The Ontological Turn
The Ontological Turn
The Ontological Turn
Series Editorial Board
Jonathan Spencer, University of Edinburgh
Michael Lambek, University of Toronto
he Ontological Turn
An Anthropological Exposition
MARTIN HOLBRAAD
University College London
www.cambridge.org
Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9781107503946
10.1017/9781316218907
© Cambridge University Press 2017
his publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception
and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements,
no reproduction of any part may take place without the written
permission of Cambridge University Press.
First published 2017
Printed in the United Kingdom by Clays, St Ives plc
A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library.
I SB N 978-1-107-10388-7 Hardback
I SB N 978-1-107-50394-6 Paperback
Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of U R L s
for external or third-party Internet Web sites referred to in this publication and does not
guarantee that any content on such Web sites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.
Contents
vi
Contents
Conclusion 282
Post-critical Anthropology 288
he Politics of Ontology 293
Bibliography 299
Index 333
vi
Figures and Boxes
Figures
2.1 Wagner’s nature/culture reversal page 82
2.2 Wagner’s scheme of metaphoric invention 89
2.3 Wagner’s holographic model of obviation 97
2.4 Obviation sequence of Daribi myth about the origin of
food crops 101
3.1 Postplural abstraction 135
3.2 Trans-temporal comparison 149
Boxes
0.1 Why the ontological turn is not relativism 12
2.1 Part-whole relations in obviation and the hermeneutic circle 92
3.1 Strathern’s dialogue on perspectivism with Viveiros de Castro 152
4.1 Ontology in the mirror: Viveiros de Castro and Wagner 174
4.2 Viveiros de Castro, Deleuze and anthropology 182
vii
ix
xi
xi
xi
Botelho and Neil Wells for their help with preparing the manuscript and
the index for publication.
For reading and commenting on drats of our chapters we are enor-
mously grateful to Benjamin Alberti, Kristofer Albris, Mikkel Bille,
Tom Boellstorf, Matthew Carey, Igor Cherstich, Jo Cook, David Cooper,
Iracema Dulley, Alice Elliot, Astrid Grue, Agnieszka Halemba, Casper
Bruun Jensen, Stine Krøijer, Chloe Nahum-Claudel, Morten Nielsen,
Adam Reed, Joel Robbins, Julia Sauma, Mario Schmitt, Michael Scott,
Charles Stewart, Soumhya Venkatesan and James Weiner, as well as mem-
bers of the Cosmology, Religion, Ontology and Culture (CROC) research
group at University College London (UCL), students in the Contemporary
Anthropological heory class at the University of Copenhagen and the
Advanced Cultural heory seminar at the University of California Santa
Cruz and participants in seminars, workshops and conferences held in
the United Kingdom, Denmark and other parts of Europe, the United
States, Cuba, Mongolia and Japan where diferent versions of the argu-
ments developed in this book have been presented.
In Chapters 2, 3, 5 and 6 we have drawn liberally on the follow-
ing previously published works: pp 37–46 of Holbraad’s monograph
Truth in Motion: he Recursive Anthropology of Cuban Divination
(Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012); sections of our co-written
article “Planet M: the intense abstraction of Marilyn Strathern,” pub-
lished in two diferent versions, in Cambridge Anthropology Volume 28,
Issue 3, pp. 43–65 (2009) and Anthropological heory Volume 9, Issue 4,
pp. 371–394 (2009); sections of Holbraad’s article “Can the thing speak?,”
irst published online on the Open Anthropology Cooperative Press
(Working Papers Series #7, 2011), with further versions published in
Savage Objects, edited by G. Pereira (Guimaraes: INCM, 2013), pp. 17–30,
and Objects and Materials: A Routledge Companion, edited by P. Harvey
et al. (London: Routledge, 2014), pp. 228–237; sections of Chapter 4 in
Pedersen's monograph Not Quite Shamans: Spirit Worlds and Political
Lives in Northern Mongolia (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2011);
xii
xi
xiii