attack on Pearl Harbor. As prime
minister until July 1944, Tojo led Japan through most of the Second World War.
In response to Japan’s invasion of China, the United States had imposed economic economic sanctions
restrictions on trade
sanctions on Japan in 1939. Britain also joined the economic blockade of Japan. If the
sanctions had continued, Japan would run out of resources by 1942. Most critically for
Japan, a shortage of oil was a serious threat in a world where oil had emerged as the fuel
needed to drive both industry and the military.
The military leaders who dominated Japanese politics resented what they saw as
Western interference in their country’s right to secure their future through expansion.
Against this background, a high-stakes attack on the United States seemed a realistic
approach for the Japanese. The government believed that a decisive surprise attack on a key
asset such as Pearl Harbor might prevent the United States from engaging in the war, and
force it to drop the economic sanctions that were slowly depleting the country.
THE PROPOSED GREATER EAST ASIA CO-PROSPERITY SPHERE, 1940
LEG EN D
Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere
0 1000 km
SOURCE 2 Hideki Tojo, Prime Minister of Japan, SOURCE 3 This 1940 map shows the proposed nations that Japan
1941–44 intended would comprise its Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere.
CH A P T E R 2 T HE CONTESTA BILIT Y OF T HE PAST: PE A RL H A RBOR 19

But how would the United States respond to such an attack? The major risk was that Japan was
unsure whether it could defeat the United States in a full-scale military confrontation. If the attack
on Pearl Harbor succeeded in keeping the United States out of the war, it would be a success. If
the United States chose instead to go to war, it could lead to Japan’s defeat. It is unthinkable that
Japan’s leaders would have contemplated Pearl Harbor if they could have foreseen the catastrophic
impact of the atomic bombs dropped by the United States on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and
Nagasaki in 1945. History, however, has to reject hindsight, and interpret decisions that were made
at the time. Japan’s decision to attack Pearl Harbor would have an impact on history throughout
the Asia-Pacific region, as well as globally.
One of the many sources historians can access to help them understand the context of Pearl
Harbor is the work of Ikezaki Tadataka, a Japanese civilian writer on military affairs. In 1929 he
commented: ‘It is well known that Japan’s over-population grows more serious every year. Where
should we find an outlet for these millions?’ Tadataka went on to say that the Western powers had
already divided up the world but the Asian mainland remained, and that Japan had a claim to the
region ‘written in the blood and treasure of two wars’, referring to the wars that Japan had fought
against China in 1894–95 and against Russia in 1904–05.
In trying to understand the historical context of Japan’s decision to bomb Pearl Harbor, it
can be valuable to examine its tactics in its first war with a Western power: the Russo-Japanese
War. In 1904, a Japanese squadron of warships attacked the Russian naval base at Port Arthur (in
Kiaodong Province, China), without warning and without any declaration of war. In December
1941, the Japanese – again without warning or declaration of war – attacked the US naval base at
Pearl Harbor.
SOURCE 4
Russo-Japanese War (1904–05)
An important conflict over control of Manchuria and Korea. The Japanese launched a surprise
attack on Russian warships at anchor in the naval base of Port Arthur … without declaring war
… Port Arthur fell to the Japanese … The Russian Baltic fleet sailed 28 000 km from its base in
the East China Sea, only to be destroyed in the Tsushima Straits by the Japanese fleet ...
Edmund Wright (ed.), The Desk Encyclopedia of World History, 2006, p. 556

1 How can Source 3 help you understand the threat Japan presented to Australia in the
period before and during the Second World War?
2 In what way could Source 4 be used as evidence by a historian investigating the reasons for
the bombing of Pearl Harbor?

1 Explain what is meant by the concept of contestability in history.
2 Name two key resources that Japan was concerned about accessing during the Great Depression.
3 What was the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere?
4 Who was Hideki Tojo?
5 Which Japanese military action provided a precedent for the attack on Pearl Harbor?

2.2 The attack at Pearl Harbor
Just before eight o’clock in the morning of Sunday, 7 December 1941, Japan launched the
first of two waves of attacks on the US naval base. In the first wave, 183 Imperial Japanese
Navy aircrafts bombed US aircraft parked in their hangars, as well as warships moored at
the base. These included the battleship USS Arizona.
The Arizona exploded and sank after a bomb hit its gunpowder stores, resulting in the
death of more than a thousand of its crew. It was the only ship from the attack that could
not be salvaged. Today, a white memorial on the surface above where it sank is one of the
most visible markers of the attack (see Source 1).
The second wave of attacks followed
90 minutes later, with the arrival of an
additional 170 Japanese planes.
When the attack on Pearl Harbor was
over, 18 American warships had been
damaged or sunk and 2403 Americans had
lost their lives.
There was, however, resistance during
the two-hour attack. The US soldiers at
the base mounted counter-attacks using
anti-aircraft guns, and some US airmen
were able to take to the skies, even as their
airfield came under direct attack. The
Japanese lost 29 aircraft, and 55 Japanese
airmen were killed during the attack.
SOURCE 5 The USS Arizona explodes and sinks after a Japanese air strike
hits its gunpowder stores.
SOURCE 6 The scene

from the airfield as
the US naval destroyer
USS Shaw explodes
during the Japanese
attack on Pearl Harbor

News and images of the shocking attack quickly appeared in newspapers and in film
bulletins, and it seemed that American naval power in the Pacific had suffered a debilitating
blow. However, the situation was not as bad as it first appeared. This was due partly to an
element of chance, and partly to what proved to be poor decision-making by the commander
of the Japanese attack, Admiral Chuichi Nagumo. Nagumo decided against launching a third
wave of attacks because he did not know the location of the US aircraft carriers and feared a
counter-attack by US carrier-based aircraft. The initial waves of Japanese invaders had also
suffered more casualties than they had anticipated, because of the retaliation of the American
forces. Nagumo reasoned that the strikes had done enough.
The following day, US President Franklin D. Roosevelt declared war on Japan and, as a result,
the United States entered into the Second World War on the side of the Allied Powers. Within
six months of the attack on Pearl Harbor, the US Navy had rebuilt its strength. The United States
lead the resistance to Japan’s expansion in two crucial sea battles: the Battle of the Coral Sea and the
Battle of Midway (both 1942). America’s ability to rapidly repair, rebuild and replace vessels lost at
Pearl Harbor would prove to be crucial to the outcome of the Second World War.
SOURCE 7 Smoke rises from burning buildings SOURCE 8 An aerial view of Pearl Harbor, showing the damage inflicted by
at Pearl Harbor after the surprise attack by the the bombing
Japanese.

1 Examine Sources 5, 6, 7 and 8. How could a historian use these sources to analyse whether
the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was successful?
2 What conclusions do you draw about the attack’s short-term success after examining the
sources?

1 Argue for or against the idea that the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was successful.
2 Research the bombing of Pearl Harbor. List the major outcomes of the attack.

THE PEARL HARBOR
2.2 PROFILE
ADVANCE-KNOWLEDGE
CONSPIRACY THEORY
Ever since the attack on Pearl Harbor
took place, a persistent conspiracy theory
has suggested that President Franklin
D. Roosevelt and the US Government
were forewarned about the attacks, but
did nothing to alert the field commander
at Pearl Harbor. The reason for this,
according to the theory, is that Roosevelt
wanted a reason to bring the United SOURCE 9 The attack SOURCE 10 President Roosevelt,
States into the war and end American on Pearl Harbor was wearing a black armband, signs a
isolationism. Some go even further to used for pro-war declaration of war against Japan at
suggest that entering the Second World propaganda in the years 4.10 p.m. on 8 December 1941, the
War had been the president’s political aim that followed. day after the attack on Pearl Harbor.
all along. Considering that the country’s
entry into the war was a crucial step on
the way to making the United States the
superpower it is today, it is perhaps not For an opposing view, historians can
surprising that this theory has had many look to the 1996 article ‘How Roosevelt
supporters over the years. attacked Japan at Pearl Harbor: Myth
As historians, it is crucial that we masquerading as history’ by Robert
aim to find the source of the theories Butow, Professor of Japanese History
we study. The origin of the advance- at the University of Washington. The
knowledge theory can be traced back article, which is available online through
to a book published in September 1944 the American National Archives, directly
by John T. Flynn called The Truth about challenges the conspiracy theory, relying
Pearl Harbor. Flynn was a journalist and on evidence to support its argument. It
a political opponent of Roosevelt. He shows how historians use sources not only
was also a co-founder of the America to arrive at reasoned interpretations, but
First Committee, which wanted to keep also to challenge conspiracy theorists who
the United States out of the Second develop interpretations without the critical
World War. analysis used by historians.
2.2 PROFILE TASKS

1 What is the main argument of the conspiracy theory regarding President Franklin
D. Roosevelt and Pearl Harbor?
2 Research John T. Flynn. Does his background provide any evidence that could be used
to challenge his theory as being biased? Discuss how his background could influence
his work, using the evidence you have researched.
3 Read the article ‘How Roosevelt attacked Japan at Pearl Harbor: Myth masquerading as
history’ online, and explain how it uses evidence to reach its conclusions.

2.3 How historians test hypotheses
about the past
hypothesis Historians develop hypotheses as they search for explanations to help understand why events
a proposed
occur. This is called understanding causation. A hypothesis is not necessarily true, but if sufficient
explanation for
an event evidence is available to support it, it may become accepted. To assess the validity of any hypothesis,
historians have to ask a range of historical questions and investigate sources and evidence in order to
see whether they support the hypothesis. This process is the backbone of history as a discipline, and
is something you will become increasingly familiar with in your studies.
Developing hypotheses from historical questions

Source 11 shows examples of hypotheses that could be developed from historical questions
regarding the attack on Pearl Harbor. These reflect the emergence of new approaches by
historians to questioning the causes and consequences of the Japanese attack.
SOURCE 11
QUESTIONS HYPOTHESES Using sources to consider
Why was the attack as
successful as it was?
The Americans were unprepared for the
attack on Pearl Harbor.
the advance-knowledge theory
Who was to blame for the The commander of the Japanese fleet,
To assess the validity of any of these hypotheses,
Americans being taken Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, out-thought the it is essential that you conduct a close analysis
by surprise? commander of the US fleet, Admiral Husband of sources and evidence. As an example of
E. Kimmel.
how historians use primary sources to test
Was there a conspiracy? Americans believed President Roosevelt hypotheses, consider the question of the
invited the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. advance-knowledge theory. Historians assessing
Was the defeat, in fact, as The bombing of Pearl Harbor devastated the the hypothesis that Roosevelt was inviting a
bad as it first appeared? American fleet. Japanese attack in order to enter into the Second
How has the attack been Pearl Harbor is the most momentous event in World War can access a collection of interviews
remembered? American history. held by the US Library of Congress.
Shortly after the attack, the Archive of
American Folk Song (now the Archive of Folk
Culture, American Folklife Center) asked
its fieldworkers to collect ‘man on the street’
reactions of ordinary Americans to the bombing
and the subsequent declaration of war by the
United States. A second series of interviews,
called ‘Dear Mr President’, was recorded in
January and February 1942. These interviews
can be accessed online, giving historians and
history students evidence of how ordinary
Americans reacted to Pearl Harbor. Reviewing
these will enable you to draw conclusions about
SOURCE 12 A Japanese photograph taken during the attack on whether such Americans were blaming President
Pearl Harbor
Roosevelt in the aftermath of the attack.

Problems associated with the evaluation
of sources: authenticity, reliability and usefulness
The fact that historians rely on sources to interpret history does not mean that there is always
consensus regarding the role and importance of any individual source. On the contrary, a
group of historians could be placed in the same room with access to the same sources, and all
could come up with different interpretations. The contested nature of topics such as the reasons
behind Japan’s decision to attack Pearl Harbor requires students to evaluate sources carefully by
asking questions about their context, origin, audience and intention.
No one source will hold a complete answer, and sources are always open to interpretation.
When developing your own conclusions, it is important that you understand the contested
nature of history, and the need to always support your interpretation with reference to sources
and evidence.
Japanese sources and perspectives

In trying to understand Japan’s decision to bomb Pearl Harbor, it is important to consider
Japanese sources and perspectives. One obvious problem for historians who are unable to
read documents and books written in Japanese is the need to employ translators, if there is no
English edition available.
In Ikezaki Tadataka’s book from 1929, called Why Fear the United States?, the author
argued that Japan had no reason to fear the United States, and that there was no scenario in
which the United States could defeat Japan in a conflict. He particularly stressed the strength
of the Japanese Navy as a decisive element. This becomes a valuable source for a historian
investigating reasons for Japan’s actions, but it would certainly require close evaluation to
understand the sources Tadataka was using to build his opinions. A historian would be able
to challenge Tadataka’s assertions, and it is likely that relying on it as a source would lead to
highly contested conclusions.
Censorship of sources
Many Western and Japanese academic historians have been critical about how Japanese high
school textbooks during the 1960s and 1970s recorded the history of the Pacific War. Even Pacific War
today the issue is contested. The most famous example was the censorship imposed by the the theatre of the
Second World War,
Japanese Ministry of Education on textbooks written about the Pacific War. The details of the where the Allied
war were either ignored or presented in such a way that they absolved Japan of all guilt. Again, Powers resisted the
this creates problems for historians relying on those books as sources, and it also raises questions Japanese invasion
of countries through
about potential bias or misunderstanding for students who were schooled using those books. the Pacific region
In 1953, Japanese historian Saburo Ienaga’s book New Japanese History went against the and South-East Asia
trend of downplaying Japan’s part in wartime atrocities. The book became subject to strict
censorship by the government’s schoolbook authorisation system. In 1978, his book The Pacific
War 1931–1945: A critical perspective on Japan’s role in World War II was met with similar
criticism from the government.
To this day, the Japanese Education Ministry maintains control over what can be included
in history textbooks. In 2002 the ministry approved the publishing of the book New History
Textbook, written by a group of right-wing scholars, which sought to downplay Japanese aggression
and imperialism. This book was, however, rejected by over 99 per cent of Japanese schools.

SOURCE 13
I wrote this book to show the Japanese people the naked realities of the Pacific War. My objective
was to stimulate reflection and self-criticism about the war.
Saburo Ienaga, The Pacific War 1931–1945: A Critical Perspective on Japan’s Role in World War II, 1978, p. xi
Further historical perspectives about Pearl Harbor

Another perspective was provided by American historian John W. Dower in his 1986 book, War
Without Mercy: Race & Power in the Pacific War. Dower argued that both the Americans and the
Japanese had used their sense of racial superiority to inform their ideas about the other power,
and that these views helped explain the build-up to the attack on Pearl Harbor. After evaluating
his sources, Dower described the Pacific War – including Pearl Harbor – as a ‘race war’.
In a 2012 article in The Australian newspaper, titled ‘1930s couldn’t happen again – could
they?’, Australian journalist Max Suich asked a question many historians may not have
SOURCE 14 Did
Australian Prime
considered – did Australia contribute to the events that led to Pearl Harbor? Suich suggested that
Minister William Australian Prime Minister Billy Hughes’ very public humiliation of the Japanese Government
‘Billy’ Hughes at the Paris Peace Conference of 1919 may have helped sow the seeds that led to Pearl Harbor.
contribute to the Hughes was determined to resist Japan’s call for racial equality to be recognised by the emerging
attack on Pearl
Harbor through
League of Nations. His success left Japan distrustful of the power of the British Empire in the
his treatment of Asia–Pacific region, and Japan’s solution was to develop the concept of the Greater East Asia
Japan at the Paris Co-Prosperity Sphere (see Section 2.1). The fact that few historians have drawn connections
Peace Conference between Hughes’ actions in Paris and Pearl Harbor doesn’t mean those connections do not exist.
in 1919?

League of Nations
an international 1 Explain how Source 13 outlines the intentions of Saburo Ienaga in writing his book. Does this
organisation indicate bias?
established at the
2 Explain how Ienaga contests and challenges the viewpoint of Ikezaki Tadataka. Discuss how
end of the First
World War to
their contestation helps you understand the way historical interpretations change across
maintain world peace time. Why do you think this particular interpretation has changed?
and prevent the 3 Tadataka’s book Why Fear the United States? was written 12 years before the attack on Pearl
outbreak of future
Harbor. Discuss to what extent this might affect its validity as a source.
wars by encouraging
nations to negotiate
with each other
contestation 1 Explain how and why historians create hypotheses.
the process of
disputing and 2 How could the ‘man on the street’ interviews collected by the Archive of American Folk
debating different Song assist historians to support or challenge the idea that there was a US Government
interpretations of conspiracy surrounding Pearl Harbor?
sources by historians
3 Outline the argument Max Suich makes regarding Australia’s possible involvement in the
attack on Pearl Harbor.
4 Explain why Ikezaki Tadataka’s writings could be a useful source for historians investigating
the bombing of Pearl Harbor.
5 Discuss why Saburo Ienaga would be regarded as a controversial figure in Japanese
education. Would his views also be contested in the West?
6 What interpretation did John W. Dower develop to help explain Pearl Harbor?

2.4 The role of sources and evidence
in the evaluation of different theories
and remembrances of the past
Any historian is entitled to develop an original interpretation or theory about the past, but they
must base their suggestions on sources and evidence. As a history student, it is important to
train yourself to look for the sources and evidence that have been used whenever you investigate
a historical opinion.
One contested area that could be investigated is the reasons why the attack on Pearl Harbor
was so successful in the short term. Examination of Japanese sources might help a historian
decide that Japan’s planning and preparation were superior to America’s. This would, however,
be an unlikely conclusion for a historian relying only on American sources.
Pearl Harbor and the shaping of the American identity

Examining the draft and final copies of President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s speech to the US
Congress about Pearl Harbor provides an insight into the way sources can be used to help shape
versions of the past. In the typed draft of the speech that had been given to the president, the
text read ‘December 7, 1941, a date which will live in world history’. Roosevelt took his pen and
crossed out the words ‘world history’ and wrote in ‘infamy’.
This was the beginning of the creation in the American public memory
of the idea and image of Pearl Harbor. For generations of Americans, the
legacy, myth-making and iconography associated with Pearl Harbor are
similar to how Australians have viewed and represented Gallipoli and
Anzac Day. This is not to deny the importance of the event, its historical
implications and the tragedy of the loss of life. Nevertheless, Pearl Harbor
has been used for propaganda and a range of political and nation-building
purposes. Roosevelt and presidents after him have used Pearl Harbor to
SOURCE 15 A US postage stamp create a version of the American national identity. The historian’s role is to
commemorating the attack on Pearl Harbor, use sources to evaluate this version and arrive at a valid interpretation.
c. 1995
SOURCE 16 An excerpt from the first draft of President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s proposed message to the
US Congress, with his handwritten corrections

The portrayal of Pearl Harbor in films
There have been two feature-length motion pictures
made specifically about the attack on Pearl Harbor.
The first, Tora! Tora! Tora!, was released in 1970 (in
Japanese, ‘tora’ means ‘tiger’, which was the code name
for the attack). This Japanese–American film, which was
co-directed by one American and two Japanese directors, went to great lengths to deal
with the details of the attack from both sides. The primary focus of the film was, however,
the shortcomings of the US commanders at Pearl Harbor: Admiral Husband E. Kimmel
and General Walter Short.
The second film about the attack was the 2001 Hollywood blockbuster Pearl Harbor,
starring Ben Affleck, which received harsh criticism from survivors of the attack as being
grossly inaccurate. One of the main historical inaccuracies is a scene in which the Japanese
bombers deliberately target hospitals. In reality, this did not happen. Although a local
medical centre was affected by the attack, resulting in one American casualty, there was no
deliberate targeting of hospitals or medical centres by Japanese pilots.
When watching films that feature actual historic events, it is sometimes easy to forget that
vilify their main function is to entertain, and not to give a scene-by-scene accurate account. But as
to make abusive
statements about a a student of history, it is important not only to challenge these often simplified versions of
person or people, history, but also to question the intention behind them. In the case of Pearl Harbor, director
so that others will
have a lower opinion
Michael Bay clearly sets out to vilify the Japanese. It is up to you to consider the reasons for
of them this, and what the impacts could be on the audience’s understanding of the events.
SOURCE 17 A film still from the motion picture Tora! Tora! Tora! (1970) SOURCE 18 A promotional image for the motion
picture Pearl Harbor (2001)

Pearl Harbor memorial
The famous US Pearl Harbor memorial – the World War II Valor in the Pacific National
Monument – is, like these feature films, an example of how history is constructed. Until
1999, the centrepiece of the site was the glistening white USS Arizona Memorial, above the
sunken battleship. This site is the resting place of more than a thousand American servicemen
who died in the attack and is an official US war grave site. As such, it is a place treated with
appropriate reverence.
In 1999, the Arizona was joined at the site by the USS Missouri. The Missouri had served
with distinction in the Second World War, the Korean War, and Operation Desert Storm in
the Persian Gulf. It is arguably most famous
for being the location of the formal Japanese
surrender that ended the Second World War.
The official explanation for bringing the
Missouri to Pearl Harbor was that the two
warships represented the beginning and the
end of the war. This is true, but – as is always
the case with history – there is more to it. The
Arizona represented an American defeat, while
the Missouri reminds visitors of American
power and the ultimate American victory.
Even for historians, it is easy to accept the
official story of memorials and museums.
However, the key to sound historical
thinking is a willingness to recognise that
there are always contested versions of every SOURCE 19 The Missouri arrives at Pearl Harbor to join the Arizona at the
historical event. Pearl Harbor memorial site.

1 Examine Sources 17 and 18. Explain what each seems to imply about the film interpretations
of Pearl Harbor.
2 Analyse Source 19. Does it provide evidence to support or challenge the assertion that
the Missouri was placed at the Pearl Harbor memorial site to convey an image of American
strength, power and victory? Explain your answer.
3 Explain how Source 20 (next page) could be used as evidence of the ongoing significance of
Pearl Harbor for Americans.

1 Discuss the significance of President Franklin D. Roosevelt changing ‘world history’ to
‘infamy’ in his speech to the US Congress.
2 Research reviews and comments on the films Tora! Tora! Tora! (1970) and Pearl Harbor
(2001). Discuss whether there is anything that would encourage you to rely on either film
for historical understanding.
3 Discuss the possible reasons behind the Missouri joining the Arizona at the Pearl Harbor
memorial site. What explanation or explanations do you find most plausible?

CONCLUSION As President Franklin D. Roosevelt said in his speech to the US Congress, 7 December
1941 is ‘a date which will live on in infamy’. There are a range of perspectives and
interpretations about what the significance of that date actually is. For some, it
represents an unprovoked attack that cost the lives of innocent people; for others, it was
a desperate attempt to guarantee a future for their country. Still others will argue it was
the event that brought the United States firmly into a position of world leadership.
Historical interpretations are always contestable, and rely on facts, sources and
evidence to support them. This chapter has introduced you to some of the views of Pearl
Harbor that have been debated in the years since it occurred. You may accept some and
reject others. In history, the important thing is to always rely on the evidence to help you
come to a valid conclusion.
SOURCE 20 US President Barack Obama visits the USS Arizona Memorial at Pearl Harbor in 2011.
FOR THE TEACHER

chapter

3
The Construction
of Modern
Histories:
the Holocaust
The extermination camp at Historical interpretation
Auschwitz, Poland
Once sources have been
selected, they have to be
interpreted. The meaning of
FOCUS QUESTIONS sources is not absolute, and it Communicating about the
is not unusual for historians to Holocaust raises ethical issues.
1 How do historians construct These can range from the use
develop conflicting opinions
history? of confronting images of human
from a single source. With its
2 How does a study of the strong emotional impact, a suffering and death, through
Holocaust reveal the way history of the Holocaust is open to the moral dilemmas faced
history is constructed? to competing interpretations, by many participants of this
often originating in personal period of history. Presenting any
3 What happens if sources are
connections. This is why it is work on the Holocaust requires
ignored when constructing
important for you to always ethics and empathy, without
history?
consider ‘who is the historian?’, compromising the integrity of
as well as ‘what are they saying?’ your investigation.
KEY CONCEPTS AND SKILLS
Historical investigation
Analysis and use of sources and research LEARNING GOALS
When historians are faced with a In the digital age we have wider > Understand the way history
wide range of sources, they are access to sources than at any can be constructed.
also faced with an important previous time in history. A key
> Be able to investigate the
decision: which are the most question to consider, though,
construction of Holocaust
appropriate resources to use? is whether this makes it easier
history.
Selection of sources is a critical or more difficult for historians
element in the construction of and history students. Historical > Recognise and analyse the
history. If sources are ignored investigation and research now nature of sources historians
because they do not support a require an ability to rapidly sort have used, and how these
certain perspective, the result material to establish what is sources impact upon their
will be poor and biased history. relevant to your specific inquiry. construction of history.

3.1 Introduction
In this chapter you will examine the various ways that history is constructed over time.
Focusing on the Holocaust, the chapter will show how historians’ selection of sources – and
their approach to these sources – can affect how history is written and interpreted. The chapter
will help you understand not only what historians do when they investigate history, but also the
skills that you need to develop to be successful in your own history studies.
What was the Holocaust?

The Holocaust refers to the systematic
mass murder of Jewish people and other
minorities by Germany’s Nazi Government
and accomplices from various countries
under the command of Adolf Hitler during
the Second World War (1939–45). Over the
course of the Holocaust, more than half of
all European Jews – more than six million SOURCE 1 Holocaust survivor Leo Bretholz
people – died in Nazi-occupied territories. points to his name in a record book of passengers
on French trains bound for Nazi extermination
genocide
The word ‘Holocaust’ means ‘sacrificed by
camps. Also pictured is his yellow badge, marking
the deliberate and fire’ or ‘burnt’. Jewish people prefer to use him as a Jew.
systematic mass the Hebrew word ‘Shoah’ instead, meaning
killing of people
based on their race,
‘catastrophe’.
ethnicity, religion
Sources of evidence
or culture
Gestapo
the secret police Histories of the Holocaust are constructed from a range of sources, including the memories of
of Nazi Germany victims. Many families around the world can draw on personal connections to the Holocaust. In
2016, however, there were fewer than 100 000 Holocaust survivors still alive. As living memories
fade, their recorded accounts will become the primary sources that inform historical records.
The Holocaust was not the first time in history that race hatred, fear and prejudice led to
race violence and even genocide. What made the Holocaust different, aside from the scale of
the murders, was the level of planning and
organisation by German authorities. Their
documents provide telling sources of evidence
for historians, such as meticulous records kept
of the Holocaust victims transported to Nazi
extermination camps by train. Documents
show that bureaucrats at the German Rail
Authority billed the Gestapo for transporting
people to the extermination camps – one way at
the third-class rate, with discounts for children,
and group rates for 400 or more passengers. In
this matter-of-fact way, whole communities of
SOURCE 2 The entrance to Auschwitz, with the ironic words ‘Arbeit macht
frei’ – ‘work sets you free’
people were sent to their deaths.

SOURCE 3 A deportation train bringing Hungarian Jews to the Auschwitz extermination camp in Poland,
c. 1942
Investigating the Holocaust

Although there is no doubt that Jews and other minorities were persecuted and murdered
by the Nazis during this time, historians have used a variety of different methodologies to
reconstruct the events. This, in turn, has led to a wide range of varying arguments about the
nature, causes and impact of the Holocaust.
The nature of both the event and the evidence means that investigating the Holocaust can
be an emotional experience. Still, the Holocaust needs to be remembered, and it needs to be
understood. Remembering and attempting to understand are the first steps to ensuring that
nothing like it ever happens again.

1 How would you describe the Holocaust?
2 Describe the types of sources available to historians investigating the Holocaust.

How could Sources 1 and 3 be used by historians investigating the history of the Holocaust?
CH A P T E R 3 T HE CONST RUC TION OF MODERN HISTORIES: THE HOLOCAUST 33

3.2 Different types of histories
It is easy to say that ‘history is history’ – that historians simply select a topic, research information,
analyse sources, and write down their findings. However, in practice, historians have to consider
the type of history they will produce, or the approach they will use, and this choice will impact on
the topics they investigate, the sources they use, and the stories they tell. Instead of thinking of
history as ‘history’, it can be useful to think of it as ‘histories’.
There are many different methods of investigating the past, and each one is useful in its own
way. Four examples of different types of histories are narrative history, biography, social history and
cultural history.
Narrative history
chronology A narrative history tells the story of events, normally relying on chronology to move the narrative
a record of events forward. National histories often use a narrative approach. For example, a narrative history of
in the order they
Australia might describe the change from Aboriginal nations, to convict settlements, to British
took place
colonies, to an independent nation, to a multicultural nation.
Some narrative histories may divert from chronology to focus on broader trends or themes.
For example, the narrative history of Australia could include sections such as occupation and
use of land, development of political independence, and leisure activities as ways of moving the
narrative forward.
SOURCE 4 A roll
call at Buchenwald
concentration camp; Biography
two prisoners in
the foreground A biography examines history through the lens of the life of a particular person (or sometimes a
are supporting a group). By studying an individual, a historian can give insight into their life and times. One of
comrade, as fainting
the challenges for biographers is trying to establish the ideas and motives of the person they are
was frequently
an excuse for the writing about, particularly if they are relying on sources that are removed from that person. Some
guards to murder historians use biographies to examine how an individual influenced their society, while others use
‘useless’ inmates. biographies to examine how events affected individuals.
Social history
Social history emerged in the 1960s as a reaction to the mainstream focus at the time on ‘history
from above’. In other words, history was seen as being too concerned with the great events and the
important and powerful individuals – particularly men – who
shaped history. Social history gave a stronger focus to
the experiences of the broader population, creating
a ‘history from below’. It often used previously
overlooked sources, such as censuses, parish records
and financial records, to understand the lives of
ordinary people who left few other sources behind.
By taking a more inclusive approach, it was believed
that social history would give a deeper understanding
of societies and the way they functioned.

Cultural history
Cultural history combines elements of social history, intellectual history (the history of ideas)
and anthropology (the study of human societies and cultures and their development) to develop sociology
a new way of investigating the past. Cultural historians argue that all forms of human culture – the study of the
development,
from rock music and films to ceremonies and place names – are ‘texts’ that can be ‘read’ in the
structure and
same way as written sources. By examining these types of sources, cultural historians have been functioning of
able to develop a deeper understanding of the past. Cultural history is the most popular type of human society
history practised today.

literary studies
the evaluation and
Multiple approaches to history interpretation of
literature
Those outlined above are not the only approaches to history. Intellectual historians focus on the
development and impact of ideas, economic historians examine the role of economic factors in cultural studies
the study of the ways
history, transnational historians examine connections between nations, and political historians in which culture is
focus on political interactions within or between societies. Historians are constantly developing constructed and
new ways of investigating the past, often influenced by other disciplines such as sociology, organised, and the
ways in which it
literary studies, cultural studies and anthropology. changes over time
There is no ‘right’ approach to history. Any of these approaches can be valuable, depending
on what you are researching and the type of information you require. Many historians use anthropology
the study of human
different approaches for different topics, or combine multiple approaches in a single study. It is
societies and
important to recognise that the construction of meaning through the interpretation of sources cultures, and their
lies at the heart of history, regardless of the approach. development
SOURCE 5
[T]he narrative of A People’s Tragedy weaves between the private and the
public spheres. Wherever possible, I have tried to emphasize the human
aspect of its great events by listening to the voices of individual people
whose lives become caught up in the storm. Their diaries, letters and other
private writings feature prominently in this book. More substantially,
the personal histories of several figures have been interwoven through
the narrative. Some of these figures are well known … while others are
unknown even to historians … In following the fortune of these figures, my
aim has been to convey the chaos of these years, as it must have been felt by
ordinary men and women.
Orlando Figes, A People’s Tragedy:
The Russian Revolution 1891–1924, 1996, Preface

1 Read Source 5 and discuss the approaches to history that are
described there.
2 Consider the four different approaches to history discussed in this
section: narrative, biography, social and cultural. Now for each
approach, suggest one event, topic or period in modern history – SOURCE 6 Mother and daughter at the Berlin
apart from the Holocaust – that would be suitable for investigation Holocaust Monument
using that approach.

3.3 The historical
context of the
Holocaust
The Holocaust was a direct consequence
of Nazi Party ideology and its race-based
antisemitic thinking. Hitler made his antisemitic beliefs
hostile to or a central feature of his book Mein Kampf
prejudiced
against Jews (‘My Struggle’), published in 1925. However,
hostility towards Jews had its origins as far
back as the ancient world and appeared
throughout Europe in the Middle Ages.
The Jewish people – especially those
in Poland and Eastern Europe – were the
prime targets for Nazi violence, but they
were not the only victims of the Nazi
Party’s racial policies. The Nazis also
persecuted the Sinta and Romani people
(often referred to as ‘Gypsies’), who were
also seen by the Nazis as racially inferior.
An estimated 500 000 Sinta and Romani
people were killed during the Holocaust.
SOURCE 7 The Hall of Names in the Yad Vashem
dissidents Other victims included homosexuals,
people who
Holocaust Museum in Jerusalem remembers
challenge
people with physical or intellectual some of the six million Jews murdered during the
government policies disabilities, and political dissidents. Holocaust.
The Nuremberg Laws

In 1935, Hitler’s Nazi Government passed
the Nuremberg Laws, which restricted
the freedom of Jews to marry non-Jews
and denied them German citizenship, as
well as protection and equal opportunity
under the law. Further laws ancillary to the
Nuremberg Laws were passed, discriminating
against Jewish people. These laws sought
to remove all Jews from the government,
universities and the army, and limited the
number of Jewish students in public schools.
Businesses owned by Jews were given to non-
Jewish Germans. Meanwhile, government
SOURCE 8 This 1935 chart shows racial classifications under the
Nuremberg Laws: German, Mischlinge (mixed blood) and Jew. propaganda encouraged hatred of the Jews.

Kristallnacht
On the night of 9–10 November 1938, the
persecution of Jewish people intensified
with a series of coordinated attacks by Nazi
Party members on Jewish synagogues and
businesses across Germany and Austria. This
was known as Kristallnacht (‘Crystal Night’, or
‘Night of Broken Glass’). Jewish people were
attacked, some were murdered, and at least
1000 synagogues were burnt. Jewish shops
and business were wrecked and looted and
30 000 Jewish people were arrested. While
all of this took place, the police stood by and
did nothing. The attacks were widely reported
in the media, both in Germany and overseas;
but despite the well-documented instances of
murder, arson and robbery against Jews, none
SOURCE 9 Pedestrians glance at the broken
of the Nazis responsible were charged. Rather, windows of a Jewish-owned shop in Berlin after
the police blamed the victims. the attacks of Kristallnacht, November 1938.
SOURCE 10 Furnishings and ritual objects from the synagogue in Mosbach, Germany, are burnt on the town square,
10 November 1938.

Jewish ghettos
What began as an attack on Jewish people in Germany turned into the
systematic, calculated mass murder of all of Europe’s Jews who came under
Nazi rule, as Germany overran much of Europe from 1939. Hitler’s vision
of the elimination of the Jews from Europe came into sharper focus in 1939
with the invasion of Poland and again in 1941 with the invasion of the
Soviet Union. It was in these countries that the most significant populations
of European Jews lived.
ghetto Soon after the German invasion of Poland in 1939, ghettos were set up
a section of a town in Nazi-occupied cities in Poland, Hungary and the Soviet Union. They
or city established by
the Nazis during the
were areas bricked off or encircled with barbed wire to stop people from
Second World War escaping. Over the course of the war, many Jewish people were rounded
to confine Jews and up and forced to leave their homes and move into ghettos. The conditions
other ‘undesirables’,
and isolate them inside were extremely brutal, and approximately 800 000 people died in the
from the wider ghettos from malnutrition, disease and forced labour.
population
Concentration camps
concentration camp The Nazi Government used so-called concentration camps to contain Jews
a camp in which and other ‘undesirables’. The exact number of concentration camps is not
civilians and
political prisoners known, but it is generally accepted that the number is in the thousands.
or prisoners of war Even the terms used to describe the camps are open to interpretation, with
are detained under
historians generally breaking the camps into various categories, including
extremely harsh
conditions prison camps, labour camps and extermination camps.
In labour camps, inmates were compelled to do hard physical labour
such as mining and road building under harsh conditions. In many of these labour camps – like
Buchenwald and Belsen – inmates were simply worked to death. Many prisoners also fell victim to
disease and were murdered as soon as they were unable to work.
Auschwitz–Birkenau
Extermination camps were also referred to as death camps. One of the largest of these was
a complex of camps known as Auschwitz–Birkenau, which was a combined labour and
extermination camp in Nazi-occupied Poland. Here, once inmates were considered unsuitable for
forced labour, they were gassed and their bodies burnt in crematoria (giant ovens). Gold fillings
were taken from the teeth of many of those murdered, and these were melted down and sent to
the Reich Treasury, the finance authority of the Nazi Regime.
The statistics from Auschwitz (as the complex is commonly known) are staggering, and help
synonymous explain why its name has become synonymous with the Holocaust. The exact number of victims
closely associated
is still debated, but according to the US Holocaust Memorial Museum, Hitler’s state military
with or suggestive of
something organisation (the SS) systematically killed at least 960 000 of the 1.1–1.3 million Jews deported
to the camp. Other victims included approximately 74 000 Poles, 21 000 Romani people, 15 000
Soviet prisoners of war and at least 10 000 people of various other nationalities. More people died
at Auschwitz than at any other Nazi concentration camp and, probably, more than at any other
extermination camp in history. Upon liberation in 1945, about 7000 starving prisoners were
found alive in the camp.

SOURCE 11 The only known photo of the Birkenau
extermination unit at Auschwitz. The photo raises
the question of why the camp was not bombed in
August 1944, when this picture was taken.
SOURCE 12 German students visiting Auschwitz

1 Explain how and why historians could approach evidence that they obtain from Holocaust
survivors differently from evidence obtained from other sources.
2 What were the Nuremberg Laws? What evidence would there be to confirm what they did?
3 How could you explain the fact that the exact number of concentration camps is not known?
4 What were concentration camps and what evidence is there that they existed?

1 In what sort of historical investigation could you use Source 7 as evidence?
2 Compare Sources 9 and 10. What do they reveal about Kristallnacht? Comment on the
reliability of both sources. What interpretations can be drawn from them?
3 How important is the caption that accompanies Source 11 for helping you understand
what it is showing you? Discuss how a different caption could change your interpretation
of the source.
4 Examine Source 12. Why would school students be visiting Auschwitz? Discuss what you
think Auschwitz represents in history. Does Source 12 support or challenge your view?

3.4 The role of evidence, interpretation
and perspective in the construction
of historical accounts
An area of historical study like the Holocaust brings with it a range of specific problems for
historians looking to construct meanings from the available sources. There is a wide range of
material, but much of it is disturbing and can elicit strong emotional responses. There is also
the issue of the strong personal agendas of the people involved in creating historical records by
telling their sides of the story.
In this section we explore the range of approaches and methodologies that Holocaust
scholars have taken to gain an understanding of the Holocaust.
Richard Evans and a question of perspective: where to start

Richard Evans is one of the most respected academic historians writing about twentieth-century
Germany and the Nazis. Evans is known to take a long-term view of German history. For
example, much of his influential book The Coming of the Third Reich examines the nineteenth-
century background to the rise of Hitler and the Nazi Party.
Evans adopted a similar approach in his construction of a history of the Holocaust, The
Third Reich at War. His investigation of the nature and the causes of the Holocaust was not
limited to the study of Hitler and Nazi race thinking. Instead, Evans went back to Germany’s
SOURCE 13 A
group of starving nineteenth-century and pre–First World War imperial tradition to look for clues.
Hereros, who Like many other European nations at the time, Germany had colonies in Africa in the
had been driven nineteenth century. Among them was German South West Africa – now the country of
into the desert of
Namibia – where the Germans arrived in 1884. When the local tribes resisted the increasing
South West Africa
by German forces level of land seizures by the colonists, the German Government dispatched 14 000 troops under
in 1907 General Lothar von Trotha. Von Trotha claimed that the natives would only respond to violence
and fought a war of extermination against them. Between 1904 and 1907, the
Germans conducted a genocidal war against two of the local native tribes,
the Herero and the Nama, resulting in the Herero population being
reduced from 80 000 to 15 000, and half of the 20 000 Nama
people being killed.
After the tribes’ resistance had been crushed, the
survivors were moved into special labour camps. The
Germans called them ‘concentration camps’, the first
time the Germans had used the term. The worst of
these was on Shark Island on the coast of present-day
Namibia. The prisoners were put to forced labour on
limited rations. Part of their daily routine was to take
the bodies of those who had been worked to death
to the beach, where the bodies would drift out into
shark-infested waters on the tide.

The Germans were not the only colonial
power to mistreat native peoples, but they
were the only ones to set up concentration
camps and conduct them in a way that was
designed, according to Evans, to ‘exterminate
through labour’, in much the same way that
the Nazis were to do some 30 years later.
As a precursor of the medical experiments
that saw the Jewish inmates of the Nazi
camps used as guinea pigs, the Africans
were injected with experimental drugs and
dangerously high doses of arsenic in the
search of a cure for sleeping sickness (a serious
and often fatal insect-borne disease). Death
rates among the experiment subjects were
exceptionally high.
SOURCE 14 A Soviet doctor examines survivors from Auschwitz after the

camp was liberated on 27 January 1945.
SOURCE 15 Skulls of Herero and Nama

tribespeople killed by German colonial forces
were taken to Germany for medical experiments,
in an attempt to demonstrate the racial
superiority of Europeans over black Africans.
More than 20 skulls, many of them draped with
Namibian flags, were returned to Namibia in 2011.
3.4a Understanding and using the sources

1 Analyse Sources 13 and 15. Explain how they help you interpret the German occupation of
South West Africa.
2 Compare and contrast Sources 13 and 14. Outline how they could assist a historian
investigating continuity and change in Germany between 1870 and 1945.
3 Examine Source 15 and explain how it could be interpreted by:
a a Namibian historian constructing a history of Namibia
b a former member of the German occupying colonial force
c a German doctor working for the Nazis during the Second World War.

Another disturbing precursor of the Holocaust was the introduction
in 1905 of so-called ‘racial hygiene programs’, which banned mixed-
race marriages. Unlike other European powers, the German colonial
administrators passed laws to ban racial intermarriage across their
colonies: in German East Africa in 1906 and in the German Pacific
colony of Samoa in 1912.
As part of this process, the Germans introduced the term Rassenschande,
meaning ‘racial defilement’. It was argued that the ‘naturally superior’
European racial stock would be defiled or weakened by intermarriage
with other peoples. This was the first time that the term had appeared in
German legal terminology. It did not surface again until 1935, with the
passing of the Nuremberg Laws.
In 1913, 20 years before Hitler came to power, a new law was passed
in Germany that defined German citizenship on the basis of race and
ethnic descent, rather than residence. Evans argued that this kind of ‘race
thinking’ can be traced directly to the principles that Germany developed
in its colonies. It was from this time that German nationalists began to
speak of and write about Poles and Slavs as being racially inferior peoples.
As a result, countries in Eastern Europe were increasingly viewed by
German nationalists as being equivalent to Germany’s overseas colonies –
as places where the people, land and resources could be exploited to serve
Germany, in much the same way that the Germans had exploited their overseas colonies.

1 What evidence is there that Richard Evans takes a long-term view of causes when constructing
his histories?
2 Outline the similarities and differences between Germany’s policies and behaviour as a colonial
power, and its policies and behaviour in the 1930s.
3 Explain how Germany’s policies on race were refined by its colonial experience.
Christopher Browning and the narrow interpretation

Christopher Browning, a leading Holocaust scholar, was interested in the question of where to
focus an investigation that sought to interpret the reasons people were willing to implement
‘Final Solution’ Hitler’s ‘Final Solution to the Jewish Problem’.
the Nazi Party’s plan
The implementation of the ‘Final Solution’ in Poland had proven difficult for the Germans.
for the extermination
of Jews in Europe This was partly because the Jewish population in Poland was widespread and partly because,
during the most intense period of mass murder, the German Army was short on manpower due
to heavy fighting against the Soviet Union. While the numbers needed to staff extermination
camps like Auschwitz were relatively small, rounding up thousands of Jews across the rural
areas and small towns of Poland was a different matter. Hence German reservists – older men
who had initially been seen as unfit for the German Army – were used for the task. Browning
investigated one such unit that served in Poland around 1942–44: Reserve Police Battalion 101.

SOURCE 16
Polish Jews are
marched to an
extermination
camp from the
Warsaw ghetto –
typical of the type
of work carried out
by Battalion 101.
In building his interpretation, Browning

carefully reviewed the testimonies of
surviving Battalion members during
war crimes trials held between 1962 and
1972. The testimony of these men was
important because, as Browning pointed
out, the Holocaust was only possible because
‘individual human beings killed other human
beings in large numbers over an extended
period of time’. Browning wanted to know
how these seemingly ordinary men had
become ‘professional killers’.
3.4b Understanding and using

the sources
1 Discuss your personal reaction to Sources
16 and 17. How do you interpret them?
2 What steps could you take to establish:
a the validity and reliability of Sources
16 and 17?
b the thoughts and motivations of the SOURCE 17 German soldiers lead rural Polish women into the forest to be
reservists and soldiers involved? shot. Browning argues that this type of behaviour became routine.

Browning adopted the critical approach to evidence and sources that is the key to
historical thinking. He acknowledged the limitations of the testimony of the old men
who were the survivors of Battalion 101, and pointed out that the testimony of Battalion
members had to be tested against other sources and the accounts of the surviving victims.
Specifically, Browning noted that some of these accounts might be clouded and confused
by selective memory. He also recognised that some of the men in the Battalion would be
willing to lie or give a version of events that depicted themselves in the best possible light,
due to fear of punishment.
Browning noted that his narrow interpretation of the actions of the members of
Battalion 101 might be criticised for shifting the focus away from the atrocities of the
Holocaust. In defence of his approach, Browning explained that, at the time, murderous
and criminal behaviour became part of everyday life and mass murder was no longer
exceptional. He asserted that his study of Battalion 101 confirmed the degree to which
mass murder had become routine. Browning maintains that trying to understand is not the
same as excusing or forgiving. According to Browning, the men of Battalion 101 were, for
the most part, middle-aged family men from lower-middle-class backgrounds who had been
drafted into the reservists.
So why did most men in Battalion 101 become killers? Browning presents a few different
theories to explain their behaviours, including:
> wartime brutalisation > ideological indoctrination
> racism > conformity.
> acceptance of authority and respect
for orders
Browning thought that the truth might lie in a combination of all these factors. The
men of Battalion 101 seem to have been brutalised ‘on the job’. In other words, the first
time they killed would have been the most difficult.
Through his focused interpretation and examination of Battalion 101, Browning was
able to draw wider conclusions through the critical use of a range of sources. Drawing on
evidence from various testimonies, and probing the reasons why people acted the way they
did, he shows how historians can sometimes stray into other fields – such as psychology –
to assist their construction of history.
3.4b Check your learning

1 Why would Christopher Browning have to be careful in relying on the testimony of the
survivors of Battalion 101 when constructing his history?
2 Do you think Browning’s interpretation of his sources helps you understand aspects of the
Holocaust more clearly? Support your response with examples from this section.
3 Discuss what you think were the contributing factors that enabled the men of Battalion
101 to become killers.

The Nuremberg War Crimes Trials 1945–49: where
interpretation and perspective meet
The horrors of the Holocaust increased pressure on the victors to do more than had ever been
done before to ensure that those guilty of crimes against humanity and peace were brought to
justice. In terms of its scale, the Holocaust had been unlike anything that had gone before. For
this very reason, the Holocaust and the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials saw, for the first time,
the use of the word ‘genocide’ in a trial.
Nuremberg established and redefined
many principles of international law. The
Nuremberg Principles – a set of guidelines for
determining what constitutes a war crime –
included the following:
> It is not a defence to say ‘I was only
following orders’. Everyone is responsible
for their own moral decisions.
> Murder, extermination, enslavement,
deportation and other inhumane acts done
against any civilian population are crimes
against humanity.
An important difference between the
end of the Second World War and the end
of other wars was that the winners did not
just punish their defeated enemies. The Nazi
SOURCE 18 The Nuremberg War Crimes Trials, 1946
leaders were given public trials and the chance
to offer arguments in their own defence.
The Nuremberg War Crimes Trials produced valuable sources for historians to interpret.
By hearing the perspective of those accused of war crimes, it ensured that Nazi viewpoints
became part of the historical record. This helped historians to consider a range of perspectives
when interpreting their sources, and thus helped ensure that history would not just reflect the
viewpoint of the winners.
3.4c Understanding and using the sources

1 Analyse Source 18. What does it reveal about the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials?
2 Research the career of Hermann Goering. Why was he on trial at Nuremberg? What would
be the strengths and weaknesses of his testimony for a historian?
3.4c Check your learning

1 Discuss the problems that could be associated with conducting trials such as those in
Nuremberg in 1945–49.
2 Create a Venn diagram with two circles – one to contain the strengths and one the
weaknesses of a historian relying on the testimonies of those charged at Nuremberg
as primary sources. Is there any overlap?
CH A P T E R 3 T HE CONST RUC TION OF MODERN HISTORIES: T HE HOLOCAUST 45

3.5 The role of selectivity, emphasis
and omission in the construction
of historical accounts
Holocaust deniers
people who seek
to either deny the
All historians have to make choices when they are constructing history. They choose which
Holocaust ever sources to use, how much emphasis to place on them, and which sources to ignore. Each
took place, or argue decision has a significant impact on the history that is being constructed. Bias occurs when
that the numbers
killed were wildly historians allow their personal feelings to interfere with the choices they make, rather than
exaggerated allowing their investigation to be objective.
David Irving and the construction of a case

for Holocaust denial
British writer David Irving is perhaps the most famous, or
infamous, of the Holocaust deniers. He maintains that many of
the claims made about the Holocaust are exaggerated or false. In
2006, an Austrian court sentenced Irving to three years in prison
after he pleaded guilty to the charge of denying the Holocaust.
This followed speeches he gave in Austria where he contested the
existence of gas chambers in Auschwitz and claimed that camp
victims died from disease rather than execution. He was released
after serving 13 months of his sentence, and banned from ever
returning to Austria. He now lectures to small, ticketed audiences,
and there is still a debate about whether he deserves to be
SOURCE 19 The Shoes on the Danube Bank, a described as a historian, or even as a historical writer.
Holocaust memorial in Budapest, Hungary
Irving is not a trained academic historian, but has written
extensively about the Nazi Regime and the Second World War,
and claims to have discovered the ‘objective truth’ about Nazi
Germany. This clearly contrasts with Christopher Browning’s
more careful approach, in meticulously and critically examining
a range of sources and perspectives when constructing his history
of Battalion 101. It is also at odds with Richard Evans’ approach.
Unlike Irving, Browning and Evans both recognise that there are
different ways of looking at sources and evidence.
Irving’s basic argument is that if an event has not been
documented in an archive, then it did not take place. This idea has
major implications for historians. In Australia, for example, such
SOURCE 20 David Irving under police guard
at a trial in Austria in 2006, where he was found
a view would mean that Indigenous perspectives could never be
guilty of Holocaust denial and sentenced to considered in constructing histories, because there are no archival
three years in prison records reflecting their oral tradition.

Irving also interprets historical documents in a different way to trained historians. Most
historians agree that documents should be read in context. But for Irving, the absence of an
explicit document indicating that Hitler ordered the deliberate murder of millions means
that there was no intent on Hitler’s part to do so. In proving his point, Irving also leaves out
many Nazi-related documents that do not support his preferred view. As an example, Irving
disregarded a record from March 1942, where Joseph Goebbels discussed Hitler demanding a
‘radical solution’ to the Jewish question, even if it meant resorting to the most brutal methods.

1 Outline the arguments for and against regarding David Irving as a historian. What is your
conclusion?
2 Is Irving entitled to write ‘history’ if he is selective in his sources, and ignores evidence that
contradicts his viewpoint? Does this mean he should be banned from speaking?
HISTORY ON TRIAL
3.5 PROFILE
In the 1990s, David Irving’s views were
challenged by American historian Deborah
Lipstadt, who wrote that Irving distorted
the truth. He responded by suing her and
her publishers, Penguin Books, for libel.
Irving said Lipstadt had falsely labelled
him a Holocaust denier, which affected
his reputation as a historian. The defence
argued that Irving had manipulated facts
and evidence, and therefore should be SOURCE 21 The Irving v Penguin Books and Deborah Lipstadt
case was made into the feature film Denial (2016), with Rachel Weisz
labelled a Holocaust denier.
playing the role of Lipstadt.
The case has been described as
‘putting history on trial’, with a court having
to decide what constituted ‘proper’ history. unable to undermine his testimony. Several
Irving’s use of sources was challenged by other well-known historians also appeared
the defence’s team, which included Richard for the defence, and one of these,
Evans as the lead witness. Evans and two architectural historian Robert Jan van
of his graduate students took 18 months Pelt, exposed Irving’s misunderstanding
to compile a 740-page report on Irving’s of the architecture of Auschwitz. The trial
works. Evans criticised Irving’s scholarship concluded in 2000 in favour of Penguin
and examination of sources, and Irving was and Lipstadt.
3.5 PROFILE TASKS

Research the Irving v Penguin Books and Deborah Lipstadt case.
1 Discuss the types of evidence Penguin Books and Lipstadt could have used to prove
their case.
2 Examine some of the arguments made during the case. Explain how they have helped
you understand how history is constructed.

CONCLUSION It should now be clear that history can be constructed in many different ways. However,
while there is no correct way to construct a history, there are clear requirements
regarding accuracy, ethical behaviour and critical examination of sources. In this chapter
you have examined the approaches of Richard Evans, Christopher Browning, and David
Irving to the history of the Holocaust. Their different approaches show why it is more
accurate to refer to ‘history’ as ‘histories’.
History is not a static field of study, and its dynamic approach to interpretation and
construction in the digital age presents new challenges for historians. As the ‘putting
history on trial’ court case showed, however, the demand for historians to be honest and
accurate when dealing with sources ensures that well-constructed histories will be valid.
SOURCE 22 Holocaust memorial sculpture by artist Kenneth Treister at the Holocaust Memorial
in Miami Beach, Florida, USA
FOR THE TEACHER

chapter

4
History and
Memory:
Autobiography

The use of memory in history Explanation and communication
introduces historians to a range As you access different types of
of new historical sources, such sources, think about how they
as autobiographies, audiobooks, can be effectively presented. If,
films and memoirs. These require for example, you are accessing
the same rigorous analysis that the memories of a musician, a
is applied to more traditional slideshow incorporating words,
historical sources. visual sources and music may be
Historical interpretation effective.
The deeply personal and
imperfect nature of memory LEARNING GOALS
Could a glowing review of an makes historical interpretation
Ed Sheeran concert influence critical if memory is to play > Gain an appreciation of the
attendees’ memories and lead
any role in history. It becomes role of memory in history.
them to mythologise their own
essential not only to establish > Develop the ability to critically
experience?
the historical context of the analyse and use historical
memory, but also to corroborate sources that rely on memory.
FOCUS QUESTIONS any memory that is being used as > Extend understanding of
evidence. what constitutes a historical
1 What role does memory play
in history? Historical investigation source.
and research > Critically examine the way
2 How can we analyse national
Memory considerably expands traditional history, including
memory in history?
the range of evidence available history in schools, is adapting
3 How is collective memory when conducting a historical to the range of material
reflected in history? investigation. available as historical sources.

4.1 Introduction
Memory is perhaps our greatest asset as humans. It allows us to link generations and
collective memory place ourselves in history. Our collective memory as a species has allowed humans
the memory of a to dominate the planet. Memory allows us to recall experiences, both trivial and life-
group of people,
passed from one changing, and our memories can be particularly vivid when linked to stimuli, such as
generation to sound or smell.
the next
We have become increasingly used to accessing peoples’ memories through
autobiographies, where people write the story of their own life. Some may be famous,
celebrating a life of achievement; others may simply be recording personal memories
for limited distribution to family and friends. Some write everything themselves, others
rely on a ghost writer; but all are using memory and creating historical sources. Their
usefulness, validity and reliability as sources in historical investigations have to be tested,
and this is a major focus of this chapter.
The value and significance of memory in history

In the digital age, students and historians have access to an ever-increasing array of
sources based in some way upon memory. They can be valuable as primary sources from
participants in an historical event. However, it is crucial that you learn to interrogate
these sources with a critical eye, rather than simply accept an account because the person
was involved in the event or time.
Consider the words of Robert Forster, the Australian singer and songwriter with
the band The Go-Betweens. Source 1 is an extract from his autobiography, Grant & I,
describing a memory of a day in 1972 when he was home from school sick.
SOURCE 1
I was sitting in the loungeroom chair enjoying the luxury of listening to the radio by day and
not a snatched half hour at night, and the dust in the air from my mother’s sweeping was
creating a glittering storm effect when from the radio came, ‘Didn’t know what time it was
the lights were low oh oh …’
Robert Forster, Grant & I: Inside and Outside
The Go-Betweens, 2016, p. 13
The song Forster is referring to is ‘Starman’ by David Bowie. The moment Forster
first heard Bowie was of such significance for him that he was able to recall the light in
the room when the song came on the radio. Does the fact that Forster’s memory appears
to be so precise make this a reliable historical source? Does the fact that he subsequently
became a major figure in Australian music colour his memory and attach greater
significance to the event? Is memory rendered unreliable because it often operates with
hindsight hindsight?
understanding
of a situation or
Many sources you will encounter in your study of history are firsthand accounts
event only after it based on memory, and these are the types of questions we have to ask when using
has happened or memory as a historical source.
developed

Source 2 is an extract from an interview with American singer Linda Ronstadt about her
autobiography, Simple Dreams (extracted in Source 3). Around this time, Ronstadt had revealed
that she was suffering from Parkinson’s disease, a condition that can have an effect on memory.
SOURCE 2
I’ve never written anything. I never wrote a journal or a diary, and I only
had one letter that my parents had saved – it was a story about the Doors
that I wrote about in the book, chartering a DC-3 and what it was like.
Otherwise it was from my memory, which is failing. I had to check with
everybody and ask, ‘Do you remember it this way?’ I had a good copy editor
who checked dates and stuff like that. Otherwise I’d have people dying way
before they ever had children.
Jeff Tamarkin, interview with Linda Ronstadt, Best Classic Bands website, 2013
SOURCE 3
The next day we had a show in Boston. We went to the airport early in the
morning to find that a massive snowstorm had grounded all the planes …
so we waited several hours while [manager Herb Cohen] chartered a DC-3
passenger aircraft. But we still didn’t have a pilot … Herb found someone
who flew in his spare time … We were all green faced with motion sickness,
SOURCE 4 Linda Ronstadt receiving the 2013
and in a propeller plane it took us two and a half hours to get to Boston. National Medal of Arts from President Barack
Linda Ronstadt, Simple Dreams, 2013, p. 45 Obama in the White House

1 Think about the oldest memory you have, as well as your most precious memory.
a Talk to someone who can corroborate or challenge these memories. This may be corroborate
someone you shared the memory with, someone who was an observer, or someone who to confirm or
is linked by time or place. give support to a
statement, theory or
b Analyse the different perceptions of the memories that are revealed by your discussions. finding
c Explain what this tells you about history, and what issues it reveals about relying on
memory as a historical source.
2 What would you call your autobiography if you wrote it at this stage of life?

1 Analyse Source 1. Do you believe that Robert Forster’s precise recalling of this situation
makes his autobiography more or less reliable as a historical source?
2 Read Source 2 carefully. Would a historian worry about using Linda Ronstadt’s
autobiography as an historical source if she only had one letter from the time to refer back
to? Is Ronstadt’s ‘failing memory’ made more valid by the techniques she talks about using
to verify her memories?
3 Source 3 is Ronstadt’s account of the ‘story about the Doors’, based on the letter she refers
to in Source 2. Does this make Source 3 a reliable source? Do you feel Ronstadt’s memory
has been corroborated in these two sources?
4 Source 4 indicates that Ronstadt has achieved considerable success in her career. Does this
have any impact on the value of her autobiography as a historical source?
CH A P T E R 4 HISTORY AND MEMORY: AU TOBIOGR A PH Y 51

4.2 History and memoir
Every history student has been told to ‘back up your claims with evidence’ and asked ‘where are
memoir your sources?’ Writing about a historical question is different from writing a memoir, because
a historical account
of the emphasis by historians to assess the reliability of their sources.
or biography written
from personal British journalist Ian Jack, in an article in The Guardian newspaper (9 February 2003),
knowledge describes a memoir as wanting ‘to do more than record the past; it wants to re-create it’. He
then goes on to ask a key question that needs to be considered if you are using a memoir as a
historical source: ‘Who can remember with any exactness how things were with themselves and
others 50, or 40 or 10 years ago?’
In Source 1, Robert Forster recreates the moment he first heard

David Bowie with precise detail. Jack’s question means that you
have to ascertain whether that detail is the result of the significance
of the moment etching the detail in Forster’s memory, or whether it
is simply serving as a literary flourish. For the historian examining
the contribution of Forster and The Go-Betweens to Australian
culture, this account may be less important than other known
information, such as the significance of Bowie as an influence
on Forster. A primary source, such as music charts that show
‘Starman’ entering the Australian charts in November 1972, would
also corroborate Forster’s recollections.
Linda Ronstadt’s battles with Parkinson’s disease, and its impact
on her memory (which she alludes to in Source 2), illustrate the
need for any history relying on memory to be thoroughly checked
before it can be regarded as a reliable source. Ronstadt’s awareness
of this has ensured that she has already taken steps to help
corroborate her own memory, arguably increasing the reliability of
her work.

1 How would you explain the difference between history and
memoir?
2 What role can memoirs and autobiographies play as sources for
understanding of a historical event?
3 Ian Jack asks the question: ‘Who can remember with any
exactness how things were with themselves and others 50, or
40 or 10 years ago?’
a As a class, discuss significant historical moments that you
have lived through. Develop a list and ask each other what
SOURCE 5 David Bowie: a significant influence you remember about any of those events.
on Robert Forster b Discuss the results and decide as a class what you think the
answer to Jack’s question is.

The tensions between national memory and different
perspectives of the past
Certain events become deeply ingrained in a country’s history,
culture and sense of national identity, and the national ceremonies
that celebrate or commemorate them can be regarded as ‘national
memoirs’. Anzac Day in Australia is one example. There is
widespread acceptance of the date – 25 April – and the ceremonies
associated with Anzac Day. This does not mean, however,
that national ceremonies are not open to changing historical
interpretations.
Consider the emerging debate over the celebration of Australia
Day on 26 January. From one historical perspective, this date
commemorates the official beginning of British colonisation of
Australia and the start of the Australian nation. A competing
perspective is that the date recognises the British invasion of
the Australian continent, and the illegal seizure of Indigenous
Australian lands.
Youth radio network Triple J has led the debate on this
potentially divisive issue. Triple J’s musical countdown on Australia
Day, ‘Hottest 100’, has become a significant event for many
Australians. In 2017, however, the network stated that it would
review the timing of the ‘Hottest 100’, and consult widely. The
SOURCE 6 Young Australians celebrate
issue was also brought into greater focus by ‘January 26’, a song by Australia Day by the beach.
Indigenous Australian duo A.B. Original that came in at number
16 on the 2016 ‘Hottest 100’ countdown. This song challenges the
ongoing acceptance of 26 January as a national day, making the case
for change.
SOURCE 7
We have to make ourselves uncomfortable to be able to make everyone else

uncomfortable to initiate change, because if we’re all comfortable, nothing
is going to change.
Adam Briggs of A.B. Original, discussing the need to change the
date of Australia Day, 7.30, ABC Radio, 26 January 2017
SOURCE 8
Mr Joyce said he was tired of people ‘weeping’ about Australia Day. ‘Today
is a day about celebration,’ he said. ‘I’m just sick of these people who, every
time, they want to make us feel guilty about it ... They don’t like Australia
Day, they’re just miserable ... and I wish they’d crawl under a rock and hide
for a little bit’. SOURCE 9 Adam Briggs performs with A.B.
Padraig Collins, ‘Deputy PM tells Australia Day protesters to Original at St Jerome's Laneway Festival,
“crawl under a rock” ’, The Irish Times, 26 January 2017 Brisbane, 26 January 2017.

1 Analyse the debate over 26 January in Australian society. Outline the competing
perspectives, and also the historical arguments those perspectives represent. Discuss why
Australia is even considering changing the date for this national ceremony.
2 Analyse the different perspectives of the Australia Day issue presented in Sources 7 and 8.
In pairs, write a conversation between Adam Briggs and Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby
Joyce where they explain their perspectives to each other, and present it to the class. Which
aspects of national memory would Briggs and Joyce be drawing from?
3 Create a collage of images that could all be included under the heading ‘Australia Day’.
Analyse them and discuss what they have in common.
TESTIMONIES OF REFUGEES
4.2 PROFILE
Najeeba Wazefadost arrived in Australia in 2000. Her family

escaped from Afghanistan when she was 12, and took the journey
by boat from Indonesia to Australia. In 2012, Wazefadost was
asked to share her story as part of a Refugee Week campaign to
have Australians put faces and personalities to refugees.
As Australia’s treatment of refugees becomes an increasingly
controversial aspect of our history, the testimonies of people like
Wazefadost will become important source material for historians.
The memories of refugees will be essential in any historical
investigation if a fair and valid understanding is to be established.
SOURCE 11
It was a horrifying journey to come to Australia by boat, or

I should actually call it a piece of wood. We had to sit in the
boat for more than a week, just hoping to survive. We risked
being drowned in the Pacific Ocean.
We had no clue that we would arrive in Australia and be
SOURCE 10 Afghan refugee Najeeba
Wazefadost imprisoned in a place like Curtin detention centre. The first
thing we saw was security guards with guns coming towards
us. We were coming from a war-torn country where we were
really traumatised. I was a child, and being detained in a jail-like
environment only added to that trauma.
Najeeba Wazefadost’s account, reported on <abc.net.au>
4.2 PROFILE TASKS

1 Explain why the memories of refugees such as Najeeba Wazefadost would ‘be essential
in any historical investigation if a fair and valid understanding is to be established’.
2 Read Source 11. Analyse the impact of Wazefadost’s memories on your own perception of
refugees. Explain why you accept or reject her account as a reliable source of information.

4.3 The contribution of oral history
to understanding the past
oral history Oral history refers to information gathered through the recording of memories. The term
the collection and
study of historical
‘oral history’ is used because the information is transmitted by voice. Oral history usually
information using refers to an interview, quite often done with the explicit purpose of gaining access to a
sound recordings person’s memories about a time, place or event. Frequently, oral history is most valuable in
of interviews
with people
the areas of social and cultural history; collecting oral testimonies can often reveal the small
who remember details of daily life that larger-scale narratives ignore.
past events
Many autobiographies, particularly those which nominate a co-author, are often based
on hours of interviews. In this way, they often preserve valuable memories and act as
a written summary of oral history. Autobiographies and interviews can help historians
understand the past, and often provide unique perspectives that are overlooked in
mainstream historical accounts.
Indigenous Australian oral histories

Although they have probably been part of Australia’s history for at least 60 000 years,
Indigenous Australian oral histories have been largely ignored by ‘traditional history’. The
emerging acceptance of the role of memory and oral history into mainstream historical
studies opens exciting opportunities for a re-evaluation of Indigenous oral histories in
historiography Australian historiography.
the study of the
construction of
history Gathering oral histories
The process of gathering oral histories needs to comply with strict ethical guidelines that concern
a range of issues such as privacy, the right to use material in a public forum, confidentiality,
and giving interviewees the right to review, correct and withdraw material. Even in a classroom
setting, collecting any oral history has to be conducted under strict ethical protocols.

1 Analyse the value of oral history for a historian. What would be a good example of oral
history aiding historical understanding?
2 Research the role of oral tradition in Indigenous Australian culture and history. How
could a greater understanding and acceptance of this influence Australian history and
historiography?
3 Design an oral history project that you could conduct. Consider the following:
> the area of investigation your oral history interview could contribute to
> the person you could conduct the interview with
> the ethical considerations necessary to conduct the interview
> how you will record the interview and present the information you find
> how conducting this project could deepen your historical understanding of your area
of investigation.

The Cold War and sources based on memory
The increasing availability of oral and autobiographical sources allows historians to broaden the
Cold War scope of their historical inquiries. The Cold War, for example, has traditionally been observed
the state of political through the prism of political history, but oral and autobiographical histories provide rich
conflict and hostility
that existed between source material that allows for deeper and broader perspectives. Consider how the following
the Soviet Union and sources could add depth to the historical understanding of an investigation into the Cold War.
the United States
from 1945 to 1990
SOURCE 12
In 1969, Czechoslovakia was part of an Eastern European Rock and Roll Festival, endorsed by
the Soviets, and the festival’s organizers approached the State Department and asked if The Beach
Boys would participate. We were supposedly the only rock group in America that was acceptable
… We accepted the invitation, and a representative from the State Department flew into Los
Angeles and swore us in as official ambassadors.
Mike Love with James S. Hirsch, Good Vibrations: My Life as a Beach Boy, 2016, p. 220
SOURCE 13
[In 1988] I brought my band to East Berlin … 160 000-plus East Germans showed up. The
wall still stood, but the first cracks were definitely appearing in its once impregnable façade.
Conditions were not what they had been a decade ago. There in an open field stood the largest
single crowd I’d ever seen or played to … Home-stitched American flags flew in the East
German wind.
Bruce Springsteen, Born To Run, 2016, p. 352
4.3 Understanding and using

the sources
The following questions refer to Sources 12,
13 and 14.
1 Explain how these sources contribute to
your understanding of the Cold War. Why
might these perspectives be valuable to
historians?
2 Research the term ‘soft power’. How
could these sources contribute to an
understanding of the role of soft power in
the Cold War?
3 Explain how the memories of the East
Germans shown in Source 14 could be
useful and reliable sources for historians
investigating the end of Communism
in Eastern Europe. What other types
of sources would help challenge or
SOURCE 14 Fans of Bruce Springsteen gather at a concert in East Berlin, corroborate these memories?
19 July 1988.

4.4 Expressions of collective memory
‘Expressions of collective memory’ refers to how the memory of a community may be stored
and transmitted. These can range from local histories preserving the memory and heritage of
local areas, to statues commemorating past events or contributions by significant individuals.
The Explorers’ Monument in Fremantle, Western Australia, illustrates how
memory can be a highly contested field for historical interpretation and the
construction of histories. The monument, unveiled in 1913, is a statue of explorer
and politician Maitland Brown, set on a base inset with plaques (see Source 15).
The top plaque commemorates the deaths of explorers Frederick Panter, James
Harding and William Goldwyer at the hands of Aboriginal Australians near La
Grange Bay in Western Australia in 1864; and the career of Brown, who led a
punitive expedition to return the remains of the three men the following year. The
inscription refers to the deaths of the explorers as murder by ‘treacherous natives’.
Brown is described as ‘one of the pioneer pastoralists and premier politicians of this
state’. The plaque concludes with ‘Lest We Forget’.
The second plaque was added in 1994 after ongoing challenges to the collective
SOURCE 15 Part memory displayed in the first plaque. The new plaque comments that ‘the monument describes
of the Explorers’ the events at La Grange from one perspective only: the viewpoint of the white settlers’. It notes
Monument,
that Brown’s expedition resulted in ‘the deaths of somewhere around twenty Aboriginal people’. It
Esplanade Reserve,
Fremantle, Western also concludes with ‘Lest We Forget’ and ‘Mapa Jarriya-Nyalaku’, mirroring the traditional White
Australia perspective with an Indigenous manifestation.
SOURCE 16
punitive THIS MONUMENT WAS ERECTED BY C. J. BROCKMAN as a fellow bush wanderer’s

intended as tribute to the memories of PANTER, HARDING and GOLDWYER, earliest explorers after
punishment Grey and Gregory of this Terra Incognita, attacked at night by treacherous natives [they] were
murdered at Boola Boola near [La] Grange Bay on the 13th November 1864.
Also as an appreciative token of remembrance of MAITLAND BROWN one of the pioneer
pastoralists and premier politicians of this state. Intrepid leader of the government search and
punitive party. His remains together with the sad relics of the ill fated three recovered with great
risk and danger from lone wilds repose under a public monument in the East Perth Cemetery.
Lest We Forget.
The inscription on the plaque on the top, unveiled in 1913
SOURCE 17
This plaque was erected by people who found the monument before you offensive.
The monument described the events at La Grange from one perspective only; the viewpoint
of the white ‘settlers’. No mention is made of the right of Aboriginal people to defend their land
or of the history of provocation which led to the explorers’ deaths. The ‘punitive party’ mentioned
here ended in the deaths of somewhere around twenty Aboriginal people. The whites were well-
armed and equipped and none of their party was killed or wounded. This plaque is in memory of
the Aboriginal people killed at La Grange. It also commemorates all other Aboriginal people who
died during the invasion of their country.
Lest We Forget. Mapa Jarriya-Nyalaku.
The inscription on the second plaque, added in 1994

SOURCE 18 An engraving by C. Robinson for The Illustrated London News, 7 October 1865: ‘Finding the remains of the lost
explorers, Harding, Panter, and Goldwyer, near Lagrange Bay, North-West Australia’

Describe what you understand by the term ‘collective memory’. List a range of examples that
you feel qualify as collective memory, and explain why you think they do.

1 Explain how Source 15 could be used as evidence in a discussion about collective memory
and what comprises history.
2 Identify the perspectives that are presented in Sources 16 and 17.
3 Discuss the ways in which Sources 16 and 17 could be used as historical sources. How could
a historian verify the information contained in these inscriptions?
4 Explain how the inscriptions shown in Sources 16 and 17 help you understand and explain
important historical concepts, including:
> different perspectives
> reliability of sources
> continuity and change
> significance
> interpretation.
5 How could Indigenous Australian oral traditions balance the view given in the plaque?

The concert experience – where memory can become myth
Music concerts, sporting events, plays, dances and other forms of cultural interaction are a rich
source of personal memories. As most occur in the public space, they are also often reviewed in
public areas, such as social media and traditional media. Reviews can be a powerful influence
on collective and individual memory. A positive review can lead people to start mythologising vested interests
personal interests
their own experience. What becomes critical when using reviews as a historical source is to that may influence a
consider the perspective of the reviewer, and to also research whether they have any vested perspective
interests in the review.
SOURCE 19 A review of Adele’s concert, ANZ

Stadium, Sydney, 10 March 2017
When a quite massive show – of construction,

technology and staging – that really should
have been done from a conventional, face-
everyone-all-the-time stage, still feels
human-scale (and you could almost say living
room-scale) something is being done right
somewhere.
And whatever other quibbles there may
be, such as When We Were Young being
preposterous, Take It All is a mighty song.
Every man or woman would agree.
Bernard Zuel, ‘Adele review: She’s all human –
every man and woman would agree’,
Sydney Morning Herald, 10 March 2017

1 Think of a concert or similar cultural
experience that you have attended.
a Conduct some research to find a
review of the event. Does it match
your perception of the event? Does
it influence the way you remember
the event?
b Write a review of the event and swap
it with a classmate. Can they correctly
identify your perspective?
2 Does the fact that Bernard Zuel was
employed by the Sydney Morning Herald
to write reviews impact on the reliability of
Source 19? Explain your answer.
3 To what extent does a historian need to SOURCE 20 Adele in concert at ANZ Stadium, Sydney, 10 March 2017
consider the commercial considerations
that may have impacted upon the area they are investigating? Discuss areas where you
think this may be significant. To what extent do you think your own memory is impacted
by commercial activity, such as advertising and promotion?

CONCLUSION This chapter has explored the role that memory plays in the construction and
understanding of history, and the challenges this can present for historians. As any student
of history knows, societies change, and so do understandings of not only what comprises
history, but also what constitutes a valid and reliable historical source. As the world
undergoes a digital revolution, historians constantly have to refine their understanding of
sources. Historical memory is an important part of that process.
Each generation has collective memory of historical events they have experienced. They
also have accounts from the collective memory of the previous generation, of the events that
generation lived through. In this way, collective memory is transferred across generations.
Many of these memories have been recorded on film (for documentaries), or in
oral histories or autobiographies. The increasing availability of such sources allows
historians to broaden the scope of their historical inquiries. The emergence of rock ’n’ roll
autobiographies and memoirs, for example, has not only shed light on the origins and
influence of rock ’n’ roll as a major cultural and historical change, but has also allowed for
the introduction of new perspectives on significant events such as the Cold War.
Historians will always face the challenge of confronting potential distortions of
understanding from faulty memory, as well as deliberate manipulations of historical
record. Your challenge as a Modern History student is to recognise not only key facts, but
also the sources that allow you to verify what is fact, what is distortion, what is memory,
and what can be supported with evidence.
Could a glowing review of an Ed Sheeran concert influence attendees’ memories and lead them to
mythologise their own experience?
SOURCE 21 The Berlin Wall was a symbol of the Cold War, and its fall in 1989 marked the war’s
approaching end.
FOR THE TEACHER

chapter

5
The Representation
and Commemoration
of the Past: Film,
Michelle Dockery as Lady
Mary Crawley in Downton Television and History
Abbey. Watching a film
or television program can
be an easy way to gain
historical understanding,
but how reliable is it as a Historical interpretation
source for constructing our Complicating the role of film
historical understanding? and television as components Historical investigation
of historical understanding is and research
the reality that they may often
FOCUS QUESTIONS Film opens up a huge range of
represent an artistic response,
source material for historians in
1 How can film and television rather than a traditional historical
the modern world. It is important
be used to assist our historical interpretation of history and
that you develop a series of
understanding? historical sources. As a student of
questions that will enable you to
history you must be aware of the
2 What are the strengths and assess the historical validity of
need to interrogate not only the
weaknesses of using film a film that you may use in your
film or television program itself,
and television to study and investigation, to help you come
but also its maker.
understand history? to a decision about how useful it
Explanation and communication will be as a source.
3 Why is it important to use and
understand film and television An argument will be made that
film and television allow for a LEARNING GOALS
as a historical source?
deeper understanding of history
on an emotional level. This is > Gain an appreciation of the role
KEY CONCEPTS AND SKILLS because film and television of film and television in history.
are often able to convey a > Develop the ability to critically
Analysis and use of sources sense of experience in a way analyse and use film and
Film and television introduce that establishes an emotional television as historical sources.
historians to a range of new connection with a topic. If
historical sources that have been that understanding can be > Extend understanding of what
widely disregarded by ‘traditional communicated to you, it raises a constitute historical sources.
history’. These require the same crucial question: can you also use > Critically examine the way
rigorous analysis that is applied the film or television program traditional history, including
to the historical sources that effectively as a source to history in schools, is adapting
historians and students have communicate your own historical to the range of material
been using for over a century. understanding? available as historical sources.

5.1 Introduction
In this chapter we investigate how the past
is represented and commemorated through
film and television. We examine how film
and television can be critically analysed as
historical sources, and consider examples of
films and television programs that represent
and commemorate the past.
Surveys have shown that more than
80 per cent of people have learnt about
the past in the previous year by watching
a film or television series based on history.
In recent years, film and television have
become omnipresent and powerful
media in terms of their use in historical
investigations.
Watching a film or television program
can be an easy way to gain historical SOURCE 1 Ralph Fiennes and Keira Knightley in
The Duchess (2008) – the costume designer is just
understanding, but it also raises the one member of the creative team, each of whom
important question of just how reliable it is brings their own understanding of an event to
as a source for constructing our historical the screen.
understanding. Consider how many creative
decisions are involved in the making of films and television programs. There is input from
writers, directors, producers, set designers and costume designers, each of whom bring their
own understanding of an event to the screen. The skills of the historian – such as critically
evaluating sources of evidence – are becoming more and more important in order to make
sense of the ‘history’ that is presented on large and small screens.
SOURCE 2 The
film Hidden Figures
(2016) examined the
careers of female
African American
workers at NASA
in the late 1950s
and early 1960s. It
has been praised
for challenging
stereotypes based
on gender and
race, but historians
using it in their
investigations would
have to consider
whether it is reliable
as a historical
source.

Think about the sources that future historians will be using to
develop a historical understanding of today. One example is Donald
Trump’s election as the 45th President of the United States. Trump’s
profile was enhanced with the public because of his long-term
exposure as a reality television star on The Apprentice. This allowed
him to gain far more coverage and recognition prior to the election
campaign than other candidates, and it is difficult to imagine that
any future historical consideration of the Trump presidency would
exclude coverage of his reality television role. In addition, when
analysing Trump’s inauguration ceremony in 2017 – which was the
subject of debate about the size of the crowds, compared with Barack
Obama’s in 2009 – historians will undoubtedly be examining SOURCE 3 Donald Trump’s profile as a reality
television footage of both ceremonies, just as earlier historians have television star allowed him to gain more public
analysed photographs, eyewitness accounts and diaries. recognition than other political candidates.
The public nature of history and its uses

If we take time to look around us, we soon realise that we are surrounded by history. Spend
some time looking around your school. How old is it? What visible indications are there of
its past, such as past achievements of former students? Consider the suburb you live in. Is
there a ‘historic’ area or building? What is the historical significance of its name?
History in the public sphere tells us about the past, but it can also be used to create
identity or a sense of connection within societies or nations. Consider the concept of
citizenship. People who want to be citizens of a country often have to pledge alliance to
certain values, such as having respect for freedom of religion and commitment to the rule
of law. This is an example of history being used by governments to unify a nation behind
values and beliefs that are presented as having historical resonance with today’s society. Film
and television can be powerful media to convey historical representations of a country and
for building a national understanding of a common past.

1 Reflect upon the films and television programs you have viewed in the past year, and
identify those that could qualify as being historically based.
a Outline the historical understandings you have gained from these films or television
programs.
b Discuss how historically reliable you believe they are.
2 Discuss whether film and television programs qualify as valid historical sources and
include examples that support your view.
3 Research the film Hidden Figures (2016) (see Source 2) and identify the types of
information that would help you to evaluate how reliable the film is as a historical source.
4 Research photographs comparing the size of the crowds at the inaugurations of President
Trump in 2017 and President Obama in 2009. Discuss whether television footage of the
two inaugurations would be more valid and reliable sources than the photographs.
5 Discuss what you can identify as public uses of history in your local area.
CH A P T E R 5 T HE REPRESENTATION AND COMMEMOR ATION OF T HE PAST: FILM, TELE VISION AND HISTORY 63

5.2 The need for critical analysis of film
and television representations
of the past
It is important to recognise that the same critical analysis that is applied to more
traditional sources – such as diary entries, government records and newspaper articles –
should be applied to film and television sources. For each new source we have to consider
questions such as:
> Who made the film or television program?
> What was their perspective?
> Are they biased?
> Were there any organisations involved in funding or supporting the production?
> What other historical sources were used in constructing understanding and
interpretation of the past?
> When was the production made? Did the context at the time influence the end product?
Above all, it is important to remember that film and television programs are reconstructions
and historical interpretations. Like all historical accounts, they are manufactured products
that tell only one version of a story.
The limitations of film and television as historical resources

One of the limitations of film and television programs is the limited amount of content
they can contain. A typical film runs for about two hours, which limits the amount of
information that can be presented when compared with, for example, a 500-page history
book. A film is also unable to present information such as footnotes, which allow authors
to establish the identity and reliability of their sources.
It also has to be remembered that film and television programs are made by commercial
enterprises, designed to make a profit for those people who have invested money in the
project. The result is a pressure to make the film or television program commercially
successful. It should always be remembered that this, rather than historical accuracy, is the
main drive behind film and television productions.
Finally, films and television programs are made by people with different tastes and who
are influenced by aspects such as industry trends, and what is considered politically correct or
socially acceptable at any given time. In other words, historical films and television programs
can reflect the time they are made, as much as the time they are trying to recreate.
Consider the Vietnam War–era film The Green Berets (1968), which was filmed and
released while the war was ongoing. Now compare this film with those made well after
the war ended, such as Apocalypse Now (1979) or Platoon (1986). As a historian, you should
carefully consider how the timing of a film’s release would have impacted on the choices
made by its producers, writers, directors and actors.

1 Explain why is it important to remember that all historical accounts are manufactured
products, whether they are in the form of books, articles, documentaries, films or television
programs. How does this impact on the way you approach them as historical sources?
2 Identify a film or television program you have viewed that could be used as a historical
source. How could you, working as a historian, ensure that you analyse the source in a way
that gives it credibility and validity?
SOURCE 4
We may think that the content of American

movies is free from government interference,
but in fact, the Pentagon has been telling
filmmakers what to say – and what not to
say – for decades. It’s Hollywood’s dirtiest
little secret.
David L. Robb, Operation Hollywood:
How the Pentagon shapes and censors
the movies, 2004, p. 25
SOURCE 5
Don Baruch, the longtime head of the

Pentagon’s film office, was worried. He’d
given the OK for the Defense Department
to go all out in support of the new John
Wayne movie, ‘The Green Berets’ … He was
worried that it was perhaps too obviously … a
government sponsored propaganda film. SOURCE 6 John Wayne on the set of his Vietnam War–era movie The
David L. Robb, Operation Hollywood: Green Berets, released in 1968
How the Pentagon shapes and censors
the movies, 2004, p. 277

1 Explain the impact Source 4 would have on a historian’s methodology when using film as a
historical source.
2 Don Baruch, mentioned in Source 5, was eventually successful in having the Department
of Defense removed from the credits of The Green Berets, despite its provision of
resources and support. How does Source 5 help you understand why he was so keen for
that to happen?
3 Examine Source 6 carefully. Can you identify anything that could have been supplied by the
US Department of Defense? If there were things supplied by the government for this film,
discuss how this could compromise its historical validity.

5.3 Investigating the ways that films
represent and commemorate the past
Historical dramas have been popular with Australian audiences since the very earliest days of
television. In 1960, for example, the ABC produced the miniseries Stormy Petrel, about the life
and times of Governor William Bligh, commander of HMS Bounty, and it proved to be a great
success. In 1978, Against the Wind – a miniseries set among convicts in New South Wales – was
the first major Australian production to be broadcast in the United States. This was followed
by a boom in historical Australian films in the 1980s, which coincided with an emerging sense
of Australian identity and confidence as the Australian economy transformed and boomed.
Rabbit-Proof Fence (2002)

Phillip Noyce’s film Rabbit-Proof Fence – based on real events and adapted from the 1996
book Follow the Rabbit-Proof Fence by Doris Pilkington – tells of Australia’s Stolen Generation
through the story of three young Aboriginal girls: sisters Molly (14) and Daisy (8), and their
cousin Gracie (10). The girls are forcibly removed from their families in Jigalong, Western
Australia, by the government, which wanted to integrate Indigenous children into White
Australian society. The girls are taken to the Moore River Native Settlement, north of Perth,
but manage to escape. They return to their families by following a rabbit-proof fence across the
state for 2400 km.
SOURCE 7 A poster for the film Rabbit-Proof Fence (2002)

Debate surrounding this film has been an ongoing feature of Australia’s so-called ‘history
history wars
wars’ since its release in 2002. Although commonly studied in classrooms across Australia, debate over the
Rabbit-Proof Fence has received substantial criticism for the way it portrays history. meaning and
impact of British
One of the loudest critics is Australian writer and historian Keith Windschuttle, who has colonisation on
used the film as an example of fabrication and invention. Windschuttle called the film ‘grossly Australia, and the
consideration
inaccurate’ and even argued that it should not be shown in schools at all. Windschuttle’s
of Indigenous
criticism is mainly focused on the reason for the girls’ removal from their families. According perspectives in
to historical records, the girls had been ‘running wild’ with white men in the area. At the time, understanding that
meaning and impact
‘running wild’ was a euphemism for having sex. Windschuttle argued that the children were
not removed by a racist government, but because they were being used by older men for sex and
hence needed the state’s protection.
The debate around Rabbit-Proof Fence raises the point that in history, truth and fact –
although linked – are not the same thing. For example, the film features a powerful scene
where the girls are thrown into the back of a car by a police constable and driven away,
leaving behind their grieving female relatives. As Windschuttle has correctly pointed out, the
actual removal was far less dramatic. The girls left the Jigalong settlement on horseback and,
according to Windschuttle, ‘Molly was taken without a struggle and with the acquiescence of
her stepfather who was present at the time’.
However, the scene in question – although at odds with some of the details of this particular
removal – still conveys crucial historical truths, notably a sense of the emotional trauma and
powerlessness experienced by anyone in a similar situation. It raises an important point for you
to consider when analysing film – that something can be truthful, without being completely
factually accurate.

1 Research the Australian miniseries boom
of the 1980s. What historical periods
and personalities were covered in this
period? Do more recent miniseries reflect
continuity or change in the representation
of Australia’s historical past?
2 View the film Rabbit-Proof Fence.
a Explain how it increased your historical
understanding.
b Discuss why you would or would not
recommend it to other school students SOURCE 8 This powerful scene from Rabbit-Proof Fence is at odds with
studying this period of Australian the actual events.
history.
3 Research Keith Windschuttle’s criticism of Rabbit-Proof Fence. After your own research, do
you think his criticism:
a is valid?
b establishes the film as an unreliable text for historical understanding?

How does Source 7 help you understand the way filmmakers can represent history and
construct historical meaning?

Schindler’s List (1993)
The Holocaust is an important, powerful and emotional subject (see Chapter 3). For this
reason, it is no surprise that Steven Spielberg received both praise and criticism for his film
Schindler’s List, based on the 1982 book Schindler’s Ark by Australian author Thomas Keneally.
The film deals with the story of a German businessman, Oskar Schindler, who was moved to
save the lives of more than a thousand Polish Jews from death in the Nazi-run concentration
camps by employing them in his factories.
Some critics of the film have questioned how a catastrophe such as the Holocaust could ever
be entertainment, while others point to the fact that the film was inspired by a book which –
although based on real people and events – was written in the form of a novel.
Spielberg’s decisions to shoot the film in black and white and to use cinéma vérité also
resulted in criticism. Cinéma vérité, meaning ‘truthful cinema’, is a creative technique that often
involves using handheld cameras to give the audience the impression that they are part of the
action. The choice of filming in black and white further gives the impression of watching old
documentary film or news footage.
The critics claimed that this was all Hollywood-style staging, rather than truthful
representation. They also objected to the plot featuring a non-Jew as the hero and a happy
ending. Finally, critics have challenged the fact that the focus and theme of the film are on
survival, when the reality of the Holocaust was that millions of people died.
Despite the criticism, Schindler’s List went on to be hugely successful and received wide
public acclaim. Perhaps most importantly, it reminded people – even in an imperfect way – of
the horrors of the Holocaust.
The girl in the red coat

One of the most dramatic and memorable sequences of Schindler’s List takes place as the
ghetto German soldiers clear one of the Jewish ghettos, while Schindler watches from a hill top. As
a section of a town with the rest of the film, the scene is shot in black and white – with one exception. Amid scenes
or city established by
the Nazis during the of families being rounded up, to be bundled into trucks or lined up and shot, a small girl in a
Second World War red coat wanders through the streets. She stands out in the scene as her coat is the only thing
to confine Jews and that is coloured. As the scene progresses, the last the audience sees of the little girl in red is her
other ‘undesirables’,
and isolate them hiding from the soldiers as the director cuts the scene.
from the wider In a scene later in the film, Schindler sees dead bodies piled on carts being wheeled away
population
to be burnt on fires. Then, on one of the carts, amid all the other corpses, he sees a small body
in a red coat, again standing out against the black and white. Both Schindler and the audience
understand that the girl has not survived.
Spielberg’s creative choice was made in order for us to focus on, and empathise with, the
little girl. It individualises the murders and it offers a tantalising but futile sense of hope.
Individualising victims in this manner is one of the ways in which Hollywood can
communicate important historical truths. The huge number of Holocaust victims and their
collective stories can numb the brain. The ‘Hollywood-style’ vignette of the small girl in
the red coat makes the deaths and the Holocaust more individual and personal. In that, this
sequence of the film does present a deep and valid historical truth. The Holocaust is not one
story; rather, it is more than six million separate and individual stories. As in the case of the girl
in the red coat, it must have contained individual elements of fear, hope and despair.

SOURCE 9 The
little girl in the
red coat from
Steven Spielberg’s
Schindler’s
List (1993)
The image of the girl in the red coat, as a filmic device, also
contributes to another element of understanding. For the people
who lived through the Holocaust, it was a minute-by-minute and
day-by-day reality. When we first see the little girl hiding, we are
left thinking that she might survive. Through this filmic device, the
audience is drawn into the time frame of the Holocaust.

1 Read reviews of Schindler’s List and, in columns, note down
positive and negative points reviewers have made about the film.
Review these points, and discuss whether there is any evidence
that reviewers regard the film as a reliable source of historical
understanding.
2 Do you think Steven Spielberg’s decision to film Schindler’s List in black
and white adds historical authenticity to the film? Why or why not?

1 Examine Source 9 and comment on the effectiveness of using
the red coat as a film technique. Do you think that encouraging SOURCE 10 A carbon copy of one of 13 pages
empathy by using such techniques helps with developing a of the original Schindler’s list of 801 Jews from
historical understanding? 1945. It was found in Sydney among a collection
2 Why is the existence of a real ‘Schindler’s list’, as shown in Source 10, of documents archived from material provided
important for historians? Does it have any impact upon the film’s by Thomas Keneally, author of Schindler’s Ark.
historical validity?

Saving Private Ryan (1998)
In 1998 Steven Spielberg again turned to history as the basis for a film. This time the subject
matter was the invasion of Normandy in the Second World War. The film, inspired by a true
story, follows Captain John Miller (Tom Hanks) as he goes behind enemy lines to retrieve
paratrooper James Ryan (Matt Damon), the last survivor of four brothers.
Although the film is loosely based on the fate of the Niland brothers from New York, many
of the characters and events in the film are fictionalised. Nevertheless, like other films with
historical themes, Saving Private Ryan can contribute to our understanding of the emotions and
sensations of war.
Three scenes are especially worth analysing. The opening scene
of the film shows an old man, a war veteran, visiting the US military
cemetery at Omaha Beach. Through a series of close-ups, it is obvious
that the old man is overcome by memories and emotion. His wife and
family follow at a distance. There is a powerful emotional historical
truth reconstructed in the sequence. Only war veterans, or those with
relatives who had been part of the trauma of war, would have seen and
felt this emotional connection firsthand.
In another scene, a military car approaches an isolated rural
SOURCE 11 Saving Private Ryan’s recreation of farmhouse. The woman in the house almost immediately recognises
battle scenes can build historical understanding
that she may be about to receive tragic news. The power of the scene,
of the realities of war.
again, lies in its emotion and potential to communicate empathy.
Anyone who received the news of the death of a loved one during this time would understand
the apprehension that came with the sight of a telegram. This scene is not only historically
true, but also historically important. Wars are the source of grief and trauma, for survivors
and families at home as well as those in the midst of them, and words alone can never hope to
depict this as well as a strongly written, acted and filmed scene.
The third scene that powerfully captures one of the historical realities of war is the
sequence depicting the US landing at Omaha Beach, Normandy, one of the bloodiest parts
of the US landing. One of America’s greatest historians, Stephen Ambrose, wrote a powerful
account of the landing and the action in Spielberg’s film closely followed that account.
The difference between the two modes of reconstructing the landing is that no matter how
eloquent and graphic Ambrose’s words are, they cannot convey the carnage in the way the
film footage does.
Thus Saving Private Ryan, through its representation of the violence and death involved in
war, allows viewers to construct a historical understanding that is based on the broader truth
that war involves carnage, rather than the fact of whether Private Ryan actually existed.
5.3c Check your learning

1 What do you think the words ‘inspired by a true story’ at the start of a film mean for anybody
using it for historical understanding?
2 How can a film such as Saving Private Ryan, which is only loosely based on fact, still offer
valuable historical insights?
3 Discuss how useful film is for constructing ‘a powerful emotional historical truth’. Is this an
important part of historical understanding?

THE CROWN (2016)
5.3 PROFILE
Described as a ‘biographical drama series’,
Netflix’s The Crown is about the early days
of the reign of Queen Elizabeth II. The
first season spans the time period 1947–55
– critical years that included Elizabeth’s
marriage in 1947 and her elevation to
Queen in 1952.
Unlike most historical dramas, because
the Queen is still alive and many of the
rituals and traditions we see played out
on screen remain the same, the storyline
of The Crown is, in a way, developing
parallel to the series being aired. In this
regard, The Crown is unique, as it has
the power not only to change the way
we view the past, but also to potentially
impact on the decisions we make in the
future. In Australia, the political debate
on whether we should continue being a
monarchy under Elizabeth II resurfaces at
regular intervals. It is not far-fetched to
believe that a sympathetic portrayal of the
Queen – although partly fictional – could
in fact influence our feelings towards the
monarchy.
Although The Crown is believed to offer
relatively accurate historical accounts of the
events covered in the series, it is important SOURCE 12 Film and television representations
to keep in mind that shows like this can of the past, such as Claire Foy’s portrayal of
only construct history while confronting Queen Elizabeth II in The Crown, can alter the
the commercial reality of having to attract way we view the past and may even have an
audiences. In the end, the watchability of impact on how we view the present.
the series is a higher priority to producers
than historical accuracy. This is perhaps the
most important aspect to remember for
anyone using The Crown or similar dramas
to build a historical understanding.
5.3 PROFILE TASKS

1 Research reviews of The Crown and examine what they say about the portrayal of
Queen Elizabeth II. Discuss whether that portrayal could influence debate about
whether Australia should become a republic.
2 Explain how The Crown encapsulates the pressure between the need for commercial
success and historical accuracy. Can those two elements ever be compatible?

CONCLUSION In addition to offering important insights into aspects of history not as easily explored
by the written word, films and television have a power to emotionally engage and move
audiences. However, as a student of history it is important to remember that films and
television programs are produced with commercial revenue in mind, which influences
their historical interpretation. Therefore, you must be rigorous in applying all the skills
of historical inquiry and source analysis to your viewing of film and television as sources
of historical knowledge and understanding. It is essential that you understand the
implications of the words ‘based on a true story’, and that representations of the past on
screen are simply a source of historical understanding, not the source.The railway to the
extermination camp at Auschwitz, Poland
SOURCE 13 Films such as Schindler’s List have the power to emotionally engage and move
audiences.
FOR THE TEACHER

chapter

6
Historical
Investigation

Being able to analyse and
use sources is fundamental to
the success of any historical
investigation. Conducting an
investigation gives you the
opportunity to do exactly what
a historian does and analyse
sources for usefulness, validity
and bias, as well as giving you
the opportunity to consider
different perspectives.
Historical interpretation
During a historical investigation
you will be required to develop
your own interpretation of the
evidence to draw well-reasoned
conclusions regarding areas such
RMS Titanic at the docks as cause and effect.
LEARNING GOALS
Historical investigation and
FOCUS QUESTIONS research > Develop a focus for a
This is the very heart of this unit historical investigation.
1 What is a historical as you develop, conduct and > Conduct appropriate research
investigation? communicate the findings in your to support the investigation.
2 How do I conduct a historical own historical investigation. > Use a range of sources
investigation?
Explanation and communication to support a historical
3 How do I support my Ultimately, the success of your interpretation.
investigation with evidence? investigation will depend upon > Develop an appropriate
4 How do I present my historical your ability to communicate your method to communicate
investigation? findings clearly and directly. findings.

6.1 Introduction
A historical investigation presents you with the opportunity to ‘do’ history, rather than simply
‘learn’ history. You will become an active participant as you learn the step-by-step process used to
conduct historical investigations. These steps will help you to develop critical skills: the ability to
identify a topic for investigation, frame the area of research, conduct research, and communicate
your findings in a clear and coherent way. These skills are not just necessary for exam success;
they are also highly valued in many areas of employment.
The use of technology has greatly increased the opportunities for historical investigation.
Digitised newspaper and journal articles have made information more accessible than ever
before. The range of sources available for research has exploded in recent years, as libraries and
universities collate and digitise collections, and make them available to researchers anywhere in
the world from their websites.
Consider an investigation into the sinking of RMS (Royal Mail Ship) Titanic. At the click
of a mouse, a researcher has access to the archived Library of Virginia’s online exhibition ‘RMS
Titanic: 100 years later’. However, as the Library of Virginia cautions its website users in Source 1,
you are still required to not only check that sources you may be using during your investigation are
actually authentic, but also analyse them for usefulness, validity and bias. The ability to do this is
an ongoing requirement for a successful historical investigation. It is important to remember that
widespread access to the internet means that there are few checks on what is posted there.
SOURCE 1
In order to provide equal access to information on our site, we offer text transcriptions of the articles
offered here. Due to the age and condition of the original documents, we cannot guarantee that the
transcriptions are exact.
‘RMS Titanic : 100 years later’, Library of Virginia website Building the Titanic, in Belfast, Ireland

SOURCE 2
Building the Explain how technology has changed historical research and investigation.
Titanic, Belfast,
Ireland
1 Why would Source 1 be important for a historian conducting a historical investigation?
2 Explain what Source 1 is saying about primary sources available on the Library of Virginia’s website.

6.2 The process of historical
investigation
This chapter will guide you through a historical investigation using 11 steps. This process,
or a version of it, is used by all historians when conducting an investigation. By following the
steps outlined below when conducting your own investigation, you will also practise your
investigative, research and presentation skills, all of which are important skills for a successful
historical investigation.
Step 1 Planning and conducting historical investigations using

historical concepts
The first step is to make sure that you are fully aware of specific requirements for your
investigation, such as whether there are any limitations on the way it is presented. Make sure
you note the final due date.
It is generally a good idea to break large tasks (like historical investigations) into manageable
steps. This is called ‘chunking’. Each chunk of work you complete is another step towards
completing your final investigation. Once you have identified the chunks, or steps, note the
dates when each step will need to be completed in order to meet the final due date. It is also
useful to note the type of resources you could use for each step.
Step 2 Formulating historical questions and hypotheses

relevant to the investigation
hypothesis One of the most daunting aspects of a historical investigation is deciding what you are going to
a proposed
explanation for
investigate. Before you begin, check the instructions you have been given, and make sure you are
an event aware of any limits that your teacher has set on what you are able to investigate.
You should then select an area of history
that interests you. To develop your ideas,
construct a mind map (or similar graphic
organiser), starting with a topic name. Your
mind map will be a record of how far your area
of interest extends, and will help you develop
a historical question, which you would then
attempt to answer; or a hypothesis, which
you would then attempt to test. For example,
a mind map that started with the topic name
‘American history’ could lead to the historical
question: ‘Why is the Battle of the Alamo
so important in the history of Texas?’; or the
hypothesis: ‘The Battle of the Alamo proves
that Texans have always placed national
SOURCE 3 The Alamo, San Antonio, Texas interests above personal interests’.
CH A P T E R 6 HISTORICA L IN V ESTIGATION 75

A historical question and a hypothesis could be combined into a single investigation. For
example, the question and hypothesis above could culminate in a historical investigation into
the role the Battle of the Alamo played in Texas’ campaign to become part of the United States
of America.
As your investigation proceeds, you could find yourself posing more and more historical
questions or hypotheses to help move your research forward. For example, if the focus of your
investigation was the Alamo, you could consider the types of questions that could arise from an
examination of Source 3. These could include:
> What was the original function of the building?
> How old is it?
> Why is it so well preserved today?
> How much of it is left?
> How accessible is it?
As your investigation progresses from questions and hypotheses into a completed
investigation, it is important to ask the following key questions at every stage:
> What evidence can I find?
> Where can I access it?
> How do I know if it is reliable?
SOURCE 4 How reliable a source do you think this painting of the Battle of the Alamo is?

Step 3 Locating and
interrogating a range
of sources
For many people, the answer to almost any
question has become ‘Google it’. A search
engine can be a useful starting point, but
does have problems. For example, asking
the question ‘Why is the Vietnam War
often referred to as the first television war?’
brings up over a million search results.
Although this is a very quick way to locate
possible sources, a lot of time can be wasted
looking through the sites offered. It is
important that you are clear about what
you are looking for, and that you check any
potential source for relevancy. Ask yourself
this simple question: ‘Does this source tell SOURCE 5 South Vietnamese paratroopers
jumping from US planes in a strike against the
me anything about my topic?’ Viet Cong in South Vietnam, March 1963. Why
Once you have established a range of do you think the Vietnam War is often referred
relevant sources to assist you with your to as the first television war?
investigation, you have to interrogate them.
Effectively this means asking questions
of each source to determine whether it is
useful, reliable and/or biased.
Consider the difficulties that historians
may face in the future when analysing the
Donald Trump presidency in the United
States. They will be searching through
thousands of tweets as primary sources,
and will have to interrogate sources such as
that described in Source 6.
SOURCE 7 Former White House press secretary Sean Spicer

SOURCE 6
After Trump’s inauguration in January, [Sean] Spicer inspired the hashtag #SpicerFacts after
reiterating his claim that the ceremony had the biggest audience in history, despite evidence from
photos, crowd experts, TV ratings and the Washington Metro network. ‘This was the largest
audience to ever witness an inauguration, period!’ Spicer said.
In the face of mounting evidence to the contrary, Spicer declared: ‘Sometimes we can disagree
with the facts.’
Alexandra Topping, ‘A history of Sean Spicer’s gaffes as White House Press Secretary’,
The Guardian online, 12 April 2017

Step 4 Identifying different perspectives evident in sources
It is essential that you recognise any perspectives in a source if you are going to use it effectively.
In an age when terms such as ‘fake news’ and ‘alternative facts’ have come into popular usage, it
is important to accept that anyone can have a perspective on an event. Your job is to ensure that
there is evidence to support a perspective if it is to be regarded as valid.
If you have found two different perspectives of the same event, you should compare the two
accounts and identify where they are similar, and where they are dissimilar. A useful technique is
to construct a Venn diagram to note the commonalities and differences.
You may need to conduct further research on the background of the sources before you conclude
whether you should only rely on the commonalities found, or how you could explain the differences.
Examine Sources 8 and 9. Both are accounts of an incident that occurred in Helena, Arkansas,
in 1965, involving members of the rock group The Band who were having a meal in a ‘Black’ part
of town when the police arrived.
SOURCE 8
I said ‘Good evening officers, is there a problem?’

‘Oh there ain’t no problem, not as long as you don’t mind sitting here eating with a bunch of
niggers, there ain’t no problem … You all are gonna get in that new car of yours … and we don’t
wanna see you around here no more …’
We mumbled around and finally got out of there, since the next step was to get the shit beat out
of us by a bunch of cops.
Levon Helm, This Wheel’s On Fire, 1993/2013, pp. 119–20
SOURCE 9
The cops looked at us with blood in their eyes. ‘What do you think you’re doing?’ [the police said].
Levon stood up and introduced himself … [The police continued] ‘your uncle’d be real proud of
you, eatin’ with niggers. What in the goddamn hell are you thinkin’?’
‘What I want you boys to do is get in that car and drive as fast as you can outta here … we’re all
gonna follow you outta town.’
Robbie Robertson, Testimony, 2016, p. 157

1 Read Source 6 about Sean Spicer, former White House press secretary.
a What implications does Spicer’s comment ‘[s]ometimes we can disagree with the facts’
have for historians?
b How would this source impact on you
using official White House press reports
as historical sources? What questions
would you ask of those sources? Helm’s Robertson’s
2 Use a Venn diagram to note the differences testimony testimony
and commonalities in Sources 8 and 9.

Step 5 Analysing sources for their usefulness and reliability
in relation to the question(s) asked
The key to conducting this step is making sure that you are clear about the question(s) you are
asking, because this has a major impact on the usefulness of a source. It is the question being
asked that influences the usefulness of the source, not the other way round.
Source 10 is one of the most famous photos of the twentieth century. Taken by Nick Ut, it
shows Phan Thi Kim Phuc and other children running, after their village had been hit with a
napalm bomb during the Vietnam War. It is a very useful source for historians investigating
the impact of chemical weapons during the war, but of limited use for historians investigating
the causes of the war.
It is also possible to digitally alter images, so you also have to consider what makes an image
source reliable. Does the fact that Source 10 is one of the most recognisable images of the
twentieth century make it more or less reliable?
You should also ask yourself whether you trust written, visual or aural sources more. Does
your opinion make it easier or more difficult to trust certain sources? What would it take for
you to accept a source as reliable?
Another consideration is whether a source is biased. For example, the two members of the
rock group The Band, who related the accounts in Sources 8 and 9, had a major disagreement
leading to a decades-long feud. How important is that information when considering the
reliability of the sources? Could their feelings about each other lead to conscious or unconscious
bias in their recollections of events? Is there any evidence that this is the case?
SOURCE 10 Children fleeing after South

Vietnamese planes accidentally dropped a
napalm bomb on their village of Trang Bang
in South Vietnam

Step 6 Developing and/or examining historical interpretations
As you interrogate sources that are relevant to your research, you will develop your own
interpretation of that evidence. You should also consider the interpretations of other
writers who have considered the same sources as you. You do not have to agree with their
interpretations, but if you reject them, you need to provide evidence to support your view.
You may encounter evidence that requires you to change your interpretation, and this is a
normal part of a historical investigation. The evidence should drive the research, rather than
the other way round. One of the features of a poor investigation is that it ignores evidence that
does not fit a predetermined outcome.
Step 7 Using sources to develop a view about a

historical issue
If the evidence is driving your research, then your sources will lead you to develop a viewpoint
about the historical issues involved in your investigation. As more and more sources become
available, it is important to consider how to use sources to develop your view on historical issues.
Part of this processing is making sure that you reject sources only because you question their
reliability, and not because they don’t support your opinion.
It is also useful to think about the ways you can access a particular source, and consider
how different versions of a source may impact on the way you develop your historical
understanding. For example, Martin Luther King’s ‘I have a dream’ speech is a primary source
that provides evidence of the significance
of Martin Luther King’s role in the US civil
rights movement.
Through digital archiving and sharing,
you are able to watch King’s speech, and see
the size of the crowd he was addressing in
Washington DC on 28 August 1963. You
are also able to see the impact his words had
on the crowd. Or you could simply listen to
King’s speech, or read it in text form. You
would also have to research how others have
interpreted this speech, and why it is regarded
as such a famous and historical moment. All
these things have an impact on the way you
SOURCE 11 Martin Luther King delivering his ‘I have a dream’ speech, develop your view about King’s significance
Washington DC, 28 August 1963 and impact.

1 Read the text of Martin Luther King’s ‘I have a dream’ speech, and then view footage of the
speech. Explain whether viewing the speech affects your understanding of this source. To
what extent does the delivery of the speech influence the way you remember the content?
2 If you were using King’s speech as evidence to support your viewpoint on the civil rights
movement, how valuable would Sources 8 and 9 also be? Would you treat these written
sources any differently from the way you approached King’s speech?

Step 8 Selecting and organising relevant information ‘Ten Pound Pom’
a colloquial term for
It is important to make sure that your resources are well organised. You could organise British immigrants
source folders (digital or physical) that reflect different aspects of your investigation. For to Australia who
were charged just
example, if your investigation was examining the difference between the experiences of ‘Ten £10 for the voyage
Pound Poms’ and ‘Vietnamese boat people’ as migrants to Australia, you could organise by the Australian
Government, which
your sources into folders such as:
subsidised the cost
> The context of the Ten Pound Poms
> The experiences of the Ten Pound Poms synthesise
to form a whole
> The context of the Vietnamese boat people by combining
> The experiences of the Vietnamese boat people different parts
These folders could be further subdivided

into primary and secondary sources.
Having well-organised sources will help
you when you are ready to interrogate your
sources and write up your findings. This step
is also another opportunity to reflect on the
sources you are selecting and the sources you
are rejecting as your investigation progresses.
Always ask yourself if your personal bias is
playing any role in this process.
Step 9 Synthesising evidence

from a range of sources
to develop and support a
reasoned historical account
or argument
One of the important skills you must have
when you are working towards finalising your
investigation is the ability to synthesise a
range of sources into a coherent and reasoned
historical argument. It is important that you
have worked from a range of sources, if it is
to be a successful investigation. Relying on a
single source means that you won’t have been
able to develop a clear view of your topic, and
won’t have displayed your ability to assess a
range of sources.
You may well come to exactly the same
conclusion after examining one or many
sources. However, by accessing a wider range
of sources and opinions you will be able to
SOURCE 12 Photos – such as this one of Vietnamese boat people on the
cite a much stronger range of evidence to South China Sea in 1982 – can offer unique insights, but they should not be
support that conclusion. relied upon as your only sources.

Step 10 Using historical terms and concepts appropriately
Before you start writing up your investigation, reflect on how the following historical concepts can
help you to develop it. Start by outlining the main points you will be covering, and the evidence you
will use to support your interpretation. To help you understand the historical concepts that will be
relevant to your final presentation, highlight your work using different colours for each one:
> Causation – is there any evidence of cause and effect in your work? Can you identify the
cause of the topic of your investigation?
> Continuity and change – what evidence is there to show that your topic has changed
anything, or been a force for continuity?
> Perspectives – can you identify the perspectives that are present in the sources you are using?
> Significance – what is the significance of your topic? Does every perspective agree about
that significance?
> Contestability – to what extent is your view of your topic contested? What evidence do
other sources use to support their views? How can you justify rejecting their evidence and
accepting your own?
It is important to review your work and check that you have used historical terms relevant
to your topic. For example, if you are writing about colonial Australia, have you included terms
such as ‘colonisation’, ‘imperialism’ and ‘dispossession’?
Step 11 Presenting and communicating the findings of a

historical investigation using appropriate and well-structured
oral, written and/or multimedia forms, including ICT
Before you present your investigation in its final format, it is important that you give yourself
sufficient time to produce a satisfactory draft of your work. Common sense will tell you that
the first draft of a piece of work is never as good as the second draft, where you have had an
opportunity to correct errors, check sources and ensure you have met all the marking criteria.
Once you are satisfied with your draft, you need to decide on the most effective and
appropriate method of presentation. To help you do this:
> Make sure that you check the instructions you have been given about the task. For example,
does it specify a certain type of presentation?
> Consider which format will allow you to show most clearly that you have conducted quality
research and used a range of sources effectively to support your interpretation. For example,
does your presentation rely on a wide array of visual sources that might benefit from an
ICT-style presentation? Have you accessed an impressive range of resources that could be
effectively presented in an extensive annotated bibliography?
Communication is a vital component of any investigation. Regardless of the format chosen,
you have to be able to communicate your findings clearly and directly. A useful technique is to
ask someone who is unfamiliar with the topic to review your work. If they can understand your
argument and evidence, you can be sure that your ideas have been communicated effectively.

Use a mind map or other graphic organiser to summarise your understanding of the 11 steps in
the process of historical investigation.

6.3 Historical investigation: the sinking
of the Titanic
This section explores how the 11 steps in the process of historical investigation could be
conducted, using the sinking of the Titanic as a focus.
Step 1 Planning and conducting historical investigations using

historical concepts
As always, the best starting point of an investigation is personal interest. A mind map
starting with ‘Titanic’ could lead to ‘passengers’, and develop into ‘who were the passengers?’
Alternatively, ‘Titanic’ could lead to ‘what was life on the ship like?’, which could develop into
‘what was it like for the different classes of passenger?’
A list of potential concepts could underpin the investigation, for example:
> Causation – what caused the Titanic to have passengers divided into first, second and
third class?
> Continuity and change – did the division of passengers on the Titanic represent continuity
or change in regard to the social structure of the time?
> Perspectives – is there a difference between the perspectives of the different classes of
passengers that survived the Titanic?
> Significance – what was the significance of the sinking of the Titanic for historians?
> Contestability – is there agreement on the treatment of and opportunities available to the
different classes of passenger when the Titanic sank?
Step 2 Formulating historical questions and hypotheses

relevant to the investigation
Either one of the starting points above could lead to the topic that we will use in this example
investigation: ‘What does a study of the Titanic reveal about aspects of the society at that time?’
This topic raises a range of historical questions that could help frame an investigation, for example:
> Why is the Titanic so famous? > What classes were represented in society in
> Where and when was it built? countries such as Ireland, Great Britain and
> Who travelled on it? the United States at this time?
> How were the classes divided on the ship? > Did you have a better chance of survival if
> Did the classes meet and mingle on board? you were located in any particular class on
the ship?
> Why did the Titanic sink?

You may prefer to test hypotheses rather than ask questions. These hypotheses could
include:
> The Titanic reflected social divisions in society at that time.
> If you wanted to survive the sinking of the Titanic, you should have travelled in
first class.
> The crew of the Titanic preferred to save first- and second-class passengers, rather than
third-class passengers.
> The saying ‘women and children first’ was applied on the Titanic regardless of class.
Quite often, the further you research, the more questions you develop, as your inquiry
uncovers more evidence. Source 13 is an extract from a student’s historical investigation
on aspects of the Titanic’s sinking, and society at the time. This is an example of how
research drives you deeper into the material, raising more questions that will propel your
investigation to a higher standard.
SOURCE 13
There is definitive evidence to suggest, but not conclusively prove, that at least some of the
third-class gates were left locked the night the Titanic sank.
If this finding is accurate, and I believe on the evidence presented that it is, then more
questions must be asked. Why were the third-class passengers not given a chance to survive?
On whose orders were the gates locked? Whose responsibility was it to unlock the gates? Why
didn’t they perform their duty? Why did the inquiries cover up the actions and not hold the
White Star line [owners of the Titanic] accountable?
Extract from a student historical investigation exploration of the hypothesis that the
third-class passengers were kept below decks by locked gates as the Titanic sank
Step 3 Locating and interrogating a range of sources

A simple Google search asking ‘How many people died on the Titanic?’ will access basic
information to help start you off; for example: the Titanic had 2223 people on board when it
sank, while the capacity of the lifeboats was 1178; of the passengers who died, 130 were first-
class passengers, 166 were second-class passengers, and 536 were third-class passengers.
To make this information more valid, it is important to find out how many people were
in each class. So the next step would be to find a site that gives you access to the complete
passenger lists, such as <www.titanicfacts.net/titanic-passenger-list.html/>. Here you can find
the name, age and fate of every passenger. Interrogating this source will require patience and
organisational skills in order to sort and organise information.
Step 4 Identifying different perspectives evident in sources

For the historical question ‘What does a study of the Titanic reveal about aspects of the
society at that time?’, it is important to access a range of perspectives based around class,
as this was a clear division on the Titanic itself. The sea-going tradition of ‘women and
children first’ in a maritime disaster also raises the issue of gender perspectives. First-class
women and children had the greatest chances of survival, and therefore their perspective
will be more strongly represented in survivor accounts.

One advantage of having the names of the survivors is that this allows for more detailed and
specific searches – to find accounts of the sinking that will help establish a range of perspectives.
The centenary of the sinking of the Titanic in 2012 was marked by an increase in scholarly centenary
hundredth
articles and other publications commemorating the event. One example of the new publications
anniversary
was Deborah Hopkinson’s book Titanic: Voices From the Disaster. It explored survivor stories
from all three classes of the ship, and allows you to compare accounts easily. The Profile below
gives a sample of some of these stories.
PERSPECTIVES OF TITANIC SURVIVORS
6.3 PROFILE
First class
Jack Thayer was 17, and returning to the United States from
a trip to Europe with his parents. His mother escaped in a
lifeboat, and he jumped from the ship in desperation as it was
sinking. He became one of the few to be rescued from the
water, when he was dragged onto a lifeboat. He wrote down
his recollections in 1940 in a privately published book that was
reprinted in 2012. His account has to be interrogated while
recognising that his perspective is from the experience of a
first-class passenger.
Second class
Eight-year-old Marjorie Collyer was thrown into a lifeboat by a
member of the crew, and her mother Charlotte was dragged
from her husband and also placed in the lifeboat. The family SOURCE 14 Second-class survivors of the
was emigrating from England to start a new life farming sinking of the Titanic, Charlotte Collyer
in Idaho. and her daughter Marjorie
United States Library of Congress
Third class [Public domain], via Wikimedia
Rhoda Abbott was returning to the United States from England

with her two sons, aged 16 and 13. As third-class passengers,
they were among the last to reach the deck. At this point, the
Titanic was listing badly. Abbott stayed with her sons, who
were considered too old to go aboard Collapsible Lifeboat C,
which was being loaded as the Titanic sank. (The collapsible
lifeboats were boat-shaped rafts with canvas sides, which could
be raised up.) Abbott jumped from the ship with her sons,
who were never seen again. She was hauled into Collapsible
Lifeboat A, where she was the only woman. SOURCE 15 Collapsible Lifeboat D being
towed to RMS Carpathia
6.3 PROFILE TASK

Research sources relating to the Titanic survivors profiled above, and assess them for their
reliability and their relevance to the question ‘What does a study of the Titanic reveal
about aspects of the society at that time?’

Step 5 Analysing sources for their usefulness and reliability
for the question(s) asked
The newspaper front page shown in Source 16 was published two days after the sinking of the
Titanic. It is a good example of a primary source that could be analysed for its usefulness and
reliability in relation to an investigation into what the sinking of the Titanic revealed about the
society of the time.
In terms of usefulness, an analysis could focus on the following:
> How long after the event was the newspaper published?
> Does it contain eyewitness accounts?
> What is the significance of the following phrases in the headline: ‘women and children
saved’ and ‘scores of notables not accounted for’?
> What does the smaller headline ‘Hope that many may be found on wreckage’ reveal about
the knowledge of the sinking at the time of printing?
> Does the source give any indication about attitudes towards class at the time?
The question of reliability could be assessed by:
> researching the background of The World newspaper – did it have a reputation for
reliability?
> researching whether the newspaper was written before there was access to eyewitness
accounts. If it was, what would the reports be based on?
> analysing the perspective of the articles to see if there was any indication of the newspaper
reflecting the experiences of one social group or gender above others.
SOURCE 16 Front
page of The World
newspaper from
New York, published
16 April 1912

Step 6 Developing and/or examining historical interpretations
Assessing the reliability of sources is critical at every stage of an investigation. Although this
can be time-consuming, it is an important part of developing a strong investigation.
Source 17 is an account from a Titanic survivor, relating that Titanic officers shot third-
class passengers who were trying to escape. This accusation is sensational and, if true, would
certainly cast White Star Line, owners of the Titanic, in a poor light. It is an account that has
to be analysed very carefully before developing an interpretation of your own.
It would be worth investigating the question of shootings on the Titanic in detail. An
article by Earl Chapman on the Encyclopedia Titanica website <www.encyclopedia-titanica.org>
would be a useful starting point in assessing the available evidence before arriving at your
interpretation.
SOURCE 17
When the steerage passengers came up many of them had knives, revolvers and clubs and sought
to fight their way to the two unlaunched, collapsible boats. Many of these were shot by the
officers.
Dr Washington Dodge [first-class passenger from San Francisco],
‘Dr Dodge gives story of rescue’, San Francisco Bulletin, 20 April 1912
SOURCE 18 A Titanic grave site, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. Four Canadian ships were sent from
Halifax to retrieve bodies. Of the 1514 victims of the tragedy, only 333 bodies were recovered in total.
One hundred and fifty of those were buried in three Halifax cemeteries.

Step 7 Using sources to develop a view about a historical issue
By this stage of the investigation, you should be developing some clear views about the
historical question. Sources such as 19 and 20 could be used to compare the facilities available
to first- and third-class passengers on board. Research would be needed for the Source 20
sister ship photograph of the third-class dining saloon on RMS Olympic – the Titanic’s sister ship – to
a ship of the same assess its validity. If it is judged to be valid, these two sources would help to develop a view
class and/or of
virtually identical about social division and opportunities in the Western society of 1912.
design to another
ship made by the
same company
SOURCE 19 A staircase leading to the first-class restaurant on the Titanic
Step 8 Selecting and organising relevant

information
At this point, you should have well-established folders for your
evidence. Your investigation should be well advanced, and
your folders could include:
> evidence of class division on board the Titanic
> first-class passenger accounts
> second-class passenger accounts
> third-class passenger accounts
> uncorroborated accounts
> secondary sources
> evidence from official inquiries
SOURCE 20 The third-class dining saloon on > visual sources
the Titanic’s sister ship, the Olympic > passenger lists.

Step 9 Synthesising evidence from a range of sources to develop
and support a reasoned historical account or argument
By now, you have consulted a wide range of sources to establish a clear understanding of what
happened on the Titanic, what the opportunities were for the different classes of people on
board, and how that information helps you understand the society of 1912.
You might now be prepared to argue that the result of your investigation was that the
composition of the passengers on board the Titanic reflected the prevailing social structure of
the time. You may feel you have sufficient evidence to go further and argue that your social
class – and/or your gender – reflected your life opportunities, and, in the case of the Titanic,
your chances of survival.
SOURCE 21
A Canadian stamp
commemorating
the Titanic
centenary, 2012
The key to a successful investigation is to now gather together the evidence that supports
your argument and allows you to ensure that your viewpoint is historically valid. Your evidence
folders should help make this task achievable. If, for example, you wanted to show that there was
clear social division on board the Titanic, you could draw on evidence from your visual sources
folder, and synthesise that with accounts drawn from first-, second- and third-class passengers.
Take some time to check that the evidence you use is indeed supporting your argument, and
not merely a distraction. For example, in an investigation of the Titanic, it would be easy to be
side-tracked by the debate over the proximity of SS Californian, a ship that was accused of not
going to the Titanic’s aid. The debate over the Californian would, however, be largely irrelevant
to an investigation into what a study of the Titanic reveals about the society of the time. You
could discover both interesting and valid sources on the Californian and its role in the Titanic
tragedy, but they would not be useful for your investigation.
Step 10 Using historical terms and concepts appropriately

As you move towards your final presentation, it will be important for you to revisit the list of
concepts you constructed at the beginning of the process, and review their appropriateness. You
may also develop a list of historical terms that would be relevant to your examination of the
Titanic. These could include:
> social class > social division > hierarchy > gender > industrialisation.

Step 11 Presenting and communicating the findings of a
historical investigation using appropriate and well-structured
oral, written and/or multimedia forms, including ICT
You will by now have established the steps that unpack your investigation, with each step
adding more evidence to support your argument. As you select the format with which to
present your investigation, review the information you have and consider the nature of the
sources you have used.
Your research may have used video-sharing sites such as YouTube (where you can find
footage of the Titanic as it left on its only voyage, as well as footage of survivors recalling
the events). If this is the case, then it may be that an ICT format is the best option for your
presentation, so that footage can be embedded in it. Reliance on written testimonies, on the
other hand, may lead you to prefer a written format, with images only used when they add
clarity to a point you are making. The bottom line is that you have to be absolutely clear in
what it is that you are communicating as the result of your investigation.
SOURCE 22 The Titanic leaving

for its maiden voyage from
Southampton, Great Britain,
10 April 1912

CONCLUSION
A historical investigation is your opportunity to ‘do’ rather than simply ‘learn’ history.
It allows you to develop the critical historical skills of:
> analysing and using sources
> developing your own historical interpretation, as well as recognising others
> developing and researching a historical inquiry
> explaining and communicating the results of that inquiry.
If you break your investigation into clear and achievable chunks, you will find that
a successful investigation is achievable. The keys to success are:
> giving yourself time
> being prepared to research extensively and effectively
> allowing the evidence to drive your research
> using a range of evidence to support your argument
> communicating that argument clearly and effectively.
SOURCE 23 Survivors of the Titanic being rescued from their lifeboat, photographed from
RMS Carpathia
FOR THE TEACHER

chapter

An Orthodox Jew praying at the Western Wall in Jerusalem,
one of the most contested places on earth and sacred to Jews,
Christians and Muslims alike

PART B
Investigating
Modern History –
Case Studies
Chapter 7 Terrorism 94
Chapter 8 The American Civil War 113
Chapter 9 The Decline and Fall of the

Romanov Dynasty 133
Chapter 10 The Cuban Revolution 153
Chapter 11 The Boxer Rebellion in China 173
Chapter 12 The Origins of the Arab–Israeli

Conflict 189

7
Terrorism
and research
It is important for you to develop
a relevant set of questions
to develop a meaningful
investigation into the causes and
nature of terrorism. Establishing
KEY CONCEPTS AND SKILLS a historical context will be a key
part of this process, helping you
Analysis and use of sources trace the stages that terrorism
Terrorism is a highly emotive has undergone since the French
topic, involving different Revolution.
perspectives that often clash
over the meaning of sources.
Tributes for the victims of the
In this chapter you will be In an area that is as contested
suicide bomber who struck
synthesising information from a as terrorism, the ability to
the crowds at Ariana Grande’s
variety of sources, and carefully communicate a critical analysis
concert in Manchester, England,
analysing the motives of those of your sources will be vital to
22 May 2017
providing them. ensure that any conclusions you
draw are valid.
FOCUS QUESTIONS Historical interpretation
As you form a judgment about
1 What is terrorism? the significance of sources, it
LEARNING GOALS
2 Who is a terrorist? will become apparent that even > Understand the nature of
that judgment is contributing terrorism and its causes.
3 How has terrorism been
to your interpretation. It is
justified by individuals and > Analyse the history of
vital that you approach your
states historically? terrorism.
sources in a critical and unbiased
4 What are the different way as you develop historical > Explain the role of terrorism
historical ‘waves’ of terrorism? interpretations. in the world today.

7.1 Introduction
Hardly a day goes by without some reference to terrorism in the media. Across the world, there
are stories of bombings, shootings, kidnappings, assassinations, suicide attacks, and vehicles
being used as deadly weapons. Media reports of terrorism often include the reactions of
political leaders to terrorism, and the issue is reflected in politicians’ policies. In January 2017,
US President Donald Trump signed an order to ban people from entering the United States
if they came from selected Muslim-majority countries, due to fear of terrorism. The current
political climate shows that fear can sometimes be too powerful to be combated by reason and
understanding.
In this chapter, the political and religious origins of terrorism will be considered as we trace
the history of terrorism to the present day. Gaining a historical understanding of terrorism
allows us to see beyond sensational news reports. Instead of relying on emotion to form an
opinion, we can use the skills of historical inquiry, using a range of sources to support a
reasoned viewpoint.
9/11 and historical perspective

During the dramatic events of 9/11 – September 11, 2001 – members of the extremist Islamic
group al-Qaeda hijacked four American domestic aircraft and crashed two of them into the
towers of the World Trade Center in New York City. The third hijacked plane was deliberately
crashed into the Pentagon, the headquarters of the US military in Washington DC. The fourth
aircraft, United Airlines Flight 93, did not reach its target due to the efforts of the passengers,
who were able to retake control of the aircraft. It crashed into a field in Pennsylvania, with no
survivors.
For many people in the West, the televised images of planes crashing into the World
Trade Center towers, and the subsequent devastation, came to redefine how we think about
terrorists and terrorism today. Expressions such as ‘9/11’ and ‘War on Terror’ – the term used
by the US Government for the international campaign to fight al-Qaeda and its supporters –
have become part of our everyday language and reality.
This relatively recent event offers lessons for our understanding of terrorism, but it also has
the capacity to distort. It is fair to say that 9/11 brought terrorism to the forefront of public
thinking, especially in the United States and other Western countries. However, 9/11 is just
one part of a very long history. When then US President George W. Bush urged the world to
join the United States in a War on Terror, he was not the first president to make such a call
to action. In 1901, exactly 100 years earlier, US President Theodore Roosevelt called for an
international crusade against terrorism following the assassination of his predecessor, President
William McKinley. The anti-terrorist crusade of 1901 eventually failed due to a lack of
international cooperation. The current War on Terror is facing some of the same challenges.
There is more to terrorism than either 9/11 or the latest terrorist attack mentioned in the
media. It can be difficult to look past the most recent dramatic attacks and the personal
suffering of the victims; but – while acknowledging these tragedies – as students of history,
we need to take a longer-term view.

SOURCE 1 Police respond to a terrorist incident near the Houses of Parliament in London, 22 March 2017.

1 List recent events that have been described as
terrorism. Combine the lists of each member
of the class. How many events have been
mentioned?
2 Explain how you believe a study of history can
help you understand terrorism.
3 Research the incident that occurred in London
on 22 March 2017. Do you think this event would
qualify as an act of terrorism? Why or why not?
4 Discuss the reasons why 9/11 has become such a
significant historical date.
5 Research an earlier attack on the World Trade
Center, which took place in 1993. Create a Venn SOURCE 2 New York City on 9/11. Shortly after this photograph was
diagram that compares and contrasts the 1993 taken, both towers of the World Trade Center collapsed.
and 2001 attacks.
6 Research the assassination of William McKinley. Do you think this should be regarded as a
terrorist act? Why or why not?

1 Examine Source 1, which shows a car that was used as a weapon in a terrorist attack. What
difficulties do the use of cars and trucks in terrorist attacks create for security forces?
2 Examine Source 2 and explain what it reveals about twenty-first-century terrorism.
CH A P T E R 7 TERRORISM 97

7.2 What is terrorism?
The words ‘terror’ and ‘terrorism’ are often used without a clear idea of exactly what they mean.
Governments, academics and authors offer an assortment of definitions. For the purposes
terrorism of this chapter, we use the definition of terrorism provided in the margin note. You are
the unofficial or
encouraged to research other definitions, and find the ones that make the most sense to you.
unauthorised use
of violence and Terrorists can act as individuals or as members of a group. Furthermore, unlike other
intimidation in the criminals who commit acts of violence, terrorists do not consider money or personal gain as
pursuit of political or
religious aims
their primary objective. Their goal is to spread a particular set of political or religious ideas,
or to protect political and religious principles that they value. While not all terrorist attacks
are necessarily well planned, there is an element of calculation and thought that goes into the
decision to resort to terrorism. Terrorists are generally willing to accept that innocent people
will die or be injured as a result of their actions. Many terrorists are also willing to sacrifice
their own lives in suicide attacks. Terrorists see these deaths and injuries as justified and as part
of the struggle.
State-sponsored terror
There is another dimension to the concept of terror; that is when terror – in the form of
violence or the threat of violence – is used by a state or government in order to control its own
people. Perhaps the best examples of this in Western history are the use of state-sponsored
terror in Adolf Hitler’s Germany or Joseph Stalin’s Russia. Both Hitler and Stalin used secret
police, torture, imprisonment and brutal punishment to help ensure control of their people.
Today, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s alleged use of chemical weapons on his own people is
an example of terror tactics of a modern-day dictator.
The French Revolution’s

‘Reign of Terror’
The word ‘terror’ came into popular use in
the English language around the time of the
French Revolution (1789–99); in particular,
the period 1793–94. This was during a phase
of the revolution known as the ‘Reign of
Terror’, when the post-revolutionary French
leader Maximilien Robespierre took the view
that the revolution had to be protected from
potential enemies. To that end, a campaign
was launched to seek out and execute those
thought to be enemies of the revolution and
SOURCE 3 A Syrian child receives treatment following a suspected
toxic gas attack in Syria’s north-western Idlib province, 2017. The Syrian of the new government.
Government has been accused of carrying out the attacks.

This campaign gave rise to a series of famous public executions involving the guillotine, guillotine
a machine for
where victims were beheaded in front of large audiences. British statesman and philosopher
beheading people,
Edmund Burke at the time condemned the use of terror and wrote that Robespierre and consisting of a
the Committee of Public Safety (the arm of government in charge) were ‘hell-hounds called wooden frame with
a heavy blade that
terrorists … let loose on the people’.
slides down when
Considering the definition given earlier, we can recognise the French Revolution – and its released by the
Reign of Terror – as terrorism, because it was planned, calculated and systematic, and aimed at executioner
achieving a specific political goal.
SOURCE 4 An artist’s impression of the last victims of the Reign of Terror being taken to the guillotine in
a tumbril (open cart), from 1794

1 Define terrorism in your own words. Do you think the definition of terrorism has changed
over time? Explain your answer.
2 Select three examples of historical events that could be regarded as terrorism, and explain
how they conform to your definition.
3 Research the methods either Adolf Hitler or Joseph Stalin used to secure and maintain
power, and explain how they can be defined as state-sponsored terrorism.
4 Research the career of Maximilien Robespierre and analyse the role he played in
establishing what we have come to know as terrorism.

The following questions relate to Source 4.
1 What is the significance of the origin of this source for a historian?
2 How does the fact that this is an artist’s impression of the events impact on the validity
of the source?
3 What steps could you take to establish whether this illustration is reliable as a source
of evidence?

7.3 Have they acted as terrorists?
Many in the general population may not have a clear definition of terrorism in their own
minds, but they ‘know it when they see it’. Perspectives of what constitutes terrorism can
subjective be subjective and based simply on emotion. The purpose of this unit is to encourage you
based on personal to examine the evidence, and think critically to make up your own mind about the types
feelings or beliefs
of actions that could be considered as terrorism. We will examine the actions of those
listed below:
> Governor Arthur Phillip
> Pemulwuy
> Ned Kelly
> the Ku Klux Klan.
None of these are typically viewed as ‘terrorists’ and may challenge some of your
assumptions as we consider: have they acted as terrorists?
Governor Arthur Phillip: terror to maintain order

Arthur Phillip, the first Governor of New South Wales, is an icon of
Australian history and is generally viewed in positive terms. There
are schools, streets and suburbs named in his honour. As a captain
of the First Fleet, Phillip was a man of many talents, who faced the
demanding job of establishing a settlement far from home. For the
most part, the convicts were unwilling settlers, and for the British,
Australia was a strange and sometimes hostile land. At the time, the
European population of the colony was small and Phillip was uncertain
what danger the local Indigenous population posed to the settlers. He
therefore decided to make a show of force to intimidate and terrorise
the locals. He hoped that this would instil fear, and make the colony
and Europeans safe from attacks.
In December 1790, Phillip’s gamekeeper John McIntyre died after
SOURCE 5 Arthur Phillip, commander of
the First Fleet. Could he be considered a
he was speared by an Indigenous Australian warrior, almost certainly a
terrorist? man named Pemulwuy (see next page). Phillip responded by ordering a
punitive expedition: a military action to punish the Indigenous peoples
who lived in the area. He ordered his troops to capture two Indigenous Australian men and
punitive
take the heads of 10 more, seeming to imply that one European life was worth as many as
intended as
punishment 10 or more Aboriginal lives.
The expedition members were equipped with axes for the purpose of decapitating the
enemy, and bags to carry the heads back to the settlement. Two of the officers who were
ordered to take part in the expedition objected. Marine officer Watkin Tench argued that
the punishment was too harsh, and managed to convince Phillip to settle for six men, either
captured or shot. Another officer, William Dawes, felt that Phillip’s orders were not lawful
and not just. Dawes opposed the idea that people who had not been part of the attack on
McIntyre should be punished.

In the end, Tench led the expedition with 50 marines, including Dawes. The troops
marched overland from Sydney Harbour towards Botany Bay in search of Indigenous
Australians. They returned to the settlement after a long march and reported that they
had only seen five of the locals at a distance on a beach, and had not been able to get close
to them.
At this point, the historian can only speculate about what occurred that day, and
remember that historical investigations start by asking questions or stating a hypothesis.
Did Tench make a real attempt to find some Indigenous Australians and terrorise them
as ordered? Or was he ‘going through the motions’ to keep the governor happy? Perhaps
the locals were skilful enough to avoid Tench and his men in their bright red coats as they
bashed their way through the bush with their heavy equipment?
SOURCE 6
Phillip was in general so humane in his treatment of the Aborigines that it is surprising that
Dawes could not agree with him that this particular attack [on McIntyre] was unprovoked and
that harsh measures were justified … He [Dawes] reconciled his conscience to accompanying
the party only after discussion with Rev. Richard Johnson, and later incensed Phillip by stating
publicly that he ‘was sorry he had been persuaded to comply with the order’.
Phyllis Mander-Jones, ‘William Dawes’,
Australian Dictionary of Biography
guerrilla
Pemulwuy: terror in defence of home and values a style of warfare
where small groups
Pemulwuy was a freedom fighter and a leader of the Indigenous Australian resistance to the confront a much
larger enemy with
European invaders. From 1792, Pemulwuy conducted an ongoing, terrorist-style guerrilla surprise attacks and
war against the Europeans for over a decade. David Collins, one of the officers with the ongoing harassment
First Fleet, described him as a ‘riotous and
troublesome savage’. By 1802, however,
his attacks against European settlements
around Parramatta and the Georges River
saw Governor Philip Gidley King describe
Pemulwuy in letters as ‘an active and daring
leader’.
Pemulwuy resorted to typical terrorist
tactics, including assassination, for example
in the case of his probable spearing of
Governor Phillip’s gamekeeper, McIntyre.
He raided isolated homesteads and attacked
civilians, successfully avoiding the British
military. When special detachments of
troops were sent out looking for him, he
would disappear into the bush and then
appear in a different part of Sydney and
raid another settlement. SOURCE 7 This engraving by Samuel John Neele (1758–1824) from 1804 is
the only known image that possibly represents Pemulwuy.

Eora nation For Pemulwuy and other members of the communities of the Eora nation, the British
the Indigenous settlement in 1788 was an invasion of their homeland and they were fighting to protect
communities
of the Sydney their way of life. As an example of cultural understanding, Pemulwuy was a warrior by
metropolitan area temperament and training, and in his mind the act of invasion justified terrorist tactics.
According to the British, however, Pemulwuy was a criminal. They treated him in the same
way that modern governments view and treat terrorists. Rewards were offered for his capture
or death, and in 1802 Pemulwuy was shot and killed. His head was chopped off and sent to
naturalist Sir Joseph Banks in Britain.
Examining the social and political context of Phillip and

Pemulwuy
The two Australian examples presented here, Governor Arthur Phillip and Pemulwuy, offer
valuable insights for a terrorist case study. Modern academics and terrorism experts talk about
a ‘rational’ or ‘political’ analysis of terrorism. This means looking at the social and political
context of the person committing a terrorist act, and the situation in which that act takes place.
Using a modern analysis like this, we can see that both Phillip and Pemulwuy were rational in
their decisions to use terrorism.
Phillip’s actions were an example of a government or a group in power resorting to terror to
protect that power and keep what they see as public order. Pemulwuy behaved like a terrorist,
using assassination and arson to defend a way of life and a set of values that he thought were
under attack. Pemulwuy accepted that the enemy had better weapons and more resources, and
that they could not be defeated in a conventional war. He therefore used terrorist tactics as the
best means at his disposal.

1 Research Governor Arthur Phillip’s approach to the Indigenous communities around Sydney.
To what extent do you think his reaction to the murder of John McIntyre was typical of this
approach?
2 Outline two different perspectives of Pemulwuy: those of the Eora nation and those of the
White settlers. Can these competing viewpoints ever be reconciled in an accepted historical
interpretation of Pemulwuy?
3 Examine the actions and behaviours of Arthur Phillip, Watkin Tench and William Dawes on
one side, and Pemulwuy on the other, outlined above. What were the social and historical
circumstances behind the actions and behaviours of each?

1 Analyse Source 6 carefully. What perspective does it give about Phillip and Dawes? What
interpretation do the words ‘it is surprising that Dawes could not agree with him that this
particular attack [on McIntyre] was unprovoked’ impose on the reader? Is this a fact or an
opinion?
2 Why would there be doubts about whether Source 7 represents Pemulwuy? Discuss how this
impacts upon its usefulness and reliability as a historical source.

Ned Kelly: bushranger or politically motivated terrorist?
Ned Kelly is one of the most familiar, but least understood, figures of Australian history.
Was he a common criminal? Or did he, at times, behave like a revolutionary, using terrorism
to fight for what he believed in? All of his actions immediately before his capture in the
Victorian town of Glenrowan in 1880 are more typical of a terrorist than a thief and
murderer, including an attempt by his gang to derail and ambush a train carrying police
reinforcements to Glenrowan.
After three policemen were shot dead by the Kelly gang at Stringybark Creek in October
1878, the Victorian Government declared Kelly, his brother Dan, and fellow gang members
Steve Hart and Joe Byrne outlaws. This meant they could be shot on sight by anyone. For
nearly two years they evaded capture and fostered an image of rebellion, letting it be known
that they were standing up for ordinary Australians against the oppression of squatters and SOURCE 8
government. Ned Kelly,
photographed
The most compelling argument for viewing Kelly as a terrorist can be the day before his
found in the motivations and actions that were part of his famous ‘last hanging at Old
stand’ at Glenrowan in June 1880. Bushrangers regularly stole the best Melbourne Gaol
in 1880. He was
and fastest thoroughbred horses so that they could outrun the police.
25 years old.
Why would Kelly do the opposite at Glenrowan, and weigh himself and
the members of his gang down in their now famous heavy armour? The
most obvious conclusion is that he planned to stand and fight.
squatters
At the time of the stand at Glenrowan, people around the state in colonial Australian
had already come to admire Kelly as a rebel who fought their battle history, a person
who occupied land
against politicians and wealthy landowners. A year before the incident for cattle or sheep
at Glenrowan, Kelly had dictated his confessional Jerilderie Letter, an grazing, without
SOURCE 9 This giant initially having any
8000-word manifesto (public declaration) in which he attempts to
legal right to that
justify his bushranging actions and describes his hatred of the police. statue of Kelly in
land; many squatters
Glenrowan gives an
The letter talks of police corruption and calls for justice for poor Irish indication of the heavy
were extremely
wealthy and of high
families like his own. armour he wore social status
SOURCE 10
… I have spent and will again spend many happy days fearless free and bold as it only aids the
police to procure false witnesses to lag [arrest] innocent men I would advise them to subscribe a
sum and give it to the poor of their district as no man could steal their horse or cattle without the
knowledge of the poor …
Ned Kelly, Jerilderie Letter, February 1879

1 To what extent do you think that Ned Kelly’s words and actions represent a terrorist rather
than a common outlaw?
2 Locate and read the entire Jerilderie Letter.
a To what extent do you think it provides evidence that Kelly was following a political agenda?
b Does this strengthen or weaken the case for arguing that Kelly was a terrorist? Explain
your answer.

The Ku Klux Klan: racially motivated terror
The Ku Klux Klan is the name of three extremist movements active during three periods of
American history. The first iteration of the KKK or Klan (as they are commonly known) was
founded in the 1860s in the American South. Its aim was to promote White supremacy and
resistance during the Reconstruction Era (1863–87), the period of rebuilding following the
official ending of slavery in the South through President Abraham Lincoln’s Emancipation
Proclamation of 1863 (see Chapter 8). The KKK’s focus was on hindering the progression
towards equality between Blacks and Whites, and their terror tactics included threats of
violence towards – and even assassinations of – Black politicians. These tactics proved
successful in intimidating many civil rights leaders at this time, but the first iteration of the
KKK didn’t last. By the 1870s, the group’s actions had caused a political backlash that saw
them lose political support. The Civil Rights Act of 1871 was also known as the ‘Ku Klux Klan
lynching Act’, and was designed to stop the group’s violence, which frequently including lynchings.
where a group of It was during its second iteration, in the 1920s, that the KKK adopted the business-like
people kills someone
for an alleged
structure that would see its membership exceed four million American men. The members at
offence without a this time were primarily attracted to the group’s stand to protect American values of morality
legal trial, often by against aspects of society such as divorce, adultery, drinking and criminality. During this
hanging
period, which lasted until the 1940s, the KKK focused its opposition on Blacks, Jews and
morality
the Catholic Church. It was also around this time that the burning cross was introduced as a
principles symbol of intimidation. Although the criminal behaviour of the Klan’s leaders and growing
concerning the political opposition saw membership numbers fall rapidly – to about 30 000 by 1930 – the
distinction between
right and wrong
group still kept its most extreme members, who continued to carry out lynchings of African
or good and bad Americans across Southern states, such as Mississippi and Georgia.
behaviour
SOURCE 11 Lynching victims in the Southern United States, 1930. This image was the inspiration for the
poem ‘Bitter Fruit’ by Abel Meeropol, which later became the song ‘Strange Fruit’, famously performed
by Billie Holiday.

SOURCE 12 A KKK meeting, complete with SOURCE 13 Members of the KKK participate in a march on 11 July
symbolic burning cross, held during the group’s 2009, in Pulaski, Tennessee
second iteration in the 1920s
Since the first movement, the KKK has argued that its actions – including bombings,
beatings and murders – have been justifiable, as Klan members claim to be representing
a White, Christian God and a White, Christian nation that they see as being under
threat. In other words, Klan members, like many other terrorists, claim to be defending a
traditional way of life.
The current manifestation of the KKK emerged after 1950, in the shape of local,
independent groups with various nationalist, neo-fascist and neo-Nazi agendas. It is neo-fascism,
neo-Nazism
estimated that these groups have between 5000 and 8000 members.
political movements
inspired by fascism –
more specifically by
7.3c Check your learning the Nazi leader Adolf
Hitler – with ideals of
Research the stated aims of the KKK, as well as the history of its actions. Explain whether
extreme nationalism,
this group should be regarded as a Christian organisation or a terrorist organisation. including beliefs
in racial purity and
anti-immigration,
7.3b Understanding and using the sources and sometimes using
violence to pursue
1 Analyse Sources 11, 12 and 13, and write down your personal reaction to them. Why do their aims
images like these present difficulties for historians? Do they provide evidence that the
KKK was a terrorist organisation? Explain your answer.
2 What do Sources 12 and 13 tell us about continuity and change in the history of
the KKK?

7.4 The four waves of terrorism
David Rapoport, a professor at the University of California Los Angeles, is a pioneer of
terrorism studies. He suggests that modern terrorism can be viewed as a series of phases, or
‘waves’. According to Rapoport, there have been four distinctive waves of global terrorism
between the 1880s and the present day, each with its own clearly identifiable causes and
characteristics, and each lasting about a generation.
anarchist
a person who
believes in the
absolute freedom
of the individual
and the idea of a
society without
government or law SOURCE 14 Helsinki Cathedral looms over a statue of Tsar Alexander II (who was also Grand Duke
of Finland).
The Anarchist Wave: 1880s

to early 1900s
The anarchists came to prominence in Russia
in the 1880s, and the best known of the early
anarchist terrorist groups was the People’s Will
(Narodnaya Volya). This group introduced
what some scholars have called a ‘Golden
Age of Assassination’. The Anarchist Wave
spread and other groups copied the tactics of
the early terrorist groups. The result was that
the world saw some of the most famous and
influential political assassinations in modern
history, including those of Tsar Alexander II
in Russia in 1881, US President William
McKinley in 1901 (the event that launched
SOURCE 15 Austrian Archduke Franz Ferdinand and Sophie, Duchess of
Hohenberg (back row) depart for Sarajevo, where they were assassinated the first modern War on Terror), and Austrian
by a member of the Serbian terrorist group, the Black Hand. Archduke Franz Ferdinand on 28 July 1914.

The assassination of the Archduke was carried out by a member of the Black Hand, a
Serbian terrorist group that followed the example of the early anarchists. This assassination set
in motion a dramatic chain of events known as the ‘July Crisis’, which eventually led to the
First World War – a key event in changing and shaping the modern world.
The Anarchist Wave was partly inspired by influential Russian political writers, including
Nihilist movement figure Sergei Nechayev. In 1869 Nechayev published The Revolutionary Nihilist movement
a Russian movement
Catechism, which soon became a manual for radicals who wanted to achieve their goals
in the 1860s
through terror. that rejected
all authorities,
becoming
SOURCE 16 associated with
the use of violence
The revolutionary despises all doctrines and refuses to accept the mundane sciences, leaving them to bring about
for future generations. He knows only one science: the science of destruction. For this reason, political change
but only for this reason, he will study mechanics, physics, chemistry, and perhaps medicine.
But all day and all night he studies the vital science of human beings, their characteristics and
circumstances, and all the phenomena of the present social order. The object is perpetually the
same: the surest and quickest way of destroying the whole filthy order.
Sergei Nechayev, The Revolutionary Catechism, 1869, Point 3

Analyse Source 16. Although it was published in 1869, does it still have any relevance for the
modern world? Explain your answer.
The Anti-colonial Wave: 1920s to 1960s

One of the most striking consequences of the First and Second World Wars was the decline in
the power of European nations and the rise of national self-determination and anti-colonial, self-determination
the right of a
nationalist movements across Africa, South America, Asia and the Middle East.
people or nation
One of the key principles of the Treaty of Versailles (1919) was the idea of national self- to form their own
determination – that people who shared a common language and culture had the right to govern government
themselves. In the period after the First World War, nationalist and anti-colonial movements
Treaty of Versailles
became increasingly active in various countries, including Ireland, India, Burma, Egypt, the peace treaty that
Morocco, the Philippines and Nigeria. officially ended the
First World War
In 1963, Kenya became the last of Britain’s East African colonies to gain independence.
But, as with many colonies, independence did not come without bloodshed. Prior to Kenyan
independence, a group known as the Mau Mau staged a military uprising against the British
Army that lasted for eight years.
Throughout the conflict, the Mau Mau employed what would be regarded as terror tactics
typical of Rapoport’s Anti-colonial Wave. These tactics saw terrorists moving away from the
assassinations that were such a feature of the Anarchist Wave. Instead, a type of guerrilla warfare
using ‘hit and run’ tactics – including bombings and sabotage – became more common. These
attacks created the pressure that would ultimately lead to Kenyan independence.
The gradual weakening in the economic and military power of European nations and the
decline of the old nineteenth-century empires saw the Anti-colonial Wave fade, as more and
more nationalist movements across Africa and Asia achieved their goal of independence.

Examine Source 17. To what extent does it help to explain why the
native populations of colonies felt they had to resort to violence to
achieve their aims?
The New Left Wave: 1960s to 1990s

Part of the motivation behind the third wave of terrorism – the New
Left Wave – was the Vietnam War. The success of the Viet Cong
in defying the might of the United States appeared to encourage
other groups, especially in the Developing World. These groups
SOURCE 17 Members of the British Devonshire were typically enthused by left wing, communist and socialist ideas.
Regiment search a Kenyan village for Mau Mau Examples include the Tupamaros of Uruguay and the Tupac Amaru
terrorists in 1954.
Revolutionary Movement in Peru. This wave also included some
notable left wing, anti-capitalist radicals in the West.
Viet Cong
the communist
guerrilla movement
United States
in Vietnam that One of the most influential and militant of the American New Left groups was the
fought against
South Vietnam and
Weather Underground Organization. This group started in Ann Arbor, on the campus
US forces in the of the University of Michigan in 1969 – a time when the Vietnam War had divided the
Vietnam War United States. It took its name from Bob Dylan’s 1965 song ‘Subterranean Homesick
Blues’, which included the line: ‘You don’t need a weatherman to know which way the
Developing World
the countries of
wind blows.’ The Weather Underground Organization grew out of the Students for a
Africa, Asia and Democratic Society activist group, and
South America that its key positions were militant support
are less economically
and technologically
for Black Power as part of the civil rights
advanced; struggle, as well as opposition to the
also known as Vietnam War. Its goal was to overthrow the
‘Third World’
US Government and its tactics included
capitalism a campaign of targeted bombings in the
an economic system 1970s. These bombings were mostly aimed
in which businesses
at government buildings, including the
for profit by private United States Capitol in 1971 and the
owners, rather Pentagon in 1972.
than run by the
government
Another prominent New Left group at
this time was the Symbionese Liberation
Army (SLA), which was active in California
between 1973 and 1975. Inspired by the
New Left ideology of overturning what
it saw as a corrupt capitalist system based
on inequality, the SLA conducted bank
robberies and orchestrated two murders.
SOURCE 18 A protest by the Weather
Underground Organization

The SLA’s most successful public act was the kidnapping in
February 1974 of Patty Hearst, the 19-year-old granddaughter of
American publishing magnate William Randolph Hearst. Hearst
spent over 18 months with the SLA, and even participated in a bank
robbery with group members. Once caught, she served 21 months
of a seven-year sentence for her role in the bank robbery, before her
sentence was commuted by President Jimmy Carter. She was finally
pardoned by President Bill Clinton, as it was accepted that she had
been tortured and drugged during her time as a prisoner, and was
suffering from Stockholm syndrome.
Europe
In Europe, the West German Red Army Faction (RAF, often
referred to as the Baader-Meinhof Group), the Italian Red Brigades
and the French Action Directe were representative of the New Left
Wave of the 1970s. All of these groups received support and training
from the Soviet Union and other communist groups around the SOURCE 19 Patty Hearst participating in a
bank robbery with the SLA, April 1974
world. When the Vietnam War ended in 1975, many of the New
Left groups took the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) as
their inspiration and model, because of that group’s willingness to confront major powers. Stockholm syndrome
Aside from bombings, the activities of the New Left Wave groups featured kidnapping and feelings of trust
and affection that
aircraft hijacking as their preferred tactics of terror. some kidnapping
Despite its often violent methods, the RAF’s image as an anti-American group fighting or hostage victims
develop toward their
an anti-imperial struggle on the side of the world’s oppressed saw it gain considerable captors as a way of
support from young people in West Germany. By the mid-1970s, however, the majority of coping with their
its members had been arrested, including founders Andreas Baade and Ulrike Meinhof, traumatic situation
who both committed suicide in prison. In 1998, the remaining members of the RAF
declared that their ‘urban guerrilla project’ was over. There was a postscript to the group’s
story in 2016, when three members were suspected of having come out of hiding to commit
robberies and hold-ups of security vans and supermarkets in Germany.
The third wave began to decline in the 1980s, in part as a result of decisive anti-terrorist
action in a number of counties, but also due to work by the United Nations that saw
countries from around the world come together to fight terrorist groups.
The Religious Wave: 1990s to present day

According to Rapoport, the world is currently living through what he calls the Religious
Wave of terrorism. This describes a phase where support for – or opposition to – religious
beliefs is linked to other aims, such as political aims, in an attempt to bring about change.
Many religions have been implicated in terrorist acts where religious and political aims have
often become blurred. Protestants and Catholics have resorted to murder and intimidation in West Bank
a contested area
Ireland (see Source 20). In India, Sikhs have carried out attacks in the fight for a homeland of land on the west
in the Punjab. In the Middle East, both Muslims and Jews have resorted to terror; in 1994, side of the Jordan
River; it is currently
an American-Israeli activist murdered 29 Muslim worshippers in the Cave of the Patriarchs
controlled by Israel,
massacre in Hebron, West Bank (see Source 22), while Palestinians have carried out attacks which seized it from
against Jewish settlements since the early 1900s. Jordan in 1967

Nonetheless the dramatic impact of 9/11 (see Section 7.1) and the surge in terrorist attacks
carried out by supporters of the so-called Islamic State – notably in European capitals such
as London, Paris, Brussels and Berlin – has meant that Islamic terrorism has received the vast
majority of media attention in the West in the past decade.
The future of terrorism

Throughout history, the drama and sensations surrounding terrorist attacks have often caused
people to get caught in the moment, focusing on the individual circumstances of an attack
while losing sight of the broader patterns evident in modern terrorism. As historians, we have
to take a more considered approach if we are to understand the role that terrorism has played in
shaping our history and the way it is likely to affect us in the future.
Lessons that emerge from looking back at the four waves of terrorism include:
> Terrorism is not new, nor is it simply the
result of the actions of a few psychologically
disturbed individuals.
> Terrorism is inseparable from the political
process and the pursuit of power. In other
words, revolutionaries have repeatedly used
terror to gain power and governments have
repeatedly used it to retain power.
> All of those who have used terror as a tactic
throughout history have believed that the ends
justified the means.
> It is likely that terrorist tactics will become
even more dangerous. In the 1880s, the most
destructive weapons available to terrorists
were explosives (following the invention
of dynamite). Since then, new and deadly
weapons have been developed, including those
SOURCE 20 The destruction caused by a truck bomb planted by the related to chemical and biological warfare.
Provisional IRA (Irish Republican Army) in Bishopsgate, London, on 24 Ultimately, who can say that a nuclear device
April 1993. The attack killed one person and injured 44. will never become available to a terrorist?

1 Use a graphic organiser, such as a mind map or timeline, to summarise the four waves of
modern terrorism according to Professor David Rapoport, including an example of an event
during each wave.
2 Research one example of an assassination from the Anarchist Wave. What did it achieve?
3 Research one example of a movement from the Anti-colonial Wave that used terror to try
and achieve its aims. How effective was the use of terror?
4 Research one example of terrorism by a Christian group and one by an Islamic group. Create
a Venn diagram that allows you to compare and contrast the groups’ objectives and methods.
5 How would you support or challenge the assertion that terrorism has been the most
successful method of promoting political and social change since the 1880s?

OSAMA BIN LADEN
7.4 PROFILE
Osama bin Laden was born into a wealthy
family in Saudi Arabia in 1957 or 1958.
The family had made their money in the
construction business and had close
relationships with powerful leaders around
the region. At university, bin Laden came
under the influence of the Palestinian-born
scholar Abdullah Azzam, who propagated the
idea of a Pan-Islamist state; that is, a single
state governed by the rules of the Islamic
faith. Azzam has often been called the ‘father
of global Islamic terrorism’.
The fundamentalist Islamic revolution
in Iran in 1979 and the Soviet invasion of
Afghanistan in 1980 helped to advance the
idea of violent struggle and war against the SOURCE 21
West for Azzam and his followers, including Osama
bin Laden
bin Laden. It was Azzam who convinced bin
Laden to travel to Afghanistan and finance the
training of the Mujahideen, who were fighting Bin Laden died in Abbottabad, Pakistan, propagate
against the Soviets. By 1988, bin Laden had on 2 May 2011, after being located and to spread
assassinated by US military. In addition to his or promote
formed al-Qaeda, with support from the
ideas widely
United States (which provided money and reputation as one of the world’s most prolific
weapons) and Pakistan (which provided terrorists, he left behind the legacy of another
training). The group quickly became known as terror group, ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and Mujahideen
one of the world’s foremost terror groups. Syria), which was founded as an offshoot of guerrilla fighters
al-Qaeda in Iraq in 2004. in Islamic
Bin Laden spent time establishing terrorist
countries
training camps in Sudan before returning Bin Laden’s death reveals many of the fighting
to Afghanistan in 1996. This was the year he difficulties historians face trying to construct against non-
declared war against America, accusing the historical understanding from recent events. Muslim forces
United States of trying to colonise the Middle The Obama administration provided one
East by supporting Israeli interests over Arab narrative of events, but journalists produced
ones. The 9/11 attacks on the United States articles that questioned elements such as
(see Section 7.1) were the culmination of a whether the Pakistani military knew about
series of escalating al-Qaeda terrorist acts. the American raid in advance, and how the
Ultimately, al-Qaeda’s success in instilling US actually discovered bin Laden’s location.
fear in the United States led then President The competing versions of bin Laden’s death
George W. Bush to declare a global War on serve to remind us that journalism is not
Terror. At this point, bin Laden became the history, but does become sources for later
world’s most wanted terrorist. historical understanding.
7.4 PROFILE TASKS

1 Research the life of Osama bin Laden and create a timeline highlighting the key events
that led to him becoming the world’s most wanted man.
2 Create two obituaries for bin Laden – one written from a Western perspective, and one
from the perspective of an al-Qaeda supporter.

CONCLUSION The causes of terrorism are complex and have reflected changes as the modern world
emerged from an era of colonisation. As this chapter has shown, terrorism has been part
of world politics throughout modern history. Historians are now engaged in a serious
study of the phenomenon of terrorism in an attempt to not only understand it, but also
to explain its causes and consequences. It is a topic that covers a range of interpretations
and perspectives, and requires reliance on evidence if genuine historical understanding is
to be achieved.
Terrorism is a constant topic for both the media and politicians in the contemporary
world and if Professor David Rapoport’s ‘waves of terrorism’ model is accepted, we are
currently living through the Religious Wave. This leads to a range of highly contested
viewpoints on causes and effects, and as a history student it is important that you always
demand evidence and reliability – in regard to both yourself and your sources – and
carefully assess your sources of information for bias.
SOURCE 22 Palestinians evacuate an injured victim after the Cave of the Patriarchs massacre in
Hebron, West Bank, 25 February 1994.
FOR THE TEACHER

chapter

8
The American
Civil War
The American Civil War was the
first war where photographs
emerged as historical sources, Explanation and communication
enabling a visual record of the As this is the first war where
war. However, photography was photographs can be part of the
in its infancy and struggled to evidence you use to support
record movement. Therefore it is an investigation, it is important
vital that you investigate whether that you reflect on how this may
any photographs you are impact on the format you choose
interpreting have been posed. for your presentations. It is also
important to realise that some
images from the Civil War are
A civil war – that is, a war quite graphic, so the appropriate
between differing factions and respectful use of these
in the same country – can be images becomes an important
particularly brutal. Such a war consideration.
can split families, and many
A soldier holding up
people will have a strong
the torn flag of the 8th LEARNING GOALS
emotional investment in the war
Pennsylvania Reserve
Colour Guard during the
and its outcome. Therefore it
> Understand the nature of
American Civil War is important that you consider
the differences between the
the origin of any sources you
North and the South.
use, and that you are aware of
potential bias in sources. > Discuss the effects of slavery
FOCUS QUESTIONS
on the South and the rights of
Historical investigation slaves.
1 What were the main causes of
and research
the American Civil War? > Outline the key battles of the
Any investigation into the Civil
2 What were the reasons for war and reasons for Union
War will require you to research
Union victory? victory.
competing views so that you can
3 What is the legacy of the Civil arrive at a balanced and valid > Understand the legacy of the
War? conclusion. Civil War in US history.

8.1 Introduction
In this chapter you will investigate the causes and consequences of the American Civil War, one
factions of the most critical episodes in the history of the United States of America. The Civil War was
interest groups or
politically based fought between two factions: the Union in the North (the Yankees) and the Confederates in
groups competing the South (the Southerners), who sought to leave the Union and establish a separate country.
for power within
an organisation or
The Civil War almost destroyed the United States – if the South had won, there would be
country two countries occupying the area that is now the United States. It was also the bloodiest war
in American history. During the Civil War years (1861–65), more than 600 000 Americans
Union died. More Americans were killed in the Civil War than in the First World War (115 000) and
the states that
stayed loyal to the
the Second World War (318 000) combined. The leadership of the North, provided by the
United States and Republican President Abraham Lincoln, was one of the key reasons for the survival of the Union.
fought to retain a
The Civil War remains the most widely studied and discussed historical issue in the United
united single country
States. Books, films, television programs and re-enactments about the war remain popular, and
Confederates/ for academic historians, this period redefined the American nation.
Confederacy/
Confederate States
of America (CSA) 8.1a Check your learning
the states that joined
together to secede Refer to Chapter 5 (‘The Representation and Commemoration of the Past: Film, Television and
from (leave) the History') to better understand the power of memory and the influence of films in the study of
United States history. View one of the film and television programs dealing with aspects of the Civil War, such
as Ken Burns’ mini-series The Civil War (1990) or the films Gettysburg (1993) or Glory (1989).
Explain whether you think such representations of the Civil War are valid as sources of historical
information. Discuss how a historian could use them.
SOURCE 1 Civil War enthusiasts taking part in a re-enactment of the Battle of Gettysburg on its 150th
anniversary, 28 June 2013

The economic and social differences between North and South
The Northern states and the Southern states were not alike. The North was more industrialised
and urbanised. In contrast, the South had fewer large cities and its economy depended more
on agriculture. In 1860, about 80 per cent of the labour force in the South was involved in
agriculture, compared with 40 per cent in the North.
The North favoured high tariffs, while the South wanted lower tariffs. Tariffs on tariff
a tax put on
manufactured goods imported from other countries meant that the South had to pay more for
imported goods to
such goods; but tariffs did not affect the North, as it produced these goods itself. It was often make them more
cheaper for the South to pay a tariff on imported goods than to ship products from the North. expensive, so that
people would buy
The South did not like the fact that most of the big banks were in the North; if Southerners US-made goods
needed to borrow money, they generally needed to do so from Northern banks, and so many instead
felt controlled by the North. The North received more migrants from Europe – people with
new ideas and dreams of a new way of life. Southerners were more conservative and preferred
the old, agrarian ways. They feared that the more populous North, growing rich on trade and agrarian
related to the use of
industry, would threaten their independence and their way of life.
land for farming
The way of life for the White population in the South, and in particular for Southern
landowners, depended on slavery. The issue of slavery, along with that of states’ rights (see states’ rights
Section 8.3), was central to the causes of the Civil War. the rights that
individual states
After decades of increasing tensions and compromises between the Federal Government believed they still
and the Southern states, the state of South Carolina seceded from the Union in December held, despite the
existence of a
1860. Other Southern states seceded in the following months, and war between the Union and Federal Government
the Confederates began in April 1861. Less than a century after the formation of the United
States in 1776, it had started to split into two countries. Federal Government
the central (national)
government of
the United States,
UNION STATES AND CONFEDERATE STATES, 1863
formed in 1789,
after the individual
states federated to
ta
become a single
so
Vermont
ne
Wisconsin Maine
in
country
M
Oregon New
Michigan
Hampshire
New York Massachusetts
Iowa
US Territories
Pennsylvania Rhode Island secede
a
Ohio Connecticut to leave or separate

ian
Illinois
New Jersey
Ind
Kansas West from the Union

Delaware
Virginia
Missouri Kentucky Virginia Maryland
American Washington DC
Tennessee North
Indian Carolina Richmond
California Arkansas
Territory South
i
ipp
Carolina
siss
Alabama Georgia
Mis
Texas
Louisiana
Florida
L E GE ND N
Confederate states
Union states
Territories 0 400 800 1200 km
SOURCE 2 This map shows the Union states and the Confederate states in 1863. Note that ‘territories’
refer to areas that had not gained a large enough population to become states.
CH A P T E R 8 T HE A MERICAN CIVIL WA R 115

SOURCE 3 Timeline
Key events of the Civil War 1850

1820
The compromise of 1850: Land taken from Mexico creates
new problems – should people in the new land be allowed
to have slaves? The result is another compromise. California
joins the Union as a ‘free state’, while the rest become
territories and decide for themselves whether they will allow
The Missouri Compromise: The pro-slave territory of
slavery. Again, the problem is put off until another time.
Missouri applies to join the Union as a state in 1819. Until
this time, pro-slavery and anti-slavery states had joined
1852
the Union in pairs to keep the balance in the US Senate.
Missouri spoils the balance. The dispute is settled by
letting the Northern ‘free’ state of Maine into the Union
at the same time. The Missouri Compromise does not
solve the problem; it simply postpones it for forty years. Harriet Beecher Stowe
writes the novel Uncle Tom’s
Cabin, attacking slavery.
1831
It has great influence in
the North and causes
resentment in the South.
The Nat Turner slave rebellion

in Virginia: Turner (an
enslaved African American)
and a group of followers A poster for Uncle Tom’s
Cabin, 1859
kill 60 Whites. After the
rebellion is put down,
Turner and a hundred
others are executed.
1854
The state government
in Virginia starts to talk
about abolishing slavery.
The Kansas–Nebraska Act: As people move west, arguments

An engraving depicting the ‘horrid increase about whether slavery should go with them. The
massacre in Virginia’ during the new territories of Kansas and Nebraska attract a great deal
Nat Turner rebellion of attention. Stephen Douglas, a Northern Democrat who
wants to be president, argues that the new territories should
make the decision for themselves. This is called ‘popular
1832 sovereignty’. Pro- and anti-slavery groups flood the new

territories with their supporters and this leads to violence.
The Republican Party is formed. The Republicans are

South Carolina defies the Federal Government over a outraged by the Kansas–Nebraska Act and oppose the idea
national tariff law citing states’ rights. President Andrew of extending slavery any further. Abraham Lincoln becomes
Jackson threatens to use the army to force South one of the early leaders of the new party.
Carolina to accept the law, and the state backs down.
This illustrates the views held by Southern states about
their rights in relation to the Federal Government.
1857
1846 The Dred Scott case: This case, heard by the US Supreme
Court, holds that slaves are always the property of
The United States goes to war with Mexico and gains their masters, even if they are taken into ‘free states’ or
land in the south-west. territories. This decision is greeted with approval in the
South, but with increased calls from the North to make
slavery illegal.

1859 1863
John Brown’s Raid: Brown,
Lincoln announces the Emancipation Proclamation, which
an anti-slavery campaigner,
frees all slaves.
raids the federal arsenal at
Harpers Ferry, Virginia, to John Brown (played by Sterling The Battle of Gettysburg is perhaps the last real chance
steal guns and start a slave Hayden) on the gallows in the of success that the South has in the war. Gettysburg is a
rebellion. The Union army 1982 mini-series The Blue and Union victory.
stops him and Brown is the Gray
1864
hanged.
1860 Lincoln appoints Ulysses Grant as general-in-chief of the

Union Army.
The Democratic Party splits over slavery into Northern
and Southern Democrats. This ensures the election Lincoln is re-elected President.
1865
of Abraham Lincoln, the Republican candidate, to the
sixteenth presidency of the United States. When Lincoln
is elected, South Carolina becomes the first of the
Southern states to leave the Union.
1861
The Civil War ends.
Lincoln is assassinated. Vice-President Andrew Johnson

becomes President.
The South forms the Confederate States of America The 13th Amendment to the US Constitution makes the
(also known as the CSA or the Confederacy) and leaves abolition of slavery official.
the Union.
Jefferson Davis becomes President of the Confederacy.
The Confederates fire upon Fort Sumter, the Union

fort in Charleston Harbor, South Carolina, and the
1868
Civil War begins. Ulysses Grant, the
most successful
The Battle of Bull Run is the first battle of the Civil War
Union general of
and the South wins. The North realises it will be a
the war, is elected
long war.
as the eighteenth
President of the
Slaves working on United States.
the fortifications
of Savannah,
Georgia, during the Civil
War, 1863 The Confederate
cemetery, Vicksburg,
Mississippi
1862 8.1b Check your learning

Robert E. Lee is given command of the army of Northern Research two sources that provide evidence about the
Virginia. economic and social differences between the North
and the South around the mid-nineteenth century.
The Battle of Antietam, repelling an invasion of the
Evaluate the reliability and usefulness of each source
North by Lee, is called a Union victory, but at a great
in explaining why the Civil War occurred.
cost of lives.
At the Battle of Fredericksburg, the Union attacks at the

strongest point of the Southern line, suffers heavy losses
and is forced to withdraw.

8.2 Slavery and human rights
The noble statement made by Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence about
Declaration of
Independence all people being equal was contradicted by the fact that slavery was legal in the United States.
the official document Many American politicians struggled with this contradiction – that their society was meant to
in which the United be free and fair, but at the same time it allowed slavery.
States declared its
independence from The first Black slaves arrived in the United States around 1619. Slavery expanded as the
Great Britain plantation economy of the South developed. An estimated three million slaves were brought
into the United States between 1619 and 1865 to provide cheap labour for the tobacco, sugar
plantations
large farms where
cane and cotton plantations. As the number of slaves grew into millions in the South, laws were
slave labour was adjusted to control slavery. By 1740 slaves had become ‘chattels’; that is, they were regarded
used to produce as property that could be bought, sold and used as the owner pleased. The changes to the law
crops such as cotton,
tobacco and sugar
produced what has been called the ‘peculiar institution’ of slavery in the Southern states.
Cotton production was the main reason why slavery flourished in the Southern states. A
peculiar institution huge demand for raw cotton to feed the textile mills in Great Britain made cotton growing very
the term used by profitable, and by the 1830s cotton was the most important crop in the Southern economy.
Southerners for the
system of slavery Cotton farming was extremely labour intensive, and Southern planters came to rely on slave
labour. The Yankees in the North had less need for slaves in their industries and farms, and
slavery may have declined gradually in the South, as it had in the North, had it not been for
cotton. This fundamental difference was one of the key causes of the American Civil War.
SOURCE 4 A
slave family in a
cotton field near
Savannah,
Georgia, 1860s

The effects of slavery on the South
Not everyone in the South owned slaves. Out of eight million Whites, about 380 000 owned
slaves in 1860. Nevertheless, the class of rich landowners with slaves, known as planters, planter
a landowner in the
controlled the South. Slavery might have helped the Southern economy in the short term, but
South owning 20 or
some historians argued that it discouraged the development of new industry and new ideas. more slaves
Slavery was seen by many Southerners as the means to keep all Whites more or less equal.
Without slavery, they argued, Whites would have to perform menial jobs; with slavery, the
Blacks performed such tasks, keeping the Whites in a class above. Southerners were critical of
developments in the North, where Whites did manual work in harsh conditions in factories,
claiming this created inequality among Whites and was, therefore, contrary to American ideals.
Life for slaves

In the 1800s, slaves suffered the following conditions:
> They were regarded as ‘chattels’.
> They could be separated from their families and sold to different ‘masters’.
> The Whites tried to eliminate memories of their past and culture.
> By law, slaves could not own property, leave their master’s land without permission, be out
after dark, join groups of other slaves (except on work gangs or in church), carry guns, ever
hit a White person (even in self-defence), or learn to read or write.
> Whites could kill slaves without penalty.
There were, however, differences in how slaves were treated, depending on their age, gender, skills,
location and luck. Some masters could be kind and thoughtful; others could be extremely cruel.
Occasionally, slaves did gain their freedom. Some managed to get extra work and save money
to ‘buy themselves’ from their owners. Some slaves were set free in thanks when their owner
died. For the most part, however, slaves gained their freedom by running away. Free Blacks and
ex-slaves played an important part in the Civil War; for example, they made up 10 per cent of
the Union Army. One of the most famous Black units was the 54th Massachusetts Infantry that
was featured in the 1989 film Glory.
Slave-owners claimed ‘their Blacks’ were ‘happy’; however, this was not supported by the facts
that slaves saw Abraham Lincoln as a hero, and that Whites were always on the alert for slave
revolts or runaway slaves.

1 When did the first slaves arrive in the United States?
2 Why did slavery become important to the South?
3 To what does the phrase the ‘peculiar institution’ refer?
4 How many slaves were brought into the United States between 1619 and 1865?
5 How many Southern Whites owned slaves?
6 How was slavery meant to avoid inequality among Whites?

What insight does Source 4 give you into the condition and lifestyle of slaves in the South?

8.3 The causes of the Civil War
The debate among historians and writers about the causes of the Civil War has been going on
for a long time. There is, however, general agreement about some of the causes:
> the different views of politicians in the North and South about states’ rights under the
constitution US Constitution
a set of rules by
which a country is
> the fear in Southern states that slavery would be abolished by the government
governed > the westward expansion of US settlement; as more territories became states, this created
increasing tensions about the balance of states for and against slavery
> the catalyst, finally, was the election of Abraham Lincoln as president in the 1860 election.
The South and states’ rights

The differences between North and South, and the fear in Southern states that a powerful
North threatened their independence and way of life, became evident in the differing views
of each about the powers of the Federal Government. The Northern view was that the
Federal Government was dominant and its authority was greater than that of the states. In
the South, there was a strong belief in ‘states’ rights’: the idea that the rights of individual
states were more important than the Federal Government. Southern politicians argued
that if they disapproved of the Federal Government, they could leave the Union, because
the states had joined the Union of their own free will and were therefore entitled to leave
whenever they wanted.
States’ rights crisis in 1832

A clash between the state of South Carolina and the Federal Government about states’
rights erupted in 1832. The president at the time was Andrew Jackson, who believed that the
interests of the people were best served by a strong Federal Government. Jackson made this
clear during a dispute over a new tariff law.
South Carolina was against the new law; it did not have manufacturing industries and
wanted to buy goods more cheaply from Great Britain. South Carolina claimed that the law
favoured the Yankee Northern states, where most of America’s industries were located, but
disadvantaged the Southern states. Political leaders in South Carolina argued that any federal
laws that were not in their interests could be declared void or nullified by the state. South
Carolina accepted the tariffs only after President Jackson authorised the use of armed forces
against it if the tariff law was not enforced.
Slavery and the growth of the abolitionist movement

The argument about the significance of slavery as a cause of the Civil War has been ongoing
since the 1860s. At times, historians have believed that slavery was the only real cause of the
war, while at other times, they have felt it wasn’t really that important. In fact, slavery was a
vital cause as it became the symbol of the differences between North and South.

The abolitionist movement had gained strength in the North during the 1830s. In the abolitionist
movement
1850s, the issue resulted in a split within the Democratic party into Northern and Southern the campaign to end
Democrats and the emergence of a new political party, the Republicans. Clearly, the issue of slavery in the United
States
slavery had a great deal of influence on events.
The South believed that slaves were needed to work their plantations. To
Southerners, slavery was part of their way of life – it had existed for hundreds of
years and it was legal. When people in the North started to speak out against
slavery and demand that it be made illegal, Southerners saw this as another
example of the North trying to tell them what to do.
The continuing tension between North and South was stirred up by
events such as John Brown’s raid on Harpers Ferry, Virginia, in 1859.
Brown was a radical Northerner who believed that slavery was against
the will of God. He staged an unsuccessful raid of the federal arsenal
at Harpers Ferry, with the aim of stealing guns to arm the slaves for a
massive slave revolt.
Westward expansion
When the United States was formed, it was made up of only 13 states, all on the east
coast. The men who wrote the Constitution hoped that the problems of slavery would just go
away with time, but as the United States grew, westward expansion kept the nation’s attention
on slavery. People in the North did not want slavery to expand, while people in the South
felt that since slavery was legal, they should be able to have slaves wherever they wanted and
wherever they went. As the frontier moved west, there were arguments about whether slaves frontier
the outer limit of
should be allowed in the new territories.
settled land
The problem was that the newly opened territories would eventually become states. Under
the Constitution, each state had two senators. The Senate was the most important law-making
and decision-making body in America. If the anti-slavery groups from the North acquired
more senators, they could pass laws to make slavery illegal. If the pro-slavery South acquired
more senators, they could maintain the status quo. Neither side wanted the other to gain the
advantage. The result was a series of compromises that kept the balance between ‘slave states’ ‘slave state’
and ‘free states’, and therefore a balance between ‘slave senators’ and ‘free senators’. a state that allowed
slave labour
First came the Missouri Compromise of 1820, when Missouri wanted to be let into the
Union. Missouri would have been a ‘slave state’, giving the South two extra senators. The problem
was solved by allowing Maine to enter the Union at the same time. Maine was a ‘free state’ in the
far North. This compromise lasted until 1850, when another set of compromises was needed over
the land that had just been won from Mexico. These held until Kansas and Nebraska wanted to
join the Union and yet another compromise, the Kansas–Nebraska Act, was passed in 1854.
Lincoln’s election and the start of the Civil War

The Republican candidate for the presidency in 1860 was Abraham Lincoln. His main
opposition, the Democratic Party, had become so badly divided over slavery that they put
up two candidates, one from the North (Stephen Douglas) and one from the South (John
Breckinridge). Lincoln won the election with strong support from the North, even though he
was hated in the South, where people feared that he would ban slavery.

The new president made it as clear as he could that he would not force the South to
give up slavery, but the Southerners were in no mood to listen. As soon as Lincoln was
elected, Southern states began to leave the Union. The first state to leave the Union
was South Carolina, quickly followed by Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia,
Louisiana and Texas. They became the Confederate States of America on 4
February 1861, with Jefferson Davis of Mississippi as their president.
Lincoln took the view that although slavery was legal, breaking away from the
Union was illegal and constituted a rebellion. He publicly stated that he would
not abolish slavery, but would fight to keep the Union together; in other words, it
was a matter of national unity.
When Southern forces, also known as rebels or Confederates, fired on the Union’s
SOURCE 5 The Fort Sumter in Charleston Harbor, South Carolina, the Civil War began. At this point, four
Lincoln Memorial,
more states – Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee and North Carolina – also broke away from the
Washington DC
Union to join the Confederate states, bringing the total to 11.
SOURCE 6
Apprehension seems to exist among the people of the Southern States that by the accession of
a Republican Administration their property and their peace and personal security are to be
endangered. There has never been any reasonable cause for such apprehension …
… I declare that – I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution
of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no
inclination to do so.
… In your hands, my dissatisfied fellow countrymen, and not in mine, is the momentous
issue of civil war. The government will not assail you. You can have no conflict without being
yourselves the aggressors. You have no oath registered in heaven to destroy the government, while
I shall have the most solemn one to ‘preserve, protect, and defend it.’
Excerpts from President Lincoln’s inauguration speech, 4 March 1861
SOURCE 7
[From the date of the adoption of the Constitution to 1860] the productions of the South in
cotton, rice, sugar, and tobacco, for the full development and continuance of which the labor of
African slaves was and is indispensable, had swollen to an amount which formed nearly three-
fourths of the exports of the whole United States and had become absolutely necessary to the
wants of civilized man. With interests of such overwhelming magnitude imperiled, the people of
the Southern States were driven by the conduct of the North to the adoption of some course of
action to avert the danger with which they were openly menaced.
Excerpt from Jefferson Davis’ address to the Congress of the
Confederate States of America, 29 April 1861

1 Identify Abraham Lincoln’s view on slavery, according to Source 6.
2 Discuss why Jefferson Davis considers slavery to be indispensable, according to Source 7.
3 Explain how Sources 6 and 7 are useful for a historian investigating why the Southern states
decided to leave the Union.

SOURCE 8 Arguments for and against the right of the Southern states to leave the Union, dealing
with the themes of states’ rights and national unity. The arguments ‘for’ are like those presented
by Confederate President Jefferson Davis. The arguments ‘against’ are similar to those used by
US President Abraham Lincoln.
‘FOR’: THE SOUTHERN ARGUMENT ‘AGAINST’: THE NORTHERN ARGUMENT
The states joined the Union of their own free will. The Union, once made, cannot be
If they change their mind and want to leave, they broken up unless all the states agree. An
must be allowed to do so. individual state cannot make an individual
decision to leave the Union.
The states existed before the Union and are the To break away without the agreement of
real basis of the government of the people. They the other states is against the law and is
are therefore more important than the Union. therefore rebellion.
The government in Washington is too far away The nation as a whole has to be
and doesn’t know what the people in each more important than any single
state want. State governments are closer to state. The good of the nation
their people and have a better idea of what is more important than the
the people want, and the people want to leave wishes of individual states.
the Union.
The South has had slaves for Slavery is against the

hundreds of years. No matter spirit of the Declaration
what Northerners may think of Independence and
about it, slavery is legal. everything that America
Some Northerners now is meant to be. Lincoln
want to stop Southerners cannot and will not
taking their slaves – in other make slavery illegal
words, their property – with unless the Southern
them wherever they go. This is states agree. He is
typical of how the North tells only against the
the South what it should do. The idea that slavery be
South doesn’t tell the North to allowed to spread.
give its factory workers better
pay or shorter hours.
SOURCE 10
Abraham Lincoln in
1863. Many regard
him as the greatest
US president.
SOURCE 9 Jefferson Davis (1808–89) –

President of the Confederate States of
America from 1861 to 1865

Examine Source 8. Think about the arguments presented and discuss them in a
group. As a class, conduct a debate about whether the South should leave the
Union, with one side arguing for and one against the proposal.

8.4 The course of the Civil War
At the start of the war in 1861, both sides were confident that the conflict would be over
quickly.
> Many in the South believed all that was needed was a strong show of force to convince the
North to leave them alone. Southerners also believed that European powers would intervene
to help them. Southerners supplied much of the world’s cotton, and they thought that any
attempt by the North to stop the export of this key material to Europe would result in Great
Britain and other European nations joining the war.
> Northerners were confident of a quick victory because the North was more populous, had
more industry and greater wealth, and controlled almost all the US Navy.
Both sides were wrong. The war turned into a long and bitter struggle that did not end until
1865. The American Civil War was the first industrial war, and was also one of the first wars
total war that could be called a total war. Civilians on both sides felt its effects.
a war in which all
aspects of society
are involved
The key battles
Many vital battles determined the outcome of the war and each side had real chances to win.
The First Battle of Bull Run (1861)

This was the first major battle of the Civil War and was a setback for the North. It was fought
in northern Virginia, not far from the Union capital, Washington DC. A Union army of
30 000, under the command of General Irvin McDowell, faced a Confederate force of 20 000,
led by General Beauregard. Both sides were equally inexperienced and the battle could have
gone either way. However, in the end the South won and the Union troops ran all the way back
to Washington. This proved to be a great surprise to the civilians who had driven out from the
Union capital with picnic baskets in order to watch. They were forced to flee with the Union
army, and a few lucky members of the rebel army enjoyed the lunches that were left behind.
The Battle of Antietam (1862)

McDowell was immediately replaced as Commander of the Union Army by General George
McClellan. In September 1862, McClellan’s army of 87 000 faced the invading Confederate
army of 50 000, led by General Robert E. Lee, across Antietam Creek in Maryland. This was
the bloodiest single day of the war – 24 000 men died, and it was possible to walk all the way
across the battlefield on a carpet of corpses. During the battle, some of the wounded from
both sides had crawled into haystacks to wait for help. As the battle raged, shells fired by the
cannons started fires; these raced through the haystacks, and the wounded men – too weak to
move – were burnt alive. The Confederate army withdrew, so the battle was technically a Union
victory, but at enormous cost.
The next two commanders of the Union Army were General Ambrose Burnside and
General Joseph Hooker. They were in turn replaced by General George Meade, as President
Lincoln tried to find a general who might match the leadership of the South’s General Lee.

The capture of Vicksburg (July 1863)
In the west, the important Confederate town of Vicksburg on the Mississippi River fell to the
Union after a long siege. Control of Vicksburg and a later Union success at Port Hudson in
Louisiana gave the North command of the entire Mississippi River, cut Texas off from the rest
of the Confederacy, and badly weakened the South’s already poor supply and transport system.
Along with other successes in the west, the capture of Vicksburg brought General Ulysses
Grant to national attention.
The Battle of Gettysburg (July 1863)

This battle was fought just before the surrender of Vicksburg. The Southern commander,
General Lee, moved north into Pennsylvania; he hoped that, by doing so, he might force the
Union to take some of the pressure off Vicksburg.
Gettysburg was the bloodiest battle of a war filled with bloody battles, with more than
50 000 men killed or wounded during three days of fighting.
Gettysburg was also one of the key battles of the Civil War and probably the last real chance
the South had to win. It was also perhaps the worst battle that General Lee fought. His decision
on the last day of the battle, to order troops to charge across open ground in the middle of the
Union line, proved to be a disaster. Known as ‘Pickett’s Charge’, after one of the generals who
led it, this assault resulted in 50 per cent casualties for the Confederates. Lee’s army retreated
and was on the defensive for the rest of the war.
SOURCE 11 Casualties on the field at Gettysburg – artillery

and the new Minié ball bullets (whose design dramatically
increased range, accuracy and speed of loading) made the
open battlefield a lethal place.

The campaigns of 1864–65
By 1864, Lincoln had found the general he needed. Ulysses Grant was put in charge of all the
home front
those citizens who Union armies. Some historians argue that Grant’s understanding of modern industrial war
remain at home made him as good a general as – if not better than – Robert E. Lee. Grant believed that the key
during a war; the
home front typically
to winning was to wage war in a way that would hurt the Southern home front – Grant’s
includes women, campaign in Virginia and General William Sherman’s campaign in Georgia were clear
children and the examples of this plan.
elderly
Grant’s campaign in Virginia

Grant led the Union Army south into
Virginia. He fought a series of bitter battles
in May and June of 1864: the Wilderness,
Spotsylvania, North Anna and Cold Harbor.
Of these four battles, only Spotsylvania
could be called a Union victory. However,
Grant kept moving south, putting Lee under
continual pressure.
Grant was in fact fighting a war of
attrition. He knew that the North had more
men and more resources, and therefore would
ultimately win such a war. This is supported
by the fact that when the war ended, the
North had lost 359 000 men and the South
had lost 258 000. The North won because it
SOURCE 12 A dramatic Civil War battle re-enactment could afford more losses.
war of attrition
a strategy to wear
down the enemy
with continuous
actions to reduce
their resources
SOURCE 13 The ruined city of Richmond, Virginia – the Confederate capital – after suffering a Union siege

Sherman’s campaign in Georgia
Meanwhile, another Union general, William Sherman, was moving south into Georgia with
a ruthlessness to match Grant’s. A defeat at Kennesaw Mountain did not stop him. Sherman
moved on. He captured the city of Atlanta in September 1864 and then set about destroying
the economy of Georgia to diminish the provision of supplies to Confederate troops. Railway
lines were torn up, crops and houses were burnt and livestock were killed. Sometimes, the
Union troops got out of control, robbing and bashing civilians.
Sherman’s ‘march to the sea’ from Atlanta to the coast at Savannah was an example of total
war. The purpose was to make war on the Southern home front. Sherman did not apologise for
this. He blamed the Southerners for starting the war and felt they were simply being punished,
saying ‘war is cruelty’.
Confederate surrender
As the war moved into 1865, Grant set up another siege, this time around Petersburg, Virginia.
When Lee could no longer defend the town, he moved west. By this time, however, Lee’s army
was reduced to only 25 000 men, and on 9 April 1865 he surrendered to Grant at Appomattox,
Virginia.

1 What evidence do Sources 12 and 13 provide about the nature of warfare in the Civil War?
2 What evidence does Source 13 provide about Grant’s beliefs in regard to the way that the
war would be won?
The roles and experiences of different groups during the Civil War
The roles of different groups and the impact of the war upon them varied according to the
location, class, age and gender of the people involved. Poor and working-class men, as is the
case with most modern wars, did most of the fighting. Many industrialists in the North
grew rich. Civilians in the South suffered more, with homes, crops and towns destroyed by
advancing Union forces and retreating Confederate armies. Civilians in the South also suffered
more in terms of food shortages and rationing due to the blockade imposed by the Union blockade
the act of stopping
Navy on Southern ports. ships from leaving or
entering ports
The role of African Americans during the Civil War

African American men were given the chance to fight for the North and against slavery. More
than 30 000 free Black men joined Union armies, and reports of Black regiments that fought
well helped to change racial attitudes and opinions about the emancipation of slaves. emancipation
the freeing of people
In September 1862, Lincoln’s government issued the Emancipation Proclamation, which stated from slavery
that slavery would not be affected in states that returned to the Union before 1 January 1863, but
that any slaves in Confederate territories won by Union armies would be freed. The proclamation
encouraged slaves to flee to Union lines, adding to the strength of the Union Army and reducing
the manpower that slaves provided for the Confederate cause as farm workers and military
labourers. By the end of the war, almost 200 000 Black men, mostly ex-slaves, had enlisted in
the Union Army or Navy.

The role of women during the Civil War
In the South, a significant portion of the male population of fighting age left their homes to
join the Confederate Army. This meant that women took on numerous tasks, both to feed their
families and to support the war effort. They worked long hours as farm labourers and assumed
new roles supervising slaves and managing plantations.
In towns in both the South and the North, women took on jobs normally done by men,
such as secretarial and clerical work. More women also went to work in factories; in the North,
an estimated one-third of factory workers were female, working mainly in the textiles and shoe-
making industries.
Women took on nursing roles in large numbers for the first time during the Civil War.
Nursing in hospitals was previously a role for men, as it was not seen as appropriate for
women to nurse males outside of their families. However, with so many sick and wounded
soldiers requiring care, thousands of women worked as paid or volunteer nurses in camps and
field hospitals. Stories of wartime nursing changed society’s ideas about women in nursing,
and after the war, formal nursing training developed and nursing came to be seen as a
‘women’s profession’.
SOURCE 14
A nurse caring
for soldiers in a
Union barrack in
Pennsylvania, 1861
SOURCE 15 On the home front, women went to work in factories.

The reasons for Union victory
The primary reason for the Union victory was that the North had more men and more
resources. It had a much larger population, and was able to field more than two million
soldiers during the course of the war; more than double the number of Confederate soldiers.
Its industries were able to manufacture weapons, clothing and other materials in much
larger quantities than the South. The North also controlled almost all the navy vessels. The
South could not compete in any of these areas because it was primarily agricultural. The
steady, calculated and at times inspirational leadership of Abraham Lincoln was also an
important contributing factor.
19%
25%
34% 33% 81%

39% 75%
66% 67%
61%
Population Railroad Farms Wealth Factories

mileage produced
North South
SOURCE 16 Men, cannon and mortar awaiting transportation to battle by SOURCE 17 A comparison of Union and
Union navy ships, Yorktown, Virginia, 1862 Confederate resources in the Civil War

Discuss how Sources 16 and 17 can be used to help explain why the Union won the Civil War.

1 Outline the role of slaves in the Civil War.
2 Explain the consequences of the Emancipation Proclamation for the South and the
North.
3 Identify ways the role of women changed during the Civil War.
4 Research three sources that provide evidence about the roles of women during the war.
Evaluate the reliability and usefulness of each source in explaining the way women’s
roles changed.

8.5 The immediate consequences and
legacy of the Civil War
The immediate consequences of the war were the preservation of the Union and the
emancipation of four million slaves. More than 600 000 men had died during the war, with
hundreds of thousands more left wounded or disabled.
Immediate consequences for the South

When the war ended, Confederate soldiers returned to their home states, and women returned
to their roles in the home. The South now faced a massive task of rebuilding, as the occupation
of Southern land had left cities ruined, railways damaged and crops destroyed. However,
the Federal Government did not treat the Southern rebels harshly. The President pardoned
Southern leaders, and returned land that had been confiscated during the war.
The end of slavery

In January 1864, the US Congress passed the 13th Amendment to the Constitution, abolishing
slavery. However, the abolition of slavery did not ensure equal civil rights or an improvement in
social status for Black Americans.
The 15th Amendment to the Constitution, introduced in 1869, gave Black males the right
to vote. It declared that the right to vote could not be denied based on ‘race, colour or previous
condition of servitude’, but this was not always enforced in the Southern states.
After the war, some ex-slaves moved north, but most remained in the South and became
‘sharecroppers’. They lived and worked on plots of plantation lands as tenants, paying their
landlords a share of the crops they produced. Their day-to-day lives were free from White
supervision, but in reality, debts to their landlords meant they were not economically
independent. Cotton prices fell in the 1870s, so many sharecroppers were perpetually in debt.
segregation Segregation of Black and White communities in the South continued, with separate
the practice of churches, schools and hospitals, and Black people were still treated as second-class citizens. It
separating people in
a community on the was not until the mid-twentieth century that African Americans achieved basic civil rights.
basis of race
civil rights
A united nation
the rights of
individuals to equal
Before the war, ‘the United States’ was a plural noun, meaning separate states that had chosen
treatment and equal to ‘unite’. After the war, ‘the United States’ became a singular noun, with the emphasis on the
opportunities ‘union’ of ‘states’. The shift of power to the Federal Government, and dominance of Northern
values of innovation and equality, accelerated the nation’s development towards an urbanised
and industrialised society, which would become a world power in the twentieth century.

1 Explain why the system of sharecropping has been described as ‘slavery by another name’.
2 Use a graphic organiser to summarise the legacy of the Civil War.

8.5 PROFILE
SOURCE 18 An illustration depicting the assassination of President Lincoln, 1865
THE ASSASSINATION OF ABRAHAM LINCOLN

Due to his leadership during the most critical domestic crisis in America’s history, Lincoln
is widely regarded as one of the greatest, if not the greatest, of the US presidents. His
death at the hands of an assassin, on 15 April 1865, only six days after the end of the war,
helped reinforce his status. He had won the Civil War and ended slavery. By dying in office,
his reputation would never be tainted by the difficulties of reconstructing a divided nation.
Lincoln was shot in the head at close range as he sat with his wife and two guests in the
presidential box at Ford’s Theatre in Washington. He died the next morning. The assassin
was John Wilkes Booth, an actor who sympathised with the Confederates. Booth and
his fellow conspirators planned to kill not only the President, but also the Vice-President
Andrew Johnson, and the Secretary of State William Seward.
Following the shooting, Booth suffered a broken leg jumping down to the stage, but
he managed to escape capture in the theatre. On 26 April 1865, however, federal troops
tracked him down and cornered him in a barn, where he was shot and killed.
8.5 PROFILE TASKS

Research the circumstances of Lincoln’s assassination:
1 What motivated Booth and his co-conspirators and what were they trying to achieve?
2 The plot also involved killing the US Vice-President Andrew Johnson and Secretary of
State William Seward on the same night. Write a news article based on your knowledge
of the Lincoln assassination and the events that followed.

CONCLUSION The Civil War dominates America’s history. Historians continue to debate both the
causes and the legacy of the war that cost the United States more lives than any
other war, before or since. What isn’t mentioned as often is how close the country
came to dividing into two. It is an unanswerable question, but historians can pose the
hypothetical question ‘What if the South had won?’ and create endless debates about
what the world would look like today.
Many of the issues that divided Americans in the Civil War have continued to bubble
away throughout the past 150 years. Consider ongoing tensions and movements
concerning inequality, class and race in America today. It is up to you to consider just
how much the Civil War solved and achieved in American history.
SOURCE 19 The Confederate Memorial Carving in Stone Mountain, Georgia, depicts three
Confederate heroes of the Civil War: President Jefferson Davis and Generals Robert E. Lee and
Thomas J. ‘Stonewall’ Jackson. The carved surface is larger than a football field.
FOR THE TEACHER

chapter
13 2 K E Y F E AT UR E S OF MODE RN HIS T OR Y 1 Y E A R 11

9
The Decline
and Fall of
the Romanov
Dynasty
Grand Duchess Anastasia,
c. 1908–10
FOCUS QUESTIONS
1 Who were the Romanovs and Historical investigation
what was their impact on and research
Russia?
An event as dramatic and Investigating the decline and
2 How and why was decisive as the fall of the fall of the Romanovs means
the Romanov dynasty Romanovs and their replacement you are confronting direct and
overthrown? with a completely different decisive change. This requires
3 How reliable are the sources form of government will the development of a range
from this period? always generate a range of of historical questions to help
interpretations. Considering the you unpack the reasons for and
array of contested interpretations consequences of change.
KEY CONCEPTS AND SKILLS of this specific event will help
you understand how historians LEARNING GOALS
interpret evidence to develop
One of the key skills in their own viewpoint. > Understand the reasons for
analysing and using sources is the decline and fall of the
understanding and taking into Explanation and communication
Romanovs.
account the varying perspectives As your understanding of the
contained in them. A study of the fall of the Romanovs develops, > Access and apply a range of
decline and fall of the Romanovs you will be communicating your relevant sources that help
is the perfect opportunity to understanding of that crucial explain the decline and fall
develop the skill of identifying historical question: ‘Why?’ It is of the Romanovs.
different perspectives in vital that your communications > Understand the implications
sources, and making sure your contain a range of relevant of the fall of the Romanovs
interpretation reflects those sources to support your on shaping Europe in the
perspectives. explanation. twentieth century.

9.1 Introduction
This chapter will investigate the decline and
fall of the Romanov dynasty. Romanov tsars
ruled Russia from 1613 to 1917. During this
agrarian time, there had been good and bad, great and
related to the use of cruel rulers. By the later nineteenth and early
land for farming
twentieth centuries, the rule of the Romanovs
had become corrupt and inefficient; Russia’s
Industrial Revolution
the rapid system of government had outlived its time.
development of When Tsar Alexander III died suddenly in
industry, beginning
in Britain in the mid- 1894, aged only 49 years, his son succeeded
eighteenth century, him as Nicholas II. Nicholas was ill-prepared
in which advances
for the task of governing the extensive
in technology
fundamentally Russian Empire. He once complained to his
changed the brother-in-law: ‘I am not prepared to be a
agricultural and
manufacturing
tsar. I never wanted to become one. I know SOURCE 1 Michael I (1596–1645), the first
industries, as well nothing of the business of ruling.’ Romanov tsar of Russia, ruled 1613–45.
as transport and
communications
The Russian Empire in the time of Nicholas II
intelligentsia
highly educated Nicholas II ruled a vast empire, stretching across one-sixth of the world’s land surface, from
people with political eastern Europe to the Asian continent. The Russian Empire had expanded through centuries of
influence, such as
writers, journalists conquest, and its population of more than 122 million was diverse, including Slavs, Germans
and academics and Poles. Less than half of Nicholas’ subjects were ethnically Russian.
The Russian Empire was recognised as a European power; however,
it was socially, economically and politically backwards compared with
Western Europe. Its economy was primarily agrarian: in 1897, an
official census showed that 82 per cent of the population were peasant
farmers, many living in small and often isolated rural settlements. In
countries such as Britain and Germany, industries had grown rapidly
during the Industrial Revolution, while Russia’s industrial and
economic development had been much slower. A worldwide industrial
boom in the 1890s, together with economic reforms such as the
expansion of the Russian railway system, led to a spurt of economic
growth in Russia during this decade; but even so, the 1897 census
showed that those classified as the industrial working class made
up only 4 per cent of the population. The upper class – including
the nobility, high-ranking military officers and church officials –
accounted for 12 per cent of the population. The still-emerging middle
class – the merchants, factory owners, white-collar workers and the
intelligentsia – accounted for 1.5 per cent of the population. At the
top of Russia’s social structure, the tsar and his court who ruled this
SOURCE 2 Nicholas II (1868–1918), the last vast empire made up 0.5 per cent of the population.
Romanov tsar of Russia, ruled 1894–1917.

The following questions relate to Source 3.
1 What comment is the cartoon making about the tsar’s position in society?
2 What is the cartoon suggesting about conditions in Russia?
3 There are two figures on the ‘surface’ of the ground (one to the left and one to
the right). What group of society do you think these figures represent?

1 Research the Romanov dynasty and choose a significant individual. What were
their key achievements and what was their impact on the Russian Empire?
2 Research the extent of the Russian Empire, around 1900.
a List the ethnic groups or nationalities that were part of the empire’s population.
b List countries that were the empire’s neighbours.
3 Research the Trans-Siberian Railway. Why was it built and what was its
significance to Russian trade and economy?
4 Use a pie chart or pyramid chart to show Russia’s social structure, based on the
1897 census.
Nicholas’ rule as an autocrat

Russia had not advanced politically compared with other nations in Western Europe,
many of which had developed forms of representative government by this time.
Nicholas, like his father before him, was determined to rule Russia as an autocrat; SOURCE 3 Underground Russia – a
that is, without any limitations to his power. In an autocracy, no consultation is foreign artist’s view
necessary: the ruler’s will is law. In tsarist Russia, there was no parliament, and the
empire was run by ministers and civil service officials who were appointed by the tsar. Censorship representative
and the tsar’s secret police were used to prevent ideas for political reform from being expressed. government
a system of
During his reign, Nicholas would not willingly grant any concessions to those who wanted government where
political reform, and in this lay the seeds of destruction – both for Russia as a monarchy and for citizens elect people
to represent their
Nicholas as an individual. British historian Orlando Figes argued that Nicholas not only ignored interests and concerns
the realities of the twentieth century, but also tried to take Russia back to the seventeenth.
autocrat
a ruler who has
SOURCE 4 Livadia Palace in Crimea, the tsar’s absolute power
summer retreat, which was built in 1911
CH A P T E R 9 T HE DECLINE AND FA L L OF T HE ROM ANOV DYNAST Y 135

SOURCE 5 Timeline
Key events in the life of

Nicholas II and the fall of the
Romanov dynasty
1905
Russia’s war with Japan over disputed territories in
Manchuria ends in a humiliating defeat for Russia. The 1905
1868 Revolution, a year of riots and disturbances, leads to the

October Manifesto, a concession issued by Nicholas that
helps to stop the unrest by promising political reform and
the country’s first constitution.
Nicholas Romanov is born on 18 May as one of six
children of Alexander III and Maria Feodorovna.
1894 1906
Aged 26, Nicholas marries Princess Alix (Alexandra) The first Russian Duma (parliament) meets, but is dissolved
of Hesse-Darmstadt and becomes Tsar Nicholas II after 10 weeks because it questions the tsar’s powers. The
following the death of his father Alexander III. key to the failure of the 1905 Revolution is the inability of the
anti-tsarist forces to unify and agree after they had gained a
degree of power.
1895–1904
The royal children are born: Olga (1895), Tatiana (1897),
Marie (1899), Anastasia (1901) and Alexis (1904). Alexis
1914
suffers from the potentially fatal disease haemophilia, The First World War breaks out, temporarily uniting
in which the blood fails to clot. the country behind Nicholas. Russia is not, however,
economically capable of fighting a large-scale modern war
and the economy quickly collapses. The greatest burden
of the fighting falls on the peasants. When the army takes
many of the young men from the villages, the families left
behind struggle to make their small farms work.
1915
Nicholas becomes commander-in-chief of the Russian Army,
thus identifying himself with Russia’s military failures in
the war. As was the case with so much of his reign, Nicholas
is ill-equipped to be a commander-in-chief.
1916
In the middle of the year, the Russians launch a major, costly
and unsuccessful offensive against Austria-Hungary in the
Alexis Romanov was just 13 years south. In December, Gregory Rasputin, the ‘Mad Monk’ –
old when he was executed. whose influence over the Tsarina Alexandra has attracted
widespread criticism – is murdered.

Russia’s relationships with
foreign powers
The Russian Empire had always been on
the fringes of Europe. The vast distances
had been a key factor in Russia’s defeat of
Napoleon’s invading armies in 1812, and
the revolutionary ideas that had inspired the
French Revolution of 1789 (which established
Russian imperial soldiers ride on the running boards France as a republic) and the later 1848 1848 revolutions
of a car with red flags hanging from their bayonets to a wave of revolts
revolutions had had little impact on Russia.
show their support for the revolution, following the across Europe in
abdication of Tsar Nicholas II in 1917.
The Russians had gone to war against an 1848 demanding
alliance between Britain, France and Turkey social and political
reforms; these
in the Crimean War, 1853–56. Their defeat
1917
popular uprisings
by this alliance prompted some reforms inside achieved some
Russia, but the Romanovs remained firmly initial reforms, but
generally failed after
in power. Europe’s monarchies
Nicholas abdicates in the face of revolution. In 1904–05 the Romanovs went to war supressed the revolts
Russia becomes a republic. A Provisional and regained their
against Japan in the Russo-Japanese War.
Government is formed, made up of a number hold on power
of different political parties, but on Lenin’s This war was one of the defining moments of
orders, the Bolsheviks refuse to join. world history in the early twentieth century,
and it marked the first occasion when an
Asian power defeated a modern European
power. It was covered extensively in the
media, with daily reports in newspapers
1918 made possible by the telegraph. In terms of

international relations, the war was a disaster
for the Russians and exposed the weaknesses
Nicholas, Alexandra and their children are
and corruption of their regime. It marked
executed at Ekaterinburg on 17 July. The
Romanov dynasty has ended after more than
the decline of Russian power and the rise
300 years of rule. of Japan.
The Russo-Japanese War and the
The bullet-riddled skull of Tsar Nicholas II subsequent disaster of the First World War
saw Russia turn inward and become more
focused on domestic affairs.

Research the Russo-Japanese War, 1904–05.
1 What were the causes of the conflict?
2 Outline key events during this conflict and
explain why the Russians were defeated.
3 What was the impact of this defeat on the
Russian people?

SOURCE 6 THE CHARACTER OF
9.1 PROFILE
Tsar Nicholas II
and the Tsarina NICHOLAS II
Alexandra, with
their children Sources 7–10 provide different
perspectives of Nicholas.
SOURCE 7
At his desk, he wore a simple Russian

peasant blouse, baggy breeches
and soft leather boots ... Although
Nicholas’s English, French and
German were excellent, he preferred
to speak Russian.
R.K. Massie, Nicholas and Alexandra, 1972, p. 61
SOURCE 8
Nicholas was not only unstable, but treacherous. Flatterers called him a charmer ...
because of his gentle way with courtiers. But the Tsar reserved his special caresses
for just those officials he had decided to dismiss. Charmed beyond measure at a
reception, the minister would go home and find a letter requesting his resignation.
Nicholas recoiled in hostility from anything gifted and significant. He felt at ease
only among completely mediocre and brainless people.
Leon Trotsky, The History of the Russian Revolution, 1932, p. 52
SOURCE 9
He was a devoted husband and father, loved the country and the wildlife, and was a
good landlord. Of constitutional, social and economic problems he understood little.
Hugh Seton-Watson, The Decline of Imperial Russia 1855–1914, 1964, p. 136
SOURCE 10
A quick intelligence, a cultivated mind, method and industry in his work, and an
extraordinary charm that attracted all who came near him – the Emperor Nicholas
had not inherited his father’s commanding personality nor the strong character and
prompt decision which are so essential to an autocratic ruler ...
Sir George Buchanan, British Ambassador to Russia from 1910, in Hugh Seton-Watson,
The Decline of Imperial Russia 1855–1914, 1964, p. 108
9.1 PROFILE TASKS

1 List the positive and negative features of Tsar Nicholas II mentioned in Sources 7–10,
and make an assessment of his character, as revealed in these sources.
2 Why was Nicholas’ desire to rule as an autocrat likely to end in failure?
3 Overall, did Nicholas possess the qualities to be a good ruler of a country on the brink
of the twentieth century? Explain your answer.
4 Discuss why there would be different perspectives of Nicholas. Of Sources 7–10, how
many are based on personal knowledge?

9.2 The development of opposition
to the Romanovs
liberalism In the nineteenth century, improved transport and communication meant that modern
a political philosophy revolutionary and reformist ideas, such as liberalism and socialism, began to filter into Russia.
that supports the
rights and freedoms
As Russia slowly started to modernise, literacy rates were rising, even in the countryside. The
of the individual growing middle class and industrial working class proved responsive to these ideas, and agitated
for change. This newly literate generation was to provide many of the local activists who, when
socialism faced with the intransigence of an autocratic regime, became more revolutionary as discontent
a political and
economic theory
increased. Military defeats in the Russo-Japanese War added to the grievances of the peasants,
that promotes the workers and reformist groups, leading to the events known as the 1905 Revolution.
public ownership
of a nation’s
resources and
means of production
The 1905 Revolution
(for example
The new century had started badly for the
factories, farms
and machinery), autocracy. A poor harvest in 1902 intensified
as opposed to the poverty of the peasants, who seized land
privately owned and
controlled ownership
from the landowners and destroyed property.
in a capitalist system Disorder spread to the cities, and by the
middle of 1903 a wave of strikes in the oil
intransigence industry, engineering works and the railways
unwillingness or
refusal to change
threatened to paralyse the economy. The war
one’s views or agree with Japan, which began in 1904 with the
about something expectation that Russia would enjoy a quick
victory over an ‘inferior’ rival, had brought
1905 revolution
a revolution that sent
unexpected difficulties. The mobilisation of
a wave of political peasants’ sons disrupted agriculture and food
SOURCE 11 Workers in their lodging house in
and social unrest supplies, driving up food prices. Added to the Moscow, 1911. Those workers who were too poor to
throughout the
Russian Empire economic hardships were general discontent hire beds slept on the floor underneath the beds.
with the conduct of the war and alarm at a
mobilisation series of defeats.
the preparation and
movement of troops
for military service
SOURCE 12
A peasant women
tilling the soil in
Russia, 1900

The 1905 Revolution was triggered by a strike in the Putilov steelworks in St Petersburg,
Russia’s capital, on 16 January. The strike was caused by the dismissal of men belonging to the
Assembly of Russian Workers, a union founded by Father George Gapon, who was a priest of
the Russian Orthodox Church. Gapon has been described as a young and popular priest with
a genuine interest in the welfare of his people in the working-class districts of St Petersburg.
Others saw him differently. A contemporary observer alleged that Gapon was a revolutionary
socialist, whose purpose was to secure concessions on working conditions from employers,
under the respectable cloak of the priesthood.
Bloody Sunday
Gapon organised a protest march and petition that would be presented to the tsar at his official
residence, the Winter Palace in St Petersburg, on Sunday, 22 January 1905. About 150 000
icons people marched from all parts of the city, many of them carrying religious icons and portraits
paintings of Christ or of the tsar. The petition was written in respectful terms, addressing the tsar as ‘Sire’ and ‘O
another holy figure
Emperor’, and called for:
> a guarantee of civil liberties, for example freedom of speech
> measures to alleviate poverty, including the introduction of an income tax
> better working conditions, such as an eight-hour day.
To many of the marchers, and to others of the poorer classes throughout Russia, Nicholas was
a father figure – affectionately known as ‘Little Father’ – who had their best interests at heart,
but was prevented from understanding their plight by a barrier of officialdom. If they could only
SOURCE 13
An artist’s
meet the tsar face to face, so the argument ran, he would realise the true situation and put in place
impression of measures to remedy it. However, Nicholas was not in the Winter Palace that weekend; he had
the shooting of gone to Tsarskoe Selo, another palace on the outskirts of the city.
workers in front of
The protest that started peacefully became violent as tsarist troops attacked the marchers.
the Winter Palace
on 9 January 1905, The official toll was 92 dead and several hundred wounded, though one English
painted in 1909 newspaper reported 2000 killed and 5000 wounded.

Whatever the final figure, ‘Bloody Sunday’ had a profound effect on the attitude of the
people towards the tsar. Instead of ‘Little Father’, he became ‘Nicholas the Bloody’. The
traditional belief that the tsar and the people were linked in a common bond – a view that
Nicholas himself liked to foster – was shattered forever.
SOURCE 14
Along the Nevsky Prospect … came row upon row of orderly and solemn faced workers all
dressed in their best clothes … We had already reached the Alexander Gardens, on the other
side of which lay the Winter Palace square, when we heard the sound of bugles, the signal for
the cavalry to charge. The marchers came to a halt … in front, on the right, was a detachment
of police, but since they showed no sign of hostility, the procession began moving again. Just
then, however, a detachment of cavalry rode out … The first volley was fired in the air, but the
second was aimed at the crowd … Panic stricken, the crowd turned and began running in every
direction … It was quite clear that the authorities had made a terrible mistake; they had totally
misunderstood the intentions of the crowd … the workers went to the palace without any evil
intent. They sincerely believed that when they got there they would kneel down and the Tsar
would come out to meet them or at least appear on the balcony.
A. Kerensky, The Kerensky Memoirs: Russia and History’s Turning Point, 1965
SOURCE 15
I have heard the assembled crowd accused of nothing worse than jeering at the troops, hustling
the officers, and using language to them that will not bear repetition, although they came, it is
said, armed with knives, pieces of piping, sticks, and some even with revolvers.
I do know that the commanding officer of the infantry … twice warned them to disperse,
adding that if they did not, he would be compelled to fire on them … the officers, on foot,
would go right in among the people and try to reason with them, seeming to do everything in
their power to persuade the people to disperse peaceably.
Robert McCormick, the US Ambassador in St Petersburg, in Michael Bucklow and Glenn Russell,
Russia: Why Revolution?, 1987

Read the accounts by A. Kerensky and Robert McCormick of the Bloody
Sunday march in Sources 14 and 15. In what ways do these accounts differ?
How do you account for these differences?

1 Research the living and working conditions of industrial workers in Russia,
around 1900. Explain the main grievances of the industrial working class.
2 Research the system of agriculture in Russia, around 1900.
a Explain the main grievances of Russia’s peasants.
b Refer to Source 12, and find two further sources of evidence about farming methods in
Russia, around 1900. Analyse these sources for their reliability.

The aftermath of Bloody Sunday
Following the events of 22 January, Gapon escaped into hiding, and issued a public letter
denouncing the tsar for the bloodshed. Just over a year later, in April 1906, his body was found
hanging in an abandoned cottage in Finland. Other leaders of the march were arrested and
internal exile sent into internal exile. This only succeeded in helping to spread the news of the massacre
forced settlement
across the country. On 17 February 1905, Grand Duke Sergei – Nicholas’ uncle and the
to another part
of a country as Governor-General of Moscow – was killed by a bomb thrown by a socialist revolutionary.
punishment; in Peasant revolts had begun in early February 1905 and these intensified as the year progressed.
Russia, this was
usually in the isolated
In one district after another, the landowners were forcibly removed and their land seized.
region of Siberia In June, a national Peasants’ Union was formed, as the peasants took up the socialist
revolutionary cry of ‘Land for the peasants!’
By the end of January 1905, nearly half a million workers were on strike in the cities,
and unions for all classes blossomed – doctors, lawyers and teachers formed organisations,
Union of Unions alongside factory workers, waiters and engineers. In May, the Union of Unions was formed,
an alliance of
and at the end of June a congress of representatives from 86 city councils across Russia met
professional Russian
unions, formed to in Moscow to demand civil liberties and the formation of a legislative assembly elected by
place pressure on universal suffrage.
the government
to reform
News of a series of embarrassing defeats in the war with Japan worsened the situation. In
February 1905, the Russian Army was defeated by the Japanese at Mukden, and on 27 May
universal suffrage the Russian fleet was destroyed in the Straits of Tsushima. With morale in the armed forces
a form of voting low, the sailors aboard the battleship Potemkin in the Black Sea mutinied in June.
rights, where all
adults have the right By August 1905, the increasing discontent led Nicholas to promise that an assembly or
to vote in political Duma would be called; Nicholas would seek its opinion when he chose, but it would have
elections
no authority to make laws against his wishes. The promise of a Duma on such limited terms
failed to satisfy the opponents of the regime. Strikes and protest meetings intensified. On
21 October, a railway strike was declared in Moscow and spread across the nation. On 26
soviet October, the first St Petersburg soviet was formed, with Leon Trotsky as one of its leaders.
a district-
level political
organisation, The October Manifesto
associated with
revolutionary Russia Nicholas turned to Prime Minister Sergei Witte for advice, and was told that the regime could
only be saved by granting the people a constitution. Nicholas issued a document known as
the October Manifesto, which promised political reform, and this marked a watershed in the
events of 1905. Ultimately, however, it solved little and pleased very few. The soviets, with
their concerns for working conditions such as the eight-hour day, condemned the Manifesto
as it did little to address the everyday needs of the working people; but they found that their
alliance with the more liberal middle-class elements was crumbling, as the latter seemed to
be willing to settle for the political concessions offered. In November 1905, the St Petersburg
soviet called a general strike in support of the eight-hour day, but was forced to abandon the
protest as there was little support from the middle classes.
It had been a troubled year for Nicholas. However, the secret police were as powerful
as ever, the army had remained loyal, the bureaucracy remained intact, and the soviets had
been defeated. As Trotsky said, ‘Although with a few broken ribs, Tsarism came out of the
experience of 1905 alive and strong enough.’

SOURCE 16
We, Nicholas the Second … declare to all our

loyal subjects:
The rioting and agitation in the capitals
and in many localities of our Empire fills our
heart with great and deep grief. The welfare
of the Russian Emperor is bound up with the
welfare of the people, and its sorrows are his
sorrows. The turbulence which has broken
out may confound the people and threaten the
integrity and unity of our empire.
[The Tsar decided the following:]
1 To grant to the population the inviolable
right of free citizenship, based on the
principles of freedom of the person,
conscience, speech, assembly, and union. SOURCE 17 The mutiny on the Potemkin and the events leading up to it
2 Without postponing the intended elections were dramatised in the classic 1925 Soviet film Battleship Potemkin.
for the State Duma … to include in the
participation of the work of the Duma those classes of the population that have been until now
entirely deprived of the right to vote …
3 To establish as an unbreakable rule that no law shall go into force without its confirmation by
the State Duma …
The October Manifesto, issued by Tsar Nicholas II, 1905
SOURCE 18
So a Constitution is granted. Freedom of assembly is granted; but the assemblies are surrounded
by the military. Freedom of speech is granted, but censorship exists exactly as before. Freedom of
knowledge is granted, but the universities are occupied by troops. Inviolability of person is granted,
but the prisons are overflowing with the incarcerated … A constitution is given, but the autocracy
remains. Everything is given and nothing is given.
A comment by Leon Trotsky after the October Manifesto, in Bertram Wolfe,
Three Who Made a Revolution: A Biographical History, 1964
LEFT WING (radical revolutionaries) REVOLUTIONARY PARTIES RIGHT WING (moderate revolutionaries)
SOCIAL DEMOCRATS split in 1903 into Bolsheviks and Mensheviks

SOCIALIST
NAME
BOLSHEVIKS MENSHEVIKS REVOLUTIONARIES

CADETS OCTOBRISTS
• Urban working class • Urban working class • Peasants • Progressive landlords • Wealthy land- and
• Soldiers in the army • Some lawyers and other • Some moderate and industrialists Factory-owners
SUPPORT
during WWI professionals urban socialists • Many lawyers and other • Monarchists
• Cautious socialists professionals
PERSONALITIES
• Vladimir Lenin • Julius Martov • Alexander • Paul Miliukov • Alexander Guchkov

• Leon Trotsky • Fedor Dan Kerensky • Prince Luov • Mikhael Rodzianko
• Alliance between working Cooperation with the Land reform to A constitutional monarchy, • Supporter of the
class and peasants middle class to overthrow benefit the like the English model 1905 October Manifesto
POLICIES
• Rapid overthrow of the the tsar, followed by peasants • A Duma, but with the tsar
Tsar and the middle class steady progress to retaining most power
to attain socialism socialism
SOURCE 19 Groups opposed to the reign of Nicholas II at the time of the 1905 Revolution

1 Why was the October Manifesto introduced, according to
Source 16? What changes were agreed to by Nicholas?
2 According to Source 18, did Leon Trotsky view the tsar’s desire
for reform as genuine? Do Trotsky’s comments suggest that
revolutionary activity would increase or diminish after the issuing
of the October Manifesto? Explain your answer.
3 The following questions refer to Source 19.
a Which political parties did Vladimir Lenin and Alexander
Kerensky belong to?
b Which groups wished to retain the tsar as head of state?
SOURCE 20 Moscow residents celebrate the c State two policy differences that help explain why the
October Manifesto. Bolsheviks and Mensheviks disagreed with each other.
Political developments following the 1905 Revolution

Nicholas disliked the October Manifesto. He had hoped to buy peace with concessions
and, feeling betrayed when strikes and protests continued, he returned to the methods of
an autocrat. In the countryside, loyal troops moved through the villages with a campaign
of hangings and floggings to subdue the rebellious peasants. On 16 December 1905, the
St Petersburg soviet was closed and 190 of its members arrested. A general strike in Moscow
led to street fighting from 21 December 1905 until 2 January 1906, resulting in defeat for the
strikers and the deaths of more than 1000 workers.
Nicholas had bitterly resented having to concede to a Duma, and tried to reassert his
Fundamental Laws position by issuing a series of Fundamental Laws on 2 May 1906. These confirmed the tsar’s
a decree from the
tsar in 1906 that right to appoint his own ministers, legislate by decree and have complete control over foreign
ostensibly confirmed affairs. Laws passed by the Duma would require his approval. An Imperial Council, with half
the October
of its members appointed by the tsar, would share power with the Duma.
Manifesto, but also
asserted his power The elections for the first Duma in 1906 and the second Duma in 1907 produced
over the Duma parliaments that were critical of the government, and both were dissolved by Nicholas after
only a few months. Before the third Duma, Nicholas altered the electoral law to ensure that the
representation of peasants, small landowners and urban dwellers was drastically reduced. The
resulting Duma was a submissive and conservative body. It was allowed to serve its full term
from 1907 to 1912, as was the fourth and final Duma from 1912 to 1917.
While the Dumas met, the prime minister, Peter Stolypin, carried out a policy to repress
the revolutionary elements, while offering limited land concessions to the peasants. This
two-pronged approach was designed to consolidate the position of the tsar by removing his
revolutionary opponents and winning the loyalty and gratitude of the peasants.

1 What do you understand by the term ‘revolution’? Do the events of 1905 merit the
description of ‘revolution’? Why or why not?
2 The events of 1905 have been called a ‘dress rehearsal’ for the Russian Revolution of 1917.
What lessons might revolutionaries have drawn from the events of 1905?

9.3 The fall of the Romanov dynasty
RUSSIA’S SOUTH-WEST FRONT LINE, 1916 War was declared between Germany and
Russia in August 1914, and at first it seemed
Petrograd that the First World War would save the
B A L T I C Romanov throne, not destroy it. Political
S E A
differences were put aside as Russians joined
to fight the common enemy in defence of
the homeland. Volunteers hastened to join
RUSSIA the army, and the tsar blessed the troops as
they left for the front. Even urban discontent
Gumbinnen Mogilev
– which had been expressed in an increasing
Tannenberg Masurian number of political and economic strikes
Lakes in the first half of the year – vanished. No
GER Warsaw strikes of any kind were recorded in the
Front Line, Decemb
MA
NY month of August 1914.
Brusilov’s Offensives,
1916 and 1917
The role of the First World
AUSTRIA–HUNGARY Galicia War in the collapse of the
er
1
Romanov dynasty
91
6
N At first, Russia’s campaign on the south-

B L A C K
west front seemed a story of unstoppable
S E A
success. The Austrians were pushed back
0 200 400 600 km
in Galicia, and the Germans were defeated
at Gumbinnen. Then came the German
SOURCE 21 This map shows Russia’s south-west frontline in 1916, including response. At Tannenberg in August 1914,
the location of the offensives led by Brusilov in 1916 and 1917. the Germans inflicted a heavy defeat on
the Russians. Masses of prisoners, stores
and guns were taken, and the Russian
commander, Vladimir Samsonov, shot
himself. In September, another heavy defeat
at the Masurian Lakes confirmed the end
of the advance against the Germans and
the beginning of a three-year attempt
to hold back the German advance into
Russia’s western provinces. There were some
campaign successes against the Austro-
Hungarian Army, spearheaded by Russian
General Aleksei Brusilov, but the optimistic
mood that had greeted the war changed to
one of increasing disillusionment.
SOURCE 22 Russian boy soldiers are guarded by German troops after
their capture at the Battle of Tannenberg, 1914.

Russia had been inadequately prepared for a modern war. Vladimir Sukhomlinov, the
war minister, had severely underestimated the needs of the army. Factories could not produce
enough ammunition, and army commanders were forced to plan manoeuvres using maps as
much as 18 years out of date. Soldiers were fighting barefoot because of a shortage of boots, and
only one in three had a rifle. Artillery commanders were rationed to three to five shells per gun
per day. The wounded were often left unattended on station platforms for days, and were then
transported in freight cars – lying on the bare boards and often without adequate clothes or
food. By the end of the 1915 summer campaign, Russia had suffered 3.5 million casualties.
The impact of the war

The economy soon began to feel the strains of war. The normal trade routes through the Baltic
Sea and the Black Sea were virtually cut off. Exports fell by 86.7 per cent in the first full year of
the war, while budget expenditure rose from 3.5 billion roubles in 1914 to 15.3 billion roubles in
Allies 1916. The government tried to fill the gap by borrowing from the Allies and by printing more
the coalition
of countries in
money. The result was inflation, which saw the price of flour double and the price of meat triple
opposition to the between 1914 and 1916. Speculators flourished, and a third of the grain stocks were held by
Central Powers in banks, in anticipation of price increases.
the First World War;
they included Britain, The war hit rural areas particularly hard. Most of the 15 million men mobilised during the
the Commonwealth, war were from the countryside. The loss of fathers and sons and even horses to the war effort
France and Russia,
which were joined
meant fewer people and animals to work the soil. Though the 1916 harvest was good, the army
by the United States took most of the supplies, and the peasants were reluctant to sell grain for devalued money that
in 1917 bought little. There was, in fact, little to buy. With manufacturing focused on the war effort, the
production of agricultural implements dropped to 15 per cent of the pre-war level.
In the cities, the situation was no better. Food was hard to come by, as the overloaded rail
network had trouble transporting grain from the farming areas to the cities. Wages remained low
and as prices rose, discontent showed itself in strike activity. There were 268 strikes in January
and February 1917, resulting in 403 295 lost working days.
conscript As long as the state’s main priority was feeding and equipping millions of conscripts, there
a person who is
could be no improvement in the overall economic picture. Increasingly, thoughts turned towards
compulsorily enlisted
in the armed forces ending the war. A soldier named Pireiko wrote:
SOURCE 23
Everyone, to the last man, was interested in nothing but peace … who should win and what
kind of peace it would be, that was of small interest to the army. It wanted peace at any cost,
for it was weary of war.
In Leon Trotsky, The History of the Russian Revolution, 1932, p. 16
If the war showed up Russia’s economic weaknesses, it also confirmed the view that the
corruption and ignorance of key individuals were leading the country to ruin. The principal
objects of gossip and rumour were Tsarina Alexandra and her friendship with a man named
Gregory Rasputin.

1 Use a mind map to summarise the impact of the war on Russia’s economy and its people.
2 Write a letter from the perspective of a peasant soldier after serving three years in the army.

RASPUTIN – THE ‘MAD MONK’
9.3a PROFILE
Gregory Rasputin was born in Pokrovskoe, Siberia, in 1872. His
drinking and sexual activities earned him his acquired name
(‘Rasputin’ is Russian for womaniser). Rasputin claimed to have had
a deep religious experience as a young man, and he was brought
to the attention of Nicholas and Alexandra in November 1905 as a
staretz, a wandering holy man.
Rasputin’s physical appearance was in stark contrast to others at
the Russian court. Dressed in a peasant’s smock, his unkempt, matted
hair hung to his shoulders. His eyes were bright and piercing, and
many described how they felt hypnotised by his gaze. Despite the
‘Mad Monk’ label that his enemies later gave him, he was neither mad,
nor a monk; he had a wife and three children in Pokrovskoe.
Alexandra had worried constantly about the health of her son, SOURCE 24 Rasputin in 1908
Alexis. His haemophilia meant that he was often ill and in great pain,
and only Rasputin seemed to be able to help him. As Rasputin’s influence at the court grew,
so did the stories about his womanising and drunken exploits. However, Alexandra’s belief in
‘Our Friend’ (her name for Rasputin) as a healer had earnt him her unquestioning support.
By late 1916, criticism of Rasputin’s influence over the Romanovs and his corruption of the
government was constant. Eventually, the rumours that Rasputin held the real power in the
court led two young members of the extended royal family, Prince Felix Yusupov and Grand
Duke Dimitry Pavlovich, to murder Rasputin in December 1916. After he had been poisoned,
shot and clubbed to death, Rasputin’s body was wrapped in canvas and dropped through a
hole in the ice in the River Neva.
9.3a PROFILE TASKS

1 Research Rasputin’s influence in the Romanov court and explain how this affected the
public perception of Nicholas and Alexandra.
2 Write an article announcing Rasputin’s death, including reactions to the news from a
palace spokesperson representing the Tsarina Alexandra, and the ‘people in the street’.
The declining legitimacy of Nicholas’ rule

In August 1915 Nicholas appointed himself commander-in-chief of the army, and consequently
Russia’s continuing military failures were now directly blamed on him. Nicholas spent much of
his time in his military headquarters at Mogilev, isolating himself from the capital Petrograd,
Petrograd
more than 600 km away. Control of government business was left in the hands of Alexandra,
the capital of the
and Rasputin began to meddle in political and military matters. He promoted the appointment Russian Empire; it
of friends and admirers to positions of power, regardless of ability. Able ministers were dismissed was renamed from
St Petersburg to
if they spoke out against the growing corruption. In this way, Russia went through five Petrograd in 1914,
interior ministers and three foreign ministers within 10 months. Open corruption in political at the beginning of
appointments, and the inability of Nicholas to overrule the influence of the ‘Mad Monk’ and the the First World War,
because the original
‘German woman’ (as the German-born Alexandra became known), made it clear to many that a name sounded
change was needed at the top. too German

The death of Rasputin in December 1916 could not undo the effect of his years of
influence. As the new year began, even members of the Duma and several of the grand dukes
of the imperial family talked of removing Nicholas. Their hope was to put his son, Alexis, on
the throne, with the experienced and popular Grand Duke Nicholas (a cousin of Nicholas II
regent and a former commander-in-chief of the Russian Army) as regent and effective leader.
a person who
administers a state
for an underage
monarch
The Russian Revolution
The last chapter of the Romanov dynasty began in February 1917. During a savage Russian
winter, riots and demonstrations broke out over the shortage of bread in Petrograd. Striking
workers from the factories swelled the numbers of protestors. The president of the Duma,
Michael Rodzianko, sent telegrams to Nicholas II, advising him that it was ‘essential
immediately to order persons having the confidence of the country to form a new government’.
Nicholas ignored these warnings.
On 25 February, the city virtually came to a standstill as crowds once again marched to
demonstrate against the government, with placards demanding bread, and calling for the
overthrow of the tsar and the ending of the war. In parts of Petrograd, the police fired on the
Cossacks crowds but, in an ominous sign for the authorities, patrols of mounted Cossack troops refused
an Eastern Slavic- to fire on the people. On 26 February, Nicholas, with a poor understanding of what was
speaking ethnic
Russian group with happening, ordered the military commander in Petrograd to end the disorder. A turning point
a strong military in the revolution came as soldiers who sympathised with the protestors refused to fire against
tradition
the crowds. This defiance against their commanding officers became a full-scale mutiny of the
Petrograd garrison. Nicholas had given orders to suspend the Duma, but its members continued
to meet. This in itself was an act of rebellion. Some ministry buildings and government offices
had been occupied by revolutionaries. The headquarters of the secret police, police stations and
the law courts had been set on fire. No one gave orders or directed events. According to one
observer, it was as if the revolution had its own momentum. The Duma members formed a
provisional committee to try to control the developing situation. Yet even as they were taking
this step, a rival source of authority had arisen in the form of the workers’ soviet establishing a
Provisional Government.
Abdication and the transfer of power to the Provisional

Government
Finally grasping the seriousness of the situation, Nicholas began the rail journey home.
Receiving word that the rail lines into Petrograd were in the hands of the revolutionaries, his
train was forced to turn aside to Pskov. There, he heard that his generals had deserted him and
received messages from the newly formed Provisional Government urging him to abdicate.
At first, Nicholas intended to abdicate in favour of his son, Alexis. Then, after talking to his
personal physician – who reminded him of the seriousness of Alexis’ illness, and the likelihood
Bolsheviks that Nicholas and Alexandra would be separated from him by exile – he decided to include
a revolutionary
political party
Alexis in the abdication document, which was signed on 2 March 1917. The throne passed to
led by Lenin that Nicholas’ brother, Michael, but he too was persuaded that the public would not accept him as
seized power from tsar, and he abdicated. Russia was now a republic and the Romanov dynasty had ended after
Russia’s Provisional
Government in 300 years of rule. The Provisional Government did not last long. In November 1917, it was
November 1917 replaced by Lenin and the Bolsheviks.

SOURCE 25 A Russian bread queue guarded SOURCE 26 Striking workers at the Putilov steelworks, on the first day of
by the Imperial Police, March 1917 the February 1917 revolution
SOURCE 27
At ten o’clock I went to Mass. The reports were on time. There were many people at breakfast,
including all the foreigners. Wrote to Alix [Tsarina Alexandra] and went for a walk near the chapel by
the Brobrisky road. The weather was fine and frosty. After tea I read and talked with Senator Tregubov
until dinner. Played dominoes in the evening.
From the diary of Nicholas II, 26 February 1917, in Orlando Figes,
A People’s Tragedy, The Russian Revolution 1891–1924, 1997

1 What evidence does Source 25 provide about the impact of the war on the Russian people?
2 Describe the scene shown in Source 26. What evidence does the source provide about the
nature of the protests on the first day of the revolution?
3 What evidence does Source 27 provide about the tsar’s understanding of the protests in
Petrograd on 26 February 1917?
The fate of the royal family

Nicholas had hoped that while the political turmoil of the revolution played itself out in Russia,
he and his family would be allowed to retire to Livadia, their palace on the Black Sea coast. This
was not to be. The new government could not let Nicholas stay at liberty. On the one hand,
revolutionaries might try to kill him; on the other, supporters might try to restore him to the
throne. Efforts to find the family a refuge abroad brought no results. The most obvious solution
was to send them to Britain, where Nicholas’s cousin George was king. However, British public
opinion was against giving refuge to a man with such a reputation as a harsh ruler.
The royal family were at first confined to the palace at Tsarskoe Selo, outside Petrograd, then
later moved to Ekaterinburg, a town far from the capital where the local soviet was loyal to the
Bolshevik revolutionary cause. The family remained under guard, an afternoon’s walk in the
garden being the only break from the confinement in their rooms.

Beyond the walls of their prison, Russia was in the grip of a civil war. Supporters of the
revolutionary Bolshevik Government (the Reds) were opposed by a collection of anti-Bolshevik
forces (the Whites). As the fighting spread, Ekaterinburg, which was held by Red forces, came
under threat from the approaching Whites. The decision was taken to kill the entire Romanov
family to prevent their being rescued by the Whites and the possibility of Nicholas being
restored to the throne.
Around midnight on 17 July 1918 the family were awoken and told to get dressed and be
ready to leave. When they made their way downstairs, they were shown into a basement, and
chairs were brought for the Tsarina Alexandra and Alexis. Then a firing squad entered the room.
All seven members of the family were shot, along with their servants and the family
physician. Their bodies were placed in a truck and transported to an abandoned mine, where
they were doused in sulphuric acid, burnt, and tossed down the mine shaft. This was not their
last resting place. The Romanovs’ head jailer, Yakov Yurovsky, was appalled to find upon his
return to Ekaterinburg that the ‘secret’ burial place was being talked about all over town. The
Bolsheviks did not want the grave of the last tsar to become a shrine for future generations of
monarchists, and so it was necessary to move the bodies to a new hiding place. Yurovsky led
another group of soldiers back to the mine. Once again, the bodies were placed in the back of a
truck, which set off into the forest. There, the bodies were again doused with acid and reburied.
For almost 70 years, their whereabouts remained a mystery. The Soviet Union, under a
communist government, kept its state files secret and showed no interest in the ‘Romanov
mystery’. With the collapse of communist government in 1991 came a new openness and the
opportunity to unravel the puzzle. In 1979, three geologists and a writer investigating how the
Romanovs had ‘disappeared’ had discovered the forest location and dug up three skulls. After
making casts, the skulls were reburied. Fearful of the reaction from the authorities, they did not
tell their story to the press until a decade later. In 1991, the grave was reopened and the bones of
nine corpses removed. Modern techniques of forensic science established one of the skulls as that
of the tsar. The grave of Nicholas Romanov had been found.
Yet there remained a further mystery. Of the 11 people shot, only nine skeletons were found
in the grave. The remains of Alexis and one of the younger females were missing.
HISTORICAL DEBATE: DID ANASTASIA

9.3b PROFILE
SURVIVE?
In 1920, a young woman was pulled from a canal in Berlin. It was
presumed that she had attempted suicide, and for several months
she was kept in a clinic while attempts were made to find her identity.
Gradually, it emerged that this young woman claimed to be the tsar’s
youngest daughter, Anastasia. After she left the clinic and began a life
that would take her from Europe to the United States, she became best
known as Anna Anderson.
For years, her claim intrigued historians and surviving members of
the Russian nobility. She fought several court cases to establish her
SOURCE 28 identity, but they were inconclusive. During her lifetime, many people
Anastasia in 1915 who claimed to know the Romanov family, including surviving relatives,

met Anna Anderson in a bid to establish the truth. Some, such as Pierre
Gilliard, who had been tutor to Anastasia and her sisters, declared her to
be a fraud. Others, such as the son and daughter of Dr Eugene Botkin, the
Romanov physician who had died with the tsar, declared her to be genuine. In
1984 she died in Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, where she had settled.
If this was Anastasia, how did she survive? Her story was that she had been
badly wounded and lapsed into unconsciousness. When she next opened
her eyes, she saw stars above her. Seeing that she was still alive, a guard,
Alexander Tschaikowsky, took pity on her and helped her to escape in the
confusion and darkness that surrounded the disposal of the bodies. Eventually
she made her way as a refugee to Romania, where she had Tschaikowsky’s
child and married him. After Tschaikowsky was killed in 1919, his young widow
left the child with her late husband’s family and made her way to the German
capital, Berlin, in the hope that her mother’s family would help her. However,
when she approached the Netherlands Palace in Berlin she was overcome with
doubts. Would she be admitted to the palace? Would any of the royal family SOURCE 29 Anna Anderson
be in residence? Would anybody recognise her after all the ordeals she had in 1926
been through? Filled with despondency, she turned to the Landwehr Canal.
Attempts to prove or disprove the identity of Anna Anderson gave rise to a stream of
books, films and documentaries. In the early 1990s, a British forensic team was commissioned
to perform DNA tests to finally establish the identity of this mysterious woman. A television
documentary based on this investigation showed various tests that had been carried out.
These included comparison of her handwriting to Anastasia’s, from surviving schoolbooks,
and speech patterns compared with accents from eastern Europe. Ear patterns, like
fingerprints, are distinctive and can be used as a means of identification. Measurements
taken from Anna Anderson were compared with a photograph of Anastasia’s ear, and found
to be virtually identical. Anna Anderson and Anastasia appeared to be the same person.
However, the findings from the DNA sample were to upset this conclusion. Mitochondrial
DNA (mtDNA) is passed down through the generations from women to their children. Thus,
mtDNA patterns can link people to their mothers and grandmothers, and even to ancestors
who are separated by many generations. Using DNA obtained from the Duke of Edinburgh,
a grand-nephew of the Tsarina Alexandra, it was found that Anna Anderson could not have
been related to Alexandra and therefore could not have been Anastasia. Furthermore, a
link was made, through the mtDNA, between Anna Anderson and the family of Franziska
Schanzkowska. Schanzkowska was a Polish wartime factory munitions worker, and it had long
been suggested that she and Anna Anderson were one and the same.
In August 2007, it was announced that the two missing bodies from the Romanov mass
grave had been found by a team of Russian amateur historians searching in the forests
around Ekaterinburg (now Yekaterinburg). Russian archaeologists asserted they had
discovered the remains of a 10–13-year-old boy and an 18–23-year-old woman. In May 2008,
a US genetic science laboratory confirmed the royal identities of the bones. Many would now
be satisfied that the Anastasia mystery has been answered beyond a reasonable doubt.
Do you agree?
9.3b PROFILE TASK

Conduct some research to find three sources relating to the execution or survival of Anastasia
from the firing squad in 1918. Assess the reliability and usefulness of these sources.

CONCLUSION The fall of the Romanov dynasty can now be seen as a major event that helped shape the
twentieth century and beyond. The Soviet Union, which emerged from the destruction of
tsarist rule in 1922, would be a dominant world power for much of the century. It joined
with Western allies such as Great Britain and the United States to resist Germany in the
Second World War, and opposed them in the Cold War that followed. The rapid chain
of events that led to the dissolution of the Soviet Union between 1989 and 1991 in some
ways mirror the end of the Romanov dynasty. Some Western media sources refer to
Vladimir Putin as a ‘new tsar’, indicating that in the world’s understanding of Russia, the
idea of a tsarist regime endures.
The Romanov dynasty exhibits many of the key features of modern history. There are
both written and visual sources available that enable students and historians to analyse
and assess competing perspectives. There are the memories of participants that express
perspectives and bias that needs to recognised. There are the clashes of forces of
continuity (represented by the Romanovs) with the forces of change (represented by the
political parties of the workers and the emerging middle class). There is the opportunity
to examine the impact of the individual on history, with Rasputin, Nicholas II and Lenin
all being worthy of further study. Finally, there is the drama of the Anastasia mystery.
Could she have survived the assassination? Ultimately, as with many historical mysteries,
emerging scientific techniques appear to have enabled the story of Anna Anderson to
be fully explained.
SOURCE 30 Tsar Nicholas II with three of his daughters
FOR THE TEACHER

chapter

10
The Cuban
Revolution
A revolution such as that
experienced by Cuba in 1959 is
often characterised by quick and
often violent change. Individuals
cope with change differently,
and it is to be expected that
you will confront a range of very Explanation and communication
different perspectives in the
Make sure you become familiar
sources you consult in the course
with important concepts that
of your investigation of the Cuban
could help you communicate
Revolution.
your historical understanding.
Historical interpretation Examine the words that are
How significant was the Cuban bolded and defined in this
Revolution? Does its significance chapter and consider whether
vary, depending upon the any of them could be useful
Fidel Castro speaks to the perspective of the person as you communicate what you
people of Santa Clara, c. 1959. conducting the analysis? Is it understand about the Cuban
possible to be free of bias when Revolution.
analysing such an event? All these
FOCUS QUESTIONS questions must be considered LEARNING GOALS
as you investigate the Cuban
1 What was the Cuban Revolution. > Understand the context,
Revolution and why did conduct and legacy of the
it occur? Historical investigation
Cuban Revolution.
and research
2 Who was Fidel Castro > Analyse sources relevant to an
and why is he a significant It is important to ensure that
you engage with a variety of investigation into the Cuban
historical figure? Revolution.
perspectives. Each perspective will
3 How did the Cuban challenge or support the argument > Consider the significance
Revolution succeed? you are developing, and, by of the Cuban Revolution
4 What is the legacy of the engaging with it, you will be able in the post–Second World
Cuban Revolution? to refine your own understanding. War world.

10.1 Introduction This chapter investigates the causes, course and nature of the Cuban Revolution of 1959, and
the impact it has had on Cuba and the world over the past 60 years. The Cuban Revolution
saw the overthrowing of the US-backed military dictator Fulgencio Batista by Fidel Castro and
his supporters. This was the most recent in a number of revolutions and uprisings in Cuba’s
history, which took place both during its time as a Spanish colony (1492–1898) and during the
protectorate years when it was a protectorate of the United States (1902–59). After more than 400 years of
a country that is
controlled and
occupation, Castro and his rebels succeeded in making Cuba a sovereign state. This has given
protected by a more Castro and his fellow revolutionary, Ernesto ‘Che’ Guevara, legendary status – not only in
powerful country Cuba, but also among their ideological followers throughout Latin America and the world.
The lens of historiography

Historiography is the study of the construction of history – how accounts of the past have been
created, and how and why versions of the past have changed over time. The causes and nature
of the Cuban Revolution, and the personalities and motivations of its leaders, have been the
subject of ongoing historical research since 1959.
Since the 1990s, new evidence has stimulated reassessments by historians and political scientists
about the revolution. In that decade, the US Government released previously classified
communism documents held in its Cuba archives. Around the same time, Communist Party documents
an economic system that had been held in the archives of the former Soviet Union became available to historians for
in which the means
of production
the first time.
(for example An increasing number of personal narratives and biographical accounts published in Cuba
factories, farms
and machinery) are
have also added to our understanding of the Cuban point of view. In 2016, British academic
publicly owned by Steve Cushion examined a range of previously ignored Cuban documents, and developed an
the state, and goods argument that the Cuban working class played a much larger and more significant role in the
are distributed
equally according to
revolution than previously acknowledged.
need, as opposed to These developments highlight one of the most important elements of historical
privately owned and
investigation; namely that historical discourse constantly involves
controlled systems
such as capitalism reassessment and revision of earlier ideas and perspectives.
SOURCE 1 Fidel
Castro and Che
Guevara. These
two revolutionary
leaders gained
legendary status in
Cuba and around
the world after
the 1959 Cuban
Revolution.

JOSÉ MARTÍ (1853–95)
10.1 PROFILE
José Julián Martí Pérez was born in the
Cuban capital of Havana in 1853, during
Spanish colonial rule. Originally planning
to make a living as an artist, Martí left his
art studies to join the nationalists’ war
for Cuban independence. During the
war, he developed resentment towards
the Spanish and slavery, which was still
present in Cuba for years after its official
abolition. In 1869 Martí was arrested and
deported to Spain, where he continued
to criticise the Spanish Government,
publishing many articles that told of the
atrocities carried out by the Spanish in
the Caribbean.
Martí returned to the Americas
after completing his law studies,
moving between Mexico, Venezuela
and Guatemala, and visiting a number
of other Latin American counties. He
gained a following of intellectuals and
artists – many of them Cubans in exile
– through his published essays, poems,
books and articles. In 1893, Martí visited
SOURCE 2 A poster with images of Cuban national hero José
Martí and Fidel Castro, in 2003. The text on the poster reads ‘I
Cuban clubs throughout the United
have the master’s teachings in my heart’, in reference to Martí.
States and the Caribbean to raise funds
for his return to Cuba, with the aim of
starting a revolution against the Spanish.
He finally entered Cuba in April 1895, but
it soon became clear that he was not a his movement was heavily inspired by
skilled solider. Martí was killed in a battle Martí’s fight for independence. nationalism
against Spanish troops on 19 May 1895, Stanzas of Martí’s poetry were used a sense of pride
just over a month later. as the lyrics of Cuba’s most famous song, in, and love of,
one’s country;
Despite his military defeat, Martí’s ‘Guantanamera’. The song was not only
advocacy
return to Cuba is regarded as having an international hit in the 1960s, but has of political
boosted the independence movement, ensured that Martí’s poetry has continued independence
and to this day he is regarded a national to live on through popular culture in films for a particular
country
hero in Cuba. Castro often claimed that as diverse as Godfather II and Antz.
10.1 PROFILE TASKS

1 Assess Martí’s achievements. To what extent do you think he contributed to the 1959
Cuban Revolution? Explain your answer.
2 Investigate the history of the song ‘Guantanamera’. Explain how its history and use can
be explained by the concepts of continuity and change.
CH A P T E R 10 T HE CUBAN RE VOLU TION 155

1903
SOURCE 3 Timeline
Key events in Cuba’s history
1492 The United States and Cuba sign a reciprocal trade

agreement. Cuba’s economy is now controlled by the
United States, and US companies own most of the sugar
and tobacco plantations.
The Caribbean Island of Cuba is colonised by Spain.
1700s–1867 1906
Unrest in Cuba causes US President Theodore Roosevelt to call
on the rights stated in the Platt Agreement and invade Cuba.
More than a million slaves are brought from Africa to
Cuba to work in the sugar plantations.
1868–98 1914–18
The First World War rages in Europe, and sugar production
there comes to a standstill. Cuba’s economy booms with
Cuban revolutionaries wage a 30-year war against the
the high demand for Cuban sugar in the United States.
colonial power of Spain, influenced by the populist and
nationalist ideas of poet and revolutionary José Martí.
1898 1925–33
Gerardo Machado, a war hero from the War of
The United States Independence against Spain, is elected president.
increases its military Machado rules as a dictator and installs himself for a
presence around Cuba. second term, causing major political unrest.
On 15 February, the
1933
American battleship
USS Maine explodes in
Havana harbour and, soon
after, the United States
declares war on Spain. The 1933 Revolution overthrows Machado on 12 August, and
A statue of Cuban
After the US victory, Cuba is Ramón Grau San Martín becomes provisional president. The
national hero José Martí,
made a protectorate of the new government is not recognised by the United States.
Cienfuegos, Cuba
United States.
1901 1934
With US support, military leader
The Platt Amendment Fulgencio Batista removes
is added to the Cuban Grau’s nationalist government.
Constitution, granting The Platt Amendment is officially
the United States the abolished, but the United
right to intervene in States retains its naval base in
An American stamp, c. 1998, Cuban affairs. Guantánamo Bay. Cuba and
remembers USS Maine.
the United States sign a new Colonel Fulgencio Batista (left),
1902
reciprocal trade agreement. with a US general on a visit to
Washington DC, 1938
Cuba officially becomes independent. However, the

Platt Amendment remains, limiting Cuban sovereignty. 1940
Batista is elected president. A new Cuban Constitution is
adopted and Batista makes several social reforms, including
156 K E Y F E AT UR E S OF MODE RN HIS T OR Y 1 Y E A R 11 labour rights and women’s rights.

1944–52 1960
Grau is elected president in 1944 and takes the Castro’s close relationship with the Soviet Union and his
presidency back from Batista. He serves until 1948, when adoption of communist ideals, such as his control of the
he is succeeded by Carlos Prío Socarrás. In March 1952 economy, is met with hostility by the US Government.
Batista overthrows Prío in a military coup d’état and After US-owned oil companies refuse to process Soviet oil,
suspends the Cuban Constitution, enabling him to make Castro seizes all US-owned property in Cuba. The United
decisions without reference to any elected body. States imposes a full-scale economic blockade of Cuba.
1953 1961
Fidel Castro and his supporters stage a failed attack on The ‘Bay of Pigs Invasion’, a US-funded invasion of Cuba,
the Moncada military barracks, and are imprisoned. fails to overthrow Castro.
1955 1962
The Cuban Missile Crisis brings the world to a nuclear
Batista declares a political amnesty, releasing Castro
flashpoint when the Soviets place missiles on Cuba, at
and other political prisoners. Castro and his supporters
Cuba’s request. After a two-week confrontation, the
relocate to Mexico. There they meet Ernesto ‘Che’
Soviets agree to withdraw the missiles under the condition
Guevara, who joins their group.
that the United States will never invade Cuba again.
1956 A US Navy Patrol plane flying over the missile-carrying

Soviet ship Potzunov as it leaves Cuba in 1962
Castro and his rebels return to Cuba. Their base is the

jungle in the Sierra Maestra area, where they stay and
grow their movement for the next two years.
1958
Batista has grown increasingly unpopular among the
poor in Cuba, who stage revolts and strikes. Castro’s
rebels leave the Sierra Maestra and launch a popular
insurrection. Batista orders army offensives against the
rebels, but is not able to subdue them. On 31 December,
Batista steps down and flees the country along with his
family, the political elite and many US officials.
1962–2016
Castro rules Cuba as a dictator until his death on
25 November 2016, after which his brother Raúl takes over
as president.
,
1959 10.1 Check your learning
1 In your own words, write a definition of what you
understand the term ‘historiography’ to mean.
Fidel Castro is sworn in
as prime minister on 16 2 What was the basis of Steve Cushion’s new
February 1959. interpretation of the Cuban Revolution?
3 What changes in the 1990s helped historians
develop new interpretations of the Cuban
Fidel Castro speaking to Revolution?
the media shortly after the
rebel victory in 1959

10.2 The historical context of the Cuban
Revolution
In your investigation of the Cuban Revolution of 1959, it is crucial to understand that this
turbulent time was only one of many uprisings and revolutions in the country’s 450-year
colonial history. What sets the revolution in 1959 apart is that it was the first one to result in
a lasting, peaceful period in Cuba since the country was first occupied by Spain in 1492. It
was also the first revolution to see Cuba emerge as a sovereign state, free from economic and
political control by colonial powers.
CUBA
UNITED STATES
Florida
LE GE ND Cuba as a Spanish colony
Country border
Cuba is the largest island in the Caribbean.
It became a Spanish colony following
MEXICO the arrival of Christopher Columbus in
CUBA 1492. Typical of colonial powers, Spain
exploited Cuban resources for the benefit
of Spain’s domestic economy. Cuba’s main
agricultural products during this time
were tobacco and sugar and, towards the
late 1700s, it was completely dependent
N on the export of these products. By the
1860s, Cuba was one of the world’s leading
0 500 1000 km producers of sugar, and much of the export
was going to Cuba’s neighbour to the
SOURCE 4 Cuba, located less than 170 km from the coast of the United
States, is the largest island in the Caribbean. north, the United States.
Slavery and civil war

In order to meet the very high demand for Cuban sugar, the Spanish Government brought over
millions of African slaves to work on the sugar plantations. Despite the Abolition of Slave Trade
emancipation Act 1807, which saw British colonies abolish the slave trade, and the emancipation of slaves in
the freeing of people
from slavery
the United States in 1865, the Spanish continued to profit from the slave trade until officially
abolishing it in 1867. It has been estimated that, at one
point, there were more slaves in Cuba than
white Spanish colonists.
SOURCE 5 A woodcut from

1849 shows workers, probably
slaves, working on a Cuban
tobacco plantation.

Following a successful slave rebellion in neighbouring Haiti in 1791, the colonial government
in Cuba became more despotic. The wealth that the export of sugar brought to the island despotic
did not benefit the people of Cuba, and even the plantation owners soon began to show their governing with
threats or the use
dissatisfaction. By the mid-1800s, Cuba was in a state of intense political unrest leading to of force
a series of protests and uprisings, with intellectuals and political activists such as José Martí
leading the struggle for an independent Cuba. In the 30-year period from 1868 to 1898, Cuba
fought three wars of liberation against Spain, culminating in the Cuban War of Independence,
1895–98. These uprisings ultimately failed to end Spanish rule. It would take the intervention
of the United States to do so.
Cuba as an American protectorate

By the end of the 1890s, the US public had grown
increasingly supportive of the Cuban cause, and many
Americans regarded the Spanish as oppressive tyrants.
Due to their own history as a British colony, Americans
identified with the Cuban people’s struggle to be free of a
European power. Many also regarded the Spanish use of
slavery as barbaric and outdated.
The US Government was wary of the ongoing
political instability taking place so close to its shores.
After much public agitation by New York newspapers,
the naval vassal USS Maine was sent to Havana in 1898
to observe the situation. On the night of 15 February,
the Maine exploded in Havana harbour. To this day,
historians are divided about who was responsible.
The newspapers published increasingly sensationalist
headlines calling for revenge for the destruction of the
Maine and the deaths of its 163 crewmen. The public
outcry this created ensured that the United States
declared war on Spain in April 1898. The Spanish– SOURCE 6 A 1868 political cartoon depicting Uncle Sam
American War lasted for four months before Spain’s and William H. Seward, the secretary of state in the Lincoln
defeat. The peace treaty that followed resulted in Cuba and Johnson administrations, discussing the annexation of
Cuba under the allegory of a giant pear (Cuba) hanging over a
being declared an American protectorate.
garden wall from a tree on the other side (Spain).
The Platt Amendment

On 2 March 1901, US President William McKinley signed the Platt Amendment, a set of
conditions to which Cuba had to agree in order for the US to withdraw from the island. The
amendment gave the United States control over Cuba’s economy; the right to intervene in
Cuba, both politically and militarily; and the right to retain naval bases on Cuba, including the
established base at Guantánamo Bay.
In practical terms, Cuba had replaced one colonial ruler, Spain, with another, the United
States. For the Americans, the Platt Amendment consolidated their interest and control over a
neighbour they believed was crucial to their long-term safety as a nation. It would take until
the revolution of 1959 for Cuba to finally free itself from its new masters.

1 How does Source 5 help you understand the long-term causes of the Cuban Revolution?
2 Analyse Source 6 carefully. What point is it trying to make?

1 What were Cuba’s main agricultural products, which brought wealth to its colonisers?
2 What were Cubans such as José Martí fighting for in the nineteenth century?
yellow journalism 3 Sensationalist reporting of the unrest in Cuba was described as yellow journalism. Do you
news reports based believe that the newspaper publishers bear any responsibility for the events in Cuba in 1898?
on sensationalism,
to shock and attract 4 Outline the main terms of the Platt Amendment.
readers
Political, economic and social conditions under

President Batista
Relying on the Platt Amendment for legal
authority, the United States kept a close eye
on the political situation in Cuba during
the early 1900s and intervened when it
found it necessary. In 1933, Fulgencio
coup d’état Batista became a military hero when he
a swift, decisive and
frequently violent
overthrew the US-backed dictator Machado
seizure of power, in a coup d’état that had wide support
often by the military among the Cuban people. Although not
elected president until 1940, Batista held
puppet government
a government where
the real power in Cuba from this point, and
the person who ruled behind the scenes of several puppet
wields effective governments.
power is not
holding office In the first year after the coup, Cuba
experienced a period of rapid social SOURCE 7 Cuban President Fulgencio Batista
populism change. A range of populist reforms were with US President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1942
a type of politics that introduced reflecting Western, democratic
claims to represent
the opinions values, including women’s voting rights,
and interests of minimum wage for sugar-cane cutters and eight-hour work days. The new regime – led by
ordinary people Batista’s approved president, Ramón Grau – also began to bring about agrarian reforms,
which would give Cuba’s peasants legal rights to their land. There is a strong argument that
agrarian reforms
changes to the law this period in Cuba’s history was crucial to forming the basis upon which Castro and his
relating to land followers would build their socialist reforms after the 1959 revolution.
ownership
The base for Batista’s power in the 1930s was his position as the self-appointed chief
of the armed forces. As the US Government became increasingly suspicious of the Cuban
reforms, Batista became the Americans’ favoured Cuban politician, and he received
substantial support from them in exchange for his loyalty to the US government. This led
to Batista leaving behind his progressive ways to rule as a dictator, from the moment he
seized power again in 1952 and suspended the Cuban Constitution.

Growing social and economic inequalities: 1940s–50s
Even though Cuba was more economically developed than many of
the other countries in Latin America at this time, there was a vast gap
between the lifestyles of the rich and the poor. During the 1940s–50s, the
benefits of modernisation and capitalism continued to be unevenly shared.
Three of the reasons for the uneven nature of Cuba’s economic
development were:
> The Cuban economy was still based heavily on primary
production, mainly on its sugar industry. When world prices for
sugar were high, the Cuban economy prospered, but when they fell,
the Cubans suffered.
> The sugar industry, 60 per cent of the land and most of Cuba’s big
businesses were all owned or controlled by US companies.
> American investors controlled 90 per cent of Cuba’s tobacco
industry, and its iron ore, copper and nickel mines. They also
controlled the railways, electricity and telephone system.
SOURCE 8 Inequalities led to dissatisfaction
The result of these factors was that few Cubans had the chance among Cuba’s many sugar plantation owners
to share in the wealth that their work created. Corruption was rife and workers who felt that President Batista had
and most of the profits went to companies in the United States. Only not followed through on his promise of land
rights.
a small fraction was spent on public works, schools, hospitals or
improved wages for Cubans.
The contrast between rich and poor

During the 1950s, Cuba could be roughly divided into three separate
societies.
The first Cuba was made up of the 1.5 million people who were
part of the rural poor, or who suffered from high unemployment.
Many were living on the brink of starvation, and the sight of
malnourished, poorly dressed children in the streets was common.
The second Cuba comprised the 3.5 million people who struggled
SOURCE 9 American tourists gambling at the
to get by. Economic dependence on the United States meant that the Cuban casino at the Nacional Hotel in Havana,
cost of living was high for the everyday working Cuban. Almost all Cuba, 1957. At this time, 1.5 million Cubans were
manufactured goods were imported from the United States and sold at living in severe poverty.
higher prices.
The third Cuba was the 900 000 people who benefited from 43 per cent of the national
income. This group had so much money that they struggled to spend it. Many of them owned
more than one luxury home, both in Cuba and in the United States. Some of them were so
extravagant that they built luxury family tombs. These multi-storeyed mausoleums had lifts,
telephones and air-conditioning. Even in death they were better housed than the majority of
their fellow Cubans. police state
a state where the
During Batista’s dictatorship, Cuba’s capital Havana was a playground for the wealthy.
police, usually
Cuba’s tourism and casino industries were dominated by the American mafia. The staggering the secret police,
difference in wealth and opportunity was met with frequent revolts and demonstrations, which detect and suppress
opposition to the
were repressed by Batista’s armed forces. Cuba had become a police state – ruled by a dictator government
and run largely as a profit-making enterprise for dubious American companies.

What caused the 1959 Cuban Revolution?
Prior to 1959, Cuba displayed many of the pre-conditions that the famous American
historian and revolutionary theorist, Crane Brinton, suggests makes a revolution possible.
Brinton differentiates between ‘pre-conditions’ – the environment that might make
revolution possible; and ‘causes’ – the specific elements that lead to revolution. The relevant
pre-conditions that were present in Cuba for decades before Castro took power
in 1959 were as follows:
intelligentsia 1 an economically advancing society – conditions where industrialisation, modern transport
highly educated
people with political
and communication create conflicts, opportunities and pressures for a new kind of
influence, such as government
writers, journalists
and academics
2 growing class conflict – an environment where, although society has advanced and grown
richer overall, wealth is not evenly shared; some people become exceptionally rich, while
intransigence others remain exceptionally poor
unwillingness or 3 an alienated intelligentsia – a growing class of better-educated people, teachers, doctors
refusal to change
one’s views or agree and lawyers, who begin to question the way that the society is governed and why wealth
about something is unevenly shared
4 government intransigence – a government that is unwilling to listen to the complaints of
Great Depression the people and refuses to reform or change the system
a period of severe
economic downtown 5 a corrupt and inefficient government – which is easier to challenge
that began in the
6 financial crisis – in this case, the Great Depression, which made life worse for the
United States and
quickly spread middle and lower classes, and posed an immediate challenge to the government,
around the world exposing its inefficiency.
during the 1930s
and 40s

the sources
1 Explain what the two people shown in
Source 7 would have to gain from their
relationship with one another.
2 What evidence do Sources 8, 9 and
10 provide to a historian studying the
causes of the Cuban Revolution?

1 Create a timeline of Fulgencio Batista’s
career.
2 Explain why inequalities between classes
developed in Cuba from the 1930s
onwards.
3 Compare life between the classes in
Cuba under Batista.
SOURCE 10 Living conditions for the poor in Cuba, c. 1950

10.3 The nature and course of the
Cuban Revolution
Massive inequality, dependence on the United States, the Cuban Government’s refusal to
reform, and government corruption combined to create a growing sense of dissatisfaction
among the majority of Cuba’s population. This dissatisfaction made them likely to accept
radical solutions. It was against this background that Castro developed his political and
revolutionary ideas.
Castro’s rise to power

Castro became politically active at the University of Havana, where he studied law. There, he
became involved with student activism and joined the Partido Ortodoxo, a left-wing people’s
political party. After completing his studies, Castro opened a small law practice in Havana
where most of his clients were poor Cubans, many of whom he represented free of charge.
With Batista controlling the courts and no chance of fair elections, Castro decided that an
armed revolution was the only way to put an end to the regime. Castro and his brother Raúl
recruited supporters for an attack on the Moncada army barracks on 26 July 1953. The assault
manifesto failed and Castro was arrested. During his trial, Castro made a four-hour speech that was later
a public declaration
to express beliefs
published as History Will Absolve Me, a manifesto justifying his actions and setting out his
and intentions complaints about the Batista Government.
The central points of Castro’s

manifesto were:
> Land reform is required to support the
85 per cent of Cuba’s small farmers who
live in constant fear of being thrown off
their land.
> Cuba needs to be industrialised and
infrastructure must be improved to serve
the more than two million people living
without electricity.
> The housing shortage must be addressed
and the hundreds of thousands of people
living in huts without proper sanitation
must have their living standards raised.
> Opportunities for education in rural
areas are limited; this must change.
> Quality medical care should be available
to everyone, not only to the rich.
SOURCE 11 Posters of Fidel Castro in Santiago de Cuba, 2016, which is

often referred to as birthplace of the Cuban Revolution

SOURCE 12
Only death can liberate one from so much misery. In this respect, however, the State is most helpful – in
providing early death for the people. Ninety per cent of the children in the countryside are consumed
amnesty by parasites which filter through their bare feet from the ground they walk on. Society is moved to
a general pardon
compassion when it hears of the kidnapping or murder of one child, but it is indifferent to the mass
for crimes against
the government, murder of so many thousands of children who die every year from lack of facilities, agonizing with pain
or under an earlier … They will grow up with rickets, with not a single good tooth in their mouths by the time they reach
regime thirty; they will have heard ten million speeches and will finally die of misery and deception.
Fidel Castro, History Will Absolve Me, 1953
At his trial, Castro was sentenced to

15 years in prison and his brother Raúl
to 13 years; but following an amnesty
by Batista, both were released after only
serving 18 months. Releasing the Castro
brothers proved to be a major mistake by
the government. Soon after their release,
the Castros left Cuba for Mexico, where
they spent two years building support and
developing a plan for their revolution. This
is where Castro met the Argentinian doctor
and guerrilla leader Che Guevara, who joined
the revolutionary cause. Under the cover of
darkness, Castro and his followers arrived back
in Cuba on a small yacht, the Granma, landing
on a beach in Cuba’s south-east on 2 December
1956. The rebels moved inland and took refuge
SOURCE 13 Castro is questioned by Cuban military and intelligence from Batista’s police and military forces in the
officials following the attack on the Moncada army barracks, 26 July 1953. remote Sierra Maestra mountains.
guerrilla
a style of warfare
The nature of guerrilla warfare and the activities
where small groups
confront a much
of revolutionaries
larger enemy with
The Moncada attack had given Castro a loyal following – both in Cuba and among Cubans in
surprise attacks and
ongoing harassment exile. His return to Cuba resulted in great media interest and Castro proved to be a master of
communicating to the world, even when operating from his jungle headquarters in the Sierra
Maestra. He named his guerrillas the ‘26th of July’ movement, after the date of their attack on
Moncada.
Castro’s revolutionaries worked hard to win over the poor local farming population. They
treated the farmers fairly, and helped build schools and educate the population about the rights they
should have. Throughout their time in the jungle, the group’s members rarely numbered more than
200. Despite this, they manage to evade arrest by avoiding major battles, specialising instead in
guerrilla ‘hit and run’ tactics. Batista had more than 30 000 soldiers and police officers, but Castro
conscript recognised that many of them were not committed to the fight. They were conscripts, or else
a person who is
they had joined the army only because it provided an income, clothes and food. Castro adopted a
compulsorily enlisted
in the armed forces strategy of releasing captured government troops after they surrendered and gave up their weapons.
This move won the sympathy of some of Batista’s soldiers and also helped arm the rebels.

SOURCE 14 During his time in hiding in the Sierra Maestra, Fidel Castro SOURCE 15 Castro (left) and Che Guevara in the
won the support of local farmers by supporting social projects and instilling woods of the Sierra Maestra, 8 October 1957
hope that his revolution would see the end of Batista’s brutal rule.
SOURCE 16 A huge crowd gathers in Revolution Square in Havana, July 1959, to hear Castro deliver one of his soon-to-be-
infamous lengthy speeches.
Batista’s attempt to crush Castro’s forces through heavy-handed military tactics, random
arrests of possible rebels and the raiding of towns in the region only served to create stronger
opposition against his regime. By the end of 1958, Castro had cultivated a ‘Robin Hood’ image
in America, and the US Government had called for Batista to step down. The United States,
which up until this point had armed Batista’s military, stopped supplying weapons. Left to fend
for himself and confronted by growing resistance from the public and his own army, Batista
realised that his time was up. On New Year’s Eve 1958, Batista and his aides fled Cuba.
After Batista’s escape from Cuba, his police and military did nothing to stop Castro’s rebels
as they entered Havana on 1 January 1959, allowing Castro to claim victory in the revolution.

Women and the Cuban
Revolution
Although women’s rights in Cuba started
to improve after Batista’s 1933 coup,
the role of women in Cuban society was
still mainly limited to taking care of the
home. Castro’s movement offered an
alternative, and attracted women who
contributed to everything – from helping
to spread propaganda, to sewing uniforms,
smuggling weapons and participating in
the fighting. The most influential woman
during the revolution was Celia Sánchez,
a friend and secretary of Castro’s, who had
been part of the 26th of July movement
since the Moncada barracks attack. Sánchez
had also been present in Mexico, and
was one of the organisers of the Granma
landing in 1956. After the victory in 1959,
Sánchez was given the title of Secretary to
SOURCE 17 Castro’s rebel soldiers wave from a tank upon their arrival in
the Presidency of the Council of Ministers.
Havana, Cuba, 1959.

1 Analyse Sources 12–18, and explain how they would assist a
historian investigating the motivation for and conduct of the
Cuban Revolution.
2 What argument is Fidel Castro making in Source 12?
3 Explain how Sources 17 and 18 provide evidence to support
the suggestion that the Cuban Revolution expanded the roles
available to women in Cuban society.

1 Identify how Castro’s early career as a lawyer could have helped
to shape his political views.
2 Explain why the attack on the Moncada army barracks was
significant for the Cuban Revolution.
3 Describe the ideology that Castro’s manifesto represents.
4 Describe Castro’s tactics and campaign, from his arrival in Cuba
in December 1956, through to Batista’s departure from Cuba on
New Year’s Eve 1958.
SOURCE 18 Celia Sánchez with Fidel Castro,

c. 1960

10.4 The aftermath of the revolution
After taking over power, Castro promised to tear down the old corrupt Cuba and
Cold War introduce a fairer and more equitable system. At first, Castro’s government was made up of
a state of political intellectuals, but they were soon replaced by those closest to him, including his brother Raúl
conflict and hostility and Guevara, both of whom had ministerial positions.
that existed between
the Soviet Union In the first few months after forming government, Castro signed his first agrarian
and the United reform, blocked foreigners from owning Cuban land, gave land title deeds to thousands of
States from 1945 to
1990, characterised
peasants, lowered rents, and forced American companies to leave the island. However, this
by threats and was also a time of brutal measures against those who had resisted the revolution. The regime
propaganda, but not imprisoned those opposing the new government, often without trial, and many people were
resulting in direct
fighting or military executed or fled into exile to the United States.
conflict
Marxist
Nationalism, populism and communism
a supporter of
the political and It is easy to label the Cuban Revolution as a communist revolution. However, while
economic theories Castro’s government did follow a communist path after 1959, that does not mean that
of the nineteenth-
the nature of the revolution can only be interpreted as a communist one. The Cuban
century Prussian-
born philosopher Revolution of 1959 – like the nineteenth-century war against Spain and Jose Martí’s fight
Karl Marx, whose for independence – is better understood as a war of national liberation. For a country
theories formed the
basis of communism
that had not been in control of its own destiny for more than 450 years, freedom from
colonial oppression was a far more powerful motivation to the everyday Cuban than where
their government stood on the political spectrum. This is now being acknowledged by a
growing number of American historians.
SOURCE 19 A wall
painting in Havana The Cuban Revolution consisted of several elements: nationalism, populism and
features the iconic communism. Each of these elements combined to define the nature of the Revolution. The
image of Che Communist element became dominant after 1959 due to the circumstances of the revolution,
Guevara
opposition from the United States, and the broader historical context of the Cold War.
The ideology of Fidel Castro and Che Guevara

Guevara and Raúl Castro were both staunch Marxists and great admirers of the political
developments in the Soviet Union. In expressing his belief in communism, Guevara once
said that the communist ideas expressed by Karl Marx in the nineteenth century must
be seen to be as obvious as the laws of gravity. After the revolution, Guevara expanded
on his Marxist philosophy. In his role as finance minister in Castro’s government, he was
responsible for some of Cuba’s boldest experiments in social justice. He was, however,
idealistic, and was often criticised for lacking an understanding of economics.
While Fidel Castro would soon abandon some of his pre-1959 ideals in order to
create stronger bonds with the powerful Soviet Union, Guevara did not back down from
denouncing the Soviet Government for what he thought was failed communism, which he
saw as being almost as imperialistic in nature as America’s capitalism. Castro soon realised
that Guevara’s devotion to Marxism could be a threat to the Cuban–Soviet relationship.

By 1965 Guevara had been fired from his government post,
renounced his honorary Cuban citizenship and left Cuba. He
remained committed to spreading the communist revolution,
and advocated support for revolutionary movements across
Latin America and in Africa. He was executed by officials in
Bolivia while trying to organise a guerrilla army there in 1967.
In many ways, Guevara came to represent the idealistic
utopian and utopian potential of the revolution. By contrast, Castro
aiming for a state in
was a populist and a tactical genius, having claimed on various
which everything is
perfect occasions prior to 1959 that his revolution was neither left,
nor right, but ‘one step forward’. The strongest communist
or Marxist influence on Castro’s ideology came after he SOURCE 20 Fidel Castro
took power. (right) and Soviet Premier Nikita
Khrushchev, United Nations
General Assembly, New York,
The impact of the Cold War September 1960
The Revolution cannot be fully understood without recognising that it took place in the height
of the Cold War. Information recently made available from the former Soviet Union’s archives
revealed that initially the Soviets did not prioritise links with Cuba after Castro came to power.
sphere of influence They regarded Cuba and the Latin American region as part of the US sphere of influence. This
an area in which approach changed as China started to threaten the Soviet Union’s position as the leader of the
a foreign power
has significant international communist movement. An alliance with a country strategically placed only a few
military, political and hundred kilometres from the American coast became a great asset to the Soviets in the early 1960s.
economic influence
or control
The creation of a communist state
The hostility of the United States and the need for economic aid from the Soviet Union
encouraged Castro to embrace communist ideas of a centralised, planned economy and
government ownership of key industries. In October 1959, an unofficial Soviet representative
arrived in Cuba to establish a direct link between the Soviet and Cuban Governments. The
following year, the Cuban Government signed a trade treaty and resumed full diplomatic
relations with the Soviets. The US Government responded to this development by establishing
a series of secret action plans to overthrow the Cuban Government, and by imposing a full-scale
economic blockade economic blockade of Cuba.
The Bay of Pigs Invasion and the Cuban Missile Crisis

In April 1961, anti-Castro Cubans living in exile in the United States invaded Cuba. More than
CIA a thousand exiles – who had been funded, trained and armed by the CIA – landed on Cuba’s
Central Intelligence
southern coast at the Bay of Pigs. However, they were overwhelmed by counter-attacks from
Agency; a
department of the Castro’s military forces within just three days, and almost all were captured. This invasion
US Government that attempt convinced the Cuban Government that it was in constant danger of being overthrown
collects information
about other
by the US Government.
countries, often In 1962, the Cold War Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev made a deal with Castro to place
secretly
Soviet nuclear missiles in Cuba, pointed at the United States. In exchange, Cuba would receive
continuous economic support and political protection.

This decision resulted in the Cuban Missile Crisis, a tense 13-day confrontation between the
United States and the Soviet Union that took the world to the brink of a nuclear conflict. The
crisis ended after the Soviets agreed to withdraw the missiles, under the condition that the United
States would never again invade Cuba.
Cuba after the Cold War

Like the revolutionaries who had come before him, Castro soon lost much of the support he
had at the time of the revolution. Despite the fact that Castro had introduced popular reforms,
such as free education and healthcare, the people of Cuba grew frustrated with the totalitarian totalitarian
a form of
government and their isolation from the rest of the world.
government where a
When the Cold War ended with the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991, it was a devastating blow single party controls
for the Cuban regime. Cuba was now ideologically isolated, and it had also lost the economic the country’s
administration
support from the Soviets it had enjoyed for decades. Cuba lost valuable aid and trading privileges, and most other
and was left with billions of dollars of debt. The financial crisis hit the population hard. For the areas of life,
first time since the revolution of 1959, Cubans took to the street to protest against the government. requiring complete
subservience
Castro answered by cracking down on protesters and urging those not satisfied with the regime and suppressing
to leave for the United States. Thousands left the country, and the US Government responded by opposition
opening its borders to Cuban immigrants. This, however, inadvertently helped Castro consolidate
his power. By welcoming Cuban dissidents, the United States provided a kind of ‘safety valve’ that
removed any powerful people who might have been able to oppose Castro’s regime.
The fall of the Soviet Union allowed for glacially slow movement
towards increased engagement between Cuba and the United States.
This reached its strongest point under US President Barack Obama,
who moved towards warmer relations between the two countries.
When Castro died on 25 November 2016, Raúl had already been
the acting president for almost 10 years, due to his brother’s illness.
During this period, Cuba’s relations with the international community
improved, the normalising of Cuba’s relationship with the United States
being the most significant development. In 2012, Cuba received the
first shipment of American aid in over 50 years, and in 2015, Obama
reopened the US Embassy in Havana. SOURCE 21 Che Guevara, Raúl Castro and Vilma
Espín (Raúl’s wife and fellow revolutionary), 1964

Compare Source 20 with Source 7. Explain the continuities and changes in Cuban–American
relations represented by these two photographs.

1 Explain how Castro’s actions and agenda after the revolution represented elements of
nationalism, populism and communism.
2 Identify the reasons why Che Guevara left Cuba after the revolution.
3 Outline the impact of the Cold War on the Cuban Revolution after Castro came to power.
4 What did Castro gain by allowing political dissidents to flee to the United States?

10.5 Historical debate: what is the legacy
of the Cuban Revolution?
For many people around the world, the Cuban Revolution of 1959 came to represent what was
possible in terms of both national independence and social reform. Those who supported the
fight for socialist reforms viewed Fidel Castro and Che Guevara as heroic defenders of the poor.
Those on the other end of the political spectrum, as well as many exiled Cubans, view them
as cold-blooded tyrants who used terror and executions to control their people. As with any
historical debate, the reality is more complex.
The Cuban Revolution also had direct political implications for other countries in the
Latin and South American region. While many South American countries looked to Cuba for
inspiration and support for their own socialist revolutions in the mid to late 1900s, a number
also suffered consequences due to their relationship with Cuba. Following the 1959 revolution,
the US Government was wary of similar revolutions breaking out in the region. In order to
stop what it saw as the threat of spreading communism, the United States helped to overthrow
democratically elected socialist governments and install military dictatorships in Guatemala
(1954), Brazil (1964) and Chile (1973) during the Cold War.
Almost 60 years after the Cuban Revolution, it is hard to say whether it was ultimately
successful. On the one hand, Castro and the 26th of July movement met their promises to
the Cuban people in terms of making Cuba a sovereign state, free from colonial masters.
The Castro regime also successfully produced social reforms that saw millions of Cubans
receiving developed-world education and healthcare. Perhaps the most significant legacy of
the revolution, however, is the nearly six decades of relative peace that Cubans have enjoyed
for the first time since the arrival of the Spanish in 1492.
SOURCE 22 In Nicaragua, supporters of the socialist President Daniel Ortega celebrate his re-election in
2011 by waving Che Guevara flags.

SOURCE 23 Cuban President Raúl Castro and US President Barack Obama meet for talks in Havana,
Cuba in March 2016. This was the first visit to Cuba by a US president since 1928.
On the other hand, Cuba did not become the free socialist utopia that many Castro
supporters had dreamt of. Like so many before him, Castro grew to become a dictator who
demanded loyalty from his people, limited free speech, and harassed and imprisoned those
who questioned him, including journalists and bloggers. The isolationist politics of the Castro
regime have left Cuba lagging decades behind other countries in the region.
The next few years will likely see further changes to Cuba’s politics, both domestic and
international. The current president, Raúl Castro, has indicated that he will step down in 2018.
By then, few living Cubans will remember a time before the 1959 revolution.

1 Analyse Source 22 and explain the evidence it provides about the legacy of the Cuban
Revolution.
2 Explain the significance of the event shown in Source 23.

1 Identify two different perspectives that Fidel Castro represents, and explain why people
would hold each viewpoint.
2 Was the Cuban Revolution a success? Create a table with two columns, headed ‘For’ and
‘Against’, and list the relevant arguments on each side.
3 Discuss what the future may hold for Cuba if Raúl Castro steps down from the presidency of
Cuba in 2018.

CONCLUSION In the nearly 60 years since Fidel Castro forced President Fulgencio Batista to flee from
Cuba and ushered in a revolution, the country has undergone great change, while
maintaining many continuities. The revolution threw off the chains of foreign control
that had been in place since 1492. On the other hand, independent Cuba found itself
alienated from its nearest neighbour, the United States, because of its adoption of a
communist-inspired ideology.
Castro ensured that Cubans had access to healthcare and education, but the
continuity of US economic sanctions ensured difficulties for the Cuban economy,
particularly after the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991. The socialist reforms also came at
the cost of freedom of speech and lack of democracy.
The future of Cuba can really only be understood with knowledge of the Cuban
Revolution. Fidel Castro is dead, and his brother Raúl has planned to step down from
the presidency in 2018. This will end 60 years of Castro rule. Despite Cuba’s warmer
relationship with the international community, the wounds of the revolution have not
completely healed and it will continue to shape Cuba’s destiny for decades to come.
SOURCE 24 Cubans pay tribute to Fidel Castro in the midst of a nine-day mourning period
following his death on 19 November 2016.
FOR THE TEACHER

chapter

11 The Boxer
Rebellion in
China
and research
Try and consult a range of
sources as you investigate the
Boxer Rebellion. For example
if you use a photograph as a
source, is there a written source
that can add further insight or
Analysis and use of sources explanation? By doing this, you
will strengthen the interpretation
The introduction of photography
you develop during your
opened the way for a new
investigation.
type of source to be available
to historians. Consider what Explanation and communication
photographs of the Boxer How are you going to
Rebellion reveal, and whether communicate your findings?
the type of technology available Consider whether the sources
at the time limits their validity as you are using make one type of
historical sources. communication method more
Imprisoned Boxers in their suitable than another.
compound, c. 1900 Historical interpretation
One of the challenges of the
Boxer Rebellion for historians is LEARNING GOALS
FOCUS QUESTIONS deciding why it happened. It is
critical that any interpretation > Understand the causes,
1 What was the Boxer Rebellion nature and outcome of the
and why did it occur? you develop is based on sources.
If you reject some sources, it is Boxer Rebellion.
2 Who were the Boxers and important that you do so with > Access and utilise a range of
what did they believe? valid reasons, not simply because sources to support a historical
3 What was the outcome and they do not fit the argument you interpretation of the Boxer
legacy of the Boxer Rebellion? are trying to make. Rebellion.

11.1 Introduction This chapter will investigate the Boxer Rebellion in China (1898–1900). The Boxer
Rebellion is one of the best-known but perhaps least-understood aspects of Chinese history.
As such, it is an excellent introduction to the historian’s craft.
dowager The Boxers were not in fact ‘boxers’; they were a semi-religious peasant group known as
a widow with a
the ‘Righteous and Harmonious Fists’. They became known as ‘Boxers’ by foreigners because
title or property
derived from her late of their ritual of performing gymnastic-like movements before going into battle. The Boxers
husband believed such rituals made them invulnerable to bullet or sword. Further, the Boxer uprising
was not actually a rebellion. The term
SPHERES OF INFLUENCE IN CHINA, EARLY 1900s
‘rebellion’ implies that the Boxers wanted
to overthrow the ruler of the Qing dynasty
(to Russia 1860) of China, the Empress Dowager Cixi. In
fact, the Boxers supported the Qing, but
MANCHURIA they were opposed to foreign influence in
(DONGBEI) all its forms; they wanted to drive out all
foreigners, their works and their Christian
MONGOLIA religion. Thus the Boxer Rebellion could be
Vladivostok more accurately described as an anti-foreign
uprising or movement.
The Boxer movement gained support
KOREA
in northern China at a time when peasants
Beijing (to Japan had suffered decades of poverty and famine.
Port Arthur 1905)
Weihaiwei Their protest took the form of violent
L E GE ND
attacks on foreign traders, and on Christian
French Kiachow (Jiaozhou)
missionaries and their Chinese converts.
British
CHINA
Russian
Japanese
Nanjing (Nanking)
Background to the Boxer
Rebellion
German
Shanghai
Italian
During the nineteenth century, China

Liuqiu
(to Japan fought four wars, all ending in defeat.
Fuzhou 1879) The first of these was the First Opium
Amoy (Xiamen)
War (1839–42), which broke out when
TAIWAN the Chinese Emperor wanted to stop the
Canton (to Japan 1895)
British from selling opium to the Chinese.
Kowloon
Pescadores
(to Japan 1895)
The opium trade was very profitable for the
Guangzhouwan
FRENCH British, and they refused. Tensions between
INDO-CHINA N the countries grew further as the British
PHILIPPINES Government demanded that the principle
0 500 km
of extraterritoriality be followed in China,
SIAM
meaning that British citizens in China
followed British law, not Chinese law.
SOURCE 1 This map shows the spheres of influence held by European and
Japanese powers in China in the early 1900s.

The increasing enmity between the two nations led to armed conflict between British and
Chinese naval forces in 1840. The British Navy was superior and easily defeated the Chinese.
The war ended with the signing of the Treaty of Nanjing in 1842, which further extended
British political and economic control in China, forced China to pay significant money in
indemnity and made Hong Kong a British colony. indemnity
money paid by one
The Treaty of Nanjing failed to resolve the tensions between the two nations and the country to another
Second Opium War (1856–60) broke out. This time, the British forces were backed up by country after
French, Russian and US troops, which helped bring China to another crushing defeat. As military defeat, as a
condition of peace
a result of the treaty that ended the first phase of the war – the Treaty of Tianjin of 1858 –
Russia, France and the United States all gained trading rights in China, and China was obliged
to pay still more in indemnity, this time to both Britain and France.
In summary, the peace treaties following China’s defeats in the Opium Wars, the Sino
(Chinese)-French War (1884–85) and the Sino-Japanese War (1894–95) forced China to pay
millions in indemnity, open up more ports to foreign trade, and grant territories to foreigners
sphere of influence
as spheres of influence (see Source 1).
an area in which
While the involvement of the Chinese Government in the origins of the Boxer movement a foreign power
is debated, it was clear by 1900 that Cixi openly supported the Boxers in their ‘war’ against the has significant
military, political and
foreigners in China and that she used the Imperial Army to fight on their side. economic influence
The event that gained worldwide attention during the Boxer Rebellion was the siege of the or control
foreign legations in the nation’s capital, Beijing (formerly Peking), from June to August of
legations
1900, during which the Boxers and the Imperial Army held foreigners and Chinese Christians
buildings in which
captive. Armed forces from eight foreign nations combined to lift the siege. foreign government
Although the Boxers failed to drive out the foreigners, their uprising was significant in officials work
and reside
China’s history.
SOURCE 2 Chinese Christians take refuge in a Christian mission during the Boxer Rebellion. The Boxer Rebellion was largely
aimed at foreigners, but most of the victims were Chinese.
CH A P T E R 11 T HE BOX ER REBEL LION IN CHINA 175

SOURCE 3 Timeline
Key events in China’s relationship

1842
with European powers and the The Treaty of Nanjing provides foreigners with extra
territorial rights, meaning foreigners are not subject to
Boxer Rebellion Chinese laws.
1793 1856–60
The Second Opium War – the cause of the second conflict
The Chinese Emperor is similar to the first. Westerners want to exploit the markets
Qianlong informs the British and raw materials of China, and the Chinese Government
representative Lord Macartney is powerless to stop them. The first phase of the war ends
that the Chinese possess in 1858, when China signs separate treaties with Britain,
‘all things’, and therefore France, Russia and the United States. Collectively, these are
have no need of the goods known as the Treaties of Tianjin. The treaties were ratified in
offered by the British in trade. 1860, and the war came to an end.
Qianlong has little knowledge
1884–85
of the outside world, or of
the growing economic and
industrial power of the West.
He shares this quality with
many of China’s rulers and The Sino-French War – this war is another typically one-
it continues to be a factor sided affair. The French use the war to secure control of the
An ancient Chinese painting
in the relationship between area known as Indo-China.
of the Emperor Qianlong
China and the outside world,
up to the time of the Boxer
Rebellion.
1894–95
1839–42 The Sino-Japanese War – Unlike its larger neighbour, Japan
has recognised the technological superiority of the West by
this time and has adopted modern, Western technologies
The First Opium War – this war is used by Britain to open
in warfare and industry. The result is a crushing defeat for
China up to trade. The issue is the right of the Chinese
Chinese forces as the Japanese take control of Korea and look
Government to stop the British transporting opium
for the same trading privileges in China as the Western powers.
(grown in India) into China, in exchange for silver. The
quick British victory reflects the level of corruption and
1897
military backwardness in China. The war ends in 1842
with the Treaty of Nanjing (formerly Nanking).
A painting shows British ships destroying Chinese vessels

during the First Opium War, 1839
Two German missionaries are killed in China. The German
Government uses this as an excuse to occupy part of the
Shandong province. Britain and Russia demand more
territory as well.
1898
The ‘100 Days of Reform’ movement begins in January.
Following the defeat in the Sino-Japanese War and the
growing territorial demands of the Western powers, Kang
Youwei, a minor court official, convinces Emperor Guangxu
of the need to reform and modernise China. The movement
is short-lived; it challenges the existing social and military
order too much. The Emperor’s aunt, the powerful Empress
Dowager Cixi, stages a coup and takes over with the
support of conservative nobles and generals. From this
point on, she holds the power in China.

1898
May: The first mention of the Boxers in an official
government report – the report makes reference to
anti-Christian violence in the Shandong province.
This violence is directed toward churches, European
missionaries and Chinese converts.
1899
The local governor of Shandong recruits Boxers
as militia to oppose more German expansion in
his province.
1900 The public execution of a Boxer leader, 1900
June: Boxer violence increases. The Empress Dowager

Cixi declares war on the foreign alliance – the United
Kingdom, Russia, Japan, the United States, Germany,
1901
Italy, France and Austria-Hungary – and prevents the September: The Western powers defeat the Imperial
Imperial Army from controlling the Boxers as they Army and the Boxers, and impose the settlement known
attack any foreign outpost, foreigner or Christian. as the ‘Boxer Protocol’. The Qing call the attacks a
Large numbers of Boxers attack Western homes and rebellion to limit the penalty imposed by the West. They
businesses in Beijing and Tianjin. manage to keep the foreign troops out of southern and
More than 475 foreign civilians, 3000 Chinese central China, but a harsh peace treaty further expands
Christians and 450 foreign troops are besieged inside Western power and influence in China.
the legations in Beijing. By this time, Imperial troops
have sided with the Boxers. The Western powers
respond by sending in troops to crush the Boxers and
the Imperial Army. 1908
Emperor Guangxu dies from acute arsenic poisoning
A scene from the 1963 film 55 Days at
on 14 November. Historians have suspected that the
Peking, which was based on events
during the Boxer Rebellion Empress Dowager Cixi ordered the poisoning. She died
less than 24 hours later, on 15 November, aged 72. Three
years later China would become a republic.

1 How did the Boxers get their name?
2 In what period did the Boxer Rebellion occur?
3 Why is the Boxer Rebellion better described as an
‘uprising’ rather than a ‘rebellion’?

11.2 The aims and membership of the
‘Righteous and Harmonious Fists’
China has a long history of peasant rebellion and a tradition of secret societies. The Boxers are
peddler part of both. Their background is obscure, but a historical reference to them can be found as
a person who goes
from place to place
early as 1808. They had links to other secret societies, including the ‘White Lotus’ and the ‘Big
selling goods Sword Society’ (an anti-Christian group that had similar rituals to the Boxers).
Who were the Boxers?

The Boxers were mostly peasants from
Shandong and Zhili in northern China.
Historian Joseph Esherick described the
Boxer homeland as ‘a poor agricultural
region, densely populated, but particularly
prone to both natural and human disasters’.
Almost all the Boxers were adolescents, with
local leadership provided by Chinese monks
and peddlers, many from the class that had
led local peasant uprisings in the past. Female
Boxers were known as Shining Red Lanterns.
SOURCE 4 Many of the Boxers were very young. The Boxers were either illiterate or
semi-literate. Some of their ideas appeared
to be inspired by travelling operas and sensational stories. In their induction to the secret
SOURCE 5
A group of society, they learnt the Boxer rituals, and believed what they were told by Boxer leaders – that
armed Boxers performing the ritual movements would make them invulnerable in battle.
in Beijing, 1900

The origins and aims of the Boxer movement
There is a range of opinions among historians about the origins and aims of the Boxer
movement. The two main points of view relate to whether the Boxers were originally formed
to oppose the Qing dynasty or to support it.
The most widely held view is that the Boxers began as an anti-Qing movement; in other
words, they were opposed to the existing government of China. By the 1890s they had
changed from opposing the Qing to supporting them, but they retained their opposition to
foreigners. The alternative view is that the Boxers were recruited by the Qing as a militia militia
a military force
to help oppose foreigners. Events in Shandong in 1899 – when the local governor recruited
raised from
Boxers to oppose German expansion – seem to support this view. members of the
The difficulty in deciding between these two quite different points of view arises because civil population (not
professional soldiers)
of the sources available to historians. Many of the sources we have about the Boxers come that can be used to
from Chinese officials. Some were hostile to the movement, while others were sympathetic support an army
to it. Other information comes from European missionaries, who were among the Boxers’
prime targets. Still more information has been gained from oral histories taken from the
peasants of Shandong. Historians studying the Boxers need to be aware of the biases of each
of these groups.
Reasons for the emergence of the Boxers

A range of factors contributed to the emergence of the Boxers, including the following:
1 China had suffered over 50 years of foreign exploitation and humiliation – by 1898, foreign
countries had ‘sliced off’ bits of China and there appeared to be a real risk that China
might be broken up and shared out as colonies among the foreign powers.
2 Strong anti-Christian feeling – the Western missionaries and their Chinese converts seemed
to challenge the old traditions. Missionaries were usually the only foreigners who settled
in regions further away from the trading ports, and they became the targets of anti-foreign
sentiment. Their Chinese converts were seen as traitors to their culture and their country.
3 Foreign advancements caused economic difficulties – imported foreign cotton was
cheaper than the Chinese product, which suffered as a result. Local handicrafts were
also affected, which led to growing unemployment. According to historian Immanuel
C.Y. Hsu:
SOURCE 6
By the end of the 19th century, the country was beset by bankruptcy of village industries, decline
of domestic commerce, rising unemployment, and a general hardship of livelihood.
Immanuel C.Y. Hsu, in Thomas D. Schoonover, Uncle Sam’s War of 1898
and the Origins of Globalization, 2013, p. 40
The foreigners were blamed for many of China’s ills.

4 China’s history of secret societies and traditional beliefs – to understand the emergence of
the Boxers and the way they were viewed by society, one must acknowledge China’s long
history of secret societies, as well as the widespread beliefs in traditional Chinese folk
religion, which was at odds with Christianity.

5 Natural disasters – the Yellow River dominated the vast plains
in northern China. It had shifted its course in 1852 and flooded
regularly from 1882. A major flood in 1897 affected more than
a million people. This was followed by a severe drought in
1900. The Boxers blamed the foreigners, saying that Western
technology and the construction of Christian churches had
angered the traditional spirits.
SOURCE 7 The vast Yellow River, SOURCE 8

northern China. The Boxers blamed the
foreigners for the devastating Yellow River flood Attention: all people in markets and villages of all provinces in China – now,
in 1897, one of the deadliest natural disasters owing to the fact that Catholics and Protestants have vilified our gods and
ever recorded. sages, have deceived our emperors and ministers above, and oppressed the
Chinese people below, both our gods and people are angry at them, yet we
have to keep silent. This forces us to practise the I-ho magic boxing so as to protect our country,
I-ho magic boxing
the practice of expel the foreign bandits and kill Christian converts, in order to save our people from miserable
spiritual and martial suffering. After this notice is issued to instruct you villagers, no matter which village you are
arts that the Boxers living in, if there are Christian converts, you ought to get rid of them quickly. The churches which
believed would make
belong to them should be unreservedly burned down. Everyone who intends to spare someone, or
them invulnerable to
bullets to disobey our order by concealing Christian converts, will be punished according to the regulation
when we come to his place, and he will be burned to death to prevent his impeding our program.
We especially do not want to punish anyone by death without warning him first. We cannot bear
to see you suffer innocently. Don’t disobey this special notice!
A Boxer notice, 1900, in S. Teng and J. Fairbank, China’s Response to the West, 1968, p. 190
SOURCE 9
Girls who joined the Boxers were called ‘Shining Red Lanterns’. They dressed all in red, in one
hand they had a little red lantern and in the other a little red fan. They carried a basket in the
crook of their arm. When bullets were shot at them they waved their fans and the bullets were
caught in the basket. You couldn’t hit them! Some were possessed by spirits and say they were Ma
Guiying or Hu Jinchan [heroines in Chinese legend].
In every village there were girls who studied the Shining Red Lantern … They’d wave their
fans and go up into the sky. They didn’t want people to watch so they’d practice at night when it
was dark. There was a song then that went:
Learn to be a Boxer, study the Red Lantern, Kill all the foreign devils and make the
churches burn.
From the recollections of eyewitnesses, in Pai-kai Cheng and Michael Lestz,

The Search for Modern China, 1999, pp.185–6

1 What was the purpose of the notice in Source 8?
2 How can Sources 8 and 9 help historians investigating spiritual beliefs in China at the time of
the Boxer Rebellion?
3 According to Source 9, what did the Shining Red Lanterns believe and what were their aims?

Summarise the two conflicting theories about the Boxers’ origins.

11.3 The nature and extent of the Boxer
Rebellion
The Boxer Rebellion was almost entirely limited to northern China, where the uprising
began with attacks on Christians in the rural province of Shandong. Source 12 shows the
types of incidents and numbers of attacks in Shandong from May 1899 to January 1900.
Territories in Shandong were part of the German sphere of influence in China, and in
1897, two German Catholic missionaries were killed in an attack on a Christian mission in
the Shandong town of Juye. The attack was used as a pretext by the German Government to
increase its influence in the province; it sent two gunboats and seized control of Jiaozhou Bay.
Germany demanded that the Qing Government pay compensation to the mission that had
been attacked and also forced the removal of Shandong’s governor and other officials. Further,
Germany ordered that three Catholic churches be built, as well as fortified residences for
German missionaries.
The increasing missionary activity in Shandong in the following years led to a growing
number of Boxer attacks. In 1898, such attacks were mentioned for the first time in official
Qing Government reports.
In 1899, the Governor of Shandong, who was one of the Empress Dowager Cixi’s
conservative allies, recruited Boxers as militia to oppose more German expansion in his
province. This action is seen by historians as evidence of the Qing Government using the
Boxers to drive out foreigners. When the Western powers protested, however, the Qing
Government appeared to act against the Boxers and the Governor was replaced; but the Boxers
simply moved to the neighbouring province of Zhili.
THE AREAS AFFECTED BY THE BOXER REBELLION, 1898–1900
Beijing
L E GE ND
r
ve
Tianjin
Ri
Area affected by gh
e
Boxer uprising an
Hu
Wei E A S T
he R
iver
N C H I N A
S E A
CHINA Nanjing
Wuzhang Suzhou Shanghai
0 200 400 600 km
er
Riv Hankou
ng
n gjia
Cha Daozhu
Hunan
Yongan
S O U T H C H I N A
Xijia Zhangzhou
ng R
iv er
S E A
Guangzhou
SOURCE 10 The Boxer Rebellion started in northern China and the Boxers soon entered Beijing.

SOURCE 11
Officers of the
eight-nation
alliance at the
gates of the
Forbidden City, the
Chinese Imperial
palace in Beijing,
during the Boxer
Rebellion, c. 1900
SOURCE 12 Boxer attacks in Shandong, May 1899 – January 1900

TYPE OF THOSE 5 MAY – 4 5–18 OCT 19 OCT – 2 3–14 NOV 15–27 NOV 28 NOV – 7 DEC 8 DEC – 5 JAN TOTALS
INCIDENT AFFECTED OCT (148 DAYS) (14 DAYS) NOV (15 DAYS) (12 DAYS) (13 DAYS) (10 DAYS) (29 DAYS)
Vandalism Christians 4 0 0 1 2 1 19 27
Non-Christians 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Theft Christians 10 48 0 90 53 37 80 318
Extortion Christians 4 0 2 12 47 5 12 82
Kidnapping Christians 0 0 0 6 4 0 3 13
Arson Christians 0 0 0 20 92 0 9 121
Injury Christians 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3
Deaths Christians 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 5
All Christians 18 48 2 130 203 44 124 569

incidents
Non-Christians 8 2 0 2 23 3 23 61
Source: J.W. Esherick, Origins of the Boxer Uprising, 1987

The international response to the rebellion
From May 1900, Boxer raids increased and spread to the area around Beijing and Tianjin, with
Western missions and churches as their main targets. In response, eight countries – Austria-
Hungary, France, Germany, Britain, Italy, Japan, Russia and the United States – sent troops to
protect their citizens, who were finding themselves under mounting threat in Beijing. A large
contingent of 2000 foreign troops under the leadership of British Admiral Edward Seymour
moved towards Beijing from Tianjin by rail. However, they came under attack by Boxers halfway
into the journey and were forced to fight their way back to Tianjin. On 13 and 14 June 1900, the
Boxers attacked Christians and foreigners in Beijing and Tianjin, while the Qing Government
attempted to calm the Western powers by telling them that their diplomats in Beijing were well
defended by the Imperial Army and that there was no need for them to send troops.
On 20 June 1900, Clemens von Ketteler, a German diplomat in Beijing, was killed by Boxers.
The Qing Government had promised to keep foreigners safe; but rather than following through
on those promises, the Empress Dowager reacted by declaring war on all the foreign powers.
According to British historian Vincent Purcell, it was the Imperial Court that authorised
the Boxer attack on the foreign diplomats in Beijing. He suggests four possible motives for this
action – that the court wanted to:
besiege
> vent anger against the foreigners
the act of
> stir up patriotic feeling among the Chinese people surrounding an area
with armed forces in
> remove the foreign military presence from the Qing capital
order to capture it or
> eliminate foreigners as possible witnesses to Imperial involvement in the fighting. force its surrender
Siege of the foreign legations

in Beijing
Foreign diplomats, missionaries and Chinese
Christians in Beijing fled to the foreign
legations, where they were besieged by
Boxers and Qing Imperial troops from 20
June to 14 August 1900. Reinforcements
were sent to Beijing by the eight-nation
alliance, and a force of 19 000 soldiers and
marines attacked and gained control of
Beijing. The siege was finally ended when
Indian troops, part of the British Army,
broke through. Trapped inside the diplomatic
compound, along with the 475 foreign
SOURCE 13 Japanese troops, part of the international force that crushed
civilians and 3000 Chinese Christians, were the Boxer Rebellion, with bodies of victims of the Boxers
450 troops from the allied nations.
During the siege, 66 foreigners were killed and 150 wounded. But as was the case with
China’s earlier clashes with Western powers, the Boxer Rebellion was eventually crushed
by superior foreign weaponry and technology. The Boxers, despite all their rituals, were not
invulnerable to bullets.

SOURCE 14
American troops
march in the
Forbidden City
after the lifting of
the Boxer siege in
Beijing
Australia’s involvement in the Boxer Rebellion

The foreign troops in China included a small contingent from Australia. These men
left home as Victorians and New South Welshmen supporting the British Empire, but
by the time they returned home from China in March 1901, they were Australians.
SOURCE 15 The Federation had been proclaimed while they were away in the service of Britain.
front page of a The Australian contingent was mainly naval, and was small because the colonies had already
French newspaper, committed forces to support another of Britain’s wars, in South Africa. Those from New South
17 June 1900, shows
Wales travelled to Pei Tang to capture the Chinese forts there, along with troops from Russia,
Boxers destroying
railroad tracks Germany, Austria and India. However, they arrived too late to take part in the attack. A short
between Beijing time later, the Victorians made their way to Pao-ting Fu, but by the time they arrived the fort had
and Hong Kong already surrendered.
Although they missed the fighting, the Australians remained for nine months, as foreign
troops became a kind of international police force in Beijing. Six Australian soldiers died from
Federation sickness or injury during this time.
the process by
which the separate
self-governing 11.3 Understanding and using the sources
colonies came
together to form the 1 Look carefully at Source 12, which records Boxer attacks between 5 May 1899 and 5 January
Commonwealth of
Australia in 1901
1900 in the rural province of Shandong.
a Who were the most common victims of Boxer attacks?
b What conclusions can you draw about the Boxers from this source?
2 What evidence do Sources 13 and 14 provide about China’s relationship with foreign powers
at the time of the Boxer Rebellion?

1 What key events led to the siege of the foreign legations in Beijing?
2 What are the suggested motives behind the decision of the Imperial Court to wage war on
the foreign diplomats?

THE EMPRESS DOWAGER
11.3 PROFILE
CIXI: HER ROLE
AND MOTIVATION IN
ENCOURAGING THE BOXER
REBELLION
Cixi first arrived at the Imperial Palace
as a 16-year-old concubine (mistress)
to Emperor Xianfeng. After five years
in the Imperial Court, Cixi gave birth
to a son, who succeeded his father and
became Emperor Tongzhi at the age of
five, after Xianfeng’s death in 1861. At the
time of his death, Xianfeng had a wife, the a variety of techniques – including plots, SOURCE 16
Empress Dowager Ci’an. As Cixi was the lies, sexual favours and even murder – to The Empress
mother of the young Tongzhi but Ci’an was influence her ministers and other powerful Dowager
the Empress Dowager, tensions soon grew people in and around the courts. Cixi, seated,
between the two women. In 1898, Cixi led a coup that deposed her receives the
Although Ci’an’s official title was Empress nephew from the throne and placed him into wives of foreign
Dowager, she became known as the ‘East palace confinement, as part of a reaction diplomats in
Empress Dowager’, while Cixi was called against the reforms that he attempted to 1903. Cixi is
the ‘West Empress Dowager’, based on the make during the famous but short-lived ‘100 holding hands
locations of the palaces where they lived. Days of Reform’ movement. There was no with Mrs Sarah
It soon became clear that Cixi had greater longer any doubt that Empress Dowager Pike Conger,
political aspirations than Ci’an, and she had Cixi was the ruler of the Qing Empire. one of the
great influence over the politics of China Although the Boxer Rebellion was a survivors of the
during Tongzhi’s reign. peasant movement, the entire affair would Boxer siege
That reign, however, was to be short. have been different had it not been for Cixi, of the Beijing
Tongzhi died in 1875, aged only 19, without who used the Boxers to force the foreigners legations.
leaving any male heirs to the throne. to reduce their influence in China. In her
This created a crisis in the courts. It was decision to use the Boxers in this way, Cixi
eventually decided that Cixi’s nephew, was influenced by several hard-line, anti-
whom she had adopted, would become foreign conservatives at court, notably
emperor. Like Cixi’s own son, the nephew Prince Tuan. In hindsight, it was the greatest
was only a young child when he took over single political miscalculation of Cixi’s life.
the throne and became Emperor Guangxu, Nevertheless, it proved to be a typically
which meant that Cixi was again the de facto devious tactic; and even though the Boxers
ruler of the Qing dynasty. failed, she survived. In the end, Cixi’s
The sudden death of Ci’an in April 1881 relationship with the Boxers was paradoxical.
saw Cixi strengthen her grip on power over If the Boxers succeeded, she would take the
the empire. By this point, Cixi had become credit; if the Boxers failed, they would take
a talented political strategist who employed the blame.
11.3 PROFILE TASKS

1 Research the life of Cixi. Write an account of her rise to power in the Imperial Court and
include sources of evidence that support your account.
2 Research sources that either corroborate or challenge the view that Cixi supported the
Boxer Rebellion. Evaluate your sources for their reliability and usefulness.

11.4 The implications of the
rebellion for China and
the Qing dynasty
When the foreign troops arrived in Beijing, the Empress Dowager
Cixi was smuggled to safety. After peace terms were arranged,
she returned to the capital some 18 months later. Qing officials
promoted the myth that the uprising had been a rebellion, with
the hope of limiting the penalty the Western powers might impose
propaganda on China. The Qing propaganda was only partly successful.
information, The terms of the settlement, known as the ‘Boxer Protocol’,
especially of a biased
or misleading nature, included the execution of 10 high-ranking Qing officials and the
used to promote a punishment of 100 others. The area of the legations in Beijing
political cause or
was enlarged and more troops were brought in to defend it. The
point of view
Protocol also stated that an indemnity of $333 million was to be
paid by China to the European powers over a period of 40 years.
The effect on the Qing Empire could, however, have been
worse. The Boxer Rebellion was limited to northern China, and
government officials in other parts of the country had managed
to ignore Cixi’s call for war with the West. Although the peace
treaty required China to accept foreign troops being stationed in
northern China, these troops were out of key regions in central and
southern parts of the country.
Historical debate: was the Boxer Rebellion

a complete failure?
The Boxer Rebellion has often been described as a catastrophe.
The uprising seemed to be a desperate and fanatical response by
peasants to forces beyond their comprehension or control, and in
the short term, it was indeed a catastrophe. In particular, it resulted in the Chinese people
facing an enormous tax burden, as the Imperial Government raised the money to pay the
massive indemnities imposed by the foreign powers. In the longer term, however, the Boxer
Rebellion triggered some major historical changes, and the Boxers did in fact have a victory
of sorts. Their action prevented the foreign powers from taking further control over China
and dividing the Empire up between the European powers as colonies, as was happening
nationalism
throughout Africa and other parts of Asia at the time.
a sense of pride
in, and love of, The Boxer Rebellion was also a clear reflection of an emerging nationalist movement,
one’s country; which was to transform China in the twentieth century. But this new century was not
advocacy of political
independence for a going to be defined by dynasties. The decisions made by Cixi and her court during the
particular country uprising indicated that the Qing dynasty was incapable of ruling China. As a result, the

SOURCE 17 A propaganda poster from the 1960s
shows Chairman of the Communist Party Mao
Zedong, who launched the Cultural Revolution.
The Communist Party publicly glorified the Boxers
as national heroes.
Boxer Rebellion accelerated demands for reform and revolution, and

the eventual overthrowing of Qing rule in 1911 can be traced back
to the Boxer Rebellion of 1898–1900.
It is now more than a century since the Boxer Rebellion. With
the advantages bestowed by time and a new perspective, it is possible
to see the status and significance of the event more clearly. Looking
back on the Boxer Rebellion today, it is clear that the events that
took place in the late 1800s and early 1900s in China offer insights
into aspects of imperialism, nationalism, globalism, power balance
and authority.
As a historian, it is crucial to look at these events in the cultural
context in which they took place. This includes understanding the
commonly held beliefs that there were racial differences between
the Westerners and the Chinese. Racially superior ideals were held
on both sides, and it is fair to say that neither side fully understood
the other.
Over the past hundred years, the Boxer Rebellion has been
repeatedly used and reused to champion a range of views and
causes. From 1903, Dr Sun Yatsen and the Republicans employed
the rebellion as an example of Chinese nationalism and the struggle
against oppression. During the 1920s, the emerging Chinese
Communist Party referred to the Boxers as anti-imperialists. From
1949, following the Communist takeover, the Chinese Government
recorded the stories of the aging, surviving Boxers and used them
in party propaganda, where they were turned into Communist
heroes. In 1967, during the period of the radical social and political
movement known as the Cultural Revolution, members of the
Red Guard (a student paramilitary force) claimed to follow the Boxers’ example in their
opposition to corrupt government officials and foreign interference. Finally, in 1989 during
the famous anti-Communist Government protests in Tiananmen Square, Beijing, some of
the protesters compared themselves with the Boxers.

1 What were the key terms of the Boxer Protocol?
2 Why have some historians described the Boxer Rebellion as a catastrophe?
3 What were some of the long-term outcomes of the Boxer Rebellion for China?

CONCLUSION Historians still debate elements of the Boxer Rebellion in China. As China has tried to
distance itself from the West, reliable historical sources remain difficult to access. As the
sources used in this chapter reveal, however, the camera had become a vital method
of recording history, and photographs provided a greater range of primary sources for
historians to interpret.
The Boxer Rebellion sought to expel foreigners from China, and restore more
traditional values and beliefs to the country. In this way, it was a very conservative
uprising – seeking to maintain continuity rather than impose change. The role of the
Empress Dowager Cixi adds an extra element of complexity for historians to unravel,
and should allow you to reflect on the impact individuals can have on history. Ultimately
the uprising failed, but it would echo through twentieth-century Chinese history as the
country sought to rebuild its power and influence, without kowtowing to the West.
SOURCE 18 Representatives of the German, British, French, Italian, American and Russian military
forces that combined with Austria-Hungary and Japan and defeated the Boxer Rebellion, 1900
FOR THE TEACHER

chapter

12 The Origins of
the Arab–Israeli
Conflict
Three Jewish children on their
way to Palestine after being
released from the Buchenwald
Concentration Camp at the end of
the Second World War
FOCUS QUESTIONS
1 What is the historical origin
When dealing with controversial
and significance of Palestine?
topics, it is important to make
and research
2 What is the historical basis of sure that you can clearly Researching the origins of
the conflict between Arabs communicate the fact that you the Arab–Israeli conflict will
and Jews in the Middle East? have developed a historical involve you having to cover a
3 What role has Britain played understanding that is based on significant period of time in
in the Arab–Israeli conflict? a range of factual material. Take your investigation. You have to
the time to explain not only your be prepared for your research
view, but also why it is valid. to stretch further back in time
KEY CONCEPTS AND SKILLS than you might have originally
Historical interpretation planned.
Analysis and use of sources This chapter brings into sharp
Due to the lengthy historical focus the question of how
background to the Arab-Israeli historians arrive at balanced
LEARNING GOALS
conflict, you will come in contact interpretations of events. As you > Analyse a range of sources
with a wide range of sources in explore aspects of this topic, you to recognise perspective
your studies. It is essential that will be accessing the viewpoints and bias.
you not only utilise a range of of those who may be promoting
sources, as you would in any personal agendas. You will need > Understand the origins of the
historical study, but also analyse to examine personal perspectives Arab–Israeli conflict.
those sources to ensure you and assess their validity through > Understand how historical
recognise their perspective and corroboration and depth of events and forces can impact
any potential bias. research. on the present.

12.1 Introduction
A study of the Arab–Israeli conflict, by necessity, begins with the Old Testament. It is a
conflict that has its roots in mythology and conflicting sources, spanning up to 3000 years
of history. It involves conflicting and biased perspectives, and has led to the modern city of
Jerusalem being one of the most contested sites in the world today. It links religion and history,
and requires acceptance and acknowledgment of faith and fact. The timeline in Source 3 shows
key events in the Arab–Israeli conflict from the more recent past, 1897–1948.
This long-running conflict has helped shape the world you are living in now. In examining
and understanding the roots of the Arab–Israeli conflict, you will be moving towards a greater
understanding of the contemporary world. This is an opportunity to see how history shapes the
present and future.
The historical context of the Arab–Israeli conflict

The Old Testament tells the story of how Abraham was guided by God to settle in the land of
Israel, once called Canaan and later Palestine. The Jews often referred to Israel as ‘the Promised
Land’ because of their belief that God had promised it to Abraham and his descendants.
Despite the differences that were later to emerge between them, Arabs and Jews by tradition
share a common ancestor in Abraham, who was in turn descended from Shem, the son of the
biblical character Noah. The term ‘Semite’ is given to any one of a variety of ancient peoples
antisemitic who claim descent from Shem, though for practical purposes the term antisemitic has come to
hostile to or mean anti-Jewish.
prejudiced
against Jews In CE 70, the Romans conquered the city of Jerusalem and the Jewish temple there was
destroyed, except for the western wall, which remains to this day and is known as the Wailing
Wall (see Source 1). Many Jews fled or were driven out of Palestine, and became known as Jews
Diaspora of the Diaspora, or Dispersion. They never gave up hope of one day returning to the Promised
the dispersion of the
Jews beyond Israel
Land, but for many centuries this seemed impossible. The Jewish population of Palestine
gradually declined until, by the fifth century CE, Jews were a minority there. Nevertheless, a
Jewish presence in the land contiuned to exist.
SOURCE 1 Jerusalem is a holy city for both Jews and Muslims.

The Dome of the Rock marks the spot from where the prophet
Mohammed rose to heaven. Below it stands the Wailing Wall, the
last remaining part of the ancient Jewish temple.

Arab peoples began to move into Palestine in the seventh century CE. Most Arabs adopted
the Muslim faith and spoke their own language, Arabic. Like the Jews before them, the Arabs
had to endure invasion from foreign powers. The Ottoman Turks ruled the area from 1516 to
1920, during which time Palestine was an area without fixed boundaries within the Turkish
Empire. For centuries, Jews and Arabs lived in relative harmony under their Turkish rulers.
Developments at the end of the nineteenth century

For many centuries, Jews were persecuted in Europe. With their different culture and religion, pogrom
they stood out from the rest of the population. Labelled as ‘the killers of Christ’, they were an organised
massacre of a
often made the scapegoats for problems such as famine and plague. Some of the worst particular ethnic
persecution took place in Eastern Europe in the Russian Empire, where about five million Jews group; in particular,
were forced to live in an area called the Pale of Settlement (parts of modern Poland and western that of Jews in Russia
and Eastern Europe
Russia). In other areas, Jews were forced to live in the poorer sections of towns in areas known
as ghettos. Acts of organised state-approved violence called pogroms were launched against tsars
the Jews, notably in 1881, when the Jewish community was blamed for the assassination of the the rulers of Russia
Russian Tsar Alexander II. Some 200 Jewish communities were looted and burnt. until 1917

Using Sources 1 and 2 and your own research, explain why Jerusalem has become such a
contested area.
THE TURKISH (OTTOMAN) EMPIRE, C. 1900
RE
M E D I T E R R A N E A N Tyre
TURKEY
S E A AC
F
Acre
O
SANJAK OF
HAURAN
T
E
Y
A Nazareth
IL
V
M E D I T E R R A N E A N Beirut
US
S E A
Damascus
SC
A
Nablus
M
Jerusalem A
SAN D
Jaffa
JA
K F
O O
F
Y ET N
A
N VILA B
LU
Jerusalem
S
Cairo
S E A
SANJAK OF SANJAK OF
GAZA JERUSALEM
EGYPT
Gaza Hebron
D
D E A
LE GE ND
Turkish (Ottoman) Empire
R E D 0 50 km
S E A
SOURCE 2 Palestine did not exist as a separate territory during the period of Turkish occupation, but was part of the vilayet
(district) of Damascus, which was divided into several smaller regions called sanjaks.
CH A P T E R 12 T HE ORIGINS OF T HE A R A B – ISR AELI CONF LIC T 191

1939
SOURCE 3 Timeline
Key events in the origins of the

Arab-Israeli conflict Britain’s controversial White Paper calls for the end of
1897
Jewish immigration and an independent Palestine with
an Arab majority, but is strongly rejected by the Jewish
population who view it as a provocation.
1942–45
The First Zionist Congress in Basle, Switzerland, led
by Theodor Herzl (the founder of the modern Zionist
movement), calls for a homeland for the Jews.
1915 The Holocaust kills six million

Jews. Many survivors want to
make a new life in Palestine.
The McMahon–Hussein Correspondence supports Arab Jewish survivors of the Holocaust enter
the port of Haifa, Palestine, 1945.
independence in Palestine if the Arabs help Britain to
fight the Turks.
1916 1946
Jewish terrorists carry out an attack at the King David Hotel,
The Sykes–Picot Agreement is signed in secret. It seeks
Palestine, where the British have their headquarters.
to divide the Middle East between Britain, France and,
to a lesser extent, Russia.
1917 1947
United Nations Resolution 181 approves the partition of
The Balfour Declaration promises a Jewish ‘national Palestine into a Jewish state and an Arab state.
home’ in Palestine.
1919 1948
The state of Israel is proclaimed on 14 May. One day later it
Britain takes control over Palestine as a result of the is invaded by neighbouring Arab states.
League of Nations mandate system laid down at the
Versailles Peace Conference.
1929 12.1 Check your learning

1 Briefly research the time period covered by the
Old Testament. Then create a timeline of the
Riots in Jerusalem kill history of Palestine from the time of the Old
over 200 Arabs and Jews.
Testament through to 1900.
2 Why did the Jews refer to Israel as ‘the
A French magazine illustration
Promised Land’?
shows Arabs attacking Jews in
Jerusalem during the 1929 riots. 3 Explain how the Palestine region changed in the
seventh century CE. What implications has this
change had for subsequent history?
1936
4 Explain the significance of Abraham in the
background to the Arab–Israeli conflict.
5 Research the experience of the Jewish people,
A general Arab strike in Palestine is followed by an Arab from the Diaspora to the twentieth century.
revolt in protest against Jewish immigration. How does this help you understand the Jewish
commitment to a homeland in modern Israel?

12.2 Arab nationalism and Zionism: origins
and aspirations
By the middle of the nineteenth century, there were approximately 10 000 Jews and 500 000
nationalism Arabs in Palestine. It was at this time that the first stirrings of Arab nationalism were noted.
a sense of pride
A Lebanese Christian philosopher named Ibrahim al-Yazigi started calling for Arabs to ‘throw
in, and love of,
one’s country; off the yoke of the Turks’. By the 1870s, secret societies were being formed among Arabs
advocacy of political wanting to see a revitalisation of Arab culture. The key question Arab nationalists tussled with
independence for a
particular country
was whether to push for a pan-Arab society that could arise from the Ottoman-controlled
areas, or whether to satisfy nationalist yearnings for individual nations. The British were keen
pan-Arabism
to exploit any anti-Ottoman sentiment among the Arabs during the First World War, but their
the idea of a unified eventual betrayal of the Arabs would come to play a key role in the emergence of the modern
Arab world Arab–Israeli conflict.
The first wave of modern immigration to Palestine

In the last decades of the nineteenth century, a small trickle of Jewish immigrants entered
Palestine, primarily for religious reasons. During this first wave of modern immigration to
Zionist Palestine, called the First Aliyah (ascent), some 10 000 Jewish settlers entered the region and
a supporter of established about 20 agricultural settlements. Finance to assist the settlers was provided by
Zionism; a person
who believes in self- benefactors such as Baron Edmond James de Rothschild, a member of a prominent Jewish
determination for the banking family in France.
Jewish people and
the development
It was at this time that the first tensions between Arabs and Jews begin to arise. Soon after
and protection of a the first Jewish settlers arrived in the 1880s, quarrels broke out with neighbouring Arab villagers
Jewish nation (‘Zion’) over grazing, crops and other land issues. Disputes also arose when Jews purchased land from
absentee Arab landowners, leading to the dispossession of the peasants
who farmed the land. As the number of Jewish settlements increased,
and Arabs became aware of the Zionist intention to establish a Jewish
homeland, opposition to the new immigrants spread through the Arab
community. Jews in the wider Diaspora were largely unaware of the
situation in Palestine. Many regarded Palestine as ‘a land without a
people awaiting a people without a land’.
Herzl and the First Zionist Congress, 1897

In 1896 an Austrian Jew, Theodor Herzl, published a pamphlet titled
The Jewish State, in which he argued that Jews were alienated from
society, and destined to be universally hated. Because the Jews were
‘a people without a land’, Herzl believed that world powers should
grant a territory to fulfil the need for a Jewish nation. Herzl travelled
throughout Europe meeting national leaders, but failed to convince
SOURCE 4 Theodor Herzl (1860–1904), the them to support his scheme. However, he was acclaimed among
Jewish Austrian writer and journalist who Eastern European Jews and, on the strength of this, was able to
founded Zionism in 1896 convene the First Zionist Congress in Basel, Switzerland, in 1897.

Delegates at the First Zionist Congress agreed to promote the settlement of Palestine
by Jewish farmers and artisans, attempt to strengthen the national consciousness of all
Jews, and seek approval from whatever governments were necessary to achieve the goals
of Zionism. Not all Jews were in favour of these aims, however. Opponents argued that
for men to create a new state was a blasphemy, forcing the hand of God. Others advocated
assimilation assimilation rather than separation as the way for Jews to become better accepted in
the absorption society. Nonetheless, the congress was a significant step towards the establishment of a
and integration of
people, ideas or Jewish homeland.
culture into a wider Because Herzl did not have the deep emotional and religious ties to the Old Testament
society or culture
of many Eastern European Jews, he was willing to consider sites other than Palestine for
the new Jewish homeland. Consequently, when in 1903 the British Government offered a
territory in Uganda, East Africa, Herzl was eager to accept. His advocacy for Uganda split
the Zionist movement, but his death in July 1904 effectively killed off the Uganda scheme.
SOURCE 5
The poorest will go first [to Palestine] to cultivate the soil. In accordance with a preconceived
plan they will construct roads, bridges, railways and telegraph installations, regulate rivers, and
build their own dwellings; their labour will create trade, trade will create markets and markets
will attract new settlers.
Theodor Herzl, The Jewish State, 1896
SOURCE 6
They own the Anglo-Palestine bank which makes loans to them at a rate not exceeding one
per cent per annum … They have a blue flag in the middle of which is a ‘Star of David’ …
They have deceived the government with lying and falsehoods when they enrol themselves as
Ottoman subjects … for they continue to carry foreign passports which protect them … you
see their houses crammed with weapons … They have a special postal service, special stamps
etc, which proves they have begun setting up their political aims … no time will pass before
you see that Palestine has become the property of the Zionist organisation.
An extract from a newspaper in Haifa, Palestine, 1910,
in S.J. Houston, The Arab–Israeli Conflict, 1989, p. 11

1 What evidence is there in Source 5 that the Zionists might not be willing to live side
by side with the Arabs in Palestine? Does this explain why Arabs are not mentioned in
Source 5?
2 What is the main fear expressed in Source 6?
3 From the tone of the article in Source 6, who do you think are the main readers of this
newspaper?

Explain why some historians argue that the establishment of Jewish settlements in Palestine
during the 1880s and 1890s was a long-term cause of the modern Arab–Israeli conflict.

12.3 The nature of Arab–Israeli
tensions: the First and Second
World Wars
Inspired by the idea of settling in the Promised Land, a second wave of immigration – the
Second Aliyah – began in 1904 and continued until the outbreak of the First World War. By
1914, the Jewish population of Palestine had reached between 50 000 and 90 000 people.
In November 1914, the Ottoman Empire (Turkey) entered the First World War on the side
of Germany, and in opposition to Britain and France. Although the main battlegrounds were
Allies in Europe, the Allies – including Britain – were keen to encourage the Arabs to revolt against
the coalition their Turkish masters, as this would give support to the Allies.
of countries in
opposition to the
Central Powers in
The McMahon–Hussein Correspondence, October 1915
they included Britain,
the Commonwealth, One year into the First World War, the British High Commissioner in Cairo, Egypt, Sir Henry
France and Russia, McMahon, exchanged letters with the Sharif of Mecca, Amir Hussein. Hussein’s family was
which were joined
the traditional guardian of the Holy Places of Islam – Mecca and Medina – and had a large
by the United States
in 1917 following among the Arab peoples. The result of the correspondence was an agreement that
appeared to promise British support for Arab independence in the Middle East, if the Arabs
Sharif assisted in the overthrow of the Turks. Hussein accepted the deal, and in 1916 he declared war
an Arabic term to
describe someone
on Turkey. Prince Feisal, his son, led the Arab Army. Assisting Feisal was a British officer,
who is of noble birth; T.E. Lawrence, who became famous under his nickname – Lawrence of Arabia.
often a leader of a
society
The Sykes–Picot Agreement, October 1916
While seemingly promising to support Arab independence, the British were also in close
consultation with their allies, France and Russia, about the possible future division of the
Ottoman Empire between the European powers at the end of the war. British diplomat Sir
Mark Sykes and his French counterpart, François Georges-Picot, drew up an agreement that
divided up much of the Middle East, placing
it under the control of either Britain or
France. Arabia was to be an independent Arab
state, while Palestine was to be under the
joint control of Britain, France and Russia.
This was at first a secret agreement. However,
in November 1917, the new revolutionary
government in Russia published the terms,
to the embarrassment of the British and the
annoyance of the Arabs. The Arabs felt they
had been betrayed in their hopes of obtaining
much more of the region, including Palestine,
SOURCE 7 Muslim devotees at the feast of Ramadan in Mecca, one of the
as independent Arab territory.
Holy Places of Islam, 2017

LAWRENCE OF ARABIA
12.3 PROFILE
T.E. Lawrence was born out of wedlock in 1888. In Victorian times,
being illegitimate at birth was regarded as a major setback in
society, but Lawrence overcame his birth to attend Jesus College
at Oxford University, where he studied history between 1907 and
1910. From there he became an archaeologist in Syria, working at
Carchemish with the esteemed archaeological pioneer Leonard
Woolley up until the outbreak of the First World War.
Lawrence volunteered to join the British Army, and his
knowledge of the Arabian world saw him placed in Cairo, in the
Arab Bureau of the British Foreign Office. As the McMahon–
Hussein Correspondence worked to encourage the Arabs to
overthrow the Ottomans, Lawrence became involved in the
Arab Revolt. He worked in both political and military areas,
and became known as Lawrence of Arabia. He later wrote an
autobiographical book of his experiences called Seven Pillars of
Wisdom, which some later historians have complained placed too
great an emphasis on his own achievements.
SOURCE 8 T.E. Lawrence (1888–1935), Lawrence spent most of his postwar career in the British
also known as Lawrence of Arabia, was Air Force, and the popularity of his book saw him emerge as a
a British army officer who fought on the
wartime hero in Britain. He died in a motorcycle accident in 1935
side of the Arabs in the Arab Revolt,
which aimed to secure independence at the age of 46.
from the ruling Ottoman Turks and create
a single unified Arab state.
SOURCE 9 Peter O’Toole played

Lawrence in the 1962 film Lawrence
of Arabia, which won seven Academy
Awards. This filmed portrayal of Lawrence
cemented his legend as the British soldier
who campaigned for Arab rights and
supported Arab nationalism.
12.3 PROFILE TASKS

1 Research the life of T.E. Lawrence and create a timeline of the major events. How much
of his life was spent in Arab regions?
2 How much did Lawrence actually achieve for Arab nationalism?
3 Assess Lawrence’s place in history.

The Balfour Declaration, November 1917
Only a few days before the publication of the Sykes–Picot Agreement,
the British Foreign Secretary, Arthur Balfour, had further confused the
situation by writing a letter to Walter Rothschild, a prominent British
Zionist, in which the British Government promised support for the
establishment of a Jewish national home in Palestine (see Source 11).
There were several motives for the issuing of what became known as
the Balfour Declaration. First, the British were eager to pre-empt any
attempt by the Germans to win the support of the Jewish community
for their war effort. The British were also hoping that if they created
favourable feelings towards Britain from Jews in the United States and
Russia, the Jews would in turn encourage their governments to increase
the war effort on behalf of the Allies. Finally, the establishment of a
friendly Jewish presence in Palestine would safeguard the Suez Canal
and Britain’s route to India. SOURCE 10
Arthur Balfour, 1st Earl of Balfour
(1848–1930)
1 What was the promise
Suez Canal
made by Arthur Balfour
a canal, built in the
to Walter Rothschild in nineteenth century,
Source 11? that runs through
Egypt, linking the
2 The Balfour Declaration
Red Sea with the
speaks of ‘a’ national home, Mediterranean Sea
not ‘the’ national home.
What difference does this
word make?
3 Around the time of the
First World War, the Arabs
represented over 90 per cent
of the population of Palestine.
How are they referred to in
the Balfour Declaration? Why
might this reference be taken
as an insult by Arabs?
4 Analyse Source 11 and explain
why it is such a crucial source
when trying to understand
the origins of the Arab–Israeli
conflict.
SOURCE 11 The Balfour Declaration – a

letter from the British Foreign Secretary,
Arthur Balfour, to Walter Rothschild,
leader of the British Jewish Community

Arab and Jewish responses to the Balfour Declaration
There is a strong argument suggesting that the Balfour Declaration laid the foundations
for the current Arab–Israeli conflict. The Arabs had helped the British defeat the Turks in
the First World War, and saw the Declaration as a clear betrayal of the McMahon–Hussein
League of Nations Correspondence; this view has influenced a level of distrust of the West from the Arabs ever
an international since. In the eye of the Arabs, Britain was now encouraging occupation of Arab land by
organisation people they believed had no right to it.
established at
the end of the For the Zionist movement, the Balfour Declaration was interpreted as the green light
First World War for the occupation of Palestine. It was the start of the process that culminated in the mass
to maintain world
peace and prevent
migration of Jews to the area, and the creation of the nation of Israel.
the outbreak of Historians debate the meaning of the Balfour Declaration, and there are areas that are
future wars by
certainly vague. No mention is made of a specific state being created, and it does state that
encouraging nations
to negotiate with the civil and religious rights of the non-Jewish population were to be protected. What is
each other not contested is that the Balfour Declaration represented a victory for the Zionist view, and
started a historical process that disenfranchised the Arab population of the area in favour
mandate of Jewish migrants.
a commission given
to one nation by
others (for example
through the League
Palestine in the interwar period
of Nations) to
control a country or When the First World War ended in 1918, the future of the Middle East was determined at
geographical area the Versailles Peace Conference of 1919. US President Woodrow Wilson was anxious to avoid
a return to the old pre-war habits of colonialism, but
MIDDLE EAST MANDATES AFTER THE FIRST WORLD WAR
was forced to acknowledge the interests of Britain and
TURKEY France in the former territories of the Ottoman Empire.
The resulting compromise was the League of Nations
mandate system, whereby the victorious powers would
LEBANON
SYRIA
IRAN administer the regions of the former empire until they
MEDITERRANEAN were ready for self-government.
SEA IRAQ
PALESTINE Under this system, Syria and Lebanon became
TRANS-JORDAN mandates of France, while Britain became
responsible for Iraq and Greater Palestine. The
KUWAIT PERSIAN British divided the mandate of Greater Palestine
GULF
into two portions. The land to the east of the Jordan
River was renamed Trans-Jordan. The area between
EGYPT
the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River now
RED SEA
became known as the British Mandate of Palestine.
SAUDI ARABIA
For the first time Palestine had defined frontiers.
The intractable problem that now confronted the
SUDAN
British as administrators of Palestine was that if they
allowed any Jewish immigration, they would offend
N the Arab residents who feared being overrun by Jews;
L E GE ND
yet if they stopped or slowed Jewish immigration,
French mandate
there would be an outcry from Jews and their
British mandate
0 200 400 600 km supporters worldwide.
SOURCE 12 The French and British mandates in the Middle

East after the First World War

exodu
the de
forced
numb
Antisemitism in Europe and growing Jewish migration

The third wave of Jewish immigration to Palestine (the Third Aliyah) commenced soon after
the establishment of the British mandate. In September 1923, the mandate authority limited
Jewish immigration to a maximum of 16 500 a year, though this number was rarely reached
during the next decade.
Those who did arrive in Palestine in the 1920s were mainly poor, uneducated immigrants
from the Ukraine or Poland, who had been forced to leave by antisemitic violence or legislation.
By the late 1920s, the Zionist hope of a national home built on a steady influx of immigrants
appeared to be in crisis. The costs of establishing new settlements were increasing, and
unemployment was growing. In 1927, as economic conditions worsened, twice as many Jews
left Palestine as reached it.
The situation changed with the advent of Nazism in Germany. In 1932, there were 9553
Jewish immigrants to Palestine; in 1933, there were more than 30 000, many of these from
Germany, where Adolf Hitler had come to power. Hitler regarded Jews as an inferior race and
was determined to remove them from German life. Jews in countries surrounding Germany
also felt threatened, and an exodus from Europe began. Many countries were unwilling exodus
to accept Jewish migrants, or imposed strict quotas on their intake. For large numbers of the departure, often
forced, of a large
migrants, Palestine became their only hope. number of people
By 1940, Jews made up 40 per cent of the population of Palestine, and the new wave of
immigrants from central Europe tended to be better educated and wealthier than those of the
1920s. However, the uneven but continual growth of the Jewish population had caused mutual
distrust and antagonism between the Jews and the Arabs, and suspicion by both towards the
‘neutral’ mandatory power of Britain.
SOURCE 13 A sign at the ticket office of a public swimming pool reading ‘No admittance to Jews’, Nazi
Germany, c. 1938. The persecution of Jews in Germany under Hitler saw a huge increase in the number of
Jews who sought refuge in Palestine.

1 Examine Source 12. Discuss what it reveals about British and French attitudes towards Arab
nationalism and the Middle East. What does the source reveal about possible causes of the
current Arab–Israeli conflict?
2 Analyse Source 13. What implications does this sign on a German swimming pool in 1938
have for current Arab–Israeli relations?

1 What do the terms laid out in the McMahon–Hussein Correspondence of 1915 suggest
about the extent of Arab independence and the British position in the Middle East?
2 How does the Balfour Declaration compare with the McMahon–Hussein Correspondence
and the Sykes–Picot Agreement?
3 Prepare a letter to a newspaper (about 200 words) entitled ‘Betrayed by the British’, written
from the point of view of an Arab nationalist in 1920. Then prepare a response to justify
British policy entitled ‘Britain defended’.
4 Which countries were involved in making decisions regarding the future of the Middle East
after the First World War?
5 Explain the impact of the rise of Adolf Hitler on the Middle East in the 1930s.
British response to increasing tensions in the lead-up to the

Second World War
Outbreaks of violence between Arabs and Jews had been frequent since
the beginning of the mandate period. In 1920, Arabs attacked Jewish
settlements in the north of Palestine, causing four of these settlements
to be abandoned. This resulted in the establishment, in March 1921, of
the Haganah, or Jewish Defence Force, a secret organisation operating
without the approval of the British, dedicated to maintaining the
security of the settlements. As the violence mounted, the British would
eventually fail to subdue the Arab resistance.
In April 1921, mob violence broke out in Jerusalem when Arabs
attacked the Jewish quarter of the Old City. In four days of bloodshed,
nine people were killed and 244 wounded. This was followed in May
by further riots in Jaffa, leading to the deaths of almost a hundred
Arabs and Jews. The authorities reacted by temporarily suspending
Jewish immigration, but following protests from Jews abroad, the
suspension was lifted.
In 1921, the British also appointed Haj Amin al-Husseini as Mufti
(chief judge) of Jerusalem. Al-Husseini had been prominently involved
in the anti-Jewish riots of the previous months. If the British hoped to
SOURCE 14 Haj Amin al-Husseini, Mufti of curb his anti-Jewish actions by appointing him to responsible office,
Jerusalem they miscalculated.

The Arab riots, 1929
In the early months of 1929, Jewish
religious observances at the Wailing Wall in
Jerusalem became a focus for Arab protests.
Tensions grew over the following months,
until matters came to a head in August
1929. Arab mobs attacked Jews in Jerusalem
and other settlements, killing 60 Jews in
Hebron and driving the ancient Jewish
community out of the city. By the time
British troops were able to bring the riots
under control, 116 Arabs had been killed,
mostly by the British police, and 133 Jews
had died at the hands of the Arabs.
One result of the 1929 riots was the
increasing division between Zionists who
still sought compromise with the Arabs,
and those who believed that military
confrontation was the only option. In 1931,
the militant ultra-nationalist Zionist group
Irgun was founded as a result of growing
dissatisfaction among members of the
Haganah, who felt that their interests were
not being defended. Many observers also see
the riots of 1929 as marking the emergence
of a particular Palestinian nationalism,
which expressed itself from April 1936
through the workings of the Arab Higher
Committee under the leadership of the
Mufti, which worked to mobilise all
sections of the Arab community to halt
Jewish migration and land purchase.
Arab strikes and

protests, 1930s
In 1936, the Arab leadership, under the SOURCE 15 British police attempt to contain Arab protestors against
direction of the Mufti, organised a general Jewish immigration during the 1930s.
strike where Arabs refused to pay taxes and
businesses were closed. The strike lasted
six months, during which time more than 300 people were killed, mostly Arabs. This was general strike
a mass strike by a
followed by the Arab Revolt of 1937–39, which involved attacks on Jewish settlements and
large sector of the
individuals. In response, the Jews established more than 50 so-called ‘tower and stockade’ workforce, covering
settlements in strategic areas (incorporating guard towers surrounded by fencing). a range of industries

The region was engulfed in violence until the beginning of the Second World War. The
Arab Revolt was eventually put down by British troops after the death of more than 500 Jews
and 3000 Arabs, and the arrest or imprisonment of the major Arab leaders. Haj Amin fled to
Damascus and later made his way to Germany, where he sought support for his antisemitism
from Hitler.
SOURCE 16
Wingate reached down and took some sand and grit from the ground. He thrust it into the
mouth of the first Arab and pushed it down his throat until he choked and puked. ‘Now’, he said,
‘Where have you hidden the arms?’ Still they shook their heads. Wingate turned to one of the
Jews and, pointing to the coughing and spluttering Arab, said ‘Shoot this man.’ The Jew looked
at him questioningly and hesitated. Wingate said in a tense voice: ‘Did you hear? Shoot him.’ The
Jew shot the Arab.
An account of an interrogation by Orde Wingate, a British officer, of Arab villagers, by L. Mosley,
in S.J. Houston, The Arab–Israeli Conflict, p. 24
SOURCE 17
I was arrested along with scores of others from my village. They took us in lorries to one of
the concentration camps … in a place called Akrit. There we had to pass between two lines of
soldiers who beat us as we entered the camp. They used their guns as sticks … Then we had to
crawl through barbed wire while they hit us all the time. We were herded into a compound. Day
after day we sat in the open under the sun, and in the night we had to endure the extreme cold.
We had no blankets.
A Palestinian’s account of his treatment by the British, in Jonathan Dimbleby,
The Palestinians, 1980, p. 76
SOURCE 18
For the Jews it was galling to see what little effect the British protection could have. Jews were
killed while travelling in buses, or even sitting in their homes. Whole Jewish communities fled,
among them the 94 Jews … whose families had lived in the predominantly Bedouin town of
Beisan since the beginning of the century … and all but one Jewish family of the ten families who
had lived in the Arab village of Peki’in, where, according to tradition, their ancestors had lived
since Roman times.
Martin Gilbert, Israel: A History, 1998, p. 80

1 From information in Sources 16 and 17, describe the different methods used by the British to
subdue the Arab resistance to the mandate authority.
2 How would you describe the actions of Orde Wingate in Source 16? Does a reading of
Source 18 help to make his actions more understandable or acceptable? Why or why not?
3 Why do you think Martin Gilbert uses the example of the families from Peki’in in Source 18?
4 According to the sources, how effective were the British policies in:
a reassuring the members of the Jewish community that they would be protected?
b persuading the Arabs to abandon violence?

The White Paper, 1939
By 1939, British attempts to maintain peace in Palestine had proven unsuccessful, drawing criticism
from Arabs and Jews alike. The approach of the Second World War caused a shift in British attitude
and policy. Throughout the 1920s, the British Government had firmly adhered to the principles
of the Balfour Declaration. However, the need to maintain Britain’s position in the Arab world
in the face of mounting German and Italian challenges led the British Prime Minister, Neville
Chamberlain, to issue a White Paper outlining the future of Palestine. The main points of the White Paper
an official and
White Paper were that Britain wished to establish an independent Palestine within 10 years, with
authoritative report
Arabs and Jews combined in government. Jewish immigration was to be restricted to 75 000 over on a topic, usually
five years, and then no further Jewish immigration would be permitted unless the Arabs agreed. commissioned by a
government
Not surprisingly, the Jews were furious at this betrayal of the Balfour Declaration. The
Zionist leader, David Ben-Gurion, expressed Jewish policy as follows: ‘We shall fight the war as
if there was no White Paper; and we shall fight the White Paper as if there was no war.’
Developments during the Second World War

In 1942, the British army formed a military group called the Jewish Brigade to fight with the
Allies. The political climate was calmer than it had been in decades, with most of the Arab leaders
terrorism
in prison or exile after the Arab Revolt, and the majority of the Jewish population content to the unofficial or
suspend its anti-British actions during the war. One exception to this was a terrorist group called unauthorised use
the Lehi, or Stern Gang, which broke away from the Irgun when it suspended operations in 1940. of violence and
intimidation in the
The Lehi continued to attack British installations and carry out assassinations, notably the murder pursuit of political or
of Lord Moyne, the British Minister in Palestine, on 6 November 1944. religious aims
One widely supported form of Jewish resistance

was attempts to undermine the immigration
restrictions maintained by the British in accordance
with the terms of the 1939 White Paper. Illegal
Jewish immigration into Palestine persisted until
1948. During the war, Jews fleeing from German-
occupied countries in Europe sailed to Palestine on
whatever ship they could. Some landed illegally,
while others were intercepted by the British Navy
and still others died when their ships sank on the
way. The Patria sank in Haifa Harbour with 250
deaths in 1940. The Struma, with 769 refugees SOURCE 19 Members of the Jewish Brigade march in Tripoli, Libya,
aboard, sank in the Black Sea in 1941. in 1943.

1 Create a table with two columns headed ‘Strengths’ and ‘Weaknesses’, and fill in examples
under each column that show the strengths and weaknesses of Britain’s rule of its Middle
Eastern mandates between the First and Second World Wars.
2 What was the significance of the Arab riots of 1929?
3 How was the Arab Revolt finally resolved?
4 What led to the British White Paper of 1939? What did it propose? How effective was it?
5 Who were the Lehi? Outline their activities during the Second World War.

12.4 Responses to the question of a
Jewish homeland post-Second
World War
When the Second World War ended in 1945, the terrible truth about the Holocaust was revealed.
Six million Jews had been murdered, and hundreds of thousands of survivors of the Nazi
concentration camp concentration camps found themselves living in refugee camps. By 1946, there were 250 000
a camp in which Jewish displaced persons in Europe. With much international support, Jewish people argued that
civilians and
political prisoners Jewish refugees from Europe should be allowed to enter Palestine for humanitarian reasons.
or prisoners of war American opinion at the time supported the Zionist cause. Many Jews had settled in
are detained under
extremely harsh
the United States, and held significant financial and voting power. An Anglo-American
conditions Committee of Inquiry was established, and in 1946 recommended that 100 000 Jews be
allowed into Palestine. The US President, Harry Truman, supported this recommendation.
Britain’s response to Jewish refugees

The British Government, however, was not ready to open the borders of Palestine to the
Jewish refugees. This was made clear by the fate of the SS Exodus, a ship used to transport
4550 survivors of the Nazi concentration camps to Palestine. The vessel was intercepted,
rammed and boarded by the British Navy. At Haifa, the passengers – including at least 143
wounded – were disembarked and immediately placed on board ships to take them back to
SOURCE 20
Jewish refugees Europe. When the passengers refused to go ashore in France, their starting point, the British
crowd the deck Government sent them back to Germany. This had a profound effect on world public opinion,
of the illegal which condemned Britain for these actions. Despite this setback, approximately 40 000 Jews
immigration ship
entered Palestine illegally between August 1945 and May 1948.
SS Exodus at the
port of Haifa in the
British Mandate
of Palestine,
18 July 1947

Mounting violence
leading to the 1948
Arab–Israeli War
Arabs continued to oppose increased
Jewish immigration into Palestine after
the Second World War and argued that
as they had not been responsible for
the recent persecution of the Jews, they
should not be the ones to bear the brunt of
Jewish resettlement. The armed struggle
between Jewish groups and the British
authorities in Palestine intensified. While
the Haganah attacked installations and SOURCE 21 Two Jewish terrorists captured by the British in 1946. They
deliberately avoided endangering lives, were sentenced to execution by hanging, but committed suicide by blowing
themselves up with a grenade that had been smuggled to them in prison.
the Jewish militant group Irgun and its
breakout group, the Lehi, had no such
reservations. They attacked British soldiers
and government workers, mined roads,
blew up facilities and captured weapons
from the British.
On 22 July 1946, Irgun fighters
mounted an attack, in retaliation to a
British security blitz that had seen 4000
suspected Jewish terrorists swept into
detention camps. Dressed as Arabs,
they delivered milk churns packed with
explosives to the basement of the King
David Hotel, which was used as the
headquarters of the British administration
of Palestine. When the churns exploded,
much of the hotel was destroyed and
nearly a hundred people were killed,
among them top civil servants and military
officials. One of the five Irgun terrorists
involved was shot dead; the others escaped.
SOURCE 22 A wing of the King David Hotel lies

in ruins. The Irgun claimed that it had telephoned
a warning to allow the building to be evacuated;
the British said no warning was received.

THE UNITED NATIONS PARTITION PLAN
The United Nations and
LEBANON
the partition of Palestine
M E D I T E R R A N E A N SYRIA The actions of the Jewish resistance groups tied up
Acre
100 000 British troops in Palestine, at a time when
S E A Haifa
Britain was hoping to reduce the numbers in its
armed forces after the end of the war. The search
for a compromise between Arabs and Jews had
only antagonised both sides at Britain’s expense. In
February 1947, Britain decided to hand over the
Palestine issue to the United Nations.
Tel Aviv
Jaffa In September 1947, the United Nations Special
Rehovot
Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP) presented
Jerusalem Resolution 181, a plan that recommended Palestine be
partitioned into a Jewish state and an Arab state, with
S E A
Jerusalem administered as an international zone. The

Gaza
Arabs objected to the proposed Partition Plan; the Jews
N
D
RDA
D E A
accepted it, although they made it clear that in their

Beersheba
OF JO
opinion, Jerusalem should be part of the Jewish state.

The Partition Plan gave the Jews 56 per
cent of the land area of Palestine, although they
DOM
NEGEV
constituted only 33 per cent of the population. The
KING
Partition Plan originally envisaged that the new

Jewish territory would include 510 000 Arabs and
500 000 Jews. This was amended in May 1948 to
397 000 Arabs and 538 000 Jews.
The United Nations voted on the Partition
SINAI
Plan on 29 November 1947. Thirty-three
N nations supported the plan, including the United
LE G E N D
Jewish State
States, France, Australia and the Soviet Union.
Thirteen nations opposed the plan, including nine
Arab State
0 50 100 km
Muslim countries in the Middle East, as well as
UN Zone India and Greece. There were 10 abstentions,
Aqaba including Britain. Resolution 181 was passed,
SOURCE 23 The UN Partition Plan, according to Resolution 181; and it appeared that the Jewish people had
of the 26 000 square kilometres of Palestine, the Arabs retained finally turned the ‘national home’ of the Balfour
44 per cent, although they had 67 per cent of the population. Declaration into a state, alongside the proposed
new Arab state.
abstention
a deliberate refusal 12.4a Understanding and using the sources
to take part in a vote
1 How does Source 20 help you understand the situation many Jews found themselves in after
the Second World War?
2 Examine Sources 21 and 22, and explain what they reveal about Jewish tactics in the period
leading up to the establishment of the state of Israel.
3 What criticisms could you make about the boundaries of the two proposed states, as shown
in Source 23?

The failure of the United Nations Partition Plan and
the establishment of the state of Israel
Uncertainties about the responsibilities of the implementation, as well as ongoing
hostilities between Jews and Arabs, saw the United Nations Partition Plan fail before it was
implemented. In the Partition Plan, the British had made it clear that they would withdraw
from their mandate and end their 30 years of control of Palestine no later than 1 August
1948. According to the plan, the new states would come into existence no later than
1 October 1948. The date for British withdrawal was later set to 14 May.
Despite the rejection of the Partition Plan from Arabs both within Palestine and in
surrounding states, the Jewish Agency for Israel, led by David Ben-Gurion, set up a provisional
government and proclaimed the establishment of the state of Israel on 14 May 1948. With the
British gone and no neutral power monitoring the situation, it was only one day before the
young state was invaded. On 15 May 1948, the neighbouring Arab states of Egypt, Jordan,
Iraq and Syria invaded Israel, effectively turning what had been an ongoing civil war into an
international conflict.
SOURCE 24 David Ben-Gurion reads Israel’s proclamation of nationhood as members of the provisional
government look on, 14 May 1948. Behind him hangs a portrait of Theodor Herzl and the Israeli flag.
Three days later, Ben-Gurion would become Israel’s first prime minister.

Examine Source 24. Explain why a portrait of Theodor Herzl would be placed in such a position
of prominence.

1 How did the British handling of the SS Exodus incident impact on the situation in the
Middle East?
2 Discuss the Arab argument that ‘as they had not been responsible for the recent persecution
of the Jews, they should not be the ones to bear the brunt of Jewish resettlement’.
3 Do you consider the Irgun a terrorist group? Explain your answer.
4 Why did Britain hand control of the Palestine region to the United Nations in 1947?
5 Explain the United Nations Partition Plan. Why did Jews accept it and Arabs reject it?
Historical debate: what is Britain’s responsibility?

A historical debate means examining two sides of an issue, and coming to a level of
understanding based on the evidence. Debating the causes of the Arab–Israeli conflict is
especially difficult because there are so many arguments and perspectives to be considered. In
order to conduct an effective debate, there has to be a clear focus.
Today, the Arab–Israeli conflict is usually blamed on the actions of the Arabs and the Jews,
and the role of Britain and its imperialism in the region has been pushed into the background.
Considering that Britain was controlling Palestine for decades – and made promises to support
the sides of both the Jews and the Arabs, while secretly making plans to split the area between
themselves, France and Russia – it is reasonable to ask: is the Arab–Israeli conflict a result of
British imperialism?
As a history student, your job is to go back and review the sources presented throughout
this chapter before making up your mind.
SOURCE 25 The
last British troops
leave Palestine,
following the
end of the British
mandate and the
establishment of
the state of Israel.

CONCLUSION
Although the United Nations believed it had created a solution to the situation in the
Middle East in 1948 when it sought to partition Palestine, peace has continued to be
elusive. Conflicts over the territory go back thousands of years, and three different major
religions claim the area as significant to their beliefs.
History brings clarity to complex issues by accessing sources, examining evidence
and allowing for the development of well-supported opinions based on facts rather
than faith. The Arab–Israeli conflict has resisted attempted solutions throughout the
twentieth century, and in the twenty-first century is still the source of much instability.
By examining its origins in a reasoned way, you will be able to understand a little more
clearly why Palestine is a major trouble spot to this day.
You have been given the opportunity to examine sources, consider perspectives,
reflect upon where responsibility lies, and ultimately come to your own decision. By
understanding this aspect of history, you are taking a step towards understanding your
own world.
and u
SOURCE 26 Palestinian school students demonstrate in support of refugees on the 58th

anniversary of the establishment of the state of Israel, 14 May 2006.
FOR THE TEACHER

chapter
CH A P T E R 12 12 T HE ORIGINS OF T HE A R A B – ISR AELI CONF LIC T 209

The iconic painting Liberty Leading the People (1830) by Eugène Delacroix
shows a woman personifying the concept of freedom by holding up the
tricolour flag, a symbol of the French Revolution.

PART C
The Shaping of the
Modern World
Chapter 13 The First World War 212
Chapter 14 The French Revolution 245
Chapter 15 The Age of Imperialism 263

13The First
World War
British troops heading

into no man’s land,
Battle of the Somme, 1916
FOCUS QUESTIONS Historical interpretation

1 What was the historical You are required to form
context of the First judgments about historical
World War? significance. This is particularly Explanation and communication
important in the current chapter In order to succeed in effective
2 What are some of the where, in dealing with the First communication, it is important
key features of the First World War, you are investigating that you know what you are trying
World War? a major historical event that is to communicate. Investigating the
3 How has the First World still impacting on the world. If impact of the First World War on
War helped shape the you are going to argue for the your world requires the ability to
modern world? significance of an event, it is vital explain continuity and change,
that you produce evidence to and it may be useful to consider
support your claims. methods of communication such
Historical investigation as comparative charts or flow
Analysis and use of sources and research charts for this purpose.
You will be exposed to a range As you investigate the impact
of sources in this chapter. As of the First World War on the LEARNING GOALS
a history student, one of your modern world, it is important that
challenges is to analyse sources you access a range of sources to > Display an understanding of
and bring together the evidence inform your investigation. In this the context and course of the
drawn from those sources to chapter, you will have access to First World War.
develop a reasoned historical sources such as maps, images > Investigate and use a range
argument. Those sources and the and poetry from the time, and the of sources to enhance and
evidence you draw from them are opinions of historians. Use these communicate understanding
crucial in establishing the validity to shape the questions that will of the First World War and
of any claims you wish to make. frame your research. its impact.

13.1 Introduction On 4 August 1914, after weeks of tension, hesitation and
uncertainty, Europe plunged into war. The conflict was welcomed
on all sides as an opportunity for glory, patriotism and adventure.
Soldiers rushed to be in ‘the show’, in the firm belief that it would
League of Nations be ‘over by Christmas’. It was in fact four years before the guns
an international finally fell silent. More than 9.5 million people lay dead, and the
organisation
initial enthusiasm for the ‘Great War’ (as the First World War had
established at the
end of the First become known) had been replaced by disillusionment and the
World War to conviction that there must be no more such wars. The League of
maintain world peace
and prevent the
Nations was created in the hope of ensuring that discussion and
outbreak of future ‘right’ replaced warfare and ‘might’. Yet the seeds for the next war
wars by encouraging had already been sown.
nations to negotiate
with each other The emphasis of this chapter is on enabling you to come to
a clear and well-supported judgment about the role of the First
Industrial Revolution World War in shaping the modern world. You will access a range of
the rapid sources that will help guide your understanding of what occurred
development of
industry, beginning during the war, why it occurred, and how it has influenced the
in Britain in the mid- world that you live in today. It will encourage you to reflect on
eighteenth century,
the continuities and changes set in progress by the ‘war to end
in which advances
in technology all wars’.
fundamentally
changed the
agricultural and Historical context: Europe in the lead-up
manufacturing SOURCE 1 Soldiers leaving
industries, as well
as transport and
to the First World War Paris for the battlefront,
August 1914
communications At the start of twentieth century, life for many in Europe was a
prosperous and peaceful time. The Industrial Revolution had many
Balkan states
the countries on the positive impacts. Technological advances in agriculture and manufacturing meant that
Balkan peninsula in food and mass-produced goods were more affordable. Governments made improvements
southern Europe
in housing, sanitation and healthcare, and new railways, canals and roads made transport
easier. People could use telegraphs and telephones to communicate with each other
socialism
a political and immediately, and to receive news reports from around the world.
economic theory These improvements, however, were not enjoyed by all in Europe. The Industrial
that promotes the
public ownership of
Revolution had less impact in Eastern European countries: Austria-Hungary, the Balkan
a nation’s resources states and the Russian Empire. In addition, there was still a huge gap between rich and
and means of poor, even in industrialised countries in Western Europe, such as Britain and Germany.
production
The century before the First World War had also been a time of new ideas. Socialist
1905 Revolution
movements increasingly demanded political reform of Europe’s rule by monarchies, and
a revolution that sent the uprisings of the 1848 revolutions swept through many countries in Europe, demanding
a wave of political social and political reforms. In Russia, the violent reaction of imperial troops to protesters
and social unrest
throughout the
in the 1905 Revolution would change the way the tsar (Russian ruler) was viewed by
Russian Empire his people.

EUROPE BEFORE THE FIRST WORLD WAR
LE GE ND
Countries and their associated territories
France Italy
Germany The Ottoman Empire
Great Britain Spain
Norway
Sweden
Great Britain NOR TH

SEA
Denmark
A
SE
TI C
BAL
The Russian Empire
Netherlands
ATL AN T IC
Belgium Germany
OCEAN
France
Switzerland Austria–Hungary
Portugal Romania
Serbia BLACK SEA
Spain Corsica Bulgaria
Italy
Sardinia Albania
The Ottoman
MEDITER
RA
NE Empire
AN
Morocco
SE
Tunisia A
N
0 1000 km
SOURCE 2 This map shows the countries of Europe and their territories
before the First World War.

Compare Source 2 with a modern map of Europe. Create a list of continuities and changes
that this comparison shows you.
The influence of nationalism, imperialism, militarism nationalism

a sense of pride
and alliances in, and love of,

one’s country;
Nationalism came to dominate international relations in the nineteenth and early twentieth independence for a
centuries, and was one of the key factors that brought Europe to the outbreak of hostilities in particular country
1914. The national rivalries between the leading European powers were played out in the rapid
imperialism
growth of imperialism in the nineteenth century, as nations competed to increase their colonial
the practice of
territories. Another key factor that led nations into war was militarism, the race to build up their extending the
armies and navies, despite claims that they were not preparing for a war. European nations had power of a nation,
especially by
also become involved in a complex system of alliances by the end of the nineteenth century. acquiring territory of
The alliances were meant to create a ‘balance of power’ and deter any conflict. Instead, when an another nation
assassin’s bullet provided the trigger for war, they would pull nations one by one into the ‘war to
end all wars’.
CH A P T E R 13 T HE FIRST WORLD WA R 215

Nationalism
Feelings of nationalism can unite a people who share a common language, culture and history.
In Europe’s history, however, nationalism often involved a form of patriotism whereby people
believed that their own nation was superior to others, and this led to intense rivalries between
countries over territories.
In the Balkans, nationalism also led to division within countries along ethnic and cultural
lines. The Balkan province of Bosnia-Herzegovina, which had become part of the Austro-
Hungarian Empire in the years before the First World War, comprised different ethnic
groups: Bosnians, Serbs and Croats. Serbian nationalists became passionate about freeing Serbs
from foreign rule to create a new Serbian nation. Some were moved to join secret societies that
were willing to use terrorist actions to achieve this aim.
Imperialism
The European powers had been great rivals in their imperialist ambitions, as they raced to
increase their power, status and wealth. Britain, Spain, France and Portugal had colonised much
of the world between the fifteenth and nineteenth centuries, and by the late nineteenth century,
European powers were engaged in a new wave of imperialism.
One of the impacts of the Industrial Revolution was the need to find new sources of raw
materials – such as timber, cotton and oil – to feed rapidly growing industries. European
economies also needed new markets for all the goods that were now mass-produced in their
factories and textile mills.
The main rivals in this period were Britain, France and Germany. Germany had only become a
unified nation in 1871, and its leaders were eager to build a colonial empire. In the years before the
First World War, Germany unsuccessfully attempted to take control of French colonies in North Africa
– German troops sent to Africa were twice defeated by French forces, with the support of Britain.
EUROPEAN EMPIRES, 1914
PAC I F I C
PA CI FI C
OC EAN
O CE A N AT L A N T IC
OC E A N
L E GE ND
Belgium
France
Germany IN D IA N
Great Britain OC EA N
Italy
Netherlands
The Ottoman Empire N
Portugal
The Russian Empire
Spain 0 3000 km
SOURCE 3 This map shows the extent of the European empires by 1914.

arms race
the military build-
Militarism up by countries
competing to have
the largest military
As well as competing with each other over the size of their empires, the European powers forces and the latest
became engaged in an arms race. Despite claims that they were not preparing for war, they were military technology
training armies and building up their stores of armaments. Between 1870 and 1914, military
spending in many European countries increased on average by 300 per cent. All the major dominion
a territory of a sovereign
nations in Europe except Britain had introduced conscription (compulsory military service). or government
Britain relied on its naval supremacy
COUNTRY POPULATION NATIONAL WAR
to protect its vast overseas empire. When (MILLIONS) INCOME EXPENDITURE
Germany started to build up its navy, Britain (US$ BILLIONS) (US$ BILLIONS)
was compelled to increase its own naval Germany 65 12 19.9
power and the two countries competed to Britain 45 11 23
build new submarines and increase their fleets France 39 6 9.3
of dreadnoughts, fast and powerful armoured
Austria-Hungary 52 3 4.7
battleships that could control the seas.
Russia 171 7 5.4
Italy 37 4 3.2
Source: Paul Kennedy, The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers, 1988, pp. 243–74
the sources
SOURCE 4 National income, war expenditure (at 1913 prices) and
1 Examine Source 3. Is there any evidence population in key European nations 1913–1914
to support the argument that Germany
EUROPEAN ALLIANCES, 1914
was resentful of the imperial power of the
older European countries?
LE GE ND
2 Analyse Source 4. Compare the various Triple Alliance
countries’ population, national income and
Triple Entente
war expenditure and comment on what
Neutral countries
this data suggests about each country’s
ability to contribute to the war efforts. Norway
Sweden
Alliances NOR TH
A
SE
SE A
Great Britain Denmark
By 1914, the leading European nations I
C
LT
BA
had grouped themselves into two alliances.
Netherlands
Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy formed AT L A N T IC The Russian Empire
Belgium Germany
the Triple Alliance, and the member nations OC EA N
of the rival alliance, the Triple Entente, were France

Switzerland Austria–Hungary
Britain, France and Russia (see Source 5).
These groups of nations signed binding Portugal Romania
B L A CK S E A
agreements that each would provide military Spain Corsica Italy
Bulgaria
support if one of its members was attacked. Albania

Sardinia
The Ottoman
Many other countries, colonies and MEDITERR
AN Empire
EA
territories were attached to these alliances. N
Morocco SE
Japan, for example, had signed a treaty N
Tunisia
A
with Britain, which made it a member of

the Triple Entente. British colonies and
dominions, including India, Australia and 0 1000 km
New Zealand, were automatically a part of
British agreements. SOURCE 5 European alliances formed before the First World War

SOURCE 6 Timeline
Key events and developments A soldier wearing
in the lead-up and course of the

a gas mask rings
a bell to warn of a
gas attack, c. 1915
First World War
1882 1915
The Triple Alliance is formed between Germany, Western Front
Austria-Hungary and Italy. April–May: The Second Battle of Ypres takes place. Poison
gas is introduced.
Eastern Front
1907 May: German forces take command of the Eastern Front.

Home front and other developments
January: The first raid on Britain by Zeppelins (early airships)
The Triple Entente is formed between Britain, takes place.
France and Russia. 25 April: The Anzacs land at Gallipoli.
May: A German U-boat (submarine) sinks the British ocean
liner RMS Lusitania, with the loss of 1198 lives, including 128
1914
Americans.
December: Sir Douglas Haig becomes the British
commander-in-chief.
A peace demonstration is held in Berlin.
28 June: Archduke Franz Ferdinand (heir to the Austro-
Hungarian throne) and his wife Sophie are assassinated Troops are evacuated from Gallipoli after eight months of
in Sarajevo, Bosnia-Herzegovina. fighting.
28 July: Austria-Hungary declares war on Serbia.
Western Front
August: Germany declares war on Russia and France.
1916
Germany’s Schlieffen Plan results in the German Western Front
invasion of neutral Belgium on 4 August. Britain
February–December: The Battle of Verdun takes place.
declares war on Germany. The First World War begins.
March: The Australian Imperial Force (AIF) joins the Allied
September: The First Battle of the Marne – French and
forces against Germany on the Western Front.
British forces halt the Germans in Belgium and France.
July–November: The Battle of the Somme, a major British
Trench warfare on the Western Front begins.
offensive, tries to break the stalemate on the Western
October–November: The First Battle of Ypres takes Front. Tanks are used for the first time.
place.
August: Paul von Hindenburg becomes the German
Eastern Front commander-in-chief.
August–September: War begins on the Eastern Front Home front and other developments
when Russia launches an offensive against Germany on
May: Britain introduces universal conscription.
17 August. Russian forces are defeated in the Battle of
Tannenburg and the Battle of the Masurian Lakes. May–June: The Battle of Jutland – the only major
encounter between the British and German naval fleets –
Home front and other developments ends indecisively.
August: Recruits flock to enlist. The Defence of the
October: Australia holds its first conscription
Realm Act is introduced in Britain to impose wartime
referendum. It is narrowly defeated.
restrictions. Britain’s Royal Navy begins a blockade of
A French soldier’s grave, marked by his
Germany.
rifle and helmet, on the battlefield of
October: Turkey enters the war on the side of Verdun
Germany.

1918
Western Front
March: The Ludendorff Offensive begins – this is the final
attempt by Germany to break through the Allied lines and
win the war.
April: General Ferdinand Foch becomes the Allied
commander-in-chief.
Australian troops recapture the town of Villers-Bretonneux
in France from the Germans, at the cost of around 1200
Australian lives.
July: The Battle of Hamel takes place.
July–August: The Battle of Amiens begins. The first day
of this battle will later become known as the ‘black day for
the German Army’.
The Second Battle of the Marne – the last great German
offensive of the war. Its failure turns the war in favour of
British soldiers marching to the front line to replace worn-
the Allies.
out troops, 1916
September–October: Allied forces battle to capture the
1917
Hindenburg Line. A German Army representative tells the
Reichstag (German parliament) that victory is no longer
possible.
November: The Kaiser (German emperor) abdicates.
Western Front The armistice is signed on 11 November and fighting
ceases.
March: Germans withdraw to the Hindenburg Line
(Germany’s formidable defensive line of trenches and
1919
concrete fortifications).
July–November: The Third Battle of Ypres takes place;
it is better known as the Battle of Passchendaele.
Home front and other developments January–June: The Paris Peace Conference is held to
February–March: The Russian Revolution leads to the decide the fate of Germany. At this conference, the Treaty
abdication of the tsar on 2 March. of Versailles is drawn up, which officially ends the First
April: German miners go on strike in the Ruhr World War.
coalfields, objecting to a cut in the bread ration.
The United States enters the war.
October: The Battle of Beersheba, a British offensive
against Turkish forces, takes place. It is remembered for
the charge of the Australian Light Horse Regiment.
October–December: The Bolshevik revolution in 13.1 Check your learning
October ends the Provisional Government in Russia.
The Bolshevik leader, Vladimir Lenin, signs an
1 Explain the term ‘nationalism’. What are the
armistice with Germany in December, ending Russia’s positive and negative features of nationalism?
participation in the war. 2 Does an arms race necessarily lead to a war? Give
December: Australia holds its second conscription reasons for your response.
referendum, which is also defeated. The British 3 In your own words, explain the situation in
Government passes a bill to give the vote to women Europe in the early 1900s.
over 30 years old.
4 What was the potential danger of the alliance
system to stability in Europe in 1914?

13.2 The outbreak of war in 1914
As we have already seen, relationships between the key European powers were dominated
by complex and interrelated factors, including nationalism, imperialism, militarism and the
alliance system. Historians view these simmering national rivalries as the long-term causes of
the First World War. Such tensions needed a spark to provoke outright hostilities, and this
was provided by the assassination of the heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne, the Archduke
Franz Ferdinand.
The July Crisis and the first

declarations of war
The Archduke and his wife Sophie were shot
at close range by a gunman as they drove
through the streets of Sarajevo, Bosnia-
Herzegovina, on 28 June 1914. This violent
act was intended to promote the cause
of Serbian nationalists. The immediate
consequence was a period of threats, bluffs
and failed negotiations among European
nations known as the July Crisis. Tensions
in the Balkans in the years prior to 1914
meant that Austria-Hungary was ready to
lay blame for the Archduke’s assassination
on Serbia, and it issued its neighbour with
SOURCE 7 This photograph of Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife
Sophie riding in their car on 28 June 1914 was taken minutes before the
10 ultimatums. When Serbia could not
event that sparked the First World War – their assassination by a gunman, a comply with all of these demands, Austria-
19-year-old Serb nationalist named Gavrilo Princip. Hungary declared war on Serbia on 28
July 1914.
The world at war

The alliance system now came into effect. Russia promised to support Serbia and began to
mobilise its army. Germany, Austria-Hungary’s powerful ally, threatened Russia with war
unless it ceased this mobilisation. When this threat was ignored, Germany declared war on
Russia on 1 August 1914, and two days later declared war on Russia’s ally, France.
At this point, Germany rapidly put into effect the Schlieffen Plan, its long-held strategy
when faced with a war on two fronts: against France on its western borders and Russia
on its eastern borders. Germany had feared a war on both fronts since Russia and France
had become allies in 1894. If successful, the Schlieffen Plan would mean that the German
Army would not need to fight on both fronts simultaneously. The plan called for an all-out
attack on France to capture Paris and achieve a quick victory on the Western Front. The
German Army could then turn to the east and defeat Russia before it had time to fully
mobilise its army.

To reach the French border, German troops would advance through Belgium, a neutral
country. Germany hoped that the British Government would decide to stand apart and stay
neutral. However, Britain had pledged to protect Belgium’s neutrality, and when Germany
commenced its invasion of Belgium on 4 August 1914, Britain declared war on Germany.
Other countries would later join the war. These included Italy, Japan and the United States
on the side of the Allies, and the Ottoman Empire (Turkey) and Bulgaria on the side of the Allies
the coalition
Central Powers. (Note that although Italy had been a member of the Triple Alliance alongside
of countries in
Germany and Austria-Hungary, it did not join the Central Powers as it considered the actions opposition to the
of its old enemy, Austria-Hungary, to be in breach of the terms of that alliance.) The colonies Central Powers in
and dominions of the European nations would also be drawn into the conflict, including they included Britain,
Australia as a dominion of the British Empire. the Commonwealth,
France and Russia,
So began the world’s first global conflict.
which were joined
by the United States
Stalemate on the Western Front in 1917
Central Powers
Germany’s attempt to maintain the timetable imposed by the Schlieffen Plan met with the coalition
difficulties. Belgian resistance was greater than expected and delayed the advance, while of countries in
the British Expeditionary Force arrived to defend Paris more rapidly than the Germans had opposition to the
Allies in the First
anticipated. The German Army – its troops underfed and exhausted and already delayed – World War; they
suffered a further blow on nearing Paris, when 100 000 of its men were transferred to the included Germany
and Austria-Hungary,
Eastern Front to face the Russians, who had also mobilised quickly and invaded Germany.
which were later
The First Battle of the Marne, which followed, was a hard-won Allied victory. The Germans joined by the
had come so close to Paris they could see the Eiffel Tower in the distance, but they got no Ottoman Empire
(Turkey)
further. The Schlieffen Plan had failed and Germany was caught in a two-front war.
SOURCE 8 A cartoon illustrating how the First World War escalated as a result of the alliance system

The German Army retreated to the River Aisne and began to dig trenches. The Allied
armies, equally exhausted, did not have the strength to push the Germans out of France. This
led to the ‘race to the sea’, as each side extended its trench systems and fortified them with
barbed wire, machine guns and artillery defences.
By the end of the year, when many had expected the war to be over, a line of trenches
stalemate stretched from the sea to the Swiss Alps, movement had ended and the war was at a stalemate.
a situation where
neither side is able to
gain an advantage War on the Eastern Front
Australian students of the First World War are familiar with the areas on the Western Front, where
Australians served, but the Eastern Front is also of great significance. This theatre of war stretched
from the Baltic Sea in the north to the Black Sea in the south. It included most of Eastern Europe
and also stretched into Central Europe. In area, it was much larger than the Western Front.
Russia surprised Germany by sending in troops soon after the war had started. Germany’s
resistance was rushed but effective. By 1915, Germany was moving into Russia, and Russian
troops suffered defeats in 1915 and 1916. In 1917, the Tsar of Russia was forced from office,
Bolsheviks and the Bolsheviks seized power.
a revolutionary
political party
The spread-out nature of the Eastern Front meant that trenches were largely ineffective, and
led by Lenin that it was the mobility and training of the German troops that proved to be decisive. By March
seized power from 1918, German troops were within striking distance of the Russian capital, Petrograd (formerly
Russia’s Provisional
Government in St Petersburg), and the Bolsheviks concluded the Treaty of Brest–Litovsk that withdrew Russia
November 1917 from the war and ended the war on the Eastern Front.
Although Australia was not directly involved in this action, the campaign at Gallipoli had
been designed to help Russia secure and maintain its access to the Mediterranean Sea.
The Battle of Tannenberg, August 1914

The Battle of Tannenberg was the battle that halted the Russian advance into Germany in the
first month of the war. So effective were the German forces that the invading Russian Second
Army was effectively destroyed. The statistics tell the story. Germany’s 150 000 troops were
clearly outnumbered by Russia’s 250 000 troops, but 78 000 Russian soldiers were killed or
wounded, and 90 000 were taken as prisoners of war. It took 60 German trains to carry away
all the Russian equipment that had been captured.
The Battle of Tannenberg decisively stopped any Russian advance into Germany.

1 How could a historian use Source 7 to explain the outbreak of the First World War?
2 Analyse Source 8 and outline what information it gives you.

1 Explain why a political assassination in Sarajevo led to the First World War. Construct a flow
chart or timeline to support your explanation.
2 Why was it that the Western Front developed into a stalemate, while the Eastern Front didn’t?
3 Explain why the Battle of Tannenberg is significant.

SOURCE 9 Beersheba, 1917
13.2 PROFILE
BATTLE OF BEERSHEBA
In the desert sands of Palestine, the when he joined the Western Australian
Battle of Beersheba (31 October 1917) Light Horse.
saw Australian and New Zealand Among the 31 Australians killed in
troops support the British against the the charge was the Test cricketer Albert
Ottoman Empire in one of the last great ‘Tibby’ Cotter, who was widely regarded
cavalry battles of modern warfare. It as the best fast bowler of the time.
was effectively a battle for water, as Cotter, a stretcher-bearer, was shot as the
Beersheba’s wells were the only reliable troops dismounted to engage the enemy
water source in the area. The sight of on reaching Beersheba. The walkway to
Australia’s Light Horse Regiment charging the Sydney Cricket Ground is named in
across the desert sands, with bayonets his memory.
and rifles strapped to their backs, Success at Beersheba helped
captured the romantic image of war that consolidate British control in the region
modern technology had driven into the and, taking a longer-term view of history,
mud of the Western and Eastern Fronts. could be seen as one of the factors that
Indeed, this was the style of battle that has led to today’s conflict in the
Archy Hamilton, the hero of the 1981 film Middle East.
Gallipoli, thought he was signing up for
13.2 PROFILE TASKS

1 Explain what is meant by the statement that Beersheba ‘captured the romantic
image of war that modern technology had driven into the mud of the Western and
Eastern Fronts’.
2 Research the sporting and military careers of Albert ‘Tibby’ Cotter.

13.3 Experiences of soldiers in key battles
on the Western Front
The stalemate on the Western Front endured for the next three years. It was clear that a new
type of war had begun to unfold. This was not a war of dash, excitement and adventure, but
an ‘industrial war’, where the products of modern armament factories were set against flesh
and bone. In this uneven contest, the power of defence was much greater than the power of
offence – it was far easier to defend a trench line than to capture one.
In 1916 and 1917, military leaders on both sides attempted to break the deadlock with
key battles at Verdun, the Somme and Passchendaele.
Battle of Verdun, February–December 1916

garrison On the Western Front, the French held the garrison of Verdun, a great French fortress,
a body of troops which was surrounded by 13 massive concrete forts. German General Erich von Falkenhayn
stationed in a
fortified place hoped to break the stalemate by forcing the French to defend Verdun, using artillery to
inflict huge numbers of casualties and ‘bleed the French Army to death’.
The Germans began a massive bombardment of French defences in February 1916, using
1400 heavy guns. French General Philippe Pétain was given the job of defending Verdun.
This resistance became symbolic in the eyes of the French, and Pétain declared: ‘They shall
not pass!’
The Battle of Verdun was brutal.
German artillery fired twenty-three million
shells at the French, and also used new
deadly weapons. Phosgene gas (see Section
13.4) was introduced to the battlefield and,
for the first time, flame-throwers were used
in large numbers. The forts were the scene
of fierce hand-to-hand fighting in their
underground passageways.
Crucial to the French was their ability
to bring in reinforcements of soldiers and
supplies through what became known as
‘La Voie Sacrée’ (The Sacred Way), the
only road into and out of Verdun. Despite
intensive German shelling, this vital route
was never closed and, at the height of
activity, it saw 6000 vehicles a day. Almost
three-quarters of the French Army was
brought in to defend Verdun.
SOURCE 10 The landscape around Verdun after months of intensive
shelling by German artillery

The Germans called off their main attack in July 1916, although fighting continued
until December, when the French recaptured most of the land won by the Germans in
earlier advances. The Germans had failed to break the French resistance.
Both sides suffered huge losses, with a total of more than 700 000 men killed, wounded
or missing during the 10-month battle. Of these, it is estimated that 300 000 men died,
with losses roughly equal on each side.
Battle of the Somme, July–November 1916

The Battle of the Somme in 1916 has become the defining symbol of the Great War. The first
day of this bloody battle was perhaps the worst ever in the history of the British Army, which
suffered 57 000 casualties, including 20 000 killed.
The Somme campaign was initially devised by the British as a way to break through German
lines and break the stalemate on the Western Front. Allied forces fighting with the British
included troops from France, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and South Africa.
The battle began on 1 July 1916 and was preceded by a week-long bombardment of German
trenches, in order to destroy the Germans’ barbed wire and front-line trenches. This aim was
not achieved, however, because the Germans were aware of the impending attack and prepared
by digging underground chambers that allowed their soldiers to shelter from the bombardment.
When the Allied troops went ‘over the top’, they were confident that the German trenches over the top
were cleared; soldiers from one British regiment even kicked footballs into no man’s land as they the movement by
troops when they
advanced. But instead, they were hit by a barrage of machine-gun fire. climbed up from
Although the French troops had some success, the British did not achieve any of the targets their trenches to
move forward
set by their commander-in-chief, General Sir Douglas Haig, in the first two days. Nevertheless, into battle
Haig persisted and the offensive continued. After the battle, the commander wrote that he had
hoped for a breakthrough at first, but then accepted that the attack must go on anyway because it
drew German troops away from Verdun. The optimistic ‘breakthrough’ battle had become part
of the war of attrition. war of attrition
a strategy to wear
Over the course of the following months, the Battle of the Somme became a series of attacks
down the enemy with
and counter-attacks, which saw the British front line advancing a mere 15 km at its furthest continuous actions
extent. The campaign of attrition was only halted by the British commanders in November 1916. to reduce their
resources
Final casualties have been estimated at 500 000 on the German side, and 620 000 suffered
by the Allies.
SOURCE 11 British soldiers

go over the top during the
Battle of the Somme.

SOURCE 12
By the end of July, responding to every British or French advance or attempt to advance, the
German infantry had made not less than sixty-seven counter attacks, large or small, that I can
identify. Probably they had made a great many more, now lost in time’s obscurity – possibly twice
as many. This was the texture of the battle: attack, counter-attack; attack again, counter-attack
again ... That is why it is so utterly pernicious to dwell constantly on the freak of 1 July, and to
associate the whole battle with the image of that day ... The Somme was the turning point.
John Terraine, The Smoke and the Fire: Myths and Anti-Myths of War, 1861–1945, 1980
SOURCE 13
The Somme offensive was a necessary if painful stage in the process of weakening a skilful,
courageous and highly professional enemy.
Peter Simkins, in Chris McCarthy, The Somme: The Day-By-Day Account, 1993, foreword
SOURCE 14
We may perhaps question whether the four-and-a-half month slog of the Somme was the
unmitigated disaster it is usually painted. One voice worth hearing in this context is that of
the German supreme commander Field Marshal Paul von Hindenburg, who was sufficiently
chastened by the sufferings of his troops during the campaign to state at a conference in January
1917, ‘We must save the men from a second Somme battle.’ Another notable viewpoint is that of
the distinguished soldier–writer Charles Carrington, who would later claim that ‘The Somme
battle raised the morale of the British Army. Although we did not win a decisive victory there was
what matters most, a definite and growing sense of superiority, man to man ... We were quite sure
we had got the Germans beat.’
M. Brown, ‘Sommewhere in France’, History Today, July 2006, Vol. 56, Issue 7, pp. 22–4
Battle of Passchendaele, July–November 1917

blockade The year 1917 began positively for the Allies. The British naval blockade continued to deprive
the act of stopping
Germany of vital raw materials, the British and French gained control in the air and Allied
ships from leaving or
entering ports industrial production was up. The French commander-in-chief, Robert Nivelle, attempted a
breakthrough offensive in early 1917, but only succeeded in gaining less than 8 km, at great cost.
He was replaced by Philippe Pétain in May 1917.
Disillusionment led to mutinies in some French units. Some scholars have gone so far as to
suggest that from this point on, the French Army ceased to be a potent offensive force. This view
may be extreme, but the fact remains that for the rest of 1917, the British Army had to carry the
weight of the offensive.
The Third Battle of Ypres, better known as the Battle of Passchendaele, lasted from the end of
July until November. Soldiers from Britain, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa once again
attempted to break through German lines in Belgium. There were many frightening parallels
between the circumstances surrounding the Somme in 1916 and Passchendaele in 1917. On both
occasions, the British were requested to launch an attack to take pressure off the French Army, and
in both battles the point of attack gave every advantage to the German defenders. Haig’s decisions
regarding both battles have produced much debate and criticism.

At Passchendaele, a huge bombardment of four and a half million shells combined with the
worst rains seen in 30 years, turning the battlefield into a quagmire. Movement became almost
impossible, as men, horses and equipment got stuck in the mud. Some men who fell into craters
drowned, or had their backs broken as their comrades tried to pull them out of the mud.
Passchendaele was the ultimate example of the rationale for a war of attrition. Even
though the Allies suffered heavy losses, Haig argued that as long as the Germans lost more
men than the British and French, the Allies would win in the end. While there had been
no breakthrough, Haig claimed that the Germans were suffering a fearful defeat because of
their losses. Clearly, this kind of thinking worried the politicians, who were dependent on the
support of the public – a public weary of the long casualty lists in their daily newspapers. Haig’s
view of attrition also gave little comfort to the troops, who joked grimly about who would be
left to take food and ammunition up to the last man standing.
Passchendaele cost the Allies 275 000 casualties and the Germans 200 000, for an Allied
gain of just over 10 km.

1 Explain how Sources 10, 11 and 15 help you understand the conditions soldiers experienced
on the Western Front.
2 Examine Sources 12, 13 and 14, and sources from your own research, and explain how the
historiography
historiography of the Somme has changed over time.
the study of the
3 Assess the Battle of the Somme. Was it a monstrous waste of life resulting from incompetent construction of
generalship, or a turning point that mortally wounded the German Army? Include relevant history
sources in your response.

1 Outline what the Battles of Verdun, the Somme and Passchendaele were trying to achieve.
Analyse how successful each was in achieving its objective.
2 What does each battle reveal about the conditions under which soldiers were fighting?
SOURCE 15 Battlefield conditions at the Third Battle of Ypres,

better known as the Battle of Passchendaele

13.4 The changing nature of war by 1918
During the First World War, both sides used scientific and industrial developments in
weaponry in an attempt to break the deadlock. In 1914, the British infantryman walked to
battle and attacked enemy trenches with his rifle and bayonet, a soft cap on his head. By 1918,
technological and industrial advances meant that he was transported to battle in a truck, and
Lewis gun could be armed with a Lewis gun, grenades, a rifle grenade or a flame-thrower. He now
a type of machine
carried a gas respirator and his head was protected by a helmet. Infantry attacks were supported
gun that was mass-
produced in Britain by barrages of high explosives, which bombarded the enemy from artillery and airplanes. Tanks
during the First were used to clear barbed wire ahead of an attack, and clouds of poison gas exploded from gas
World War
shells to terrorise the enemy.
rifle grenade
a grenade-type
explosive device
The mechanisation of modern warfare
propelled from a rifle
barrel; these devices
On the Western Front, it was the use of mechanised weapons, such as heavy artillery guns and
covered far greater machine guns, that gave the advantage to defenders and prolonged the stalemate. Infantryman
distances than those attacking enemy lines on foot stood little chance against a defensive force with heavy artillery,
thrown by hand
and with machine guns that could fire up to 600 rounds of ammunition per minute. The
massive loss of life on the first day of the Battle of the Somme was a tragic example of this.
More fire-power was needed to break the deadlock, and the industries in the Central Powers
and the Allied nations now bent their efforts toward mass production of the weapons that
American Civil War could provide it.
the war between
the Northern and In addition to the fire-power laid down by their heavy artillery, military leaders in the First
Southern states of World War were the first to use tanks and aircraft. These developments in mechanised warfare
the United States,
fought between 1861
could be used to counter the enemy’s artillery fire during an attack, and increase the chances of
and 1865 a rapid advance and victory.
Guns and artillery

Machine guns had been used in the
American Civil War and their fire-power
was improved in the First World War. They
gave defenders the ability to cut down the
approaching enemy in numbers that could
not have been imagined before the Battles of
the Somme and Verdun.
Heavy artillery guns fired large shells over
a long distance, hitting their targets from
above. However, although they were mounted
on wheels, the weight of artillery weapons
meant they were difficult to move into the
desired positions and often became bogged
down in mud or stuck in craters.
SOURCE 16 German soldiers using a machine gun, in the First World War,
c. 1916

Tanks
Tanks were first introduced to the battlefield
on the Somme in September 1916. Tanks’
main uses were to flatten barbed-wire
obstacles and take out nests of enemy
machine gunners. They also gave advancing
soldiers some shelter from enemy fire.
These early tanks lacked the capacity to
seriously affect the course of events. Only small
numbers were available, and their slowness
meant they could neither spearhead an attack,
nor punch a hole in the enemy line to open the
way for a major advance. They were limited
in the terrain in which they could be used
– they could not operate safely in built-up
areas, woods, or over badly cratered or muddy SOURCE 17 A British Mark IV tank doing what it did well – crushing
ground, which excluded a good proportion of barbed wire
the areas where infantry needed it most.
Tank crews in the First World War faced a risk of carbon-monoxide poisoning, overheating
or ‘seasickness’. The tanks were deafeningly noisy for those inside, and the crews’ visibility was
also extremely limited.
Between 1916 and 1918, tanks were never more than an auxiliary to the infantry, with only
slightly greater speed than a foot soldier.
Aircraft
Modern warfare unveiled a new form of terror: attack from the air. Until
1916, German air raids were mainly carried out by Zeppelins – huge,
hydrogen-filled balloons, with the crew slung underneath in a gondola.
At first, there was little protection against the Zeppelins. Anti-aircraft
guns were hopelessly inadequate, the shells exploding well below the
height of the airships. In September 1916, however, the first airship
was shot down over England, and by the end of that year the Zeppelin
had had its day as an offensive weapon, though they were still used
sporadically in raids until August 1918.
The Zeppelin was succeeded by the German Gotha bomber plane
and its British equivalent, the Handley Page Type O.
In all, there were 53 Zeppelin raids and 57 aeroplane raids over
Britain during the war, resulting in about 1400 deaths and 3400 SOURCE 18 Mounting bombs on a German
injuries. These signalled an important change in the nature of modern Gotha bomber before take-off
warfare: women, children, the sick and the elderly were – in their own
homes – now in the front line.
Britain was not the only country to face an aerial onslaught during the war. Gotha planes also
attacked Paris and although Berlin was too distant, British and French aviators bombed many
other German cities, especially in the Ruhr and Rhineland industrial areas in 1918. As in Britain,
civilian morale in Germany was shaken by these attacks. German casualties from Allied aerial
bombing were 740 killed and 1900 wounded.

Gas: a breakthrough weapon?
Chemical warfare was one of the scientific developments designed to break the deadlock on the
Western Front. Three types of gas were used as weapons:
> Chlorine caused difficulty in breathing, a burning sensation in the throat and chest pain.
> Phosgene was more sinister and deadly because it did not cause coughing and irritation on
first contact, like chlorine; thus, victims were exposed to larger doses for longer periods
without realising it. The vast majority of all gas-related fatalities in the war were caused
by phosgene.
> Mustard gas led to blistering of the skin, airways and lungs, and even blindness. While
death rates from mustard gas were relatively low, its effects were debilitating, and those
affected required long-term, elaborate care.
Protective measures against gas were initially primitive, with soldiers told to urinate on a
sock or piece of cloth and place it over their mouth and nose. Various types of gas mask were
tried, until in 1917 the small-box respirator was developed, which gave effective protection.
At first, gas was released from cylinders, and thousands of these were carried to the front
line. However, winds made gas difficult to control once it was released. From 1916, the French
and Germans used gas shells, but these had limited use.
On the Western Front, the use of gas was occasionally effective, but never decisive. Gas was
not the new breakthrough weapon that had been hoped for.
SOURCE 19 An aerial photo showing one of the first poison attacks using gas, taken over Belgium in April/May 1915

SOURCE 20
Not a cruel method. I look upon it as the most

humane element in war. It should be said that of our
gas casualties only 3 or 4 per cent died and of those
that lived nearly all of them are getting well …
Response by General William Sibert of the US Chemical Warfare

Service during the First World War, when
asked whether he considered gas to be a cruel
method of warfare, in Donald Richter,
Chemical Soldiers, 1994, p. 219
SOURCE 21
SOURCE 22 A French
Gas! Gas! Quick, boys! – An ecstasy of fumbling, soldier and his dog head to
the Western Front, 1919.
Fitting the clumsy helmets just in time,
But someone still was yelling out and stumbling
And floundering like a man in fire or lime …
Dim through the misty panes and thick green light,
As under a green sea, I saw him drowning.
In all my dreams, before my helpless sight,

He plunges at me, guttering, choking, drowning.
If in some smothering dreams, you too could pace

Behind the wagon that we flung him in,
And watch the white eyes writhing in his face,
His hanging face, like a devil’s sick of sin;
If you could hear, at every jolt, the blood
Come gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs,
Obscene as cancer, bitter as the cud
Of vile, incurable sores on innocent tongues, –
My friend, you would not tell with such high zest
To children ardent for some desperate glory,
The old Lie: Dulce et decorum est Pro patria mori.*
Wilfred Owen, ‘Dulce et Decorum Est’, written during the First

World War and published posthumously in 1920.
Owen was killed in action in 1918, just one week
before the signing of the armistice.
*It is sweet and fitting to die for one’s country.

Advances in communications
The development of telephone and wireless radio systems allowed instant communication
between the front line and commanding field officers, who were behind the front line.
However, telephone lines could be easily damaged by artillery fire or tank movements. Soldiers
continued to act as ‘runners’, moving backwards and forwards through the trenches to relay
information.
Advances in medicine
As weaponry designed to destroy lives
developed rapidly, so too did medical
technology designed to save lives. For
example, a soldier whose thigh was broken
in the conflict in 1914 had an 80 per cent
chance of dying; but by 1916, that rate
had changed to an 80 per cent chance of
survival, thanks to the use of the Thomas
splint. By the end of the war, mobile X-ray
machines were brought to the front, nurses
and surgeons were stationed much closer
to the battles to treat injuries more quickly,
and blood transfusions were available to help
treat massive blood loss. At home, medical
technology to produce prosthetic limbs and
aid in facial reconstruction improved to meet
the urgent need of soldiers disfigured by their SOURCE 23 French medics locating a bullet with
wounds. Awareness of the dangers of bacteria an X-ray machine at a French field hospital during
and infection also increased dramatically. the First World War

1 Contrast the views about gas warfare shown by General William Sibert in Source 20 and
Wilfred Owen in Source 21. How would you account for the differences?
2 Research the life of Owen. Would you regard the view of Owen or Sibert as the more reliable
source to provide an understanding of the impact of gas warfare? Explain your reasoning.
3 Analyse Sources 16, 17, 18, 19 and 23 and explain how each source contributes to your
understanding of the developments of the First World War.

1 Create a timeline or flow chart that shows the changes in warfare that occurred during the
First World War.
2 As a class, debate whether the First World War had greater success in creating or curing injuries.
3 Identify which area of change in war technology you feel made the greatest contribution to
the First World War and explain, using evidence, why you have made this selection.

13.5 The impact of war on civilians
Prior to the First World War, wars had traditionally been fought by men on battlefields, often
in distant lands. The First World War was different. The communities left behind became
more than spectators awaiting news of battle; they became participants. They joined another
front in the war – the ‘home’ front – that became vital to the outcome of the conflict.
home front The involvement of the home front led to the First World War becoming the first
those citizens who
total war.
remain at home
during a war; the
home front typically
includes women, Impact of war on civilians
children and the
elderly Civilians often found they had no choice about being involved in the war. Invading armies and
the mass destruction wrought along the Western Front ensured that simply living where you had
total war always lived suddenly became impossible. Civilians fled from newly created war zones as the
a war in which all
aspects of society
Germans launched their invasion through Belgium and into France. More than 150 000 Belgian
are involved refugees sought shelter in Britain in the early years of the war, returning home years later to their
shattered landscape, to try and rebuild their villages, their farms and their communities. This
was a story repeated across Europe, as families fled and communities were destroyed.
SOURCE 24 French civilians flee the advancing German Army, 1915.

Impact of the war: the home front
The war had a deeper and more profound impact on the German home front than it did in
Britain. The British experienced food shortages and rationing, but the German food shortages
were more severe and the German Government’s regulation of domestic labour, industry and
agriculture was more extensive. Germany had more than three and a half million civilians
engaged in war work, the greatest number of any aggressive power. Food and fuel rationing
eventually led to strikes and the breakdown of the German economy.
Britain focused its home front on ensuring the continued supply of all the munitions
and products necessary to conduct war. The government took on extensive measures to
ensure control of the home front. The Defence of the Realm Act (DORA) in 1914 gave the
government extraordinary powers over the lives of its citizens and banned a range of activities,
including flying kites, buying binoculars, feeding bread to animals and buying alcohol on
public transport. People could be arrested without a warrant, and workers could be directed to
do specific jobs. Emphasis was put on civilians producing food because of shortages, and food
rationing was introduced.
Germany’s food shortages soon became much more serious than anything experienced by
the British home front. Germany largely relied on imports for food, and the British Navy’s
blockade of German trade proved an effective weapon. As shortages and heavy winters had an
increasing impact, substitute products replaced foods that were no longer available. Coffee, for
example, was made from roasted barley, rye, chicory and figs. Bread was known as K Bread or
Kriegsbrot (war bread). At times, K bread was made with potatoes, turnips or rye, and by 1918
it contained large amounts of sawdust and chalk.
These deprivations of food and freedoms at home increased opposition to the war.
SOURCE 25
GERMANY IS STANDING AGAINST A WORLD OF ENEMIES WHO WOULD

DESTROY HER!
I. We have enough breadstuffs in the country to nourish our population until the next harvest,
but nothing must be wasted.
II. Breadstuffs must not be used as fodder.
VI. Do not despise even a single piece of bread because it is no longer fresh.
VII. Do not cut off a slice more than you need to eat. Think always of our soldiers in the field
who, often in some far-off, exposed position, would rejoice to have the bread which you waste.
VIII. Eat war bread. It is recognisable by the letter K. It satisfies and nourishes as thoroughly as
any other kind ...
IX. Whoever first peels potatoes before cooking them wastes much. Therefore, cook potatoes
with the jackets on.
X. Leavings of potatoes, meat, vegetables, etc., which you can not use, do not throw away, but
collect them as fodder for cattle.
A notice that was prominently displayed on public transport,
and in shops, restaurants and other public places in Germany,
in H.W. Wilson, The Great War, Vol. 4

SOURCE 26 Germans in Berlin crowd around a mobile soup kitchen during the First World War.

How do Sources 25 and 26 help historians understand the life of civilians during the war?

1 Explain in your own words what you understand by the term ‘total war’. Justify why it is an
appropriate term to use to describe the First World War.
2 Describe the impact of the war on civilians across Europe.
3 Canadian historian Margaret MacMillan suggests that one of the significant impacts of the
First World War was that governments extended their control over citizens by imposing
restrictions, such as postal censorship and other measures that undermined privacy, that
they were reluctant to relinquish after the war. What evidence can you see around you to
suggest that governments of today might take similar actions?

SOURCE 27 British women training as fire fighters during the First World War
The changing role of women in Britain

Britain in 1914 was still a society dominated by class. Upper- and middle-class women knew
little of labour-based work until the advent of war, but widespread shortages meant that
women of every class took up employment in areas where men had previously dominated.
The manufacturing of munitions became a key area, but women became involved in other
sectors of the economy, including transport, education, banking, finance and administration.
For working-class women, whose lives had always been physically demanding, the war meant
higher wages; but for upper- and middle-class women, the war years often meant their first
experience of any form of employment.
This situation did not survive the war, however. Two years after the war ended, there were
fewer women in work than there had been before the war, and returning servicemen often felt
they had to protect their jobs from women. It was in the political arena that women found
more success. The contribution of women to the war effort convinced most members of
parliament, who were overwhelmingly male, that women had earned a fuller place in society.
Previously, women in Britain had not been allowed to vote, but in December 1917 a bill was
passed to give the vote to all women over 30 years. In this way, the war had enabled women to
achieve a change, where a long campaign before the war had failed.

Explain how Source 27 either confirms or challenges the information on the changing role of
women in Britain during the First World War, outlined above.
13.5b Check your understanding

1 List the ways in which British women aided the war effort.
2 What benefits did British women gain from their experiences of war work?
3 How did the experience of British women during the war represent continuity and change?

Recruitment and conscription in Britain
and Germany
Before the war, the Germans had a tradition of conscription for
military training and service, which meant that they entered the war
in 1914 with a well-trained army of more than three million soldiers.
By the end of the war, this had grown to eleven million. Britain,
on the other hand, started the war with a small volunteer army of
730 000 men. Calls for volunteers were promoted throughout all areas
of society and, by late September of 1914, more than two million men
had volunteered.
Germany maintained its numerical superiority because of its
efficient and accepted conscription system. Britain initially relied
upon voluntary enlistment, but as the numbers of casualties mounted
rapidly, Prime Minister H.H. Asquith introduced a conscription bill to
parliament in January 1916. This bill targeted all single men between
18 and 41, but in May this was expanded to include married men.
The mass destruction at the Somme basically ended Britain’s
volunteer army, and it relied on conscripts from late 1916. In 1918,
SOURCE 29 A 1914 British recruitment poster,
the upper age for conscription was raised to 51. The total number
featuring Lord Kitchener, Secretary of State for
conscripted was two and a half million, which along with support War, who organised the largest volunteer army
from the Empire and Allies, enabled Britain to outlast Germany. Britain had ever seen
By the end of the war, more than five million British men
had served.
conscription
SOURCE 28 compulsory
enlistment into the
We thought it would be a novelty, you know, none of us had ever been out of England. To see armed forces
another country, we thought that was a great thing. We were raw country lads who’d never seen
nowt ... you had the impression you’d grown up from being a lad to a man. We were patriotic. It
had been driven into us a bit that Germany wanted England, that’s all we knew. We were young,
strong lads, and thought we should go and help the old soldiers out.
Volunteer soldier George Littlefair, in R. van Emden and
S. Humphries, Veterans, 1998, pp. 18–19

1 Describe the method used in Source 29 to persuade men to enlist.
2 What does Source 28 indicate about the level of knowledge of many would-be recruits?
Is there any evidence that these young men had been influenced by propaganda? propaganda
information,
3 How useful and reliable are Sources 28 and 29 for a historian studying the home front in especially of a biased
Britain at the beginning of the war? or misleading nature,
used to promote a
political cause or
13.5c Check your learning point of view
1 Explain why Germany was able to enter the war with a large, well-trained army in 1914.
2 Explain why Britain had to resort to conscription during the First World War.

Propaganda and censorship
in the First World War
Propaganda is an attempt to spread or
encourage a particular idea or ideas. Though
it can be a collection of lies, the best
propaganda relies upon a seed of truth, even
though it may be necessary to exaggerate or
distort that truth. The apparently ruthless
behaviour of the German armies in Belgium
and the use of U-boats meant that British
propagandists had a wealth of material to
draw on to portray Germans as inhuman, or
as bullies and aggressors.
Posters and cartoons

Posters and cartoons were a common
propaganda device. Their messages reinforced SOURCE 30 A cartoon shows the devil and a
German soldier looking gleefully at a monthly
positive feelings about your own side report, which contains the numbers of civilians
and negative images of the enemy. Much killed. This is an example of the type of
British propaganda was originally produced propaganda that was used to drum up public
voluntarily by patriotic and eager publishers; support for the war effort.
however, the British soon began to organise

and control their propaganda flow through
agencies such as the War Propaganda Bureau.
Compared with the British propaganda
effort, German propaganda lacked
coordination and was largely undertaken
by a number of private groups. Circulation
both of newspapers and of magazines rose in
Germany during the war, with people eager
for news; however, there appears to have
been a growing lack of public confidence in
these publications. The military was clearly
unhappy with the domestic propaganda effort
and set up its own news source, the Deutsche
Kriegsnachrichten (German War News).
Like the British, the Germans sought
to justify the war. The ‘encirclement’ of
Germany by enemy forces was a constant
feature of published stories, as was the
suggestion that the war was somehow a plot
by rivals to suppress German Kultur and
deny Germany its true and deserved position
of greatness. SOURCE 31 A war poster, 1915

As with Allied propaganda, the Germans did not hesitate to use
and embellish stories of atrocity; censorship and outright lies were
well-established aspects of German propaganda. Examples of this
approach were the falsification of casualty figures (an approach
not unique to Germany), exaggeration of German resources, and
inaccurate news from the battlefield. The German public was told that
the war had begun with a French invasion of German soil.
Censorship in the First World War

Censorship was in many ways virtually
indistinguishable from propaganda, and was
designed to minimise bad news or keep it from
the public entirely. In April 1915, Britain’s
Directorate of Special Intelligence (DSI) was set
up to coordinate all censorship and intelligence
activities. Censorship of mail offered excellent
opportunities for finding suitable themes on
which propaganda might be based.
In the trenches, soldiers were forbidden to keep diaries, a regulation
that they bypassed by writing on scraps of paper, or keeping notes illicitly.
It may seem surprising that there are so many war memoirs, but it should
be remembered that nearly all letters were censored by a soldier’s own
officers, and often not especially rigorously.
There was also the ‘green envelope system’. Soldiers were given one
green envelope per month, in which they could send uncensored letters to SOURCE 32 An anti-English propaganda
poster, c. 1916. The text reads: ‘He is to
their loved ones. The system was based on trust; the soldiers had to verify blame, when you have to struggle and bleed,
that these letters included only private and family matters, enabling them when you have to do without, when you
to write about personal things that they did not wish their immediate must save light and coal, when you need
superiors to see. Random green envelopes were opened at headquarters as ration books, when you cannot return to your
peacetime work! The arch enemy is England!
a deterrent, and if a soldier was found to have betrayed the trust placed in So, remain united! Remain strong! And you
him, he would be punished. will assure Germany’s victory!’
13.5d Understanding and using the sources

Analyse Sources 30, 31 and 32.
1 Identify each one as either British or German, and summarise the messages they are conveying.
2 Are they promoting positive views of their own side, or a negative view of the enemy?
3 Rank them in order of effectiveness, and explain your rankings.
13.5d Check your learning

1 What is propaganda? Why was it so important in the First World War?
2 What were the two basic approaches to propaganda used by both sides during the war?
3 Why was British propaganda more effective than German propaganda?
4 Explain why censorship was thought to be important during the war.

13.6 Victory and peace In 1917, two events occurred that changed the
course of the war: the entry of the United States
into the war, and the withdrawal of Russia from the
Eastern Front. Intense fighting continued on the
Western Front in the closing months of 1918, but the
extent to which the morale of the German Army had
collapsed was clear. On 2 October 1918, the German
Army’s high command told the German Reichstag
that victory in the war was no longer possible. In early
November – with the Austro-Hungarians signing
an armistice and the threat of revolution growing in
Germany – the Kaiser abdicated and fled to Holland.
armistice At 5 a.m. on 11 November 1918, the armistice was SOURCE 33 The front page of the Daily
the agreement made
signed and came into operation six hours later, thus News, 12 November 1918
by opposing sides in
a war to stop fighting ending the war at the eleventh hour of the eleventh day
of the eleventh month of 1918.
An overview of the reasons for the Allied victory

> The British naval blockade – this was effective in depriving Germany of the food and raw
materials it needed to continue the fight over a longer period. As to the overall effectiveness of
the blockade, Allied commander-in-chief Ferdinand Foch stated that the final victory in the
First World War was due 50 per cent to the military and 50 per cent to the blockade.
> Improved Allied tactics – under Foch’s direction, attacks on the Germans came in different
directions from the French, the British and the Americans in a never-ending series of jabs that
wore down enemy resistance. In the Battles of Hamel and Amiens in 1918, Australian General
John Monash and British General Douglas Haig pursued carefully planned, closely defined
engagements, avoiding the futile battles of attrition of former years. By this time, the Allied
commanders had learnt to use artillery, tanks and aircraft in well-coordinated attacks. New
strategies spared their troops from high casualties; for example ‘bite and hold’ tactics, where
soldiers did not push beyond the protection offered by their artillery, gaining and consolidating
small gains in territory before moving on.
> Fire-power – the Allies had developed an overwhelming industrial supply of weaponry. British
trench mortar factories were delivering large quantities of tanks, machine guns, Lewis guns, trench mortars
a short, stumpy gun
and shells. Artillery, and the constant supply of it, was a key factor in victory on the Western
firing bombs at high
angles to drop into Front. The British war economy, now increasingly aided by the Americans, could supply it; the
enemy trenches; it German war economy could not.
was designed to be
fired from trenches > Manpower – both sides were running out of men and an important factor, therefore, was
without exposing the growth in numbers with the arrival of the Americans in 1917. The first sustained
soldiers to enemy fire
US offensive took place at the end of May 1918. The growing numbers of fresh US troops
were to provide a source of manpower that the Germans could not match. By 1918, many
German units were commanding boys, older men or repatriated prisoners, who had already
experienced enough of war.

The effects of the war in giving rise to the Russian
Revolution
When war was declared in 1914, it seemed that the conflict would save the
threatened Romanov dynasty – and its head, Tsar Nicholas II – and not destroy it.
Volunteers hastened to join the Russian Army, and the tsar blessed the troops as
they left for the front. Political differences were put aside as Russians joined to fight
the common enemy in defence of the homeland. communism
an economic system
The Russian Empire, however, was inadequately prepared for modern warfare. in which the means
Supplies of weapons, ammunition and clothing for the troops proved hopelessly of production
(for example
inadequate. After some initial successes, the pattern for the war on the Eastern factories, farms
Front was soon set by the German victories at Tannenberg and the Masurian and machinery) are
Lakes in August and September 1914. By the end of 1915 Russia had suffered publicly owned by
the state, and goods
three and a half million casualties. are distributed
As resources went to the war effort, food supplies in Russian cities dwindled and prices rose. equally according to
need, as opposed to
There were 268 strikes in January and February 1917 alone. Increasing discontent with the war
privately owned and
and the leadership led to revolution and the abdication of the tsar in March 1917. Though the controlled systems
Provisional Government that replaced the tsar attempted to continue the war, the failure of its last such as capitalism
major offensive in July 1917 strengthened the calls of anti-war revolutionaries within Russia, led by
Lenin’s Bolsheviks.
With little direction from the government and
increasing rates of troop desertion, war on the Eastern
Front effectively ended in 1917. When the Bolsheviks took
power in November 1917, the formal ending of the war
was only a matter of time and negotiation. Russian and
German delegates signed the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk on
3 March 1918.
From this point, the revolution would lead to the rise
of the Soviet Union from the ashes of Russia. With its
communist ideology and a determination to support
revolution elsewhere, the Soviet Union was the polar
opposite of the rapidly emerging power of the United States.
They would fight as allies during the First World War,
but the divisions that would shape the second half of the SOURCE 34 Bolshevik leader Vladimir Lenin addressing the
crowd in the Red Square, Moscow, 1919, one year after the
twentieth century were falling into place as it ended.
end of the war

1 How did British tactics change and improve in the second half of the war?
2 Why was the United States’ decision to join the war on Britain’s side in 1917 so critical to the
outcome?
3 How could the First World War have been the salvation of the tsar and the Romanov
dynasty? Why wasn’t it?
4 Identify the group that eventually won power in Russia during the revolution, and research
its tactics and ideology. Why would Western countries such as Britain and the United States
have been so opposed to this group and its beliefs?

13.7 First
The nature and legacy of the
World War and its influence
on modernity
The First World War was a war of attrition, and introduced the world to the concept of total
Blitzkrieg war. It started out with Germany’s high hopes of a rapid Blitzkrieg (lightning war) into France,
a military tactic used
by the Germans that
and Britain’s belief that the ‘big show’ would be over by Christmas 1914. Soldiers believed
included short and they were fighting the ‘war to end all wars’, and that they would give the generations that
fast attacks using followed a peaceful world in which to prosper. Yet within a generation the world would be at
a range of mobile
weapons, such as war again.
tanks and air attacks
SOURCE 35
The cold numbers capture much of the war’s horror: more than 9 million men dead and twice as
many again wounded – a loss of sons, husbands and fathers but also of skills and talents. Graves
in the north of France and Belgium and war memorials across the US bear witness to the 53 000
American soldiers who died. Thousands of civilians died, too, during the war itself, whether of
hunger, disease or violence. And then, as the guns were falling silent, a new pestilence struck
humanity in the shape of a virulent influenza. As troops returned home, they unwittingly helped
carry the disease around the world. It has been estimated that 50 million died.
Margaret MacMillan, ‘The First World War: The war that changed everything’,
Wall Street Journal , 20 June 2014
As well as being one of the defining events of the twentieth century, the First World War
left an enormous legacy that is still being felt in today’s world. Historians argue that it was this
war that shaped the world we are all living in. Consider the following summary of points raised
by Canadian historian Margaret MacMillan in a Wall Street Journal article (quoted in Source
35) commemorating the centenary of the outbreak of the First World War in 2014. Some of the
seminal changes she attributes to war include:
> many modern national boundaries being established
> many governments establishing more direct control over their civilian populations
> attempts to establish an international body to avoid future conflicts
> the collapse of traditional empires, such as Austria-Hungary and the Ottomans
SOURCE 36 > the brutalisation of European society that led to violence becoming an acceptable way
The French
National War to resolve differences
Cemetery at > a lack of trust in governments to deliver peace and security
La Targette

> a fall in church attendance and an increase in alcohol consumption
> the hastening of the end of colonial empires, as colonies that contributed troops to the war
effort saw at first hand the myth of European superiority
> recognition of the problem of how to end major wars without starting new conflicts
> the impact of the West’s rejection of Japanese and Chinese claims in the peace settlement
> the reinforcement of America’s sense of exceptionalism. exceptionalism
These changes all have implications for the modern world. That same year, the Wall Street the belief that
something has
Journal also ran a centenary article called ‘100 years, 100 legacies’, which detailed 100 legacies
special qualities
from the First World War that it believed continue to influence life today. These included: that place it above
> the massive migration of African Americans from the Southern states to the North, in others; the most
common usage of
search of work in rapidly expanding industrial cities such as Chicago and Detroit this term is linked to
> the development of a sense of national identity among Australians and New Zealanders the self-belief of the
United States
> the popularisation of condoms as a means of combating the massive spike in sexually
transmitted diseases
> the introduction of daylight saving as a method of preserving energy and gaining more
productive daylight hours.
The world today evidently has many roots in the First World War. In Source 37, MacMillan
makes her perspective very clear.
SOURCE 37
We should not see it merely as something of historical interest, a series of sepia photographs showing
people who are quite alien to us. We are still living with the results of that war, and we face similar
concerns. How, for example, does the world deal with powers whose leaders feel they must have their
place in the sun? For Germany then, read Russia now. Or how can we rebuild societies after deeply
damaging conflicts – in Europe then, but in Central Africa, the Middle East or Afghanistan today?
A century after the assassination of an Austro-Hungarian archduke in the streets of Sarajevo, it may
be that looking back to The First World War can still help us toward a more peaceful future.
Margaret MacMillan, ‘The First World War: The war that changed everything’,
Wall Street Journal, 20 June 2014

1 What evidence does Margaret MacMillan use to support her contention that ‘cold numbers
capture much of the war’s horror?’
2 Discuss how MacMillan’s inclusion of a reference to civilian casualties helps you understand
the concept of total war.

1 Discuss why the First World War wasn’t the ‘war to end all wars’.
2 Discuss the impact you think the First World War has had on the world today. How does this
represent the value of studying history?
3 Analyse MacMillan’s list of changes above. Explain which you think are the most significant
three and justify your selection.
4 Conduct some online research to find the ‘100 years, 100 legacies’ article, or a similar article,
and identify how many legacies of the First World War have had a direct or indirect influence
on your life.

CONCLUSION In August 1914, the First World War unfolded before Europeans as a ‘grand adventure’
for those involved. Common phrases included ‘We’re off to the big show’, ‘It will all be
over by Christmas’ and the ‘war to end all wars’. The only one that would prove to have
any validity was the reference to the ‘big show’, if that is interpreted as total war.
The First World War became a war that killed civilians as freely as it did combatants.
Whole communities were obliterated, as technology emerged that enabled mass
destruction on a level that had never been previously imagined.
This war changed the world forever. After 400 years of virtual world dominance,
Europe virtually self-destructed, and dragged far-flung sections of the British Empire –
such as Australia – into the conflict too. From the ashes of destruction, the United States
and the Soviet Union would emerge as the world powers to dominate the second half of
the twentieth century.
The peace that concluded the war was as ill-advised as the conflict that preceded it.
Squabbling over territories, winners blaming losers, selfish parochial interest and a last,
fatal attempt by the traditional powers to retain their international control all combined
to lead the world into the Second World War a mere generation later.
The First World War was not the ‘war to end all wars’, but it did change the world.
EUROPE BEFORE THE FIRST WORLD WAR
SOURCE 38 Inspired by the First World War poem ‘In Flanders Fields’, in which poet John McCrae
observed how quickly poppies grew around the graves of those who fell at the Battle of Ypres, the
poppy has long been used to commemorate military personnel who have died in war.
FOR THE TEACHER

chapter
2 4 4 K E Y F E AT UR E S OF MODE RN HIS T OR Y 1 Y E A R 11

14The French
Revolution
and research
‘Why’ and ‘how’ will become
key questions to help guide you
KEY CONCEPTS AND SKILLS through an investigation of a
period as volatile as the French
Analysis and use of sources Revolution. It will be equally
The French Revolution is a important to recognise a range
complex historical event. It of sources if you are to develop
covers different phases, and a balanced perspective of your
the people involved often had own in your investigation.
very different motivations for
joining the cause. It is vital that
you understand the motivation Think about some of the key
underlying any source that you terms that could help you
use during your investigation of communicate your understanding
the revolution. It is crucial to ask of the French Revolution,
Maximilien Robespierre questions such as: who said it, including ‘causation’, ‘legacy’,
(1758–94), a leading figure what were the circumstances, ‘democracy’, ‘terror’, ‘rights’ and
of the French Revolution, did they have anything to gain, ‘Enlightenment’. Correct and
is guillotined in the and was it an attempt to sway relevant use of these terms and
Place de la Révolution, opinion? concepts can greatly enhance
Paris, 28 July 1794. your investigation.
Revolutions are about abrupt
FOCUS QUESTIONS LEARNING GOALS
change. As you investigate the
1 What were the long- and French Revolution, you will have > Understand the role and
short-term causes of the to keep asking the following impact of key ideas at the
French Revolution? key questions: what is changing time of the revolution.
and why is it changing? You will
2 What were some of the crucial > Understand the perspective
have to be alert to investigate
events during the French and motivations of different
continuities that may indicate
Revolution? individuals and groups.
strong underlying social and
3 What is the legacy of the cultural values that may survive > Recognise the legacy of the
French Revolution? revolutionary change. revolution.

14.1 Introduction The French Revolution was not a
single event, but a series of dramatic
political, social and economic changes,
stretching across 26 years from 1789. This
revolutionary period marked the end of
the French monarchy, saw the rise of a new
political order, and led to enduring changes
worldwide in how people thought about
government and human rights.
The revolution provided examples of
both the best and the worst in human
nature. There were displays of courage,
examples of high ideals and acts of terror.
Source 4 outlines the key events and
medieval developments during the French Revolution,
a period of European from 1789 to 1815. The revolutionary
history, also known
as the Middle Ages,
period, like all important episodes in
that lasted from history, later became the focus of historical
approximately the debate about both its causes and its
fifth to the fifteenth
centuries influence.
For many years, 1789 has been
feudal traditionally accepted as the starting
the dominant social
system in medieval
point for the study of modern history. It
Europe, where the marked the end of the medieval period
nobles could live (which incorporated feudal and absolutist
on the King’s land
in exchange for
systems), and represented the beginning of
military service, the Modern Era.
and the peasants
in turn rented the
land in exchange
for working on the
Historical context: society
land and sharing the
produce with the
and government in France SOURCE 1 King Louis XVI painted in 1779, 10 years
before the start of the revolution
nobles and the King
before the revolution
absolutist The system of government that was dramatically overthrown in France in the first phase of
a political system
where absolute and
the revolution was an absolute monarchy. The French King Louis XVI had absolute power,
complete power which meant that he had the final say in all matters of government. He had ministers and
is held by one advisers at court to help in the day-to-day running of the country, but the final decision was
individual
always his. He decided matters of domestic policy (such as taxation) and foreign relations
absolute monarchy
(that resulted in war or peace).
a system of The foundation of the king’s power was the ‘divine right of kings’ – the people accepted
government
the idea that God chose the king and his family to rule. The Church supported this view of
where the king has
complete power the world, and was a great supporter of the monarchy.

The system of monarchy had been well
established in France for centuries, but
when Louis XVI came to the throne in
1774, the kingdom faced major economic
and political problems that would
ultimately lead to its overthrow.
The structure of French

society – the Estates
of the Realm
Under the king, France was divided into
three main social classes, known as the
Estates of the Realm:
1 The First Estate: the clergy – the clergy
were those who served the Church: the
priests, monks, nuns, bishops and
cardinals. In France at the end of the
eighteenth century, most of France’s
population of 28 million was Roman
Catholic. The Church was wealthy and
owned a great deal of valuable land,
amounting to 10 per cent of the total
SOURCE 2 A French agricultural labourer, land in France. It was unpopular with
c. 1800 many, and it enjoyed various privileges,
such as exemption from tax, and being
able to charge landowners tithes. tithe
a tax payment to the
2 The Second Estate: the nobility – the French nobility was divided into two groups: church of one-tenth
– the ‘Nobility of the Sword’, which was made up of families with noble titles that of annual produce or
earnings
went back for centuries
– the ‘Nobility of the Robe’, which was made up of newcomers to the ranks of the
nobility. They were often from middle-class backgrounds, and many of them had
become rich as a result of changes in the economic structure of society. They were
business people, manufacturers and merchants. Members of this group of nobles
played a more active role in government and some served as judges. As a group,
they were also more likely to comment on the King’s decisions. Such official
comments were called ‘remonstrances’, and were often criticisms of government
policy and royal authority. It was the Nobility of the Robe that initially challenged
the authority of the King and triggered the first phase of the French Revolution.
3 The Third Estate: the commoners – this group comprised peasants, the growing
number of urban workers, business people and some professionals, such as doctors,
teachers and lawyers. The peasants made up most of the population, about
85 per cent, but bore virtually 100 per cent of the tax burden in pre-revolutionary serfdom
France. Serfdom no longer existed as a large-scale system, but relics of the feudal the state of
being a serf or
system still remained, such as duties and payments that French peasants owed to labourer within a
their landlords, and that caused great resentment. feudal system
CH A P T E R 14 T HE F RENCH RE VOLU TION 247

The absolute monarchy had been able to function for hundreds of years with this
Industrial Revolution traditional class structure, but with the birth of the Industrial Revolution the old
the rapid
systems started to show signs of cracking. The Second Estate had begun to change; the
development of
industry, beginning newer Nobility of the Robe wanted to be more active in government.
in Britain in the mid- The Third Estate had also changed. It was no longer just made up of rural peasants
eighteenth century,
in which advances working on the land. There were growing numbers of urban workers. These were poor
in technology people who lived in the cities, especially Paris, and worked in manufacturing – in
fundamentally factories, mills or mines. The Third Estate also had growing numbers of educated middle-
changed the
agricultural and class people, referred to in France as the bourgeoisie. This group included wealthier,
manufacturing more educated workers in professions such as medicine, education and law. Many of
industries, as well
these people were influenced by the ideas of the Enlightenment, the broad philosophical
as transport and
communications movement that had become influential in the 1700s. Many Enlightenment writers
challenged the divine right of kings and other traditional ideas of government.
bourgeoisie
the French middle
class 14.1 Understanding
and using the sources
Enlightenment
an intellectual Examine Source 3 and discuss
philosophical the message that the artist is
movement in the
conveying.
seventeenth and
eighteenth centuries
in the West that
saw the emergence 14.1 Check your learning
of reason rather
than faith as the 1 Create a diagram that
major component shows the distribution of
of thought and power and wealth in pre-
the development
revolutionary France.
of ideas
2 Describe the concept of
absolute monarchy.
3 Explain why the
bourgeoisie was a class
that would be steadily
increasing in size after
the end of the eighteenth
century.
SOURCE 3 An engraving from

1789 portrays a farmer from the
Third Estate bearing the First
and Second Estates on her back.
An approximate translation of
the text is: ‘The forced labour of
the farmer. Hopefully this game
will be finished soon.’

SOURCE 4 Timeline
Key events in the French

revolutionary period
1789
May: Louis XVI gathers the Estates-General (general
assembly) at the Royal Palace of Versailles and tries to
get a proposal passed that will increase taxes on the
wealthy and the clergy. This is the first time in over
150 years that this type of meeting has been held.
Unsurprisingly, the clergy (First Estate) and the nobility
(Second Estate) are opposed to the tax increase, while
the commoners (Third Estate) are supportive of it.
June: Members of the Third Estate meet as the
Communes (Commons), and vote on a measure
declaring themselves a National Assembly – not of the
Estates, but of the people. This is the start of a shift of
The three Estates of the Realm, forging the new
power, as members of the First and Second Estates join
constitution. An approximate translation of the text
the Third Estate in vowing not to leave Versailles until a
reads: ‘Soon, soon, soon. Strike while the iron is hot.
new constitution has been decided upon. Louis agrees Soon, soon, soon. Good luck. Have faith in your work.’
to the formation of a National Constituent Assembly.
July: The Bastille (a government fortress) in Paris is
stormed and captured by a mob, as patience among the
lowest classes becomes stretched.
August: The Assembly abolishes feudalism and
1790
privilege. It then issues the Declaration of the Rights February: All religious orders are abolished, and monks
of Man and the Citizen. This document, influenced by and nuns are encouraged to return to civilian life.
American Founding Father Thomas Jefferson, becomes
July: The Civil Constitution of the Clergy is adopted. This is
the foundation of basic human rights and equality under
a law that turns all clergy into civil employees of the state;
the law. The 1948 United Nations Declaration of Human
it effectively ends over a thousand years of power and
Rights drew heavily on this essential document from the
privilege for the Roman Catholic Church in France.
French Revolution.
The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen,

1789: the enduring legacy of the French Revolution 1791
June: Louis attempts to flee to Austria. This leads to his
capture and return to Paris in disgrace, and permanently
weakens his position as king.
July: Louis accepts a new constitution, which severely
limits his power and strengthens the National Constituent
Assembly. After two years, the revolution has finally shifted
political power to the people and away from the monarchy.
October: The Legislative Assembly replaces the National
Constituent Assembly as the main decision-making body
for the country, further strengthening the position of the
revolutionaries; although splits over future aims will mark
the following years of the revolution.

1793
January: King Louis XVI is executed by guillotine in front of
a large crowd at the Place de la Révolution in Paris.
April: The Committee of Public Safety is established to
impose order and political control over opponents of the
revolution, both in France and abroad. This committee
becomes the effective government of France during the
Reign of Terror.
May: A maximum price on bread is imposed in an effort to
win public support and help the poor.
The Fête de la Fédération holiday festival was first celebrated

in 1790.
1792
January–March: Food riots take place across Paris as
the poor demand action and stability to improve their
situation.
August: A Jacobin mob storms the royal palace and
imprisons the king. The Jacobins are members of a
political club that becomes increasingly influential
under the control of revolutionary leader Maximilien
Robespierre. They are the perhaps the most radical and
ruthless of the revolutionaries, and will lead the Reign of
Terror the following year.
September: A convention elected by the Legislative
A meeting of the Committee of Public Safety
Assembly abolishes the monarchy and declares the First
French Republic; it will last until the rise of Napoleon
June: Robespierre and fellow revolutionary Louis Antoine
in 1804. More than 1200 royalists being held in Parisian
de Saint-Just write a new, radical constitution which is only
prisons are murdered.
partly enacted before being replaced in 1795.
August: The metric system of measurement is adopted, in
a reform that will have far-reaching and long-term effects
The ‘Tree of Liberty’ around the world.
was adopted in 1792
September: The Committee of Public Safety, led by
as a symbol of the
everlasting republic. Robespierre, institutes the Reign of Terror, killing about
The phrase ‘Liberté, 1400 rivals. It is a bloody and chaotic period of the
égalité, fraternité’ revolution, where violence is used as a political weapon.
(‘Liberty, equality,
fraternity’) is the motto
1794
of the modern French
nation.
July: The Reign of Terror ends with the arrest and execution
of Robespierre. The Committee of Public Safety is
dissolved, and moves commence towards a more stable
and conservative system of government.

1795
February: In a sign of a conservative reaction to the
previous dramatic changes, churches reopen for
Christian worship, but Church and state are now formally
separated.
August: A new constitution is approved, establishing
the Directory – a five-man system of government that
presides over attempts to install French-supporting
governments among neighbouring countries. However,
its policies increase the economic chaos. The Directory
starts deteriorating over the next four years, creating a
power vacuum that Napoleon Bonaparte is able to fill.
The emblem of the French Revolution:

‘God, the King’
‘Napoleon Crossing the Alps’ by Jacques-Louis David, 1802
1805–09
Building on the unsuccessful attempts made by the
1799
Directory, Napoleon proves to be an outstanding and
successful general. He is successful in his campaign to
establish republics across Europe.
November: Napoleon seizes power in a coup d’état

and is proclaimed First Consul of the Republic. This
effectively ends the French Revolution and ushers in the
1814
Napoleonic Era (which is effectively a postscript to the
Napoleon is defeated by a European coalition and exiled
revolution).
to the Italian island of Elba.
1804 1815
Napoleon escapes from Elba and marches into France,
March: The French Civil Code, also known as the rallying troops in the belief that he can restore himself
Napoleonic Code, is enacted and provides the basis for to power.
modern law in the West. In June, Napoleon is finally defeated at Waterloo by the
December: Any pretence at democracy is swept away Duke of Wellington, and Louis XVIII accedes to the throne,
when Napoleon is crowned Emperor of France. reinstating the French monarchy and effectively ending the
Napoleonic Era. Napoleon is exiled to the remote British
island of Saint Helena, between South America and Africa,
where he dies in 1821.

14.2 The causes of the revolution
As with all major historical events, the causes of the revolution can be divided into four
separate classifications: long-term and short-term, and primary and secondary. As the label
suggests, long-term causes are forces that have been in motion for more than 50 years prior to
the event. Short-term (or immediate) causes are factors that were in play just before the event
and acted as triggers for it.
The other classifications of primary and secondary causes are more complicated. This is
where historians argue about what they regard as the most important or indisputable causes
SOURCE 5 (primary causes), and the less significant causes (secondary causes). Without the primary
‘La Marseilleise’, causes, there would not have been a French Revolution in 1789; while the secondary causes
on the Arc de
only influenced the nature and the extent of the revolution.
Triomphe, Paris.
‘La Marseilleise’
was the song of
the revolution
Long-term causes of the French Revolution
– a patriotic call
For the French Revolution, the long-term causes include the following.
for freedom. It
became France’s
national anthem The changing economic and social
in 1795.
structure of France
In the years before the revolution, the growth of industry and
manufacturing changed the ways in which people worked and
how they acquired their wealth. Before the 1700s, wealth was
determined by how much land a person owned, and money was
mainly made through agriculture. The people in France who
owned most of the land – and hence controlled most of the
wealth – were the king, his royal relatives and the aristocracy,
that small group of noble families who lived on vast estates.
The spread of the Industrial Revolution changed
everything. It created new ways for people to earn money
through manufacturing and trade, which in turn produced
new classes of citizens:
> wealthy industrialists, who were without noble titles
but sometimes as wealthy as – or even wealthier than –
members of the nobility
> the bourgeoisie, or middle class – the number of members
of this class had grown from around 700 000 in the year
1700 to over 2.3 million in 1780
> the industrial working class – these were the poor people
who moved away from working on the land, going to towns
and cities where they found work in factories, tanneries,
glassworks, paper mills and textile mills. As an example, the
French Anzin Coal Mining Company had been established
in 1757 to meet the energy needs of the new economy, and
by 1780 it employed more than 4000 workers.

SOURCE 6 This engraving from 1751 shows a French mould-making factory.
Growing class conflict

There had always been class conflict in France, but the Industrial Revolution made old
conflicts worse and created new ones. The bourgeoisie paid heavy taxes but had no real say
in government, and this was a source of conflict. The industrial working class often laboured
under harsh conditions for low wages. The members of this group, unlike the traditional poor
peasants, were concentrated geographically, and found it easier to organise opposition and
protests against the government. It was the industrial working class that led the first attack on
the king’s power in Paris – storming the government fortress of the Bastille on 14 July 1789.
The influence of the Enlightenment

The Enlightenment – or, as it was known to French contemporaries, the Age des Lumières
– began around 1640. It was a vast and influential intellectual and spiritual movement,
amounting to a revolution in thinking. It introduced new ideas about science, nature,
education, and the relationships between social classes, government and people, and between
the people and the Church. These ideas challenged the very fabric of French society by
questioning the concept of the absolute monarchy, and the relationships between the groups
that comprised French society.

Some of the significant Enlightenment
thinkers included:
> René Descartes – who in the 1640s
suggested that humans had to rely on
reason, not dogma, faith or religion, to
understand their world
> Voltaire – who questioned the existing
structure of society and was critical of
the nature of the absolute monarchy
> Baron Charles Montesquieu – who
argued for liberty, and dividing and
sharing power between separate branches
of government; this was a direct attack
on the existing French system of absolute
monarchy
> Jean-Jacques Rousseau – who
maintained (notably in his famous book,
The Social Contract) that the people and SOURCE 7 French philosopher, mathematician
and writer René Descartes (1596–1650)
their governments had a shared duty.
The rulers had to govern well and fairly,
in which case the people should obey. If, however, the rulers governed badly and were
cruel and unfair, then the people had the right to rebel.
The ideas of the Enlightenment directly challenged the existing order and old way of
doing things. It raised questions about the authority of both the king and the Church.
It is important to note that the Enlightenment was not a direct cause of the revolution.
However, the views expressed in the publications of Enlightenment writers are useful
because they leave us with a record of what many people in France were already thinking
and feeling on the eve of the revolution.
Short-term causes of the French Revolution

Short-term causes of any event are often more identifiable. These
often become the trigger for a chain of events that culminate in
dramatic change. In the case of the French Revolution, there were
both internal and external short-term causes.
Bread riots
The harvests of 1788 had been poor due to a hot dry summer,
and the winter that followed had been unusually cold. Food
shortages and outdated government regulations meant that poor
families were going hungry. The result was a series of bread riots,
both in rural areas, where the houses of nobles were burnt, and in
SOURCE 8 French writer and the cities, where stores were looted. This helped create the climate
philosopher Voltaire (François-
for a violent revolution.
Marie Arouet, 1694–1778)

The example of the American Revolution
The decision of the French Government to support the American colonies in their war of
independence against the British added to the massive French national debt. The success of the
Americans, and the example of the new democratic form of government that they established,
inspired the French to believe that they could do the same thing. Many hoped that France
would be able to establish a government based on something similar to the US Constitution constitution
a set of rules by
of 1781, the opening words of which declared ‘We the People …’ The idea that a government
which a country is
could be established that was based on some of the theories of the Enlightenment became governed
increasingly important.
Financial crisis and the meeting of the Estates-General

By the time Louis XVI came to the throne in 1774, France was already in the grip of a major
financial crisis. A series of wars and decades of extravagant spending – coupled with a taxation
system that favoured the wealthy and therefore limited government revenue – meant that France
was deep in debt. The French Government could rely on 377 million livres in annual income,
but was spending 411 million, including 35 million on the king and the court. This gap was
being covered by money that the French Government had borrowed. A further 154 million was
needed to cover debt repayments. This situation could not go on, and the king therefore tried to
change the taxation system to compel the nobility and the Church to pay more in taxes.
It was this decision that led the king to call into session the ancient parliament known as
the Estates-General, which had not met since 1614. The Estates-General represented all three
of France’s Estates. At the session, which was held at the Royal Palace of Versailles, the nobles
opposed the changes in taxation, leading to what is known as the first phase of the French
Revolution: the Revolt of the Nobles. At the same time, the Third Estate was agitating for
increased recognition of its numerical superiority.
In the end, neither Estate was happy, and the lack of trust between the nobles and the
commoners led to riots breaking out, particularly in Paris. On 14 July 1789, a group of
insurgents stormed the Bastille, where gunpowder and weapons were stored. The Storming
of the Bastille is usually seen as the start of the French Revolution.

1 Compare Sources 1, 2 and 6, and explain how different the lives of the people pictured in
each would be.
2 Select one of the three Estates to research, and outline its contribution to the French Revolution.

1 Describe the French system of government before the French Revolution.
2 Identify three long-term causes of the French Revolution, and explain the role they played
in creating the environment where a revolution could occur.
3 Discuss the impact of the Enlightenment on the French Revolution. Do you think it was
an important cause? Explain your answer.
4 Explain why the American Revolution would be an inspiration to the French.
5 Research the US Constitution, and explain why this document would have influenced French
political thinking at the time.

14.3 The nature of the French Revolution
The French Revolution can be a difficult period of history to follow. It is marked by twists and
turns, as various groups with competing agendas and aims struggled for power and acceptance.
Public choice also changed, and groups quickly slipped from a position of acceptance if they
proved too dangerous, too disorganised or too weak to introduce reforms that benefited the
majority. It is not unfair to describe the nature of the French Revolution as chaotic. You
should frequently refer back to the timeline in Source 4 as you follow the fortunes of varying
competitors striving to achieve power and control of the forces that had been unleashed in
France from 1789.
The Storming of the Bastille

A lack of trust in the deliberations of the Estates-General in the Royal Palace of Versailles,
combined with the desperate conditions in which many of the urban poor lived, saw riots
break out, particularly in Paris. On 14 July 1789, a group of insurgents stormed the Bastille,
a government fortress where gunpowder and weapons were stored.
The Storming of the Bastille is usually seen as the start of the French Revolution. Although
SOURCE 9 ‘The
Conquerors of the
in reality it achieved little, its symbolic importance was dramatic. Traditionally, the Bastille
Bastille before the was used by French kings to imprison subjects who disagreed with them politically, so the
Hotel de Ville in Bastille had come to represent the oppressive nature of the monarchy. As a result of the attack,
1789’ by Hippolyte many nobles fled France, fearing that their lives of privilege were about to come crashing
Delaroche, 1839
down violently.

The counter-revolution and the Reign of Terror
On 4 August 1789, the National Constituent Assembly officially abolished the old system of
feudalism, adopting the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen, which became the
foundation of basic human rights and equality under the law. But agreeing on a constitution to
replace the old order proved to be much more difficult. When a new constitution was finally
adopted in 1791 and a constitutional monarchy was established, it was a more moderate constitutional
outcome than many of the revolutionaries had hoped for. monarchy
a system of
In 1792, the more radical forces of the revolution, under the command of activist government where
Maximilien Robespierre, arrested the king and declared France a republic. In the months to a monarch is head
of state, but their
come, the revolution grew increasingly extreme. The Jacobins – a political group of which power is restrained
Robespierre was a member, and that was allied with the Paris radicals – promised sweeping by a constitution and
economic and social reform. For 18 months, Robespierre and the Committee of Public Safety is largely ceremonial
(which was established to impose order and political control) ruled France, and presided over
the new Constitution of 1793 and the Declaration of Rights of Man and the Citizen.
This period was marked by mass executions of anyone thought to be an enemy of the
revolution, including King Louis XVI in January 1793, and his wife Marie Antoinette nine
months later. It became known as the Reign of Terror. Gradually, the heavy-handed rule
of the Committee of Public Safety created resentment and resulted in a backlash in the
form of a counter-revolution. In 1794, Robespierre himself became the victim of execution,
signifying the end of the Reign of Terror and the beginning of another, more moderate
phase of the revolution.
SOURCE 10 The execution of King Louis XVI marked an acceleration in the Reign of Terror.

The Directory and the end of the Revolution
In 1795, a new form of government was developed, run by a five-man Directory appointed by
parliament. Its period in control was marked by corruption and protest, and much of its power
rested on the support of the military. In 1799 one of France’s generals, Napoleon Bonaparte,
coup d’état staged a coup d’état, abolishing the Directory and appointing himself First Consul of the
a swift, decisive and Republic. This was effectively the end of the French Revolution and the beginning of the
frequently violent
seizure of power, Napoleonic Era, with a single powerful figure who came to dominate much of Europe, but also
often by the military spread many of the values of the revolution throughout the Continent.
nationalism
a sense of pride The rise of Napoleon and the growth of nationalism
in, and love of,
one’s country; When Napoleon used the army to take power, he had to justify his action by providing stable
government. Napoleon was a military man and therefore favoured discipline over liberty and
independence for a
particular country individual freedom. He was not a reactionary; he did not want to turn back the clock to a pre-
revolutionary form of government. He was a product of the revolution and he knew
that he owed his rise to its reforms. Nevertheless, Napoleon made sure that he kept
executive power in his hands.
By the time he made himself Emperor in 1804, Napoleon had destroyed many of
the political and constitutional reforms of the revolution, but saved the positive social
and administrative advances that had been made since 1789. The greatest of these
was the French Civil Code – a unified code of clear laws that has formed the basis
of many of Europe’s laws ever since. Under Napoleon’s leadership, France rose to a
dominant military position on the continent of Europe. This encouraged a powerful
feeling of French nationalism that survived his defeat in 1814. Napoleon’s armies
had swept aside outdated feudal regimes across Europe, and encouraged nationalism
in all of the countries that were, for a time, subject to French occupation or under
the threat of Napoleon’s armies.

SOURCE 11 1 Given that the French Revolution occurred in an era before photography, what checks would
The original
you undertake before relying on Sources 9 and 10 as evidence for what occurred at the key
French Civil Code,
published in 1804 moments of the revolution they depict?
2 Explain why the document shown in Source 11 could be regarded as the greatest
achievement of the French Revolution.

1 Create your own timeline that helps you understand the main events of the French Revolution.
2 Research the Storming of the Bastille. Outline what occurred and discuss why Bastille Day
is celebrated on 14 July in modern France to this day.
3 Outline an argument supporting the assertion either that Napoleon saved the French
Revolution, or that Napoleon destroyed the French Revolution.
4 Explain why Maximilien Robespierre could be seen to have played a key role in enabling
Napoleon to come to power.

LOUIS XVI
14.3 PROFILE
Louis was a decent family man. He was not a cruel or
ruthless individual. He was not, however, intellectually or
emotionally equipped to be an absolute monarch in a
time of crisis. His attempt to flee to Austria in 1791 greatly
increased his unpopularity, and helped lead to his execution
in 1793.
MARIE ANTOINETTE
As the king and his court became increasingly unpopular,
his Austrian-born wife Marie Antoinette became a target for
that unpopularity. The groups that opposed the king came
to use her, often unfairly, in anti-government propaganda.
One of the most famous lies about Marie Antoinette was
that when told that the people were starving and did not
have any bread to eat, she replied: ‘Then let them eat cake.’
There is no evidence to support this claim and the phrase
had been in wide circulation in France since the 1740s, more
than a decade before she was born.
SOURCE 12 Clockwise from top left: King Louis
Marie Antoinette was only 14 years old when she
XVI; Maximilien Robespierre; Queen Marie
married the future Louis XVI as part of an arrangement to Antoinette; Napoleon
strengthen ties between Austria and France. When she was
executed in 1793, she died as the last Queen of France.
MAXIMILIEN ROBESPIERRE
Maximilien Robespierre started his career as a lawyer, representing the poor and
underprivileged of society, and this sparked his zeal for change. He was elected to the
Estates-General in 1789 as a member of the Third Estate. In 1793, he led the Committee
of Public Safety, which he used to force adherence to the revolution and its aims, often
condemning opponents to execution. He was guillotined on 28 July 1794, as his enemies
extracted revenge and ended his Reign of Terror.
NAPOLEON BONAPARTE
Born on the island of Corsica in 1769, Napoleon relocated to France and joined the French
military in 1793. He supported the Jacobins, but fell out with Robespierre and switched
allegiance to the Directory, which was formed as the system of government in 1795. The
disarray in French politics enabled Napoleon to lead a successful military coup in 1799.
His political ability led to a new constitution and his election as First Consul. In effect, he
became a dictator, and his success heralded the effective end of the French Revolution.
He was proclaimed Emperor of France in 1804, but suffered his final military defeat at
Waterloo in 1815. He died in exile in 1821.
14.3 PROFILE TASK

Select one of these key individuals from the French Revolution and examine their activity,
contribution and achievements during this period.

14.4 The legacy of the French Revolution
and its influence on modernity
‘Modernity’ is a term used by historians to describe the type of Western or European way of living,
thinking and knowing that arose in post-medieval Europe. Modernity is closely linked to the
Enlightenment and, as such, the French Revolution played an important role in spreading the ideas of
modernity – not only in France, but also throughout Europe.
As a history student, it is important to remember that modernity is a primarily Western idea that
privileges Western ways of understanding, teaching and recording aspects of society and the past at
the expense of other ways.
The broader influence of the French Revolution

British historian William Doyle, a leading authority on the revolution, observes that there were both
winners and losers in the 26 chaotic years between 1789 and 1815. The landowners benefited when the
right to property was guaranteed and protected by law. The bourgeoisie benefited from a fairer system
of taxation and the opportunity to have a say in government. They also benefited when advancement
in government and society in general came to be based on merit and ability, rather than aristocratic
birth. Soldiers benefited as they could now enter the military as a career, rather than having to be born
to serve. However, the soldiers did have to pay a price. By 1802, 400 000 French soldiers had died in
battle and further million died before Napoleon was finally defeated at Waterloo in 1815.
Even though many of the common people suffered through uncertain times, in one enduring way
this class of people were winners. The ordinary people became sovereign. As in the United States,
with its new republican, democratic constitution, people in a European country were in charge
for the first time since the small-scale experiments with democracy in ancient Athens. The French
SOURCE 13
The revolutionary
Revolution also created a social transformation – away from a society that built its ideas around
motto ‘Liberté religion, to one that believed in reason, the sovereignty of the ordinary people, and advancement and
égalité fraternité’ opportunity based on talent, not birth.
is still widely used
today. Here, it
appears on a ‘Liberty, equality, fraternity’ and the concept of inalienable rights
memorial for the
terrorist attacks in The phrase ‘Liberté, égalité, fraternité’ (‘Liberty, equality, fraternity’) is the motto of the modern
Paris, 2016. French nation and was officially adopted with the formation of the Third French Republic in 1870.
However, Robespierre first used the phrase 80 years earlier, in December 1790. The ideas behind
these words influenced the revolution and also marked a key aspect of its legacy. Since the revolution,
inalienable rights inalienable rights (basic human rights and freedoms) have been guaranteed to the French people by
rights that cannot be law. These rights include the idea that all people are born free and equal and should remain free and
taken away
equal, along with basic freedoms, such as freedom of speech and freedom of religion. The inalienable
rights had begun to spread during the Enlightenment, and endured as a legacy of the revolution.

Historical debate: a chaotic bloodbath or the triumph of reason?
Even before the revolution had ended, there were arguments about its nature and broader
influence. One of the strongest arguments and most durable ideas about the French Revolution
is associated with the critical views of famous British writer Edmund Burke. Burke took a
conservative view and argued that the revolution was a dangerous threat to individual liberty.
In his widely read account Reflections on the Revolution in France, first published in November
1790, he depicted the revolution as excessively violent and evil. Burke was basically opposed
to any radical, sudden, revolutionary change, and believed that the best kind of change was
gradual or evolutionary.
At the height of the revolution, English-American writer and political activist Thomas Paine
offered a very different point of view. Paine was one of the figures who inspired the thinking
associated with the American Revolution, and he regarded the French Revolution positively.
In 1791, he wrote The Rights of Man as a defence of the French Revolution. He insisted that
the old French monarchy was corrupt and that it deserved to be overthrown. Although Paine
acknowledged the violence, he felt that it was a price that had to be paid for social justice.
Paine focused on the revolution’s positive influences, such as the ending of serfdom in 1789,
a system where poor rural workers were not much more than the property of landowners. Paine
also pointed to the steps taken towards promoting social justice and ending massive inequality
based on the power of the aristocracy, with their inherited titles and privileges. Burke had not
failed to see these things, but he thought that change needed to be slow and steady.
Burke also predicted that the violence and turmoil might lead to a dictatorship. When
Napoleon came to power in 1799 using military force and declared himself Emperor, it seemed
that Burke was right.
The critical view of the French Revolution was reinforced in 1837 when Scottish writer
Thomas Carlyle published his account. Carlyle wrote like a novelist, and his account was full of
dramatic accounts of the violence associated with the revolution, especially the Reign of Terror.
This perspective was strengthened further by images of the mass executions and the guillotine, guillotine
a machine for
which are forever linked in popular memory with the French Revolution.
beheading people,
Perhaps Charles Dickens, the great British nineteenth-century novelist, came closer to the consisting of a
truth about the French Revolution than many historians in the opening words of A Tale of Two wooden frame with
a heavy blade that
Cities, 1859, which is set against the historical backdrop of the revolution: slides down when
released by the
It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of
executioner
foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light,
it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair …

1 Explain why ‘Liberté égalité fraternité’ is still such a powerful idea in modern France. How
does this help you understand the historical concept of continuity?
2 To what extent do you think the values and ideals of many participants in the French Revolution
paved the way for modernity and the values and ideals that are often described as ‘Western’?
3 Explain the differences between Edmund Burke’s and Thomas Paine’s interpretations of the
French Revolution.

CONCLUSION The French Revolution proved to be a powerful influence on generations of
revolutionaries on all continents. The next time that you use the metric system or
decimal currency, you are working with two of the global consequences of the French
Revolution. The legal systems of Germany, Belgium, Italy, Spain, Portugal and several
other European countries are based on the French Civil Code introduced by Napoleon in
1804. The current United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) is based
on the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen, which was written in the wake
of the French Revolution in August 1789. In some instances, parts of the United Nations
declaration are taken word for word from the French document.
When coupled with the American Revolution, the French Revolution helped spread
and embed many of the values we hold close today. In a world where terrorism threatens
stability, it is those guiding principles of ‘Liberté égalité fraternité’ that still bind societies
together, more than 200 years after they became a revolutionary motto.
SOURCE 14 France celebrates 200 years since the revolution, 1989.
FOR THE TEACHER

chapter

15 The Age
of Imperialism

Two very clear perspectives
emerge in any study of
imperialism: that of the imperialist
country and that of the peoples
they conquered. It is vital for any
valid historical interpretation to
consider both perspectives.
A local driver tows a
Western man on a pousse- Historical interpretation
pousse or rickshaw, in
Any interpretation relating to the
French Indochina, c. 1900.
Age of Imperialism will engage Historical investigation
French Indochina was a
with the concepts of cause and and research
group of French colonial
effect. You will need to consider It is important that you
territories in what is now
what factors enabled imperialism access a range of sources and
Vietnam, Cambodia
and Laos.
to develop, and examine the perspectives as you investigate
effects of imperialism on the various aspects of imperialism.
conquerors and the conquered. This will help ensure that your
FOCUS QUESTIONS Explanation and communication investigation is balanced and
valid.
1 What is imperialism and The emergence of newspapers
how did it shape the and magazines enabled
modern world? illustrations from this time LEARNING GOALS
period to be widely circulated in
2 Which were the imperialist the imperialist countries. Such > Identify the causes and
countries and what areas did illustrations created a sense of effects of imperialism.
they control? a ‘grand adventure’ in foreign > Understand the impact of the
3 What is the legacy of the Age lands, and can effectively offer Age of Imperialism on the
of Imperialism? one perspective of imperialism. modern world.

15.1 Introduction The nineteenth century is often described as the Age of Imperialism, but imperialism is, of
course, much older than that. As far back as ancient Rome, stronger, more militarily and
technologically advanced powers were exploiting their weaker neighbours; in order for their
expansion to be successful, imperialist nations have always relied on military strength to impose
control over other countries.
SOURCE 1 Imperialism in action: the French Resident-General of Madagascar being carried by native
porters. Madagascar was invaded by the French in 1883.
imperialism In simple terms, imperialism is where a powerful country establishes political and
the practice of
economic control over another country or area, for the benefit of the stronger power.
extending the power
of a nation, especially Colonisation is the process of a group of peoples establishing their own system of government
by acquiring territory and law over another group of peoples. The two processes are closely linked. For example it was
of another nation
their belief in imperialism that saw the British establish colonies in areas as far apart as Kenya,
Australia and Jamaica.
colonisation
the practice of This chapter will give you the opportunity to investigate the roots of the imperialist expansion
settling among and in Africa, Asia and the Pacific that characterised the nineteenth century. You will confront the
establishing control
over the indigenous
ugliness of the exploitation of many people and resources for the betterment of the few; deal with
people of an area the ethical dilemma of analysing sources that convey a sense of racial and moral superiority; and
arguably see the roots of much of the discord inherent in the modern world. While doing this,
you will learn to recognise that all historical sources were created in a unique context that must
be considered. You may reject perspectives and points of view, but it is vital that you place your
sources in their historical context in order for your conclusions to be fair, balanced and insightful.

15.2 The historical context of nineteenth-
century imperialism
From the fifteenth century, European explorers travelled to previously unexplored areas of the
world with the intention of enriching themselves and their governments. As these explorers
broke free of the Mediterranean Sea to reach areas previously unknown to Europe, settlers and
armies from their countries followed in order to secure control, and exploit the natives and the
besiege resources of the new conquests. The European nations’ belief in their right to do this was an
the act of imperialist approach, and the control they established over conquered areas led to colonisation.
surrounding an
At the time of their invasion of other countries, many imperialist states claimed that
area with armed
forces in order to their forceful takeover of developing nations was done with good will, to spread Christianity
capture it or force its or to ‘help’ these less fortunate peoples become more ‘civilised’. All such arguments aside,
surrender
imperialism was, first and foremost, the conquest of non-European communities for the benefit
of European countries.
outpost
a place that The capture of Seringapatam (Source 2) is one classic example. Here, troops representing
represents the the British East India Company (see 15.3 Profile) besieged and eventually colonised
authority of a
far-away imperial Seringapatam, India, to guarantee trade routes for the company, which in turn would bring
country wealth to the British Government.
The history of European

imperialism
The foundation for the European imperialism
of the nineteenth century was laid centuries
earlier, starting with advances in shipbuilding
and navigation from the 1400s onwards. The
original leaders in European imperialism were
the Spanish and Portuguese, who ventured
to the Americas in search of gold. They were
quickly followed by the Netherlands (the
Dutch), who established outposts in Asia. It
was not long before a rivalry grew between
Britain, France, Spain, Portugal and the
Netherlands, all of which wanted to acquire
colonies during the 1600s and 1700s to
supply their populations with raw materials
and luxury items – such as cotton, tea, coffee,
cocoa, sugar, tobacco, silk and spices – that
were not available in Europe. Soon, each
of these countries had acquired colonies
and trading posts in Africa, Asia and the
SOURCE 2 An artist’s impression of the capture of Seringapatam, India, Americas.
in 1799

The Seven Years’ War and the British Empire
A key turning point in this early phase of imperialism was the Seven Years’ War, a global
conflict that ranged from Europe to Africa, India, the Philippines and the Americas,
1754–63. The principal result of this conflict was the emergence of Britain as the world’s
dominant maritime power. The Seven Years’ War also saw Britain gain control of Canada at
the expense of France, take Florida from the Spanish, and reinforce the British hold on the
east coast of what is now the United States.
In the decades that followed, Britain continued to build its empire, and by the nineteenth
century it controlled the largest empire the world has ever seen. The British Empire covered
almost a quarter of the earth’s surface and governed approximately the same percentage of
the world’s population.
The American Revolution (1765–83) briefly interrupted this dominance. The American
colonists, with the support of the French (who sought revenge on Britain for their defeat in
the Seven Years’ War), gained their independence from British rule. It was not long, however,
before Britain renewed its acquisition of new territories. Australia and New Zealand became
part of the British Empire at the end of the eighteenth century, in the aftermath of the
American Revolution.
THE BRITISH EMPIRE, c.1700
LE GE ND 15.2 Understanding and using

British Empire 1700 the sources
Compare Sources 3 and 4. How can you
account for the dramatic expansion in Britain’s
colonies between the start of the eighteenth
and twentieth centuries?
N 15.2 Check your learning

0 2000 4000 km 1 Identify the main European imperialist
countries in the period between the
SOURCE 3 British-controlled areas in 1700 fifteenth and twentieth centuries.
THE BRITISH EMPIRE, c.1900 2 Which country emerged as the strongest
imperial power? Identify five different
LE GE ND countries it controlled.
British Empire 1900
0 2000 4000 km
SOURCE 4 By 1900 Britain controlled the largest empire the world has ever
seen.

15.3
Industrial Revolution
The nature of the Age of Imperialism
As a result of the Industrial Revolution in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, the
the rapid
development of machinery, factories and metallurgy had made Europe more scientifically and
development of
industry, beginning technologically advanced than any other area on earth. The Europeans exploited this advantage
in Britain in the mid- to continue to plunder the rest of the world for luxury goods and raw materials to make them
eighteenth century,
in which advances
even richer and more powerful.
in technology By 1800, Europeans occupied or controlled 35 per cent of the earth’s land surface. By
fundamentally
1878, that figure had risen to 67 per cent and by 1914, at the beginning of the First World
changed the
agricultural and War, Europe controlled 84 per cent of the world. The empires were built on a combination of
manufacturing commercial, patriotic, religious, humanitarian, racist, strategic and exploitative motivations.
industries, as well
as transport and
WORLD POWERS, c.1914
communications
metallurgy
the science of
separating metals
from their ores
LE GE ND
United Kingdom Russia Germany
N France Japan Turkey
Spain Austrian Empire Belgium
Portugal Denmark United States
0 2000 4000 km Netherlands Norway Italy
SOURCE 5 European empires controlled 84 per cent of the earth’s surface by 1914.
The Scramble for Africa (1881–1914)

The most dramatic phase of late-nineteenth-century period of imperial expansion was the rapid
invasion, occupation and colonisation of Africa by different European countries, which raced
to carve the continent up and divide it between themselves. The Portuguese had established
colonies along the east coast of Africa in the fifteenth century, but European involvement in
the continent exploded in the late nineteenth century, when France, Italy, Portugal, Germany
and Belgium each dominated sections of it. In 1870, only 10 per cent of Africa was under
European control. By 1914, just 44 years later, it was 90 per cent.

The most successful imperial expansion of the period was,
however, Britain’s. The British dominance of Africa was able to
establish a line of control from the ‘Cape to Cairo’. In other words,
at one stage or another, Britain had African colonies that ran from
Cairo in Egypt, on the Mediterranean coast, down to the Cape
of Good Hope in South Africa, where the Atlantic and Indian
Oceans join.
Slave labour in the Belgian Congo

The European powers traded not only in goods, but also in people
and labour; for centuries they used African peoples as slaves. The
British abolished slavery in 1807, but African peoples continued
to be exploited in this way by other European imperial powers
well into the nineteenth century, both in their native countries
and overseas.
One of the more ruthless examples of this kind of imperial
exploitation took place in the Belgian Congo. King Leopold
II of Belgium gained control of a colony that became known
as the Belgian Free State in 1885. The Congo was rich in
SOURCE 6 A 1906 cartoon depicting King raw materials and minerals, especially copper, and the native
Leopold II of Belgium’s stranglehold on the peoples of the Congo were brutalised as members of a cheap
Belgian Congo workforce, with all of the profits going back to Leopold in Belgium.
This period saw many atrocities, murders and mutilations.
Historians have suggested that Leopold’s exploitation of the
Congo, with its brutality and mass murder, can be compared with the terrors associated
with Hitler and Stalin in the twentieth century – a link between ruthless nineteenth-
totalitarian century imperialism and the totalitarian regimes that emerged in the twentieth century.
a form of The key difference is that Leopold acted mostly out of a desire for profit, while Hitler and
government where a
single party controls Stalin were motivated by ideology and power.
the country’s
administration
and most other The role of trade
areas of life,
requiring complete Trade was a key motive for, and form of, imperialism. It was a two-sided element of
subservience
and suppressing
imperialism, in that raw materials were ripped from the colonies as cheaply as possible, and
opposition then the finished products were sold back to the colonies, reaping still further profits.
India is perhaps the best example of this aspect of trade. British India provided most of
the raw cotton for Britain’s textile factories, as well as jute fibre (which is similar to cotton)
and indigo (deep blue) dye. Once processed, the British sold the finished products back to
millions of their Indian subjects.
Trade made the European powers richer, which in turn provided surplus capital for
investment. By the end of the nineteenth century, European business people were looking
for more opportunities to invest and they turned their eyes towards Asia and Africa.
The risks were high, but so were the potential profits. Sometimes investors asked their
governments to support trade by providing armies, in order to help minimise risks and
maximise profits.

In China, European powers had established trading bases as early
as the 1600s. In the middle of the nineteenth century, when China
tried to limit European trade and exploitation, the British answered
by declaring war on the Chinese. The result was the First and Second
Opium Wars, fought between 1839 and 1860. These led to several
European powers occupying territory in China, including Britain,
which took possession of Hong Kong.
Trade was also the main driving force between Britain’s move to
take control of the Malayan peninsula and the island of Singapore.
Malaya was rich in rubber and tin, while Singapore was an important
naval base that was vital to Britain’s imperial defence and trade
network. These expansions were all examples of strategic, resource-
and trade-based forms of imperialism.
The ‘eclipse of the non-European world’

British economic historian Paul Kennedy, in his study The Rise and
Fall of the Great Powers, argued that the nineteenth century saw the
‘eclipse of the non-European world’. This is clearly demonstrated SOURCE 7 A caricature from 1898 depicting
the division of China between imperial powers
in statistics regarding global economic output during that period.
A comparison of Europe with China and India illustrates how swift
and dramatic Europe’s economic rise was:
eclipse
> In 1800, Europe as a whole was responsible for 28 per cent of global economic output, and to pass from a
China and India 57 per cent. position of power
> Within 60 years, by 1860, the percentage for Europe was 53 per cent, while China and
global economic
India had dropped to 28 per cent. output
> By 1880, the European dominance was a striking 61 per cent, to China and India’s 15 per cent. the total value of
goods produced and
This shift in economic power accompanied a comparable shift in political and military power. services provided
across the entire
world in a year
Technology as an agent of imperialism

One of the keys to understanding any
overview of imperial expansion is to take into
consideration the huge changes that took
place in transportation and communication
technology during the nineteenth century.
Steamships replaced sail ships, railway
construction reduced overland travel times
and, above all, the development of the electric
telegraph brought the entire world closer
together. Telegraph lines linked London and
India in 1870, and London and Australia
in 1872. Thus people, products, ideas and
information were all able to move around
the world at a speed that would have been
SOURCE 8 The American steamship Washington, in 1851, as sail was giving
regarded as impossible only a century earlier. way to steam and revolutionising ocean transport

1 Analyse Source 6. What is it implying about King Leopold II’s control of the Belgian Congo?
Research the treatment of the indigenous peoples of the Congo under Belgian control and
discuss whether the attitude shown in Source 6 is justified.
2 Analyse Source 7 and explain what point it is making about the Age of Imperialism.
3 Explain how steamships such as that shown in Source 8 could change international trade
and increase the value of European colonies.

1 What percentage of the planet did European countries control by 1914?
2 Create a flow chart that explains the two-way trade process that enriched imperialist
countries in the nineteenth century.
3 Identify a specific example of imperialism that benefited the trade of an imperialist country.
Research its impact on the population of the colonised country.
4 Conduct research to identify which areas of the planet had not been colonised by
Europeans by 1914.
THE EAST INDIA COMPANY

15.3 PROFILE
Although the spreading of Christianity

and ‘civilised’, Western ideals were used
to justify imperialist expansion, these were
not the core reasons behind colonisation.
At the heart of imperialism was always the
desire to secure profit for business owners
and shareholders. Nowhere was this more
evident than in the activities of the East
India Company.
Known by a range of names during its
years of operation, the East India Company
was essentially an English private company
formed to take advantage of new trading
opportunities after the defeat of the
Spanish Armada of 1588. In this conflict,
England broke the monopoly (total control)
Spain and Portugal had enjoyed in the East
Indian spice trade.
Conflict with the Dutch in what was
then called the Dutch East Indies (now
SOURCE 9 Tom Hollander as Cutler Beckett, Chairman of the
Indonesia) saw the Company focus its
East India Trading Company, in Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead
Man’s Chest (2006). The avaricious company in this film was based attention in India in the early seventeenth
on the real East India Company, with the pirates representing century, while also pursuing interests in the
freedom from imperialist powers. Persian Gulf, South-East Asia and East Asia.

The major products the Company
traded in were cotton, silk, spices, tea
and opium. The latter was eventually
to bring it into conflict with China
in the Opium Wars. The Company,
displaying the inherent ‘logic’ of
nineteenth-century imperialism,
demanded to be able to sell Indian
opium in China to pay for the Chinese
tea it was selling in England. Twice,
after China banned the sale of opium
to its citizens, wars were fought to
ensure the Company had the right to
sell opium to the Chinese.
For around 150 years, from the
1620s, the Company transported
slaves to support its economic
expansion.
SOURCE 10 An artist’s impression of an official of the East India
The Company effectively ruled
Company riding in a procession in India
India on behalf of the British crown
from 1834. Resentment of the
Company’s imperialist actions in
India eventually resulted in the
Indian Mutiny of 1857. As a result of
this conflict, the British Government
took formal control of India in 1858,
and seized the Company’s Indian
possessions, its administrative powers
and its armies.
The Company lost all its power. It
was finally dissolved in 1873, after over
300 years as a spearhead of English
imperialism.
SOURCE 11 A woman smokes an opium pipe in modern-day China.
15.3 PROFILE TASKS

1 Which event paved the way for the establishment of the East India Company?
2 Research the Indian Mutiny and outline why the East India Company would have been
resented by Indians.
3 Analyse Source 10 and explain how it could be used as evidence to help a historian
understand the relationship between the East India Company and the Indian
population.

15.4 Ideas driving imperialism: nationalism,
Christianity and the idea of a
superior race
Nineteenth-century European imperialism was driven to some extent by ideas, as well as
the desire for profit and power. Among the most influential key ideas in this period were
nationalism nationalism, social Darwinism and the spread of Christianity.
a sense of pride
in, and love of,
one’s country;
Nationalism
independence for a
particular country
Famous American scholar Benedict Anderson argued that nationalism was inseparable from
the idea of the nation. He called this the creation of ‘imagined communities’, or the idea that a
community is ‘imagined’ by the people who see themselves as part of that community.
The drive for communities to establish themselves as nations bound by a common
culture and sense of identity and aspiration became a feature of nineteenth-century Europe.
For a number of European countries, their national idea of themselves was linked to their
international standing. The easiest way to measure that international standing was to look at
the size of their armed forces and the size of their empire.
Germany only became a unified nation in 1871, and so was a latecomer to the nineteenth-
century race for colonies. It was prompted to enter that race by nationalism and a desire to be
seen as the equal of the other great European powers, Britain and France.
Many believe that the desire of European powers to compete with each other to create
empires ultimately led to the First World War.
Glorification of empire
Celebrating the empire became central to life and culture in
many European countries, none more prominently than Britain.
In their classrooms, Britain’s youngest citizens were told stories
about national success, power and conquest. Generations of school
children across the empire read books such as Deeds That Won the
Empire (1896) by British-born Australian writer William Henry
Fitchett, and the famous poems of Rudyard Kipling.
After the death of Queen Victoria in 1901, Empire Day was
instituted across the British Empire (including Australia), where
events such as community bonfires and fireworks gave people
a chance to show their pride in being part of the empire. It was
celebrated on 24 May, Victoria’s birthday. In 1958, this day was
replaced by British Commonwealth Day, which celebrated the
achievements and unifying power of the British Commonwealth.
In ways such as these, the empire was glorified and celebrated.
SOURCE 12 A statue of Queen Victoria, who ruled
England throughout the Age of Imperialism

Social Darwinism
Social Darwinism was a perversion of
a central theory in On the Origin of the
Species, the ground-breaking 1859 book by
British naturalist Charles Darwin. Darwin
had argued that when some species failed
to adapt to change, they died out and
were replaced by other species that were
fitter or better adapted to change. This
led to the evolutionary concept of ‘natural
selection’, or ‘survival of the fittest’. The
European imperialists chose to apply this
concept to human society, and found it to
be a convenient justification for their abuse
and subjugation of indigenous peoples in
the areas they conquered. They argued
that European superiority justified the
exploitation of ‘less civilised’ races, whose
main role was to serve the superior race.
It was this idea that informed much of
the treatment and policy directed towards
Indigenous Australians under British
colonisation and beyond.
Spreading Christianity
In 1837, a committee of the British
Parliament declared that Britain had a
special mission to ‘carry civilization and
humanity, peace and good government, and
above all the knowledge of the true God
SOURCE 13 The ‘White Man’s Burden’ is to teach cleanliness, according to
to the uttermost ends of the earth’. This a Pears’ Soap advertisement from the 1890s.
quote clearly reflected another characteristic
of nineteenth-century imperialism
– Christianity.
SOURCE 14
The essential point in dealing with Africans is to establish a respect for the European. Upon
this – the prestige of the white man – depends his influence, often his very existence, in Africa.
If he shows by his surroundings, by his assumption of superiority, that he is far above the native,
he will be respected, and his influence will be proportionate to the superiority he assumes and
bears out by his higher accomplishments and mode of life.
Sir Frederick Lugard, Governor of Hong Kong and Nigeria,
The Rise of Our East African Empire, 1893

In 1792, British Christian missionary
William Carey published a treatise called
Enquiry into the Obligations of Christians to
use Means for the Conversion of the Heathens.
Carey called for the Christianisation of all
parts of the world that had been deprived
of the message of the Gospels. His call
was heeded by Christians from a range
of churches, who formed ‘missions’ to
bring the word of God to the natives of
the British Empire. This drive to destroy
native culture and beliefs and replace them
with Christianity had a destructive effect
on many indigenous populations. When
accompanied by social Darwinism, the result
was devastating.
Throughout history both great good
and great evil has been done in the name
of religion, including Christianity. In
Africa, Australia, Asia, the Pacific and the
Americas, Christianity brought peace and
hope to many, but it also destroyed lives and
broke up families. While some missionaries
cared deeply about the welfare of their new
congregations, there were others who counted
converts as if they were keeping a scorecard.
Christianity challenged old ways of
thinking and traditional modes of behaviour;
SOURCE 15 One of the earliest photographs taken in the tropics, this therefore, it amounted to a revolution. Aside
image shows a missionary with two Tahitian converts to Christianity. from the spiritual side, however, Christianity
was a tool of Western imperialism and it
therefore cannot be separated from the
processes of Westernisation.
treatise 15.4 Understanding and using the sources

a formal piece of
writing that examines
1 Analyse Source 13. What attitude towards Indigenous people does it convey? Discuss how
a specific subject
advertisements such as this help explain imperialism.
mission 2 Explain how Source 14 provides evidence for the acceptance of social Darwinism as a
a group of people philosophy of imperialism.
sent by a religious
organisation to teach
their religion to 15.4 Check your learning
conquered peoples
1 Discuss how the idea of empire became a part of British culture.
2 Explain how social Darwinism and Christianity contributed to imperialism.

15.5 Australia: a ‘settler colony’
Australia, New Zealand, Canada and South Africa have been classified as ‘settler colonies’.
In other words, it is suggested that one of the reasons these countries became part of Britain’s
extensive imperial web of colonies was to provide places to resettle the growing European
population, and the people who had been forced off their agricultural land by urbanisation
and industrialisation. In each case, the settlers dispossessed the original inhabitants.
Australia has always struggled with acknowledgment of its treatment of Indigenous
Australians. What anthropologist W.E.H. Stanner called ‘the great Australian silence’
surrounding this issue was challenged by historian Henry Reynolds in his ground-breaking
book The Other Side of the Frontier, published in 1981. With this publication, Reynolds
became one of the first historians to publicly question the traditional viewpoint that the
settlement of Australia had been largely peaceful, with little or no resistance from Indigenous
Australian communities. However, it was not until the Mabo Decision in 1992 that the
Australian Government was willing to admit that Australia had been occupied by other
peoples before the arrival of the Europeans.
Because of its recent history of colonisation, Australia offers a special case study that
highlights a number of important themes in the story of nineteenth-century European
imperialism.
The myth of the convict settlement

Generations of Australians were taught – and many still believe – that the primary reason
for the British occupation of Australia was to use it to dispose of Britain’s unwanted convicts.
Like all great myths, this version of Australian history does have an element of truth.
The First Fleet that arrived in New South Wales in 1788 was largely made up of convicts
sentenced to transportation (banishment) for their crimes, and Britain did have a problem
with overcrowded jails. However, few major events in history ever have such simple and
straightforward explanations. The real reasons for the occupation of Australia are more
complicated, interesting and challenging.
In the 1950s, Australian economic historian Ken Dallas argued that it just did not make
financial sense for the British Government to try and solve the problem of overcrowded
jails by shipping batches of convicts halfway around the world. This represented a huge cost
when there were much cheaper solutions and alternative sites for a convict settlement closer
to home. Dallas instead linked the decision to send Arthur Phillip and the First Fleet to
Australia to other imperialist factors.
The settlement of Australia offered the British a potential site for a trading base in the
Pacific. This, Dallas pointed out, offered the British a range of economic opportunities,
such as the rich tea and spice trade with China, possible links to the fur trade in the North
Pacific, and access to whaling. In addition to these economic and trade incentives, Dallas
also suggests that Britain wanted to prevent its imperial rivals, specifically France, from
establishing a foothold in the region.

This debate was rekindled in the 1960s, when two of Australia’s most gifted researchers and
historians, Geoffrey Blainey and Geoffrey Bolton, engaged in a long academic discourse about
the reasons why the British decided to occupy Australia.
Bolton acknowledged that the decision to send the First Fleet to Australia was expensive and
that the strategic placement of Australia in the Pacific might have played a role, but maintained
that the most important factor was the overcrowded jails.
By contrast, Blainey – in a 1966 book entitled The Tyranny of Distance – said that Dallas
had been right about the economic forces behind the decision to colonise, and then added
some strategic reasons of his own. Blainey argued that aside from trade, Britain was attracted
to Australia because of the existence of flax plants and impressive pine trees on Norfolk Island,
close to Australia. According to Blainey, both of these raw materials were vital to the Royal
Navy, and securing them was an important part of Britain’s global naval strategy. The flax was
used for ropes and the pine for masts and spars of sailing ships. Therefore Australia was not just
intended as a place to dump convicts; rather, it was to become a plantation for these important
strategic commodities.
As is the case with most historical debates, many still argue over the reasons for the
settlement of Australia.
SOURCE 16 The famous Norfolk Island pines

that Geoffrey Blainey argued were an important
reason for settlement in Australia

The colonisation of Australia’s first peoples
Indigenous Australians are part of the oldest surviving continuous culture on the planet.
It is now generally acknowledged that Australian Indigenous cultures can be traced back
at least 60 000 years, but they are likely to be much older. Some Indigenous communities
argue that they have been here forever, and that they were born from this land.
The treatment of the first Australians is not a proud part of Australia’s national story
– and in some ways is made still worse by a long history of denial. A close examination
frontier
of the nineteenth-century records indicates an acknowledgment of frontier violence, the outer limit of
amounting in some cases to war. For example, on the Western plains of New South Wales, settled land
the Wiradjuri people actually drove back the advances of the Europeans into their country,
for a time. By the twentieth century, however, in the wake of Federation, the records Federation
the process by
of the frontier became sanitised, and modern ‘White Australia’ invented itself without which the separate
acknowledging that the British settlers took the land and homes of other people. self-governing
colonies came
In Australia, as in other parts of the world, European diseases and weapons combined together to form the
with lethal force to overcome opposition. Sometimes, the European treatment of the first Commonwealth of
Australians was deliberately brutal. The infamous Myall Creek Massacre in 1838 and Australia in 1901
the activities of the Queensland Native

Police in the 1840s and 1850s are clearly
documented examples of a level of violence
that amounted to mass murder. These
actions were on occasion disguised with
government terms, such as ‘dispersal’. This
sounded harmless enough, but in 1861,
when the Queensland Attorney-General
was questioned in parliament, he explained
that ‘dispersal’ meant ‘shooting Aborigines’.
There are also stories from the Queensland
frontier of poisoned flour being handed to
small Aboriginal groups, as though they
were pests to be exterminated.
It has been argued that Europeans did
not understand that they were taking land
that belonged to someone else. Famous
Australian historian Henry Reynolds rejects
this view and points to a number of people
– including Watkin Tench and William
Dawes of the First Fleet, and Philip Gidley
King, third Governor of New South Wales
– who were troubled by the processes of
invasion and dispossession. These men all
publicly expressed their objections at the
time and for the record. Reynolds described
them and others that followed as men and
women of conscience. SOURCE 17 Aboriginal Australians, c. 1880

SOURCE 18
assimilation I look on the blacks (said this enlightened and philanthropic juror) as a set of monkies, and the
the absorption
and integration of
earlier they are exterminated from the face of the earth the better. I would never consent to hang
people, ideas or a white man for a black one. I knew well they were guilty of the murder, but I, for one, would
culture into a wider never see a white man suffer for shooting a black.
society or culture A quote ascribed to a juror who had acquitted those accused of murdering Indigenous Australians
at Myall Creek; this appeared in a letter to the editor of The Australian newspaper, 8 December 1838
Once resistance was subdued, the imperial

impulse was to either eliminate the original
owners or to make them like the newcomers.
This assimilation process included a plan
to turn the Indigenous population of New
South Wales into European-style farmers
in the 1800s. It also involved an ‘education’
program, which was dominated by the
drive to turn Indigenous Australians into
Christians and servants. By 1880, this
philosophy was reflected in the three guiding
principles of the New South Wales education
policy for Aboriginal Australians: that
they be ‘clean, clothed and courteous’.
For much of the nineteenth century,
the Europeans expected the Indigenous
SOURCE 19 A plaque at the Myall Creek Massacre and Memorial Site, Australian population to simply die out.
New South Wales Government policies of dispossession and
removal, and the establishment of missions
and reserves for Indigenous Australians, were all predicated on the idea that it was only a
matter of time before all Indigenous peoples would disappear. It would take until the first two
decades of the twentieth century for government policies around the treatment of Indigenous
Australians to begin to change.

1 To what extent does Source 17 reflect ideas of social Darwinism?
2 Examine Sources 17, 18 and 19, and explain how they display continuities and changes in the
recognition of the rights and freedoms of Indigenous Australians since the days of British
imperialism.

1 What are settler colonies? Give three examples of such colonies.
2 Discuss the different arguments about why Australia was established as a British colony.
Which evidence do you find most compelling?
3 Briefly discuss the impact of British imperialism on Indigenous Australians.
4 To what extent do ideas of nationalism, social Darwinism and the spreading of Christianity
help you understand the treatment of Indigenous Australians in the eighteenth and
nineteenth centuries?

Case study: Australian imperialism
Once Australia had been established as a British colony, it went on to colonise its own territories.
Claimed areas included Macquarie Island (roughly halfway between New Zealand and
Antarctica), which became the sole responsibility of Tasmania late in the nineteenth century,
and the eastern portion of Papua New Guinea, which became an Australian territory in 1902.
A decade later, in 1914, Australia was given control of Norfolk Island, and it would go on to seize
control of the northern portion of Papua New Guinea from Germany during the First World War.
The League of Nations granted Australia a mandate to control the island of Nauru (a rich League of Nations
source of phosphate) in 1923, and Britain granted Australia control of the Ashmore and Carter an international
organisation
Islands in the Indian Ocean in 1931. Australia’s biggest geographical claim was made in 1933, established at
when Britain gave it authority over the Australian Antarctic Territory, an area of the Antarctic the end of the
continent over 5 896 500 km2 in size. First World War
to maintain world
peace and prevent
the outbreak of
future wars by
encouraging nations
to negotiate with
each other
mandate
a commission given
to one nation by
others (for example
through the League
of Nations) to
control a country or
geographical area
SOURCE 20 This 1959 postcard marks the opening of the Wilkes post office in the Australian
Antarctic Territory.
Australia continued to expand its territories in the 1950s and 1960s, acquiring the Heard
and McDonald Islands in the Southern Ocean; Christmas Island and the Cocos (Keeling)
Islands in the Indian Ocean; and the Coral Sea Islands in the Coral Sea.
Many of these territories provided Australia with valuable resources, such as phosphate,
guano (a fertiliser made from manure) and whale oil. Even in the twenty-first century, decades
after countries such as Papua New Guinea and Nauru gained independence from Australia, the
Commonwealth still controls seven external territories, spanning from just 10 degrees south of
the equator, all the way to the South Pole.

1 What evidence is there that Australia was also an imperialist country?
2 Research the territories Australia still controls from ‘10 degrees south of the equator, all
the way to the South Pole’. What does Australia gain from this control?

15.6 Global resistance and the resilience
of Indigenous groups
Despite the best intentions of missionaries spreading the word of a ‘loving Christian God’,
indigenous groups around the world resisted European imperialism. It is important to recognise
that although the responses of indigenous groups to imperialism were generally not recorded,
there are records of their resistance.
In Africa, where tribal groups such as the Zulu were large and well organised, armed
resistance could be formidable. The Zulu Wars (1879–96) – which included the Battle of
Isandlwana in 1879, where a Zulu Army of 20 000 warriors wiped out a British Army of more
than 2000 men equipped with modern weapons – is a classic example. In New Zealand, where
the Indigenous Māori people were similarly numerous, unified and organised, the resistance
known as the Māori Wars (between 1845 and 1875) forms a key feature of national history.
In Australia, there was lengthy and determined resistance by Indigenous Australians,
albeit more localised. Unlike the Zulu and the Māori, Indigenous Australians did not share
a common language; nor did they have the kind of social organisation that allowed for the
creation of large armies. In 2017, work done by Professor Lyndall Ryan at the University of
Newcastle produced a map of Indigenous massacre sites on the east coast of Australia. It
was based largely on settler accounts, newspaper reports, and Indigenous evidence that had
previously been largely disregarded. This ongoing project has so far documented 150 massacres,
resulting in at least 6000 deaths.
SOURCE 21 ‘Incident at the

Battle of Isandlwana’, depicting
the Anglo–Zulu War in 1879

Ultimately, the courage, spears and clubs
of indigenous peoples were no match for
European technology and weapons. As the
nineteenth century progressed, European
armies had at their disposal modern
artillery, repeating rifles and early forms
of the modern machine gun. This was
the age of the ‘firepower revolution’, with
weapons that could fire hundreds of rounds
a minute. They turned a single man into an
army, and practically eliminated all chance
of a successful resistance.
Despite the fact that indigenous
resistance was consistently crushed, with
varying degrees of ruthlessness, indigenous
peoples around the world displayed
remarkable resilience and capacity to
recover.
15.6 Understanding and using

the sources
1 Analyse Sources 21–23. What
perspective does each convey? Create
a list of similarities and differences SOURCE 22 ‘The relief of Lucknow’ depicts an event in the Indian Mutiny
between these three sources. of 1857. Indian historians still often refer to this as the ‘First War of Indian
Independence’.
2 Select one source from Sources 21–23,
and explain how it helps you understand
British imperialism in the nineteenth
century.

1 Explain why the Zulu and Ma‐ori had
more success in resisting British
imperialism than Indigenous Australians.
2 Research the Indian Mutiny of 1857. Why
did Indians revolt against the control of
the East India Company? How successful
were they?
3 Investigate and analyse one example
of indigenous resistance to British
imperialism in the nineteenth century.
SOURCE 23 A poster for a Barnum and Bailey Circus production, showing

not only how British troops dealt with local resistance, but also the role
popular culture played in spreading the idea of the glory of empire

15.7 The legacy
of imperialism
Imperialism in the nineteenth century
transformed the global economic, political
and social landscape. It reflected the
emergence of Europe, and spread Western
modes of thinking worldwide. It led directly
to the first phase of what we refer to today
as ‘globalisation’ – the interconnectedness of
economies all over the world. Due to Britain’s
pre-eminent position as an imperial power, it
also made English the universal language of
trade and communication.
In addition to Christianity, which spread
dramatically in the wake of imperialism,
the European expansion also brought
with it the other great Western article of
capitalism faith: capitalism. The concepts of the free
an economic system
market, banking systems and investment
in which businesses
and industry are run were spread globally, along with a culture
for profit by private of respect for the elites of business and the
owners, rather
than run by the
corporate sector.
government Imperialism and colonial rivalry between
the great European powers have also long
free market been considered among the causes of the First
a major belief of
capitalism that World War. In order to protect and maintain
government should order in their colonies, European powers
not interfere in the
needed armies and navies. Imperialism
operation of the
economy therefore encouraged aspects of militarism.
militarism
the belief that a Imperialism and modernity
country should
maintain strong The concept of modernity could be
military forces and interpreted as an example of twenty-first-
continually update its
military technology,
century cultural imperialism. This is
in order to defend primarily a Western idea that assumes the
national interests superiority of the Western, modern way of
living, thinking and knowing. It privileges
Western or European ways of understanding,
teaching and recording aspects of society SOURCE 24 Perhaps the most famous of the British
Christian missionaries was David Livingstone (1813–73), a
and the past, at the expense of other doctor and minister who travelled widely through Africa
ways of doing so. and preached that Christianity, civilisation and European
trade and commerce should all go ‘hand in hand’.

One legacy of European imperialism was the creation of
globalisation and the spread of Western thought, beliefs and ideas.
These ideas took hold in relation to economics, as well as areas
such as infrastructure and technology.
Ultimately, any judgments made about the legacy of European
capitalism imperialism will depend on who you ask. Imperialism, like any
an economic system other historical event, had winners and losers. The irony is that if
in which businesses
imperialism and colonial rivalry did indeed help trigger the First
for profit by private World War, then ultimately imperialism carried within it the seeds
owners, rather of European global decline. After the First World War, the balance
than run by the
government
of global economic and political power began to shift away from
Europe towards the United States, and a new style of imperialism.
free market
a major belief of
capitalism that
government should
not interfere in the
operation of the
economy
militarism
the belief that a
country should
maintain strong
military forces and
continually update its
military technology,
in order to defend
national interests
SOURCE 25 French machine gunners take position during the Battle of the Aisne during the First
World War in 1917. Was this war the end result of the Age of Imperialism?

1 Explain how Source 25 could be regarded as the culmination
of the Age of Imperialism. What would you choose as the final
image in a book chapter on the Age of Imperialism?

1 Discuss the significance of imperialism, both as an idea, and as
the actions of European nations.
2 To what extent do you think imperialism was a contributing
cause of the First World War?
3 In your own words, explain the concept of modernity.
4 Discuss the legacy of imperialism for the modern world. To what
extent do you think the world is still dealing with the effects of
the Age of Imperialism?

CONCLUSION There is no doubt that the Age of Imperialism had a profound effect on the world we live
in. The nineteenth century saw Europe dominate the global landscape. Colonies were
established across the planet to increase the wealth and power of Europe at the expense
of those who became the conquered. Huge profits were made, and the First World War
erupted among those wealthy and privileged nations as they strove for even more wealth
and privilege.
To some extent, in the twenty-first century we are still dealing with the effects of the
Age of Imperialism. Global wealth continues to be largely concentrated in the countries
that were the beneficiaries of imperialism, including the United States, which began as a
product of European imperialism and then went on to become an imperial power in its
own right.
Clashes over ideas and global inequalities are also still part of our daily life today.
Indeed, Britain’s decision in 2016 to exit the European Union – ‘Brexit’ – and US President
Donald Trump’s campaign call to ‘make America great again’ echo a nationalist desire to
return to a period where imperial powers exerted greater control of world affairs.
As a history student, it is your responsibility to develop a well-researched interpretation
of imperialism, supported by evidence and sources. You will be confronted by a range of
opinions, many revealing bias, and it is critical that you think for yourself, and rely on the
sources to guide you to your conclusion.
SOURCE 26 Queen Victoria presents a gift to an African diplomat.
FOR THE TEACHER

chapter

GLOSSARY
1848 revolutions anarchist
a wave of revolts across Europe in 1848 a person who believes in the absolute
demanding social and political reforms; freedom of the individual and the idea of a
these popular uprisings achieved some society without government or law
initial reforms, but generally failed after anthropology
Europe’s monarchies supressed the revolts the study of human societies and cultures,
and regained their hold on power and their development
1905 Revolution antisemitic
a revolution that sent a wave of political and hostile to or prejudiced against Jews
social unrest throughout the Russian Empire
armistice
the agreement made by opposing sides in a
A war to stop fighting
abolitionist movement arms race
the campaign to end slavery the military build-up by countries competing
absolute monarchy to have the largest military forces and the
a system of government where the king has latest military technology
complete power assimilation
absolutist the absorption and integration of people,
a political system where absolute and ideas or culture into a wider society or
complete power is held by one individual culture
abstention autocrat
a deliberate refusal to take part in a vote a ruler who has absolute power
agrarian Axis Powers

related to the use of land for farming the coalition of countries in opposition to
the Allied Powers in the Second World War;
agrarian reforms they included Germany, Italy and Japan
changes to the law relating to land ownership
Allied Powers
the coalition of countries in opposition to
B
the Axis Powers in the Second World War; Balkan states
they included Britain, the Commonwealth the countries on the Balkan peninsula in
and France, which were joined by the United southern Europe
States and the Soviet Union in 1941 battalion
Allies a large body of troops
the coalition of countries in opposition to besiege
the Central Powers in the First World War; the act of surrounding an area with armed
they included Britain, the Commonwealth, forces in order to capture it or force its
France and Russia, which were joined by the surrender
United States in 1917
Blitzkrieg
American Civil War a military tactic used by the Germans that
the war between the Northern and Southern included short and fast attacks using a range
states of the United States, fought between of mobile weapons, such as tanks and air
1861 and 1865 attacks
amnesty blockade
a general pardon for crimes against the the act of stopping ships from leaving or
government, or under an earlier regime entering ports
GL OS S A R Y 285

Bolsheviks colonisation cultural studies
a revolutionary political party led the practice of settling among the study of the ways in which
by Lenin that seized power from and establishing control over the culture is constructed and
Russia’s Provisional Government in indigenous people of an area. organised, and the ways in which it
November 1917 changes over time
communism
bourgeoisie an economic system in which the
the French middle class means of production (for example D
factories, farms and machinery) Declaration of Independence
are publicly owned by the state, the official document in which
C and goods are distributed equally the United States declared its
capitalism according to need, as opposed independence from Great Britain
an economic system in which to privately owned and controlled despotic
businesses and industry are run for systems such as capitalism governing with threats or the use
profit by private owners, rather than concentration camp of force
run by the government a camp in which civilians and Developing World
centenary political prisoners or prisoners of the countries of Africa, Asia
hundredth anniversary war are detained under extremely and South America that are less
harsh conditions economically and technologically
Central Powers
advanced; also known as the
the coalition of countries in Confederates/Confederacy
‘Third World’
opposition to the Allies in the First the states that joined together to
World War; they included Germany secede from (leave) the United States Diaspora
the dispersion of the Jews beyond
and Austria-Hungary, which were conscript
Israel
later joined by the Ottoman a person who is compulsorily
Empire (Turkey) enlisted in the armed forces dissidents
people who challenge government
chronology constitution policies
a record of events in the order they a set of rules by which a country is
dominion
took place governed
a territory of a sovereign or
CIA constitutional monarchy government
Central Intelligence Agency; a a system of government where a
dowager
department of the US Government monarch is head of state, but their a widow with a title or property
that collects information about power is restrained by a constitution derived from her late husband
other countries, often secretly and is largely ceremonial
civil rights contestation

the process of disputing and
E
the rights of individuals to equal
debating different interpretations of eclipse
treatment and equal opportunities
to pass from a position of power
sources by historians
Cold War
economic sanctions/blockade
the state of political conflict and corroborate
hostility that existed between the to confirm or give support to a
Soviet Union and the United States statement, theory or finding emancipation
the freeing of people from slavery
from 1945 to 1990, characterised Cossacks
by threats and propaganda but an Eastern Slavic-speaking ethnic Enlightenment
not resulting in direct fighting or Russian group with a strong military an intellectual philosophical
military conflict movement in the seventeenth and
tradition
eighteenth centuries in the West
collective memory coup d’état that saw the emergence of reason
the memory of a group of people, a swift, decisive and frequently rather than faith as the major
passed from one generation to violent seizure of power, often by component of thought and the
the next the military development of ideas

Eora nation Fundamental Laws guillotine
the Indigenous communities of the a decree from the tsar in 1906 that a machine for beheading people,
Sydney metropolitan area ostensibly confirmed the October consisting of a wooden frame with a
Manifesto, but also asserted his heavy blade that slides down when
exceptionalism
power over the Duma released by the executioner
the belief that something has
special qualities that place it above
others; the most common usage of G H
this term is linked to the self-belief
garrison hindsight
of the United States
a body of troops stationed in a understanding of a situation or
exodus fortified place event only after it has happened or
the departure, often forced, of a developed
large number of people general strike
a mass strike by a large sector of historiography
the study of the construction of
the workforce, covering a range of
F industries
history
factions history wars

genocide
interest groups or politically based debate over the meaning and
the deliberate and systematic mass
groups competing for power within impact of British colonisation on
killing of people based on their
an organisation or country Australia, and the consideration
race, ethnicity, religion or culture
of Indigenous perspectives in
Federal Government
geophysical understanding that meaning and
the central (national) government
relating to the use of instruments impact
of the United States, formed after
to study the physics of the earth in Holocaust deniers
the individual states federated to
inaccessible areas people who seek to either deny the
become a single country
Gestapo Holocaust ever took place, or argue
Federation that the numbers killed were wildly
the secret police of Nazi Germany
the process by which the
exaggerated
separate self-governing colonies ghetto
came together to form the a section of a town or city home front
Commonwealth of Australia in 1901 established by the Nazis during the those citizens who remain at home
Second World War to confine Jews during a war; the home front
feudal typically includes women, children
and other ‘undesirables’, and isolate
the dominant social system in and the elderly
them from the wider population
medieval Europe, where the nobles
could live on the king’s land in global economic output hypothesis
exchange for military service, and a proposed explanation for an event
the total value of goods produced
the peasants in turn rented the land and services provided across the
in exchange for working on the land entire world in a year I
and sharing the produce with the
Great Depression icons
nobles and the king
a period of severe economic paintings of Christ or another holy
‘Final Solution’ downtown that began in the figure
the Nazi Party’s plan for the United States and quickly spread I-ho magic boxing
extermination of Jews in Europe around the world during the 1930s the practice of spiritual and martial
free market and 1940s arts that the Boxers believed would
a major belief of capitalism that guerrilla make them invulnerable to bullets
government should not interfere in a style of warfare where small imperialism
the operation of the economy groups confront a much larger the practice of extending the power
frontier enemy with surprise attacks and of a nation, especially by acquiring
the outer limit of settled land ongoing harassment territory of another nation
GL OS S A R Y 287

inalienable rights literary studies mission
rights that cannot be taken away the evaluation and interpretation of a group of people sent by a
indemnity literature religious organisation to teach their
money paid by one country to religion to conquered peoples
lynching
another country after military where a group of people kills mobilisation
defeat, as a condition of peace someone for an alleged offence the preparation and movement of
Industrial Revolution without a legal trial, often by hanging troops for military service
the rapid development of morality
industry, beginning in Britain in
the mid-eighteenth century, in
M principles concerning the distinction
between right and wrong or good
which advances in technology mandate and bad behaviour
fundamentally changed the a commission given to one nation
Mujahideen
agricultural and manufacturing by others (for example through
guerrilla fighters in Islamic countries
industries, as well as transport and the League of Nations) to control a
fighting against non-Muslim forces
communications country or geographical area
intelligentsia manifesto
highly educated people with a public declaration to express
N
political influence, such as writers, beliefs and intentions nationalism
journalists and academics a sense of pride in, and love of,
Marxist
internal exile one’s country; advocacy of political
a supporter of the political
forced settlement to another part of independence for a particular
and economic theories of the
a country as punishment; in Russia, country
nineteenth-century Prussian-born
this was usually in the isolated neo-fascism, neo-Nazism
philosopher Karl Marx, whose
region of Siberia political movements inspired by
theories formed the basis of
intransigence communism fascism – more specifically by the
unwillingness or refusal to change Nazi leader Adolf Hitler – with ideals
medieval
one’s views or agree about of extreme nationalism, including
a period of European history, also
something beliefs in racial purity and anti-
known as the Middle Ages, that immigration, and sometimes using
lasted from approximately the fifth
L to the fifteenth centuries
violence to pursue their aims
nihilist movement
League of Nations memoir a Russian movement in the 1860s
an international organisation a historical account or biography that rejected all authorities,
established at the end of the First
written from personal knowledge becoming associated with the use
World War to maintain world peace
metallurgy of violence to bring about political
and prevent the outbreak of future
the science of separating metals change
wars by encouraging nations to
negotiate with each other from their ores no man’s land
legations militarism the area between the trench
buildings in which foreign the belief that a country should systems of opposing armies;
government officials work and reside maintain strong military forces soldiers were unlikely to return from
and continually update its military this area
Lewis gun
a type of machine gun that was technology, in order to defend
mass-produced in Britain during the national interests O
First World War militia oral history
liberalism a military force raised from the collection and study of historical
a political philosophy that supports members of the civil population (not information using sound recordings
the rights and freedoms of the professional soldiers) that can be of interviews with people who
individual used to support an army remember past events

osteoarchaeologist populism serfdom
a specialist in the study of human a type of politics that claims to the state of being a serf or labourer
skeletal remains represent the opinions and interests within a feudal system
outpost of ordinary people Sharif
a place that represents the authority propaganda an Arabic term to describe someone
of a far-away imperial country information, especially of a biased who is of noble birth; often a leader
over the top or misleading nature, used to of a society
the movement by troops when they promote a political cause or point sister ship
climbed up from their trenches to of view a ship of the same class and/or of
move forward into battle
propagate virtually identical design to another
to spread or promote ideas widely ship made by the same company
P protectorate ‘slave state’
Pacific War a country that is controlled and a state that allowed slave labour
the theatre of the Second World protected by a more powerful socialism
War, where the Allied Powers country a political and economic theory
resisted the Japanese invasion of
punitive that promotes the public ownership
countries through the Pacific region
intended as punishment of a nation’s resources and means
and South-East Asia
of production (for example factories,
pan-Arabism puppet government farms and machinery), as opposed
the idea of a unified Arab world a government where the person
to privately owned and controlled
who wields effective power is not
peculiar institution ownership in a capitalist system
holding office
the term used by Southerners for sociology
the system of slavery the study of the development,
peddler R structure and functioning of
a person who goes from place to regent human society
place selling goods a person who administers a state for Soviet
Petrograd an underage monarch a district-level political organisation,
the capital of the Russian Empire, associated with revolutionary
representative government
renamed from St Petersburg to Russia
a system of government where
Petrograd in 1914, at the beginning
citizens elect people to represent sphere of influence
of the First World War, because the
their interests and concerns an area in which a foreign power
original name sounded too German
rifle grenade has significant military, political and
plantations economic influence or control
large farms where slave labour was a grenade-type explosive device
used to produce crops such as propelled from a rifle barrel; squatter
cotton, tobacco and sugar these devices covered far greater in colonial Australian history, a
distances than those thrown by hand person who occupied land for cattle
planter
or sheep grazing, without initially
a landowner in the South owning 20
having any legal right to that land;
or more slaves S many squatters were extremely
pogrom secede wealthy and of high social status
an organised massacre of a to leave or separate from the Union
particular ethnic group; in particular, stalemate
that of Jews in Russia and Eastern segregation a situation where neither side is able
Europe the practice of separating people in to gain an advantage
a community on the basis of race
police state states’ rights
a state where the police, usually the self-determination the rights that individual states
secret police, detect and suppress the right or a people or nation to believed they still held, despite the
opposition to the government form their own government existence of a Federal Government
GL OS S A R Y 289

Stockholm syndrome total war V
feelings of trust and affection a war in which all aspects of society
that some kidnapping or hostage are involved vested interests
victims develop toward their personal interests that may
totalitarian
captors as a way of coping with their influence a perspective
a form of government where a
traumatic situation single party controls the country’s Viet Cong
stratigraphic dating administration and most other the communist guerrilla movement
the geological method of dating areas of life, requiring complete in Vietnam that fought against
subservience and suppressing South Vietnam and US forces in the
objects by their position in the
opposition
stratigraphy – or layering – of rocks Vietnam War
and sediment treatise
vilify
a formal piece of writing that
subjective examines a specific subject to make abusive statements about
based on personal feelings or beliefs a person or people, so that others
Treaty of Versailles will have a lower opinion of them
Suez Canal the peace treaty that officially
a canal, built in the nineteenth ended the First World War
century, that runs through Egypt,
trench mortar W
linking the Red Sea with the
a short, stumpy gun firing bombs war of attrition
Mediterranean Sea
at high angles to drop into enemy a strategy to wear down the enemy
synonymous trenches; it was designed to
with continuous actions to reduce
closely associated with or be fired from trenches without
their resources
suggestive of something exposing soldiers to enemy fire
Triple Alliance West Bank
synthesise a contested area of land on the
the alliance between Germany,
to form a whole by combining west side of the Jordan River; it is
Austria-Hungary and Italy prior to
different parts currently controlled by Israel, which
the First World War
seized it from Jordan in 1967
Triple Entente
T the alliance between Britain, White Paper
tariff France and Russia prior to the First an official and authoritative report
a tax put on imported goods to World War on a topic, usually commissioned
make them more expensive, so tsars by a government
that people would buy US-made the rulers of Russia until 1917
goods instead
‘Ten Pound Pom’ U Y
a colloquial term for British yellow journalism
Union
immigrants to Australia who were news reports based on
the states that stayed loyal to the
charged just £10 for the voyage by sensationalism, to shock and
United States and fought to retain
the Australian Government, which a united single country attract readers
subsidised the cost
Union of Unions
terrorism an alliance of professional Russian Z
the unofficial or unauthorised use unions, formed to place pressure
of violence and intimidation in the
Zionist
on the government to reform
a supporter of Zionism; a person
pursuit of political or religious aims
universal suffrage who believes in self-determination
tithe a form of voting rights, where all for the Jewish people and the
a tax payment to the church of one- adults have the right to vote in development and protection of a
tenth of annual produce or earnings political elections Jewish nation (‘Zion’)
topography utopian
the arrangement of the natural and aiming for a state in which
artificial physical features of an area everything is perfect

1905 Revolution, Russia armistice 240 Castro, Fidel 154, 160, 162,
INDEX
139–44, 214 Arthur Phillip, Governor 100–2 168–9, 170
Bloody Sunday 140–2 assassinations see political ideology of 167
mobilisation of peasants 139, assassinations rise to power 163–5
142 Auschwitz-Birkenau 32, 38–9, causation 82, 83
October Manifesto 142–3, 42 censorship
144 Australian imperialism 275–9 in First World War 238–9
9/11 see September 11 Axis Powers 18 in the Pacific War 25–6
Che Guevara see Guevara,
Ernesto ‘Che’
A B chemical warfare 230
absolute monarchy 246, 248 Balfour Declaration 192, 197–9, civil rights 130
advance-knowledge theory 203, 206 Civil War, the see American
24–5 Balkan states 214, 216, 220 Civil War
Africa Bastille, storming of 249, 255–6 Cixi, see Empress Dowager Cixi
colonisation of 267–8 Batista, Fulgencio 154, 156, Cold War, the 56, 167
Age of Imperialism 264, 267, 157, 160–2, 163–6, 172 collective memory see memory
272, 283, 284 Battle of Beersheba 223 colonisation
Alamo, the see Battle of the Battle of Midway 22 definition of 264
Alamo Battle of Passchendaele 226–7 of Africa 267–8
Alexander II, Tsar 106 Battle of Tannenberg 222 communism 154, 187, 241
Allied forces 195, 197, 203 Battle of the Alamo 75–6 concentration camps 38, 204
Allied Powers 18, 219, 221 Battle of the Coral Sea 22 Confederates, the 114
American Civil War 114–32, 228 Battle of the Somme see conscription 237
abolitionist movement 121 Somme, the contestability 18, 25, 30, 82, 83
and the Constitution 120, 121, Battle of Verdun 224, 228 continuity and change 82, 83
130 Battleship Potemkin 143 Coral Sea, Battle of see Battle
causes of 120–3 Bay of Pigs invasion 168 of the Coral Sea
factions of 114 Beaumont-Hamel 10–12 Crystal Night see Kristallnacht
key events 116–17 Beersheba, Battle of see Battle Cuban Missile Crisis 168–9
legacy of 130, 132 of Beersheba Cuban Revolution
role of women 128 bin Laden, Osama 111 Bay of Pigs invasion 168
slavery 115, 118–19, 120–2 Blitzkrieg (lightning war) 242 causes of 154, 162
anarchism 106–7 Bloody Sunday (1905 Cold War impact on 168–9
Anastasia Revolution) 140–2 Cuban Missile Crisis 168–9
mystery of 150–1 Bolsheviks 148, 222, 241 key events 157
anti-colonialism 107–9 Bonaparte, Napoleon 258–9, legacy of 170
Antoinette, Marie 257, 259 260–1, 262 role of women 166
Anzac Cove 10 bourgeoisie, the 248, 252–3, United States economic
Anzac Day 53 260 blockades 168
Arab–Israeli conflict Boxer Rebellion
and First World War 195–8 Australian involvement 184
and Second World War 200–3 background to 174–5, 176, D
Arab protests 201 178–80 Declaration of the Rights of
Britain’s responsibility 200, extent of 181 Man and the Citizen 261–2
204, 206–8 female boxers 178 Developing World, the 108
historical context of 190–2 implications for China 186 DNA analysis
key events 192 international response to 183 at Fromelles 14
pan–Arabism 193 members of 178 Dutch East Indies 270
Zionism 193–4, 204 British naval blockade 240
Arab –Israeli War 204 Browning, Christopher 42–4
archaeological techniques E
contribution of 13–16 East India Company 270–1
osteoarchaeologists 14 C emphasis
archives Canada role in constructing historical
importance of 8–9 role in Western Front 10–11 accounts 46–7
INDE X 291

Empress Dowager Cixi 174, 185, 186 formulation of 75–6, 83 L
Enlightenment, the 248, 253, 254–5, 260 historical terms
Lawrence of Arabia 196
Evans, Richard 40, 41–2, 46, 47 appropriate use of 82, 89
Lawrence, T.E. see Lawrence of Arabia
exceptionalism 243 histories, types of 34 League of Nations 26, 198, 214, 279
historiography 55, 154 liberalism 139
F Hitler, Adolf 32, 36, 42, 98 Lincoln, Abraham 106, 120–31
Holocaust, the 32–48 Louis XVI 246, 248, 257, 259
Ferdinand, Franz, Archduke 106
deniers of 46–7 lynchings 104
films
in films 68–9
and historical understanding 62,
interpretations of 40–4
64–70, 70–2, 114
investigation of 33
M
limitations as historical sources 64–5 Martí, José 155, 159
sources of evidence 32
Final Solution Marxism 167
hypotheses 75, 76
Hitler’s Final Solution 42 McKinley, William 106
First World War mechanisation of warfare 228–9, 230–1
Allied victory 240 I Mein Kampf 36
Eastern Front, the 222 imperialism memoirs 52
events leading to 218–19 and Christianity 272–3, 274 memory
historical context of 8, 214–17 and nationalism 272 and different perspectives 53, 60
impact on civilians 233–6 collective memory 50, 57–9
and Social Darwinism 272, 273
influence on modernity 242–3 significance of in history 50–1
definition of 264
July crisis 220 Midway, Battle of see Battle of Midway
during nineteenth century 265–6
Western Front, the 220–2, 224 mujahideen, the 111
legacy of 283–3
French Revolution 98–9, 137
resistance to 280–1
Bastille, storming of 249, 255–6
trade as motivation for 268–9, 270–1 N
bread riots 254
inalienable rights 260 Nazi Government 32, 36
causes of 252–5
Indigenous Australians Nazi Party
historical context 246
and assimilation 278 ideology of 36
Reign of Terror 98–9, 257
and colonisation 275–8 neo-fascism 105
societal structure 246–7
oral history 55 neo-Nazism 105
Fromelles 13–14, 16 Nicholas II, Tsar 134–8, 142–3, 144,
Stolen Generation, the 66–7
Industrial Revolution, the 134, 214, 147–50, 241
G 216, 248 abdication of 148
death of 150
genocide 32 Irving, David 46–7
discovery of grave 150
Gestapo, the 32 Italian Red Brigades 109
Night of Broken Glass see Kristallnacht
ghettos 38, 68
Nihilist movement 107
Great Depression, the 19
Guevara, Ernesto ‘Che’ 154, 157, 164,
J no man’s land 11
Jackson, President Andrew 120 Nuremberg
167–8, 170 Laws 36
Japan
gypsies see Romani people, Sinta Principles 45
and Pearl Harbor attack 18–23, 25
people War Crimes Trials 45
and Russo-Japanese War 137, 139
Jewish ghettos see ghettos
H Jewish refugees O
Hearst, Patty 109 British response to 204 Obama, Barack 51, 63
Herzl, Theodor 193,194, 207 post-Second World War 192, 193 omission
historical interpretations 80, 87 role in constructing historical
historical investigations
of the Titanic 83–90
K accounts 46–7
oral history 55
Kelly, Ned 100, 103 oral testimony 9
planning of 75, 83
Kristallnacht 37 osteoarchaeologists 14
presentation of findings 82, 90
Ku Klux Klan 100, 104–5 Ottoman Empire 191, 194, 195, 198
processes of 75–82
historical questions

P Ronstadt, Linda 51 terrorism
Roosevelt, Franklin D. 22–4, definition of 98–9
Pacific War 25
27, 30 four waves of 106–10
Palestine
Russian Empire, the 134 future of 110
British authorities in 205
Russo-Japanese War 137, 139
Jewish immigration to 192, 193 in the media 96
partition of 206–7 in the Middle East 109, 111
pan-Arabism 193 S racial motivation for 104–5
Passchendaele, Battle of see Battle of Saving Private Ryan 70 Religious Wave of 109–12
Passchendaele Schindler’s List 68–9 The Crown 71
Pearl Harbor 18–23 segregation 130 Tiananmen Square 187
conspiracy theories 23 selectivity Titanic 74, 83–91
historical perspectives of 25–6
role in constructing historical survivor perspectives 85, 87
in films 28
accounts 46–7 Tojo, Hideki 19
influence on American identity 27–30
self-determination 107 Trotsky, Leon 138, 142–3, 144, 146
Pemulwuy 100–2
September 11 96, 110, 111 Trudeau, Justin 12
perspectives
serfdom 247, 261
and memory 53, 60 Trump, Donald 63, 77, 96, 284
Seven Years’ War, the 266
identification in sources 78
Shining Red Lanterns (Boxer
pogroms 191
political assassinations
Rebellion) 178, 180 U
Shoah 32 Union, the (Yankees) 114, 118
of Alexander II, Tsar 106
significance 82, 83 United Nations Partition Plan 207, 209
of Franz Ferdinand, Archduke 106
Sinta people 36 United Nations Universal Declaration
of Lincoln, Abraham 106, 131
slavery 115, 118–19, 120–2, 130 of Human Rights 262
of McKinley, William 106
abolition of 130
of Romanov, Nicholas 150 USS Arizona 21, 29, 30
Social Darwinism 272, 273
propaganda 26, 27, 166, 167, 186 USS Missouri 29
socialism 139, 204
in First World War 237–9
Somme, the 10, 225, 226, 237
sources V
Q analysis of 79, 86 Verdun, Battle of see Battle of Verdun
Qing dynasty 174, 179, 185, 186 different perspectives in 78, Versailles
Qing government 180–1, 183 84–5
Palace 256
anti-Qing movement 179 interrogation of 77, 84
Treaty of 107
location of 77, 84
Viet Cong 108
R use of 80
stalemate 11
Vietnam War 77, 79, 108
Rabbit-Proof Fence 66–7 ‘Vietnamese boat people’ 81
Stolen Generation, the see
Rapoport, David 106, 112 Villers-Bretonneux 15
Indigenous Australians
Rasputin, Gregory 136, 147–8, 152 Vimy Ridge 12
Storming of the Bastille see Bastille,
Red Army Faction see West German
storming of
Red Army Faction
Red Brigades see Italian Red Brigades
Symbionese Liberation Army (SLA) W
108–9
reliability 79, 86 War on Terror 96
Religious Wave (of terrorism) 109–12 Waves of Terrorism model 106–10, 112
RMS Titanic see Titanic T Weather Underground Organization
Robespierre, Maximilien 250, 257, 259, Tannenberg, Battle of see Battle of 108
260 Tannenberg West German Red Army Faction 109
Romani people 36 television Western Front, the 6, 220–2, 224
Romanov dynasty and historical understanding 62–4, World Trade Center, New York 96–7
decline of 134, 139, 145–52, 241 70–1
execution of 150 limitations as historical source
key events 136–7 64 Z
role of First World War 145–8, 24 Ten Pound Poms 81 Zionism 193–4, 204
INDE X 293

The author and the publisher wish to thank the following copyright holders for reproduction of their material.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Front cover and title page: Getty images/Lee image /Rolls Press/Popperfoto, source 11 /Science &
Lockwood/The LIFE Images Collection. Society Picture Library, source 20 /ullstein bild, source
22; imagefolk/Mary Evans /The National Archives,
Back cover: Getty Images/Frank Schwere.
London. England, source 23 /Mary Evans Picture
Contents page: Getty/Mansell. Library/ONSLOW AUCTIONS LIMITED, source 19;
Library of Congress, source 4, 14; NARA, source 5;
Part A opening image: Alamy/Entertainment Pictures.
Shutterstock, sources 15, 16, 17, 21, p. 83.
Chapter 1: AAP Image/PA, source 12; Australian
Part B opening image: Alamy/PhotoStock-Israel.
War Memorial, sources 13 (DA10774), 15 (E05925);
Getty Images/Cameron Spencer, source 14 /Chris Chapter 7: Agefotostock/Ann Ronan Pictures, source
Jackson, opening image /JEAN-CHRISTOPHE 4; Getty Images, source 2 /Ben Stansall, opening
VERHAEGEN/AFP, source 1 /Philippe Huguen, image /David Fenton, source 18 /Keystone-France,
source 16 /Photo 12/ UIG, source 8 /Samir Hussein, source 12 /MOHAMED AL-BAKOUR/AFP, source 3 /
source 10; Imagefolk/Clement Philippe, sources 3, 9; PATRICK BAZ/AFP, source 22 /Popperfoto, source 17 /
Shutterstock, sources 6, 7. Richard Baker, source 20 /Spencer Platt, source 13 /
Tony Korody, source 19 /Yui Mok/PA Images, source 1;
Chapter 2: 123RF, p. 28 (plane); Alamy/AF archive, imagefolk/Illustrated London News Ltd/Mary Evans,
source 18; Getty Images/20th Century Fox, source 17 source 15 /Image Asset Management, source 21 /Mary
/Bettmann, sources 2, 10 /Epics, source 7 /GEORGE Evans Picture Library, source 5 /World History Archive,
F. LEE/AFP, source 19 /Kent Nishimura/Corbis, source source 11; Shutterstock, sources 9, 14; State Library of
20 /Wolfgang Kaehler, opening image; Imagefolk/ Victoria, sources 7, 8.
Universal History Arc, source 14; NARA, sources 5, 6,
9, 12, 16; Shutterstock, sources 15, pp. 28–9 (sky); U.S. Chapter 8: Alamy/Granger Historical Picture Archive,
Navy, sources 1, 8. source 3 (1862) /Lebrecht Music and Arts Photo
Library, source 15; Getty Images/ CBS Photo Archive/
Chapter 3: 123RF, opening image, source 6, p. Contributor, source 3 (1859) /Fotosearch / Stringer,
44; Agefotostock/Fine Art Images, source 10 / source 3 (1831) /AFP PHOTO / Karen BLEIER, source
The Hollywood Archive, source 21; Bundesarchiv, 1 /Bettmann, source 3 (1852), 4 /Corbis, source 13 /
Bild 183-N0827-318 / CC-BY-SA 3.0, source 3; Getty Corbis/David Butow, source 3 (1868) /DenGuy, source
Images/ © Hulton-Deutsch Collection/CORBIS, 12 /Fotosearch, source 14 /mathieukor, source 5;
source 17 /Bettmann, source 18 /Fotosearch, source Shutterstock, source 19, pp. 119, 121.
13 /Keystone-France/Gamma-Keystone, source 14 /
Linda Davidson / The Washington Post, source 1 / Chapter 9: AAP/AP, source 5 (1918); Getty Images/
Roland Schlager, source 20 /Sean Gallup, source 15 / Apic, source 24 /FPG, source 22 /Hulton Archive,
Wolfgang Kunz/ullstein bild, source 12 Imagefolk/ sources 2, 29 /Leemage, source 5 (1916) /Popperfoto,
Image Asset Management, source 9; NARA, source 16; source 28; Imagefolk/Fine Art Images, source 25 /
Shutterstock, sources 2, 4, 7, 19, 22. Fine Art Images, source 26, 30 /GOSKINO/Ronald
Grant Archive/Mary Evans, source 17 /Image Asset
Chapter 4: AAP Image/AP Photo/Lionel Cironneau, Management, source 20 /JT Vintage, source 6 /Sovfoto,
File, source 21; Alamy/Antiqua Print Gallery, source 18 source 12 /Sovfoto/UIG, source 13 /World History
/Pictorial Press Ltd, source 5; Bernie Howitt, source Archive, source 5 (1895); Library of Congress, opening
15; Getty Image/Alex Wong, source 4 /Ashley Feder, image; Shutterstock, source 4, p. 141.
source 6 /Cameron Spencer, source 20 /Gary Miller,
Chapter 10: 123RF, sources 3 (1898 & 1901), 19; AAP/
opening image /Herbert Schulze/ullstein bild, source
AP, source 18; Getty Image/AFP, sources 13, 15, 23 /
14 /Marc Grimwade/WireImage, source 9; Newspix/
Archive Photos, source 8 /Bettman, sources 3 (1959),
Dan Himbrechts, source 10.
5 /Carl Mydans, source 3 (1962) /Corbis/Lester Cole,
Chapter 5: AAP/AP, source 12; Agefotostock/© source 17 /Elizabeth Frey/Three Lions, source 10 /Grey
Paramount Vantage/Entertainment Pictures/ Villet, opening image /Hank Walker/The LIFE Picture
ZUMAPRESS.com, source 1 /Entertainment Pictures, Collection, source 20 /Historical, source 6 /Hulton
source 8 /The Hollywood Archive, source 11, p.70; Archive, source 1 /Joe Raedle, source 24 /JORGE
Alamy/Collection Christophel, opening image /FILM CABRERA/AFP, source 22 /Jung/ullstein bild, source 21
COMPANY UNIVERSAL, source 9 /United Archives /Lee Lockwood/The LIFE Images Collection, sources
GmbH, source 13; Getty Images/John D. Kisch/ 14, 16 /New York Daily News Archive, source 7 /New
Separate Cinema Archive, source 7 /Sergio Dionisio, York Times Co, source 3 (1934) /Niurka Barroso, source
source 10 /Slaven Vlasic, source 3 /Sunset Boulevard/ 2 /Ralph Morse/The LIFE Picture Collection, source 9;
Corbis, source 6; Shutterstock, source 2. Shutterstock, source 11.
Chapter 6: 123RF, source 3; agefotostock/Ron Sachs/ Chapter 11: Agefotostock/DEA/G DAGLI ORTI,
Photoshot, source 7; Getty Images/Bettmann, source source 15; Alamy/Granger Historical Picture Archive,
10 /Michel Setboum, source 12 /Popperfoto, Opening source 16 /Peter Probst, source 17; Getty Images/

Bettman, opening image, source 14 /DEA Picture Library, source Chapter 14: Alamy/Pictorial Press Ltd, opening image /
3 (1839) /George Rinhart, source 2 /Hulton Archive, Sources 4, 11 / VincentDrago, source 13; Getty Images, source 4 (1793) /Christophel
Keystone, source 3 (1900 execution) /Photo12, source 5 /VCG, source Fine Art/UIG, sources 3, 4 (1789 three) /DEA Picture Library, source
7; Imagefolk/Mary Evans Picture Library, source 18; /Ronald Grant 4 (1972) /DEA/G DAGLI ORTI, source 4 (1795) /Godong, source
Archive/SAMUEL BRONSTON PRODUCTIONS, source 3 (1900 4 (1791) /Ipsumpix/Corbis, source 10 /Pierre Perrin, source 14 /
Peking); Wellcome Library, source 13. Universal History Archive, source 2; imagefolk/CSP_PhillipMinnis,
source 5.
Chapter 12: Alamy/Everett Collection, source 8 /Heritage Image
Partnership Ltd, source 19 /National Geographic Creative, source Chapter 15: Alamy/(c) Walt Disney/courtesy Everett Collection,
14; Getty Images/Apic, source 4 /Archive Photos, source 13 / source 9 /David Hancock, source 19; Getty Images/Albert
Bettman, source 22 /Corbis, opening image /Frank Scherschel/ Harlingue/Roger Viollet, opening image /Corbis/Hulton-Deutsch
The LIFE Picture Collection, source 24 /Hans Pinn/GPO, source 20 / Collection, source 15 /Hulton Archive / Stringer, source 17 /
Hulton Archive, source 3 (1942) /JAAFAR ASHTIYEH/AFP, source 26 Southern Lightscapes-Australia, source 16; Imagefolk/Image
/Keystone-France/Gamma-Keystone, source 25 /Ramazan Turgut/ Asset Management, sources 1, 10, 24 /Mary Evans Picture Library,
Anadolu Agency, source 7 /Sunset Boulevard, source 9 /Universal sources 2, 6, 22 /McPHOTO, source 11 /Schultz Reinhard, source 25;
History Archive, source 3 (1929); Imagefolk/Mary Evans Picture Shutterstock, source 12.
Library, source 10 /World History Archive, source 11 /World History
Every effort has been made to trace the original source of copyright
Archive/Ann Ronan Collection, source 15; Shutterstock, source 1.
material contained in this book. The publisher will be pleased to
Chapter 13: Alamy/Granger Historical Picture Archive, source hear from copyright holders to rectify any errors or omission.
23; Australian War Memorial, source 9 (B02371); Getty Images/
General Photographic Agency, source 16 /Heritage Images, source
34 /Hulton, source 6 (1916) /IWM, opening image /Mansell, source
6 (1917) /Mondadori Portfolio, source 10 /Popperfoto, sources 17,
33 /Popperfoto, source 6 (1915) /Roger Viollet, source 1 /STR/AFP,
source 7 /Topical Press Agency, source 26 /ullstein bild, sources
18, 19; Imagefolk/Clement Philippe, source 30 /Image Asset
Management, source 27 /Mary Evans Picture Library, source 29 /
Robert Hunt Library/Mary Evans, source 32 /World History Archive,
source 24 /World History Archive/Ann Ronan Collection, source 15;
Library of Congress, sources 22, 31; Margaret MacMillan, ‘World
War I: The War That Changed Everything’, Wall St Journal, June 20,
2014, reprinted with Permission of the Wall Street Journal, Copyright
(c) 2014, Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All rights Reserved Worldwide.
License number 4160460924468 & 4160460832316, sources 35, 37;
Shutterstock, sources 36, 38; US National Archives, source 11.
A C K NO W L E DGE ME N T S 295

9/10/2017 2:05 PM
Bruce Dennett | Stephen Dixon | Bernie Howitt | Angela Wong
1 YEAR 11
KEY FEATURES OF
MODERN
HISTORY
cyan magenta yellow black

5TH EDITION
KEY FEATURES OF MODERN HISTORY

1
YEAR
Dennett | Dixon
11
5TH EDITION Howitt | Wong

Church Street, New York City, covered in ash and litter after the terrorist attack Jubilant crowd gathering on the streets of Havana, Cuba, on 1 January 1959 to
on the World Trade Center, a few blocks away, on 11 September 2001. celebrate Fidel Castro and his rebel army’s victory in the Cuban Revolution.
CMYK
spine: 15mm
visit us at: oup.com.au or

contact customer service: [email protected]
ISBN 978-0-19-031046-2
9 780190 310462
format: 280mm x 217mm
title: DEN_MH_5e_10462
DEN_MH1_5e_10462_CVR_SI.indd All Pages

Modern History Ebook

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Modern History Ebook

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Modern History Ebook

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

title: DEN_MH_5e_10462 format: 280mm x 217mm spine: 15mm CMYK

on the World Trade Center, a few blocks away, on 11 September 2001.

cyan magenta yellow black

00_DEN_MH1_5e_10462_TXT_SI.indd 1 2/10/2017 1:15 PM

Bruce Dennett | Stephen Dixon | Bernie Howitt | Angela Wong

00_DEN_MH1_5e_10462_TXT_SI.indd 3 2/10/2017 1:15 PM

00_DEN_MH1_5e_10462_TXT_SI.indd 4 2/10/2017 1:15 PM

PART A INVESTIGATING MODERN HISTORY

Chapter 1 3.4 The role of evidence, interpretation

1.1 Introduction ............................................ 6

4.4 Expressions of collective memory ....... 57

00_DEN_MH1_5e_10462_TXT_SI.indd 5 2/10/2017 1:15 PM

11.4 The implications of the rebellion

12.3 The nature of Arab–Israeli tensions:

9.2 The development of opposition

9.3 The fall of the Romanov dynasty.........145

10.2 The historical context of the

10.3 The nature and course of the Cuban

10.4 The aftermath of the revolution...........167

10.5 Historical debate: what is the legacy

00_DEN_MH1_5e_10462_TXT_SI.indd 6 2/10/2017 1:15 PM

14.3 The nature of the French Revolution .....256

14.4 The legacy of the French Revolution

00_DEN_MH1_5e_10462_TXT_SI.indd 7 2/10/2017 1:15 PM

‘Focus questions’, ‘Key concepts and

Content includes up-to-date case

studies, maps and rich visual and

written source material.

9.2b Understanding and using the sources

strikers and the deaths of more than 1000 workers.

and easily find

144 K E Y F E AT UR E S OF MODE RN HIS T OR Y 1 Y E A R 11 CH A P T E R 9 T HE DECLINE AND FA L L OF T HE ROM ANOV DYNAST Y 145

09_DEN_MH_5E_10462_TXT_2pp.indd 144-145 30/08/2017 12:02 pm

viii K E Y F E AT UR E S OF MODE R N HIS T OR Y 1 Y E A R 11 KEY FEATURES OF MODERN HI

00_DEN_MH1_5e_10462_TXT_SI.indd 8 2/10/2017 1:15 PM

allows for more in-depth learning about

a historically significant person, event

how to use and

India eventually resulted in the

CH A P T E R 15 T HE AGE OF IMPERIA LISM 271

N HISTORY STAGE 6 YEAR 11 C ON T E N T S ix

00_DEN_MH1_5e_10462_TXT_SI.indd 9 2/10/2017 1:15 PM

01_DEN_MH1_5e_10462_TXT_SI.indd 2 2/10/2017 1:26 PM

Chapter 2 The Contestability of the Past:

Chapter 3 The Construction of Modern Histories:

Chapter 4 History and Memory: Autobiography 49

Chapter 5 The Representation and Commemoration

Chapter 6 Historical Investigation 73

01_DEN_MH1_5e_10462_TXT_SI.indd 3 2/10/2017 1:26 PM

and the Archaeology

01_DEN_MH1_5e_10462_TXT_SI.indd 5 2/10/2017 1:26 PM

THE WESTERN FRONT, 1915

Points of attack with gains

Trenches line Mulhouse

01_DEN_MH1_5e_10462_TXT_SI.indd 6 2/10/2017 1:26 PM

1.1 Check your learning

1.1 Understanding and using the sources

CH A P T E R 1 T HE IN V ESTIGATION OF HISTORIC SITES AND SOURCES 7

01_DEN_MH1_5e_10462_TXT_SI.indd 7 2/10/2017 1:26 PM