FAMILY.

Family (from Latin: familia) is a group of people related either by consanguinity (by recognized birth) or
affinity (by marriage or other relationship). It forms the basis for social order.[1] The purpose of the
family is to maintain the well-being of its members and of society. Ideally, families offer predictability,
structure, and safety as members mature and learn to participate in the community.[2] Historically,
most human societies use family as the primary locus of attachment, nurturance, and socialization.[3][4]
[5][6]

Anthropologists classify most family organizations as matrifocal (a mother and her children), patrifocal
(a father and his children), conjugal (a married couple with children, also called the nuclear family),
avuncular (a man, his sister, and her children), or extended (in addition to parents and children, may
include grandparents, aunts, uncles, or cousins).

The field of genealogy aims to trace family lineages through history. The family is also an important
economic unit studied in family economics. The word "families" can be used metaphorically to create
more inclusive categories such as community, nationhood, and global village.

Social

Detail of a gold glass medallion with a portrait of a family, from Alexandria (Roman Egypt), 3rd–4th
century (Brescia, Museo di Santa Giulia)[7]

One of the primary functions of the family involves providing a framework for the production and
reproduction of persons biologically and socially. This can occur through the sharing of material
substances (such as food); the giving and receiving of care and nurture (nurture kinship); jural rights and
obligations; and moral and sentimental ties.[8][9] Thus, one's experience of one's family shifts over time.
From the perspective of children, the family is a "family of orientation": the family serves to locate
children socially and plays a major role in their enculturation and socialization.[10] From the point of
view of the parent(s), the family is a "family of procreation", the goal of which is to produce, enculturate
and socialize children.[11] However, producing children is not the only function of the family; in societies
with a sexual division of labor, marriage, and the resulting relationship between two people, it is
necessary for the formation of an economically productive household.[12][13][14]

C. C. Harris notes that the western conception of family is ambiguous and confused with the household,
as revealed in the different contexts in which the word is used.[15] Olivia Harris states this confusion is
not accidental, but indicative of the familial ideology of capitalist, western countries that pass social
legislation that insists members of a nuclear family should live together, and that those not so related
should not live together; despite the ideological and legal pressures, a large percentage of families do
not conform to the ideal nuclear family type.[16]

Size

Further information: Fertility factor (demography)

Mennonite siblings, Montana, United States, 1937

The total fertility rate of women varies from country to country, from a high of 6.76 children
born/woman in Niger to a low of 0.81 in Singapore (as of 2015).[17] Fertility is low in most Eastern
European and Southern European countries, and high in most sub-Saharan African countries.[17]

In some cultures, the mother's preference of family size influences that of the children through early
adulthood.[18] A parent's number of children strongly correlates with the number of children that their
children will eventually have.[19]

Types

A German mother with her children in the 1960s

Although early western cultural anthropologists and sociologists considered family and kinship to be
universally associated with relations by "blood" (based on ideas common in their own cultures) later
research[8] has shown that many societies instead understand family through ideas of living together,
the sharing of food (e.g. milk kinship) and sharing care and nurture. Sociologists have a special interest
in the function and status of family forms in stratified (especially capitalist) societies.[20]

According to the work of scholars Max Weber, Alan Macfarlane, Steven Ozment, Jack Goody and Peter
Laslett, the huge transformation that led to modern marriage in Western democracies was "fueled by
the religio-cultural value system provided by elements of Judaism, early Christianity, Roman Catholic
canon law and the Protestant Reformation".[21]

Much sociological, historical and anthropological research dedicates itself to the understanding of this
variation, and of changes in the family that form over time. Levitan claims:
Times have changed; it is more acceptable and encouraged for mothers to work and fathers to spend
more time at home with the children. The way roles are balanced between the parents will help children
grow and learn valuable life lessons. There is [the] great importance of communication and equality in
families, in order to avoid role strain.[22]

Multigenerational family

Historically, the most common family type was one in which grandparents, parents, and children lived
together as a single unit. For example, the household might include the owners of a farm, one (or more)
of their adult children, the adult child's spouse, and the adult child's own children (the owners'
grandchildren). Members of the extended family are not included in this family group. Sometimes,
"skipped" generation families, such as a grandparents living with their grandchildren, are included.[23]

Settled Sami (Lapplander) family of farmers in Stensele, Västerbotten, Sweden, early 20th century

In the US, this arrangement declined after World War II, reaching a low point in 1980, when about one
out of every eight people in the US lived in a multigenerational family.[23] The numbers have risen since
then, with one in five people in the US living in a multigenerational family as of 2016.[24] The increasing
popularity is partly driven by demographic changes and the economic shifts associated with the
Boomerang Generation.[23]

Multigenerational households are less common in Canada, where about 6% of people living in Canada
were living in multigenerational families as of 2016, but the proportion of multigenerational households
was increasing rapidly, driven by increasing numbers of Aboriginal families, immigrant families, and high
housing costs in some regions.[25]

Conjugal (nuclear) family

The term "nuclear family" is commonly used to refer to conjugal families. A "conjugal" family includes
only the spouses and unmarried children who are not of age.[26][failed verification] Some
sociologists[which?] distinguish between conjugal families (relatively independent of the kindred of the
parents and of other families in general) and nuclear families (which maintain relatively close ties with
their kindred).[27][28]

A father with his children in the United States in the 1940s

Single-parent family

A single-parent family consists of one parent together with their children, where the parent is either
widowed, divorced (and not remarried), or never married.[32] The parent may have sole custody of the
children, or separated parents may have a shared-parenting arrangement where the children divide
their time (possibly equally) between two different single-parent families or between one single-parent
family and one blended family. As compared to sole custody, physical, mental and social well-being of
children may be improved by shared-parenting arrangements and by children having greater access to
both parents.[33][34] The number of single-parent families have been[when?] increasing, and about half
of all children in the United States will live in a single-parent family at some point before they reach the
age of 18. Most single-parent families are headed by a mother, but the number of single-parent families
headed by fathers is increasing.[35][36]

Matrifocal family

Main article: Matrifocal family

A "matrifocal" family consists of a mother and her children.[37] Generally, these children are her
biological offspring, although adoption of children occurs in nearly every society. This kind of family
occurs commonly where women have the resources to rear their children by themselves, or where men
are more mobile than women. As a definition, "a family or domestic group is matrifocal when it is
centred on a woman and her children. In this case, the father(s) of these children are intermittently
present in the life of the group and occupy a secondary place. The children's mother is not necessarily
the wife of one of the children's fathers."[38] The name, matrifocal, was coined in Guiana but it is
defined differently in other countries. For Nayar families, the family have the male as the "center" or the
head of the family, either the step-father/father/brother, rather than the mother.[37]

Extended family

Hispanic family eating a meal

A family from Basankusu, Democratic Republic of the Congo

Extended family with roots in Cape Town, Kimberley and Pretoria, South Africa
The term "extended family" is also common, especially in the United States. This term has two distinct
meanings:

It serves as a synonym of "consanguineal family" (consanguine means "of the same blood").

In societies dominated by the conjugal family, it refers to "kindred" (an egocentric network of relatives
that extends beyond the domestic group) who do not belong to the conjugal family.

These types refer to ideal or normative structures found in particular societies. Any society will exhibit
some variation in the actual composition and conception of families.[39]

Historically, extended families were the basic family unit in the Catholic culture and countries (such as
Southern Europe and Latin America),[40] and in Asian, Middle Eastern and Eastern Orthodox countries.
[40]

Family of choice

The term family of choice, also sometimes referred to as "chosen family" or "found family", is common
within the LGBT community, veterans, individuals who have suffered abuse, and those who have no
contact with biological "parents". It refers to the group of people in an individual's life that satisfies the
typical role of family as a support system. The term differentiates between the "family of origin" (the
biological family or that in which people are raised) and those that actively assume that ideal role.[41]

The family of choice may or may not include some or all of the members of the family of origin. This
family is not one that follows the "normal" familial structure like having a father, a mother, and children.
This is family as a group of people that rely on each other like a family of origin would.[42] This
terminology stems from the fact that many LGBT individuals, upon coming out, face rejection or shame
from the families they were raised in.[43] The term family of choice is also used by individuals in the 12
step communities, who create close-knit "family" ties through the recovery process.

As a family system, families of choice face unique issues. Without legal safeguards, families of choice
may struggle when medical, educational or governmental institutions fail to recognize their legitimacy.
[43] If members of the chosen family have been disowned by their family of origin, they may experience
surrogate grief, displacing anger, loss, or anxious attachment onto their new family.[43]

Blended family

The term blended family or stepfamily describes families with mixed parents: one or both parents
remarried, bringing children of the former family into the new family.[44] Also in sociology, particularly
in the works of social psychologist Michael Lamb,[45] traditional family refers to "a middle-class family
with a bread-winning father and a stay-at-home mother, married to each other and raising their
biological children," and nontraditional to exceptions to this rule. Most of the US households are now
non-traditional under this definition.[46] Critics of the term "traditional family" point out that in most
cultures and at most times, the extended family model has been most common, not the nuclear family,
[47] though it has had a longer tradition in England[48] than in other parts of Europe and Asia which
contributed large numbers of immigrants to the Americas. The nuclear family became the most common
form in the U.S. in the 1960s and 1970s.[49]

In terms of communication patterns in families, there are a certain set of beliefs within the family that
reflect how its members should communicate and interact. These family communication patterns arise
from two underlying sets of beliefs. One being conversation orientation (the degree to which the
importance of communication is valued) and two, conformity orientation (the degree to which families
should emphasize similarities or differences regarding attitudes, beliefs, and values).[50]

Blended families is complex, ranging from stepfamilies to cohabitating families (an individual living with
guardians who are not married with step or half siblings). While it is not too different from stepfamilies,
cohabiting families pose a prevalent psychological effect on youths.[51] Some adolescents would be
prone to "acts of delinquency," and experiencing problems in school ranging from a decrease in
academic performance to increased problematic behavior. It coincides with other researches on the
trajectories of stepfamilies where some experienced familyhood, but others lacking connection.
Emotional detachment from members within stepfamilies contributes to this uncertainty, furthering the
tension that these families may establish.[52] The transition from an old family to a new family that falls
under blended families would also become problematic as the activities that were once performed in
the old family may not transfer well within the new family for adolescents.[53]