Conners 3 Parent Assessment Report

By C. Keith Conners, Ph.D.
Conners 3–Parent
E
Assessment Report
PL
M
SA
This Assessment report is intended for use by qualified assessors only, and is not to be shown or presented
to the respondent or any other unqualified individuals.
Copyright © 2008 Multi-Health Systems Inc. All rights reserved.
P.O. Box 950, North Tonawanda, NY 14120-0950
3770 Victoria Park Ave., Toronto, ON M2H 3M6
Conners 3–P Assessment Report for Rosa J Admin Date: 05/01/2007
Introduction
The Conners 3rd Edition–Parent (Conners 3–P) is an assessment tool used to obtain the parent’s
observations about the youth’s behavior. This instrument is designed to assess Attention
Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and its most common co-morbid problems in children and adolescents
aged 6 to 18 years old. When used in combination with other information, results from the Conners 3–P can
provide valuable information for guiding assessment decisions. This report provides information about the
parent's assessment of the youth, how she compares to other youth, and which scales and subscales are
elevated. See the Conners 3 Manual (published by MHS) for more information.
This computerized report is an interpretive aid and should not be given to clients or be used as the sole
criterion for clinical diagnosis or intervention. Administrators are cautioned against drawing unsupported
interpretations. Combining information from this report with information gathered from other psychometric
measures, interviews, observations, and review of available records will give the assessor or service
E
provider a more comprehensive view of the youth than might be obtained from any one source. This report is
based on an algorithm that produces the most common interpretations for the scores that have been
obtained. Administrators should review the client’s responses to specific items to ensure that these typical
interpretations apply to the youth being described.
Assessment of Validity
Inconsistency Index.
Positive Impression
Raw score = 0 (Probably valid) PL
The following section provides the parent’s scores for the Positive and Negative Impression scales and the
The Positive Impression score does not suggest an overly positive response style.
Negative Impression
Raw score = 0 (Probably valid)
The Negative Impression score does not suggest an overly negative response style.
M
Inconsistency Index
Raw score = 2, Number of absolute differences ≥ 2 = 0 (Probably valid)
The responses to similar items are consistent with one another.
SA
Page 2
Conners 3–P Content Scales: T-scores

The following graph provides T-scores for each of the Conners 3–P Content scales. The error bars on each
bar represent Standard Error of Measurement (SEM). For information on SEM, see the Conners 3 Manual.
E
PL
M
SA
Page 3
Conners 3–P Content Scales: Detailed Scores

The following table summarizes the results of the parent’s assessment of Rosa J and provides general
information about how she compares to the normative group. Please refer to the Conners 3 Manual for more
information on the interpretation of these results. Caution: please note that T-score cutoffs are guidelines
only and may vary depending on the context of the assessment. T-scores from 57–63 should be considered
borderline and of special note, since the assessor must decide (based on other information and knowledge
of the youth) whether or not the concerns in the associated area warrant clinical intervention.
T-score ±
Scale Raw SEM Guideline Common Characteristics of High
Score (Percentile) Scorers
Inattention 19 83 ± 3.4 (97) Very Elevated Score (Many May have poor concentration/attention or
more concerns than are typically difficulty keeping his/her mind on work.
reported) May make careless mistakes. May be
E
easily distracted. May give up easily or be
easily bored. May avoid schoolwork.
Hyperactivity/ 2 42 ± 2.7 (36) Average Score (Typical levels of High activity levels, may be restless
Impulsivity concern) and/or impulsive. May have difficulty being
quiet. May interrupt others. May be easily
excited.
Learning 7 58 ± 4.0 (78) Average Score (Typical levels of Academic struggles (reading, writing,
Problems
Executive
Functioning
Aggression
17
1
PL concern)
78 ± 3.8 (98) Very Elevated Score (Many

and/or math). May have difficulty learning
and/or remembering concepts. May need
extra explanations.
May have difficulty starting or finishing
more concerns than are typically projects, may complete projects at the last
reported) minute. May have poor planning or
organizational skills.
48 ± 3.1 (71) Average Score (Typical levels of Physically and/or verbally aggressive; may
concern) show violent and/or destructive
tendencies. May bully others. May be
argumentative. May have poor control of
anger and/or aggression. May be
M
manipulative or cruel.
Peer Relations 2 54 ± 5.4 (75) Average Score (Typical levels of May have difficulty with friendships, may
concern) have poor social connections. May seem
to be unaccepted by group.
Note: SEM = Standard Error of Measurement
SA
Page 4
DSM-IV-TR Overview
This section of the report provides the following information for each DSM-IV-TR diagnosis on the Conners
3–P:
1. DSM-IV-TR Symptom scales: T-scores

2. DSM-IV-TR Symptom scales: Detailed scores
3. DSM-IV-TR Total Symptom Counts
4. DSM-IV-TR Symptom tables
· Listing of Conners 3–P item(s) that correspond to each DSM-IV-TR Symptom
· Criterion status of each DSM-IV-TR Symptom (i.e., whether or not the symptom is
"indicated," "may be indicated," or "not indicated"). Symptoms marked indicated or may be
indicated are summed to get the Total Symptom Count for that diagnosis. Please refer to
specific DSM-IV-TR Symptom tables for each criterion status and for any exception that
E
may alter the Total Symptom Count. See the Conners 3 Manual for details on how each
criterion status is determined.
Interpretive Considerations
Results from the Conners 3–P are a useful component of DSM-IV-TR based diagnosis, but cannot be
relied upon in isolation. When interpreting the Conners 3–P DSM-IV-TR Symptom scales, the assessor
should take the following important considerations into account. Please refer to the Conners 3 Manual for
PL
further interpretative guidelines.
· The Conners 3–P contains symptom-level criteria, not full diagnostic criteria, for DSM-IV-TR
diagnoses. Additional criteria (e.g., course, age of onset, differential diagnosis, level of impairment,
pervasiveness) must be met before a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis can be assigned.
· The Conners 3–P items are approximations of the DSM-IV-TR Symptoms that are intended to
represent the main clinical construct in a format that most parents can understand. As a result, some
aspects of the DSM-IV-TR criteria may not be fully represented. Before using any diagnostic labels, the
assessor must consider all criteria that are required for a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis, including the
symptoms from the Conners 3–P.
· The Conners 3–P provides information relevant to the DSM-IV-TR diagnoses from two different
perspectives: absolute (Symptom Count) and relative (T-score). Results from the DSM-IV-TR Symptom
M
Counts can contribute to the consideration of whether a particular DSM-IV-TR diagnosis might be
appropriate. A T-score for each DSM-IV-TR diagnosis facilitates comparison of this individual’s
symptoms with his/her peers. At times, there may be discrepancies between the Symptom Count and T-
score for a given diagnosis. This is to be expected, since they are based on different metrics (i.e.,
absolute versus relative). The following points provide some concrete guidelines for the interpretation
of this pair of scores (DSM-IV-TR Symptom Count and T-score).
· Both scores are elevated (i.e., DSM-IV-TR Symptom Count probably met, DSM-IV-TR T-
SA
score ³ 60): This diagnosis should be given strong consideration.

· Both scores are average or below (i.e., DSM-IV-TR Symptom Count probably not met,
DSM-IV-TR T-score < 60): It is unlikely that the diagnosis is currently present (although
criteria may have been met in the past).
· Only Symptom Count is elevated (i.e., DSM-IV-TR Symptom Count probably met, DSM-
IV-TR T-score < 60): Although the absolute DSM-IV-TR symptomatic criteria may have
been met, the current presentation is not atypical for this age and gender. Consider
whether the symptoms are present in excess of developmental expectations (an
important requirement of DSM-IV-TR diagnosis).
· Only T-score is elevated (i.e., DSM-IV-TR Symptom Count probably not met, DSM-IV-TR
T-score ³ 60): Although the current presentation is atypical for the youth's age and
gender, there are not enough symptoms reported to meet DSM-IV-TR symptomatic
criteria for this disorder. Consider alternative explanations for why the T-scores could be
elevated in the absence of this diagnosis (e.g., another diagnosis may be producing
these types of concerns in that particular setting).
Page 5
DSM-IV-TR Symptom Scales: T-scores

The following graph provides T-scores for each of the DSM-IV-TR Symptom scales. The error bars on each
bar represent Standard Error of Measurement for each DSM-IV-TR Symptom scale score.
E
PL
M
DSM-IV-TR Symptom Scales: Detailed Scores
The following table summarizes the results of the parent’s assessment of Rosa J with respect to the DSM-IV-
TR Symptom scales, and provides general information about how she compares to the normative group.
Please refer to the Conners 3 Manual for more information on the interpretation of these results. Caution:
please note that T-score cutoffs are guidelines only and may vary depending on the context of the
SA
assessment. T-scores from 57–63 should be considered borderline and of special note, since the assessor
must decide (based on other information and knowledge of the youth) whether or not the concerns in the
associated area warrant clinical intervention.
T-score ±
Scale Raw SEM Guideline
Score (Percentile)
ADHD Predominantly 22 89 ± 3.3 (98) Very Elevated Score (Many more concerns
Inattentive Type than are typically reported)
ADHD Predominantly 3 45 ± 3.1 (44) Average Score (Typical levels of concern)
Hyperactive-Impulsive Type
Conduct Disorder 0 46 ± 4.8 (33) Average Score (Typical levels of concern)
Oppositional Defiant Disorder 1 44 ± 3.4 (45) Average Score (Typical levels of concern)
Note: SEM = Standard Error of Measurement
Page 6
DSM-IV-TR Total Symptom Counts

The following tables summarize the results of the DSM-IV-TR Symptom scale Total Symptom Counts as
indicated by the Conners 3–P.
Results from the Conners 3–P suggest that the Symptom Count requirements are
probably met for the following DSM-IV-TR diagnoses:
DSM-IV-TR Symptom Count Symptom Count as

DSM-IV-TR Symptom scale
Requirements indicated by Conners 3–P
ADHD Predominantly At least 6 out of 9 symptoms 8
Inattentive Type (ADHD In)
E
Results from the Conners 3–P suggest that the Symptom Count requirements are
probably not met for the following DSM-IV-TR diagnoses:
DSM-IV-TR Symptom Count Symptom Count as
DSM-IV-TR Symptom scale
Requirements indicated by Conners 3–P
ADHD Predominantly At least 6 out of 9 symptoms 0
Hyperactive-Impulsive Type
(ADHD Hyp-Imp)
ADHD Combined Type
Conduct Disorder
PL
Criteria must be met for both ADHD In and ADHD
Hyp-Imp
At least 3 out of 15 symptoms
Oppositional Defiant Disorder At least 4 out of 8 symptoms
ADHD In: 8
ADHD Hyp-Imp: 0
0
0
M
SA
Page 7
DSM-IV-TR Symptom Tables

This section of the report provides information about how the parent rated Rosa J on items that correspond
to the DSM-IV-TR. Please see the DSM-IV-TR Overview section for important information regarding
appropriate use of DSM-IV-TR Symptom Counts.
The following response key applies to all of the tables in this section:
Parent’s Rating: 0 = Not true at all (Never, Seldom); 1 = Just a little true (Occasionally); 2 = Pretty much
true (Often, Quite a bit); 3 = Very much true (Very often, Very frequently); ? = Omitted item.
DSM-IV-TR ADHD Predominantly Inattentive Type

DSM-IV-TR Symptoms: Criterion A Item Parent's Rating Criterion Status
Number 0 1 2 3 ?
A1a. 47 ü Indicated
A1b. 95 ü Indicated
E
A1c. 35 ü Indicated
68 ü
A1d. -and- Indicated
79 ü
A1e. 84 ü Not Indicated
A1f.
A1g.
A1h.
A1i.
PL 28
97
101
2
DSM-IV-TR ADHD Predominantly Hyperactive-Impulsive Type

DSM-IV-TR Symptoms: Criterion A
Hyperactivity
A2a.
Item
Number 0
98 ü
1
ü
ü
ü
ü
Parent's Rating
2 3 ?
May be Indicated
Indicated
Indicated
Indicated
Criterion Status
Not Indicated
M
A2b. 93 ü Not Indicated
69 ü
A2c. -or- Not Indicated
99 ü
A2d. 71 ü Not Indicated
54 ü
A2e. -or- Not Indicated
SA
45 ü
A2f. 3 ü Not Indicated
Impulsivity
A2g. 43 ü Not Indicated
A2h. 61 ü Not Indicated
A2i. 104 ü Not Indicated
DSM-IV-TR ADHD Combined Type

An ADHD Combined Type diagnosis requires the examination of symptoms for ADHD Predominantly
Inattentive Type and for ADHD Predominantly Hyperactive-Impulsive Type. See the ADHD Predominantly
Inattentive Type and ADHD Predominantly Hyperactive-Impulsive Type symptom tables above. Please also
see the DSM-IV-TR or the Conners 3 Manual for additional guidance.
Page 8
DSM-IV-TR Conduct Disorder

DSM-IV-TR Symptoms: Criterion A Item Parent's Rating Criterion Status
Number 0 1 2 3 ?
A1. 16 ü Not Indicated
E
A15.
A1.
A2.
A3.
A4.
PL
DSM-IV-TR Oppositional Defiant Disorder
DSM-IV-TR Symptoms: Criterion A
6
Item
Number 0
14
102
94
59
ü
ü
ü
1
ü
Parent's Rating
2 3 ?
Not Indicated
Criterion Status
Not Indicated
Not Indicated
Not Indicated
Not Indicated
M
SA
Page 9
Impairment
The parent’s report of Rosa J’s level of impairment in academic, social, and home settings is presented
below.
Not true at Just a little Pretty much Very much
all/never true/occasionally true/often true/very often
Academic
Rosa J’s parent indicated that Rosa J’s problems seriously affect her schoolwork or grades often (score of 2).
Social
Rosa J’s parent indicated that Rosa J’s problems seriously affect her friendships and relationships occasionally
E
(score of 1).
Home
Rosa J’s parent indicated that Rosa J’s problems seriously affect her home life occasionally (score of 1).
PL
M
SA
Page 10
Conners 3 Index Scores

The following section describes the results for the two index scores on the Conners 3–P.
Conners 3 ADHD Index

The following graph summarizes the parent’s ratings of Rosa J with respect to the Conners 3 ADHD Index.
E
Among ADHD and general population cases, individuals with ADHD obtained this score 82% of the time.
Based on this metric, a classification of ADHD is strongly indicated, but other clinically relevant information
should also be carefully considered in the assessment process. Please see the Conners 3 Manual for further
PL
information about interpretation.
Conners 3 Global Index

The following section summarizes the parent’s ratings of Rosa J with respect to the Conners 3 Global Index
(Conners 3GI). High scores on the Conners 3GI may describe a youth who is moody and emotional, or
restless, impulsive, or inattentive. The error bars on each bar represent Standard Error of Measurement
(SEM). For information on SEM, see the Conners 3 Manual.
M
T-score = 51 (Raw score = 5, Percentile = 64, SEM = 3.6)
SA
Average Score (Typical levels of concern).
Page 11
Anxiety Screener Items

The following table displays the results from the parent’s observations of Rosa J’s behavior with regards to
specific items that are related to generalized anxiety.
Guideline based on the parent’s ratings to these items: No need for further investigation is indicated
Item Item Content Parent's Rating
Number 0 1 2 3 ?
4 Worries ü
20 Trouble controlling worries ü
70 Nervous or jumpy ü
100 Irritable when anxious ü
E
Parent’s Rating: 0 = Not true at all (Never, Seldom); 1 = Just a little true (Occasionally); 2 = Pretty much true (Often,
Quite a bit); 3 = Very much true (Very often, Very frequently); ? = Omitted item.
Depression Screener Items

The following table displays the results from the parent’s observations of Rosa J’s behavior with regards to
Item
Number
17
66
82
103
Item Content
Worthlessness
Tired; low energy
PL
specific items that are related to depression.
Guideline based on the parent’s ratings to these items: No need for further investigation is indicated
Loss of interest or pleasure

Sad, gloomy, or irritable
0
ü
ü
ü
ü
Parent's Rating
1 2 3 ?
M
SA
Page 12
Severe Conduct Critical Items

The following table displays the parent’s observations of Rosa J’s behavior with regards to several Severe
Conduct Critical items. Endorsement of any Critical item indicates the need for immediate follow-up.
Item Item Content Parent's Rating Recommendation
Number 0 1 2 3 ?
ü No need for further
11 Forced sex
investigation is indicated
27 Uses a weapon
41 Cruel to animals
E
78 Fire setting
89 Breaking and entering
96 Confrontational stealing
Additional Questions
Number
109
110
PL
The following section displays additional comments from the parent about Rosa J.
Item Item Content Parent’s Rating
Additional concerns about your child This item was omitted.

Child's strengths or skills This item was omitted.
M
SA
Page 13
Conners 3–P Results and IDEA

The Conners 3–P provides information that may be useful to consider when determining whether a student
is eligible for special education and related services under current U.S. federal statutes, such as the
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA 2004).
Elevated scores on the Conners 3–P may indicate the need for special education and related services. The
following table summarizes areas of IDEA 2004 eligibility that are typically listed for children and
adolescents who have elevated scores on various portions of the Conners 3–P. Checkmarks indicate which
areas of the Conners 3–P were indicated or endorsed, suggesting possible consideration of IDEA 2004
eligibility in related areas. The information in this table is based on the IDEA 2004 and general
interpretation/application of this federal law. Specific state and local education agencies may have specific
requirements that supersede these recommendations. The assessor is encouraged to consult local policies
that may impact decision making. Remember that elevated scores or even a diagnosis is not sufficient
E
justification for IDEA 2004 eligibility. Finally, keep in mind that the IDEA 2004 clearly indicates that
categorization is not required for provision of services. Please see the Conners 3 Manual for further
discussion of the IDEA 2004 and its relation to the Conners 3–P content.
Content Areas Follow-up Possible IDEA Eligibility Category

Recommended
Conners 3–P Content Scales
Inattention
Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Learning Problems
Executive Functioning
Aggression
Peer Relations
DSM-IV-TR Symptom Scales

PL
ADHD Predominantly Inattentive Type
ü
ü
ED, LD, OHI
DD-Emotional , ED, OHI
LD
LD, OHI
DD-Emotional, ED
Autism, DD-Communication, DD-Emotional,
DD-Social, ED
ED, LD, OHI

M
ADHD Predominantly Hyperactive-Impulsive Type ED, OHI
ADHD Combined Type ED, LD, OHI
Conduct Disorder ED
Oppositional Defiant Disorder ED
Screener Items
Anxiety ED
SA
Depression ED
Critical Items
Severe Conduct ED
DD=Developmental Delay, ED=Emotional Disturbance, LD=Specific Learning Disability; OHI=Other Health Impairment.
Note: The category of Developmental Delay only applies to children through age 9 years.
Page 14
Item Responses
The parent entered the following response values for the items on the Conners 3–P.
E
PL
M
SA
Response Key:
0 = In the past month, this was not true at all. It never (or seldom) happened.
1 = In the past month, this was just a little true. It happened occasionally.
2 = In the past month, this was pretty much true. It happened often (or quite a bit).
3 = In the past month, this was very much true. It happened very often (very frequently).
? = Omitted Item
Date printed: March 20, 2008

End of Report
Page 15
Conners 3rd Edition

Feedback Handout for Parent Ratings
Child's Name/ID: Rosa J
Child's Age: 7
Date of Assessment: May 01, 2007
Parent's Name: Mrs. J
Assessor's Name:
This feedback handout explains scores from parent ratings of this youth’s behaviors and feelings as
E
assessed by the Conners 3–Parent form (Conners 3–P). This section of the report may be given to
parents (caregivers) or to a third party upon parental consent.
What is the Conners 3?
The Conners 3 is a set of rating scales that are used to gather information about the behaviors and feelings
of children and adolescents. These rating scales can be completed by parents, teachers, and youth. The
Conners 3 forms were developed by Dr. Conners, an expert in child and adolescent behavior, and are used
PL
all over the world to assess youth from many cultures. Research has shown that the Conners 3 scales are
reliable and valid, which means that you can trust the scores that are produced by the parent’s ratings.
Why do parents complete the Conners 3?
Information from parents (or guardians) about their child’s behavior and feelings is extremely important, as
parents generally know their child better than anyone else. Parents can describe their child’s behaviors in a
number of different situations, including the home and community.
The most common reason for using the Conners 3 is to better understand a youth who is having difficulty,
and to determine how to help. The Conners 3 can also be used to make sure that treatment services are
helping, or to see if the youth is improving. Sometimes the Conners 3 is used for a routine check, even if
there is no reason to suspect the youth is struggling with a problem. If you are not sure why you were asked
M
to complete the Conners 3, please ask the assessor listed at the top of this feedback form.
How does the Conners 3 work?
The parent read 110 items and decided how well each statement described Rosa J, or how often Rosa J
displayed each behavior in the past month (“Not at all/never,” “Just a little true/occasionally,” “Pretty much
true/often,” or “Very much true/very frequently”). The parent’s responses to these 110 statements were
combined into several groups of items. Each group of items describes a certain type of behavior (for
example, inattention, aggression). The parent’s responses were compared with what is expected for 7-year-
SA
old girls. The scores for each group of items show how similar Rosa J is to her peers. This information helps
the assessor know if Rosa J is having more difficulty in a certain area than 7-year-old girls.
Results from the Conners 3–Parent Form
The assessor who asked the parent to complete the Conners 3 will help explain these results and answer
any questions you might have. Remember, these scores were calculated from how the parent described
Rosa J in the past month. The parent ratings help the assessor know how Rosa J acts at home and in the
community. The results from parent ratings on the Conners 3 should be combined with other important
information, such as interviews with Rosa J and her parent, other test results, and observations of Rosa J.
All of the combined information is used to determine if Rosa J needs help in a certain area and what kind of
help is needed.
As you go through the results, it is very helpful to share any additional insights that you might have, make
notes, and freely discuss the results with the assessor. If the scores do not make sense to you, you should
let the assessor know so that you can discuss other possible explanations.
Page 1
The parent’s responses to the 110 items were combined into groups of possible problem areas. The
following table lists the main topics covered by the Conners 3–Parent form. These scores were compared
with other 7-year-old girls. This table gives you information about whether the parent described typical or
average levels of concern (that is, “not an area of concern”) or if the parent described “more concerns than
average” for 7-year-old girls. This table also gives you a short description of the types of difficulties that are
included in each possible problem area. Rosa J may not show all of the problems in an area; it is possible to
have “more concerns than average” even if only some of the problems are happening. It is also possible that
a parent may have described typical or average levels of concern, even if Rosa J is showing some of the
problems in an area.
It is important to discuss these results with the assessor listed at the top of this feedback handout. This
feedback handout describes results only from the Conners 3–Parent form. A checkmark in the “more
concerns than average” box does not necessarily mean that Rosa J has a serious problem and is in need of
treatment. Conners 3 results must be combined with information from other sources and be confirmed by a
qualified clinician before a conclusion is made that an actual problem exists.
E
Inattention
More concerns than
Not an area of concern Problems that may exist if there are more concerns than
average
(good/average score) average
(elevated score)
Poor concentration and attention, difficulty keeping his/her mind on
Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Not an area of concern
(good/average score)
ü
average
PL ü
More concerns than
(elevated score)
work, careless mistakes, easily distracted; gives up easily; easily
bored; avoids schoolwork.
Problems that may exist if there are more concerns than

average
High activity levels, restless and/or impulsive; difficulty being quiet;
interrupts others; easily excited.
M
Learning Problems
More concerns than
average
(elevated score)
Academic struggles; difficulty learning/remembering concepts;
ü needs extra instructions; struggles with reading, spelling, and/or
math.
SA
Executive Functioning
More concerns than
average
(elevated score)
Difficulty starting or finishing projects; completes projects at the last
ü minute; poor planning, prioritizing, or organizational skills.
Peer Relations
More concerns than
average
(elevated score)
Difficulty with friendships; poor social skills; seems to be unaccepted
ü by group.
Page 2
Aggression
More concerns than
average
(elevated score)
Physically and/or verbally aggressive; violent behaviors, including
ü bullying or destructive tendencies; argumentative; poor control of
anger/aggression; manipulative or cruel.
Oppositional Behavior
More concerns than
average
(elevated score)
ü Oppositional, hostile, defiant behaviors.
E
Conduct Problems
More concerns than
average
(elevated score)
Aggression; cruelty; destruction of property; deceitfulness; theft;
Validity
ü
results with you.
Additional Topics for Discussion

PL serious rule-breaking behaviors.
Information about the validity of the Conners 3 results should be considered when the assessor reviews the
In addition to the results described above, some of the parent’s responses on the Conners 3 suggest that it
is important to consider the following areas for further evaluation of Rosa J. Please ask the assessor listed
at the top of this form to discuss these areas with you.
M
· Features that are commonly seen in youth with inattention, hyperactivity, and/or impulsivity
When asked to rate whether the problems described on the Conners 3 Parent form affected the
youth’s functioning, the parent responded:
The parent indicated that Rosa J’s problems often seriously affect her schoolwork or grades.
The parent indicated that Rosa J’s problems occasionally seriously affect her friendships and relationships.
SA
The parent indicated that Rosa J’s problems occasionally seriously affect her home life.
Page 3
Assessor comments:
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
E
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
PL
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
M
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
SA
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
Page 4

Conners 3 Parent Assessment Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Conners 3 Parent Assessment Report

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Conners 3 Parent Assessment Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

By C. Keith Conners, Ph.D.

Copyright © 2008 Multi-Health Systems Inc. All rights reserved.

Conners 3–P Content Scales: T-scores

Copyright © 2008 Multi-Health Systems Inc. All rights reserved.

Conners 3–P Content Scales: Detailed Scores

78 ± 3.8 (98) Very Elevated Score (Many

Copyright © 2008 Multi-Health Systems Inc. All rights reserved.

1. DSM-IV-TR Symptom scales: T-scores

score ³ 60): This diagnosis should be given strong consideration.

Copyright © 2008 Multi-Health Systems Inc. All rights reserved.

DSM-IV-TR Symptom Scales: T-scores

Copyright © 2008 Multi-Health Systems Inc. All rights reserved.

DSM-IV-TR Total Symptom Counts

DSM-IV-TR Symptom Count Symptom Count as

Copyright © 2008 Multi-Health Systems Inc. All rights reserved.

DSM-IV-TR Symptom Tables

DSM-IV-TR ADHD Predominantly Inattentive Type

DSM-IV-TR ADHD Predominantly Hyperactive-Impulsive Type

DSM-IV-TR ADHD Combined Type

Copyright © 2008 Multi-Health Systems Inc. All rights reserved.

DSM-IV-TR Conduct Disorder

Copyright © 2008 Multi-Health Systems Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2008 Multi-Health Systems Inc. All rights reserved.

Conners 3 Index Scores

Conners 3 ADHD Index

Conners 3 Global Index

Average Score (Typical levels of concern).

Copyright © 2008 Multi-Health Systems Inc. All rights reserved.

Anxiety Screener Items

Depression Screener Items

Loss of interest or pleasure

Copyright © 2008 Multi-Health Systems Inc. All rights reserved.

Severe Conduct Critical Items

Additional concerns about your child This item was omitted.

Copyright © 2008 Multi-Health Systems Inc. All rights reserved.

Conners 3–P Results and IDEA

Content Areas Follow-up Possible IDEA Eligibility Category

DSM-IV-TR Symptom Scales

ED, LD, OHI

Copyright © 2008 Multi-Health Systems Inc. All rights reserved.

Date printed: March 20, 2008

Copyright © 2008 Multi-Health Systems Inc. All rights reserved.

Conners 3rd Edition

Copyright © 2008 Multi-Health Systems Inc. All rights reserved.

More concerns than

Problems that may exist if there are more concerns than

Copyright © 2008 Multi-Health Systems Inc. All rights reserved.

results with you.

Additional Topics for Discussion

Copyright © 2008 Multi-Health Systems Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2008 Multi-Health Systems Inc. All rights reserved.

You might also like