This document discusses the importance of using credible primary sources in historical research and analysis. It defines primary sources as documents created during the time period being studied that provide first-hand accounts. Secondary sources interpret and analyze primary sources but are one step removed from the actual events. The historical method involves critically examining sources to determine their authenticity and credibility through both external and internal criticism. This ensures historians base their accounts on genuine evidence rather than fabricated information.
This document discusses the importance of using credible primary sources in historical research and analysis. It defines primary sources as documents created during the time period being studied that provide first-hand accounts. Secondary sources interpret and analyze primary sources but are one step removed from the actual events. The historical method involves critically examining sources to determine their authenticity and credibility through both external and internal criticism. This ensures historians base their accounts on genuine evidence rather than fabricated information.
This document discusses the importance of using credible primary sources in historical research and analysis. It defines primary sources as documents created during the time period being studied that provide first-hand accounts. Secondary sources interpret and analyze primary sources but are one step removed from the actual events. The historical method involves critically examining sources to determine their authenticity and credibility through both external and internal criticism. This ensures historians base their accounts on genuine evidence rather than fabricated information.
This document discusses the importance of using credible primary sources in historical research and analysis. It defines primary sources as documents created during the time period being studied that provide first-hand accounts. Secondary sources interpret and analyze primary sources but are one step removed from the actual events. The historical method involves critically examining sources to determine their authenticity and credibility through both external and internal criticism. This ensures historians base their accounts on genuine evidence rather than fabricated information.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4
READPH From a political opponent: “I wonder if
he’s as good as he is in Malacañang”
LESSON 1: An LP loyalist: “Good for him, he The Importance of Credible and Authentic deserves a break from his everyday Primary Sources work” HISTORY A clergy man: “As a role model for all Historical Method Filipinos, he shouldn’t be photographed doing that” Historical Sources History is not fiction. Historical Criticism Historical accounts must be based HISTORY on all available relevant evidence. It is defined as the RECORDED struggle of A version of the past that cannot be people for ever increasing freedom and for supported by evidence is worthless. newer and higher realizations of the human The reconstruction of the total past of mankind, person. although it is the goal of historians, thus (Constantino) becomes the goal they know full well is UNATTAINABLE. Introduction: History as Reconstruction WHAT IS HISTORICAL METHOD? the historian is many times removed from the events under investigation. Agreed ground rules for researching and writing academic research or historians rely on surviving records. professional history. “Only a part of what was observed in the past Core protocols historians use for was remembered by those who observe it; only a handling sources. part of what was remembered was recorded; only a part of what was recorded has survived; Historians have to base their accounts only a part of what has survived has come to the on source materials historian’s attention. Only a part of what is Historians need to be able to locate and credible has been grasped, and only a part of organize the relevant sources on which what has been grasped can be expounded or they will base their account. narrated by the historian.” Historians have to verify sources, to HISTORIAN: date them, locate their place of origin Fallible (capable of error…capable of and identify their intended functions. making mistakes) In short, the Historical Method is…. Biases – personal, political, religious, personal idiosyncrasies The process of critically examining Each has his own frame of preference – and analyzing the records and a set of interlocking values, loyalties, survivals of the past. assumptions, interests and principles of SCEE: it involves. actions. Selection of Subject Different Interpretations Collection of Sources Examination of Genuineness A primary source must have been produced by a contemporary of the Extraction from Sources event it narrates. A primary source is a document or LESSON 2: physical object which was written or created during the time under study. The Importance of Credible and Authentic Primary Sources These sources were present during an experience of time period and offer an Historical Sources inside view of a particular event. Source – an object from the past or Primary sources provide first-hand testimony concerning the past on which testimony or direct evidence historians depend in order to create concerning a topic under investigation. their own depiction of that past. They are created by witnesses or Tangible remains of the past recorders who experienced the events or conditions being documented. WRITTEN SOURCES: These sources are created at the time 1. Published materials when the events or conditions are occurring, it can also include Books, magazines, journals autobiographies, memoirs, and oral Travelogue histories recorded later.
transcription of speech Primary sources are characterized by
their content, regardless of whether 2. Manuscript [any handwritten or typed they are available in original format, in record that has not been printed] microfilm/microfiche, in digital Archival materials format, or in published format.
Memoirs, diary Four Main Categories of Primary Sources
NON- WRITTEN SOURCES: 1. Written sources
Oral history 2. Images
Artifact 3. Artifacts
Ruins 4. Oral testimony
Fossils What are Secondary Sources?
Art works A secondary source interprets and
analyzes primary sources. These Video recordings sources are one or more steps removed from the event. Audio recordings Secondary sources may have pictures, What are Primary Sources? quotes or graphics of primary sources in them. Testimony of an eyewitness. Examples: History textbook e.g. determines its genuineness Printed materials (serials, periodicals 6. Semantics – determining the meaning which interprets previous research) of a text or word Practical Example/Worksheet 7. Hermeneutics – determining ambiguities Topic: Tejeros Convention What is Internal Criticism? Primary Source: Santiago Alvarez’ account The Problem of Credibility Secondary Source: Teodoro Agoncillo’s Relevant particulars in the document – Revolt of the Masses is it credible? What is Historical Criticism? Verisimilar – as close as what really happened from a critical examination of In order for a source to be used as vast available sources evidence in history, basic matters about its form and content must be settled Test of Credibility 1. External Criticism 1. Identification of the author 2. Internal Criticism e.g. to determine his reliability; mental processes, personal attitudes What is External Criticism? 2. Determination of the approximate date The problem of authenticity e.g. handwriting, signature, seal To spot fabricated, forged, faked documents 3. Ability to tell the truth To distinguish a hoax or e.g. nearness to the event, misrepresentation competence of witness, degree of attention Test of Authenticity 4. Willingness to tell the truth 1. Determine the date of the document to see whether are anachronistic e.g. to determine if the author consciously or unconsciously tells falsehoods e.g. pencils did not exist before the 16th Century 5. Corroboration 2. Determine the author. i.e historical facts – particulars e.g. handwriting, signature, seal which rest upon the 3. Anachronistic style independent testimony of two or more reliable witnesses e.g. idiom, orthography, punctuation Three Major Components to Effective Historical 4. Anachronistic reference to events Thinking e.g. too early, too late, too 1. Sensitive to Multiple Causation remote 2. Sensitive to Context 5. Provenance or custody 3. Awareness of the interplay of continuity and change in human affairs Sensitivity to Multiple Causation Every event or situation is the product of multiple causes or factors, short-term or long-term Inquiry into all relevant condition and circumstances that determine the direction of human affairs Sensitivity to Context consciousness about how other times and places differ from our own Bridging the cultural and temporal gap Interpreting the past using values and beliefs of the past (historical mindedness) Continuity and Change There can be “history” only when there is change