MjgotlvOTNa4KLZbzpzW2Q BF C3 W4 Biases and Forecasting

Business Forecasting
Biases and Forecasting

Problems in Judgmental
Forecasting
Although judgmental methods have relative merit in
certain circumstances there are also problems
These problems can lead to biases and hence systematic

inaccuracies in forecasting
Some biases are due to individual judgment and psychology

(eg. Sales Force forecasts)
Others are related to group biases with forecasts derived from

group input/interaction (Jury of Executive Opinion)
In addition political and organisational issues may lead to

systematic biases
Judgmental Biases- Individual
Research indicates that individual’s decision making
processes and judgments (including forecasts) can be
influenced by psychology, personality, physiology, and
circumstance
These factors can influence the accuracy of judgments made by

influencing the selection of relevant information from
available information, the weighting applied to that information
and subsequent forecasts
Two individuals presented with the same available

information may produce widely differing judgmental
forecasts
How good is your Judgment?
Which is the larger inner Circle?

Which line is Longest?
Centred?
Further Judgment Exercise
Please count the number of times the letter F appears in the
following sentence:
FINISHED FILES ARE THE RESULT OF YEARS OF

SCIENTIFIC STUDY
COMBINED WITH THE EXPERIENCE OF YEARS.
FINISHED FILES ARE THE RESULT OF YEARS OF

SCIENTIFIC STUDY
COMBINED WITH THE EXPERIENCE OF YEARS.
Judgmental Biases-
Individual
Further issues arise because of inconsistency in decision making
for a given individual over many almost identical decision
situations
People are often unable or unwilling to apply the same

criteria or procedures when making similar decisions
Inconsistency may be due to forgetfulness, mood, boredom,

novelty-seeking, or belief conditions have changed when
they haven’t
Research indicates a given individual can make widely varying

decisions using almost identical information depending on
circumstances
Other Problems and Biases
Recency – remembering recent events more vividly, which
consequently influences our judgement more greatly than less
recent events
Beliefs about Information:
1. Belief that the more information we have, the more

accurate our decision will be. Empirical evidence does not
support such a belief. More information increases our confidence
that we are right without necessarily improving accuracy
2. Belief that we can discriminate between useful and

irrelevant information. Empirical evidence indicates that is
rarely the case.
Interpretation of Information
Given the inability to discriminate between useful and irrelevant
information, often irrelevant information is used in
making decisions. This decreases decision-making
accuracy
Most people seem to weight ‘verbal’ information more

heavily than numbers or statistical information and tend to
include qualitative information (that is often irrelevant) in
preference to quantitative information (that is often relevant)
Our system of learning is biased towards analysis of verbal,

oral and aural cues and against mathematical and other
objective information
Consider this Exercise
Linda is 31 years old, single, outspoken and very bright. She
majored in philosophy. As a student, she was deeply
concerned with issues of discrimination and social justice,
and also participated in antinuclear demonstrations.
Which of these two alternatives is more probable?
(a)Linda is a bank teller
(b) Linda is a bank teller and active in the feminist

movement
Which alternative would you choose?
Conjunction Fallacy
Assume you chose (b), just as most subjects - 80% to 90% - in

previous experiments did
Tversky and Kahneman (1983) argue: (b) is the conjunction of

two facts, namely that Linda is a bank teller and is active in the
feminist movement, whereas (a) is one of the conjuncts
Since the probability of a conjunction cannot be greater

than that of one of its conjuncts, the correct answer is (a), not
(b).
Therefore, your judgment is recorded as an instance of a

celebrated reasoning error, known as the conjunction fallacy
Judgmental Biases - Group
Evidence suggests that group decision making amplifies biases
because of organisational issues, politics, personality,
psychology and circumstances
Typically, responsibility for the decisions taken cannot be

attributed to any single individual possibly influencing
accountability and decision making input and process
Herding behaviour and group-think are particular problems

that may bias decisions
Issues of power and conflict are possibly relevant

Group-think
Group-think is a concept which suggests that individuals will
behave and react differently to stimulii if in a group
situation
Decision processes within groups may bias judgments leading

to inaccuracy of decisions and forecasts
Group-think may be a political phenomenon or a reflection of

personality of team members
Group-think is exacerbated when there is high group

cohesiveness and insulation
Also exacerbated if there is dominant leadership and

power/conflict issues within the group.
Accuracy Of Judgmental
Forecasts – Financial Markets
Financial Markets - Graham and Harvey (1995)
Only 22.8% of investment newsletters have average returns
higher than a passive portfolio of equity and cash with the
same volatility
Poor performance more persistent than good performance
Found no evidence investment letters have any knowledge

over and above common levels of predictability. Very few
investment letters can ‘beat’ S&P 500.
Few can beat the market forecast derived from a statistical

representation of publicly available information
There is no evidence that the letters can time the market

(forecast direction of the market) Investment letter
‘winners’ rarely win again and ‘losers’ often again
Forecast “Gurus”
Some investment gurus have outperformed the market but
they represent a tiny exception to the rule;
Past above-average performance does not indicate such

performance will continue in the future
All evidence points to the one conclusion;
All markets where information is widely disseminated and that

cannot be influenced by a few players makes it impossible to
predict them accurately other than by using today’s price
as the best possible forecast (naïve)

MjgotlvOTNa4KLZbzpzW2Q BF C3 W4 Biases and Forecasting

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

MjgotlvOTNa4KLZbzpzW2Q BF C3 W4 Biases and Forecasting

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

MjgotlvOTNa4KLZbzpzW2Q BF C3 W4 Biases and Forecasting

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Business Forecasting

Biases and Forecasting

These problems can lead to biases and hence systematic

Some biases are due to individual judgment and psychology

Others are related to group biases with forecasts derived from

In addition political and organisational issues may lead to

These factors can influence the accuracy of judgments made by

Two individuals presented with the same available

Which is the larger inner Circle?

FINISHED FILES ARE THE RESULT OF YEARS OF

FINISHED FILES ARE THE RESULT OF YEARS OF

People are often unable or unwilling to apply the same

Inconsistency may be due to forgetfulness, mood, boredom,

Research indicates a given individual can make widely varying

Beliefs about Information:

1. Belief that the more information we have, the more

2. Belief that we can discriminate between useful and

Most people seem to weight ‘verbal’ information more

Our system of learning is biased towards analysis of verbal,

Which of these two alternatives is more probable?

(a)Linda is a bank teller

(b) Linda is a bank teller and active in the feminist

Assume you chose (b), just as most subjects - 80% to 90% - in

Tversky and Kahneman (1983) argue: (b) is the conjunction of

Since the probability of a conjunction cannot be greater

Therefore, your judgment is recorded as an instance of a

Typically, responsibility for the decisions taken cannot be

Herding behaviour and group-think are particular problems

Issues of power and conflict are possibly relevant

Decision processes within groups may bias judgments leading

Group-think may be a political phenomenon or a reflection of

Group-think is exacerbated when there is high group

Also exacerbated if there is dominant leadership and

Poor performance more persistent than good performance

Found no evidence investment letters have any knowledge

Few can beat the market forecast derived from a statistical

There is no evidence that the letters can time the market

Past above-average performance does not indicate such

All evidence points to the one conclusion;

All markets where information is widely disseminated and that

You might also like