The document discusses three main assumptions underlying the popular view that morality depends on religion:
1. Religious belief is needed for moral motivation. However, doing good only for reward or fear of punishment undermines moral character.
2. God must be the creator of morality as morality requires a lawmaker. But reasons that explain God's commands are what make actions right or wrong, not God alone.
3. Religion is an essential source of moral guidance as God knows morality perfectly and wants to share wisdom. But for religion to reliably guide morality, the existence of God and means of communication must be justified. Interpretations must also be defended and balanced with tradition.
The document discusses three main assumptions underlying the popular view that morality depends on religion:
1. Religious belief is needed for moral motivation. However, doing good only for reward or fear of punishment undermines moral character.
2. God must be the creator of morality as morality requires a lawmaker. But reasons that explain God's commands are what make actions right or wrong, not God alone.
3. Religion is an essential source of moral guidance as God knows morality perfectly and wants to share wisdom. But for religion to reliably guide morality, the existence of God and means of communication must be justified. Interpretations must also be defended and balanced with tradition.
The document discusses three main assumptions underlying the popular view that morality depends on religion:
1. Religious belief is needed for moral motivation. However, doing good only for reward or fear of punishment undermines moral character.
2. God must be the creator of morality as morality requires a lawmaker. But reasons that explain God's commands are what make actions right or wrong, not God alone.
3. Religion is an essential source of moral guidance as God knows morality perfectly and wants to share wisdom. But for religion to reliably guide morality, the existence of God and means of communication must be justified. Interpretations must also be defended and balanced with tradition.
The document discusses three main assumptions underlying the popular view that morality depends on religion:
1. Religious belief is needed for moral motivation. However, doing good only for reward or fear of punishment undermines moral character.
2. God must be the creator of morality as morality requires a lawmaker. But reasons that explain God's commands are what make actions right or wrong, not God alone.
3. Religion is an essential source of moral guidance as God knows morality perfectly and wants to share wisdom. But for religion to reliably guide morality, the existence of God and means of communication must be justified. Interpretations must also be defended and balanced with tradition.
[email protected] Morality and October 9, 2021 Religion ´ Religion as the most popular source of morality ´ 3 central assumptions underlying the popular view that morality depends on religion: 1. Religious belief is needed to get 3 assumptions us to do our duty. about morality 2. Morality must be created by someone, and God is by far the and religion best candidate for the job. 3. Religious wisdom is the key to providing us with moral guidance. ´ Atheism prevents us from seeing why we should be moral. ´ The belief in God is more likely to motivate people to be moral as it gives them to be more conscientious and righteous. ´ So, why are religious people supposed to 1st Assumption: be more conscientious and righteous? Religious ´ Our fear of God and our desire for a happy afterlife check on our immoral beliefs needed impulses. ´ Justice and reward at least in the for moral afterlife. motivation ´ Atheists do not have such strong reasons to be moral. ´ Can’t be they moral then? ´ If hope for heavenly reward or fear of God’s anger is what prompts us to do good, then we may well do the right thing but for the wrong reasons. ´ Doing good for God’s reward or for avoiding God’s punishments is different from doing good for the love for God. ´ Compare: doing good because you will get bribes. ´ Such a person is unreliably moral, for if she Problems of the came to believe that God really didn't offer the expected rewards and punishments, then 1st assumption she would see no reason to be moral. ´ Motivated by fear of God in being moral undermines moral character, rather than supports it. ´ People who deserve our praise and admiration are those who do their duty for its own sake. Rather than acting from ulterior, self-interested motives, they do what is right because it is right. ´No. Morally admirable behavior comes when we do our duty for its own sake, rather than from self-interest. ´Fear of God, or desire for Is God needed heavenly reward, do not to ensure that necessarily tarnish our character. But they are no we are morally substitute for a direct love of motivated? morality, which can be displayed as much by atheists as by religious believers. ´ “If God is dead, then everything is permitted.”– Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov ´ Argument for God’s Creation of Morality: 2nd ´Every law requires a lawmaker. ´Therefore, the moral law requires a assumption: lawmaker. God is the ´Humans cannot be the author of the moral law (since we are imperfect in so Creator of many ways). morality ´If humans cannot be the author of the moral law, then none other than God is its author (since God is wholly perfect). ´Therefore, God is the author of the moral law. ´ A perfect God must have had excellent reasons for laying down the moral law as He did. But then these reasons, and not God's commands, are what makes actions right or wrong. Actions are not right because God commands them. Whatever reasons support God's choices also explain why actions have Problems of the moral status they do. the 2nd ´ Suppose, for instance, that God really did forbid us from torturing others, and that God assumption had very good reasons for doing so. Assuming that these are the relevant reasons, then these reasons, and not God's say-so, are what makes torture immoral. These reasons can fully explain why torture is wrong. Torture is wrong because it is extremely painful, humiliating, and so on. ´ No. ´Rather, God (if He exists) understands everything, and so knows precisely what is wrong with such things as rape and torture, and right about such things as compassion and kindness. He issues commands on Does God the basis of this perfect create understanding, out of love for His creatures. A God who issues morality? commands for good reasons will rely on the very best reasons and those can explain, all by themselves, what is right and wrong. ´ God is not the creator of the moral law. ´But He could still play a crucial role in morality by being its infallible 3rd reporter, and our expert guide. God knows everything including every assumption: single detail of the moral law. And if Religion is an God is all-loving, then God will want to share some of that wisdom with us. essential ´How will He share it? source of ´By means of revelation, either personal and direct (say, by moral talking to you or giving you signs of guidance certain kinds), or by indirect means (say, by inspiring the authors of a bible). ´ Compare: Thermometer ´2nd: acts are right and wrong because of God’s commands. Difference ´3rd: God’s commands don’t between the make actions right (or wrong). God’s commands are morally 2nd and 3rd decisive because He never assumptions makes a mistake. ´ Those who seek divine guidance in trying to lead a moral life must meet several conditions: 1. It must be the case that God exists, and that we can be justified in believing this. 2. God must offer us moral advice, and we must be able to defend the claim that He does so. Problems of 3. Theists must be justified in selecting a the 3rd particular source of religious and moral wisdom, such as the Koran, the Book of assumption Mormon, or the Christian scriptures. 4. Theists must also defend specific interpretations of those sources. 5. When an interpretation conflicts with tradition, religious believers must successfully argue for the priority of one over the other. ´ Possibly. That depends on many things such as ´whether God exists and speaks to us ´whether we can know which texts Does religion are divinely written or inspired ´whether we can defend our offer reliable favored interpretations against the competition moral ´ whether we can balance these guidance? interpretations against the importance of religious tradition and authority in cases of conflict. ´ Russ Shafer-Landau, The Fundamentals of Ethics, Reference Oxford University Press, 2018. Thank you!
(Studies in Penal Theory and Penal Ethics) A.P. Simester, Andreas Von Hirsch-Crimes, Harms, and Wrongs - On The Principles of Criminalisation-Hart Publishing (2011) PDF