Motion For Partial Summary Judgment

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

USDC IN/ND case 3:21-cv-00645-DRL document 67 filed 03/30/23 page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
SOUTH BEND DIVISION

FOREST RIVER, INC., ) Civil Action No.: 3:21-cv-00645-DRL-


) MGG
Plaintiff, )
v. ) Judge Damon R. Leichty
)
INTECH TRAILERS, INC., ) Magistrate Judge Michael G. Gotsch, Sr.
)
Defendant. )

PLAINTIFF’S PARTIAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiff Forest River, Inc. (“Forest River”), by and through its undersigned counsel and

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56, hereby moves the Court for partial summary judgment in its favor

and against Defendant inTech Trailers, Inc. (“inTech”) as to inTech’s liability on each of the

following claims asserted in its First Amended Complaint (Doc. 25): (i) Count I, for Trademark

Infringement under 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1)(A); (ii) Count II, for Trademark Infringement under 15

U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1)(A); (iii) Count III, for Trademark Infringement under Indiana Code § 24-2-1-

13; and, (iv) Count IV, for Common Law Unfair Competition. Forest River also respectfully moves

the Court to grant it summary judgment on inTech’s affirmative defense of “Assumption of the

Risk/Incurred Risk/Causation in Fact.” (See Doc. 26.)

inTech’s infringement on Forest River’s DELLA TERRA and Mountain Design

trademarks is in violation of the Lanham Act, the Indiana Trademark Act, and common law, and

no genuine issues of material fact remain in dispute. As such, Forest River’s Motion for Summary

Judgment should be granted, inTech should be permanently enjoined from its infringing uses, and

a hearing or an order for further briefing on the issue of damages should be set. 1

1
Forest River’s damages are supported by the unrebutted expert testimony of expert Stephen A. Holzen, of Stout
Risius Ross, LLC, who has opined that Forest River is entitled to more than $7,600,000 in damages as a result of
USDC IN/ND case 3:21-cv-00645-DRL document 67 filed 03/30/23 page 2 of 3

Pursuant to Local Rule 56-1, Forest River is filing both a Memorandum in Support and a

Statement of Material Facts, with supporting exhibits, deposition testimony, and declarations

attached to the Statement of Material Facts. Forest River certifies that it has met and conferred

with inTech on the substance of its Motion. 2 Forest River and inTech were unable to reach

agreement on the substance of the Motion.

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Philip R. Bautista
Philip R. Bautista (Ohio Bar No. 0073272)
[email protected]
JoZeff W. Gebolys (Ohio Bar No.0093507)
(admission via pro hac vice)
[email protected]
TAFT STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER LLP
200 Public Square, Suite 3500
Cleveland, Ohio 44114
Phone: (216) 241-2838
Fax: (216) 241-3707

Tracy N. Betz (Indiana Atty. No. 24800-53)


[email protected]
TAFT STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER LLP
One Indiana Square, Suite 3500
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204
Phone: (317) 713-3544
Fax: (317) 715-4535

Counsel for Plaintiff, Forest River, Inc.

inTech’s infringement. inTech has not engaged an expert on the issue of damages and has not submitted any expert
testimony to rebut Mr. Holzen’s expert testimony.
2
Forest River and inTech conducted their meet and confer on March 17, 2023.

2
USDC IN/ND case 3:21-cv-00645-DRL document 67 filed 03/30/23 page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on March 30, 2023 the foregoing was filed electronically. Notice of

this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court’s electronic filing system, and parties

may access this filing through the Court’s system.

s/ Philip R. Bautista
Philip R. Bautista (Ohio Bar No. 0073272)

Counsel for Plaintiff, Forest River, Inc.

You might also like