NCAA Safety Bulletin 23-4 - April
NCAA Safety Bulletin 23-4 - April
NCAA Safety Bulletin 23-4 - April
Aviation Authority
4 Rudolf Herzog
Street
P/Bag 12003
Auspannplatz
Safety Promotion
and Quality
Department
[email protected]
Ph. 083 235 2511 or
083 235 2468
APRIL Safety
MATTERS
2023
www.ncaa.com.na
This monthly publication will keep industry, NCAA, license
holders, and the general public updated in terms of what
has occurred in safety monthly within the industry. All
reports are de-identified and no attempt should be made
to identify the reporter in this or any other avenue unless
specific authorisation is given.
Contents
Safety Statistics........................3
Reporting Culture....................4
SPIs.........................................5
Quote of the Month..................5
Competition............................6
Meet the Team, AIR.................8
Occurrences............................9
Training feedback..................17
Reporting Practices................19
Drum Fuelling........................20
Safety Updates.......................21
Safety Statistics
April 2023
In April there were 35 safety reports, with six medium risk events, two high risk events (one
from March not reported in last month edition), and the remaining twenty eight were low
risk. Three of the medium events were wildlife encounters. There were no accidents reported
in April. There were no accidents reported in April.
The year-to-date figures for risks show approximately 78% low risk, 18% medium risk, and only
3.5% high risk. A small improvement over last month and a continuation of the positive start
to the year.
For more about classifications of risk see the definitions in Safety Bulletin 1-22.
Graphs included in this document show year to date figures unless specified.
REPORTING CULTURE
SPIs
alerts! Further there were four categories with no reports. The one global high risk
category with an event was loss of separation, an occurrence in unmanned airspace,
see more under occurrences. Maintenance and technical was below target with only
nine events and wildlife was well below the target and also below the ICAO
recommended level, with only three events.
Note: All alerts levels are calculated based on the "Standard Deviation Method" described in
ICAO safety Management Manual and targets are set approximately 10% below the previous
year average.
”Practicing safety may get old -BUT- so do those who practice it!” - Anon
f e !
y Sa
Sta Reporting
Safety Bulletin - April 2023 www.ncaa.com.na Page 5
Safety
NCAA is proud to announce an aviation safety social media competition for schools,
as follows:
1. Submit an aviation safety social media graphic or short video. This competition is
open only to school age children. Submissions shall include name, age, grade,
and school.
If you have any questions about this competition please ask us at [email protected].
1. Submit an aviation safety article of 600 to 1000 words with one image. This
competition is open to anyone outside NCAA SPQ department (there are three
prizes for internal and three prizes for external);
If you have any questions about this competition please ask us at [email protected].
Isak Nangombe
Hamunyela Kayone
Under the leadership of Mr. Robert Mathe, Senior Manager, the AIR team work tirelessly to keep
our aircraft flying in an airworthy state and reducing technical or maintenance events. If you
have any questions about airworthiness, reach out to the AIR team on [email protected], the
designated inspector will respond.
NCAA aims to include one safety oversight section each month so you can get to know our
inspectors and the eight different safety/security oversight sections' roles and responsibilities.
These sections comprise, AGA, AIR, ANSSO, AvSec, CRR, OPS, PEL, and SPQ.
TECHNICAL FAULTS
(MANDATORY, LOW RISK, AIR)
Note that nearly all unscheduled failures require an incident report. This
need not be a lengthy dissertation, that is, it shouldn't take you too much
time, only a brief summary of the most likely or determined cause of the
failure. This is important for trending and/or for preventative
maintenance. Please see the April 2022 article on service difficulty reports
(SDRs) and mandatory occurrence reports (MORs).
WILDLIFE STRIKES
(VOLUNTARY, MEDIUM RISK, AGA)
There were three wildlife events reported in April, two bird encounters and one
encounter with springbok. This is a positive step forward in our wildlife management
programmes.
Note: Bird strikes, while the damage is normally negligible, are a frequent occurrence
so fall into the medium risk category.
While it is a little early to determine if there are any trends in our wildlife report
tracking for interest sake we provide the below table illustrating the wildlife strikes
to date since establishing our safety data collection and processing system. UPDATE
TABLE!!
*Of note, in the go around reported at FYOG, the ATIS reported the
visibility and cloud as VMC, while when the approach was flown to
minimums no visual contact could be made. Even with the best of
meteorological equipment weather reports can sometimes be
inaccurate so always remember to be prepared!
There were two events of flight and duty period exceedance in April.
In one case a pilot was rostered off prior to a night flight and was called
into the office to attend to office duties.
Managers are warned that NCAA does not take such actions lightly. If a
pilot is rostered off the must be completely free from duties and no action
by management or other staff should cause them to make a decision to
attend to duties on their off time.
In a second case weather delayed the flight and the pilot elected to
utilise the 3 hour PIC discretionary period.
Pilots are advised to use PIC discretion with caution, however there is
sometimes good reason. Always submit a report following PIC discretion
report followg such an event.
MET FACILITIES
(MANDATORY, LOW RISK, ANSSO)
ATS FACILITIES
(MANDATORY, LOW RISK, ANSSO)
There were two ATS failures occurring in April, one which was recurrent:
NCAA has immediately taken action on this event by tracking the fuel
fault with the supplier and the event was tracked to one farm worker and
one drum being ordered to be filled incorrectly. Additionally, guidance
material has been sent out warning messages to all operators about the
precautions to use when fueling from drums. See more on page 20.
Fortunately, through the pilot's quick actions this was not more serious.
NOTAM FORMAT
HAZARD, LOW RISK, AIM)
It was reported that the format of NOTAMs for hazards and surveys is
very cumbersome to work with when there is only co-ordinates and no
location reference. It was requested that AIM consider to include an
aerodrome reference point, for example "15nm SSE of FYOA".
This report was referred to AIM, ANSSO, and OPS for further comment and
we will report back in the feedback section once a response is received.
There was a report of alleged low flying in the Swakopmund area. The
report was investigated and found to be unsubstantiated, however
pilots and operators are reminded of the importance of adherence to
NAMCAR 91.06.33 at all times.
Under NAMCAR Part 98, 106, and 149, powered paragliders, paragliders,
and hang gliders are required to have a valid membership to a Part 149
association and all pilots are required to have a valid license or
certificate for operation.
INTOXICATED PASSENGER
(MANDATORY, LOW RISK, OPS)
SAFETY ARTICLE:
REPORTING PRACTICES
Firstly we want to congratulate the industry on improved reporting practices.
However secondly we need to remind everyone that we still have a long way to go!
Of primary concern when we receive reports at the NCAA is that a large number of
incidents involve multiple reporting parties. For example an in-flight turn back
(IFTB), often a result of a technical event, can be a mandatory report. It should be
reported on the first instance by the pilot. However there should also be a report
from the air traffic controller, and further from the aviation maintenance
organisation, and in some cases also from the aerodrome operator. That is one event
can have a potential 4 reports. If we receive all these reports follow up is very quick
and trouble free. However in most cases we receive one and if we are luck two.
Further for any mandatory report it is essential that the safety manager submit the
closure of the SMS investigation to the NCAA. This allows us to know that action has
been taken and the matter resolved. Please do expect us to be asking for this, either
via your assigned inspector of through SPQ.
Finally, there is an aspect we see so little of, but is so crucial for our progression from
a reactive to proactive approach to safety, and that is Hazards. Please remind your
employees or members at your safety meetings to be conscious of hazards. Only by
identifying hazards before they create an event, can we truly become proactive and
not just reactive. The more aware we are of alerting others about any hazards we
observe, the more safety will improve for all of us. The safer our skies become the
better our chances of attracting tourism, more air carriers, and more jobs in the
industry, and the growth of the industry will prevail. So help us all help the industry
grow by proactively looking for and timely reporting of hazards.
Prepared by :
SPQ www.ncaa.com.na Page 19
Safety Bulletin - April 2023
SAFETY ARTICLE:
Stay safe!
Prepared by :
SPQ www.ncaa.com.na Page 20
Safety Updates
Articles and Ask NCAA
NCAA values your input and we have created this forum for answering
questions industry may have or requests for publications. Feel free to drop us a
line and enquire: [email protected].
Publications
The National Aviation Safety Plan has
been approved by the Board and will be
available on the website soon.
Invitation to Contribute
Service providers and users are invited to contribute topics and ideas or articles
to NCAA SPQ department for consideration in our safety publications or safety
workshops. Remember the safety system only works with participation and
information sharing is key to continuous improvement and achieving global
aviation safety goals.