Corporate Governance 2022 - Luxembourg
Corporate Governance 2022 - Luxembourg
Corporate Governance 2022 - Luxembourg
Luxembourg
(“Luxembourg Issuers”) and companies listed on the
1 Setting the Scene – Sources Euro MTF, the Luxembourg Stock Exchange provides
and Overview further guide- lines in its X Principles of Corporate
Governance (the “X Principles”) as well as its Rules and
1.1 What are the main corporate entities to Regulations.
be discussed?
The most comprehensive legal framework concerning
1.3 What are the current topical issues,
corporate governance applies to companies (“Issuers”) developments, trends and challenges in corporate
whose shares are listed and admitted to trading on a governance?
regulated market (“Regulated Market”) within the meaning
During the COVID-19 pandemic, virtual general meetings
of Directive 2004/39/EC on markets in financial instruments,
became the new standard. In the new post-pandemic envi-
as amended, such as the Official List of the Luxembourg
ronment, Issuers are facing the task of transitioning back
Stock Exchange. In Luxembourg, Issuers are most commonly
into a non-emergency legal framework where physical
organised as a public limited liability company (société
general meet- ings, with all their challenges, are the norm.
anonyme – “SA”). In addition, ESG matters remain a key driver of
Less stringent corporate governance laws and practices Luxembourg’s corporate governance landscape with a
apply to entities whose securities are listed and admitted to particular focus on non-financial and corporate
trading on the Euro MTF operated by the Luxembourg sustainability reporting. In 2022, the non-financial
Stock Exchange as well as investment fund structures. reporting requirements under the Taxonomy Regulation
Such entities are not covered by this chapter. (EU) 2020/852 apply for the first time. The EU
Commission’s proposal for a Corporate Sustainability
1.2 What are the main legislative, regulatory and Reporting Directive, currently in the trilogue phase, will
other sources regulating corporate governance significantly extend the scope of sustainability reporting
practices? obligations imposed on Issuers and also apply to a large
number of non-listed companies.
From a legal perspective, there are two different kinds In Luxembourg, shareholders generally do not owe any
of duties to the company’s corporate governance. Shareholders
are only liable up to the amount of their participation in the
share capital. However, the founders of the company are
jointly liable toward third parties for:
■ all not validly subscribed parts of the capital as well as
the difference between the minimum capital and the
amount of subscriptions;
■ the effective payment of up to 25% of the
subscribed shares at the time of constitution of the
subscribed shares;
■ the payment within five years of the shares issued in with the Luxembourg Trade and Companies Register shall
consideration of contributions other than in cash; and disclose certain information concerning their beneficial owners.
■ in case of nullity of the company, or in case of and Issuers are only required to register the name of the Regulated
starting from the absence or non-conformity of the Market. In addition, shareholders of Issuers must notify the
statements in the deed or in the company’s object, the Issuer and the CSSF when their shareholding reaches, exceeds or
compensation for the prejudice resulting from them. falls
In addition, shareholders can be liable for the acts or
omis- sions of the company if they appeared to have acted
as de facto managers, i.e. even though not appointed as a
director, the rele- vant shareholder has regularly and
independently performed acts or duties normally performed
by directors, or represented the company. However, this
liability is not based on the shareholder, but applies to any
person who de facto managed the company.
Luxembourg does not have any stewardship laws.
However, institutional investors and asset managers are
required on a comply-or-explain basis to develop and
publicly disclose their engagement policy describing how
they integrate shareholder engagement in their investment
strategy and to disclose annu- ally how their engagement
policy has been implemented. Some shareholders of
Luxembourg-based Issuers chose to follow best practices,
such as the Principles of Responsible Investment.
3 Management Body and Management 3.3 What are the main legislative, regulatory and
other sources impacting on compensation and
remuneration of members of the management body?
3.1 Who manages the corporate entity/entities and how?
3.6 What are the principal general legal duties 3.8 Are indemnities, or insurance, permitted in
and liabilities of members of the management relation to members of the management body and
body? others?
The main duties of directors (and other members of the regulations applicable to Issuers and aligning them to their
manage- ment bodies) are the following: investors’ expectations.
■ Duty of careful, diligent and wise management: the
duty to manage the company with a level of
diligence and prudence that may be expected from a
person in that posi- tion. Directors must apply the
necessary care and atten- tion to their office. This is a
best-effort obligation (obli- gation de moyens);
therefore directors do not have to meet a specific result.
■ Duty of loyalty: the duty to ensure that the interest of
the company prevails over the personal interests of
directors. In particular, directors shall avoid any
conflict of interest. A conflict of interest arises where a
director has a direct or indirect financial interest that
is conflicting with that of the company (articles 441-7
Companies Law).
■ Duty of skills and availability: the duty to accept a
mandate only if the director has the necessary skills,
qualities and time capacity.
■ Duty of confidentiality: the duty to avoid the
disclosure of any information with respect to the
company that is confidential.
With respect to liabilities, directors, members of the
manage- ment board and of the supervisory board may be
held liable as follows:
■ toward the company in the event that they committed
a fault that damaged the company (article 441-9 first
paragraph Companies Law);
■ toward the company or third parties if their conduct
was in breach of the applicable law and/or the articles
of asso- ciation (article 441-9 second paragraph
Companies Law). In this case, shareholders may
individually act against the direc- tors or members of
the management committee if they prove to have been
independently prejudiced;
■ in accordance with tort regulation (articles 1382 and
1383 Civil Code), if the requirements provided by the
Companies Law are not fulfilled; and
■ in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal
Code (Code Pénal ) or the criminal provisions of the
Companies Law.
4 Other Stakeholders