Capital Asset Pricing Model, Susan Raverty 2017
Capital Asset Pricing Model, Susan Raverty 2017
Capital Asset Pricing Model, Susan Raverty 2017
The Property Tax Division of the Minnesota Department of Revenue is responsible for the assessment of
utility, pipeline, and railroad operating property. We complete a Capitalization Rate Study each year. We
use the capitalization rates published in the study to help determine the unitary value of State Assessed
Property.
We welcomed interested parties to the department’s Spring Forum on March 1, 2018, to discuss current
market conditions, industry trends and developments, mergers and acquisitions, new projects, and other
topics that may affect the Capitalization Rate Study. They shared their input and provided feedback on
factors the department used to prepare the Draft Capitalization Rate Study.
Sincerely,
Introduction
Under state law, the Minnesota Department of Revenue assesses utility, pipeline, and railroad operating
property. The department considers these market segments State Assessed Property. The department
completes this study to determine unitary valuations of State Assessed Property in Minnesota.
The department’s Property Tax Division assesses these properties, in part, with the income capitalization
approach to valuation. This approach measures the present value of the anticipated future benefits of
property ownership. There are two methods of income capitalization: direct and yield capitalization. 1
• Yield capitalization calculates the net present value of the anticipated future income by
discounting cash flows using the yield rate.
• Direct capitalization is used to convert an estimate of a single year’s net operating income
expectancy into an indication of value for the subject property. This conversion is based on the
market-observed relationship between an income level and market value.
Under the income approach, yield capitalization rates are used in yield capitalization models and direct
capitalization rates are used in direct capitalization models. The table below summarizes the rates
derived from this study, by market segment.
The band of investment method is used for both the yield capitalization and direct capitalization rates.
This method calculates the combined rate of the debt and equity components using the capital structure
indicated by the market. The table below shows an example of the band of investment method:
1
Appraisal Institute (2013). The Appraisal of Real Estate, 14th Edition, Page 46
2
This is the difference between the yield capitalization rate and the direct capitalization rate for each market segment.
3
See the short-term growth rate section in this narrative.
4
This is the estimated long-term growth rate of the United States Economy, explained in further detail in the Growth section
of this narrative.
5
See the Inflation Section in this narrative
The present value of future benefits as of the assessment date is what NCF Net Cash Flows
the current owner would give up by selling the property and what the
new owner would receive by purchasing the property. NCF 1 Net Cash Flows for
Next Period
Discounted Cash Flows is the most sophisticated form of yield
capitalization and is used when explicit forecasts of net cash flows n nth Period
(NCF) are available and when these forecasts show the rate of
g Expected long-term
change in the cash flows is not constant. Net cash flows are equal to growth rate in net cash
net operating income plus non-cash expenses minus capital flows
expenditures minus change in working capital. Net operating income
is an after-tax accounting income prior to any deductions for interest NOI Net Operating Income
or dividends.
Because explicit forecasts of cash flows are generally not made into perpetuity, after the period of
explicit forecasts the assumption is made that the growth rate will be stable and a long-term growth rate
(g) is applied to the cash flows into perpetuity. This step is called the reversion.
The formula below shows three periods of explicit forecasts followed by the reversion.
Value = NCF 1 / (1+Y 0 )1 + NCF 2 / (1+Y 0 )2 + NCF 3 / (1+Y 0 )3 + ((NCF 3 * (1+g)/ (Y 0 -g)) /
(1+Y 0 )3)
Stable Growth Yield Capitalization is used when explicit forecasts of net cash flows are not available or
when the forecasted growth in net cash flows is stable. This model is a simplified, but mathematically
identical, model to the Discounted Cash Flows model when the forecasted growth rate (g) is constant.
Value = NCF 1 / (Y 0 – g) 1
A version of this model that assumes that the constant growth rate is 0%, which means that the income
with remain the same over time, is called a Zero Percent Stable Growth Yield Capitalization Model.
If the further assumption is made that the net cash flows will be equal to the net operating income (NOI)
– which means that depreciation will be equal to capital expenditures over time – the formula becomes:
6
Western States Association of Tax Administrators, (2009). Appraisal Handbook – Unit Valuation of Centrally Assessed
Properties, Page III-13
Guideline Companies
When selecting guideline companies, the department reviews the Standard Industrial Classification Code
and market segments listed by Value Line Investment Survey. We use the Value Line survey because it
is a well-respected, widely used publication. Value Line classifies companies into 100 unique industries
and groupings based on their operations, products, customers, and competitors. Value Line constantly
evaluates every company tracked in the survey to make sure they are located in the proper sector. 7
The department reviewed possible guideline companies for comparability in their market segments to
the companies doing business in Minnesota. We generally exclude companies that underwent a merger
or acquisition in the previous calendar year, or companies that have announced an upcoming merger or
acquisition during the current year.
For details on the companies reviewed for each segment, see Guideline Company Selection (page H-1).
The CAPM is based on the following assumptions, according to Shannon Pratt and Roger Grabowski 8:
1. Investors are risk averse.
2. Rational investors seek to hold efficient portfolios (i.e., portfolios that are fully diversified).
3. All investors have identical investment time horizons (i.e., expected holding periods).
4. All investors have identical expectations about such variables as expected rates of return and
how discount rates are generated.
5. There are no transaction costs.
6. There are no investment-related taxes. However, there may be corporate income taxes.
7. The rate received from lending money is the same as the cost of borrowing money.
7
Severo Nieves, (9 March 2016). Value Line Institutional Services, Institutional Sales & Marketing, Analyst, email
8
Pratt, Shannon and Grabowski, Roger, (2010). Cost of Capital Applications and Examples, 4th Ed., Page 113
8. The market has perfect divisibility and liquidity (i.e., investors can readily buy or sell any desired
fractional interest).
“Low interest rates are not a short-term aberration, but part of a long-term trend,” Ben Bernanke noted
during his term as Federal Reserve chair. The Fed, he added, is keeping the interest rates low, only in a
very narrow sense: “The [Federal Reserve’s] ability to affect real rates of return, especially longer-term
real rates, is transitory and limited.” 10
While serving as vice chair of the Federal Reserve, Stanley Fischer said, “The actual federal funds rate
has to be so low for the Fed to meet its objectives suggests that the equilibrium interest rate –that is, the
federal funds rate that will prevail in the longer run, once cyclical and other transitory factors have
played out—has fallen.” In addition, Fischer added, “…changes in factors over which the Federal
Reserve has little influence—such as technological innovation and demographics—are important factors
contributing to both short- and long-term interest rates being so low at present.” 11
Corporate finance and equity valuation expert Dr. Aswath Damodaran also addressed this topic: “There
is only one rate that the Federal Reserve sets, and it is the Fed Funds rate. It is the rate at which banks
trade funds, that they hold at the Federal Reserve, with each other. … [I]interest rates in the U.S. (and
Europe) have been low because inflation has been non-existent and real growth has been anemic.” 12
Moreover, notes Damodaran, the author of several finance textbooks: “In the long term, the real riskless
rate will converge on the real growth rate of the economy and the nominal riskless rate will approach the
nominal growth rate of the economy.… A simple rule of thumb on the stable growth rate is that it should
not exceed the riskless rate used in the valuation” 13.
Beta
The beta selected for each market segment indicates the market segment’s risk relative to the market.
The effects of un-levering and re-levering guideline companies’ betas for the selected capital structure
for each market segment were analyzed. The income tax liability data was not reliable for Gas
Transmission Pipeline or Fluid Transportation Pipeline companies because the companies are limited
partnerships and the income tax liability is “passed-through” to the shareholders.
9
The daily observations rate for 20-year U.S. Treasury coupon bonds was 2.58% as of January 29, 2017.
10
Bernanke, Ben. (30 March 2015). “Why are interest rates so low?” Retrieved from http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/ben-
bernanke/posts/2015/03/30-why-interest-rates-so-low.
11
Fischer, Stanley (17 October 2016). Why Are Interest Rates So Low? Causes and Implications. Live Speech at Economics
Club of New York, New York. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/federal-reserve-september-2017
12
Damodaran, Aswath, Dr. (4 September 2015). “The Fed, interest rates, and stock prices: fighting the fear factor.”
Retrieved from http://aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com/2015/09/the-fed-interest-rates-and-stock-prices.html.
13
Damodaran, A. Chapter 2, Intrinsic Valuation, Page 32, Retrieved from
http://people.stern.nyu.edu/adamodar/pdfiles/DSV2/Ch2.pdf
See each market segment’s Beta Analysis page in the appendices for more information on how the
department arrived at the indicated beta.
As provided by Damodaran, “Broadly speaking, there are two ways of estimating equity risk premiums,
with the first being a historical premium estimated by looking at the difference between past returns on
stocks and the risk free investment and the second being a forward looking estimate, where you back out
from stock prices what investors are building in as an expected return on stocks in the future.” 16
The department reviewed seven different calculations of the equity risk premium:
Ex Post, long-horizon expected equity risk premium from Duff & Phelps Annual Valuation
Handbook: Guide to Cost of Capital. Large company stock total returns minus long-term
government bond income returns. 17
Supply Side, long-horizon expected equity risk premium forecasted by the use of supply side
models from Duff & Phelps Annual Valuation Handbook: Guide to Cost of Capital. 18 Finance
and capital expert Roger Ibbotson described the Supply Side Model in his Stocks, Bonds, Bills,
and Inflation Yearbook: “Long-term expected equity return scan be forecasted by the use of
supply side models. “The supply of stock market returns is generated by the productivity of the
corporations in the real economy. Investors should not expect a much higher or lower return than
that produced by the companies in the real economy. Thus, over the long run, equity returns
should be close to the long-run supply estimates.” 19
Three Stage Ex Ante, forward looking model using a three-stage dividend growth model of the
Standard & Poor’s 500. The department calculates this equity risk premium. 20 According to
14
Pratt, Shannon and Grabowski, Roger, (2010). Cost of Capital Applications and Examples, 4th Ed., Pages 115-116
15
Cornell, Bradford, (1999). The Equity Risk Premium, Page 18
16
Damodaran, Aswath, Dr. (April 2016). The Cost of Capital: The Swiss Army Knife of Finance, Page 11. Retrieved from
http://people.stern.nyu.edu/adamodar/pdfiles/papers/costofcapital.pdf
17
Duff & Phelps. (2018). Valuation Handbook: Guide to Cost of Capital. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. Chapter 3, Page 1
18
Ibid.
19
Ibbotson SBBI 2013 valuation yearbook: market results for stocks, bonds, bills, and inflation, 1926-2012. (2013).
Chicago: Morningstar. Page 64.
20
See Appendix F for this calculation.
Ibbotson, “One of the advantages of a three-stage discounted cash flow model is that it fits with
the life cycle theories in regards to company growth.” 21
Damodaran, forward looking equity risk premium as calculated by Dr. Aswath Damodaran,
Professor of Finance at the Stern School of Business at New York University. 22
Duff & Phelps, recommended equity risk premium (conditional). The Duff & Phelps
recommended equity risk premium was developed in relation to (and should be used in
conjunction with) a 3.50% “normalized” risk-free rate. 23
Graham and Harvey, forward-looking equity risk premium based on surveys of U.S. Chief
Financial Officers and their opinion of the equity risk premium in every quarter from June 2000
to June 2016. 24
Fernandez, Pershin, and Acin, forward-looking equity risk premium based on surveys of
finance and economics professors, analysts and managers of companies and their opinion of the
required market risk premium in different countries. 25
The equity risk premium (RP e ) is multiplied by the market segment- Key – Variables in equations
specific beta (β). The product is then added to the risk-free rate (R f ) to
estimate the market rate of equity for the market segment. RP e Equity risk premium
21
Ibbotson, SBBI 2013 valuation yearbook. Page 51
22
Implied Equity Risk Premium on January 1, 2018 as determined by Dr. Aswath Damodaran;
http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/
23
Duff & Phelps. (2018). Valuation Handbook: Guide to Cost of Capital. Hoboken: John Wiley. Chapter 3, Page 1
24
Graham, J. R., and Harvey, C. R. (04 August 2016). The Equity Risk Premium in 2016. Retrieved October 18, 2017, from
http://ssrn.com/abstract=2816603
25
Fernandez, P., Pershin, V., and Acín, I. F. (19 April 2017). Discount Rate (Risk-Free Rate and Market Risk Premium)
Used for 41 Countries in 2017: A Survey. Retrieved October 18, 2017, from
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2954142
2018, putting this approach into play, I estimated an equity risk premium of 5.08% for
the S&P 500. 26
According to Steven Kihm, Andrew Satchwell, and Peter Cappers, the model “mutes the sensitivity of
the cost of equity estimate to changes in the beta coefficient, consistent with the adjustment suggested
by the empirical research.” 27
The equity risk premium (RP e ) is multiplied by the market segment-specific beta (β) and 75%. The
product is then added to the equity risk premium (RP e ) multiplied by 25%. The two products and the
risk free rate are added tighter to estimate the market rate of equity for the market segment.
Market Rate of Equity for Market Segment = (RP e x β x 75%) + (RP e x 25%) + R f
We completed seven ECAPM models for each market segment, using the equity risk premiums
described in the Capital Asset Pricing Model section above.
Build-Up Model
The Build-Up Model is another model used to estimate the market rate Key – Variables in equations
of equity. Some view this as a version of the Capital Asset Pricing
Model without specifically incorporating systematic risk. 28 The RPe Equity risk premium
CAPM assumes that the risk premium portion of a security’s expected
return is a function of that security’s systematic risk. 29 Rf Risk-free rate
An investor can diversify their portfolio to remove unsystematic risk RPU Market segment
(market segment-specific risk). Systematic risk (market risk) is the specific risk premium
risk related to an investment return that cannot be eliminated through (unsystematic)
diversification. 30
In the Build-Up Model, the market rate of equity for the market segment is equal to the risk free rate
plus the equity risk premium plus the risk specific to the market segment for unsystematic risk.
26
Damodaran, Aswath, Dr. January 2018 Data Update 2: The Buoyancy of US Equities. January 9, 2018.
https://aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com/2018/01/january-2017-data-update-2-buoyancy-of.html
27
Kihm, Steven; Satchwell, Andrew; and Cappers, Peter. The Financial Impacts of Declining Investment Opportunities on
Electric Utility Shareholders, Electricity Markets & Policy Group, Technical Brief, Page 20
28
Pratt, Shannon and Grabowski, Roger, Cost of Capital Applications and Examples, 4th Ed., Page 102 (2010)
29
Ibid, p. 105
30
Keown, Arthur; Martin, John; and Petty, J., Foundations of Finance: The Logic and Practice of Financial Management,
8th Ed., (2014). Page 195
The Build-Up Model can be used when the inputs are not available to complete CAPM. The department
was able to complete the CAPM for each market segment and did not need to resort to the Build-Up
Model.
The formula for this model is the same as the simplified Discounted Cash Flows Income Model
explained above, referred to as Stable Growth Yield Capitalization, using a stable growth rate.
Estimating the sustainable growth rate is explored below in this section and the Growth section.
Theoretically, the growth estimate in the DGM is the estimated growth in dividends, which are cash
flows to equity shareholders after reinvestment. Dividend growth estimates may track earnings growth
estimates. However, companies may change dividend payment policies drastically, resulting in large
differences between earnings growth estimates and dividend growth estimates.
A consensus based on substantial academic literature indicates analysts’ forecasts of earnings take account
of all the information provided by more formulaic forecasting rules and incorporate other information as
well. “Based on these findings, the most common solution is to assume that the dividend payout rate
remains effectively constant and to use analyst forecasts of earnings growth as a proxy for the growth rate
of dividends.” 32
Another issue that leads the department to question the usefulness and Key – Variables in equations
reliability of the dividend growth rate in this model is the trend for U.S.
companies to include stock buybacks in their dividend payment DY Dividend Yield
policies. This is discussed in detail in the Stock Buybacks section.
DG Dividend Growth
The formula uses Dividend Yield (DY), which is next year’s expected
dividends per share divided by the current market price per share of EG Earnings Growth
stock, plus an estimate of growth. Both dividend and earnings growth
models were reviewed.
Dividend Growth (DG), analysts’ estimates of dividend growth is used in the model:
Earnings Growth (EG), analysts’ estimates of earnings growth is used in the model:
31
Western States Association of Tax Administrators (2009). Appraisal Handbook – Unit Valuation of Centrally Assessed
Properties, Page III-20
32
Cornell, Bradford, (1999). The Equity Risk Premium, Page 105
Another formulaic expression of the Dividend Growth Model is: Key – Variables in equations
KE = D1 / P0 + G1 KE Cost of Equity
In this expression, the Cost of Equity is estimated by taking the D1 Expected Dividends
Dividend Yield (Expected Dividends in the next period divided by the
Recent Stock Price) plus expected growth. This model is the same P0 Recent Stock Price
model as the simplified Discounted Cash Flows Income Model that
the department referred to as the Stable Growth Yield Capitalization, G1 Projected 5-year
mentioned above. The formula is stated again here: Growth Rate
Guideline companies for the Gas Transmission Pipeline and Fluid Transportation Pipeline segments did
not have sufficient data provided by Value Line for earnings or dividends growth rates. As a result, the
growth estimate for the next five years as provided by Yahoo! Finance was used. There is less
information available for earnings growth and dividend growth estimates in the Gas Transmission
Pipeline and Fluid Transportation Pipeline market segments, causing concern about the reliability of
these estimates.
See each market segment’s Dividend Growth Model page in the appendices for more information on
how the department arrived at the indicated rate.
The growth rate used in the DGM is a short-term growth rate, typically much higher than the growth rate
of the U.S. economy. This model is used to calculate value of a company into perpetuity. It is not
possible for a company to grow at a growth rate higher than the U.S. economy in the long-term.
According to Damodaran, “the amount of cash that U.S. companies are returning to stockholders is
unstainable, given the earnings and expectations of growth.” 33 Pratt and Grabowski also state, “Long-
term growth rates exceeding the real growth in GDP [Gross Domestic Product] plus inflation are
generally not sustainable.” 34
33
Damodaran, A. January 2017 Data Update 9: Dividends and Buybacks Damodaran, February 6, 2017.
http://aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com/2017/02/january-2017-data-update-9-
dividends.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+blogspot%2FpHUuM+%28M
usings+on+Markets%29
34
Pratt, Shannon and Grabowski, Roger, (2010). Cost of Capital Applications and Examples, 4th Ed., Page 681
Because a company cannot act as its own shareholder, the company absorbs repurchased shares, and the
number of outstanding shares on the market is reduced. This increases the relative ownership stake of
each investor because there are fewer shares, or claims, on the earnings of the company. 37 The amount
of cash that U.S. companies are returning to stockholders is unsustainable, given the earnings and
expectations of growth. In 2015 and 2016, the companies in the S&P 500 returned more than 100% of
earnings to investors. 38
Given the trend of U.S. companies to include stock buybacks in their dividend payment policies, the
department questions the reliability of the expected dividends and expected dividend growth rate inputs
of the Dividend Growth Model (DGM).
35
Keown, Arthur; Martin, John; and Petty, J., (2014). Foundations of Finance: The Logic and Practice of Financial
Management, 8th Ed., Page 53
36
Damodaran, Aswath, Dr. (2015). Applied Corporate Finance, 4th Ed., Page 439
37
http://www.investopedia.com/articles/02/041702.asp
38
Damodaran, Aswath, Dr. (2017, February 06). January 2017 Data Update 9: Dividends and Buybacks. Retrieved February
06, 2017, from http://aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com/2017/02/january-2017-data-update-9-
dividends.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A%2Bblogspot%2FpHUuM%2B
%28Musings%2Bon%2BMarkets%29
indexes. In the 2017 study, we were researching sources of actual debt issued by the guideline
companies for future assessments. 39
For this (2018) study, the department analyzed the guideline companies’ actual cost of debt and used
them to estimate debt rates. 40
We compiled our debt analysis using a majority blend of the market-observed, true cost of each
guideline company’s debt (through the utilization of yield to maturity calculations described below) and
spread analysis when such data was unavailable. This debt analysis is referenced in the Current Actual
Cost of Debt pages for each market segment (see appendices A through E).
1. Accessed public information available for specific fixed and/or corporate bond mutual funds –
their Quarterly Schedule Of Portfolio Holdings Of Registered Management Investment
Company (Form N-Q) on the SEC website
2. Pulled out company-specific marketable debt securities data from Form N-Q, which are
mandated by the SEC to include: issue name, coupon rate, maturity date, holding (face) amount,
and market value amount. 41
3. Combined the data from Form N-Q – filed December 31, 2017 – with reasonable assumptions
(see below) to calculate the cost of debt.
4. Used the above data to derive the Yield to Maturity (YTM) for each company. We calculate a
market price (Market Value divided by Face Value). From that point we assume:
• A T+3 settlement date of January 4, 2018 (January 1 is a Holiday and therefore a non-
settlement date.)
• A redemption price of par ($100.00)
• A semi-annual interest payment
• The debt is non-callable (The “make whole” call included in most corporate debt
securities favors the issuer and is therefore irrelevant to the company’s cost of debt.)
We have calculated 33 of the 43 guideline company’s cost of debt and YTM using the method outlined
above. For the other 10 companies, we employed a spread analysis tool using long-term debt
information from their most recently published Form 10-K. (The marketable long-term debt outstanding
39
Minnesota Department of Revenue. 2017 Capitalization Rate Study, Page 9-10.
40
In previous years, the department used the following indexes to estimate the market rate of debt for guideline companies:
• Corporate Bond Yield Averages for Public Utility Bonds from Mergent Bond Record, for the Electric and Gas
Distribution market segments
• Corporate Bond Yield Averages for Industrial Bonds from Mergent Bond Record, for the Gas Transmission
Pipeline, Fluid Transportation Pipeline, and Railroad market segments
41
Each company’s principal executive and financial officers verify and sign off on the data on Form N-Q.
for these 10 companies was most likely placed privately to institutional or accredited investors that do
not have to file Form N-Q.)
We focused on a long-term average industry YTM. 42 To arrive at this average, we built a spot U.S.
Treasury zero coupon yield curve and then calculated a Z-spread to build out the data. This “boot-
strapping” process is common practice in the financial sector when it comes to pricing new issue
corporate debt.
For more information on how we analyzed the market rate of debt, see each market segment’s Indexed
Rate of Debt and Current Actual Cost of Debt pages in the appendices of this report.
Value = NOI1 / D0
Guideline Companies
When selecting guideline companies, the department reviews the Standard Industrial Classification Code
and market segments listed by Value Line Investment Survey. We use the Value Line survey because it
is a well-respected, widely used publication. Value Line classifies companies into 100 unique industries
and groupings based on their operations, products, customers, and competitors. Value Line constantly
evaluates every company tracked in the survey to make sure they are located in the proper sector. 44
The department reviewed possible guideline companies for comparability in their market segments to
the companies doing business in Minnesota. We generally exclude companies that underwent a merger
or acquisition in the previous calendar year, or companies that have announced an upcoming merger or
acquisition during the current year.
For details on the companies reviewed for each segment, see Guideline Company Selection (page H-1).
42
Our indexed cost of debt calculations in previous capitalization rate reports similarly used a long-term basis.
43
Western States Association of Tax Administrators (2009). Appraisal Handbook – Unit Valuation of Centrally Assessed
Properties, Page III-8
44
Severo Nieves, (9 March 2016). Value Line Institutional Services, Institutional Sales & Marketing, Analyst, email
Equity Component
An inverse of the Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio is used to estimate the equity component in the direct
rate.
The Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E Ratio) as calculated by Value Line Investment Survey was used. The
Trailing P/E Ratio as calculated by Value Line Investment Survey was used if the P/E Ratio was not
calculated. The P/E ratio most indicative of the market segment data was selected. The inverse of the
selected ratio is the equity component of the direct capitalization rate.
See each market segment’s Direct Equity Component page for more information on how the department
arrived at the indicated equity component.
Debt Component
All data used for the cost of debt calculation is from the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC.gov). This differs from the 2017 study when the cost of debt was exclusively derived from
indexes. In the 2017 study, we were researching sources of actual debt issued by the guideline
companies for future assessments. 45
For this (2018) study, the department analyzed the guideline companies’ actual cost of debt and used
them to estimate debt rates. 46
We compiled our debt analysis using a majority blend of the market-observed, true cost of each
guideline company’s debt (through the utilization of yield to maturity calculations described below) and
spread analysis when such data was unavailable. This debt analysis is referenced in the Current Actual
Cost of Debt pages for each market segment (see appendices A through E).
1. Accessed public information available for specific fixed and/or corporate bond mutual funds –
their Quarterly Schedule Of Portfolio Holdings Of Registered Management Investment
Company (Form N-Q) on the SEC website
2. Pulled out company-specific marketable debt securities data from Form N-Q, which are
mandated by the SEC to include: issue name, coupon rate, maturity date, holding (face) amount,
and market value amount. 47
3. Combined the data from Form N-Q – filed December 31, 2017 – with reasonable assumptions
(see below) to calculate the cost of debt.
45
Minnesota Department of Revenue. 2017 Capitalization Rate Study, Page 9-10.
46
In previous years, the department used the following indexes to estimate the market rate of debt for guideline companies:
• Corporate Bond Yield Averages for Public Utility Bonds from Mergent Bond Record, for the Electric and Gas
Distribution market segments
• Corporate Bond Yield Averages for Industrial Bonds from Mergent Bond Record, for the Gas Transmission
Pipeline, Fluid Transportation Pipeline, and Railroad market segments
47
Each company’s principal executive and financial officers verify and sign off on the data on Form N-Q.
4. Used the above data to derive the Yield to Maturity (YTM) for each company. We calculate a
market price (Market Value divided by Face Value). From that point we assume:
• A T+3 settlement date of January 4, 2018 (January 1 is a Holiday and therefore a non-
settlement date.)
• A redemption price of par ($100.00)
• A semi-annual interest payment
• The debt is non-callable (The “make whole” call included in most corporate debt
securities favors the issuer and is therefore irrelevant to the company’s cost of debt.)
We have calculated 33 of the 43 guideline company’s cost of debt and YTM using the method outlined
above. For the other 10 companies, we employed a spread analysis tool using long-term debt
information from their most recently published Form 10-K. (The marketable long-term debt outstanding
for these 10 companies was most likely placed privately to institutional or accredited investors that do
not have to file Form N-Q.)
We focused on a long-term average industry YTM. 48 To arrive at this average, we built a spot U.S.
Treasury zero coupon yield curve and then calculated a Z-spread to build out the data. This “boot-
strapping” process is common practice in the financial sector when it comes to pricing new issue
corporate debt.
For more information on how we analyzed the market rate of debt, see each market segment’s Indexed
Rate of Debt and Current Actual Cost of Debt pages in the appendices of this report.
Flotation Costs
Flotation costs are costs incurred when a company issues a new security, including fees to an investment
banker, legal fees, accounting, and other out of pocket expenses. The market-determined opportunity
cost of capital is not affected by the flotation costs of a particular firm. 49 The correct procedure for the
economic analysis of flotation costs does not alter the weighted average cost of capital. 50
The yield rates and direct rates in this study are market derived, using market data. Unlike for
determining allowable rates of return in rate cases, the recovery of previously incurred costs is not added
to the yield rates or direct rates used for estimating market value. The yield rate and direct rate are not
recovery mechanisms for the costs of doing business. Flotation cost adjustments were not made to the
yield rate or direct rate in this study.
Dr. Richard Simonds stated in his paper published in the Journal of Property Tax Assessment &
Administration, “When capitalizing net operating income in the income approach, a flotation-cost
adjustment cannot be applied to the cost of capital. Advocates of an adjustment may be confusing the
48
Our indexed cost of debt calculations in previous capitalization rate reports similarly used a long-term basis.
49
Western States Association of Tax Administrators, (2009). Appraisal Handbook – Unit Valuation of Centrally Assessed
Properties, Page III-31
50
Copeland, Thomas E., and Weston, Fred J. (1988). Financial Theory and Corporate Policy (3rd Ed.). Addison-Wesley
Publishing Company.
concept of the allowed rate of return on invested capital in a rate-regulated environment with the concept
of the market-determined opportunity cost of capital.” 51
Thomas Copeland and Fred Weston find that adjusting for flotation costs in the rate of return is incorrect
because it implicitly adjusts the opportunity cost of funds supplied to the firm. The true market-
determined opportunity cost is unaffected by the flotation costs of a particular firm. 52
The department does not include an adjustment for flotation costs. We estimate the market cost of
capital for each market segment, under Minnesota Rules 8100 and 8106.
Company-Specific Risk
The department does not include an adjustment for company-specific risk or a size premium adjustment
for a specific company. The department estimates the market cost of capital for each market segment,
per Minnesota Rules 8100 and 8106.
The department does not agree with a size premium adjustment based on the average market
capitalization size of the guideline companies and does not find this to be generally accepted practice.
Damodaran points out several reasons why a size adjustment to the CAPM is not appropriate,
concluding that the empirical evidence is not as conclusive as it was initially thought to be. 53 He also
finds that forward-looking risk premiums are yielding no premiums for small cap [market capitalization]
stocks and much of the additional risk is either diversifiable or double counted. 54
Eugene Fama and Kenneth French analyzed size premiums of companies that move to different market
capitalizations and found, “the size premium is almost entirely a result of the extreme positive returns of
small-cap [market capitalization] stocks that move to a big-cap [market capitalization] portfolio from
one year to the next.” 55
Illiquidity
The department does not adjust capitalization rates for illiquidity. As the Appraisal Institute explains:
A discount rate reflects the relationship between income and the value that a market will
attribute to that income. The financial and economic concepts implicitly in a discount rate are
complex and have been the subject of significant analysis for more than a century. Although four
key components can be identified within a discount rate – the safe rate plus considerations of
51
Simonds, Richard R., Dr. (2006). “Income Capitalization, Flotation Costs, and the Cost of Capital.” Journal of Property
Tax Assessment & Administration, Volume 3, Issue 4.
52
Copeland and Weston. Financial Theory and Corporate Policy (3rd Ed.). Page 534
53
Damodaran, Aswath, Dr. “Equity Risk Premiums (ERP): Determinants, Estimation and Implications – The 2011 Edition.”
Retrieved from: http://people.stern.nyu.edu/adamodar/pdfiles/papers/ERP2011.pdf
,54 Damodaran, Aswath, Dr. (11 April 2015). “The small cap premium: Where is the beef?” Retrieved from:
http://aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com/2015/04/the-small-cap-premium-fact-fiction-and.html.
55
Fama, Eugene F. and French, Kenneth R. (2007). “Migration.” Financial Analysts Journal, Volume 63, Number 3. CFA
Institute.
illiquidity, management, and various risks – a discount rate that is constructed by adding
allowances for these components can be misleading and inaccurate” (p. 458). 56
Growth
The importance of the growth rate is that it affects the yield model, explained in the Yield Capitalization
Rate section. Minnesota Rules, 8100 and 8106 imply a Zero Percent Growth Yield model. If the
assumption that income streams remain equal over time is incorrect, the model may not accurately
reflect the market value of the company.
For a company with a changing income streams, a Discounted Cash Flows model or Stable Growth
Yield model may be better at estimating the value for the company under review. The Discounted Cash
Flows model uses explicit forecasts of income and expenses for each period. These inputs can be
estimated if they are not made available.
The Implied Growth Rate is the difference between the yield rate and the direct rate. The direct rate is
the relationship between an estimate of a single year’s net operating income and the value of the
property, while the yield rate converts income from future periods into present value.
The Western States Association of Tax Administrators Appraisal Handbook states, “direct capitalization
is not affected by the appraiser’s view of the future income.” 57 In addition, Unit Valuation Insights
states, “The direct capitalization rate is typically calculated as the yield capitalization rate minus an
expected long-term growth rate.” 58
Business news service Reuters provides analysts’ estimates of market segment earnings per share
growth. The estimates for the next five years for the industry (as of January 9, 2018) are as follows:
Value Line Investment Survey provides analysts’ estimates of change in earnings and dividends from
2014-2016 to 2020-2022. Gas Transmission Pipeline and Fluid Transportation Pipeline segments did not
have sufficient data provided by Value Line for earnings or dividends growth rates. The average growth
rates provided by Value Line Investment Survey are as follows:
56
Appraisal Institute (2013). The Appraisal of Real Estate, 14th Edition, Page 458
57
Ibid., Page III-9
58
Schweihs, Robert P. & Reilly, Robert F. (Spring 2014). Unit Valuation Insights, Issues Related to the Unit Valuation
Principle, Page 77
Yahoo! Finance provides growth estimates for the next five years for several publicly traded companies.
These estimates were used for Gas Transmission Pipeline market segment and Fluid Transportation
Pipeline market segment. The median growth estimates for the guideline companies are as follows:
Based on the sources above, the indicated short-term growth rate for each market segment is as follows:
This evidence indicates that there is significant short-term growth in each market segment.
“Since no firm can grow forever at a rate higher than the growth rate of the economy in which it
operates, the constant growth rate cannot be greater than the overall growth rate of the economy.” 60
Therefore, the risk-free rate can be viewed as the maximum constant growth rate for each market
segment. The U.S. Treasury 20-year Coupon Bond Yield was 2.58% on December 29, 2017. 61
The sources analyzed for this report indicate varying rates of growth in the U.S. economy over the long-
term:
59
Genesee & Wyoming is the only railroad company used for the Other Railroads market segment. Genesee & Wyoming
does not pay dividends. Therefore, there is no estimated growth rate for dividends for Genesee & Wyoming.
60 Damodaran, Aswath, Dr. (n.d.) The Stable Growth Rate,
http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/valquestions/stablegrowthrate.htm
61 Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, H.15, Selected Interest Rates, Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities 20-year
constant maturity quoted on investment bases, daily observations, December 29, 2017. Accessed on January 8, 2018 from
http://www.federalreserve.gov/
• The Federal Reserve Bank projects their “longer run” estimate of U.S. real Gross Domestic
Product (GDP) growth at 1.8% 62.
• The World Bank forecasts that U.S. GDP will grow by 3.1% in 2018, 3.0% in 2019, and 2.9% in
2020. 63
• Trading Economics projects the U.S. GDP annual growth rate to trend around 2.60% in 2020 64.
• The Economist Intelligence Unit forecasts that U.S. real GDP will grow by 1.7% from 2017 to
2050. 65
• A 2014 publication from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
(OECD) indicates that the average growth rate in potential GDP for the U.S. is 1.70% from 2031
to 2060. 66
After considering the above sources, the department finds the indicated growth rate of the U.S. economy
to be 2.50%.
The department also plans to review the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated average growth
rate of U.S. real GDP to help measure the indicated long-term growth rate of the U.S. economy. This
estimate will be available April 9, 2018 (when the CBO’s Budget and Economic Outlook is published).
We intend to re-review the selected long-term growth rate at that time.
Inflation
Inflation makes future income less valuable than today’s income. Inflation is the percentage change in
the value of the Wholesale Price Index (WPI) on a year-to-year basis. It effectively measures the change
in the prices of a basket of goods and services in a year. 67
According to Arthur Keown, John Martin, and J. William Petty, “investors require nominal (or quoted)
rate of interest that exceeds the inflation rate or else their realized real return will be negative.” 68
62
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Monetary Policy Report – February 2018, Part 3.
https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/2018-02-mpr-part3.htm
63 World Bank Group Flagship Report, Global Economic Prospects – Broad-Based Upturn, but for How Long?, January
2018, Page 4
64
Trading Economics, United States GDP Growth Rate Forecast, http://www.tradingeconomics.com/forecast/gdp-annual-
growth-rate, accessed on January 31, 2018
65
The Economist Intelligence Unit. Dated May 5, 2017.
http://country.eiu.com/article.aspx?articleid=165451600&Country=United States&topic=Economy&subtopic=Long-
term+outlook&subsubtopic=Summary#, accessed on January 12, 2018
66
OECD (2014), “Growth Prospects and Fiscal Requirements Over the Long Term”, OECD Economic Outlook, Volume
2017/2, Page 224
67
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/definition/inflation
68
Keown, Arthur; Martin, John; and Petty, J. William, (2014). Foundations of Finance: The Logic and Practice of
Financial Management, 8th Ed., Page 35
According to Damodaran, “An inflation-indexed Treasury security does not offer a guaranteed nominal
return to buyers, but instead provides a guaranteed real return.” 69
According to Cornell, “inflation is not considered explicitly when using the equity risk premium to
forecast long-run future stock returns because it is already included in the interest rates that go into the
calculation.” 70 Cornell continues, “When investors invest, their goal is to increase future consumption.
Consequently, the success of an investment is measured not in nominal dollars but real dollars…
investors are concerned with real returns, defined as the percent increase in purchasing power, not
nominal returns.” 71
The U.S. Treasury issues inflation-indexed securities. Comparing the inflation-indexed securities to the
non-inflation indexed securities, one can estimate the inflation rate. Using the 10-year, 20-year, and 30-
year securities, the department estimated the inflation rate between 1.74% and 1.91% as shown below. 72
The department used the expected inflation rate of 2.0% estimated by the Federal Reserve Bank in its
Monetary Policy Report 73. In this report, the Fed Board of Governors estimates the longer run personal
consumption expenditures (PCE) inflation rate at 2.0%
Given the indicated long-term growth rate of 2.5% and the expected inflation rate of 2.0%, the
department estimates the nominal growth rate at 4.5%.
The department plans to analyze the CBO estimate of expected inflation. This estimate will be available
April 9, 2018 (when the CBO’s Budget and Economic Outlook is published). We intend to re-review the
selected nominal growth rate used in the multistage DGM at that time.
Market-to-Book Ratios
The department analyzes market-to-book ratios of publicly traded stock and debt securities by market
segment, as data is available. This analysis indicates how the market perceives the value of these assets
relative to the book value. A market-to-book ratio below one indicates that there may be obsolescence
affecting that market segment; a ratio over one would indicate that there is no obsolescence.
69
Damodaran, Aswath, Dr. (2015). Applied Corporate Finance, 4th Ed., Page 90
70
Cornell, Bradford, (1999). The Equity Risk Premium, Page 29
71
Ibid. Page 31
72
Difference between inflation-indexed and non-inflation indexed securities for 10-year, 20-year, and 30-year daily rates,
averaged. Accessed on January 8, 2018 from www.federalreserve.gov
73
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Monetary Policy Report – February 2018, Part 3.
https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/2018-02-mpr-part3.htm
For more information, see each market segment’s Market-to-Book Ratio analysis in the appendices of
this report.
In addition to market-to-book ratios, the department reviewed the Houlihan Lokey 2016 Purchase Price
Allocation Study, published in September 2017. 74 Houlihan Lokey reviewed 455 transactions that closed
in 2016 where: the acquirer was a U.S. publicly traded company; the acquirer sought 50% or greater
ownership percentage; and the base equity purchase price was disclosed.
The Houlihan Lokey study reviews the amount of purchase consideration allocated to tangible assets,
identifiable intangible assets, and goodwill. The 2016 study finds that:
• Purchase consideration “is equivalent to the fair value of the total assets of the target” (p. 13).
• The median percentage of purchase consideration allocated to goodwill was 36% (p. 19).
• Larger transactions generally recorded lower allocations to intangible assets and higher
allocations to goodwill (p. 22).
• Sixty four percent of the transactions allocated 20% or more of purchase consideration to
goodwill (p. 47).
Representatives of the fluid transportation pipeline market segment noted that the industry is seeing an
increase to regulatory risk and regulatory costs that may affect the capitalization rate data inputs.
Representatives of the electric market segment noted that the federal tax reform announced in 2017 will
affect the cost of debt, cost of equity, and capital structure. Representatives of the electric market
segment also noted that the tax benefit of holding debt is eroding.
Attendees of the forum asked how we plan to use the actual debt analysis referenced in the department’s
Cost of Debt presentation. As we indicated at the forum, we analyzed the reliability of the actual and
indexed debt. We found the actual cost of debt to be more complete and reliable, so we decided to use
actual debt in this study (see the Current Actual Cost of Debt pages for each market segment)
Industry representatives also noted an upward shift to the yield on U.S. Treasury bonds and suggested
the department should consider selecting an average risk-free rate over a longer timeframe as opposed to
a risk-free rate selected from a specific date.
The department’s presentation at the forum included the intended list of guideline companies for each
market segment. Since the forum, we have further reviewed the guideline companies and decided:
74
Houlihan Lokey. (September 2017). 2016 Purchase Price Allocation Study Downloaded from
https://www.hl.com/us/insightsandideas/12884902608.aspx, accessed on October 11, 2017
• To add Holly Energy Partners LP and Enbridge Energy Partners LP in the fluid transportation
market segment.
For a complete list of guideline companies we reviewed, considered, and selected for this study, see
Appendix H.
Public Comment
The Minnesota Department of Revenue requests comments from all parties with an interest in or
information about any of the material in the 2018 Capitalization Rate Study. We posted the study on
April 10, 2018 on the department website (www.revenue.state.mn.us).
Please submit any comments you have about the study in writing to [email protected]. We will
accept comments through April 24, 2018. We will compile and review all written comments.
Questions?
If you have questions about the Draft 2018 Capitalization Rate Study, contact Jesse Larson at
651-556-6112 or [email protected].
Yield Rate
Capital Rate Composite
Structure
Long-Term Debt 32.00% 3.92% 1.25%
Common Equity 68.00% 8.23% 5.60%
Yield Rate 6.85%
Capital Structure
Company Value of Long- Value of Value of Total Market % Long- % Preferred % Common
Term Debt Preferred Common Equity Value Term Debt Equity Equity
Equity
Allete Inc. 1,444,600,000 None 4,014,269,102 5,458,869,102 26.46% 0.00% 73.54%
Alliant Energy Corp. 4,255,100,000 400,000,000 10,251,601,322 14,906,701,322 28.54% 2.68% 68.77%
Ameren Corp. 6,922,000,000 142,000,000 15,159,822,179 22,223,822,179 31.15% 0.64% 68.21%
American Electric Power Company Inc. 18,362,000,000 None 37,515,984,061 55,877,984,061 32.86% 0.00% 67.14%
Black Hills Corp. 3,109,900,000 None 2,867,842,107 5,977,742,107 52.02% 0.00% 47.98%
CenterPoint Energy Inc. 7,531,000,000 None 12,461,178,745 19,992,178,745 37.67% 0.00% 62.33%
CMS Energy Corp. 9,121,000,000 37,000,000 13,909,541,576 23,067,541,576 39.54% 0.16% 60.30%
DTE Energy Co. 11,795,000,000 None 20,513,279,204 32,308,279,204 36.51% 0.00% 63.49%
Entergy Corp. 14,000,000,000 203,200,000 14,984,299,464 29,187,499,464 47.97% 0.70% 51.34%
MGE Energy Inc. 389,400,000 None 2,225,709,354 2,615,109,354 14.89% 0.00% 85.11%
Northwestern Corp. 1,816,900,000 None 2,619,730,358 4,436,630,358 40.95% 0.00% 59.05%
OGE Energy Corp. 2,749,500,000 None 6,843,899,055 9,593,399,055 28.66% 0.00% 71.34%
Otter Tail Corp. 490,400,000 None 1,849,312,704 2,339,712,704 20.96% 0.00% 79.04%
Vectren Corp. 1,639,100,000 None 5,667,403,257 7,306,503,257 22.43% 0.00% 77.57%
WEC Energy Group 8,785,800,000 30,400,000 21,534,876,351 30,351,076,351 28.95% 0.10% 70.95%
Xcel Energy Inc. 14,573,000,000 None 22,996,580,880 37,569,580,880 38.79% 0.00% 61.21%
We selected the median capital structure as the indicated capital structure, rounding to 32% debt, 68% equity.
Notes:
Data downloaded from Value Line.
Mean 4.21
Median 4.38
Public Utility Bond Yield Averages from Mergent Bond Record, January 2018 Edition
Public Utility Bond Averages, December 2017
Notes:
None
Current Actual Cost of Debt The Yield-to-Maturities (YTMs) calculated below are based
off of information received via year-end filings (Form N-Q or
10-K) with the SEC. The 30-year YTMs are then calculated
Electric Company & Treasury HQM based off an observed spread to the Treasury High Quality
Yield Curves Market Corporate Bond spot rate curve (equation below) and
4.30 followed out to 30 years.
4.20
Yield to Maturity
4.10
4.00
3.90
3.80 Average of 30-Year YTMs
3.70 3.92%
3.60
3.50 Indicated Debt Rate 3.92%
2045 2046 2047 2048 2049
Year
1.00
Year
* The data behind the HQM yield curve can be found in Appendix G
Allete Inc. 1
3.11% 6/1/2027 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100.00 3.11%
Ameren Corp.
2.70% 11/15/2020 $ 300,000 $ 300,968 $ 100.32 2.58%
2.70% 9/1/2022 $ 600,000 $ 601,752 $ 100.29 2.63%
3.25% 3/1/2025 $ 370,000 $ 377,010 $ 101.89 2.95%
4.15% 3/15/2046 $ 125,000 $ 137,599 $ 110.08 3.58%
3.70% 12/1/2047 $ 500,000 $ 511,098 $ 102.22 3.58%
CMS Energy
3.45% 8/15/2027 $ 790,000 $ 796,750 $ 100.85 3.35%
4.88% 3/1/2044 $ 694,000 $ 810,127 $ 116.73 3.85%
Entergy Corp.
7.13% 2/1/2019 $ 225,000 $ 236,357 $ 105.05 2.34%
5.13% 9/15/2020 $ 200,000 $ 211,282 $ 105.64 2.93%
3.75% 2/15/2021 $ 125,000 $ 129,517 $ 103.61 2.54%
4.00% 7/15/2022 $ 200,000 $ 208,763 $ 104.38 2.96%
4.05% 9/1/2023 $ 200,000 $ 211,962 $ 105.98 2.90%
3.70% 6/1/2024 $ 175,000 $ 183,706 $ 104.97 2.84%
3.50% 4/1/2026 $ 600,000 $ 618,986 $ 103.16 3.06%
2.95% 9/1/2026 $ 300,000 $ 291,802 $ 97.27 3.32%
2.40% 10/1/2026 $ 200,000 $ 189,271 $ 94.64 3.11%
3.12% 9/1/2027 $ 200,000 $ 199,429 $ 99.71 3.15%
3.25% 4/1/2028 $ 200,000 $ 200,998 $ 100.50 3.19%
2.85% 6/1/2028 $ 200,000 $ 193,582 $ 96.79 3.22%
Northwestern Corp.
4.18% 11/15/2044 $ 200,000 $ 215,727 $ 107.86 3.71%
Vectren Corp. 4
3.26% 8/28/2032 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100.00 3.26%
3.93% 11/29/2047 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100.00 3.93%
1 On June 1, 2017, ALLETE issued $80.0 million of its senior unsecured notes (the Notes) to certain institutional buyers in the private placement
market. The Notes were issued in reliance on an exemption from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, to
institutional accredited investors. The Notes bear interest at 3.11 percent and mature on June 1, 2027. Interest on the Notes is payable semi-
annually in June and December of each year, commencing on December 1, 2017. ALLETE has the option to prepay all or a portion of the Notes at
its discretion, subject to a make-whole provision. The Notes are subject to additional terms and conditions which are customary for these types
of transactions. Proceeds from the sale of the Notes were used to redeem debt, fund corporate growth opportunities and for general corporate
purposes. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/66756/000006675618000029/ale12312017-
10k.htm#sD85C1EE07580C7A0020D0A5661099EB1
2 In October 2017, MGE issued $30 million of long-term unsecured debt to cover capital expenditures and other corporate obligations. The debt
carries an interest rate of 3.11% per annum, over its 10-year term. The covenants of these debt issuances are substantially consistent with MGE's
existing unsecured long-term debt.https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/61339/000116172818000003/f20171231.htm
3 On November 14, 2017, OTP entered into a Note Purchase Agreement (the 2018 Note Purchase Agreement) with the purchasers named therein,
pursuant to which OTP agreed to issue to the purchasers, in a private placement transaction, $100 million aggregate principal amount of OTP’s
4.07% Series 2018A Senior Unsecured Notes due February 7, 2048 (the 2018 Notes). The 2018 Notes were issued on February 7, 2018. Proceeds
from the 2018 Notes were used to repay $100 million in outstanding borrowings under the OTP Credit Agreement.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1466593/000143774918002843/ottr20171231_10k.htm
4 On July 14, 2017, (Vectren) Utility Holdings entered into a private placement Note Purchase Agreement pursuant to which institutional investors
agreed to purchase the following tranches of notes: (i) $100 million of 3.26 percent Guaranteed Senior Notes, Series A, due August 28, 2032 and
(ii) $100 million of 3.93 percent Guaranteed Senior Notes, Series B, due November 29, 2047. The notes are jointly and severally guaranteed by
Indiana Gas, SIGECO, and VEDO, wholly owned subsidiaries of Utility Holdings.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1096385/000109638518000021/vvc10k2017doc.htm
8.23%
0.0764
We established a range of acceptability for the cost of equity with all available models. We considered all of the data
and placed the most reliance on the Dividend Growth Model, Earnings Growth. The department placed secondary
reliance on the Capital Asset Pricing Models using Dr. Damodaran's and the Ex Post equity risk premiums.
Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) (ERP x β) + RFR = Indicated Equity Rate
Notes:
1 U.S. Treasury 20 year Coupon Bond Yield, Daily observations, December 29, 2017, www.federalreserve.gov
2 Long-horizon expected equity risk premium (historical), 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
3 Long-horizon expected equity risk premium (supply side), 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
4 3 Stage Dividend Growth Model, S&P 500, See Exhibit, Three Stage Ex Ante Calculation
5 Implied Equity Risk Premium on January 1, 2018 as determined by Dr. Aswath Damodaran; http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/
6 Duff & Phelps recommended equity risk premium (conditional) : The Duff & Phelps recommended ERP was developed in relation to (and
should be used in conjunction with) a 3.5% “normalized” risk-free rate. 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
7 Graham and Harvey Survey of U.S. Chief Financial Officers, The Equity Risk Premium in 2016
8 Fernandez, Pershin, and Acin Survey of Finance and Economic Professors, Analysts, and Managers, 2017
Empirical Capital Asset Pricing Model (ECAPM) (ERP x β x .75) + (ERP x .25) + RFR = Indicated Equity Rate
Notes:
1 U.S. Treasury 20 year Coupon Bond Yield, Daily observations, December 29, 2017, www.federalreserve.gov
2 Long-horizon expected equity risk premium (historical), 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
3 Long-horizon expected equity risk premium (supply side), 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
4 3 Stage Dividend Growth Model, S&P 500, See Exhibit, Three Stage Ex Ante Calculation
5 Implied Equity Risk Premium on January 1, 2018 as determined by Dr. Aswath Damodaran; http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/
6 Duff & Phelps recommended equity risk premium (conditional) : The Duff & Phelps recommended ERP was developed in relation to (and should be
used in conjunction with) a 3.5% “normalized” risk-free rate. 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
7 Graham and Harvey Survey of U.S. Chief Financial Officers, The Equity Risk Premium in 2016
8 Fernandez, Pershin, and Acin Survey of Finance and Economic Professors, Analysts, and Managers, 2017
We placed more reliance on the median to arrive at the indicated rates for DGM - Earnings Growth and DGM - Dividend Growth.
Notes:
Dividend Yield and growth rates provided by Value Line
D1 / P0 G1 Growth
g Stable
Company Dividend Estimate, next 0.67 x G1 .33 x g KE Cost of Equity
Growth
Yield five years
Allete Inc. 2.80% 5.00% 4.50% 3.35% 1.49% 7.64%
Alliant Energy Corp. 3.00% 6.00% 4.50% 4.02% 1.49% 8.51%
Ameren Corp. 3.00% 6.00% 4.50% 4.02% 1.49% 8.51%
American Electric Power Company Inc. 3.30% 4.00% 4.50% 2.68% 1.49% 7.47%
Black Hills Corp. 3.50% 7.50% 4.50% 5.03% 1.49% 10.01%
CenterPoint Energy Inc. 3.80% 6.00% 4.50% 4.02% 1.49% 9.31%
CMS Energy Corp. 2.90% 6.50% 4.50% 4.36% 1.49% 8.74%
DTE Energy Co. 3.10% 6.00% 4.50% 4.02% 1.49% 8.61%
Entergy Corp. 4.30% -2.50% 4.50% -1.68% 1.49% 4.11%
MGE Energy Inc. 2.00% 6.50% 4.50% 4.36% 1.49% 7.84%
Northwestern Corp. 4.10% 4.50% 4.50% 3.02% 1.49% 8.60%
OGE Energy Corp. 4.10% 6.00% 4.50% 4.02% 1.49% 9.61%
Otter Tail Corp. 2.80% 7.00% 4.50% 4.69% 1.49% 8.98%
Vectren Corp. 2.70% 6.50% 4.50% 4.36% 1.49% 8.54%
WEC Energy Group 3.20% 6.00% 4.50% 4.02% 1.49% 8.71%
Xcel Energy Inc. 3.40% 4.50% 4.50% 3.02% 1.49% 7.90%
Mean 8.32%
Median 8.57%
Multi-Stage DGM, Indicated Rate 8.57%
We placed the most reliance on the median to arrive at the indicated rate.
Notes:
Dividend Yield provided by Value Line
Growth Estimates, Next 5 Years for Earnings provided Value Line
Stable growth rate is the nominal growth rate determined in the Capitalization Rate Study Narrative (indicated long-term growth rate of the U.S. economy of 2.5%
plus the expected inflation rate of 2.0%).
Value Line
Company
P/E Ratio
Allete Inc. 23.8
Alliant Energy Corp. 23.1
Ameren Corp. 22.4
American Electric Power Company Inc. 20.1
Black Hills Corp. 16.2
CenterPoint Energy Inc. 21.6
CMS Energy Corp. 21.3
DTE Energy Co. 20.1
Entergy Corp. 16.9
MGE Energy Inc. 28.0
Northwestern Corp. 15.9
OGE Energy Corp. 18.0
Otter Tail Corp. 25.0
Vectren Corp. 25.2
WEC Energy Group 21.1
Xcel Energy Inc. 20.6
Mean 21.21
Median 21.20
Selected Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio 21.20
Notes:
The Price/Earnings Ratio was downloaded from Value Line.
Beta Analysis
Company Beta
Allete Inc. 0.80
Alliant Energy Corp. 0.70
Ameren Corp. 0.70
American Electric Power Company Inc. 0.65
Black Hills Corp. 0.90
CenterPoint Energy Inc. 0.90
CMS Energy Corp. 0.65
DTE Energy Co. 0.65
Entergy Corp. 0.65
MGE Energy Inc. 0.75
Northwestern Corp. 0.70
OGE Energy Corp. 0.95
Otter Tail Corp. 0.90
Vectren Corp. 0.75
WEC Energy Group 0.60
Xcel Energy Inc. 0.60
Electric Beta Mean 0.74
Electric Beta Median 0.70
Unlevered and Relevered Mean* 0.73
Indicated Beta 0.74
We considered the mean, median, and unlevered/relevered mean. We placed more reliance on the mean
when selecting the indicated beta.
Notes:
*See the Unlevering Relevering Beta page for the calculation
Unlevering/Relevering Betas
Value Line From Capital Structure Page From Capital Structure Page Value Line Formula
Actual Equity in Capital Levered Beta Unlevered
Unlevering of Betas Actual Income Tax Rate Actual Debt in Capital Structure
Structure (Published) Beta
Allete Inc. 20.00% 26.46% 73.54% 0.80 0.62
Alliant Energy Corp. 15.00% 28.54% 68.77% 0.70 0.52
Ameren Corp. 39.50% 31.15% 68.21% 0.70 0.55
American Electric Power Company Inc. 36.00% 32.86% 67.14% 0.65 0.49
Black Hills Corp. 30.00% 52.02% 47.98% 0.90 0.51
CenterPoint Energy Inc. 36.00% 37.67% 62.33% 0.90 0.65
CMS Energy Corp. 33.00% 39.54% 60.30% 0.65 0.45
DTE Energy Co. 24.50% 36.51% 63.49% 0.65 0.45
Entergy Corp. 6.00% 47.97% 51.34% 0.65 0.35
MGE Energy Inc. 35.00% 14.89% 85.11% 0.75 0.67
Northwestern Corp. 8.50% 40.95% 59.05% 0.70 0.43
OGE Energy Corp. 32.00% 28.66% 71.34% 0.95 0.75
Otter Tail Corp. 25.00% 20.96% 79.04% 0.90 0.75
Vectren Corp. 35.00% 22.43% 77.57% 0.75 0.63
WEC Energy Group 37.50% 28.95% 70.95% 0.60 0.48
Xcel Energy Inc. 35.50% 38.79% 61.21% 0.60 0.43
Average 0.74
Formula From Capital Structure Page From Capital Structure Page Formula
Industry Equity in Capital
Relevering of Betas Composite Income Tax Rate Industry Debt in Capital Structure Levered Beta
Structure
Allete Inc. 28.03% 32.00% 68.00% 0.83
Alliant Energy Corp. 28.03% 32.00% 68.00% 0.70
Ameren Corp. 28.03% 32.00% 68.00% 0.74
American Electric Power Company Inc. 28.03% 32.00% 68.00% 0.66
Black Hills Corp. 28.03% 32.00% 68.00% 0.68
CenterPoint Energy Inc. 28.03% 32.00% 68.00% 0.87
CMS Energy Corp. 28.03% 32.00% 68.00% 0.60
DTE Energy Co. 28.03% 32.00% 68.00% 0.60
Entergy Corp. 28.03% 32.00% 68.00% 0.47
MGE Energy Inc. 28.03% 32.00% 68.00% 0.90
Northwestern Corp. 28.03% 32.00% 68.00% 0.58
OGE Energy Corp. 28.03% 32.00% 68.00% 1.00
Otter Tail Corp. 28.03% 32.00% 68.00% 1.00
Vectren Corp. 28.03% 32.00% 68.00% 0.84
WEC Energy Group 28.03% 32.00% 68.00% 0.64
Xcel Energy Inc. 28.03% 32.00% 68.00% 0.58
Average 0.73
Market Value estimates for Common Equity are from Value Line. Market Value Estimates for Long-Term Debt are from the company's 10-K.
Yield Rate
Capital Rate Composite
Structure
Long-Term Debt 28.50% 4.03% 1.15%
Common Equity 71.50% 8.10% 5.79%
Yield Rate 6.94%
Capital Structure
Company Value of Long- Value of Value of Total Market % Long- % Preferred % Common
Term Debt Preferred Common Value Term Debt Equity Equity
Equity Equity
Atmos Energy Corp. 3,066,700,000 None 9,451,505,260 12,518,205,260 24.50% N/A 75.50%
Chesapeake Utilities Corp. 201,200,000 None 1,336,975,356 1,538,175,356 13.08% N/A 86.92%
New Jersey Resources Corp. 897,700,000 None 3,833,662,682 4,731,362,682 18.97% N/A 81.03%
NiSource Inc. 7,518,600,000 None 9,123,741,143 16,642,341,143 45.18% N/A 54.82%
Northwest Natural Gas Co. 757,400,000 None 1,899,368,390 2,656,768,390 28.51% N/A 71.49%
RGC Resources Inc. 53,100,000 None 190,840,209 243,940,209 21.77% N/A 78.23%
South Jersey Industries 1,180,300,000 None 2,576,594,701 3,756,894,701 31.42% N/A 68.58%
Southwest Gas Holdings Inc. 1,732,000,000 None 3,920,216,019 5,652,216,019 30.64% N/A 69.36%
Spire Inc. 1,995,000,000 None 3,774,468,296 5,769,468,296 34.58% N/A 65.42%
We selected the median capital structure as the indicated capital structure, rounding to 28.50% and 71.50%.
Notes:
Data downloaded from Value Line.
Mean 4.69
Median 4.19
Public Utility Bond Yield Averages from Mergent Bond Record, January 2018 Edition
Public Utility Bond Averages, December 2017
Notes:
Not rated companies or companies who's debt rate was not available were excluded.
*This company is rated below the Mergent Bond Record Bond Yield Averages. We analyzed the
Mergent Bond Record, January 2018 issue, for U.S. Corporate Bonds that were considered below
investment grade. We determined the average B yield to maturity is 8.53%.
Gas Distribution Company & The Yield-to-Maturities (YTMs) calculated below are based
off of information received via year-end filings (Form N-Q or
Treasury HQM Yield Curves 10-K) with the SEC. The 30-year YTMs are then calculated
based off an observed spread to the Treasury High Quality
5.00
Market Corporate Bond spot rate curve (equation below)
4.80
and followed out to 30 years.
4.60
Yield to Maturity
4.40
4.20
4.00
3.80
3.60
3.40
3.20 Average of 30-Year YTMs
3.00 4.03%
2045 2046 2047 2048 2049
Year Indicated Debt Rate 4.03%
Treasury HQM
5.00
Yield to Maturity
4.00
Graphed Above
3.00
2.00
1.00
Year
* The data behind the HQM yield curve can be found in Appendix G
Redemption Settlement
Periodicity
Price Date
Semi-Annual $ 100.00 1/4/2018
NiSource Inc.
2.65% 11/17/2022 150,000 148,848 $ 99.23 2.82%
3.49% 5/15/2027 12,542 12,684 $ 101.13 3.35%
5.95% 6/15/2041 100,000 128,125 $ 128.13 4.08%
5.25% 2/15/2043 200,000 239,292 $ 119.65 4.00%
4.80% 2/15/2044 150,000 169,655 $ 113.10 3.99%
5.65% 2/1/2045 815,000 1,019,699 $ 125.12 4.10%
3.95% 3/30/2048 200,000 204,680 $ 102.34 3.82%
Spire Inc.6
3.92% 1/15/2048 1,000,000 1,000,000 $ 100.00 3.92%
4.02% 1/15/2058 1,000,000 1,000,000 $ 100.00 4.02%
1 In May 2016, Prudential agreed to purchase $70.0 million of 3.25 percent Prudential Shelf Notes, which were issued on April 21, 2017. The
proceeds received from this issuance of Prudential Shelf Notes were used to reduce short-term borrowings under the Revolver. The balance
under the Revolver had accumulated over time as capital expenditures were temporarily financed. As of December 31, 2017, $80 million
remains available for issuance under the Prudential Shelf Agreement In November 2017, NYL agreed to purchase $50.0 million of 3.48% "Series
A" notes and $50.0 million of 3.58% "Series B" notes. The Series A notes and Series B notes will be issued on or before May 21, 2018 and
November 20, 2018, respectively. The proceeds received from these issuances will be used to reduce short-term borrowings under the Revolver,
lines of credit and/or to fund capital expenditures. The NYL Shelf Agreement has been fully utilized.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/19745/000162828018002594/cpk1231201710-k.htm#s8735FBA2DA6A5707B145DAB5B916D8E3
2 On January 26, 2018, NJR entered into a variable-for-fixed interest rate swap on NJR's existing $100 million variable rate term loan due August
16, 2019, which fixed the variable rate at 2.84 percent.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/356309/000035630918000056/njr10qdec2017.htm
3 (Northwest Natural Gas Co) issued $100.0 million of FMBs in September 2017 consisting of $25.0 million with a coupon rate of 2.822% and
maturity date in 2027 and $75 million with a coupon rate of 3.685% and maturity date in 2047. The issuance of FMBs, which includes our
medium-term notes, under the Mortgage and Deed of Trust (Mortgage) is limited by eligible property, adjusted net earnings, and other
provisions of the Mortgage. The Mortgage constitutes a first mortgage lien on substantially all of our utility
property.https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/73020/000007302018000008/form10-k2017.htm
4 On October 2, 2017, Roanoke Gas issued ten-year unsecured notes in the principal amount of $8,000,000 with a fixed interest rate of 3.58% per
annum. The proceeds from the notes were used to convert a portion of the Company's line-of-credit balance into longer-term financing.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1069533/000106953318000007/a10q-20171231xq1.htm
5 In January 2017, SJG issued $200.0 million aggregate principal amount of MTN's, Series E, 2017, due January 2047, with principal repayments
beginning in 2025. The MTN's bear interest at an annual rate of 3.0% payable semiannually. Proceeds were used to pay down the $200.0 million
multiple-draw term facility referenced in (M) below, which was set to expire in June 2017.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/91928/000009192818000038/sji-12311710xk.htm#sAC74E596849956569740E1884B49320D
6 On December 1, 2017, Spire Alabama entered into the First Supplement to Master Note Purchase Agreement with certain institutional
investors. Pursuant to the terms of that supplement, on December 1, 2017, Spire Alabama issued and sold $30.0 million in aggregate principal
amount of its 4.02% Series 2017A Senior Notes due January 15, 2058, and on January 12, 2018, issued and sold $45.0 million aggregate principal
amount of its 3.92% Series 2017B Senior Notes due January 15, 2048, to those institutional investors. The notes bear interest from the date of
issuance, payable semi-annually on the 15th day of July and January of each year, commencing on July 15, 2018. The notes are senior unsecured
obligations of Spire Alabama, rank equal in right to payment with all its other senior unsecured indebtedness, and have make-whole call
options. Spire Alabama used the proceeds from the sale of the notes to repay short-term debt and for general corporate purposes.
8.10%
0.0754
We established a range of acceptability for the cost of equity with all available models. We considered all of the
data and placed the most reliance on the Dividend Growth Model, Earnings Growth. The department placed
secondary reliance on the Capital Asset Pricing Models using Dr. Damodaran's and the Ex Post equity risk
premiums.
Notes:
1 U.S. Treasury 20 year Coupon Bond Yield, Daily observations, December 29, 2017, www.federalreserve.gov
2 Long-horizon expected equity risk premium (historical), 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
3 Long-horizon expected equity risk premium (supply side), 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
4 3 Stage Dividend Growth Model, S&P 500, See Exhibit, Three Stage Ex Ante Calculation
5 Implied Equity Risk Premium on January 1, 2018 as determined by Dr. Aswath Damodaran; http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/
6 Duff & Phelps recommended equity risk premium (conditional) : The Duff & Phelps recommended ERP was developed in relation to (and
should be used in conjunction with) a 3.5% “normalized” risk-free rate. 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
7 Graham and Harvey Survey of U.S. Chief Financial Officers, The Equity Risk Premium in 2016
8 Fernandez, Pershin, and Acin Survey of Finance and Economic Professors, Analysts, and Managers, 2017
Model Equity risk x Industry x 75% = Industry Risk Equity risk x 25% Equity Risk + Risk-Free Indicated
premium Beta (β) Premium premium Premium Rate1 (RFR) Equity Rate
(ERP) (weighted) (ERP) (weighted)
Ex Post2 7.07% 0.70 75% 3.71% 7.07% 25% 1.77% 2.58% 8.06%
Supply Side3 6.04% 0.70 75% 3.17% 6.04% 25% 1.51% 2.58% 7.26%
Three Stage Ex Ante
Model4 5.77% 0.70 75% 3.03% 5.77% 25% 1.44% 2.58% 7.05%
Dr. Damodaran Equity
Risk Premium5 5.08% 0.70 75% 2.67% 5.08% 25% 1.27% 2.58% 6.52%
Duff & Phelps6 5.00% 0.70 75% 2.63% 5.00% 25% 1.25% 2.58% 6.46%
Graham and Harvey7 4.02% 0.70 75% 2.11% 4.02% 25% 1.01% 2.58% 5.70%
Fernandez, Pershin and
Acin8 5.70% 0.70 75% 2.99% 5.70% 25% 1.43% 2.58% 7.00%
Notes:
1 U.S. Treasury 20 year Coupon Bond Yield, Daily observations, December 29, 2017, www.federalreserve.gov
2 Long-horizon expected equity risk premium (historical), 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
3 Long-horizon expected equity risk premium (supply side), 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
4 3 Stage Dividend Growth Model, S&P 500, See Exhibit, Three Stage Ex Ante Calculation
5 Implied Equity Risk Premium on January 1, 2018 as determined by Dr. Aswath Damodaran; http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/
6 Duff & Phelps recommended equity risk premium (conditional) : The Duff & Phelps recommended ERP was developed in relation to (and should be used in conjunction with) a 3.5%
“normalized” risk-free rate. 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
7 Graham and Harvey Survey of U.S. Chief Financial Officers, The Equity Risk Premium in 2016
8 Fernandez, Pershin, and Acin Survey of Finance and Economic Professors, Analysts, and Managers, 2017
We placed equal reliance on the mean and median to arrive at the indicated rates for DGM - Earnings Growth and DGM - Dividend
Growth.
Notes:
Dividend Yield provided by Value Line
RGC Resources, Inc. do not have analysts estimates and, therefore, the companies were not included in the mean or median. They are
still shown.
Notes:
Dividend Yield provided by Value Line
Growth Estimates, Next 5 Years for Earnings provided Value Line
Stable growth rate is the nominal growth rate determined in the Capitalization Rate Study Narrative (indicated long-term growth rate of the U.S. economy of
2.5% plus the expected inflation rate of 2.0%).
We removed the below companies because they do not have growth estimates available through Value Line
RGC Resources Inc. 2.20% N/A
Mean 25.46
Median 24.90
Selected Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio 24.90
Notes:
The Price/Earnings Ratio was downloaded from Value Line.
* Trailing P/E Ratio
Beta Analysis
Company Beta
Atmos Energy Corp. 0.70
Chesapeake Utilities Corp. 0.70
New Jersey Resources Corp. 0.80
NiSource Inc. 0.60
Northwest Natural Gas Co. 0.70
RGC Resources Inc. 0.45
South Jersey Industries 0.85
Southwest Gas Holdings Inc. 0.80
Spire Inc. 0.70
We considered the mean, median, and unlevered/relevered mean. We placed more reliance on the median when
selecting the indicated beta to account for the wide range of betas.
Notes:
* See the Unlevering Relevering Beta page for the calculation
Unlevering/Relevering Betas
Value Line From Capital Structure Page From Capital Structure Page Value Line Formula
Unlevering of Betas Actual Income Tax Rate Actual Debt in Capital Structure Actual Equity in Capital Structure Levered Beta (Published) Unlevered Beta
Atmos Energy Corp. 36.60% 24.50% 75.50% 0.70 0.58
Chesapeake Utilities Corp. 39.50% 13.08% 86.92% 0.70 0.64
New Jersey Resources Corp. 32.00% 18.97% 81.03% 0.80 0.69
NiSource Inc. 35.50% 45.18% 54.82% 0.60 0.39
Northwest Natural Gas Co. 35.00% 28.51% 71.49% 0.70 0.56
RGC Resources Inc. 38.70% 21.77% 78.23% 0.45 0.38
South Jersey Industries 25.00% 31.42% 68.58% 0.85 0.63
Southwest Gas Holdings Inc. 35.00% 30.64% 69.36% 0.80 0.62
Spire Inc. 32.40% 34.58% 65.42% 0.70 0.52
Average 0.70
Formula From Capital Structure Page From Capital Structure Page Formula
Relevering of Betas Composite Income Tax Rate Industry Debt in Capital Structure Industry Equity in Capital Structure Levered Beta
Atmos Energy Corp. 34.41% 28.50% 71.50% 0.73
Chesapeake Utilities Corp. 34.41% 28.50% 71.50% 0.81
New Jersey Resources Corp. 34.41% 28.50% 71.50% 0.87
NiSource Inc. 34.41% 28.50% 71.50% 0.49
Northwest Natural Gas Co. 34.41% 28.50% 71.50% 0.71
RGC Resources Inc. 34.41% 28.50% 71.50% 0.48
South Jersey Industries 34.41% 28.50% 71.50% 0.79
Southwest Gas Holdings Inc. 34.41% 28.50% 71.50% 0.78
Spire Inc. 34.41% 28.50% 71.50% 0.66
Average 0.70
Market Value estimates are from the Capital Structure page of the Capitalization Rate Study.
Book Value amounts are from the company's balance sheet as listed in the 10-K or Annual Report.
Yield Rate
Capital Structure Rate Composite
Capital Structure
Company Value of Long- Value of Value of Total Market % Long- % Preferred % Common
Term Debt Preferred Common Equity Value Term Equity Equity
Equity Debt
Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP 3,585,700,000 N/A 3,579,243,983 7,164,943,983 50.05% N/A 49.95%
Enterprise Products Partners, LP 21,709,900,000 N/A 52,870,376,396 74,580,276,396 29.11% N/A 70.89%
Kinder Morgan Inc. 34,000,000,000 N/A 38,099,067,132 72,099,067,132 47.16% N/A 52.84%
TC PipeLines, LP 2,427,000,000 None 3,617,112,000 6,044,112,000 40.15% None 59.85%
Williams Partners, LP 16,000,000,000 N/A 33,917,762,569 49,917,762,569 32.05% N/A 67.95%
We placed equal reliance on the mean and median when selecting the indicated capital structure, rounding to 40% debt, 60% equity.
Notes:
Data downloaded from Value Line.
Mean 4.94
Median 4.50
Industrial Bond Yield Averages from Mergent Bond Record, January 2018 Edition
Industrial Bond Averages, December 2017
Notes:
*This company is rated below the Mergent Bond Record Bond Yield Averages. We analyzed the Mergent Bond
Record, January 2018 issue, for U.S. Corporate Bonds that were considered below investment grade. We
determined the average Ba yield to maturity is 6.71%.
4.50
4.30
4.10
3.90
3.70 Average of 30-Year YTMs
3.50 4.56%
2045 2046 2047 2048 2049
Year Indicated Debt Rate 4.56%
5.00
Yield to Maturity
4.00
Graphed Above
3.00
2.00
1.00
Year
* The data behind the HQM yield curve can be found in Appendix G
Redemption Settlement
Periodicity
Price Date
Semi-Annual $ 100.00 1/4/2018
Boardwalk Pipelines, LP
5.75% 9/15/2019 $ 200,000 $ 209,615 $ 104.81 2.83%
3.38% 2/1/2023 $ 200,000 $ 199,084 $ 99.54 3.47%
5.95% 6/1/2026 $ 200,000 $ 223,035 $ 111.52 4.30%
4.45% 7/15/2027 $ 6,362,000 $ 6,427,000 $ 101.02 4.32%
Model Rate
CAPM - Ex Post 11.77%
CAPM - Supply Side 10.43%
CAPM - Three Stage Ex Ante 10.08%
CAPM - Damodaran 9.18%
CAPM - Duff & Phelps 9.08%
CAPM - Graham and Harvey 7.81%
CAPM - Fernandez, Pershin, and Acin 9.99%
Empirical CAPM - Ex Post 11.24%
Empirical CAPM - Supply Side 9.98%
Empirical CAPM - Three Stage Ex Ante 9.65%
Empirical CAPM - Damodaran 8.80%
Empirical CAPM - Duff & Phelps 8.71%
Empirical CAPM - Graham and Harvey 7.51%
Empirical CAPM - Fernandez, Pershin, and Acin 9.57%
Dividend Growth Model 12.50%
Multi-Stage DGM 14.65%
Indicated Rate of Equity 11.45%
0.1145
We established a range of acceptability for the cost of equity with all available models. We considered all of the data and
placed the most reliance on the Capital Asset Pricing Models using Dr. Damodaran's and the Ex Post equity risk premiums. The
department placed secondary reliance on the Dividend Growth Model.
Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) (ERP x β) + RFR = Indicated Equity Rate
Notes:
1 U.S. Treasury 20 year Coupon Bond Yield, Daily observations, December 29, 2017, www.federalreserve.gov
2 Long-horizon expected equity risk premium (historical), 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
3 Long-horizon expected equity risk premium (supply side), 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
4 3 Stage Dividend Growth Model, S&P 500, See Exhibit, Three Stage Ex Ante Calculation
5 Implied Equity Risk Premium on January 1, 2018 as determined by Dr. Aswath Damodaran; http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/
6 Duff & Phelps recommended equity risk premium (conditional) : The Duff & Phelps recommended ERP was developed in relation to (and
should be used in conjunction with) a 3.5% “normalized” risk-free rate. 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
7 Graham and Harvey Survey of U.S. Chief Financial Officers, The Equity Risk Premium in 2016
8 Fernandez, Pershin, and Acin Survey of Finance and Economic Professors, Analysts, and Managers, 2017
Model Equity risk x Industry x 75% = Industry Risk Equity risk x 25% Equity Risk + Risk-Free Indicated
premium Beta (β) Premium premium Premium Rate1 (RFR) Equity Rate
(ERP) (weighted) (ERP) (weighted)
Ex Post2 7.07% 1.30 75% 6.89% 7.07% 25% 1.77% 2.58% 11.24%
Supply Side3 6.04% 1.30 75% 5.89% 6.04% 25% 1.51% 2.58% 9.98%
Three Stage Ex Ante
Model4 5.77% 1.30 75% 5.63% 5.77% 25% 1.44% 2.58% 9.65%
Dr. Damodaran Equity
Risk Premium5 5.08% 1.30 75% 4.95% 5.08% 25% 1.27% 2.58% 8.80%
Duff & Phelps6 5.00% 1.30 75% 4.88% 5.00% 25% 1.25% 2.58% 8.71%
Graham and Harvey7 4.02% 1.30 75% 3.92% 4.02% 25% 1.01% 2.58% 7.51%
Fernandez, Pershin and
Acin8 5.70% 1.30 75% 5.56% 5.70% 25% 1.43% 2.58% 9.57%
Notes:
1 U.S. Treasury 20 year Coupon Bond Yield, Daily observations, December 29, 2017, www.federalreserve.gov
2 Long-horizon expected equity risk premium (historical), 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
3 Long-horizon expected equity risk premium (supply side), 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
4 3 Stage Dividend Growth Model, S&P 500, See Exhibit, Three Stage Ex Ante Calculation
5 Implied Equity Risk Premium on January 1, 2018 as determined by Dr. Aswath Damodaran; http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/
6 Duff & Phelps recommended equity risk premium (conditional) : The Duff & Phelps recommended ERP was developed in relation to (and should be used in conjunction with) a 3.5%
“normalized” risk-free rate. 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
7 Graham and Harvey Survey of U.S. Chief Financial Officers, The Equity Risk Premium in 2016
8 Fernandez, Pershin, and Acin Survey of Finance and Economic Professors, Analysts, and Managers, 2017
Given the wide range of growth estimates, we selected the median as the indicated rate.
Notes:
Dividend Yield provided by Value Line
Growth Estimates, Next 5 Years for Earnings provided Yahoo Finance
Notes:
Dividend Yield provided by Value Line
Growth Estimates, Next 5 Years for Earnings provided Yahoo Finance
Stable growth rate is the nominal growth rate determined in the Capitalization Rate Study Narrative (indicated long-term growth rate of the U.S. economy of
2.5% plus the expected inflation rate of 2.0%).
Mean 17.86
Median 17.70
Selected Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio 17.70
We placed most reliance on the median when selecting the price to earnings ratio given the wide range of values.
Notes:
The Price to Earnings Ratio was downloaded from Value Line.
*Trailing P/E Ratio
Beta Analysis
Company Beta
Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP 1.00
Enterprise Products Partners, LP 1.30
Kinder Morgan Inc. 1.45
TC PipeLines, LP 1.15
Williams Partners, LP 1.55
We considered the mean and median, placing more reliance on the median when selecting the indicated beta. We
unlevered and relevered the betas (see the Unelevering Relevering Beta page). However, the income tax data is not
reliable for this market segment and we did not give weight to the unlevered relevered mean.
Notes:
* See the Unlevering Relevering Beta page for the calculation
Unlevering/Relevering Betas
Value Line From Capital Structure Page From Capital Structure Page Value Line Formula
Unlevering of Betas Actual Income Tax Actual Debt in Capital Actual Equity in Capital Levered Beta Unlevered Beta
Rate Structure Structure (Published)
Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP 0.20% 50.05% 49.95% 1.00 0.50
Enterprise Products Partners, LP 1.00% 29.11% 70.89% 1.30 0.92
Kinder Morgan Inc. 15.50% 47.16% 52.84% 1.45 0.83
TC PipeLines, LP --- 40.15% 59.85% 1.15 N/A
Williams Partners, LP 2.00% 32.05% 67.95% 1.55 1.06
Average 1.29
Formula From Capital Structure Page From Capital Structure Page Formula
Relevering of Betas Composite Income Debt in Capital Structure Equity in Capital Structure Levered Beta
Tax Rate
Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP 4.68% 40.00% 60.00% 0.82
Enterprise Products Partners, LP 4.68% 40.00% 60.00% 1.50
Kinder Morgan Inc. 4.68% 40.00% 60.00% 1.36
TC PipeLines, LP 4.68% 40.00% 60.00% N/A
Williams Partners, LP 4.68% 40.00% 60.00% 1.73
Average 1.35
Calculation of Market to Book Ratios for the Gas Transmission Market Segment
December 31, 2017 calendar year information for the January 2, 2018 Assessment
A market to book ratio over one would be an indication of no obsolescence.
Market Value estimates for Common Equity are from Value Line. Market Value Estimates for Long-Term Debt are from the company's Annual Report or 10-K.
Book Value amounts are from the company's balance sheet as listed in the 10-K or Annual Report.
Yield Rate
Capital Rate Composite
Structure
Long-Term Debt 41.00% 4.81% 1.97%
Common Equity 59.00% 12.57% 7.42%
Yield Rate 9.39%
Capital Structure
Company Value of Long- Value of Value of Total Market % Long- % Preferred % Common
Term Debt Preferred Common Equity Value Term Debt Equity Equity
Equity
Buckeye Partners, LP 4,593,600,000 N/A 6,952,389,907 11,545,989,907 39.79% N/A 60.21%
Enbridge Energy Partners, LP 6,835,000,000 N/A 4,332,882,050 11,167,882,050 61.20% N/A 38.80%
Holly Energy Partners, LP 1,245,100,000 None 2,045,985,959 3,291,085,959 37.83% N/A 62.17%
Magellan Midstream Partners, LP 4,051,400,000 N/A 14,817,035,649 18,868,435,649 21.47% N/A 78.53%
NuStar Energy, LP 3,232,600,000 None 2,630,944,960 5,863,544,960 55.13% N/A 44.87%
Plains All American Pipeline 10,489,000,000 N/A 14,569,049,782 25,058,049,782 41.86% N/A 58.14%
Given the wide range in capital structures, we selected the median capital structure as the indicated capital structure, rounding to 41% debt, 59% equity.
Notes:
Data downloaded from Value Line
Mean 5.61
Median 5.61
Industrial Bond Yield Averages from Mergent Bond Record, January 2018 Edition
Industrial Bond Averages, December 2017
Notes:
* These companies are rated below the Mergent Bond Record Bond Yield Averages. We analyzed the Mergent
Bond Record, January 2018 issue, for U.S. Corporate Bonds that were considered below investment grade. We
determined the average Ba yield to maturity is 6.71%.
Current Actual Cost of Debt The Yield-to-Maturities (YTMs) calculated below are based
off of information received via year-end filings (Form N-Q or
10-K) with the SEC. The 30-year YTMs are then calculated
Fluid Transp. Pipeline Company & based off an observed spread to the Treasury High Quality
Treasury HQM Yield Curves Market Corporate Bond spot rate curve (equation below)
and followed out to 30 years.
6.00
5.50
Yield to Maturity
5.00
4.50
Average of 30-Year YTMs
4.00 4.81%
5.00
4.00
Graphed Above
3.00
2.00
1.00
Year
* The data behind the HQM yield curve can be found in Appendix G
Redemption Settlement
Periodicity
Price Date
Semi-Annual $ 100.00 1/4/2018
Buckeye Partners, LP
2.65% 11/15/2018 $ 200,000 $ 200,577 $ 100.29 2.31%
4.88% 2/1/2021 $ 200,000 $ 210,343 $ 105.17 3.10%
4.35% 10/15/2024 $ 200,000 $ 204,046 $ 102.02 4.01%
3.95% 12/1/2026 $ 300,000 $ 294,793 $ 98.26 4.19%
4.13% 12/1/2027 $ 500,000 $ 491,000 $ 98.20 4.35%
5.85% 11/15/2043 $ 200,000 $ 215,254 $ 107.63 5.30%
5.60% 10/15/2044 $ 100,000 $ 104,992 $ 104.99 5.25%
Enbridge Inc. / Enbridge Energy Partners, LP
9.88% 3/1/2019 $ 4,325,000 $ 4,702,000 $ 108.72 2.21%
5.20% 3/15/2020 $ 7,942,000 $ 8,355,000 $ 105.20 2.74%
4.38% 10/15/2020 $ 7,870,000 $ 8,229,000 $ 104.56 2.66%
4.20% 9/15/2021 $ 7,869,000 $ 8,205,000 $ 104.27 2.97%
2.90% 7/15/2022 $ 8,450,000 $ 8,422,000 $ 99.67 2.98%
4.00% 10/1/2023 $ 4,505,000 $ 4,675,000 $ 103.77 3.27%
3.50% 6/10/2024 $ 6,834,000 $ 6,890,000 $ 100.82 3.36%
5.88% 10/15/2025 $ 6,825,000 $ 7,736,000 $ 113.35 3.87%
4.25% 12/1/2026 $ 14,625,000 $ 15,294,000 $ 104.57 3.64%
3.70% 7/15/2027 $ 13,007,000 $ 13,008,000 $ 100.01 3.70%
7.50% 4/15/2038 $ 1,373,000 $ 1,747,000 $ 127.24 5.29%
5.50% 9/15/2040 $ 733,000 $ 782,000 $ 106.68 5.00%
4.50% 6/10/2044 $ 700,000 $ 708,000 $ 101.14 4.43%
7.38% 10/15/2045 $ 625,000 $ 817,000 $ 130.72 5.26%
5.50% 12/1/2046 $ 1,700,000 $ 1,963,000 $ 115.47 4.53%
Holly Frontier / Holly Energy Partners, LP
5.88% 4/1/2026 $ 11,809,000 $ 13,073,000 $ 110.70 4.32%
12.57%
We established a range of acceptability for the cost of equity with all available models. We considered all of the data and
placed the most reliance on the Capital Asset Pricing Models using Dr. Damodaran's and the Ex Post equity risk premiums.
The department placed secondary reliance on the Dividend Growth Model, Earnings Growth.
Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) (ERP x β) + RFR = Indicated Equity Rate
Notes:
1 U.S. Treasury 20 year Coupon Bond Yield, Daily observations, December 29, 2017, www.federalreserve.gov
2 Long-horizon expected equity risk premium (historical), 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
3 Long-horizon expected equity risk premium (supply side), 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
4 3 Stage Dividend Growth Model, S&P 500, See Exhibit, Three Stage Ex Ante Calculation
5 Implied Equity Risk Premium on January 1, 2018 as determined by Dr. Aswath Damodaran; http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/
6 Duff & Phelps recommended equity risk premium (conditional) : The Duff & Phelps recommended ERP was developed in relation to (and
should be used in conjunction with) a 3.5% “normalized” risk-free rate. 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
7 Graham and Harvey Survey of U.S. Chief Financial Officers, The Equity Risk Premium in 2016
8 Fernandez, Pershin, and Acin Survey of Finance and Economic Professors, Analysts, and Managers, 2017
Empirical Capital Asset Pricing Model (ECAPM) (ERP x β x .75) + (ERP x .25) + RFR = Indicated Equity Rate
Model Equity risk x Industry x 75% = Industry Risk Equity risk x 25% Equity Risk + Risk-Free Indicated
premium Beta (β) Premium premium Premium Rate1 (RFR) Equity Rate
(ERP) (weighted) (ERP) (weighted)
Ex Post2 7.07% 1.25 75% 6.63% 7.07% 25% 1.77% 2.58% 10.98%
Supply Side3 6.04% 1.25 75% 5.66% 6.04% 25% 1.51% 2.58% 9.75%
Three Stage Ex Ante
Model4 5.77% 1.25 75% 5.41% 5.77% 25% 1.44% 2.58% 9.43%
Dr. Damodaran Equity
Risk Premium5 5.08% 1.25 75% 4.76% 5.08% 25% 1.27% 2.58% 8.61%
Duff & Phelps6 5.00% 1.25 75% 4.69% 5.00% 25% 1.25% 2.58% 8.52%
Graham and Harvey7 4.02% 1.25 75% 3.77% 4.02% 25% 1.01% 2.58% 7.36%
Fernandez, Pershin and
Acin8 5.70% 1.25 75% 5.34% 5.70% 25% 1.43% 2.58% 9.35%
Notes:
1 U.S. Treasury 20 year Coupon Bond Yield, Daily observations, December 29, 2017, www.federalreserve.gov
2 Long-horizon expected equity risk premium (historical), 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
3 Long-horizon expected equity risk premium (supply side), 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
4 3 Stage Dividend Growth Model, S&P 500, See Exhibit, Three Stage Ex Ante Calculation
5 Implied Equity Risk Premium on January 1, 2018 as determined by Dr. Aswath Damodaran; http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/
6 Duff & Phelps recommended equity risk premium (conditional) : The Duff & Phelps recommended ERP was developed in relation to (and should be used in conjunction
with) a 3.5% “normalized” risk-free rate. 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
7 Graham and Harvey Survey of U.S. Chief Financial Officers, The Equity Risk Premium in 2016
8 Fernandez, Pershin, and Acin Survey of Finance and Economic Professors, Analysts, and Managers, 2017
Given the wide range of growth rates, we selected the median as the indicated rate.
Notes:
Dividend Yield provided by Value Line
Growth Estimates, Next 5 Years for Earnings provided Yahoo Finance
We placed the most reliance on the median to arrive at the indicated rate.
Notes:
Dividend Yield provided by Value Line
Growth Estimates, Next 5 Years for Earnings provided Yahoo Finance
Stable growth rate is the nominal growth rate determined in the Capitalization Rate Study Narrative (indicated long-term growth rate of the U.S. economy of 2.5%
plus the expected inflation rate of 2.0%).
Mean 19.70
Median 18.05
Selected Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio 18.05
We selected the median as the price to earnings ratio given the wide range of values.
Notes:
The Price/Earnings Ratio was downloaded from Value Line.
*Trailing P/E Ratio
Beta Analysis
Company Beta
Buckeye Partners, LP 1.20
Enbridge Energy Partners, LP 1.30
Holly Energy Partners, LP 1.00
Magellan Midstream Partners, LP 1.20
NuStar Energy, LP 1.30
Plains All American Pipeline 1.50
We considered the mean and median, placing more reliance on the median when selecting the indicated beta given
the wide range of betas. We unlevered and relevered the betas (see the Unlevering Relevering Beta page).
However, the income tax data is not reliable for this market segment and we did not give significant reliance to the
unlevered relevered mean.
Notes:
* See the Unlevering Relevering Beta page for the calculation
Unlevering/Relevering Betas
Value Line From Capital Structure Page From Capital Structure Page Value Line Formula
Unlevering of Betas Actual Income Tax Rate Actual Debt in Capital Structure Actual Equity in Capital Structure Levered Beta (Published) Unlevered Beta
Buckeye Partners, LP 0.50% 39.79% 60.21% 1.20 0.72
Enbridge Energy Partners, LP 5.00% 61.20% 38.80% 1.30 0.52
Holly Energy Partners, LP 0.20% 37.83% 62.17% 1.00 0.62
Magellan Midstream Partners, LP 0.50% 21.47% 78.53% 1.20 0.94
NuStar Energy, LP 14.70% 55.13% 44.87% 1.30 0.63
Plains All American Pipeline 3.50% 41.86% 58.14% 1.50 0.89
Average 1.25
Formula From Capital Structure Page From Capital Structure Page Formula
Relevering of Betas Composite Income Tax Rate Debt in Capital Structure Equity in Capital Structure Levered Beta
Buckeye Partners, LP 4.07% 41.00% 59.00% 1.20
Enbridge Energy Partners, LP 4.07% 41.00% 59.00% 0.87
Holly Energy Partners, LP 4.07% 41.00% 59.00% 1.03
Magellan Midstream Partners, LP 4.07% 41.00% 59.00% 1.57
NuStar Energy, LP 4.07% 41.00% 59.00% 1.05
Plains All American Pipeline 4.07% 41.00% 59.00% 1.48
Average 1.20
Calculation of Market to Book Ratios for the Fluid Transportation Market Segment
December 31, 2017 calendar year information for the January 2, 2018 Assessment
A market to book ratio over one would be an indication of no obsolescence.
Market Value estimates for Common Equity are from Value Line. Market Value Estimates for Long-Term Debt are from the company's 10-K.
Book Value amounts are from the company's 10-K.
Yield Rate
Class I Railroads
Other Railroads
Capital Structure
Company Value of Long- Value of Value of Total Market % Long- % Preferred % Common
Term Debt Preferred Common Equity Value Term Equity Equity
Equity Debt
Canadian National Railway Co. 6,883,000,000 None 60,535,900,000 67,418,900,000 10.21% N/A 89.79%
Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd. 5,745,000,000 None 24,915,350,000 30,660,350,000 18.74% N/A 81.26%
CSX Corp. 11,788,000,000 None 44,149,920,300 55,937,920,300 21.07% N/A 78.93%
Genesee & Wyoming 2,398,100,000 N/A 4,496,988,727 6,895,088,727 34.78% N/A 65.22%
Kansas City Southern 2,238,400,000 6,100,000 10,794,370,364 13,038,870,364 17.17% 0.05% 82.79%
Norfolk Southern Corp. 9,280,000,000 None 36,335,170,307 45,615,170,307 20.34% N/A 79.66%
Union Pacific Corp. 15,930,000,000 None 91,492,631,367 107,422,631,367 14.83% N/A 85.17%
We placed more reliance on the median capital structure when selecting the indicated capital structure for Class I Railroads, rounding to 18% debt, 82% equity.
We selected the median and mean capital structure as the indicated capital structure for Other Railroads, rounding to 35% debt, 65% equity.
Notes:
Data downloaded from Value Line.
* Does not include Genesee & Wyoming.
^ Genesee & Wyoming only.
Industrial Bond Yield Averages from Mergent Bond Record, January 2018 Edition
Industrial Bond Averages, December 2017
Notes:
*Does not include Genesee & Wyoming.
^Genesee & Wyoming Only.
**Genesee & Wyoming is rated below the Mergent Bond Record Bond Yield Averages. We analyzed the Mergent Bond
Record, January 2018 issue, for U.S. Corporate Bonds that were considered below investment grade. We determined the
average Ba yield to maturity is 6.71%.
Current Actual Cost of Debt The Yield-to-Maturities (YTMs) calculated below are based
off of information received via year-end filings (Form N-Q or
10-K) with the SEC. The 30-year YTMs are then calculated
Railroad Company & Treasury based off an observed spread to the Treasury High Quality
HQM Yield Curve Market Corporate Bond spot rate curve (equation below)
and followed out to 30 years.
7.50
7.00
6.50
Yield to Maturity
6.00
Class I Railroads
5.50
Average of 30-Year YTMs
5.00 4.49%
4.50
Other Railroads
4.00 Average of 30-Year YTMs
3.50 7.19%
3.00 Indicated Debt Rate (Class I) 4.49%
2045 2046 2047 2048 2049
Year Indicated Debt Rate (Other) 7.19%
7.00
6.00
Yield to Maturity
5.00
4.00
2.00
1.00
Year
* The data behind the HQM yield curve can be found in Appendix G
CSX Corp.
3.70% 11/1/2023 $ 125,000 $ 129,662 $ 103.73 3.00%
3.40% 8/1/2024 $ 300,000 $ 308,262 $ 102.75 2.94%
3.35% 11/1/2025 $ 200,000 $ 203,292 $ 101.65 3.11%
2.60% 11/1/2026 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,144,795 $ 95.40 3.20%
3.25% 6/1/2027 $ 10,150,000 $ 10,086,000 $ 99.37 3.33%
6.00% 10/1/2036 $ 100,000 $ 128,132 $ 128.13 3.87%
6.15% 5/1/2037 $ 200,000 $ 262,241 $ 131.12 3.85%
5.50% 4/15/2041 $ 400,000 $ 493,940 $ 123.49 3.95%
4.40% 3/1/2043 $ 350,000 $ 378,652 $ 108.19 3.89%
4.10% 3/15/2044 $ 100,000 $ 104,082 $ 104.08 3.85%
3.80% 11/1/2046 $ 675,000 $ 670,494 $ 99.33 3.84%
3.95% 5/1/2050 $ 200,000 $ 198,803 $ 99.40 3.98%
4.50% 8/1/2054 $ 300,000 $ 315,525 $ 105.18 4.22%
4.25% 11/1/2066 $ 150,000 $ 149,707 $ 99.80 4.26%
1 Partner Loan Agreement (6.50% and 6.51% interest rate at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively) due 2026.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1012620/000101262018000008/gwr10k20171231secimport.htm
Other Railroads
Model Rate
CAPM - Ex Post 13.19%
CAPM - Supply Side 11.64%
CAPM - Three Stage Ex Ante 11.24%
CAPM - Damodaran 10.20%
CAPM - Duff & Phelps 10.08%
CAPM - Graham and Harvey 8.61%
CAPM - Fernandez, Pershin, and Acin 11.13%
Empirical CAPM - Ex Post 12.30%
Empirical CAPM - Supply Side 10.89%
Empirical CAPM - Three Stage Ex Ante 10.51%
Empirical CAPM - Damodaran 9.57%
Empirical CAPM - Duff & Phelps 9.46%
Empirical CAPM - Graham and Harvey 8.11%
Empirical CAPM - Fernandez, Pershin, and Acin 10.42%
DGM - Dividend Growth 9.60%
DGM - Earnings Growth 10.30%
Multi-Stage DGM 8.95%
Indicated Rate of Equity 11.00%
11.00%
We established a range of acceptability for the cost of equity with all available models. We considered all of the data and
placed the most reliance on the Dividend Growth Model, Earnings Growth. The department placed secondary reliance on the
Capital Asset Pricing Models using Dr. Damodaran's and the Ex Post equity risk premiums.
Other Railroads
Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) (ERP x β) + RFR = Indicated Equity Rate
Class I Railroads
Model Equity risk x Industry = Industry Risk + Risk-Free Indicated Equity
premium (ERP) Beta (β) Premium Rate1 (RFR) Rate
Ex Post2 7.07% 1.15 8.13% 2.58% 10.71%
Supply Side3 6.04% 1.15 6.95% 2.58% 9.53%
Three Stage Ex Ante
Model4 5.77% 1.15 6.64% 2.58% 9.22%
Dr. Damodaran Equity
Risk Premium5 5.08% 1.15 5.84% 2.58% 8.42%
Duff & Phelps6 5.00% 1.15 5.75% 2.58% 8.33%
Graham and Harvey7 4.02% 1.15 4.62% 2.58% 7.20%
Fernandez, Pershin and
Acin8 5.70% 1.15 6.56% 2.58% 9.14%
Notes:
1 U.S. Treasury 20 year Coupon Bond Yield, Daily observations, December 29, 2017, www.federalreserve.gov
2 Long-horizon expected equity risk premium (historical), 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
3 Long-horizon expected equity risk premium (supply side), 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
4 3 Stage Dividend Growth Model, S&P 500, See Exhibit, Three Stage Ex Ante Calculation
5 Implied Equity Risk Premium on January 1, 2018 as determined by Dr. Aswath Damodaran; http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/
6 Duff & Phelps recommended equity risk premium (conditional) : The Duff & Phelps recommended ERP was developed in relation to (and
should be used in conjunction with) a 3.5% “normalized” risk-free rate. 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
7 Graham and Harvey Survey of U.S. Chief Financial Officers, The Equity Risk Premium in 2016
8 Fernandez, Pershin, and Acin Survey of Finance and Economic Professors, Analysts, and Managers, 2017
Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) (ERP x β) + RFR = Indicated Equity Rate
Other Railroads
Model Equity risk x Industry = Industry Risk + Risk-Free Indicated Equity
premium (ERP) Beta (β) Premium Rate1 (RFR) Rate
Ex Post2 7.07% 1.50 10.61% 2.58% 13.19%
Supply Side3 6.04% 1.50 9.06% 2.58% 11.64%
Three Stage Ex Ante
Model4 5.77% 1.50 8.66% 2.58% 11.24%
Dr. Damodaran Equity
Risk Premium5 5.08% 1.50 7.62% 2.58% 10.20%
Duff & Phelps6 5.00% 1.50 7.50% 2.58% 10.08%
Graham and Harvey7 4.02% 1.50 6.03% 2.58% 8.61%
Fernandez, Pershin and
Acin8 5.70% 1.50 8.55% 2.58% 11.13%
Notes:
1 U.S. Treasury 20 year Coupon Bond Yield, Daily observations, December 29, 2017, www.federalreserve.gov
2 Long-horizon expected equity risk premium (historical), 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
3 Long-horizon expected equity risk premium (supply side), 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
4 3 Stage Dividend Growth Model, S&P 500, See Exhibit, Three Stage Ex Ante Calculation
5 Implied Equity Risk Premium on January 1, 2018 as determined by Dr. Aswath Damodaran; http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/
6 Duff & Phelps recommended equity risk premium (conditional) : The Duff & Phelps recommended ERP was developed in relation to (and
should be used in conjunction with) a 3.5% “normalized” risk-free rate. 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
7 Graham and Harvey Survey of U.S. Chief Financial Officers, The Equity Risk Premium in 2016
8 Fernandez, Pershin, and Acin Survey of Finance and Economic Professors, Analysts, and Managers, 2017
Empirical Capital Asset Pricing Model (ECAPM) (ERP x β x .75) + (ERP x .25) + RFR = Indicated Equity Rate
Class I Railroads
Model Equity risk x Industry x 75% = Industry Risk Equity risk x 25% Equity Risk + Risk-Free Indicated
premium Beta (β) Premium premium Premium Rate1 (RFR) Equity Rate
(ERP) (weighted) (ERP) (weighted)
2
Ex Post 7.07% 1.15 75% 6.10% 7.07% 25% 1.77% 2.58% 10.45%
3
Supply Side 6.04% 1.15 75% 5.21% 6.04% 25% 1.51% 2.58% 9.30%
Three Stage Ex Ante
Model4 5.77% 1.15 75% 4.98% 5.77% 25% 1.44% 2.58% 9.00%
Dr. Damodaran Equity
Risk Premium5 5.08% 1.15 75% 4.38% 5.08% 25% 1.27% 2.58% 8.23%
Duff & Phelps6 5.00% 1.15 75% 4.31% 5.00% 25% 1.25% 2.58% 8.14%
Graham and Harvey7 4.02% 1.15 75% 3.47% 4.02% 25% 1.01% 2.58% 7.06%
Fernandez, Pershin and
Acin8 5.70% 1.15 75% 4.92% 5.70% 25% 1.43% 2.58% 8.93%
Notes:
1 U.S. Treasury 20 year Coupon Bond Yield, Daily observations, December 29, 2017, www.federalreserve.gov
2 Long-horizon expected equity risk premium (historical), 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
3 Long-horizon expected equity risk premium (supply side), 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
4 3 Stage Dividend Growth Model, S&P 500, See Exhibit, Three Stage Ex Ante Calculation
5 Implied Equity Risk Premium on January 1, 2018 as determined by Dr. Aswath Damodaran; http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/
6 Duff & Phelps recommended equity risk premium (conditional) : The Duff & Phelps recommended ERP was developed in relation to (and should be used in conjunction with) a 3.5%
“normalized” risk-free rate. 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
7 Graham and Harvey Survey of U.S. Chief Financial Officers, The Equity Risk Premium in 2016
8 Fernandez, Pershin, and Acin Survey of Finance and Economic Professors, Analysts, and Managers, 2017
Empirical Capital Asset Pricing Model (ECAPM) (ERP x β x .75) + (ERP x .25) + RFR = Indicated Equity Rate
Other Railroads
Model Equity risk x Industry x 75% = Industry Risk Equity risk x 25% Equity Risk + Risk-Free Indicated
premium Beta (β) Premium premium Premium Rate1 (RFR) Equity Rate
(ERP) (weighted) (ERP) (weighted)
Ex Post2 7.07% 1.50 75% 7.95% 7.07% 25% 1.77% 2.58% 12.30%
Supply Side3 6.04% 1.50 75% 6.80% 6.04% 25% 1.51% 2.58% 10.89%
Three Stage Ex Ante
Model4 5.77% 1.50 75% 6.49% 5.77% 25% 1.44% 2.58% 10.51%
Dr. Damodaran Equity
Risk Premium5 5.08% 1.50 75% 5.72% 5.08% 25% 1.27% 2.58% 9.57%
Duff & Phelps6 5.00% 1.50 75% 5.63% 5.00% 25% 1.25% 2.58% 9.46%
Graham and Harvey7 4.02% 1.50 75% 4.52% 4.02% 25% 1.01% 2.58% 8.11%
Fernandez, Pershin and
Acin8 5.70% 1.50 75% 6.41% 5.70% 25% 1.43% 2.58% 10.42%
Notes:
1 U.S. Treasury 20 year Coupon Bond Yield, Daily observations, December 29, 2017, www.federalreserve.gov
2 Long-horizon expected equity risk premium (historical), 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
3 Long-horizon expected equity risk premium (supply side), 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
4 3 Stage Dividend Growth Model, S&P 500, See Exhibit, Three Stage Ex Ante Calculation
5 Implied Equity Risk Premium on January 1, 2018 as determined by Dr. Aswath Damodaran; http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/
6 Duff & Phelps recommended equity risk premium (conditional) : The Duff & Phelps recommended ERP was developed in relation to (and should be
used in conjunction with) a 3.5% “normalized” risk-free rate. 2018 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital
7 Graham and Harvey Survey of U.S. Chief Financial Officers, The Equity Risk Premium in 2016
8 Fernandez, Pershin, and Acin Survey of Finance and Economic Professors, Analysts, and Managers, 2017
Class I Railroads
We placed most reliance on the median when selecting the indicated rate given the wide range in values.
Notes:
Dividend Yield provided by Value Line.
Genesee & Wyoming is shown in the above calculation, but is not included in the mean or median because
they do not pay dividends.
We placed the most reliance on the median to arrive at the indicated rate.
Notes:
Dividend Yield provided by Value Line.
Growth Estimates, Next 5 Years for Earnings provided Value Line.
Stable growth rate is the nominal growth rate determined in the Capitalization Rate Study Narrative (indicated long-term growth rate of the U.S. economy
of 2.5% plus the expected inflation rate of 2.0%).
Value Line
Company
P/E Ratio
Canadian National Railway Co. 20.00
Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd. 18.90
CSX Corp. 20.30
Kansas City Southern 18.60
Norfolk Southern Corp. 19.00
Union Pacific Corp. 19.20
Mean 19.33
Median 19.10
Selected Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio 19.10
Value Line
Company
P/E Ratio
Canadian National Railway Co. 20.00
Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd. 18.90
CSX Corp. 20.30
Genesee & Wyoming 22.40
Kansas City Southern 18.60
Norfolk Southern Corp. 19.00
Union Pacific Corp. 19.20
Mean 19.77
Median 19.20
Selected Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio 19.20
We placed the most reliance on the median price to earnings ratio for both the Class I and Other Railroads.
Notes:
The Price/Earnings Ratio was downloaded from Value Line.
Beta Analysis
Company Beta
Canadian National Railway Co. 1.05
Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd. 1.20
CSX Corp. 1.20
Genesee & Wyoming 1.50
Kansas City Southern 1.15
Norfolk Southern Corp. 1.15
Union Pacific Corp. 1.05
Class I Railroads*
Beta Mean 1.13
Beta Median 1.15
Unlevered and Relevered Mean^ 1.14
Indicated Beta 1.15
Other Railroads^^
Beta Mean 1.50
Beta Median 1.50
Indicated Beta 1.50
We placed equal reliance on the median when selecting the indicated beta for both Class I and Other Railroads.
Notes:
^ See the Unlevering Relevering Beta page for the calculation.
Unlevering/Relevering Betas
Guideline Companies for Class I Railroads
Value Line From Capital Structure Page From Capital Structure Page Value Line Formula
Unlevering of Betas Actual Income Actual Debt in Capital Actual Equity in Capital Levered Beta Unlevered
Tax Rate Structure Structure (Published) Beta
Canadian National Railway Co. 26.00% 10.21% 89.79% 1.05 0.97
Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd. 26.50% 18.74% 81.26% 1.20 1.03
CSX Corp. 37.50% 21.07% 78.93% 1.20 1.03
Kansas City Southern 33.00% 17.17% 82.79% 1.15 1.01
Norfolk Southern Corp. 37.00% 20.34% 79.66% 1.15 0.99
Union Pacific Corp. 38.00% 14.83% 85.17% 1.05 0.95
Average Beta 1.13
Formula From Capital Structure Page From Capital Structure Page Formula
Relevering of Betas Composite Debt in Capital Structure Equity in Capital Structure Levered Beta
Income Tax Rate
Canadian National Railway Co. 33.00% 18.00% 82.00% 1.11
Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd. 33.00% 18.00% 82.00% 1.18
CSX Corp. 33.00% 18.00% 82.00% 1.18
Kansas City Southern 33.00% 18.00% 82.00% 1.16
Norfolk Southern Corp. 33.00% 18.00% 82.00% 1.14
Union Pacific Corp. 33.00% 18.00% 82.00% 1.09
Average Beta 1.14
Class I Railroads
Application of Capital Structure as determined in the Capitalization Rate Study
Other Railroads
Application of Capital Structure as determined in the Capitalization Rate Study
Notes:
^ Canadian Dollars converted to U.S. Dollars using 12/29/2017 exchange rate of 0.79517 from exchange-rates.org
Mean 7.66%
Median 7.66%
Market Rate Used 8.35%
(Less) Risk-Free Rate 2.58%
Equals Equity Risk Premium 5.77%
Assumptions:
Stages Years Growth Model 1 Model 2
1st Stage 1-5 years Constant @: 12.57% * 10.20% *
Linear
2nd Stage 6-15 years Linear from: 11.87% to 4.91% OR 11.87% to 3.37% from
Real Growth** Inflation^ 1st
3rd Stage 15 years -perpetuity GDP Growth: Real and Inflation 1.50% 3.00% + 1.87% to 1.91% Stage
to 3rd
GDP Growth^^: Real + Inflation 4.91% TO 3.37% Stage
Model 1 Model 2
Implied Market Return 8.35% 6.97%
Model 1 Model 2
Year Starting Industry S & P 500 Starting Industry S & P 500
2017 Start Price† $ (2,600.87) Start Price† $ (2,600.87)
2018 Expected Dividends†† $ 53.00 Expected Dividends†† $ 53.00
2019 12.570% $ 59.66 1st Stage 10.200% $ 58.41
1st Stage
2020 12.570% $ 67.16 Growth 10.200% $ 64.36
Growth Rates
2021 12.570% $ 75.60 Rates 10.200% $ 70.93
2022 12.570% $ 85.11 10.200% $ 78.16
2023 11.87% $ 95.21 11.87% $ 87.44
2024 11.177% $ 105.85 11.023% $ 97.08
2025 10.481% $ 116.95 10.173% $ 106.96
2026 9.785% $ 128.39 9.323% $ 116.93
2nd Stage
2027 2nd Stage 9.088% $ 140.06 8.472% $ 126.84
Growth
2028 Growth Rates 8.392% $ 151.81 7.622% $ 136.50
Rates
2029 7.695% $ 163.50 6.771% $ 145.75
2030 6.999% $ 174.94 5.921% $ 154.38
2031 6.303% $ 185.97 5.071% $ 162.21
2032 5.606% $ 196.39 4.220% $ 169.05
2033 4.910% $ 206.04 3.370% $ 174.75
2034 4.910% $ 216.15 3.370% $ 180.64
2035 4.910% $ 226.76 3.370% $ 186.73
2036 4.910% $ 237.90 3.370% $ 193.02
2037 4.910% $ 249.58 3.370% $ 199.52
2038 4.910% $ 261.83 3.370% $ 206.25
2039 4.910% $ 274.69 3.370% $ 213.20
2040 4.910% $ 288.18 3.370% $ 220.38
2041 4.910% $ 302.33 3.370% $ 227.81
2042 4.910% $ 317.17 3.370% $ 235.49
2043 4.910% $ 332.74 3.370% $ 243.42
2044 4.910% $ 349.08 3.370% $ 251.62
2045 4.910% $ 366.22 3.370% $ 260.10
2046 4.910% $ 384.20 3.370% $ 268.87
2047 4.910% $ 403.07 3.370% $ 277.93
2048 4.910% $ 422.86 3.370% $ 287.30
2049 4.910% $ 443.62 3.370% $ 296.98
2050 4.910% $ 465.40 3.370% $ 306.99
2051 4.910% $ 488.25 3.370% $ 317.33
2052 4.910% $ 512.23 3.370% $ 328.03
2053 4.910% $ 537.38 3.370% $ 339.08
2054 4.910% $ 563.76 3.370% $ 350.51
2055 4.910% $ 591.44 3.370% $ 362.32
2056 4.910% $ 620.48 3.370% $ 374.53
2057 4.910% $ 650.95 3.370% $ 387.15
2058 4.910% $ 682.91 3.370% $ 400.20
2059 4.910% $ 716.44 3.370% $ 413.69
2060 4.910% $ 751.62 3.370% $ 427.63
2061 4.910% $ 788.52 3.370% $ 442.04
2062 4.910% $ 827.24 3.370% $ 456.94
2063 4.910% $ 867.86 3.370% $ 472.33
2064 4.910% $ 910.47 3.370% $ 488.25
2065 4.910% $ 955.17 3.370% $ 504.71
2066 4.910% $ 1,002.07 3.370% $ 521.71
2067 4.910% $ 1,051.27 3.370% $ 539.30
2068 4.910% $ 1,102.89 3.370% $ 557.47
Northern States
Otter Tail Corp.
Treasury HQM
Northwestern
Alliant Energy
Vectren Corp.
Entergy Corp.
Ameren Corp
Xcel Energy /
CenterPoint
DTE Energy
Power Co.
Allete Inc.
Energy
Corp.
Corp.
2018 1.83
2018 1.98
2019 2.12
2019 2.23
2020 2.33
2020 2.41
2021 2.49
2021 2.56
2022 2.64
2022 2.71
2023 2.79
2023 2.86
2024 2.94
2024 3.02
2025 3.09
2025 3.17
2026 3.24
2026 3.30
2027 3.36 3.11 3.51 3.13 3.29 3.43 3.06 3.29 3.36 3.09 3.11 2.99 2.98 3.33 3.25 3.40 3.16
2027 3.42 3.17 3.57 3.19 3.35 3.49 3.12 3.35 3.42 3.15 3.17 3.05 3.04 3.39 3.31 3.46 3.22
2028 3.47 3.22 3.62 3.24 3.40 3.54 3.17 3.40 3.47 3.20 3.22 3.10 3.09 3.44 3.36 3.51 3.27
2028 3.52 3.27 3.67 3.29 3.45 3.59 3.22 3.45 3.52 3.25 3.27 3.15 3.14 3.49 3.41 3.56 3.32
2029 3.57 3.32 3.72 3.34 3.50 3.64 3.27 3.50 3.57 3.30 3.32 3.20 3.19 3.54 3.46 3.61 3.37
2029 3.61 3.36 3.76 3.38 3.54 3.68 3.31 3.54 3.61 3.34 3.36 3.24 3.23 3.58 3.50 3.65 3.41
2030 3.65 3.40 3.80 3.42 3.58 3.72 3.35 3.58 3.65 3.38 3.40 3.28 3.27 3.62 3.54 3.69 3.45
2030 3.68 3.43 3.83 3.45 3.61 3.75 3.38 3.61 3.68 3.41 3.43 3.31 3.30 3.65 3.57 3.72 3.48
2031 3.71 3.46 3.86 3.48 3.64 3.78 3.41 3.64 3.71 3.44 3.46 3.34 3.33 3.68 3.60 3.75 3.51
2031 3.74 3.49 3.89 3.51 3.67 3.81 3.44 3.67 3.74 3.47 3.49 3.37 3.36 3.71 3.63 3.78 3.54
2032 3.77 3.52 3.92 3.54 3.70 3.84 3.47 3.70 3.77 3.50 3.52 3.40 3.39 3.74 3.66 3.81 3.57
2032 3.79 3.54 3.94 3.56 3.72 3.86 3.49 3.72 3.79 3.52 3.54 3.42 3.41 3.76 3.68 3.83 3.59
2033 3.81 3.56 3.96 3.58 3.74 3.88 3.51 3.74 3.81 3.54 3.56 3.44 3.43 3.78 3.70 3.85 3.61
2033 3.83 3.58 3.98 3.60 3.76 3.90 3.53 3.76 3.83 3.56 3.58 3.46 3.45 3.80 3.72 3.87 3.63
2034 3.85 3.60 4.00 3.62 3.78 3.92 3.55 3.78 3.85 3.58 3.60 3.48 3.47 3.82 3.74 3.89 3.65
2034 3.86 3.61 4.01 3.63 3.79 3.93 3.56 3.79 3.86 3.59 3.61 3.49 3.48 3.83 3.75 3.90 3.66
2035 3.88 3.63 4.03 3.65 3.81 3.95 3.58 3.81 3.88 3.61 3.63 3.51 3.50 3.85 3.77 3.92 3.68
2035 3.89 3.64 4.04 3.66 3.82 3.96 3.59 3.82 3.89 3.62 3.64 3.52 3.51 3.86 3.78 3.93 3.69
2036 3.90 3.65 4.05 3.67 3.83 3.97 3.60 3.83 3.90 3.63 3.65 3.53 3.52 3.87 3.79 3.94 3.70
2036 3.91 3.66 4.06 3.68 3.84 3.98 3.61 3.84 3.91 3.64 3.66 3.54 3.53 3.88 3.80 3.95 3.71
2037 3.92 3.67 4.07 3.69 3.85 3.99 3.62 3.85 3.92 3.65 3.67 3.55 3.54 3.89 3.81 3.96 3.72
2037 3.93 3.68 4.08 3.70 3.86 4.00 3.63 3.86 3.93 3.66 3.68 3.56 3.55 3.90 3.82 3.97 3.73
2038 3.94 3.69 4.09 3.71 3.87 4.01 3.64 3.87 3.94 3.67 3.69 3.57 3.56 3.91 3.83 3.98 3.74
2038 3.95 3.70 4.10 3.72 3.88 4.02 3.65 3.88 3.95 3.68 3.70 3.58 3.57 3.92 3.84 3.99 3.75
2039 3.96 3.71 4.11 3.73 3.89 4.03 3.66 3.89 3.96 3.69 3.71 3.59 3.58 3.93 3.85 4.00 3.76
2039 3.97 3.72 4.12 3.74 3.90 4.04 3.67 3.90 3.97 3.70 3.72 3.60 3.59 3.94 3.86 4.01 3.77
2040 3.98 3.73 4.13 3.75 3.91 4.05 3.68 3.91 3.98 3.71 3.73 3.61 3.60 3.95 3.87 4.02 3.78
2040 3.98 3.73 4.13 3.75 3.91 4.05 3.68 3.91 3.98 3.71 3.73 3.61 3.60 3.95 3.87 4.02 3.78
2041 3.99 3.74 4.14 3.76 3.92 4.06 3.69 3.92 3.99 3.72 3.74 3.62 3.61 3.96 3.88 4.03 3.79
2041 4.00 3.75 4.15 3.77 3.93 4.07 3.70 3.93 4.00 3.73 3.75 3.63 3.62 3.97 3.89 4.04 3.80
2042 4.00 3.75 4.15 3.77 3.93 4.07 3.70 3.93 4.00 3.73 3.75 3.63 3.62 3.97 3.89 4.04 3.80
2042 4.01 3.76 4.16 3.78 3.94 4.08 3.71 3.94 4.01 3.74 3.76 3.64 3.63 3.98 3.90 4.05 3.81
2043 4.02 3.77 4.17 3.79 3.95 4.09 3.72 3.95 4.02 3.75 3.77 3.65 3.64 3.99 3.91 4.06 3.82
2043 4.02 3.77 4.17 3.79 3.95 4.09 3.72 3.95 4.02 3.75 3.77 3.65 3.64 3.99 3.91 4.06 3.82
2044 4.03 3.78 4.18 3.80 3.96 4.10 3.73 3.96 4.03 3.76 3.78 3.66 3.65 4.00 3.92 4.07 3.83
2044 4.03 3.78 4.18 3.80 3.96 4.10 3.73 3.96 4.03 3.76 3.78 3.66 3.65 4.00 3.92 4.07 3.83
2045 4.04 3.79 4.19 3.81 3.97 4.11 3.74 3.97 4.04 3.77 3.79 3.67 3.66 4.01 3.93 4.08 3.84
2045 4.04 3.79 4.19 3.81 3.97 4.11 3.74 3.97 4.04 3.77 3.79 3.67 3.66 4.01 3.93 4.08 3.84
2046 4.05 3.80 4.20 3.82 3.98 4.12 3.75 3.98 4.05 3.78 3.80 3.68 3.67 4.02 3.94 4.09 3.85
2046 4.05 3.80 4.20 3.82 3.98 4.12 3.75 3.98 4.05 3.78 3.80 3.68 3.67 4.02 3.94 4.09 3.85
2047 4.06 3.81 4.21 3.83 3.99 4.13 3.76 3.99 4.06 3.79 3.81 3.69 3.68 4.03 3.95 4.10 3.86
2047 4.06 3.81 4.21 3.83 3.99 4.13 3.76 3.99 4.06 3.79 3.81 3.69 3.68 4.03 3.95 4.10 3.86
2048 4.07 3.82 4.22 3.84 4.00 4.14 3.77 4.00 4.07 3.80 3.82 3.70 3.69 4.04 3.96 4.11 3.87
2048 4.07 3.82 4.22 3.84 4.00 4.14 3.77 4.00 4.07 3.80 3.82 3.70 3.69 4.04 3.96 4.11 3.87
2049 4.08 3.83 4.23 3.85 4.01 4.15 3.78 4.01 4.08 3.81 3.83 3.71 3.70 4.05 3.97 4.12 3.88
2049 4.08 3.83 4.23 3.85 4.01 4.15 3.78 4.01 4.08 3.81 3.83 3.71 3.70 4.05 3.97 4.12 3.88
2050 4.08 3.83 4.23 3.85 4.01 4.15 3.78 4.01 4.08 3.81 3.83 3.71 3.70 4.05 3.97 4.12 3.88
2050 4.09 3.84 4.24 3.86 4.02 4.16 3.79 4.02 4.09 3.82 3.84 3.72 3.71 4.06 3.98 4.13 3.89
2051 4.09 3.84 4.24 3.86 4.02 4.16 3.79 4.02 4.09 3.82 3.84 3.72 3.71 4.06 3.98 4.13 3.89
2051 4.10 3.85 4.25 3.87 4.03 4.17 3.80 4.03 4.10 3.83 3.85 3.73 3.72 4.07 3.99 4.14 3.90
Northern States
Otter Tail Corp.
Treasury HQM
Northwestern
Alliant Energy
Vectren Corp.
Entergy Corp.
Ameren Corp
Xcel Energy /
WEC Energy
CenterPoint
DTE Energy
Power Co.
Allete Inc.
Energy
Group
Corp.
Corp.
2052 4.10 3.85 4.25 3.87 4.03 4.17 3.80 4.03 4.10 3.83 3.85 3.73 3.72 4.07 3.99 4.14 3.90
2052 4.10 3.85 4.25 3.87 4.03 4.17 3.80 4.03 4.10 3.83 3.85 3.73 3.72 4.07 3.99 4.14 3.90
2053 4.11 3.86 4.26 3.88 4.04 4.18 3.81 4.04 4.11 3.84 3.86 3.74 3.73 4.08 4.00 4.15 3.91
2053 4.11 3.86 4.26 3.88 4.04 4.18 3.81 4.04 4.11 3.84 3.86 3.74 3.73 4.08 4.00 4.15 3.91
2054 4.11 3.86 4.26 3.88 4.04 4.18 3.81 4.04 4.11 3.84 3.86 3.74 3.73 4.08 4.00 4.15 3.91
2054 4.11 3.86 4.26 3.88 4.04 4.18 3.81 4.04 4.11 3.84 3.86 3.74 3.73 4.08 4.00 4.15 3.91
2055 4.12 3.87 4.27 3.89 4.05 4.19 3.82 4.05 4.12 3.85 3.87 3.75 3.74 4.09 4.01 4.16 3.92
2055 4.12 3.87 4.27 3.89 4.05 4.19 3.82 4.05 4.12 3.85 3.87 3.75 3.74 4.09 4.01 4.16 3.92
2056 4.12 3.87 4.27 3.89 4.05 4.19 3.82 4.05 4.12 3.85 3.87 3.75 3.74 4.09 4.01 4.16 3.92
2056 4.13 3.88 4.28 3.90 4.06 4.20 3.83 4.06 4.13 3.86 3.88 3.76 3.75 4.10 4.02 4.17 3.93
2057 4.13 3.88 4.28 3.90 4.06 4.20 3.83 4.06 4.13 3.86 3.88 3.76 3.75 4.10 4.02 4.17 3.93
2057 4.13 3.88 4.28 3.90 4.06 4.20 3.83 4.06 4.13 3.86 3.88 3.76 3.75 4.10 4.02 4.17 3.93
2058 4.13 3.88 4.28 3.90 4.06 4.20 3.83 4.06 4.13 3.86 3.88 3.76 3.75 4.10 4.02 4.17 3.93
2058 4.14 3.89 4.29 3.91 4.07 4.21 3.84 4.07 4.14 3.87 3.89 3.77 3.76 4.11 4.03 4.18 3.94
2059 4.14 3.89 4.29 3.91 4.07 4.21 3.84 4.07 4.14 3.87 3.89 3.77 3.76 4.11 4.03 4.18 3.94
2059 4.14 3.89 4.29 3.91 4.07 4.21 3.84 4.07 4.14 3.87 3.89 3.77 3.76 4.11 4.03 4.18 3.94
2060 4.14 3.89 4.29 3.91 4.07 4.21 3.84 4.07 4.14 3.87 3.89 3.77 3.76 4.11 4.03 4.18 3.94
2060 4.15 3.90 4.30 3.92 4.08 4.22 3.85 4.08 4.15 3.88 3.90 3.78 3.77 4.12 4.04 4.19 3.95
2061 4.15 3.90 4.30 3.92 4.08 4.22 3.85 4.08 4.15 3.88 3.90 3.78 3.77 4.12 4.04 4.19 3.95
2061 4.15 3.90 4.30 3.92 4.08 4.22 3.85 4.08 4.15 3.88 3.90 3.78 3.77 4.12 4.04 4.19 3.95
2062 4.15 3.90 4.30 3.92 4.08 4.22 3.85 4.08 4.15 3.88 3.90 3.78 3.77 4.12 4.04 4.19 3.95
2062 4.15 3.90 4.30 3.92 4.08 4.22 3.85 4.08 4.15 3.88 3.90 3.78 3.77 4.12 4.04 4.19 3.95
2063 4.16 3.91 4.31 3.93 4.09 4.23 3.86 4.09 4.16 3.89 3.91 3.79 3.78 4.13 4.05 4.20 3.96
2063 4.16 3.91 4.31 3.93 4.09 4.23 3.86 4.09 4.16 3.89 3.91 3.79 3.78 4.13 4.05 4.20 3.96
2064 4.16 3.91 4.31 3.93 4.09 4.23 3.86 4.09 4.16 3.89 3.91 3.79 3.78 4.13 4.05 4.20 3.96
2064 4.16 3.91 4.31 3.93 4.09 4.23 3.86 4.09 4.16 3.89 3.91 3.79 3.78 4.13 4.05 4.20 3.96
2065 4.16 3.91 4.31 3.93 4.09 4.23 3.86 4.09 4.16 3.89 3.91 3.79 3.78 4.13 4.05 4.20 3.96
2065 4.17 3.92 4.32 3.94 4.10 4.24 3.87 4.10 4.17 3.90 3.92 3.80 3.79 4.14 4.06 4.21 3.97
2066 4.17 3.92 4.32 3.94 4.10 4.24 3.87 4.10 4.17 3.90 3.92 3.80 3.79 4.14 4.06 4.21 3.97
2066 4.17 3.92 4.32 3.94 4.10 4.24 3.87 4.10 4.17 3.90 3.92 3.80 3.79 4.14 4.06 4.21 3.97
2067 4.17 3.92 4.32 3.94 4.10 4.24 3.87 4.10 4.17 3.90 3.92 3.80 3.79 4.14 4.06 4.21 3.97
2067 4.17 3.92 4.32 3.94 4.10 4.24 3.87 4.10 4.17 3.90 3.92 3.80 3.79 4.14 4.06 4.21 3.97
RGC Resources
Southwest Gas
Treasury HQM
Atmos Energy
Utilities Corp.
NiSource Inc.
South Jersey
Chesapeake
Natural Gas
New Jersey
Northwest
Resources
Industries
Spire Inc.
Holdings
Corp.
Inc.
2018 1.83
2018 1.98
2019 2.12
2019 2.23
2020 2.33
2020 2.41
2021 2.49
2021 2.56
2022 2.64
2022 2.71
2023 2.79
2023 2.86
2024 2.94
2024 3.02
2025 3.09
2025 3.17
2026 3.24
2026 3.30
2027 3.36
2027 3.42 3.18 2.92 4.03 3.41 2.96 3.58 3.33 3.43 3.23
2028 3.47 3.23 2.97 4.08 3.46 3.01 3.63 3.38 3.48 3.28
2028 3.52 3.28 3.02 4.13 3.51 3.06 3.68 3.43 3.53 3.33
2029 3.57 3.33 3.07 4.18 3.56 3.11 3.73 3.48 3.58 3.38
2029 3.61 3.37 3.11 4.22 3.60 3.15 3.77 3.52 3.62 3.42
2030 3.65 3.41 3.15 4.26 3.64 3.19 3.81 3.56 3.66 3.46
2030 3.68 3.44 3.18 4.29 3.67 3.22 3.84 3.59 3.69 3.49
2031 3.71 3.47 3.21 4.32 3.70 3.25 3.87 3.62 3.72 3.52
2031 3.74 3.50 3.24 4.35 3.73 3.28 3.90 3.65 3.75 3.55
2032 3.77 3.53 3.27 4.38 3.76 3.31 3.93 3.68 3.78 3.58
2032 3.79 3.55 3.29 4.40 3.78 3.33 3.95 3.70 3.80 3.60
2033 3.81 3.57 3.31 4.42 3.80 3.35 3.97 3.72 3.82 3.62
2033 3.83 3.59 3.33 4.44 3.82 3.37 3.99 3.74 3.84 3.64
2034 3.85 3.61 3.35 4.46 3.84 3.39 4.01 3.76 3.86 3.66
2034 3.86 3.62 3.36 4.47 3.85 3.40 4.02 3.77 3.87 3.67
2035 3.88 3.64 3.38 4.49 3.87 3.42 4.04 3.79 3.89 3.69
2035 3.89 3.65 3.39 4.50 3.88 3.43 4.05 3.80 3.90 3.70
2036 3.90 3.66 3.40 4.51 3.89 3.44 4.06 3.81 3.91 3.71
2036 3.91 3.67 3.41 4.52 3.90 3.45 4.07 3.82 3.92 3.72
2037 3.92 3.68 3.42 4.53 3.91 3.46 4.08 3.83 3.93 3.73
2037 3.93 3.69 3.43 4.54 3.92 3.47 4.09 3.84 3.94 3.74
2038 3.94 3.70 3.44 4.55 3.93 3.48 4.10 3.85 3.95 3.75
2038 3.95 3.71 3.45 4.56 3.94 3.49 4.11 3.86 3.96 3.76
2039 3.96 3.72 3.46 4.57 3.95 3.50 4.12 3.87 3.97 3.77
2039 3.97 3.73 3.47 4.58 3.96 3.51 4.13 3.88 3.98 3.78
2040 3.98 3.74 3.48 4.59 3.97 3.52 4.14 3.89 3.99 3.79
2040 3.98 3.74 3.48 4.59 3.97 3.52 4.14 3.89 3.99 3.79
2030 3.99 3.75 3.49 4.60 3.98 3.53 4.15 3.90 4.00 3.80
2031 4.00 3.76 3.50 4.61 3.99 3.54 4.16 3.91 4.01 3.81
2032 4.00 3.76 3.50 4.61 3.99 3.54 4.16 3.91 4.01 3.81
2033 4.01 3.77 3.51 4.62 4.00 3.55 4.17 3.92 4.02 3.82
2034 4.02 3.78 3.52 4.63 4.01 3.56 4.18 3.93 4.03 3.83
2035 4.02 3.78 3.52 4.63 4.01 3.56 4.18 3.93 4.03 3.83
2036 4.03 3.79 3.53 4.64 4.02 3.57 4.19 3.94 4.04 3.84
2037 4.03 3.79 3.53 4.64 4.02 3.57 4.19 3.94 4.04 3.84
2038 4.04 3.80 3.54 4.65 4.03 3.58 4.20 3.95 4.05 3.85
2039 4.04 3.80 3.54 4.65 4.03 3.58 4.20 3.95 4.05 3.85
2040 4.05 3.81 3.55 4.66 4.04 3.59 4.21 3.96 4.06 3.86
2040 4.05 3.81 3.55 4.66 4.04 3.59 4.21 3.96 4.06 3.86
2041 4.06 3.82 3.56 4.67 4.05 3.60 4.22 3.97 4.07 3.87
2041 4.06 3.82 3.56 4.67 4.05 3.60 4.22 3.97 4.07 3.87
2042 4.07 3.83 3.57 4.68 4.06 3.61 4.23 3.98 4.08 3.88
2042 4.07 3.83 3.57 4.68 4.06 3.61 4.23 3.98 4.08 3.88
2043 4.08 3.84 3.58 4.69 4.07 3.62 4.24 3.99 4.09 3.89
2043 4.08 3.84 3.58 4.69 4.07 3.62 4.24 3.99 4.09 3.89
2044 4.08 3.84 3.58 4.69 4.07 3.62 4.24 3.99 4.09 3.89
2044 4.09 3.85 3.59 4.70 4.08 3.63 4.25 4.00 4.10 3.90
2045 4.09 3.85 3.59 4.70 4.08 3.63 4.25 4.00 4.10 3.90
2045 4.10 3.86 3.60 4.71 4.09 3.64 4.26 4.01 4.11 3.91
2046 4.10 3.86 3.60 4.71 4.09 3.64 4.26 4.01 4.11 3.91
2046 4.10 3.86 3.60 4.71 4.09 3.64 4.26 4.01 4.11 3.91
Treasury HQM
Resources Inc.
Atmos Energy
Utilities Corp.
NiSource Inc.
Gas Holdings
South Jersey
Chesapeake
Natural Gas
New Jersey
Northwest
Southwest
Resources
Industries
Spire Inc.
Corp.
RGC
2047 4.11 3.87 3.61 4.72 4.10 3.65 4.27 4.02 4.12 3.92
2047 4.11 3.87 3.61 4.72 4.10 3.65 4.27 4.02 4.12 3.92
2048 4.11 3.87 3.61 4.72 4.10 3.65 4.27 4.02 4.12 3.92
2048 4.11 3.87 3.61 4.72 4.10 3.65 4.27 4.02 4.12 3.92
2049 4.12 3.88 3.62 4.73 4.11 3.66 4.28 4.03 4.13 3.93
2049 4.12 3.88 3.62 4.73 4.11 3.66 4.28 4.03 4.13 3.93
2050 4.12 3.88 3.62 4.73 4.11 3.66 4.28 4.03 4.13 3.93
2050 4.13 3.89 3.63 4.74 4.12 3.67 4.29 4.04 4.14 3.94
2051 4.13 3.89 3.63 4.74 4.12 3.67 4.29 4.04 4.14 3.94
2051 4.13 3.89 3.63 4.74 4.12 3.67 4.29 4.04 4.14 3.94
2052 4.13 3.89 3.63 4.74 4.12 3.67 4.29 4.04 4.14 3.94
2052 4.14 3.90 3.64 4.75 4.13 3.68 4.30 4.05 4.15 3.95
2053 4.14 3.90 3.64 4.75 4.13 3.68 4.30 4.05 4.15 3.95
2053 4.14 3.90 3.64 4.75 4.13 3.68 4.30 4.05 4.15 3.95
2054 4.14 3.90 3.64 4.75 4.13 3.68 4.30 4.05 4.15 3.95
2054 4.15 3.91 3.65 4.76 4.14 3.69 4.31 4.06 4.16 3.96
2055 4.15 3.91 3.65 4.76 4.14 3.69 4.31 4.06 4.16 3.96
2055 4.15 3.91 3.65 4.76 4.14 3.69 4.31 4.06 4.16 3.96
2056 4.15 3.91 3.65 4.76 4.14 3.69 4.31 4.06 4.16 3.96
2056 4.15 3.91 3.65 4.76 4.14 3.69 4.31 4.06 4.16 3.96
2057 4.16 3.92 3.66 4.77 4.15 3.70 4.32 4.07 4.17 3.97
2057 4.16 3.92 3.66 4.77 4.15 3.70 4.32 4.07 4.17 3.97
2058 4.16 3.92 3.66 4.77 4.15 3.70 4.32 4.07 4.17 3.97
2058 4.16 3.92 3.66 4.77 4.15 3.70 4.32 4.07 4.17 3.97
2059 4.16 3.92 3.66 4.77 4.15 3.70 4.32 4.07 4.17 3.97
2059 4.17 3.93 3.67 4.78 4.16 3.71 4.33 4.08 4.18 3.98
2060 4.17 3.93 3.67 4.78 4.16 3.71 4.33 4.08 4.18 3.98
2060 4.17 3.93 3.67 4.78 4.16 3.71 4.33 4.08 4.18 3.98
2061 4.17 3.93 3.67 4.78 4.16 3.71 4.33 4.08 4.18 3.98
2061 4.17 3.93 3.67 4.78 4.16 3.71 4.33 4.08 4.18 3.98
2062 4.17 3.93 3.67 4.78 4.16 3.71 4.33 4.08 4.18 3.98
2062 4.18 3.94 3.68 4.79 4.17 3.72 4.34 4.09 4.19 3.99
2063 4.18 3.94 3.68 4.79 4.17 3.72 4.34 4.09 4.19 3.99
2063 4.18 3.94 3.68 4.79 4.17 3.72 4.34 4.09 4.19 3.99
2064 4.18 3.94 3.68 4.79 4.17 3.72 4.34 4.09 4.19 3.99
2064 4.18 3.94 3.68 4.79 4.17 3.72 4.34 4.09 4.19 3.99
2065 4.18 3.94 3.68 4.79 4.17 3.72 4.34 4.09 4.19 3.99
2065 4.18 3.94 3.68 4.79 4.17 3.72 4.34 4.09 4.19 3.99
2066 4.19 3.95 3.69 4.80 4.18 3.73 4.35 4.10 4.20 4.00
2066 4.19 3.95 3.69 4.80 4.18 3.73 4.35 4.10 4.20 4.00
2067 4.19 3.95 3.69 4.80 4.18 3.73 4.35 4.10 4.20 4.00
2067 4.19 3.95 3.69 4.80 4.18 3.73 4.35 4.10 4.20 4.00
TransCanadian Pipelines
Enterprise Products
Boardwalk Pipeline
Williams Parteners
Kinder Morgan
Treasury HQM
TC Pipelines /
Partners
2018 1.83
2018 1.98
2019 2.12
2019 2.23
2020 2.33
2020 2.41
2012 2.49
2021 2.56
2022 2.64
2022 2.71
2023 2.79
2023 2.86
2024 2.94
2024 3.02
2025 3.09
2025 3.17
2026 3.24
2026 3.30
2027 3.36
2027 3.42 4.32 3.45 4.01 3.84 3.73
2028 3.47 4.37 3.50 4.06 3.89 3.78
2028 3.52 4.42 3.55 4.11 3.94 3.83
2029 3.57 4.47 3.60 4.16 3.99 3.88
2029 3.61 4.51 3.64 4.20 4.03 3.92
2030 3.65 4.55 3.68 4.24 4.07 3.96
2030 3.68 4.58 3.71 4.27 4.10 3.99
2031 3.71 4.61 3.74 4.30 4.13 4.02
2031 3.74 4.64 3.77 4.33 4.16 4.05
2032 3.77 4.67 3.80 4.36 4.19 4.08
2032 3.79 4.69 3.82 4.38 4.21 4.10
2033 3.81 4.71 3.84 4.40 4.23 4.12
2033 3.83 4.73 3.86 4.42 4.25 4.14
2034 3.85 4.75 3.88 4.44 4.27 4.16
2034 3.86 4.76 3.89 4.45 4.28 4.17
2035 3.88 4.78 3.91 4.47 4.30 4.19
2035 3.89 4.79 3.92 4.48 4.31 4.20
2036 3.90 4.80 3.93 4.49 4.32 4.21
2036 3.91 4.81 3.94 4.50 4.33 4.22
2037 3.92 4.82 3.95 4.51 4.34 4.23
2037 3.93 4.83 3.96 4.52 4.35 4.24
2038 3.94 4.84 3.97 4.53 4.36 4.25
2038 3.95 4.85 3.98 4.54 4.37 4.26
2039 3.96 4.86 3.99 4.55 4.38 4.27
2039 3.97 4.87 4.00 4.56 4.39 4.28
2040 3.98 4.88 4.01 4.57 4.40 4.29
2040 3.98 4.88 4.01 4.57 4.40 4.29
2030 3.99 4.89 4.02 4.58 4.41 4.30
2031 4.00 4.90 4.03 4.59 4.42 4.31
2032 4.00 4.90 4.03 4.59 4.42 4.31
2033 4.01 4.91 4.04 4.60 4.43 4.32
2034 4.02 4.92 4.05 4.61 4.44 4.33
2035 4.02 4.92 4.05 4.61 4.44 4.33
2036 4.03 4.93 4.06 4.62 4.45 4.34
2037 4.03 4.93 4.06 4.62 4.45 4.34
2038 4.04 4.94 4.07 4.63 4.46 4.35
2039 4.04 4.94 4.07 4.63 4.46 4.35
2040 4.05 4.95 4.08 4.64 4.47 4.36
2040 4.05 4.95 4.08 4.64 4.47 4.36
2041 4.06 4.96 4.09 4.65 4.48 4.37
2041 4.06 4.96 4.09 4.65 4.48 4.37
2042 4.07 4.97 4.10 4.66 4.49 4.38
2042 4.07 4.97 4.10 4.66 4.49 4.38
2043 4.08 4.98 4.11 4.67 4.50 4.39
2043 4.08 4.98 4.11 4.67 4.50 4.39
2044 4.08 4.98 4.11 4.67 4.50 4.39
2044 4.09 4.99 4.12 4.68 4.51 4.40
2045 4.09 4.99 4.12 4.68 4.51 4.40
TransCanadian Pipelines
Enterprise Products
Boardwalk Pipeline
Williams Parteners
Kinder Morgan
Treasury HQM
TC Pipelines /
Partners
Magellan Midstream
Energy Partners
Energy Partners
NuStar Logistics
Treasury HQM
Partners
Pipeline
2018 1.83
2018 1.98
2019 2.12
2019 2.23
2020 2.33
2020 2.41
2012 2.49
2021 2.56
2022 2.64
2022 2.71
2023 2.79
2023 2.86
2024 2.94
2024 3.02
2025 3.09
2025 3.17
2026 3.24
2026 3.30
2027 3.36
2027 3.42 4.35 3.72 4.44 3.55 4.88 4.50
2028 3.47 4.40 3.77 4.49 3.60 4.93 4.55
2028 3.52 4.45 3.82 4.54 3.65 4.98 4.60
2029 3.57 4.50 3.87 4.59 3.70 5.03 4.65
2029 3.61 4.54 3.91 4.63 3.74 5.07 4.69
2030 3.65 4.58 3.95 4.67 3.78 5.11 4.73
2030 3.68 4.61 3.98 4.70 3.81 5.14 4.76
2031 3.71 4.64 4.01 4.73 3.84 5.17 4.79
2031 3.74 4.67 4.04 4.76 3.87 5.20 4.82
2032 3.77 4.70 4.07 4.79 3.90 5.23 4.85
2032 3.79 4.72 4.09 4.81 3.92 5.25 4.87
2033 3.81 4.74 4.11 4.83 3.94 5.27 4.89
2033 3.83 4.76 4.13 4.85 3.96 5.29 4.91
2034 3.85 4.78 4.15 4.87 3.98 5.31 4.93
2034 3.86 4.79 4.16 4.88 3.99 5.32 4.94
2035 3.88 4.81 4.18 4.90 4.01 5.34 4.96
2035 3.89 4.82 4.19 4.91 4.02 5.35 4.97
2036 3.90 4.83 4.20 4.92 4.03 5.36 4.98
2036 3.91 4.84 4.21 4.93 4.04 5.37 4.99
2037 3.92 4.85 4.22 4.94 4.05 5.38 5.00
2037 3.93 4.86 4.23 4.95 4.06 5.39 5.01
2038 3.94 4.87 4.24 4.96 4.07 5.40 5.02
2038 3.95 4.88 4.25 4.97 4.08 5.41 5.03
2039 3.96 4.89 4.26 4.98 4.09 5.42 5.04
2039 3.97 4.90 4.27 4.99 4.10 5.43 5.05
2040 3.98 4.91 4.28 5.00 4.11 5.44 5.06
2040 3.98 4.91 4.28 5.00 4.11 5.44 5.06
2030 3.99 4.92 4.29 5.01 4.12 5.45 5.07
2031 4.00 4.93 4.30 5.02 4.13 5.46 5.08
2032 4.00 4.93 4.30 5.02 4.13 5.46 5.08
2033 4.01 4.94 4.31 5.03 4.14 5.47 5.09
2034 4.02 4.95 4.32 5.04 4.15 5.48 5.10
2035 4.02 4.95 4.32 5.04 4.15 5.48 5.10
2036 4.03 4.96 4.33 5.05 4.16 5.49 5.11
2037 4.03 4.96 4.33 5.05 4.16 5.49 5.11
2038 4.04 4.97 4.34 5.06 4.17 5.50 5.12
2039 4.04 4.97 4.34 5.06 4.17 5.50 5.12
2040 4.05 4.98 4.35 5.07 4.18 5.51 5.13
2040 4.05 4.98 4.35 5.07 4.18 5.51 5.13
2041 4.06 4.99 4.36 5.08 4.19 5.52 5.14
2041 4.06 4.99 4.36 5.08 4.19 5.52 5.14
2042 4.07 5.00 4.37 5.09 4.20 5.53 5.15
2042 4.07 5.00 4.37 5.09 4.20 5.53 5.15
2043 4.08 5.01 4.38 5.10 4.21 5.54 5.16
2043 4.08 5.01 4.38 5.10 4.21 5.54 5.16
2044 4.08 5.01 4.38 5.10 4.21 5.54 5.16
2044 4.09 5.02 4.39 5.11 4.22 5.55 5.17
2045 4.09 5.02 4.39 5.11 4.22 5.55 5.17
2045 4.10 5.03 4.40 5.12 4.23 5.56 5.18
Magellan Midstream
Energy Partners
Energy Partners
NuStar Logistics
Treasury HQM
Partners
Pipeline
2046 4.10 5.03 4.40 5.12 4.23 5.56 5.18
2046 4.10 5.03 4.40 5.12 4.23 5.56 5.18
2047 4.11 5.04 4.41 5.13 4.24 5.57 5.19
2047 4.11 5.04 4.41 5.13 4.24 5.57 5.19
2048 4.11 5.04 4.41 5.13 4.24 5.57 5.19
2048 4.11 5.04 4.41 5.13 4.24 5.57 5.19
2049 4.12 5.05 4.42 5.14 4.25 5.58 5.20
2049 4.12 5.05 4.42 5.14 4.25 5.58 5.20
2050 4.12 5.05 4.42 5.14 4.25 5.58 5.20
2050 4.13 5.06 4.43 5.15 4.26 5.59 5.21
2051 4.13 5.06 4.43 5.15 4.26 5.59 5.21
2051 4.13 5.06 4.43 5.15 4.26 5.59 5.21
2052 4.13 5.06 4.43 5.15 4.26 5.59 5.21
2052 4.14 5.07 4.44 5.16 4.27 5.60 5.22
2053 4.14 5.07 4.44 5.16 4.27 5.60 5.22
2053 4.14 5.07 4.44 5.16 4.27 5.60 5.22
2054 4.14 5.07 4.44 5.16 4.27 5.60 5.22
2054 4.15 5.08 4.45 5.17 4.28 5.61 5.23
2055 4.15 5.08 4.45 5.17 4.28 5.61 5.23
2055 4.15 5.08 4.45 5.17 4.28 5.61 5.23
2056 4.15 5.08 4.45 5.17 4.28 5.61 5.23
2056 4.15 5.08 4.45 5.17 4.28 5.61 5.23
2057 4.16 5.09 4.46 5.18 4.29 5.62 5.24
2057 4.16 5.09 4.46 5.18 4.29 5.62 5.24
2058 4.16 5.09 4.46 5.18 4.29 5.62 5.24
2058 4.16 5.09 4.46 5.18 4.29 5.62 5.24
2059 4.16 5.09 4.46 5.18 4.29 5.62 5.24
2059 4.17 5.10 4.47 5.19 4.30 5.63 5.25
2060 4.17 5.10 4.47 5.19 4.30 5.63 5.25
2060 4.17 5.10 4.47 5.19 4.30 5.63 5.25
2061 4.17 5.10 4.47 5.19 4.30 5.63 5.25
2061 4.17 5.10 4.47 5.19 4.30 5.63 5.25
2062 4.17 5.10 4.47 5.19 4.30 5.63 5.25
2062 4.18 5.11 4.48 5.20 4.31 5.64 5.26
2063 4.18 5.11 4.48 5.20 4.31 5.64 5.26
2063 4.18 5.11 4.48 5.20 4.31 5.64 5.26
2064 4.18 5.11 4.48 5.20 4.31 5.64 5.26
2064 4.18 5.11 4.48 5.20 4.31 5.64 5.26
2065 4.18 5.11 4.48 5.20 4.31 5.64 5.26
2065 4.18 5.11 4.48 5.20 4.31 5.64 5.26
2066 4.19 5.12 4.49 5.21 4.32 5.65 5.27
2066 4.19 5.12 4.49 5.21 4.32 5.65 5.27
2067 4.19 5.12 4.49 5.21 4.32 5.65 5.27
2067 4.19 5.12 4.49 5.21 4.32 5.65 5.27
Union Pacific
Gennesse &
Kansas City
CSX Corp.
Wyoming
Canadian
Canadian
Southern
Southern
Treasury
National
Norfolk
Pacific
HQM
2018 1.83
2018 1.98
2019 2.12
2019 2.23
2020 2.33
2020 2.41
2012 2.49
2021 2.56
2022 2.64
2022 2.71
2023 2.79
2023 2.86
2024 2.94
2024 3.02
2025 3.09
2025 3.17
2026 3.24
2026 3.30
2027 3.36
2027 3.42 3.18 3.44 3.39 6.50 3.75 3.24 3.11
2028 3.47 3.23 3.49 3.44 6.55 3.80 3.29 3.16
2028 3.52 3.28 3.54 3.49 6.60 3.85 3.34 3.21
2029 3.57 3.33 3.59 3.54 6.65 3.90 3.39 3.26
2029 3.61 3.37 3.63 3.58 6.69 3.94 3.43 3.30
2030 3.65 3.41 3.67 3.62 6.73 3.98 3.47 3.34
2030 3.68 3.44 3.70 3.65 6.76 4.01 3.50 3.37
2031 3.71 3.47 3.73 3.68 6.79 4.04 3.53 3.40
2031 3.74 3.50 3.76 3.71 6.82 4.07 3.56 3.43
2032 3.77 3.53 3.79 3.74 6.85 4.10 3.59 3.46
2032 3.79 3.55 3.81 3.76 6.87 4.12 3.61 3.48
2033 3.81 3.57 3.83 3.78 6.89 4.14 3.63 3.50
2033 3.83 3.59 3.85 3.80 6.91 4.16 3.65 3.52
2034 3.85 3.61 3.87 3.82 6.93 4.18 3.67 3.54
2034 3.86 3.62 3.88 3.83 6.94 4.19 3.68 3.55
2035 3.88 3.64 3.90 3.85 6.96 4.21 3.70 3.57
2035 3.89 3.65 3.91 3.86 6.97 4.22 3.71 3.58
2036 3.90 3.66 3.92 3.87 6.98 4.23 3.72 3.59
2036 3.91 3.67 3.93 3.88 6.99 4.24 3.73 3.60
2037 3.92 3.68 3.94 3.89 7.00 4.25 3.74 3.61
2037 3.93 3.69 3.95 3.90 7.01 4.26 3.75 3.62
2038 3.94 3.70 3.96 3.91 7.02 4.27 3.76 3.63
2038 3.95 3.71 3.97 3.92 7.03 4.28 3.77 3.64
2039 3.96 3.72 3.98 3.93 7.04 4.29 3.78 3.65
2039 3.97 3.73 3.99 3.94 7.05 4.30 3.79 3.66
2040 3.98 3.74 4.00 3.95 7.06 4.31 3.80 3.67
2040 3.98 3.74 4.00 3.95 7.06 4.31 3.80 3.67
2030 3.99 3.75 4.01 3.96 7.07 4.32 3.81 3.68
2031 4.00 3.76 4.02 3.97 7.08 4.33 3.82 3.69
2032 4.00 3.76 4.02 3.97 7.08 4.33 3.82 3.69
2033 4.01 3.77 4.03 3.98 7.09 4.34 3.83 3.70
2034 4.02 3.78 4.04 3.99 7.10 4.35 3.84 3.71
2035 4.02 3.78 4.04 3.99 7.10 4.35 3.84 3.71
2036 4.03 3.79 4.05 4.00 7.11 4.36 3.85 3.72
2037 4.03 3.79 4.05 4.00 7.11 4.36 3.85 3.72
2038 4.04 3.80 4.06 4.01 7.12 4.37 3.86 3.73
2039 4.04 3.80 4.06 4.01 7.12 4.37 3.86 3.73
2040 4.05 3.81 4.07 4.02 7.13 4.38 3.87 3.74
2040 4.05 3.81 4.07 4.02 7.13 4.38 3.87 3.74
2041 4.06 3.82 4.08 4.03 7.14 4.39 3.88 3.75
2041 4.06 3.82 4.08 4.03 7.14 4.39 3.88 3.75
2042 4.07 3.83 4.09 4.04 7.15 4.40 3.89 3.76
2042 4.07 3.83 4.09 4.04 7.15 4.40 3.89 3.76
2043 4.08 3.84 4.10 4.05 7.16 4.41 3.90 3.77
2043 4.08 3.84 4.10 4.05 7.16 4.41 3.90 3.77
2044 4.08 3.84 4.10 4.05 7.16 4.41 3.90 3.77
2044 4.09 3.85 4.11 4.06 7.17 4.42 3.91 3.78
2045 4.09 3.85 4.11 4.06 7.17 4.42 3.91 3.78
2045 4.10 3.86 4.12 4.07 7.18 4.43 3.92 3.79
2046 4.10 3.86 4.12 4.07 7.18 4.43 3.92 3.79
2046 4.10 3.86 4.12 4.07 7.18 4.43 3.92 3.79
2047 4.11 3.87 4.13 4.08 7.19 4.44 3.93 3.80
Gennesse &
Kansas City
CSX Corp.
Wyoming
Canadian
Canadian
Southern
Southern
Treasury
National
Norfolk
Pacific
Pacific
Union
HQM
Section Contents
Market Segment: Electric .........................................................................................................................1
Companies Included in the Electric Market Segment ..............................................................................1
Companies Not Included in the Electric Market Segment .....................................................................10
Market Segment: Gas Distribution ........................................................................................................24
Companies Included in the Gas Distribution Market Segment ..............................................................25
Companies Not Included in the Gas Distribution Market Segments .....................................................30
Market Segment: Gas Transmission Pipeline and Fluid Transportation Pipeline............................32
Companies Included in the Gas Transmission Pipeline Market Segment .............................................33
Companies Included in the Fluid Transportation Pipeline Market Segment .........................................36
Companies Not Included in the Gas Transmission Pipeline or Fluid Transportation Market
Segments ................................................................................................................................................41
Market Segment: Railroad, Class I and Other Railroads....................................................................79
Companies Included in the Railroad Market Segment...........................................................................80
Companies Not Included in the Railroad Market Segment....................................................................83
Note: The information below is verbatim from Value Line and the company’s website.
integrated water management; ALLETE Renewable Resources, which operates and maintains wind
generation facilities in North Dakota; and ALLETE Properties, which owns real estate in Florida. 1
Why was the company included?
This company is similar (and is one of) to the Electric Companies that the State Assessed Section is
responsible for valuing. The company engages in providing energy in the upper Midwest.
Alliant Energy Corp.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Alliant Energy Corp., formerly named Interstate Energy, is a holding company formed through the
merger of WPL Holdings, IES Industries, and Interstate Power. Supplies electricity, gas, and other
services in Wisconsin, Iowa, and Minnesota. Elect. revs. by state: WI, 44%; IA, 55%; MN, 1%. Elect.
rev.: residential, 35%; commercial, 25%; industrial, 29%; wholesale, 9%; other, 2%. Fuel sources, 2016:
coal, 44%; gas, 21%; other, 35%. Fuel costs: 49% of revs. 2016 depreciation rate: 5.9%. Estimated plant
age: 14 years. Has approximately 4,000 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Alliant Energy has two energy generation and distribution subsidiaries, one in Wisconsin and one in
Iowa. The company has a strategic plan built upon two key elements: Growth and Optimization. Growth
- The growth element of the strategic plan includes accelerating the growth of customers’ electric and
gas usage and expanding our portfolio of energy resources to include additional clean and renewable
energy. Optimization - The second key element of the strategic plan focuses resources on providing
reliable electric and natural gas service to customers in our Iowa and Wisconsin service areas. We do
this through continued modernization of the power grid, upgrades to the gas distribution system and
optimization of the generation fleet. Alliant Energy owns a portfolio of electric generating facilities
operating on a diverse mix of fuels, including coal, natural gas and renewable resources. The output
from these generating facilities is supplemented with purchased power. Alliant Energy Resources is the
parent company of Alliant Energy’s non-regulated businesses. The strategic plan for Alliant Energy’s
non-regulated operations involves maintaining a portfolio of businesses that add to earnings but do not
require significant amounts of capital. Alliant Energy Corporate Services, Inc., supports the company
with traditional administrative functions including strategy, accounting, communications, legal,
regulatory, information technology, environmental and safety management and more. 2
Why was the company included?
This company is similar to the Electric Companies that the State Assessed Section is responsible for
valuing. The company engages in providing energy in the upper Midwest.
Ameren Corporation
Company Summary from Value Line:
Ameren Corporation is a holding company formed through the merger of Union Electric and CIPSCO.
Acq’d CILCORP 1/03; Illinois Power 10/04. Has 1.2 mill. electric and 127,000 gas customers in
Missouri; 1.2 mill. electric and 813,000 gas customers in Illinois. Discontinued nonregulated power-
generation operation in ’13. Electric rev. breakdown: residential, 45%; commercial, 33%; industrial,
12%; other, 10%. Generating sources: coal, 66%; nuclear, 23%; hydro, 3%; purchased & other, 8%. Fuel
costs: 28% of revs. ’16 reported deprec. rates: 3%-4%. Has 8,600 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Ameren Corporation is a Fortune 500 company that trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol AEE. It is the parent company of Ameren Illinois, based in Collinsville, Ill., and Ameren
1
http://www.allete.com/, Accessed 12/27/2017
2
https://www.alliantenergy.com/AboutAlliantEnergy/OperationsValuesandCompliance, Accessed 12/27/2017
Missouri in St. Louis. Ameren Transmission Company, also based in St. Louis, designs and builds
regional transmission projects. View our businesses. Ameren was created by the combination of three
Illinois utilities (CIPSCO Incorporated, CILCO Inc. and Illinois Power Company) and Union Electric
Company of St. Louis. The name comes from combining the words American and Energy. Employing
more than 8,500 personnel, Ameren powers the quality of life for 2.4 million electric customers and
more than 900,000 natural gas customers across a 64,000-square-mile area. Ameren Missouri ranks as
the largest electric power provider in Missouri, and Ameren Illinois ranks as Illinois' third largest natural
gas distribution operation in total number of customers. Ameren companies generate a net capacity of
nearly 10,200 megawatts of electricity and own more than 7,500 circuit miles of transmission lines.
Ameren's rates are some of the lowest in the nation. 3
Why was the company included?
This company is similar to the Electric Companies that the State Assessed Section is responsible for
valuing. The company engages in providing energy in the Midwest.
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
Company Summary from Value Line:
American Electric Power Company, Inc. (AEP), through 10 operating utilities, serves 5.4 mill.
customers in Arkansas, Kentucky, Indiana, Louisiana, Michigan, Ohio, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas,
Virginia, & West Virginia. Electric revenue breakdown: residential, 40%; commercial, 23%; industrial,
19%; wholesale, 15%; other, 3%. Sold SEEBOARD (British utility) ’02; Houston Pipeline ’05;
commercial barge operation in ’15. Generating sources not available. Fuel costs: 35% of revenues. ’16
reported depreciation rates (utility): 1.5%-8.6%. Has 17,600 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
AEP is one of the largest electric utilities in the U.S., serving nearly 5.4 million customers in 11 states.
We own: A more than 40,000-mile electricity transmission network – the largest in the nation. More
765-kilovolt extra-high voltage transmission lines than all other U.S. transmission systems combined.
Approximately 26,000 megawatts of generating capacity. 4
3
https://www.ameren.com/about/facts, accessed 12/27/2017
4
https://www.aep.com/about/, accessed 12/27/2017
serves 1.2 million natural gas and electric utility customers in eight states. The company's non-regulated
businesses generate wholesale electricity and produce natural gas, oil and coal. 5
5
https://www.blackhillscorp.com/about, accessed on 12/27/2017
6
http://www.centerpointenergy.com/en-us/corporate/about-us/company-overview, accessed on 12/27/2017
million residents. With our subsidiary, CMS Enterprises Company, we are also engaged in independent
power generation in several states. Our business also includes EnerBank® USA, which specializes in
providing unsecured home improvement payment option programs for homeowners through nationwide
dealer networks. 7
7
http://www.cmsenergy.com/about-cms-energy/default.aspx, accessed 12/27/2017
8
https://www.newlook.dteenergy.com/wps/wcm/connect/dte-web/home/about-dte/common/about-dte/about-dte,
accessed 12/27/2017
9
http://entergy.com/about_entergy/, accessed 12/27/2017
10
https://www.mgeenergy.com/about-us/about.htm, accessed 12/27/2017
sources: hydro, 34%; coal, 30%; other, 10%; purchased, 26%. Fuel costs: 32% of revenues. ’16 reported
deprec. rate: 3.0%. Has 1,600 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
For more than 100 years, NorthWestern Energy has delivered the energy and exceptional service that
our customers and communities count on – safely, efficiently and responsibly. We own and operate
natural gas production, transmission and distribution systems serving 282,600 customers. We own and
operate a diverse generation fleet of wind, water, natural gas and coal-fired resources* and the high-
voltage transmission system and distribution system that reliably delivers responsibly-produced
electricity to more than 427,000 customers daily. 11
Why was the company included?
This company is similar to the Electric Companies that the State Assessed Section is responsible for
valuing. This company operates in Montana, Wyoming, South Dakota, and Nebraska with generating
facilities in North Dakota and Iowa.
OGE Energy Corporation
Company Summary from Value Line:
OGE Energy Corp. is a holding company for Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company (OG&E), which
supplies electricity to 841,000 customers in Oklahoma (84% of electric revenues) and western Arkansas
(8%); wholesale is (8%). Owns 25.7% of Enable Midstream Partners. Electric revenue breakdown:
residential, 42%; commercial, 25%; industrial, 15%; other, 18%. Generating sources: coal, 33%; gas,
31%; wind, 5%; purchased, 31%. Fuel costs: 39% of revenues. ’16 reported depreciation rate (utility):
3.0%. Has 2,500 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
OGE Energy Corp. is headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma and is publicly traded on the New
York Stock Exchange under the symbol OGE. It is the parent company of Oklahoma Gas and Electric
(OG&E), a regulated utility and holds a 25.7 percent limited partner interest and 50 percent general
partner interest in Enable Midstream Partners, LP, also headquartered in Oklahoma City. Formed in
1902, OG&E is Oklahoma’s oldest and largest investor-owned electric utility. We serve more than
830,000 customers in 276 towns and cities in a 30,000 square mile area of Oklahoma and western
Arkansas. The largest city on our system, Oklahoma City, has a metro area population of approximately
1.5 million people. But we also serve towns like Enid, Ardmore, Muskogee, Norman, Durant, Ft. Smith
Ark., as well as many other smaller communities throughout our service territory. We have
approximately 2,500 employees who live and work in the very communities we serve. Our power plants,
located throughout Oklahoma, generate electricity using natural gas, coal, wind and solar power. We are
extremely proud of the fact that we, as a company, have some of the lowest rates in the entire nation.
And, because of our strong system reliability and high customer satisfaction, we're consistently ranked
in surveys as one of the highest performing utilities in the nation. 12
11
http://www.northwesternenergy.com/our-company/about-us, accessed 12/27/2017
12
https://www.oge.com/wps/portal/oge/about-
us/companyOverview/!ut/p/a1/jZDbCoJAFEW_pR_wHGe07HFszBuhBpHOS1jYJKgTJvn7adFLdDtPe8PasDgg
IAXR5NdS5l2pmrwau5jurMRFLzT0lYvzJTJK9ChaxtSdkQHIRoDgAn2DBG5IHGQh54kZc923jf_2-
OEY_tpvQTyQpwEGQ2QLi4fJ3Kboma_AG8U78MUhACErtR_-
sbVBUMcxkY3mrNlTS4Joi2PRFq12UpcO0r7vNamUrArtoGo415sUy7heZ2xyA8Fqh68!/dl5/d5/L2dBISEvZ0F
BIS9nQSEh/, accessed 12/27/2017
13
http://www.ottertail.com/corporate-profile, accessed 12/27/2017
14
https://www.vectren.com/corporate/about, accessed 12/27/2017
15
https://www.wecenergygroup.com/about/aboutus.htm, accessed 12/27/2017
to how we produce and deliver energy, looking for better ways to serve our customers and ensure we are
Always Delivering. 16
AVANGRID, Inc. (NYSE: AGR) is a U.S. based diversified energy and utility company with $30
billion in assets and operations in 25 states, created through the merger of Iberdrola USA and UIL
Holdings Corp. in December 2015. 18
16
https://www.xcelenergy.com/company/corporate_responsibility_report/who_we_are, accessed 12/27/2017
17
https://www.avangrid.com/AboutAvanGrid/default.html, accessed on 12/19/2016
18
http://www.avangrid.com/NewsRoom/NewsReleases/default.html, accessed 12/22/2016
19
http://www.avistacorp.com/about/Pages/aboutus.aspx, accessed 12/27/2017
20
https://www.coned.com/en/about-us/company-information, accessed 12/27/2017
21
https://www.dominionenergy.com/about-us/who-we-are, accessed 12/27/2017
22
https://www.duke-energy.com/our-company/about-us, accessed 12/27/2017
23
https://www.edison.com/home/about-us/our-companies.html, accessed 12/27/2017
24
https://www.epelectric.com/, accessed 12/27/2017
Eversource is New England’s largest energy delivery company, safely and reliably delivering energy to
more than 3.7 million electric and natural gas customers in Connecticut, Massachusetts and New
Hampshire.
The company operates more than 4,270 circuit miles of transmission lines, 72,000 pole miles of
distribution lines, 578 substations, 449,737 distribution transformers and 6,459 miles of natural gas
distribution pipelines across our service territory.
Our customers:
Connecticut: 1.2 million electric in 149 communities, 222,000 natural gas in 71 communities.
Massachusetts: 1.4 million electric in 140 communities, 283,000 natural gas in 51 communities.
New Hampshire: 510,000 electric in 211 communities. 26
25
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/algonquin-power--utilities-corp-completes-acquisition-of-the-
empire-district-electric-company-609135805.html, accessed 12/27/2017
26
https://www.eversource.com/Content/general/about/about-eversource/customer-profile, accessed 12/27/2017
ind’l, 13%; other, 1%. Generating sources: nuclear, 68%; other, 8%; purch., 24%. Fuel costs: 40% of
revs. ’16 depr. rates: 2.7%-5.9% elec., 2.2% gas. Has 34,400 empls.
Additional Company Information from Website:
We are a FORTUNE 100 company that works in every stage of the energy business: power generation,
competitive energy sales, transmission and delivery. As the nation's leading competitive energy
provider, Exelon does business in 48 states, D.C., and Canada and had 2016 revenues of $31.4 billion.
We employ approximately 34,000 people nationwide. 27
Why was the company not included?
This company is located in the Electric Utility (East) Value Line Industry. We are limiting the guideline
companies for electric to the Electric Utility (Central) Value Line Industry as well as those companies
that are located in or directly next to Minnesota.
FirstEnergy Corporation
Company Summary from Value Line:
FirstEnergy Corp. is a holding company for Ohio Edison, Pennsylvania Power, Cleveland Electric,
Toledo Edison, Metropolitan Edison, Penelec, Jersey Central Power & Light, West Penn Power,
Potomac Edison, & Mon Power. Provides electric service to 6.1 million customers in OH, PA, NJ, WV,
MD, & NY. Acq’d Allegheny Energy 2/11. Electric revenue breakdown by customer class not available.
Generating sources: coal, 44%; nuclear, 26%; purchased, 30%. Fuel costs: 38% of revenues. ’16
reported deprec. rate: 2.5%. Has 15,700 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
We are a forward-thinking electric utility powered by a diverse team of employees committed to making
customers’ lives brighter, the environment better and our communities stronger. FirstEnergy (NYSE:
FE) is dedicated to safety, reliability and operational excellence. Headquartered in Akron, Ohio,
FirstEnergy includes one of the nation's largest investor-owned electric systems, more than 24,000 miles
of transmission lines that connect the Midwest and Mid-Atlantic regions, and a diverse generating fleet
with a total capacity of more than 16,000 megawatts. Our company has invested $10 billion in
environmental efforts since 1970, and we have a continuing commitment to cleaner energy resources,
smarter technology and a more sustainable planet. 28
Why was the company not included?
This company is located in the Electric Utility (East) Value Line Industry. We are limiting the guideline
companies for electric to the Electric Utility (Central) Value Line Industry as well as those companies
that are located in or directly next to Minnesota.
Fortis, Inc.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Fortis Inc.’s main focus is electricity, hydroelectric, and gas utility operations (both regulated and
nonregulated) in the United States, Canada, and the Caribbean. Has 2 mill. electric, 1.2 mill. gas
customers. Owns UNS Energy (Arizona), Central Hudson (New York), FortisBC Energy (British
Columbia), FortisAlberta (Central Alberta), and Eastern Canada (Newfoundland). Sold commercial real
estate and hotel property assets in 2015. Acquired ITC Holdings 10/16. Fuel costs: 34% of revenues. ’16
reported deprec. rate: 2.8%. Has 8,000 employees.
27
http://www.exeloncorp.com/company/about-exelon, accessed 12/27/2017
28
https://www.firstenergycorp.com/about.html, accessed 12/27/2017
29
https://www.fortisinc.com/about-us, accessed 12/27/2017
30
http://www.greatplainsenergy.com/about-gpe/company-information, accessed 12/27/2017
31
http://www.greatplainsenergy.com/news-releases/news-release-details/great-plains-energy-and-westar-energy-
shareholders-approve-0, accessed 12/27/2017
Operating companies’ systems are not interconnected. Electric. revenue breakdown: residential, 31%;
commercial, 34%; large light & power, 34%; other, 1%. Generating sources: oil, 53%; purchased, 47%.
Fuel costs: 43% of revs. ’16 reported depr. rate (utility): 3.2%. Has 3,800 empls.
Additional Company Information from Website:
At HEI, we strive to be a catalyst for a better Hawaii. We endeavor to be trusted and valued leaders in
improving the economic well-being of the state, promoting the environmental sustainability of our
islands, and benefiting the communities we serve. At the Hawaiian Electric Companies, we're
committed to achieving a 100 percent renewable energy future for Hawaii. As we continue to add
diverse types of local renewable energy, Hawaii will reduce its dependence on imported oil. Our vision
is to empower our customers and communities with affordable, reliable, clean energy, and provide
innovative energy leadership for Hawaii. At American Savings Bank, we are the bank where everybody
is somebody – a place where teammates work together to make banking easy while providing the best
customer experience. For more than 90 years we have championed the dreams of generations of island
residents and businesses. Our strength comes from helping customers succeed and supporting the
communities they live in. HEI works proactively to improve the future of Hawaii and its communities.
These efforts are integrated into our core business strategies. By helping our state achieve economic
prosperity and a clean environment, and by addressing our communities' needs, we build a sustainable
future for our companies and for Hawaii. 32
Why was the company not included?
This company is located in the Electric Utility (West) Value Line Industry. We are limiting the guideline
companies for electric to the Electric Utility (Central) Value Line Industry as well as those companies
that are located in or directly next to Minnesota.
IDACORP, Inc.
Company Summary from Value Line:
IDACORP, Inc. is a holding company for Idaho Power Company, a regulated electric utility that serves
539,000 customers throughout a 24,000-square-mile area in southern Idaho and eastern Oregon
(population: 1 million). Most of the company’s revenues are derived from the Idaho portion of its
service area. Revenue breakdown: residential, 41%; commercial, 24%; industrial, 14%; irrigation, 12%;
other, 9%. Generating sources: hydro, 39%; coal, 25%; gas, 10%; purchased, 26%. Fuel costs: 33% of
revenues. ’16 reported depreciation rate: 2.6%. Has 2,000 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Boise, Idaho-based IDACORP is a holding company comprised of Idaho Power Company, a regulated
electric utility; IDACORP Financial, a holder of affordable housing projects and other real estate
investments; and Ida-West Energy, an operator of small hydroelectric generation projects that satisfy the
requirements of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978. IDACORP was formed Oct. 1, 1998,
following approval by Idaho Power shareholders, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the
public utility commissions of Idaho, Oregon, Nevada and Wyoming (states where IDACORP has
conducted business or has holdings). Under the holding company structure, Idaho Power Company is the
primary subsidiary. This regulated utility, created in 1916, is dedicated to providing quality electric
service to nearly 542,000 general business customers in a 24,000-square-mile service area in southern
Idaho and eastern Oregon. The backbone of the company’s generation portfolio is a series of 17
hydroelectric plants it owns and operates on the Snake River and its tributaries. Idaho Power also owns
three natural gas-fired power plants and a partial interest in three coal-fired generating stations.
32
http://www.hei.com/CustomPage/Index?keyGenPage=1073751872, accessed 12/22/2017
IDACORP's common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol
"IDA". 33
33
http://www.idacorpinc.com/about-us/at-a-glance, accessed 12/27/2017
34
http://www.mdu.com/our-business, accessed 12/27/2017
commercial, 36%; industrial & other, 9%. Generating sources: gas, 70%; nuclear, 23%; coal, 4%;
purchased, 3%. Fuel costs: 25% of revs. ’16 reported depr. rate (utility): 3.4%. Has 13,800 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
NextEra Energy, Inc. (NYSE: NEE) is a leading clean energy company with consolidated revenues of
approximately $16.2 billion, approximately 45,900 megawatts of generating capacity, which includes
megawatts associated with noncontrolling interests related to NextEra Energy Partners, LP (NYSE:
NEP), and approximately 14,700 employees in 30 states and Canada as of year-end 2016. Headquartered
in Juno Beach, Florida, NextEra Energy's principal subsidiaries are Florida Power & Light Company,
which serves approximately 5 million customer accounts in Florida and is one of the largest rate-
regulated electric utilities in the United States, and NextEra Energy Resources, LLC, which, together
with its affiliated entities, is the world's largest generator of renewable energy from the wind and sun.
Through its subsidiaries, NextEra Energy generates clean, emissions-free electricity from eight
commercial nuclear power units in Florida, New Hampshire, Iowa and Wisconsin. A Fortune 200
company and included in the S&P 100 index, NextEra Energy has been recognized often by third parties
for its efforts in sustainability, corporate responsibility, ethics and compliance, and diversity, and has
been ranked No. 1 in the electric and gas utilities industry in Fortune's 2016 list of "World's Most
Admired Companies." 35
Why was the company not included?
This company is located in the Electric Utility (East) Value Line Industry. We are limiting the guideline
companies for electric to the Electric Utility (Central) Value Line Industry as well as those companies
that are located in or directly next to Minnesota. This company has nuclear plants in Wisconsin as well
as renewable energy generators in Minnesota. However, these operations are very small considering the
overall company.
Ormat Technologies, Inc.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Ormat Technologies, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides geothermal and recovered energy
power and products through two operating segments. Its electricity division (66% of 2016 revs.)
develops, constructs, owns, and operates geothermal power plants that sell electricity. Under the product
segment (34% of revs.), the company designs and manufactures power units for geothermal plants and
power units for recovered generation. Employs 1.250. Off./dir. own 14.7% of outs. stock; FIMI ENRG
and Bronicki Invest., 21% each (4/17 Proxy). On 7/26/17, the three aforementioned owners sold a 22%
stake in co. to ORIX Corp.
Additional Company Information from Website:
At Ormat Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: ORA), we’re always on; delivering renewable power and energy
solutions to our customers around the clock and around the world. Clean, reliable energy solutions
provided from geothermal, recovered energy, as well as energy management and storage solutions, is
our expertise, commitment and focus. Built on ingenuity and proven experience, Ormat is recognized
globally for developing state-of-the-art, environmentally sound power solutions. We design, build and
supply power generating equipment for our customers’ geothermal and recovered energy power plants
in 30 countries. We understand our customers’ operating challenges, because we are operators too. As a
geothermal industry leader, we’ve gained global expertise in exploring, developing, designing,
manufacturing, building, owning and operating geothermal power plants in Kenya, Guadalupe,
Guatemala, Honduras and the United States. Our vertically integrated structure enables us to leverage
35
http://www.investor.nexteraenergy.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=88486&p=irol-homeProfile, accessed 12/27/2017
our renewable energy expertise, our core capabilities, and our global experience to supply and develop
geothermal, recovered energy, and energy management and storage solutions. 36
Why was the company not included?
This company is located in the Power Company Value Line Industry. We are limiting the guideline
companies for electric to the Electric Utility (Central) Value Line Industry as well as those companies
that are located in or directly next to or in Minnesota. Ormat does have generating facilities in
Minnesota, but they are a very small portion of their overall company and Ormat is not an accurate
reflection of the types of companies we are valuing.
PG&E Corporation (Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Inc.)
Company Summary from Value Line:
PG&E Corporation is a holding company for Pacific Gas and Electric Company and nonutility
subsidiaries. Supplies electricity and gas to most of northern and central California (population 16
million). Has 5.4 million electric and 4.5 million gas customers. Electric revenue breakdown: residential,
40%; commercial, 39%; industrial, 11%; agricultural, 9%; other, 1%. Generating sources: nuclear, 24%;
hydro, 11%; gas, 7%; purchased, 58%. Fuel costs: 30% of revenues. ’16 reported depreciation rate
(utility): 3.8%. Has 24,000 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
PG&E Corporation, incorporated in California in 1995, is a holding company whose primary
operating subsidiary is Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a public utility operating in northern and
central California. The Utility was incorporated in California in 1905. PG&E Corporation became
the holding company of the Utility and its subsidiaries in 1997. The Utility generates revenues
mainly through the sale and delivery of electricity and natural gas to customers. 37
Why was the company not included?
This company is located in the Electric Utility (West) Value Line Industry. We are limiting the guideline
companies for electric to the Electric Utility (Central) Value Line Industry as well as those companies
that are located in or directly next to Minnesota.
Pinnacle West Capital Corporation
Company Summary from Value Line:
Pinnacle West Capital Corporation is a holding company for Arizona Public Service Company (APS),
which supplies electricity to 1.2 million customers in most of Arizona, except about half of the Phoenix
metro area, the Tucson metro area, and Mohave County in northwestern Arizona. Discontinued SunCor
real estate subsidiary in ’10. Electric revenue breakdown: residential, 50%; commercial, 40; industrial,
5%; other, 5%. Generating sources: nuclear, 28%; gas & other, 26%; coal, 20%; purchased, 26%. Fuel
costs: 31% of revenues. ’16 reported deprec. rate: 2.7%. Has 6,300 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Pinnacle West Capital Corporation (NYSE: PNW) is an investor owned electric utility holding company
based in Phoenix, Arizona with consolidated assets of nearly $17 billion. For over 125 years, Pinnacle
West and our affiliates have provided energy and energy-related products to people and businesses
throughout Arizona -- our history and Arizona’s history are bound together. Pinnacle West derives
essentially all of our revenues and earnings from our wholly-owned subsidiary, Arizona Public Service
(“APS”). APS is a vertically-integrated electric utility that provides either retail or wholesale electric
service to most of the State of Arizona, 1.2 million customers in total. APS is also the operator and co-
36
http://www.ormat.com/en/company/welcome/profile/ accessed 12/27/2017
37
http://www.pgecorp.com/investors/financial_reports/annual_report_proxy_statement/ar_pdf/2016/2016_Annual
_Report.pdf, accessed 12/27/2017
owner of the Palo Verde Generating Station – a primary source of electricity for the Southwest. Pinnacle
West’s other principal subsidiary is Bright Canyon Energy. 38
Why was the company not included?
This company is located in the Electric Utility (West) Value Line Industry. We are limiting the guideline
companies for electric to the Electric Utility (Central) Value Line Industry as well as those companies
that are located in or directly next to Minnesota.
PNM Resources, Inc.
Company Summary from Value Line:
PNM Resources, Inc. is a holding company with two regulated electric utilities. Public Service
Company of New Mexico (PNM) serves 520,000 customers in north central New Mexico, incl.
Albuquerque and Santa Fe. Texas-New Mexico Power Company (TNMP) transmits and distributes
power to 247,000 customers in Texas. Electric rev. breakdown: residential, 29%; commercial, 31%;
industrial, 18%; other, 22%. Generating sources: coal, 57%; nuclear, 30%; gas/oil, 12%; solar, 1%. Fuel
costs: 49% of revenues. ’16 depreciation rate: 3.3%. Has 1,800 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
PNM Resources, Inc. is an investor-owned energy holding company based in Albuquerque, New
Mexico. It provides electricity and electric services in New Mexico and Texas through its two utilities,
PNM and TNMP. PNM and TNMP have approximately 2,791 megawatts of generation capacity and
serve electricity to more than 761,000 homes and businesses in New Mexico and Texas. PNM
Resources has a solid reputation for shareholder value, customer satisfaction and service reliability. It is
publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange as PNM. In 2016, consolidated operating revenues
totaled $1.4 billion. 39
38
http://www.pinnaclewest.com/about-us/default.aspx, accessed 12/27/2017
39
http://www.pnmresources.com/about-us.aspx, accessed 12/27/2017
40
https://www.portlandgeneral.com/our-company/pge-at-a-glance/quick-facts, 12/27/2017
41
https://www.pplweb.com/who-we-are/about-us/, accessed 12/27/2017
customers and 1.8 million gas customers or nearly three out of every four people in the state. PSEG also
owns and operates a diverse fleet of power plants with approximately 12,000 megawatts of generating
capacity located primarily in the Mid-Atlantic and Northeast regions and has solar energy facilities
throughout the United States. Another member of the PSEG family of companies, PSEG Long Island,
operates the electric transmission and distribution system of the Long Island Power Authority, with 1.1
million customers. PSEG has approximately 13,100 employees, who are carrying forward a proud
tradition of dedicated service over more than 100 years. 42
Why was the company not included?
This company is located in the Electric Utility (East) Value Line Industry. We are limiting the guideline
companies for electric to the Electric Utility (Central) Value Line Industry as well as those companies
that are located in or directly next to Minnesota.
SCANA Corporation
Company Summary from Value Line:
SCANA Corporation is a holding company for South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, which supplies
electricity to 718,000 customers in central, southern, and southwestern South Carolina. Supplies gas
service to 1.4 million customers in North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia. Electric revenue
breakdown: residential, 46%; commercial, 33%; industrial, 17%; other, 4%. Generating sources: coal,
38%; gas & oil, 27%; nuclear, 23%; hydro & other, 4%; purchased, 8%. Fuel costs: 40% of revenues.
’16 reported depreciation rate: 2.6%. Has 5,900 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Headquartered in Cayce, South Carolina, SCANA is an energy-based holding company that has brought
power and fuel to homes in the Carolinas and Georgia for 170 years. SCANA is principally engaged,
through subsidiaries, in regulated electric and natural gas utility operations and other non-regulated
energy-related businesses in South Carolina, North Carolina and Georgia. In 1846, local business leaders
met to form the Charleston Gas Light Company. Two years later, the company lit the streets of
Charleston with gas streetlights. SCANA Corporation, a diversified holding company, was formed on
December 31, 1984. Over half a million electric customers in 25 counties throughout South Carolina.
More than 1.3 million customers in South Carolina, North Carolina and Georgia. Nearly 6,000 full and
part-time employees. 43
42
https://www.pseg.com/family/index.jsp, accessed 12/27/2017
43
https://www.scana.com/about, accessed 12/27/2017
44
http://www.sempra.com/about-us, accessed 12/27/2017
45
https://www.southerncompany.com/about-us.html, accessed 12/27/2017
Energy is dedicated to operating the best electric utility in the Midwest and providing quality service at
below average prices. The company is headquartered in Topeka, and employs about 2,400 people in
Kansas. Our energy centers in eleven Kansas communities generate more than 7,000 megawatts of
electricity, and we operate and coordinate 34,000 miles of transmission and distribution lines.46
KANSAS CITY, Mo. & TOPEKA, Kan.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Nov. 21, 2017-- Westar Energy, Inc.
(NYSE: WR) and Great Plains Energy Incorporated (NYSE: GXP), the parent company of Kansas City
Power & Light (“KCP&L”), today announced at their respective shareholder meetings that shareholders
overwhelmingly approved the proposals necessary for the merger between the two companies. 47
Why was the company not included?
This company is similar to the Electric Companies that the State Assessed Section is responsible for
valuing. The company serves an electric service territory in Kansas. Great Plains Energy and Westar
Energy, Inc. shareholders approved the merger on November 21, 2017. Merger is pending regulatory
approval. After the acquisition, we will review the company again to see if we should include the
company as a guideline company.
46
http://investors.westarenergy.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=89455&p=irol-irhome, accessed 12/27/2017
47
http://www.greatplainsenergy.com/news-releases/news-release-details/great-plains-energy-and-westar-energy-
shareholders-approve-0, accessed 12/27/2017
48
https://www.atmosenergy.com/company/about-atmos-energy, accessed 12/5/2017
markets natural gas; and provides other unregulated energy services, including midstream services in
Ohio. Officers and directors own 4.2% of common stock; T. Rowe Price, 9.4; BlackRock, 6.0% (4/17
Proxy).
Additional Company Information from Website:
We strive to provide operational excellence and positive experiences for our customers and the
communities we serve. Chesapeake’s regulated energy businesses include natural gas distribution and
transmission operations on the Delmarva Peninsula and in Florida, and electric distribution operations in
Florida. Chesapeake’s unregulated energy businesses include its natural gas marketing subsidiary, its
propane distribution operations, and its propane wholesale marketing subsidiary based in Houston,
Texas. 49
Why was the company included?
This company is similar to the Gas Distribution Companies that the State Assessed Section is
responsible for valuing.
New Jersey Resources Corporation
Company Summary from Value Line:
New Jersey Resources Corp. is a holding company providing retail/wholesale energy svcs. to customers
in New Jersey, and in states from the Gulf Coast to New England, and Canada. New Jersey Natural Gas
had about 521,200 customers at 9/30/16 in Monmouth and Ocean and other N.J. counties. Fiscal 2016
volume: 337 bill. cu. ft. (18% interruptible, 17% residential and commercial and electric utility, 65%
incentive programs). N.J. Natural Energy subsidiary provides unregulated retail/wholesale natural gas
and related energy svcs. 2016 dep. rate: 2.6%. Has 1,034 empls. Off./dir. own about 1.5% of common
(12/16 Proxy).
Additional Company Information from Website:
New Jersey Resources (NJR), a Fortune 1000 company, provides reliable energy and natural gas
services including transportation, distribution and asset management in states from the Gulf Coast to
New England, including the Mid-Continent region, the West Coast and Canada, while investing in and
maintaining an extensive infrastructure to support future growth. NJR safely and reliably operates and
maintains 7,300 miles of natural gas transportation and distribution infrastructure serving more than half
a million customers; develops and manages a diverse portfolio of more than 1.6 Bcf/day of
transportation capacity and 45 Bcf of storage capacity; and provides appliance installation, repair and
contract service to homes and businesses. Additionally, NJR holds investments in midstream assets
through equity partnerships, including Steckman Ridge and its stake in Dominion Midstream Partners,
L.P., as well as equity interest in the PennEast Pipeline project. NJR and its more than 1,000 employees
are committed to helping customers save energy and money by promoting conservation and encouraging
efficiency through Conserve to Preserve® and initiatives such as The SAVEGREEN Project® and The
Sunlight Advantage®. 50
Why was the company included?
This company is similar to the Gas Distribution Companies that the State Assessed Section is
responsible for valuing.
NiSource, Inc.
Company Summary from Value Line:
NiSource Inc. is a holding company for Northern Indiana Public Service Company (NIPSCO), which
supplies electricity and gas to the northern third of Indiana. Customers: 461,000 electric in Indiana, 3.4
49
http://www.chpk.com/our-company/our-companies/, accessed 12/5/2017
50
http://www.njresources.com/about/our-companies.asp, accessed 12/5/2017
million gas in Indiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Kentucky, Virginia, Maryland, Massachusetts through its
Columbia subsidiaries. Revenue breakdown, 2016: electrical, 34%; gas, 66%; other, less than 1%.
Generating sources, 2016: coal, 77.3%; purchased & other, 22.7%. 2016 reported depreciation rates:
3.0% electric, 1.8% gas. Has 7,596 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
We're a leading natural gas and electric utility company. Our nearly 8,000 employees ensure Columbia
Gas and NIPSCO customers have the energy they need across seven states. Focused on strategically
investing in our energy infrastructure – between $1.6 billion - $1.8 billion annually through 2020 – we
will be able to meet our customer commitments for the next 100 years. We offer a compelling long-term
total return investment opportunity for our shareholders. Our more than $30 billion in long-term,
identified investment opportunities in our regulated utility assets, mean we expect to grow both our
earnings and dividend by 5-7 percent annually through 2020. Virtually all of our revenues are generated
from regulated utility operations and investments. We maintain investment grade credit ratings and our
balanced and diverse geographic profile provides a balanced business risk. Headquartered in
Merrillville, Indiana – about 35 miles from Chicago – we also have a significant corporate presence in
Columbus, Ohio.51
Why was the company included?
This company is similar to the Gas Distribution Companies that the State Assessed Section is
responsible for valuing.
Northwest Natural Gas Company
Company Summary from Value Line:
Northwest Natural Gas Co. distributes natural gas to 90 communities, 704,000 customers, in Oregon
(89% of customers) and in southwest Washington state. Principal cities served: Portland and Eugene,
OR; Vancouver, WA. Service area population: 2.5 mill. (77% in OR). Company buys gas supply from
Canadian and U.S. producers; has transportation rights on Northwest Pipeline system. Owns local
underground storage. Rev. breakdown: residential, 35%; commercial, 22%; industrial, gas
transportation, and other, 43%. Employs 1,092. BlackRock Inc. owns 11.9% of shares; officers and
directors, 1.5% (4/17 proxy).
Additional Company Information from Website:
In 1852, H. C. Leonard and John Green moved from Astoria to Portland. A few years earlier, after
emigrating from the East Coast, they had founded a store serving the frontier community. But believing
that Portland was the city of the future, they moved upriver. Among other businesses, they founded a gas
company. Their purpose was to bring gas lamps to Portland’s streets, homes and businesses. On Jan. 7,
1859, they obtained a perpetual franchise from the territorial government to distribute gas. Weeks later,
on Feb. 14, Oregon became a state. Today, more than 150 years later, NW Natural carries on the
tradition started by Leonard and Green and the Portland Gas Light Co. A business that started with 49
customers in one square mile of Portland now serves more than 730,000 homes and businesses in 107
communities in Oregon and Southwest Washington. The company remains headquartered in Portland,
just a few blocks from its original site. NW Natural also serves customers out of service centers in
Albany, Astoria, Coos Bay, Eugene, Lincoln City, Salem and The Dalles in Oregon, and Vancouver,
Washington. 52
51
https://www.nisource.com/company, accessed 12/5/2017
52
https://www.nwnatural.com/AboutNWNatural/TheCompany/Overview, accessed 12/5/2017
53
https://www.rgcresources.com/about/, accessed 12/5/2017
management services in the mid-Atlantic region and also oversees the company’s activities in the
Marcellus Shale. 54
Why was the company included?
This company is similar to the Gas Distribution Companies that the State Assessed Section is
responsible for valuing.
Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. is the parent holding company of Southwest Gas and Centuri Construction
Group. Southwest Gas is a regulated gas distributor serving about 2.0 million customers in sections of
Arizona, Nevada, and California. Centuri provides construction services. 2016 margin mix: residential
and small commercial, 85%; large commercial and industrial, 3%; transportation, 12%. Total
throughput: 2.1 billion therms. Has 6,277 employees. Off. & dir. own 1.1% of common stock;
BlackRock Inc., 11.3%; The Vanguard Group, Inc., 9.4% (3/17 Proxy).
Additional Company Information from Website:
Southwest Gas Corporation was founded in 1931 and is a subsidiary of Southwest Gas Holdings Inc. We
provide natural gas service to Arizona, Nevada, and portions of California. Our communities, and the
more than 1.9 million customers we serve, are the reasons why we've been heating things up for
decades. So, whether you’re enjoying a backyard barbeque with friends, getting cozy indoors during the
winter, or preparing an epicurean delight in your new restaurant, Southwest Gas is here to support your
comfort and your lifestyle. 55
Why was the company included?
This company is similar to the Gas Distribution Companies that the State Assessed Section is
responsible for valuing.
Spire, Inc., formerly The Laclede Group
Company Summary from Value Line:
Spire Inc., formerly known as the Laclede Group, Inc., is a holding company for natural gas utilities,
which distributes natural gas across Missouri, including the cities of St. Louis and Kansas City. Has
roughly 1.7 million customers. Acquired Missouri Gas 9/13, Alabama Gas Co 9/14. Utility therms sold
and transported in fiscal 2017: 3.0 bill. Revenue mix for regulated operations: residential, 29%;
commercial and industrial, 15%; transportation, 49%; other, 6%. Has around 3,279 employees. Officers
and directors own 3.1% of common shares (1/17 proxy).
Additional Company Information from Website:
We’re dedicated to understanding our customers’ needs and goals to better serve them today and
tomorrow. Spire’s natural gas utilities and other related businesses work together to enrich the lives of
the 1.7 million customers we serve across Missouri, Mississippi and Alabama. Our gas marketing
business maintains the balance between our natural gas supplies and our customers’ needs, ensuring the
highest reliability at the lowest costs. And we’re investing in infrastructure to strengthen the regions we
serve for a better, more resilient tomorrow. 56
54
https://www.sjindustries.com/about-sji/company-overview, accessed 12/5/2017
55
https://www.swgas.com/en/about-us, accessed 12/5/2017
56
https://www.spireenergy.com/about-spire, accessed 12/5/2017
57
https://www.adamsresources.com/about-us/, accessed 12/5/2017
58
http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20170221005844/en/Delta-Natural-Gas-Enters-Agreement-
Acquired-Peoples, accessed 12/5/2017
59
http://www.egas.net/, accessed 12/5/2017
60
http://investor.egas.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=96426&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=2291982, accessed 12/5/2017
we make cash distributions. This activity will be reported on final 2017 Schedules K-1, which will be
issued in March of 2018. After that, the Partnership will no longer issue Schedules K-1. Cash
distributions made on or after November 1, 2017, by Star Group, L.P. to its unitholders will be treated
like dividends paid by a corporation and will be reported on Form 1099-DIV and may be subject to U.S.
federal income tax, as well as any applicable state or local income tax. 61
Why was the company not included?
This company’s business segments include sale of home heating products and services to residential and
commercial customers. Also, this company was recently involved in acquisitions.
Star Gas Partners, L.P. (the “Partnership” or “Star”) (NYSE:SGU), a home energy distributor and
services provider, today [August 7, 2017] announced the acquisition of two businesses that further
expand its customer base and, in one case, its geographic footprint. The Partnership purchased certain
assets of one entity in Imlay City, Michigan and another located in Plainview, New York. The former
serves approximately 3,000 accounts with annual volume (propane and motor fuel) of 3.8 million
gallons, while the latter has roughly 16,800 accounts with annual volume (heating oil, propane, and
motor fuel) of approximately 15.5 million gallons. Additional terms were not disclosed. 62
UGI Corporation
Company Summary from Value Line:
UGI Corp. operates six business segments: AmeriGas Propane (accounted for 14.2% of net income in
2016), UGI International (35.8%), Gas Utility (27.1%), Midstream & Marketing (24.2%), and Corp. &
Other -1.3%. UGI Utilities distributes natural gas and electricity to over 626,000 customers mainly in
Pennsylvania; 26%- owned AmeriGas Partners is the largest U.S. propane marketer, serving about 1.3
million users in 50 states. Acquired remaining 80% interest in Antargaz (3/04); Energy Transfer Partners
(1/12). The Vanguard Group holds 10.2% of stock; Wellington Mngt., 9.3%; Offs./dir., 2.2% (12/16
proxy). Has 8,300 empls.
Additional Company Information from Website:
UGI Corporation is a holding company that, through subsidiaries, distributes, stores, transports and
markets energy products and related services. We are a domestic and international retail distributor of
propane and butane (which are liquefied petroleum gases (“LPG”)); a provider of natural gas and
electric service through regulated local distribution utilities; a generator of electricity; a regional
marketer of energy commodities; an owner and manager of midstream assets; and a regional provider of
heating, ventilation, air conditioning, refrigeration and electrical contracting services. 63
Why was the company not included?
This company’s non-gas utility segments accounted for almost 73% of net income in 2016. Their gas
utility segment only accounted for 27% of their net income.
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Company Summary from Value Line:
WGL Holdings, Inc. is the parent of Washington Gas Light, a natural gas distributor in Washington,
D.C. and adjacent areas of VA and MD to resident’l and comm’l users (1,129,865 meters). Hampshire
Gas, a federally regulated sub., operates an underground gas-storage facility in WV. Non-regulated
subs.: Wash. Gas Energy Svcs. sells and delivers natural gas and provides energy-related products in the
61
http://www.star-gas.com/about-us, accessed 12/5/2017
62
https://globenewswire.com/news-release/2017/08/07/1081020/0/en/Star-Gas-Partners-L-P-Announces-Two-
Acquisitions.html, accessed 12/5/2017
63
http://www.ugicorp.com/about-us/, accessed 12/5/2017
D.C. metro area; Wash. Gas Energy Sys. designs/installs comm’l heating, ventilating, and air cond.
systems. The Vanguard Group owns 9.8% of common stock; Off./dir. less than 1% (1/17 proxy).
Additional Company Information from Website:
WGL Holdings, Inc. is a public utility holding company serving the Washington, D.C. metropolitan
region. Washington Gas, our leading subsidiary, has provided safe, reliable natural gas service to
customers in the D.C. area for over 160 years and, today, serves more than one million customers in the
District of Columbia, Maryland and Virginia. Our unregulated subsidiaries provide energy-related
services to residential and commercial customers, including government organizations. Whether we are
distributing clean natural gas safely to a customer’s home, providing electric power through renewable
wind energy, or installing energy-efficient systems for the federal government, our vision is consistent
and clear throughout our business: to be the preferred source of clean and efficient energy solutions. 64
WGL Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: WGL) (WGL) and AltaGas Ltd. (TSX: ALA) (AltaGas) today [January
25, 2017] announced that the Boards of Directors of both companies have unanimously approved a
definitive agreement and plan of merger for WGL to be acquired by AltaGas in an all cash transaction
for approximately $6.4 billion in cash. 65
AltaGas Ltd. (AltaGas) (TSX:ALA) and WGL Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:WGL) (WGL) announced today
[December 4, 2017] the achievement of a significant milestone in the regulatory approval process in
Maryland, with the signing of a settlement agreement with the Maryland Energy Administration (MEA),
Montgomery County, Prince George's County, and the Laborers' International Union of North America,
its affiliated District Council, and Local Unions serving or located in Washington D.C. (collectively,
LiUNA) on key terms for the merger of AltaGas and WGL currently before the Maryland Public Service
Commission (PSC). The settlement is subject to review and approval by the PSC. AltaGas continues to
anticipate closing the transaction in the first half of 2018. 66
Why was the company not included?
This company is similar to the Gas Distribution Companies that the State Assessed Section is
responsible for valuing. However, this company is currently in the middle of an acquisition.
64
http://wglholdings.com/company.cfm, accessed 12/5/2017
65
http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/WGL-II/5673262011x0x925234/4E244BFD-9996-4EF9-9436-
A2298946E1E2/WGL_News_2017_1_25_General_Releases.pdf, accessed 12/5/2017
66
http://wglholdings.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=1050534, accessed 12/5/2017
other. Boardwalk GP, is the general partner. Loews Corp. owns 51.2% of equity through subs. Has
1,200 emplys.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP (NYSE: BWP) is a midstream master limited partnership that primarily
provides transportation and storage of natural gas and liquids for our customers. Through our
subsidiaries, we own and operate approximately 13,930 miles of interconnected natural gas pipelines,
directly serving customers in thirteen states and indirectly serving customers throughout the northeastern
and southeastern United States through numerous interconnections with unaffiliated pipelines. We also
own and operate more than 435 miles of liquids pipelines in Louisiana and Texas. In 2016, our pipeline
systems transported approximately 2.3 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of natural gas and approximately 64.8
million barrels (MMBbls) of liquids. Average daily throughput on our natural gas pipeline system
during 2016 was approximately 6.3 Bcf. Our natural gas storage facilities are comprised of 14
underground storage fields located in four states with an aggregate working gas capacity of
approximately 205 Bcf, and our liquids storage facilities consist of nine salt-dome caverns located in
Louisiana with an aggregate storage capacity of 24 MMBbls. We also own three salt-dome caverns and
a brine pond for use in providing brine supply services and to support the liquids storage operations. We
serve a broad mix of customers, including producers, local distribution companies (LDCs), marketers,
electric power generators, direct industrial users and interstate and intrastate pipelines. 67
Why was the company included?
This company is similar to the Gas Transmission Pipeline Companies that the State Assessed Section is
responsible for valuing. The company primarily provides transportation and storage of natural gas and
liquids.
Enterprise Products Partners
Company Summary from Value Line:
Enterprise Products Partners, LP, is a leading integrated provider of natural gas and natural gas liquids
(NGLs) processing, fractionation, transportation, and storage services in the U.S. and Canada. Acquired
GulfTerra Energy 9/04; TEPPCO, L.P. 10/09; M2 Midsteam, 5/10; Enterprise GP, 11/10; Oiltanking
Partner, 2/15. Assets include 49,300 miles of pipelines, 260 MMBbls of storage capacity for liquids and
14 Bcf for natural gas. Four segments: NGL Pipeline (57% of 2016 revenues); Crude Oil Pipelines,
(16%); Petrochemical & Refined Products, (12%); Natural Gas Pipelines, (14%); Employs 6,800.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. is one of the largest publicly traded partnerships and a leading North
American provider of midstream energy services to producers and consumers of natural gas, NGLs,
crude oil, refined products and petrochemicals. Our services include: natural gas gathering, treating,
processing, transportation and storage; NGL transportation, fractionation, storage and import and export
terminals; crude oil gathering, transportation, storage and terminals; petrochemical and refined products
transportation, storage and terminals; and a marine transportation business that operates primarily on the
United States inland and Intracoastal Waterway systems. 68
Why was the company included?
This company is similar to the Gas Transmission Pipeline Companies that the State Assessed Section is
responsible for valuing. The company engages in the transportation, gathering, and storage of natural
gas.
67
http://www.bwpmlp.com/AboutUsBWP.aspx, accessed 12/5/2017
68
http://www.enterpriseproducts.com/about-us, accessed 12/5/2017
69
https://www.kindermorgan.com/pages/default.aspx, accessed 12/5/2017
conservative balance sheet, a low general partner cash take and an ample amount of available liquidity,
we are well positioned for growth. 70
Why was the company included?
This company is similar to the Gas Transmission Pipeline Companies that the State Assessed Section is
responsible for valuing. The company owns and actively participates in the management of natural gas
pipelines and related assets.
Williams Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Williams Partners L.P. is a master limited partnership providing oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids
processing, fractionation, transportation, and storage services. Acquired by Access Midland Partners on
1/1/15 in a stock swap. Access Partners continued to operate under the name of Williams Partners L.P.
As of 1/17, has four operating segments: Northeast G&P; Atlantic-Gulf; West; and NGL and
Petrochemicals Services. Williams Partners GP, LLC is the company’s general partner. Employs 5,604.
The Williams Companies (WMB) owns WPZ’s general partner and 74% of common units.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Williams Partners L.P. (NYSE:WPZ) is a master limited partnership focused on being the premier
provider of large-scale infrastructure connecting the growing supply of North American natural gas and
natural gas products to growing global demand for clean fuels and feedstock. Williams Partners is
dedicated to increasing the quarterly cash distributions we pay to our unitholders over time while
ensuring the ongoing stability of our business. 71
Energy Transfer Equity announced merger on 9/28/2015 with the Williams Companies. 72 The Williams
Companies owns Williams Partners, L.P. general partner and 73% of common units. This company’s
parent, Energy Transfer Equity, announced a merger on 9/28/2015 with the Williams Companies. 73
Mergers can make analysts’ opinions of the company unreliable if they are considering the proposed
merger.
Energy Transfer Equity, L.P. (NYSE:ETE) (“ETE” or the “Partnership”) today announced that it has
terminated its merger agreement with The Williams Companies, Inc. (“Williams”) effective June 29,
2016. 74
Why was the company included?
This company is similar to the Gas Transmission Pipeline Companies that the State Assessed Section is
responsible for valuing. The company provides oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids processing,
fractionation, transportation, and storage services
70
http://www.tcpipelineslp.com/, accessed 12/5/2017
71
http://investor.williams.com/williams-partners-lp, accessed 12/5/2017
72
Press Release Energy Transfer to Combine with Williams, 9/28/815, Business Wire.
http://ir.energytransfer.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=106094&p=irol-newsArticle_print&ID=2090796
73
Press Release Energy Transfer to Combine with Williams, 9/28/815, Business Wire.
http://ir.energytransfer.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=106094&p=irol-newsArticle_print&ID=2090796
74
http://ir.energytransfer.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=106094&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=2180700, accessed 12/5/2017
75
http://www.buckeye.com/AboutUs/tabid/54/Default.aspx, accessed 12/5/2017
trade on the New York and/or Toronto stock exchanges, including Enbridge Inc. (ENB), Enbridge
Energy Partners, L.P. (EEP), Enbridge Energy Management, L.L.C. (EEQ), Spectra Energy Partners, LP
(SEP) and Enbridge Income Fund (ENF). 76
CALGARY, ALBERTA--(Marketwired - Feb. 27, 2017) - Enbridge Inc. (TSX:ENB)(NYSE:ENB)
(Enbridge) announced the completion today of the previously announced stock-for-stock merger
transaction (the Transaction) to acquire all of the outstanding common stock of Spectra Energy Corp
(NYSE:SE) (Spectra Energy). 77
Spectra Energy Corp and Enbridge Inc. will combine to create North America’s largest energy
infrastructure company. This transaction creates the largest energy infrastructure company in North
America with an enterprise value of approximately C$165 billion (US$127 billion), a C$74 billion
(US$57 billion) inventory of current and potential growth projects and anticipated annual dividend
growth of 10-12 percent through 2024. The combined company will be exceedingly well positioned to
invest in critical infrastructure to meet the needs of our customers and create value for our
shareholders. 78
Why was the company included?
This company is similar to, and is one of, the Fluid Transportation Pipeline Companies that the State
Assessed Section is responsible for valuing. The company engages in the common transportation of
refined petroleum products. Even though Enbridge, Inc. completed the stock-for-stock merger
transaction of Spectra Energy Corp on February 27, 2017, still including Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P.
as a guideline company. Enbridge, Inc. is the parent of Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P., which could
affect the financial information for the current year for all companies involved.
Holly Energy Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Holly Energy Partners, L.P. (HEP) is a publicly held master limited partnership. The company is
engaged in ownership and operation of petroleum product and crude oil pipelines, terminal, tankage and
loading rack facilities, and refinery processing units that support HollyFrontier Corp.’s (HFC) refining
and marketing operations in the mid-continent, southwest, and northwest regions of the US and Alon
USA, Inc.’s refinery in Big Spring, TX. As of September 30, 2017, it owned a 75% interest in UNEV
Pipeline, LLC, a 50% interest in Frontier Aspen LLC, a 50% interest in Osage Pipe Line Company,
LLC, a 50% interest in Cheyenne Pipeline LLC, and a 25% interest in SLC Pipeline LLC. On October
31, 2017, HEP and HollyFrontier closed the restructuring transaction under which HFC now holds 59.6
million HEP common units, representing 59% of the outstanding common units, with a market value of
$2.0 billion based the on closing price of $34.19.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Holly Energy Partners, L.P. ("HEP") is a Delaware limited partnership formed in early 2004 by
HollyFrontier and is headquartered in Dallas, Texas. HEP provides petroleum product and crude oil
transportation, terminalling, storage and throughput services to the petroleum industry, including
HollyFrontier Corporation subsidiaries. The Partnership, through its subsidiaries and joint ventures,
owns and/or operates petroleum product and crude gathering pipelines, tankage and terminals in Texas,
New Mexico, Arizona, Washington, Idaho, Oklahoma, Utah, Nevada, Wyoming and Kansas as well as
refinery processing units in Kansas and Utah. 79
76
https://www.enbridgepartners.com/About-Enbridge/Company-Overview.aspx, accessed 12/7/2017
77
https://www.enbridge.com/media-center/news/details?id=2126823&lang=en&year=2017, accessed 12/7/2017
78
http://www.spectraenergy.com/Transaction/, accessed 12/28/2016
79
http://www.hollyenergy.com/about-us/corporate-structure/default.aspx, accessed 12/5/2017
Holly Energy Partners, L.P. (NYSE:HEP) (“Holly Energy”) today [August 10, 2017] announced it has
entered into definitive agreements to acquire a 50% interest in Frontier Aspen LLC (“Frontier”), the
owner of the Frontier Aspen Pipeline, and a 75% interest in the SLC Pipeline LLC (“SLC”), the owner
of the Salt Lake City Pipeline, from affiliates of Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (NYSE:PAA)
(“Plains”) for an aggregate purchase price of $250 million in cash. Holly Energy currently owns 50% of
Frontier and 25% of SLC. As a result, following the transactions, SLC and Frontier will be wholly-
owned subsidiaries of Holly Energy. The Frontier Aspen Pipeline is a 289-mile crude pipeline from
Casper, Wyoming to Frontier Station, Utah that supplies Canadian and Rocky Mountain crudes to Salt
Lake City area refiners through a connection to the SLC Pipeline. The Salt Lake City Pipeline is a 95-
mile crude pipeline that transports crude oil into the Salt Lake City area from the Utah terminal of the
Frontier Pipeline and from Wahsatch station. The acquired interest in both pipelines is expected to
generate approximately $23 million in annual forecasted EBITDA. 80
Why was the company included?
This company is similar to the Fluid Transportation Pipeline Companies that the State Assessed Section
is responsible for valuing. The company engages in the common transportation of refined petroleum
products.
Even though Holly Energy Partners, L.P. recently announced a definitive agreement to acquire 50%
interest in Frontier Aspen LLC, and a 75% interest in the SLC Pipeline, LLC from Plains All American
Pipeline, L.P., including both as guideline companies.
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P., engages in the transportation, storage, and distribution of
hydrocarbons and related products, largely in the U.S. Gulf coast and upper midwest regions. Segments:
Refined products (71% of 2016 Revs., 56% of operating income) has 9,700 miles of pipeline and 53
terminals; Crude oil (21%, 36%) has 2,200 miles of pipeline and storage capacity of 27 million barrels;
Marine storage (9%, 8%) has storage capacity of 26 million barrels. Acq’d. Longhorn Pipeline, 7/09;
storage and pipeline from BP, 9/10. Employs 1,747. Offs./dirs. Own 0.2% of out. shares; Tortoise Cap.
6.3% (2/17 proxy).
Additional Company Information from Website:
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P. is a publicly traded oil pipeline, storage and transportation company
based in Tulsa, Okla. Formerly a part of Williams Companies, Magellan began trading as Williams
Energy Partners in February 2001. In September 2003, we changed our name to Magellan Midstream
Partners and began trading under the stock ticker MMP. In 2004, Magellan purchased significant assets
from Shell, including more than 3,000 miles of refined product pipelines as well as terminals and storage
capacity. In 2007, another acquisition expanded Magellan’s footprint again with increased capabilities in
Texas. In 2009, we bought the Longhorn Pipeline running from Houston to El Paso. The reversal of this
line has played a key part in Magellan’s growth the last few years. In 2010, Magellan purchased another
100 miles of pipeline and 7.8 million barrels of storage from BP. In 2013, Magellan acquired
approximately 800 miles of refined petroleum products pipeline, four terminals and 1.7 million barrels
of storage from Plains All American Pipeline. This purchase added assets in Colorado, New Mexico,
South Dakota and Wyoming. Today, Magellan has 9,700-mile refined products pipeline system with 53
connected terminals as well as 27 independent terminals not connected to our pipeline system and our
1,100-mile ammonia pipeline system. In addition, we own approximately 2,200 miles of crude oil
pipelines and storage facilities with an aggregate storage capacity of about 26 million barrels, of which
80
http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20170810006075/en/Holly-Energy-Partners-Acquire-Remaining-
Interests-Frontier, accessed 12/5/2017
16 million are used for leased storage. We also operate five marine terminals located along coastal
waterways with an aggregate storage capacity of approximately 26 million barrels. The foundation of
our business strategy is safe and efficient operations combined with superior customer service. Upon
that foundation, we strive to increase cash distributions to our unitholders through internally-generated
growth projects which expand the profitability of our existing asset base and through acquisitions of
energy infrastructure assets possessing a reasonable risk/reward profile. 81
Why was the company included?
This company is similar to, and is one of, the Fluid Transportation Pipeline Companies that the State
Assessed Section is responsible for valuing. The company engages in the common transportation of
refined petroleum products.
NuStar Energy, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
NuStar Energy, LP, through its subsidiaries, engages in the transportation, terminalling, and storage of
crude oil and refined products. It conducts operations through its subsidiaries, primarily NuStar
Logistics, LP, and NuStar Pipeline Operating Partnership, LP. The company’s Storage segment provides
storage and handling services on a fee basis for petroleum products, specialty chemicals and other
liquids, including crude oil and other feedstocks. Its Pipeline segment owns common carrier refined
product pipelines in Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota,
Oklahoma, South Dakota, and Texas. Within its Fuels Marketing operations, the company purchases
crude oil and refined petroleum products for resale. NuStar currently has 9,300 miles of pipeline and 81
terminal and storage facilities that store and distribute crude oil, refined products, and specialty liquids.
Has 1661 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Since it went public in 2001, NuStar Energy L.P. has grown from 160 employees to about 1,600 today;
from $387 million in assets to $6.1 billion; and from $100 million in revenues to $2.1 billion. As a result
of its growth, NuStar currently has more than 9,200 miles of pipeline and 81 terminal and storage
facilities that store and distribute crude oil, refined products and specialty liquids. The partnership’s
combined system has more than 96 million barrels of storage capacity at its facilities around the world,
and NuStar has operations in the United States, Canada, Mexico, the Netherlands, including St.
Eustatius in the Caribbean, and the United Kingdom. 82
Why was the company included?
This company is aligned with, and is one of, the fluid transportation companies that the State Assessed
Section is responsible for valuing.
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P., is a publicly traded master limited partnership which operates
through various subsidiaries. It engages in the transportation, storage, terminaling, and marketing of
crude oil, refined products, and liquefied petroleum gas. As of December 31, 2016, the company owned
or leased approximately 19,200 miles of active pipelines and gathering systems. Storage capacity 32
million barrels of natural gas liquids (NGL) storage facilities; approximately 80 million barrels of crude
oil and refined products; 97 Bcf of natural gas. Has about 5,100 employees.
81
https://www.magellanlp.com/AboutUs/Default.aspx, accessed 12/5/2017
82
http://nustarenergy.com/en-us/Company/Pages/CompanyMain.aspx, accessed 12/5/2017
Holly Energy Partners, L.P. (NYSE:HEP) (“Holly Energy”) today [August 10, 2017] announced it has
entered into definitive agreements to acquire a 50% interest in Frontier Aspen LLC (“Frontier”), the
owner of the Frontier Aspen Pipeline, and a 75% interest in the SLC Pipeline LLC (“SLC”), the owner
of the Salt Lake City Pipeline, from affiliates of Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (NYSE:PAA)
(“Plains”) for an aggregate purchase price of $250 million in cash. Holly Energy currently owns 50% of
Frontier and 25% of SLC. As a result, following the transactions, SLC and Frontier will be wholly-
owned subsidiaries of Holly Energy. The Frontier Aspen Pipeline is a 289-mile crude pipeline from
Casper, Wyoming to Frontier Station, Utah that supplies Canadian and Rocky Mountain crudes to Salt
Lake City area refiners through a connection to the SLC Pipeline. The Salt Lake City Pipeline is a 95-
mile crude pipeline that transports crude oil into the Salt Lake City area from the Utah terminal of the
Frontier Pipeline and from Wahsatch station. The acquired interest in both pipelines is expected to
generate approximately $23 million in annual forecasted EBITDA. 84
Why was the company included?
This company is similar to the Fluid Transportation Pipeline Companies that the State Assessed Section
is responsible for valuing. The company engages in the common transportation of refined petroleum
products.
83
https://www.plainsallamerican.com/about-us, accessed 12/5/2017
84
http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20170810006075/en/Holly-Energy-Partners-Acquire-Remaining-
Interests-Frontier, accessed 12/5/2017
85
http://www.americanmidstream.com/about-us/default.aspx, accessed 12/5/2017
86
http://www.americanmidstream.com/investor-relations/press-releases/press-release-details/2017/American-
Midstream-Partners-to-Acquire-Southcross-Energy-Partners-and-Certain-Assets-of-Southcross-Holdings-
Forming-3-Billion-Partnership/default.aspx, accessed 12/5/2017
87
http://www.americanmidstream.com/investor-relations/press-releases/press-release-details/2017/American-
Midstream-Partners-Announces-Successful-Completion-of-Merger-with-JP-Energy-Partners/default.aspx,
accessed 12/6/2017
approximately 2,100 distribution locations. We conduct our business principally through our subsidiary
AmeriGas Propane, L.P. UGI Corporation, through subsidiaries, is the sole General Partner and owns
26% of the Partnership. 88
Why was the company not included?
This company operates as a retail and wholesale distributor of propane gas.
Andeavor Logistics, L.P. (formerly Tesoro Logistics, L.P. )
Company Summary from Value Line:
Andeavor Logistics LP, formerly Tesoro Logistics LP, is a full-service logistics company operating
primarily in the western and midcontinent US. It owns/operates a network of crude oil, refined products,
& natural gas pipelines; terminals with storage capacity for crude oil and refined products, rail facilities,
marine terminals, a trucking fleet, and natural gas processing and fractionation complexes. Business
incl.: Terminalling/Transportation (50% of ’16 rev.), Gathering (28%), and Processing (22%). Employs
1088. Off./dir own less than 1% of units; Tesoro Corp., 34.4%; Tortoise Cap’l, 10.6%; Center Coast
Cap’l, 5.1% (’16 10-K).
Additional Company Information from Website:
Andeavor Logistics LP is a leading full-service logistics company operating primarily in the western and
mid-continent regions of the United States. We are highly focused on delivering a superior customer
experience through safe, reliable performance, attention to detail, and offering smart, flexible solutions.
Andeavor Logistics owns and operates a network of crude oil, refined products and natural gas
pipelines. We also own and operate crude oil and refined products truck terminals, marine terminals and
dedicated storage facilities. In addition, Andeavor Logistics owns and operates natural gas processing
and fractionation complexes. Headquartered in San Antonio, Texas, we have operations across nine
states. Our assets are well positioned around key basins and connected to major gathering, storage,
transportation and processing hubs. By optimizing our existing operations, pursuing organic expansion
opportunities and growing through strategic acquisitions, Andeavor Logistics is on a distinctive path and
the premier partner of choice for midstream service. 89
SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS - October 30, 2017 - Andeavor Logistics LP (NYSE: ANDX) and Andeavor
(NYSE: ANDV) today announced that Andeavor Logistics has completed its acquisition of Western
Refining Logistics, LP (NYSE: WNRL) in a unit-for-unit transaction and assumption of $280 million of
net debt for a total enterprise value of approximately $1.7 billion, based on Andeavor Logistics' closing
unit price of $45.90 on October 30, 2017. The strategic combination of the two companies further
positions Andeavor Logistics as a growth-oriented, full-service and diversified midstream company with
greater organic growth opportunities across the combined geographic footprint. As a result of this
acquisition, Andeavor Logistics is well positioned to compete and grow organically in the highly
attractive Permian Basin, principally in the Delaware basin where Andeavor and Andeavor Logistics
have a strong logistics asset base, crude oil marketing capability and meaningful refining offtake. 90
88
http://investors.amerigas.com/investor-relations/ir-home/default.aspx, accessed 12/6/2017
89
http://www.andeavorlogistics.com/about/, accessed 1/4/2017
90
http://ir.andeavorlogistics.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=242247&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=2312595, accessed
12/6/2017
and transportation were 50% of revenues. Will consider this company for future studies. Not including
for the 2018 study because the company was recently involved in an acquisition of Western Refining
Logistics, L.P.
Antero Midstream Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Antero Midstream Partners, LP is a limited partnership formed by Antero Resources Corp. (AR) to own,
operate, and develop midstream energy assets to service its energy production. The partnership’s assets
consist of gathering pipelines, compressor stations, and interests in processing and fractionation plants
that collect and process natural gas, NGLs, and oil from AR’s wells in the Marcellus and Utica Shales.
Also owns water handling and treatment infrastructure that deliver fresh water and wastewater handling
services for well completion operations. As of 2/15/17, AR owns 58.6% of outstanding units; Off. & dir.
less than 1%. Employs 480.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Headquartered in Denver, Colorado, Antero Midstream Partners LP (NYSE:AM) is a growth-oriented
limited partnership formed by Antero Resources Corporation (NYSE:AR) to own, operate and develop
midstream energy assets to service Antero Resources’ rapidly increasing production. Our assets consist
of gathering pipelines and compressor stations, processing and fractionation plants, and water handling
and treatment infrastructure, through which we provide midstream services to Antero Resources under
long-term, fixed-fee contracts. Our assets are located in the rapidly developing liquids-rich southwestern
core of the Marcellus Shale in northwest West Virginia and liquids-rich core of the Utica Shale in
southern Ohio. We invite you to discover our impressive assets and learn more about our significant
organic growth potential. 91
Why was the company not included?
This company is mainly provides gathering services and water for hydro fracturing. These business
segments are not similar to the main business segments of the companies the State Assessed Section is
responsible for valuing.
ARC Logistics Partners
Company Summary from Value Line:
In August 2017, Arc Logistics Partners, LP along with Lightfoot Capital Partners GP, LLC and
Lightfoot Capital Partners, LP entered into a merger agreement with Zenith Energy US, LP. Under the
terms of the agreement, all Arc Logistics common unitholders, other than Lightfoot, will receive $16.50
per common unit in cash for each common unit they own. Due to this news, the company’s ranks were
suspended. Arc Logistics Partners is a limited partnership formed by Lightfoot Capital Partners and its
general partner, Lightfoot Capital Partners GP, to operate a diversified portfolio of complementary
energy logistics assets. As of September 30, 2017, its assets consisted of: 21 terminals with
approximately 7.8 million barrels of crude oil, and petroleum product; four rail transloading facilities
with approximately 126,000 bpd of throughput capacity; and the LNG Interest in connection with the
LNG Facility, which has 320,000 M3 of LNG storage, and 1.5 bcf/d natural gas sendout capacity. Has
111 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Arc Logistics Partners LP (NYSE: ARCX) logistics assets are strategically located along the East Coast,
West Coast, Gulf Coast, and Midwest regions of the United States to receive and supply a diverse group
of third-party customers, including major oil and gas companies, independent refiners, crude oil and
petroleum product marketers, distributors and various industrial manufacturers. The location of our
91
http://www.anteromidstream.com/, accessed 12/6/2017
assets, combined with our connectivity to major U.S. energy infrastructure, allows us to meet the
evolving needs of our customers.We provide customers with storage alternatives to handle a wide array
of products including gasoline, distillates, aviation gas, asphalt, fuel oil, crude oil, ethanol, bio-diesel,
methanol and crude tall oil. Many of our facilities manage multiple products and offer additional
capacity to support the changing needs of our customers. Our customer-focused business model,
combined with a diverse asset base, provides us with the opportunity to attract new customers and
expand services to our existing customers. 92
Why was the company not included?
This company’s operations focus mainly on storage and a wide variety of products. These business
segments are not similar to the main business segments of the companies the State Assessed Section is
responsible for valuing. Also, this company entered into a merger agreement in August 2017 (see
Company Summary from Value Line).
Archroc, Inc.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Archrock, Inc. is a pure play natural gas contract operations services business and the leading provider
of natural gas compression services to customers in the oil and natural gas industry throughout the US
and a leading supplier of aftermarket services to customers that own compression equipment in the US.
The company operates in two business segments. As of December 31, 2016, its contract operations
business was largely comprised of its significant equity investment in Archrock Partners, L.P. and its
subsidiaries, in addition to the company’s owned fleet of natural gas compression equipment that it uses
to provide operations services to its customers. Archrock’s aftermarket services business provides a full
range of services to support the compression needs of customers. The company sells parts and
components and provide operations, maintenance, overhaul and reconfiguration services to customers
who own compression equipment. Has 1700 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Archrock, Inc. (NYSE:AROC) is a pure-play U.S. natural gas contract compression services business.
Archrock, Inc. holds interests in Archrock Partners, L.P. (NASDAQ: APLP), a master limited
partnership and the leading provider of natural gas compression services to customers in the oil and
natural gas industry throughout the United States. 93
Why was the company not included?
This company provides compression services. This business segment is not similar to the main business
segments of the companies the State Assessed Section is responsible for valuing.
Archrock Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Archrock Partners, LP, a Delaware limited partnership formed in June 2006, is the leading provider of
natural gas contract compression services. It provides comprehensive contract operations services,
including the personnel, equipment, tools, materials, and supplies to meet its customers’ natural gas
compression needs. Based on the operating specifications at the customer’s location and the customer’s
unique compression needs, these services include designing, sourcing, owning, installing, operating,
servicing, repairing, and maintaining equipment. When providing contract operations services, the
company works closely with a customer’s field service personnel so that the compression services can
be adjusted to efficiently match changing characteristics of the natural gas reservoir and the natural gas
92
http://arcxlp.com/company/, accessed 12/6/2017
93
http://www.archrock.com/aboutus, accessed 12/6/2017
produced. Archrock, Inc. owns an equity interest in Archrock Partners, including all of the general
partner interest.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Archrock Partners, L.P. (NASDAQ:APLP), a master limited partnership, is the leading provider of
natural gas contract compression services to clients throughout the United States. An equity interest in
the company is owned by Archrock, Inc. (AROC), a pure-play U.S. natural gas contract compression
services leader. 94
Why was the company not included?
This company provides compression services. This business segment is not similar to the main business
segments of the companies the State Assessed Section is responsible for valuing.
Azure Midstream Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Not available. Company is not publically traded.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Azure Midstream Partners, LP, headquartered in Dallas, Texas, is a fee-based, growth-oriented limited
partnership formed to develop, operate, and acquire midstream energy assets. The Partnership provides
natural gas gathering, transportation, and processing services; as well as NGL transportation and crude
oil logistics services. The Partnership's assets include 963 miles of gathering lines in the Shelby Trough
sub-play of the Haynesville Shale and the horizontal Cotton Valley play located in east Texas and north
Louisiana that are capable of gathering 1.9 Bcf/d. The Partnership also has three natural gas processing
facilities with 210 MMcf/d of cumulative processing capacity located in the Panola, San Augustine and
Tyler Counties of Texas, two NGL transportation pipelines that connect its Panola County and Tyler
County processing facilities to third party NGL pipelines capable of transporting 20,000 barrels per day,
and three crude oil transloading facilities containing six crude oil transloaders with a combined capacity
of 31,200 Bbls/d. 95
Why was the company not included?
Company is no longer publically traded.
Blueknight Energy Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Blueknight Energy Partners, LP, a publicly traded master limited partnership, provides integrated
terminalling, storage, processing, gathering, transportation, and marketing services for companies
engaged in the production, distribution, and marketing of crude oil and asphalt products. It manages its
operations through four segments: asphalt terminalling services; crude oil terminalling and storage
services; crude oil pipeline services; and crude oil trucking and producer field services. Its diversified
portfolio of assets consist of roughly 9.6 million barrels of combined asphalt product and residual fuel
oil storage at 54 terminals in 26 states, 7.2 million barrels of crude oil storage in Oklahoma and Texas,
about 6.6 million barrels of which are located at the Cushing, Oklahoma Interchange, 670 miles of crude
oil pipeline located primarily in Oklahoma and Texas, and 200 crude oil transportation and oilfield
services vehicles deployed in Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas. Has 380 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Blueknight Energy Partners, L.P. is a publicly traded master limited partnership formed in July 2007.
Blueknight owns and operates a diversified portfolio of complementary midstream energy assets. The
94
http://www.archrock.com/aplp, accessed 12/5/2017
95
http://www.azuremidstreampartners.com/pages/about-us, accessed 12/5/2017
depth of our experience in the midstream energy business is second to none. Our strategically located
assets allow us to be a leading provider of midstream services in the energy industry. We provide
services to our customers by focusing on two operational areas: 1. Product terminalling (Liquid asphalt
and Crude oil) and 2. Crude oil logistics (Pipeline transportation and Trucking and producer field
services). 96
96
http://www.bkep.com/about, accessed 12/6/2017
97
https://www.bp.com/en_us/midstream/bp-midstream-partners.html, accessed 12/6/2017
98
https://www.bp.com/en_us/midstream/bp-midstream-partners/our-assets.html, accessed 12/6/2017
99
https://www.bp.com/en_us/bp-us/media-room/press-releases/bp-midstream-partners-lp-launches-initial-public-
offering.html, accessed 10/17/2017
connecting the Sabine Pass LNG terminal to various existing interstate natural gas pipelines in southwest
Louisiana. Has 642 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Cheniere Energy, Inc. (NYSE MKT: LNG) (Cheniere), is a Houston-based energy company primarily
engaged in LNG-related businesses. We own and operate the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal and
Creole Trail Pipeline located in Louisiana, through our general partner ownership interest in and
management agreements with Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (NYSE MKT: CQP) (Cheniere Partners)
and our partial ownership interest in Cheniere Energy Partners LP Holdings, LLC (NYSE MKT: CQH).
Cheniere Partners is developing, constructing and operating a liquefaction project at the Sabine Pass
LNG terminal (the "SPL Project") adjacent to the existing regasification facilities for up to six trains,
with expected aggregate nominal production capacity, which is prior to adjusting for planned
maintenance, production reliability and potential overdesign, of approximately 27.0 mtpa of LNG. Train
1 commenced operations in May 2016, Train 2 commenced operations in September 2016 and Train 3
commenced operations in March 2017. Trains 4-5 are currently under construction. All regulatory
approvals have been received to construct and operate Train 6, and FID is expected to be reached upon
obtaining an EPC contract, commercial contracts and financing sufficient to support construction.
Cheniere is developing and constructing additional liquefaction facilities near Corpus Christi, Texas (the
"Corpus Christi LNG terminal"). The Corpus Christi LNG terminal is being designed for up to five
trains, with expected aggregate nominal production capacity, which is prior to adjusting for planned
maintenance, production reliability and potential overdesign, of approximately 22.5 mtpa of LNG, three
LNG storage tanks with capacity of approximately 13.5 Bcfe and two marine berths. Construction began
on the first two trains in May 2016. All regulatory approvals have been received to construct and operate
Train 3, and FID is expected to be reached upon obtaining commercial contracts and financing sufficient
enough to support construction. Cheniere has also filed the NEPA pre-filing to commence the regulatory
process on Train 4 and 5. Cheniere is also engaged in the LNG and natural gas marketing business.
Through its subsidiary, Cheniere Marketing, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Cheniere Marketing”),
it is developing a portfolio of long-, medium- and short-term SPAs offering LNG on an FOB or DAT
basis. Cheniere Marketing has purchased LNG from the SPL Project and other locations worldwide and
transported and unloaded commercial LNG cargoes. Cheniere Marketing is expected to have access to
excess LNG from the SPL Project and the Corpus Christi LNG terminal not sold under long-term sale
and purchase agreements to third parties. Cheniere continues to evaluate the energy markets for
additional development and/or marketing opportunities that would leverage the existing platform and
strategically fit within the Cheniere organization. 100
Why was the company not included?
This company is mainly located in the Gulf Coast. The Gulf Coast is a different market than the market
of the companies for which the State Assessed Section is responsible for valuing. If this company and its
subsidiaries was similar to the companies for which the State Assessed Section is responsible for
valuing, would most likely use the subsidiaries.
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Cheniere Energy Partners, LP (Cheniere Partners) is a limited partnership formed by Cheniere Energy,
Inc. to own and operate the Sabine Pass liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal on the Sabine Pass deep-
water shipping channel less than four miles from the Gulf Coast. The Sabine Pass LNG terminal has
regasification facilities owned by its wholly owned subsidiary, Sabine Pass LNG, LP, that include
existing infrastructure of five LNG storage tanks with capacity of 16.9 Bcfe, two marine berths that can
100
http://cheniere.com/about-us/cheniere-energy/, accessed 12/6/2017
accommodate vessels of up to 266,000 cubic meters, and vaporizers with regasification capacity of
roughly 4.0 Bcf/d. Cheniere develops and constructs natural gas liquefaction facilities at the Sabine Pass
LNG terminal adjacent to the existing regasification facilities through Sabine Pass Liquefaction. The
company is developing and constructing natural gas liquefaction facilities at the Sabine Pass LNG
terminal adjacent to the existing regasification facilities through its wholly owned subsidiary, SPL.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (NYSE MKT: CQP) (Cheniere Partners) is a Delaware limited
partnership formed by Cheniere Energy, Inc. Through wholly owned subsidiaries, it owns and operates
the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal and the Creole Trail Pipeline located in western Cameron
Parish, Louisiana on the Sabine-Neches Waterway. Its primary business objectives are to generate stable
cash flows sufficient to pay the initial quarterly distribution to unitholders and, over time, to increase
quarterly cash distributions. Cheniere Partners is currently developing, constructing and operating
liquefaction facilities (SPL Project) situated adjacent to the regasification facilities at the Sabine Pass
LNG terminal. The SPL Project currently consists of up to six natural gas liquefaction trains with
expected aggregate nominal production capacity of approximately 27.0 mtpa, or roughly equivalent to
over 3.5 Bcf/d. Train 1 commenced operations in May 2016, and Trains 2-5 are currently under
construction. All regulatory approvals have been received to construct and operate Train 6, and FID is
expected to be reached upon obtaining an EPC contract, commercial contracts and financing sufficient
to support the construction. 101
Why was the company not included?
This company is mainly located in the Gulf Coast. The Gulf Coast is a different market than the market
of the companies for which the State Assessed Section is responsible for valuing.
Clean Energy Fuels Corp
Company Summary from Value Line:
Clean Energy Fuels Corp. provides natural gas as an alternative fuel for vehicle fleets in the United
States and Canada. It designs, builds, finances, and operates fueling stations and supplies compressed
natural gas and liquefied natural gas. It serves about 650 fleet customers operating over 30,600 natural
gas vehicles in various markets, including public transit, refuse hauling, airports, taxis, and trucking. It
owns, operates, and supplies about 224 natural gas fueling stations. The company also constructs fueling
stations and sells or leases the stations to customers. Has about 710 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
We Are Pioneers and Your Partner in Natural Gas for Transportation. Clean Energy is changing the way
the world fuels its vehicles. Energy independence is an undisputed goal for our nation, and we at Clean
Energy know just how realistic and attainable that goal is with natural gas fuel. Moving forward in our
thinking as well as in our vehicles means a safer, healthier planet for all of us. This change is already
happening. Natural gas is abundant and domestically available and is already used as a cleaner source of
energy around the world. 102
Why was the company not included?
This company provides natural gas an alternative fuel for vehicle fleets. This business segment is not
similar to the main business segments of the companies the State Assessed Section is responsible for
valuing.
101
http://www.cheniere.com/about-us/cheniere-partners/, accessed 12/6/2017
102
https://www.cleanenergyfuels.com/about-us/, accessed 12/6/2017
103
http://www.columbiapipelinepartners.com/about-us, accessed 12/27/2016
104
http://www.conemidstream.com/CustomPage/Index?KeyGenPage=328650, accessed 12/6/2017
105
http://www.crestwoodlp.com/about-us/default.aspx, accessed 12/6/2017
900 sites. Units of CrossAmerica Partners are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol "CAPL.. 106
Why was the company not included?
This company is a wholesale distributor of motor fuels. Also, owner and lessee of real estate used in the
retail distribution of motor fuels. These business segments are not similar to the main business segments
of the companies the State Assessed Section is responsible for valuing.
DCP Midstream Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
DCP Midstream, LP (formerly DCP Midstream Partners, LP) was formed through a January, 2017
merger with DCP Midstream, LLC. It owns, operates, and develops a diversified portfolio of domestic
midstream energy assets, including more than 60 plants and 64,000 miles of natural gas and natural gas
liquids (NGLs) pipelines. It is the nation’s largest NGL producer and natural gas processor. Has three
segments: Natural Gas Services, NGL Logistics, and Wholesale Propane Logistics. Officers/directors
own less than 1% of units; DCP Midstream, LLC, 36.8%; four institutions combined, 17.6% (’16 10-K).
Additional Company Information from Website:
DCP Midstream is one of the largest producers of NGLs and one of the largest natural gas processing
companies in the U.S. We gather and/or process about 12 percent of our nation’s gas supply. We have a
competitive footprint and strong geographic diversity with leading positions in key economic-producing
basins where producers are focused, including the DJ Basin, the Permian Basin, and the
STACK/SCOOP areas of the Midcontinent. We provide natural gas gathering services to the wellhead,
and we’re leveraging our strategic footprint to extend the value chain through our integrated NGL
pipelines and other marketing and logistics infrastructure. Through our DCP 2020 framework, DCP is
committed to being sustainable in any market environment, with a focus on operational excellence,
including industry-leading safety performance. 107
We are a must-run sector that gathers, compresses, treats, processes, transports, stores, and sells natural
gas, as well as produces, fractionates, transports, stores and sells natural gas liquids and recovers and
sells condensate, and transports, stores and sells propane in wholesale markets. 108
Why was the company not included?
This company was involved in a merger in the beginning of 2017. Will consider for future studies,
depending on the size of the different types of business segments.
Delek Logistics Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Delek Logistics Partners, LP owns and operates logistics and marketing assets for crude oil, and
intermediate and refined products in the United States. The company consists of assets, including
pipelines and trucks and ancillary assets that provide crude oil gathering and crude oil, intermediate and
finished products transportation, and storage services primarily in support of the Tyler and El Dorado
refineries, as well as offers crude oil and other products transportation services to third parties. It
operates approximately 400 miles of crude oil transportation pipelines; 366 miles of refined product
pipelines; and approximately 600 miles of crude oil gathering and trunk lines with an aggregate of
approximately 7.3 million barrels of active shell capacity. The company provides marketing,
106
http://www.crossamericapartners.com/about-us/about-lehigh-gas-partners/page.aspx?id=1002, accessed
12/6/2017
107
http://www.dcpmidstream.com/company, accessed 12/6/2017
108
http://www.dcpmidstream.com/company/business-segments, accessed 12/6/2017
transporting, storing, and terminalling refined products and services to independent third parties. Delek
Logistics Partners, LP was founded in 2012 and is headquartered in Brentwood.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Delek Logistics Partners LP (NYSE: DKL), headquartered in Brentwood, Tennessee, is a growth-
oriented publicly traded master limited partnership (MLP) formed by Delek US Holdings in 2012 to
own, operate, acquire, and construct crude oil and refined products logistics and marketing assets. A
substantial majority of our existing assets are integral to the success of Delek’s refining and marketing
operations. We gather, transport and store crude oil and market, distribute, transport and store refined
products in select regions of the southeastern United States and west Texas for Delek and third parties,
primarily in support of Delek’s refineries in Tyler, Texas and El Dorado, Arkansas. Learn more about
our parent company at DelekUS.com. 109
Cove Point’s operations currently consist of LNG import and storage services at the Dominion Energy
Cove Point LNG Facility and the transportation of domestic natural gas and regasified LNG to Mid-
Atlantic markets via the Cove Point Pipeline. Following binding commitments from counterparties and
regulatory approvals, construction is in progress on a liquefaction facility that will enable Dominion
Energy to operate the Cove Point facility as a bi-directional facility, able to import LNG and vaporize it
as natural gas or to liquefy domestic natural gas and export it as LNG. The Dominion Energy Cove
Point LNG Facility includes an offshore pier, LNG storage tanks, regasification facilities and associated
equipment required to (1) receive imported LNG from tankers, (2) store LNG in storage tanks, (3)
regasify LNG and (4) deliver regasified LNG to the Cove Point Pipeline. 111
109
http://www.deleklogistics.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=251361&p=irol-IRHome, accessed 12/7/2017
110
http://www.dommidstream.com/aboutus/index.php, accessed 12/7/2017
111
http://www.dommidstream.com/aboutus/asset_overview.php, accessed 12//2017
112
http://ir.emergelp.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=251428&p=irol-homeProfile&t=&id=&, accessed 12/7/2017
ArcLight Capital Partners, LLC in May 2013. Our general partner is equally controlled by CenterPoint
Energy and OGE. 113
Operations
• 12,900 miles of gathering lines
• 14 major processing plants with approximately 2.5 billion cubic feet per day with construction
on one new plant underway
• ~7,800 miles of interstate pipelines (including Southeast Supply Header, LLC) with 8.4 billion
cubic feet per day of transport capacity
• ~2,200 miles of intrastate pipelines
• 85.0 billion cubic feet of natural gas storage capacity 114
113
https://www.enablemidstream.com/html/pages/p001-homepage.html, accessed 12/7/2017
114
http://www.enablemidstream.com/html/pages/p002-about.html, accessed 12/7/2016
115
https://www.enbridge.com/about-us accessed 12/7/2017
116
https://www.enbridge.com/media-center/news/details?id=2126823&lang=en&year=2017, accessed 12/7/2017
(US$57 billion) inventory of current and potential growth projects and anticipated annual dividend
growth of 10-12 percent through 2024. The combined company will be exceedingly well positioned to
invest in critical infrastructure to meet the needs of our customers and create value for our
shareholders. 117
As of June 28, 2017, Enbridge Inc. closed the transaction to acquire 100% of Midcoast Energy Partners
from Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. On April 27, 2017, MEP was privatized under Enbridge Inc. with
the purchase of all outstanding publicly-traded units. 118
Why was the company included?
This company was not included because we would use Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P.
Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (ETP) owns and operates natural gas midstream and intrastate
transportation and storage as well as interstate natural gas transportation and storage through ET
Interstate and Panhandle. The partnership also has liquids operations, including natural gas liquids
(NGLs) transportation, storage and fractioning services, and crude oil, NGLs and refined product trans,
terminaling and acquisition and marketing through Sunoco Logistics. ETP was formed following the
4/17 acquisition of Energy Transfer Partners by Sunoco Logistics. Roughly 8,480 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
We are pleased to announce that the merger between Energy Transfer Partners (ETP) and Sunoco
Logistics Partners (SXL) is complete and the entities are now operating as one Partnership known as
Energy Transfer Partners. 119
Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (NYSE: ETP) is a master limited partnership that owns and operates one
of the largest and most diversified portfolios of energy assets in the United States. Strategically
positioned in all of the major U.S. production basins, ETP owns and operates a geographically diverse
portfolio of complementary natural gas midstream, intrastate and interstate transportation and storage
assets; crude oil, natural gas liquids (NGL) and refined product transportation and terminalling assets;
NGL fractionation; and various acquisition and marketing assets. ETP’s general partner is owned by
Energy Transfer Equity, L.P. (NYSE: ETE). 120
DALLAS & NEWTOWN SQUARE, Pa.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Apr. 28, 2017-- Sunoco Logistics
Partners L.P. (NYSE: SXL) (“SXL”) and Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (NYSE: ETP) (“ETP”) today
announced the completion of their previously announced merger of an indirect subsidiary of SXL, with
and into ETP, with ETP surviving the merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of SXL. 121
Why was the company included?
This company is similar to the Gas Transmission Pipeline Companies that the State Assessed Section is
responsible for valuing. The company engages in the transportation, gathering, and storage of natural
gas. However, this company completed a merger with Sunoco Logistics Partners, L.P. on April 28, 2017
117
http://www.spectraenergy.com/Transaction/, accessed 12/28/2016
118
http://www.midcoastpartners.com/, accessed 12/12/2017
119
http://www.energytransfer.com/, accessed 12/7/2017
120
http://www.energytransfer.com/company_overview.aspx, accessed 12/7/2017
121
http://ir.energytransfer.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=106094&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=2267001, accessed 12/7/2017
122
http://www.energytransfer.com/company_overview.aspx, accessed 12/7/2017
123
http://www.enlink.com/operations/, accessed 12/7/2017
124
https://www.eqtmidstreampartners.com/about-us/home, accessed 12/11/2017
125
https://www.ferrellgas.com/our-company/investor-information/, accessed 12/11/2017
126
https://www.ferrellgas.com/our-company/, accessed 12/11/2017
communities in which we operate is evident in our project design, construction and day to day
operations. 127
Why was the company not included?
This company’s main business segments are grouped in four divisions: offshore pipeline transportation,
refinery services, marine transportation, and onshore facilities and transportation. These market
segments are not similar enough to the market segments of the companies for which the State Assessed
Section is responsible for valuing.
Global Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Global Partners, LP is engaged in the purchasing, selling, and logistics of transporting petroleum and
related products, including domestic and Canadian crude oil, gasoline and gasoline blendstocks (such as
ethanol and naphtha), distillates (such as home heating oil, diesel, and kerosene), residual oil, renewable
fuels, natural gas and propane. It also receives revenue from convenience store sales and gasoline station
rental income. Global owns, controls, or has access to one of the largest terminal networks of refined
petroleum products and renewable fuels in the northeast. It owns transload and storage terminals in
North Dakota and Oregon that extend its origin-todestination capabilities from the mid-continent region
of the US and Canada to the east and west coasts. In October 2017, Global Partners acquired retail fuel
and convenience store assets from Honey Farms, Inc. in a cash transaction valued at approximately $36
million. Has 1770 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
A publicly traded master limited partnership, Global is a midstream logistics and marketing company
that owns, controls or has access to one of the largest terminal networks of petroleum products and
renewable fuels in the Northeast. Global also is one of the largest distributors of gasoline, distillates,
residual oil and renewable fuels to wholesalers, retailers and commercial customers in New England and
New York. The Partnership is engaged in the transportation of crude oil and other products by rail from
the mid-continental U.S. and Canada to the East and West Coasts for distribution to refiners and others.
With approximately 1,500 locations, primarily in the Northeast, Global also is one of the largest
independent owners, suppliers and operators of gasoline stations and convenience stores. 128
Why was the company not included?
This company is one of the largest distributors of gasoline, distillates, residual oil and renewable fuels to
wholesalers, retailers, and commercial customers in New England and New York. This type of business
segment is different than the business segments of the companies for which the State Assessed Section is
responsible for valuing.
Green Plains Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Green Plains Partners L.P. provides fee-based fuel storage and transportation services by owning,
operating, developing and acquiring ethanol and fuel storage tanks, terminals, transportation assets, and
other related assets and businesses. The company was formed by Green Plains, Inc., a vertically
integrated ethanol producer, to support its marketing and distribution activities as its primary
downstream logistics provider. The company generates a substantial portion of its revenues under fee-
based commercial agreements with Green Plains Trade for receiving, storing, transferring and
transporting ethanol and other fuels, which are supported by minimum volume or take-orpay capacity
commitments. Green Plains owns 38 ethanol storage facilities at or near 17 ethanol production plants in
127
http://genesisenergy.com/about/, accessed 12/11/2017
128
http://www.globalp.com/, accessed 12/11/2017
Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia, and which
have a current combined ethanol production capacity of roughly 1.5 billion gallons annually.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Green Plains Partners LP is a fee-based, limited partnership formed by our parent, Green Plains Inc., to
provide ethanol and fuel storage, terminal and transportation services by owning, operating, developing
and acquiring ethanol and fuel storage tanks, terminals, transportation assets and other related assets and
businesses. 129
Our transportation assets include a leased railcar fleet of approximately 2,700 railcars with an aggregate
capacity of 81.0 million gallons that is dedicated to transporting products under commercial agreements
with our parent, including ethanol and other fuels, from our fuel terminal facilities or third-party
production facilities to refineries throughout the United States and international export terminals. 130
Why was the company not included?
This company’s main operating segments are ethanol storage, fuel terminals, and transportation. The
transportation segment includes railcars. This is not similar to the transportation companies that the State
Assessed Section is responsible for valuing.
JP Energy Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Not available. Company is not publically traded.
Additional Company Information from Website:
HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- American Midstream Partners, LP (NYSE:AMID) (“American
Midstream” or “Partnership”) and JP Energy Partners LP (NYSE: JPEP) (“JP Energy”) today [March 8,
2017] announced the successful completion of the previously announced merger. 131
Why was the company not included?
Company is no longer publically traded.
Martin Midstream Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Martin Midstream Partners, L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership with a diverse set of operations
focused primarily in the US Gulf Coast region. Its four primary business lines include: natural gas
services, including liquids transportation and distribution services and natural gas storage; terminalling
and storage services for petroleum products and by-products, including the refining of naphthenic crude
oil, blending and packaging of finished lubricants; sulfur and sulfur-based products processing,
manufacturing, marketing and distribution; and marine transportation services for petroleum products
and byproducts. In October 2017, West Texas LPG Pipeline Limited Partnership joint venture (of which
Martin Midstream owns a 20% interest with ONEOK, Inc. owning and operating the other 80% interest)
plans to invest approximately $200 million to expand its natural gas liquids (NGL) system into the
prolific Delaware Basin in service by the third quarter 2018.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Martin Midstream Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership with a diverse set of operations
focused primarily in the United States Gulf Coast region. Our four primary business lines
129
http://www.greenplainspartners.com/, accessed 12/11/2017
130
http://www.greenplainspartners.com/operations/transportation-assets/, accessed 12/11/2017
131
http://www.americanmidstream.com/investor-relations/press-releases/press-release-details/2017/American-
Midstream-Partners-Announces-Successful-Completion-of-Merger-with-JP-Energy-Partners/default.aspx,
accessed 12/11/2017
include:Terminalling, storage and packaging services for petroleum products and by-products including
refining, blending and packaging of finished lubricants; Natural gas liquids transportation and
distribution services and natural gas storage; Sulfur and sulfur-based products gathering, processing,
manufacturing, marketing and distribution including fertilizer manufacturing and distribution; and
Marine transportation services for petroleum products and by-products. The petroleum products and by-
products we collect, transport, store and distribute are produced primarily by the independent oil and gas
companies who often turn to third parties, such as us, for the transportation and disposition of these
products. In addition to these major and independent oil and gas companies, our primary customers
include independent refiners, large chemical companies, fertilizer manufacturers and other wholesale
purchasers of these products. We operate primarily in the Gulf Coast region of the U.S., which is a
major hub for petroleum refining, natural gas gathering and processing and support services for the
exploration and production industry. Our diversified asset base enables us to offer our customers an
integrated distribution network consisting of transportation terminalling, distribution and midstream
logistical services. 132
Why was the company not included?
This company is mainly located in the Gulf Coast. The Gulf Coast is a different market than the market
of the companies for which the State Assessed Section is responsible for valuing.
Midcoast Energy Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Not available. Company is not publically traded.
132
http://www.martinmidstream.com/about-us, accessed 12/12/2017
133
http://www.midcoastpartners.com/, accessed 12/12/2017
3,500 miles of crude oil pipelines and 2,400 miles of light product pipelines. MPLX also has 59 owned
and operated, one leased and two partially owned light product terminals, butane and NGL storage
caverns, an inland marine business, crude oil and product storage facilities (tank farms) and a barge dock
facility. MPLX’s marine transportation operations include 18 owned towboats as well as more than 200
owned and leased barges that transport refined products and crude oil on the Ohio, Mississippi and
Illinois rivers and their tributaries and inter-coastal waterways. MPLX operates several natural gas
gathering systems in six states. The scope of gathering services provided depends on the composition of
the raw or untreated gas at producer customers’ wellheads. MPLX’s natural gas processing complexes
remove the heavier and more valuable hydrocarbon components from natural gas. MPLX currently
operates natural gas processing complexes in the Marcellus shale, Utica shale, Appalachia region, and
Southwest region. Once natural gas has been processed at a natural gas processing complex, the heavier
and more valuable hydrocarbon components, which have been extracted as a mixed natural gas liquid
(NGL) stream, can be further separated into their component parts through the process of fractionation.
Our NGL fractionation facilities separate the mixture of extracted NGLs into individual purity product
components for end-use sale. Assets include approximately 5.9 billion cubic feet per day of gathering
capacity, 7.8 billion cubic feet per day of natural gas processing capacity and 570,000 barrels per day of
fractionation capacity. 134
Why was the company not included?
This company has some common carrier pipelines that transport crude oil and refined products in the
midwest. However, the company also has extensive natural gas gathering systems in six states. This company
also engages in the marketing of natural gas liquids.
Noble Midstream Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Noble Midstream Partners, LP is a growth oriented Delaware master limited partnership formed in December
2014 by Noble Energy, Inc. to own, operate, develop, and acquire a wide range of domestic midstream
infrastructure assets. It provides crude oil, natural gas, and water-related midstream services through long-
term, fixed fee contracts. The company’s current focus areas are in the Denver-Julesburg (DJ) Basin in
Colorado and the Southern Delaware Basin position of the Permian Basin (Delaware Basin) in Texas. It also
serves as the operator of the Advantage system, which includes a 70 -mile crude oil pipeline in the southern
Delaware Basin from Reeves County, TX to Crane County, TX, with 150,000 barrels of daily shipping
capacity and 490,000 barrels of storage capacity. In November 2017, Noble Energy signed an agreement
with SRC Energy Inc. to divest about 30,200 net acres from the company’s non-core DJ Basin position in
Weld County, CO in the transaction valued at $608 million. Has 90 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Noble Midstream Partners is a growth-oriented master limited partnership formed by Noble Energy to own,
operate, develop and acquire midstream infrastructure assets. Our assets reside in two of the most resilient oil
basins in the United States: the DJ Basin in Colorado and the Delaware Basin in Texas. In these areas, we
provide crude oil, natural gas and water-related midstream services for Noble Energy and third parties. In the
Denver-Julesburg Basin (DJ Basin) in Colorado, we have acreage dedications spanning approximately
300,000 acres (235,000 dedicated acres from Noble and 65,000 from a third party). We have approximately
111,000 dedicated acres in Reeves County in the Delaware Basin where we will provide crude oil, natural
gas and water-related midstream services under long-term, fixed fee contracts. In addition to these existing
operations and acreage dedications, Noble Energy has granted us rights of first refusal (ROFR) on a
combination of midstream assets. Retained assets include natural gas gathering and processing facilities
serving the East Pony area in the DJ Basin and approximately 31,000 acres in Webb and Dimmit Counties in
the Eagle Ford Shale area of South Texas. Noble Midstream Partners owns and operates the Advantage
134
http://www.mplx.com/About_MPLX/, accessed 12/12/2017
Pipeline, a 16-inch common carrier crude oil pipeline serving the southern Delaware Basin (assets owned by
joint venture with Plains All American Pipeline). 135
Why was the company not included?
The main assets owned by this company are related to gathering, oil treating, terminals, and storage. A
main business segment of the companies the State Assessed Section is responsible for valuing is fluid
transportation pipeline services or gas transmission pipeline services.
NuStar GP Holdings, LLC
Company Summary from Value Line:
NuStar GP Holdings, LLC is a publicly traded limited liability company. It has no operations or sources
of income or cash flows other than its investment in NuStar Energy L.P., a publicly held Delaware
limited partnership engaged in the transportation of petroleum products and anhydrous ammonia, the
terminalling, storage, and marketing of petroleum products. NuStar Energy has pipelines in the US, as
well as terminal and storage facilities in the US, Canada, Mexico, the Netherlands, including St.
Eustatius in the Caribbean, and the United Kingdom. As of September 30, 2017, the company had an
approximate 13% ownership in NuStar Energy, consisting of the general partner interest; 100% of the
incentive distribution rights issued by NuStar Energy, which entitle it to receive increasing percentages
of the cash distributed by NuStar Energy, currently at the maximum percentage of 23% ; and
100,214,626 common units of NuStar Energy.
Additional Company Information from Website:
NuStar GP Holdings, LLC owns general partner and limited partner interests in NuStar Energy L.P. that
engages in the transportation of petroleum products and anhydrous ammonia, the terminalling and
storage of petroleum products and the marketing of petroleum products. It holds a 2% general partner
interest, 13.0% limited partner interest, and 100% of the incentive distribution rights in NuStar Energy
L.P. The company, through NuStar Energy L.P., has interests in 79 terminal and storage facilities with
approximately 93 million barrels of storage capacity; and approximately 8,700 miles of crude oil and
refined product pipelines. The company has operations in the United States; Canada; Mexico; the
Netherlands, including St. Eustatius in the Caribbean; and the United Kingdom. NuStar GP Holdings,
LLC was founded in 2000 and is based in San Antonio, Texas. 136
Why was the company not included?
This company was not included because we use (or would use) NuStar Energy L.P.
ONEOK, Inc.
Company Summary from Value Line:
ONEOK, Inc. is the sole general partner and owner of ONEOK Partners. ONEOK Partners gathers,
processes, fractionates, transports, stores, markets, and distributes natural gas and natural gas liquids.
ONEOK has three operating segments: natural gas liquids, natural gas gathering and processing, and
natural gas pipelines. Completed separation of natural gas distribution business in February of 2014. Has
2,384 employees. BlackRock, Inc. owns 10.9% of common stock; The Vanguard Group, Inc., 10.6%;
off. and dir., less than 1.0% (4/17 Proxy).
Additional Company Information from Website:
ONEOK, Inc. (pronounced ONE-OAK) (NYSE: OKE) is one of the largest energy midstream service
providers in the U.S., connecting prolific supply basins with key market centers. It owns and operates
one of the nation's premier natural gas liquids (NGL) systems and is a leader in the gathering,
processing, storage and transportation of natural gas. ONEOK’s operations include a 38,000-mile
135
http://www.nblmidstream.com/about-us/, accessed 12/12/2017
136
http://www.nustargpholdings.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=197894&p=irol-default, accessed 12/12/2017
integrated network of NGL and natural gas pipelines, processing plants, fractionators and storage
facilities in the Mid-Continent, Williston, Permian and Rocky Mountain regions. ONEOK is a
FORTUNE 500 company and is included in Standard & Poor's (S&P) 500 index. 137
TULSA, Okla., June 30, 2017 /PRNewswire/ -- ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE) today announced that it
has closed the acquisition of all outstanding common units of ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) it
did not previously own, and the merger of ONEOK Partners with a subsidiary of ONEOK will be
effective at the end of today. As a result of the acquisition, ONEOK Partners common units will no
longer be publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange. 138
Why was the company not included?
This company was not included because of the acquisition of ONEOK Partners, L.P.
ONEOK Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Not available. Company is not publically traded.
Additional Company Information from Website:
TULSA, Okla., June 30, 2017 /PRNewswire/ -- ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE) today announced that it
has closed the acquisition of all outstanding common units of ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) it
did not previously own, and the merger of ONEOK Partners with a subsidiary of ONEOK will be
effective at the end of today. As a result of the acquisition, ONEOK Partners common units will no
longer be publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange. 139
Why was the company not included?
Company is no longer publically traded.
PBF Logistics, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
PBF Logistics, LP is a fee-based, growth oriented master limited partnership formed by PBF Energy,
Inc. to own or lease, operate, develop and acquire crude oil and refined petroleum products terminals,
pipelines, storage facilities, and similar logistics assets. The company operates in two segments:
Transportation and Terminaling, and Storage. The transportation and terminaling segment consists of the
DCR Rail Terminal, which serves PBF Holding’s Delaware City and Paulsboro refineries; the DCR
West Rack, which serves PBF Holding’s Delaware City refinery; the Toledo Truck Terminal, which
serves PBF Holding’s Toledo refinery, comprised of LACT units; a propane truck loading facility,
located within the Toledo Storage Facility; the Delaware City Products Pipeline; and the Delaware City
Truck Rack, which consists of a truck loading rack utilized to distribute gasoline. The storage segment
consists of the Toledo Storage Facility.
Additional Company Information from Website:
PBF Logistics LP, headquartered in Parsippany, New Jersey, is a fee-based, growth-oriented master
limited partnership formed by PBF Energy to own or lease, operate, develop and acquire crude oil and
refined petroleum products, terminals, pipelines, storage facilities and similar logistics assets. 140
137
http://www.oneok.com/, accessed 12/12/2017
138
http://ir.oneok.com/news-and-events/press-releases/2017/06-30-2017-211557242, accessed 12/12/2017
139
http://ir.oneok.com/news-and-events/press-releases/2017/06-30-2017-211557242, accessed 12/12/2017
140
http://www.pbflogistics.com/, accessed 12/12/2017
141
http://www.pembina.com/, accessed 12/12/2017
acquisition, Phillips 66 Partners will enter into a new 15-year tolling agreement that includes a base
throughput fee and minimum volume commitment from Phillips 66. 142
Phillips 66 Partners (NYSE: PSXP) began trading on the New York Stock Exchange on July 23, 2013.
Headquartered in Houston, Texas, Phillips 66 Partners is a growth-oriented, traditional master limited
partnership formed by Phillips 66 to own, operate, develop and acquire primarily fee-based crude oil,
refined petroleum product and natural gas liquids (“NGL”) pipelines and terminals and other
transportation and midstream assets. 143
Why was the company not included?
This company began trading publicly on July 23, 2013. The 2018 calendar year will be the fifth full year
of financial information, consider for the 2019 Capitalization Rate Study. Also, the company recently
reached and agreement to acquire 25% interest in Dakota Access, LLC and Energy Transfer Crude Oil
Company, LLC and 100% in Merey Sweeney, L.P.
Plains GP Holdings, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Plains GP Holdings, L.P. is a publicly traded entity that owns an indirect, non-economic controlling
general partner interest in Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA) and an indirect limited partner
interest in PAA. PAA, is a publicly traded master limited partnership that owns and operates midstream
energy infrastructure and provides logistics services for crude oil, natural gas liquids (NGL), natural gas,
and refined products. PAA owns an extensive network of pipeline transportation, terminalling, storage
and gathering assets in key crude oil and NGL producing basins, and transportation corridors and at
major market hubs in the US And Canada. On average, PAA handles over five million barrels per day of
crude oil and NGL in its transportation segment.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Plains GP Holdings, L.P. (“PAGP”) is a Delaware limited partnership formed in July 2013 that has
elected to be taxed as a corporation for United States federal income tax purposes. PAGP does not
directly own any operating assets; as of December 31, 2016, its principal sources of cash flow are
derived from its indirect investment in Plains All American Pipeline, L.P (“PAA”), a publicly traded
Delaware limited partnership. 144
Why was the company not included?
This company was not included because we used Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.
Rice Midstream Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Rice Midstream Partners, LP, growth oriented limited partnership formed by Rice Energy, owns,
operates, develops and acquires midstream assets in the Appalachian Basin. The company operates in
two business segments, which are managed separately due to their distinct operational differences:
gathering and compression and water services. The natural gas gathering and compression assets consist
of natural gas gathering and compression systems that service high quality producers in the rapidly
developing dry gas core of the Marcellus Shale in southwestern Pennsylvania. The water services assets
consist of water pipelines, impoundment facilities pumping stations, take point facilities and
measurement facilities which are used to support well completion activities and to collect and recycle or
142
http://unitholder.phillips66partners.com/financial-information/news-releases/news-release-
details/2017/Phillips-66-Partners-Announces-24-Billion-Acquisition/default.aspx, accessed 12/12/2017
143
http://www.phillips66partners.com/, accessed 12/12/2017
144
http://www.edgarexplorer.com/EFX_dll/EdgarPro.dll?FetchFilingConvPDF1?SessionID=FS0sqyvAnOPqo-
9&ID=11876657, accessed 12/12/2017
dispose of flowback and produced water for Rice Energy and third parties in Washington and Greene
counties, Pennsylvania and Belmont County, Ohio.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Rice Midstream Partners is set up for success through owning, operating, developing and acquiring
midstream assets in the prolific Appalachian Basin. Our anchoring relationship with Rice Energy; our
strong portfolio of strategically located assets; our flexibility to deliver our customers’ gas to premium
markets; and our visible growth opportunities position us to become a leading midstream energy
company in the Appalachian Basin. 145
Our natural gas gathering and compression assets consist of natural gas gathering and compression
systems that service high quality producers in the dry gas core of the Marcellus Shale in southwestern
Pennsylvania. Our water services assets consist of water pipelines, impoundment facilities, pumping
stations, take point facilities and measurement facilities, which are used to support well completion
activities and to collect and recycle or dispose of flowback and produced water for EQT Corporation
(NYSE: EQT) and third parties in Washington and Greene Counties, Pennsylvania and Belmont County,
Ohio. We provide our services under long-term, fee-based contracts, primarily to EQT. 146
Why was the company not included?
This company’s main operations are gas gathering and compression and water services. A main business
segment of the companies the State Assessed Section is responsible for valuing is fluid transportation
pipeline services or gas transmission pipeline services.
Shell Midstream Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Shell Midstream Partners, L.P. is a fee-based, growth-oriented master limited partnership formed by
Royal Dutch Shell plc to own, operate, develop, and acquire pipelines and other midstream assets. Its
assets consist of interests in entities that own crude oil and refined products pipelines serving as key
infrastructure to transport onshore and offshore crude oil production to Gulf Coast and Midwest refining
markets and to deliver refined products from those markets to major demand centers, as well as interests
in entities that own natural gas and refinery gas pipelines which transport offshore natural gas to market
hubs and deliver refinery gas from refineries and plants to chemical sites along the Gulf Coast. As of
September 30, 2017, it owns interests in nine crude oil pipeline systems, three refined products systems,
one natural gas gathering pipeline system, one gas pipeline system, and a crude tank storage and
terminal system. In September 2017, Shell Midstream agreed to sell 10,370,000 units for $275 million.
Additional Company Information from Website:
We are a fee-based, growth-oriented master limited partnership recently formed by Shell to own,
operate, develop and acquire pipelines and other midstream assets. Our assets consist of pipelines, crude
tank storage and terminal systems that serve as key infrastructure to transport and store onshore and
offshore crude oil production to Gulf Coast and Midwest refining markets and to deliver refined
products from Gulf Coast markets to major demand centers. 147
Houston, May 05, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Shell Midstream Partners, L.P. (NYSE: SHLX)
entered into a purchase and sale agreement to acquire a 100% interest in the Refinery Gas Pipelines,
Delta Pipeline and Na Kika Pipeline for $630 million from wholly owned subsidiaries of Shell. The
acquisition price reflects an approximate 8.4 times multiple of the assets' forecasted next twelve months
adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization and is expected to be immediately
145
http://www.ricemidstream.com/Home/default.aspx, accessed 12/12/2017
146
http://www.ricemidstream.com/operations/default.aspx, accessed 12/12/2017
147
http://www.shellmidstreampartners.com/, accessed 12/12/2017
accretive to unitholders. Shell Midstream Partners intends to fund the acquisition with a combination of
borrowings under existing credit facilities and cash on hand. The acquisition is expected to close on or
around May 10, 2017, subject to customary closing conditions. 148
Why was the company not included?
This company is mainly services the Gulf Coast (including offshore assets), the Gulf Coast to New York
City, and the Gulf Coast to the Midwest. The Explorer pipeline system from the Gulf Coast to the
Midwest transports gasoline, diesel, fuel oil, and jet fuel from the US Gulf Coast to Hammon, IL. The
Explorer pipeline system is the company’s only asset that is similar to the companies the State Assessed
Property Section is responsible for valuing. The Explorer pipeline system is not a large enough portion
of the company’s overall business segments (Shell Midstream Partners, L.P. only owns 2.62%
ownership interest in Explorer). Also, this company was formed on March 19, 2014.
Southcross Energy Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
In November 2017, American Midstream Partners, LP (AMID) signed an agreement to acquire certain
assets of Southcross Holdings, LP, and proposed to merge Southcross Energy Partners, L.P. (SXE) into
a wholly owned subsidiary of AMID in two separate transactions valued at approximately $815 million.
As a result of the transactions, the pro forma partnership with an enterprise value of $3 billion is
expected to generate annualized 2018 Adjusted EBITDA in excess of $300 million. Due to this news,
the company’s ranks were suspended. Southcross Energy Partners, L.P. provides natural gas gathering,
processing, treating, compression and transportation services and NGL fractionation and transportation
services. It also sources, purchases, transports, and sells natural gas and NGL. Its assets are located in
Alabama, Mississippi, and South Texas, and include two gas processing plants, one fractionation plant,
and roughly 3,100 miles of pipeline.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Southcross Energy Partners, L.P. (“Southcross”) is a master limited partnership that provides natural gas
gathering, processing, treating, compression and transportation services and NGL fractionation and
transportation services. It also sources, purchases, transports and sells natural gas and NGLs. Its assets
are located in South Texas, Mississippi and Alabama and include two cryogenic gas processing plants, a
fractionation facility and approximately 3,100 miles of pipeline. The South Texas assets are located in or
near the Eagle Ford shale region. Southcross is headquartered in Dallas, Texas. 149
HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- American Midstream Partners, LP (NYSE: AMID) (“AMID” or
“American Midstream”) announced today [November 1, 2017] that it has signed an agreement to
acquire certain assets of Southcross Holdings, LP (“Southcross Holdings”), and has proposed to merge
Southcross Energy Partners, L.P. (NYSE: SXE) (“SXE” or “Southcross Energy”) (collectively, with
Southcross Holdings referred to as “Southcross”) into a wholly owned subsidiary of AMID in two
separate transactions valued at approximately $815 million, including the repayment of net debt. As a
result of the transactions, the pro forma partnership with an enterprise value of $3 billion is expected to
generate annualized 2018 Adjusted EBITDA in excess of $300 million. 150
148
http://www.shellmidstreampartners.com/releasedetail.cfm?releaseid=1025062, accessed 12/12/2017
149
http://www.southcrossenergy.com/about/, accessed 12/12/2017
150
http://www.americanmidstream.com/investor-relations/press-releases/press-release-details/2017/American-
Midstream-Partners-to-Acquire-Southcross-Energy-Partners-and-Certain-Assets-of-Southcross-Holdings-
Forming-3-Billion-Partnership/default.aspx/, accessed 12/12/2017
151
https://www.enbridge.com/media-center/news/details?id=2126823&lang=en&year=2017, accessed 12/7/2017
152
http://www.spectraenergypartners.com/, accessed 12/12/2017
153
https://www.enbridge.com/media-center/news/details?id=2126823&lang=en&year=2017, accessed 12/7/2017
America with an enterprise value of approximately C$165 billion (US$127 billion), a C$74 billion
(US$57 billion) inventory of current and potential growth projects and anticipated annual dividend
growth of 10-12 percent through 2024. The combined company will be exceedingly well positioned to
invest in critical infrastructure to meet the needs of our customers and create value for our
shareholders. 154
Why was the company not included?
This company is similar to the Gas Transmission Pipeline Companies that the State Assessed Section is
responsible for valuing. The company engages in the transportation, gathering, and storage of natural
gas. However, the Spectra Energy Partners, L.P.’s general partner, Spectra Energy Corp, recently
completed a merger with Enbridge, Inc., which could affect the financial information for the current year
for all companies involved.
Sprague Resources, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Sprague Resources, LP is a Delaware limited partnership formed in June 2011 by Sprague Holdings and
its general partner (Sprague Resources GP LLC) to engages in the purchase, storage, distribution, and
sale of refined products and natural gas, and to provide storage and handling services for a broad range
of materials. The company owns, operates and/or controls a network of refined products and materials
handling terminals strategically located throughout the northeast US and in Quebec, Canada that have a
combined storage capacity of 14.8 million barrels for refined products and other liquid materials, as well
as 2.0 million square feet of materials handling capacity. In October 2017, Sprague’s subsidiary,
Sprague Operating Resources, LLC, purchased the membership interests of Coen Energy, LLC and
Coen Transport, LLC, as well as assets consisting of four bulk plants and underlying real estate. Has
about 600 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
We are a Delaware limited partnership formed in June 2011 by Sprague Holdings and our General
Partner to engage in the purchase, storage, distribution and sale of refined products and natural gas, and
to provide storage and handling services for a broad range of materials. We are one of the largest
independent wholesale distributors of refined products in the Northeast United States based on aggregate
terminal capacity. We own, operate and/or control a network of 19 refined products and materials
handling terminals strategically located throughout the Northeast United States and in Quebec, Canada
that have a combined storage capacity of 14.1 million barrels for refined products and other liquid
materials, as well as 2.0 million square feet of materials handling capacity. We also have an aggregate of
2.1 million barrels of additional storage capacity attributable to 48 storage tanks not currently in service.
These tanks are not necessary for the operation of our business at current levels. In the event that such
additional capacity were desired, additional time and capital would be required to bring any of such
storage tanks into service. Furthermore, we have access to approximately 60 third party terminals in the
Northeast United States through which we sell or distribute refined products pursuant to rack, exchange
and throughput agreements. We operate under four business segments: refined products, natural gas,
materials handling and other operations. 155
154
http://www.spectraenergy.com/Transaction/, accessed 12/28/2016
155
http://www.spragueenergy.com/investor-relations#tab5, 2016 10-K, accessed 12/12/2017
company engages in the marketing and distribution of coal. These specializations are not the same
market segments as the companies in which the State Assessed Section is responsible for valuing.
Suburban Propane Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Suburban Propane Partners, L.P., is a master limited partnership (MLP) that markets and distributes
propane, fuel oil, and other refined fuels in the U.S., operating in Propane; Fuel Oil and Refined Fuels;
Natural Gas and Electricity; and Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC). As of 9/24/16,
serves about 1.1 million active propane customers through more than 675 locations in 41 states,
concentrated on the east and west coasts of the United States. Sold approximately 415 million gallons of
propane and 30.9 million gallons of fuel oil in fiscal 2016. Has 3,417 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Headquartered in Whippany, New Jersey, Suburban Propane is a nationwide marketer and distributor of
a diverse array of products to meet the energy needs of our customers. Specializing in propane, heating
oil and refined fuels, as well as the marketing of natural gas and electricity in deregulated markets. With
nearly 3,200 full-time employees, Suburban Propane maintains business operations in 41 states,
providing prompt, reliable service to approximately 1.1 million residential, commercial, industrial and
agricultural customers through 668 locations. 156
156
https://suburbanpropane.com/about/about-suburban-propane.php, accessed 12/12/2017
shale formations in Colorado. Our systems and the basins they serve are as follows: the Mountaineer
Midstream system, which serves the Appalachian Basin; the Bison Midstream system, which serves the
Williston Basin; the Polar & Divide system, which serves the Williston Basin; the DFW Midstream
system, which serves the Fort Worth Basin; the Grand River system, which serves the Piceance Basin;
the Summit Utica system, which serves the Appalachian Basin; the Tioga Midstream system, which
serves the Williston Basin; and the Niobrara G&P system, which serves the DJ Basin. SMLP also owns
substantially all of a 40% ownership interest in Ohio Gathering, which is included in the Utica Shale
segment. Ohio Gathering is developing natural gas gathering and condensate stabilization infrastructure
in the Utica Shale in southeastern Ohio. We generate a substantial majority of our revenue under
primarily long-term and fee-based gathering agreements with our customers. The majority of our
gathering agreements are underpinned by areas of mutual interest (“AMIs”) and minimum volume
commitments (“MVCs”). Our AMIs provide that any production drilled by our customers within the
AMIs will be shipped on our gathering systems. The MVCs are designed to ensure that we will generate
a minimum amount of gathering revenue over the life of each respective gathering agreement. The fee-
based nature of the majority of the gathering agreements enhances the stability of our cash flows and
limits our direct commodity price exposure. Since our formation in 2009, our management team has
established a track record of executing this growth strategy through the acquisition and subsequent
development of DFW Midstream, Grand River, Bison Midstream, Polar & Divide, Mountaineer
Midstream, Summit Utica, Tioga Midstream, and Niobrara G&P. 157
Why was the company not included?
This company’s main business segments are natural gas gathering, treating and compression services,
which are not the same main business segments of the companies in which the State Assessed Section is
responsible for valuing.
Sunoco Logistics Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Not available. Company is not publically traded.
Additional Company Information from Website:
DALLAS & NEWTOWN SQUARE, Pa.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Apr. 28, 2017-- Sunoco Logistics
Partners L.P. (NYSE: SXL) (“SXL”) and Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (NYSE: ETP) (“ETP”) today
announced the completion of their previously announced merger of an indirect subsidiary of SXL, with
and into ETP, with ETP surviving the merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of SXL. 158
Why was the company not included?
Company is no longer publically traded.
Tallgrass Energy GP, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Tallgrass Energy GP, LP (TEGP) is a limited partnership that has elected to be treated as a corporation for
US federal income tax purposes. TEGP owns a controlling membership interest in Tallgrass Equity, LLC
through its role as the sole managing member. Tallgrass Equity, LLC owns, both directly and through its
ownership of the general partner of Tallgrass Energy Partners, LP, (TEP), all of TEP’s incentive distribution
rights, 100 % of the general partner interest in TEP and 20,000,000 TEP common units. It provides natural
gas transportation and storage services for customers in the Rocky Mountain and Midwest regions. It
performs water business services in Colorado and Texas through BNN Water Solutions, LLC. Its operations
are located in and provide services to certain main US hydrocarbon basins, including the Denver-Julesburg,
157
http://www.summitmidstream.com/about, accessed 12/12/2017
158
http://ir.energytransfer.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=106094&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=2267001, accessed 12/7/2017
Powder River, Wind River, Permian and Hugoton-Anadarko Basins and the Niobrara, Mississippi Lime,
Eagle Ford, and Bakken shale formations.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Tallgrass Energy GP, LP (NYSE: TEGP) is a limited partnership that has elected to be treated as a
corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. TEGP owns a controlling membership interest in
Tallgrass Equity, LLC through its role as the sole managing member. Tallgrass Equity, LLC owns, both
directly and through its ownership of the general partner of TEP, all of TEP's incentive distribution
rights, 100 percent of the general partner interest in TEP and 20,000,000 TEP Common Units.159
Why was the company not included?
This company was not included because we would use Tallgrass Energy Partners, L.P.
Tallgrass Energy Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Tallgrass Energy Partners, LP is a growth oriented limited partnership formed to own, operate, acquire,
and develop midstream energy assets in North America. Its Natural Gas Transportation segment is
engaged in the operation of FERC-regulated interstate natural gas pipelines and integrated natural gas
storage facilities. The Crude Oil Transportation segment operates a FERC regulated crude oil pipeline
system. The Gathering, Processing & Terminalling segment is engaged in operations of natural gas
gathering, processing, treating, and fractionation facilities; crude oil gathering, storage, and terminalling
facilities; the provision of water business services to the oil and gas exploration and production industry;
and the transportation of NGLs. In September 2017, Tallgrass Energy Partners and its subsidiary,
Tallgrass Energy Finance Corp., priced an offering of $500 million in aggregate principal amount of
5.50% senior unsecured notes due 2028 at price equal to 100% of par.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Tallgrass Energy Partners, LP (NYSE: TEP) is a publicly traded, growth-oriented limited partnership
formed to own, operate, acquire and develop midstream energy assets in North America. We currently
provide crude oil transportation to customers in Wyoming, Colorado, and the surrounding regions
through Tallgrass Pony Express Pipeline, LLC, which owns a crude oil pipeline commencing in
Guernsey, Wyoming and terminating in Cushing, Oklahoma that includes a lateral in Northeast
Colorado that commences in Weld County, Colorado, and interconnects with the pipeline just east of
Sterling, Colorado. We provide crude oil storage and terminalling services through Tallgrass Terminals,
LLC, which owns and operates crude oil terminals near Sterling, Colorado and in Weld County,
Colorado. Terminals also owns a 20% membership interest in Deeprock Development, LLC, which
owns a crude oil terminal in Cushing, Oklahoma. We provide natural gas transportation and storage
services for customers in the Rocky Mountain, Midwest and Appalachian regions of the United States
through: (1) our 49.99% membership interest in Rockies Express Pipeline LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company which owns the Rockies Express Pipeline, a FERC-regulated natural gas pipeline
system extending from Opal, Wyoming and Meeker, Colorado to Clarington, Ohio, (2) the Tallgrass
Interstate Gas Transmission system, a FERC-regulated natural gas transportation and storage system
located in Colorado, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska and Wyoming, and (3) the Trailblazer Pipeline system,
a FERC-regulated natural gas pipeline system extending from the Colorado and Wyoming border to
Beatrice, Nebraska. We also provide services for customers in Wyoming at the Casper and Douglas
natural gas processing facilities and the West Frenchie Draw natural gas treating facility, and NGL
transportation services in Northeast Colorado. We also provide gathering services for natural gas
flowing into the Douglas processing facility. We perform water business services in Colorado and Texas
through BNN Water Solutions, LLC. Our operations are strategically located in and provide services to
159
http://ir-tep.tallgrassenergylp.com/, accessed 12/12/2017
certain key United States hydrocarbon basins, including the Denver-Julesburg, Powder River, Wind
River, Permian and Hugoton-Anadarko Basins and the Niobrara, Mississippi Lime, Eagle Ford, Bakken,
Marcellus and Utica shale formations. 160
Why was the company not included?
This company was formed in 2013. Consider using when there are five full years of financials.
TransCanada Corporation
Company Summary from Value Line:
TransCanada Corp. operates the most extensive natural gas pipeline system in Canada, transporting
natural gas from the Alberta border to Ontario, Quebec, and the U.S. with more than 91,500 mi. of
natural gas pipelines, and 2,700 mi. of liquids pipeline (Keystone). Its three major segments are natural
gas pipelines (53% of ’16 rev.), oil pipelines (14%), and energy (33%). It has interests in 10,700 mw of
power generation assets, and has 653 bill. Bcf of regulated/nonregulated gas storage. Acq. ANR 2/07.
Has more than 7,165 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
With one of North America’s largest energy infrastructure portfolios, no one powers day-to-day life like
TransCanada. We share technical, stakeholder and operating expertise across all of our operations.
Natural Gas: Safe operation of 91,500 km (56,900 miles) of pipeline & 653 billion ft3 of natural gas
storage. Oil & Liquids: Safe operation of approximately 4,800 km (3,000 miles) of pipeline. Power:
Approximately 6,200 megawatts of capacity – enough to power more than six million homes.161
Why was the company not included?
This company was not included because we use TC PipeLines, L.P.
TransMontaigne Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
TransMontaigne Partners, LP is a terminaling and transportation company based in Denver, Colorado
with operations in the US along the Gulf Coast, in the Midwest, in Houston and Brownsville, Texas,
along the Mississippi and Ohio Rivers, and in the Southeast. It provides integrated terminaling, storage,
transportation, and related services for customers engaged in the distribution and marketing of light
refined petroleum products, heavy refined petroleum products, crude oil, chemicals, fertilizers, and other
liquid products. In November 2017, one of TransMontaigne’s wholly owned subsidiaries agreed to
acquire the Martinez Terminal and Richmond Terminal (West Coast Facilities) from an affiliate of
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P., for $275 million. Also, TransMontaigne commenced an
underwritten public offering to sell 2,500,000 units representing limited partner interests in the
partnership. Has 452 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
TransMontaigne Partners (NYSE: TLP) is a leading provider of terminaling, storage, transportation and
related services to the energy industry. We are a growth-oriented master limited partnership that owns
and operates a diversified network of midstream terminals located in strategic markets throughout the
United States. Our highly-contracted terminals and pipelines provide essential storage and transportation
services to our customers, who are distributors and marketers for a wide array of petroleum products,
crude oil, chemicals, fertilizers and other liquid products. 162
160
http://ir-tep.tallgrassenergylp.com/CorporateProfile, accessed 12/12/2017
161
https://www.transcanada.com/en/operations/, accessed 12/12/2017
162
http://www.transmontaignepartners.com/about-us/company-overview/, accessed 12/12/2017
SAN ANTONIO, Oct. 26, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Valero Energy Partners LP (NYSE:VLP)
(the “Partnership”) today announced that the board of directors of its general partner has approved the
Partnership’s acquisitions of the Port Arthur terminal assets and Parkway Pipeline LLC (“Parkway
Pipeline”) from Valero Energy Corporation (NYSE:VLO) (“Valero”) for total consideration of $508
million. In the first twelve months of operation, the acquired operations are expected to contribute a total
163
https://www.valeroenergypartners.com/Pages/About.aspx, accessed 12/12/2017
of approximately $24 million and $60 million of net income and EBITDA, respectively. The transaction
is expected to close effective November 1, 2017. 164
164
https://globenewswire.com/news-release/2017/10/26/1154138/0/en/Valero-Energy-Partners-LP-Announces-
Acquisitions-of-the-Port-Arthur-Terminal-Assets-and-Parkway-Pipeline-LLC-for-508-Million.html, accessed
12/12/2017
165
http://www.westerngas.com/About/, accessed 12/12/2017
East, West and South Texas, the Rocky Mountains (Colorado, Utah and Wyoming), North-Central
Pennsylvania and the Mid-Continent (Kansas and Oklahoma), and WES is engaged in the business of
gathering, processing, compressing, treating and transporting natural gas, condensate, natural gas liquids
and crude oil for Anadarko, as well as third-party producers and customers. 166
Why was the company not included?
This company’s main business segments include gathering and treating. A main business segment of the
companies the State Assessed Section is responsible for valuing is a fluid transportation pipeline
services or gas transmission pipeline services.
Western Refining Logistics, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Not available. Company is not publically traded.
Additional Company Information from Website:
SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS - October 30, 2017 - Andeavor Logistics LP (NYSE: ANDX) and Andeavor
(NYSE: ANDV) today announced that Andeavor Logistics has completed its acquisition of Western
Refining Logistics, LP (NYSE: WNRL) in a unit-for-unit transaction and assumption of $280 million of
net debt for a total enterprise value of approximately $1.7 billion, based on Andeavor Logistics' closing
unit price of $45.90 on October 30, 2017. The strategic combination of the two companies further
positions Andeavor Logistics as a growth-oriented, full-service and diversified midstream company with
greater organic growth opportunities across the combined geographic footprint. As a result of this
acquisition, Andeavor Logistics is well positioned to compete and grow organically in the highly
attractive Permian Basin, principally in the Delaware basin where Andeavor and Andeavor Logistics
have a strong logistics asset base, crude oil marketing capability and meaningful refining offtake. 167
166
http://www.westerngas.com/About/, accessed 12/12/2017
167
http://ir.andeavorlogistics.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=242247&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=2312595, accessed
12/6/2017
168
http://investor.williams.com/williams, accessed 12/12/2017
169
https://www.wfscorp.com/about-wfs, accessed 12/12/2017
170
https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20170602005203/en/World-Point-Terminals-LP-World-Point-
Terminals, accessed 12/12/2017
171
https://www.cn.ca/en/investors/regulatory-filings, accessed 12/13/2017, 2016 Annual Report Information, page
12
Soo Line, Delaware & Hudson, and DM&E (purchased 10/4/07) subsidiaries. Alliances with other
carriers extend market reach beyond its owned network. Grain shipments 24%, of 2016 freight revenue;
intermodal, 22%; chemicals/plastics, 12%; coal, 10%; other, 32%. Operating ratio in 2016: 58.6%.
Employs 11,653 as of 12/31/16.
Additional Company Information from Website:
CP [Canadian Pacific] operates and owns a transcontinental freight railway in Canada and the United
States, providing industry-leading transportation services and supply chain solutions for a diverse book
of business. 172
Why was the company included?
This company is similar to (and is the parent of) the Railroad Companies that the State Assessed Section
is responsible for valuing. The company engages in railroad transportation services.
CSX Corporation
Company Summary from Value Line:
CSX Corporation provides rail, intermodal transportation, and rail-to-truck transload services. Has about
21,000 route miles in 23 states and two Canadian provinces, with links to more than 240 short-line
railroads. Connects the Northeast, Midwest, and Canada with the Southeast. Principal freight: coal,
fertilizer, chemicals, automobiles & parts, agricultural products, and intermodal cargo. Sold CSX World
Terminals 2/05. 2016 rail operating ratio: 70.4%. Had about 27,000 employees, as of 12/31/16.
Vanguard Group owns 7.2% of common stock; Capital Research, 5.9%; offs/dirs, 4.8% (4/17 proxy).
Additional Company Information from Website:
CSX is a leading supplier of rail-based freight transportation in North America. But there’s more to CSX
than you might expect. Learn all about CSX and discover what we’re doing for our customers,
environment and communities. 173
Why was the company included?
This company is similar to the Railroad Companies that the State Assessed Section is responsible for
valuing. The company engages in railroad transportation services.
Genesee & Wyoming, Inc.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Genesee & Wyoming owns and operates 122 short line and regional freight railroads. Also performs
contract coal loading and railcar switching for industrial customers. Has operations in North America
(74% of ’16 revenue), Australia (14%), and U.K./Europe/ (12%). ’16 freight revenue mix: Pulp & Paper,
8%; Coal, 8%; Minerals & Stone, 13%; Metals, 11%; Other, 60%. Has 7,300 employees. ’16 operating
ratio: 85.5%. Off. & dir. own 2.3% of class A and 92.0% of class B shares outstanding (representing
12.0% of total voting rights); Wellington Man., 9.5% of Class A; FMR, 8.9%; Vanguard, 6.6% (4/17
proxy).
Additional Company Information from Website:
Genesee & Wyoming Inc. owns or leases 122 freight railroads worldwide (collectively "G&W" or the
"company")* organized in nine locally managed operating regions with 8,000 employees serving 3,000
customers. G&W’s seven North American regions serve 41 U.S. states and four Canadian provinces and
include 115 short line and regional freight railroads with more than 13,000 track-miles. G&W’s
Australia Region serves New South Wales, the Northern Territory and South Australia and operates the
172
http://s21.q4cdn.com/736796105/files/doc_downloads/fact-book/2017/CPR-FactBook-2017-Print.pdf,
accessed 12/13/2017 (page 4)
173
https://www.csx.com/index.cfm/about-us/, accessed 12/13/2017
1,400-mile Tarcoola-to-Darwin rail line. The Australia Region is 51.1% owned by G&W and 48.9%
owned by a consortium of funds and clients managed by Macquarie Infrastructure and Real Assets.
G&W’s UK/Europe Region includes the U.K.’s largest rail maritime intermodal operator and second-
largest freight rail provider, as well as regional rail services in Continental Europe. G&W subsidiaries
and joint ventures also provide rail service at more than 40 major ports, rail-ferry service between the
U.S. Southeast and Mexico, transload services, contract coal loading and railcar switching and repair. 174
Why was the company included?
This company is similar to (and is the parent of) the Railroad Companies that the State Assessed Section
is responsible for valuing. The company engages in railroad transportation services.
Kansas City Southern
Company Summary from Value Line:
Kansas City Southern, Inc. is a holding company that has railroad investments in the U.S., Mexico, and
Panama. Kansas City Southern, its primary holding, serves the central and south central U.S. Kansas
City Southern de Mexico serves northeastern and central Mexico, as well as the port cities of Lazaro
Cardenas, Tampico, and Veracruz. Panama Canal Railway (50% stake) provides ocean-to-ocean service
along the Panama Canal. 2016 rail operating ratio: 65.0%. Has 6,820 employees. Officers & directors
own less than 1.0% of common stock; The Vanguard Group, 9.1%; BlackRock, 8.9% (4/17 Proxy).
Additional Company Information from Website:
KCS is a complete network of capabilities, possibilities and advantages for businesses and shippers of
all sizes. You produce it or need it and we can ship it. From accordions to zippers, KCS can ship your
cargo. We are a full-service railroad capable of shipping anything from the tiniest plastic pieces to the
largest machinery. Liquid or metal. Large or small. Finished or Unfinished. We've got your shipment
needs covered. 175
174
https://www.gwrr.com/about_us, accessed 12/13/2017
175
http://www.kcsouthern.com/en-us/why-choose-kcs/what-we-ship, accessed 12/13/2017
176
http://www.nscorp.com/content/nscorp/en/about-ns/corporate-profile.html, accessed 12/13/2017
177
http://www.up.com/aboutup/corporate_info/uprrover/index.htm, accessed 12/13/2017
facilities, including mini-shops and mobile units, offering a range of services from full to light repair.
We partner in two separate and distinct joint ventures: Axis, LLC, and Ohio Castings Company, LLC. 178
Why was the company not included?
This company designs and manufactures railcars.
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. is a holding company owning subsidiaries engaged in property and casualty
insurance on a direct and reinsurance basis through GEICO, General Re and Berkshire Reinsurance.
Other business activities include electric utilities, railroads, flight training services, candy
manufacturing, ice cream, building products, newspapers, retailing, fine jewelry, etc. Also, fractional
ownership programs for general aviation (NetJets), energy (Mid-American Energy). Has approximately
367,700 employees. Officers & directors control 22.1% of voting power (3/17 proxy).
Additional Company Information from Website:
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (“Berkshire,” “Company” or “Registrant”) is a holding company owning
subsidiaries engaged in a number of diverse business activities. The most important of these are
insurance businesses conducted on both a primary basis and a reinsurance basis, a freight rail
transportation business and a group of utility and energy generation and distribution businesses.
Berkshire also owns and operates a large number of other businesses engaged in a variety of activities,
as identified herein. Berkshire is domiciled in the state of Delaware, and its corporate headquarters are
located in Omaha, Nebraska. Berkshire’s operating businesses are managed on an unusually
decentralized basis. There are essentially no centralized or integrated business functions (such as sales,
marketing, purchasing, legal or human resources) and there is minimal involvement by Berkshire’s
corporate headquarters in the day-to-day business activities of the operating businesses. Berkshire’s
corporate office senior management participates in and is ultimately responsible for significant capital
allocation decisions, investment activities and the selection of the Chief Executive to head each of the
operating businesses. It also is responsible for establishing and monitoring Berkshire’s corporate
governance practices, including, but not limited to, communicating the appropriate “tone at the top”
messages to its employees and associates, monitoring governance efforts, including those at the
operating businesses, and participating in the resolution of governance-related issues as needed.
Berkshire and its consolidated subsidiaries employ approximately 367,700 people worldwide. 179
Why was the company not included?
We reviewed Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. because the company is the parent of BNSF Railway, which
operates in Minnesota. However, BNSF Railway is not the majority business segment of Berkshire
Hathaway, Inc.
GATX Corporation
Company Summary from Value Line:
GATX Corp. specializes in tank car, freight car, and locomotive leasing. The company owns or has an
interest in 148,941 railcars, and manages 425 railcars for third-party owners. Specialty unit finances
marine and industrial equipment. American Steamship unit operates a fleet of vessels on the Great
Lakes, providing waterborne transportation of dry bulk commodities. Invests in joint ventures that
complement existing businesses. Has about 2,260 employees. Off. & dir. own 3.5% of common; State
Farm, 16.4%; GAMCO, 13.0%; BlackRock, 10.3%; Wellington, 8.5%; Dimensional Fund, 8.7% (3/17
Proxy).
178
http://www.americanrailcar.com/Home/About, accessed 12/13/2017
179
http://www.berkshirehathaway.com/2016ar/201610-K.pdf, accessed 12/13/2017
180
http://www.gatx.com/wps/wcm/connect/GATX/GATX_SITE/Home/About/, accessed 12/1/2017
181
http://www.gbrx.com/about-us/, accessed 12/13/2017
billion square feet. Has 14,000 employees. Acquired Boise (10/13). Off/dirs. own 1.2% of common
stock; Black- Rock, 14.5%; The Vanguard Group, 8.3% (3/17 proxy).
Additional Company Information from Website:
At PCA, we think of ourselves as more than a box manufacturer. We are an ideas and solutions
company. We seek to be the leader in helping our customers — large and small — package, transport
and display products of all kinds. It just happens to be that corrugated products are our area of expertise.
So a partnership with PCA isn’t just about buying boxes. It’s about building a relationship with a
knowledgeable, trusted, committed source; adding value to your business; and actively contributing to
your success in the marketplace. Whether you are looking for conventional shipping containers, custom-
printed corrugated boxes, custom packaging or eye-catching retail visual displays, PCA is here to deliver
the right packaging solution on time and on budget. 182
Why was the company not included?
We reviewed Packaging Corporation of America because the company is the parent of Boise Paper,
which is the parent of Minnesota, Dakota & Western Railroad. Minnesota, Dakota & Western Railroad
operates in Minnesota. However, Minnesota, Dakota & Western Railroad is not the majority business
segment Packaging Corporation of America.
Trinity Industries, Inc.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Trinity Industries, Inc. manufactures a variety of metal products for many industries. Its five principal
operating segments are: Rail (railcars and component parts), Construction Products (highway safety
products, concrete, and aggregate), Inland Barge (barges and related products), Energy Equipment (wind
towers), and Railcar Leasing and Management. Acquired Thrall 10/01. ’16 depr. rate: 3.4%. Has about
17,680 employees. Officers & directors own 2.0% of common stock; ValueAct Capital 10.2%;
Vanguard Group, 7.7%; BlackRock, 7.6% (4/17 Proxy).
Additional Company Information from Website:
Trinity Industries, Inc. is a diversified industrial company that owns complementary, market-leading
businesses providing products and services to the energy, chemical, agriculture, transportation, and
construction sectors. Trinity reports its financial results in five principal business segments: the Rail
Group, the Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group , the Inland Barge Group , the
Construction Products Group , and the Energy Equipment Group . Our common stock is traded on the
New York Stock Exchange under the symbol TRN. 183
Why was the company not included?
This company manufactures metal products for many industries.
182
https://www.packagingcorp.com/our-company, accessed 12/13/2017
183
http://www.trin.net/, accessed 12/13/2017