See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/341440197

IDEALISM

Research · May 2019

CITATIONS READS

0 13,451

1 author:

Kübra Mahmutoğlu Kutlu

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

International Relations Theory View project

Political Science View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Kübra Mahmutoğlu Kutlu on 17 May 2020.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

İSTANBUL 29 MAYIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ

İKTİSADİ VE İDARİ BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİ

SİYASET BİLİMİ VE ULUSLARARASI İLİŞKİLER BÖLÜMÜ

IDEALISM AND ITS EFFECTS

Kübra MAHMUTOĞLU

İSTANBUL, 2019.
Introduction

Human is the social being and needs to socialize with others. It can be taken as the basis for the

formation of international relations. All human beings live in the same world but they did not

have the capacity to connect with each other. Of course, it has changed after globalization in

modern ages. However, people were in need of states command to take advantages of other

countries but unlike citizens’ benefit, states used all chances for their own benefits and these

kinds of problems created warfare between states. It is known the fact that wars have no gains

but loss because both sides give too much loss and most importantly they lose humans even

they have gained some advantages at the end of the war. Nevertheless, these gains are mainly

about enlarging lands and other things, which are not important more than human life. Idealism

emerged at that certain time for determining human value in these cases. Because human lives

are important for continuity of the world and idealism tries to protect humanity. Norman Angels

say wars and armament take humanity to back and we need works based on wealth. Idealism

base on protecting peace and cooperation between states through trade and some other ways for

establishing the main order at the international level where there is no such institution to

regulate states’ act. In order to this aim, idealist thinks they should firstly remove war

environment for stability. It tries to understand the causes of war and find a way to peace. The

narrow understanding sees idealism as intimately tied to the inter-war period (1919-1939).

After the destruction of World War I, idealism was in search of how to stop the wars and

improve peace by establishing organisations by using international law, norms and diplomacy.

There are many intellectuals who defend idealism; Sir Alfred Zimmerman, S. H. Bailey,

Philip Noel-Baker, David Mitrany, Woodrow Wilson, James T. Shotwell, Pitman Potter and

Parker T. Moon.1 This article is going to examine these intellectuals as well to explain idealist

1
Ramazan Gözen, Theories of International Relations (İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2017).
theory. In order to intellectuals, idealist created many norms and principles. Wilson Principles

are one of them and it will be helpful to explain the structure of idealism. So, the second case

will mention about history, background and aims of idealism and critics from realism and

liberalism to idealism. In order to these critics, the aim is analysing the cognitive world of the

theory from the perspective of other opponent theories to understand failure and gains of

idealism to international relations. Some intellectuals believe, idealism was theory in itself and

some of them believe it was not theory and even they go further by saying it was nothing more

than philosophical idea and utopia such as E.H. Carr. In addition, he was close to realism and

it was like the other side of the medallion behind idealism. So, this article is going to make a

comparison between realism and idealism. Because according to some discourses idealism lost

its effect with the appearance of realism. At the end of the article, the main idea of idealism and

its current situation will be understood by looking to the background, history, discourses of

idealism and its contributions to international relations.

Idealism with Broad Definition

In the beginning, understanding the background of idealism can be possible through looking

to its history. In the 19th century, European system based their policies on balance of power to

protect the status quo. They were trying to protect perpetual peace for providing continuity of

the great powers in Europe. Nevertheless, there were countries which feel uncomfortable about

the situation. Starting from that point, this balance was destroyed and the road to World War I

has been constructed. On the other hand, the industrialization of Germany and leaving the UK

and France was another problem for that period. Why World War I is mentioned because it has

two important dimensions; firstly, it was collectively first big war which entailed humanity to

extreme hazard and made financial and emotional damage. Secondly, the collapse of empires

and the establishment of new governments were important. Idealism emerged after WWI but
there were power gaps, which created by newly established governments. Actually, perpetual

peace did not prove well. This situation caused all possible conditions for WWII.

Regarding the period between the two world war, it can be said even those treaties made by

governments do not protect its continuity such as the Versailles Treaty. Indeed, this treaty has

shown as the most important reason for WWII. For this reason, idealist intellectuals offered

ideas like organizations free from the government in international relations. They started to

think about what should be done for prevention of warfare. Between 1920s-1930s, there was

the dominance of ideas constructed on understanding the causes of war and how it can be

prevented also they questioned the required mechanism for prevention of war. Although

idealism was built on the theme of war-peace, which is, in essence, the most important subject

of international relations, it attaches importance to the establishment of an 'ideal world order'

whose details explained here; since the current or real situation or realities in international

relations are negative and bad, they reveal the parameters of an ideal world order.2

Idealism influenced from period’s politics on the other hand; it contributed to shaping

politics of the period. The most important and prominent political document was “Wilson

Principles”. This doctrine provided the philosophical basis for President Woodrow Wilson’s

campaign to put national self-determination at the heart of the 1919 peace settlement.3 Wilson

idea was using the USA’s accumulation for the common good of mankind; because, according

to Wilson, governments’ interest was related to nations’ state. Despite all his efforts, he couldn’t

procure acceptance to assembly proposal about the participation of the USA to League of

Nations. Some historians criticized Wilson as being realist rather than idealist because they

thought the idea of participation to the League of Nations was a political necessity and they also

2
Ramazan Gözen, Theories of International Relations (İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2017): 71.

3
Peter Wilson, “Idealism in International Relations”, Encyclopaedia of Power, Australia: Sage Publications,
2011:2.
thought peace will serve to USA’s interest. In fact, Wilson was against warfare because

according to him wars have no winners. You might win diplomatically but you also have a loss.

In that period, Wilson’s USA was not a candidate to be great power so they do not have any

expectation for any kind of gain from wars under these conditions. Nevertheless, the USA

reached to enough political and economic power at that time and Europeans accepted the USA

as they will be great power in the future. Despite all the things, today NATO is one of the

outcomes of Wilson principles and there are still countries, which want to become a member of

NATO. Therefore, it can be said that today idealism has still effect.

Moreover, Wilson Principles began to be implemented after the First World War, but could

not be completed successfully. Therefore, Wilson idealism is a failed project. President

Wilson's ideas did not receive the support of his own country and the US Congress did not

authorize or support Wilson's principles.4 These principles are important for the basis of

idealism. There are 14 principles but general principles are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 14. Wilson

emphasized the sense of justice, which should be accepted by everyone. He defended

international cooperation, free trade, democratic governances and establishing perpetual peace

through international organizations with equal representations of nations. The League of

Nations is an international organization that has emerged in line with such ideals that overlaps

with American national interests. Moreover, England and France had the same idea about the

establishment of the League of Nations. Their motive was protecting national interests under

idealism. League’s main aim was developing international cooperation to provide international

peace and security. The USA supported the establishment of League at the beginning but it

could not become a member and it weakened universality argument. Also, the Soviet Union

was not in the League until 1934. The absence of the US and the Soviet Union turned the League

into an organization that seeks to protect the interests of Britain and France. After all, the

4
Ramazan Gözen, Theories of International Relations (İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2017):74.
League was successful to solve problems such as Greece’s attack to Bulgaria in the 1920s and

broad problem between Turkey and Iraq. However, the League of Nations could not prevent

Hitler’s expansionist and aggressive policies, Italy’s Ethiopia invasion and Soviets intervention

into Finland in 1939. England and France preferred to get close relations with Hitler’s Nazi

Germany and Mussolini’s Fascist Italy for providing counter power balance against the Soviet

Union rather than working on actualizing institutions and rules of the League of Nations

successfully. Thereby, France and Germany acted according to Machiavelli’s realism

understanding instead of Wilson idealism. Consequently, the balance of power and polarisation

occurred in the international system like happened in the First World War and that period caused

the Second World War.5 The fact that the League of Nations remains as an unsuccessful

initiative and has not prevented a new war has led to the questioning of the founding philosophy

of the organization.

Subsequently, academicians, intellectuals and philosophers were responsible to educate

elites for changing leaders’ mind in the future about relations between state and security to

change general idea about war. International politics is in need of lecturers for transforming

world current situation. These lecturers will have an important influence on the world politics.

This process would change states act at the end and will create a more beneficial environment

for the citizens. Some intellectuals define the idealism as the white one in all contrasts. Because,

idealism says human is good as its nature with its normative perspective. It searches the bad at

the system level with its phenomenon. They have to solve these bad things, they see war as the

worst thing, and they say it is not because of human nature it is because of environmental

aspects. According to idealist intellectuals, the war was kind of disease to international politics.

So, idealists take the problem of lack in institutions and order in the international order. They

aimed on making the world better with the help of international law and international

5
Ramazan Gözen, Theories of International Relations (İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2017):81.
organizations. They also predicted controlling tributary units by upper will. Therefore, they

mainly mentioned about what should be done not existing condition. They offered upper will

because they thought if this kind of power would be obligatory all governments will have

peaceful order with social groups through international norms and rules. They also opened

themselves to criticism with this argument. In fact, if peoples come together for same purpose

they will probably do everything which will be good for their own benefit. While accepting that

the different peoples exhibit different codes of behaviour, cultural norms, values, habits and

tastes, they contend that human beings are fundamentally uniform. Regardless of ethnic, social,

cultural and religious background, all human beings desire the same things in terms of security,

welfare, recognition and respect.6

In addition to importance of intellectuals in the idealism, it is important to mention those

intellectuals created basis of idealist ideas. Philosophers revealed suggestions, which will

empower peace and security of international system and government. 7 Plato and Aristoteles

thought the policy as the tool to provide social order, which ensures virtuous life. So, they seen

as first philosopher of idealism. This idea reflected to security policies as there is no threats and

hostilities in reality and threats occur because of human behaviours. As for that, human

behaviours influenced from environment thereby changing of environmental conditions and

human behaviours with education are main idealist mentality. Also, Aristoteles says good

people make good governments and these good governments shapes society in a good way.

Remarkable quality of these idealist theories is start to increase with seeking hope after big

declines and great wars. This perspective can be seen in the period after First World War and

Second World War while seeking peace. Because of its thesis, idealism generally criticized as

utopianism. Philosophers such as John Locke, Jean Jacques Rousseau, Immanuel Kant and

6
LSE Research Peter Wilson, “Idealism in International Relations”, Encyclopaedia of Power, Australia: Sage
Publications, 2011:
7
Ramazan Gözen, Theories of International Relations (İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2017):91.
Hugo Grotius produced new ideas and theories for developing international politics.8 Origin of

the idealism base on dates back to old times and John Locke, Jeremy Bentham, JJ Rousseau,

Immanuel Kant, David Hume and John Stuart Mill are important for creating its basis. Idealist

ideas shaped by Arnold Toynbee, Norman Angell and Alfred Zimmern. John Locke defends

human is peaceable and Voltaire defends monarchies are cause of war and peace can be kept

only through democratic republics. Idealist approach acts with ethic and universal phenomenon

despite realists’ power and nationalist conceptualization. In this context, disarmament,

developing democracy, widespread of international organizations developing international law

were most popular discourses of idealist intellectuals.

As it is mentioned above, there are many critics to idealism from realism. Contrary to

popular wisdom, Marxists were first one criticized not realists. According to Marxists, class

conflict affecting international relations, basic factors such as separation of rich and poor and

nations do not fit to idealist ideas and they think their thesis is more determinant in shaping

relations. They say; WWI happened not because of lack of an institution that can prevent the

war but because of inner contradictions of capitalists. Thus, capitalists have to struggle for

providing raw material so democracies have warrior character in opposition to idealists. Realists

today often criticise the intellectual descendants of inter-war idealists-those e.g. advocating

global governance, cosmopolitan democracy, and much greater power for the UN- on much the

same grounds. They ignore the power and self-interestedness of the independent nation state,

the reign of instrumental (cf. ‘abstract’) reason in international politics, and the emotional

appeal of national sovereignty.9 According to Idealists, war is a generally used tool for

maximizing governments’ benefit. The first step for preventing warfare is averting the method

of secret diplomacy, which mostly use between governments. Idealists propose governments

8
Ramazan Gözen, Theories of International Relations (İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2017):91.
9
Peter Wilson, “Idealism in International Relations”, Encyclopaedia of Power, Australia: Sage Publications,
2011:3.
should use treaties that provide collective and multilateral tools with broad participation rather

than bilateral treaties and security precautions including national tools and limited purposes.

Realists say, war cannot be prevented with collective security precautions because governments

defend acting with collective move is like zero-sum game. Idealist emphasize bilateral relations

and say if trade is increased between nations wars will be prevented and all roads will be closed

to war. But, realists say there is hierarchical order in international relations and trade and

economy does not have place at the top of this hierarchical order. To conclude, idealists believed

they can regulate international politics with the help of cooperation in global, international

institutions, international law and de-militarization treaties rather than understand realities of

policies between nations. Realist discourses power and its role in history and its realities. They

separate politics as utopia and reality by saying people should look to reality more than utopia

for preventing warfare.

There are loss and gains of idealism to international relations during whole history. The fact

that England and France, the great powers of the time, used the League of Nations for their

national interests, which established with an idealist perspective, got a big blow in the

credibility of the approach. Another gain of idealism was discourse on democracy, human rights

and freedom that used by USA in Iraq war, European Union and France for their Libya

Operations. Because their main background was idealism. However, some intellectuals said

those kinds of discourses used for obscuring government’s national interest. In fact, if it would

not be ideological tool of European countries, there can be important acquirements. In fact,

although idealism regarded as an unsuccessful approach, it has made important scientific

contributions to the emergence of international relations as an independent discipline. Learning

of democracy, human rights and values such as liberalism by USSR and eastern bloc countries

was important step to end of the Cold War period. First World War was biggest destruction of

humanity ever lived. This tragic event encouraged intellectuals and political leaders to think
again about conflict, security and warfare. Idealism occurred at that time to prevent another big

war. However, idealism used for politics and changed into politics tool beyond ideals. As stated,

idealist ideas used by western countries for their national interests. Bearing this thesis in mind

there are important gains with the framework of idealism such as development of environmental

law, adaptation of sustainable economic growth by other countries, transfer of funds from

international funds initially from the World Bank to less developed countries. Speeding of

spread of democracy to world and spread of freedom in the context of politics and most

importantly empowerment of international law norms day by day are valuable achievements of

idealist thought.

In conclusion, 14 Principles, which named as Wilson Principles were important structure of

idealist tradition. Although, Idealism is the founding theory of the International Relations

discipline, it has minimum number of books, articles and works written in the International

Relations literature. The primary reason of that underestimation of idealism by realism and

seeing its validity as impossible for international relations.10 It must be said that idealism has to

adapt itself to modern world and build its scientific framework again for starting to increase in

international relations theories. In order to get rid of critics such as “utopian” it should influence

from approaches and scientific methods of other international relations theories to make new

approach.

10
Ramazan Gözen, Theories of International Relations (İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2017): 117.
 RESOURCES

Wilson, Peter. “Idealism in International Relations”, Encyclopaedia of Power, Australia: Sage

Publications, 2011.

Crawford, Robert MA. “Idealism and Realism in International Relations.” London: Routledge,

2005.

Mearsheimer, John J. “E.H. Carr vs. Idealism: The Battle Rages on.” USA: University of

Chicago, 19.2, (2005): 139-152.

Çalış, Şaban; Özlük, Erdem. “Uluslararası İlişkiler Tarihinin Yapısökümü: İdealizm-Realizm

Tartışması” Konya: Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2007, 18: 225-243.

Ateş, Davut. “Uluslararası İlişkiler Disiplininin Oluşumu: İdealizm/Realizm Tartışması ve

Disiplinin Özerkliği”, İzmir: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Üniversitesi Dergisi, 5/2,

(2009):139-145.

Tuğcu, Tuncar. “Immanuel Kant ve Transendental İdealizm” Alesta Yayınları, 2001.

Gözen, Ramazan. “Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorileri,” 4. bs. Araştırma İnceleme Dizisi 347.

İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2017.

View publication stats