Bcog-172 e
Bcog-172 e
Bcog-172 e
MEASUREMENT
1
Unit 2: Features of Indian Economy: An Emerging Economy: highlights
the success story of the Indian economy. India has emerged as the fastest
growing major economy in the world after economic reforms of 1991 and is
expected to be one of the top three economic powers in the world over the next
10-15 years. India is also backed by its robust democracy and strong
partnership. The institutional changes embarked after economic reforms have
been eloquently explained.
Unit 3: Growth: Pre and Post Reforms: explains the process of planning after
India achieved independence. A detailed account of each Five-Year Plan
starting from the first Five-Year Plan in 1951including its targets, achievements
and failures is given. An Assessment of Indian Economy before Economic
Reforms and post reforms has been presented.
2
Unit -1: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Structure
1.0 Objectives
1.1 Introduction
1.2 How an Economy Works
1.2.1 Capitalism
1.2.2 Socialism
1.2.3 Mixed Economy
1.3 Concept of Economic Development
1.3.1 Development and Underdevelopment
1.3.2 A Developing Economy
1.3.3 Economic Growth
1.3.4 Big Push Approach
1.3.5 Poverty Trap
1.3.6 UN Development Decade
1.3.7 Sustainable Development
1.3.8 Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)
1.4 Measurement of Economic Development
1.4.1 GNP per capita
1.4.2 Population Growth
1.4.3 Occupational Structure of the Labour Force
1.4.4 Human Development Index
1.5 Determinants of economic development
1.5.1 Capital Formation
1.5.2 Capital Output Ratio
1.5.3 Natural Resources
1.5.4 Non- Economic Factors in Economic Development
1.5.5 Institutional factors affecting development
1.6 Role of Government in Development
1.7 Let us Sum Up
1.8 Key Words
1.9 Answers to Check Your Progress
1.10 Terminal Questions
1.0 OBJECTIVES
After going through this unit, you will be able to:
• Discuss the working of an Economy in different Economic Systems
• State the concepts of economic development, under development and
developing Economy
• Describe the various development related concepts
• Explain the determinants of economic development
3
• Discuss the Role of Government in Development
1.1 INTRODUCTION
The economic system and the historical context of a country also decide the
development prospects to a great extent. The policy of leissez faire (i.e. leave
free) was favoured by the classical economists. Capitalist system, centrally
planned economic system and mixed system with efficient market and rational
interventionist role of the state restrictive and liberalization policy are also
shaped in the process of evolution
Economic system of country provides its broadest process of working of major
economic activities. There are three kinds of economic systems.
• Capitalism
• Socialism
• Mixed Economy
1.2.1 Capitalism
In a capitalist economic system, activities of a business firm are market
determined. In a capitalist economy, neither an individual nor any institution
takes decisions in a centralised or planned manner concerning its day-to-day
functioning of economic activities. However, the people of capitalist countries
know that in spite of all this the producers generally produce those commodities
which are effectively demanded in the market. The producers also find it
necessary to demand services of factors of production like land, labour, capital
and organization. There is payment by producers for these services, which is in
the form of rent, wages, salaries, interest and profit. This is also known as
income in lieu of rendering services to the producer. It is only by spending this
income that the people can buy goods and services of their choice.
4
In a free market economy, the invisible behaviour of the consumers and
producers based on their needs develop a system of price mechanism. This
system decides ‘What to produce’, ‘How to produce’ and ‘Whom to produce’.
This system not only solves the central problems of working of te economy but
also helps in reaching the state of equilibrium. This can be understood with the
help of the following Figure.
Separately Determine
determine
Supply
Schedule
Supply schedules
Of
Demand of product and
Schedules for demand
Products schedules for
and
It is clear from the figure that the choice and preferences of the individuals for
consumption goods and their income which they wish to spend on buying these
will together determine the demand for various goods in the market. The
production function and the quantity and proportion in which labour, capital,
land and other factors are used in the productive process determine the supply
of the products in the market. It is these conditions of demand and supply in the
commodity market which determine the prices of all products which enter it.
5
The other factors, such as wage, rate, rent, etc. are determined in more or less
the same manner.
In free market or in the capitalist countries, it is through the working of this
price mechanism that the free enterprise economy takes decisions regarding the
three central problems, viz. what to produce, how to produce and for whom to
produce in favour of maximum social welfare.
This price mechanism works efficiently under the conditions of perfectly
competitive market structure and equitable distribution of income and wealth.
But major challenge in most of the capitalist countries today is neither the
equitable distribution of income nor the perfect competition. Therefore, a
number of weaknesses can be noted in the way in which the price mechanism
regulates the economy. It is very often seen in capitalist countries that on the
one hand, there is scarcity of necessities like wheat and milk, while on the other
hand, liquor, motor car, television and other luxuries are freely available.
Moreover, whereas the children of the poor fail to get basic necessities like food
and clothing due to very low income, rich have all luxuries of life because of
high income.
1.2.2 Socialism
Socialism is an economic system where private sector does not have any kind of
control over price fixation by market forces. The production, distribution and
consumption resulting from all major economic activities are centralised. By
centralization means, it is controlled by the state or state-established agencies.
This kind of system is also known as command economy.
According to Paul M. Sweezy, “Socialism is a complete social system which
differs from capitalism not only in the absence of private ownership of the
means of production but also in its basic structure and mode of functioning.”
Market system or market determined prices have no role to play in the working
of a socialist economy. China and Russia are examples of Socialist Economy. In
these economies, generally the planning commission or central decision making
agencies, are required to solve the basic central problems, i.e. what to produce,
how to produce, and for whom to produce. In order to do this, the Planning
Commission or central agencies have to, on the one hand, make an estimate of
the available economic, human and natural resources at its command, while on
the other hand, it has to determine the requirements of the nation for various
goods and services. This process can also be termed as Command Economy.
6
To put it more clearly, the Commission has to decide upon the various
commodities which the economy should produce with the available resources.
There can be many different ways of achieving the output targets. The Planning
Commission in a socialist country takes into consideration the social welfare
aspect and the development related goals of the nation while choosing the
technique of production to be used. In this system, disposable income of people
are given by state in an equitable way by taking into consideration the poorest
section of the society also. The price mechanism in a capitalist economy
operates in such a way that production takes place only to meet the demands of
all those people who have considerable amount of disposable income. Under
this system, not much attention is generally paid to the production of those
commodities which belong to the poor man’s basket. In a socialist economy,
however, income inequalities are drastically reduced so that everyone has an
adequate amount of disposable income. While determining the pattern and size
of the output, the Planning Commission has to see to it that its decisions in this
regard are such that they ensure the availability of commodities for all in the
market.
Economists view socialist planning as equivalent to planning for economic
development. Therefore, every economic plan of the nation which determines
its economy’s pace and pattern of development should necessarily incorporate
two elements: First, the way in which national income is to be distributed
between consumption and accumulation, and secondly, the manner in which
investment is to be allocated among the different sectors of the economy.
7
Indian is perhaps the best example of such an economy and can legitimately be
called a mixed economy.
A mixed economy contains the good features of both socialism and capitalism.
Every possible effort is made to make the best possible use of available
economic resources. The price mechanism and the profit motive and all kinds
of freedoms result in the efficient allocation and utilisation of the available
resources. As a result, shortages and surpluses are easily avoided and business
fluctuations are eliminated.
Check Your Progress: A
8
development is a policy intervention endeavour which aims to increase
economic as well as social well-being of people,
1.3.1 Development and Underdevelopment
The Indian economy, like every other economy, performs three vital functions,
viz. production, consumption and growth; it produces different types of goods
and services; it enables its people to buy and consume them. While USA,
Sweden, West Germany, Japan, etc. are developed economies with
technologically advanced agriculture, industry, transport and communication
system, etc. the Indian economy has been struggling to become a developed
economy.
Economists world over have indicated certain features of underdevelopment.
Economic development may be defined as the process by which a traditional
society employing primitive techniques and capable of sustaining only a low
level of income is transformed into a modern, high technology, high-income
economy. Such a developed economy uses capital, skilled labour and scientific
knowledge to produce wide variety of products for the market. Capital goods
and human capital and relevant scientific knowledge play a major role for the
development of an economy.
The underdeveloped countries face poverty, high and rising burden of
unemployment, growing disparities in income distribution, low and stagnant
agricultural productivity, sizeable gap between urban and rural levels of living,
lack of adequate education, health and housing facilities, dependence on foreign
and often inappropriate technologies and more or less stagnant occupational
structure. Some of the features of the underdeveloped economy are as follows:
1. Low Per Capita Income: Per capita income refers to the average income of
people of a country. It is calculated by dividing national income by total
population of the country. Per capita income is also often used to measure a
country's standard of living. You must be aware that the national income of an
under developed country is low and the population is high. As a result, the
under developed countries have low per capita income.
9
3. Heavy Dependence on Agriculture: A large proportion of population is
dependent on agriculture in underdeveloped countries. The natural calamities
adversely affect the agriculture. As a result, the farmers get less output from
agriculture. These days, the contribution of agriculture to the GDP of under-
developed countries has been rapidly declining.
10
9. Low Financial Inclusion Rate: The lower strata of the society, particularly
in rural areas is less financially inclusive in underdeveloped countries. Financial
inclusion means access of people to useful and affordable financial products,
such as banking services, insurance, etc. The less financial inclusion rate
reduces the number of opportunities for growth.
1.3.2 A Developing Economy
After Independence, the government took keen interest in the economy which
was given a big push through the sector enterprises in the core sectors. As a
result, per capita income has been rising, although not steadily. The dominance
of agriculture is gradually reducing; the secondary and tertiary sectors (services)
are slowly expanding. In the last seventy years, the Indian economy has
developed a large number of basic industries that produce capital equipment and
useful raw materials. India is now in a position to maintain the growth of most
of her industries by the domestic production of capital goods, supplemented
with only marginal imports. India has also built a large number of canals and
storage works, hydro and thermal power generation and largely electrified
railway system, expanding post and telecommunication system covering most
of the countries and linking its important business centres with other countries,
expanding system of banking and finance; and so on.
1.3.3 Economic Growth
The basic aim of economic policy of the Government of India has been to
remove poverty and create means for better standard of living of the people.
This aim can be achieved through rapid economic growth. Economic growth
can be defined as the process whereby an economy’s real national income
increases over a long period of time. Economic growth is an increase (or
decrease) in the value of goods and services that a geographic area produces and
sells in comparison to an earlier time. If the value of an area's goods and
services is higher in one year than the year before, it experiences positive
growth, usually known as "economic growth”
However, as economist Amartya Sen points out: “economic growth is only one
aspect of the process of economic development.”
1.3.4 "Big Push" Approach
It is the measure of help to the developing countries trapped in the vicious circle
of poverty trap, by injecting large sums of financial supports, so as to break the
cycle and improve the local living standards based on industrial development
and investment.
1.3.5 Poverty Trap
11
Poverty trap is a self-perpetuating condition where an economy suffers from
persistent underdevelopment where poverty breeds or perpetuates poverty.
Poverty trap has to be distinguished from (possibly temporary) bad market
outcomes, such as recessions and financial crises.
1.3.6 UN Development Decade
The UN General Assembly declared each decade of the 1960s, 1970s, 1980s
and 1990s, as the first, second, third, and fourth UN Development Decade,
respectively. The first Development Decade was announced by President John.
F. Kennedy of the United States in 1962. Each decade put forth specific sets of
development goals. No announcement of the development decade was made for
the first decade of the 21st century; however, the Millennium Development
Goals (covering the period up to 2015) were adopted at the UN Millennium
Summit in 2000.
1.3.7 Sustainable Development
It is the process of development that "meets the needs of the present without
compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs" (the
Brundtland Report, 1987). While the central issue of sustainable development
is the reduction/prevention of environmental degradation, but it must be done
without unduly forgoing the needs of economic development, social equality
and justice.
1.3.8 Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)
The eight goals covering a wide range of social and economic development that
the UN member states have agreed to strive for with the year 2015 as the target
time-limit. The MDGs were adopted on the occasion of the 2000 UN
Millennium Summit. Since then, the UN system has been mobilized to their
achievement, and many NGO have rallied around the UN campaign. The
MDGs specifically concern the eradication of extreme hunger and poverty;
achieve universal primary education; promote gender equality and empower
women; reduce child mortality; improve maternal health; combat HIV/AIDS,
malaria, and other diseases; ensure environmental sustainability; develop a
global partnership for development.
1.4 MEASUREMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Economic development refers to the total quality of life of a population. It
includes the standard of its education, medical care and diet. The greater a
country’s economic development, the better the living standard of people should
be.
12
A major goal of poor countries is economic development or economic growth.
The two terms are not identical. Growth may be necessary but not sufficient for
development. Economic growth refers to increases in a country's production or
income per capita Production is usually measured by Gross National
Product (GNP) or Gross National Income (GNI), used interchangeably, an
economy's total output of goods and services.
Economic development is accompanied by changes in output distribution and
economic structure. These changes may include an improvement in the material
well-being of the poorer half of the population; a decline in agriculture's share
of GNP and a corresponding increase in the GNP share of industry and services;
an increase in the education and skills of the labour force; and substantial
technical advances originating within the country. As with children, growth
involves a stress on quantitative measures (height or GNP), whereas
development draws attention to changes in capacities (such as physical
coordination and learning ability, or the economy's ability to adapt to shifts in
tastes and technology). Currently measurement of development are:-
GNP is the total market value of all final goods and services produced by a
country in one year. It is a measure of economic activity, or how much is
produced in a country. The more that country produces per person, the more
"developed" it is assumed to be.
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is closely linked with GNP. It is the value of the
goods and services produced in the country only. It includes all goods and
services produced by foreign owned companies. GDP excludes all goods and
services produced outside the country. The average GDP per person can be
calculated by dividing the GDP by the total population of the country
13
In general, poorer countries have higher rate of population growth. Many of the
world's countries, including many in Sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle
East, South Asia and South East Asia, have seen a sharp rise in population in
the last few years. The fear is that high population numbers may put further
strain on the natural resources, food supplies, fuel supplies, employment,
housing, etc. in underdeveloped and developing countries. It has been seen that
in underdeveloped and developing countries, rapid growth of population is an
important hindrance to the economic growth. Higher population means less
resources per capita. Since economic growth is measured in terms of an increase
in per capita income, a part of the increase in national income is utilised to
maintain the additional population. In other words, in terms of per capita
income, on account of a rise in population, the country is left with small
potential of spreading benefits of growth across its population. This highlights
the need for a large and active programme of family planning so that the
benefits of the massive developmental efforts do not get dissipated.
But it may be emphasized that it would not be proper to isolate the population
factor because history has shown that birth rate only falls significantly when the
standard of living rises significantly for the majority of the population. Hence
economic development and population are interconnected. Whereas population
hinders economic development, the latter, as it gathers momentum, leads to the
creation of more appropriate conditions to control population.
Economic activities of any country are broadly classified into primary activities,
secondary activities, and tertiary activities.
Primary activities are known as primary because they directly remove resources
from the earth, for examples, agriculture, mining, fishing, and lumbering.
Tertiary activities comprise the service sector of the economy. These facilitate
further adding values to the primary and manufacturing activities. The tertiary
activities include retailing, transportation, education, banking, etc.
Growth rate of the national income in the developed nations’ high capital
formation has contributed to higher economic growth. A higher rate of capital
formation leads to productive capacity of a nation, which results into higher
production of goods and services and higher national income.
Capital includes the stock of machines, tools and equipment (which produce
consumer goods as well as machines) and improvements in skill formation of its
work force, which has enhancing effect on the process of growth. Any
increment to this stock year to year are called Capital Formation. Investment is
also generally known as amount of capital formation.
In underdeveloped countries, the level of income is low and due to this, saving
ratio is also low. Low saving results into low investment and lower level of
capital formation. Therefore, increase in income leads to more capital
formation. To make optimum use of the natural wealth, necessary amount of
capital is needed so that they can be used to their fullest. If the level of income
is low, the savings will also be low. In such a case, a country may use foreign
capital. The actual requirement of capital depends upon growth target and
capital output ratio.
16
1.5.2 Capital-Output Ratio
In developed nations, the health and education levels are much higher as
compared to the underdeveloped countries. Developed countries with better
health and education produce larger output and higher incomes. The role of
human capital formation in economic development can be stated in terms of
increase in output, in productive capacity, improved quality of life and increase
in inventions and innovations.
If the economy depends solely on the price mechanism to solve its central
problems, then given the income and wealth inequalities, there is a possibility
that a large number of people die of starvation while a handful possess the good
things of life very much in excess of what is required by them. Here
intervention of government to facilitate inclusive and sustainable development
is required. Any enlightened government finds it necessary to curb inhuman
traits in the working of the price mechanism.
18
It has been seen that price mechanism due to the individualistic orientation of
human behaviour cannot adequately allocate resources for education, medical
facilities and other social services. Government must allocate resources for
education, medical facilities and other social services by keeping in mind that in
a country like India, there is sizable population living in poverty and they lack
resources to buy these services. Other services of immense national importance,
like transportation, communications, water and electricity, defence, space are
also very important for development. The Government cannot solely depend on
private sector or by the price mechanism alone. Because then it is likely to
result in a very short supply of each one of them. Therefore, it becomes
imperative for the government to participate directly in the production of these
services.
The economic system and the historical context of a country also decide the
development prospectus to a great extent. Economic system of country provides
its broadest process of working of major economic activities, namely
Capitalism, Socialism and Mixed Economy.
19
of policymakers and community to promote the standard of living and economic
condition in a country. Economic development refers to the total quality of life
of the population. It includes the standard of its education, medical care, the
diet, etc. The greater a country’s economic development, the better the living
standard of people is. Currently, measurement of development are:
Capitalism: The economic system in which business are owned and run for
profit by individuals and not by the state.
Socialism: The political idea that is based on the belief that all people are equal
and that money and property should be equally divided.
20
Development: The process of becoming bigger, stronger better etc. or of
making somebody something do this.
Gross National Product (GNP): Total market value of the final goods and
services produced by a nation’s economy during a specific period of time a year
computed before allowance is made for the depreciation or consumption of
capital used in the process of production.
Gross Domestic Product (GDP): GDP is the most commonly used measured
for the site of an economy.
21
22
UNIT 2: FEATURES OF INDIAN ECONOMY: AN EMERGING
ECONOMY
Structure
2.0 Objectives
2.1 Introduction
2.2 India an Emerging Economy
2.3 India in Transition
2.4 Institutional Changes
2.5 Liberalization
2.5.1 Industrial Sector Reforms
2.5.2 Financial Sector Reforms
2.5.3 Fiscal Reforms
2.6 Privatisation
2.7 Globalization
2.8 Structural Changes
2.9 Major Issues Controlling Indian Economy
2.9.1 Poverty
2.9.2 Unemployment
2.9.3 Inequalities In Income Distribution
2.9.4 Regional Disparities
2.10 Let Us Sum Up
2.11 Key Words
2.12 Answers to Check Your Progress
2.13 Terminal Questions
2.0 Objectives
After going through this unit, you will be able to:
• Discuss the evolutionary process of Indian Economy;
• State the concepts of Liberalization, Privatisation and Globalization;
• Describe the various economic challenges which India is facing and
• Explain Major Issues Controlling Indian Economy highlighting the issues
relating to poverty, unemployment, inequalities in income distribution
and regional disparities.
2.1 Introduction
Theodore Roosevelt remarked, “A peep in the past prepares you better for the
future”. Thus for understanding the present state of the Indian economy and its
future prospects a brief comment on its past will be appropriate. The Indian
economy, before the British came around the middle of the nineteenth century,
was quite sound. According to an estimate, the Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
of India in the sixteenth century was about 25% of the world economy, the
second largest in the world. However, after the arrival of the colonial rule the
Indian economy faced disaster; from being an exporter of processed goods it
changed to being an exporter of raw materials and a buyer of manufactured
goods. As per British economist, Angus Maddison, India’s share of the world
income went from 27% in 1700 A.D. (compared to Europe share of 23%) to 3%
in 1950.
After India got independence in 1947, the process of rebuilding the economy
started. However, it was mostly centralized and the period from 1947 to 1991
was termed as the licence raj, because the successive governments followed
protectionist economic policies. This trend led to a balance of payments crisis in
the year 1990. The year 1991 turned out to be watershed in the Indian economy
when the government of India in June 1991 announced major liberalization
policies in Indian economy. Dr. Manmohan Singh while presenting the budget
in 1991, quoted victor hugo, “no power on earth can stop an idea whose time
has come”. The emergence of India as a major economic power in the world
happens to be one such idea.” Since then Indian economy has progressed
immensely with GDP progressing at the rate of 6 to 8% per annum and is
expected to be one of the top three economic powers in the world over the next
10-15 years. India is also backed by its robust democracy and strong
partnerships. India has finally arrived in the category of fast emerging
economies. It is fast entering the league of high growth nations. The future
seems to have much more in store. But a lot depends on how the grey areas are
tackled.
We have finally been able to unshackle ourselves from the stigma of being a
low growth economy and have infused dynamism into our economic system.
Not only is India achieving higher growth rates year after year, the rate at which
it is moving towards higher growth targets is also higher.
India's economy over the last three decades is a success story; after a major
economic crisis in 1991, followed by Economic reforms, the economy has
experienced a high and sustainable economic growth rate, attracted large
amount foreign investment, and a boom in the information technology sector
and pharma sector. These characteristics are good enough to classify India as an
emerging economy. Since the start of the 21st century, annual average GDP
growth 6% to 7% and from 2013-2018 India was the world’s fastest growing
major economy. It was the robustness of Indian economy that unlike US and
Europe India was not affected by global financial crisis in the year 2008.
India's key growth factors are a young and rapidly growing working-age
population, rising education and engineering skill levels, accentuating growth in
the manufacturing sector, a rapidly growing middle-class, implementing a
sustained growth of the consumer market.
Among all the emerging markets, it is India’s robust growth in manufacturing,
business friendly reforms, infrastructural development and political stability that
makes the country the most prominent emerging market to invest in for
investors. According to the IMF World Economic Outlook, April 2016, India
ranks fourth among the list of the world’s fastest growing economies with a
growth projection of 7.2 percent for the fiscal year 2017 and 7.7 percent for the
fiscal year 2018, surpassing China.
• Economic reforms that began 25 years ago have transformed India. What
used to be a poor, slow growing country now has the third largest gross
domestic product (GDP) in the world with regard to purchasing power
parity and is projected to be the fastest‐growing major economy in the
world in 2016 (with 7.6 percent growth in GDP).The Indian GDP rose
from $266 billion in 1991 (inflation adjusted) to $3 trillion in
2019 (1100% increase) while its purchasing power parity rose from $1
trillion in 1991 to $12 trillion in 2019 (1100% increase).
• The external sector of Indian Economy is also performing well under the
new economic policy. Exports, which had been treated as a residual
category before economic reforms have now received a place of
prominence in our economic strategy. Various promotional steps have
been taken to increase the rate of growth of our exports which has been
around 10% in the entire post-liberalisation period. Imports, on the other
hand, were deliberately compressed in 1991-92, but have been growing
since then owing to the renewal of economic activity. But during the
entire period, between 1990-91 and 1995-96, the rate of growth of
imports has been lower than that of exports and this has led to an
improvement in our balance of trade. But, since 1993-94, the high saving-
investment gap has led to an increase in the trade and current account
deficit.
• The high rate of capital inflows since 1991 have been another positive
feature of our balance of payments situation. Furthermore, these inflows
have been preponderantly of the non-debt creating variety, with net
foreign borrowings constituting only about 20% of the total capital
inflows during 1993-95. Capital inflows are mainly taking the form of
foreign investment which has grown by around 85% from 1990-91 to
1995-96.
(i) Increase in the investment limit for the Small Scale Industries (SSIs): The
role of small and medium enterprises (SME) sector was recognized as an
important contributor to the Indian economy. It was for the first time defined
in terms of a separate act, governing, promotion and development of Micro,
Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) Act, 2006. SME’s not only play
important role in providing employment opportunities at comparatively lower
capital cost but also usher in industrialization of the rural areas. This sector
consists of about 36 million units, as of now, and provides to employment to
over 80 million persons. Some of the advantages of SME’s include low
investment requirements, operational flexibility, low intensive imports,
appreciable export earnings, development of domestic technology, etc. For
upgrading machinery and improve their efficiency in SMIs, Investment limit
of the small scale industries was raised to Rs. 1 crore in 1991
(ii) Freedom for expansion and production to Industries:
Industries are free to diversify their production capacities and reduce the cost of
production. Earlier government used to fix the maximum limit of production
capacity. No industry could produce beyond that limit. Now the industries are
free to decide their production by their own on the basis of the requirement of
the markets.
2.6 Privatisation
Indian Govt. started selling shares of PSU’s to public and financial institution
e.g. Govt. sold shares of Maruti Udyog Ltd. Now the private sector will acquire
ownership of these PSU’s. The share of private sector has increased from 45%
to 55%.
The Govt. has started the process of disinvestment in those PSU’s which had
been running into loss. It means that Govt. has been selling out these industries
to private sector
Previously Public sector was given the importance with a view to help in
industrialisation and removal of poverty. But these PSU’s could not able to
achieve this objective and policy of contraction of PSU’s was followed under
new economic reforms. Number of industries reserved for public sector was
reduces from 17 to 2.
2.7 Globalization
Globalisation means the interaction of the domestic economy with the rest of
the world with regard to foreign investment, trade, production and financial
matters. Following steps are taken for Globalisation:
Equity limit of foreign capital investment has been raised from 40% to 100%
percent. In 47 high priority industries foreign direct investment (FDI) to the
extent of 100% will be allowed without any restriction. In this regard Foreign
Exchange Management Act (FEMA) will be enforced.
If the Indian economy is shining at the world map currently, its sole attribution
goes to the implementation of the New Economic Policy in 1991.
The 1991 balance of payments crisis led to India's 'plunge into structural
reforms. The strategy of reforms introduced in India in July 1991 presented a
mixture of macroeconomic stabilization and structural adjustment. It was
guided by short-term and long-term objectives. ... Besides this, structural
reforms were initiated in the field of trade, industry and the public sector.
The purpose of economic development is not only to increase the output, but
also to change the composition of output. Economic development is not only
to increase the output, but also to change the composition of output. As the
community’s needs are satisfied, new wants inevitably appear and these have
to be met through supplies of new types of products. Moreover, while some
new demands are met through higher imports, some new supplies get
diverted towards exports. Thus structural change in an economy consists of
change in the composition of output and there are four sources of the same.
They are:
(viii) Change in Final Demand
(ix) Change in Exports
(x) Change in Import Structure
(xi) Change in Technology
During reforms structural adjustment programs and loans were arranged
through the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank. The
Indian Government was to review its trade policies to allow more foreign
investment and reduce trade restrictions so that India's economy could be
restored to its former level. Import tariffs underwent significant reductions
and import/export licensing system procedures were simplified. The opening
up of capital markets to include more foreign participation has allowed
multinationals companies entrance into otherwise untapped markets.
The Indian economy has responded vigorously to a program of stabilisation
and reform measures started in 1992. The Indian Government took drastic
action including devaluation, the imposition of higher interest rates, fiscal
and monetary restraint and import compression. In succeeding budgets long
term measures were introduced which removed the protection for Indian
industry and commerce from international competition.
2.9 Major issues controlling Indian economy
2.9.1 Poverty
Figure 2.2. Rural and urban poverty percentages for the years 1993-94, 2004-05
and 2011-12.
The percentage of the poverty personnel according to the social groups are
shown in Figure 2.3.
Figure 2.3. Poverty by social groups for the years 1993-94, 2004-05 and 2011-
12
For combating poverty, it was realised that two-pronged strategy will have to be
followed:
1. Modernize agriculture and accelerate agricultural growth
2. Create job opportunities in industry and services.
2.9.2 Unemployment
Indian economy is a developing economy and the problem of unemployment is
very grave in India. But here the nature of unemployment differs from most of
the developed western countries. In western countries, unemployment is due to
shortfall in demand. More or less it is a form of cyclical unemployment. It
implies that in such economies, machines become ideal and demand for labour
falls because the demand for the products of industry is no longer there. Thus,
most of Keynesian remedies concentrated on measures to keep the level of
effective demand sufficiently high so that the economic machine does not
slacken the production of goods and services.
But more serious than cyclical unemployment or frictional unemployment in an
undeveloped economy like India, is the existence of chronic under-employment
mainly in the rural sector and the existence of educated unemployment in the
urban areas. There is disguised unemployment by which a situation we mean
where the productivity of workers is almost zero or near zero. This contention
of zero productivity is a very controversial issue among the economists. But
finally it has been concluded that productivity of employed disguised worker is
low. Educational unemployment is due to the gap between manpower planning
and number of educated personnel and is mainly due to the structural
inadequacy to absorb all the educated persons in the system.
Therefore, it is quite clear that unemployment in underdeveloped economies
like India is not the result of deficiency of effective demand in the Keynesian
sense but a consequence of shortage of capital equipment or other
complementary resources.
Poverty in India is also associated with unemployment, unlike in industrially
advanced countries. “The miseries of unemployment in India are sometimes
partly cushioned by the institution of joint family. Yet for a given family, the
lack of adequate employment opportunities for its adult members and a non-
earner who is dependent are among the common characteristics of poverty”.
It has been said that unemployment is mainly the result of emphasis on heavy
industry during the planning process. Early planners had almost a mystic faith
in the twin gods of technology and heavy industry which has turned out to be
misplaced. Western technology, which developed in the west in response to a
shortage of labour and the consequent need to replace men with machine,
provides no short cut to prosperity in countries with a large number of
underemployed and undernourished labour and an acute shortage of capital.
Planners and economists have often debated whether employment is a by-
product of development and economic growth or whether employment creating
policy should be a primary objective of the planning process. The primary
objective of such a policy has to be the maximisation of economic welfare of
all. The attainment of this objective would require structural changes in the
development process.
Thus, the problem of unemployment cannot be viewed as a residual one and all
measures and policies concerning economic affairs of the country have to be
directed in such a way that they aim at the elimination of various forms of
unemployment.
Manpower planning is a part of the entire labour force organisation which
requires policy and programmes for the development and effective utilisation of
human capital on its optimum basis. This process involves the available and
future supply of human capital, simultaneously, while keeping close watch on
the demand pattern. Thus, manpower planning is an inter-disciplinary subject. It
is intimately connected with social and economic factors of demographic
composition.
There is no formal report by the Niti Aayog about the unemployment data.
However according to the National Sample Survey (NSS) Office’s Periodic
Labour Force Survey, the country’s unemployment rate was at a 45-year-high of
6.1 per cent in 2017-18. This reported generated much controversy and Niti
Aayog claimed that the data released by NSS were not verified.
2.9.3 Inequalities in income distribution
Income inequality is a significant disparity in the distribution of
income between individuals, social groups, populations, or countries. It is a
major factor of social stratification and social class. Other elements included in
inequalities are wealth, political power, and social status. Income is a major
determinant of quality of life, affecting the health and well-being of individuals
and families, and varies by social factors such as sex, age, and race or ethnicity.
As per the 'World Inequality Report 2022', India is among the most unequal
countries in the world, with rising poverty and an 'affluent elite.' The report
highlights that the top 10% and top 1% in India hold 57% and 22% of the total
national income respectively while the bottom 50% share has gone down to
13%.
According to another report by the Johannesburg-based company New World
Wealth, India is the second-most unequal country globally, with millionaires
controlling 54% of its wealth. In India, the richest 1% own 53% of the country’s
wealth, according to the latest data from Credit Suisse. The richest 5% own
68.6%, while the top 10% have 76.3%.At the other end of the pyramid, the
poorer half held a mere 4.1% of national wealth. The Credit Suisse data shows
that India’s richest 1% owned just 36.8% of the country’s wealth in 2000, while
the share of the top 10% was 65.9%. Since then they have steadily increased
their share of the pie. The share of the top 1% now exceeds 50%.
The average national income of the Indian adult population is Rs 2,04,200.
Here, the bottom 50% earns Rs 53,610 while the top 10% earns Rs
11,66,520, over 20 times more.
Causes of Inequalities:
Major causes of the inequalities are te following:
(i) Inheritance: It plays a significant role in inequality. The persons born in
rich family have a significant advantage. If they are prudent enough,
they maintain the lead. On the other hand, people born in poor
families are at disadvantage in this respect.
(ii) Difference in natural traits: Different people have different talents and
initiatives. The people gifted with natural traits and entrepreneurship
multiply their prosperity as compared the people who lack these
qualities.
(iii) Opportunities of higher education and skill development: Some
people get opportunities of better education and skill development.
With this background, they succeed in getting jobs of higher
emoluments.
(iv) Family influence: It is often found that family influence plays
important role in getting one a lucrative job.
Consequences of Inequality
The consequences of inequality are summarised in diagram 1.
(i) Social unrest:
Inequality in society creates two classes: ‘haves’ and ‘have-not’. The people
who are deprived of essential requirements feel frustrated and create unrest. The
caste-based agitations demanding reservations in jobs and other fields are the
examples of the social unrest. Thus inequality of incomes is an important cause
of social and political instability.
(v) Progressive Taxation: Progressive Taxation on the rich and the luxuries will
help reduce income inequalities. Other direct taxes like the super tax, excess
profits tax, and capital gains tax and limitation of dividends, etc., may also be
imposed.
There is also need of policies and some sort of machinery by the Government,
which may provide equal opportunities to all rich and poor in getting
employment or getting a start in trade and industry. In other words, something
may be done to eliminate the family influence in the matter of choice of a
profession. For example, the government may institute a system of liberal
stipends and scholarships, so that even the poorest in the land can acquire the
highest education and technical skill.
There are diverse geographical factors responsible for disparity among states.
Among these, it has been seen that adverse climate and proneness to flood are
two factors responsible for poor rate of economic development of different
regions of the country. These are reflected by low agricultural productivity and
lack of industrialization. Thus these natural factors have resulted uneven growth
of different regions of India.
While determining the location of iron and steel projects or refineries or any
heavy industrial project, some technical factors included in the locational
advantage are getting special considerations. Thus regional imbalances arise due
to such locational advantages attached to some regions and the locational
disadvantages attached to some other backward regions.
To remove regional disparities, various five year plans aimed at the expansion
of power, transport, irrigation, education and training facilities and the
development of village and small industries. Some backward areas in different
States were given special considerations for location of industries
In our planning process from second five year plan onwards, balanced growth
was one of the major objectives of economic planning in India but regional
disparities increased due to lack of specific backward state development policies
Rather, in the process of implementation , planning mechanisms has enlarged
the disparity between the developed states and less developed states of the
country.
There was more allocation plan outlay relatively to developed states as
compared to less developed states. From First Plan to the Seventh Plan, Punjab
and Haryana have received the highest per capita plan outlay, all along. The
other three states like Gujarat, Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh have also
received larger allocation of plan outlays in almost all the five year plans.
On the other hand, the backward states like Bihar, Assam, Orissa, Uttar Pradesh
and Rajasthan have been receiving the smallest allocation of per capita plan
outlay in almost all the plans. Due to such divergent trend, imbalance between
the different states in India has been continuously widening, inspite of framing
achievement of regional balance as one of the important objectives of economic
development in the country.
Inter-state economic and social disparities in India have been increasing in spite of
various governmental measures to develop backward areas. The increased
disparities is i in terms of demographic indicators, female literacy, state domestic
product and poverty, development and non-development expenditure by state
government, shares in plan outlay, investments, banking activities and infrastructure
development.
After India got independence in 1947 the process of rebuilding the economy
started. However, it was mostly centralized and the period from 1947 – 1991
was termed as the licence raj because the successive governments followed
protectionists economic policies. This trend led to a balance of payments crisis
in the year 1990. The year 1991 turned out to be watershed in the Indian
economy when the government of India announced major liberalization policies
in Indian economy.
Under the new economic policy some radical changes related to foreign trade,
foreign direct investment, exchange rate, industry, fiscal discipline, etc were
made. The NEP has been towards creating a more competitive environment in
the economy as a means to improving the productivity and efficiency of the
system. Under NEP liberalization was a key component. It included industrial
sector reforms, financial sector reforms and fiscal reforms.
The second component of NEP was privatization which included sale of shares
of PSUs, disinvestment in PSUs and diminished role of PSUs. The third
component of NEP namely globalization included reduction in tariffs and long
term trade policy. Under the latter all controls on foreign trade have been
removed; open competition is encouraged and partial convertibility of Indian
currency permitted. The NEP presented a mixture of macro economic
stabalization and structural adjustment. The structural changes include change
in final demand, change in exports, change in import structure and change in
technology.
Inspite of the Indian economy responding vigorously and positively to the new
changes, it still suffers from certain issues. The major issues controlling Indian
economy comprise poverty, unemployment, inequalities in income distribution
and regional disparities.
Structure
3.0 Objectives
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Growth of the Indian Economy during Plans : Early Phase
3.2.1 Growth of Indian Economy in First Five Plan (1951-1956)
3.2.2 Growth of Indian Economy in Second Five Plan( 1956-61)
3.2.3 Growth of Indian Economy in Third Five Plan( 1961-66)
3.2.4 Growth Rate in Plan Holiday (66-69)
3.2.5 Growth Rate in Fourth Five Year Plan (1969-74)
3.2.6 Growth Rate in Fifth Five Year Plan (1974-78)
3.2.7 Growth Rate in Rolling Plan (1978-80)
3.2.8 Growth Rate in Sixth Five Year Plan (1980-85)
3.2.9 Seventh Five year Plan (1985-90)
3.2.10 Annual Plans:
3.3 An Assessment of Indian Economy before Economic Reforms
3.4 Economic reforms
3.4.1 Eighth Five Year Pan (1992- 1997) Reform Phase
3.4.2 Ninth Five Year Plan ((1997-2002)
3.4.3 Tenth Five Year Plan (2002-2007)
3.4.4 Eleventh Five-Year Plan (2007–2012)
3.4.5 Twelfth Five-Year Plan (2012-2017)
3.5 Growth of Indian Economy in Post Planning Era
3.6 Let us Sum Up
3.7 Key Words
3.8 Answers to Check your progress
3.9 Terminal Questions
3.0 Objectives
After going through this unit, you will be able to:
It was considered necessary that the public sector should undertake investment
in defence, heavy and basic industries. Since these industries required lumpy
investment and has a long gestation period, the private enterprise was unwilling
to undertake investment in these areas. It sought investment in areas of short
gestation and maximum profit. The state, therefore, planned the development of
defence, heavy and basic industries in the public sector.
The mixed economy framework in India was particularly marked with the
deliberate development of the public sector in (a) defence, heavy and basic
industries, (b) the development of economic and social infrastructure and (c) in
controlling the commanding heights of the economy, viz., banking and
insurance.
Thus, the environment provided by the mixed economy framework permitted
the co-existence of both the public and private sectors on an enduring basis.
Both had to work for the attainment of the socio-economic goals of planning.
In 1950, the Government of India set up the Planning Commission with the
objective of making an assessment of the resources of the country, both physical
and human and formulate a plan for the development of the country. The
Planning Commission laid down the long-term goals of planning. They were:
i) To increase production to the maximum possible extent so as to achieve
higher levels of national and per capita income;
ii) To achieve full employment;
iii) To promote industrialisation of the country with special emphasis on the
growth of heavy and basic industries so as to achieve self-reliance;
iv) To reduce inequality of income and wealth; and
v) To establish a socialist pattern of society based on equality and social
justice and absence of exploitation.
3.2 Growth of the Indian Economy during Plans: Early Phase
To solve the immediate problems of shortage of food and control of inflation,
the First Five Year Plan (1951 – 56) adopted the strategy to achieve food self-
sufficiency and also control inflation. For this purpose, it was decided to
increase irrigation. The strategy worked and India was able to reduce her
imports of food grains to just 0.5 million tonnes by the end of the year 1956. As
a result of increase in food grains production and utilisation of capacities in
industry, shortages of food grains and consumer goods were taken care of. This
helped the country to stabilise the price level and control inflation. Thus the
country at the end of the First Plan presented a picture of an economy which
had overcome shortage of food and brought about price stability. This provided
a climate for adopting a strategy for industrialisation of the economy.
The strategy emphasised the rapid development of heavy industry so as to build
an industrial base of the economy. The objective was to make the economy self-
reliant in terms of the capital –goods sector. Arguing for the acceptance of the
strategy, the Second Five Year Plan stated:
“In the long run, the rate of industrialisation and the growth of the national
economy would depend upon the increasing production of coal, electricity, iron
and steel, heavy machinery, heavy chemicals and heavy industries generally –
which would increase the capacity for capital formation. One important aim was
to make India independent as quickly as possible of growth of producer goods
so that the accumulation of capital would not be hampered by difficulties in
securing suppliers of essential producer goods from other countries. The heavy
industry must, therefore, be expanded with all possible speed.”
The main arguments which provided justification for heavy industry strategy
were:
a) The British rule deliberately denied the development of heavy industry
and kept India, primarily an agrarian economy as an appendage of the
British colonial system.
b) Indian industrial structure had a narrow base, mainly dependent on
consumer goods industries. It was necessary to enlarge this base by the
development of heavy industries and infrastructure. A diversified
industrial structure, it was argued, could absorb a large proportion of
labour force. This would also reduce dependence of excessive population
for its livelihood on agriculture.
c) Productivity of labour being higher in manufacturing than in agriculture,
and industrialised economy promised to bring about a rapid increase in
national and per capita income.
d) Rapid industrialisation was essential, not only for the development of
agriculture, but also for development of all other sectors of the economy.
Role of public and private sector - Since the private sector was not likely to
undertake investments in heavy industry sector which has a long gestation
period, but had low profitability, the government decided to give this
responsibility to the public sector. The government conceived of the public
sector as the engine of growth of heavy industries and infrastructural facilities.
The role of the private sector was complementary to the public sector in
expanding the production of consumer goods and such other areas in which
public sector investment was directed.
However it was realized that overemphasis on the heavy industry sector, would
not enlarge employment significantly, since such investments are capital
intensive. It would, therefore, be necessary that in order to encourage the
production of consumer goods and generate more employment, investment be
made in small industry.
However, there were certain shortcomings noticed in the process of
implementation:
1. Although agriculture did progress, but with relatively small allocation for
agriculture, the progress could not be considered adequate. Development
of agriculture required greater investment in irrigation, electricity,
fertilisers, implements, pesticides etc.
2. Heavy industry strategy was heavily dependent on imports for capital
intensive goods. It, therefore, developed a capital – intensive pattern of
development. This resulted in a relative neglect of small industries and
industries producing consumer goods. Thus, heavy industry strategy
created balance of payments difficulties on the one hand and failed to
absorb the rapidly growing labour force, on the other. This resulted in a
failure to enlarge employment adequately.
3. The public sector expansion led to the emergence of high cost economy
with much less emphasis on efficiency. Both the undertakings of the
Central Government and those of the State Government like state
electricity boards, road transport undertakings and irrigation works etc.
incurred losses year after year and the state exchequer was required to
pay these losses out of the general tax revenues of the government.
4. Failure of exports to rise commensurate with the increase in imports
necessitated by the expansion of the capital goods sector, resulted in the
persistence of trade deficits and these deficits increased in magnitude
with every successive plan.
Achievements and Failures of Planning during 1951 – 1990
As a result of 40 years of planning, Indian economy recorded progress on
various fronts. It would, therefore, be desirable to list the major achievements of
the Indian economy:
1. Growth of national and per capita income: During the first 30 years (1950
– 51 to 1980-81), national income grew at an average rate of 3.4 per cent per
annum, but per capita income grew barely by 1.2 per cent per annum. In terms
of raising the level of living of the poor, this was not sufficient. However,
compared to the British period (1900-1950), when national income increased
merely at the rate of 0.5 per cent annually, the achievement in the planning
areas is significant.
Table 3.1: Growth of national and per capita income (At 1980-81 prices)
Compound Annual Net National Product Per Capita Income
Growth Rate
1950 – 51 to 1960-61 3.8 1.8
1960-61 to 1970-71 3.4 1.2
1970-71 to 1980-81 3.0 0.7
1950-51 to 1980-81 3.4 1.2
1980-81 to 1990-91 5.4 3.2
Source: CSO, National Accounts Statistics
The economy showed a much better performance during 1980-81 to 1990-91
and the national income grew at the rate of 5.4 per cent annually, and this
helped to push up the growth rate of per capita income of 3.2 percent per annual
which was quite significant. There is a need to not only maintain high growth
rate of national income, but also to raise it further, if serious impact on the level
of living has to be made.
2. Growth of savings in India : The rate of saving in India was just 10.4
per cent of gross domestic product in 1950-51 and as a result of 40 years
of planning, the rate of savings reached a fairly high level of 24.3 per cent
in 1991-92. This is a matter of great satisfaction for the economic
development of the country.
3. Rise in per capita cereal consumption: The per capita cereal
consumption which was just 334 grams per day in 1951 increased to 471
grams in 1991 – a rise by 41 per cent. This is a matter of satisfaction, but
unfortunately, the per capita availability of pulses declined from 61 grams
to 40 grams per day. However, the overall availability of food grains
showed an improvement.
4. Improvement in the per capita consumption of several basic
consumer goods: During 1950-51 to 1990-91, per capita consumption
of edible oils and vanaspati increased from 3.1 kgs. To 6.4 kg. The per
capita consumption of mil improved form 47kgs. In 1950-51 to 66.5 kgs.
In 1990-91. The per capita consumption of cloth increased from 11
meters in 1951 to 30 meters in 1991. It may be noted that there was a
much greater use of man-made fabrics by the people which has greater
durability.
Besides this, there was much greater use of the amenities of life by a
large proportion of the population. The use of bicycles, electric fans,
sewing machines, refrigerators, scooters and mopeds, passenger cars, dry
cells, radios and television etc. enriched the life of the people.
On the basis of the above analysis, it can be concluded that there has been
increase in the consumption of necessaries of life by the common man,
though it may not be equally spread over all regions and groups.
5. Impressive industrialization action of capital goods sector with the
help of the public sector: During the British period, capital goods sector
was not developed at all. Some consumer goods industries such as
matches, sugar, cotton textiles, paper jute etc. were permitted to grow
under the umbrella of protection. It was, therefore, essential that in a
programme of industrialisation of the economy, the capital goods sector
be developed. For this purpose, since private sector was not forthcoming
to undertake heavy investment in capital goods industries, the
responsibility was given to the public sector. As a consequence, heavy
goods industries like steel, cement, locomotives, engineering, machine
goods, defence industries, air craft manufacture, shipping were
developed. Power and transport development was also accelerated. As a
consequence, with an impressive industrialisation of the economy, India
was able to provide an industrial base to its economy.
6. Development of economic infrastructure: Another important
achievement of vital significance is the creation of economic
infrastructure in the form of energy, transport and irrigation which
provided the base for a programme of industrialisation. In 1950-51, road
length in India was 400 thousand kms. and this increased to 1,770
thousand kms. by 1984-85 – a more than fourfold increase.
Similarly, there has been a rapid increase in irrigation, In 1950-51, the
total irrigated area was only 22.6 million hectares and b 1991-92, this
increased to 72.8 million hectares. As a percentage of gross cropped areas
, as against 16.7 per cent in 1950-51, irrigated area accounted for 31 per
cent in 1991-92. This sharp increase in irrigation potential gave a big
boost to increase production in agriculture.
There has been a tremendous increase in power generation and
consumption of energy. Electric energy generation was merely 6.6 billion
kWh in 1950-51 and it increased to 269.4 billion kWh in 1990-91. This
was a tremendous achievement. Consequently, our production potential in
agriculture, industry and service sector was considerably enlarge. Per
capita consumption of electric energy has also risen from 13.2 kWh in
195-51 to 220 kWh in 1990-91. This strengthened the infrastructure of
the economy.
7. Achievement of self-sufficiency in food grains and raw materials:
With the development of irrigation facilities, it was possible to undertake
application of high yielding varieties (HYV) of seeds with chemical
fertilizers. This water-seeds-fertilizer technology in agriculture, popularly
known as green revolution helped to boost the production of food grains
from 55 million tonnes in 1950-51 to 176 million tonnes in 1990-91. As a
consequence, India became self-sufficient in food grains and stopped
imports of food grains. Not only that substantial increased in production
of sugarcane, jute, cotton etc. were also achieved. This helped to reduce
our dependence for agricultural raw materials on foreign countries and
encouraged the production of our agro-based industries.
8. Diversification of industrial structure: There has been a rapid
diversification of industrial infrastructure in India during the 40-year
period. New industries such as steel, cement, machine tools, petroleum
refining, fertilizers, power transformers, locomotives, tractors,
commercial vehicles, diesel engines, dry cells, drugs and chemicals have
sprung up. These industries were either in a state of infancy or had not
been started in the pre-independence period. This has meant a
diversification of industrial structures. All these industries required
trained scientific and technical personnel to manger them. India has
developed a very large technical and managerial cadre to meet the needs
of a diversified industrial structure. It is claimed that India has the fourth
largest pool of technical manpower in the world. This has reduced our
dependence on foreign experts. Not only that, India has started exporting
experts in engineering and technology to Middle East and African
countries. This is matter of legitimate pride for our country.
9. Diversification of exports and import substitution: As a result of
industrialisation, India’s dependence on foreign countries for the import
of capital goods had declined. Similarly, a large number of consumer
goods imported earlier are being produced within the country. This has
led to import substitution. Consequently, the composition of our exports
has changed in favour of manufactures, mineral ores and engineering
goods. The share of raw materials has considerably declined. This is an
index of the industrialisation of our economy.
To conclude, it may be stated that India made significant achievements during
40 years of planning. These included growth of national and per capita income,
a sharp increase in rate of saving, the development of economic infrastructure in
the form of energy, irrigation, transport and power generation, attainment of
near self-sufficiently in food grains and agricultural raw materials,
diversification of industrial structure, more especially the capital goods sector,
the achievement of a substantial degree if import substitution in capital and
consumer goods sector. Besides, it was able to develop a large pool of technical
manpower – the fourth largest in the world to manage the diversified industrial
structure developed in India.
After the Janta party came in power in the year 1977 it terminated the 5th five
year plan before its completion and instead launched yearly plans for the period
1978 – 83 which were called “Rolling Plans”. It was called “Rolling Plan”
because it was decided to assess the performance of the plan every year and a
new plan will be launched next year with modification, it necessary.
The main advantage of the rolling plans was that they were flexible, and if
necessary, the targets, projections and allocations could be revised as per the
prevailing conditions.. Thus in contrast to the five year plans, in case of the
rolling plans the yearly reviews were made.
It was realized later that in case the targets being revised each year, it was
difficult to achieve targets which required longer periods. Furthermore, frequent
revisions made it difficult to maintain right balances in the economy which was
absolutely necessary for a balanced development. After the Janta party
government, the new government shelved the concept of rolling plans and
resumed the customary five year plans and the new 6th Five year plan was
launched on April 1, 1980.
The entire process, meaning and need for reforms also New Economic Policy
1991 have been summarized in diagram 1
3.4.1 Eighth Five Year Pan (1992- 1997) Reform Phase
The eighth plan approach paper has projected a 5.6% per cent Gross Domestic
Product (GDP). It assumes a domestic saving rate of 21.6 per cent of GDP and a
foreign resource inflow of Rs 49,000 crore (1.4 per cent of GDP). Export
growth rate has been estimated at 13.6 per cent per year. The incremental capital
output ratio (ICOR) has been assumed as 4:1. (Approach paper of Eight Five
Plan 1991).
Significant achievements were also made in the reform of the economic system.
The new financial system with tax decentralization at its core, and the new tax
system with value-added tax as its main component, were set up. Policy finance
and commercial finance were gradually separated. A macro regulating system
emerged, and the market started to play a more major role in resource
allocation. Also mapped out were the beginnings of a dominant public sector.
The growth rate in eight five year plan was 6.6 percent. This was higher than
the projected growth rate of 5.6%. There was a substantial growth in
agriculture, industry and services. The agricultural sector grew at the rate of
4.69 percent, manufacturing at the rate of 7.58 percent and services 7.45
percent. Table 4
3.4.2 Ninth Five Year Plan ((1997-2002)
The rate of growth of GDP during the ninth plan dropped to 5.3 percent from
6.6. The rate of growth declined particularly in the agriculture and
manufacturing sectors, whereas in the services sector there was a marginal
increase in the growth rate.
The GDP from agriculture alone declined by 0.4 per cent in 2000-01 compared
with an increase of1 per cent in 1999-2000. According to the quick estimates of
national income for 2000-01 provided by the Central Statistical Organisation on
January 31, 2002, the overall GDP growth rate decelerated significantly from
6.1 per cent in 1999-2000 to 4 per cent in 2000-01. The gross value added in
agriculture and allied sectors declined by 0.2 per cent in 2000-1 compared with
an increase of 1.3 per cent in 1999-2000.
Within the industry sector, there was marked improvement in the growth rates
of manufacturing (from 4.2 per cent in 1999-00 to 6.7 per cent in 2000-01) and
mining and quarrying (from 2 per cent to 3.3 per cent during the same period)
Growth rates of services sector decelerated significantly in 2000-01. In
particular, the growth rate of trade, hotels and restaurants reduced considerably
from 7.3 per cent in 1999-2000 to 3.8 per cent in 2000-01, while the growth of
transport storage and communications remained almost unchanged at around 8.2
per cent during 1999-00 and 2000-01.
Financial, real estate and business services performed poorly with growth rate
of only 2.9 per cent in 2000-01 compared with a growth rate of 10.6 per cent in
1999-00.
Table 3.4 provides a comparative growth of Indian Economy during Eighth and
Ninth Plans
Table 3.5: Growth of Indian Economy during Eighth and Ninth Plans:
This plan aimed to double the Per Capita Income of India in the next 10 years. It
also aimed to reduce the poverty ratio to 15% by 2012 by reducing poverty ratio
by 5 percentage points by 2007. The target for growth rate was 8.1% GDP
growth per year.
The Economic Survey 2012-13, reveals that the growth rate of GDP at 2004-05
prices was 9.7 per cent in 2007-08, 6.5 per cent in 2008-09, 8.6 per cent in
2009-10, 8.8 per cent in 2010-11 and 6.4per cent in 2011-12. GDP growth rate
is likely to average 8.0 per cent over Eleventh Plan.
Thus during last two years, the plan experienced a slow growth rate as a result
of global economic slowdown.
The Economic survey, 2009-10, observed in this connection, the fiscal year
2009-10 began as a difficult one. There was significant slowdown in the growth
rate in the second half of 2008-09, following the financial crisis that began in
the industrialized nations in 2007 and spread in the real economy across the
world. The growth rate of the gross domestic product (GDP) in 2008-09 was 6.7
per cent, with growth in the last two quarters (of 2009-10) hovering around 6
per cent.
The continued recession in the developed world, for the better part of 2009-10,
meant a sluggish export recovery and a slowdown in financial flows into the
economy. Yet, over the span of the year, the economy posted a remarkable
recovery not only in terms of overall growth figures but, more importantly, in
terms of certain fundamentals, which justify optimism for the Indian economy
in the medium to long term.
On 24th March 2010, a meeting of the full Planning Commission conducted a
mid-term review of the Eleventh Five Year Plan and lowered Indian’s targeted
growth of 9 per cent per annum because of past performances and prevailing
situations.
The appraisal document which was placed in the meeting stated that “the
average rate of growth in the plan period could be a little over 8 per cent.
The economy would be well positioned for the transition to a growth rate
higher than 9 per cent in the Twelfth Plan period.”
Thus at the end of the Eleventh Plan, it is stated that although the draft plan set
the target of attaining 9.0 per cent annual average growth rate of GDP but it
could manage to attain annual average growth rate of 7.7 per cent during the
Eleventh Plan under the prevailing global economic environment. While this is
well behind China’s average growth of 10.4 percent over the past decade
Meanwhile, the third quarter GDP data released by the National Statistical
office( NSO) showed that the Indian economy came out of the recession and
expanded by 0.4 per cent. The economy had contracted by a record 24.4 per
cent in the first quarter the current financial year due to the coronavirus
pandemic and consequent lockdowns. However, the contraction narrowed to 7.5
per cent in the second quarter as economic activity picked up.
RBI estimated that Indian Economy will attain growth rate of 9.5 percent in
2021-22. Earlier this estimate was 10.5% but due to second wave again, RBI
revised estimate to 9.5%.
Domestic credit ratings agency Crisil has revised India's real GDP growth
projection for 2021-22 downwards to 9.5 per cent from 11 per cent estimated
earlier. The downward revision has been attributed to the decline in private
consumption and investments following the second wave of Covid-19.
Though the ride had been bumpy over the past two years after 2019, the Indian
economy managed to be labelled as the fastest growing economy of the world in
2018. The World Bank has forecasted that India’s economy is all set to grow at
a rapid pace than the other major economies of the world. Now India economy
is the third largest in Asia and the trends seen at present can move Indian
economy to the upper slots in the years to come. A significant recovery in
private instruments and a strong growth in the consumption of goods and
services in the private sector is expected to fuel the growth of Indian economy
over the next few years.
The economy of India is now regarded from low income and developing
economy to a middle income developing market economy. Indian economy is
now classified as the world's sixth-largest economy by nominal GDP and
the third-largest by purchasing power parity (PPP) by International Monetary
Funds and other credit agencies .
The long-term growth perspective of the Indian economy remains positive due
to its young population and corresponding low dependency ratio, healthy
savings, and investment rates, increasing globalisation in India and integration
into the global economy.
Check Your Progress B
1. Which of the following statements are True or False?
a) Before economic reforms, employment grew at a faster rate than the
labour force.
b) Public sector performance was disappointing.
c) Before the economic reforms, balance of payment situation was quite
favourable.
d) The emphasis of the economic reforms as on delicensing.
e) Under economic reforms the scope of the private sector was enlarged.
2. Name four important concerns of the Indian economy before economic
reforms.
3. Name four important priorities of the economic reforms.
3.6 Let Us Sum Up
After independence, India followed mixed economy and accepted the
coexistence of the public and the private sector. The public sector covered areas
of defence, heavy and basic industries, economic and social infrastructure and
public utilities.
National planning commission was set up in 1950 and was assigned the task of
formulating a plan for the economic development of India. The commission laid
down the long term goals of planning: a) to increase production (b) to achieve
full employment (C) to promote industrialization and (d) to reduce inequalities
of income and wealth. With these objectives the first five year plan was
launched in the year 1951. This process continued upto 1978 when 5th five year
plan was completed. However in the year 1978, the then government of India
discontinued 5 year planning and instead launched yearly planning known as
the rolling plans. But in the year 1980 when the government changed at the
centre the process of 5 year planning was resumed.
The year 1990-91 turned out to be very critical for the Indian economy. There
was a serious crisis of balance of payments. Furthermore, the foreign exchange
reserves dipped to a critically low level and it was not sufficient enough to
maintain 15 days imports. India received financial help of dollar 7 billion from
the World Bank and the IMF on the agreement to announce its new economic
policy known as economic reforms.
The new economic policy was launched in June 1991 with the plan of
liberalizing the economy and quickening its rate of economic growth. The
essential features of the economic reforms are: Liberalization, Privatization and
Globalization, commonly known as LPG. The economic reforms ushered in a
new era of economic growth, which was 6.6% in 201. The next year it increased
to 7.3%. it reached 8% in 2016 but it declined to 7.1% in 2017 and 6/7% in
2018. During 2019-20 the economic growth slowed down due to Covid 19
lockdown.
The impact of Covid 19 and lockdown was severe and it impacted growth rate
badly. However, after May 2021 the economy is on the path of recovery.
3.7 Key Words
Rolling Plan - the plan launched for short period that is one year with the
possibility of modifications.
Economic Infrastructure: indicates creation of infrastructure in the form of
irrigation, energy, transport and communications.
Globalization: refers to the process by which the economy of the country is
integrated with the world economy. It involves four parameters: (i) Reduction of
trade barriers so as to permit free flow of goods and services across national
frontiers; (ii) Creation of an environment in which free flow of capital can take
place among nation-stages; (iii) Creation of an environment permitting free flow
of technology; and (iv) Creation of an environment in which free movement of
labour can take place in different countries.
Plan Holiday: a term coined to describe the period in which the country
abandoned the formulation of the five year plans and shifted to a system of
annual plans. The period referred to was 1966-67 to 1968-69.
Privatisation: refers to transfer of ownership of a public sector undertaking to
the private sector – may be company, a workers’ cooperative or an individual.
When 100 per cent ownership is transferred, it is a case of denationalisation.
Transfer of ownership can be partial as well. In such cases, the public sector
undertaking is transformed into a joint venture.
Public Distribution System: refers to the system of fair price shops to
distribute articles of essential consumption to the poor at reasonable prices. The
government takes the responsibility to procure and distribute essential
commodities.
Social Infrastructure: indicated infrastructure in the form of schools, colleges,
technical training institutes, primary health centres, hospitals, family planning
and welfare centres etc.
3.8 Answers to Check Your Progress
A3 i) False ii) True iii) True iv) False v) True
B1 i) False ii) True iii) False iv) True v) True
4.0 OBJECTIVES
After studying this unit, you will be able to
• explain the concept of infrastructure;
• appreciate the role of infrastructure sector in economic growth;
• identify the various types of infrastructure;
• distinguish between physical infrastructure and social infrastructure;
• describe the present state of infrastructure sector in India; and
• assess the government initiatives on infrastructure sector.
102
Economic
4.1 INTRODUCTION Infrastructure
Infrastructure refers to basic physical and structural facilities, which are essential
for an economy to function. There is no universally accepted definition of
infrastructure. In India, for example, different oroganisations include different
sectors or industries under the category infrastructure. According to the National
Statistical Commission of India, infrastructure possess six characteristics: (i) high
sunk cost, (ii) natural monopoly, (iii) Non-tradability of output (produced and
sold at the same location), (iv) presence of economic “externalities”, (v) Non-
rivalness in consumption (consumption by one user does not exclude others from
its consumption), and (vi) price exclusion (enjoyment of benefits could be subject
to payment of user charge).
We give a broad list of sectors which can be included in the infrastructure sector
(See table 4.1).
Table 4.1: List of Infrastructure Sub-Sectors
106
(i) Commercialisation of Infrastructure: Infrastructure services should not be Economic
Infrastructure
treated as public goods. In this regard, the possibility of
commercialisation will depend on the ability to segregate payers and non-
payers and prevention of any incidence of ‘free riding’. Thus, the
excludability is a key factor in commercialisation.
(ii) Pricing Policy: The role of private sector is not restricted to that of
provider of funds. It has to play the role of efficient and accountable
operator of the facility. The issue of pricing of infrastructure services
becomes critical here. In this sphere the long track record of uneconomic
pricing and prevalence of subsidies will be major obstacles.
(iii) Demand Orientation of Services: The existing procedure of financing
infrastructure facilities is based on plan allocation and is mainly supply-
oriented. Insufficient stress on the existing and the anticipated demand
has resulted in deviations in different countries and consequently a large
part of such investments are not providing sufficient returns. Privatisation
will necessitate a demand-oriented approach.
(iv) The challenge for policy is to find appropriate market signals which
indicate the future trend of infrastructure demand and to coordinate the
supply of such facilities in such a manner that investment in infrastructure
provides appropriate returns.
(v) Allocation of Risk: Allocation of risk is of key importance in
commercialisation of infrastructure. The risk should be appropriately
demarcated and allocated to different stakeholders. This is important for
two reasons:
(a) There is a tendency among the private shareholders to shift the risk
to the government.
(b) There is also a tendency among the shareholders to shift the risk on
each other.
(vi) Direct Participation by the Government: While the existence of elements
of monopoly in infrastructure will necessitate regulation by the
government, constraints in financing and user charging will render the
direct participation by the government necessary. Therefore, a transparent
framework for promotion of synergistic firmness of public-private
partnership in infrastructure is required.
4.3.3 Lessons from Private Investment
Lessons so far have not been encouraging. Investments in the couple of fiscals
through 2012 backfired, leaving in their wake stalled projects and a mountain of
stressed assets. After a decade, private investment capacity is yet to recover
meaningfully.
Private investments in thermal generation are already in deep trouble with
stranded capacities, stressed loans and weak demand. While airports, ports and
power transmission have robust engagement models, new investment activity is 107
Determinants of tepid. In railways, and urban infrastructure, private investments are negligible.
Growth
It’s down sharply at the state level as well.
National highways remain the only bright spot, where policy actions and the de-
risked hybrid annuity model (HAM) have revived projects. And the recent toll-
operate-transfer (TOT) auction is a good example of asset monetization and
crowding-in of private capital.
Private sector participation in infrastructure delivery helps deliver tangible
benefits, and there is anecdotal evidence to support this, even as the fiscal space
remains constrained. In highways, airports, ports and renewables, the private
sector’s role has been landscape altering. The private sector has also delivered
efficiently – both on project execution (where land and clearances have not been
a constraint) as well as operations.
However, history has taught us that public private participation (PPP) is no silver
bullet. Broad-basing private investment in infrastructure requires relentless
commitment and holistic efforts from both the Centre and the states. There are
three vectors along which this transformation ought to be steered; these could
help rev up the stalled private investment engine.
Table 4.2 provides the report’s scores for India (and the inevitable comparison
with China) for seven infrastructure indicators as well as an overall score. For
108
comparison purposes, the highest-scoring country on each indicator is listed. For Economic
Infrastructure
the first five indicators and the overall quality, scores are on a seven-point scale,
the higher the better; while for the two telecom indicators, they reflect the
numbers of connections per 100 people.
We can draw three pretty obvious messages from this picture. First,
notwithstanding pockets of success, our overall infrastructure strategy hasn’t
delivered to the extent necessary. One reason for this is that we have not
approached “infrastructure” as a fully integrated network. Two, the benefits of
successful projects are significantly diluted by their linkages on failed ones. The
“weakest link” principle is essentially why our overall infrastructure experience
is so negative, despite some strategies and projects being successful. Third, the
cost of moving from the 80-100 rank range to the 50-70 range is going to be
enormous – the trillion dollar aspiration of the 12th Five-Year Plan reflected this.
But the money needs to be spent in a consistent way across sectors and, most
importantly, over time, to get the best value from it. It is a lot easier to move
down the rankings than it is to move up.
4.4.1 State-wise Distribution of Infrastructure
109
Determinants of India’s infrastructure sector has been troubled for quite some time now. The full
Growth
extent of the crisis is becoming apparent only now, with banks facing increasing
difficulties in recovering loans made to the sector. The non-performing assets
(NPA) crisis that Indian state-owned banks face today is in large measure the flip
side of the unravelling of the infrastructure boom of the past decade. State-wise
distribution of infrastructure can be seen from Fig. 4.2.
4.4.2 Suggestions for Infrastructure Development
It was around the Ninth Plan (1997-2002) that India seriously woke up to the
infrastructure challenge. With a slew of interventions, the key indicator of
infrastructure development, gross capital formation in infrastructure (GCFI) as a
percentage of gross domestic product (GDP), started a steady upward climb.
From 2002 onwards, the government aggressively pushed public-private
partnerships (PPPs) to generate infrastructure investments. The results exceeded
expectations. The share of private capital in infrastructure investments, which
stood at 22 per cent during the 10th Plan period (2002-07), moved up to 37 per
cent in the 11th Plan period (2007-12). The 12th plan (2012-17) optimistically
budgeted for 48 per cent.
Going forward, the challenges are manifold. We can lists down 12 priority
suggestions for revitalising the infrastructure agenda.
1. Reform the Railways
Three reports provide a clear reform agenda: the Rakesh Mohan Committee
(2002), the Kakodkar Committee on Railway Safety (2012), and the Pitroda
Expert Group for Modernisation of Indian Railways (2012). The Rakesh
Mohan Committee suggested that the Railways must eventually be
corporatised into the Indian Railways Corporation (IRC). The government
would need to set up an Indian Rail Regulatory Authority (IRRA) to
distance the IRC from the government. The IRC should be governed by a
reconstituted Indian Railways Executive Board (IREB). The government of
India should be in charge of only setting policy direction, constituting the
IRRA and the IREB.
2. Privatisation of Coal Mining
India boasts the world’s fifth-largest coal reserves. Yet, we all are aware of the
bottlenecks in supply and our dependence on Coal India. Coal mining was
nationalised in 1973. It now needs to be denationalised with a sense of urgency.
3. Resurrect the river-linking plan
The government had set up a task force in 2002 to resurrect the idea in the
hope of creating another iconic infrastructure initiative. The reasons were
powerful. Increasing disposable incomes would prompt voters to demand
better water services and pay for them; similar pressures in agricultural
water demand would arise due to diversification of Indian agriculture.
Rising energy costs would make pump irrigation increasingly unattractive.
110
Rapid growth in urban agglomerations would seriously strain their ground- Economic
Infrastructure
water-dependent supply systems. The phenomenon of simultaneous droughts
and floods would be substantially addressed, and inland water transport
would be fostered.
4. Stop bidding out projects without sovereign clearances in place
Here are two ways to bite the bullet. First, have the sponsoring government
authority set up a 100 per cent government-owned special purpose vehicle (SPV)
to implement the project. This SPV should secure all permissions and clearances.
Then the authority should bid out the SPV to the highest bidder. Second, let all
infrastructure PPP bids carry a special annexure listing all of the permissions
required, thereby delineating the responsibilities of the sovereign sponsoring
authority. Get babudom and its political leadership to be publicly and monetarily
accountable. Let them not merely bid out project as bemused observers.
5. Form an infrastructure ministry
There are 12 ministries at the central level that directly look after infrastructure.
The rural development, environment, industry and commerce, and heavy
industries ministries raise the count to 16. Adding the NITI Aayog, finance
ministry, the Prime Minister’s Office and the Cabinet Secretariat (Cabinet
Committee on Infrastructure, the number comes to 20).
And they are all co-ordinating with 29 states. It is about time such “coordination”
was institutio-nalised through a ministry for infrastructure.
6. Reshape IIFCL to catalyse long-term funds
The Interim Report of the High-Level Committee on Financing Infrastructure
(August, 2012), headed by Deepak Parekh, argued for a significant restructuring
of the role of India Infrastructure Finance Company Ltd (IIFCL) from that of a
normal lender to one that provides guarantees for bonds and extends subordinated
debt. This would make HFCL a catalyst in channelling large long-term inflows
for infrastructure projects.
7. Independent regulatory authorities
The Planning Commission’s draft legislation of 2006 recommends that regulators
need to be directly responsible to the legislature. Selection should not only be fair
(Create a “National Infrastructure but also “best in class”). India should consider
opting for multi-sectoral regulators for communications, electricity, fuels and
gas, and transport. This would eliminate proliferation of regulatory commissions,
help build capacity, promote consistency of approach and check costs. In the case
of states, a single regulatory commission for all infrastructure sectors may be
more productive and cost-effective.
8. Set up land bank corporation
Enactment of the Land Acquisition Act 2013 has given rise to apprehensions on
adequate and timely availability of land for development purposes. Energetic and
visionary state land bank corporations need to be created. They should be
111
Determinants of empowered under the clause of “public purpose” to acquire large tracts of
Growth
unused, unusable or waste land. They should be sufficiently capitalised by state
governments and have the power to leverages more finance on the strength of
their land-bank inventories. They could also oversee resettlement and
rehabili-tation obligations.
9. Push hydro-electricity
India has exploited only 24 per cent of its hydro potential at an installed capacity
of around 35,000 megawatts against an “identified potential” of 148,701 Mw. A
realistic target would be to try and restore hydropower to at least an overall share
of 20 per cent in India’s energy basket by the end of the 2025. This would require
an addition of 62,000 Mw of hydro capacity over the next 5 years.
10. Implement the 74th Amendment for urban governance
The 74th Amendment to the Constitution in 1992 sought to bring about a major
change in the functioning of urban local governments. Unfortunately, very little
additional empowerment of municipal bodies has happened.
11. Clean up electricity distribution
Distribution reform requires micro-management of millions and millions of end-
users with metering, billing, collection, theft reduction, mafia control, and local
area infrastructure upgradation. This systemic micro overhaul across the length
and breadth of the country with attention to detail and a granular set of related
activities needs massive orchestration. Large-scale appointment of “distribution
franchisees in PPP mode” is the only practical solution.
12. Create a National infrastructure Partnership Commission
There is an all-pervasive belief in the private sector that the manner in which
risks are currently shared between the government and private players in PPP
contracts is heavily skewed against the private sector. Where, then, is the so-
called “partnership”? Such a partnership should be carefully nurtured. There is
the Infrastructure Concessions Regulatory Commission in Nigeria, the PPP
Advisory Unit in Ghana, the PPP Centre in the Philippines and the PPP Unit in
South Africa. In the case of South Africa, for example, one of the key functions
of the PPP Unit is “contract renegotiations”.
Self-Assessment Exercise A
1) Describe the importance of Infrastructure in an economy.
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
112
2) Distinguish between ‘economic infrastructure and social Infrastructure. Economic
Infrastructure
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
3) Explain how there is a two-way relationship between infrastructure and
economic growth.
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
4.6 TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Few areas of India’s economy have enjoyed as sharp a pace of structural change
as that in the telecom sector. The rapid pace was the outcome of the New
Telecom Policy, 1999. It brought in vigorous competition among firms and
technologies. The drastic pace of structural change highlights the possibilities in
other segments of infrastructure for eliciting massive investment by the private
sector, and for benefitting the consumers through competition between old and
new technologies.
The major features of the telecom sector can be identified as follows:
(i) The structure and composition of telecom growth have undergone a
substantial change in terms of mobile versus fixed phones and public
versus private participation.
(ii) In 1999, both mobile phones and private sector separately accounted for
5 per cent of total number of phones. Presently, mobile phones account
for a little over 92 per cent of total phones and the private sector
accounts for 78 per cent of total phones. From basic telephony to Value
Added Services (VAS) several remarkable changes have happened that
have resulted in not only expanding the base of mobile users but also
providing more user-friendly services to consumers. Mobile phone has
surpassed their primary role of voice communications and have become
more of an infotainment device for mobile users.
(iii) Although India has a 1010 million strong telephone network, including
mobile phones, the tele-density (number of phones per hundred
population) at about 80 is much less than over 120 in the UK, the US,
and Australia.
(iv) While tele-density lags behind the world, present trends suggest that
catching up is presently underway. For this, massive investments,
including FDI, are planned.
(v) India also lags behind the world to a considerable extent in the field of
broadband telecom.
(vi) The telecom market in India is a highly competitive market but is driven
115
Determinants of by regulatory and other policy issues.
Growth
Telecom operators are no longer in control of their industry with companies such
as Apple, Google, and Samsung, emerging as the new leaders and start-ups
ranging from cloud communication companies to secure chat ones scorching the
telecom highway. In the Big Data value chain too, telecom companies merely
generate the data but have little control over its usage and much less over its
commercialization. Their future depends on services such as Internet TV, mobile
payments and cloud services. But all that, for India’s telecom giants, is coming at
a huge cost. This steep cost base set against the shallow curve of their revenue
base is a mortal threat to many.
For the technology sector the issues may be considered.
• Focus areas will include Artificial intelligence, Big Data, Block-chain, Fin-
tech, 5G, loT, Massive MIMO, Network augmentation, etc.
• 5G is the next generation of broadband connection that offers 20 times faster
data transmission speed than the 4G network. The much-awaited network
trial for 5G services in the country is slated to start from June 2019 for a
period of three months, with the auctions planned for October 2019.
• Artificial Intelligence will alter the networking landscape, network
infrastructure, and enhance traffic management, as telecom companies
harness the power of AI to process and analyse huge volumes of Big Data for
better customer experiences, improve operations, and increase revenue
through new products and services.
• With less than 25 per cent towers fiberised against the global standards of 70-
80 per cent, fiber leasing in India is heading towards a $2.56 billion market
by FY2020. Fiberised towers are expected to increase from 90,000 to
330,000.
Adaption of new technologies necessitate that telecom providers continuously
realign their business strategies and restructure themselves. In order to gain a
competitive edge, they invest in network infrastructure and forge JVs with
leading media and content providers. Add to this the burden of fluctuations in the
import duties on telecom equipment; a high GST; spectrum charges; competitive
tariffs; arbitrary right-of-way charges taken by States for permits to lay fibre, etc.,
and Indian telcom are currently saddled with a debt of around $60 billion. This
has resulted in private sector consolidation, with further consolidation being
undersirable.
Recently, RBI issued a directive to banks to closely monitor the stress in telecom
accounts, as around 80 per cent of the debt is held by domestic banks. While the
industry has welcome the move, the government needs to address the other issues
plaguing the sector as well. Legislation is urgently required from the centre to
ensure that States takes a lower right-of-way permission charge. There is also a
need to review the existing tariff structure and to reconsider the decision to revise
the interconnection charges to zero. Other measures requiring relief include debt
116
restructuring, cut in licence fee and spectrum charges, etc., and efficient release Economic
Infrastructure
of locked up GST input tax credit.
Self-Assessment Exercise B
2) Describe any three features of the transport infrastructure in India.
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
2) State the principal weaknesses of the transport sector in India.
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
3) Examine the role of the communication infrastructure in the growth of the
Indian economy.
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
FURTHER READINGS
Dhingra, I. C., Resource Base of the Indian Economy, Manakin Press (New
Delhi, 2020)
Government of India: Economic Survey, Recent Issue.
Annual Reports of concerned Ministries of the Government of India
128
UNIT 5 SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE
Structure
5.0 Objectives
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Achievements of the Education Sector
5.2.1Tertiary Education
5.2.2 Primary Education
5.2.3 Human Capital Formation
5.0 OBJECTIVES
After going through this unit, you will be able to
• appreciate the role of social infrastructure in economic growth;
• identify the constituents of the social infrastructure;
• describe the progress in various heads of social infrastructure; and
• identify major shortcomings and limitations of the various social
infrastructure sectors.
5.1 INTRODUCTION
In the process of economic growth the functions performed by economic
infrastructure (e.g., power, transport, communication, etc.) are complemented by
the functions performed by social infrastructure (e.g., schools, hospitals, art and
culture, etc.). Social infrastructure not only contributes to the production of goods
and services, it also contributes to social welfare. Thus, viewed from the
Determinants of perspective of human development, social infrastructure deserves more attention.
Growth
You should note that maximisation of social welfare is the ultimate objective of
all activities, economic and non-economic. There is no dispute over this approach
to development. Rather the importance of social infrastructure is further
strengthened by the recent experiences in wake of Covid-19. Globally, countries
having strong social infrastructure have been able cope with the Covid-19
problem in a much better manner.
Education is the process of acquiring knowledge, skill, values and personal
development. It could be imparted through three channels, viz., formal, informal
and non-formal. Formal education refers to various levels of studies imparted in
schools, colleges, universities and other educational institutions. Such institutions
could be in the public sector or in the private sector. Non-formal education refers
to various structured educational programmes that take place outside the formal
education system. Informal education refers to the learning acquired at home,
work place, peer group, etc. Formal education comprises three segments:
elementary education, secondary education and higher education.
The healthcare system includes organisations, institutions and resources that
produce actions whose primary purpose is to improve health. Thus, it is a vast
network of hospitals, diagnostic centres, blood banks, healthcare professionals,
etc. Also, there are laws, policies, plans and strategies to provide between health
facilities to people.
All along the recorded history, India has sought to build infrastructure with sound
foundations. Since independence these efforts have been further energised.
Notwithstanding the fact that the education and health sectors of India suffer
from serious limitations, we cannot ignore the fact that not many emerging
economies have reached such a level.
2002 2020
SELECT REFERENCES
Ishwar C. Dhingra, The Indian Economy: Environment and Policy (Sultan
Chand, New Delhi, 2021).
Government of India, Economic Survey (various issues).
117
UNIT 6 HUMAN RESOURCES
INFRASTRUCTURE
Structure
6.0 Objectives
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Importance of Human Resource Development
6.3 Indicators of Human Resource Development
6.4 Human Resource Development in India
6.5 Human Resource Development and Skill Formation
6.6 Labour Force and Work Force
6.6.1 Measurement of Employment in India
6.6.2 Gender Inequality and Economic Growth
6.0 OBJECTIVES
After going through this unit, you will be able to
• explain the concept of human resource;
• describe the role of human resource in economic growth;
• identify the factors that enhance human resources;
• evaluate the present position of human resources in India; and
• describe the employment profile of the Indian economy;
Determinants of
6.1 INTRODUCTION
Growth
Human capital is defined as the body of knowledge possessed by the population
and the capacity of the population to use such knowledge effectively. As you
know, human beings provide an important input to production of goods and
services, that is, labour. You should note that the purpose of economic growth is
to enhance the consumption human beings are also the end of economic growth.
Every economic activity is undertaken to satisfy the needs of human beings and
improve their living standards. Economic activity generates work; it creates
employment opportunities, both for labour and other resources such as capital.
Labour and capital are complementary resources. But with increasing automation
of production techniques, capital is being increasingly substituted for labour.
Such substitution of capital for labour has made production process capital-
intensive, although it has raised productivity level and generated income and
output. There is a growing fear that the capital-intensive nature of production
process and automation of production activities will displace labour.
Employment of labour may suffer, thereby defeating the very purpose of
economic growth. In the present Unit, we examine the employment situation in
the Indian economy also.
103
Determinants of (viii) Empirical evidence in most countries, including India, establish
Growth significant
– positive relationship between proportion of people below poverty
line and the proportion of illiterate persons;
– negative relationship between female literacy and birth rate; and
– positive relationship between years of schooling and net increase
in agricultural production.
(ix) Poverty is both a cause and a consequence of deficiencies in human
development. With poverty alleviation at the top of the development
agenda, a serious assault on poverty will no doubt bring human beings
into focus as the major beneficiaries of development. Increased public
spending on aspects of human development is more likely to have a
greater impact on poverty reduction and, at the same time, in improving
human development.
(x) Human Resource Development is required to modernise attitudes. A
backward social system and primitive attitudes and beliefs cannot go
along with economic development.
In short, HRD is an important condition for improving productivity and raising the
level of production which hold the key to economic development. Indeed, the
available empirical evidence testifies that poverty ceases to be a handicap and
becomes an advantage when a poor country builds up human capital and then uses
this cheap, skilled labour in conjunction with cheap global capital to produce a
world-beating combination.
105
Determinants of The World Bank recently released its report on the Global Human Capital Index
Growth rankings, where India currently ranks 115th out of 157 nations (China being 46th,
Indonesia 87th, Malaysia 55th). According to the index scores from the report, a
child born in India is likely to be only 44 per cent productive when (s)he grows
up, if (s)he receives education and adequate healthcare.
India, in relation to other developing economies, does poorly in its ability to
expand overall productivity with a rise in GDP per capita. The disproportional
relationship between the two axes remains connected with India’s dismal
performance in aspects such as infant mortality (with 96 per cent children born
today having the probability to survive till they are 5).
In addition to the Global Human Capital Index, another useful indicator for
monitoring India’s performance is the Global Innovation Index (GII). The GII
reflects the technological state of growth for around 180 economies, computing
the progress made in technological advancements at a national level, ranging
from intellectual property filing rates to mobile application creation, education
spending, and scientific and technical publications. India currently ranks 57th
(out of 180) in GII’s latest ranking released in 2018 (China was 17th, Israel was
11th, UAE was 38th).
The development of human resources requires adequate provision of health
services, water supply, education, housing, nutrition and family welfare facilities
which are essential determinants of the quality of life. The provision of one
without the other is bound to affect the life adversely hence the strategy of HRD
is to take an integrated view of these factors.
Self-assessment Exercise A
1) Explain how there is a two-way relationship between human capital and
economic growth.
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
2) Describe the importance of human capital for an economy.
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
3) Define the concepts of tangible and intangible assets. Give some examples.
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
106
6.5 HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT AND Human Resources
Infrastructure
SKILL FORMATION
Creating a skilled workforce for the future of work rests on the growing demand
for advanced cognitive skills, socio-behavioural skills, and adaptability.
Technological change makes it harder to anticipate which job-specific skills will
thrive and which will become obsolete in the near future. In the past, shifts in
skill requirements prompted by technological progress took centuries to manifest
themselves (Fig. 6.2). In the digital era, advances in technology have been much
faster.
107
Determinants of tools and methods in any occupation. Third, there are social and behavioural
Growth skills, which include working, communicating, and listening to others.
Different levels of these three types of skills can be combined to further classify
skills into foundational, employability, and entrepreneurial skills (see Fig. 6.3).
According to the 2018 report by NCAER, India had about 468 million people in
its workforce. Around 92 per cent of them were in the informal sector. Around 31
per cent were illiterate, only 13 per cent had a primary education, and only 6 per
cent were college graduates. Further, only about 2 per cent of the workforce had
formal vocational training, and only 9 per cent had non-formal, vocational
training. That report had also estimated that almost 1.25 million new workers
(aged 15-29) were projected to join India’s workforce “every month” through
2022.
Another noteworthy observation in that report was that out of the more than 5
lakh final year bachelors students aged 18-29 who were surveyed, around 54 per
cent were found to be “unemployable”.
What is at stake?
If the skilling issue is not resolved, India risks forfeiting its so-called
“demographic dividend”. There is great opportunity for India to improve both its
social and economic outcomes if the higher number of workers are productively
employed. At precisely the year 2020, the proportion of those Indians who
belong to the working age (15 to 64 years of age) and those who are dependent
will be 50-50. Between 2020 and 2040, this proportion will turn even more
favourable.
But whether this will turn into a demographic dividend or not will depend
entirely on how many of those in the working age bracket are working and
becoming prosperous. If they are not in well-paying jobs, the economy would not
have the resources to take care of itself since with each passing year, the
proportion of dependents will continue to rise after 2040. “To put it simply, to
attain its rightful place and realise its aspirations, India must become rich before
108 it gets old,” states the report succinctly.
But why is India stuck with low levels of skilling? Indians have excelled in Human Resources
Infrastructure
technical expertise at the global level–be it medicine or engineering. Then what
explains India’s domestic skilling paradox?
A big part of the trouble is the starting condition. Over 90 per cent of India’s
workforce is in the informal sector. According to researchers at the NCAER,
India is trapped in a vicious cycle: Greater workforce informality leads to lower
incentives to acquire new skills. Faced with inadequately skilled workers,
businesses often choose replacing labour with machinery. That is because
“skilled labour and technology are complementary, but unskilled labour and
technology are substitutes”. This, in turn, leads to still fewer formal jobs.
Millions of Indians who work in agriculture continue to subsist because they do
not have the skills to take up industrial or services sector jobs even as these
sectors themselves have failed to create adequate job opportunities.
What can be done to break this cycle?
A distinct disadvantage with India’s approach towards skilling has been to ignore
the demands of the market. For the most part, skills have been provided in a top
down fashion. Thus, most skilling efforts focus almost solely on providing
certain skills but fail to “match” them with the needs of the market.
Experts argue that for skilling schemes to yield lasting results, even matching is
not enough. Given the way market demands fluctuate–for instance, look at how
the COVID-19 pandemic has upended supply chains–skilling efforts must try to
anticipate the needs of the market.
Self-assessment Exercise B
1) State the nature of relationship between the proportion of literates and the
proportion of persons living below poverty line.
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
2) What do you mean by the statement that there is negative correlation
between female literacy and birth rate?
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
3) How does education modernise attitudes?
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
110
Thus, it is the work force which represents the face of employment in an Human Resources
Infrastructure
economy.
6.6.1 Measurement of Employment in India
Employment in an economy is measured by using different criteria; each gives a
different concept of employment. These are: (1) Usual Principal Status, (2)
Current Weekly Status, and (3) Current Daily Status.
(i) Usual Principal Status (UPS): In UPS, the reference period a year to
describe the activity status of a worker. A person is known to be
employed if he or she was engaged in an economic activity for a longer
period of time (183 days or more) in 365 days. Similarly, a person is said
to be unemployed if that person is available for work but is not engaged
in any economic activity.
(ii) Current Weekly Status (CWS): In CWS, the reference period is a week
to describe the activity status of a worker. The CWS employment refers to
those persons who are employed for at least an hour during the reference
week.
(iii) Current Daily Status (CDS): In CDS, the reference period is a day. It
measures the rate of utilisation of the labour force in terms of person
days.
113
Determinants of (ii) Increase in the Proportion of Casual Labour. Another measure of
Growth growing informalisation of labour is an increase in the proportion of
casual labour in total work force.
For this purpose, we can classify the workers in three categories as
(1) self employed, (ii) regular salaried, and (iii) casual.
The proportion of each category in India is shown in Table 6.2:
Table 6.2: Distribution of Workers by Nature of Employment
(in per cent)
Nature of Employment
Year Self Employed Regular Casual
Salaried Worker
1977-78 58.9 13.9 27.2
1987-88 57.4 13.9 28.7
1983 56.0 14.4 29.6
1993-94 54.8 13.2 320
2018-19 52.9 13.9 33.2
We observe from Table 6.2 that
a) A majority of workers still work as self employed. A large majority
of them are engaged in agriculture or in unorganised sector.
b) A smaller proportion of workers are employed as regular salaried.
This class of workers has regular jobs with security, relatively better
earnings and social security. But their proportion is stagnant.
c) The category of casual workers has steadily increased. This class of
workers suffers from low earnings, irregularity and uncertainty of
work availability, poor condition of work and lack of social
protection and vulnerability to risks and hazards.
Thus, increasing informalisation and casualisation of work force represents
declining quality of labour in India.
6.9.1. Factors Responsible for Informalisation of Labour
Informalisation of labour is a characteristic feature of market economies, which
is dominated by forces of competition. Following factors account for it:
(i) Pressure to cut costs: Competition requires that each producer
should produce at minimum possible cost of production. In pursuit of
lower cost of production. producers opt for improved technology.
This technology provides for increasing substitution of labour for fer
for capital. Therefore, employers prefer to employ casual labour, so
that they can be retrenched at will.
(ii) Rigid Labour Laws: Labour laws do not permit retrenchment of
labour. In the controlled protected economy of the past, the producers
114 could afford extra labour and pass on the cost to the consumers. In the
emerging competition this luxury is no longer available to them. Human Resources
Infrastructure
Therefore, they do not like to employ regular workers.
(iii) Need for Upgradation of Skills: Technology is undergoing a
dramatic fast change. Every next round of technology demands more
skills. It means that skill-base of workers has to be upgraded. This
again cuts back the regular employment.
(iv) No scope for hidden costs: A regular permanent employee gets not
only his salary but also a number of other benefits accrue to him.
These are hidden costs to the employer. Competition requires that
costs should be transparent. And hence the need to dispense with
regular workers.
(v) Demand-Supply Imbalance: That the employers could easily take
resort to informalisation is also explained by obtaining demand-
supply imbalance in the labour market. Supply of labour far exceeds
the demand for labour. This is because of the fact that adequate
employment opportunities could not be created in our economy.
(vi) Shortcomings of Planning: A few shortcomings in our technique of
planning can be identified that have worked as constraints on
employment expansion.
One, efforts to lay sufficient infrastructure in the country for balanced
economic development have been lacking.
Two, the plans could not stop the migration of the rural population
into cities by making rural areas more attractive and congenial by
enabling them to earn a better living off land and encouraging the
development of growth centres around villages
Three, the plans could not encourage the use of labour-intensive
techniques of agriculture and industrial production.
Last, the plans also have not done well in the spheres of irrigation,
wasteland reclamation, soil conservation, and development of dairies,
fisheries and poultry farming, flood control, drainage, anti-water-
logging, rural electrification and other construction activities which,
in turn, could have provided extensive employment opportunities to
all categories of workers including skilled and unskilled personnel.
In short, in the wake of liberalisation, privatisation and globalisation, the
pressures on labour have increased. No doubt, economic reforms have opened up
new opportunities and markets for investments and entrepreneurship, but unless
growth is rapid enough and has high employment elasticity, labour is on the
losing side. Therefore, it is important to work out and implement a sound
employment generation strategy.
115
Determinants of
6.10 SUGGESTIONS FOR EMPLOYMENT
Growth
GENERATION STRATEGY
Suitable strategies should be formulated and implemented for generating more
employment both in rural and urban areas of the economy.
6.10.1 Suggestions to Promote Employment in Urban Areas
(a) Reform of the educational system to make it vocational at the school stage,
further give it a vocational bias at the undergraduate stage, and restrict
admissions to really highly qualified persons at the postgraduate stages.
(b) Deliberate promotion of low capital intensity in industrial production except
in areas where technological considerations make it impossible to avoid high
capital intensity. Fiscal incentives and technological facilities will have to be
provided for encouraging low capital intensive methods of production that
will still be modern and viable in costs
(c) The vast infrastructure of research and development that we have built up in
the public sector is now not being used for the promotion of intermediate
technology and low capital intensive choice of techniques. The present
policy must be changed and deliberate attempts should be made to identify
and develop techniques of production that can be undertaken with low
capital-intensity
(d) In planning investment, whether in the private or public sector, long
gestation period should be avoided except where they are technologically
inescapable. Deliberate attempt should be made to promote investments that
involve a quick turnover of capital. This will ensure larger and more
continuous employment with a given volume of capital.
(e) In order to diminish the concentration of employment in the metropolitan
centres action will have to be taken to promote decentralisation and
dispersal of industrial activity. Mere policy declarations will not do; they
have to be accompanied by follow-up action.
(f) The new policy directives given to the nationalised banks to promote MSME
sector and encourage self-employment should be vigorously followed up.
6 10.2 Suggestions to Promote Employment in Rural Areas
In rural areas, economists are unanimous in their view that there is no other
remedy than a massive programme of investment in rural development. This also
requires upgradation of technology in production process in rural areas.
The measures for rural development can be listed as follows:
(i) Creation of local assets, particularly projects suitable for a quick
increase in agricultural production, such as small and medium irrigation
116
and drainage works, the construction of storage facilities and feeder Human Resources
Infrastructure
roads and the development of local transport;
(ii) Land development and settlement;
(iii) Expansion of animal husbandry and diversification of agricultural
production;
(iv) Development of other productive activities such as forestry and fishing;
(v) Promotion of rural social activities such as education, housing and
health services;
(vi) Development of viable small-scale industries and handicrafts in rural
areas, such as the local processing of agricultural products and the
manufacture of simple consumer and producer goods needed in the
areas;
(vii) Promotion and rapid spread of rural electrification;
As already noted, development by itself may not bring about employment.
Some measures will have to be taken to increase employment potential of
development. This will require a frontal attack on the low productivity and the
low income status of large mass of the rural population like the marginal
farmers and small farmers. This goal can be achieved by:
(a) land reforms with ceiling on holdings and redistribution of surplus
land in such a manner as to increase the number of owner-cultivated
holdings,
(b) paying special and differential attention to the needs of marginal
and small farmers in terms of availability of credit, lower rates of
interest and facilities for obtaining easily technically-improved
agricultural inputs, and
(c) concerted efforts to find viable and year round employment in the
rural areas by an appropriate policy of rural industrialisation.
6.10.3. Other Measures
Employment opportunities both in the rural and urban areas can also be promoted
by a large national programme of public works for the creation of the national
network of infrastructural facilities especially in terms of transport and
communications that can widen the Indian market, facilitate mobility of goods
and people, and create opportunities for new as well as increased economic
activity in both urban and rural areas. This type of programme may cause
inflationary consequences in the short run. To offset consequences, simultaneous
attempts need be made to increase the supply of basic wage-goods and services
that will enable the economy to meet the pressure of the increased purchasing
power resulting from the public works programmes.
Finally, and to top it all, we may mention that we would be fighting a losing
battle unless efforts are made, along with efforts to create new employment
117
Determinants of opportunities, to check the demand for new jobs. This would require the adoption
Growth of an effective and meaningful population control policy. As long as the rate of
population growth does not slow down so that it enables new jobs.
Self-assessment Exercise C
1) Distinguish between the concepts of labour force and workforce.
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
2) Give a brief account of occupational structure in India.
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
3) Analyse the problems associated with casualisation of labour in India.
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
SELECT REFERENCES
Dhingra, I. C., Indian Economic Development (Sultan Chand, New Delhi, 2020).
Government of India, Economic Survey, recent issue
119
BLOCK 3 ISSUES IN INDIAN ECONOMY
You have learnt about Economic Development in Block 1 and Determinants of
Growth in Block 2. This block discusses in detail about the major themes of
poverty, its causes, difference between poverty and inequality, unemployment
nature, types and causes, causes and indicators of inequality in income
distribution and need for balanced regional development in India. This block has
four units.
Unit 7 deals with Poverty and inequality. The unit begins with the concepts
ofpoverty, its types (absolute & relative), measurement, difference
betweenpoverty and inequality is then explained,the needfor studying gender
equality and poverty with economic growth is highlighted, whether economic
growth reduces poverty and gender inequalityare discussed andin the end the
linkages between inequality and poverty are outlined.
Unit 8 deals inUnemployment in India. The unit begins with the concept of
unemployment and its types (rural and urban), measurement, causes and
consequences of unemployment in India are explained, remedial measures for
unemploymentare suggested and in the end the policy measures for employment
generation and labour reforms are highlighted.
Unit 9 deals with the Inequalities in Income Distribution. The unit begins with
the concept of inequality in income distribution, causes of income inequality are
discussed, income inequalities by using different methods are explained and in
the end policy measures taken by the government to reduce income inequality are
highlighted.
Unit 10 deals with Balanced Regional Growth. The unit begins with the
concept of regional imbalance in India, then measurement of regional imbalance
is given, the need for regional balance is highlighted, the factors responsible for
regional imbalance are identified, the impact of regional imbalance is described,
and in the end the policy initiatives by the government to reduce regional
imbalance along with the issues involved in achieving balanced regional growth
are outlined.
Issues in Indian
Economy UNIT 7 POVERTY AND INEQUALITY
7.0 Objectives
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Concepts of Poverty
7.2.1Absolute Poverty
7.2.2 Relative Poverty
7.2.3 Extent of Poverty in India
7.0 OBJECTIVES
After going through this unit, you should be able to:
• describe the concepts of poverty and inequality;
• distinguish between poverty and inequality;
• identify the need for studying gender equality and poverty with economic
growth;
• explain whether economic growth reduces poverty and gender inequality;
and
• describe the linkages between inequality and poverty.
7.1 INTRODUCTION
Human beings have always endeavoured to improve their quality of life. The
advancements made in the field of science and technology, particularly during
past two centuries have impacted human life in the most unusually way. This has
helped societies achieve stupendous economic progress categorically in the
countries of the North America and Europe among others. Lately, economies in
Asia and Africa have also experienced economic growth and development
102
benefitting their people in multiple ways. However, the economic progress has Poverty and
Inequality
not been quite equitable. Certain sections of society, mainly due to social
hierarchy, have been able to reap greater benefits than others, eventually leading
to economic inequalities. People, relatively less equipped with good education,
appropriate training and relevant skill have not been able to contribute
quantitatively and/ or qualitatively, and therefore, have remained economically
poor. Historical exploitation of certain sections of the society by the dominant
and privileged people has widened the gap between haves and have-nots and
thrown the less privileged into absolute poverty. M. K. Gandhi once said,
“Poverty is the worst form of violence.”
According to the World Bank, there were 736 million poor in the world in 2015.
Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asian countries house around three-fourth of the
total poor population in the world. About half (368 million) of the total poor in
the world live in just 5 countries – India (24 per cent), Nigeria (12 per cent),
Democratic Republic of Congo (7 per cent), Ethiopia (4 per cent) and Bangladesh
(3 per cent). With sustained efforts of the World Bank, the United Nations
Development Program (UNDP), national governments and numerous
development agencies, the extent of absolute poverty globally has been steadily
falling. However, the Covid-19 led pandemic is likely to impact this trend in
poverty reduction in the vulnerable countries. Therefore, poverty elimination has
remained a major challenge right before the developing countries.
Thus, we can say that 23.5 per cent people in the locality are poor. A major
limitation of this approach is that it does not take into account the intensity of
poverty, that is, how severe is poverty among people.
7.3.2 Poverty Line
In India poverty was defined initially in terms of energy requirement to enable a
person lead an active and healthy life. The energy norm during the 1950s was
2900 kilo calorie (Kcal) per day for rural areas and 2400 kilo calorie per day for
urban areas. Based on this norm, it was estimated that Rs. 20 per person per
month (1961-62 prices) was required for a person in rural area. The
corresponding figure for urban areas was Rs. 25 per person per month. These
figures defined the poverty line. Thus, if a person in rural areas earned less than
Rs. 20 per month (below Rs. 25 per month for urban areas), he was considered to
be below the poverty line.
Later, during the 1980s, the calorie requirement was reduced to 2400 Kcal per
day for rural areas and 2100 Kcal for urban areas. Due to inflation in the
economy, the poverty line figures were revised to Rs. 49 per capita per month for
rural areas and Rs. 57 per capita per month for urban areas. The poverty line was
estimated on the basis of consumption requirements. It did not include other
essential items required for an active and healthy life.
During 2004-05, apart from energy requirement, five non-food items were also
taken into consideration for estimation of poverty line. Accordingly, poverty line
was defined as Rs. 720 per capita per month for rural areas Rs. 840 per capita per
month for urban areas. Such estimates of poverty line continued for many years.
Percentage of population below poverty line was also estimated on the basis of
such poverty lines. The Planning Commission of India released the estimates of
persons below poverty line till 2011-12, after which the practice was
discontinued.
7.3.3 Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI)
Over time it was perceived that poverty is strongly linked with many other
economic and social variables. A poor person is deprived of not only food, but
also of education, health, housing and durable assets. Thus poverty is
106
multidimensional in nature. In order to measure poverty a comprehensive index Poverty and
Inequality
is required, which will measure deprivation of people from consumption of
essential goods and services. Such thoughts gave rise to the concept of
Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI).
MPI was first released by the Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative
(OPHI) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in 2010. Since
then the OPHI has been bringing out MPI which gives the poverty index for India
as a whole. Recently, in 2021, the NITI Aayog has brought out the baseline
report on multidimensional poverty index in India. This report presents the
multidimensional poverty index for the states and union territories of India.
As per the MPI, there are three important dimensions of poverty: (i) Health, (ii)
Education and (iii) Standard of Living. Under the category ‘health’, we consider
nutrition, child mortality and antenatal care. Under the category ‘education’ we
consider years of schooling and school attendance. For determination of the
standard of living, we consider seven criteria: (i) cooking fuel, (ii) sanitation, (iii)
drinking water, (iv) electricity, (v) housing, (vi) assets, and (vii) bank account.
According to the MPI report, the percentage of poor in certain states is very high
in 2021. For example: Bihar (51.91%), Jharkhand (42.16%), Uttar Pradesh
(37.79%) and Madhya Pradesh (36.65%). On the other hand, certain states have
relatively low levels of poverty. For example: Kerala (0.71%), Goa (3.76%),
Sikkim (3.82%), Tamil Nadu (4.89%) and Punjab (5.59%).
107
Issues in Indian (ii) Social Factors
Economy
Indian society is hierarchical in nature. It is dominated by caste system,
discriminatory inheritance laws, and rigid traditions have directly or indirectly
aggravated the problem of poverty in the country. Caste-based occupational
reservation in India has discouraged people from learning skill sets and venture
into the labour market on the basis of efficiency. There is discrimination against
women in Indian society. Education of girl child is an important factor in this
context. Further, there is a need to change our mindset, as certain families do not
allow women to work outside.
(iii) High Population Growth
As per the Population Census of India, population in India was around 36 crores
in 1951 but increased to around 121 crores in 2011. India is the second most
populous country in the world after China. Population in India has increased over
two per cent per annum during the last half a decade. On an average, about 17
million people are added every year to the population of the country. In 2011,
population of India at 1210.8 millions, was almost equal to combined population
of the United States, Indonesia, Brazil, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Japan put
together. The population of India increased by more than 181 million during the
decade 2001-11. The estimated population of India in 2022 is 135 crores.
High population growth has increased the burden on the natural resources.
Population growth increases demographic pressure on land, resulting into
fragmentation of landholding, and ‘disguised unemployment’. It leads to reduced
agricultural productivity and fall in income of farmers. Marginal farmers,
particularly with large family size, use traditional methods of cultivation on their
fragmented land holdings. Indian cities and towns have neither been able to
provide enough jobs nor a decent living for the migrant workers. During 2001-
11, certain states registered low population growth (for example, Kerala, Andhra
Pradesh, Odisha, West Bengal, Punjab and Himachal Pradesh) while certain
states (such as Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh and
Madhya Pradesh) recorded high population growth rate.
(iv) Low Level Literacy
Illiteracy is a major cause of poverty. According to the United Nations Children’s
Fund (UNICEF), “About 25 per cent of children in India have no access to
education”. According to a study in the medical journal The Lancet, “44.5 per
cent of girls are still married in India before they are of legal age”. The illiterate
people – for not possessing relevant skill and education – are trapped in a vicious
cycle of poverty. The illiterate people end up with petty jobs, usually employed
in informal sector, and are paid poorly. As per Census 2011, literacy rate at all
India level was 72.98 per cent. There is a wide gap in the literacy rate for females
(64.63 per cent) and males (80.9 per cent). Education of the girl child again is the
need of the hour.
108
(v) Inflationary Pressure Poverty and
Inequality
High rate of inflation adversely affect the purchasing power of people. The
annual inflation rate in India has remained over 5 per cent. The lower economic
stratum of people is hit hard when prices of food grains, fuel and edible oil
exceed the rise in income levels. They find it difficult to get their minimum needs
fulfilled. For example, India, after Green Revolution, has become self-sufficient
and self-reliant in food grain production. The increase in food production
however has not increased the food availability for the poor in the country.
(vi) Unemployment
Indian economy has structural bottlenecks that hinder economic development.
This results in structural unemployment, seasonal unemployment as well as
disguised unemployment. Half of India’s population still depend on agriculture
and allied activities for livelihood. Employment opportunities are limited in
urban areas as well. Non-agricultural sector (industries and services) has not been
able to absorb the unemployed people.
(vii) Lack of Investment
India is a capital scare and labour abundant country. Lack of capital reduces the
extent of investment. During the early years after independence, the Government
used to invest heavily in key sectors including minerals and metals, transport and
communication, health and education, among others. Unfortunately, Foreign
Exchange Regulation Act (FERA), Monopolistic and Restrictive Trade Practices
(MRTP) Act, Industrial Licensing and high tax regime kept the private sector
from participating in the industrial development of the country. So, whatever
little investment was seen in the country, it prioritized select industrial and/urban
clusters. Restricted or limited availability of credit/capital for investment in
industries discouraged entrepreneurship in the country. The shortage of supply of
capital made it difficult for production and reduced employment opportunities in
the private sector particularly for the poor.
(viii) Regional Imbalance
There is regional imbalance in distribution of income and wealth in India. We
observe disparities across states in per capita income in India. Two major features
are observed so far as regional disparities is concerned. One, there is wide
disparity across states in per capita income. Sates such as Punjab, Haryana, Goa
and Karnataka have very high per capita income while states such as Bihar, Uttar
Pradesh, Jharkhand, Manipur and Madhya Pradesh have very low per capita
income. Second, the gap between rich and poor states is widening over time.
While rich states are getting richer, poor states are getting poorer.
The north-eastern states in India, popularly known as the Seven Sisters, despite
being endowed with abundant natural resources, do not contribute much to the
GDP of the country. States such as Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Odisha, Madhya
Pradesh and Rajasthan are rich in minerals and metals, but due to lack of
109
Issues in Indian conducive business environment, many people migrate to other states in search of
Economy
jobs.
(ix) Populist Measures
Political parties have learnt the skill of pursuing populist policy measures so as to
create vote banks. Provision of subsidies eats away a substantial portion of our
budgets. Free electricity to farmers and all households in certain states are major
heads of expenditure. In the process there is little resources left for investment in
capital formation. If productive capacity of the economy does not increase,
employment generation and output growth will be slower. Such populist
measures are not always meant to reduce poverty.
Self-assessment Exercise B
1) Describe the major causes of poverty in India.
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
2) Why is inflation an important cause of poverty in India?
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
3) Comment on the statement that high population growth and illiteracy are the
main causes of poverty in India.
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
FURTHER READING
The following textbooks and online resources can be referred for further in-
depth reading on the topics discussed in this unit.
Deaton and Kozel. The Great Indian Poverty Debate, Laxmi Publications, 1
January 2006
Martin Ravallion. The Debate on Globalization, Poverty, and Inequality: Why
Measurement Matters, Policy Research Working Papers, April, 2003.
Nilakantha Rath and V M Dandekar. Poverty in India, Economic and Political
Weekly, Vol. 6, Issue No. 2, 09 January, 1971
118
Amartya Sen. Poverty and Inequality, Stanford University Press, 2006 Poverty and
Inequality
Jonathan Haughton, Shahidur R. Khandker. Handbook on Poverty + Inequality,
World Bank Publications, 27 March, 2009
Abhijit Banerjee and Esther Duflo. Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the
Way to Fight Global Poverty, 26 April 2011
Paul Collier. The Bottom Billion: Why the Poorest Countries are Failing and
What Can be Done About it, Oxford University Press, 31 August 2012
Gary S. Fields. Poverty, Inequality, and Development, Cambridge University
Press, October 2009,
P. Sainath. Everybody Loves a Good Drought: Stories from India’s Poorest
Districts, Penguin Books, 14 October 2000
Online references:
https://www.drishtiias.com/to-the-points/paper3/poverty-estimation-in-india
World Bank publication. Poverty and Shared Prosperity 2020: Reversals of
Fortune,https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/poverty-and-shared-
prosperity
Amitabh Kundu and P. C. Mohanan. Employment and Inequality Outcomes in
India. https://www.oecd.org/employment/emp/42546020.pdf
Note: These questions/ exercise will help you understand the unit better. Try to
write answers of these questions, but do not submit your answers to the
University for assessment. These questions are for your practice only.
119
UNIT 8 UNEMPLOYMENT IN INDIA
8.0 Objectives
8.1 Introduction
8.2 Types of Unemployment
8.3 Nature and Extent of Unemployment in India
8.3.1 Rural Unemployment Scenario
8.3.2 Urban Unemployment Scenario
8.3.3 Measurement of Unemployment in India
8.3.4 Extent of Unemployment in India
8.0 OBJECTIVES
After studying this unit you should be able to:
● explain the concept of unemployment;
● describe the types of Unemployment;
● discuss the causes and consequences of unemployment in India;
● suggest remedial measures for unemployment; and
● highlight the policy measures for employment generation and labour reforms.
8.1 INTRODUCTION
Unemployment is a situation where a person is willing to work at the ongoing
wage rate, but does not find work. In other words, if a person is able to work and
willing to work, but does not get work at the prevailing wage rate, he is
considered as unemployed.
Classical economists held that there is always full employment in the economy.
Their viewpoint however was proved wrong during the ‘Great Depression’ of
1929-33. Famous economist J M Keynes explained the concept of depression and
associated it with unemployment in his book “The General Theory of
Employment Interest and Money”, which was published in 1936. Keynes also
suggested remedial measures for controlling depression as well as
unemployment. Hence the problem of unemployment gained importance only
after the Great Depression.
Unemployment is one of the major problems in India. Unemployment is not only
a social stigma for a person; it leads to wastage of human resources, poverty,
Issues in Indian inequality and ill-health. The nature of unemployment in India is different from
Economy
that in the developed countries. In developing countries unemployment exists
mainly due to the lack of capital. Capital deficiency does not permit various
economic sectors to expand and generate jobs.
102
Sometimmes structuraal unemployment arises due to stru uctural changges in Unem
mployment in
India
the economy. Due to t structural changes, soome sectors grow fasterr than
others. Further,
F theere is a chhange in prroduction teechnology iin the
economyy also. For example: inntroduction of electric vehicles
v in India.
This willl lead to the demand for f an altogeether differeent type of repair
services for electric vehicles annd the existiing lot of mechanics
m w
will be
unemployyed unless th hey are re-skkilled.
(v) Disguiseed Unemplloyment: Disguised
D u
unemployme ent occurs when
laborers are employeed, but theirr contributionn to output is zero. It im
mplies
that thee marginal productivitty of laboour is zeroo. This typpe of
unemployyment is quuite commoon in agricuultural sectoor of most over-
populatedd poor counttries. Disguiised unemplooyment can be explainedd with
the help of
o Fig. 8.1.
Fig. no
n 8.1
Fig. 8.1:
8 Disguiseed Unemplooyment
In Fig. 8.1, we measuure labour on the x-axis and output on o the y-axis. The
curve OA AB is the total output cu urve. When we increasee the labour input,
there is an increasee in output. When laboour employeed is OL1, ooutput
produced d is OQ1. Yo ou should nootice that outtput increasees till labourr input
employedd is OL2. The T maxim mum output is OL2. When W labour input
employedd is greater than OL2, there is no increase in output. In Indian I
agricultuure, family laabour is widdely used. Thhey get engaged in worrk, but
their conntribution to output is neg
gligible.
In Fig. 8.1,
8 the segm ment L2L3 refers
r to dissguised unem
mployment. If we
withdraww L2L3 quanntity of laboour, output ddoes not deccline and reemains 103
Issuees in Indian unchaanged at O
OQ2. It shoows that L2L3 labour has zero marginal
Econnomy
produ
uctivity.
8
8.3 NATTURE AN
ND EXT
TENT OF
F UNEMP
PLOYM
MENT
IN INDIA
I
Inn developedd countries tthere is cycllical unemplloyment is very
v much prevalent
p
d to presen
due nce of busineess cycles. According
A too Keynes, th
he main causse of this
ty
ype of emplooyment is loow effective demand. Buut in India, as a in many other
o less
d
developed coountries, therre exists chroonic unemplloyment. Unnemploymennt in India
foor rural and urban areass is of differrent types. WWe present the
t typologyy of rural
annd urban uneemploymentt in India in Fig. 8.2.
Unemployment
in India
Rural
Unemployment Urban
Un
nnemployment
F 8.2: Ty
Fig. ypes of Unem
mployment in Rural an
nd Urban In
ndia
New job seekers 9.0 11.8 17.0 20.2 22.0 34 39.38 35 405.4 378.65 432.02
during the plan period
3.The total number of 12.3 17.1 24.1 33.0 36.0 46 48.58 58 423.4 413.50 453.52
unemployed (1+2)
4.Additional job 7.0 10.0 14.51 19.0 15.4 36.8 40.36 40 416.4 392.20 451.53
created during the
Plan
5. No. of unemployed 5.3 7.1 9.6 14.0 20.6 9.2 8.22 18 7.0 21.5 1.99
at the end of the Plan
2016-17 43.50
Source: Tenth Five Year Plan document and various issues of Economic Survey.
107
Issues in Indian Table 8.3: Employment and Unemployment Scenario in India
Economy
Variable Unit/ 1999- 2001-02 2006-07 2016-17
Year 2000 (P)
Source: Periodic Labour Force Survey (Annual Report, July 2021), NSO
Self-Assessment Exercise A
1) Define the concept of unemployment.
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
2) Distinguish between the concepts of seasonal unemployment and disguised
unemployment.
………………………………………………………………………………
108 ………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………… Unemployment in
India
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
3) Distinguish between labor force and work force.
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
(v) Neglect of Small and Cottage Industries: Small scale and cottage
industries are labour intensive. But these industries could not develop
in India appreciably. Technological upgradation and marketing
became a major problem for these industries. The five year plans laid
more stress on capital-intensive industries. Neglect of small scale
industries is therefore another cause of unemployment in India.
(vi) Slow Industrial Growth: Industrial growth rate has been very slow
in India due to many problems such as industrial disputes, strikes,
lockouts, industrial sickness, etc. These problems have increased
urban unemployment.
(vii) Shortage of Capital: Till recent time period, there has been a
shortage of capital in India. We know that the rate of capital formation
depends on the rate of saving. If saving rate is high, capital formation
rate will also be high. Without adequate capital formation, overall
expansion of the economy cannot take place. Thus capital inadequacy
leads to slower growth of jobs.
(viii) Defective Education System: Education system in India is not based
on employment. Every year millions of boys and girls come out of
colleges and universities but they are not absorbed in any suitable job.
Emphasis is laid on ‘general’ education rather than ‘vocational’ one.
Our education system has led to rapid increase in white collar
unemployment.
(ix) Lack of Mobility: Even these days, many Indians are superstitious.
Marginal farmers and laborers are so much attached to their land and
birth place that they do not want to leave it even if they do not have
111
Issues in Indian any work to do. Similarly, many skilled labour and educated youth do
Economy
not want to migrate to other regions. There are of course differences
in language and culture across states, which discourage mobility. As a
result, in some regions there is shortage of labour while in other
regions there is surplus. Shortage of farm labour in Punjab is a valid
example. Thus, lacks of mobility, cultural differences, customs and
tradition are also responsible for unemployment.
(x) Under-Utilization of Installed Capacity: Our productive capacity is
not utilized fully in many industries so there exists limited
employment opportunities. Various causes like lack of working
capital, skilled labour, raw material and infrastructural facilities
inhibit full utilization of capacity.
(xi) Modernization: In the modern time, many industries have adopted
capital intensive modern techniques. Consequently, unemployment
has increased as machines have replaced the labourers.
(xii) Other Factors: Apart from the factors mentioned above, there are
several others which worsens unemployment situation in India. Non-
availability of good quality infrastructure; shortage of essential inputs
such as electricity, raw materials, and credit; non-availability of
skilled labour and modern technology; etc.
FURTHER READINGS
The following text books may be used for further in-depth study on the topics
dealt with in this unit.
116
UNIT 9 INEQUALITY IN INCOME
DISTRIBUTION
Structure
9.0 Objectives
9.1 Introduction
9.2 Basic Concepts
9.2.1 Distribution of Income
9.2.2 Inequality
9.2.3 Inequality of Income
9.0 OBJECTIVES
After going through this unit, you should be able to:
● explain the concept of inequality in income distribution;
● describe the causes of income inequality;
● measure income inequalities by using different methods; and
● appreciate policy measures taken by the government to reduce income
inequality.
9.1 INTRODUCTION
The word inequality refers to some sort of injustice or unfairness. Inequality in
income distribution implies that some people are poorer compared to others.
Equality in income distribution is an ideal situation which is not seen anywhere.
Moderate inequality is not a problem for a country. Inequality turns out to be
problem, when it is too steep and it has many adverse consequences. In view of
this, it has been an objective of the government to reduce inequality in the
economy. The objective of Indian planning has always been to raise the standard
of living of the masses. This objective was given priority in all the five year plans
but somehow all these plans failed to reduce inequality.
The concept of income inequality is deeply connected with that of poverty and
social justice. Poverty and inequalities go hand-in-hand. Poverty is defined as a
condition in which an individual or household lacks the financial resources to
afford certain basic minimum standard of living. The poor households are not in
a position to meet the necessities of life. These necessities include food, clothing,
Issues in Indian
Economy
shelter, medical facilities, etc. Poverty is a curse and it brings misery to human
life. A poor man loses confidence and surrenders to the prevailing conditions and
problems. Due to poverty, a man cannot fulfill his basic needs and therefore mass
poverty disrupts social harmony and generates dissatisfaction.
Different institutions and economists have tried to measure the inequality in the
distribution of personal income. Among them the efforts made by RBI and the
NCEAR are praise-worthy. Though these measures were taken at different points
of time using different methods, yet they all make it clear that there exists
considerable inequality in the distribution of personal income (see Table 9.2).
3
Issues in Indian
Economy
Table 9.2: Personal Income Distribution in India
Though the data differ, the general inference we can draw is that distribution of
personal income is highly skewed in India. It also shows that inequality is more
pronounced in urban area than in the rural one.
Table 9.3: Estimates of Inequality in Income in India
Table 9.3 shows the extent of income inequality in India during 1961-62 to 1993-
94, top 10 per cent of people in India got 35 per cent of the national income and
bottom 20 per cent got only 7 per cent. In the same way in 1975-76, top 10 per
cent people used to get 33.6 per cent of the income whereas bottom 20 per cent
got only 7 per cent. According to the World Development Report, in 1992-93 top
ten per cent population got 28.4 per cent of the national income whereas bottom
20 per cent got only 8.5 per cent. According to the World Development Report,
in 2006, top 10 per cent got 28.5 per cent of the national income while bottom 20
per cent received only 8.9 per cent of the national income.
The distribution of consumption expenditure given in Table 9.4 also shows that
there was very steep income inequality in India.
Table 9.4: Distribution of Family Consumption Expenditure
(Percentage Share in Total Consumption Expenditure)
4
Inequality in Income
Area Rural Urban Distribution
7
Issues in Indian
Economy
Many social and political factors are responsible for it. As a result,
poverty in rural areas could not be removed.
(10) Under Utilization of Natural Resources: Nature has been very kind to
India. In other words, India is full of natural resources but we have been
unable to make the best use of these resources because of the lack of
capital and technical knowledge etc. Sh. K T. Shah’s comment that ‘India
is a rich country but the Indians are poor’, proves it.
(11) Failure of Programmes designed to Remove Poverty and Inequality:
Government launched many programmes to remove poverty and
inequality. Some of the main programmes are:
a. Minimum Needs Programmes (MNP)
b. Integrated Rural Development Program (IRDP)
c. National Rural Employment Program (NREP)
d. 20 Points Economic Program etc.
But all these programmes could not succeed fully. Rather these programmes
benefited vested interests and officials.
(12) Conservative Social Structure: Our social structure is responsible for
the problem of poverty and inequality in India. Indian farmer is orthodox
by nature, he is not ready to change his methods and remove the
hindrances in his way. Fatalism has crippled us, especially the villages.
Most of us leave everything to fate and God. They also lack mobility
spirit of enterprises and scientific attributes. Hence unprogressive way of
thing and backward social setup also cause poverty and perpetuate it.
Social institutions like joint family system and inferior states to women
are also responsible for this.
There are a number of other factors including more than hundred years of
foreign rule of British domain and exploitation, low labour productivity,
weak infrastructure, backward and primitive technology, over dependence
on agricultural sector, inefficient use of capital and other productive
resources, unbalanced regional growth, defective planning strategy,
widespread illiteracy and defective education system. Lack of sincerity on
the part of the leaders and corruption are also reason behind the problems
of poverty and income inequality.
Check Your Progress A
1 What is Inequality ?
2 What is Multidimensional Poverty Index.
3 What is inadequate Growth Rate.
4 What is Conservative Social Structure.
8
9.4 MEAS
SUREME
ENT OF INEQUA
ALITY Inequalitty in Income
Distribution
9
Issues in Indian
Economy
12
Classes. The socially disadvantaged group remain deprived of health, education Inequality in Income
Distribution
and other facilities.
Regional Inequality: It means the differences in the economic development of
different regions.
FURTHER READINGS
The following text books may be used for further in-depth study on the topics
dealt with in this unit:
Atkinson, A.B., The Economy of Inequality, 2nd Edition, Clarndon Press, Oxford.
Cheney H., et al., Redistribution with Growth, Oxford University Press, London.
Jain T.L., Poverty in India: An Economic Analysis, ESS Publication, New Delhi.
13
Issues in Indian Singer H. and Ansari J., Rich and Poor Countries, George Allen & Urwin
Economy
Limited, London.
14
UNIT 10 BALANCED REGIONAL GROWTH
10.0 Objectives
10.1 Introduction
10.2 Nature of Regional Imbalance in India
10.3 Measurement of Regional Imbalance
10.4 Need for Balanced Regional Development in India
10.5 Factors Responsible for Regional Imbalance
10.6 Impact of Regional Imbalance
10.7 Policy Initiatives by the Government to Reduce Regional Imbalance
10.8 Issues in Balanced Regional Development
10.9 Let Us Sum Up
10.10 Key Words
10.11 Terminal Questions
10.0 OBJECTIVES
Having gone through this unit you will be able to:
• highlight the nature of regional imbalance in India;
• measure regional imbalance;
• find out the need for regional balance;
• identify the factors responsible for regional imbalance;
• describe the impact of regional imbalance;
• describe the policy initiatives by the government to reduce regional imbalance;
and
• identify the issues involved in achieving balanced regional growth.
10.1 INTRODUCTION
Regional disparity is a ubiquitous phenomenon of the developing countries like
India. Balanced regional development is an ongoing challenge for the
government. Reducing regional inequalities remains a daunting politico-
administrative challenge. The inter-state and intra-state disparities are a major
source of concern for faster and more inclusive development at national level.
Development is not only area specific but also time specific. Development varies
from area to area. You should note that in every country some regions are more
developed than others. Further, growth rate in all the regions are not equal –
some region are growing at faster rate than others.
Since the 1950s, central government has paid attention to those regions which are
lagging behind in economic growth and development. Despite this, one of the
Issues in Indian features of development experience in India is the accentuation in regional
Economy
disparity in India. Disparities have strengthened over the years, instead of
weakening over time. Scholars have identified various factors that have
contributed to such disparities. The issue of regional imbalance came into a
sharper focus after the economic reforms of the 1990s. The less developed states
are falling behind the richer ones instead of catching up. In this unit, we look at
various aspects of regional imbalance in terms of its concept, nature, need, causes
and policy initiatives taken by the government.
108
10.5 FACTORS RESPONSIBLE FOR REGIONAL Balanced Regional
Growth
IMBALANCE
The level of development of a state largely depends on a complex set of cultural,
historical, natural and sociological factors. Regional inequalities in the levels of
development are the result of the disparities in the distribution of physical
resources, diverse culture, and technological achievements. Technology is a vital
input of development strategies as there is a positive correlation between the
level of technological improvement and the level of economic development.
Regional disparities in the level of development are the product of collective
effect of all these factors. Further, factors like distance to the nearest urban
agglomeration, differences in urbanization, availability of electricity and certain
state-specific characteristics play a crucial role in explaining divergence across
regions.
In India, regional inequality is the product of the following factors:
1. Geographical Factors
a. Some regions are endowed with natural resources such as
minerals, water, fertile land, proximity to the ocean, and
accessibility to waterways. Such regions are more developed
than geographically disadvantaged regions of hilly terrain,
desert, infertile land, etc. As for example, North-Eastern states
have remained mostly backward due to their inaccessibility and
other inherent difficulties.
b. Coastal states have geographical advantage as they have a port
to do business abroad. These are more developed compared to
many non-coastal states.
2. Manmade / Historical Factors
a. Historical factors also play an important role in regional
disparity. Development during colonial rule has contributed to
regional inequities. The British rulers preferred to develop
those regions of the country which had potential for
manufacturing and trading activities. At that time, they did not
had any industrial policy focusing on overall development.
3. Social Factors
a. Illiteracy and lack of education in the less developed regions
has high fertility rate and thus growing population.
b. Non-availability of required social services.
c. Social peace and harmony are conducive for development.
That is why the region having a peaceful society is more
developed.
109
Issues in Indian 4. Economic Factors
Economy
a. Inadequate infrastructure like transport system in poorer
states.
b. Incapacity of the states to harness rich demographic dividend
due to less developed job market.
c. There is disparity in availability of power supply among
states.
5. Political Factors
a. Faulty development strategies in the post-independence era.
b. Inter-state disparities in development have increased post
economic reforms period.
c. Some regional governments implemented development policy
more effectively as compared to other regions, hence they are
more developed.
d. Red-tapism, corruption and administrative inefficiency. Added
to this is the lack of political will to fulfil regional needs.
e. Neglect of some regions and preference of other regions in
terms of new investments and infrastructure facilities. It is
apparent that new investment in the private sector has a
tendency to prefer those regions having basic infrastructural
facilities.
f. Unhealthy business environment because of extremist
activities, law and order problem, etc. have obstructed the flow
of investments into backward regions besides making flight of
capital from backward states.
110
(v) Concentration of industrial development at one place leads to air Balanced Regional
Growth
and sound pollution, shortage of housing and water, problem of
congestion, etc.
(vi) Pressure on existing infrastructure in metropolitan cities.
The states with low level of socio-economic development have become more
vulnerable to the adverse effect of liberalisation. Bihar, Madhya Pradesh,
Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh are still lagging behind in terms of per capita income
and social indicators.
Poverty and under-employment are especially acute in areas with heavy pressure
of population and in those with scanty development of natural resources. Thus,
regional imbalance is a threat to the goal of inclusive growth and reduction of
poverty. Such imbalances have dampened the speed of further economic reforms,
and pose an obstacle to India’s future economic growth. They affect character of
social life, the nature of the political process, and the priorities of the state.
Self-Assessment Exercise B
2) Mention four factors responsible for regional imbalance in India.
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
2) Describe the nature of regional imbalance in India.
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
3) Explain how regional imbalance can be measured.
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
4) Explain why regional balance is important for a country.
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
Q3. Which kind of policy measures are important? Write five sentences.
_________________________________________________
_________________________________________________
_________________________________________________
_________________________________________________
_________________________________________________
115
Issues in Indian
Economy
Q4. Point out reasons for policies not being very effective. Indicate
important ones.
_________________________________________________
_________________________________________________
_________________________________________________
_________________________________________________
_________________________________________________
Q5. What suggestions will you give for achieving regional balance?
Write four of them.
_________________________________________________
_________________________________________________
_________________________________________________
_________________________________________________
_________________________________________________
117
Issues in Indian
Economy 10.11 TERMINAL QUESTIONS
Q1. What do you mean by balanced regional growth? Is regional inequality in
India actually a problem of economic geography? Discuss.
Q2. Analyse the causes of regional imbalance in India? Which cause(s) you
consider to be of importance in the present condition?
Q3. Describe the impact of regional imbalance in the economy. Classify the
impact into social, economic and political.
Q4. Explain the policy steps taken by the government since 1960 and with
what effect?
Q5. How do you suggest the policy makers for an effective plan for achieving
balanced regional growth in the country? Narrate your plan in some
detail.
Goswami, Omkar (2022, January 26). A Tale of two Indias: The regional skew in
Janardhan, Gadekar Deepak & Rajendra, Sonawane Vijay (2017, May). Regional
Disparities of Socio- Economic Development in Ahmednagar
District, Maharashtra (India). International Journal of Recent
Research and Applied Studies Volume 4, Issue 5(5).
Niti Aayog: India (2017): Three Year Action Agenda (2017-18 and 2019-20)
Planning Commission (2013). Twelfth five year plan (2012 - 2017) Vol. I. Sage
Publications India Pvt Ltd, New Delhi.
118
BLOCK 4 SECTORAL DEVELOPMENT-I;
AGRICULTURE SECTOR IN INDIA
You have learnt about Economic Development in Block 1 and Determinants of Growth in Block
2 and in Block 3 about issues in Indian Economy. This fourth block covers importance of agriculture,
problem of productivity and growth pattern in detail. This block has three units.
Unit 11 deals in Importance of Agriculture. The unit begins with sectoral contribution to the Economy,
some empirical evidence about agriculture and economic development are described, role of Agriculture
in Economic Development of a country is highlighted, and the unit ends with the importance of
agriculture in India’s national economy.
Unit 12 deals in Problem of Productivity. The unit begins with productivity in India’s agriculture,its
general causes, institutional causes andtechnological factors, thenmeasures to raise productivity in Indian
agriculture are given,how to reduce pressure of population on land is discussed, concept of agriculture
research and extension, agriculture marketing,ever green technology are explained in the end.
Unit 13 deals in Growth Pattern. The unit begins with history and development of India’s agriculture
during the first half of the 20th centuryBritish period andpost-independenceperiod ranging from ‘The Pre
- Green Revolution Period’ to ‘The Beginning of Green Revolution’ to ‘The Maturing of Green
Revolution’ to ‘Economic Liberalization and Deceleration of Agricultural Growth’ to‘The Period of
Recovery’ to the‘The National Democratic Alliance- II (NDA-II) Rule’ and in the end challengesthe
Indian agriculture facesalong with the policy suggestions are given.
UNIT: 11 IMPORTANCE OF AGRICULTURE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Structure
11.0 Objectives
11.1 Introduction
11.2 Sectoral Contribution to the Economy
11.3 Agriculture and Economic Development: Some Empirical Evidences
11.4 Role of Agriculture in Economic Development of a Country
11.5 Importance of Agriculture in India’s National Economy
11.6 Let Us Sum Up
11.7 Key Words
11.8 Answers to Check Your Progress
11.9 Terminal Questions
11.0 OBJECTIVES
11.1 INTRODUCTION
“Everything else can wait, but not Agriculture”, the first prime minister of India, Pt. Nehru said
while addressing a group of farmers in late 1950s. Agriculture is the oldest organized occupation
in the world. It is as old as the human civilization when the human being started utilization of
land for his/her survival and sustainability. Over the time, a dynamic change took place in
agriculture and its operations. In this unit, you will learn about the sectoral contribution to the
economy, agriculture and economic development, role of agriculture in economic development
of a country and importance of agriculture in India’s national economy. Till the onset of the
industrial revolution in Western Europe, agriculture was the main source of livelihood and
employment and agriculture was basically subsistence in nature. Even today in most of the
developing countries, agriculture sector is the dominant source of employment and livelihood.
The importance of agriculture in the national GDP and employment depends very much upon the
level of economic development in that country. It is the agriculture sector, which in the initial
stages of development owns much of resources, be it income, labour or capital. Any economy
can be divided into three broad sectors, namely primary sector, secondary sector and tertiary
sector. Primary sector incorporates agriculture and allied activities, secondary sector all types of
manufacturing and tertiary sector contains the services sector. The structure of an economy
changes as economic development takes place in the economy. The economists have termed
these changes in the economy over a period time as ‘Structural Transformation of an Economy’.
Agriculture continues to be the mainstay of Indian economy even after 70 years of independence
since agriculture contributes 16.5 per cent of the GDP (Economic Survey, 2019-20) and about 42
per cent of the working population is engaged in agriculture (National Statistics office,2020).
Indian economy can also be divided into three sectors, namely, agriculture and allied activities,
industry and services. Agriculture sector includes agriculture (Agriculture proper and Livestock),
forestry and Logging, fishing and related activities. Industry includes mining and quarrying,
manufacturing (Registered and Unregistered), electricity, gas, water supply, and construction.
Services sector includes 'Trade, hotels, transport, communication and services related to
broadcasting', 'Financial, real estate and profession services, 'Public Administration, defense and
other services.
At the time of independence of the country, the agriculture sector was the predominant sector of
the economy, both in terms of its contribution to the gross domestic product (GDP) and in
providing employment to the country’s labour force. Table 1 depicts the lopsided picture of the
Indian economy on the eve of independence when the agriculture sector dominated the economy
in terms of contribution to national income and to provision of employment to the labour force.
One half of the national income and three fourth of jobs originated from the agriculture sector.
The industrial sector contributed 17 per cent of the national income and about 10.7 per cent of
the workforce was working in industries. The industrial activities where technical progress is the
most important source of growth were employing just one tenth of the workforce. The most of
the industries were consumer good based while the capital goods industries were typically
missing from the scenes. The tertiary sector comprising the services was adding one third of the
national income while employing about one fifth of the workforce.
It can be noted from Table 1 that India’s economy on the eve of Independence was
predominantly rural and agrarian in nature with more than 85 per cent of the population living in
villages and most of them were dependent on agriculture for their livelihood. In spite of a large
proportion of workers employed in agriculture (70%), the country was not self sufficient in food
and raw materials for the industry. The average food grain availability was deficient in quantity
and quality and country faced recurring famines.
Since then a systemic and significant decline in the share of agriculture sector in the nation’s
GDP was observed. The share of employment did not catch up with GDP resulting in a huge
difference in the earning of the agriculture sector and non-agriculture sector.
Table 2: Composition of Gross Domestic Product since independence (in per cent)
Agriculture and
Allied
Year Activities(GDP) Industries(GDP) Services(GDP)
1950-51 51.81 14.16 33.25
1980-81 35.39 24.29 39.92
2000-01 24.5 25.22 50.27
2010-11 17.74 27.76 54.5
2016-17 15.11 31.12 53.77
2019-20 18 27 55
2020-21 20 26 54
Source: Economic Survey, GOI., (various years)
As shown in Table 2, the contribution of the agriculture sector to the GDP has come down from
more than fifty per cent in 1950-51 to 35 per cent in 1980-81and to 15 per cent in 2016-17. We
observe a consistent decline in the contribution of agriculture to the national income and its place
has been taken over by the industrial and service sectors, particularly the service sector which
now shares more than 50 per cent of the national income. Whereas the importance of agriculture
as a source of employment is being marked by a small decrease over time and latest government
source says that 44 per cent of the workforce is engaged in the agriculture for the employment.
Thus, we can say that a partial transformation of the economy has taken place since
independence wherein the share of agriculture in the gross value added (GVA) has marked
significant reduction while the agriculture as the dominant source of employment remains intact.
Most of the studies related to the western developed countries and East Asian countries verify
the stage wise system pattern adopted by these countries.
11.3 AGRICULTURE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: SOME EMPIRICAL
EVIDENCES
Agriculture is the most important sector of the economy and it is the development of agriculture
sector which precedes the development of the other sectors of the economy. In the initial stages
of the economic development, agriculture sector commands most of the resources. A significant
proportion of national output came from agriculture and most of the labour force found
employment in agriculture. Agriculture dominates low income countries, 70% of whose
population depends on it; amongst the vast majority of the world’s poor, agriculture is still the
main source of income, just as farming is their chief occupation (World Bank,1982). In India,
agriculture was the main source of national income and occupation at the time of independence.
Agriculture and allied activities contributed nearly 50 per cent to India’s national income and
around 72 per cent of total working population was engaged in agriculture. Agriculture
contributes to both income growth and poverty reduction in developing countries. Agriculture
sector generates income and employment in rural areas and provides food at reasonable prices in
urban areas. The sector matters greatly in low-income countries where about 60 per cent of the
labour force is employed in agriculture. It accounts for 25 per cent of GDP (but only 9 per cent in
middle-income and 1 per cent in high-income countries). Agriculture provides food, income and
jobs and hence can be an engine of growth in agriculture-based developing countries and an
effective tool to reduce poverty in transforming countries. Agriculture contributes factor, labour
and market to the other sectors in the initial stages of the development.
Kuznet (1968) has identified three important contributions which agriculture makes to the
economic growth of an economy, viz. factor contribution, product contribution and market
contribution. According to the World Development Report (1982), in Europe, Japan and United
States, for example, a dynamic agriculture accompanied, and in some instances led, process of
industrialization and growth (World Bank,1971). In contemporary development theory, the
agricultural and rural sectors of the less developed countries are believed to be the key sectors in
attaining desired development and growth objectives (Reynolds, 1975; Todaro, 1989).
Development of agriculture is crucial for the development of people directly engaged in
agriculture and those in non-agriculture sectors. The development of agriculture stimulates the
development of other sectors through linkages, both backward and forward. It was Hirschman
(1958) who introduced the concept of ‘sectoral linkages’ in his theory of ‘unbalanced growth’.
He argued that the growth of the sector with larger linkages will increase growth faster, through
linkages other than the alternative means. At the same time, he mentioned that agriculture cannot
be leading sector because of its weak backward linkages, whereas Kalecki (1960) and Kuznet
(1968) emphasized that agriculture development is the sine qua non for industrialization.
Joanson and Mellor (1961) and Mellor (1976) discussed the importance of agriculture on non-
agriculture sector. The researchers have not only acknowledged the dominant role of agriculture
in economic development of less developed countries, but have seen technological change as a
key dynamic force for transforming conventional agriculture. Traditional agriculture is seen as a
source of food and raw material for the economy and its people. It is also seen as a source of
income and employment. While the above-mentioned contributions of agriculture are a common
knowledge what is not so common is a twofold contribution of agriculture and its people. One of
these is that this sector provides a demand base for the rest of the economy, which has multiplier
effects for the development of secondary and tertiary sectors at the local, regional and national
level. And second is that the development of agriculture is conducive to reducing the poverty
ratio. Agriculture also contributes to the economy by providing savings and foreign exchange.
The empirical studies regarding the economic development and agriculture come from the study
of Kuznet (1966) who observed that as economies develop, the importance of agriculture in
employment and income diminishes. Timmer (2002) using a panel of 65 developing countries
over 1960 – 1985 found a positive correlation between growth in agricultural, GDP and its
lagged values and non-agricultural GDP growth. Self and Grabowksi (2007) established a
positive relation between different measures of agricultural productivity and average growth of
real GDP per capita over 1960 – 1995 for a cross-section of countries. De Janvry and Sadoulet
(2009) studied in China over 1980 – 2001 and found that a 1 per cent agricultural growth had an
effect on aggregate growth of 0.45 per cent, whereas the indirect effect through the non-
agricultural sector represents half this effect. In his study, ‘Agricultural growth and Industrial
performance in India’, Rangarajan (1982) maintained that one per cent growth in agricultural
production brought about a resultant increase by about 0.5 per cent in industrial production and
by more than 0.7 per cent in national income. So, development of the agricultural sector is
essential for achieving a faster rate of economic growth. Chand and others (2012) calculated that
a one per cent increase in agriculture GDP contributes about 0.25 per cent to overall GDP growth
in India. It means if agriculture attains the four per cent annual growth rate, it would contribute
additional two per cent to India’s national output. Whereas the World Bank report (2008) from
cross country evidence suggests that growth in agriculture GDP is at least twice as effective as
the other sectors in reducing poverty.
The World Development Report (2008) has classified the operation of agriculture in three
distinct worlds- the developing countries, the transforming countries and the urbanized countries.
The agriculture sector plays different roles in the above mentioned countries accordingly. In
agriculture-based economies, agriculture contributes on average 32 per cent to overall economic
growth and the majority of the poor live in rural areas, whereas in transforming countries,
agriculture contributes on average 7 per cent to overall growth but poverty is still mostly rural. In
urbanized countries, agriculture accounts for only 5 per cent of economic growth and urban
poverty is higher than poverty in the rural areas.
Agriculture dominates low-income developing countries, where 60-70 per cent of the population
depends on agriculture for their sustenance. Its growth in large part dictates the growth of their
GDP. The chunk of the population spends 60 to 70 per cent of its income on food. As the
development proceeds, role of agriculture diminishes, eventually accounting for the smaller
share in both output and employment. For the developing countries, growth in agriculture will
further speed up the process of industrialization in these countries. A clear positive relationship
between the agriculture and economic development emerges from different experiences of the
developing countries.
In the agriculture based poor countries, which include Sub Saharan Africa, agriculture and its
allied activities are essential to growth and to reducing mass poverty and food insecurity. These
sub-Saharan countries are dominated by the small size farm holdings, so increasing the small
holder farming’s productivity is a prerequisite for the agriculture development in these countries.
It is not so that small holders are less productive or less motivated than the large farm holders.
Given the right incentive and institutional framework, small farmers are equally responsive and
productive.
In transforming countries, which include most of the South and East Asia and Middle East and
North Africa, ever increasing rural–urban income inequality and continuing extreme rural
poverty are primary sources of social and political tensions. These countries have been relying
on agriculture protection and subsidies which in fact is not sustainable nor can it solve the
problems of income disparities. The right approach to the income disparities in these countries
requires a comprehensive approach-shifting to high value agriculture, decentralizing nonfarm
economic activities in rural areas, and providing assistance to help move people out of
agriculture. All these require a bold and a committed political decision and innovative policy
initiative.
In urbanized countries, which include most of Latin America and much of Europe and Central
Asia, agriculture can help reduce the remaining rural poverty if small holders become direct
suppliers in modern food markets. In this way, good jobs are created in agriculture and agro
industry, and markets for environmental services are introduced.
Check Your Progress A
1. What was the contribution of agriculture to income and employment on the eve of
independence?
2. How did the contribution of agriculture to GDP change from 1950 to 2021?
3. Name three contributions of agriculture to the economic growth.
4. Which of the following statements are True or False?
i) Agriculture is the oldest organized occupation in the world.
ii) Economic development leads to ‘Structural Transformation of an Economy’.
iii) India’s economy on the eve of Independence was predominantly urban.
iv) Agriculture also contributes to the economy by providing savings and foreign
exchange.
v) The agriculture sector plays same role in the developing countries, the
transforming countries and the urbanized countries. False
As we stated earlier, agriculture is the mainstay of India’s economy. Its importance to the
national economy can be gauged from the following facts:
1. Agriculture as a source of employment: As reproduced in Table 3, agriculture is the
largest employer in India. The proportion of the workforce employed in agriculture has come
down in the course of time, but it is still the single largest employer in the country. About 42 per
cent of the workforce is engaged in agriculture in India according to the latest government
figures.
In the western developed countries like the United States of America and United Kingdom, a
meager 2 to 3 per cent of the working population is employed in agriculture. Even Australia and
New Zealand which have a well developed agriculture employ a miniscule part, less than 10 per
cent of its working population in agriculture.
2. Contribution to national income: When India got independence in 1947, agriculture
contributed more than fifty per cent of India’s national income. Since then, there has been a
consistent net decline in the agriculture’s contribution to national income which is depicted in
Table 2. The share of agriculture in GDP increased to 19.9 per cent in 2020-21 from 17.8 per cent
in 2019-20. Following 2003-04, the share has remained between 17 and 19 per cent.“The growth
in GVA (gross value added) of agriculture and allied sectors has been fluctuating over time.
However, during 2020-21, while the GVA for the entire economy contracted by 7.2 per cent,
growth in GVA for agriculture maintained a positive growth of 3.4 per cent,” according to the
Economic survey,2020-21. The share of agriculture in the national income is regularly used as an
indicator of economic development.
The the share of agriculture in the national income of the developed countries has become very
low and the sector contributes only between 2 to 3 per cent of their national income. It suggests
that as a country develops, the significance of agriculture as a source of employment and income
declines.
3. Supply of food to the expanding population:India is the second largest populated
country in the world and according to the United Nations Population Fund (UNPF), India will
surpass China as the most populated country in the world. Agriculture in India is facing the twin
challenges of supplying food grain to a large and growing population. Further, the demand for
food will increase in the course of time with increase in income. In other words, income elasticity
of demand for food in a developing country is high. According to Ramesh Chand (member NITI
Aayog), domestic demand for food grain is expected to increase from 207 million tonnes in 2004 -
05 to 235.4 million tonnes by the end of eleventh five year plan and further to 280.6 million
tonnes by the end of 2020-21.
Thus, combined with the growth in per capita income and urbanization, the demand for food
grain and specially the high value crops will increase in future. That would be another challenge to
meet for India’s agriculture given the shrinking land size and climatic variability.
“Everything else can wait, but not Agriculture”, the first prime minister of India, Pt. Nehru said
while addressing a group of farmers. India’s economy on the eve of Independence was
predominantly rural and agrarian in nature with more than 85 per cent of the population living in
villages and most of them were dependent on agriculture for their livelihood. In spite of a large
proportion of workers employed in agriculture (70%) and the country was not self sufficient in
food and raw materials for the industry. Since then a systemic and significant decline in the share
of agriculture sector in the nation’s GDP was observed. Its place has been taken over by the
industrial and service sectors, particularly the service sector which now shares more than 50 per
cent of the national income.
Kuznet (1968) has identified three important contributions which agriculture makes to the
economic growth of an economy, viz. factor contribution, product contribution and market
contribution. Agriculture dominates low-income developing countries, where 60-70 per cent of
the population depends on agriculture for their sustenance. Its growth in large part dictates the
growth of their GDP. Agriculture is the largest employer in India. The proportion of the workforce
employed in agriculture has come down in the course of time, but its still the single largest
employer in the country. About 42 per cent of the workforce is engaged in agriculture in India
according to the latest government figures. The share of agriculture in GDP increased to 19.9 per
cent in 2020-21 from 17.8 per cent in 2019-20. Agriculture in India is facing the twin challenges
of supplying food grain to a large and growing population and at the same time, the demand for
food will increase in the course of time with increase in income.
Agriculture provides raw materials to various industries of national importance. Sugar industry,
jute industry, cotton textile industry are examples of some such industries which completely rely
on agriculture for their inputs. Agricultural growth has a direct impact on the poverty eradication
and has special powers in reducing poverty across all country types. According to a World Bank
Study (Year?), the GDP growth originating in the agriculture sector is at least twice as effective in
reducing poverty as GDP growth originating outside agriculture. According to a WTO report
(2021), India became one of the top 10 exporters of the agricultural products in 2019 with a
considerable share in export of rice, cotton, meat and soya bean. The above facts state the story of
India’s successful transition from ‘ship to mouth’ situation to top ten agricultural exporters in the
world.
FURTHER READINGS
Ramesh Chand, “Demand for Foodgrains”, Economic and Political Weekly, December 29,2007.
Kapila Uma, Economic Development and Policy in India, Academic Foundation, New Delhi,
2009-10.
Soni, R.N, Leading issues in Agriculture economics
Witt,L.(1965), “Role of Agriculture in economic development,: A Review” journal of Farm
Economics, Feburary, 1965.
Kuznet, S.(1965), Economic Growth and structure, Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi.
Government of India; Economic Survey-various issues.
UNIT 12: PRODUCTIVITY IN INDIAN AGRICULTURE
Structure
12.0 Objectives
12.1 Introduction
12.2 Productivity in India’s Agriculture
12.2.1 General Causes
12.2.2 Institutional Causes
2.2.3 Technological Factors
12.3 Measures to Raise Productivity in Indian Agriculture
12.3.1 Reduction in the Pressure of Population on Land
12.3.2 Agriculture Research and Extension
12.3.3 Agriculture Marketing
12.3.4 Ever Green Technology
12.4 Let Us Sum Up
12.5 Key Words
12.6 Answers to Check Your Progress
12.7 Terminal Questions
12.0 OBJECTIVES
After reading this unit, you should be able to
12.1 INTRODUCTION
With a population of 1.30 billion, India is the world's second most populous country. It is the
seventh largest country in the world with an area of 3.288 million sq kms. It has a long coastline
of over 7,500 kms. With the highest mountain range in the world, the Himalayas to its north, the
Thar desert to its west, the Gangetic delta to its east and the Deccan Plateau in the south, the
country is home to vast agro-ecological diversity. India is the world's largest producer of milk,
pulses and jute, and ranks as the second largest producer of rice, wheat, sugarcane, groundnut,
vegetables, fruit and cotton. It is also one of the leading producers of spices, fish, poultry,
livestock and plantation crops.
While agriculture’s share in India’s economy has declined to 20% in 2021, it was once
consistently declined to 15 % in 2010-11 then improved to current level, due to the high growth
rates of the industrial and services sectors. The sector’s importance in India’s economic and
social fabric goes well beyond this indicator. First, nearly three-quarters of India’s families
depend on rural incomes. Second, the majority of India’s poor (some 770 million people or about
70 percent) are found in rural areas. Third, India’s food security depends on producing cereal
crops, as well as increasing its production of fruit, vegetables and milk to meet the demands of a
growing population with rising incomes. To do so, a productive, competitive, diversified and
sustainable agricultural sector will need to emerge at an accelerated pace1.
Agriculture, with its allied sectors, is the largest source of livelihoods in India. Seventy percent
of its rural households still depend primarily on agriculture for their livelihood, with 87 percent
of farmers being small and marginal. In 2020-21, total food grain production was estimated at
305.44 million tonnes (MT) (Advance Estimate). India is the largest producer (25% of global
production), consumer (27% of world consumption) and importer (14%) of pulses in the world.
India's annual milk production was 165 MT (2017-18), making India the largest producer of
milk, jute and pulses, and with the world's largest cattle population 303 million in 2020.India's
cattle inventory amounted to over 303 million in 2020. While the global cattle population stood
at over 987 million, India had the highest cattle population, followed by Brazil, the United
States, and China that year. It is the second-largest producer of rice, wheat, sugarcane, cotton and
groundnuts, as well as the second-largest fruit and vegetable producer, accounting for 10.9% and
8.6% of the world fruit and vegetable production respectively2.
As per “Third Advance Estimates” for 2020-21, total Food grain production in the country is
estimated at record 305.44 million tonnes, which is higher by 7.94 million tonnes than the
production of food grain of 297.50 million tonnes achieved during 2019-20. Further, the
production during 2020-21 is higher by 26.66 million tonnes than the previous five years’ (2015-
16 to 2019-20) average production of food grain.
1
World Bank,2019.
Table 1 Production of Major food crops in India (in million tonnes)
2020-21
Crop Season 2005-06 2010-11 2015-16 (Advance
Estimate)
Kharif 78.27 80.65 91.41 104.30
Rice Rabi 13.52 15.33 13.00 17.16
Total 91.79 95.98 104.41 121.46
Wheat Rabi 69.35 86.87 92.29 108.75
Kharif 12.16 16.64 16.05 20.95
Maize Rabi 2.55 5.09 6.51 9.29
Total 14.71 21.73 22.57 30.24
Kharif 105.01 113.73 119.56 139.87
Cereals Rabi 90.21 112.52 115.66 140.00
Total 195.22 226.25 235.22 279.87
Tur Kharif 2.74 2.86 2.56 4.14
Gram Rabi 5.60 8.22 7.06 12.61
Kharif 0.90 1.40 1.25 1.56
Urad Rabi 0.35 0.36 0.70 0.82
Total 1.25 1.76 1.95 2.38
Kharif 0.69 1.53 1.00 1.99
Moong Rabi 0.26 0.27 0.59 0.65
Total 0.95 1.80 1.59 2.64
Kharif 4.86 7.12 5.53 8.49
Total Pulses Rabi 8.52 11.12 10.79 17.09
Total 13.38 18.24 16.32 25.58
Kharif 109.87 120.85 125.09 148.36
Total Foodgrains Rabi 98.73 123.64 126.45 157.08
Total 208.60 244.49 251.54 305.44
Total Oilseeds Kharif 167.67 219.22 166.98 245.52
Rabi 112.11 105.57 85.53 120.13
Total 279.78 324.79 252.51 365.65
Sugarcane Total 2811.72 3423.82 3484.48 3927.97
(C): Oilseeds
India is primarily an agricultural country, as the sector provides livelihood to more than 50% of
the population and contributes nearly one fifth of the country’s GDP. However, India lags behind
many other countries as far as agricultural productivity is concerned. The reasons are several.
The agricultural productivity can be measured in two ways; a) productivity per hectare, and b)
productivity per labour. If we compare the productivity of the India’s agriculture with the rest of
the world, India lags behind not only the developed western countries but the developing
countries as well. Some of the major causes behind the low productivity of Indian agriculture are
discussed below:
India’s yield per hectare for rice and wheat is low if we compare with the BRICS countries. If
India’s yield rates for the two crops are at China’s levels, it can double our yields or halve the
land used for the purpose. At present, India produces 106.19 million tonnes of rice a year from
44 million hectares of land. That is a yield rate of 2.4 tonnes per hectare, placing India at 27th
place out of 47 countries. China and Brazil have yield rates of 4.7 t/ha and 3.6 t/ha, respectively.
If Indian agricultural productivity was at these rates, we could produce 205.52 million tonnes and
160.01 million tonnes of rice, respectively. Egypt leads the world in rice yields—at Egypt’s yield
rate, India could almost triple its rice output. As far as wheat is concerned, India has a higher
yield rate than for rice, but it still lags a large part of the world. India’s yield rate of 3.15 tonnes
per hectare for wheat places it 19th out of 41 countries. Here, India does better than Brazil’s
yield rate of 2.73 tonnes per hectare, but lags behind South Africa (3.4 t/ha) and China (4.9 t/ha).
If India’s wheat productivity is at these countries’ levels, it would be producing 101.22 million
tonnes and 147.53 million tonnes of wheat, respectively. New Zealand has the highest
productivity of wheat in the world. If India produces wheat at the rate at which New Zealand
does, then it can produce 2.5 times more than what it produces. This is not to say that Indian
agricultural productivity in wheat and rice has not improved over the years. Yield rates in wheat
have grown at a compounded annual growth rate of 1.8% from 1983 to 2013 and in rice by
1.71% over the same period. These are not particularly slow growth rates. The improvement in
yield rates for rice would place it at number 13 in the world while that in wheat would peg it at
14th rank3.
3
The Mint, 9th September,2014
of the population is directly falling to the agriculture sector resulting in consistent decline in the
size of the holding and low productivity.
b) Social Environment: The social environment of the villages is regarded as one of the major
hindrances to the development of Indian agriculture. It has been observed that in general the
Indian farmers are illiterate, superstitious, conservative and do not respond to the new and
modern agricultural techniques. Again the working conditions as well as the health conditions
are very poor and it has lessened the productive capacity of the farmers.
a) Land Tenure System: Zamindari system has been an important factor responsible for the low
productivity of Indian agriculture, the form of land tenure system which India inherited from the
colonial powers. The zamindari system was highly exploitative in character and ruined the
capacity, willingness and enthusiasm of the cultivators to increase the production and
productivity. In this system the cultivator is not the owner of land. Zamindar is the owner of
land and he can evict the tenant at any time. So the cultivator does not take interest in the
development of land and Zaminder does not take an interest in the development of cultivation.
Though the zamindari system was abolished after independence, yet the position of the cultivator
has not improved. Legislation passed after the independence of the country for the abolition of
intermediaries did not break the stronghold of the zamindars and it only changed the
nomenclature from the “zamindars” to big landlords. Moreover, the land reforms carried out in
the country in the post reform period did not make any significant changes in the stronghold of
the zamindars in the rural areas and except few states like West Bengal, Kerala and Jammu
Kashmir, the reforms failed miserably. Regulation of rent, security of tenure, ownership rights of
tenants did not make much aspired changes in the tenant’s life, they are still at the mercy of big
landlords.
b) Uneconomic Holding: As discussed in demographic factors, according to National Sample
Survey (NSS), since the first agriculture census over 45 years ago, the number of farms in India
has more than doubled from 71 million in 1970-71 to 145 million in 2015-16. The average farm
size more than halved from 2.28 hectares (ha) to 1.08ha.Between 1970-71 and 2010-11, the
number of farms increased by 194%, almost exactly in line with the rural population, which
increased by 189%. In India as per latest NSS report, small and marginal farmers with less than
two hectares of land account for 86.2% of all farmers in India, but own just 47.3% of the crop
area. At the same time, semi-medium and medium land holding farmers owning between 2-10
hectares of land account for 13.2% of all farmers, but own 43.6% of the crop area. During this
period the proportion of small and marginal farmers grew from 84.9% to 86.2%, while the total
number of operational holdings grew from 138 million to 146 million. The total area under
farming, however, fell from 159.6 million hectares in 2010-11 to 157.14 million hectares in
2015-16.Between 2010-11 and 2015-16, the number of small and marginal farms rose by about 9
million. Further, these 126 million farmers together owned about 74.4 million hectares of land —
or an average holding of just 0.6 hectares each—not enough to produce surpluses. Thus, a
booming small and marginal farmers and consistent decline in the farm size makes Indian
agriculture uneconomic and less productive.
ii) Lack of Grading and Standardization: The practice of selling graded items which can fetch
better return is missing among the small farmers. The common practice is to sell them in heaps
of one lot with items of different qualities mixed up. The low returns received as a result of this
practice do not induce the farmers to adopt better methods and practices for producing quality
products.
iii) Inadequate Transport Facilities: Good road connectivity to transport the produce to Mandi
(the places where produce are sold in bulk) with adequate motorized transport facilities is a must.
The practice in India, particularly for small farmers, is to transport their goods in bullock carts.
The feasibility to transport items to far off places is greatly constrained by this means of
transportation.
iv) Presence of Large Number of Intermediaries: As we have seen above, the length of
marketing channel is not small or optimum to realise maximum returns to the producers. The
situation is particularly adverse due to number of intermediaries or middle men operating in the
names of village traders, kutcha/pucca arhtiyaas, brokers, wholesalers, retailers, money lenders,
etc. A number of middle men in the marketing of agri produce leads to a situation where in both
the producers and consumers are at receiving end and a good part of margin goes to the middle
man. Empirical evidences suggest that the marketing margin varies for different commodities
and farmers receives only 30 to 25 percent of the consumer price.
v) Inadequate Market Information: Very often, farmers do not get the right information about
prices in the markets. Taking advantage of this ignorance on the part of farmers, middlemen take
undue benefit of the situation. The situation is changing with the government making use of
media like radio, newspapers, etc. to announce and disseminate information on prices in markets.
However, there are problems of time lag and the consequent less reliable information reaching
the sellers. This leads to traders often paying less than the prices quoted by the government in the
news media.
vi) Inadequate Credit facilities: The farmers need credit for various purposes like purchase of
seeds, fertilizers, irrigation, etc. In India the scope of formal institutional lending has been
limited and curtailed in post liberalization period. At the same time, many formalities are
associated with formal credit institutions so farmers rely on the informal sources like money
lender and Mahajan who not only charge exorbitant interest rate but they also indulge in many
malpractices. This exorbitant interest and unscrupulous practices adopted by informal credit
sources are a major reason behind the farmer suicide in India. According to P.Sainath, a veteran
journalist, in India every four hours a farmer kills himself. Timely provision of credit is must for
the efficient and sustainable agriculture.
The following technological factors are also responsible for low agricultural productivity in
Indian agriculture:
(a) Traditional Methods of Cultivation: The farmers in India have been adopting orthodox and
inefficient methods and techniques of cultivation. As they are tradition bound and poor, thus they
could not adopt modern, efficient methods adopted by western countries of the world. These
farmers were relying on centuries old wooden plough and other implements. It is only in recent
years that the Indian farmers have started to adopt improved implements like steel ploughs, seed
drills, harrows, hoes etc. to a limited extent only. Thus, Indian agriculture is dualistic in nature
wherein the developed regions of the country, Punjab, Haryana and Western Uttar Pradesh apply
the most sophisticated technology used by their counter parts in the western developed
countries. On the other hand in most of the country’s hinterland farmers are using the traditional
methods used by their fore father resulting in low productivity. Thus, Indian agriculture is
traditional and therefore, productivity is low.
(b) Lack of High Yielding Seeds: Indian farmers are still using seeds which are not of good
quality. In the post green revolution period, the use of high yielding varieties of seeds increased
substantially resulting in a considerable increase in the productivity. But the use of high yielding
varieties of seeds is limited to irrigated areas of the country. Still a large number of farmers use
low quality seeds resulting in low productivity.
(c) Lack of Fertilizer: Fertilizer consumption measures the quantity of plant nutrients used per
unit of arable land. Fertilizer products cover nitrogenous, potash, and phosphate fertilizers
(including ground rock phosphate). Traditional nutrients--animal and plant manures--are not
included.
Indian farmers are not applying sufficient quantity of fertilizers on their lands. Constant
cultivation of land causes deterioration of the fertility of soil. For the revitalization of soil
fertility and to use fallow land for cultivation, application of various types of fertilizer is
indispensable. The use of fertilizers in India increased after mid 1970’s, but is still confined to
few agriculturally advanced regions of the country. As of 2018, fertilizer consumption in Hong
Kong was 3,573.9 kilograms per hectare. The top 5 countries also include Malaysia, Bahrain,
New Zealand, and Ireland. India with 175 kg per hectares was ranked 45th according to the world
bank data. Thus, the fertilizers used per hectare is very low compared to the world standards.
(d) Inadequate Irrigation Facilities: Water is the most critical input for enhancing agricultural
productivity, and therefore expansion of irrigation has been a key strategy in the development of
agriculture in the country. The ultimate irrigation potential of India has been estimated to be
139.5 mha, comprising 58.5 mha from major and medium schemes, 15 mha from minor
irrigation schemes and 66 mha from groundwater exploitation. India’s irrigation potential has
increased from 22.6 mha in 1951 to about 90 mha at the end of 1995.An adequate and assured
water supply at the appropriate time is essential for increasing the yield of the crops. In India,
agriculture largely depends on the rainfall, which is mostly uncertain and unseasonable. Before
independence, only 19 per cent of the total land was irrigated in India. But in-spite of vigorous
programme of major and minor irrigation projects undertaken since 1951, currently about 45
percent of country’s cropped area is irrigated. This shows that 55 percent of cropped area is still
dependent on the rains. Rainfall is becoming erratic in India owing to the climate change and
variability in precipitation in the last twenty years has increased. This has resulted in droughts in
some parts of the country and excess rainfall and flood in other parts of the country. The
Country’s full irrigation potential is not wholly utilised because of defective management and
water cost is constantly increasing, thus, making farming difficult and costly for small farmers.
(e) Lack of pesticides: Farmers in India lose a considerable part of their produce to pests and
insects which eats the plants. According to a study by the Associated Chambers of Commerce
and Industry of India in 2015, annual crop losses due to pests and diseases amount to Rs.50,000
crore ($500 billion), which is significant in a country where at least 200 million Indians go to bed
hungry every night. About 30-35% of the annual crop yield in India gets wasted because of pests,
according to a research by Indian Council of Agriculture Research (ICAR) paper in 2017.The
use of pesticides and insecticides is still limited to a few areas and larger farms. Thus, over a
wider area, crops suffer much damage due to pests and insects resulting in lower output and low
productivity.
(f) Lack of Agricultural Research: Public spending on agriculture is one of the key policy
instruments of the government to promote growth and alleviate poverty in rural areas. Amongst
the various types of government spending, Agricultural Research and Education (R&E) is found
to be one of the most critical for promoting farm yields, which contributes towards augmenting
yield and thus income of the peasantry. According to Ashok Gulati, a renowned Agricultural
Economist, India spends about 0.7 per cent of its GDPA (2014-15) on aggregate agriculture
research, including education, extension and training (AgRE&XT) as against the recommended
level of 2 per cent of agri-GDP by the world Bank. Further, According to the Economic Survey
2017-18, the total R&D expenditure in India as a percentage of GDP has been stagnant at 0.6 to
0.7 per cent in the last two decades — much lower than the US (2.8 per cent), China (2.1 per
cent), South Korea (4.3 per cent) and Israel (4.2 per cent). Comparing India and China’s
spending on agricultural research and development, “Agriculture Science and Technology
Indicators (ASTI)” data reveal that India currently spends 0.30 per cent of agriculture GDP on
agricultural research, which is just half the share invested by China (0.62 per cent).
Thus, Productivity of most of the crops in the country is low and there is considerable scope to
raise it. Except wheat, productivity of most other crops in the country is below the world average
and much lower than agriculturally advance countries. Even, within the country there are large
variations in yield across states. A large variation in yield across states is due to variation in the
factors discussed above, even the variations are found in the states with the similar irrigation
coverage, productivity show significant variations due to poor level or low adoption of improved
technology.
2. List the main reasons for the low agricultural productivity in India.
i) Agriculture, with its allied sectors, is the largest source of livelihoods in India
iii) India’s yield per hectare for rice and wheat is low if we compare with the BRICS
countries.
iv) There are very good warehousing facilities in the villages in India. False
v) Indian farmers are not applying sufficient quantity of fertilizers on their lands
There are two sources to increase agricultural output, i.e., area and productivity. Due to rising
demand for land for non agricultural uses and already high share of arable land in the total
geographical area of the country, further expansion in the area under cultivation is not feasible.
Rather, there is a decline of about 10 lakh hectares, as agricultural land has been diverted to non-
agricultural uses since the year 2004-05. Therefore, agricultural output has to be increased
through improvement in productivity per unit of land (Nitti Aayog,2017).
12.3.1 Reduction in the Pressure of Population on Land: Indian agriculture employs the
largest share of the workforce – about 42 percent in 2019 – though its share in the overall gross
domestic product (GDP) is only 20 percent in 2020. India is still largely a rural economy with 66
percent of the country’s population living in rural areas (World Bank, 2019). The proportion of
the workforce employed in the agriculture in India is very high from any standard. Thus, there is
utmost need to withdraw a part of the workforce from agriculture and provide them alternative
employment outside agriculture, which would help reduce the pressure on agriculture and
consequently improve the productivity. Over the last four decades, the absolute number of
workers in India has increased from 180.7 million in 1971 to 481.7 million in 2011, indicating an
addition of close to 6 million workers to the workforce every year (Census of India, various
issues). Moreover, the absolute number of workforce employed in the agriculture sector has
increased from 125.7 million to 263.1 million during the same period, though in terms of
percentage, this share has declined from 66.5 percent in 1981 to 42.3 per cent in
2019(Gulati,2019). According to Gulati, raising labour productivity will require raising land
productivity by (a) pumping in more capital; (b) creating employment opportunities in off-farm
jobs such as food processing, cold storages, construction sector; (c) skill formation; and (d)
‘diversification’ towards high value agricultural activities such as dairy farming, poultry rearing,
horticulture and fisheries.
12.3.2. Agriculture Research and Extension: As we have seen the expenditure made by the
Government of India for agricultural research and extension is very low as compared to other
countries. An increase in the expenditure on agriculture knowledge and innovation systems is an
important factor in the improvement of productivity of the agricultural sector in India. In a study
conducted by Gulati and Terway (2018) on the impact of investment and subsidies on
agricultural GDP growth and poverty reduction, it was estimated that for every rupee invested in
agricultural research and education (R&E), agriculture GDP increases by INR 11.2. Moreover,
for every million rupees spent on agricultural R&E, 328 people are brought out of poverty. The
study confirms the return from per rupee spent on agriculture research is highest. It shows that
every rupee spent on agricultural research and development yields better returns (11.2),
compared to returns on every rupee spent on fertilizer subsidy (0.88), power subsidy (0.79),
education (0.97) or on roads (1.10).In India, over the years, the ratio of expenditure on
agricultural knowledge and innovation systems as a percentage of agricultural gross value added
(GVA) improved from 0.38 percent in 2000/01, touched 0.64 percent in 2010/11 but fell back to
0.35 percent in 2018/19.Therefore, in order to improve the sector’s total factor productivity,
India needs to invest more in agricultural R&E (Gulati and Gupta, 2019).
12.3.3 Agricultural Marketing: Agricultural Marketing is riddled with the middlemen who
sucks the benefits accruing to the farmers and end consumers. Some of the reforms in the
marketing suggested by experts are discussed below4, which are essential for improving the
productivity in the agriculture sector.
a) Uniform Mandi fees: These fees now range from 0.5% to 5% on the value of sale, while
varying across states and commodities. It is proposed that a uniform Mandi fee of 0.25% or
0.50% be levied nationwide for foodgrain, oilseeds and fruits & vegetables. The consequent
losses to APMCs may be compensated by the Centre and state governments, as in the case of the
Goods and Services Tax.
4
“Reform 2.0: focus must shift from agricultural production to marketing”, Indian Express, 27thjune, 2019.
b) Abolish Mandi fees on inter-state trade: Charging Mandi on produce brought to a state
from other states (where it would already have been levied) amounts to double taxation, besides
violating the idea of a single national market. The practical difficulty is to verify whether the
commodity has actually come from another state, as traders sometimes use this route to pass on
their unaccounted stocks. A way out is to make e-way bills mandatory for all inter-state trade and
Mandi fee exemptions be given only against these.
d) Storage and banking facilities near APMCs: At Mandis the lowest prices are during
the 3-4 post-harvest months and highest in the immediate pre-harvest period. Farmers undertake
maximum sales just after harvest, as they need to purchase inputs for the next sowing season.
Such distress sales can be avoided if facilities for bagging and storage, along with loans against
warehouse receipts, are available to meet immediate cash requirements. These should exist in the
vicinity of APMCs. When farmers have the choice to sell or store their crop, it will force traders
to pay the actual value of produce based on quality.
12.3.4 Ever Green Technology: The chemicals induced technology known as green revolution
has made India self sufficient in food grains. The application of new technology in mid 1960’s
not only eliminated India’s dependence on imports for feeding the ever increasing population,
but also increased the productivity of the crops by leaps and bounds. The productivity of rice and
wheat recorded high growth owing to the application of new technology. The major problems
associated with Green Revolution are related to environmental factors like depletion and
pollution of groundwater, soil erosion and loss of biodiversity. The chemical technology was not
carbon neutral, the excessive use of chemicals; fertilizers and pesticides resulted in a number of
environmental problems. As a result gain in productivity achieved through the new technology
has reached a plateau. More than that chemical based technology is not sustainable knowing
agriculture is one of the largest users of water in India and the largest polluter of the environment
worldwide. Owing to the resource and technology constraints in India, the chemical technology
cannot be the solution to increase the productivity and meet nutrition security in India. Hence
scientists and the government of India have come up with the concept of ‘evergreen revolution’;
which implies productivity improvement in perpetuity without social and environment harm. The
evergreen revolution involves the integration of ecological principles in technology development
and dissemination.
The Green Revolution transformed the image of India from being a ‘begging bowl’ to ‘bread
basket’. However, to rectify flaws and loopholes of the Green Revolution, the country needs to
make it evergreen. Though India is now self-sufficient in many aspects of food production, it still
relies on imports for crops such as pulses and oilseeds, where production has not kept pace with
demand.
Dr.M.S.Swaminathan, who coined the term “Evergreen Revolution” to highlight the pathway of
increasing production and productivity in a manner such that short and long term goals of food
production are not mutually antagonistic. The logic is to produce more from less--less land, less
pesticide, less water and it must be an evergreen revolution to get sustainable agriculture.
Introducing Indian farmers to innovative information and communication technologies (ICT) can
enhance farm productivity. ICT initiatives can tackle key challenges in the agricultural value-
chain through networking on weather alerts, the sowing period, and the prices of produce.
According to the ICAR in the dry areas, dry lands produce half the country’s cereals, 77 per cent
of its oilseeds and 85 per cent of its pulses. Implementation of new and efficient irrigation
methods, better watershed management and maintenance of vegetation cover in catchment areas
and development of drought-tolerant crop varieties is required to optimise water utilisation.
GM food crops are also critical for enabling the success of evergreen revolution. These crops
have been proven to significantly improve yield through high levels of disease and pest
resistance, improved weed management, abiotic stress tolerance and nutrient-use efficient crops.
For example approval and promotion of Bt.Mustard helps us to reduce the edible oil imports and
improve Indian economy as well as provide nutrition.
With increase in population, there is a dire need to increase food grain production at a rapid pace.
The challenge lies in producing more with less resources. Only increased productivity which is
ecologically sustainable can ensure higher production of Foodgrains. Food security involves an
increase in food grain production and distribution which is accessible and affordable. Stagnation
of food grain production is the biggest concern of recent time. Evergreen revolution is the need
of the hour.
i)There has been a decline of about 10 lakh hectares as agricultural land since the year
2004-05.
ii) The farmer should have total freedom to sell his produce at any place of his choice.
iii) The Green Revolution transformed the image of India from being a ‘begging bowl’ to
‘bread basket’.
iv) India has invested sufficient funds in the agricultural research.
v) Only increased productivity which is ecologically sustainable can ensure higher
production of foodgrains.
India is primarily an agricultural country, as the sector provides livelihood to more than 50% of
the population and contributes nearly one fifth of the country’s GDP. However, India lags behind
many other countries as far as agricultural productivity is concerned. India’s yield per hectare for
rice and wheat is low if we compare with the BRICS countries. If India’s yield rates for the two
crops are at China’s levels, it can double our yields or halve the land used for the purpose. At
present, India produces 106.19 million tonnes of rice a year from 44 million hectares of land.
That is a yield rate of 2.4 tonnes per hectare, placing India at 27th place out of 47 countries.
There are several reasons for this, which include demographic factors, Social Environment, Land
Tenure System, Inadequate/Improper Warehouses, Uneconomic Holding, Inadequate Transport
Facilities, Presence of Large Number of Intermediaries, Inadequate Market Information,
Inadequate Credit facilities and several Technological Factors.
Therefore, agricultural output has to be increased through improvement in productivity per unit
of land (Nitti Aayog,2017). Several desirable measures have been suggested, such as Reduction in the
Pressure of Population on Land, Agriculture Research and Extension, Agricultural Marketing,
Uniform Mandi fees, Abolish Mandi fees on inter-state trade, Eliminate Arthtiya-based trading,
Storage and banking facilities near APMCs, Promote Farmers Producers Orgainisation (FPOs) in
marketing, and Ever Green Technology, etc.
BRICS countries: Group of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa.
e-NAM: Electronic National Agriculture Market is a platform where online trading of the
agricultural products can be done.
Zamindari system: During the British rule in India, Zamindars were recognized as the owner of
the lands and were given the rights to collect the rent from the peasants. While the zamindars
became the owners of the land, the actual farmers became tenants. It was abolished after
Independence.
1.What are the factors responsible for the low productivity of agriculture in India?
2. Describe various methods being implemented for improving agricultural productivity.
3. “The Green Revolution was a watershed in Indian agriculture” Elaborate.
4. What is the difference between the “Green Revolution” and “Ever Green Revolution”?
5. How middlemen can be eliminated in the trade of agricultural products?
FURTHER READINGS
1) Kapila, Uma, Economic Development and Policy in India, Academic Foundation (2009-10)
Edition, New Delhi.
2) “Reform 2.0: focus must shift from agricultural production to marketing”, Indian Express,
27th June, 2019.
3) NITI Aayog. 2018. Demand and Supply Projections Towards 2030: The Working Group
Report. New Delhi, NITI Aayog, Government of India.
4) World Bank. 2019. World Development Indicators. Washington, DC., The World Bank
https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators.
5) Gulati,Ashok and Juneja,2021, “Transforming Indian Agriculture”. Nitti Ayog, New Delhi.
UNIT 13 GROWTH PATTERN IN INDIA'S AGRICULTURE
Structure
13.0 Objectives
13.1 Introduction
13.2 India’s Agriculture during the first half of the 20th century –British period
13.3 India’s Agriculture in Post Independence Period
13.3.1 1950-51 to 1964-65: The Pre-Green Revolution Period.
13.3.2 1967-68 to 1979 -80: The Beginning of Green Revolution.
13.3.3 1980-81 to 1990-91: The Maturing of Green Revolution.
13.3.4 1990-91 to 2003-04:Economic Liberalization and Deceleration of Agricultural
Growth.
13.3.5 2004-05 to 2014-15: The Period of Recovery.
13.3.6 2014-15 to 2019-20: The National Democratic Alliance- II (NDA-II) Rule.
13.4 Challenges of Indian Agriculture
13.5 Policy Suggestions
13.6 Let Us Sum Up
13.7 Key Words
13.8 Answers to Check Your Progress
13.9 Terminal Questions
13.0 OBJECTIVES
• compare the agricultural growth pattern of the post-independence era with that of the pre-
independence;
13.1 INTRODUCTION
India’s agriculture has moved from very low, subsistent, ship-to-mouth situation to self-
dependent in the food grains and also a net exporter of the agricultural commodities in the recent
years. Today, India is the largest exporter of rice in the world. The main objective of this chapter
is to review the performance of Indian agriculture since independence. A brief analysis of the
performance of India’s agriculture in the first half of the 20th century is attempted in the first part
and a detailed in-depth analysis of the country’s agriculture post-independence is done in the
subsequent section. The policy recommendations to make the growth consistent and sustainable
have been made in the last section. India’s agricultural growth trajectory during the British
period, especially the first half of the 19th century, is very important for understanding the
growth in the rest of the post-independence period.
According to all the credible estimates, India’s growth performance during the first half of the
nineteenth century was not an impressive one. According to Sivasubraamonian, the growth rate
of the primary sector during the 1900-01 to 1946-47 was only 0.46% per annum (pa) which is
very low from any standard. The growth rate of the secondary sector and the tertiary sector
during the same period was higher than the primary sector. The economy did not show any
credible structural change and three-fourth of the work force was employed in the agriculture
throughout the 20th century. That is the reason why economists called the performance of the
Indian economy in the first half of the twentieth century as “Static Economy in Progress”.
Table 1. Growth Rates of GDP and per capita Income at 1993-94 Prices
The growth rate of agricultural produce was miniscule. According to George Blyn’s estimate
prepared on the basis of 18 major crops during 1901-04 to 1940-44, agricultural output recorded
a growth rate of 0.262 pa at the 1925-29 prices. Similarly, as per Sivasubramonian’s extended
study of the princely states of India covering 25 instead of 18 crops using the 1938-39 prices
used by Blyn, the growth rate of total agricultural output was 0.41% pa during 1900-01 to 1946-
47. While foodgrains grew at 0.15% p.a., the growth of non-foodgrains was 0.77% pa. The
growth rate of population during that interval was slightly higher than the growth rate of the food
grains; hence the per capita availability of food grains declined during that time interval.
Further, the precarious condition of the economy in general and agriculture sector in particular
can be gauged from the structure of gross domestic product (GDP) and employment as depicted
in Table 2. At the advent of independence, the primary sector, mainly consisting of agriculture,
generated more than half of the national income and employed three-fourth of the work force. No
visible transformation in the economy during the first half of the 19th century has been observed,
resulting the economy one of the lowest per capita consumption and income in the world.The
first half of the 19th century in India can be better categorized as the period of near stagnation.
India, at the time of independence, inherited one of the most backward agriculture. In spite of
having an overwhelming population dependent on the agriculture, the country was not self-
sufficient in the food grain production. The country had to depend heavily on imports to feed its
large and ever growing population. The agricultural economist Dr Ashok Gulati termed this
phenomena as “ ship-to-mouth”. The study of agriculture growth in India can be divided into five
phases, first four are named by another prominent agriculture economist, Prof. G.S.Bhalla, while
the period from the 2004-05 to 2014-15 has been named as period of recovery by Dr. Ramesh
Chand, member, NITI Aayog.
Table 4. Growth Rate of GDP and Per Capita Income at 1993-94 prices
Source: Growth up to 1994-05 to 2003/04 has been taken from Sivasubramonian, 2000 and
NAS,2004.
13.3.1 1949-50 to 1964-65: The Pre-Green Revolution Period: During this period, the major
thrust soon after independence was on institutional and agrarian reforms. India passed a
significant body of land reform legislation. According to Prof. Kaushik Basu, a leading
economist, the most obvious argument in favour of land reform is equity. In a land-scarce
country with a significant section of the rural population below the poverty line, the case for
ensuring that everyone has access to some minimum amount of land seems compelling from this
point of view. The two basic objectives of the land reforms were:
1) To remove the intermediaries or impediments that were widespread owing to the kind of land
tenure system which the country inherited from colonial rulers.
2) To eliminate the kind of exploitation of the landless and small farmers through the
distribution of land in their favor.
During this phase, some other steps needed for the development of agriculture were also taken.
These were: the construction of new roads, provision of additional irrigation facilities through
multipurpose projects, provision of additional credit facilities and production of more fertilizers
in the country. Community development programme (CDP) was started to involve people in the
process of agricultural and rural development. Many agricultural research institutions and
agricultural universities and college were set up during this period in the country. Consequently,
foodgrain output increased from 51 million tonnes in 1951-52 to 68 million tonnes in 1955-56
and it was 82 million tones in 1960-61. Intensive Agriculture Districts Program (IADP) was
launched in 1961. In the begining, IADP programme was initiated in three districts and it was
extended in stages to thirteen other districts in later period.To motivate the farmers to adopt
better technology, the Government had started the incentive price policy in 1964. The
Agriculture Price Commission was institutionalized to advise the government on the fixation of
support prices of agricultural crops. As a result of initiatives like IADP, the agricultural output
increased to 89 million tonnes in 1964-65 which was significantly higher than the 82 million
tonnes produced in 1960-61.
Table 5. Growth rates of Production, Area under Cultivation and Productivity (per cent
per annum)
Table 5 depicts the compound growth rates for agriculture production, area and productivity of
the all crops taken together from 1951 to 1965.The productivity growth had been increasing in
every successive plan and significantly in the intensive plan period. At the same time, the growth
rate of the area under the crops was more than the yield growth except in the intensive period.
During the first period, 1949 - 50 to 1964-65 total crop output in India recorded a trend growth
rate of 3.15% pa. This growth rate was fairly high compared to the pre-independence period and
was achieved mainly as a result of increase in irrigation and net sown area. The growth rate of
yield was rather low during this period. As per Ramesh Chand, first five year plan allocated a
substantial outlay to the agriculture sector, followed by tenancy reforms, institutional changes
and completion of major irrigation projects. He further mentions that the priority and importance
that agriculture sector received in the first plan was not sustained and growth of sub sector
decelerated in the beginning of 1960’s resulting in shortages of food. The large quantity of
foodgrains was imported. Another important characteristic of growth in this period was that
growth of output was relatively more and this was contributed by the new area brought under
cultivation. The growth of output in this period was contributed 50 per cent by the area whereas
the yield supplemented another 38 per cent to the output growth shown in the Table 6.
In the mid sixties, a new agriculture strategy was adopted which laid stress on the application of
new draft high yielding varieties (HYV) of seeds. As a policy support measure in January 1965,
the Agriculture Prices Commission was set up to recommend MSP. This was followed by the
Food Corporation of India (FCI) to take charge of the logistics of procuring major agricultural
commodities. These seeds were innovated by the American scientist Norman Borlaug. The
introduction of Borlaug’s new seed- fertilizer technology during the mid–sixties resulted in a
spectacular jump in the yield levels of wheat, rice and later oilseeds and cotton. The growth rate
of total crop output during 1967- 68 to 1979-80 decelerated to 2.19 % pa compared with a
growth rate of 3.15 % pa during the earlier period.The growth rate of food grain output also
decreased to 2.15% pa during this period, compared with 2.82% pa earlier. The limited impact of
new technology as per Bhalla was due to:
1) New technology was limited to wheat in the initial period, and had a low weight in cereals
during the 1960s. In spite of wheat output being doubled by 1970-71, it only constituted about
22% of total food grain output in that year.
2) The geographical coverage of HYV was also confined to the north- western states of Punjab,
Haryana and western U.P. So, its overall impact on the growth of food grain output was limited.
Further, this decline in the growth of agricultural GDP happened because of the after effect of
the 1965-66 and 1966-67 drought and also the result of the after effects of wars. There were two
oil crises and conflict with the neighbours and a drastic reduction in foreign aid that resulted in a
big decline in public and overall investment (Bhalla, 2007). Further, an important point to notice
in this period is that the major contribution to the output growth was coming from the growth of
yield rather than area. The wheat production registered a compound growth rate of 5.03 per cent
per annum during this period. The yield’s contribution to the growth in this period was 58.45 per
cent, while the area contributed 23.29 per cent. Other than Punjab, Haryana and western part of
Uttar Pradesh, state of West Bengal also benefitted from the wheat revolution. The southern
states comprising of Tamil Naidu, Kerala and Karnatka also recorded medium to high growth
rate.Thus, we can conclude that growth in this period was prominently assisted by the yield, and
the influence of new technology was limited to few crops and limited regions in the country.
This period witnessed the wider dissemination of new technology into new areas and extension
to new crops resulting in very impressive growth of the agricultural output from 2.19 % achieved
in the earlier period to 3.19%. The new technology made inroads into new regions of the country
which otherwise was confined to the northwestern states, Panjab, Haryana and western Uttar
Pradesh. The new technology was extended to wheat, rice, maize and a few other commercial
crops like cotton, sugarcane and oilseeds. During this period, all the major crops registered
higher growth rate in yield. rice marked production and yield growth rate of 3.62 per cent and
3.19 per cent, respectively. Wheat yield also registered impressive growth of 3.57 per cent.
Growth in yield of pulses and coarse cereals was commendable. The production of food grains
observed a high growth rate of 2.73 per cent, mainly assisted by high growth rate of yield of 2.97
per cent. The technology mission on oilseeds was started in the mid 1980s to boost the
production and productivity of oilseeds and the mission succeeded in raising the production and
productivity which registered a growth rate of 5.46 per cent and 2.95 per cent. Potato, coconut
and cotton all showed high growth rates in production and yield and cotton registered a high
growth of 3.50 per cent and 5.19 per cent1respectively.More than that, the notable feature of this
period was that growth in output was contributed more by the increase in yield rather than the
increase in area as enumerated in the Table 6. The yield contributed the 80 per cent of the growth
in output and the area supplemented less than 5 per cent to output growth. This period was very
significant in the agriculture development of the country. In this period, not only the new
technology spread to the other regions especially of the rainfed areas but also many new crops
also benefitted from new technology. The agricultural growth of the eastern states of the country
particularly West Bengal during this period was remarkable and also rainfed states like Rajasthan
and Madhya Pradesh performed spectacularly on account of shifting of the areas from coarse
cereal to oil seeds. This period also witnessed the narrowing down of regional inequality in
output growth and yield level.
1
Individual crop growth rate has been derived from the Kannansand work and they are coumpound growth rate
1999‐00 prices.
Table 6 Per Cent Contribution of Area and Yield Growth to Output Growth
Despite major reforms in the economy, the performance of agriculture output came down in the
initial years of the reforms and the growth rate of agriculture GDP decelerated from 3.08% pa
during the 1980-81 to 1990-91 to 2.38% during 1992-93 to 2003-04.The growth rate of overall
crop sector decelerated from 3.19% pa during the 1980’s to only 1.18% pa during the later
period. The deceleration was aided by negative growth in oilseeds (-1.07%) and fibers (-1.17%)
and the poor performance of cereals (0.51%) and pulses (0.23%). It was only drugs and
narcotics, fruits and vegetables, and spices and condiments that performed well in this phase.
Similarly, the terms of trade, which had shown improvement in the 1980s and the early part of
1990s deteriorated in the late 1990s and remained so till 2003-04. The growth rate of food grains
in this period could not keep pace with the growth rate of the population, resulting in reduction in
2
Ramesh Chand,
the availability of food gains per capita. The adverse effect of falling growth in agriculture was
manifested in the form of severe rural agrarian crises including farmers’ suicide.
Some of the important causes behind the poor performance of the agriculture in the initial years
of the post reform period has been delineated as:
1. The capital formation in the agriculture followed a rising trend since the 1960s and 1970s and
that continued till the mid 1980s. After that, it started declining and the trend has been reversed
after late nineties. The declining trend since 1990s suggests there has been low investment in
agriculture compared to the non-agriculture sector. Total investment in agriculture as a share of
GDP declined from 9.9% during 1980s to 6.0 per cent during 2003-04 predominantly pulled
down by a reduction in public investment.
2. Research and extension services: Gulati and Tervey (2019) found that among the major
investment components of growth of agriculture, the elasticity of research and extension is
highest. The green revolution in India was successful because of the international research
collaboration. The spending on research and extension services in India has been very low as
compared to the developed and other developing countries. Lack of public spending in research
and development has resulted in the non-availability of any major invention in new technology
like biotechnology resulting in increased input in Indian agriculture.
3. Credit extension: Credit, especially the institutional credit is the sine qua non for the
development of the agriculture sector. Empirical evidences show that the share of rural bank
branches in total branches increased soon after the nationalization of banks in late 1960s reached
a maximum in 1990 and since then it has a declining trend. Further, the trend in credit-deposit
ratio and lending to priority sector and agriculture declined in the 1990s compared to 1980s.
Reduction of rural bank branches and the priority sector lending in outstanding credit of
commercial banks led the farmers to approach the non institutional lenders. These lenders
charged exorbitant interest from the borrowers resulting a number of farmer suicides in rural
India.
13.3.5 The Period of Recovery 2004-05 to 2014-15. The year 2004-05 was a turning point. To
reverse the declining trend in the agriculture production in the country, the mid-term appraisal of
the Eleventh Five year plan reviewed the performance of the farming sector and proposed multi-
pronged steps to revive agriculture. As a result, a number of steps were taken to revive the
growth in the agriculture produce after 2004-05, which are highlighted below:
1) A substantial increase in the budget outlay was made to the departments associated with
the development of Agriculture, Animal husbandry and Agriculture Research and Education.
2) The National Horticulture Mission started in 2005-06 and its scope was expanded to
include the medicinal plants and spices.
3) Support to State Extension Program for Extension Reform, a centrally sponsored scheme
was launched in 2005-06.
4) In 2005-06, a National Fund for Basic, Strategic and Frontier Application Research in
Agriculture and a National Agricultural Innovation Project (in July 2006) were launched.
5) The terms of trade started favouring agriculture soon after 2005-06, when central government
started a massive increase in procurement prices of food grains aided by a significant increase in
international food prices. At the same time, in 2005, trade in agriculture was opened under the
World Trade Organisation (WTO) agreements.
6) An initiative to reform the domestic agricultural marketing was already undertaken through
Model Agriculture Produce Marketing Committee (APMC) Act, 2003.
The initiatives paid off and the overall growth rate of the economy bounced to 8.57 per cent per
annum and agriculture and allied activities marked an impressive growth of 3.33% per annum.
This period of high growth in the agriculture output has been termed as period of recovery. The
growth movement which picked up after 2004-05 reached its plateau in 2012-13 and thereafter it
started falling. The growth rate in agriculture in the period 2009-10 to 2013-14 was 4.3% per
annum. This is one of the highest growth rates recorded in independent India. The net positive
impact of high growth rate on the economy can be gauged from the fact that the number of
farmer suicide in India came down from 18,241 in 2004 to 11,772 in 2012. The robustness of the
agriculture growth during this period can be supplemented by the instability index, which shows
the year-to-year fluctuations or variability of the production in the agriculture. This is due to
dependence on the rainfall and other vagaries of nature, and is measured by the coefficient of
variation.The coefficient of variation has declined from 2.76% during 1961-1988, to 1.87%
during 1988-2004 and to 0.75% during 2004-2014 (Table 2). It shows that volatility in
agricultural growth has been declining and it was low in the decade (2004-14). Variability in
pulses was very high at 20% and 5% for cereals during 1990-2004. But it declined drastically in
the decade 2005-2014. In other words, resilience to rainfall has been rising for Indian agriculture
during this period.
We have observed that India’s agriculture bounced back to its long term trajectory in this period.
It is pertinent to discuss the important ingredients of growth in this period. The public investment
in agriculture, which observed a declining trend in the post reform period had been reversed. A
significant improvement in public investment was observed followed by private investment in
agriculture. Total gross capital formation as a percentage of agricultural GDP averaged 12.9%
during the five year period ending2003-04. Thereafter, it has continuously risen from 13.5% in
2004-05 to 17.0% in 2012-13. The private investment also flowed positively though moderately
from 10-11% of private investment to the agriculture gross domestic product (GDP) in early
2000s to 14% in 2008-09 and remained at that level thereafter.
Another noticeable features of farm sector growth in this period was overwhelming performance
of Rabi season production compared to the Kharif season production. For the first time, the Rabi
food grain production surpassed the Kharif food grain production between 2004-05 to 2014-15.
Further, a Planning Commission study of the state level growth performance of states found that
high growth occurred not only in the irrigated areas and high productivity states, but in the rain -
fed, low productivity states also in the country.
As a result of the structural changes that took place in the agriculture sector, a quantum jump in
the productivity of the crops has been recorded. An examination of the sources of the growth
during the period 2004-05 to 2014-15 reveals that growth in agriculture output in the study
period was prominently contributed by improvement in the crop yield (Table 3.8). Improvement
in yield contributed maximum to the growth of cereals (92%) followed by foodgrains (88%),
pulses (76%), oilseeds (67%). In case of cotton, the area attributed 31% and yield a 45 %
increased in crop output. Hybrid Bt cotton seeds not only replaced the traditional variety, but
also brought new area under the cotton cultivation. It is clear from Table 13.8 that during the
period of rapid improvement, increase in yield attributed most of the growth registered in crop
production. Lastly, Indian agriculture experienced a rapid drive towards the diversification of
traditional crops to the horticultural crops resulting from the direct consequences of the National
Horticulture Mission which was operationalised in 2005-06. The area under fruits and vegetables
recorded a splendid growth rate of 41.3% and 23.5% per annum respectively during that interval.
Table 8 Growth Rate in Production of Selected Crop Groups and its Decomposition: 2004-
05 to 2014-15
Crop Group Growth Rate(%) Decomposition of Production Change (%)
Producti Interaction
Area Yield on Area effect Yield effect Effect
Foodgrains 0.15 2.57 2.72 9 88 3
Cereals 0.01 2.63 2.64 6 92 2
Pulses 0.73 3.03 3.78 18 76 6
Oilseeds -0.32 2.14 1.81 26 67 7
Cotton 4.44 3.68 8.28 31 45 24
Source: Ramesh Chand and Shrivastva(2017)
In the last two years of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) rule, the growth in the agriculture
output declined.
Agriculture Growth in NDA Rule (2014-15 to 2018-19). In May, 2014 a new National
Democratic Alliance (NDA) government under Prime Minister Narender Modi took charge at the
Centre. As we have observed that the growth movement in the farm sector output, which picked
up from 2004-05 peaked in 2012-13 and thereaftert started falling. If we exclude the year 2014-
15 from the decadal interval, the average growth rate in agriculture improves to 4% per cent per
annum. The Modi government’s performance in the agricultural sector in the first five years in
office is mediocre compared to the growth achieved under the previous period. The growth rate
achieved in the first five years of NDA-II rule was 2.4%, which is significantly lower than the
more than 4 per cent achieved during UPA-II rule. The first two years of Modi’s first tenure in
office had been marred by two successive droughts.The agricultural growth rate declined 0.2% in
2014-15 and it barely grew at 0.6% in 2015-16. A good monsoon in 2016-17 drove the rate to
6.3%. The sector slowed again in 2017-18, with a 3% growth rate. The average agricultural
growth rate under NDA’s five years is 2.3%, which was the lowest since the economic reforms
in India. In Feburary 2016, Prime Minister Modi set an objective of doubling farmers' income by
2022, which signalled a policy shift from production to income enhancement. To meet the above
stated objective of doubling farmers' income, a committee under the chairmanship of former
agriculture secretary Ashok Dalwai was set up to make recommendations in that direction. The
committee came to the conclusion that India’s agriculture ought to grow by 10.4 per cent per
annum in real term to reach that level by 2022. From the level of real growth which has been
achieved during the first five years of Modi government at the Centre, the aim of doubling
farmers' income by the year 2022 appears hard to achieve, but can be met in near future.
Table 9 Agriculture Growth under the National Democratic Alliance –II (2014-18)(In Per
cent)
4. Name three reasons of the poor performance of the agriculture in the initial years of the
post reform period.
i) The first half of the 19th century in India can be categorized as the period of stagnation.
ii) The period from the 2004-05 to 2014-15 has been named as period of recovery.
iii) Despite major reforms in the economy, the performance of agriculture output came down
in the initial years of the reforms.
iv) A number of steps were taken to revive agricultural growth just before 2004-05,
v) In Feburary 2016, the government set an objective of doubling farmers' income by 2022.
A) The shrinking land size: India has 198 million hectares (ha) gross cropped area which is
relatively larger than China where it is 166 million hectares. The average size of the land is
decreasing consistently ever since the agriculture census in this country has been started. The
average size of landholding in India has come down from 2.28 hectares in 1970-71 to 1.08
hectares in 2015-16 and would shrink further in near future. So, one of the challenges before the
country is to raise the production and productivity from the small size farms where it is difficult
to adopt the good quality seeds, capital and technology. It is not so that small size farming is not
efficient or can not be viable. An example from the Chinese economy makes the case clear.
China has an average size of land just 0.7 ha which was 0.46 ha at the time of economic reforms,
and still China produces three times more than what India produces. The message is clear that if
correct incentives are put in the place and right investment is made on infrastructure and
agriculture research and development (R&D), India can make the small farms viable and
sustainable.
Quality Inputs and Efficient Value Chain: Water, seeds, fertilizer and chemicals are the basic
inputs used in the production process and are crucial determinants of the agriculture growth.
Thus timely and sufficient supply of these ingredients are essential for a robust production
system in agriculture.
The Indian agriculture is basically a small holder dominated. One of the key challenges of small
holder agriculture is to build an efficient and inclusive value chain for the different agricultural
commodities. One of the examples of successful small farmers' participation in the value chain is
AMUL in the state of Gujarat. The Government of India’s initiative to motivate the formation of
Farmers Producers' Organizations (FPOs) is a step in right direction. The finance minister has
announced formation of additional 10000 FPOs in union budget 2020, which should link the
exporters/processors and markets so as to realize better prices for the farmers. More than that,
most of the farmers sell their produce at the farm gate or small markets in the hinterland. These
markets lack the modern and scientific equipments for weighing, grading and their functioning is
not transparent resulting in lower value realization by the farmers. There is an urgent need to
upgrade the existing marketing infrastructure so that farmers can receive their rightful dues and a
huge post harvest loss that results from the inefficiency in the system can be corrected.
B. Changing Climatic Patterns: Climate change is a reality. Agriculture is the sector most
vulnerable to climate change due to its high dependence on climate and weather. The people
involved in agriculture are poorer compared with urban residents. Agriculture is part of the
problem and part of the solution. As we know, India has 198 million hectares of gross cropped
area and about 49 per cent of that is irrigated. The rest, more than half of the cropped area
depends on the rains, mainly monsoon rains to irrigate the land. In the last 18 years (2000–01 to
2018–19), India faced droughts in five years (2002, 2004, 2009, 2014 and 2015) and in all of
those, India’s agricultural GDP growth rate and food grain production fell. The sharpest fall in
food grain production was in the year 2002–03 when the rainfall inadequacy was 19.2% and the
annual food grain production fell by more than 38 MMTs. In 2009–10, which was the worst
drought year in recent years, the fall in food grain production was lower compared to 2002–03 at
16.4 MMTs even though the rainfall inadequacy was higher at 21.8%. It has been witnessed that
rainfall pattern has undergone a dynamic change in recent years in India. The variability and
intensity of rainfall in India have recorded major change resulting in droughts in one part of the
country while floods and excess rainfall in other parts of the country.
C India’s population is second largest in the world and very soon it is going to overtake the
population of China. The population pyramid of the country is such that it is dominated by the
young population. The country is the youngest country in the world wherein the median age of
Indians was 29 years in 2019. The urbanization is also increasing at the fastest rate ever since
independence. Thus, the demand for higher value crops, especially vegetables, fruits, eggs, milk
and chicken/mutton will increase in future owing to increase in income and urbanization. Hence,
the challenge before the country is not only to feed the growing population, but also to supply the
nutrients and high value commercial crops to its bulging middle to high income and urban
population. India’s obsession with wheat, rice crop culture has damaged the north western part of
the country. There is an urgent need to shift from the wheat - rice mono crop culture and to high
value low water intensive crops.
Famous economist T.N.Srinivasan once argued the solution to Indian agriculture lies outside the
agriculture and in the non-agriculture sector. The Indian economy has breached the traditional
development strategy and it has moved directly from the primary (agriculture and allied
activities) sector to tertiary (service) sector as dominant output contributing sector by passing
manufacturing sector. The non-agriculture sector and urban growth have been also found
important in reducing the poverty. At the same time, agriculture is found two to three times as
effective in reducing the poverty as relative to the other sectors. Hence, one should adopt a
balanced approach regarding the utility of agriculture and non-agriculture in raising the
agricultural productivity, farm income and reduction of poverty. It is true that India cannot
improve the farm productivity unless a considerable size of the labour force is moved outside the
agriculture sector and fruitfully employed in the non-agriculture sector. At the same time, growth
in the agriculture is important as it is more effective in reducing the rural poverty. You must
notice that the largest source of livelihood comes from the agricultural sector. There has been
more robust backward and forward linkages of agriculture with other sectors of the economy.
Thus, both agriculture and non-agriculture sectors are complementary for the agriculture
population.
Diversification of cropping Pattern: Government policies have been biased towards cereals
particularly rice and wheat. It procures rice and wheat based on minimum support prices in few
states. Cereal-centric policies also provide subsidies for fertilisers, water, power, credit and
seeds. Large part of the subsidy goes to these two crops. These subsidies also benefit large
farmers, few states and irrigated areas and have adverse impact on soil quality, water quantity,
quality and human health. Punjab, Haryana and other states have been focusing mainly on rice
and wheat because of government support to these crops. There is a need to shift from cereal-
centric policies to non-cereal focused policies. Diversification of cropping pattern is obvious for
improving agricultural growth, incomes of farmers and environmental sustainability.
2. Why is it necessary to shift from the wheat - rice mono crop culture to high value low
water intensive crops?
3. Why are the non-agriculture sector and urban growth important in reducing the poverty?
ii) The period from the 2004-05 to 2014-15 has been named as period of recovery.
v) Large part of the subsidy goes to the crops of wheat and rice.
According to all the credible estimates, India’s growth performance during the first half of
nineteenth century was not an impressive one. The growth rate of the primary sector during the
1900-01 to 1946-47 was only 0.46% per annum (pa) which is very low from any standard. The
economy did not show any credible structural change and three-fourth of the work force was
employed in the agriculture throughout the 20th century. That is the reason why economists
called the performance of the Indian economy in the first half of the century as “Static Economy
in Progress”.
The major thrust soon after independence was on institutional and agrarian reforms. India passed
a significant body of land reforms legislation. During this phase, some other steps needed for the
development of agriculture were also taken. These were: the construction of new roads,
provision of additional irrigation facilities through multipurpose projects, provision of additional
credit facilities and production of more fertilizers in the country. Community development
program (CDP) was started to involve people in the process of agricultural and rural
development. Many agricultural research institutions and agricultural universities and colleges
were set up during this period in the country. During the first period, 1949 - 50 to 1964-65 total
crop output in India recorded a trend growth rate of 3.15% pa. This growth rate was fairly high
compared to the pre-independence period and was achieved mainly as a result of increase in
irrigation and net sown area. However, the growth rate of total crop output during 1967- 68 to
1979-80 decelerated to 2.19 % pa. The 1980-81 to 1990-91period witnessed the wider
dissemination of new technology into new areas and extension to new crops resulting in very
impressive growth of the agricultural output from 2.19 % achieved in the earlier period to 3.19%.
The new technology made inroads into new regions of the country which otherwise was confined
to the northwestern states, Punjab, Haryana and western Uttar Pradesh. The new technology was
extended to wheat, rice, maize and a few other commercial crops like cotton, sugarcane and
oilseeds.
The year 2004-05 was a turning point. A substantial increase in the budget outlay was made to
the departments associated with the development of Agriculture, Animal husbandry and
Agriculture Research and Education. The initiatives paid off and the overall growth rate of the
economy bounced to 8.57% per cent per annum and agriculture and allied activities marked an
impressive growth of 3.33% per annum. This period of high growth in the agriculture output has
been termed as period of recovery. Several suggestions have been made to augment agricultural
sector.
Subsidy: Financial contribution of the government to the purchase of fertilizers, pesticides, etc.
by the farmers.
1) India’s Agriculture in colonial period was purely stagnant and declining, discuss.
2) What were the factors responsible for the green revolution in India.
3) Discuss in detail the growth rate of india’s agriculture in the post-independence period.
4) Discuss the causes of deterioration of agriculture growth soon after the reforms.
5) Suggest ways to make agriculture in India vibrant and sustainable.
REFERENCES
Planning Commission (2005): Mid-Term Appraisal of Tenth Five Year Plan (2002-2007),
Government of India, June
Bhalla, G.S (2007), Indian Agriculture Since Independence, National Book Trust, New Delhi.
Soni,R.N(2010), Leading Issues in Agriculture Economics, Vishal Publishing Company,
Jalander(PB).
Gulati et al (2021), Revitalising Indian Agriculture and Boosting Farmers Income. Springer.
DCR.(2018). Dalwai committee report volume 4. https://farmer.gov.in/imagedefault/DFI/DFI%
20Volume%204.pdf..
Mundial, B. (2008). World development report.Agriculture for Development. Washington, DC:
World Bank.
NFHS-4 (2017), National family health survey 2015–16. International Institute for Population
Sciences (IIPS).
Sivasubramonian,S.(2000),The National Income of India in the Twntieth Century, Oxford
University Press, New Delhi.
Blyn,G.,(1966), Agricultural Trends in India,1891-1947,1891-1947, Philadelphia.
Kannan,E&Sundaram,S.(2011), Analysis of Trends in India’s Agricultural Growth. Working
Paper No. 276.The Institute of Social and Economic Change, Bangalore.
Chand, R and Shrivasta,S. (2017), Agriculture Performance in India: Main Trends,
Commercialisation, and Regional Disparities. Rural India Perspective, 2017.NABARD.Oxford
University Press(OUP).
BLOCK 5: Sectoral Development-II: Industrial and Services
In this block you will learn about various Industrial policy resolutions, Industrial policy
statement, Various indicators of industrial growth, phases of growth trends in Indian
industry, Roles and contribution of public and private sector in the economy, difference
in public & private sector, Public- Private partnership (PPP) models, forms, applications
and Challenges, Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) meaning, opportunities
and challenges and their present status in the country, Structure of IT industry and
telecommunications industry, Present status of ICT sector in the economy. The block has
4 units.
Unit-14 deals with‘Industrial Policy of Pre & Post’. The unit begins with the introduction
of industrial policy resolutions. The understanding of industrial policy resolution, 1948,
1956, 1977, 1980 and 1991 drafted by the government and amendments made therein are
provided. Indicators of industrial growth and their significance are than highlighted.
Growth trends in Indian industry are discussed in major four phases. Factors that have
played a defining role in shaping industrial policies after independence were given in the
last.
Unit-15 deals with ‘Public& Private Sector’. The unit begins with the meaning of public
and private sector. Respective roles and contribution of public and private sector in the
economy are described and a comparative view of public and private sector is given.
Definition of Public- private partnership is provided along with the different models of
PPP and their application. In the end, PPP model in India and it various forms and
challengesare outlined.
Unit-16 deals with ‘Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME)’. The unit begins
with the meaning and definition of MSMEs. Features and opportunities of MSMEs are
discussed. Various information technology (IT)initiatives are given. Credit support
initiatives are explained.Highlights of entrepreneurship promotion and development
programmes are then presented. Roles, challenges in growth and development of MSMEs
sector in India are explained thereafter. The chapter ended with the details of the
distribution of MSMEs in India.
Unit-17 deals with ‘Service Sector (ICT & Communication)’. The unit begins with the
brief introduction of IT industry. A list of facilitators of growth of software industry in
India is than provided. Growth drivers of telecommunications industry are discussed.
Role of ICT in economic development and the challenges faced by them are briefly
discussed. A list of ICT products is given along with the government support for ICT
product development is outlined in the last.
Unit-14: Industrial Policy of Pre & Post
Structure
14.0 Objectives
14.1 Introduction
14.2 Industrial Policy Resolution
14.2.1 Industrial Policy Resolution, 1948
14.2.2 Industrial Policy Resolution, 1956
14.2.3 Industrial Policy Statement, 1977
14.2.4 Industrial Policy Statement, 1980
14.3 New Industrial Policy, 1991
14.4 Indicators of Industrial Growth in India
14.5 Let UsSum Up
14.6 Key Words
14.7 Terminal Questions
________________________________________________________________________
14.0 Objectives
________________________________________________________________________
Industrial Policy is defined as the strategic effort by the state to encourage economic
transformation, i.e. the shift from lower to higher productivity activities. Industrial policy
refers to any type of selective government intervention or policy that attempts to alter the
structure of production in favour of sectors that are expected to offer better prospects for
economic growth. So, Industrial Policy is the set of standards and measures set by the
Government to evaluate the progress of the manufacturing sector that ultimately enhances
economic growth and development of the country. It is a vision document that provides a
direction to the government to achieve certain predetermined goals in a stipulated period.
An industrial policy has its pre-decided aims and objective that are to be achieved in the
given time frame. Following can be some of the common objectives of an Industrial
Policy;
• To maintain steady growth in productivity
• To create more employment opportunities
• Utilize the available human resources effectively
• To accelerate GDP growth rate
The Government of India set out in their Resolution dated 6 April, 1948 the policy which
they proposed to pursue in the industrial field. The Resolution emphasised the importance
to the economy of securing a continuous increase in production and its equitable
distribution.It pointed out that the State must play progressively active role in the
development of Industries. It laid down that arms and ammunition, atomic energy and
railway transport would be the monopoly of the Central Government.The State would be
exclusively responsible for the establishment of new undertakings in six basic industries.
If the State realises the necessity to secure the cooperation of private enterprise in the
national interest, the state may do so. The rest of the industrial field was left open to
private enterprise though it was made clear that the State would also progressively
participate in this field. Some of the important take away points this resolution were as
follows;
• Mixed Economy: The Industrial Policy Resolution, 1948 was first major policy of
independent India which was launched to lay the foundation of a mixed
economy.In mixed economy both private and public enterprises would march
hand in hand to accelerate the pace of industrial development. It means there
would be co-existence of public sector and private sector. The decision regarding
price determination, resource allocation and distribution in public sector shall be
taken by the government. Tata Steel, Hero Motors and Hindustan Unilever fall
under the domain of public sector.However, the market shall take all economic
decisions in case of the private sector. Hinduja, Tata and Birla are examples of the
private sector.
• Priority to Small scale and cottage industries: Small scale and cottage industries
were given the importance due to their wide spread, labour intensive nature
andlow capital and low skill requirements.
• Restrictions on foreign investments: The government restricted foreign
investments to protect domestic industries from global competition.
• Industries were divided into 4 categories
• State monopolies:dExclusive monopoly of central government in arms and
ammunitions, production of atomic energy and management of railways.
According to Cambridge Dictionary, “State monopoly is a situation wherein an
organization owned by a government supplies of all particular product or service,
with no competitors”. For example, LIC, Air India and BSNL used to be state
monopoly in India.
• New undertaking undertaken only by state(coal, iron and steel, aircraft
manufacturing, ship building, telegraph, telephone etc).
• Industries to be regulated by the government(Industries of basic importance): The
entire secondary sector was by and large regulated by the government.
• Remaining sectors were open to private enterprise, individuals and cooperatives.
Although, there was not much important left behind for the private sector to
perform outstandingly well.
During the early years after independence, the Government adopted a policy that
favoured industrialization through public sector intervention and giving limited space to
the private sector. The reason was the private sector had neither enough resources not
willingness to undertaken projects of nation building. The private sector unlike the
Government had no capacity to mobilize funds for megaprojects from anywhere.India
needed to develop heavy and basic industries like iron and steel, power generation, heavy
engineering, to name a few.The Industrial Policy Resolution, 1948 – historically
important policy document that declared India as a Mixed economy- was a step towards
right direction to develop industries through state participation. It showed that the Indian
Government had a socialist bent. It provided some ownership rights of assets but at the
same time, the private sector did get some space to participate in the process of
industrialization between 1948 and 1956.
The Industrial Policy Resolution of 1948 was followed by the Industrial Policy
Resolution of 1956.The objective was to accelerate the rate of economic growth and the
speeding up of industrialisation as a means of achieving a socialist pattern of society. It
was regarded as the “Economic Constitution of India” or “The Bible of State Capitalism”.
In 1956, capital was scarce and the base of entrepreneurship not strong enough. Hence,
the 1956 Industrial Policy Resolution gave primacy to the role of the State to assume a
predominant and direct responsibility for industrial development. The 1956 Policy
emphasised the need to expand the public sector, to build up a large and growing
coop-erative sector and to encourage the separation of ownership and management in
private in-dustries and, above all, prevent the rise of private monopolies.
The Industrial Policy Resolution - 1956 was shaped by the Mahalanobis Model of
growth. This Model suggested for a shift in the pattern of industrial investment towards
building up a domestic consumption goods sector.This requiredinvestment in building a
capacity in the production of capital goods or heavy industries leading to an economy
with a long term higher growth path. It provided the basic framework for the
government’s policy in regard to industries till June 1991.
The Industrial Policy Resolution - 1956 classified industries into three categories;
a) Schedule A: The first category comprised 17 industries (included in Schedule A of
the Resolution). These industries were exclusively under the domain of the
Government. These included inter alia, railways, air transport, arms and ammunition,
iron and steel and atomic energy.
b) Schedule B:The second category comprised 12 industries (included in Schedule B of
the Resolution). These industries were envisaged to be progressively State owned but
private sector was expected to supplement the efforts of the State.
c) Third Category:The third category contained all the remaining industries and it was
expected that private sector would initiate development of these industries. The
industries would remain open for the State as well.
The Resolution widened the scope of the public sector, rather established the dominance
of the public sector in most of the key areas of the economy. Some of the public sector
enterprises grew too big in size. It was envisaged that the State would facilitate and
encourage development of these industries in the private sector, in accordance with the
programmes formulated under the Five Year Plans. The appropriate fiscal measures and
adequate infrastructure would be insured. Despite the demarcation of industries into
separate categories, the Resolution was flexible enough to allow the required adjustments
and modifications in the national interest.
Following the Theory of Infant Industry Argument, the domestic industry was protected
from global competition, through import quota, import licensing and other import trade
barriers. However, the IPR 1956 came in for sharp criticism from the private sector since
this Resolution reduced the scope for the expansion of the private sector significantly.The
IPR, 1956 was a landmark policy statement and it formed a basis of subsequent policy
announcements.
This Statement emphasized decentralization of industrial sector with increased role for
small scale, tiny and cottage industries. It also provided for close interaction between
industrial and agricultural sectors. Highest priority was accorded to power generation and
transmission. It expanded the list of items reserved for exclusive production in the small
scale sector from 180 to more than 500. For the first time, within the small scale sector, a
tiny unit was created. The tiny unit is defined as a unit with investment in machinery and
equipment up to Rs0.1million and situated in towns or villages with a population of less
than 50,000 (as per 1971 census). Basic goods, capital goods, high technology industries
important for development of small scale and agriculture sectors were clearly delineated
for large scale sector. It was also stated that foreign companies that diluted their foreign
equity up to 40 per cent under Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) 1973 were to be
treated at par with the Indian companies. Fully owned foreign companies were allowed
only in highly export oriented sectors or sophisticated technology areas. For all approved
foreign investments, companies were completely free to repatriate capital and remit
profits, dividends, royalties, etc. Further, in order to ensure balanced regional
development, it was decided not to issue fresh licenses for setting up new industrial units
within certain limits of large metropolitan cities (more than 1 million population) and
urban areas (morethan 0.5 million population).
Policy measures were announced to revive the efficiency of public sector undertakings
(PSUs) by developing the management cadres in functional fields viz., operations,
finance, marketing and information system. An automatic expansion of capacity up to
five per cent per annum was allowed, particularly in the core sector and in industries with
long-term export potential. Special incentives were granted to industrial units which were
engaged in industrial processes and technologies aiming at optimum utilization of energy
and the exploitation of alternative sources of energy. In order to boost the development of
small scale industries, the investment limit was raised to Rs.2 million in small scale units
and Rs.2.5 million in ancillary units. In the case of tiny units, investment limit was raised
to Rs.0.2 million.
Self-assessment Exercise A
1. What are the objectives of industrial policy?
…………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………
MRTP…………………………………………………………………………………
MNC……………………………………………………………………………………
IPR………………………………………………………………………………..…
……………………………………………………………………………………...
…………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………
________________________________________________________________________
14.3 New Industrial Policy, 1991
________________________________________________________________________
In India, regulatory mechanisms were enforced in various ways. For instance, industrial
licensing under which every entrepreneur had to get permission from government
officials to start a firm, close a firm or decide the amount of goods that could be
produced. Private sector was not allowed in many industries. Some goods could be
produced only in small-scale industries, and controls on price fixation and distribution of
selected industrial products. During late 1980s and early 1990s, India faced high level of
debt, double digit inflation, slow GDP growth and Balance of Payment (BOP) crisis. The
Government’s financial health was unsound and it was on the verse of collapse. The
reasons put forth by experts included high tax rates, industrial licensing, MRTP act and
FERA, among others.
The New Industrial Policy, 1991 had the main objective of providing facilities to market
forces and to increase efficiency.
Industrial licensing, under the broad umbrella of economic reforms, was abolished for all
industries, except those specified, irrespective of levels of investment. That means,
anyone can set an industrial unit without obtaining a license except certain conditions.
These specified industries (Annex-II), will continue to be subject to compulsory licensing
for reasons related to security and strategic concerns, social reasons, problems related to
safety and over-riding environmental issues, manufacture of products of hazardous nature
and articles of elitist consumption. The exemption from licensing aimed at helping many
dynamic small and medium entrepreneurs who have been unnecessarily hampered by the
licensing system. As a whole the Indian economy will benefit by becoming more
competitive, more efficient and modern and will take its rightful place in the world of
industrial progress.
With a view to injecting the desired level of technological dynamism in Indian industry,
Government provides automatic approval for technology agreements related to high
priority industries within specified parameters. Indian companies are free to negotiate the
terms of technology transfer with their foreign counterparts according to their own
commercial judgement. The predictability and independence of action that this measure is
providing to Indian industry is inducing them to develop indigenous competence for the
efficient absorption of foreign technology. Greater competitive pressure induces our
industry to invest much more in research and development than they have been doing in
the past.
Public Sector Policy: The public sector has been central to our philosophy of
development. In the pursuit of our development objectives, public ownership and control
in critical sectors of the economy has played an important role in preventing the
concentration of economic power. It reduces the regional disparities and ensures that
planned development serves the common good. The Industrial Policy Resolution of 1956
gave the public sector a strategic role in economic development. Massive investments
have been made post-independence to build a public sector which has a commanding role
in the economy. Today key sectors of the economy are dominated by mature public
enterprises that have successfully expanded production, opened up new areas of
technology and built up a reserve of technical competence in a number of areas.
After the initial success of the public sector entering new areas of industrial and technical
competence, a number of problems have begun to manifest themselves in many of the
public enterprises. Serious problems are observed in the insufficient growth in
productivity, poor project management, over-manning, lack of continuous technological
upgradation, and inadequate attention to R&D and human resource development. In
addition, public enterprises have shown a very low rate of return on the capital
investment. This has inhibited their ability to regenerate themselves in terms of new
investments as well as in technology development. The result is that many of the public
enterprises have become a burden rather than being an asset to the Government.
The disinvestment process of CPSEs (Central Public Sector Enterprises) in India was
initiated inthe year 1991 with the advent of Government’s new economic policy.
Disinvestment was started mainlythrough sale of minority shareholding in CPSEs and has
considerably evolved over the years influenced bymarket conditions. This is done to
bridge resources gap, and recommendation of bodies like Rangarajan committee and GV
Ramakrishna Disinvestment commission. In 1996, the Government of India set up a
Disinvestment Commission under the Ministry of Industries.The mandate of the
commission was to assess the viability and advice the Government on disinvesting
various PSE's.Many important PSEs like Bharat Aluminium Corporation Limited, Videsh
Sanchar Nagar Limited, Lodhi Hotel, Computer Maintenance Company, Hindustan Zinc
and many more were either privatized or disinvested. Department of Investment and
Public Asset Management (DIPAM) under the Ministry of Finance, Government of India
is tasked with the entire process of disinvestment in India. Disinvestment helped
Government realize massive funds that could be used for welfare activities and financing
of infrastructural developmental projects. However, some of the funds have also been
diverted towards financing of the public debt in the country.
Every year, the government fixes a target for disinvestment of PSEs. For instance, in
1991-92, it was targeted to mobilise Rs 2500 crore through disinvestment. The
government was able to mobilise Rs 3,040 crore more than the target. In 2017–18, the
target was about Rs 1,00,000 crore, and the achievement was about Rs 1,00,057 crore.
Critics point out that the assets of PSEs have been undervalued and sold to the private
sector. This means that there has been a substantial loss to the government and the
outright sale of public assets. Moreover, the proceeds from disinvestment are used to
offset the shortage of government revenues rather than using it for the development of
PSEs and building social infrastructure in the country.
The Disinvestment program has come a long way from the cautious start made in fiscal
1991-92 when small stakes in select CPSEs was divested to financial institutions alone.
As on 31st January, 2018, CPSEs constituted 10.93% and 11.04% of the total market
capitalization of companies listed at BSE and NSE respectively. Government strategies of
disinvestment have taken shape over the years and have been influenced by political
compulsions, budgetary constraints, market conditions and ideology of ruling political
party at the Centre. In a haste of fund-raising funds through privatization/disinvestment,
the government has resorted to multiple shortcuts in the disinvestment process.It has
compromised both the long-term interests of profitable PSUs, and the basic objectives of
the disinvestment programme itself.
There are disadvantages of economic reforms as well. Reforms leads to too much of
dependence on market resulting into unreasonable price rise, undesired allocation of
resources and regional unbalance in the economic development. Availability of funds for
social welfare like health and education and social security benefits etc. may decrease.
Economic reforms increase exposure to global competition eventually leading to Indian
firms, particularly small scale industries, struggling to survive in the long. Undue
political/policy interference by multinational companies may be risky from the point of
view of national security as well as political stability of the nation. Reforms may increase
temptation of the Government to sell profit making public sector enterprises as well. The
process of globalisation through liberalisation and privatisation policies has produced
positive, as well as, negative results both for India and other countries. Some scholars
argue that globalisation should be seen as an opportunity in terms of greater access to
global markets, high technology and increased possibility of large industries of
developing countries to become important players in the international arena. On the
contrary, the critics argue that globalisation is a strategy of the developed countries to
expand their markets in other countries. According to them, it has compromised the
welfare and identity of people belonging to poor countries. It has further been pointed out
that market driven globalisation has widened the economic disparities among nations and
people.
________________________________________________________________________
14.4 Indicators of Industrial Growth
________________________________________________________________________
Indian industry sometimes grew fast, sometimes faster but at times at much slower rates.
The pattern of growth was never same for all years post-independence. The growth trends
in Indian industry can be discussed in various phases as follows.
India Industrial Production
P
Sourcee:https://trad
dingeconomiics.com/india/industrial--production
The year 2004-05 started on a positive note in April 2004 with annual growth of 8.9% in
the Index of Industrial Production (IIP). The year 2004-05 conforms to the normal
historic pattern of industrial buoyancy, 8.4% growth, following a good agricultural year.
The Indian economy has inched closer to the Chinese economy with its dominant
manufacturing sector.
Sectoral Growth Rates as per IIP (%) calculated w.r.t. previous year
Sub-Sector Mining Manufacturing Electricity General
Weights 14.37 77.63 7.99 100.00
2012-13 -5.3 4.8 4.0 3.3
2013-14 -0.1 3.6 6.1 3.3
2014-15 -1.4 3.8 14.8 4.0
2015-16 4.3 2.8 5.7 3.3
2016-17 5.3 4.4 5.8 4.6
2017-18 2.3 4.6 5.4 4.4
2018-19 2.9 3.9 5.2 3.8
2019-20 1.6 -1.4 1.0 -0.8
2020-21 -7.8 -9.6 -0.5 -8.4
Source: RBI
Annual Growth Rates as per IIP (%) calculated w.r.t. previous year
Use- Primary Capital Intermediate Infrastructure/ Consumer Consumer
based goods goods goods construction durables non-
category goods durables
Weight 34.05 8.22 17.22 12.34 12.84 15.33
2012-13 0.5 0.3 5.1 5.4 4.9 6.1
2013-14 2.3 -3.7 4.6 5.7 5.6 3.7
2014-15 3.8 -1.1 6.1 5 4 3.8
2015-16 5 3 1.5 2.8 3.4 2.6
2016-17 4.9 3.2 3.3 3.9 2.9 7.9
2017-18 3.7 4 2.3 5.6 0.8 10.6
2018-19 3.5 2.7 0.9 7.3 5.5 4
2019-20 0.7 -13.9 9.1 -3.6 -8.7 -0.1
2020-21 -7 -18.6 -9.4 -8.7 -15 -2.2
Source: RBI
It is important to note that the annual growth rate as per the IIP data for the period
between 2012-13 and 2020-21 shows that movement has relatively slowed down to
below 5% in all the sub-sectors of industrial sector, be it primary goods or capital goods.
Further, the growth rates of the three major sub-sectors of manufacturing, namely,
mining, manufacturing and electricity, one can see a downward trend during the same
period. Slowdown in industrial performance is not a good sign for overall economy of the
country because, for instance, manufacturing, value added (% of GDP) in India was
reported at 12.96 % of GDP in 2020. The COVID-19 pandemic is visibly having an
adverse impact on the industrial activities in India.
Self-assessment Exercise B
1) Write four features of new industrial policy, 1991.
………………………………………………………………………………..........
………………………………………………………………………………..........
………………………………………………………………………………..........
2) Write three advantages of foreign investment.
…………………………………………………………………………………......
………………………………………………………………………………..........
…………………………………………………………………………………......
3) What do you mean by Liberalization, Privatization and Globalization?
………………………………………………………………………………….….
……………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………………..
________________________________________________________________________
14.5 Let Us Sum Up
________________________________________________________________________
Short questions
1. Define industrial policy.
2. Distinguish between privatization and disinvestment.
3. Define industrial licensing.
4. Explain the meaning globalization.
5. Define liberalization.
6. Give two reasons behind privatization of public sector enterprises.
7. How was the state of economic affairs of the economy of India during the early
years of 1990s that led to LPG reforms in the country?
Essay type of questions
1. Discuss in detail Industrial Policy Resolution, 1956.
2. Explain in detail LPG reforms initiated in India since 1991.
3. Discuss how state controls and regulations like MRTP Act, FERA and Industrial
Licensing acted as obstacles on the road of industrialization.
4. Discuss in detail indicators of industrial growth in India.
Note: These questions/exercise will help you understand the unit better. Try to
write answers for them. But do not submit your answers to the University for
assessment. These are for your practice only.
________________________________________________________________________
Further reading
________________________________________________________________________
The following textbooks and online resources can be referred for further in-depth
reading on the topics discussed in this unit.
Ahluwalia, I.J. and I.M.D., Little (1998). India’s Economic Reforms and
Development, Oxford University Press, New Delhi.
Bhagwati, Jagdish (2004).In Defense of Globalization, Ukraine: Oxford University
Press, March.
Baldev, Raj Nayar (2014). Globalization and India's Economic Integration, South
Asia in World Affairs Series, Georgetown University Press.
Bhattacharjee, Govind (2020). Public Sector Enterprises in India: Evolution,
Privatisation and Reforms, New Delhi: Sage Publications, July 29.
Bhaduri, Amit and Deepak Nayyar (1996). The Intelligent Person’s Guide to
Liberalisation, Penguin, Delhi.
Government of India Handbook of Industrial Policy and Statistics (Various Issues),
Office of Economic Adviser, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, New Delhi.
Guha, Ashok (Ed.) (1990). Economic Liberalisation, Industrial Structure and
Growth in India. Oxford University Press, New Delhi.
Handbook of Statistics on Indian Economy, Reserve Bank of India for various years,
Mumbai.
Mohan, Rakesh (Ed.) (2017). India Transformed: 25 Years of Economic Reforms,
Brookings Institution Press, August 23.
Sachs, Jeffrey D., AshutoshVarshney and NirupamBajpai (1999). India in the Era of
Economic Reforms, Oxford University Press, New Delhi.
Jalan, Bimal (1996). India’s Economic Policy: Preparing for the Twenty First
Century, Viking, Delhi.
Online references:
https://ncert.nic.in/textbook/pdf/jess204.pdf
https://ncert.nic.in/textbook/pdf/keec103.pdf
https://dipam.gov.in
Unit-15: Public and Private Sector
Structure
15.0 Objectives
15.1 Introduction
15.2 Concept and features of Public Sector and Private Sector
15.2.1 Concept and features of Public Sector
15.2.2 Concept and features of Private Sector
15.3 Role and Importance of the Public Sector and Private
Sector
15.3.1 Role and Importance of the Public Sector
15.3.2 Role and Importance of the Private Sector
15.4 Difference between Public & Private Sector
15.5 Public-Private Partnership Model and Application
15.6 India and PPP Model
15.7 Forms of PPP in India
15.7.1 Government Incentives for PPPs
15.7.2 Challenges before PPPs
15.7.3 Way Forward
15.8 Let Us Sum Up
15.9 Key Terms
15.10 Terminal exercises
1
15.0 Objectives
After studying this unit, you will be able to:
• Explain the meaning of public and private sector;
• Describe the respective roles of public and private sector in the economy;
• Give a comparative view of public and private sector;
• Discuss the contribution of public and private sector in India;
• Define the public-private partnership;
• Analyse the different models of PPP and their application;
• Indicate the challenges before PPP in India;
15.1 Introduction
Private sector is managed by private individuals. The primary focus of
companies in the private sector is making a profit. Private sector entities have
less exposure to government interference. There are numerous types of
undertakings in the private sector like retail, manufacturing, local services etc.
The role of the private sector is integral to the development of an economy. Not
only does the private sector contribute to national income, but it is also a
principal job provider. The private sector needs a good public sector and stable
macro-economic environment.
The public sector is owned and managed by the government (central, state and
local). Governments provide public goods. Many argue that national defense is
an important public good because the security of the nation benefits all its
citizens which is financed through taxation. Individual countries will reach
different decisions as to which goods and services should be considered public
goods, and this is often reflected in their national budgets. Both the public and
private sector have a role to play.Choosing the right policies to promote
economic growth and development is essential.
In India,since 1991 private sector financing through public-private partnerships
(PPP) has become increasingly popular as a way of procuring, renewing and
maintaining public sector infrastructure in many sectors such as social
infrastructure, transportation, public utilities, communications, government
offices and others in which public services are provided.
2
In this unit you will learn the concept of public and private sector, their role in
the economy and a comparison of both the sectors. Along with this the
relationship between them is explained through the concept of public-private
partnership. The Government has focused on developing several enabling tools
and activities to spur private sector investments in India through public-private
partnerships (PPPs).
3
The private sector will not provide public goods because of the free-rider
problem.This problem happens because some members of a community fail to
contribute their fair share to the costs of a shared resource. Free riding is
considered a failure of the market system. Non-payment for the service/good
makes it infeasible to produce economically.
A mixed economy has a mixture of the both public and private sectors. India has
a mixed economy and the mixture depends on requirements of the economy to
balance profit-making and social welfare.
The public sector includes all government organizations, including the central
government, states, and local. Some government agencies operate as
“corporations.” These agencies are established by an act of Parliament to provide
public services.
Features of public sector: Following are important feature of the public sector:
(i) More stable business and services: Businesses and services in
the public sector are more stable than private ones. By and large
they are not profit driven.
(ii) Job security: Job security and other related facilities is one of the
many appealing features public sector possess and provide a
better and congenial working environment. Working in or with
the public sector holds many advantages for employees, and
consumers.
(iii) Reinvestment of profits: Whatever profits earned are reinvested
in the business and the community.
(iv) Ownership and Control: In India, the public sector ownership,
control and management by a government body can be complete
or partial. These companies usually come under specific
ministries and are functionally administered by them.It is to be
noted that there are types of public sector organisations which
4
include departmental undertakings (e.g. Railways, Posts, etc.),
statutory corporationse.g. SBI, LIC, etc.) and government
companies(e.g. HPCL, IOCL, etc.).
The private sector is a part of the national economy that is not owned by the
government. They conduct their operation through companies or entrepreneurs
who mainly focus on earning profit and seekcustomer’s satisfaction.Companies
in the private sector are usually free from state ownership or control. However,
sometimes the private sector can collaborate with the government in a public-
private partnership to jointly deliver a service or business venture to the
community. The private sector makes up a big part of Indian economy.The
extent of private sector participation in infrastructurevaries across sectors and with
the level of national economic development.
Features of the private sector: The main features of the private sector are:
(i) Profit motive: Profits provide reward for the risk taken and the
required return on capital.
(ii) Private ownership and control: Private entrepreneurs own, control
and manage the business. Each formation has its benefits and
legalities depending upon the number of employees, source of
funding, business scale, and government regulations.
(a) When the ownership belongs to a single person, company
is referred to as a sole proprietorship. It is a business
owned, incorporated, and sustained by one person. The
proprietor can employ others for conducting and managing
the business. It bears an unlimited liability towards the
business debts. Privately owned small- and medium-size
businesses constitute the bulk of the private sector. Small
professional entities, like doctors' and lawyers' offices,
plumbers, technicians, contractors, developers and
designers etc. also fall under this category.
5
(b) Under partnershipa group of persons jointly own a firm.In
partnerships, two or more people come together to conduct
a business. It has lesser legal compliances than a company.
The partners are subjected to unlimited personal liability on
the business debts.
(c) A joint-stock company is a business owned by its investors,
with each investor owning a share based on the amount of
stock purchased. Joint-stock companies are formed in order
to access huge amount of finance for large scale production
which is not possible for an individual to fund. It is created
to fulfil organizational goals. A company is often funded
by debt-equity. It enjoys a separate legal identity and has
certain rights. The owners of a company are called
shareholders. These are the people who invest capital and
are the prime decision-makers for business-related matters.
Employees usually work under a board of directors. The
directors are responsible for carrying the business of a
company based on the decisions taken by the shareholders
in the Annual General Meeting.Large Corporate firms
constitute the most prominent entities of the private sector.
Their importance results from exerting considerable
political and economic influence. Government agencies
exercise regulations on them but do not control them.
(iii) No state interference: There is no interference by the governments in
the ownership and control of a private sector firm. However, any
business or corporate entity operating in the country must operate
under the laws of the land.
(iv) Independent management: The management of the private sector
firm wholly depends on its owners. A sole proprietorship firm is
managed by the ownerwho takesall the decisions and acts on behalf
of the company in legal matters. In the case of management of a
joint-stock company a group of directors who are elected
representatives of the shareholders are responsible for the operation
of the company.
6
(v) Private finance: The private sector firms raise capital from their
owners or shareholders by varied means. Under a sole proprietorship
the owner contributes capital, and partners invest capital in case of a
partnership. A joint-stock company raises capital through the issue
of share and debentures (a type of long-term debt). It is well to
remember that it depends on the financial strength of the firm,
companies with sounds financials have better options to mobilize
more funds from the market.
(vi) Work culture of employees: The private sector has a competitive
work culture andemployees’performance is very important for
career growth and higher compensation.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
3. Give four features of private sector?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
4. Point out four important features of public sector?
7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------
15.3 The Role and Importance of the Public and Private Sector
You have learnt about the concepts and features of Public Sector and Private
Sector. Let us now learn the role and importance of Public Sector and Private
Sector.
In early years of India’s independence, capital was scarce and the base of
entrepreneurship was also not strong enough. Hence, the 1956 Industrial Policy
Resolution gave primacy to the role of the public sector which was directly
responsible for industrial development. The strategies for the public sector were
later outlined in the policy statements in the years 1973, 1977, 1980 and 1991.
The year 1991 can be termed as the watershed year, heralding liberalisation of
the Indian economy.
The public sector provided the required thrust to the economy and developed and
nurtured the human resources, the vital ingredient for success of any
enterprise.The public sector emerged as the driver of economic growth. In India,
the public sector is made up of different manufacturing and services which are
run by the government. This is evident from the fact that starting with heavy
capital goods industries, services like transport, communication, and further
extended to academic institutions (schools, colleges, universities, libraries),
8
health services (institutions and hospitals) to various welfare services. The public
sector as a whole employs millions of peoples in India. It provides a lot of job
opportunities for those interested in a range of career paths.
Over the years, operations of PSEs covers a wide range of activities in the
manufacturing, engineering, steel, heavy machinery, machine tools, fertilizers,
drugs, textiles, pharmaceuticals, petro-chemicals, extraction and refining of
crude oil and services such as telecommunication, trading, tourism, warehousing,
etc. and a range of consultancy services.
Challenges before public sector: With the advent of globalization, the public
sector faced new challenges. No longer the public sector had the privilege of
operating in a sellers’ market and had to face competition both from domestic
and international competitors. Since 1980s there has been a feeling that the
public sector is a burden for the economy. This is largely because of the factors
like (Giovanni Tria, 2014):
(iii) hyper-regulation,
(v) inefficiency,
Technologies can change the public sectors as they have changed a lot of areas in
the private one.Giovanni Tria (2014) emphasised that “the public sector must
take the opportunity coming from the digital innovation to change the way of
thinking: the power does not arise from the ownership of data, but from the
9
quality of services.Digital transformation can create a new relationship between
public and private sector”.
Liberalising and deregulatory steps were initiated from the year 1991 onwards.
Since then, the thrust has been on reduction of areas reserved exclusively for
public sector and disinvestment of equity of selected public sector enterprises
(PSEs).It was recognised that public enterprises could not compete effectively
with private entrepreneurs without freedom to function and operate
commercially. The public sector needs to change its way of thinking. Financing
the economy’s infrastructure needs will require greater outlays from the public
sector and a more-than-proportionate increase in private investment.
Many scholars have argued that public sector must not venture into those areas,
where the private sector could undertake job efficiently and emphasis was laid
on market driven economy. As of 2022, policy makers getting convinced that
role of the government should be that of a facilitator and regulator rather than the
producer and manager.
The private sector has many roles concerning the society and national
economy.The role of private sector is explained below:
10
(ii) Generate employment: The private sector plays the pivotal role of
generating employment opportunities in the country. Private firms
employ a major portion of the labour force and act as the backbone of
employment.
(iii) Assist in development: The private sector enhances the process of
industrialization. By introducing new commodities, equipment,
machinery and technology, companies in the private sector produce
innovative ideas that modify methods of production and lead to better
economic development. The intense competition forces the companies
to develop newer technologies and ways to cut down resource wastage.
Also, to satisfy the customers better, companies develop innovative
products and services that have improved the quality of life.
(iv) Provision of goods and services: The sector is responsible for providing
essential goods and services to most citizens of the country at a
competitive price.
(v) Promote diversification of business: The private sector encompasses
varied businesses and provides new companies with the opportunity to
develop no matter the type of business. With this freedom, private
companies are able to diversify their operations.
(vi) Some industrial houses in India have played a major role in
industrialisation of the country. They are often cited as examples of
successful entrepreneurs in the country. Though some have existed
since the pre-independence time, others have come up later. Successful
diversification has been an important feature of operation of the
industrial houses.
The importance of private sector in Indian economy since 1990s has been
enormous. Liberalisation has led to inflow of foreign direct investment (FDI)
along with modern technology, which provided ample incentive to private sector
to grow faster. This also fueled competition amongst same industry players as
well as in public sector enterprises.
There has been faster increase in total investment of private sector. These
investments were made in sectors like financial services, transport, social
services, manufacturing, infrastructure, agriculture products, information
11
technology and telecommunication. Manufacturing companies covering sectors
like automobile, chemicals, textiles, agri-foods, computer hardware,
telecommunication equipment, and petrochemical products are the main driver
of growth of Indian economy. As of early 2022, the trend shows a marked
increase in investment in areas covering pharmaceutical, biotechnology,
semiconductor, contract research and product research and development.
Both have a role in the economy: For the progress and development of the
country, both the sectors must go hand in hand as only one sector cannot lead the
country to the path of success.Stiglitz (2016) has highlighted that in all successful
economies, private sector has played an important role. MSME’s have played an
especially important role in job creation. But MSME’s often face special
problems in accessing finance.
12
(ii) Ownership: Individuals own private-sector businesses.
Governmental agencies arenot owned by individuals; they are
owned by and operate on behalf of the public through
officials.
(iii) In the private sector working environment is quite competitive
which is missing in the public sector because they are not
established to meet commercial objectives. The employees of
the public sector have the security of the job along with that
they are given the benefits of allowances, perquisites, and
retirement benefits like gratuity, pension, etc. which are
generally not available in the case of the private sector.
(iv) Employment: Employment differs between the public and
private sectors. In the public sector, civil service employees
work for central, state, or local government agencies. They
receive pay and benefits under different systems than private
employees. In the private sector, employers have more
flexibility. Each employer can set its own employment rules,
as long as they abide by central and state employment laws.
13
In general public sector uses seniority for promoting employees, however, merit
cum seniority is also taken as a base for promoting employees. Unlike private
sector, where performance is everything, and so merit is considered as a
parameter to promote them.
Check your progress II
1. What is the role of the private sector?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------
2. Who is the single biggest creator of jobs?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------
3. Highlight four importance of public sector in Indian economy?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------
4. What goes wrong in public sector? Give four factors.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------
5. Distinguish between Public sector and Private sector?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------
14
6. Indicate four challenges faced by private sector?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------
15.5 Public-Private Partnership Model and Application
The expression PPP is a widely used concept world over but is often not clearly
defined.World Bank (2012) has defined“public–private partnership (PPP) as a
long-term contract between a private party and a government agency for
providing a public asset or service, in which the private party bears significant
risk and management responsibility”. Private sector businesses leverage
governmental assets and resources while developing, financing, owning and
operating public facilities or services.
The private sector may also contribute investment capital depending on the form
of contract. As regards allocation of risks, the design of contract should take into
account who are best able to manage those risks so that costs are minimizedalong
with improvementin performance.
Rationale for PPPs:There are following major aspects that drive governments to
enter into PPPs for infrastructure projects. (ADB 2008):
15
(iii) The intention is to push reform through a reallocation of roles,
incentives, and accountability. PPP provides an opportunity to
reallocate respective roles of public and private sector.
(iv) Setting the optimal level of private-sector participation and risk
transfer should result in projects being completed on time and
on budget. Private-sector risk-management capabilities look at
the entire spectrum of relevant risks, often with a particular
focus on their potential commercial and financial effects.
In meeting the public needs there exists a growing acceptance that private sector
partnerships serve as an additional and complementary instrument to supply of
infrastructure and services. However, there are no any standardized and globally
accepted schemes of public and private sector relations which fit to all
economies. Governments choose the level and coverage of private sector
engagement in consistent with economic profile, fiscal condition and business
environment.
How to make PPPs a successful venture? PPPs are complex arrangements and
can create potential problems for both the public and the private sectors if they
are not properly designed and administered. This requires precautionary
measures for the success of PPPs. Ultimately, the success of PPPs depends not
only on developing mutual trust between government officials and private sector
executives, but on building and maintaining public confidence in the integrity of
the partnerships (Rondinelli, 2004). For PPPs to work effectively, governments
must retain responsibility and accountability for deciding among competing
objectives; define chosen objectives for services provision; set standards, criteria,
output targets; and safeguard the broader public interest. To implement PPP
transaction requires the passage of laws and establishment of separate regulatory
bodies. This is essential for the success of a PPP project.
16
(ii) The purpose is to make use of private sector’s expertise in commerce,
management, operations, and innovation to run the business efficiently.
(iii) Governments contract with private organizations takes place
through three types of contracts:
a. Service contracts. Contracts with a private firm to provide a
specific service for a specified period of time.
b. Management Contracts. Contracts to provide services more
efficiently while maintaining ownership control.
c. Lease Contracts. Used extensively for both public services and
commercial operations.
(iv) Co-ownership or co-financing of projects,
(v) Build operate-transfer (BOT) arrangements,
(vi) Governments around the world use turnkey projects with consortia of
private companies to build telecommunications, transport, shipping,
airport, utility, and water and sewerage infrastructure.
(vii) There are benefits for both citizens and governments in PPP
arrangement. PPPs facilitate to the generation of resources and
knowledge transfer.
In the Indian context, the term PPP is used very loosely. According to the
National Public Private Partnership Policy 2011, “a Public Private Partnership
(PPP) means an arrangement between the government/statutory
entity/government owned entity on one side and a private sector entity on the
other, for the provision of public assets and/or public services, through
investments being made and/or management being undertaken by the private
sector entity. This is done for a specified period of time, where there is well
defined allocation of risk between the private sector and the public entity.The
private entity receives performance linked payments that conform (or are
17
benchmarked) to specified and pre-determined performance standards,
measurable by the public entity or its representative”.
Since the need of infrastructural development in India is on the rise, the public
private partnership is the way to go forward as it provides innovation, diversity,
and higher productivity, efficient and cost effective delivery of projects. With the
announcement of industrial policy of July 1991, a new wave for PPP was felt and
it was decided to allow private participation in the power sector which opened up
the doors for independent power producers. The National Highways Act, 1956
was altered in 1995 to empower private support. In 1994, through a focused
offering process, licenses were conceded to eight-cell cellular telephone utility
administrators in four metro urban areas and 14 administrators in 18 state circles.
The main objectives of pursuing PPP model in India relate to the following:
(i) Better infrastructure.
(ii) Risk sharing.
(iii) Optimum allocation of resources.
(iv) Innovations.
(v) Aid in growth of other sectors.
(vi) The catalyst for the economy.
(vii) More employment generation.
(viii) Improve the image of the country.
(ix) Attract foreign direct investment (FDI).
For smooth operation of PPP a separate wing has been setupin 2006 under
Department of Economic Affairs (DEA), Ministry of Finance. This wing acts as
the Secretariat for Public Private Partnership Appraisal Committee (PPPAC),
Empowered Committee (EC), and Empowered Institution (EI) for the projects
proposed for financial support through Viability Gap Fund (VGF).
The PPP Cell is responsible for policy level matters concerning PPPs, including
policies, schemes, programmes, model concession agreements and capacity
building. The PPP Cell is also responsible for matters and proposals relating to
clearance by PPPAC, scheme for financial support to PPPs in infrastructure
(VGF Scheme) and India Infrastructure Project Development Fund (IIPDF).
18
15.7 Forms of PPP in India
In India PPPs take a wide range of forms varying in the degree of purpose,
involvement of the private entity, legal structure and risk sharing. The private
sector participation in the infrastructure building have broadly been taken place
through corporatisation of existing PSUs (e.g. GAIL, ONGC, IOC, etc),
greenfield investment for development of new projects. PPP in the form of BOT
or BOOT model in the road sector and concession agreements with the private
sector such as rehabilitate, operate, and transfer (Lakshmanan, 2008). India
majorly follows 3 types of PPP models out of many models available. They are:
(i) Hybrid Annuity Model (HAM)
(ii) Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT)
(iii) Engineer-Procure-Construct (EPC)
HAM is a mixture of BOT and EPC where the financing, risks, operations, etc,
are distributed between Government and a private partner. Look at Table 15.1
which shows the difference in these models:
(source: https://www.jatinverma.org/public-private-partnership-in-india)
19
(i) BOT (build operate transfer) models used for two-thirds of the
total PPP projects in India. User-fee based BOT model widely
used in medium- to large-scale projects, especially in energy
and transport (road, ports and airports). Annuity-based BOT
model commonly used in sectors/projects not meant for cost
recovery by levying a fee on sectors such as health and
education.
(ii) Modified design-build (turnkey) contracts yield time and cost saving
benefits; also enable efficient risk-sharing and improve quality.
(iii) Performance- based management/ maintenance contracts
suitable for sectors (water supply, sanitation, solid waste
management and road maintenance) constrained by the
availability of economic resources to improve efficiency
20
are built on the PPP model. The PPP has seen several successful infrastructural
projects over the past decade.
It has rightly been observed that “selection of right PPP model for a right project
at a right time through realistic planning would go a long way in providing
meaningful and hassle free infrastructure development. This will ultimately
increase the infrastructure standards and thereby sustain the overall
macroeconomic developments of the country” (Lakshmanan, 2008).
Aman Hans (2017), a NITI Aayog specialist in PPP has pointed out that “a
mature PPP framework, along with a robust enabling ecosystem shall enable the
Government to accomplish to a considerable extent that “the government has no
business to do business”. Thus promote private sector investments and
participation towards the nation building”. PPP is emerging as the new success
route in India’s attempts to build world-class infrastructure. The prospect of
future investments is bright because PPP investments are being pulled by
increased demand for infrastructure services.
21
(v) The most important challenge before state governments is to
develop well-designed PPP projects in social infrastructure so
that private investors, including NGOs, are sufficiently
motivated to invest.
(vi) Changes in the PPP model during execution: Given the long-
term nature of these projects, it is difficult to identify all
possible contingencies and issues that may come up during
project development. The parties may not have anticipated
these contingencies when the contract was signed.
(vii) It is also possible that some of the projects may fail or may be
terminated prior to the projected term of the project. The
reasons may be changes in government policy, failure by the
private operator or the government to perform their
obligations, or due to external circumstances.
(viii) In certain cases, environment and social considerations are
also important. These issues can become very complicated and
politically challenging.
22
The committee has emphasised that India’s success in deploying PPPs as an
important instrument for creating infrastructure will depend on a change in
attitude and in the mind-set of all authorities dealing with PPPs. The public
agencies partnering with the private sector, government departments supervising
PPPs, and auditing and legislative institutions providing oversight of PPPs
should have positive attitude towards PPPs.
23
15.8 Let Us Sum Up
The private sector consists of all privately owned, for-profit businesses in the
economy. It is a major part of the economy and encompasses all for-profit
businesses that are not owned or operated by the government. The private sector
is the main provider of goods and services. Companies and corporations that are
government run are part of what is known as the public sector.Private sector
businesses can also collaborate with government run agencies in arrangements
called public-private partnerships (PPPs).
Public sector is mainly concerned with public goods which are commodities or
services that benefit all members of society, and which are often provided for
free through public taxation.Public goods are the opposite of private goods,
which are inherently scarce and are paid for separately by individuals. A public
enterprise primarily focuses on providing cheaper goods and services to the
general people. It includes: central government bodies, state government entities
and even local government authorities. Public sector can be broadly divided into
two sections depending on its government control. Financed entirely by a
government body and More than 51 percent share capital of an enterprise is
owned by a government entity.
As opposed to the public sector that the government operates, the primary
objectives of the private sector are profit maximization and acting in the best
interest of the stakeholders.Although focused on profit maximization, private
firms help in economic development by enhancing the GDP, employment, per
capita income, infrastructural facilities, etc.The sector plays a crucial role in
economic development. India’s private sector has been the major engine of
growth and employment generation.
Since 1991, India has adopted the policy of privatisation through which private
sector is gaining importance and is progressing faster. As compared to private,
public sector has number of limitations.
Given the pressure of funds on central, state, and local governments, they
have increasingly turned to public-private partnerships, or P3s, as a means to
solve problems.PPP is recognized as an effective way of delivering value-
24
for-money public infrastructure or services. For looking at various aspects of
PPP, the PPP cell was set up in 2006 under department of economic affairs.
PPPs combine the professionalism of the corporate sector with the welfare
objectives of the state. The PPPs have resulted in projects which are known for
their world class facilities and advanced amenities.
Free Rider: Is a failure of the conventional free market system that occurs when
those who benefit from resources, public goods, or services do not pay for them
or under-pay. The problem occurs when some members of a community fail to
contribute their fair share to the costs of a shared resource. The free rider
25
problem is the burden on a shared resource. The failure to contribute makes the
resource economically infeasible to produce. Thus, the good may be under-
produced, overused or degraded.
Books/References
26
Asian Development Bank (2008, September). Public-Private Partnership
Handbook, Business Guide,
https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/institutional-document/31484/public-
private-partnership.pdf
Khan, Yaruqhullah (2021, June 29). Why does India need a new public-private
partnership policy, Money Control,
https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/economy/policy/explained-why-does-
india-need-a-new-public-private-partnership-policy-7101931.html
MURRAY, JEAN (2021, January 26). Public Sector vs. Private Sector: What’s
the Difference,The Balance Samll business,
https://www.thebalancesmb.com/public-sector-vs-private-sector-5097547
Ray, Gautam, 2014. PPP projects in India: Progress, prospects and problems, in
Commonwealth Governance and Growth
http://www.commonwealthgovernance.org/assets/uploads/2014/03/10-India-
PPP-Gautam-Ray.pdf
27
Rondinelli, Dennis A. (2004). Partnering For Development: Government-
Private Sector Cooperation in Service Provision,
http://projects.mcrit.com/foresightlibrary/attachments/article/1239/unpan006231
.pdf
Stiglitz, Joseph E.(2016, May 11). Role of Government and the Private Sector in
a Development State, Namibia
https://www8.gsb.columbia.edu/faculty/jstiglitz/sites/jstiglitz/files/May%2011%
20Namibia_Role_of_Government.pdf
Tria, Giovanni (2014, October 23). The public and private sector relationships:
The entrepreneur standpoint, Directors of Institutes and Schools of Public
Administration (DISPA) Meeting – Roma,
https://sna.gov.it/fileadmin/files/attivita_internazionali/DISPA/ROMA/Parisi.pdf
28
Unit – 16 Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises
Structure
16.0 Objectives
16.1 Introduction
16.2 Definition of MSME
16.3 Features of MSMEs
16.4Government Support to MSMEs
16.4.1 Information Technology Initiatives
16.4.2 Credit Support Initiatives
16.4.3 Skill Development
16.5 Challenges in Growth and Development of MSME Sector in India
16.6 Problems of MSMEs
16.7 Role of MSMEs in Propelling Economic Development
16.8 MSMEs in India
16.9 Let Us Sum Up
16.10 Key Words
16.11 Answers to Check Your Progress
16.12 Terminal Questions
______________________________________________________________________________
16.0 Objectives
______________________________________________________________________________
Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) occupy an important placein both developed
and developing countries of the world. They are helping in achieving the important goals of an
economy viz., poverty alleviation, economic growth, employment creation, reduction in
incomeand gender inequalities, prevention of migration from rural to urban areas etc.
Recognizing the contribution of the MSMEs, the United Nations declared 27th of June of every
year as MSME day. In spite of the several initiatives by the government in providing financial
assistance, technologyassistance and upgradation, infrastructure development, skill development
and training,enhancing competitiveness and market assistanceto help the growth of MSMEs in
the country, they still face several challenges. There challenges include:infrastructure
bottlenecks, availability of finance, marketing of products, procurement of inputs, timely
payment of dues by creditors etc. In this you will learn the definition of MSMEs, opportunities
provided by the Government to promote the growth of MSMEs in the country, challenges faced
by the MSMES and the present status of MSMEs in the country.
______________________________________________________________________________
16. 2Definition of MSME
______________________________________________________________________________
The MSME is largely used to describe a small business in the private sector. The World Bank
has identified three criteria viz., number of employees, asset size and annual sales for defining
MSME. If a business unit satisfies at least two of the three criteria it is recognized as MSME by
the World Bank. The table 1 provides the three criteria based World Bank definition of MSME.
In our country, prior to 2006, the definition provided by the Industrial Development and
Regulation (IDR) Act, 1951was adopted to identify small industries. Theyincluded tiny, cottage,
traditional, and village enterprises. They were collectively termed as Small Scale Industries
(SSIs) under the Act.They were defined in terms of “number of employees”. But the government
experienced difficulty in collecting reliable data on the number of employees. Hence,the MSME
Development Act 2006 (MSMED) took investment as a criterion for defining the MSMEs. This
was because it was relatively easy to measure and verify investment. According to a report
published in 2014, there were267 definitions of the MSMEs in 155 economies. However, about
90 percent of the institutions across the world take number of employees as the basis for defining
a MSME. Many other definitions are based on turnover and value of assets. The other variables
considered for defining a MSME include loan size, years of experience, type of technology, size
of the manufacturing space, and initial investment amount etc.The table 2 shows the Indian
definition of MSME as per MSMED Act, 2006.
In brief, the amended definition of MSMEs has not shown any distinction between
manufacturing and service providing enterprises. Further, a new criteria turnover is added to the
definition. Furthermore, the new definition significantly enhanced the limit of investment in
plant and machinery for recognition of MSMEs.This amendment to the definition of MSME is
helpful in many ways. The Government felt that the MSMEs including even the very successful
ones were not making attempt to grow for the fear that if they outgrow the size of what is defined
as the MSME,they would lose the benefits that they get. Therefore, MSMEs preferred to remain
within the definition rather than grow. This is preventing them from reaping the benefit of
economies of scale. Hence, the revision of definition would shed the fear and help the enterprise
to grow and realize the advantages of economies of scale. The removal of distinction between
manufacturing and service sector is done to facilitate the ease of doing business. This definition
helps businesses such as retail to claim the benefits of MSME.There is no need for any MSME to
prove that it is basically a manufacturing unit to claim the benefits. Inclusion of the criteria of
turnover in the recognition of MSME is also done with a purpose. Currently there is no check on
the investment in plant and machinery claimed by an enterprise and is based on self-
authentication. With the definition requiring turnover, firms would need to register on GST
thereby making them eligible for the scheme. Hence, the additional inclusion of turnover may
help in bringing in better authentication of the MSME.The Government decided not to count the
turnover with respect to exports in thelimits of turnover for any category of MSME units whether
micro, small or medium. This isyet another step towards ease of doing business.
______________________________________________________________________________
16.3 Features of MSMEs
______________________________________________________________________________
MSMEs exhibit special features which are distinct from large enterprises. Some such features are
discussed in this section.
(i) Limited Investment:In MSMEs, particularly micro and small enterprises, capital is supplied
by an individual or a small group of individuals. As per a census of small scale units in India,
micro and small business enterprises are run mostly as sole- proprietorship or partnership model.
(ii) Personal Character/Owner-Management:A micro and small businesses are identified with
its owners; who themselves act as managers. Managers as such have maximum motivation to
work; as they themselves happen to be the owners also.
(iii) Labour-Intensive:Micro and small enterprises are fairly labour intensive with
comparatively smaller capital investment than the larger units. With any given investment,
employment possibilities would be greater in comparison with corresponding factory system.
(iv) Unorganized Labour:Micro and small business enterprises employ less number of workers
as compared to big business enterprises. Workers of these units do not form labour unions and
remain unprotected.
(v) Local Area of Operations:The area of operations of micro and small enterprises is generally
local as they have less capital and less marketing facilities at their disposal. There is a local touch
between employer and employees and between employer and customers. These days products of
some small scale enterprises are also exported to many countries of the world.
(vi) Flexibility: MSMEs are more adaptable to the changing business environment. So in case of
amendments or unexpected developments, they are flexible enough to adapt and carry on, unlike
large industries.
(vii) Use of Local Resources: Micro and small business units use indigenous resource. As a
result they can be located anywhere subject to the availability of these resources like raw
materials, labour etc.
(viii) Gestation Period: Compared to large units, a micro industrial unit has a lesser gestation
period, i.e. the period after which the return on investment starts.
(ix) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): MSMEs are best suited as compared to large
enterprises for achieving the SDGs such as creation of employment to lift people out of poverty.
______________________________________________________________________________
16.4Government support to MSMEs
______________________________________________________________________________
India is one of the fastest growing economies of the world. In the last half-decade, India has been
witnessing a respectable rate of economic growth. This growth has been driven by many factors
such as i) robust socio-economic policies of the government; ii) an influx in the domestic and
foreign capital;iii) rise in disposable income; iv) increasing consumption etc. among many other
positive attributes. MSME sector is likely to continue to play a significant role in the growth of
the Indian economy. In the last ten years, MSME sector has shown impressive growth in terms of
parameters like number of units, production, employment, and exports. Given the right set of
support systems and enabling framework, this sector can contribute much more, enabling it to
actualize its immense potential.
MSME sector has emerged as a highly vibrant and dynamic sector of the Indian economy over
the last six decades. It created more than 11 crore employment opportunities and has the
potential to create more at a lower capital cost as compared to large industries. It also helps in
industrialization of rural and backward areas. This may result in reducing regional imbalances
and more equitable distribution of national income and wealth. MSMEs are complementary to
large industries as ancillary units. The MSME sector contributes enormously to the socio-
economic development of the country. Ministry of MSME envisions a vibrant MSME sector by
promoting growth and development of the MSME sector, including Khadi, Village and Coir
Industries. This is done in cooperation with concerned Ministries/Departments, State
Governments and other Stakeholders.
The government is providing support to existing enterprises and encouraging creation of new
enterprises through many initiatives which can broadly be classified into information technology
initiatives, credit support initiatives and skill development initiatives. These initiatives provide
lot of opportunities to MSMEs to start new business and continue existing businesses in an
efficient manner.
Governmenthas taken several IT initiatives to facilitate the ease of doing of business of MSMEs.
Some of the initiatives are as follows:
MyMSME: One of the complaints of the MSME units pertains to availability of information on
the government schemes for the sector at one place. MyMSME is a mobile application that
provides information on all schemes implemented by the Ministry of MSME at one place. The
MSMEs can apply for any of these schemes through this application. They can also lodge
grievances pertaining to Ministry of MSME through this app.
MSME SAMBANDH:The Public Procurement Policy for Micro and Small Enterprises (MSEs)
order 2012 has mandated every Central Ministry/Department/PSU to set an annual goal for
procurement from the MSME sector at the beginning of the year. This is done with an objective
of achieving an overall procurement goal of minimum 25 per cent of the total annual purchases
from the products or services produced or rendered by MSEs. Out of 25% target of annual
procurement 4% is exclusively reserved for MSMEs owned by SC/ST and 3% for MSEs owned
by Women entrepreneurs. In order to make the Public Procurement Policy more effective, a
Public Procurement Portal “MSME SAMBANDH” was launched on 8th December, 2017. The
Portal tracks the procurement made by CPSEs from MSEs including SC-ST MSEs on a quarterly
basis. It contains the necessary information relating to the requirement of CPSEs in terms of
items required, quantity, specifications, last purchase price etc. Hence, the portal helps in
effective monitoring while also enabling MSEs to build their capacities and participate in Public
Procurement market.
MSME SAMADHAN: MSMED Act, 2006 contains provisions to deal with cases of delayed
payment to Micro and Small Enterprises (MSEs). As per the provisions, the buyer is liable to pay
compound interest with monthly rests to the supplier on the amount at three times of the bank
rate notified by Reserve Bank. This provision is applied in case he does not make payment
within 45 days of acceptance of the goods/service. The Ministry of MSME has launched MSME
Delayed Payment Portal –MSME SAMADHAN for empowering MSEs across the country to
directly register their cases.
Udyam: Due to non-registration, the government was not able to collect quality data on MSMEs
and it became a serious constraint in passing on the benefits of welfare measures to all the
MSMEs. Many MSMEs were hesitant to register themselves with the government due to a
lengthy registration process. To overcome this, the government introduced a single page Udyog
Aadhaar Memorandum (UAM) equivalent to the previous 11 forms protocol for self-certification
of the MSMEs. The registration process under UAM was completely paperless (online). After
completing the registration, the applicant was able to receive a unique Udyog Aadhaar Number
(UAN). This UAN was an identification number that can be used in applications of all MSME
schemes. More than 8.6 million (as of January 2020) units were registered under the scheme.
Along with the change in the definition of MSMEs based on investment and turnover the
government changed the registration procedure from UAM to Udyam. With the new
classification, any new person setting up an MSME has first to be registered under the Udyam
Registration and do a self-declaration regarding the size of the business they conduct. The new
Udyam Registration can be filed online with no requirement to upload any documents,
certificates, papers, or proof. Few salient points of registration are as follows:
1. The new classification of MSME has been to include both Manufacturing and Services and the
criteria for division of Micro, small and medium enterprises relates to both Turnover and
Investment.
2. Any person who intends to set up an MSME should file Udyam Registration in Udyam
Registration Portal based on self-registration.
3. E-Certificate will be issued after the registration is completed.
4. Businesses will be automatically upgraded or degraded from one classification to another
based on their filing.
5. All units having multiple GST under single PAN shall be considered as one Enterprise /
Udyam.
6. Calculation of investment in Plant and Machinery be based on previous ITR filed.
7. Calculation of turnover shall be based on GST filed or on a self-declaration basis if GST is not
there.
8. No fees is charge for registration.
9. Aadhar Number is Mandatory for filing Udyam (of Proprietor, Managing Partner for
Partnership, Karta for HUF) and for Companies GSTIN is required.
10.Self-declaration to be given where necessary information is not available via other sources i.e.
GST, PAN, Aadhar, etc.
1.Collateral free loans: The purpose of the coverage of Collateral Free Loans (CGTMSE)is to
provide collateral free loans up to Rs. 200 lakhs (Up to Rs. 100 lakhs for Retail Trade) to Micro
and Small Enterprises, as defined under MSMED Act. The coverage of the Scheme is extended
to all new and existing Micro and Small Enterprises (both in the Manufacturing Sector as well as
in the Service Sector) as defined under MSMED Act, 2006. The Central Government provides
guarantee to these loans.
2.Equity infusion through MSME Fund of Funds: MSMEs are facing a severe shortage of
equity. The Fund of Funds created by the Central Government provides equity funding for
MSMEs, which have growth potential and viability. This scheme is expected to facilitate equity
financing of Rs.50,000 crores in the MSME Sector.
One of the key aspects of MSMEs is access to credit. MSMEs require credit to establish/expand
the business. To provide credit facilities to the MSMEs, the Government of India has come up
with many schemes. Some of the well recognised MSME loan schemes of 2020 are as follows:
Pradhana Mantri Mudra Yojana: The Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana (PMMY) scheme was
launched on 8th April 2015. This scheme provides loans up to 10 lakh to non-corporate and non-
farm small or micro-enterprises. These loans are known as MUDRA (Micro Units Development
and Refinance Agency Limited). MUDRA provides refinance to banks, microfinance institutions
(MFIs) and NBFCs for lending loans. The borrowers can approach any of these lending
institutions directly or apply online through the UdyamiMitra portalfor these loans. There are
three different schemes viz., ‘Shishu’, ‘Kishore’ and ‘Tarun’ under Mudra which signify the
stage of development and the funding need of the beneficiaries. ‘Shishu’ offers loans up to
Rs.50,000, ‘Kishor’ provides loans above Rs.50,000 up to Rs.5 lakhs and ‘Tarun’ provides loans
above Rs.5 lakhs up to Rs. 10 lakhs to micro-units.
Prime Minister’s Employment Generation Programme (PMEGP): PMEGP is a Government
of India’s credit-linked subsidy programme introduced in the year 2008. The scheme is designed
by merging Prime Minister’s Rojgar Yojna and Rural Employment Generation Programme. The
programme focuses on generating self-employment opportunities among unemployed youth and
traditional artisans through micro-enterprises in non-farm sector. The PMEGP Scheme is being
implemented by Khadi and Village Industries Commission (KVIC) at the national level and the
Directorates of KVIC and DICs and Banks at the State level. The maximum cost of the
project/unit admissible in the manufacturing sector is Rs.25 lakhs and in the service sector is
Rs.10 lakhs. Assistance under the scheme is available only to new units. The subsidy under the
scheme is 25% of the cost of the project in rural areas and 15% in urban areas for general
category. Similarly the subsidy is 35% of the cost of the project in rural areas and 25% in urban
areas for special category beneficiaries.
Credit Guarantee Fund Trust for Micro and Small Enterprises (CGTMSE): Ministry of
MSMEs and Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) jointly established the
CGTMSE by contributing corpus of about Rs.27,000 croresin order to implement a credit
guarantee scheme for MSMEs. The trust provides guarantee to the loans provided to MSMEs by
banks without any third-party guarantee or collateral. The guarantee coverage under this scheme
ranges from 85% for Micro Enterprise (up to Rs 5 lakh), 75% for others and 50% for retail
activity. Both existing and new enterprises are eligible under the scheme. The maximum limit of
loan under the scheme is Rs.2 crores. In case of default, the trust settles the claim up to a
maximum of 85% of the amount in default of the credit facility not covered by primary and
collateral security. The main objective is that the lender should give importance to project
viability and secure the credit facility purely on the primary security of the assets financed. The
other objective is to provide both term loan and working capital facilities from a single agency to
the borrower.
Credit Linked Capital Subsidy Scheme (CLCSS): The objective of the Scheme is to facilitate
technology up-gradation in MSMEs. Under the scheme an upfront capital subsidy of 15 per cent
on institutional finance of upto Rs 1 crore availed by the MSMEs for induction of well-
established and improved technology in the specified 51 sub-sectors/products is approved. In
other words, the major objective is to upgrade their plant & machinery with state-of-the-art
technology, with or without expansion to the existing enterprises. The scheme is also applicable
to new MSMEs which have set up their facilities with appropriate eligible and proven technology
duly approved under scheme guidelines.
Thus, the government has been helping the MSMEs to get institutional credit either directly from
the financial institutions, guaranteeing the repayment of loans taken by the MSMEs from the
financial institutions. MSMEs are provided subsidy on the loans taken and capital subsidy for
upgrading technology.
(i) Industrial Motivation Campaigns (IMCs): Two days Industrial Motivation Campaigns are
organized to identify and motivate traditional / non-traditional entrepreneurs having potential for
setting up MSEs for making them self-employed.
______________________________________________________________________________
16.5Challenges in Growth and Development of MSME Sector in India
______________________________________________________________________________
The growth and contribution of MSME sector in India has not been to the desired extent due to
several challenges faced by the sector. Some of the major challenges as pointed out by the expert
committee of RBI on the MSME sector are as follows:
Inadequate Policy and InstitutionalInterventions:There are many institutions in India to
support and help the MSME sector.The Ministry of MSME formulates policies for overall
growth of the sector. The Office of Development Commissioner MSME implements these
policies. As mentioned earlier, MSMED Act, 2006 contains several provisions for the promotion
and development of the MSME sector. For financing MSME the central government established
Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI). Broad policies for facilitating financial
support to MSMEs are formulated by RBI and Securities Exchange Board of India
(SEBI).However, there are no clear cut policies to address the problems of the sector in the
following areas:
a)Infrastructure development: Due to infrastructural bottlenecks the MSMEs are not able to
compete with large industry in the domestic sector and also not able to enter global markets. The
basic amenities such as work sheds, tool rooms, product testing laboratories, electricity, rural
broadband and innovation hubs are not adequately available to the MSMEs. This is acting as a
deterrent to the growth of the sector. The development of MSME clusters is done mainly by
Government organizations and the private investment is not coming for the development of these
clusters.
b)Formalization of the sector: As per 73rd round of National Sample Survey (NSS), there are
63.39 million MSMEs in the country. However, a large number of MSEs exist in the informal
sector and are not registered with any statutory authority. Reasons for lack of registration are
many and varied. For nano/household type of enterprises, in their view, not obtaining registration
is an escape from official machinery, paperwork, costs etc. For them, it is perhaps “the art of not
eing governed”. Registration offers them little by way of tangible benefits. There are
otherMSMEs who, upon reaching a minimum size seek legitimacy and acknowledgement of
their existence to seek benefits or credit. While Udyog Aadhaar offers a simple mode of
registration, it is usually not enough. Often, more is needed e.g., Shops and Establishments,
PAN, GST, etc. Lack of formalization impacts the sector in terms of development. It also
impacts in availing credit from financial institutions like banks and in terms of policy making as
well as development interventions. Registration provides information on nature of business,
location, segmentation, etc. In the absence of a robust system of registration for capturing
information on operational units, new units and exits, reliance has to be placed on proxy data or
on national census/ surveys, which are infrequent.
c)Technology adoption: Many MSMEs are not able to adopt new technologies due to paucity of
funds. This has been adversely affecting the competitiveness of these units both in domestic and
international markets.
d)Backward and forward linkage: MSMEs face the challenges both in having access to quality
raw material and market for finished products. National Small Industries Corporation (NSIC)
through market assistance scheme facilitates MSMEs to discover markets for their products.The
Government e-Marketplace (GeM) portal has enabled MSMEs to connect with buyers from
Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) and Government Departments. However, very few MSMEs
are availing benefits under these schemes. MSEs find it difficult to access proper market for
selling their products due to their lack of scale and in-house capabilities. Inaccessibility to
remunerative market affects their growth and sustainability. In order to support MSMEs in
selling their products at a competitive price, Public Procurement Policy for MSMEs was
introduced in the year 2012. The policy was revised in November, 2018, and came into effect
from April 1, 2019. The objective of Policy is promotion and development of MSMEs by
supporting them in marketing of their products and services.However, complexity of the public
procurement system and its process deters MSMEs to participate in public procurement. MSMEs
face constraints in terms of financial, technical and administrative capacities to access
procurement opportunities, prepare tender documents, apply the procedures and execute the
contracts.
e)Credit gap: Due to non-registration, many MSMEs lack access to formal credit. Further,
banks face challenges in credit risk assessment of MSMEs as these units do not have financial
information, historical cash flow data etc. Further, very few MSMEs are able to attract private
equity support and venture capital financing.
f)Timely payments to MSMEs and their effective implementation: Most MSMEs have been
facing problems of working capital due to non-payment of dues by the customers. Though the
Government initiated several steps to address this problem, problems still exist in
implementation of these initiatives. Buyers tend to use MSMEs as an alternative to banks. In
order to delay payments, buyers raise objections or point errors in submitted bills. Credit notes or
adjustment notes are often used to avoid cash payment. Strict legislative measures of payments
within fixed days (and penalty in the form of charging interest) have had limited effect as
MSMEs do not complain for fear of loss of future business. Electronic bill discounting systems
(such as TReDS) have provided a partial solution but the problem persists.
Thus, many governmental interventions are mostly supply-side oriented. They are not able to
effectively address the whole requirements of MSMEs.
______________________________________________________________________________
16.6 Problems of MSMEs
______________________________________________________________________________
The growth of the economy is dependent considerably on MSMEs which contribute significantly
to the GDP by generating mass employment in every nook and corner of India. In view of its
significance, the government is expected to provide adequate support to ensure MSMEs’ growth.
However, the MSMEs suffer with the following problems:
1. Ease of doing business remains a bottleneck:Most MSMEs in India face problems in the
initial stages because of too many regulations and approvals. They face problems relating to
loan, enforcing contracts and dealing with construction permits. In fact, the time taken by
businesses to enforce a contract remains longer. Entrepreneurs have to comply with 12
procedures to start a business in Mumbai, whereas globally there are just five procedures to
comply with on an average.
2. Lack of financial expertise: A large number of entrepreneurs lack the financial knowledge to
steer the business in the right direction. Those entrepreneurs without sound financial knowledge
may not be in a position to make crucial business decisions related to MSME loans. In absence
of financial knowledge, you may end up taking wrong decisions that may cost the business
unless you are seeking any external advice. Also, the knowledge about finance is important
because you have to rely on an MSME loan to tide over crises that may knock at the door
anytime. Hence, it is important to understand everything related to MSME loans, find out about
the MSME loan interest rate and compare the same in the market before availing a loan.
4. Technology remains a major deterrent:Most businesses fail to reap the benefits of the latest
technological developments in their sector due to a lack of expertise and awareness. Hence
MSMEs need to be apprised of the technological developments that are significant for the
growth of their businesses. It is important for scientific research bodies to remain involved with
the local MSME clusters, and take notice of their technology-related problems and issues.
However, there have been concerted efforts to offer solutions to MSMEs on these issues as the
government is working towards the launch of E-commerce portal ‘Bharat Craft’ that will act as a
direct interface between sellers and buyers.
5. Labour issues:Most SMEs face frequent labour issues and especially in the new normal
times.The ongoing migrant crises has manifested itself as one of the most difficult areas for
industries to operate in such times of pandemic. Apart from labour problems, businesses also
need to emphasize skill development, training, and ensuring market linkages to facilitate both
urban and rural micro-entrepreneurs. The emphasis on skill development can benefit the sector
substantially and more so at the time of crisis.
6. Lack of Trust:It is seen that banks refrain from extending MSME loan since the amount
remains small and also, banks believe MSMEs lack the required repayment capacity. In such a
situation, they end up implementing stricter regulations on these start-ups. Some businesses also
fail to keep track of their credit rating that hampers the prospect of availing loans. Moreover,
traditional lending options make it difficult for business owners to meet strict eligibility criteria
besides the lengthy procedure of MSME loan approval further dampens their spirits.
7. Absence of collateral in loan:Some businesses may find it difficult to avail MSME loan as a
result of a strict collateral protocol. Since small companies may not have the property to
substantiate the criteria to avail a loan, business owners may opt for unsecured business loans
from lenders.
Despite these challenges, the success in business is not elusive if you are determined and these
problems can be easily addressed if you get the right support from the lender.
______________________________________________________________________________
16.7 Role of MSMEs in Propelling Economic Development
______________________________________________________________________________
2. Other ways in which MSMEs help in propelling economic development are as follows:
ii) MSMEs also increase the competition amongst the peers. The continuous struggle for
supremacy among MSMEs brings out the best in a business. This triggers a win-win situation for
both provider and the consumer. Moreover, this increases the aggregate productivity as well as
economy-wide efficiency.
iii) New entrepreneurs entering MSME sector bring forth innovations, ideas and skills.
iv) In recent years, MSMEs have registered a higher growth rate as compared to the global
industrial sector. The chief advantage of the MSME sector is its potential to generate
employment at low capital expenditure.
v) The economic growth in many Asian countries such as Korea, Taiwan and Japan is directly
proportional to the spurt in MSME activities. MSMEs play a very significant role in the rapid
industrialisation and development of China, where approximately 99% of the total business
ventures are MSMEs. These MSMEs together produce around 60% of the total industrial output
and approximately 40% of the total profits and taxes achieved by the various industries in China.
Again, various SMEs in the US generate more than half of the gross domestic products.
vi) MSMEs act as a cushion against recession as they quickly adapt and innovate as per the
changing circumstances. There is a big connection between the various levels of poverty, hunger
and economic well-being of the society and the general condition of various MSMEs in the
country.
vii) In almost every country, the MSMEs are a large proportion of all businesses in the country.
In most developing and developed economies, over 90% of MSMEs improve the employment
rate. In fact, when big industries downsize and cut down jobs, MSMEs keep developing and
creating more jobs.
viii) MSMEs adapt fast to the dynamic business world by switching on to e-commerce and
online transaction of goods and services. The advancement in technology has not only eased out
the process of selling and buying, it has helped the entrepreneurs to cut cost on advertising and
marketing too. The various e-commerce platforms make life easy for MSMEs.
ix) MSMEs play a vital role in being service providers and traders to the primary industry.
xi) MSMEs contribute heavily to the development of various sectors such as manufacturing,
agriculture and ICT services.
xii) There is a reciprocal relationship between an MSME and the economy. Development in
economy ensures the creation of more MSMEs. The creation of more MSMEs ensures a boost in
the economy.
______________________________________________________________________________
16.8MSMEs in India
______________________________________________________________________________
In India, MSMEs are the important drivers of economic development, innovation and
employment. As per the National Sample Survey, India has approximately 6.4 crore MSMEs.
Bulk of them are micro-enterprises numbering about 6.3 crore. They constitute about 94% of the
total MSMEs. They are followed by small enterprises. There are about 3.3 lakh small enterprises
in the country and constitute about 5% of the total MSMEs. The number of Medium enterprises
are about 5,000 and constitute less than one percent of the total MSMEs in
India.Outof633.88estimatednumberofMSMEs,324.88lakhMSMEs(51.25%)areinruralareaand309
lakhMSMEs(48.75%)areintheurbanareas.
The MSME sector contributes very significantly to the growth of the economy. Its share in
manufacturing output is about 45%. While in exports of the country the share of the sector is
more than 40%, it is about 30% in total Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of the country.The
MSME sector provides employment to about 111 million people. The Table 5 provides the data
on the contribution of MSME sector to GDP of the country.
As per the
NSS,MSMEsectorhascreated11.10crorejobs(360.41lakhinManufacturing,387.18lakhinTradea
nd362.82lakhinOtherServices and
0.07lakhinelectricityGenerationandTransmission,)intheruralandtheurbanareasacrossthecountry
.Majority of the jobs are created in Trade followed by other services and manufacturing. Table 7 shows the
distribution of employment by various activities.
MSMEs occupy a key role in both developing and developed countries in terms of contribution
to GDP, employment, exports and also in reduction in social, gender and income inequalities.
However, the identification of MSMEs is not the same throughout the world as the definitions of
MSME vary from country to country. The World Bank identified number of employees, assets
and sales turnover as the basis for identification of MSMEs. In India, till 2006, the small
industries were identified on the basis of number of employees. The MSMED Act 2006 took
investment as a criterion for defining the MSMEs. It was because relatively easier to measure
and verify investment. The Act distinguished between manufacturing and service enterprises for
the purpose of identification of MSMEs.The Government amended the definition of MSMEs in
2016 by adding turnover to investment and removed the distinction between manufacturing and
service enterprises. The substantial enhancement of investment limits aimed at encouraging the
MSMEs to expand their capacities without losing the governmental benefits. Government of
India has initiated several steps to promote MSMEs, help them to overcome their problems and
improve their ease of doing business. The Government also simplified the process of registration
of MSMEs, as registration is mandatory for MSMEs to receive the governmental benefits. The
growth of MSMEs has not been happening to the desired extent as they face several challenges
such as infrastructure bottlenecks, credit, timely payment from customers, skill gap, marketing of
products, availability of inputs etc. The development of MSMEs in India is skewed. Majority of
the enterprises are located in urban areas and concentrated in a few states. Very less number of
MSMEs is owned by socially disadvantaged and women. Micro Enterprises are generating
employment in a significant way as compared to small and medium enterprises. However, most
of the employees of the MSMEs are men.
______________________________________________________________________________
16.10 Key Words
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
16.12 Terminal Questions
______________________________________________________________________________
1. Define MSME and explain the superiority of the present definition over the earlier definitions.
2. Explain the various initiatives taken by the Government to help the growth of MSMEs.
3. Explain the process of registration of MSMEs and the benefits of registration.
4. Explain the challenges faced by MSMEs in India.
5. Describe the role of MSMEs in economic development.
6. Describe the present status of MSMEs in India.
****
UNIT 17 SERVICE SECTOR (ICT & COMMUNICATION)
Structure
17.0 Objectives
17.1 Introduction
17.2 IT Industry
17.2.1 Facilitators of Growth of Software Industry in India
17.3 Communications (Telecom) Industry
17.3.1 Status of Telecom Industry in the Country
17.3.2 Growth Drivers of Telecommunications Industry
17.4 Role of ICT in Economic Development
17.5 Challenges Faced by ICT Industry
17.6 ICT Products
17.7 Government Support to ICT Product Development
17.8 Let Us Sum Up
17.9 Key Words
17.10 Answers to Check Your Progress
17.11 Terminal Questions
______________________________________________________________________________
17.0 Objectives
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
17.1 Introduction
______________________________________________________________________________
The economy of a country consists of three sectors viz. primary sector, secondary sector, and
tertiary sector or service sector. The primary sector consists of the activities that use natural
resources for production/extraction of raw materials and include agriculture and allied
activities, forestry, mining etc. The secondary sector also known as the industrial sector is
associated with the activities which involve the conversion of raw material into usable products
and includes heavy manufacturing, light manufacturing, energy-producing, food processing,
etc. The service sector produces intangible goods, more precisely services instead of goods. It
comprises various service industries including warehousing and transportation
services; information services; securities and other investment services; professional services;
waste management; health care and social assistance; arts, entertainment and recreation.
Countries with economies centered onthe service sector are considered more advanced than
industrial or agricultural economies.ICT sector is one of the important part of services sector and
consists of Information technologies (IT) and Communication industries. Let us discuss
these two industries separately.
______________________________________________________________________________
17.2 IT industry
______________________________________________________________________________
The IT industry covers IT services, IT-enabled services (ITES), e-commerce (online business),
Software and Hardware products. IT based services are essential for any organization to increase
productivity, ease of doing business, and grow efficiently and economically. IT contributes to the
economic growth of the country and makes governance more transparent and accessible. It has
made access to government services and information easier and less expensive. Information
technology has also made management and delivery of government services much easier and
plugged leakages. The IT industry has become the backbone of our economy to prosper
exponentially and to generate millions of jobs.
Software Products
(infrastructure Software and
Enterprise Applications
Software)
Software
According to the Ministry of Electronics and IT, “the IT sector is the biggest
employmentgenerator and has helped the growth of several ancillary industries such as
transportation, real estate, catering, security, housekeeping etc. Direct employment in the IT
services and BPO/ITeS segmentis estimated to reach 4.47million in FY 2020-2021 with an
addition of 1,38,000 people (36 percent women employees). Indirect job creation is estimated to
be over 12.0 million.” The IT industry accounted for 8% of the country’s GDP in 2020.According
to RBI, “India’s exports of software services are estimated at US$ 133.7 billion during 2020-21,
registering 4.0 per cent growth over the previous year. TheITandIT
EnabledServices(ITeS)sectorsgohand-in-hand,inevery aspect.IT software and service industry
has emerged as one of the fastest growingsectors in the Indian economy. It recorded a growth
rate exceeding 50 per cent in exports and40 per cent both domestic and exports together over the
last five years.
According to the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) of the
Government, Computer Software and Hardware industry attracted about US $180 billion (about
Rs.5.23 lakh crores) Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) during April- 2020 to September -2001
which is about 14 percent of the total FDI flows into the country.
Among the various constituents of the IT industry in the country, IT services account for about
52 percent of total IT sector revenues. Of the revenues about 80 percent
comesfromtheexportmarket. Business Processing Management (BPM) accounts for about 19
percent of the total IT industry revenue and around 87% of revenue comes from
theexportmarket. Software products and engineering services account for about 20 percent of
the total IT revenues and around84 percentof revenuecomes fromexports. Hardware accounts
for about 9 percent of IT revenue in the country. Since production of computer hardware is
one of the priority areas of the Government under Atmanirbhar Bharat, the government is
giving a push to domestic manufacturing of electronics. It is providing a production linked
incentive (PLI) of Rs 7,350 crores for production of laptops, tablets, PCs and servers in the
country. This will help improving the domestic production and export of hardware from the
country.
______________________________________________________________________________
17.2.1Facilitators of Growth of Software Industry in India
______________________________________________________________________________
1. Availability of highly qualified talent pool: One of the greatest strengths of India happens
to be its skilled human resources. Availability of highly qualified talent pool at lower
rateshelps the IT industry in cutting the cost for about 60-70 % and become competitive in the
global market. This large pool of qualified skilledworkforce hasenabledIndianIT companiesto
helpclientssaveUS$200billionduringthelast fiveyears.
2. Increasing adaption of emerging technologies: Disruptive technologies like AI (Artificial
Intelligence),Social Media, Mobility, Analytics and Cloud (SMAC), embedded systems etc.
are the emerging trendsof the industry. India has been creating a future-ready digital
workforce. India has a large number of employees with SMAC skills.The SMAC market is
expected togrow to USD225billionby 2020. In fact, India is among the top 10 nations in the
world in terms of technological advancements and funding in artificial intelligence, according
to findings from a studypublished by The Brookings Institution.
a) The Department of Electronics and Information Technology (DeitY) has drafted India’s first
‘Internet ofThingsPolicy’in October2016 to help the country to become a digital economy.
The vision of the policy is
“todevelopconnectedandsmartIoTbasedsystemforourcountry’sEconomy,
Society,Environmentandglobal needs.”
b) In 2013, Ministry of Communication and Information Technology of the Government of
India had releasedthe ‘National Cyber Security Policy’ to protect information, such as personal
information, financial/bankinginformation, sovereign data etc.As part of the policy, the
government has proposed to create a workforce of around500,000 trained in cyber security. It
also proposes to provide fiscal benefits to businesses to adopt bestsecuritypractices.
c) In order to promote further growth of ICT industry, the government has approved ‘National
Policy onInformation Technology 2012’which aims to make at least one individual in every
household e-literateamongotherobjectives.
d) The Ministry of Electronics andInformationTechnology(MeitY),GovernmentofIndia set up
Software Technology Parks of India, an Autonomous Society
in1991,withtheobjectiveofencouraging,promoting and boosting the Software Exports from
India.
e) Under Digital India Programme, the India BPO Promotion Scheme (IBPS) was approved to
incentivizeBPO/ITES Operations across the country for creation of employment opportunities
for the youths and growth of IT-ITES Industry.
f) As per the FDI policy, 100% FDI has been allowed in the software / IT industry under the
automatic route(i.e.,noneed toobtainprior government approval).
g) In September 2021, the Indian government launched Phase II of Visvesvaraya PhD
Scheme to encourage research in 42 emerging technologies in Information Technology (IT),
Electronics System Design & Manufacturing (ESDM) and Information Technology Enabled
Services (ITES).
______________________________________________________________________________
17.3Communications (Telecom) Industry
______________________________________________________________________________
The telecom sector is one of the fastest growing sectors in India. It has been undergoing an
innovative phase over the past few years. India has become the second largest
telecommunication market in the world after China. The telecom sector has assumed the position
of an essential infrastructure for socioeconomic development of the country. Telecom services in
India can bedividedintotwobroad segments,wire-lineservices(includes
fixedlinetelephoneandBroadband)andwirelessservices(includesmobilephone–
GSMandCDMA).The other telecommunication servicesthat includeinternet services, broadband
services, VSAT, have also evolvedgradually and have become an integral part of the Indian
telecom industry. On the other hand, the wire line segmenthas been witnessing adrastic decline in
its subscriberbase in the last 10 years. The following diagram presents the various telecom
services in India.
According to Invest India, a National Investment Promotion and Facilitation Agency, the
Telecom Sector of India provides direct employment of 2.2 million people and indirect
employment of 1.8 million people. According to one estimate, telecom as well as telecom
manufacturing sector is expected to createover10 millionemployment opportunities by 2025. The
employment opportunitiesare expected to be created due to combination of government’s efforts
to increase penetration in
ruralareasandtherapidincreaseinSmartphonesalesandrisinginternetusage.Riseinmobile-
phonepenetration and decline in data costs will add 500 million new internet users in India,
creating opportunities for new businesses. According to Swedish telecom gear maker Ericsson,
themonthlydatausageperSmartphoneinIndiaisexpectedtoincreasefrom3.9GBin2017to18GBby202
3.
However, in recent times, the financial downturn in the economy coupled with the policy
andregulatory uncertainty led to deteriorated fundamentals of telecom service providers.
Considering the role of telecom as the backbone of economic and socialdevelopment, the
Government has taken corrective measures to put back the sector on track. Some critical areas
requiring immediate attention of the Government, however, are rationalisation of levies and
makingmore spectrumavailable at a reasonable price to the industry to facilitate the launch of 5G
services.
Growingyoungpopulation&Changinglifestyle:Mobileinternetispredominantlyusedbyyoungst
ers. However, there is a wide variation in the use of mobile internet between urban and rural
youth. The next wave of growth in mobile internet
usersisgoingtocomefromruralareas,wheremobiledatapenetrationamong youth is very low at
present.
Increasing rural market: Rural market would be a key growth driver for telecom industry in
comingyearsas telecompenetrationin ruralareasisstillverylowas comparetourbanareas.
Favorable policy support: Government of India has fast-tracked reforms in the telecom sector
andcontinues to be proactive in providing room for growth for telecom companies. Some of
major
stepssuchasDigitalIndiaProgramme,NationalDigitalTelecommunicationPolicy2018,National
e-Governance Plan etc. have been taken up by GoI to promote R&D, innovation and to attract
investmentinTelecomsector inIndia. In the Union Budget 2021-22, the government allocated Rs.
14,200 crores (US$ 1.9 billion) for telecom infrastructure that entails completion of optical fibre
cable-based network for Defence services, rolling out broadband in 2.2 lakh panchayats and
improving mobile services in the North East.
Tele-density in rural areas remains one of the main areas of growth for telecom players
where the tele-density is low.
Despite such a strong broadband subscriber addition, there is still a large headroom for
wireless broadband penetration to improve, as it still remains low at 57.7% as of March
2020. The growth in social media usage, rapidly increasing content consumption and many
organizations gradually transitioning to 'Work from Home' will continue to drive demand for
data.
DTH operators are likely to benefit from a rising subscriber base and higher market
penetration. Innovations in paid TV services, migration from SD to HD boxes have increased
consumption of -smart TV's and HD services, offering more opportunities to service operators.
In the era of 5G, telecom companies stand to earn 70% of their revenue from core
beneficiaries of 5G. Currently, they earn 30% from enterprises. While implementation and
rollout of 5G is still some time away, the standards and ecosystem on 5G have already
gathered pace with more and more use cases coming into picture.
The Government of India has introduced Digital India Program where sectors such as
healthcare, banking, will be connected through internet providing ample opportunities for
growth in the sector.
Post COVID-19 related lockdown, work from home may become a new normal for many
organizations, thus creating opportunities for different telecommunication services across
the spectrum- fixed line, broadband, enterprise solutions besides pure mobile connectivity.
______________________________________________________________________________
17.4 Role of ICT in Economic Development
Impact on Health care: The use of ICT for health (e-health) has the potential
totransformhealthcarebyefficientlyconnectingpeopleandimprovinginformationsharing.Currently,
e-health is predominantly seen in developed countries.
ButastheavailabilityofICTspreadsrapidlyinthe
developingworld,thereisanopportunitytoexpandhealthcareaccesstoareaswheredistance,poverty,andsc
arceresourcesarecurrentlybarrierstoevenbasiccare.
ThankstoICT,doctorscanaccesspatients’medicalrecordsmoreeasily,haveimmediateaccesstotestresultsfr
omalaboratory, anddeliverprescriptionsdirectlytopharmacists.
ICTs helps, builds and transforms the lives of the farmers: ICTs plays a very crucial role by
disseminating information to farmers to help them make better well informed decisions. Through
ICTs people can obtain the latest up-to-date information, learn and practice sustainable farming.
ICT helps in improving quality and productivity in manufacturing sector: ICT helps in
creation of new models of E-businesses, save the costs, improve the quality and quantity of
production and increase the competition in markets. According to the economic literature, ICT
deepens the capital—the increase of services per capital unit. Thus, the firms tend to use IT in
the production process.
______________________________________________________________________________
17.5 Challenges Faced by ICT Industry
______________________________________________________________________________
The IT and Communication industries too face a few challenges. The challenges faced by
these two industries are discussed separately:
2. Talent Shortage: Businesses are in the need of people with combinations of skill that have
not previously been aligned, like analysts with coding abilities, or paramedics who understand
statistics. The industry is looking for super-specialized skill sets which are in short supply. There
is a huge gap in the skills the work demand and the skills job applicants have. Our education
system still needs to be revamped. And that affects the industries that seek highly skilled
employees. Unemployment is high in our country, but the fact is that many companies are not
able to find talent to fill the positions. Retention of employees is one of the biggest challenges
for the IT industry. Software companies recruit people, train them but in the end, they witness
their resignation once they are enough experienced in the job. Organizations invest into
employees to integrate them into the workflow.
3. Cloud Computing: All organizations in the IT industry are using the cloud for a wide variety
to perform tasks like data backup, disaster recovery, email, virtual desktops, software
development and testing. Rather than buying or owning physical data centres and servers one can
access services such as computing power, storage and databases from the cloud provider.
However, there are numbers of issues and concerns associated with cloud such as cost, service
provider reliability, downtime, data overload, password, security issue, data privacy etc.
4. Remote Workplace: The pandemic has made remote work (work from home) a new normal.
Working remotely can present unique challenges due to the lack of manager or teammates to
consult or to provide immediate responses or sources. Infrastructure is the prime need to
undertake such tasks, but to have such an infrastructure large investments are flown in acquiring
assets that can support, govern and handle the heavy data loads. However, there are threats to
these arrangements too, hacking and preventing the theft of data needs powerful firewalls and
software. This is an added cost to the IT industry.
5. Risks of outsourcing: More companies are opting for outsourcing due to talent shortage or
cost reduction. But outsourcing has created some challenges like security threats, legal
complications, cultural and time zone issues.
6. Government rules of different countries: US companies hire highly skilled employees from
other countries to work in their companies for special assignments. These employees were given
H1-B visa but the trump administration changed the policy of H1-B visas which caused a
negative impact on the organizations which are dependent on the US market. New procedures set
by the US government to acquire H1-B made it difficult for companies to prove that the
employee/workers who were travelling on an H1-B visa are supposed to serve a purpose in the
project and not travelling for personal benefits or hidden gains.
2. Increase in Costs: With millions of subscribers, a variety of new products, bundled and
customized solutions, the operational support services like service configuration, order
fulfillment, customer care, and billing are becoming increasingly complex. Hence, the cost of
handling these operations requires resources and different tools. This has been raising the
costs further.
4. Impact of Internet of Things: One more challenge waiting in the wings for telcos and
Internet Service Providers is the impact of Internet of Things (IoT) that is leading to explosive
growth in the connected devices. This growth is generating billions and trillions of new data
sources and thus, it is expected that this growth will push the data to be handled by networks
to zettabytes per year.
______________________________________________________________________________
17.6ICT Products
______________________________________________________________________________
According to Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) “ICT goods are
those that are either intended to fulfill the function of information processing and communication
by electronic means, including transmission and display, or which use electronic processing to
detect, measure and/or record physical phenomena, or to control a physical
process”ICTproductsmustprimarilybeintendedtofulfillorenablethefunctionofinformationprocessin
gandcommunicationbyelectronicmeans,includingtransmissionand display. Thus, the ICT
products are broadly categorized as follows:
1.Computer and Peripheral Equipment: This category includes Point of Sale terminals,
ATMs, Lap Tops, Notebooks, Input devices (Keyboard, Joystick, Mouse etc.), Scanners, Printers
(Inkjet Printers, Laser Printers, Other printers), Two-in-one/three-in-one printers, Removable
storage units, parts and accessories of computing machines, Monitors and projects etc.
3. Consumer Electronic Equipment: It includes Video game consoles, Video camera recorders,
Digital cameras, Radio broadcast receivers, Television receivers, Monitors and projectors, Sound
recording or reproducing apparatus, Video recording or reproducing apparatus, Microphones,
loudspeakers, headphones, earphones, audio-frequency amplifiers, electric sound amplifier sets
etc.
5. ManufacturingservicesforICTequipment:Includes‐
Electroniccomponentmanufacturingservices,
Computerandperipheralequipmentmanufacturingservices,Communicationequipmentmanufacturi
ngservices, Consumerelectronicsmanufacturingservices, Magnetic
andopticalmediamanufacturingservices etc.
6. Businessandproductivitysoftwareandlicensingservices: Includes-Operatingsystems,
Networksoftware, Databasemanagementsoftware,
Developmenttoolsandprogramminglanguagessoftware,
Generalbusinessproductivityandhomeuseapplications, Otherapplicationsoftware,
Licensingservicesfortherighttousecomputersoftware, Softwareoriginals,
Systemsoftwaredownloads, Applicationsoftwaredownloads, On-linesoftware etc.
7. Informationtechnologyconsultancyandservices: Includes-
Businessprocessmanagementservices, ITconsultingservices, ITsupportservices,
ITdesignanddevelopmentservicesforapplications, Websitehostingservices,
Applicationserviceprovisioning, OtherhostingandITinfrastructureprovisioningservices,
Networkmanagementservices, Computersystemsmanagementservices etc.
9. LeasingorrentalservicesforICTequipment:Includes-
Leasingorrentalservicesconcerningcomputerswithoutoperator,
Leasingorrentalservicesconcerningtelecommunicationsequipmentwithoutoperator,
Leasingorrentalservicesconcerningtelevisions,radios,videocassetterecordersandrelated
equipmentand accessories etc.
The Government of India introduced the National Policy on Software Products-2019 with a
vision to drive the rise of India as a Software Product Nation and synergies with the IT/ITES
sector. The policy is aimed at making India as a global player in development, production and
supply of innovative and efficient Software Products. This is expected to facilitate the growth
across the entire spectrum of ICT.
The following programmes have been implemented/are under implementation under the Policy:
1. National Software Product Mission (NSPM)
2. Indian Software Product Registry (ISPR)
3. Innovation Challenge for Development of Indian Video Conferencing Solution (Software
Product)
4. ICT Grand Challenge (ICTGC) under National Policy on Software Products
5. Start-up Accelerator Programme of MeitY for Product Innovation, Development and Growth
(SAMRIDH)
6. Next Generation Incubation Scheme (NGIS)
Let us learn them one by one.
1. National Software Product Mission (NSPM):The Mission has been constituted to evolve
and monitor schemes, programmes and strategy for the implementation of National Policy on
Software Products (NPSP 2019).
2. Indian Software Product Registry (ISPR):
Indian Software Product Registry (ISPR) has been created to analyse numbers/ statistics/
database of Indian Software Product Companies (ISPC). This will bring all software products at
one single platform to provide a common pool of Indian Software Products thereby providing a
trusted trade environment. It serves as a gateway to the Indian Software Product Company
(ISPC) with exposures to millions of global players.
6) Next Generation Incubation Scheme (NGIS): The scheme is to create a vibrant software
product ecosystem to complement the robust IT Industry for continued growth, new employment
and enhance competitiveness. Under this schemestart-ups working towards solutions/
outstanding software products for futuristic problems/ emerging ICT technology/ societal
problems are identified and promoted through technical and financial support and training. The
scheme is launched in 12 locations of the country and aims to handhold 300 Tech Start-ups.
Services sector plays an important role in an economy. ICT sector is a prominent sector in
services sector. It consists of Information Technology (IT) Industry and Communications
Industry. The IT industry covers IT services, IT-enabled services (ITES), e-commerce (online
business), Software and Hardware products. IT industryinIndiacanbroadly be
classifiedintothreesectors viz., i) Software, ii) ITservices and iii)
InformationTechnologyEnabledservices-BusinessProcessOutsourcing(ITeS-BPO) and is the
biggest employment generator and has helped the growth of several ancillary industries in the
country. The telecom sector is one of the fastest growing sectors in India. India has become the
second largest telecommunication market in the world afterChina. Several studies have shown
positive correlation of theInternetandMobileServices ongrowthof theGDPofa country.
ICTproductsmustprimarilybeintendedtofulfillorenablethefunctionofinformationprocessingandco
mmunicationbyelectronicmeans,includingtransmissionand display. The Government of India
introduced the National Policy on Software Products-2019 with a vision to drive the rise of India
as a Software Product Nation and synergise with the IT/ITES sector.
______________________________________________________________________________
17.09 Key Words
______________________________________________________________________________
ICT Products: The products that are either intended to fulfill the function of information
processing and communication by electronic means, including transmission and display, OR
which use electronic processing to detect, measure and/or record physical phenomena, or to
control a physical process.
National Software Product Mission (NSPM):The Mission has been constituted for the
implementation of National Policy on Software Products (NPSP 2019).
Indian Software Product Registry (ISPR): It serves as a gateway to the Indian Software
Product Company (ISPC) with exposures to millions of global players.
Next Generation Incubation Scheme (NGIS): The objective of the scheme is to create a
vibrant software product ecosystem to complement the robust IT Industry for continued growth,
new employment and enhance competitiveness.
______________________________________________________________________________
17.10 Answers to Check Your Progress
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
17.11 Terminal Questions
______________________________________________________________________________
1. Explain the various components of IT industry in India.
2. Describe the facilitators of growth of software sector in India.
3. Describe the status of Telecommunications Industry in India.
4. Explain the market players of telecommunications in India.
5. Explain the various ICT Products.
6. Describe the Government support to development of ICT products.
BLOCK 6 : EXTERNAL SECTOR OF INDIAN ECONOMY
Foreign trade plays an important role in the economy of any country and is considered as an
engine of growth. Like in every other economy, Indian economy and foreign trade are closely
interlinked. Foreign trade is a crucial part of development strategy. It has been an effective
mechanism of financial growth, creation of job opportunities and poverty reduction in the
economy. Foreign trade results in proper use of the resources of the country; making available
necessary inputs for industrialization; providing outlet for surplus production; earning much
needed foreign exchange.
This is the era of globalization. The economic upheaval in a corner of the world has its
repercussions all over the globe. The WTO has been the cornerstone of the multilateral rules-
based global trading system since its inception in 1995. The WTO is an international
organization that deals with the global rules of trade. The policies of the WTO impact all aspects
of the global society.
Unit 18: Structure of India’s Foreign Trade: explains different components of India’s foreign
trade. It includes important trends in India’s foreign trade, main imports and exports, trade in
services, traditional and emerging markets. It highlights different aspects of India’s foreign trade
policy 2015-20. The concept of foreign trade multiplier, its working, importance and
shortcomings have been elaborated.
Unit 19: Balance of Payments (BOP) and Exchange Rate: explains the concept of Balance of
Payments, its components and importance. The causes of disequilibrium of BOP and policy
measures for correcting them are discussed. The concept of exchange rate, its types and
significance along with its method of determination and its impact on BOP have been elaborated.
Unit 20: World Trade Organization (WTO): explains the background of establishing World
Trade Organization (WTO). The principles, objectives, functions and organizational structure of
WTO are discussed. Special agreements, namely Intellectual Property Right, Agriculture and
Trade in Services vis-a-vis WTO have been explained. Besides, India’s concerns in respect of
WTO and its working during 2015-21 have been elaborated.
1
UNIT 18: STRUCTURE OF INDIA’S FOREIGN TRADE
Structure
18.0 Objectives
18.1 Introduction
18.2 Trends in India’s Foreign Trade
18.3 Value of India’s Foreign Trade
18.4 Composition/pattern of Foreign Trade
18.4.1 Composition of Exports
18.4.2 Composition of Imports
18.4.3 Main Imports and Exports of India
18.5 Trade in Services
18.6 Direction of India’s Foreign Trade
18.6.1 Traditional Markets and Emerging Markets
18.7 Indian Foreign Trade Policy
18.7.1 Foreign Trade Policy 2015-20
18.8 Foreign Trade Multiplier
18.8.1 Assumptions
18.8.2 Its Working
18.8.3 Importance
18.8.4 Shortcomings
18.9 Let Us Sum Up
18.10 Key Words
18.11 Answer to Check Your Progress
18.12 Terminal Questions
2
18.0 OBJECTIVES
18.1 INTRODUCTION
Foreign trade, more generally, has been considered as an engine of growth. Like in
every other economy, Indian economy and foreign trade are closely interlinked.
Foreign trade has a significant impact on the GDP growth as well as expansion. As
such foreign trade is a crucial part of development strategy. It has been an effective
mechanism of financial growth, creation of job opportunities and poverty reduction
in the economy. Foreign trade results in proper use of the resources of the country;
making available necessary inputs for industrialization; providing outlet for surplus
production; earning much needed foreign exchange. It helps the country to deal
with the periods of natural calamities (droughts, floods, etc.) through import of
food grains and other necessary consumer goods. In the present age of
globalization, the government has initiated changes in its strategy on trade, foreign
investment, and tariffs. An appropriate and skillfully designed foreign trade policy
is essential for India’s rapid economic growth. In this unit, you will learn
examining trends in volume of trade, composition of trade; and direction of trade
in post – reform period. We will also examine the principal features of India’s
foreign trade policy. We will sum up the discussion with highlight on the concept
of foreign trade multiplier.
3
During 2019-20, total of exports and imports trade of India represents 43.3 per cent
of the country's GDP. Earlier, till 1980s this volume ranged between 15 to 20 per
cent of GDP. As per the WTO data for the year 2018 India's share in global
exports of merchandise was 1.7 percent and in global imports 2.6 percent. In the
services sector, India's share in global exports 3.5 percent and imports was 3.2
percent. The low world share of India’s exports, however, does not bring out the
importance of foreign trade for the Indian economy. All-out efforts are being made
by the government to raise the share of India in the global exports. In this section,
we will analyze the trends in value, composition and direction of exports and
imports and highlight the growing importance of services trade in recent times.
The value of India’s exports grew at the rate of 14.5 per cent a year
during the 20 year after 1991. The first decade of reforms is
characterized by a relatively low growth of 8 per cent a year, while
the second decade stands apart for its strong growth rate of 21
percent a year. In general, the growth rate of Indian exports has
been higher than the world exports throughout the post-reform
period. This is in contrast to the pre-reform period when the Indian
growth rates had been below the world average. Looking at the level
rather than growth, the value of exports stood at $23 billion in
1993-94 which increased to $45 billion in 2001-02. In other words,
during the early phase of the reforms, it took as many as eight
years to double the value of exports. However, thereafter within a
period of four years, the export value increased to more than doubled
from $45 billion in 2001-02 to $105 billion in 2005-06. Further, between 2002-03
and 2010-11, the value of exports increased nearly five times from about $54
4
billion to $250 billion. Consistent with this trend, India's share in the world exports
first increased slowly from about 0.6 percent in 1993 to 0.7 percent in 2001 and
then increased relatively faster to 1.7 percent in 2018. India's total merchandise
trade as a percentage of the gross domestic product (GDP) increased from 28.2
percent in 2004-5 to 43.2 percent in 2011-12. India's merchandise exports as a
percentage of GDP increased from 11.8 per cent to 16.5 percent during the same
period.
From 1991 to 2018, the total value of goods exports increased more than 16 times
from $18 billion to over $322.5 billion. During the same time span, goods imports
increased almost 22 times from $ 24 billion to $508 billion.
(Source:Comtrade,2020.https://www.nordeatrade.com/en/explore-new-market/india/trade-
profile).
The sustainability of India's export and prospects for further growth are strongly
contingent on the trends in world demand. Economic survey 2019-20 has observed
that export growth remains subdued with external demand weakened by slowdown
in global investment, output and heightened trade tensions, notwithstanding
resilient service exports. The global pandemic in form of Covid -19 adversely
affected trade. We are witnessing a sharp recovery presently.
Check Your Progress A
1. Identify four major trends in India’s foreign trade since 1991.
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
2. Indicate India’s position in global trade.
5
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
3. Highlight the importance of foreign trade in Indian economy.
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
4. Which of the following statements are True or False?
i) Foreign trade is considered as an engine of growth.
ii) During 2019-20, total of exports and imports trade of India were
lower than those during the 1980s.
iii) The first decade of reforms is characterized by a relatively low
growth.
iv) From 1991 to 2018, the total value of goods exports increased more
than 16 times.
v) Global pandemic in the form of Covid -19 did not affect India’s
foreign trade.
6
composition of India’s exports trade has undergone structural changes mainly as a
result of industrial progress.
India's merchandise trade increased exponentially in the 2000s decade from US$
95.1 billion in 2000-01 to US$ 793.8 billion in 2011-12. India's share in global
exports and imports also increased. Its ranking in the leading exporters and
importers stood at 19 for exports and 10 in imports in 2018 rank. Total export from
India (merchandise and services) stood at US$ 528.45 billion in 2019-20, while
total import was estimated at US$ 598.61 billion. Merchandise export stood at US$
314.31 billion in 2019-20, while merchandise import touched US$ 467.19 billion
in the same period. The estimated value of services export and import for 2019-20
stood at US$ 214.14 billion and US$ 131.41 billion, respectively.
7
(iv) The phenomenal growth of ‘mineral products’ has been driven by
‘mineral fuels and oils’ while ‘organic chemicals’ and ‘pharmaceutical
products’ are responsible for the export growth of ‘chemical products’.
(v) The export growth of ‘machinery’ has been driven primarily by ‘electrical
machinery and equipments’. The growth of ‘transport equipments’ has been
brought about by ‘vehicles other than railway or tramway rolling-stock’ and
‘ships, boats and floating structure’.
A total of 68 dynamic products in India’s export basket have been identified, of
which 50 belong to the capital-intensive category and the remaining 18 belong to
the traditional category.
The combined share of these 68 products in India's total exports has increased
very fast. The capital-intensive category as a whole contributes about 56 percent
of India's total exports. This indicates a high degree of concentration in export
activity.
To sum up compositional changes in India's export basket have been taking place
over the years. While the share of primary products in India's exports fell over the
years mainly due to the fall in shares of traditional items like textiles and leather
and leather manufactures even though the share of engineering goods and
chemicals and related products increased. In short, the proportions of high value
and differentiated products have increased in India’s export basket.
The composition of trade is now dominated by manufactured goods and services.
The diversification in export products has risen rapidly following the reforms. In
recent times, the composition of India’s exports has become more broad- based
with visibly decreased dependency on any one product category.
8
There has been a shift in India’s import trade from primary products to capital
goods and other intermediate manufactures. Now the import of primary fertilizers,
iron and steel, non-ferrous metals, and other industrial inputs has increased
substantially. The changes in the composition of imports have occurred to meet the
consumption and investment needs of the growing economy of India. The most
notable change is the rise in share of capital goods imports. The strong growth of
the manufacturing and services sector is reflected in its import bill. The shares of
import bill telecommunications, equipment, office machines, and aircrafts have
risen appreciably. Fuel imports remain a major import item. The other product
categories in India’s imports include: electronic goods, gold and silver, chemicals,
pearls and precious and semi-precious stones, iron and steel, non-ferrous metals,
professional instruments, optical goods, etc., and computer software. Due to the
greater rise in the demand for edible oils as compared to production, India’s
dependency on edible oils continues. As India has multiplied domestic production
capacity for manufacturing capital goods, its import share of capital goods has
declined.
Table 18.1: Commodity-wise Composition of Exports (Share in Total Exports
Percent)
2011-12 2019-20 (April-November)
Items
Petroleum 18.5 13.7
Products
Pearl, Precious, 9.3 7.0
Semiprecious
Stones
Drug 2.6 5.0
Formulations,
Biologicals
Gold and Other 4.3 4.5
Precious Metal
Jewellery
Iron and Steel 2.7 3.0
9
Products of Iron 2.3 2.8
and Steel
Organic Chemicals 1.7 2.8
RMG Cotton 3.2 2.6
including
Accessories
Ship, Boat and 2.7 2.5
Floating Struct
Other 5.0 2.3
Commodities
Source: Department of Commerce, Government of India
10
Since liberalization, there has been an increasing diversification of both exports
and imports. The transformation in the composition of India’s exports has been
made possible because of rapid growth and diversification of Indian industries. The
composition of imports also underwent changes.
India’s imports primarily consist of petroleum products, fertilizers, capital goods,
edible oils, etc., wherein there is little flexibility to reduce its imports bill.
The main items of exports of manufactured goods from India consist of:
(i) gems and jewellery,
(ii) readymade garments,
(iii) machinery and instruments,
(iv) drugs, pharmaceuticals, and fine chemicals,
(v) manufacturer of metals,
(vi) transport equipment,
(vii) primary and semi-finished iron and steel,
(viii) cotton yam, fabrics, and made ups,
(ix) electronic goods,
(x) dyes, intermediates, and coal tar chemicals,
(xi) leather and manufacturers, handicrafts, leather footwear, and
others,
(xii) petroleum products.
11
(v) unmanufactured tobacco,
(vi) cereals, and others.
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………...
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
12
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
4. What is the most striking aspect of the structural change in India's exports in
the recent past?.
………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………......
13
18.5 TRADE IN SERVICES
India’s services trade has been a major driver of its exports over the past two
decades. The country has emerged among the fastest growing nations in global
services trade as can be seen from Table 18.3.
This sector has not only attracted significant foreign investment flows but also
contributed significantly to exports as well as provided large-scale employment.
India’s services sector covers a wide variety of activities such as trade, hotels and
restaurants, transport, storage and communication, financing, insurance, real estate,
business services, community, social and personal services, and services associated
with construction.
18.5.1 India’s Services Exports
India’s services exports have significantly grown in the post reform period as can
be seen from Table 18.4 below. The trade in services has been growing faster than
the merchandise trade, and the share of services in the total export trade has been
increasing.
Table18.4: Service Exports as percent of GDP
14
India is now the world’s back-office because companies from rich nations have
outsourced business processes and other IT-intensive and knowledge-based
operations to Indian partners. India’s services trade surplus has increased due to the
surge in IT exports. There has been considerable growth in transport, travel, and
other services, such as telecommunications, financial, construction, and legal. The
software services are mainly responsible for the surplus in services trade. Over the
years, the composition of services exports from India has undergone considerable
change. Some of these changes can be highlighted as follows:
An analysis of services exports from India reveals that the largest services
segment, software and IT-enabled services, has graduated to newer services. The
new services include: packaged software implementation, systems integration,
network infrastructure management, and IT consulting. There remains a huge
untapped potential for IT-enabled services.
15
service imports, which is in consonance with the rising level of economic activity
in the country. The component of travel services has however been steadily
increasing reflecting the growing attractiveness of global destinations to the
domestic tourists in the country. India has maintained trade surplus in all the major
services. However, the trade surplus has shown fluctuations in the past five years.
16
7 Financial services 4.12 3.12 5.02 5.80 4.04
After independence, India’s trade expanded in many new directions. Change has
been evident in countries which India trades with. The direction of both imports
and exports of India has changed significantly. India has trading relations with all
the major trading blocs and all the geographical regions of the world. At present,
India’s major trading partners are: China, U.S.A., U.K., Russia, Japan, Germany,
France, Iran, Iraq, Belgium, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Hong Kong, Singapore. Trade
with emerging markets and developing countries has expanded spectacularly.
Within Asia, while the share of North East Asia (consisting of China, Hong Kong,
Japan) and ASEAN (Association of South East Asian Nations) fell there was a
noticeable rise in the share of West Asia-GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council)
17
countries. The country has recently signed free trade agreements with South Korea
and ASEAN, and has entered into negotiations with several partners (EU,
MERCOSUR, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa). The top five countries of
exports are U.S.A., U.A.E., China, Hong Kong and Singapore. As regards the
direction of imports, the top five countries of imports are China, Saudi Arabia,
UAE, U.S.A. and Switzerland.
Table 18.6: Direction of trade in 2018
Countries Exports Imports
(per cent) (per cent)
United States 16.0 6.4
China 5.1 14.5
United Arab Emirates (UAE) 8.8 5.3
18
rise in the share of primary products and petroleum products and a fall in the share
of manufactured goods.
The aggregate share of traditional markets in India's exports has declined steadily.
The emerging markets account for nearly two-thirds of India’s exports. India's
export shares to most of the countries in this group has increased over the years,
with the increase being particularly pronounced for the UAE and China.
With the country focusing on its Look-East policy since 2009 and exploring new
destinations, such as Latin America, Africa and Oceania, growth in exports has,
more or less, been steady, even as demand from traditional markets of the US and
the EU is on a decline. China continues to be the largest exporter to India followed
by USA, UAE and Saudi Arabia. There is need to diversify the markets.
Check Your Progress C
1. Write three importance of trade in services.
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………….
2. Name five main items of exports and imports in trade in services.
19
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………….
3. Describe the main trade partners of India for both exports and imports.
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
4. Name three important emerging markets for Indian exports.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Which of the following statements are True or False?
i) India has emerged among the fastest growing nations in global
services trade.
ii) India is now the world’s back-office.
iii) India has maintained trade surplus in all the major services.
iv) The share of manufactured goods in India's exports to the USA has
increased.
v) The Caribbean has been the traditional market for India’s exports.
20
time, in an attempt to improve the efficiency and competitiveness of Indian
industries.
The outward looking trade policy measures announced in 1991 mark the initiation
of a new era in India’s foreign trade. India adopted export promotion strategy just
to promote its exports so as to increase its foreign exchange earnings. Post 1991,
the gradual liberalization of the Indian economy created a conducive environment
for India’s exports to flourish and evolve into an engine of social and economic
growth. Hence, the last three decades have witnessed India’s transformation from a
closed economy to a big player in the global market. Many pro-export policies
have been adopted after the reforms, which have a favorable impact on India’s
trade. The process of trade liberalization is still not completed.
21
The policy describes the market and product strategy and measures required for
trade promotion, infrastructure development and overall enhancement of the trade
eco system. It seeks to enable India to respond to the challenges of the external
environment, keeping in step with a rapidly evolving international trading
architecture and make trade a major contributor to the country’s economic growth
and development. Following are the salient features of the FTP :
(i) The policy provides a framework for increasing exports of goods
and services as well as generation of employment. The focus is on
increasing value addition in the country, in line with the ‘Make in
India’ programme.
(ii) It aims to enable India to respond to the challenges of the external
environment, keeping in step with a rapidly evolving international
trading architecture. It aims at making trade a major contributor to
the country’s economic growth and development.
(iii) It introduces two new schemes. The first is ‘Merchandise Exports
from India Scheme (MEIS)’ for export of specified goods to
specified markets. The second scheme is ‘Services Exports from
India Scheme (SEIS)’ for increasing exports of notified services.
(iv) In order to give a boost to exports from SEZs, the policy extends
benefits of both the reward schemes (MEIS and SEIS) to units
located in SEZs. It is hoped that this measure will give a new
impetus to development and growth of SEZs in the country. Duty
credit scrips issued under MEIS and SEIS and the goods imported
against these scrips are fully transferable.
(v) Measures have been adopted to nudge procurement of capital goods
from indigenous manufacturers under the EPCG scheme.
(vi) It provides boost to exports of defense and hi-tech items.
22
(vii) A number of steps for encouraging manufacturing and exports under
100 percent EOU/EHTP/STPI/BTP Schemes has been taken.
(viii) 108 ‘MSME clusters’ have been identified for focused interventions
to boost exports. Accordingly, ‘Niryat Bandhu Scheme’ has been
galvanized and repositioned to achieve the objectives of ‘Skill
India’. Outreach activities will be organized in a structured way at
these clusters with the help of EPCs and other willing “Industry
Partners” and “Knowledge Partners”.
(ix) Trade facilitation and enhancing the ease of doing business are the
other major focus areas of FTP. Attention has been paid to simplify
various ‘Aayat Niryat’ Forms, bringing in clarity in different
provisions, removing ambiguities and enhancing electronic
governance.
The government has extended the existing foreign trade policy till March 2022
amid the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic. Not with standing all the changes
and reforms, India’s trade regime and regulatory environment still remains
relatively restrictive.
The concept: The foreign trade multiplier also known as the export multiplier
operates like the investment multiplier. It may be defined as the amount by
which the national income of a nation will be raised by a unit increase in
domestic investment on exports. As exports increase, there is an increase in the
income of all persons associated with export industries. These in turn create
demand for goods. But this is dependent upon their marginal propensity to save
(MPS) and the marginal propensity to import (MPM). The smaller the ratio of
23
these two marginal propensities, the larger will be the value of multiplier and vice
versa resulting in increase in domestic product to an addition to exports. As for
example, if an increase in exports by `1000 crores has raised national income
through the foreign trade multiplier by `2000 crores, given the values of MPS and
MPM.
18.8.1 Assumptions
24
marginal propensity to import (MPM). There has been an inverse relation between
the two propensities and the export multiplier.
Imports depend on the level of national income. As the national income increases,
so do domestic expenditures on imports. Thus, marginal propensity to import
(MPM) is defined as:
MPM = change in import/ change in income
Exports have no relationship with the level of domestic national income, thus they
are independent. Exports are dependent on national income of importing country.
Multiplier effect:
(i) Given the assumptions, an increase in exports tends to raise
domestic income. The increased income also encourages some
imports, which act as ‘leakages’. These tend to reduce the full
multiplier effect that would exist if imports remained constant.
Thus, MPM is the fraction of any increase in income that ‘leaks’
into imports.
(ii) Open economy’s allocation of income is MPC + MPS + MPM
= 1.
(iii) The foreign trade multiplier is defined as the reciprocal of all
the leakages, including imports.
Foreign trade multiplier= 1 / (MPS + MPM) = 1 / leakage
(iv) If MPS is constant then the MPM has an inverse relationship with MPC.
As more imports are consumed, there are smaller amounts to be
consumed for domestic goods.
18.8.3 Importance
The Foreign Trade multiplier brings about the effect of change in exports on
change in income. In the open economy exports are exogenous i.e., they do not
depend upon national income of an economy. It gets determined exogenously in
the external factors like taste and preferences of the residents of the foreign country
and the national income of the foreign countries. There is a direct and positive
25
relationship between imports and national income. As total national income rises
imports rise too and vice versa.
In reality, countries are linked to each other indirectly also. A country’s exports or
imports affect the national income of the other country which, in turn, affects the
foreign trade and national income of the first country. The smaller the country is in
relation to other trading partner, the negligible is the foreign repercussion. But the
foreign repercussion will be high in the case of a large country because a change in
the national income of such a country will have significant foreign repercussions.
The policy implications are that the export promotion measures raise national
income via the simple foreign trade multiplier, whereas increases in domestic
investment policies raise national income many times in multiplier rounds via the
repercussion effects.
18.8.4 Shortcomings
The analysis of foreign trade multiplier is based on the unrealistic assumptions.
Exports and investment are not independent. A rise in exports does not always lead
to increase in national income. On the contrary, certain imports, of say capital
goods, have the effect of increasing national income. The foreign trade multiplier
is assumed to be an instantaneous process whereby it provides the final results.
Thus, it involves no lags and is unrealistic. The assumption of full employment is
not realistic. It is not applicable to more than two countries. The foreign trade
multiplier assumes that there are no tariff barriers and exchange controls. In reality,
such trade restrictions exist which restrict the operations of the foreign trade
multiplier. Governments always interfere through monetary and fiscal policies
which affect exports, imports and national income. However, despite these
shortcomings, the foreign trade multiplier is a powerful tool of economic analysis
which helps in formulating policy measures.
26
Check Your Progress D
3. Point out six salient features of foreign trade policy (FTP) of 2015-20.
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
ii) The focus of the foreign trade policy 2015-20 is to place special
emphasis on improving the ‘ease of doing businesses’.
27
iii) The foreign trade multiplier is related to the domestic investment on
exports.
It is significant to note the four important aspects of India’s foreign trade which
include huge growth in the value and volume of trade, higher growth of imports,
inadequate growth of exports, and mounting trade deficit.
India’s share in the world trade both in terms of imports and exports has been
increasing. The bulk of India’s trade is with the developed countries of the West,
the oil producing countries and China. However, there is a good scope for
expanding trade, particularly exports, with South-East Asia, Middle-East, and East
Africa.
28
The government has been following a liberalised foreign trade policy since 1991
and has mainly concentrated on reforms on liberalization, openness and export
promotion activity.
The foreign trade multiplier may be defined as the amount by which the national
associated with export industries. But the assumptions of foreign trade multiplier
are unrealistic.
29
continued industrial diversification. India adopted import substitution strategies for
its industrialization.
industries from unfair competition from foreign ones for the benefit of a domestic
economy. The four basic tools are tariffs, subsidies, quotas, and currency
30
1. Point out significance of foreign trade in Indian economy. Describe the
broad trends in India’s foreign trade since 1991.
2. Explain changes in the composition of India’s exports and imports.
Highlight the direction of trade in recent times.
3. What is services trade? Describe its importance in India’s foreign
trade.
4. What do you mean by liberalized foreign trade policy? Examine its
importance.
5. Analyse the salient features of India’s foreign trade policy of 2015-20.
How will it be of help in promoting India’s exports?
6. What is the meaning of foreign trade multiplier? Indicate its
importance.
Ahluwalia, M.S., (2002), Economic Reforms in India since 1991: Has Gradualism
Worked? Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 64-88.
Datt, Gaurav and Mahajan, Ashwani (2020): Datt and Sundharam’s Indian
Economy, S. Chand Publishing, New Delhi
31
UNIT 19 BALANCE OF PAYMENTS (BOP) AND EXCHANGE RATE
Structure
19.0 Objectives
19.1 Introduction
19.2 Concept, Components and Importance of BOP
19.2.1 Components of BOP
19.2.2 Importance of BOP
19.2.3 Balance of Trade and Balance of Payments
19.3 BOP Disequilibrium
19.3.1 Causes of Disequilibrium
19.3.2 Policy Measures for Correcting Disequilibrium
19.4 Rate of Exchange: Concept, Types and Significance
19.4.1 Exchange Rate
19.4.2 Significance of Exchange Rate
19.5 Exchange Rage Regime / System
19.6 Fixed Exchange Rate
19.6.1 Advantages
19.6.2 Disadvantages
19.7 Floating Exchange Rates
19.7.1 Advantages
19.7.2 Disadvantages
19.8 Appreciation and Depreciation of Exchange Rate
19.9 Foreign exchange Rate and Impact on BOP
19.10 Determination of Exchange Rate
19.10.1 Purchasing Power Parity Theory
1
19.11 Let Us Sum Up
19.12 Key Words
19.13 Answers to Check Your Progress
19.14 Terminal Questions
19.0 OBJECTIVES
determination
19.1 INTRODUCTION
goods, services and capital between a nation’s residents and the residents of
2
the rest of the world during a given period of time. BOP is a key to
understanding how people trade one country’s money for that of another
and unemployment. In this unit, you will learn various facets of BOP like its
foreign exchange regime, its impact on BOP, and theory of purchasing power
parity.
institutions of one country and the rest of the world for a given period of
time, usually a year. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has developed a
the balance of payments can be grouped into three broad accounts –current,
Balance of payments
Merchandise
Exports (X) Remittances and Asset Transactions, FDI,
Imports (M) Transfer Receipts External Borrowings
and Payments
(Balance of Trade = X – M)
Item/Year 2019‐20*
Credit Debit Net
1 17 18 19
A. Current account
1. Merchandise 320431 477937 -157506
2. Invisibles (a+b+c) 321712 188862 132850
a) Services 213191 128269 84922
b) Transfers 83356 8147 75208
c) Income 25166 52446 -27281
Total Current account (1+2) 642143 666799 -24656
B. Capital account
1. Foreign investment 368534 324118 44417
2. Loans 94239 68553 25686
3. Banking capital 84716 90031 -5315
0 69 -69
4. Rupee debt service
5. Other capital 62549 44087 18462
Total capital account (1 to 5) 610038 526858 83180
C. Errors & omissions 1856 882 974
D. Overall balance (A+B+C) 1254037 1194539 59498
4
E. Monetary movements (i+ii) 0 59498 -59498
i) I.M.F. - - -
ii) Foreign exchange reserves (Increase- / Decrease+) 0 59498 -59498
* preliminary estimates
Look at Table 19.1 which shows India’s BOP account for the financial year
first part of the current account. It receives more attention than any of
and exports of goods are reported, are often the largest single
5
Services: The services category includes many payments such as
debits, while sales of these services are similar to exports and are
recorded as credits.
The net receipts from these transactions together with the net
includes the balance of trade, the balance of services, and the balance
located abroad.
Reserves are used for bringing BOP accounts into balance. When all
Net Errors and Omissions: You must have noticed that millions of
as no surprise that the amount of recorded debits are never equal to the
a government significantly and also the economy itself. Capital receipts and
payments indicate the country’s external debt position and changes in it.
BOP data are of interest because they reveal demand for the country’s
may develop in the country and, in some cases, the likelihood of economic
crisis. International crises have occurred for as long as there have been
international trade and commerce. They may occur again. Each crisis has its
8
own unique characteristics, but all follow some of the economic
fundamentals.
above, take the form of trade in goods and services, capital movements or
visible item because, it is an open trade among the countries and can be
easily certified ‘by the customs officials’. The net receipts from exports and
for a country arises in a particular year if the value of its exports is smaller
than the value of its imports. It is obvious that the balance of trade need not
balance of trade deficit and still a balance of payment surplus-or vice versa.
9
BOP is more comprehensive than the balance of trade. Balance of payments
account. The visible account is composed of the services sector and gifts
BOP BOT
1 It is a broad term. It is a narrow term.
2 It includes all transactions related to It includes only visible items.
visible, invisible and
capital transfers.
3 It is always balances itself. It can be favourable or unfavourable.
4 BOP = Current Account + Capital BOT = Net Earning on Export - Net
Account + or - Balancing item (Errors payment for imports.
and omissions)
5 Following are main factors which affect Following are main factors which
BOP affect BOT
a) Conditions of foreign lenders. a) cost of production
b)Economic policy of Government b) availability of raw materials
c) all the factors of BOT c) Exchange rate
d) Prices of goods manufactured at
home
10
19.2.2 Balance of Payments Always Balances:
The balance of payments is strictly an accounting term used to describe a
record of all monetary transactions between one country and rest of the
world. In practice, it is difficult to achieve a situation where receipts equal
payments. In reality, total receipts may diverge from total payments because
of:
(i) the difficulty of collecting accurate trade information;
(ii) the difference in the timing between the two sides of the balance;
and
(iii) a change in the exchange rates.
To say that the ‘balance of payments always balances’ is to say that a net
credit balance in one of these accounts must have a counterpart net debit
balance in one of the other accounts. The algebraic sum of the net credit and
debit balances of the three accounts must equal zero. It simply results from
this item in the BOP account is to adjust the difference between the sums of
the credit and the sums of the debit items in the BoP accounts so that they
must always show the same total. It implies only equality. In this book-
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
4. Distinguish between current and capital accounts of BOP.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
5. Which of the following statements are True or False?
i) BOP is an accounting statement of all international monetary
transactions of a country.
ii) BOP is a balance sheet.
iii) BOP highlights a country’s international economic status.
iv) The balance of payments always balances.
v) The balance of trade is more comprehensive than the balance of
payments.
19.3 BOP DISEQUILIBRIUM
13
a) When there is an imbalance between domestic savings and domestic
investments. A deficit in the current account balance will result if domestic
investments are higher than domestic savings, since the excess investments
will be financed with capital from foreign sources.
b) When the trade agreement between two countries affects the level of import
or export activities, a balance of payments disequilibrium will surface.
c) Changes in an exchange rate when a country’s currency
is revalued or devalued; it can cause disequilibrium.
d) Other factors, such as inflation or deflation, changes in the foreign exchange
reserves, population growth, increase in developmental expenditure, political
instability, etc. may result in disequilibrium.
15
Check Your Progress B
17
Exchange rate system is also called a currency system which establishes the
way in which the exchange rate is determined. There are two basic systems
that can be used to determine the exchange rate between one country’s
currency and another’s. These are: a floating exchange rate system and a
fixed exchange rate system. Between these there are a number of
combinations of the two. The choice of an appropriate exchange rate
regime—floating, managed or fixed arrangements—for individual countries
is important. It is a pivotal element of the economic policy adopted by a
country’s government. However, it remains true that there is no single
exchange rate regime that is best for all countries in all circumstances.
In a fixed exchange rate system, a rise in the exchange rate of the domestic
currency vis-à-vis another foreign currency is called a devaluation. For
example, a government’s policy decision to devalue the domestic currency
vis-à-vis the US dollar from Rs.65 to Rs.75. This means that in order to buy
1 unit of a given foreign currency more of the domestic currency is needed.
On the other hand, when the exchange rate falls it is termed as a revaluation.
These terms imply a deliberate decision on the part of the government to
change the exchange rate.
It is important to realize that fixity cannot be achieved by simple
government decree because there are powerful economic forces at work in
18
the foreign exchange markets. The fixing of an exchange rate very rarely
involves the establishment of a single point away from which a currency is
not permitted to move. The usual approach is to define a target zone for the
currency. The authorities then respond with appropriate measures when
market forces threaten to move the currency above or below the zone.
19.6.1 Advantages of Fixed Exchange Rate: These are as follows:
(i) Provides greater certainty for exporters and importers as there are no
exchange rate risks. Hence, it promotes long-term capital flows.
(ii) There is no fear of adverse effect of speculation on the exchange rate.
(iii) Businesses have the knowledge that the price is fixed and therefore,
not going to change, it is relatively easier for them to plan ahead.
(iv) Encourages international trade by making prices of goods involved in
trade more predictable. It leads to low inflation.
(v) Imposes the discipline necessary for exchange rate stability; in
particular monetary policy must be coordinated.
Keynes was a chief architect of IMF and a strong proponent of fixed rates.
Many Keynesians agree that government intervention is necessary to
promote exchange rate stability. However, the question remains how to
attain a stable exchange rate system.
19.7.1 Advantages
A flexible exchange rate system confers a number of advantages upon
economies that adopt it:
(i) Continuous changes are easier to adjust.
(ii) Less likely to permit a payments crisis to develop. Any early or
‘incipient’ deficit or surplus that might arise will be swiftly
dissipated by appropriate corrective exchange rate movements.
This system automatically provides for balance of payments
stability without the need for any action whatsoever by policy-
makers.
(iii) Less politicized and authorities do not intervene in the foreign
exchange market.
(iv) Provides fewer incentives for destabilizing speculation. Financial
instruments are available to hedge the risks posed by a
fluctuating exchange rate.
(v) Allows nations to pursue their own independent economic goals
in respect of the other objectives of macro policy. Gives the
monetary authorities’ flexibility in determining interest rates.
This is because interest rates do not have to be set to keep the
value of the exchange rate within pre-determined bands.
21
(vi) Offers the most appropriate framework for the international
allocation of resources through the trade process.
19.7.2 Disadvantages
Market forces may fail to determine the appropriate exchange rate and
hence floating exchange rate regime may not provide the desired
results. It also lead to misallocation of resources.
Since the exchange rate is basically determined by market forces, the upward
and downward movement in the value of rupee are appreciation and
depreciation respectively. Depreciation of the rupee refers to the decrease in
the external value of the domestic currency caused by the operation of market
22
forces. Appreciation of the rupee refers to the increase in the external value
of the domestic currency caused by the operation of market forces. The
exchange rate is determined in the open market through the pressure of
buying and selling of foreign currencies.
The balance of trade influences currency exchange rates through its effect on
the supply and demand for foreign exchange. When a country's trade account
does not net to zero—that is, when exports are not equal to imports. There is
relatively more supply, or demand, for a country's currency, which influences
the price of that currency on the world market. The currency exchange rate is
one of the most important determinants of a country's relative level of
economic health. Exchange rates play a vital role in a country's level of trade.
These relative values are influenced by the demand for currency, which is in
turn influenced by trade. If a country exports more than it imports, there is a
high demand for its goods, and thus, for its currency. The economics
of supply and demand dictate that when demand is high, prices rise and the
currency appreciates in value. In contrast, if a country imports more than it
exports, there is relatively less demand for its currency, so prices should
decline. In the case of currency, it depreciates or loses value.
For example, let us say that tea is the only product on the market and U.S.
imports more tea from India than it exports, so it needs to buy more dollars
relative to rupees sold. When India imports more than exports, India’s
demand for dollars outstrips U.S. demand for rupee, meaning that the value
of the rupee falls.
23
In sum, the balance of trade impacts currency exchange rates as supply and
demand can lead to an appreciation or depreciation of currencies. A country
with a high demand for its goods tends to export more than it imports,
increasing demand for its currency. A county that imports more than it
exports will have less demand for its currency. Trade balances, and as a
result, currencies can swing back and forth, assuming each are floating
currencies. If one or both currencies are fixed or pegged, the currencies do
not move as easily in response to a trade imbalance.
24
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Which of the following statements are True or False?
i) The exchange rate affects decisions made by foreign exchange investors.
ii) When the exchange rate falls, it is termed as a revaluation.
iii) Volatile exchange rate is helpful in promoting exports.
iv) Depreciation of the rupee refers to the decrease in its external value.
v) The balance of trade influences currency exchange rate.
19.10 DETERMINATION OF EXCHANGE RATE
Purchasing power parity (PPP) was created after World War I. Before then,
most countries relied on the gold standard. A country's exchange rate
reflected how much gold the currency was worth. Most countries abandoned
the gold standard to pay for the war. They printed all the money they
needed, creating inflation.
After the war, the Swedish economist Gustav Cassel suggested multiplying
each currency's pre-war value by its inflation rate to get the new parity. That
formed the basis for today's PPP. When making comparisons between
countries which use paper currencies having no intrinsic value, it becomes
necessary to convert values. Economists use a tool known as purchasing
power parity (PPP) to smooth out some of the differences between
currencies and countries. Purchasing power parity theory allows reasonable
comparisons, even across widely variable conditions. Comparing economies
and currencies based on purchasing power parity theory is an important tool
for international finance.
25
19.10.1 Purchasing Power Parity Theory
The PPP theory is often broken down into two main concepts: Absolute
purchasing power parity and Relative purchasing power parity.
Absolute purchasing power parity (APPP) is the basic PPP theory, which
states that once two currencies have been exchanged, a basket of goods
should have the same value. Usually, the theory is based on converting other
world currencies into the US dollar. For example, if the price of a can of
Coca Cola was $2, APPP would suggest that a can of Coca Cola in any other
country should cost $2 after converting USD into the local currency. If this
does not hold true, then APPP suggests that the currency exchange rate will
26
change over time until the goods are of equal value – as without any barriers
to trade, there should be an equilibrium in the price of goods. This is a
completely price-level theory, which only looks at the exact same basket of
goods in each country, with no other factors included. However, the theory
ignores the existence of inflation and consumer spending, as well as
transportation costs and tariffs, which can impact the short-term exchange
rate. Without these inclusions, a currency’s power is not properly
represented.
Once we add this concept onto APPP, we can see that inflation rates will
account for part of the change in the power of currencies. So suppose that
the India has a 5 per cent inflation rate, while US has a 2 per cent inflation
rate. This means that after one year, the price of a basket of goods in US has
increased by 2 per cent, while the same price of the basket of goods in India
has increased by 5 per cent. When a country's domestic price level is
increasing (i.e., a country experiences inflation), that country's exchange rate
must depreciate in order to return to PPP. The basis for PPP is the ‘law of
one price’. In the absence of transportation and other transaction costs,
competitive markets will equalize the price of an identical good in two
countries when the prices are expressed in the same currency.
27
How to calculate PPP: The PPP formula calculation will vary depending on
what we are trying to achieve and which PPP we want to use. The absolute
PPP calculation is calculated by dividing the cost of a good in one currency,
by the cost of a good in another currency (usually the US dollar).
Then, to calculate the relative PPP rate, we would simply assume that the
ratio of price levels was equal to the exchange rate from one currency to
another, adjusted for the inflation rate. This would give us the rate of
depreciation for one currency compared to another, and an estimate of the
future exchange rate.
The purchasing power parity theory has been subject to the following
criticisms.
(i) There are differences in transportation costs, taxes, and tariffs. These
costs will raise prices in a country. Countries with many trade
agreements will have lower prices because they have fewer tariffs.
(ii) Non-Traded Services include items as insurance, utility costs,
and labor costs. These expenses are unlikely to be at parity
internationally. There are things, like real estate and haircuts, can not
be shipped.
(iii) Not everyone has the same access to international trade.
28
(iv) Goods might be deliberately priced higher in a country. In some cases,
higher prices may obtain due to the fact that a company may have
a competitive advantage over other sellers. The company may have a
monopoly or be part of a cartel of companies that manipulate prices,
keeping them artificially high.
(v) Import costs are subject to exchange rate fluctuations. The most
significant driver of changing exchange rate values is the foreign
exchange market. It creates wide swings in exchange rate values.
In reality, there are factors which prevent costs from equalising. The theory
also assumes that the basket of goods is completely identical, or at best very
similar goods. For a truly meaningful comparison, the basket would have to
contain a wide variety of goods and services. The amount of data that has to
be collected is huge, and it can be a complex process.
It is the virtue of PPP theory to be simple; but the theory would have to be
rejected if it were simple-minded. The theory does have limitations. PPP is
used worldwide to compare the income levels in different countries. PPP
thus makes it easy to understand and interpret the data of each country. PPP
theory can be corrected by a simple alteration or extension of the theory. If
the PPP remains the more important explanatory variable, the PPP theory
has been amended but not eclipsed. Such techniques may be used to
incorporate speculation, trade restrictions, and other influences on a floating
exchange rate.
29
use the rates to predict the direction of a currency pair and use it to
determine whether to buy or sell a currency pair. The PPP theory assumes
that a decline in the purchasing power of a currency, caused by factors such
as inflation, should equate to an equal fall in the exchange rate. While it is
not a perfect measurement metric, purchase power parity does allow for the
possibility of comparing pricing between countries that have differing
currencies.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lioudis, Nick (2019): How the Balance of Trade Affects Currency Exchange
Rates (https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/041515/how-does-
balance-trade-impact-currency-exchange-rates.asp) Jul 9.
34
[1]
Structure
20.0 Objectives
20.1 Introduction
20.0 OBJECTIVES
20.1 INTRODUCTION
The WTO has been the cornerstone of the multilateral rules-based global trading system since its
inception in 1995. The WTO is an international organization that deals with the global rules of trade. The
policies of the WTO impact all aspects of global society. WTO has evoked the entire spectrum of opinion
from being the saviour of the global economy to the destroyer of less developed countries. There is a
growing international backlash against the WTO. All three of the WTO’s functions – providing a
negotiation forum to liberalize trade and establish new rules, monitoring trade policies, and resolving
disputes between its 164 members are facing challenges. In this unit you will learn evolution and features
of WTO, summarizes the key features of the types of agreements of WTO along with its principles,
objectives, functions, structure and addresses questions and concerns of India regarding WTO and its
[3]
working. With trade tensions getting increasingly politicized and Covid-19 creating huge economic
challenges, a modernized and fully functioning WTO is more essential than ever.
It was in 1946 that a conference was organized in London where the tariff concession resulting from the
tariff negotiating conference were embodied in a multilateral contract called the GATT. The contract was
signed on October 30, 1947 at Geneva and became effective from January 1, 1948. GATT was essentially
a trade agreement. The GATT embodies a set of rules of conduct for international trade policy that are
FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF GATT: GATT was a treaty that was collectively administered by
the contracting parties. Representatives of the contracting parties used to meet from time to time to discuss
matters of common interest and to give effect to the provisions of the Agreement requiring joint action.
(ii) Domestic industry should only be protected by means of customs tariffs and not through
(iii) The aims of consultations should be the avoidance of damage to member’s interests.
(iv) GATT served as a framework within which negotiations could be held to reduce tariffs and
Objectives of GATT: The objectives of the GATT were based on principles contained in the code
Criticisms of GATT: There had been large scale evasion of GATT rules by contracting parties over the
years which had made a mockery of the GATT. From the beginning of the GATT, agriculture was treated
as a special case where GATT rules hardly applied. Almost every developed country followed such
agricultural trade policies which were inconsistent with GATT rules. But trade liberalisation for
agricultural products had been much less than for manufacturers. The role of GATT was being
undermined by concluding bilateral, discriminatory and restrictive arrangements outside the GATT rules.
At the time of the conclusion of the Uruguay Round on December 15, 1993, over 100 bilateral agreements
were in force in the world which restricted exports of developing countries to the developed ones. The
GATT being a mandatory body did not possess any mechanism to get its rules implemented by
contracting parties.
Since its formation in 1947, eight rounds (conferences) of global trade negotiations were held under the
auspices of the GATT. The Eighth Round of GATT negotiations which began at Punta Del Esta in
Uruguay in September 1986 ought to have been concluded by the end of 1990. Indeed the Uruguay Round
concluded on December 15, 1993 marks the end of the longest debate in the history of the globe. The
[5]
negotiators finally produced a basic document consisting of 400 pages of agreements, together with
supplementary documents detailing the specific commitments of member nations with regard to particular
markets and products. By the end of the Uruguay Round (1994), 123 countries joined hands. The
agreement was signed in Marrakesh, Morocco, in April 1994, and ratified by the major nations—after
bitter political controversy in some cases, including the United States—by the end of that year. The so-
In short, one can have the conclusion of all the eight rounds at a glance in the shape of following Table:
agreements
WTO, etc
1. What is GATT?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. What were fundamental principles of GATT?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. What are objectives of GATT.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Point out criticisms of GATT.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Which of the following statements are True or False?
i) The GATT embodied a set of rules of conduct for international trade policy.
ii) GATT served as a framework within which negotiations could be held to reduce tariffs and
other trade barriers.
iii) After inception of GATT, no bipartisan agreements were made. False
iv) GATT did not possess any mechanism to get its rules implemented by the contracting
parties.
v) The Eighth Round of GATT negotiations was held in Uruguay.
On the conclusion of the Uruguay Round, The WTO was setup on January 01, 1995, comprising 164
member States. It provides a common platform to negotiate trade agreements among member countries
[7]
and to resolve any trade disputes. It manages 60 global and about 300 regional trade agreements. The 60
WTO Agreements cover goods, services, and intellectual property. It is a list of about 60 agreements,
annexes, decisions, and understandings. Agreements relate to both multilateral and plurilateral agreements.
Four annexes to the WTO define the substantive rights and obligations of members:
A. Annex 1 has three parts: Annex 1A, Multilateral Agreements on Trade in Goods,
which contains the GATT 1994. Annex 1B, which contains the GATS’ and Annex1C;
C. Annex 3 contains the Trade Policy Review Mechanism (TPRM), an instrument for
D. Annex 4 Plurilateral Trade Agreements, consists of Tokyo Round codes that were not
multilateralized in the Uruguay Round and that therefore bind only their signatories.
Together, Annexures 1 through 3 embody the multilateral trade agreements that are an integral part of the
Multilateral Trade Agreements are on: 1. Agriculture: (i) Market Access, (ii) Domestic Support and (iii)
Reductions in Export Subsidies. 2. Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures. 3. Textiles and Clothing 4.
Customs Valuation. 8. Pre-shipment Inspections. 9. Rules of Origin. 10. Import Licensing Procedures.
11. Subsidies and Countervailing Measures. 12. Safeguards. 14. General Agreement on Trade in
[8]
Services (GATS). 15. Trade Related Intellectual Property (TRIPS). 16. Dispute Settlement. 17. Trade
Plurilateral Trade Agreements: ‘Plurilateral Agreements’ were formally annexed to the Final Act of the
Uruguay Round and will be regulated and supervised by the WTO. These agreements will, however, only
be applicable (and thus enforceable) between their signatories. There are four Plurilateral Agreements
concerning:
Trade Liberalization: The most important results may be grouped under two headings, trade
(i) The WTO is a forum for international cooperation on trade-related policies–the creation
(ii) The WTO contains a set of specific legal obligations regulating trade policies of
member states, and these are embodied in the GATT, the GATS, and the TRIPS
agreement. The WTO acts as an umbrella organization that encompasses the GATT
along with two new sister bodies, one services and the other on intellectual property.
(iii) The WTO’s GATS has taken the lead to extending free trade agreements to services. In
the same way, the TRIPS is an attempt to narrow the gaps in the way intellectual
[9]
property rights are protected around the world and to bring them under common
international rules.
(iv) WTO has taken over responsibility for arbitrating trade disputes and monitoring the
trade policies of member countries. Countries that have been found by the arbitration
panel to violate GATT rules may appeal to a permanent appellate body, but its verdict
is binding. Every stage of the procedure is subject to strict time limits. Thus, the WTO
(v) The clarification and strengthening of GATT rules and the creation of the WTO also
hold out the promise of more effective policing and enforcement of GATT rules. The
(MFN) rule, and the national treatment principle. Nondiscrimination in the form of national
treatment and most favoured nation (MFN) treatment to our exports in the markets of other
WTO members. National treatment ensures that our exports to other member countries
would not be discriminated vis-a-vis their domestic products. MFN treatment likewise
ensures non-discrimination among various members in their tariff regimes and also other
(ii) Reciprocity: The principle of reciprocity refers to the ideal of mutual changes in
international trade policy. The granting of mutual concessions in tariff rates, quotas, or
other commercial restrictions. Reciprocity implies that these concessions are neither
intended nor expected to be generalized to other countries with which the contracting
[10]
parties have commercial treaties. Reciprocity agreements may be made between individual
abide by certain rules of the game have little value if they cannot be enforced. Once tariff
commitments are bound, it is important that there be no resort to other, nontariff, measures
that have the effect of nullifying or impairing the value of the tariff concession.
requires access to information on the trade regimes that are maintained by members.
investment is encouraged, jobs are created and consumers can fully enjoy the
(v) Safety Valves: A final principle embodied in the WTO is that, in specific circumstances
(vi) Freer Trade: Lowering trade barriers is one of the most obvious means of encouraging
(i) achieving ‘sustainable development’ in relation to the optimal use of the world’s
resources,
[11]
(ii) ensuring the need to protect and preserve the environment in a manner consistent
(iii) safeguarding the interest of developing countries to secure a better share of the
(i) Facilitates the implementation and operation of all the agreements and legal instruments
negotiated in connection with the Uruguay Round, including the Plurilateral Trade
(ii) Provides a forum for all negotiations and also facilitates implementation of the
(iii) The WTO is responsible for administration of the Trade Policy Review Mechanisms
(TPRM).
(iv) It is also the organ for establishing co-ordination with other wings of the UNO such as the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank and its affiliated agencies.
Decisions will be taken by a majority of the votes cast, on the basis of ‘one country, one vote.’ This
The structure of the WTO is dominated by its highest authority, the Ministerial Conference, composed of
representatives of all WTO members. It can take decisions on all matters under any of the multilateral
trade agreements.
[12]
The Ministerial Conference of the WTO meets every two years to make important decisions about existing
trade agreements. The Ministerial Conference holds the authority to make decisions on any aspects of all
multilateral agreements made under the WTO. The Conference includes representatives from all members
of the WTO. It gives equal representation to all its members regardless of the size of their economy or
share in international trade. It can be thought of as the legislative branch of the WTO.
The WTO is headed by the Ministerial Conference, while the daily operations are carried out by three
administrative bodies:
1. General Council: The General Council comprises the representatives of all member countries. Its job is
to carry out the implementation and monitoring function of the WTO. The General Council is further
divided into multiple councils and committees that focus on specific topics. Examples of such bodies
include the Council on Goods, the Councils on Services, the Committee on Textiles under the Council on
Goods, etc.
2. Dispute Settlement Body (DSB): The DSB is responsible for settling trade disputes between member
states. The purpose of DSB is to resolve such disputes by a rule-based system rather than through
unilateral retaliatory action by those complaining. There is now a time-table laid down for dispute
settlement. The amount of time each stage of the process should take has been indicated, though there is
some flexibility in the time-frames laid down. The DSB can reject the findings of a panel or of an appeals
report – only by consensus. The dispute settlement system is undoubtedly the jewel in the WTO's crown.
The consensus is certainly leaning in favour of preserving and strengthening the dispute settlement
function of the WTO. There is also an Appellate Body, where member states can appeal any decisions
3. Trade Policy Review Body: The Trade Policy Review Body is also a part of the General Council and is
responsible for ensuring the trade policies of member states are in line with the goals of the WTO.
[13]
Member countries are required to inform the WTO about changes in their laws and trade policies. The
body undertakes regular reviews of the policies to ensure they conform to the rules of the WTO. This is
part of the monitoring function of the WTO, and it helps the WTO to adapt to the changing economic
landscape.
In the WTO, power is not delegated to a board of directors or the organization’s head. The WTO is a
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
[14]
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
or firms of one country in the form of patents, copyrights, trademarks, industrial designs or geographical
indications. If these are copied by firms in another country without the permission of the owner and
without making a payment to the owner for use of the know-how, the property rights of the owners are
[15]
infringed. According to the WTO, intellectual property rights are the rights given to persons over the
creations of their minds. They usually give the creator an exclusive right over the use of his/her creation
for a certain period of time. In relation to intellectual property the Uruguay settlement provides for the
following:
(a) Patent protection for 20 years regardless of where an item is invented or whether it is
(b) Limitations on the use of compulsory licensing for patented products (licences are easily
(c) Copyright protection for at least 50 years from the creator’s death. This is to include
(d) All countries will have to introduce laws to prevent the unauthorized disclosure of trade
secrets.
(e) Provision of equal treatment for domestic and foreign intellectual property holders.
Protection of intellectual property rights has become an issue of wide and serious discussion. As a member
of the WTO, India is obliged to comply with the standards of the TRIPs. Indian laws are substantially in
accordance with the TRIPs standards on copyright and related rights, trademarks, geographical design and
undisclosed information. The greatest challenge, however, is posed by patents. TRIPs agreement goes
against the Patent Act of India, 1970 in almost all important areas. Patents in all the three fields
(agriculture, pharmaceuticals and industrial biotechnology) linked to microorganisms are either already
with the multinational companies or are likely to be acquired at a much faster rate vis-à-vis the developing
countries.
[16]
Patent rights in respect of trade relates to: (a) copy rights; (b) designs; (c) trade-marks; (d) trade-secrets;
or any other species of intellectual property. The Government of India enacted a new law, the Patents
(Amendment) Act, 2005, wherein product patent was extended to all fields of technology including food,
drugs, chemicals and micro-organisms to take advantage of the provisions of TRIPs agreement in respect
of plant varieties. A decision has been taken to put in place a sui generis (special) system as it is perceived
to be in India’s national interest. A major area of concern for India is the protection of the biodiversity.
It is pertinent to note that economists of repute who otherwise are fully supportive of the free trade theory
and the WTO (Jagdish Bhagwati, Dani Rodrik, Michael Finger) have, of late, recognized the inequity of
The AOA aims at removing the distortions in world trade in agriculture arising from excessive protection
and subsidization of agriculture. AOA is highly complicated and controversial; it is often criticized as a
tool in hands of developed countries to exploit weak countries. Agreement on agriculture stands on 3
pillars:
1. Domestic Support – It refers to subsidies like minimum price or input subsidies which are
direct and product specific. Under this, subsidies are categorized into 3 boxes –
b) Blue Box – Only ‘Production limiting Subsidies’ under this are allowed. They
c) Amber Box – Those subsidies which are trade distorting and need to be curbed.
The Amber Box contains category of domestic support that is scheduled for
[17]
production, except for those contained in the Blue Box, Green Box and ‘de
minimis’.
Existing non-tariff barriers in agriculture, which are considered trade-distorting, are to be abolished and
converted into tariffs so as to provide the same level of protection and subsequently the tariffs are to be
progressively reduced.
It must be recognised that globally the policy environment is becoming increasingly complex. The
dilemma most governments face, whether of developed or developing countries, is how to reconcile the
conflict arising out of their international commitment under the WTO and domestic compulsions,
economic, political and social. Agriculture holds the key to progress in future trade negotiations. And
these issues affect different countries differently, depending on the competitiveness of their agriculture.
General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS): The growing role of international services and their
implications have come to be recognized in the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). The
WTO rules on services trade, as embodied in the GATS are the first ever set of multilateral, legally
enforceable rules covering international trade in services. The economic significance of services has
increased substantially since the GATS entered into force in 1995. A WTO council of services oversees
the operation of agreement. The GATS did not directly remove any important barriers to trade in services.
It did, however, set up a legal framework under which future negotiations to liberalize service trade could
proceed.
[18]
Modes of supply of services: There are four different ways in which services can be provided
internationally are:
(i) Cross-border supply (Mode 1) is when the service is provided from one country to another
(like international phone calls. Business Process Outsourcing, KPO or LPO services).
(ii) Consumption abroad (Mode 2) this mode covers supply of a service of one country to
market, e. g branch of a foreign bank, subsidiary of a telecom firm and the like. This opens
door of relevant sector in one country to investments from another country. Accordingly, it
is in west’s interest to push for liberalization in India. There has been sustained pressure to
open up higher education sector, insurance sector, medical sector etc. through this mode.
(iv) Movement of Natural Persons (Mode 4) which covers services provided by a service
supplier of one country through the presence of natural persons in the territory of
any other country. e. g. Infosys or TCS sending its engineers for onsite work in
US/Europe or Australia. Here again, it’s in India’s interest to push for liberalization.
Negotiations in services under GATS are classified in these 4 modes, interests of different countries
WTO and India’s Trade-in-Services: From India’s point of view, services present a different picture from
agriculture and industrial tariffs. As an emerging global power in IT and business services, the country is,
in fact, a demander in the WTO talks on services. India seeks more liberal commitments on the part of its
trading partners for cross-border supply of services, including the movement of ‘natural persons’ (human
[19]
beings) to developed countries, or what is termed as Mode 4 for the supply of services. With respect to
Mode 2, which requires consumption of services abroad, India has an offensive interest.
In sharp contrast, the interest of the EU and the US is more in Mode 3 of supply, which requires the
establishment of a commercial presence in developing countries. Accordingly, requests for more liberal
policies on foreign direct investment in sectors like insurance have been received. These developed
countries are lukewarm to demands for a more liberal regime for the movement of natural persons.
Among the different modes of services of supply, India is most interested in movement of natural persons
(mode 4) and has also submitted a proposal at the WTO Council for trade in services. India has an obvious
interest in the liberalisation of services trade and wants commercially meaningful access to be provided by
WTO and Indian Agriculture: India’s domestic support to agriculture is well below the limit of 10 per
cent of the value of agricultural produce and therefore India is not required to make any reduction in it at
present. India’s food security law subsidized food supply as an integral part of its welfare programmes.
The problem is unlike the rich countries, because with limited financial means India is not able to give
Agreement on agriculture is facing issues due to food security and development requirements for
developing countries like India. India should attempt to bring its domestic food legislation in line with
WTO rules. Efficient internal policies are the best weapon against an unfair external market. But India’s
farm exports are fundamentally supply-constrained. India cannot ignore the wide-ranging provisions of the
AOA covering domestic support, export subsidies, and market access, besides sanitary and phyto-sanitary
measures.
India strongly favours extension of higher levels of protection to geographical indications for products
like Basmati rice, Darjeeling tea, and Alphonso mangoes at par with that provided to wines and
[20]
spirits under the Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) agreement. India is
against any inclusion of non-trade issues that are directed in the long run at enforcing protectionist
India should worry about the multilateral trading system and integrate rapidly with the world economy.
There is the need to align national economic policies with its WTO commitments.
By 2021, the WTO has 164 members and 25 observer governments. Since its formation, the WTO has
been under scrutiny. The WTO has remained at the forefront of efforts to promote global free trade. The
predictable market conditions fostered by the WTO have combined with improved communications to
enable the rise of global value chains (GVCs). The way the world trade has changed since the WTO was
established, fewer goods and services originate from any one supplier or country. Components and
intermediate services are increasingly sourced and assembled from specialist suppliers around the world.
The establishment of the WTO changed the character of the trading system. It is playing a crucial role in:
2 The political and legal issues arising in the international business because of globalization.
4 Countries are using the WTO represents an important vote of confidence in the organization’s
5 The WTO has proven exceedingly useful is monitoring. The most prominent of which is the
Trade Policy Review Mechanism, which subjects all WTO members to a periodic review of
Challenges before WTO: Misunderstandings about the WTO are pervasive. The WTO faces a number of
challenges today. A number of questions have been raised about the future direction of the WTO. “Not all
disputes were resolved so smoothly. As ever, agriculture was the sorest subject. Not only is the WTO
theoretically in search of a permanent substitute for India’s waiver on subsidies; it also pledged long ago
to scrap rich countries’ farm-export subsidies. Big groups or small, sweeping deals or narrow, trade
A major challenge to WTO is the proliferation of free and preferential regional/bilateral trading
arrangements. More than half of the existing 300 regional/bilateral trading arrangements have emerged in
the past 30 years. But a regrettable fact is that some of these regional/bilateral arrangements are crafted
not for promoting trade, but for political and economic diplomacy, “cartel” for negotiations, etc. The issue
of abuse of the anti-dumping procedure the problems of rules of origin criteria, technical barriers to trade,
Decision-making process at the WTO has never been above board. Little wonder that critics of the
global trading system describe WTO as ‘Whose Trade Organisation?’ The WTO increasingly looks like a
toothless tiger.
It is important to remember that since the WTO is consensus-based, with a near-universal membership of
164 countries, big, small and all sizes in-between, the organisation simply turned unwieldy. It became
increasingly impossible to negotiate one common trade rule on the basis of the consensus that applied
equally to all WTO members. However, there is little doubt that WTO is needed more than ever now
[22]
when the Covid-19 has wrought havoc with global trade. The post-Covid-19 world needs WTO more than
ever if only to provide security and predictability to international trade. But for that to happen, the WTO
members must get their act together. What is needed is the identification of areas that need improvement
for greater credibility, more confidence and larger commitment for meaningful progress in trade
liberalisation. The success of WTO’s ministerial round of conference would depend entirely on the
To address various contentious issued, the Doha Round of Negotiations (also known as the Doha
Development Round) Commenced in November 2001. Its major objective was to lower trade barriers
The aim was to put less developed countries’ priorities at heart. The needs of the developing countries
were the core reason for the meeting. The major factors discussed include trade facilitation, services, rules
of origin and dispute settlement. Special and differential treatment for the developing countries were also
The most significant differences are between developed nations led by the European Union, the US,
Canada and Japan and the major developing countries led and represented mainly by India, Brazil, China
and South Africa. There is also considerable contention against and between the EU and the US over their
This round has so far, after 20 years of negotiations, failed to make any progress.
WTO was born out of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), which was established in
1947. The WTO came into existence on January 1, 1995. It is a global organization made up of 164
[24]
member countries that deals with the rules of trade between nations. The goal of the WTO is to ensure that
From 1948 to 1994, the GATT provided the rules for much of world trade and presided over periods
that saw some of the highest growth rates in international commerce. The eighth, the Uruguay
Round of 1986-94, was the last and most extensive of all. It led to the WTO and a new set of
agreements. It took seven and a half years, almost twice the original schedule.
WTO’s main function is to ensure that trade flows as smoothly, predictably, and freely as possible. It is
designed to play the role of a watchdog in the spheres of trade in goods, trade in services, foreign
investment, intellectual property rights, etc. WTO administers the understanding on rules and procedures
governing the settlement of disputes and the Trade Policy Review Mechanism (TPRM). The WTO
remains the only forum in which developing countries are on an equal footing with their rich-country
counterparts. All WTO members may participate in all councils, committee, etc, except appellate Body.
WTO is different from the GATT. The former GATT was not really an organisation; it was merely a legal
arrangement. On the other hand, the WTO is a new international organisation set up as a permanent body.
It is expected that the enforcement mechanisms granted to the WTO would make it more effective at
Dispute settlement is the central pillar of the multilateral trading system, and the WTO’s unique
Talking of distorted global agricultural markets, whether developed or developing, all countries face the
same dilemma: How best to reconcile domestic priorities with international obligations. WTO has not
been able to ensure abolition of non-trade barriers being imposed on labour and environmental
considerations.
[25]
Anti-dumping duties: The WTO rules permit a country to impose these duties if a product from a
particular country is imported at less than the “normal” price. Both the developed and developing
countries are increasingly levying these duties among themselves and at each other.
Blue Box: Support linked to production which is subject to production limits. It is seen as minimally
trade-distorting. For example, compensation paid to farmers in the US for keeping land fallow.
Green Box: Non-trade distorting support which is permitted without a ceiling. For instance, payments for
infrastructure development.
Intellectual Property Rights: Ownership rights to intangible assets, such as patents, copyrights, etc.
Most Favoured Nation status (MFN): MFN status – expresses the primary GATT/WTO principle that
any country signing up for membership must treat all trading partners in the WTO in the same way and
Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Measures: The agreement on the application of SPS measures sets
out the basic rules for food safety and animal and plant health standards. It allows countries to set their
own standards. But it also says regulations must be based on science. They should be applied only to the
extent necessary to protect human, animal or plant life or health. And they should not arbitrarily or
1. Describe the principles and functions of WTO. Explain the importance of WTO.
2. What are the issues of concern for India, arising out of WTO agreements?
3. Explain the organizational structure of WTO. What is the role of trade policy review committee?
4. What is GATT? Compare GATT with its successor WTO. How WTO is considered an
Trade-Organization-Beginners-Guides/dp/1780745788
[27]
Felbermayr, Gabriel (2019): 25 years of the WTOPage | 27Causes of Decay and Reform Proposals for the
Future, https://www.ifw-kiel.de/publications/kiel-focus/2019/25-years-of-the-wto-causes-of-decay-and-
reform-proposals-for-the-future-13610/
Joshi, Rakesh Mohan (2009): International Business, Oxford University Press, New Delhi
Ravikanth (2014): WTO Upside Down: Trade Facilitation vs Agriculture, Economic and Political Weekly,
WTO (2013): World Trade Report: Factors shaping the future of world trade, Geneva
BLOCK 7 Fiscal & Monetary Policy
In this block you will learn about monetary policy and its goals and instruments, monetary
policy framework, overview of monetary policy in India,monetary policy rule, monetary
policy transmission, fiscal policy and its various instruments, objectives of fiscal policy and
its limitations, different sources of revenue and expenditure of a government, public debt and
government budget,main aspects of fiscal federalism, role of government in federal
economics, economic rationale for central-state transfer of grants, fiscal decentralisation and
local governance, emerging issues and challenges and redefining of fiscal architecture in
India. This block has three units.
Unit-21 deals in ‘Monetary Policy’. The unit begins with the introduction of monetary
policy. Instruments and goals of Monetary Policy are given. Monetary Policy framework and
an overview of Monetary Policy in India are clearly explained. Various monetary policy rules
are provided and monetary policy transmission process is discussed in the last.
Unit-22 deals in ‘Fiscal Policy’. The unit begins with the meaning and instruments of fiscal
policy. Concept of public revenue, its type and sources are given. Different heads of taxare
explained. Concept and main heads of public expenditure is described. Need of public debt
and methods of redemption of public debt are provided. Meaning, components and types of
government budget are elaborated in the last.
Unit-23 deals in ‘Fiscal Federalization in India’. The unit begins with the introduction and
main aspects of fiscal federalism. Role of government in federal economics and economic
rationale for centre-state transfer of grants is presented. Fiscal decentralisation and local
governance is elaborated. Emerging issues and challenges in India’s fiscal federalism are
highlighted. The chapter ended with redefining the fiscal architecture in India.
1
Unit 21 MONETARY POLICY
Structure
21.0 Objectives
21.1 Introduction
21.2 What is Monetary Policy?
21.3 Instruments of Monetary Policy
21.4 Goals of Monetary Policy
21.5 Monetary Policy Framework
21.6 An Overview of Monetary Policy in India
21.7 Monetary Policy Rule
21.7.1 Taylor Rule
21.7.2 Flexible Inflation Targeting
21.7.3 Monetary Policy Committee
21.8 Monetary Policy Transmission
21.9 Let Us Sum Up
21.10 Key Words
21.10 Terminal Questions
21.0 Objectives
After studying this unit, you should be able to:
• Describe the concept of monetary policy
• Discuss the instruments of monetary policy
• State the objective of monetary policy
• Explain the monetary policy framework
• Describe the overview of monetary policy in India
• Discuss the monetary policy rule
• Explain the monetary policy transmission
Monetary policy is the macroeconomic policy laid down by the central bank of an economy.
The policy involves an operational framework which uses certain instruments and targeting
2
mechanisms to achieve macroeconomic objectives like price stability, reviving consumption,
growth and liquidity. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is vested with the responsibility of
conducting monetary policy. This responsibility is explicitly mandated under the Reserve
Bank of India Act, 1934.Monetary policy thus involves the use of monetary instruments
under the control of the central bank to regulate magnitudes such as interest rates, money
supply and availability of credit with a view to achieve certain objectives of economic policy.
Expansionary Monetary Policy vs. Contractionary Monetary Policy
The monetary policy response depends on the economic state of affairs of the economy.
Based on which, themonetary policy may be categorized in one of two ways: expansionary
monetary policy or contractionary monetary policy.
a) Expansionary Monetary Policy: This is known as loose monetary policy,
expansionary policy increases the supply of money and credit to generate economic
growth. A central bank may deploy an expansionist monetary policy to reduce
unemployment and boost growth and investment during hard economic times.The
overall goal of any expansionary policy is to encourage spending and borrowing. This
is done by reducing the interest rate, subsequently providing easier and cheaper loans
to the borrowers. According to economic theory, more money available to individuals
and businesses at lower cost will result in the increased purchase of goods and
services, thus stimulating growth.
b) Contractionary Monetary Policy: Tight or contractionary monetary policy is used to
prevent inflation due to economy growing too fast (over-heating). It aims at reducing
the money supply, raising the interest rates and therefore, discouragingborrowing in
the economy. Business investment will decline because it is less attractive for firms to
borrow money.In addition, higher interest rates will also discourage consumer
borrowing for big-ticket items like houses and cars.
Figure 2 gives a schematic representation of how the above two policies change the output
and price level in an economy:
Figure 2 Change in Monetary policy and its influence on output and price level
3
Academics and policymakers debate whether central banks should follow a predetermined,
fixed rule or should have discretion in monetary policy. Supporters of central bank discretion
argue that a simple monetary policy rule is incompatible with the complexity of an economy.
A rules-based approach can be considered reliable on account of the following reasons:
1. A good monetary policy rule specifies a plan of action which the central bank cannot
later ignore, while discretion allows central bankers to react—and often overreact—to
economic indicators as they see appropriate.
2. The rules-based approach has been criticized for being too rigid, but it provides
certainty in the market that the central bank will not sacrifice long-term stability for
short-term gain.
In sum, a simple and easily communicated rule is better able to manage the
complexity of the economy than a central bank operating with discretion.
There are several direct and indirect instruments that are used for implementing monetary
policy.
1. Bank Rate: It is the rate at which the Reserve Bank is ready to buy or rediscount bills of
exchange or other commercial papers.
2. Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR): The average daily balance that a bank is required to
maintain with the Reserve Bank as a share of such per cent of its Net demand and time
liabilities (NDTL).The Reserve Bank may notify CRR from time to time in the Gazette
of India.
3. Statutory Liquidity Ratio (SLR): The share of NDTL that a bank is required to
maintain in safe and liquid assets, such as, government securities, cash and gold. Changes in
SLR often influence the availability of resources in the banking system for lending to the
private sector.
4. Open Market Operations (OMOs): These include both, outright purchase and sale of
government securities, for injection and absorption of durable liquidity, respectively.
5. Repo Rate: The (fixed) interest rate at which the Reserve Bank provides overnight
liquidity to banks against the collateral of government and other approved securities
under the liquidity adjustment facility (LAF).
6. Reverse Repo Rate: The (fixed) interest rate at which the Reserve Bank absorbs
liquidity, on an overnight basis, from banks against the collateral of eligible government
securities under the LAF.
7. Liquidity Adjustment Facility (LAF): The LAF consists of overnight as well as term
repo auctions. It is used to make temporary and swift adjustments in liquidity within the
banking system mainly using the repo and reverse repo rates.
8. Marginal Standing Facility (MSF): A facility under which scheduled commercial banks
can borrow additional amount of overnight money from the Reserve Bank. This provides
a safety valve against unanticipated liquidity shocks to the banking system.
9. Corridor: The MSF rate and reverse repo rate determine the corridor for the daily
movement in the weighted average call money rate.
4
10. Market Stabilisation Scheme (MSS): This instrument for monetary management was
introduced in 2004. Surplus liquidity of a more enduring nature arising from large capital
inflows is absorbed through sale of short-dated government securities and treasury bills.
5
iss not indepeendent of thee objective of growth. For
F examplee, the amenddment Act of o
2016 relatingg to RBI sayys (GoI, 20116) “Whereaas the primaary objectivee of monetarry
policy is to maintain
m pricee stability w
while keeping
g in mind thee objective of
o growth”.
21.5 M
Monetary Po
olicy Frameework
Source: Dua
D (2020)
21.6 A Overview
An w of Monetaary Policy in
n India
The storyy of contemmporary Indiaan Monetaryy policy cann be understoood by goinng back to thhe
history of
o how this policy
p has undergone
u trransformatioons over a pperiod of tim
me.The 19700s
and 19800s were markked by fiscall dominancee, wherein monetary
m poliicy almost enntirely playeed
a supportting role in financing
f fisscal needs.Tiill about the mid-1980s,, monetary policy
p in Inddia
was moree suitablyconnsidered as “credit plannning”. The key k objectivee was to chaannel credit at
cheap addministered rates
r for thee developmeental pursuits, with publlic sector baanks acting as a
the mainn intermeddiaries.Moneetary policyy formulatioon from thhe mid-19880s to 19998
functioneedon the linees of the recommendatioons of Chakrravarty Com mmittee (1985). In view of o
that,moneetary targeting was adoopted, whereein the targeeted path of monetary ex xpansion waas
designed to fund the ‘desired growth of GDP in nominal terms’, i.e., growth after accounting
for tolerable inflation.
In the wake of challenges posed by financial liberalization and increasing complexities of
monetary management, the Reserve Bank of India switched to a multiple indicator approach
in 1998-1999.Under this approach Broad money (M3) continued to remain a primary
variable; however, focus was also placed on rate channels in monetary policy formulation.
Many macroeconomic variables like interest rate along with other indicators like credit flows,
inflation rate, exchange rate, foreign exchange reserves etc. were juxtaposed with output data
for drawing policy outlooks. In June 2000, the Reserve Bank also introduced a Liquidity
Management Facility (LAF) to manage liquidity on a daily basis through reverse repo and
repo rates in order to convey interest rate signals to the market.Monetary reformscontinued
thereafter, eventually freeing the central bank from fiscal dominance. This paved way for
greaterdependence on market-oriented, price-based, indirect instruments as against the direct
measures used earlier on. These changes marked the adoption of a multiple indicator
approachby RBIwhich lasted till 2016.
Another imperative footstep towards an independent and proficient monetary policy
framework and its operations was to cut the liability of swelling fiscal deficit. It was
attempted in the form of a Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act, 2003. Under
it, the automatic monetization of fiscal deficit of Government of India was to be phased out
completely and the RBI was to be relieved of the burden of subscribing government securities
in the primary market. This assisted in giving more independence and autonomy to RBI in
outlining a balanced monetary policy subject to its goals.
The most important development between 1998 and 2016 has been the emergence of interest
rates as the chief tool of monetary intervention. This was a noticeable shift from the prior
reliance on bank rate and cash reserve ratio (CRR) by the RBI. Liquidity adjustment facility
(LAF), a cornerstone of monetary policy over this period, was used extensively. This was
used to make temporary and swift adjustments in liquidity within the banking system mainly
using the repo and reverse repo rates. This process culminated in the evolution of the repo
rate as the benchmark policy rate, determining the baseline cost of borrowing in the economy
today.
The Report of the Committee on Financial Sector Reforms, 2009 under the chairmanship of
the then Governor, Raghuram Rajan and headed by the then Deputy Governor Urjit Patel,
proposed that RBI can take care of the growth objective in the medium-run only if it focuses
on controlling inflation. It would also help serve the purpose of inclusive growth since the
poorer sections are least hedged against inflation. Following this, an Expert Committee to
Revise and Strengthen the Monetary Policy Framework was appointed on September 12,
2013. The main objectives of the Committee were: i) to devise and redefine the objectives
and conduct of monetary policy framework in an open economy environment; ii) to
recommend an appropriate nominal anchor for conduct of monetary policy; iii) to review the
operating framework and instruments of the monetary policy including the multiple-indicator
approach; and iv) to identify the impediments both fiscal and others in the smooth
functioning of monetary policy.
7
The main recommendations of this committee that submitted its report in January 2014
include the following:
(a) The Choice of Nominal Anchor: Inflation should be the nominal anchor for the
monetary policy framework. This nominal anchor should be set by the RBI as its
predominant objective of monetary policy in its policy statements. The nominal anchor
should be communicated without ambiguity, so as to ensure a monetary policy regime shift
away from the current approach to one that is centered around the nominal anchor. Subject to
the establishment and achievement of the nominal anchor, monetary policy conduct should be
consistent with a sustainable growth trajectory and financial stability.
(b) The Choice of Inflation Metric: The RBI should adopt the new CPI (combined) as the
measure of the nominal anchor for policy communication. The nominal anchor should be
defined in terms of headline CPI inflation, which closely reflects the cost of living and
influences inflation expectations relative to other available metrics
(c) Numerical Target and Precision:The nominal anchor or the target for inflation should
be set at 4 per cent with a band of +/- 2 per cent around this target should be set in the frame
of a two-year horizon.
(d) Institutional Requirements of the Monetary Policy Framework: Consistent with the
Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (Amendment) Rules, the Central Government
needs to ensure that its fiscal deficit as a ratio to GDP is brought down to 3.0 per cent by
2016-17.
The Expert Committee also recommended that decision-making should be vested in a
Monetary Policy Committee (MPC).The above recommendations were accepted and from
2016 the monetary authority shifted to flexible inflation targeting with repo rate as its
instrument of control.
Thus, the progression of monetary policy was swayed not only by the changing prototype in
monetary economics but also by the advances in the financial markets and macroeconomic
outcomes.
Check your Progress A
1. What is the difference between Expansionary Monetary Policy and Contractionary
Monetary Policy.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………….........................................
2. Write at least five instruments that are used for implementing monetary policy.
…………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………….
3. Write the major goals of monetary policy.
8
…………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………….....
Monetary policy and its implementation in India has seen a steady, fundamental shift from
the pre-1990s regime of administered interest rates to a market-based system today. The repo
rate has emerged as the primary tool of monetary intervention.The theoretical underpinning
of the recent policy stance of the RBI can be traced back to the influential Taylor rule. This
captured the way forward-looking central banks frame interest rate policies, by taking into
account inflationary expectations (based on the Phillips Curve) and the impact of real interest
rates on output (based on dynamic IS curve).
21.7.1 Taylor Rule
Taylor rule is a monetary policy rule, which explains its stance of changing the nominal
policy interest rate in response to its objectives, viz. inflation, output and other economic
conditions.
According to the original version of Taylor rule as per Taylor (1993), the nominal interest
rate should respond to divergences of actual inflation from target rates and actual output from
the potential output.
𝒊 𝛑 𝒓∗ 𝜷𝟏 𝝅 𝝅∗ 𝜷𝟐 𝒚 𝒚 ∗ …………………………….(1)
In the above equation, i is the nominal interest rate set by the central bank; r* is the
equilibrium real rate of interest; π and π* are the actual and target rates of inflation,
respectively; and y and y* are logarithms of actual and potential output levels, respectively.
According to the Taylor Rule, the coefficient values β1 and β2 should be positive and as a
rule of thumb, β1and β2 must be equal to 0.5. The rule thus proposes a higher interest rate,
when either inflation is above its target or when output is above its potential or full
employment level. In other words, a tight monetary policy, when inflation or output gap is
positive and an easy monetary policy, when the gap is negative. During times when an
economy experiences conflicting goals such as low growth and high inflation, such as
stagflation, the rule recommends, giving relative weights to stimulate output and lower
inflation. The magnitude of the weights assigned to the inflation gap and output gap
essentiallyindicate central banks’ tolerance for deviations of output vis-à-vis inflation from
respective targets.
21.7.2 Flexible Inflation Targeting
While India formally adopted an inflation target of 4% (within a 2% point range of 2–6%) in
2016.In practice, monetary policy seems to have broadly followed the Taylor rule right
through the 2000s decade.With the signing of the Monetary Policy Framework Agreement
(MPFA) between the Government of India and the RBI on Feb 20, 2015, Flexible Inflation
Targeting (FIT) was formally adopted in India. In May 2016, the Reserve Bank of India
(RBI) Act, 1934 was amended to provide a statutory basis for the implementation of the FIT
9
framework. The ameended RBI Act,A 1934 alsso provided that the Cenntral Governnment shall, ini
consultattion with thee Bank, dettermine the inflation tarrget in term
ms of the Coonsumer Pricce
Index, onnce in every 5 years.
In 2016, India thus joined seveeral developped and em merging markket econom mies that havve
implemennted inflatio on targetingg. Figure 3 shows thee timeline ffor adoptionn of inflatioon
targeting regime starrting with Neew Zealand in 1990 and most recenttly Argentina and India in
i
2016.
F
Fig. 3
Source: Dua
D (2020)
21.7.3 Monetary
M Po
olicy Comm
mittee (MPC
C)
The Monnetary Policyy Committeee (MPC) is one of the main comm mittees of thhe RBI and is
responsibble for settinng the monetary policy sstance (settin
ng the repo rate). In foormulating thhe
monetaryy policy direection, MPC C makes asssessments annd policy deecisions bassed upon data
providedd by the RBI. Under the amended RB BI Act, the MPC
M is requuired to meeet at least fouur
times in a year.
The miniimum numbber for the meeting
m of thhe MPC is four
f membeers. Currently as of 2021,
MPC is a 6 member committee. Each membber of the MPC M has one vote, and inn the event of
o
an equaliity of votes, the Governoor has a secoond or castinng vote. The resolution adopted
a by thhe
MPC is published after
a conclussion of everry meeting of the MPC C in accordaance with thhe
provisionns of Chapteer III F of thee Reserve Baank of India Act, 1934.
On the 144th day, the minutes of the
t proceedinngs of the MPC
M are publlished whichh include:
a. the ressolution adoppted by the MPC;
M
b. the votte of each member
m on th
he resolutionn, ascribed to
o such membber; and
c. the statement of eaach member on the resollution adopteed.
Once in every six months,
m the Reserve
R Bannk is requirred to publissh a documeent called thhe
Monetary
y Policy Repport to explaain:
a. the sou
urces of inflaation; and
b. the forecast of inflation for 6-18 months ahead.
The transmission mechanism of monetary policy is a process through which monetary actions
affect the twin objective of growth with stable inflation. There are various monetary policy
tools which are used for achieving the same, but in the recent past interest rate has been
predominantly and frequently used.Changes in monetary policy affect the economic activity
in general and price level in particular through the following five channels of monetary
transmission:
1. The interest rate channel:The change in the policy rate affects directly money-
market interest rates and, indirectly, lending and deposit rates, which are set by banks
to their customers.A reduction in interest rates (an ‘easing’ of monetary
policy)reduces the cost of capital thus triggering aggregate demand by motivating
business investment and consumption decisions. A tightening in monetary policy has
the opposite effect on demand and inflation.
Source:
https://www.bot.or.th/English/MonetaryPolicy/MonetPolicyKnowledge/Pages/Trans
missionMechanism.aspx
2. The exchange rate channel: Lower domestic interest rates could lead to a
depreciation of the domesticcurrency.On the one hand making exports more
competitive in the global market and addingto domestic demand and economic
activity. On the other hand, could also have a directupward impact on the rupee prices
of imported inputs, making imports (forexample, crude oil) costlier.
11
Source:
https://www.bot.or.th/English/MonetaryPolicy/MonetPolicyKnowledge/Pages/Trans
missionMechanism.aspx
3. The credit channel: Through this channel an expansionary monetary policy leads to
higher deposits.Consequently, the banks disburse higher credit, which in turn
increases the investment and output in the economy. Further, debt obligations of
businesses may also change due to a change in the interest rate. For instance, if the
policy rate falls, debt obligations of firms may decrease, strengthening their balance
sheets. As a result, financial institutions may be more willing to lend to businesses,
thus increasing investment spending.
Source:
https://www.bot.or.th/English/MonetaryPolicy/MonetPolicyKnowledge/Pages/Trans
missionMechanism.aspx
12
4. The asset price channel: Asset prices and people's wealth influence how much they
can borrow and how much they spend in the economy. The asset prices and wealth
channel typically affects consumption and investment.Lower interest rates support
asset prices (such as housing and equities) by encouraging demand for assets. Higher
asset prices also increase the equity (collateral) of an asset that is available for banks
to lend against. This can make it easier for households and businesses to borrow.An
increase in asset prices increases people's wealth. This can lead to higher consumption
and housing investment as households generally spend some share of any increase in
their wealth.
Source:
https://www.bot.or.th/English/MonetaryPolicy/MonetPolicyKnowledge/Pages/Trans
missionMechanism.aspx
13
Check your Progress B
1. What do you mean by Taylor Rule.
………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………
2. What is meant by monetary policy transmission?
………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………....
3 What do you mean by Flexible Inflation Targeting ?
………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………....
Monetary policy refers to the use of monetary instruments under the controlof the central
bank to regulate magnitudes such as interest rates, moneysupply and availability of credit
with a view to achieving the ultimate objective of economic policy.The primary objective of
monetary policy in India is to maintain price stability while keeping in mind the objective of
growth. Price stability is a necessary precondition to sustainable growth.
14
The monetary policy framework aims at setting the policy (repo) rate based on an assessment
of the current and evolving macroeconomic situation; and modulation of liquidity conditions
to anchor money market rates at or around the repo rate. Repo rate changes transmit through
the money market to the entire financial system. This in turn, influences aggregate demand –
a key determinant of inflation and growth.The MPC determines the policy interest rate
required to achieve the inflation target.The monetary policy framework adopted by India and
many other countries is correctly described as ‘flexible inflation targeting’. Most of these
countries set not only an inflation target but also provide a range within which it can
fluctuate. This flexibility is extremely important because it emphasizes the uncertainties
against which central bank have to operate.Monetary policy, therefore, has an important role
in flattening the recession curve by ensuring easy and sufficient liquidity in the economy, so
that people have money to spend even if they are unemployed. Lastly, a healthy monetary-
fiscal policy co-ordination is essential to achieve macroeconomic stability and prevent any
future growth impairment in India.
15
Unit 22 FISCAL POLICY: MEANING AND INSTRUMENTS
Structure
22.0 Objectives
22.1 Introduction
22.1.1 Meaning and Instruments of Fiscal Policy
22.2 Public Revenue
22.2.1 Current Receipts and Capital Receipts
22.2.2 Sources of Revenue of State Governments
22.2.3 Tax Revenue
22.2.4 Sources of Non-Tax Revenue for the State Government
22.3 Tax
22.3.1 Direct Tax and Indirect Tax
22.4 Progressive, Proportional, Regressive and Digressive Taxation
22.5 Public Expenditure
22.5.1 Revenue Expenditure and Capital Expenditures
22.5.2 Main Heads of Public Expenditure
22.5.3 Developmental and Non Developmental Expenditure
22.5.4. Importance of Public Expenditure
22.6 Public Debt
22.6.1 Need for Public Debt
22.6.2 Method of Redemption of Public Debt
22.7 Government Budget: Meaning and Components
22.7.1 Components of Union Budget
22.7.2 Types of Budget
22.8 Government Budget: Meaning and Components
22.8.1 Components of Union Budget and State Budget
22.8.2 Types of Budget
22.9 Let Us Sum Up
22.10 Key Words
22.11 Terminal Questions
22.0 Objectives
After studying this unit, you will be able to:
1
1. State the meaning of fiscal policy and its various instruments
2. Identify the different sources of revenue and different heads of expenditure of a
government
3. Explain the objectives of fiscal policy and the limitations thereof.
22.1 Introduction
Every government seeks to control and give direction to economic activities. For this purpose
it has at its disposal a number of instruments. Among these,the most important is the fiscal
policy or what is also known as the budgetary policy.
The fiscal policy, or budgetary policy,operates through the financial operations of the
government. Every government performs a large number of functions to carry out its
responsibilities. The functions that government has to carry and perform has been continually
rising.
Generally, fiscal policy to achieve different objectives.
22.2Public Revenue
The responsibilities of a government all over the world have been steadily increasing.
Government is responsible for the national defence and also for maintenance of law and
order. Besides, government is also responsible for promoting social and economic welfare of
the people. All these responsibilities imply that a government has to discharge large number
of functions. These require money. A government has to mobilize more and more money in
order to finance its function and the money mobilized by the government is called public
revenue.
The various sources of public revenue can be broadly presented as shown in fig. 22.1:
2
Fig. 22.1
22.2
(a) Commercial revenue:It is the revenue received by a government in the form of prices
paid for the government-supplied commodities and services. This includes payment
for postage, railways, electricity, toll,interest on funds borrowedfrom the government,
etc.
(b) Dividends:These are paid out by public sector enterprises out of the surplus income
3
generated by them.
(c) Administrative revenue:It is the revenue that arises on account of the administrative
functions of a government. Some of the different forms of administrative revenue are
as follows:
– Fees:These are the charges imposed by government to defray the cost of each
recurring service.
– License Fees:These are paid in those instances where are government authorities
invoked simply to confer a permission or privilege. No service as such is provided
by the government.
– Fines and Penalties:These are levied for infringement of law.
– Forfeitures:Theseare in the form of penalties imposed by courts for non-
compliance with orders on non-fulfillment of contract etc.
– Escheat:It refers to the claim of the government on the property of a person who
dies without having any legal Heirs or without leaving a will.
(d) Grants from abroad:Occasionally, a country receives grants and donation from
governments and philanthropic organisations situated abroad.
Capital receipts, on the other hand constituted those sources of money for a government
which involve either of the following two:
• A liability of prepayment is created for the government.
• An asset owned by the government is to be sold.
For example, when a government receives money by way of loans and borrowings, a liability
of repayment of loans arises.
Similarly, when a government raises money by way of disinvestment of equity of government-
owned enterprises, assets gets sold out to private Enterprises.
The major sources of capital receipts of a government can be conveniently presented as
shown in Fig. 22.3.
4
Fig. 22.3.
(a) Recoveries of Loans: a government extends loan to the households, business unit and
also in other countries. These loans constitute asset of the government. When these
loans are paid back to the government, it gets its money back. Government’sreceipts
increase but its assetsfall. Hence, these are known as capital receipts.
(b) Loans and borrowings:A government can borrow from different sources.By way of
loans a government gets money. But every loan is to be paid back. Till the loan is
paid back the government carries the liability of repayment.
(c) Disinvestment:The government establishes a number of Industrial and business units
which are the assets of the government.The government may sell a unit or more units
in part of whole,to private sector enterprises.This sale is known as disinvestment.By
this method moneyflows to the government.But in the process the role of government
gets reduced.
6
The important means of resource transfer are:
(i) Tax sharing: 42.0% of the total tax revenue collected by the Central Government is
distributed among the State Governments.
(ii) Grants-in-aid:The central government extends different type of grants to state
government.
These grants are made on the recommendations of the Finance Commission.
(iii) Loans:The Central Government is authorised to give loans to State Government,
subject to such condition as may be laid down by or under any law made by the
Parliament.
(iv) Other transfer:these include:
– Central assistance to an externally aided projects.
– loans, comprising mainly net small savings collection by the states.
– Grants and loans to the states for implementing Central schemes.
– Grants and loans for centrally-sponsored schemes.
– Grants and loans to the case of natural disasters.
– Loans to settle overdraft from the RBI.
– Special loans.
These transfers are made at the recommendations of the union Finance Ministry.
Apart from these direct transfer through sources also flow to the states through:
• The establishment / expansion of Central public undertakings, and
• The distribution of credit by the financial institution.
Check Your Progress 1
1. What do you mean by budgetary policy?
…………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………
2. What do you mean by public revenue?
…………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………
3. What are direct taxes?
…………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………
4. What are indirect taxes?
…………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………
7
…………………………………………………………………………………………
22.3Tax
A tax is a compulsory contribution levied on the wealth of an individual by the government
of a country without reference to any benefit.
From this definition following important characteristics of tax can be observed:
1. A tax is a compulsory payment. All those who act as to pay tax have to make the
payment. Otherwise, they are liable to fine or punishment.
2. The rate of tax is decided by the government. The taxpayer cannot bargain with the
government.
3. Tax must be paid whether the individual derives any special benefit or not.
4. A tax is paid for the general or common benefits extended by the government to all
the taxpayers.
5. No individual can claim any special service for himself in exchange for the tax paid to
the government.
8
on expenditure.
From this, we calculate the tax liability of A, B and C who have annual incomes of ₹1 lakh
₹2 lakh and ₹3 lakh respectively this is shown below:
Persons Income (₹) Tax liability (₹)
11
A 1 lakh 10,000
B 2 lakh 10,000 + 20,000 = 30,000
C 3 lakh 10,000 + 20,000 + 30,000 = 60,000
Thus, A pays a total tax of ₹10,000 on an income of ₹1 lakh, whereas C pays a tax of ₹60,000
on an income of ₹3 lakh.
B. Proportional taxation
In a proportional tax system the rate of tax remains the same at different tax bases.
Suppose, India adopt a proportional income tax system.Every individual is required to pay
tax at the rate of 10% of his income. We estimate the tax liability at different levels of income
as follows:
Income (₹) Income of Tax (₹)
10 1
1,000 100
10,000 1,000
10,00,000 1,00,000
We notice the amount of tax to be paid goes on increasing but the rate at which the tax is paid
remained unchanged.
C. Regressive Taxation
In a regressive tax system, the rate of tax Falls as the tax base increases.
Level of income (₹) Tax rate(%) Tax amount (₹)
10,000 10 1,000
20,000 8 1,600
30,000 7 2,100
D. Degressive Taxation
In a degressive tax system, the tax increases with an increase in tax base but the rate of
increase of tax diminishes with every increase in the tax base.
This can be illustrated as follows:
Taxable income (₹) Rate of tax (%) Rate of increase in tax Amount of tax (₹)
12
rate (% of point)
100 5 – 5
200 10 5 20
300 14 4 42
400 17 3 68
500 19 2 95
600 20 1 120
13
not directly create any capital asset for the economy.
Example: LPG cylinders are made available to domestic consumers at a price which is less
than theper unit cost of production of a cylinder. The difference is borne by the government
and is known as subsidy. Expenditure on subsidies is a part of the government expenditure it
does not lead to creation of any effect.
The other characteristic of revenue expenditure is that it does not cause any reduction in the
liability of the government.
Example:Expenditure incurred on the defence forces of a country does not cause any
reduction in the liability of the government.
The major items on which a government increase revenue expenditure include:
(a) subsidies,
(b) interest on government loans,
(c) public administration,
(d) defence, and
(e) other economic and social services.
(ii) Capital expenditure is in the form of investment expenditure. It results in creation of
assets in the economy. The more the capital expenditure, the larger the quantity of assets that
are created.
Examples:Construction of roads, dams bridges,flyovers, hospitals, schools, canals, etc.,
involves government expenditure this expenditure creates more assets.
The other characteristic of capital expenditure is that it causes a reduction in the liabilities of
the government.
Example:If the government incurs expenditure towards repayment of loans, its liabilities get
reduced.
16
5. Distribution of wealth and income.
6. Stage of economic development,etc.
Check Your Progress 3
1. Distinguish between revenue expenditure and capital expenditure.
…………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………
2. Distinguish between developmental expenditure and non-developmental expenditure.
…………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………….
3. What do you mean by social expenditure?
…………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………
The different components can be tabulated and illustrated with the help of data from a recent
Union Budget as follows:
Components of budget (₹ in crore)
A. Revenue budget
A1 Revenue receipt 6,02,935
A2 Revenue expenditure 6,58,119
Revenue surplus/(deficit) = (A1 – A2) –55,184
B. Capital budget
B1 Revenue receipt 1,47,949
B2 Revenue expenditure 92,765
Capital surplus/(deficit) = (B1 – B2) +55,184
C. Overall budget = (A + B)
C1 Overall receipt (A1 + B1) 7,50,884
C2 Overall expenditure (A2 + B2) 7,50,884
Overall surplus/(deficit) = (C1 – C2) 0
The state budget also follows the same pattern. However, a state government does not have
the privilege of running a fiscal deficit. The state government can borrow money from the
unknown government. This is in addition to the resources transferred by the union
government to state governments.
Among these concepts, more important ones are: (A) revenue deficit, (B) budget deficit, (C)
fiscal deficit, (D) primary deficit, gross primary deficit, and primary deficit.
20
A. Revenue Deficit
Revenue deficit obtains when the revenue expenditure of the government exceed the
revenue receipt.
This is shown in the following tabular data from the Union Budget for a recent year:
Conversely, if a government incurs revenue deficit, it implies that its current expenditure
exceeds its current revenue. To plug this difference, it will have to find additional sources of
money. For example, it may borrow within the economy; it can also borrow externally. It
may even decide to sell the assets owned by it.The money so realised may be used to finance
the deficit. It is obvious that in this situation the economy would not be in a position to
strengthen its resource-base. After all, it is bad economics to sell off family’s jewel to
celebrate a wedding at home. What is true for a family is true for the government also.
In short, the accepted wisdom is that a government should have a revenue surplus (and not
revenue deficit); it may have an overall balanced budget or deficit budget. That is a separate
question to be considered as given below.
Similarly, a government can make serious items to cut down its current expenditure. But
many items of the current expenditure are in the form of committed expenditure. These have
to be incurred and cannot be cut down. If these are cut down they may adversely affect either
the security of the nation on authority of the government or the Welfare of the people.
21
Given these limitations, government may have to leave with revenue deficit, although it is
presented by everyone.
B. Budgetary Deficit
Budgetary deficit will be obtained when the overall expenditure of the government, i.e., the
sum total of revenue expenditure and capital expenditure exceeds the overall receipts, i.e., the
sum total of revenue receipts and capital receipts. If total receipts equal total expenditure, it
will be called a balanced budget. Budgetary deficit will be zero.
It would be seen that in the given Union Budget, overall expenditure is equal to overall
receipt. It is a balanced budget in this sense.
But in case the overall expenditure were to be more than the overall receipts, the difference
between the overall expenditure and the overall receipt constitutes budgetary deficit.
But if new currency is printed in a greater proportion than the proportion in which supply of
goods and services has increased, there would be more money available in the economy than
what is required. There would be too much money chasing too little goods. This would prove
inflationary. An unchecked inflation can have serious adverse effect on the growth process in
an economy. It can adversely affect both savings and investment, which are fountainhead of
capital formation.
Thus, no government can go for uncontrolled printing of new currency to meet its financial
needs.
C. Fiscal Deficit
Fiscal deficit is calculated as follows:
22
Financial statement (₹ in crore)
A. Revenue expenditure 6,58,119
B. Capital expenditure 92,765
C. Revenue receipts 602,935
D. Recoveries of loans by the government 4,497
E. Non-debt creating capital receipts 10,165
Fiscal deficit = (A + B) – (C + D + E) 1,33,287
In other words,
The fiscal deficit equals a sum of total of revenue expenditure and capital expenditure minus
the sum total of the revenue receipts and the recovery of loan by government and the non-
debt creating capital receipts.
A small amount of fiscal deficit is considered good for economic growth, especially if it is
financed by printing of new currency.
Fiscal deficit implies that the injections by the government are more than the leakage from
the circular flow of income. If an economy is in a position to absorb additional money, it
would stimulate aggregate demand. As the result, level of employment and income will
increase.
But a large amount of fiscal deficit proves counter-productive and acts as a check on growth.
A large part of it is to be financed by borrowing. Some of the adverse effects may be briefly
stated as follows:
(i) Rise in rate of interest and adverse effects on private investment: When government
borrows large amount of money from the market, rates of interest go up in
23
consequence private investments suffers.
(ii) Increase in public debt with increase in borrowings: The burden of public debt keep
on increasing. Interest payments keep increasing at compound rates. As a result,
government’s ability to undertake development activities seriously suffers.
(iii) Inflationary pressures: High fiscal deficits cause inflationary pressures. Once
inflation set in, non development expenditure of the government begins to grow fast.
In view of this consideration, it is important to keep fiscal deficit under check.
Fiscal policy is defined as the policy under which a government uses the instruments of
taxation, public expenditure and public borrowing to achieve various objectives of economic
policy
Current receipts (also called revenue received) are those sources of inflows of money which
do not create any liability of repayment on the government.
Tax is a compulsory contribution levied on the wealth of an individual by the government of
a country without reference to any benefit.
Direct tax is a tax which is expected to be paid out of the income or wealth of the same
person on whom it has been imposed.
Indirect tax is a tax whose burden can be shifted to another person. The person who is made
24
responsible to pay the tax is expected to charge the amount of tax from another person.
Regressive tax is one in which the rate of taxation decreases as the taxpayer’s income
increases.
Public expenditure refers to the expenses of the public authorities—Central Government,
State Government and Local Government—either in protecting the citizens or in promoting
the economic social welfare.
Revenue budget contains the details of revenue expenditure and revenue receipts of the
government. These are in the nature of current expenditure and current income of the
government.
Capital budget is a statement of capital receipts and capital expenditure of the government.
25
Unit 23 FISCAL FEDERALISM
Structure
23.0 Objectives
23.1 Introduction
23.2 Main Aspects of Fiscal Federalism
23.3 Role of government in federal federalism
23.4 Economic Rationale for Central-State & Transfer of Grants
23.5 Fiscal Decentralization and Local Governance
23.5.1 Features of Well-Functioning Intergovernmental System in India
23.5.2 Importance of Fiscal Decentralization
23.5.3 Fiscal Decentralization in India
23.5.4 Criteria for Fiscal Devolution
23.6 Emerging Issues and Challenges in India’s Fiscal Federalism
23.7 Redefining the Fiscal Architecture in India
23.8 Let Us Sum Up
23.9 Key Words
23.10 Terminal Questions
23.0 Objectives
After studying this chapter, you will be able to:
• Explain main aspects of fiscal federalism
• Identify role of Government in federal economics
• Describe economic rationale for transfer of grants
• Discuss fiscal decentralization in local governance
• State issues and challenges in India’s fiscal federalism
• Redefine the fiscal architecture in India
23.1 Introduction
Fiscalfederalismisdefinedasfinancialrelationsbetweenunitsofgovernmentsinafederalgovernmen
tsystem.Fiscalfederalismispartofbroaderpublicfinancediscipline.WallaceE.Oakes,in1999,define
ditas,“FiscalFederalismisconcernedwithunderstandingwhichfunctionsandinstrumentsarebestcen
tralisedandwhicharebestplacedinthesphereofdecentralisedlevelsofgovernment.Thisconceptappli
estoallformsofgovernment:unitary,federalandconfederal”.Fiscalfederalismdealswiththedivision
ofgovernmentalfunctionsandfinancialrelationsamonglevelsofgovernment.Musgravearguedthatf
ederalgovernmentsystemshavetheabilitytosolvemanyoftheissueslocalgovernmentsfacebyprovidi
ngthebalanceandstabilityneededtoovercomedisruptiveissueslikeunevendistributionofwealthandl
ackofwidelyavailableresources.Musgravefurthertheorizedthatfederalgovernmentsshouldmanage
anation'smoneyfromthetopand give it to states,who can distribute it locally as needed.
Thetheoryoffiscalfederalismassumesthatafederalsystemofgovernmentcanbeefficientandeffecti
veatsolvingproblemsgovernmentsfacetoday,suchasdistributionofincome,efficientandeffectivea
llocationofresources,andeconomicstability.Economicstabilityanddistributionofincomecanbedo
nebyfederalgovernmentbecauseofitsflexibilityindealingwiththeseproblems.Becausestatesandlo
calitiesarenotequalintheirincome,federalgovernmentinterventionisneeded.Allocationofresource
scanbedoneeffectivelybystatesandlocalgovernments.Musgravearguedthatthefederalorcentralgo
vernmentshouldberesponsiblefortheeconomicstabilizationandincomeredistributionbutthealloca
tionofresources should bethe responsibility of stateandlocalgovernments.
Afederationissimplyamultilevelsystemofgovernmentinwhichdifferentlevelsofgovernmentexist.
Eachof whichhassomeindependentauthoritytomake
economicdecisionswithinitsjurisdiction.Byeconomicdecisions,weincludeavarietyofthings.Gov
ernmentscanacquireresourcestoprovidepublicgoodsandservices.Expendituresforthesepurposes
canbeofacurrentnature(e.g.,hiringemployees,purchasingmaterials)andacapitalnature(e.g.,buildi
ngs,infrastructure).Governmentscanraiserevenuesinordertofinanceservicesprovidedbytheprivat
eornon-
profitsectors,suchashospitals,universities,orinsurance.Theycanarrangetohaveresourcesredistrib
utedamonghouseholdsintheeconomy.Theycanintroduce regulations in the markets of the
privatesector so as to influence resource
allocationthere.Theycaninterferewiththepricingmechanismasanalternativewayofachievingreso
urceallocationorredistributiveeffects,suchasthroughsubsidizingortaxingcertainactivities.Theyc
analsoattempttoinfluencetheaggregateamountofactivitythatoccursintheeconomyboththroughbu
dgetaryactionsandthroughchangesintheamountofmoneyandcreditcirculating in the economy.
Division of Functions:
ThefiscalpowersandfunctionalresponsibilitiesinIndiahavebeendividedbetweentheCentralandStat
egovernmentfollowingtheprinciplesoffederalfinance.ThedivisionoffunctionsisspecifiedintheSev
enthScheduleoftheConstitutioninthreelistsviztheUnionList, the StateListandthe Concurrent List.
TheUnionListcontains97subjectsofnationalimportance,suchasdefence,railways,nationalhighwa
ys,navigation,atomicenergy,andpostsandtelegraphs.66itemsofStateandlocalinterest,suchaslawa
ndorder,publichealth,agriculture,irrigation,power,ruralandcommunitydevelopment,etc.havebee
nentrustedtotheStategovernments.47itemssuchasindustrialandcommercialmonopolies,economi
candsocialplanning,labourwelfareandjustice,etc.havebeenenumeratedintheConcurrentList.The
concurrentlistisoneinwhichbothstateandthecentrecanmakelegislations.However,incaseofaconfl
ictortie,federallawsprevail.
Divisionof BorrowingPowers:
TheborrowingpowershavealsobeenclearlymentionedintheConstitution.UnderArticle292,thecen
tralgovernmentisempoweredtoborrowfundsfromwithinandoutsidethecountryasperthelimitsimp
osedbytheParliament.AccordingtoArticle293(3),theStatescanborrowfundswithintheCountry.Ar
ticle293(2)empowerstheCentretoprovideloanstoStatesubjectto conditions laid down by
Parliament.
Fiscal Imbalances:
Fiscalimbalanceisamismatchintherevenuepowersandexpenditureresponsibilitiesofagovernment.
Whentherevenuepowersaredividedbetweentwoormoretiersofgovernmentinafederation,ingeneral,t
heCentralgovernmentisentrustedwithmorefinancialresources.Thisisbecauseduetoitsfunctionalres
ponsibilitieslikedefence,spaceresearch,etc.thereisalways agreater demandforits
expenditurerequirement vis-a-vis its revenue resources.
Thisistosaysomeofitsfunctionsarerequiredtobedischargedmoreinthenationalinterestthan the
interest of aregional dimension, whichwarrants greater revenue powers for it.
Thus,thefiscalimbalanceamongthestateswouldarisebecauseofinadequaterevenueresourcesinco
mparisontotheirrespectiveexpenditurecommitments.Suchnon-
correspondencebetweentherevenueresourcesandexpenditurerequirementsamongthestatesin a
federation is known asfiscalimbalance.
The instruments
oractivitiesthatgovernmentsincorporatetoundertaketheireconomicactivitiesinclude
thefollowing:
Expenditures on goodsand services:
Governmentsmaypurchaselabour,capital,goods,andservicesfromtheprivatesectorinordertoprovi
degoodsandservicestotheirconstituents.Suchmajorexpenditurecategoriesasdefencespending,tran
sportation,schools,andhospitalsareincludedintheirmenuofgoodsandservicesexpenditures.Insom
ecases,thepublicsectoractuallyproducesthegoodsorservices.Inothers,itmerelyfinancestheirprovis
ionbyprivateproducersorthenon-profitsector.Transfers to individuals or households.
Government spending alsoincludestransferpayments:
Thesecanbeprovidedtohouseholdsintheeconomy,forexample,intheformofwelfarepayments,paym
entsfordisability,andpaymentstotheelderly.Thesetransfersmightbe
administeredthroughthetaxsystemorthroughanagencyresponsiblefordeliveringthemtotheir
intendedrecipients.
Subsidies to firms:
Aparticularformoftransferisasubsidytofirmsintheprivatesector,whosepurposeistypicallytoassistt
hefirm’sparticipationintheprivatesectorinwaysthatfacilitategovernmentobjectives.
Transfers to other levels of government:
Inafederation,transferscanalsobefromonelevelofgovernmenttoanother.Mostcommonly,intergove
rnmentaltransfersgofromhigher-leveltolower-levelgovernments,butinsomecases they go
theother way.
Taxation: Governments can, and do, useawideassortmentoftaxes to raise
revenues,suchasindividualandcorporateincometaxes,generalsalestaxes,payrolltaxes,excisetaxes,
importandexportduties,andpropertyandwealthtaxes,tonamethemainones.Differentlevelsofgover
nmentmay have access to differenttaxesand may sharesome taxbases.
Userfees: Revenues mayberaisedfromcharges that arerelated to servicesprovided.Examples
includewater,garbage,andsewagecharges;roadtolls;licensesofvarioussortsimposedonindividuals
andlegislationofalower-levelgovernment.Itmayalsobeabletoimposemandatesonthelowerlevel of
government, forcing it to providecertaintypes of services for its constituents.
Publiccorporations: Governmentsmayalsoengagedirectlyinbusiness-
likeactivities,operatingpublicfirmsthatproducegoodsandservicesforsaletothepublicinindustriesth
atmightbeconsideredofnationalimportanceorinwhichitisfeltthatprivatecompetitivemarketswould
notprevail.Someexamplesofsuchindustriesincludetransportation,communications,utilities,andair
craftproduction.
Theultimateconcerninstudyingtheeconomicsoffederationsishowthesevariouspublic-
sectoractivitiesaretobedividedamong,orassignedto,governments.Whichonesshouldbedecentrali
zedtolowerlevels?Whichonesshouldberetainedatthecenter?Whichactivitiesshouldbejointlyunde
rtaken?Howshouldthedivisionofresponsibilitiesbewrittenintotheconstitution?Whatinfluence,ifa
ny,shouldonelevelofgovernmentbe
abletoexertonotherlevels?Whatinstitutionalarrangementsshouldbeusedtofacilitatetheinteraction
amonglevelsofgovernment?Thesearethesortsofquestionsthatencompasswhatinfiscalfederalisma
rereferredtoastheassignmentproblem–
theassignmentoftaxation,expenditure,andregulatoryresponsibilitiestovariouslevelsofgovernme
nt–andthefiscalarrangements–
thedesignofintergovernmentalfiscalrelations.Thekeyissuehereconcernstheoptimaldegreeofdece
ntralization ofvarious public-sectordecisions.
iii. Fiscalinefficiency:
Theargumentforsuchtransfersisreinforcedbythefactthatthesamedifferentialswhichgiveriseto
fiscalinequity also cause fiscal inefficiency.
v. Fiscal harmonization:
Totheextentthatthecentralgovernmentisinterestedinredistributionasagoal,thereisanationalinte
restinredistributionthatoccursviatheprovisionofpublicservicesbythesubnationalgovernments.
Expenditureharmonizationcanbeaccomplishedbytheuseof(non-
matching)conditionalgrants,providedtheconditionsreflectnationalefficiencyandequityconcer
ns,andwherethereisafinancialpenaltyassociatedwithfailuretocomplywithanyoftheconditions.I
nchoosingsuchpoliciestherewillalwaysbeatrade-
offbetweenuniformity,whichmayencouragethefreeflowofgoodsandfactors,anddecentralizatio
nwhichmayencourage innovation, efficiencyandaccountability.
Revenue Sharing
Manycountriesattempttoachievevariousoftheobjectivesascribedabovetotransfersthroughsystem
svariouslydescribedas"taxsharing"or"revenuesharing."Whilethereareawidevarietyofsuchsyste
ms,mostofthem-perhapsmostmarkedlyinthetransitionalcountries-
sufferfromseveralcommonproblems.First,iftheyarepartial,thatis,donotapplytoallnationaltaxesb
utonlytoasubsetofsuchtaxes,theymaybiasnationaltaxpolicy.Second,if-asisoftenthecase-
theysharetherevenuesfromorigin-
based(production)taxestothejurisdictionsfromwhichtherevenuesarecollected,theybreakthedesir
ablelinkbetweenbenefitsandcostsatthelocallevelandhencereduceaccountabilityandtheefficiency
ofdecentralization.Third,sinceinsuchsystemstaxratesareinvariablysetbythecentralgovernment,a
ndinadditionsincethesharingrateisoftenapplieduniformlythroughoutthecountry,onceagaintheac
countabilitylinkisbrokenandsubnationalgovernmentshavenoincentive to ensurethat the
amountand pattern oftheir spending is efficient. Inaddition, if,
asinsomeofthetransitionalcountries,suchtaxesarecollectedbylocalgovernmentsandthensupposed
lysharedwithnationalgovernments-
andinthiscaseperhapsespeciallyifthesharingratesarehigher(moreflowsupwards)forricherareas-
eitheranundesirabledisincentiveforcollectioneffortiscreatedor,moreusually,thetemptationto"co
okthebooks"islikelytobeoverwhelming.
• Autonomy
Subnationalgovernmentsshouldhavecompleteindependenceandflexibilityinsettingpriori
ties,andshouldnotbeconstrainedbythecategoricalstructureofprogramsanduncertaintyass
ociated with decisionmaking at the center.Tax basesharing—
allowingsubnationalgovernmentstointroducetheirowntaxratesoncentralbases,formula-
basedrevenue sharing, orblock grants—is consistent with this objective.
• Revenue adequacy
Subnationalgovernmentsshouldhaveadequaterevenuestodischargedesignatedresponsibi
lities.
• Equity
Allocatedfundsshouldvarydirectlywithfiscalneedfactorsandinverselywiththetaxablecap
acity ofeachprovince.
• Predictability
Thegrantmechanismshouldensurepredictabilityofsubnationalgovernments’sharesby
publishing five-yearprojections of funding availability.
• Efficiency
Thegrantdesignshouldbeneutralwithrespecttosubnationalgovernmentchoicesofresource
allocationtodifferentsectorsordifferenttypesofactivity.Thecurrentsystemoftransfersinco
untriessuchasIndonesiaandSriLankatofinancelowerlevelpublicsectorwagescontravenest
his criterion.
• Simplicity
Thesubnationalgovernment’sallocationshouldbebasedonobjectivefactorsoverwhichindi
vidualunitshavelittlecontrol.Theformulashouldbeeasytocomprehend
sothat"grantsmanship"isnotrewarded,asappearstooccurwithplanassistanceinIndiaandPa
kistan.
• Incentive
Theproposeddesignshouldprovideincentivesforsoundfiscalmanagementanddiscouragei
nefficientpractices.Thereshouldbenospecifictransferstofinancethedeficits of
subnationalgovernments.
• Safeguard of grantor’s objectives
Thegrantdesignshouldensurethatcertainwell-
definedobjectivesofthegrantorareproperlyadheredtobythegrantrecipients.Thisisaccompl
ishedbypropermonitoring,jointprogressreviews,andprovidingtechnicalassistance,orbyd
esigningaselectivematchingtransfer program.
Thevariouscriteriaspecifiedabovecouldbeinconflictwitheachotherandthereforeagrantormay
have to assign priorities to variousfactors incomparing policy alternatives.
23.5FiscalDecentralizationand LocalGovernance
Infederalstates,fiscaldecentralizationmeansthatrevenueandexpenditureresponsibilities(therightt
oimposeandcollecttaxandindependentlydeterminethefocusareasofexpenses)aretransferredfromt
hefederaltotheregionalandlocallevels.Fiscalfederalismisamoregeneralconceptthat
representsaverticalfinancial
structureofthepublicsector(Oates,1999),withrevenueandexpenditureassignmentamongdifferent
levelsofgovernmentandasystem
ofintergovernmentaltransfers.Thus,fiscaldecentralizationisamechanismoffiscalfederalismandca
nbeconsideredasanecessaryconditionofthelatterbecausethereisnopointinaverticalfinancialstruct
ureofthepublicsectorwithoutacertainlevelofdecentralization(in this
case,allresources,authorityand responsibilities areconcentratedat the federal level).
Howacountryorganisesitsfinances,formsthebasisforhowlocalauthoritiesgoverntheircities,towns
andvillages.Throughfiscaldecentralisation,localgovernmentshavemoreauthoritytodecidehowan
dwheretospendtheirresources.Thisenablesthemtobemoreresponsive to citizens’ needs.
Forsuccessfuldecentralisation,nationalgovernmentsneedtodesignandsuperviseclearfiscalarrang
ementsthatsupportlocalservicedelivery.Atthesametime,localauthoritiesarechallengedtostrength
entheirfinancialcapacitiesandusetheirlimitedresourcesinaneffectiveandefficientway.
Theworldwidetrendtowardsdecentralizationhasbeenaccompanied by
animateddiscussionsaboutitsbenefitsandcosts.Perceivedbenefitsrangefrombetterservicedeliver
ytopopularinvolvementingovernancetorevenuemobilization.Theperceivedcostsincludereduced
centralabilitytoimplementmacroeconomicstabilizationprogramsandefficiencylossesbecauseofp
oorlocalcapacity.Regardlessofpossiblecosts,mostcountrieshaveplacedthestrengtheningoflocalg
overnments–ordecentralization–
ontheirdevelopmentpolicyagenda.Actiontoendowlocalgovernmentswithsignificanttaxingpower
sandincreasedexpenditureautonomyhas,however,notmatchedplans.Infact,theshareofexpenditur
eofsub-nationalgovernments in developing countrieshas not increased in the past two decades.
GivenIndia’ssizeanddiversity,itisnoteasytoachieveeffectiverepresentation.Butfromthefirstcentr
alinitiativetoestablishlocal governments in 1957to
the73rdConstitutionalAmendmentin1993,therehavebeenadvancesinthisdirection.Therehaveals
obeen,ateverystep,administrativeandlegalproblems,orincompleteunderstandingoftheconceptsin
volved.Overall,decentralizationinIndiaisunfinished:ithasputlocalgovernmentsinplacebutnotend
owed them with themeans to deliverresults.
Theeffectivenessofdecentralizationrequiresthecalibrationoftheadministrative,politicalandfiscal
dimensions.Withoutpoliticaldecentralization,participatorydecision-makingisnotpossible.
Administrativedecentralization is necessary to
implementpoliticaldecisions,andanimportantprecondition for fiscaldecentralization.Efficiency
in the delivery ofpublic
servicesdependsonadministrativeefficiencyandaccountability.Toassessrurallocalgovernmentfin
ancein India,itisusefultocomparethesystem withcurrent thinkingon awell-
functioningintergovernmentalfiscalsystem.
1. Addressingallkeycomponentsofadecentralizedfiscalsystem:Grampanchayatcouncilsareelect
ed,thegrampanchayatsaresmallenoughtobecloseto thepeople,andthereissome
localtaxingpower.Thelowexpenditureofgrampanchayatstogetherwithlimitedcontrolhaveunder
mined institutions–suchas the gram sabha –set up to enablelocal participation.
2. Financeshouldfollowfunction:Thestategovernmentsmaytreatthe29expenditurefunctionsofl
ocalgovernmentnamedintheConstitutionasexclusiveorconcurrentlocalgovernmentfunctions.Bo
thKarnatakaandKeralahavechosenthelatter.Tocomplicatematters,expendituresforcentralscheme
sandforMPdevelopmentprojectsaremadeoutsidethelocalgovernmentsystem.Thisconfusestheser
vicedeliveryroleoflocal governmentsandthe estimation of theirfinancingrequirements.
3. Strongabilitytomonitorandevaluatetheintergovernmentalfiscalsystem:Bothstatesprovidefo
rperiodicstatefinancecommissions,butthesehaveinadequatestaff.Also,neitherstate has adata
systemthat helps track local government finances.
4. Astructurethattreatstheurbanandruralsectorsdifferently:TheIndiansystemdoesdifferentiat
ebetweentheurbanandrurallocalgovernmentsinitssystemoffiscalfederalism,and the statesappear
to treatthese sectors differently.
5. Assignmentofrevenuepowerstolocalgovernments:Thegrampanchayatshaveindependentrev
enueraisingpowersforlandandpropertytaxesforanumberofminorlevies,andforanumberofusercha
rges.Butthelocalgovernmentsinthetwo statesdonotusetheirrate-
settingpowersfully.Propertytaxcollectionratesarenothigh,andinsomecases,collectioncostsappro
achedrevenue levels.
6. Higher-
levelgovernmentsfollowingtherulestheymakeforrurallocalgovernments:Bothstatesfall short
in this aspect.Inparticular, thefailureof thestatetreasuries to release full andtimely funds
forintergovernmentaltransferscompromiseslocalgovernmentfiscaloperations.
7. Asimplesystem:TheIndiansystemofrurallocalgovernmentfinancesisanythingbutsimple.Thein
tergovernmentaltransferssysteminKarnatakacomprisesover400differentgrantstolocalgovernme
nts,eachwithadifferent
setofearmarksandmanagement.Theresultisthedifficultyofunderstandingthesystemandholdingeit
herlocalorhigher-levelgovernmentaccountableforthe effectiveness of these programs.
8. Intergovernmentaltransferstomatchclearlyspecifiedobjectives:Thesystemofintergovernme
ntaltransfersfallsshortofthisgoal,atleast
inKarnataka.ThegrampanchayatsinKeralareceiveblockgrantsandaregivensomediscretionindeci
dinghowthemoneyisspent.Buttheamountallocatedtothegrampanchayatsisonlyaboutfourpercent
oftotaltransfers to rurallocalgovernments.
9. Policiesthatconsiderimpactonallthreelevelsofgovernment:ThestatedeficitsinbothKeralaand
Karnatakahaveledtoexpenditurereductionprograms,whichhavebeentranslatedinto
reducedintergovernmentaltransfers to rural local governments.
10.Hardbudgetconstraintonlocalgovernments:Thedatasetgatheredforthisstudyshowthat most
gram panchayats in Karnatakaand Keralarun deficits on currentaccount.
11.Recognizingthechangingnatureofsystems:TheIndiansystemhasbothunionandstatefinancec
ommissionschargedwithperiodicreviewoftheexistingsystem.Thoughthecentral
financecommissionshavehadanimportantimpactoncentral-
statefiscalrelations,thestatefinancecommission(atleast in Karnataka) has been generally
ignored.
Indiahasa historicalcommitment to
ruraldecentralization,andPanchayatRajInstitutionsarestronglyinplace.Butpanchayatshavenotliv
eduptotheirpotentialbecausefiscaldecentralizationremainslargelyincomplete. What, then, is the
wayahead?
1. Clarifyexpenditureassignments:Expenditureassignmentsbetweenstateandpanchayatsneedto
beclarifiedbyunbundlingthegeneralsubjectsprescribedintheConstitution,andassigningresponsib
ilitiesatamoredetailedlevelofactivityandsub-
activity.ExpenditureassignmentsamongthethreetiersofPRIsalsoneedtobeclarifiedforexternalitie
s,economicsofscaleandthedemandfor
localcontrol.TheIndiansituationsuggeststhatthemostpracticable option is to acceptthat districts
and blocks areessentiallydeconcentratedagenciesofthestategovernment,
andtoconcentrateforthepresent on empowering villagepanchayats.
2. Consolidateschemes:Theassignmentsystemcanberationalizedbymappingactivitybetweenthe
stategovernmentandrurallocalgovernments;andamongthethreetiersofpanchayats.Equallyimport
antistheautonomyofpanchayatstodesignandimplementassignedfunctions.
3. Augmentpanchayatresources:Someschemes,suchascentrallysponsoredschemes,havetobeco
nsolidatedintountiedfundsforgrampanchayats.Theownrevenuesofgrampanchayatscan
beimproved through systemic changes in both policiesandinstitutionsso thatcapacity–
todesign,administerandenforceexistinggrampanchayattaxes–
isenhanced.Otherprioritiesareimprovingcollectionefficiencyandthepolicyenvironmentforprope
rtytax,modernizing the valuation system, and broadeningthe taxbase.
4. Redesigntransfers:Thefinancecommissionsneedtobeprofessionalizedtoevolvetheappropriat
emethodofdeterminingtherequirementsofdifferenttypesandtiersoflocalgovernments.Unbundlin
gthetransfersystemfromscheme-
basedtransferswouldhelplocalgovernmentsmakeallocationsaccordingtotheirpriorities.Criteria-
basedallocationisnecessaryevenatthewardlevel.Aminimumstandardofpublicservicequalitycanb
eachievedby ensuring that transfersequalize thefinancialcapacities of local bodies.
5. Createinformationsystemonlocalfinances:Itiscrucialtocompileimportanteconomicanddemo
graphicinformationanddataforvariablesattheGPlevel.Subsequently,astandardsystemofbookkee
pingbythepanchayatshastobeevolved.Capacitydevelopmentisessentialforthe collection of
comparableinformation using informalconcepts anddefinitions.
6. Improveaccountability:ThePRIs’accountingandbudgetingsystemneedsoverhauling.Theinter
nalmanagementstructureofgrampanchayatsshouldberedesigned,andthelineofcontrolofthepanch
ayatbureaucracy,especiallythatofthosefromthetransferreddepartments,madeunambiguous.Final
ly,positivemechanismsfordownwardaccountabilityintheKeralaPanchayatRajsystem–
therighttoinformation,overseeingfunctionsofgramsabhas,socialaudit,transparentmethodofbenef
iciaryselection,andthecitizen’scharter–
needtoberetainedandencouraged.Thesefeaturescanbeusedtoevaluatetheperformanceofpanchaya
tsand link it to a system of incentivesand disincentives
23.5.2 Importanceof FiscalDecentralisation
Thefiscaldecentralisationholdsmeritsforseveralreasonsandsomeofthereasonsareasfollows:
i) Promotion of Economic
Value:Fiscaldecentralisationpromoteseconomicvalue.Thefiscalfederalismli
kethepoliticalconceptofdemocracyisconsideredtobeanoptimalinstitutionalarr
angement.Ithastheprovisionofpublicserviceswithcostminimisationandwelfar
emaximisation.It alsocombinestheadvantagesofdecentralisationwith the
benefitsfromeconomiesof scale.
ii) Good Governance:
Fiscaldecentralisationleadstogoodgovernance,byensuringfiscalresponsibilit
ytothelowerlevelofgovernmentthatis.localself-
government.Governancevaluesincluderesponsivenessandaccountability,div
ersityandpoliticalparticipation.Decentralisationplacesallocationdecisionmak
ingclosetothepeople.Asaresult,thisplacesgreaterresponsiveness to
localofficials and greater accountability to citizens.
iii) Political Participation:
Fiscaldecentralisationwouldenhancepoliticalparticipationatthelocallevel.Thi
shasthepotentialtoenhancedemocraticvalueandpoliticalstabilityatthelocallev
el.Itprovidesaforumforlocaldebateaboutlocalprioritiesandcanbeaprovinggro
undforfuturepoliticalleaders.Itimpartsfinancialeducation to
thelocalleadersat thegrassroots levels.
iv) Reduction in
Poverty:Thefiscaldecentralisationissupposedtoreducepovertythroughthenee
dbasedanddemand-
drivenapproachofutilisationofresourcesthroughparticipationoflocalsatthegra
ssroots.ThecountieslikeChinaandIndiaareverymuch in thefavour
offiscaldecentralisationforpovertyreduction.
v) Effective Use of Funds:
Withfiscaldecentralisation,fundsareeffectivelyusedasa)theyaredemand-
drivenandthereishighdegreeoflocalinvolvement;b)theiroperations are
transparent and accountable; c) they arecarefullytargetedtolow-income
group; and d) free fromofficial red tapism.
vi) Government closer to people:
AccordingtoStigler,fiscaldecentralisationbringsgovernmentclosertothepeopl
e.However,arepresentativegovernmentfunctionsinbettermanner,whenitisclo
setothepeople.Thetheoreticalperceptiveofthisargumentgoeslikethis“eachpub
licserviceshouldbeprovidedbythejurisdictionhavingcontrolovertheminimum
geographicalareathatwouldinternalisebenefits and costs of such provision.”
vii) Power to Pursue Agenda:
Inafiscallydecentralisedsystemwherecitizens’participationindecisionmaking
is encouraged,locallyelectedgovernmentshavethepowertopursuethe agenda
mandated by voters.
Committees
Variouscommitteesandcommissionswereconstitutedforsuggestingmeasuresforestablishingfina
ncialautonomyofthePanchayatsandmunicipalities.Inthelightofthesesuggestions,theStateshavem
adeappropriateprovisionsintheirPanchayatRajActs.Letusnowreviewtherecommendationsofvari
ouscommitteesappointedfromtimetotimeaboutdecentralisation of finances to local self
government institutions.
i) Finance EnquiryCommittee:
In1951,theLocalFinanceEnquiryCommitteestudiedthisproblemandrecomme
ndedunconditionalassignmentof15%oflandrevenuetoberaisedinthepanchaya
tareaandtheproceedsofsurchargeleviedonthetransferofimmovablepropertytot
hePanchayats.Panchayatswerealsotobeempoweredtoraisetheirownresources
bylevyingcertaintaxesintheirterritories.
ii) Taxation enquirycommittee:
In1954,theTaxationEnquiryCommitteerecommendedfor
reservingcertaintaxessuchastaxonlandandbuilding,octroi,taxonnon-
mechanicaltransport,taxonproperty,taxonprofession,taxonadvertisementoth
erthan
newspapers,theatretax,anddutyontransferofproperty,etc.forPanchayats.
iii) SanthananCommittee:
TheSanthananCommitteeformedin1963stronglyrecommendedthatitwasesse
ntialforstabilityandgrowthoflocalinstitutionstohavesubstantialandgrowingre
sources,whichwereentirelywithintheirpowertoexploitand to develop.
iv) AshokMehtacommittee: In1978,theAshokMehtaCommittee
recommendedthatbesidesgovernmentsupport,panchayatsshouldmobiliseeno
ughresourcesoftheirown,asnodemocraticinstitutioncancontinuetomaintainits
operationalviability by depending upon externalresources.
v) SinghviCommittee:
In1966,theSinghviCommitteeamongothers,suggestedpatternofcompulsorya
ndoptionallevies.TheStateGovernmentsshalllevyandcollecttaxesandfeeson
behalfofPRIsandshalldisbursetothembasedontherecommendationoftheFinan
ceCommissionineachState.Inordertoensureandsafeguardthefinancialautono
myofthePRIs,theyshouldbefreedfromrelyingonthe“UntiedFunds”.Butencour
agedinsteadtotaketoinnovativeresourcemobilisationsuchasgenerationofinco
mefromentrepreneurialactivities,projectedloans,publiccontribution,tax-
sharing,tax-assignmentsand matching grantincentives for taxcollection.
Commissions
The73rdConstitutionalAmendmentprovidesfordevolutionoffunctionsandtransferoffunctionarie
sandfundstothethreetiersofPanchayatiRajInstitutions.Thearticle243GoftheConstitution
states,“Subjecttotheprovisionsof theConstitution,thelegislature
ofastate,bylaw,mayendowthepanchayatswithsuchpowersandauthorityasmaybenecessarytoenab
lethemtofunctionasinstitutionsofself-
government.Suchlawsmaycontainprovisionsforthedevolutionofpowersandresponsibilitiesupon
panchayatsattheappropriatelevel,subjecttosuchconditions as may bespecifiedtherein, with
respect to:
a) The preparation ofplans foreconomic development andsocialjustice; and
b) Theimplementationofschemesforeconomicdevelopmentandsocialjusticeasmaybe
entrusted to them including thosein relation to matters listed in the EleventhSchedule.
Article243AoftheConstitutionofIndiaembodiesthespiritofthedemocraticdecentralisation.
While280(3)(bb)oftheConstitutionenjoinstheCentralFinanceCommissiontosuggestmeasurersne
ededtoaugmenttheconsolidatedfundofastatetosupplementtheresourcesofthepanchayatsandmuni
cipalitiesonthebasisoftherecommendationsmadebytheFinanceCommission of the State.
Article243-H of theConstitution, empowers thestate legislatures to enactlaws:
a) Toauthoriseapanchayattolevy,collectandappropriatesuchtaxes,duties,tollsandfees;
b) Toassign to a panchayat,certaintaxes, duties, tolls leviedandcollected by
thestategovernment;
c) Toprovideformakinggrants-in-aidtothepanchayatsfromtheconsolidatedfundofthe
state;and
d) Toprovidefortheconstitutionofsuchfundsforpanchayatsandalsothewithdrawalof such
money therefrom; as may bespecifiedbylaw.
Article 243-Iof theConstitution envisages forthesetting up of theState Finance
Commission(SFC)onceineveryfiveyearstoreviewthefinancialpositionofthepanchayatsandtoma
kerecommendations to theGovernoras to:
i) Theprincipleswhich should govern
a) Thedistributionbetweenthestateandthepanchayatsofthenetproceedsofthetaxes,duties,t
ollsandfeesleviedbythestate.Itmaybedividedbetweenthemunderthispartandthe
allocationbetween the panchayats at all levelsof theirrespective sharesof suchproceeds;
b) Thedeterminationofthetaxes,duties,tollsandfeeswhichmaybeassignedto,orappropriat
ed by the panchayats;
c) The grants-in-aid to the panchayatsfrom theconsolidated fund of thestate
iii) AnyothermatterreferredtothefinancecommissionbytheGovernorintheinterestsofsounds
finance of the panchayats.
The74thConstitutionalAmendmentalsostatesthattheStateFinanceCommissiontoreviewthefinan
cialpositionoftheurbanlocalbodies,theirrevenueandcapitalaccountrequirements.Itrecommended
devolutionoftaxes,charges,fees,tolls,duties,sharedrevenues,inter-governmenttransfersand
grantsfromthestatetothemunicipalities.It suggestedmeasuresforthe mobilisation of
municipalresources.
Sources of localgovernmentrevenue
Thevarioussources of local governmentrevenuecanbroadlybe categorized into fourheads:
i) Local Taxation
ii) UserCharges
iii) Inter-GovernmentalTransfers
iv) CapitalFinance
i) LocalTaxation:Thelocalself-
governmentindifferentcountriesusedtoimposelocaltaxesasasourceofrevenue.However,itvariesfr
omstatetostateandregiontoregiondependingondecisionoftheconcernedstategovernment.Localta
xesaregenerallydividedintothreecategoriessuchastaxesonproperty,incomeandsaleofgoodsandse
rvices.Generally,itisobservedthathighlyprogressiveandmobiletaxbasesareassignedtothecentre.
While,userchargesandfeearefoundtobevestedwiththelocalgovernments.Therefore,decentralized
(local) levels of governmentrelymainly on taxes like propertytax, user chargesandfees.
ii) Usercharges:The localgovernmentschargesuserfeefor
theserviceswhichtheyprovidetothecitizenofthemunicipalareas.Nowdaylocalgovernmentsareun
derincreasingpressureto increase tariffs to meet thefull cost of serviceswhich they provide.
iii) IntergovernmentalTransfers: Theintergovernmentaltransferareof two types:
i) Shareofnationaltaxesdistributedeitherbyformula(i.e.percapital)orbyorigin(i.e. to
the localgovernmentwherethey are located).
ii) Thesecondisthegrants/subversionswhichareeithertargetedtosupportspecificexpe
nditure(i.e.socialbenefit,education,etc.)oruntargetedandusedatdiscretion of
localgovernment(often know
asblockgrants).Targetedgrantsareusuallyintendedtostimulateaspecifictypeofexp
enditurewhichisfavouredormandatedbynationalgovernment.Theuntaggedorunti
edgrantsthe otherhand can beused by the localgovernmentsbased on local
needs.
iv) CapitalFinance:Capitalexpenditureisnormallyfinancedfromoneormoreofthefollowing
sources:
i) Grantfrom the statebudget or national funds;
ii) Operating surplus representingexcessof currentrevenueovercurrentexpenditure
iii) Sale ofassets;
iv) Credit(loansand bonds)grantsfrom thestateis acommonphenomenon.
i) TaxRevenue:Urbanlocalbodieslevyafewtaxesintheirareasuchasoctroi,propertytax,professio
ntax,entertainmenttax,advertisementtax,animaltax,markettax,watertax,pilgrimtax,tollonnewbri
dges,etc.Nowa-
daysmostofthestateshaveabolishedoctroitax,whichwasamajorsourceofrevenuefortheurbanlocal
bodies.Besides,theurbanlocalbodiesalsogetapercentageoftaxrevenuefromstampduty,electricityt
axandmotorvehicletaximposedby the stategovernment.
ii) Non-
TaxRevenue:Itconsistsoffees,receipts,finesorincomefromremunerativeactivitiesofurbanlocalb
odies.Thefeesiscollectedthroughvariousformsandprocessingfees.Besides,feesarecollectedfrom
parkandexhibitionground,haltingplaces,publicmarket,etc.
a) Grant-in-Aid:TheStateGovernmentgivesgrants-in-
aidtotheurbanlocalbody.Itvariesfromstatetostatedependingontherecommendationsofthe
concernstatefinancecommission.
b) Loans&Bonds:UndertherespectiveMunicipalActs,theUrbanLocalbodiesareentitledt
oraiseloansfromthestategovernments. Theloans aretobepaid
backwithinprescribedtimelimitalongwiththeinterest.Besides,thenowadaysmanymunicip
alitiesandmunicipalcorporationsaresailingbondstoenhancetheirrevenuebase.
PanchayatiRajInstitutions(PRIs)receivesrevenuesfromvarioussources.Theimportantsources
ofrevenue of the PRIs inIndia areasfollows:
i) RevenuefromtheCentralGovernment:EverystategetsrevenuefromtheCentralGovernmenta
spertherecommendationsoftheCentralFinanceCommission.Thisisbasedonthecriteriafixedbythe
CentralFinanceCommission.ThePRIsofstatesalsogetgrantfromthe National Planning
Commission.
ii) RevenuefromtheStateGovernment:Thetwomainsourcesofrevenuefromthestategovernmen
t to the PRIsare:
a) Allocationas per therecommendation ofthe State Finance Commission;
iii) InternalresourcesofRevenue:ThePRIsindifferentstateappliesvariousmechanismsforintern
alresources mobilisation. The importantsources are
a) Taxableincomeandfees
b) Non-taxableincomelikeincomefromthecommonpropertyresources,salesofgoods
andservices, borrowings, incomefrom livestocks, etc.
iii) Predictability:ThePRIsshouldknowtheamountandtimingofthetransferstomakeprovisionfor
planning,budgetingandimplementationoftheiractivities.Irregularpaymentsarenotconducivetoeff
iciency.Quiteoftenithappensthatallocationsmaynotevenbepaid,resulting in overdue, which
eventuallymaybe permanently lost to them.
iv) Efficiency:Theresourcetransfershouldbesodesignedastofacilitateefficientmanagementand
discourageinefficientanduneconomicpractices.Thetransfermechanismshould not turn out to
bea“gap-filling” approach.
v) AbsorptiveCapacity:Theresourcetransfershouldbeinthetunewiththeutilisationabilityofthere
ceivingPanchayatormunicipalward.Inotherwords,principleshouldbeeach
accordingtoitsneed.Theallocationoffundtothepanchayatandmunicipalwardmustbefreefrombias.
vi) Simplicity:Theformulafortransfertheinter-
governmentalresourcesshouldbesimpleandtransparent.BesidesformulaformulatedbytheCentral
FinanceCommission,thestategovernmentmustdeviceitsownformulabasedonitssocio-
economic,geographicalandpopulationcompositionforallocationofresourcestopanchayatandmun
icipalitiesandalsoamong the different levels of panchayat and urbanlocalbodies.
vii) PromotionofIncentives:Thereshouldbeadequatebuilt-
inarrangementsforencouragingresourcemobilisationandpenalisingwastefulanduneconomicprac
tices.Thepanchayatwhichmobilizesandgeneratetheirownlocalresourcesmustbegivenadditional
matchinggrant,which will create competitiveness among the localself-governmentinstitutions.
viii) PovertyReduction:Removalofpovertyshouldbethemainaimthefiscaldecentralization.Pan
chayatsandmunicipalitiestakingproactivemeasuresinpovertyreductionmust begiven
incentivesfortheir initiatives.
ix) ReductionofDisparities:Socio-economicdisparitiesareoneofthemainconcerns
ofthegovernments.Thelocalself-
governmentcanplayavitalroleinnarrowingdisparitiesatthegrassroots.Thismustbeabasisfortheall
ocationofrevenueamongvariouslocalself-government institutions.
23.6EmergingIssuesandChallengesinIndia’sFiscalFederalism
Fiscalfederalismistheeconomiccounterparttopoliticalfederalism.Itassignsfunctionstodifferentle
velsofgovernmentandalsooffersappropriatefiscalinstrumentsforcarryingoutthesefunctions.Dete
rminationofthesespecificfiscalinstrumentsisachallengingtask.Buildingtheprinciplesintoanactua
lschemeofassignmentoftaxestodifferentlevelsofgovernmentinaconstitutionisdifficult.InIndia,in
cometaxisleviedonlybytheCentralgovernmentthoughsharedwiththeStates.Giventhepossibilityo
fimbalancebetweenresourcesandresponsibilities,manycountrieshaveasystemofinter-
governmentaltransfers.ThereishugeeconomicandculturaldiversityamongthevariousStates.It
isaterriblemistaketopresumethatallofIndiacanbegovernedfromDelhi.ElectedStategovernmentsa
ndleaderscannotbemadedummieswithoutanyfiscalpowersforlong.Thisfiscalfederalismtensionb
etween the Centreand States can erupt into something moredangerousandspreadwide.
Thereare anumberofchallengesfacingIndia’sfiscalfederalism.
• First,theSeventhScheduleoftheIndianConstitutionbroadlydemarcatesthefunctionsofgov
ernanceintothreelists.Thisscheduledistributesthelegislativeandfinancialpowersbetween
theunionandthestates.ListIpertainstosubjectsofthecentre.ListIIpertainstosubjectsthatbel
ongtothesubnationalgovernments.ListIIIisacategorycalledtheConcurrentList,whichbel
ongstoboththecentralandsubnationalgovernments,andintheeventofconflictinglegislatio
n,thelawpassedbythecentreprevails.
Overtime,theConcurrentListhassoughttooccupyincreasingspace,transgressingitsearmar
kedbordersandinterveninginthesubjectsofsubnationalgovernments.Thishastakenthefor
mofaformalactthrough,forexample,constitutionalamendmentslikethe42ndAmendmento
ftheConstitution(1975),whichshiftedthesubjectsofforestandeducationfrom theStateList
to the Concurrent List.
Therehavebeenotherwaysinwhichtheoriginaldemarcationhasbeenaltered.Take,forinstan
ce,theissueofentitlement-
drivenlegislations.Sometimeago,Indiaenteredaneraofentitlement-basedstand-
alonelegislation.Theclassicexamples
aretheMahatmaGandhiNationalRuralEmploymentGuaranteeActof2005,theRightofChil
drentoFreeandCompulsoryEducationActof2009andtheNationalFoodSecurityActof2013
.Thiswastheareawherefiscalauthoritiesshouldhaveintervened,asemployment,educationa
ndfoodwereoriginallyintendedtobethedomainofsubnational governments.
• Second,thereistheissueoftheincongruenceofArticle282oftheConstitutionwiththeletterand
spiritofthe SeventhSchedule.Article282oftheConstitutionstatesthat
“TheUnionoraStatemaymakeanygrantsforanypublicpurpose,notwithstandingthatthepurp
oseisnotonewithrespecttowhichParliamentortheLegislatureoftheState,as the case may
be,may make laws.”
Originally,intheIndianConstitution,itwasnotexpectedtobeanoverarching
provision,butanextraordinaryprovisionthatwastobeusedverysparingly.N.A.Palkhivala,aC
onstitutionalexpert,statedinhisopiniongiventoNinthFinanceCommission,“Art.282isnotin
tendedtoenable
theUniontomakesuchgrantsasfallproperlyunderArt.275.Art.282embodiesmerelyaresidua
rypowerwhichenablestheUnionoraStatetomakeanygrantforanypurpose,irrespectiveofthe
questionwhetherthepurposeis one overwhichthe grantorhaslegislative power.”
• Anotherchallengeisthatoffiscalincongruity.OneofthetermsofreferencemadetotheFifteent
hFinanceCommissionistoreviewthecurrentlevelofdebtoftheunionandthestatesandrecom
mendafiscalconsolidationroadmapforsoundfiscalmanagement.AspertheamendedFiscalR
esponsibilityandBudgetManagement(FRBM)Act, thecentralgovernment shall take
appropriate steps to ensurethat:
• Decentralizationcanserveasthe new
fiscalfederalismbystrengtheninglocalfinancesandstatefinance commission.
• Localpublicfinance:thecreationofanurbanlocalbodyorthePanchayatiRajinstitutions
consolidatedfund.
• CentreandStatesshouldcontributeanequalproportionoftheirCentralGST(CGST)andState
GST(SGST)collectionsandsendthemoneytotheconsolidatedfundofthethirdtier.One-
sixthsharingoftheCGSTandSGSTwiththethirdtiercangeneratemorethan1%oftheGDPev
eryyearforthefinancingofpublicgoodsbyurban-levelbodies.
• StateFinanceCommissionshouldbeaccordedthesamestatusastheUnionFinanceCommissi
onandthe3Fsofdemocraticdecentralization(funds,functions,andfunctionaries) should
beimplemented properly.
• Goods andServices Taxshould be simplified in itsstructureandbyensuring:
SingleRateGST:withsuitablesurcharges onsingoods,zero ratingsof
exportsandreformingtheIntegratedGoodsandServicesTax(IGST)andthee-
waybill.GSTisacomprehensive,multi-stage,destination-
basedtaxthatisleviedoneveryvalueaddition.GSTisoneindirecttaxfortheentirecountry.TheGSTco
uncilisthekeydecision-makingbodythatwilltakeallimportantdecisionsregarding the GST. The
GST Council should undertakereforms inaninformedandtransparentmanner, bycreating its
own secretariat and independent experts.
NationalprioritiesandnotablepolicyinitiativeslikeSwachhBharat,theNewEducationPolicy,Ayush
manBharatandSwachhJalthroughJalJeevanMissionconstituteanintegralpart ofthechanging
dynamics and natureofresponsibilitiesbetween thecentreand the
states.TheissuesofNationalPrioritytranscendboundariesastheyaredesignedtoaddressthebasictene
tsofgrowthmultipliers,benefittingeverysegmentofsocietyandaddressingwelfaretenetson health,
housing and employment ascorenational priorities.