1482 5294 1 PB
1482 5294 1 PB
1482 5294 1 PB
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20172773
Original Research Article
Department of Surgery, PGIMER and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India
*Correspondence:
Dr. Prashant Kumar Singh,
E-mail: [email protected]
Copyright: © the author(s), publisher and licensee Medip Academy. This is an open-access article distributed under
the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial
use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
ABSTRACT
Background: Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus is a common and morbid disease associated with high recurrence rate
after surgery. Many conventional surgical procedures have been described for its management with their merits and
demerits. The present study aims to evaluate the efficacy and complications of Limberg flap reconstruction surgery.
Methods: 32 consecutive patients underwent Limberg flap reconstruction between January 2015 to November 2016
and were evaluated for various parameters.
Results: All patients successfully underwent surgery, with very minimal postoperative pain, average hospital stay for
5 days, returned to work after 19 days, with 2 patients having seroma, 1 having flap necrosis, 1 developed wound
infection and no recurrences so far. Patients with complications were managed conservatively.
Conclusions: Limberg flap for reconstruction of the defect after excision of recurrent sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus
is an effective and reliable technique, easily performed, with high patient satisfaction, associated with complete cure
and low incidence of post-operative complications.
ultimately leads to an acute or chronically infected site, were male. The median ages of patients were 21 years. 7
and the disease can be treated effectively by appropriate patients (23%) had previous history of abscess drainage
surgery.7 However, extensive disease with numerous due to pilonidal sinus. The main outcome of this study
pilonidal openings, branching tracts, and overt symptoms was to evaluate the surgical procedure with respect to the
may require wide excision of the diseased region. surgical area related complications and recurrence rates.
METHODS
Figure 1: Marking with letters.
Thirty-two consecutive patients who underwent pilonidal
sinus surgery between January 2015 and November 2017
A rhombic-shaped excision of the sinus-bearing skin and
were included in this study. The mean duration of
subcutaneous tissue up to the pre-sacral fascia was done
symptoms was 3.5 years. All patients were subjected to
complete history taking and routine clinical, local by electrocautery (Figure 2) (Figure 3). Then elevation of
examination and laboratory investigations. Written perforator-based Limberg flap (Figure 4) (based on the
consent was obtained from all patients after explanation superior gluteal and sacral perforators according to the
study done by Koshimaetal on a cadaver dissection)17 in
of the procedure and expected results of the flap in this
the same manner and the level of dissection was pre
area. Data of the patients were collected from the forms,
muscular fascia, good haemostasis was achieved and the
which were created preoperatively and used for
postoperative follow up period, for each patient. The adhesive tapes which retracted the buttocks were released
patients having other local pathologies like eczematous, to allow suturing of the flap without tension A right or
fungal or other deforming pathologies were excluded left sided fasciocutaneous Limberg transposition flap,
incorporating the gluteal fascia, was fully mobilized on
from the study. All the patients underwent Limberg flap
reconstruction as the surgical procedure. All the patients
RESULTS
Table 1: Rate of complications. There are many previous studies on this subject among
which, Katsoulis had 25 patients, with 16 of them having
Complications Number Percentage complications with no recurrences and Aslam had 110
Seroma 2 6.2% patients, with 5 of them having complications and 1
Wound infection 1 3.1% recurrence (19)5.26,27 Mentes and Urhan were other
Flap necrosis 1 3.1% studies.28,29 Several series with the rhomboid or rhombic
flap technique, including more than 50 cases, have
All patients were followed up initially at 2-week interval, reported recurrence rates of1% to7%.30 In our series we
then at 1 month and again at six months. Four patients had a total of 32 patients among which 4 patients had
(12.5%) developed complications two (6.2%) had seroma complications like seroma formation (2), wound infection
formation, 1 (3.1%) had flap necrosis and the other 1 (1) and flap necrosis (1) which were managed
(3.1%) had superficial surgical site infection. subsequently. The mean pain score was 4.5 and there
were fewer needs of additional analgesics apart from the
It took nearly 8 days for seroma to resolve and three standard protocol. None of the patients reported
weeks for the surgical site infection to subside. The recurrence.
patient with flap necrosis underwent multiple
debridement and dressings and took 8 weeks to heal by Iesalnieks studied the long-term results after excision of a
secondary intention. The pain score range was in the pilonidal sinus and primary midline closure compared
range of 2-8 with a mean score of 4.5. The average length with the open surgical procedure in 73 patients.31 There
of stay in hospital was 5 days (range-2 to 14 days). All was a high recurrence rate (42%) after excision of
other patients wound healed primarily with minimal pilonidal sinus and primary midline closure. Present
scarring and less postoperative pain, with no recurrence study shows no recurrence with this procedure. In present
till now. None of the patients needed readmission due to study, the flap is inferiorly based with more anatomical
pilonidal sinus. The mean time to return to work was 19.6 and better cosmetic appearance. In 2008, El-Khatiband
days (range -10 to 30 days). Al-Basti reported a series of 8 cases of pilonidal sinus
reconstructed by bilobed perforator-based flap, the mean
DISCUSSION operative time was 90 minutes so it is time consuming
with a long scar.32 In the study, we performed inferiorly
Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease is notorious for based flap, the mean operative time was 50 min with
complete cure of the disease and very low incidence of
prolonged morbidity and recurrence and the ideal
treatment should ensure low pain, short hospitalization post-operative complications when compared with the
period, low risk of complications, rapid return to normal previous studies.
activities, better cosmesis, and should have a low
recurrence rate. CONCLUSION
There has been increased realisation of the importance Limberg flap for reconstruction of the defect after
that the midline natal cleft should be avoided for suture excision of recurrent sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus is an
placement as it is the site for recurrence. To minimise the effective and reliable technique, easily performed,
recurrence, the emphasis should not only be on flattening subjectively high patient satisfaction, associated with
the natal cleft but also of achieving an off-midline closure complete cure and low incidence of post-operative
of the resultant defect in order to minimize wound-related complications.
complications and recurrence.19-21
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Flap reconstructions having a midline lower edge or
suture line on intergluteal sulcus are more likely to Authors would like to thank their patients who gave them
increase recurrence rates, wound dehiscence and wound the opportunity to serve and learn.
infection risk. Limberg flap reconstruction achieves an
Funding: No funding sources
off-midline closure and ensures flattening of the natal
Conflict of interest: None declared
cleft.
Ethical approval: The study was approved by the
institutional ethics committee
Reconstruction of the defect with Limberg flap has many
advantages as it is easy to perform and design, and it
REFERENCES
flattens the natal cleft with large vascularized pedicle,
sutured without tension. This in turn maintains good 1. Humphries AE, James E. Evaluation and
hygiene, reducing the friction, preventing maceration, management of pilonidal disease. Surg Clin North
and avoiding scar in the midline. This flap procedure is Am. 2010;90(1):113-24.
found better than simple excision and closure, 2. Sondenaa K, Andersen E. Patient characteristics and
marsupialization, other flap procedures such as Bescom symptoms of in chronic pilonidal sinus disease. Int J
and Karydakis.22-25 Colorectal Dis. 1995;10(1):39-42.
3. Hull TL, Wu J. Pilonidal disease. Surg Clin North 20. McCallum, King PM, Bruce J. Healing by primary
Am. 2002;82:1169-85. versus secondary intention after surgical treatment
4. Clothier PR, Haywood IR. The natural history of the for pilonidal sinus. Cochrane Database Syst.
post anal pilonidal sinus. Ann R College Surg 2007;17(4). Available at
England. 61984;6(3):201-3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17943897.
5. Brearley R. Pilonidal sinus: a new theory of origin. 21. Al-Khamis A, McCallum I, King PM, Bruce J.
Br J Surg. 1955;43:62-8. Healing by primary versus secondary intention after
6. Karydakis GE. Easy and successful treatment of surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus, Cochrane
pilonidal sinus after explanation of its causative Database Syst. 2010;1. Available at
process. Aust NZJ Surg. 1992;62:385-9. http://www.cochrane.org/CD006213/WOUNDS_he
7. Surrell JA. Pilonidal disease. Surg Clin North Am. aling-by-primary-versus-secondary-intention-after-
1994;74:1309-15. surgical-treatment-for-pilonidal-sinus.
8. Urhan MK, Kucukel F, Topgul K, Ozer I, Sari S. 22. Akca T, Colak T. Primary closure with Limberg flap
Rhomboid excision and Limberg flap for managing in treatment of pilonidal sinus-randomized clinical
pilonidal sinus: results of 102 cases. Dis Colon trial. BJS. 2005;5074:1081-4.
Rectum. 2002;45(5):656-9. 23. Azab AS, Kamal MS, Saad RA, Abount AL, Atta
9. Yildiz MK, Ozkan E, Odaba M, Kaya B, Eris C, KA, Ali NA. Radical cure of pilonidal sinus by a
Abuoglu HH, et al. Karydakis flap procedure in transposition rhomboid flap. BJS 1984;71(2):154-5.
patients with sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease: 24. Mentes O, Bagci M, Biglin T, Ozgul O, Ozdemir M.
experience of a single centre in Istanbul. Scientific Limberg flap procedure for pilonidal sinus diseased:
World J. 2013. results of 353 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg.
10. Eryilmaz R, Sahin M, Alimoglu O, Dasiran F. 2008;393(2):185-9.
Surgical treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus 25. Can MF, Sevinc MM, Hahcerliogullari O, Yilmaz
with the limberg transposition flap. Surg. M, Yagci G. Multicentre prospective randomized
2003;134(5):745-9. trial comparing modified Limberg flap transposition
11. Cihan A, Ucan BH, Comert M, Cesur A, Cakmak and Karydakis flap reconstruction in patients with
GK, Tascilar O. Superiority of asymmetric modified sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease. Am J Surg.
Limberg flap for surgical treatment of pilonidal 2010;200(3):318-27.
disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49(2):244-9. 26. Katsoulis IE, Hibberts F, Carapeti EA. Outcome of
12. Nessar G, Kayaalp C, Seven C. Elliptical rotation treatment of primary and recurrent pilonidal sinus
flap for pilonidal sinus. Am J Surg. 2004;187:3. with Limberg flap. Surgeon. 2006;4(1):7-10.
13. Schoeller T, Wechselberger G, Otto A, Papp C. 27. Aslam M, Choudhry A. Use of Limberg flap for
Definite surgical treatment of complicated recurrent pilonidal sinus-a viable option. J Ayub Med Coll
pilonidal disease with a modified fasciocutaneous Abbottabad. 2009;21(4):31.
VY advancement flap. Surg. 1997;121(3):258-63. 28. Urhan MK, Kuckel F, Topgul K, Ozer I, Sari S.
14. Khatri VP, Espinosa MH, Amin AK. Management Rhomboid excision and Limber flap for managing
of recurrent pilonidal sinus by simple V-Y pilonidal sinus: results of 102 cases. Dis Colon
fasciocutaneous flap. Dis Colon Rectum. Rectum. 2002;45:656-9.
1994;37:1232e-5. 29. Mentes BB, Leventoglu S, Cihan A, Tatlicioglu E,
15. Topgul K. Surgical treatment of sacrococcygeal Akin M, Oguz M. Modified Limberg transposition
pilonidal sinus with rhomboid flap. J Eur Acad flap for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. Surg Today.
Dermatol Venereol. 2010;24:7e-12. 2004;4(5):419-23.
16. Farquharson EL, Rintoul RF. Farquharson's 30. Karydakis GE. The etiology of pilonidal sinus, Hell.
textbook of operative general surgery. 9th edn. Armed Forces Med Rev. 1975;7:411e-6.
Hodder Arnold publication; London: 2005:457-458. 31. Iesalnieks I, Furst A, Rentsch M, Jauch KW.
17. Koshima I, Moriguchi T, Soeda S, Kawata S, Ohta Primary midline closure after excision of a pilonidal
S, Ikeda A. The gluteal perforator-based flap for sinus is associated with a high recurrence rate.
repair of sacral pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg. Surgeon J Surg Med. 2003;74(5):461-8.
1993;91(4):678-83. 32. El-Khatib HA, Al-Basti HBA. perforator-based
18. Kapan M, Kapan S, Pekmezci S, Dugun V. bilobed fasciocutaneous flap: an additional tool for
Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease with primary reconstruction following wide excision of
Limberg flap repair. Tech Coloproctol. sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease. J Plast Reconstr
2002;190:388-92. Aesthet Surg. 2008;11:1e-5.
19. Petersen S, Koch R, Stelzner S, Wendlandt TP,
Ludwig K. Primary closure techniques in chronic Cite this article as: Singh PK, Gohil RK, Saxena N.
pilonidal sinus: a survey of the results of different Limberg flap procedure for sacrococcygeal pilonidal
surgical approaches. Dis Colon Rectum. sinus: a prospective study. Int Surg J 2017;4:2238-42.
2002;45(11):1458-67.