Unit 3 6 10
Unit 3 6 10
Unit 3 6 10
Remember when laying out your questionnaire that it will be printed on both
sides of a page and formed like a booklet, so that the final number of pages
will be a multiple of 4. This format also allows for double-width layouts, if
necessary.
Word questions to be read by a respondent as if you or an interviewer were
speaking to the respondent. Don’t word them like school exams; remember to
insert the work “please” in all instructions (e.g., “PLEASE SPECIFY”).
Other precautions to take include the following:
Do not skip around from topic to topic.
Just as in writing a paper, prepare an outline and group your questions according
to topic or subject matter.
Write transitional statements between sections or changes in subject matter.
In general, you will begin your questionnaire with a question related to the
subject of the research, one that is designed to capture the respondent’s interest
without being threatening.
This can be an open-ended question that encourages respondents to express
their thoughts about the subject matter and literally trains them to talk to you.
However, it is often better to begin with closed questions that respondents can
answer easily so that they can learn that the interview process will be fairly easy
for them.
Questions can then be ordered from the least threatening issues to the most
threatening. “Threatening” is, of course, a relative term, because questions
about sexual practices and respondent incomes are considered “threatening.”
In general, demographic questions are asked in the last part of the interview.
However, it is sometimes necessary to obtain some demographic information
early in the interview in order to determine how to proceed through sections of
the questionnaire.
It is not an absolute fixed rule that demographics are asked toward the end of
the interview; you just need to be aware that they are considered sensitive and
intrusive by some respondents. At the same time, of course, they are critical for
analysis.
One important rule to follow is never to ask for more personal/demographic
information than is required for analysis. For example, if ‘race’ is never going
to be an analysis variable, do not ask the question.
The same thing is true for marital status, income, gender, etc. It is not necessary
to include all of the demographic questions that one has developed. In fact, it
would be a rare survey that should require all of them.
Very dissatisfied
Somewhat dissatisfied
Slightly dissatisfied
Before the “official” pretest, try out your questionnaire on a few members of the
target population.
If there are many changes as a result of the “official” pretest, be sure to conduct a
second pretest before beginning main study data collection.
Asking threatening questions about behaviour
Open questions are better than closed questions for obtaining information on
frequencies of socially undesirable behaviour.
Example 1: On the average, about how many times do you watch thematinee
show skipping the classes?
Long questions are better than short questions for obtaining information on
frequencies of socially undesirable behaviour.
The use of familiar words may increase the reporting of frequencies of socially
undesirable behaviour.
Example 1: “Pot” for marijuana
To obtain reports of threatening behaviour, use data obtained from informants,
if possible.
Consider deliberate loading of the question to reduce both overstatements of
socially desirable behaviour and understatements of socially undesirable behaviour.
Do not depend on wording such as “Did you happen to …” to improve
reporting of socially undesirable behaviour. Such wording may actually increase
threat.
Example 1 (Loaded): Do you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman
to obtain a legal abortion if she is married and does not want any more children?
Example 2 (Unloaded): Do you believe that a woman should ever be allowed
to have an abortion?
For socially undesirable behaviour, it is better, before asking about current
behaviour, to ask whether the respondent has ever engaged in the behaviour.
For socially desirable behaviour, it is better to ask about current rather than
usual behaviour.
Embed the threatening topic into a list of more and less threatening topics, to
reduce the perceived importance of the topic to the respondent.
Consider alternatives to standard questions, such as randomised response, card
sorting, and sealed envelopes.
Consider the use of diaries or asking the panel members questions several times
to improve both reliability and validity.
Avoid the use of reliability checks on the same questionnaire, since this will
annoy respondents.
Ask questions at the end of the interview to determine how threatening the
45
topics were perceived to be by the respondent.