Killoran 2008
Killoran 2008
Killoran 2008
The synthesis and spectral analysis of a new class of long wavelength intrinsic fluorosensor is
reported. Chemosensor performance reveals large off/on fluorescence intensity responses to acid
analyte with low response to microenvironment polarity. Application to ratiometric fluorescence/
UV-visible analysis is outlined.
a
Centre for Synthesis and Chemical Biology, School of Chemistry and
Chemical Biology, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4,
Ireland. E-mail: [email protected]; Tel: +353-(0)1-7162425
b
School of Chemical Sciences, Dublin City University, Dublin 9,
Ireland Fig. 1 BF2-chelated tetraarylazadipyrromethenes.
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2008 New J. Chem., 2008, 32, 483–489 | 483
Published on 20 November 2007. Downloaded by University of Illinois at Chicago on 24/10/2014 23:01:32. View Article Online
484 | New J. Chem., 2008, 32, 483–489 This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2008
View Article Online
the para-disubstituted C–C6H4–NMe2 rings highlights these larger pyramidalisation at the N atom (greater N C3 plane
subtleties with N24A N44A 7.617(7) Å and N24B N44B distance). Therefore, the resulting and decreasing ability of the
7.041(6) Å, indicating an opening up or bending of these lone pair of electrons on the N atom to participate in
groups relative to one another (the N24 N1 N44 angles conjugation with the aromatic C6 group is observed through
in A, B are 70.04(7), 65.39(7)1). The distortion can also be (a) longer C–N bond lengths, (b) increased twisting from co-
observed in the torsion angles where the N24 C3 ; planarity and (c) increased N atom pyramidalisation. These
C8 N44 angles for A, B differ by 101 ( 0.83(13)1 in A and effects at the C6–NMe2 chromophore can have a profound
Published on 20 November 2007. Downloaded by University of Illinois at Chicago on 24/10/2014 23:01:32.
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2008 New J. Chem., 2008, 32, 483–489 | 485
Published on 20 November 2007. Downloaded by University of Illinois at Chicago on 24/10/2014 23:01:32. View Article Online
486 | New J. Chem., 2008, 32, 483–489 This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2008
View Article Online
Table 1 Spectroscopic fluorescence data for 1a-2H+ Table 2 Spectroscopic absorbance data for 1a
a
Solvent lmax/nm FWHM/nm FEF Solventa Band 1/nm Band 2/nm Band 3/nm
Cyclohexane 680 39 180 Cyclohexane 576 613 744
Toluene 692 43 240 Toluene 574 625 763
Chloroform 684 41 4250 Chloroform 572 625 770
Ethanol 677 40 4250 Ethanol 569 631 772
Acetonitrile 679 40 4250 Acetonitrile 572 648 799
Published on 20 November 2007. Downloaded by University of Illinois at Chicago on 24/10/2014 23:01:32.
a a
Room temperature. Room temperature.
formulated solutions. The shortest wavelength band was more are quoted in d (ppm) and coupling constants in Hz. Melting
distinct in polar solvents such as acetonitrile than cyclohexane points were determined on a Reichert Thermovar melting
(Fig. 10). The absorbance bands 2 and 3 show a strong positive point platform. Mass spectral analyses were performed on a
solvatochromism in proportion to increasing solvent polarity, Micromass Quattro Micro. IR spectra were recorded on a
bathochromically shifting to 648 and 799 nm in acetonitrile Mattson Instruments Galaxy series FT-IR 3000 spectometer.
when compared to 613 and 744 nm in cyclohexane (Table 2). Absorption spectra were recorded on a Varian Cary 50 UV-
Specifically band 3 exhibited the strongest positive solvato- visible spectrophotometer. Fluorescence spectra were recorded
chromism with increasing solvent polarity, which is a common on a Cary Eclipse spectrofluorometer. Elemental analyses were
characteristic of CT compounds. carried out at the microanalytical laboratory, University
College Dublin.
Conclusions 3-(4-Dimethylaminophenyl)-1-phenylpropenone (2). 4-Di-
In conclusion, we have outlined a facile synthesis to a new methylaminobenzaldehyde (10.0 g, 67 mmol), 1-phenyletha-
class of ratiometric fluorometric and colourimetric chemosen- none (8.05 g, 67 mmol) and three NaOH pellets were dissolved
sor with potential to be exploited and adapted to suit a diverse in methanol (100 mL) and stirred at room temperature until a
range of analytical, imaging and material applications. Speci- heavy precipitate formed (24 h). The precipitate was isolated
fically the low pH range in which sensor response occurs by filtration and washed with cold methanol to give the
indicates that this platform would be suitable for detection product without any further purification, as a bright yellow
of other analytes at physiological pH. Chemosensor perfor- solid of 2 (14.07 g, 84%), mp 110–112 1C. 1H NMR (300 MHz,
mance is excellent with large off/on fluorescence intensity CDCl3) d 7.98–8.02 (m, 2H), 7.79 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 1H),
responses and low microenvironment polarity effects. In addi- 7.43–7.56 (m, 5H), 7.32 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 1H), 6.64–6.69 (m,
tion the described synthetic route would readily allow for 2H), 3.00 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) d 190.8, 152.3,
analogues functionalised with other substrate specific recep- 146.0, 139.3, 132.3, 130.6, 128.7, 128.5, 122.9, 117.1, 112.0,
tors to be generated. 40.33. IR (KBr disc): 1649 cm 1. ES-MS: m/z [M + H]+
252.1. Anal. Calc. for C17H17NO: C, 81.24; H, 6.82; N, 5.57.
Found: C, 80.95; H, 6.82; N, 5.49%.
Experimental
3-(4-Dimethylaminophenyl)-4-nitro-1-phenylbutan-1-one (3).
General 3-(4-Dimethylaminophenyl)-1-phenylpropenone 2 (7.0 g, 28.0
1
H NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian FT spectrometer mmol) was dissolved in anhydrous methanol (75 mL), nitro-
at 300 MHz and 13C NMR spectra at 75 MHz, in CDCl3 with methane (8.5 g, 140 mmol) and diethylamine (10.22 g, 140
tetramethylsilane as the internal standard. All chemical shifts mmol) were added, and the reaction was heated under reflux
for 24 h. The reaction mixture was allowed to cool to room
temperature, acidified with 1 M hydrochloric acid and the
resulting precipitate was isolated by filtration. Recrystalliza-
tion from methanol gave the product 3 as a yellow solid (7.6 g,
87%), mp 113–115 1C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d
7.88–7.92 (m, 2H), 7.51–7.57 (m, 1H), 7.40–7.46 (m, 2H),
7.09–7.14 (m, 2H), 6.63–6.68 (m, 2H), 4.76 (dd, J = 12.3,
6.8 Hz, 1H), 4.61 (dd, J = 12.3, 7.9 Hz, 1H), 4.11 (m, 1H),
3.44 (dd, J = 6.1, 17.0 Hz), 3.36 (dd, J = 7.6, 17.0 Hz), 2.89 (s,
6H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) d 197.5, 150.3, 136.8, 133.6,
128.9, 128.3, 128.3, 126.6, 113.0, 80.2, 42.0, 40.6, 38.8. IR (KBr
disc): 1680, 1546 cm 1. ES-MS: m/z [M + H]+ 313.2. Anal.
Calc. for C18H20N2: C, 69.21; H, 6.45; N, 8.97. Found: C,
69.40; H, 6.39; N, 8.83%.
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2008 New J. Chem., 2008, 32, 483–489 | 487
View Article Online
g, 46%), mp 248–250 1C. 1H NMR (CDCl3) d 8.04 (d, J = 9.0 placement parameters and hydrogen atoms were treated as
Hz, 4H), 7.94 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 4H), 7.40–7.53 (m, 6H), 7.05 riding atoms using the SHELXL97 defaults at the appropriate
(s, 2H), 6.78 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 4H), 3.04 (s, 6H), (NH not temperatures (294 and 120 K).
observed). 13C NMR (CDCl3) d 154.8, 150.4, 149.8, 143.1,
132.9, 130.5, 129.7, 129.2, 126.6, 122.9, 112.2, 111.9, 40.6. IR Crystal data for 1a at 294 K. C36BF2N5, M = 583.48,
(KBr disc): 3462, 1607 cm 1. lmax (CHCl3): 623 nm. HRMS: triclinic, space group P
1, a = 10.372(10), b = 14.250(13), c
calc. for C36H34N5 [M + H]+: 536.2814, found: 536.2806. = 21.168(15) Å, a = 106.19(8), b = 91.03(11), g = 92.06(9)1,
Anal. Calc. for C36H33N5: C, 80.72; H, 6.21; N, 13.07. Found: V = 3001(5), Z = 4, m = 0.086 mm 1; 1492 reflections with
C, 80.44; H, 6.14; N, 13.10%. I 4 2s(I), R(I 4 2s(I)) = 0.1541, wR(I 4 2s(I)) = 0.3428.
488 | New J. Chem., 2008, 32, 483–489 This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2008
View Article Online
ESPRC service (University of Southampton) for collecting a Org. Biomol. Chem., 2006, 4, 776. For CT examples, see: ; (c) S. O.
low temperature dataset. McDonnell and D. F. O’Shea, Org. Lett., 2006, 8, 3493.
11 (a) R. E. Gawley, H. Mao, M. Mahbubul Haque, J. B. Thorne and
J. S. Pharr, J. Org. Chem., 2007, 72, 2187; (b) A. Coskun,
References M. Deniz Yilmaz and E. U. Akkaya, Org. Lett., 2007, 9,
607.
1 H. Mustroph, M. Stollenwerk and V. Bressau, Angew. Chem., Int. 12 J. Killoran, J. F. Gallagher, P. V. Murphy and D. F. O’Shea, New
Ed., 2006, 45, 2016. J. Chem., 2005, 29, 1258.
Published on 20 November 2007. Downloaded by University of Illinois at Chicago on 24/10/2014 23:01:32.
2 K. Y. Law, Chem. Rev., 1993, 93, 449. 13 (a) A. P. de Silva, H. Q. N. Gunaratne, T. Gunnlaugsson, A. J. M.
3 K. Rurack, M. Kollmannsberger and J. Daub, Angew. Chem., Int. Huxley, C. P. McCoy, J. T. Rademacher and T. E. Rice, Chem.
Ed., 2001, 40, 385. Rev., 1997, 97, 1515; (b) J. H. Hartley, T. James and C. J. Ward,
4 For examples, see: (a) J.-M. Zen and G. Patonay, Anal. Chem., J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 2000, 3155.
1991, 63, 2934; (b) Z. Zhang and S. Achilefu, Chem. Commun., 14 For related synthesis, see; M. J. Hall, S. O. McDonnell, J. Killoran
2005, 5887. and D. F. O’Shea, J. Org. Chem., 2005, 70, 5571.
5 A. Gómez-Hens and M. P. Aguilar-Caballos, Trends Anal. Chem., 15 H. Gelderblom, J. Verweij, K. Nooter and A. Sparreboom, Eur. J.
2004, 23, 127. Cancer, 2001, 37, 1590.
6 V. Ntziachristos, J. Ripoll, L. V. Wang and R. Weissleder, Nat. 16 For examples of ratiometric sensors, see: (a) J. V. Mello and N. S.
Biotechnol., 2005, 23, 313. Finney, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 1536; (b) K. Choi and A.
7 R. Weissleder, Nat. Biotechnol., 2001, 19, 316. D. Hamilton, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 3912; (c) Z. Xu, X.
8 A. Mishra, R. K. Behera, P. K. Behera, B. K. Mishra and G. B. Qian and J. Cui, Org. Lett., 2005, 7, 3029.
Behera, Chem. Rev., 2000, 100, 1973. 17 For examples, see: (a) K. Rurack, M. Kollmannsberger and
9 (a) J. Killoran, L. Allen, J. F. Gallagher, W. M. Gallagher and D. J. Daub, New J. Chem., 2001, 25, 289; (b) K. Rurack,
F. O’Shea, Chem. Commun., 2002, 1862; (b) A. Gorman, J. Kill- M. Kollmannsberger and J. Daub, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2001,
oran, C. O’Shea, T. Kenna, W. M. Gallagher and D. F. O’Shea, J. 40, 385.
Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 10619; (c) S. O. McDonnell, M. J. Hall, 18 Siemens Bruker AXS 1994, XSCANS Software, Ver. 2.2 Madison,
L. T. Allen, A. Byrne, W. M. Gallagher and D. F. O’Shea, J. Am. WI, USA.
Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 16360; (d) W. M. Gallagher, L. T. Allen, C. 19 Bruker SMART, SAINT and SADABS, Bruker AXS Inc., Madi-
O’Shea, T. Kenna, M. Hall, J. Killoran and D. F. O’Shea, Br. J. son, WI, USA, 2000.
Cancer, 2005, 92, 1702; (e) D. F. O’Shea, J. Killoran and W. M. 20 (a) G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXS97 and SHELXL97, University of
Gallagher, US Pat., 7220732, 2007. Göttingen, Germany; (b) P. McArdle, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 1995,
10 For PET examples, see: (a) J. Killoran and D. F. O’Shea, Chem. 28, 65.
Commun., 2006, 1503; (b) M. J. Hall, L. T. Allen and D. F. O’Shea, 21 A. L. Spek, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 2003, 36, 7.
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2008 New J. Chem., 2008, 32, 483–489 | 489