Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 35 views

    Rubric For Final Proposal Defense

    Uploaded by

    John Michael
    This document contains a scoring guide for final defense of inquiries, investigations, and immersions research papers and presentations at Quezon Hill National High School Senior High School. The scoring guide contains criteria for evaluating the research manuscript (grammar, organization, citations), proposal defense presentation (organization, content, delivery), and question and answer portion (knowledge, justification, teamwork). Sections are scored from 1 to 4, with scores being totaled out of 80 for the research manuscript and 40 for the proposal defense. Space for evaluator comments is also included.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Rubric For Final Proposal Defense

    Uploaded by

    John Michael
    35 views2 pages
    This document contains a scoring guide for final defense of inquiries, investigations, and immersions research papers and presentations at Quezon Hill National High School Senior High School. The scoring guide contains criteria for evaluating the research manuscript (grammar, organization, citations), proposal defense presentation (organization, content, delivery), and question and answer portion (knowledge, justification, teamwork). Sections are scored from 1 to 4, with scores being totaled out of 80 for the research manuscript and 40 for the proposal defense. Space for evaluator comments is also included.

    Original Title

    Rubric-for-Final-Proposal-Defense

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains a scoring guide for final defense of inquiries, investigations, and immersions research papers and presentations at Quezon Hill National High School Senior High School. The scoring guide contains criteria for evaluating the research manuscript (grammar, organization, citations), proposal defense presentation (organization, content, delivery), and question and answer portion (knowledge, justification, teamwork). Sections are scored from 1 to 4, with scores being totaled out of 80 for the research manuscript and 40 for the proposal defense. Space for evaluator comments is also included.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    35 views2 pages

    Rubric For Final Proposal Defense

    Uploaded by

    John Michael
    This document contains a scoring guide for final defense of inquiries, investigations, and immersions research papers and presentations at Quezon Hill National High School Senior High School. The scoring guide contains criteria for evaluating the research manuscript (grammar, organization, citations), proposal defense presentation (organization, content, delivery), and question and answer portion (knowledge, justification, teamwork). Sections are scored from 1 to 4, with scores being totaled out of 80 for the research manuscript and 40 for the proposal defense. Space for evaluator comments is also included.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    QUEZON HILL NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

    Senior High School


    Second Semester
    AY 2022-2023

    FINAL DEFENSE
    Inquiries Investigation and Immersion
    Research Paper and Defense Scoring Guide

    SECTION: _______________________ DATE: ___________________


    WORKING TITLE: ______________________________________________________________________________
    ______________________________________________________________________________
    AUTHORS:

    Part I: The Research Manuscript


    Excellent (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Poor (1)
    Described indicators Described indicators Described indicators Described indicators
    were shown were shown noticeably were shown vaguely and were shown indefinitely
    exceptionally and were and were somewhat were slightly and were hardly
    absolutely appropriate in appropriate in relation to appropriate in relation to appropriate in relation to
    the study. the study. the study.
    relation to the study.

    PART 1 (Overall Paper Impression) 1 2 3 4


    1. Grammar and Vocabulary
    2. Cohesion and Coherence of Literatures
    3. Clarity and Organization of Content
    4. General Knowledge (Connection to the Field of Specialization)
    5. Topic is relevant to strand chosen
    PART 2 (Introduction)
    1. Proper Definitions of Terms
    2. Bulk of Literatures are enough to create a proper topic foundation and
    proper citations
    3. Current body of knowledge are discussed properly from an international to
    local perspective
    4. The Statement of the Problem or Objective is clear and definite
    5. The study has novelty and is significant for the needs of the current body of
    knowledge
    PART 3 (Methodologies)
    1. The research design is properly discussed with proper citations
    2. The Population and/or Study Site is clearly defined and described in full
    detail
    3. The sampling procedure is thoroughly described.
    4. Thorough discussion of the data gathering or data collection procedure
    5. Instrument and/or intervention is described and defended.
    PART 4 (Citations and References)
    1.Complete entries
    2.Citations match references
    3.Followed proper format (APA 7th ed.)
    4.Refences are presented in alphabetical order
    5.There is sufficient citations and references
    SCORING(to be filled up by the panel )
    Number of Marks
    Multiplied by the column score 1 2 3 4
    Total Score
    Sum of Total Scores =______/80
    Part II: Proposal Defense Proper
    PART 1 (Group Presentation) 1 2 3 4
    1. Organization (has clear opening statement; maintains focus
    throughout; summarizes main points)
    2. Content (demonstrates substance and depth; comprehensive; and shows
    mastery of the study)
    3. Conclusion (well documented and persuasive conclusion)
    4. Delivery (effective delivery; modulated voice, projects enthusiasm,
    interest and confidence)
    5. Use of Media (effective powerpoint presentation)
    PART 2 (Question and Answer)
    1. Key Ideas in answering questions
    2. Integration of knowledge
    3. Accuracy of response
    4. Justification
    5. Teamwork
    SCORING(to be filled up by the panel )
    Number of Marks
    Multiplied by the column score 1 2 3 4
    Total Score
    Sum of Total Scores =______/40

    COMMENTS:

    __________________________________________________________________________________________
    __________________________________________________________________________________________
    __________________________________________________________________________________________
    __________________________________________________________________________________________
    __________________________________________________________________________________________

    Evaluated by:

    __________________________
    Name and Signature of Panelist

    You might also like