Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 views

    Research Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Jam Amaro
    This document provides a rubric for grading an academic research paper out of 100 total points. It evaluates papers across 5 categories: introduction/topic (20 points), content knowledge and quality of research (20 points), content application and support of thesis (20 points), conclusion (20 points), and writing (20 points). Each category has descriptors for performance at the 16-20, 11-15, 6-10, and 0-5 point levels in terms of the quality of content, research, analysis, writing, and citations presented.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Research Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Jam Amaro
    8 views1 page
    This document provides a rubric for grading an academic research paper out of 100 total points. It evaluates papers across 5 categories: introduction/topic (20 points), content knowledge and quality of research (20 points), content application and support of thesis (20 points), conclusion (20 points), and writing (20 points). Each category has descriptors for performance at the 16-20, 11-15, 6-10, and 0-5 point levels in terms of the quality of content, research, analysis, writing, and citations presented.

    Original Title

    research-rubric.doc

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides a rubric for grading an academic research paper out of 100 total points. It evaluates papers across 5 categories: introduction/topic (20 points), content knowledge and quality of research (20 points), content application and support of thesis (20 points), conclusion (20 points), and writing (20 points). Each category has descriptors for performance at the 16-20, 11-15, 6-10, and 0-5 point levels in terms of the quality of content, research, analysis, writing, and citations presented.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    8 views1 page

    Research Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Jam Amaro
    This document provides a rubric for grading an academic research paper out of 100 total points. It evaluates papers across 5 categories: introduction/topic (20 points), content knowledge and quality of research (20 points), content application and support of thesis (20 points), conclusion (20 points), and writing (20 points). Each category has descriptors for performance at the 16-20, 11-15, 6-10, and 0-5 point levels in terms of the quality of content, research, analysis, writing, and citations presented.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    RUBRIC FOR ACADEMIC RESEARCH PAPER—100 points total

    Note: grading between increments is at the discretion of the panel

    CATEGORY 16-20 points 11-15 points 6-10 points 0-5 points


    Introduction/Topic Exceptional introduction Proficient introduction Basic introduction that Weak or no
    that grabs interest of that is interesting and states topic but lacks introduction of topic.
    reader and states topic. states topic. interest. Thesis/topic is Paper’s purpose is
    Thesis/topic is Thesis/topic is clear somewhat clear and unclear. Thesis/topic
    ____ points
    exceptionally clear, well- and arguable statement arguable. is weak or missing.
    developed, and a of position.
    definitive statement.
    Content Paper is exceptionally Information relates to Information relates to Information has little
    knowledge: researched, contains 7 the main topic. the main topic, but few or nothing to do with
    sources total (including 3 Paper, is well- details and/or examples the thesis.
    Quality of peer reviewed articles); researched in detail and are given. Shows a Information has weak
    Research the sources support the from 7 good sources limited variety of or no connection to
    thesis argument in a (including 3 peer- sources. References are the thesis. References
    logical manner. reviewed articles). not cited correctly. are not cited
    References are correctly References are correctly.
    cited. correctly cited.
    ____ points
    Content Exceptionally critical, Consistent connections Some connections made Limited or no
    application: relevant and consistent are made between between evidence and connections made
    connections made evidence and thesis. thesis. Some analysis. between evidence and
    Support of Thesis between evidence and Good analysis. thesis. Lack of
    & Analysis thesis. Excellent analysis. analysis.

    ____ points

    Conclusion Excellent summary of Good summary of topic Basic summary of topic Lack of summary of
    thesis argument with with clear concluding with some final topic.
    concluding ideas that ideas. concluding ideas.
    impact reader. Introduces no new Introduces no new
    ____ points
    Introduces no new information. information.
    information.

    Writing Writing is clear and Most ideas are stated Many ideas require Paper does not meet
    relevant, with no clearly and are related clarification, are off- the criteria for the
    grammatical and/or to the topic, with only topic or have little assignment (too short
    spelling errors – polished minor grammatical relevance to the or incomplete, too
    and professional. and/or spelling errors. assignment. Many long, and/or
    Reference, citations and References, citations grammatical and/or completely off-topic).
    images are properly and images are spelling errors; very Reference, citations
    formatted. adequate. challenging to read, and images section is
    poor writing flow. missing.
    ____ points Improper references
    and/or citations section.
    Total: _____/100

    Created May 2018 – A. Mazur-Gray

    You might also like