In Vitro and in Vivo Anti-Tumor Activities of Nanoparticles Based On doxorubicin-PLGA Conjugates
In Vitro and in Vivo Anti-Tumor Activities of Nanoparticles Based On doxorubicin-PLGA Conjugates
In Vitro and in Vivo Anti-Tumor Activities of Nanoparticles Based On doxorubicin-PLGA Conjugates
Department of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Taejon 305 -701, South Korea b Mogam Biotechnology Research Institute, 341 Pojung-ri, Koosung-myun, Yongin Kyunggido 449 -910, South Korea Received 4 February 2000; accepted 18 May 2000
Abstract Doxorubicin was chemically conjugated to a terminal end group of poly( D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) [PLGA] by an ester linkage and the doxorubicinPLGA conjugate was formulated into nanoparticles. A carboxylic acid end group of PLGA was conjugated to a primary hydroxyl group of doxorubicin. The primary amine group of doxorubicin was protected during the conjugation process and then deprotected. The nanoparticles containing the conjugate exhibited sustained doxorubicin release proles over a 1-month period, whereas those containing unconjugated free doxorubicin showed a rapid doxorubicin release within 5 days. Doxorubicin release patterns could be controlled by conjugating doxorubicin to PLGA having different molecular weights. The conjugated doxorubicin nanoparticles showed increased uptake within a HepG2 cell line, which was quantitated by a ow cytometry and visualized by confocal microscopy. The nanoparticles exhibited slightly lower IC 50 value against the HepG2 cell line compared to that of free doxorubicin. In vivo anti-tumor activity assay also showed that a single injection of the nanoparticles had comparable activity to that of free doxorubicin administered by daily injection. The conjugation approach of doxorubicin to PLGA was potentially useful for the formulation of nanoparticles that requires targeting for cancer cells as well as sustained release at the site. 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: PLGA; Doxorubicin; Conjugation; Sustained release; Anti-cancer therapy
1. Introduction A conjugation approach of drugs to natural and synthetic polymers has been widely used for the purposes of long circulating in blood stream, targeting to a specic organ, and sustained release at the injection site [13]. Doxorubicin is one of the most widely used anti-cancer drugs that exert its cytotoxic activity by inhibiting the synthesis of nucleic acids
*Corresponding author. Tel.: 182-42-869-2621; fax: 182-42869-2610. E-mail address: [email protected] (T.G. Park).
within cancer cells [4,5]. In spite of its potent anticancer activity, nonspecic action of doxorubicin causes serious side effects to the patients, which has been a major problem to solve. It was proposed that doxorubicin conjugation to hydrophilic synthetic polymers resulted in an increased cytotoxic effect relative to free doxorubicin therapy [3,4]. This is caused by the enhanced permeation and retention (EPR) effect, which plays a critical role in accumulating polymerdrug conjugates in solid tumors, while minimizing a lymphatic drainage to the surrounding tissue [2,58]. While endothelial cells in blood capillaries existing in normal tissue are
0168-3659 / 00 / $ see front matter 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PII: S0168-3659( 00 )00280-7
420
tightly packed, those in tumor tissue are loosely packed for the greater uptake of nutrients and oxygen. The different cell junction structures between normal and tumor capillaries permit the polymerdrug conjugates to be targeted passively to the tumor site [9,10]. Additionally, the development of multi-drug resistance of cancer cells, which results from the expression of p-glycoprotein pump in the cell membrane, hampers the drug action by pumping out drug molecules from cytosol to extracellular area [24]. Thus, the polymer conjugation approach, along with formulations with polymeric micelles and liposomes, is an attractive means to selectively suppress the tumor growth [6,1113]. However, most of the high molecular weight synthetic polymers used in the drug conjugation are non-degradable and they tend to eventually accumulate in the body because they are macromolecules whose molecular weight is larger than the cutoff value (|5000) of glomerular ltration capacity in the kidney [14 17]. Thus, it is desirable to use biodegradable polymers for the drug conjugation. In the case of using biodegradable polymers such as a family of poly(lactic acid-co-glycolic acid) [PLGA], it was shown that drugPLGA conjugates could be achieved by coupling of a drug to the terminal end group of PLGA due to the lack of reactive functional groups in the polymer backbone [7]. These conjugates could be easily processed into nanoparticles having up to the size of 200 nm in diameter. In our previous papers, it was reported that various drug molecules could be conjugated to the terminal end group of poly( D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) [PLGA] and they could be formulated into microspheres or nanoparticles [7,18]. They exhibited high drug loading efciency and showed a near zero-order release prole without showing any burst effect. The drug PLGA conjugation approach has several advantages. Due to the biodegradable nature of PLGA, the nanoparticles can be degraded into glycolic acid and lactic acid that are non-toxic to the human body. Besides, changing the co-monomer ratio in PLGA to be conjugated permits control of the release rate of drug from nanoparticles. Furthermore, the formulation of PLGA nanoparticles with doxorubicinPLGA conjugate reveals that the released doxorubicin fraction from nanoparticles had comparable cytotoxic activity compared to free doxorubicin. However, the
conjugation was accomplished by a non-cleavable carbamate linkage, which cannot be easily broken under physiological conditions. In this study, doxorubicin was conjugated to PLGA by an ester linkage that is expected to be more readily cleavable under the physiological conditions. The nanoparticles containing doxorubicin PLGA conjugates were characterized in terms of size, zeta potential, and drug loading. In vitro sustained release proles of doxorubicin from nanoparticles were examined by conjugating two PLGA samples of different molecular weights. In vitro anti-cancer activity of doxorubicin nanoparticles was determined using a HepG2 cell line. Uptake of nanoparticles into HepG2 cells was quantitated by a ow cytometry method and visualized by using confocal microscopy. Lastly, in vivo anti-tumor activity was assessed by a single subcutaneous injection of the nanoparticle formulation into an animal tumor model to see the sustained release effect, which was compared to daily injection of doxorubicin.
2.1. Materials
Two samples of poly( D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid), having a lactic / glycolic molar ratio of 50 / 50 with different nominal molecular weights of 5000 and 10 000, were obtained from Wako Chemicals (Japan). [PLGA5005 and PLGA5010]. They have a free hydroxyl and a carboxylic group at their terminal ends. Doxorubicin, 9-uorenylmethoxycarbonylN-hydroxysuccinimide (FmocOsu), N,N-diisopropylethylamine and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiaol-2-yl)2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) were obtained from Sigma. Human hepatoblastoma cell line (HepG2) was obtained from Korean Cell Line Bank (KCLB). All other chemicals were of analytical grade.
421
FmocOsu was added, followed by 30 ml of N,Ndiisopropylethylamine. After 3 h, the solvent was evaporated under vacuum, and the residue was crystallized by triturating from 0.1% aqueous triuoroacetic acid (TFA) (v / v). The crystals were collected by ltration and washed once with cold diethyl ether to remove the trace of excess Fmoc Osu. After freeze drying, 55 mg of 98% pure NFmocDOX was obtained (84% yield). PLGA (0.18 g) and FmocDOX (20 mg) were dissolved in 10 ml of methylene chloride, followed by the addition of 15.6 mg of bromo-tris-pyrrolidino-phosphonium hexauorophosphate (PyBroP), 20 ml of triethylamine (TEA), and 4.5 mg of dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) under nitrogen. After 15 h, the reaction mixture was diluted with methylene chloride (20 ml). The organic layer was washed with 5% aqueous HCl solution and brine twice, and then concentrated under vacuum. The conjugation process was monitored by GPC with a UVvis detector (480 nm for doxorubicin, 267 nm for Fmoc, 230 nm for PLGA). FmocDOXPLGA conjugate was dissolved in 3 ml of DMF and 300 ml of piperidine was added. After 5 min, the reaction mixture was placed in an ice bath and acidied by the addition of a mixture containing a 300 ml of TFA, 700 ml of pyridine, and 2 ml of DMF. The solvent was evaporated under vacuum. The residue was solidied by triturating by the addition of diethyl ether in DMF. The obtained solid was dissolved in methylene chloride, washed with 5% HCl aqueous solution and brine, and concentrated under vacuum, and was further puried by precipitation in diethyl ether and then dried.
solution were collected by ultracentrifugation (Beckman, USA) at 15 000 rpm for 1 h and re-suspended in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution. The resuspended nanoparticles were stored under frozen condition (2208C) until use. The loading amount of doxorubicin within nanoparticles was determined by a spectroscopic method. A known amount of freezedried doxorubicin encapsulated nanoparticles was completely dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and then the absorbance was measured at 480 nm according to the aforementioned method. Encapsulation efciency was calculated based on the percentage ratio of the amount of doxorubicin incorporated into nanoparticles to the initial amount used. Size distribution was measured by using a laser light scattering technique (ZetaPlus, Brookhaven Instrument Corp., USA).
422
(third group), by nanoparticles containing doxorubicin conjugates (2.4 mg of equivalent doxorubicin / kg body weight) (fourth group), and by nanoparticles containing free doxorubicin (1.2 mg of equivalent doxorubicin / kg body weight) (fth group). The tumor diameters were measured daily and used as an index for in vivo anti-tumor activity of released doxorubicin from nanoparticles.
423
the conjugate to escape out of nanoparticles into aqueous medium during the formulation process. On the other hand, the nanoparticles formulated with free doxorubicin exhibited lower loading efciency and amount due to its greater aqueous solubility.
95.067.5 33.364.3
DOXPLGA NP: nanoparticles containing DOXPGLA conjugate. DOX / PLGA NP: free DOX encapsulated particles.
424
doxorubicin show a large burst effect at day 1 and subsequent doxorubicin release duration for the next 5 days. This relatively short release duration was attributed to the fact that the drug release occurred by a simple diffusion process through the matrix of nanoparticles. On the other hand, doxorubicin release proles from the nanoparticles containing the conjugate exhibits more sustained release patterns. To see the effect of PLGA molecular weight on the release prole, two different nominal molecular weights of PLGA 50 / 50, 5000 and 10 000, were conjugated to doxorubicin and the resultant conjugates were used for the preparation of nanoparticles. It can be seen that the nanoparticles formulated with higher M.W. PLGA exhibit a more sustained release pattern than those with lower M.W. PLGA. The higher M.W. PLGA degrades slower than the lower M.W. PLGA, which resulted in the slower water solubilization process of doxorubicinPLGA oligomer conjugates [18]. Since the water solubilization process of hydrolyzed PLGA fragments takes place when the critical molecular weight of PLGA oligomers was approached around 1000, it is highly conceivable that
the doxorubicin release prole follows the water solubilization process of cleaved PLGA fragments containing a terminal doxorubicin molecule [19,20]. These release results directly suggest that M.W. of PLGA to be conjugated is an additional critical variable in controlling the doxorubicin release rate besides PLGA co-monomer composition. It can also be found that the nanoparticles containing the conjugates do not show any signicant initial burst effect in contrast to those formulated with free doxorubicin as previously reported [7].
425
Fig. 3. Reversed phase HPLC chromatography of (A) free doxorubicin and (B) released fraction from nanoparticles for 7 days.
peak of the released fraction appears at 36 min with other small peaks, indicating that this is not an intact doxorubicin molecule eluting at 35 min, but PLGA oligomer conjugate species. The collected fraction of the major peak in HPLC was subjected to mass spectroscopy (data not shown). It was found that two major species appeared at 563.2 and 673.7 mass units. They are supposed to be a slightly modied doxorubicin and its PLGA oligomer conjugate, respectively. It was hard to dene the chemical structure of these two species based on their molecular
weights. It is highly probable that a majority of doxorubicin species were still conjugated to PLGA oligomers, possibly due to the inherently slow hydrolytic rate of the ester linkage, although a cleavable linkage was introduced between doxorubicin and PLGA.
426
427
diameter and zeta potential of nanoparticles containing the doxorubicinPLGA conjugate that was prepared using PLGA with a nominal M.W. of 10 000. Freshly prepared nanoparticles containing the conjugate were around 230 nm in size and had a zeta potential of 27.5 mV . The slightly increased size and zeta potential values compared to that of blank PLGA nanoparticles were caused by doxorubicin encapsulation and the presence of a positively charged primary amine in doxorubicin structure, respectively. There were no signicant changes in PLGA nanoparticle size throughout the incubation period regardless of doxorubicin conjugation to PLGA. This conrms the previous nding that PLGA degrades by a bulk erosion mechanism [20]. The zeta potential value of blank PLGA nanoparticles decreases with the incubation time, probably due to the cumulative generation of negatively charged terminal carboxylic acid group in PLGA fragments as a result of PLGA chain scission. On the other hand, the nanoparticles having the conjugate show higher zeta potential values during the incubation time, which was due to the ionic interaction of positively charged doxorubicin with the negatively charged PLGA fragments. GPC analysis revealed that the weight average molecular weight of PLGA, being initially 8300, reached around 1500 after 15 days of incubation.
bicin conjugates suggests that a multi-drug resistance problem, efuxing of doxorubicin out of cells by p-glycoprotein pump existing within cell membrane, might be circumvented by the nanoparticle approach presented in this study [23,24]. Fig. 7 exhibits cell viability results, which were measured after 48 h of incubation of cells treated with free doxorubicin and nanoparticles containing the conjugate. It appears that free doxorubicin has more potent activity than nanoparticles containing the doxorubicin conjugate, which was likely caused by a sustained release property of doxorubicin from nanoparticles after the internalization within cells. It was possible that although the greater cellular uptake of the nanoparticles within cells occurred, chemical hydrolytic chain scission of PLGA should proceed for the sustained release of water soluble doxorubicinPLGA oligomer species into cell cytoplasmic area. Thus, 48 h of cell incubation time given for the viability assay, seemed an insufcient period for the release of doxorubicin from the nanoparticles located within cells.
4. Conclusions Doxorubicin conjugated biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles could be formulated with high loading
428
Fig. 5. (A) Relative uorescence intensity of HepG2 cells incubated with doxorubicin conjugated nanoparticles and free doxorubicin as determined by a ow cytometry. (B) Dot plot of ow cytometry, of free doxorubicin, (left) and of nanoparticles, (right). Relative uorescence intensity is the cellular uorescence ratio of doxorubicin nanoparticles to that of doxorubicin. Cell count was 5310 3 .
efciency and amount. The nanoparticles showed more sustained doxorubicin release behavior with increasing molecular weight of PLGA. Although a cleavable ester linkage was introduced between doxorubicin and PLGA, an intact doxorubicin was not regenerated after release from nanoparticles. The
doxorubicin nanoparticles were taken up much more by HepG2 cells than free doxorubicin. The cytotoxicity of doxorubicin conjugated nanoparticles was slightly lower than that of free doxorubicin because the sustained release of doxorubicin could not be examined by MTT assay. In vivo anti-tumor activity
429
Fig. 6. Confocal microscopy of HepG2 cells containing doxorubicin nanoparticles. The left picture is HepG2 cells incubated with doxorubicin and the right is HepG2 cells incubated with nanoparticles.
430
Fig. 8. In vivo anti-tumor activity assay. DOXPLGA NP is doxorubicin-conjugated PLGA nanoparticles and DOX / PLGA NP is free doxorubicin encapsulated nanoparticles.
of the nanoparticles was almost the same as that of daily-injected free doxorubicin.
References
[1] J.M. Harris, Topic in Applied Chemistry Poly(ethylene glycol) Chemistry: Biochemical and Biomedical Applications, in: Plenum Press, New York, 1992, pp. 114. [2] T. Minko, P. Kopeckova, V. Pozharov, J. Kopecek, HPMA copolymer bound adriamycin overcomes MDR1 gene encoded resistance in a human ovarian carcinoma cell line, J. Control. Rel. 54 (1998) 223233. [3] R. Duncan, Drugpolymer conjugates: potential for improved chemotherapy, Anti-cancer Drugs 3 (1992) 175210. [4] A. Colin de Verdiere, C. Dubernet, F. Nemati, M.F. Poupon, F. Puisieux, P. Couvreur, Uptake of doxorubicin from loaded nanoparticles in multidrug resistant leukemic murine cells, Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 33 (1994) 504508. [5] V. Omelyanenko, P. Kopeckova, C. Gentry, J. Kopecek, Targetable HPMA copolymeradriamycin conjugates. Recognition, internalization, and subcellular fate, J. Control. Rel. 53 (1998) 2537. [6] M. Yokoyama, G.S. Kwon, T. Okano, Y. Sakurai, T. Seto, K. Kataoka, Preparation of micelle-forming polymerdrug conjugates, Bioconj. Chem. 3 (1992) 295301.
[7] H.S. Yoo, J.E. Oh, K.H. Lee, T.G. Park, Biodegradable Nanoparticles Containing DoxorubicinPLGA Conjugate for Sustained Release, Pharm. Res. 16 (1999) 11141118. [8] H. Maeda, Y. Matsumura, Tumoritropic and lymphotropic principles of macromolecular drugs, CRC Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carrier Sys. 6 (1989) 193210. [9] L.W. Seymour, Passive tumor targeting of soluble macromolecules and drug conjugates, CRC Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carrier Sys. 9 (1992) 132187. [10] L.S. Heuser, F.N. Miller, Differential macromolecular leakage from the vasculature of tumors, Cancer 57 (1986) 461 464. [11] M. Yokoyama, G.S. Kwon, T. Okano, Y. Sakurai, T. Seto, K. Kataoka, Preparation of micelle-forming polymerdrug conjugates, Bioconj. Chem. 3 (1992) 295301. [12] D.D. Lasic, F.J. Martin, A. Gabizon, S.K. Huang, D. Papahadjopoulos, Sterically stabilized liposomes: a hypothesis on the molecular origin of the extended circulation times, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1070 (1991) 187192. [13] S. Stolink, L. Illum, S.S. Davis, Long circulating microparticulate drug carriers, Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev. 16 (1995) 195214. [14] P. Couvreur, C. Vauthier, Polyalkylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles as drug carrier: present state and perspectives, J. Control. Rel. 17 (1991) 187198. [15] Y. Tabata, Y. Murakami, Y. Ikada, Tumor accumulation of poly(vinyl alcohol) of different sizes after intravenous injection, J. Control. Rel. 50 (1998) 123133.
H.S. Yoo et al. / Journal of Controlled Release 68 (2000) 419 431 [16] J. Kreuter, Nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems, J. Control. Rel. 16 (1991) 169171. [17] H. Maeda, M. Ueda, T. Morinaga, T. Matsumoto, Conjugation of poly(styrene-co-maleic acid) derivatives to the antitumor protein neocarzinostatin: pronounced improvements in pharmacological properties, J. Med. Chem. 28 (1985) 455 461. [18] J.E. Oh, Y.S. Nam, K.H. Lee, T.G. Park, Conjugation of drug to poly( D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) for controlled release from biodegradable microspheres, J. Control. Rel. 57 (1999) 269280. [19] T.G. Park, Degradation of poly( D,L-lactic)microsphere: effect of molecular weight, J. Control. Rel. 30 (1994) 161173. [20] A.M. Reed, D.K. Gilding, Biodegradable polymers for use in surgerypoly(glycolic acid) / poly(lactic acid) homo and copolymers. 2. In vitro degradation, Polymer 22 (1981) 494498. [21] R.I. Freshney, Measurement of viability and cytotoxicity, in:
431
Culture of Animal Cells, 3rd Edition, Wiley-Liss Inc, New York, 1994, pp. 287307, Chapter 19. [22] M.J. Ehrke, S. Verstovsek, P. Ujhazy, J.M. Meer, C. Eppolito, D.L. Maccubbin, E. Mihich, Doxorubicin plus tumor necrosis factor alpha combination treatments in EL4-lymphomabearing C57BL / 6 MICE, Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 45 (1998) 287298. [23] S. Doppenschmitt, H.S. Langguth, C.G. Regardh, P. Langguth, Role of p-glycoprotein-mediated secretion in absorptive drug permeability: an approach using passive permeability and afnity to p-glycoprotein pump, J. Pharm. Sci. 88 (1999) 10671072. [24] V.J. Wacher, C.Y. Wu, L.Z. Benet, Overlapping substrate specicities and tissues distribution of cytochrome P-450 3A and p-glycoprotein have implications for drug delivery and activity in chemotherapy, Mol. Carcinogen. 13 (1995) 129 134.