Journal Pre-proof

Effects of stocking density on the growth and flesh quality of

rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) reared in a low-tech
aquaponic system

Marco Birolo, Francesco Bordignon, Angela Trocino, Luca

Fasolato, Antón Pascual, Sergio Godoy, Carlo Nicoletto, Carmelo
Maucieri, Gerolamo Xiccato

PII: S0044-8486(20)31108-X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735653
Reference: AQUA 735653

To appear in: Aquaculture

Received date: 8 April 2020

Revised date: 20 June 2020
Accepted date: 23 June 2020

Please cite this article as: M. Birolo, F. Bordignon, A. Trocino, et al., Effects of stocking
density on the growth and flesh quality of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) reared
in a low-tech aquaponic system, Aquaculture (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.aquaculture.2020.735653

This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such
as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is
not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting,
typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this
version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production
process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers
that apply to the journal pertain.

© 2020 Published by Elsevier.

 Journal Pre-proof

Section: Aquaculture Production Science

Effects of stocking density on the growth and flesh quality of rainbow trout

(Oncorhynchus mykiss) reared in a low-tech aquaponic system

Marco Birolo1, Francesco Bordignon2,3, Angela Trocino2*, Luca Fasolato2, Antón Pascual2, Sergio

Godoy3, Carlo Nicoletto1, Carmelo Maucieri1, Gerolamo Xiccato1

1
Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural resources, Animal and Environment (DAFNAE),

of
University of Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Padova, Italy.
2

ro
Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science (BCA), University of Padova, Viale

dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Padova, Italy.

-p
3
Institute of Animal Science and Technology, Group of Aquaculture and Biodiversity, Universitat
re
Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera 14, 46071 Valencia, Spain.
lP

*Corresponding author: [email protected]

na
ur
Jo
 Journal Pre-proof

Abstract

In the present study, we evaluated the effects of two stocking densities (low - ALD, 3.81 kg m-3 vs.

high - AHD, 7.26 kg m-3) on the growth, health, and flesh quality of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus

mykiss) and the yield and microbiological quality of lettuce (Lactuca sativa) produced in a low-tech

aquaponic system compared to hydroponic cultivation (HYP). Nine experimental units (three

replications per treatment) were utilised. A total of 123 rainbow trout (initial body weight: 142 ± 35

g) were randomly distributed in six 500-L tanks (3 per stocking density) and monitored during a

117 day trial period. The final weight (331 g on average), specific growth rate (0.73% d-1), feed

of
conversion ratio (1.58), and mortality (3%) of the fish did not differ between stocking densities. The

ro
morphometric indices, slaughter results, and flesh quality were not affected. Similarly, the quantity
-p
of lettuce produced during two consecutive cycles was similar among treatments (2.4 kg m-2 on
re
average). At harvest, microbial contamination (total viable count, E. coli, Enterobacteriaceae,

Pseudomonas, mould, and yeasts) was similar in the fish skin and lettuce produced in aquaponic
lP

systems with different stocking densities, as well as in the lettuce produced in aquaponic and
na

hydroponic systems. In conclusion, rainbow trout and lettuce productions were successful in the

tested aquaponic system, whereas stocking density did not affect fish growth or flesh quality.
ur
Jo

Keywords: Water quality, Hydroponics, Slaughter results, Microbial contamination.

Highlights

 Rainbow trout can be reared in low-tech aquaponics until a final density of 17 kg m-3.

 The increase in the stocking density increased the total fish biomass yield.

 The lettuce yield was similar in the aquaponic and hydroponic systems.

 Quality and food safety of the end-products were guaranteed in the tested aquaponic system.
 Journal Pre-proof

1 Introduction

Aquaponics is an emerging sustainable food production system, which combines fish farming

(aquaculture) and soilless crop cultivation (hydroponics) in integrated multi-trophic systems where

animals, plants, and microorganisms are in symbiosis (Rakocy et al., 2006; Goddek et al., 2015;

König et al., 2018). These systems provide short and eco-friendly food supply chains with increased

resource-use efficiency, high economic and environmental sustainability, and food resilience (Van

Woensel et al., 2015). Low-tech aquaponic systems based on a simple design, easy management,

and low capital costs are suitable for implementation in different geographic regions and production

of
areas (Palm et al., 2019). Moreover, aquaponics could also play a key role in future urban farming

ro
developments and socio-economic progress in smart cities (dos Santos, 2016).
-p
A vital requirement for one-loop aquaponic systems is the need for maintaining the optimal levels
re
for fish and plants concerning the water temperature, pH, and chemical composition (Monsees et

al., 2017; Gichana et al., 2018). In this regard, the stocking density of fish is a key factor for
lP

balancing aquaponic ecosystems, since it directly affects water quality in terms of nutrients, gases,
na

and waste by-products, thus influencing plant growth as well as fish health and growth (Somerville

et al., 2014; Yildiz et al., 2017; Palm et al., 2019).

ur

Several ‘easy-to-produce’ fish species, such as Blue tilapia (Oreochromis aureus), Nile tilapia
Jo

(Oreochromis niloticus), Common carp (Cyprinus carpio), tench (Tinca tinca), and African catfish

(Clarias gariepinus), have been successfully reared in aquaponic farming (Somerville et al., 2014;

Goddek et al., 2015). Most of this research has focused on warm-water fish species, whereas, to our

knowledge, no data are available on cold-water species, such as rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus

mykiss). Indeed, the choice of fish species depends upon its economic values, the market demand,

and the geographic localisation of the production system (Forchino et al., 2017).

On the other hand, several crops have been grown in aquaponics, including herbs, fruiting species,

and leafy vegetables (Thorarinsdottir, 2015). Lettuce (Lactuca sativa) is one of the main plant

species used in aquaponic systems (Love et al., 2015), showing growth rates similar to those in
 Journal Pre-proof

hydroponics (Lennard and Ward, 2019; Monsees et al., 2019). Moreover, all studies have focused

on fish performance/mortality and vegetal biomass production, whereas, to our knowledge, no

information is available on the rheological and microbiological quality of the fish produced in

aquaponic systems. Finally, few studies have tested the microbiological quality and safety of the

vegetables in aquaponics (Elumalai et al., 2017; Schmautz et al., 2017; Mori and Smith, 2019).

Thus, our study aimed at evaluating the effects of two stocking densities in fish tanks on the growth

performance and flesh quality traits of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) as well as the

microbiological load of the end-products (both fish and vegetables) in a low-tech aquaponic system.

of
ro
2 Materials and methods -p
2.1 Experimental conditions of the aquaponic and hydroponic systems
re
The research was conducted at the experimental farm of the University of Padova, North-East Italy

(45°20′N, 11°57′E, 6 m a.s.l.), inside a plastic greenhouse. The experiment consisted of nine
lP

identical independent units (Figure 1), i.e., three hydroponic units (HYP) without fish, three
na

aquaponics units with a low stocking density (ALD), and three aquaponics units with a high

stocking density (AHD). The hydroponic section worked as a biofilter. The system size was
ur

designed basing on the recommendations of Sommerville et al. (2014) for small-scale aquaponics
Jo

units, i.e. 10 kg maximum fish biomass in a 500-L fish tank coupled with a biofilter having a

minimum volume equal to 10-30% of the total fish tank volume. Before the start of the present trial,

the system had been previously used for another cycle with European carp, which guaranteed about

the regular functioning of the biofilter (Mauceri et al., 2019). Municipal water was used without any

pre-treatment to fill the systems at the start of the European carp cycle. Then, to restore losses due

to fish splashing, evaporation and transpiration during the trial, municipal water was used after

stocking for at least 48 h. No energy to regulate water temperature, no probe for the continuous

evaluation of water quality or remote management, and no device for water sanitation was used. No

correction for alkalinity was performed.

 Journal Pre-proof

Each independent unit consisted of: 1) a main tank (volume 500 L, height 0.80 m, diameter 0.90 m),

in which the fish were kept in the aquaponic units or where the nutritive solution was present in the

hydroponic units; 2) two tanks for vegetables (volume 275 L each, height 0.35 m, diameter 1.00 m)

for a total crop area of 1.6 m2, filled with 225 L of light expanded clay aggregates (specific area 250

m2 m-3, packing density 300 kg m-3, total porosity 0.55 m3 m-3; LECA Laterlite, Solignano, Italy),

which received water from the main tank and acted both as a biofilter and hydroponic substrate for

vegetable growth; and 3) a storage tank (volume 50 L, height 0.45 m) for collecting water from the

vegetable tanks, before pumping it back into the main tank (Figure 1). The three parts of the system

of
had water at different heights so that the water flow was guaranteed by the overflow (from the main

ro
tank to the vegetable tanks, and then to the storage tank). A single pump (Newa Jet 1700, NEWA
-p
TecnoIndustria Srl, Loreggia, Italy) returned the water from the storage tank to the main tank. The
re
flow rate was 300 L h-1, which corresponded to a complete recirculation of water every 2 h. The

nine main tanks were aerated by a porous stone (4.0 cm × 4.0 cm × 15.0 cm, 14 L min-1;
lP

Sweetwater® AS15S, Pentair, Cary, NC, USA) connected to an aerator (Scubla D100, Scubla Srl,
na

Remanzacco, Italy) and covered with a net to prevent fish from jumping.
ur

2.2 In vivo trial and recordings

Jo

The experiment was run during the winter season (November-February), under a natural

photoperiod, and lasted 117 days. In all 9 units before the beginning of the trial, 132 g unit-1 of

KH2PO4, 197 g unit-1 of K2SO4, 273 g unit-1 of MgSO4·7H2O, 10 g unit-1 of Fe-EDTA, and 5 g unit-1

of micronutrients were added. On day one, fish were placed in the 3 ALD and 3 AHD units.

Meanwhile, 333 g unit-1 of Ca(NO3)2 and 480 g unit-1 of (NH4NO3) were added to the 3 HYP units.

The nutrient solution was calculated by the free software HydroBuddy based on optimal conditions

for lettuce in hydroponics.

Six of the nine main tanks were stocked with a total of 123 rainbow trout, with an initial live weight

of 142 ± 35 g, obtained from a commercial farm (Troticoltura Santa Cristina, Treviso, Italy). The
 Journal Pre-proof

three ALD units received 14 fish per tank (average initial stocking density of 3.81 kg m-3), while the

three AHD units received 27 fish per tank (average initial stocking density of 7.26 kg m-3). The low

and the high stocking density were chosen based on recommendations for small-scale aquaponics

systems, i.e. 10-20 kg m-3 (Somerville et al., 2014). The high stocking density was chosen also in

view of the maximum final biomass of the fish (estimated as 3.0–3.5 times the initial weight),

consistent with recommendations for organic aquaculture (i.e., 25 kg m-3 for rainbow trout reared in

freshwater; Commission Regulation 889/2008). Consistently with practice in not intensive farms,

the fish were manually fed once a day, until apparent satiation and in two rounds separated by 20-30

of
minutes, with a commercial diet of extruded pellets (Skretting, Verona, Italy; composition: 40%

ro
crude protein, 11.5% crude fat, 4% crude fibre, 8% ash, 0.2% sodium, 1.5% calcium, and 0.8%
-p
phosphorus, as-fed basis). The quantity of feed administered daily was calculated for each
re
aquaponic unit on the basis of the biomass present at the moment of each weighing, i.e., 1.5% of the

biomass from the beginning of the experiment to 20 days, 1.0% from 23 to 53 days, and 1.5% from
lP

56 days to the end of the experiment.

na

During the trial, two crop cycles of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) were cultivated in succession during

77 days for the first cycle and 44 days for the second one. At the beginning of each cycle, 20 plants
ur

per experimental unit (10 plants per tank, plant density of 13 plants m-2) were transplanted during
Jo

the third true leaf stage. The first cycle began 3 days before fish addition in the systems, the second

cycle was harvested the day after fish harvesting. Plants were obtained from an external supplier.

Neither pesticides nor antibiotics were used in the water or feed during the entire experiment.

2.3 Water quality

Throughout the trial, water lost from each unit via evapotranspiration was daily recorded and

manually refilled. Two times per week, the outflow water of the fish tanks was monitored for the

temperature, dissolved oxygen (DO), pH, redox potential (ORP), and electric conductivity (EC),

using a portable multi-parameter apparatus (HQ40d Portable Multi-Parameter Meter, Hach Lange
 Journal Pre-proof

GmbH, Germany). The chlorophyll content was measured with a fluorescence detector (HHLD

Fluorescence-Chlorophyll, Turner Designs, USA). The anion (NO2-, NO3-, and PO43-) and cation

(NH4+) contents in the water were determined by ion chromatography (IC) (Maucieri et al., 2019).

2.4 In vivo recordings of fish

Fish health was monitored daily. Fish were individually weighed by a scale (precision 1 g; Wunder

Sa.Bi. srl, Trezzo sull’Adda, Italy) at the beginning of the trial (day 0), and then on a monthly basis

at 22, 55, 84, and 117 days (end of the rearing period). For this, fish were removed from their tank,

of
placed in a separate one, and anaesthetised with 10 mg L-1 of clove oil containing 87% eugenol.

ro
Fish were not fed for 48 h before and 24 h after weighing. The specific growth rate (SGR) and feed
-p
conversion ratio (FCR) were calculated as follows:
re
SGR (% d-3) = [(Loge Final weight - Loge Initial weight) / No. of days] × 100 (1)

FCR = weight of dry feed distributed / net wet weight gain of fish (2)
lP
na

2.5 Recordings at fish slaughtering and vegetable harvest

At the end of the rearing period, all fish were slaughtered. Before slaughtering, fish were fasted for
ur

24 h. Fish were harvested with a handling net, anaesthetised with 10 mg L-1 of clove oil in a
Jo

separate tank, and then manually restrained using a plastic knob so that a percussion could be

applied to the head of fish. All fish were weighed and 36 fish (6 per tank; 18 per experimental

treatment), representative of their experimental groups regarding average body weight and

variability, were selected, individually tagged, and stored in polystyrene boxes with ice in a cold

room (0 to 2 ℃). Eighteen fish (3 per tank; 9 per experimental treatment) were analysed one day

after slaughter, whereas the other eighteen fish (3 per tank; 9 per experimental treatment) were

analysed seven days after slaughter. The rigor mortis index (RI) was determined using the

following formula (Bito et al., 1983):

RI (%) = [(L0 - Lt) / L0] × 100 (3)

 Journal Pre-proof

where, L0 (cm) is the vertical distance between the base of the caudal fin and the table surface,

measured immediately after death, and Lt (cm) is the vertical distance between the base of the

caudal fin and the table surface at 1 and 7 days after slaughter.

For each storage time, the total length, standard length, head length, and maximum height were

measured (Luxinger et al., 2018), and the following morphological indices (Di Marco et al., 2017)

were calculated:

Condition factor (%) = (body weight / total length3) × 100 (4)

Cranial index = head length / total length (5)

of
Relative profile = maximum height / total length (6)

ro
Thereafter, the L*, a*, and b* colour indices of the skin were measured at three points on the dorsal
-p
side with a Minolta CM–508 C spectrophotometer (Minolta Corp., Ramsey, NJ, USA). A texture
re
profile analysis (TPA) was performed at a central position on the lateral side under the first dorsal

fin, using a TA.XT.plus Texture Analyser (Stable Micro Systems, Godalming, UK) with a 20-mm
lP

diameter cylindrical probe, with 5 mm compressions at a constant speed of 2 mm/s for two
na

consecutive cycles, separated by a 5-s interval. The muscle pH was measured at three points on the

dorsal side with a pH meter (Basic 20; Crison Instruments Sa, Carpi, Italy) equipped with a specific
ur

electrode (cat. # 5232; Crison Instruments SA).

Jo

Then, the fish were dissected and the carcasses were weighed. The carcass and fillet yields were

calculated using the following formulae:

Carcass yield (%) = (carcass weight / slaughter weight) × 100 (7)

Fillet yield (%) = (fillet weight / slaughter weight) × 100 (8)

The skin was separated from the fillets, and then the flesh colour indices were measured at three

points on the dorsal side of the fillets, taken from the right side of the fish (the right fillets)

according to the procedure describe above. The left fillets were used to measure the total volatile

base-nitrogen (TVB-N) content (EEC, 1995).

 Journal Pre-proof

At harvesting (77 days: first crop cycle; 44 days: second crop cycle), all lettuce plants were divided

into aboveground and belowground parts, and the fresh weight of the leaves was immediately

recorded to determine the marketable yield following the same procedure reported by Maucieri et

al, (2019).

2.6 Microbiological analysis of vegetables and fish

At the time of fish slaughter, leaves from all plants (i.e. those of the second cycle) were collected

and pooled (one pool per tank, 9 pools). The pooled samples were rinsed with 400 mL of Buffer

of
Peptone Water (BPW) and rinsates were used for the detection and enumeration of different

ro
microbial targets. -p
Then, the same 36 fish (3 per sampling time × 2 sampling times × 3 tanks × 2 groups) selected for
re
rheological analyses were used for sampling at the skin level immediately after slaughter (18

specimens) and 7 days later, after storage at 2℃ (18 specimens). For sampling, a standard area of
lP

the skin (25 cm2) was swabbed with sterile cotton swabs, which were placed in 10 mL of Maximum
na

Recovery Diluent (8 g NaCl/L, 1 g of bacteriological peptone/L) and then serially diluted.

Targets bacteria included specific spoilage organisms (SSO) associated with fish spoilage during
ur

storage (i.e. psychotrophyc bacteria such as Pseudomonas and putative H2S producers), besides
Jo

bacteria associated with faecal contamination (i.e. Escherichia coli). Total mesophilic count (as

total viable count), mould, yeast, and Enterobacteriaceae were also evaluated being generic food

quality indicators.

In both vegetables and all fish sampled at slaughter and after 7 d, the total viable count (TVC) was

evaluated on Plate Count Agar (Biokar Diagnostics, Beauvais, France), incubated at 30℃ for 72 h

(ISO 4833-1:2013). The contamination provided by Enterobacteriaceae was assessed using Violet

Red Bile Glucose Agar (Biokar Diagnostics), incubated at 37 ℃ for 24 h (ISO 21528-2:2017).

Escherichia coli counts were performed on a Tryptone Bile X-Glucuronide (TBX, Oxoid Ltd,

Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK) medium, incubated at 44℃ for 18–24 h (ISO 7251:2005). The count
 Journal Pre-proof

of H2S-producing bacteria (putative Shewanella spp.) was carried out on iron agar (Lyngby,

Laboratorios Conda, Torrejón de Ardoz, Spain), incubated at 25℃ for 48 h (Andreani and Fasolato,

2016). The Pseudomonas spp. count was evaluated on Pseudomonas Agar Base supplemented with

cetrimide, fucidine, and cephaloridine (Oxoid), incubated at 25℃ for 48 h (Andreani and Fasolato,

2016). In trout samples, yeast and mould counts were performed on Oxytetracycline Glucose Yeast

Extract Agar (OGYE, Oxoid), incubated at 25℃ for 3–5 days (ISO 21527-1:2008). The results

were reported as log10 CFU/cm2 or mL of rinsate.

of
2.7 Ethics statement

ro
The study was approved by the Ethical Committee for Animal Experimentation (Organismo per la
-p
Protezione del Benessere Animale, OPBA) of the University of Padova (project no. 6/2017; prot. n.
re
15132). All animals were handled according to the principles stated by the EC Directive

86/609/EEC regarding the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific
lP

purposes. Research staff involved in animal handling were animal specialists (PhD or MS in
na

Animal Science) and veterinary practitioners.

ur

2.8 Statistical analysis

Jo

The data concerning the water quality, vegetable yields and microbiological quality were analysed

by a one-way ANOVA with the experimental group (ALD, AHD, and HYP) as the main effect. The

growth performance and slaughter data of the fish were analysed by a one-way ANOVA with the

stocking density (ALD and AHD) as the main effect. The rigor mortis, physicochemical traits, and

microbiological quality data of the fish were analysed by a two-way ANOVA with the stocking

density, storage time (1/7 days), and their interaction as the main effects. The PROC GLM of SAS

(Statistical Analysis System, 2013) was used for all analyses. Bonferroni’s test was used to compare

means. Differences among means with p < 0.05 were assumed to be statistically significant.
 Journal Pre-proof

3 Results

3.1 Water characteristics

Throughout the trial, the daily water losses averaged 2.45 L d-1, i.e., 0.41% of the total water

contained in each unit, without significant differences among groups (data not reported in tables).

The EC, redox potential, and contents of ammonium, nitrite, and nitrate in the water varied

according to the following pattern: ALD < AHD < HYP (p < 0.001). However, the phosphate

content was higher in aquaponic units compared to hydroponic ones, and increased significantly

with the stocking density of fish (p < 0.001; Table 1).

of
Trends in water characteristics during the trial are shown in Figure 2. Water temperature changed

ro
with external environmental conditions (Figure 2a); dissolved oxygen showed a similar pattern in
-p
the three groups, being always higher in HYP tanks (Figure 2b); pH decreased in all groups from
re
about 8.00 until about 7.00 (Figure 2c). Ammonia added with the fertilizer in the HYP tanks at the

beginning of the trial disappeared by the 60th d of trial (Figure 2d), being converted in nitrite
lP

(Figure 2e) and then in nitrate (Figure 2f). Ammonia produced by fish was higher in AHD tanks
na

compared to ALD tanks during the first weeks; it was similar in the two groups in following period,

whereas it showed an increase after 100 d when fish biomass increased (Figure 3d). Nitrite sharply
ur

increased in AHD tanks from 100 d onwards (Figure 2e) whereas nitrate showed a constant increase
Jo

in both groups until about 600 mg L-1 at the end of the trial (Figure 2f).

3.2 Fish growth performance and biomass production

Throughout the trial, only four fish died (2 from ALD and 2 from AHD treatments) without

showing any previous symptoms of disease. The stocking density did not affect the live weight,

SGR, or FCR of the fish (Table 2). At the end of the trial, the live weight and SGR averaged

331±78 g and 0.73±0.06 % d-1, respectively, while the FCR reached 1.58±0.16 (average of AHD

and ALD fish). The stocking density at the end of the experiment reached 8.86 and 16.94 kg m-3 in

ALD and AHD groups, respectively (Table 2).

 Journal Pre-proof

3.3 Biometric traits and flesh quality of fish

The stocking density did not affect the morphologic traits/indices, slaughter results (Table 3), or

flesh quality of the fish (Table 4). On average, the carcass yield was 89.0% of the slaughter weight.

Meanwhile, the fillet weight and yield were 163 g and 49.1% of the slaughter weight, respectively.

Regarding the storage time, after 7 days the rigor index, muscle pH (-0.75 percentage units),

hardness (-15.8 N), and chewiness (-509 units) significantly decreased (0.001 < p <0.01).

Meanwhile, the lightness of the skin (+12.7 units) and fillet (+5.7 units) and the yellowness of the

of
skin (+2.8 units) increased (p ≤ 0.001). Whereas, the redness of the skin (-3.6 units) and the

ro
yellowness of the fillet (-1.8 units) decreased (p < 0.001).
-p
re
3.4 Marketable yield of vegetables

The marketable lettuce yield was 2.82±0.64 kg m-2 at the end of the first cycle and 1.89±0.18 kg m-2
lP

at the end of the second cycle (average of the three groups). On average for the two cycles, the
na

lettuce production in the aquaponic system was similar to that of the hydroponic cultivation, even if

a higher production was recorded in aquaponic units compared to hydroponic ones in the second
ur

cycle (on average 1.98 vs. 1.75 kg m-2, p < 0.01; Figure 3).
Jo

3.5 Microbiological quality of fish and vegetables

At the skin level, the TVC and Enterobacteriaceae counts were not affected by the stocking density

or sampling time (Table 5). Pseudomonas increased (0.36 to 0.81 log10 CFU cm-2; p = 0.024) and

H2S-producing bacteria tended (0.41 to 0.86 log10 CFU cm-2; p = 0.072) to increase from ALD to

AHD groups. Escherichia coli, moulds and yeasts were not found in the skin or lettuce and thus

their counts are not given in tables. In addition, regarding the lettuce, the TVC, Enterobacteriaceae,

and Pseudomonas counts did not differ between the aquaponic and hydroponic systems.
 Journal Pre-proof

4 Discussion

4.1 Growth performance of fish

In the present study, the stocking density did not affect the growth performance of rainbow trout

reared in low-tech aquaponic systems. The water conditions were maintained within acceptable

values for trout growth (Azevedo et al., 1998; Bregnballe, 2015). In fact, the water temperature

ranged from 7.0 to 15.9℃ (Figure 2a), with an average of 10.7℃. The DO values were consistently

within suitable ranges for the health and welfare of rainbow trout (Ellis et al., 2002), nutrient

adsorption capacity of plant roots, and productivity of nitrifying bacteria (Somerville et al., 2014).

of
As expected, the lowest DO values were recorded in the AHD units (Figure 2b) due to the higher

ro
fish and bacteria respiration (Hussain et al. 2014; Rayhan et al. 2018; Maucieri et al., 2019). The
-p
water pH (on average 7.3, range 8.1-6.7; Figure 2c) was also consistent with the requirements for
re
rainbow trout (7.0 < pH < 8.0; Bregnballe, 2015) and bacteria (7.0 < pH < 9.0; Antoniou et al.,

1990; Goddek et al., 2015). Considering the water pH and temperature during the trial, the content
lP

of unionised ammonia was consistently below the critical threshold for rainbow trout (0.06-1.10 mg
na

L-1; Ellis et al., 2002) in both ALD and AHD treatments. Similarly, the nitrites remained within a

safe range (Kroupova et al., 2008). On the other hand, the water nitrate content overpassed values
ur

recommended for cold species in aquaponic systems (400 mg L-1; Somerville et al., 2014) for about
Jo

half of the trial in the AHD tanks and about one third in the ALD tanks (Figure 2f).

The activity of nitrifying bacteria in ALD and AHD units was proven by the nitrate content, which

was higher than previously observed in other one-loop aquaponic systems (Lennard and Leonard,

2006; Palm et al., 2014; Maucieri et al., 2019). The progressive accumulation of nitrates in the

aquaponic systems could be related to the reduction in the nutrient uptake by plants at higher pH

values (Wortman, 2015) or an unbalance between available nitrate and vegetable biomass.

Nevertheless, changes in water ammonia and nitrite during the trial can be related to changes in

water temperature and pH, which can affect the bacterial nitrification activity (Chen et al., 2006),

besides fish biomass and fish feeding rate which affect nitrogen production. On the other hand,
 Journal Pre-proof

importantly, performance of a biofilter in RAS systems can be optimized by a rigorous designing

that take into account all working factors, among which fish total ammonia nitrogen excretion,

dietary nitrogen content, biofilter substrate, nitrification rate, biofilter efficiency under different

operating conditions (temperature, salinity, and alkalinity), and mass nitrogen load rate (Drennan et

al., 2006).

The mortality rate was very low (3.3% on average), as previously observed for Cyprinus carpio

farmed in the same aquaponic system at similar stocking densities (initial values: 2.5 and 4.6 kg

m-3; final values: 6.9 and 11.5 kg m-3) (Maucieri et al., 2019). To our knowledge, only one study is

of
available concerning trout reared in aquaponic systems focused on microbiological analysis of

ro
lettuce (Alcarraz et al., 2019), whereas commercial aquaponics systems are successfully working in
-p
Columbia, Chile and Canada. Other authors found that the mortality rate simultaneously increased
re
when the initial stocking density increased, both in Cyprinus carpio var. Koi (from 2.1 to 2.8 kg

m-3) (Hussain et al., 2014) and Oreochromis niloticus (from 0.5 to 1.6 kg m-3) (Rayhan et al., 2018)
lP

cultured in aquaponics. However, the response to different stocking densities could vary
na

dramatically among fish species (Ashely, 2007), and is largely affected by the biological

requirements of the fish and water quality.

ur

Nevertheless, in the present trial, the SGR of trout were considerably lower and FCR higher than
Jo

that observed in open or recirculating aquaculture systems (Naderi et al., 2017; Zahedi et al., 2019).

Low water temperatures (10.7℃ on average) and moderate feeding levels likely accounted for these

results. However, rainbow trout show feeding activity at water temperatures as low as 6℃, while

growth and feed conversion are optimised at 15-16℃ (Azevedo et al., 1998; Bregnballe, 2015).

In intensive aquaculture systems, a high stocking density can impair the feed efficiency and growth

performance of trout (see Ellis et al., 2002 for a review). Recent studies have confirmed the

negative impacts of a high stocking density on the growth performance of different fish species (Li

et al., 2012; de las Heras et al., 2015; Ni et al., 2016), including trout (Suárez et al., 2014; Naderi et

al., 2017; Zahedi et al., 2019). However, regarding rainbow trout, these effects are detectable only
 Journal Pre-proof

when the fish biomass surpasses 24 kg m-3 (677 g final weight) (Zahedi et al., 2019), which did not

occur in the current experiment. On the other hand, North et al. (2006) did not observe significant

differences in the final weight of female rainbow trout (180 g initial weight; approximately 400 g

final weight) stocked at densities of 10, 40, and 80 kg m-3. Indeed, multiple factors, such as fish age,

fish size, and water quality, could modify the effects of stocking density on the growth performance

and welfare of fish (Ashley, 2007; Poli, 2009). Furthermore, the competition for food and

physiological stress due to crowding conditions may also reduce the growth performance of fish (Qi

et al., 2016).

of
ro
4.2 Rheological and microbiological shelf life of fish
-p
As for the growth performance, the stocking density did not modify the slaughter results or
re
morphometric indices of trout. In contrast, Suárez et al. (2014) found a decreased final weight, total

length, fillet weight, and viscerosomatic index when the initial stocking density increased from 15
lP

to 40 kg m-3 in one-year-old rainbow trout (100 g initial weight) cultured in tanks continuously
na

supplied with 1 L s-1 of water at 14℃.

In our trial, we did not detect significant differences in the flesh quality according to the stocking
ur

density. In standard land-based production systems, a high stocking density is a major chronic
Jo

stressor in farmed fish (Hoyle et al., 2007), which may also affect the end-product quality. In fact, a

high rainbow trout stocking density (40 kg m-3) has been known to reduce the muscle pH and water

holding capacity, and enhance the rigor strength and firmness (Suárez et al., 2014). Nevertheless, in

the low-tech aquaponic system we tested, the highest stocking density used in the present study did

not produce stressful conditions for the rainbow trout and, as a consequence, there were no negative

effects on the flesh quality.

The changes in fish texture during storage could be related to autolytic and microbial processes that

take place after death, which make the muscle softer and less elastic (Li et al., 2011; Cai et al.,

2014). This is usually associated with an increase in flesh lightness during cold storage, as observed
 Journal Pre-proof

in our trial and extensively reported in fillets of rainbow trout (Jouki et al., 2014; Dehghani et al.,

2018) and European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax; Chéret et al., 2005). Moreover, after one week

of storage in ice, lighter skin has also been found in the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar; Erikson and

Misimi, 2008). However, other authors have found a decreased L* (Álvarez et al., 2008) with an

increasing storage time. Therefore, in the present study, the reduction in the rigor index, and

hardness and chewiness of the flesh was expected and consistent with previous results concerning

trout fillets (Jouki et al., 2014; Concollato et al., 2016), whole gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata;

Álvarez et al., 2008), and whole red seabream (Pagrosomus major; Cai et al., 2014). In fact, the L*

of
index changes based on the muscle structure and amount of free water, which affects light scattering

ro
(Chéret et al., 2005). Moreover, significant a* and b* changes can occur in fish during storage
-p
because of the oxidation of heme pigments and lipids, respectively (Dehghani et al., 2018).
re
Under the conditions used in this trial, the flesh pH decreased from 24 hours to 7 days of storage,

which could be attributed to the anaerobic process of muscle glycogen breakdown with the
lP

consequent production and accumulation of lactic acid (Grigorakis et al., 2003; Daskalova, 2019).
na

Nevertheless, several authors have reported that the muscle pH of fish remained stable (Grigorakis

et al., 2003; Álvarez et al., 2008) or increased (Dehghani et al., 2018; Secci et al., 2018) after 6-8
ur

days of cold storage, due to the formation of alkaline by-products of microbial origin (Mokrani et
Jo

al., 2018). In the current study, the TVB-N concentration in the fish muscle did not change after one

week of storage in ice, and remained below the acceptability threshold (25-27 mg TVB-N 100 g-1 of

sample) (Giménez et al., 2002; Ninan et al., 2011).

The shelf life for rainbow trout stored on ice is approximately 8-11 days (Samples, 2014; Ninan et

al., 2011). In our study, the skin microbial contamination remained stable during the 7-day storage,

which is consistent with the absence of change concerning TVB-N. The low levels of spoiler

targets, such as Pseudomonas and Shewanella, explain the dynamics of chemical markers of

freshness, such as TVB-N. Nevertheless, the surface washing of fish by melting ice could have also

contributed to this result, as reported in other studies on rainbow trout and other species using slurry
 Journal Pre-proof

ice (Aubourg et al., 2009; Rodriguez et al., 2006). Moreover, in our trial, the initial and final

mesophilic counts were lower than those previously measured in other species reared in aquaponics

(Elumalai et al., 2017), whereas the initial skin contamination was consistent with previous

recordings in the same species farmed under conventional aquaculture systems (Aubourg et al.,

2009).

4.3 Lettuce production and microbiological contamination

The increasing concerns regarding water consumption in food production should be solved by a

of
comprehensive approach that includes several strategies focused on the improvement of water-use

ro
efficiency, especially where the availability of water for agricultural purposes is a critical factor
-p
(Goddek et al., 2019). In the present trial, the daily water consumption was within ranges reported
re
in most of the literature (0.05-5.0%; see Maucieri et al., 2018 for a review). As expected, results

obtained during winter were 70% lower than those achieved in the same aquaponic system during
lP

summer (Maucieri et al., 2019).

na

Other authors have reported that aquaponic systems can equal or even overcome the hydroponic

method in the production of lettuce, herbs, and fruiting vegetables (Shul et al., 2016; Lennard and
ur

Ward, 2019). This is consistent with our results that showed the comparable (first crop cycle) or
Jo

greater (second crop cycle) marketable yield of lettuce in aquaponics compared with the HYP units.

The vegetable production in aquaponics is supported by the continuous supply of N compounds

from the fish and the dense community of microbial flora in the system, which may assist plants in

nutrient access and uptake (Lennard and Ward, 2019). Despite Pantanella et al. (2012) reporting

that the yield of lettuce decreased in aquaponics with respect to hydroponics when the fish density

dropped from 8 to 5 kg m-3, we did not find any effect of the stocking density on lettuce production

which means that nutrient supply was sufficient also in the case of the low stocking density. In

addition, Maucieri et al. (2019) observed similar yields of lettuce in hydroponics and aquaponics at

a low fish stocking density (Cyprinus carp, 2.5 kg m-3). Overall, the marketable yield of lettuce
 Journal Pre-proof

achieved in the present study was lower than that reported by other authors (Lennard and Leonard,

2006; Maucieri et al., 2019). Differences in the variety of lettuce, environmental conditions, nutrient

concentrations, water temperature, and solar irradiation justify the different results among studies.

Regarding the microbial quality of the lettuce, leafy vegetables are often largely contaminated. The

results of the present trial are consistent with previous ones concerning whole vegetables, such as

red chicory, on which Pseudomonas (6 Log10 CFU g-1) and Enterobacteriaceae (4 Log10 CFU g-1)

were dominant microorganisms (Alfonzo et al., 2018). Under the conditions of the present study,

the average mesophilic count (reported as TVC) at harvest in the lettuce rinsate (5.65 Log10 CFU

of
mL-1) was comparable to the values measured after 63 days (4.5 Log10 CFU g-1) but higher than

ro
those after 118 days of cultivation (2.8-3.5 Log10 CFU g-1) in a previous study cultivating lettuce in
-p
aquaponics (Elumalai et al., 2017). Moreover, we did not find differences in the counts of
re
mesophilic bacteria and Enterobacteriaceae between lettuce leaves produced in aquaponics or in

hydroponics as already found by Alcarraz et al. (2019) who did not find differences neither in
lP

psychrophilic bacteria. Finally, in lettuce, as with fish samples, the absence of faecal indicator
na

bacteria, such as E. coli, suggests the aquaponic system was suitably hygienic (Elumalai et al.,

2017). On the other hand, a recent study (Wang et al., 2020) highlighted the risk for foodborne
ur

pathogens (e.g. E. coli STEC) in aquaponic and hydroponic systems.

Jo

5 Conclusions

The economic margin of aquaponic systems deployed in cold environments could be increased by

rearing species characterised by a higher market value than the warm-water species usually

cultured, such as rainbow trout. Based on our results, rainbow trout can be successfully farmed in a

low-tech aquaponic system until a final density of approximately 17 kg m-3 without negative effects

on the growth and flesh quality. The marketable yield of lettuce, similar to that obtained in

hydroponics, confirmed that aquaponics is a viable integrated production system for both fish and
 Journal Pre-proof

vegetables. The chemical, physical, and microbiological indicators proved that food-safe products

can be obtained from a low-tech aquaponic system.

Acknowledgements

The research was funded by the University of Padova (BIRD 179231; CUP: C52F17000140005).

The PhD grant of Francesco Bordignon is funded by ECCEAQUA project (MIUR; CUP:

C26C18000030004).

of
Authors’ contributions

ro
Conceptualisation: Marco Birolo, Carmelo Maucieri, Angela Trocino, Gerolamo Xiccato.
-p
Data curation: Marco Birolo.
re
Formal analysis: Marco Birolo; Francesco Bordignon.

Funding aquisition: Gerolamo Xiccato.

lP

Investigation: Marco Birolo, Francesco Bordignon, Sergio Godoy, Luca Fasolato.

na

Methodology: Marco Birolo, Carmelo Maucieri, Carlo Nicoletto, Luca Fasolato, Angela Trocino.

Supervision: Angela Trocino, Gerolamo Xiccato.

ur

Validation: Luca Fasolato; Angela Trocino, Gerolamo Xiccato.

Jo

Writing – original draft: Marco Birolo, Francesco Bordignon, Angela Trocino.

Writing – review & editing: all authors.

References

Alcarraz, Q.E.W., Tapia, L.O., Alcarraz, Q.Y.M. 2019. Microbiological analysis of lettuce (Lactuca

sativa L.) grown in an aquaponic and hydroponic system. Net J. Agric. Sci. 7:50–55.

Alfonzo, A., Gaglio, R., Miceli, A., Francesca, N., Di Gerlando, R., Moschetti, G., Settanni, L.,

2018. Shelf life evaluation of fresh-cut red chicory subjected to different minimal processes.

Food Microbiol. 73:298–304 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2018.02.008.

 Journal Pre-proof

Álvarez, A., García, B.G., Garrido, M.D., Hernández, M.D., 2008. The influence of starvation time

prior to slaughter on the quality of commercial-sized gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) during

ice storage. Aquaculture 284, 106–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.07.025.

Andreani, N., Fasolato, L., 2016. Pseudomonas and related genera. In: The microbiological quality

of food: foodborne spoilers. Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science, Technology and

Nutrition. Elsevier, pp. 7–54.

Antoniou, P., Hamilton, J., Koopman, B., Jain, R., Holloway, B., Lyberatos, G., Svoronos, S.A.,

1990. Effect of temperature and pH on the effective maximum specific growth rate of nitrifying

of
bacteria. Water Res. 24, 97–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(90)90070-M.

ro
Ashley, PJ., 2007. Fish welfare: current issues in aquaculture. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 104, 199–
-p
235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.09.001.
re
Aubourg, S.P., Testi, S., Sanxuas, M., Gil, C., Barros-Velazquez, J., 2009. Improved quality and

shelf life of farmed trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) by whole processing in a combined ozonised
lP

flow ice refrigeration system. Int. J. Food Sci. Tech. 44, 1595–1601.
na

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2008.01889.x.

Azevedo, P.A., Young Cho, C., Leeson, S., Bureau, D.P., 1998. Effects of feeding level and water
ur

temperature on growth, nutrient and energy utilization and waste outputs of rainbow trout
Jo

(Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquat. Living Resour. 11, 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0990-

7440(98)89005-0.

Bito, M., Yamada, K., Mikumo, Y., Amano, K., 1983. Studies on rigor mortis of fish: 1.

Differences in the mode of rigor mortis among some varieties of fish by modified cutting’s

method. Tokay Reg. Fish. Res. Lab. 109, 89–93.

Bregnballe, J., 2015. A guide to recirculation aquaculture. An introduction to the new

environmentally friendly and highly productive closed fish farming systems. Food and

Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and EUROFISH International Organisation.

Eurofish, Copenhagen, Denmark, 95 p.

 Journal Pre-proof

Cai, L., Wu, X., Dong, Z., Li, X., Yi, S., Li, J., 2014. Physicochemical responses and quality

changes of red sea bream (Pagrosomus major) to gum arabic coating enriched with

ergothioneine treatment during refrigerated storage. Food Chem. 160, 82–89.

https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.03.093.

Chen, S., Ling, J., Blancheton, J.., 2006. Nitrification kinetics of biofilm as affected by water

quality factors. Aquacultural Engineering 34, 179–197. doi:10.1016/j.aquaeng.2005.09.004

Chéret, R., Chapleau, N., Delbarre‐Ladrat, C., Verrez‐Bagnis, V., Lamballerie, M.D., 2005. Effects

of high pressure on texture and microstructure of sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.) fillets. J.

of
Food Sci. 70, e477–e483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2005.tb11518.x.

ro
Concollato, A., Olsen, R.E., Vargas, S.C., Bonelli, A., Cullere, M., Parisi, G., 2016. Effects of
-p
stunning/slaughtering methods in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) from death until rigor
re
mortis resolution. Aquaculture 464, 74–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.06.009.

Daskalova, A., 2019. Farmed fish welfare: stress, post-mortem muscle metabolism, and stress-
lP

related meat quality changes. Int. Aquat. Res. 11, 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40071-019-
na

0230-0.

de las Heras, V., Martos-Sitcha, J.A., Yúfera, M., Mancera, J.M., Martínez-Rodríguez, G., 2015.
ur

Influence of stocking density on growth, metabolism and stress of thick-lipped grey mullet
Jo

(Chelon labrosus) juveniles. Aquaculture 448, 29–37.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.05.033.

Dehghani, P., Hosseini, S.M.H., Golmakani, M.T., Majdinasab, M., Esteghlal, S., 2018. Shelf-life

extension of refrigerated rainbow trout fillets using total Farsi gum-based coatings containing

clove and thyme essential oils emulsions. Food Hydrocoll. 77, 677–688.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2017.11.009.

Di Marco, P., Petochia, T., Marino, G., Priori, A., Finoia, M.G., Tomassetti, P., Porrello, S., Giorgi,

G., Lupi, P., Bonelli, A., Parisi, G., Poli, B.M., 2017. Insights into organic farming of European

sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax and gilthead sea bream Sparus aurata through the assessment of
 Journal Pre-proof

environmental impact, growth performance, fish welfare and product quality. Aquaculture 471,

92-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2017.01.012.

Drennan II, D.G., Hosler, K.C., Francis, M., Weaver, D., Aneshansley E., Beckman, G., Johnson,

C.H., Cristina, C. M., 2006. Standardized evaluation and rating of biofilters II. Manufacturer’s

and user’s perspective. Aquacultural Engineering 34, 403–416.

doi:10.1016/j.aquaeng.2005.07.001

dos Santos, M.J.P.L., 2016. Smart cities and urban areas—Aquaponics as innovative urban

agriculture. Urban For. Urban Green. 20, 402–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.10.004.

of
EEC, 1995. Total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N) limit values for certain categories of fishery

ro
products and specifying the analysis methods to be used. Commission Decision 95/149/EEC of 8
-p
March 1995, Official Journal of European Communities, L 97, 84–87. Available at:
re
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudn/1995/149/adopted.

Ellis, T., North, B., Scott, A.P., Bromage, N.R., Porter, M., Gadd, D., 2002. The relationships
lP

between stocking density and welfare in farmed rainbow trout. J. Fish Biol. 61, 493–531.
na

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2002.tb00893.x.

Erikson, U., Misimi, E., 2008. Atlantic salmon skin and fillet color changes effected by perimortem
ur

handling stress, rigor mortis, and ice storage. J. Food Sci. 73, C50–C59.
Jo

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00617.x.

Elumalai, S.D., Shaw, A.M., Pattillo, D.A., Currey, C.J., Rosentrater, K.A., Xie, K., 2017. Influence

of UV Treatment on the food safety status of a model aquaponic system. Water 9, 27.

https://doi.org/10.3390/w9010027.

Forchino, A.A., Lourguioui, H., Brigolin, D., Pastres, R., 2017. Aquaponics and sustainability: The

comparison of two different aquaponics techniques using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA),

Aquacult. Eng. 77, 80–88. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2017.03.002.

 Journal Pre-proof

Gichana, Z.M., Liti, D., Waidbacher, H., Zollitsch, W., Drexler, S., Waikibia, J., 2018. Waste

management in recirculating aquaculture system through bacteria dissimilation and plant

assimilation. Aquac. Int. 26, 1541–1572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-018-0303-x.

Giménez, B., Roncales, P., Beltran, J.A., 2002. Modified atmosphere packaging of filleted rainbow

trout. J. Sci. Food Agric. 82, 1154–1159. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.1136.

Goddek, S., Delaide, B., Mankasingh, U., Ragnarsdottir, K.V., Jijakli, H., Thorarinsdottir, R., 2015.

Challenges of sustainable and commercial aquaponics. Sustainability 7, 4199–4224.

https://doi.org/10.3390/su7044199.

of
Grigorakis, K., Taylor, K.D.A., Alexis, M.N., 2003. Seasonal patterns of spoilage of ice-stored

ro
cultured gilthead sea bream (Sparus -p aurata). Food Chem. 81, 263–268.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(02)00421-1.
re
Hoyle, I., Oidtmann, B., Ellis, T., Turnbull, J., North, B., Nikolaidis, J., Knowles, T.G., 2007. A

validated macroscopic key to assess fin damage in farmed rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).
lP

Aquaculture 270, 142–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.03.037.

na

Hussain, T., Verma, A.K., Tiwari, V.K., Prakash, C., Rathore, G., Shete, A.P., Nuwansi, K.K.T.,

2014. Optimizing koi carp, Cyprinus carpio var. koi (Linnaeus, 1758), stocking density and
ur

nutrient recycling with spinach in an aquaponic system. J. World Aquacult. Soc. 45, 652–661.
Jo

https://doi.org/10.1111/jwas.12159.

Jouki, M., Mortazavi, S.A., Yazdi, F.T., Koocheki, A., Khazaei, N., 2014. Use of quince seed

mucilage edible films containing natural preservatives to enhance physico-chemical quality of

rainbow trout fillets during cold storage. Food Sci. Human Wellness 3, 65–72.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fshw.2014.05.002.

König, B., Janker, J., Reinhardt, T., Villarroel, M., Junge, R., 2018. Analysis of aquaponics as an

emerging technological innovation system. J. Clean Prod. 180, 232–243.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.037.
 Journal Pre-proof

Kroupova, H., Machova, J., Piackova, V., Blahhova, J., Dobsikova, R., Novotny, L., Svobodova,

Z., 2008. Effects of subchronic nitrite exposure on rainbow trout (Onchorhynus mykiss). Ecotox.

Environ. Safe. 71, 813–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2008.01.015.

Lennard, W.A., Leonard, B.V., 2006. A comparison of three different hydroponic sub-systems

(gravel bed, floating and nutrient film technique) in an aquaponic test system. Aquac. Int. 14,

539–550. https://10.1007/s10499-006-9053-2.

Lennard, W., Ward, J., 2019. A Comparison of plant growth rates between an NFT hydroponic

system and an NFT aquaponic system. Horticulturae 5, 27.

of
https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae5020027.

ro
Li, D., Liu, Z., Xie, C., 2012. Effect of stocking density on growth and serum concentrations of
-p
thyroid hormones and cortisol in Amur sturgeon, Acipenser schrenckii. Fish Physiol. Biochem.
re
38, 511–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-011-9531-y.

Li, X., Li, J., Zhu, J., Wang, Y., Fu, L., Xuan, W., 2011. Postmortem changes in yellow grouper
lP

(Epinephelus awoara) fillets stored under vacuum packaging at 0 °C. Food Chem. 126, 896–901.
na

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.11.071.

Love, D.C., Fry, J.P., Li, X., Hill, E.S., Genello, L., Semmens, K., Thompson, R.E., 2015.
ur

Commercial aquaponics production and profitability: Findings from an international survey.

Jo

Aquaculture 435, 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.09.023.

Luxinger, A.O., Cavali, J., Porto, M.O., Sales-Neto, H.M., Lago, A.A., Freitas, R.T.F., 2018.

Morphometric measurements applied in the evaluation of Arapaima gigas body components.

Aquaculture 489, 80–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.01.044.

Maucieri, C., Nicoletto, C., Junge, R., Schmautz, Z., Sambo, P., Borin, M., 2018. Hydroponic

systems and water management in aquaponics: a review. Ital. J. Agron. 13, 1–11.

https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3671.

Maucieri, C., Nicoletto, C., Zanin, G., Birolo, M., Trocino, A., Sambo, P., Borin, M., Xiccato, G.,

2019. Effect of stocking density of fish on water quality and growth performance of European
 Journal Pre-proof

Carp and leafy vegetables in a low-tech aquaponic system. PLoS One 14, e0217561.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217561.

Mokrani, D., Oumouna, M., Cuesta, A., 2018. Fish farming conditions affect to European sea bass

(Dicentrarchus labrax L.) quality and shelf life during storage in ice. Aquaculture 490, 120–124.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.02.032.

Monsees, H., Kloas, W., Wuertz, S., Cao, X., Zhang, L., Liu, X., 2017. Decoupled systems on trial:

eliminating bottlenecks to improve aquaponic processes. PLoS One 12, e0183056.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183056.

of
Monsees, H., Suhl, J., Paul, M., Kloas, W., Dannehl, D., Wϋrtz, S., 2019. Lettuce (Lactuca sativa,

ro
variety Salanova) production in decoupled aquaponic systems: Same yield and similar quality as
-p
in conventional hydroponic systems but drastically reduced greenhouse gas emissions by saving
re
inorganic fertilizer. PLoS One 14, e0218368. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218368.

Mori, J., Smith, R., 2019. Transmission of waterborne fish and plant pathogens in aquaponics and
lP

their control with physical disinfection and filtration: A systematized review. Aquaculture 504,
na

380–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.02.009.

Naderi, M., Keyvanshokooh, S., Salati, A.P., Ghaedi, A., 2017. Effects of chronic high stocking
ur

density on liver proteome of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Fish Physiol. Biochem.
Jo

43(5), 1373–1385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-017-0378-8.

Ni, M., Wen, H., Li, J., Chi, M., Bu, Y., Ren, Y., Zhang, M., Song, Z., Ding, H., 2016. Effects of

stocking density on mortality, growth and physiology of juvenile Amur sturgeon (Acipenser

schrenckii). Aquac. Res. 47, 1596–1604. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.12620.

Ninan, G., Lalitha, K.V., Zynudheen, A.A,. Joseph, J., 2011. Effect of chilling on microbiological,

biochemical and sensory attributes of whole aquacultured rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss

Walbaum, 1792). J. Aquac. Res. Dev. S5:001. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9546.S5-001.

 Journal Pre-proof

North, B.P., Turnbull, J.F., Ellis, T., Porter, M.J., Migaud, H., Bron, J., Bromage, N.R., 2006. The

impact of stocking density on the welfare of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquaculture

255, 466–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.01.004.

Palm, H.W., Knaus, U., Appelbaum, S., Strauch, S.M., Kotzen, B., 2019. Coupled aquaponics

systems, in: Goddek, S., Joyce, A., Kotzen, B., Burnell, G.M. (Eds.), Aquaponics food

productions systems. Combined aquaculture and hydroponic production technologies for the

future. Springer Nature Switzerland AG., Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland, pp. 163–

199. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15943-6.

of
Palm, H.W., Knaus, U., Appelbaum, S., Goddek, S., Strauch, S.M., Vermulen, T., Haїssam Jijakli,

ro
M., Kotzen, B., 2018. Towards commercial aquaponics: a review of systems, designs, scales and
-p
nomenclature. Aquacult. Int. 26, 813–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-018-0249-z.
re
Palm, H.W., Seidemann, R., Wehofsky, S., Knaus, U., 2014. Significant factors affecting the

economic sustainability of closed aquaponic systems. Part I: system design, chemo-physical

lP

parameters and general aspects. AACL Bioflux 7, 20–32.

na

Pantanella, E., Cardarelli, M., Colla, G., Rea, E., Marcucci, A., 2012. Aquaponics vs. Hydroponics:

production and quality of lettuce crop. Acta Hortic. 927, 887–893.

ur

https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2012.927.109.
Jo

Poli, B.M., 2009. Farmed fish welfare-suffering assessment and impact on product quality. I. J.

Anim. Sci. 8, 139–160. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2009.s1.139.

Qi, C., Xie, C., Tang, R., Qin, X., Wang, D., Li, D., 2016. Effect of stocking density on growth,

physiological responses, and body composition of juvenile blunt snout bream, Megalobrama

amblycephala. J. World Aquac. Soc. 47, 358–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwas.12278.

Rakocy, J.E., Masser, M.P., Losordo, T.M., 2006. Recirculating aquaculture tank production

systems: Aquaponics - integrating fish and plant culture. SRAC Publication. No. 454, South.

Reg. Aquac. Cent. 16 p.

 Journal Pre-proof

Rayhan, M.Z., Rahman, M.A., Hossain, M.A., Akter, T., Akter, T., 2018. Effect of stocking density

on growth performance of monosex tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) with Indian spinach (Basella

alba) in a recirculating aquaponic system. Int. J. Environ. Agric. Biotech. 3, 343–349.

https://doi.org/10.22161/ijeab/3.2.5

Rodríguez, Ó., Barros-Velázquez, J., Piñeirob, C.,. Gallardo, J.M., Aubourg, S., 2006. Effects of

storage in slurry ice on the microbial, chemical and sensory quality and on the shelf life of

farmed turbot (Psetta maxima). Food Chem. 95, 270–278.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.11.054.

of
Sampels, S., 2014. The effects of storage and preservation technologies on the quality of fish

ro
products: a review. J. Food Process. Pres. 39, 1206–1215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.12337.
-p
S.A.S. (Statistical Analysis System Institute, Inc.), 2013. SAS/STAT(R) 9.2 User’s Guide, second
re
ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA. Available at:

http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/63033/HTML/default/viewer.htm#glm_toc.h
lP

tm.
na

Schmautz, Z., Graber, A., Sebastian, J., Goesmann, A., Junge, R., Smits, T.H.M., 2017. Microbial

diversity in different compartments of an aquaponics system. Arch. Microbiol. 199, 613–620.

ur

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-016-1334-1.
Jo

Secci, G., Parisi, G., Meneguz, M., Iaconisi, V., Cornale, P., Macchi, E., Gasco, L., Gai, F., 2018.

Effects of a carbon monoxide stunning method on rigor mortis development, fillet quality and

oxidative stability of tench (Tinca tinca). Aquaculture 493, 233–239.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.05.002.

Somerville, C., Cohen, M., Pantanella, E., Stankus, A., Lovatelli, A., 2014. Small-scale aquaponic

food production. Integrated fish and plant farming. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical

Paper No. 589. Rome, FAO, 2014. 262 p. Available at: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4021e.pdf.

Suárez, M.D., García-Gallego, M., Trenzado, C.E., Guil-Guerrero, J.L., Furné, M., Domezain, A.,

Alba, I., Sanz, A., 2014. Influence of dietary lipids and culture density on rainbow trout
 Journal Pre-proof

(Oncorhynchus mykiss) flesh composition and quality parameter. Aquac. Eng. 63, 16–24.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2014.09.001.

Suhl, J., Dannehl, D., Kloas, W., Baganz, D., Jobs, S., Scheibe, G., Schmidt, U., 2016. Advanced

aquaponics: Evaluation of intensive tomato production in aquaponics vs. conventional

hydroponics. Agric. Water Manag. 178, 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.10.013.

Thorarinsdottir, R.I., 2015. Aquaponics guidelines, University of Iceland: Iceland. Available at:

http://skemman.is/en/stream/get/1946/23343/52997/1/Guidelines_Aquaponics_20151112.pdf.

Van Woensel, L., Archer, G., 2015. Ten technologies which could change our lives. Potential

of
impacts and policy implications. PE 527.417. In: EPRS – European Parliamentary Research

ro
Service. Scientific Foresight Unit -p (STOA), Brussels. Available at:

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_IDA(2017)598626
re
Wang, Y. J., Deering, A.J., Kim, H. J., 2020. The occurrence of shiga toxin-producing E. coli in

aquaponic and hydroponic Systems. Horticulturae 2020, 6, 1.

lP

https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae6010001.
na

Wortman, S.E., 2015. Crop physiological response to nutrient solution electrical conductivity and

pH in an ebb-and-flow hydroponic system. Sci. Hortic. 194, 34–42.

ur

https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.07.045.
Jo

Yildiz, H.Y., Robaina, L., Pirhonen, J., Mente, E., Dominguez, D., Parisi, G., 2017. Fish welfare in

aquaponic systems: its relation to water quality with an emphasis on feed and faeces–A Review.

Water 9, 1–17. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w9010013.

Zahedi, S., Akbarzadeh, A., Mehrzad, J., Noori, A., Harsij, M., 2019. Effect of stocking density on

growth performance, plasma biochemistry and muscle gene expression in rainbow trout

(Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquaculture 498, 271–278.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.07.044.
 Journal Pre-proof

of
ro
Figure 1. Rendering of the aquaponic unit. A, main tank for fish (500 L); B, tanks for
-p
vegetables/biofilters (275 L); C, storage tank for water collection (50 L) and pumping to A tank.
re
lP
na
ur
Jo
 Journal Pre-proof

18.0 ALD AHD HYP 18.0 ALD AHD HYP

16.0 16.0
14.0 14.0
12.0 12.0
10.0 10.0

mg • L-1
°C

8.0 8.0
6.0 6.0
4.0 4.0
2.0 2.0
0.0 0.0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 20 40 60 80 100 120
a) days on trial b) days on trial

of
10.0 ALD AHD HYP 5.0 ALD AHD HYP 100
9.5 4.5 90
9.0 4.0 80

ro

mg • L-1 (hydroponics)
mg • L-1 (aquaponics)
8.5 3.5 70
8.0 3.0 60
7.5
-p 2.5 50
7.0 2.0 40
re
6.5 1.5 30
6.0 1.0 20
lP

5.5 0.5 10
5.0 0.0 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 20 40 60 80 100 120
c) days on trial d) days on trial
na

1.0 ALD AHD HYP 50 1,800 ALD AHD HYP

0.9 45 1,600
ur

0.8 40 1,400
(hydroponics)
mg • L-1 (aquaponics)

0.7 35
1,200
0.6 30
Jo

mg • L-1

1,000
0.5 25
800
0.4 20
• L-1

600
0.3 15
mg

0.2 10 400

0.1 5 200
0.0 0 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 20 40 60 80 100 120
e) days on trial f) days on trial

Figure 2. Temperature (a), dissolved oxygen (b), pH (c), ammonium (d), nitrite (e) and nitrate (f)
values (means ± SE) measured in water of the main tanks with fish during the trial. ALD: aquaponic
system with low stocking density of fish; AHD: aquaponic system with high stocking density of
fish; HYD: hydroponic system.
 Journal Pre-proof

4 4
p = 0.926 p < 0.01

3 3
kg • m-2

kg • m-2
b b
2 2 a

1 1

0 0
a) ALD AHD HYD ALD AHD HYD
b)

Figure 3. Lettuce production in the first cycle (a) and in the second cycle (b). ALD, aquaponic

of
system with low stocking density of fish; AHD: aquaponic system with high stocking density of
fish; HYD: hydroponic system.

ro
-p
re
lP
na
ur
Jo
 Journal Pre-proof

Table 1. Physicochemical traits of water over the experimental period (117 days).

Experimental groups

ALD AHD HYP P-value RMSE

Tanks (n) 3 3 3
Temperature (°C) 10.8 10.8 10.6 0.722 2.0
Dissolved oxygen (mg L-1) 9.58A 8.69B 11.31C <0.001 0.85
pH 7.43B 7.24A 7.25A 0.005 0.45
Chlorophyll (µg L-1) 55.3B 80.2C 14.1A <0.001 38.2
Electrical conductivity (ds cm-1) 1.63A 1.89B 2.81C <0.001 0.20

of
A AB B
Redox potential (mV) 75.2 83.1 90.6 <0.001 24.9

ro
+ -1 Aa Ab B
NH4 (mg L ) 0.55 0.80 21.20 <0.001 13.41
NO2- (mg L-1) 0.07Aa -p 0.18Ab 7.74B <0.001 7.74
NO3- (mg L-1) 314A 417B 1405C <0.001 202
PO43- (mg L-1) 86.3B 106.5C 42.9A <0.001 16.8
re
ALD: aquaponic units at low stocking density of fish; AHD: aquaponic units at high stocking
lP

density of fish; HYP: hydroponic units. RMSE: Root mean square error.
Means with different superscript letters are statistically different (a, b: p < 0.05; A, B: p < 0.01).
na
ur
Jo
 Journal Pre-proof

Table 2. Growth performance of rainbow trout.

Stocking density
ALD AHD P-value RMSE
Total fish per treatment (n) 40 78
Tanks (n) 3 3
Fish weight (g)
0 days 143 140 0.657 6
22 days 170 166 0.726 12
55 days 217 215 0.886 19
84 days 264 256 0.660 20
117 days 333 329 0.871 26
-1
Specific growth rate (% d )

of
0-22 days 0.79 0.76 0.850 0.17
22-55 days 0.74 0.77 0.693 0.08

ro
55-84 days 0.69 0.62 0.298 0.06
84-117 days 0.70
-p 0.76 0.449 0.08
0-117 days 0.72 0.73 0.928 0.04
Feed conversion ratio
re
0-22 days 1.52 1.58 0.868 0.38
22-55 days 1.28 1.14 0.317 0.15
55-84 days 1.84 1.87 0.842 0.20
lP

84-117 days 1.73 1.44 0.255 0.27

0-117 days 1.65 1.51 0.323 0.15
-3
Biomass (kg m )
na

0 days 3.81 7.26 <0.001 0.49

22 days 4.53 8.57 <0.001 0.36
ur

55 days 5.78 11.04 <0.001 0.29

84 days 7.04 13.20 <0.001 0.49
Jo

117 days 8.86 16.94 <0.001 0.51

-3
Biomass growth (kg m )
0-22 days 0.72 1.31 0.031 0.22
22-55 days 1.25 2.47 0.002 0.21
55-84 days 1.26 2.16 0.010 0.24
84-117 days 1.82 3.74 <0.001 0.21
0-117 days 5.05 9.68 <0.001 0.08
ALD: aquaponic units at low stocking density of fish; AHD: aquaponic units at high stocking
density of fish. RMSE: Root mean square error.
 Journal Pre-proof

Table 3. Morphometric indices and slaughter results of rainbow trout.

Stocking density
ALD AHD P-value RMSE
Fish (n) 18 18
Total length (mm) 289 290 0.858 15
Standard length (mm) 250 248 0.797 13
Head length (mm) 61 61 0.644 3
Maximum height (mm) 71 73 0.402 7
Condition factor (%) 1.37 1.35 0.774 0.17
Relative profile 0.25 0.25 0.299 0.02

of
Cranial index 0.21 0.21 0.356 0.01

ro
Carcass weight (g) 287 289 0.881 73
Carcass yield (%) 89.0 89.0 0.825 0.5
-p
Fillet weight (g) 165 160 0.632 32
Fillet yield (%) 49.9 48.3 0.095 2.9
re
ALD: aquaponic units at low stocking density of fish; AHD: aquaponic units at high stocking
lP

density of fish. RMSE: Root mean square error.

na
ur
Jo
 Journal Pre-proof

Table 4. Rigor index and flesh quality measured at different times (1 day and 7 days after slaughter)

in rainbow trout stored in ice (0 to 2°C).

Stocking density (D) ALD AHD P-value

Time (T) 1d 7d 1d 7d D T D×T RMSE

Fish (n) 9 9 9 9
Whole fish
Rigor index (%) 92.4 18.7 89.2 11.6 0.216 <0.001 0.645 0.1
Muscle pH 6.55 6.45 6.54 6.45 0.956 0.014 0.885 0.11
Hardness (N) 25.0 6.9 20.2 6.7 0.279 <0.001 0.329 6.8

of
Cohesiveness 0.82 0.77 0.83 0.71 0.606 0.101 0.457 0.15

ro
Springiness (mm) 0.39 0.34 0.32 0.45 0.902 0.807 0.598 0.47
Chewiness (N mm) 7.74 1.88 5.59
-p 1.28 0.105 <0.001 0.357 2.47
TVB-N (mg 100 g-1) 16.3 16.5 16.9 16.7 0.293 0.931 0.540 1.1
Skin
re
L* 41.0 48.6 37.1 54.8 0.544 <0.001 0.136 12.8
lP

a* 4.06 0.02 3.34 0.11 0.324 <0.001 0.201 0.93

b* 6.94 11.00 7.40 9.03 0.321 0.001 0.117 2.27
Fillets
na

L* 38.3 43.8 39.1 45.0 0.111 <0.001 0.775 1.8

a* -1.71 -1.32 -1.65 -1.06 0.558 0.088 0.724 0.84
ur

b* 9.72 7.58 9.78 8.33 0.402 0.001 0.466 1.42

Jo

ALD: aquaponic units at low stocking density of fish; AHD: aquaponic units at high stocking
density of fish. RMSE: Root mean square error.
 Journal Pre-proof

Table 5. Total viable count, Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas and H2S-producing bacteria (Log10

CFU 20 cm-2) measured at skin level at different times (at slaughter, 0 d, and 7 d after slaughter) in

rainbow trout stored in ice (0 to 2°C).

Stocking density (D) ALD AHD P-value

Time (T) 0d 7d 0d 7d D T D×T RMSE

Total viable count 2.06 2.41 2.59 2.44 0.401 0.982 0.119 0.64
Enterobacteriaceae 0.63 1.00 0.92 0.93 0.665 0.469 0.502 0.78
Pseudomonas 0.39 0.33 0.87 0.74 0.024 0.637 0.846 0.57

of
H2S-producing bacteria 0.41 0.41 0.89 0.82 0.072 0.889 0.890 0.72
ALD: aquaponic units at low stocking density of fish; AHD: aquaponic units at high stocking

ro
density of fish. RMSE: Root mean square error.
-p
re
lP
na
ur
Jo
 Journal Pre-proof

Table 6. Total viable count, Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas (Log10 CFU ml-1) measured in

lettuce at harvesting.

Experimental group
Parameters ALD AHD HYD P-value RMSE
Lettuce
Total viable count 5.41 5.89 5.64 0.536 0.50
Enterobacteriaceae 3.43 2.44 1.98 0.274 1.00
Pseudomonas 6.04 5.70 6.03 0.492 0.38
RMSE: Root mean square error.

of
ro
-p
re
lP
na
ur
Jo
 Journal Pre-proof

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualisation: Marco Birolo, Carmelo Maucieri, Angela Trocino, Gerolamo Xiccato.

Data curation: Marco Birolo.

Formal analysis: Marco Birolo; Francesco Bordignon.

Funding aquisition: Gerolamo Xiccato.

Investigation: Marco Birolo, Francesco Bordignon, Sergio Godoy, Luca Fasolato.

Methodology: Marco Birolo, Carmelo Maucieri, Carlo Nicoletto, Luca Fasolato, Angela Trocino.

Supervision: Angela Trocino, Gerolamo Xiccato.

of
Validation: Luca Fasolato; Angela Trocino, Gerolamo Xiccato.

ro
Writing – original draft: Marco Birolo, Francesco Bordignon, Angela Trocino.
-p
Writing – review & editing: all authors.
re
lP
na
ur
Jo
 Journal Pre-proof

Highlights

 Rainbow trout can be reared in low-tech aquaponics until a final density of 17 kg m-3.

 The increase in the stocking density increased the total fish biomass yield.

 The lettuce yield was similar in the aquaponic and hydroponic systems.

 Quality and food safety of the end-products were guaranteed in the tested aquaponic system.

of
ro
-p
re
lP
na
ur
Jo