2B. Corporate Finance: Part 2 Unit 2
2B. Corporate Finance: Part 2 Unit 2
2B. Corporate Finance: Part 2 Unit 2
PART 2 UNIT 2
2
2B. Corporate Finance
Module
This module covers the following content from the IMA Learning Outcome Statements.
The rate of return refers to the measure of the cash flows from an investment compared with
the amount of the investment. The return on an investment (both the expected return and
actual return) is crucial to the investment decision.
Income return includes dividends, interest, or royalties earned on that underlying investment
during the period.
Income
Income return =
Beginning value
The total return is capital return plus income return over either the life of an investment or a
specified period. The total return for a single year is equal to the annual return described above.
Facts: On January 1, Year 1, an investor paid €1,000 for 500 shares of stock worth €1,700
on December 31, Year 1. During the year, dividends were paid at €0.50 per share.
Required: Calculate the capital return, income return, and total annual return.
Solution:
€1,700 ending value – €1,000 beginning value
Capital return = = 0.70 = 70%
€1,000 beginning value
Facts: An investor paid €1,000 for 500 shares of a stock on January 1, Year 1, and sold them
for €1,200 on June 30, Year 1. During the first six months of the year the investor received
€125 in dividends.
Required: Calculate the annualized return.
Solution:
€1,200 €1,000 €125
selling – purchase + dividend
Six-month holding price price income
= = 0.325 = 32.5%
period return €1,000 purchase price
The annualized return = 32.5% six-month holding period return × 2 six-month holding
periods in a year = 65%.
Note that the annual holding period return may be the same as the total return if the
evaluation period is one year.
Or:
Facts: An investor invests $10,000 and earns the following capital returns each year over
four years:
Year 1: 10 percent
Year 2: (25 percent)
Year 3: 21 percent
Year 4: 6 percent
Required: Calculate the arithmetic return and the geometric return. Determine the value
for the investment at the end of four years.
Solution:
The arithmetic return is calculated as follows:
Arithmetic return − (0.10 − 0.25 + 0.21 + 0.06) / 4 = 0.03 or 3%
The incorrect value of the investment, if the arithmetic return is used, is $11,255.08:
Incorrect value at end of Year 4 = $10,000 beginning value × (1.03)4 = $11,255.08
The correct value of the investment, if the geometric return is used, is $10,581.45:
Value at end of Year 4 = $10,000 beginning value × (1.0142296)4 = $10,581.45
To determine the value in the investment account manually, the value is adjusted each year
based on that year's return:
$10,000 value at beginning of first year × 1.10 = $11,000 value at end of first year
$11,000 value at end of first year × 0.75 = $8,250 value at end of second year
$8,250 value at end of second year × 1.21 = $9,982.50 value at end of third year
$9,982.50 value at end of third year × 1.06 = $10,581.45 value at end of fourth year
Facts: A $10,000 promissory note states that payments will be made quarterly at a
10 percent interest rate per annum.
Required: Calculate the stated interest rate. Hint: You do not need a calculator.
Solution: Stated rate = 10 percent
Facts: A $10,000 promissory note has a stated rate of 10 percent per annum and is due
in one year. The bank charges a loan origination fee of $75 and the state in which the
loan is made levies a $50 documentary stamp charge. Taxes and fees are taken from
loan proceeds.
Required: Compute the effective interest rate.
Solution:
Interest paid (10,000 × 10%) $ 1,000
Divided by net proceeds (10,000 – 75 – 50) ÷ 9,875
Effective interest rate 10.13%
Facts: A $10,000 promissory note displays a stated rate of 8 percent with interest to be
paid semiannually. The bank charges a $75 loan origination fee and a documentary tax of
$50 is assessed by the state.
Required: Calculate the annual percentage rate.
Solution:
Step 1: Compute the effective periodic interest rate (as per above)
Interest paid (10,000 × 8% × 6/12) $ 400
Divided by available funds (10,000 – 75 – 50) ÷ 9,875
Effective periodic interest rate 4.05%
Step 2: Multiply the effective periodic interest rate by the number of periods in a year
Effective periodic interest rate 4.05%
Periods in a year × 2
Annual percentage rate 8.10%
Facts: A note has an 8 percent stated rate of interest compounded semiannually (two times
per year).
Required: Compute the effective annual percentage rate or EAR.
Solution:
Effective annual interest rate = [1 + (i / p)] p – 1
Effective annual interest rate = [1 + (0.08 / 2)]2 – 1
Effective annual interest rate = [1 + (0.04)]2 – 1
Effective annual interest rate = 1.0816 – 1
Effective annual interest rate = 8.16%
LOS 2B1c
All investments carry some level of risk. Even even guaranteed government notes are at risk for
currency devaluation. Risk comes from many sources, including both macroeconomic factors
affecting the overall market (increases in interest rates, unemployment rate) and microeconomic
factors (raw materials shortages, price wars).
The prices on publicly traded stocks generally increase and decrease together with overall
market activity. Although the prices may not increase or decrease identically, they often
move in the same direction. A technology company's stock, for example, might increase in
value on a given day from $37.00 per share to $37.75 per share. This increase in the stock
price is consistent with the overall 2 percent increase in the NASDAQ on that trading day.
Pass Key
Domestic International Inc. has no foreign subsidiaries but is deeply involved in exporting
to neighboring countries. Global International Inc. has 12 foreign subsidiaries which,
combined, make up 65 percent of consolidated revenues. Domestic International has less
translation exposure than Global International because it has no foreign subsidiaries.
Domestic's international business does expose the company to exchange rate risks,
however, in terms of both transaction and economic exposure.
Because of Global International's extensive foreign operations, the parent company
has significant exposure to foreign currency translation exposure, and depending on
the entity's export/import activity, Global International may also be exposed to foreign
exchange transaction and economic risks.
On January 2, Pat paid the local bank $10,000 and the bank issued to Pat a one-year,
noncancelable certificate of deposit paying 5 percent interest. On January 3, the bank
increased its rate for a one-year, noncancelable certificate of deposit from 5 percent to 6
percent. Pat will still receive $500 interest and $10,000 principal on January 2 of the next
year. If Pat had waited one day to purchase the one-year certificate of deposit, Pat would
have received an additional $100 on January 2 of the next year.
The value of Pat's certificate of deposit acquired on January 2 decreases after the January 3,
Year 1, interest rate increase. As of January 3, Year 1, that one-year certificate of deposit for
which Pat paid $10,000 is worth only $9,905.66: $10,500 / 1.06 = $9,905.66.
Proof: On January 3, Year 1, an investor need only pay the local bank $9,905.66 in order to
receive $10,500 in one year at the new rate of 6 percent:
$9,905.66 × 6% interest rate = $594.34
$9,905.66 principal + $594.34 interest = $10,500
An easy method of remembering that a debt instrument's value moves in the opposite
direction as market rates change is to think about how Pat feels about buying the certificate
of deposit on January 2, Year 1, rather than buying the certificate of deposit on January 3,
Year 1. Pat is unhappy. Pat could have earned an extra $100 merely by waiting a day to buy
that $10,000 certificate of deposit at the higher interest rate. To summarize: "Unhappy" =
Loss and loss in value; "Happy" = Gain and gain in value.
Generally, there is a direct relationship between risk and the required rate of return: higher
(lower) levels of risk require higher (lower) expected returns. Investor risk tolerances vary,
ranging from risk-averse to risk-neutral to risk-seeking. Investors who are risk-averse require
lower levels of risk and accept lower levels of return, whereas risk-seekers accept higher risk in
exchange for higher rates of return. If given a choice between two assets that offer the same
rate of return, rational investors will choose the investment with the lower risk. Alternatively,
if investors must choose between two assets with the same level of risk, rational investors will
choose the investment that has the higher rate of return.
Facts: Consider an individual bond with an expected return of 6 percent and an individual
stock with an expected return of 10 percent. The bond and the stock are both equivalent in
value in the portfolio.
Required: Calculate the expected return.
Solution: With both the bond and stock equivalent in value, each will represent 50 percent
of the portfolio's value as a whole. The portfolio has an expected return of 8 percent:
Rp = (0.50)(0.06) + (0.50)(0.10) = 0.08 = 8%
Asset allocation is the process of selecting assets in a portfolio to achieve the best risk/return
trade-off. The assets can include bonds, stocks, derivatives, real estate, alternative investments
(such as precious metals or oil and gas wells) as well as high-risk, low-risk, long-term, short-term,
and other types of investments needed to achieve the correct balance of risk and return. When
sufficient assets have been combined to achieve the full benefits of diversification, the portfolio
is called a fully diversified or efficient portfolio. A fully diversified, efficient portfolio provides
the highest possible rate of return for a level of risk or the lowest possible level of risk for a
particular rate of return.
Where:
Rce = Required rate of return on common equity
Rf = Risk-free rate of return
β = Beta of the security
Rm = Market return
Under the CAPM formula, the [Rm − Rf—] term is also known as the market risk premium.
Risk-free rate is the theoretical rate of return on an investment with zero (or very low) risk.
Beta is a numerical representation of the risk of the stock relative to the risk of the overall
market. A beta of 1 means that the stock has the same volatility as the market, and a beta of
greater (less) than 1 means that the stock is more (less) volatile than the market.
Market risk premium is the systematic (nondiversifiable) risk associated with the overall
stock market. The market risk premium is equal to the difference between the overall
market return and the risk-free rate.
Facts: Assume that a firm's beta is 1.25, the risk-free rate is 8.75 percent, and the market
rate of return is 14.25 percent.
Required: Compute the expected return using the capital asset pricing model (CAPM).
Solution: Expected return using the capital asset pricing model (CAPM):
Expected return = Rce = Rf + β[Rm − Rf—]
= 0.0875 + [1.25 × (0.1425 − 0.0875)]
= 0.0875 + [1.25 × 0.0550]
= 0.0875 + 0.0688
= 0.1563 = 15.63%
Question 1 MCQ-12661
Assume that a stock has a beta of 1.24 based on five years of monthly data. The risk-free
rate is 3 percent and the overall market return is 10 percent.
Using the CAPM, calculate the investor's required return for the stock.
a. 8.68 percent
b. 11.68 percent
c. 12.40 percent
d. 15.40 percent
Question 2 MCQ-12662
If the goal is to reduce the investor's overall portfolio risk, which two stocks should the
advisor recommend?
a. ALK and DLE
b. ALK and CMN
c. BTY and DLE
d. BTY and CMN
This module covers the following content from the IMA Learning Outcome Statements.
CMA LOS Reference: Part 2—Section B.2. Long-Term Financial Management: Part 1
1 Debt Securities
A company's capital structure consists of its mix of debt and equity financing. Debt may
include notes payable and bonds. Interest rates play a critical role in both the structure and the
valuation of all debt securities.
The term structure of interest rates describes the relationship between interest rates on debt
securities (bonds) and the various maturities of bonds having the same risk characteristics.
Changes in the term structure of interest rates over time are caused by changes in expectations
regarding economic growth, increases (inflation) or decreases (deflation) in price levels, and
changes in interest rates.
© Becker Professional Education Corporation. All rights reserved. Module 2 2–17 B.2. Long-Term
2 B.2. Long-Term Financial Management: Part 1 PART 2 UNIT 2
A yield curve plots rates and maturities on a single curve and reflects expectations about yields, or
rates of return, at various maturities. A normal yield curve is upward sloping, showing that investors
are compensated with higher rates of return for investing their money over longer periods of time.
Yield
Maturity
Par value
Conversion ratio =
Conversion price
The conversion value is equal to the current stock price multiplied by the number of
shares to be issued if the bond is converted.
© Becker Professional Education Corporation. All rights reserved. Module 2 2–19 B.2. Long-Term
2 B.2. Long-Term Financial Management: Part 1 PART 2 UNIT 2
The conversion premium is the difference between the convertible bond's current price
and the convertible bond's conversion value.
Facts: A convertible bond with a par value of $1,000 has a conversion price of $50 and a
current price of $1,050. The current stock price is $48 per share.
Required: Determine the conversion ratio, the conversion value, and the conversion premium.
Solution:
Conversion ratio = $1,000 par value / $50 conversion price = 20:1, or 20 common shares
per bond
Conversion value = Current stock price × Number of shares to be issued upon conversion =
$48 current stock price × 20 shares to be issued per bond = $960 conversion value
Conversion premium = $1,050 bond's current price – $960 conversion value = $90
conversion premium
Bonds paying a fixed coupon rate equal to the market rate for comparable bonds are issued at
par (face) value. If a bond's coupon rate at issuance is less (more) than the market rate, the bond
will be issued at a discount (premium). As market interest rates change, the market value of the
bond will also change. For fixed-rate bonds, when market interest rates rise the market value of
the bond falls, and vice versa.
Facts: A $1,000 face value bond maturing in three years pays annual interest of 4 percent.
Required: Calculate the bond's price If the market rate at the time of issuance is 5 percent.
Solution: Because the bond pays a lower coupon rate than market rate, it will be issued at
a discount to par. The calculation for the bond's price is as follows:
Year 1 payment: 40 / 1.05 = $38.10
Year 2 payment: 40 / (1.05)2 = $36.28
Year 3 payment: (40 + 1,000) / (1.05)3 = $898.39
Total value: $38.10 + $36.28 + $898.39 = $972.77
The market value of a bond is affected by changes in current market interest rates. When market
interest rates increase (decrease), market values of bonds decrease (increase). The duration of
a bond is a measure of how sensitive the bond is to changes in market rates. Duration is also
a measure of how much the price of the bond will change when there is a 1 percent change
in the market interest rate. The price of a bond with a higher duration will be more sensitive
to changes in the market interest rate than will the price of a bond with a lower duration. The
longer the term to maturity, the higher a bond's duration.
Assume that a 10-year, fixed-rate bond has a duration of 3.96. If market interest rates
increase by 1.50%, then the price change will be equal to 3.96 duration × 1.50% rate
increase = 5.94%. Because interest rates and bond prices move in opposite directions, the
price of the bond will decrease by 5.94%.
Pass Key
A bond's duration is a measure of its sensitivity to interest rates. The longer the term to
maturity, the higher the duration of a bond, and the more sensitive the bond's price is to
interest rate movements.
© Becker Professional Education Corporation. All rights reserved. Module 2 2–21 B.2. Long-Term
2 B.2. Long-Term Financial Management: Part 1 PART 2 UNIT 2
2 Equity Securities
Equity securities such as common stock and preferred stock represent proportional ownership
in the company. Holders of stock are the owners of a corporation. If a company has issued
shares to the public, the shares are traded on a stock exchange. Common stock and preferred
stock have different features and rights that affect their risk, expected return, and valuation.
Preferred stock may also come with detachable stock warrants (also called call options),
which give preferred stockholders the right to purchase common stock at a predetermined
price and date.
Preferred shares typically do not have voting rights.
Compared with debt, the advantages of issuing preferred stock include no fixed maturity date
and no contractual obligations to make dividend payments. Unlike debt, which provides the
benefit of a tax deduction for interest, dividends on preferred stock are paid from after-tax
earnings.
2.3 Stock Valuation: Absolute Value Models (Discounted Cash Flow) LOS 2B2e
Absolute value models assign an intrinsic value to an asset based on the present value of its
future cash flows. Estimates of cash flows are derived and discounted based on interest rates
applicable to the level of risk and required return associated with the asset and its projected
cash flows.
2.3.1 Annuities
An annuity is a series of equal cash flows to be received over a number of periods. The
traditional approach to asset valuation is the annuity present value formula, which divides future
cash flows by a rate of return in order to determine the value of the annuity in today's dollars.
© Becker Professional Education Corporation. All rights reserved. Module 2 2–23 B.2. Long-Term
2 B.2. Long-Term Financial Management: Part 1 PART 2 UNIT 2
Example 3 Perpetuities
Facts: Baker Corporation pays a constant annual dividend per share of $5 per year. Able
wants to invest in Baker and earn a 20 percent return.
Required: Calculate the value of Baker's stock.
Solution:
P = D—/—R
P = $5—/—20%
P = $25
Able should pay $25 for a share of Baker.
D(t + 1)
Pt =
R − G
The candidate may be given the dividend at time = t or Dt. To determine Dt + 1 , the numerator of
the formula becomes: Dt—(1 + G).
Where:
Rce = Required rate of return on common equity
Rf = Risk-free rate of return
β = Beta of the security
Rm = Market return
Under the CAPM formula, the [Rm − Rf—] term is also known as the market risk premium.
Facts: Baker Corporation pays a current dividend per share of $5 per year and is projected
to grow at 4 percent per year. Able wants to invest in Baker and earn a 20 percent return.
Required: Calculate the value of Baker's stock today.
Solution:
Pt = D(t+1) / (R − G)
D(t+1) = $5 × 1.04
D(t+1) = $5.20
Pt = $5.20 / (0.20 − 0.04)
Pt = $5.20 / (0.16)
Pt = $32.50
The intrinsic value of Baker's stock today is $32.50.
© Becker Professional Education Corporation. All rights reserved. Module 2 2–25 B.2. Long-Term
2 B.2. Long-Term Financial Management: Part 1 PART 2 UNIT 2
Facts: Baker Corporation pays a current dividend per share of $5 per year and is projected
to grow at 4 percent per year. Able wants to invest in Baker and earn a 20 percent return.
Required: Calculate the amount that Able will pay for Baker's stock three years from today.
Solution:
Pt = D(t+1) / (R − G)
D(t+1) = $5 × 1.04 × 1.04 × 1.04 × 1.04, or
D(t+1) = $5 × (1.04)4
D(t+1) = $5 × 1.1698586
D(t+1) = $5.85
Pt = D(t+1) / (R − G)
Pt = ($5.85) / (0.20 − 0.04)
Pt = $5.85 / (0.16)
Pt = $36.56
In order to value Baker in three years, the dividend to be paid in the fourth year is required.
Able should pay $36.56 for Baker in three years.
Dn 1
n D0 (1 g s )T (r gL )
Stock value = (1 r )T
(1 r )n
t 1
D0 = Current period dividend
gs = Short-term growth rate
gL = Long-term growth rate
r = Required rate of return
n = Number of years in the first stage (short-term, high-growth rate)
Dn+1 = D0 (1+ gs )n (1 + gL)
T = Payment period (i.e., one for Year 1, two for Year 2, etc.)
Facts: An investor evaluates a stock that expects to grow 5 percent per year for the next
three years and then 2 percent in perpetuity after three years.
Required: With a current dividend of $2.00 per share and a required return of 4 percent,
what should the investor pay for the stock today?
Solution: The first step is to solve for the dividend amount for the numerator of the last
term in the equation.
Dn+1 = $2.00(1 + 0.05)3(1 + 0.02) = $2.36156
$2.36156
$2.00(1 0.05)1 $2.00(1 0.05)2 $2.00(1 0.05)3 (0.04 0.02)
1 0.04 )1
(1 (1 0.04 )2 (1 0.04 )3 (1 0.04 )3
$111.09
Relative valuation models use the value of comparable stocks to determine the value of similar
stocks. Price multiples are useful metrics in relative valuation. Price multiples represent ratios of
a stock's market price to another measure of fundamental value per share. Investors use price
multiples to determine if a stock is undervalued, fairly valued, or overvalued.
Note: The above formula is the "forward P/E" as the denominator is based on expected earnings
over the next year or four quarters.
© Becker Professional Education Corporation. All rights reserved. Module 2 2–27 B.2. Long-Term
2 B.2. Long-Term Financial Management: Part 1 PART 2 UNIT 2
Facts: Assume that Baker Corporation has current-year earnings per share of $1.50 and
anticipates earnings per share in the coming year of $2.
Required: If the P/E ratio is 7.5x, calculate the expected value of Baker's shares.
Solution:
(P0 ) = (P0 / E1) × E1
(P0 ) = 7.5 × $2
(P0 ) = $15
The P/E ratio of 7.5x implies that the current stock price should be 7.5x the anticipated earnings
per share of $2. An investor would expect the current stock price to therefore be $15.
(P0 ) = (P0 / S1) × S1
(P0 ) = (P0 / B0) × B0
© Becker Professional Education Corporation. All rights reserved. Module 2 2–29 B.2. Long-Term
2 B.2. Long-Term Financial Management: Part 1 PART 2 UNIT 2
Facts: An analyst assembles the following financial and market data for Bolden
Corporation's most recent year-end.
Market Data
Common stock price $18
Common shares outstanding 10,000,000
Financial Data
Total assets $250,000,000
Total liabilities 110,000,000
Preferred stock 20,000,000
Common stock 25,000,000
Additional paid-in capital 45,000,000
Retained earnings 50,000,000
Total stockholders' equity 140,000,000
Required: Using the previous data, calculate the P/B multiple.
Solution:
The P/B multiple for Bolden Corporation's current year is derived as follows:
1. Determine book value of common equity
$25,000,000 (CS) + $45,000,000 (APIC) + $50,000,000 (RE) = $120,000,000
2. Determine book of common equity per share
$120,000,000 / 10,000,000 shares = $12
3. Calculate P/B multiple
P0 / B0 = $18 / $12
= 1.5
Facts: An investor is comparing market ratios for the XLX Company to those of its industry.
The following ratios were calculated at the end of the current fiscal year:
Required: Discuss what each ratio indicates regarding XLX stock valuation and how the
numbers can be interpreted.
Solution:
P/E Ratio: XLX has a higher P/E ratio than its industry peer group. This measure, on its
own, would indicate that the stock price for XLX is overvalued relative to that of its peers.
Investors would expect the price of XLX stock to decline in order to align the P/E ratio
with that of its peers.
P/S Ratio: This ratio indicates that XLX stock may actually be undervalued relative to
that of its peers. However, this ratio alone does not account for cost structure, capital
structure, or tax effects that should be evaluated before determining whether a stock is
relatively overvalued or undervalued.
P/B Ratio: Relative to the value of its equity, XLS's stock price is higher than that of its
peers. The stock may not necessarily be overvalued, as a higher P/B may indicate that
the market thinks that XLX's net assets are undervalued.
Question 1 MCQ-12663
A company issued 1,000 4.25 percent coupon bonds that pay interest annually, each with a
face value of $1,000 and maturing in four years. If the market rate at the time of the bond
issuance was 4.00 percent, the price of each bond on the issuance date is closest to:
a. $983.00.
b. $990.98.
c. $1,009.07.
d. $1,017.00.
© Becker Professional Education Corporation. All rights reserved. Module 2 2–31 B.2. Long-Term
2 B.2. Long-Term Financial Management: Part 1 PART 2 UNIT 2
Question 2 MCQ-12664
Reynolds is interested in a stock that pays a current dividend of $1.15 per share and has
a growth rate of 4 percent. The risk-free rate on U.S. Treasury securities is 2 percent, the
market return is 6 percent, and the beta of the stock is 1.10.
The price that Reynolds should pay for the stock is closest to:
a. $18.69.
b. $29.90.
c. $47.92.
d. $49.83.
This module covers the following content from the IMA Learning Outcome Statements.
CMA LOS Reference: Part 2—Section B.2. Long-Term Financial Management: Part 2
© Becker Professional Education Corporation. All rights reserved. Module 3 2–33 B.2. Long-Term
3 B.2. Long-Term Financial Management: Part 2 PART 2 UNIT 2
The weighted average cost of capital (WACC) serves as a major link between the long-term
investment decisions associated with a corporation's capital structure and the wealth of a
corporation's owners. The weighted average cost of capital is the average cost of all forms
of financing used by a company. WACC is often used internally as a hurdle rate for capital
investment decisions. The theoretical optimal capital structure is the mix of financing
instruments that produces the lowest WACC.
Pass Key
The value of a firm can be computed as the present value of the cash flow it produces,
discounted by the costs of capital used to finance it. The mixture of debt and equity
financing that produces the lowest WACC maximizes the value of the firm.
LOS 2B2r 1.1 Computing the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
The weighted average cost of capital (WACC) is the average cost of debt and equity financing
associated with a firm's existing assets and operations.
1.1.1 Formula
The weighted average cost of capital is determined by weighting the cost of each specific type of
capital by its proportion to the firm's total capital structure.
The percentage equity and percentage debt in the capital structure is calculated using the
market values of the outstanding debt and equity, if market values are available.
Facts: Assume that the cost of common stock equity for XYZ Company is 8.4 percent, the
cost of preferred stock equity is 6.8 percent, and the weighted average interest rate on the
company's debt is 6.0 percent. Also, assume that the market value percentages of each
component of the capital structure are 55 percent common stock, 20 percent preferred
stock, and 25 percent debt. The corporate tax rate is 30 percent.
Required: Compute XYZ's WACC.
Solution:
1. Cost of debt (after tax):
= Interest rate × (1 − Tax rate)
= 6.0% × (1 − 30%)
= 4.2%
2. WACC = (8.4% × 55%) + (6.8% × 20%) + (4.2% × 25%) = 7.03%
If XYZ is using its WACC as the hurdle rate, then it should invest in any project that will yield
a return higher than 7.03%.
© Becker Professional Education Corporation. All rights reserved. Module 3 2–35 B.2. Long-Term
3 B.2. Long-Term Financial Management: Part 2 PART 2 UNIT 2
Facts: Assume that the long-term debt component of the weighted average cost of capital
for a firm includes a pretax cost of debt of 12.5 percent and a 30 percent tax rate.
Required: Compute the after-tax cost of long-term debt.
Solution:
After-tax cost of long-term debt = Pretax cost of debt × (1 − Tax rate)
= 0.125 × (1 − 0.30)
= 0.125 × 0.7
= 0.0875 = 8.75%
Although the pretax interest rate is 12.5 percent, the after-tax interest rate, after considering
the deductibility of the interest expense, is 8.75 percent. Note that if the tax rate increased
to 40 percent, the cost of debt would decrease to 7.5 percent [12.5% × (1 − 0.40)].
Pass Key
Debt carries the lowest cost of capital because the interest is tax deductible.
The higher the tax rate, the higher the incentive exists to use debt financing.
1.3.1 Formula
Facts: Assume that the preferred stock component of the weighted average cost of capital
for a firm is 10 percent, $100 par value preferred stock that was issued at par value with a
flotation cost of $5 per share.
Required: Compute the cost of preferred stock.
Solution:
Preferred stock dividend = Dividend percentage times par value = 10% × $100 = $10
Cost of preferred stock = Dividends / Net proceeds
= $10 / ($100 − $5)
= $10 / $95
= 0.1053 = 10.53%
© Becker Professional Education Corporation. All rights reserved. Module 3 2–37 B.2. Long-Term
3 B.2. Long-Term Financial Management: Part 2 PART 2 UNIT 2
Under the CAPM formula, the [Rm − Rf—] term is also known as the market risk premium.
Facts: Assume that a firm's beta is 1.25, the risk-free rate is 8.75 percent, and the market
rate of return is 14.25 percent.
Required: Compute the cost of retained earnings using the capital asset pricing model (CAPM).
Solution: Cost of retained earnings using the capital asset pricing model (CAPM):
Cost of retained earnings = Rce = Rf + β[Rm − Rf—]
= 0.0875 + [1.25 × (0.1425 − 0.0875)]
= 0.0875 + [1.25 × 0.0550]
= 0.0875 + 0.0688
= 0.1563 = 15.63%
D1
Cost of retained earnings = + g
P0
Where:
P0 = Current market value or price of the outstanding common stock
D1 = The dividend per share expected at the end of one year
g = The constant rate of growth in dividends
Facts: Assume that a firm is a constant growth firm that just paid an annual common stock
dividend of $2.00, has a dividend growth rate of 7.5 percent, and a current market price for
common stock of $25.25 per share.
Required: Compute the cost of retained earnings using the discounted cash flow
(DCF) method.
Solution: Compute the dividend per share expected at the end of the year as follows:
D1 = D0 × (1 + g)
D1 = $2.00 × (1 + 0.075)
D1 = $2.00 × 1.075
D1 = $2.15
Cost of retained earnings using the discounted cash flow (DCF) method:
Cost of retained earnings = (D1 / P0) + g
= ($2.15 / $25.25) + 0.075
= 0.0851 + 0.075
= 0.1601 = 16.01%
Cost of retained earnings = Pretax cost of long-term debt + Market risk premium
© Becker Professional Education Corporation. All rights reserved. Module 3 2–39 B.2. Long-Term
3 B.2. Long-Term Financial Management: Part 2 PART 2 UNIT 2
Facts: Assume that a firm has estimated its market risk premium at 4.5 percent and has
determined that the yield to maturity on its own bonds is 11.34 percent.
Required: Compute the cost of retained earnings using the bond yield plus risk premium
(BYRP) method.
Solution: Cost of retained earnings using the bond yield plus risk premium method:
Cost of retained earnings = Firm's own bond yield + Market risk premium
= 0.1134 + 0.045
= 0.1584 = 15.84%
In this example, the firm achieves its lowest WACC when its debt-to-equity ratio is at 4.0.
12.0%
10.0%
8.0%
6.0%
4.0%
2.0%
0.0%
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 Debt-to-Equity Ratio
Generally, new projects are funded by sources of capital that maintain the optimum capital
structure (ratio of debt2B_Determination of Lowest
to equity) and meet Wacc
or exceed the hurdle rate implied by its cost. The
historic weighted average cost of capital may not be appropriate for use as a discount rate for
a new capital project unless the project carries the same risk as the corporation and results in
identical leveraging characteristics.
© Becker Professional Education Corporation. All rights reserved. Module 3 2–41 B.2. Long-Term
3 B.2. Long-Term Financial Management: Part 2 PART 2 UNIT 2
The following schedule shows the expected cost of debt and cost of equity for the company:
The company wants to maintain a capital structure of 50 percent debt and 50 percent equity.
Required:
1. What projects should the company invest in if the tax rate is 30 percent?
2. Will the decision be any different if the income tax rate is 20 percent?
Solution:
1. Because company management prefers projects with higher returns, the first step is
to arrange the projects in descending order based on the expected rate of return of
each investment:
Cumulative Required
Project Required Investment Investment Expected Rate of Return
Project B $2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 19.40%
Project F $5,000,000 $ 7,000,000 17.50%
Project C $6,000,000 $13,000,000 12.20%
Project D $4,000,000 $17,000,000 10.70%
Project A $4,000,000 $21,000,000 8.80%
Project E $3,000,000 $24,000,000 7.80%
(continued)
(continued)
The weighted average cost of capital is determined for the different levels of financing
as follows:
For the first $10,000,000 the marginal WACC = (50% × 6%) + (50% × 12%) = 9%
For the second $10,000,000 the marginal WACC = (50% × 8%) + (50% × 16%) = 12%
For all additional capital the marginal WACC = (50% × 10%) + (50% × 18%) = 14%
According to the above calculations, only projects B, F, and C are viable and will be
selected by the company's management. The cumulative amount needed to finance
these investments is $13,000,000. The first $10,000,000 cumulative increment of
investments will have a cost of capital of 9.00 percent; the next $3,000,000 will have a
cost of capital of 12.00 percent. The three selected projects each have an expected rate
of return that are higher than the marginal cost of capital. Projects D, A, and E will not
be undertaken because each of their expected rates of return is less than the marginal
cost of capital needed to finance those projects.
2. The following schedule shows the expected cost of debt and cost of equity for the
company if the income tax rate is 20 percent:
The weighted average cost of capital is determined for the different levels of financing
as follows:
For the first $10,000,000
= (50% × 6.86%) + (50% × 12.00%) = 9.43%
the marginal WACC
© Becker Professional Education Corporation. All rights reserved. Module 3 2–43 B.2. Long-Term
3 B.2. Long-Term Financial Management: Part 2 PART 2 UNIT 2
A derivative security derives its value from the price of another asset or another liability.
Derivatives are useful for risk management because the fair values or cash flows of these
instruments can be used to hedge or offset the changes in fair values or cash flows of other
assets or liabilities that are at risk. Derivatives may also be used for speculative purposes,
with a goal of profiting from fluctuations in the value of the underlying asset or liability and/or
fluctuations in the price of the derivative itself.
2.1.2 Underlying
An underlying is a specified price, rate, or other variable (e.g., interest rate, security or
commodity price, foreign exchange rate, index of prices or rates, etc.), including a scheduled
event (e.g., a payment under contract) that may or may not occur.
2.1.6 Hedging
Hedging is the use of a derivative to offset anticipated losses or to reduce earnings volatility.
When a hedge is effective, the change in the value of the derivative offsets the change in value of
a hedged item or the cash flows of the hedged item.
An investor holds a long position in a derivative contract that locks in a price of $15 for the
purchase of an asset. If the price of the underlying asset goes up to $20, the investor can
pay $15 to the seller, take possession of the underlying asset, and then immediately sell
that asset for $20 and earn a $5 profit. Or, more commonly, the seller (who holds a short
position in the contract) will settle by paying the investor $5 rather than deliver the asset to
the investor.
If, on the other hand, the price of the asset falls below $15, the investor (long position) does
not benefit, but the seller (short position) does benefit. For example, if the price of the asset
drops to $12, the investor will be required to pay the seller the $3 difference.
Forward commitments allow the holder to lock in a price today to buy or sell an underlying asset
at some point in the future. There are three types of forward commitments: forward contracts,
futures contracts, and swaps.
© Becker Professional Education Corporation. All rights reserved. Module 3 2–45 B.2. Long-Term
3 B.2. Long-Term Financial Management: Part 2 PART 2 UNIT 2
On January 1, Year 1, Jones Company entered into a long position on a futures contract in
which it agreed to buy €100,000 for $1.67/€ on April 1, Year 1. On April 1, Year 1, the spot
rate was $1.74/€.
Underlying: $1.67/€
Notional amount: €100,000
Initial net investment: $0 (no cost to enter into the futures contract)
Settlement amount: $1.67/€ × €100,000 = $167,000
Derivatives generally have multiple settlement options. This derivative could be settled in
the following ways:
1. Jones could pay $167,000 and receive €100,000. Jones could then realize a $7,000 gain
by selling the €100,000 at the spot rate of $1.74/€ ($174,000 – $167,000 = $7,000).
2. The other party to the futures contract could pay $7,000 to Jones. This is a net
settlement. Jones could then purchase the €100,000 for $174,000 and still show a net
outflow of $167,000 ($174,000 purchase price – $7,000 gain).
If the spot rate on April 1 had been $1.59/€, Jones would have realized loss on the contract
because Jones would have paid $167,000 for €100,000 that could have been purchased
outside the futures contract for only $159,000 (€100,000 × $1.59/€).
East Company has invested in $1,000,000 of 8 percent fixed rate bonds. East expects
interest rates to increase during the next 12 months. On January 1, East Company enters
into an interest rate swap with West Company in which East Company agrees to make to
West Company a series of future payments equal to the fixed interest rate of 8 percent on
the principal amount of $1,000,000. In exchange, West Company agrees to make to East
Company a series of future payments equal to a floating interest rate of SOFR* + 1 percent
on the principal amount of $1,000,000.
Underlying: East Company—8%, and West Company—SOFR + 1%
Notional amount: $1,000,000
Initial net investment: $0 (no cost to enter into the swap contract)
Settlement amount: East Company—8% × $1,000,000 = $80,000, and West
Company—(SOFR + 1%) × $1,000,000
On the first settlement date, SOFR was 8.5 percent and the following amounts were exchanged:
$80,000
East Company West Company
Foreign currency (FX) swaps are designed to allow each party to gain exposure to a currency
other than each party's own. Payments in one currency are swapped for payments in another
currency at an agreed upon exchange rate.
© Becker Professional Education Corporation. All rights reserved. Module 3 2–47 B.2. Long-Term
3 B.2. Long-Term Financial Management: Part 2 PART 2 UNIT 2
Facts: In order to hedge its future raw material purchases for its operations, in Poland, a
U.S. manufacturing firm (U.S. counterparty) agrees to enter into a currency swap with a
Polish multinational firm (foreign counterparty) whereby the U.S. counterparty agrees to
provide the following quarterly notional amounts in U.S. dollars to the foreign counterparty
in exchange for the following quarterly notional amounts in Polish zlotys.
Quarter End U.S. Counterparty Receives Foreign Counterparty Receives
1 1,500,000 zloty 500,000 USD
2 900,000 zloty 300,000 USD
3 750,000 zloty 250,000 USD
4 1,800,000 zloty 600,000 USD
Assume that the exchange rates are 3.25 zloty/1.0 USD and 2.85 zloty/1.0 USD at the end of
quarter 1 and quarter 2, respectively.
Required: Calculate the U.S. manufacturing firm's foreign currency gain or loss recorded at
the end of the first and second quarters on the currency swap.
Solution: The U.S. manufacturing firm (U.S. counterparty) entered into a fixed notional
amount currency swap with a foreign counterparty when the exchange rates were 3.0
zloty/1.0 USD. Because the contractual quarterly payments made in U.S. dollars to the
Polish firm are fixed at that exchange rate throughout the swap, any movement up or
down of these two exchange rates will result in a foreign currency gain or loss.
In the first quarter, the U.S. dollar appreciates versus the Polish zloty, so the U.S.
counterparty incurs a foreign currency loss. Under the terms of the currency swap, the U.S.
counterparty pays 500,000 U.S. dollars and receives 1,500,000 zloty (based on an exchange
rate of 3.0 zloty/1.0 USD). The 1,500,000 zloty received are worth only 461,538 U.S. dollars
based on the end of quarter exchange rate of 3.25 zloty/1.0 USD:
1,500,000 / 3.25 = 461,538 USD
Paying 500,000 U.S. dollars and receiving zloty worth only 463,538 U.S. dollars represents a
loss of 38,462 U.S. dollars:
500,000 – 461,538 = 38,462 USD
In the second quarter, the U.S. dollar depreciates versus the Polish zloty. As a result of
the swap, the U.S. counterparty incurs a foreign currency gain. The U.S. counterparty pays
300,000 U.S. dollars and receives 900,000 zloty. The value in U.S. dollars of 900,000 zloty
based on the end of quarter exchange rate of 2.85 zloty/1.0 USD is 315,789 U.S. dollars.
900,000 / 2.85 = 315,789
Paying 300,000 U.S. dollars and receiving zloty worth 315,789 U.S. dollars represents a gain
of 15,789 in U.S. dollars:
315,789 – 300,000 = 15,789 USD
Pass Key
Derivatives are a zero-sum game. When one party wins, the other party loses. If, for
example, a derivative position moves in the favor of the option holder, the derivative
position has moved against the option writer.
An option is a contract between two parties that gives one party the right, but not the obligation, LOS 2B2l
to buy or sell an underlying asset to the other party at a specified price (the strike price or
exercise price) during a specified period of time. The option buyer, or holder, must pay a
premium to the option seller, or writer, to enter into the option contract. A call option gives the
holder the right to buy from the option writer at a specified price during a specified period of
time. A put option gives the holder the right to sell to the option writer at a specified price during
a specified period of time.
On January 1, Year 1, Roberts Company purchased a put option on the stock of Buy Big Inc.
The option gave Roberts the right to sell 10,000 shares of Buy Big stock at $75/share during
the next 30 days. Roberts paid a premium of $2/share to enter into the option. Roberts
exercised the option when Buy Big stock was selling for $69/share.
Underlying: $75/share
Notional amount: 10,000 shares of Buy Big stock
Initial net investment: $2/share × 10,000 shares = $20,000
Settlement amount: $75/share × 10,000 shares = $750,000
Derivatives generally have multiple settlement options. This derivative could be settled in
the following ways:
1. Roberts could deliver 10,000 shares of Big Buy stock to the option writer in exchange
for $750,000. Note that these shares could either be shares already owned by Roberts,
or shares purchased by Roberts for $690,000 ($69/share market price × 10,000 shares)
and then delivered to the option writer. Either way, Roberts realizes a gain of $60,000
[($75/share exercise price – $69/share market price) × 10,000 shares]. The option writer
realizes a loss of $60,000 because the option writer must pay $75/share for stock with a
market value of $69/share.
2. The option writer could pay Roberts $60,000 to settle the contract. This is a net settlement.
Because $20,000 was paid to purchase the put option, Roberts will report a net gain of
$40,000 ($60,000 gain – $20,000 premium). If the stock price had remained above $75/
share during the 30-day period, Roberts would not have exercised the option.
© Becker Professional Education Corporation. All rights reserved. Module 3 2–49 B.2. Long-Term
3 B.2. Long-Term Financial Management: Part 2 PART 2 UNIT 2
The Black-Scholes model is used to determine the value of a call option or put option. Six inputs
are used in the model. Although the model calculation itself is outside of the scope of the exam,
the inputs and their effect on the value of the option are important to understand. Note that the
impact with respect to the first four inputs has opposite effects on calls and puts.
Entities use other sources of long-term financing, including leases, convertible securities,
and warrants.
3.1 Leases
A lease is a contractual agreement between a lessor and a lessee that provides the lessee the
right to use property owned by the lessor for a specified period of time in return for periodic
cash payments (rents) from the lessee to the lessor.
Under U.S. GAAP, the lessee must record (capitalize) the present value of future payments as
a right-of-use (ROU) asset and must also record a corresponding lease liability when the lease
meets at least one of the following criteria:
Ownership of the underlying asset transfers from the lessor to the lessee by the end of the
lease term.
The lessee has the written option to purchase the underlying asset; the option is one that
the lessee is "reasonably certain" to exercise.
The net present value of all lease payments plus the net present value of any guaranteed
residual value are equal to or substantially exceed the underlying asset's fair value.
The term of the lease represents the major part of the economic life remaining for the
underlying asset.
The asset is specialized such that it will not have an expected, alternative use to the lessor
when the lease term ends.
Lease requirements under IFRS differ from U.S. GAAP in a few critical areas:
Lessees do not have to record leased assets under IFRS if the value is less than $5,000,
whereas GAAP has no dollar threshold.
IFRS requires lessees to account for only finance leases and not for operating leases,
whereas GAAP has two classifications (operating and finance).
3.3 Warrants
Warrants provide their holders the option to buy shares of stock during a future period at an
established exercise price (strike price). The issuing company receives new capital only if the
holders of the warrants exercise the warrants. Warrants can be offered either as standalone
products or as an attachment to other offerings, such as bonds.
A warrant allows the issuing company to reduce the interest rate on the bond because the
buyers of the bonds are receiving the value of the warrant in addition to the bond. Usually,
warrants included with bonds are detachable warrants. Detachable warrants allow the holder
to separate the two securities (the bond and the warrants) and choose to hold or to sell
each independently.
© Becker Professional Education Corporation. All rights reserved. Module 3 2–51 B.2. Long-Term
3 B.2. Long-Term Financial Management: Part 2 PART 2 UNIT 2
Changes in inflation and interest rates have a direct impact on the prices of financial instruments.
If you take out a loan with a 10 percent nominal interest rate and the inflation rate is
3 percent, then your real interest rate is only 7 percent. That is, after adjusting for the fact
that the dollars with which you will repay the loan in the future are worth less than current
dollars due to inflation, you are really only paying 7 percent to borrow the money.
Question 1 MCQ-12665
An investor has a long put option on XYZ stock and a long call option on ABC, both expiring
in 90 days. If interest rates decrease, what will happen to the values of the put position and
the call position from the investor's perspective?
a. The values of the put and the call will both be lower.
b. The values of the put and the call will both be higher.
c. The put value will be higher while the call value will be lower.
d. The put value will be lower while the call value will be higher.
Question 2 MCQ-12666
Question 3 MCQ-12667
On June 1, an investor shorted five three-month forward contracts each for 500 bushels of
wheat for $5.20 per bushel. The spot price on September 1 was $4.70 per bushel.
As a result of the transaction the investor will record a:
a. Loss of $250.
b. Gain of $250.
c. Loss of $1,250.
d. Gain of $1,250.
© Becker Professional Education Corporation. All rights reserved. Module 3 2–53 B.2. Long-Term
3 B.2. Long-Term Financial Management: Part 2 PART 2 UNIT 2
NOTES
This module covers the following content from the IMA Learning Outcome Statements.
The term financial market refers to any marketplace in which securities and other financial
instruments are bought and sold. These markets are necessary because they facilitate the
allocation of resources, create liquidity for businesses, and provide a place of exchange for
buyers and sellers. Investors or lenders seeking to earn a return on excess funds use financial
markets to invest in or lend to businesses that need funds.
Securities traded in financial markets include equity securities, debt securities, and derivatives.
Primary markets are those markets in which securities are initially sold in transactions known
as initial public offerings (IPOs). Secondary markets are exchanges where buyers and sellers of
previously sold securities come together to buy and sell securities subsequent to the IPO.
1.1.1 Exchanges
Exchanges can be either physical or electronic.
Originally, physical exchanges, like the New York Stock Exchange, were auction markets
where sellers and buyers came together in a physical location to execute transactions.
Today, most exchanges offer their services electronically.
Electronic exchanges are often used by smaller companies and by dealers buying and selling
for their own accounts who then resell the securities to profit from the difference (the
spread) between the selling price (ask price) and the buying price (bid price).
Market efficiency refers to how well current market prices reflect all available, relevant
information. If a market is efficient, then no single investor can make above-normal profits
because everyone trading in the market has the same information, which is reflected in the
market price of the security. As more information becomes available, the market becomes more
efficient with fewer opportunities to make above-average rates of return.
There are three market efficiency hypotheses:
1. Weak Form Efficiency: The market prices of securities reflect only historical information
regarding trends in price and volume. Analysts often use technical analysis by analyzing
historical trends to predict future market movements. In the weak-form efficient market
hypothesis, a technical analyst depending on analyzing trends in historical stock prices and
changes in trade volume cannot make abnormal or superior profits compared with other
investors because that information is already reflected in the market prices of the securities.
2. Semi-Strong Form Efficiency: The market prices reflect not only historical price and
volume trends but also other published information, including earnings announcements,
new product announcements, and economic news. Analysts use this type of information to
conduct fundamental analysis, which involves analyzing a company's core financial statements
(balance sheet, income statement, statement of cash flows), as well as the company's industry,
competition, and historical performance given the economic circumstances. As the information
becomes public information, it will immediately be reflected in the market prices of the
securities and, as a result, superior risk-adjusted returns are not achievable. New information
comes to the market independent from other information and in a random fashion.
3. Strong Form Efficiency: The strong-form market efficiency hypothesis states that market
prices reflect all possible information, including private information usually known only to
insiders (individuals with privileged information). With strong form efficiency, all information
including private information is reflected in market prices, which means that an investor
would not be able to achieve an above-average return making trades using such information.
Pass Key
A corporation's attorney worked to obtain a new patent for the corporation and filed the
documents on behalf of the company. The attorney purchased 100,000 shares before the
patent was awarded and made public. The attorney knows that when the patent is awarded,
the price of the company's stock will increase. The attorney's purchase of the 100,000 shares
of stock is illegal in many countries because the attorney used private, material information
for personal benefit before the information became public knowledge.
Pass Key
Trading based on private information that makes abnormal profits for the trader is an
indicator that markets are not strong-form efficient. The private information is not reflected
in market prices.
Investment banks are banks that specialize in facilitating investment transactions for companies
seeking to issue new shares of stock or bonds. Investment banks offer advisory services, provide
a platform for selling new securities for businesses, and act as a broker or underwriter of
the sale.
3.1 Advising
An investment bank serving as an advisor provides the following services:
Development of financial models to determine the type of securities to issue and the
issuance price of the securities.
Assist in the development and filing of registration statements such as those required by the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the United States when issuers (publicly held
entities) issue new securities.
3.2 Underwriting
When a company seeks to raise funds through the issuance of stocks or bonds, the company
usually approaches an investment bank that sells the securities in the market to investors. This
process performed by the investment bank is called underwriting. The investment bank acts as
either a facilitator that sells to the market for a fee or purchases the issue and then sells it to
the market.
When underwriting, an investment bank may have three roles:
1. Firm Commitment: Under this arrangement, the parties agree that the bank assumes
all the risks regarding the issuance, with the investment bank purchasing and holding
("absorbing") all stocks or bonds that are not sold to the public.
2. Best Efforts: In this arrangement, the investment bank's role is to use the bank's best
efforts to market the securities to the public, but the investment bank has no commitment
to absorb the unsold securities.
3. All or None: The entire issue must be sold in order for the trade to be completed. Under
this arrangement, the investment bank bears little risk and is not responsible for purchasing
the shares if the issuance transaction is canceled.
3.3 Trading
Most investment banks have a trading department to execute stock and bond transactions
for clients.
A credit rating agency is an independent company that analyzes financial and qualitative data to
assess an entity's ability to pay both the interest and principal on debt. Entities may be companies,
state or local governments, non-for-profit organizations, or sovereign nations. Debt instruments
include government bonds, corporate bonds, certificates of deposit, municipal bonds, preferred
stock, or collateralized debt obligations. At the completion of the credit rating agency's analysis,
a grade or rating is given to the entity. A higher rating signals to the market that the entity is less
risky, which allows the entity to borrow from lenders at lower rates of interest.
The major credit rating agencies are Moody's Investors Service, Standard & Poor's (S&P), and
Fitch Ratings. Each agency has a rating system that divides securities into either investment
grade (high-quality bonds) or speculative (junk bonds). The lower the rating, the higher the
interest rate the entity must pay on its debt securities. The higher the rating, the lower the
interest rate on the entity's debt and the lower the entity's cost of capital. Each ratings agency
provides both a short-term credit rating service rating and a long-term credit rating service.
6 Distributions to Shareholders
A dividend is a pro rata distribution by a corporation based on the shares of a particular class of
stock and usually represents a distribution of earnings. Cash dividends are the most common
type of dividend distribution, although there are many other types (covered below). Preferred
stock usually pays a fixed dividend, expressed in dollars or as a percentage.
Facts: On January 1, Year 1, Samuel Co. issued 100,000 shares of $5 par common stock
and 25,000 shares of $10 par fully participating 8 percent cumulative preferred stock.
No dividends were paid in Year 1. Cash dividends of $101,000 were declared and paid
in Year 2.
Required: Determine the dividend to be paid on the preferred and common stock.
Solution:
Schedule 1: Dividends Remaining for Distribution
Cash dividends $101,000
Year 1 preferred dividends in arrears [(25,000 × $10) × 0.08] (20,000)
Preferred dividends accumulated in Year 2 (20,000)
61,000
Common stock [(100,000 × $5) × 0.08]* (40,000)
Remaining for proration between preferred and common stock $ 21,000
Common stock
500,000
× $21,000 = $14,000
750,000
*The principle applied here is that, with participating cumulative preferred stock, before
any proration of dividends may exist, the common shareholders must receive an equal
dividend as the preferred shareholders. In this case, preferred shareholders receive an
8 percent dividend first; common shareholders receive an 8 percent dividend second; and
the balance ($21,000) is shared pro rata.
Cash dividends distribute cash to shareholders and may be declared on common or preferred
stock. They are paid from retained earnings. Dividends are paid only on authorized, issued, and
outstanding shares. They are not paid (or declared) on treasury stock.
Capital Corp. has 100,000 shares of $10 par value common stock outstanding. The
company declares a stock dividend of 5,000 shares when the fair market value is $15 (on
the date of declaration). 5,000 shares / 100,000 shares = 5%, which is considered a small
stock dividend. The amount of the distribution is (5,000 × $15 FV) $75,000.
LMT Corp. declares a 40 percent stock dividend on its 1,000,000 shares of outstanding $10
par common stock (5,000,000 authorized). On the date of declaration, LMT stock is selling
for $20 per share. Total stock dividend (0.40 × 1,000,000) of 400,000 shares valued at
$4,000,000 (400,000 shares @ $10 per share par) should be recorded.
A company's board sets the policy for what profits to distribute as dividends and what to retain
for the purpose of business expansion. The dividend policy that the board adopts signals to the
market its expectations of future profitability.
Leases are used by public and private entities as a means of gaining access to assets and
reducing their exposure to the full risks of asset ownership. A lease is defined as a contractual
agreement between a lessor who conveys the right to use real or personal property (an asset)
and a lessee who agrees to pay consideration for this right over a specific period of time. In
order for a contract to be a lease or contain a lease, both of the criteria below must be met.
The contract must depend on an identifiable asset in which the lessor does not have a
substantive substitution right.
The contract must convey the right to control the use of the asset over the lease term to
the lessee. The lessee will have the right to obtain substantially all of the economic benefits
from using the asset and have the right to direct its use.
Bentley Corp. has a written agreement in place to allow Riggs Inc. to use scientific
equipment with a book value of $75,000 for the next five years. Bentley has the right to
replace the equipment with a comparable piece of equipment during the term, but Riggs
is able to use the asset as it wishes for the next five years while keeping any cash inflows
associated with outputs from the equipment.
This is an example of a lease, as there is a contract in place that defines the asset itself,
recognizes Bentley's right to substitute the asset, and provides Riggs with the economic
benefits of and direction for the use of the asset.
7.4 Decision-Making
Two Decisions
Pass Key
If the PV of the cost of the best source of financing is less than the PV of the operating cash
flows, then the project should be undertaken.
Facts: Boulder Inc. is considering the acquisition of a new machine, either through a lease
or by purchasing the asset.
The asset will cost $200,000 on January 1, Year 1, and will have a scrap value of $25,000 at
the end of Year 2.
Operating inflows are $150,000 for two years.
The tax rate is 30 percent and the company's weighted average cost of capital is 9 percent.
The machine is fully depreciated on a straight-line basis over two years for both book and
tax purposes.
Boulder's financing options for the asset are:
using a bank loan at a 10 percent interest rate; or
leasing for $92,500 a year, with lease payments due on January 1 of each year.
Relevant PV factors include the following:
PV of ordinary annuity at 9% 1.759
PV of annuity due at 7% 1.935
PV of $1 at 7%
Year 1 0.935
Year 2 0.873
Required:
Determine the operational benefit of the project.
Determine how the project should be financed.
Determine the NPV of the investment.
(continued)
(continued)
Solution:
Operational Benefit
PV of annual after-tax cash inflow = [$150,000 × (1 – 30%)] × 1.759
PV of annual after-tax cash inflow = $105,000 × 1.759 = $184,695
Financing Decision
After-tax cost of debt = 10% × (1 – 30%) = 7%
—Borrow
— and buy asset
Annual depreciation tax shield = $100,000 × 30% = $30,000
After-tax cash inflow from scrap = $25,000 × (1 – 30%) = $17,500
Year 0 Year 1 Year 2
Cost of machine $(200,000)
Depreciation tax shield $30,000 $30,000
Scrap – – 17,500
After-tax cash flow (200,000) 30,000 47,500
Discount rate 1 0.935 0.873
Present value $(200,000) $28,050 $41,468 = $(130,483)
—Lease
—
PV of annual after-tax cash outflow = [$92,500 × (1 – 30%)] × 1.935
PV of annual after-tax cash outflow = $64,750 × 1.935 = $(125,291)
Project should be financed using the lease because the NPV of the cost is lower.
Net Present Value
PV of operating inflows $184,695
PV of lease financing (125,291)
Net present value $ 59,404
Question 1 MCQ-12668
Question 2 MCQ-12669
All the following conditions must occur for a market to be considered perfectly efficient except:
a. Information is inexpensive or free and widely available to market participants at
approximately the same time.
b. Information is generated in a specific fashion such that announcements are
basically dependent of each other.
c. There are many rational, profit-maximizing investors who actively participate in
the market.
d. Investors react quickly and fully to the new information, causing stock prices to
adjust accordingly.
Question 3 MCQ-12670
The board of directors declared dividends of $450,000 in Year 4. On December 31, Year 4,
the company had 100,000 common shares ($20 par value) and 20,000 8 percent cumulative
preferred shares ($100 par value) outstanding. Dividends were not declared for Year 3
but were declared in all previous years. How much in total dividends will be distributed to
common shareholders in Year 4?
a. $130,000
b. $320,000
c. $160,000
d. $290,000
This module covers the following content from the IMA Learning Outcome Statements.
© Becker Professional Education Corporation. All rights reserved. Module 5 2–73 B.4. Workin
5 B.4. Working Capital Management: Part 1 PART 2 UNIT 2
1 Working Capital
Working capital policy and working capital management involve managing cash so that a
company can meet its short-term obligations, and include all aspects of the administration of
current assets (CA) and current liabilities (CL). The goal of working capital management is to
manage liquidity efficiently. The optimal mix of current assets and current liabilities depends
on the nature of the business and the industry and requires offsetting the benefit of CA and CL
against the possibility of technical insolvency.
Current assets are cash and other assets that are expected to be converted into cash, sold, or
consumed within one year or within one operating cycle, whichever is longer.
Current liabilities are amounts owed by a company that will be repaid or liquidated using current
assets within one year or within one operating cycle, whichever is longer.
XYZ Co.
Adjusted Trial Balance
As of December 31, Year 1
Account Debit Credit
Cash $ 23,300
Accounts receivable 32,500
Inventory 65,000
Office equipment 75,000
Accumulated depreciation—office equipment $ 10,000
Accounts payable 26,100
Salaries payable 3,000
Notes payable (matures in Year 2) 30,000
Common stock 80,000
Retained earnings 16,050
Sales revenue 180,000
Cost of goods sold 95,000
Salaries expense 32,350
Rent expense 14,000
Supplies expense 2,000
Utilities expense 6,000
Total $345,150 $345,150
Required: Based on the adjusted trial balance, calculate net working capital.
Solution:
Net working capital = Current assets – Current liabilities
Net working capital = ( Cash + Accounts receivable + Inventory) – (Accounts payable
+ Salaries payable + Notes payable)
Net working capital = ($23,300 + $32,500 + $65,000) – ($26,100 + $3,000 + $30,000)
Net working capital = $120,800 – $59,100 = $61,700
Pass Key
Working capital increases if either current assets increase or current liabilities decrease.
Working capital decreases if either current assets decrease or current liabilities increase.
© Becker Professional Education Corporation. All rights reserved. Module 5 2–75 B.4. Workin
5 B.4. Working Capital Management: Part 1 PART 2 UNIT 2
Current assets
Current ratio =
Current liabilities
A restaurant might have low CA (e.g., accounts receivable and inventory) relative to CL (e.g.,
accounts payable and payroll obligations) and therefore a current ratio less than 1 but
might otherwise be healthy in terms of increasing cash flows, growing reputation, good
location, and limited long-term debt obligations.
A bookstore might have a high CA (e.g., inventory) relative to CL (e.g., accounts payable)
and therefore a current ratio greater than 1 but might otherwise be unhealthy in terms of
diminishing cash flows, poor location, increased competition from Internet vendors, and
low inventory turnover.
XYZ Co.
Adjusted Trial Balance
As of December 31, Year 1
© Becker Professional Education Corporation. All rights reserved. Module 5 2–77 B.4. Workin
5 B.4. Working Capital Management: Part 1 PART 2 UNIT 2
2.1.2 Advantages
Increased Profitability: Rapid conversion of operating cycle components (e.g., inventory,
receivables) into cash in order to meet short-term obligations carries the potential of
increased profitability and improved liquidity.
Decreased Financing Cost: Short-term interest rates are generally lower than long-term
interest rates given the shorter duration of the financing instruments.
2.1.3 Disadvantages
Increased Interest Rate Risk: Interest rates may abruptly change, and given shorter
maturities, may require greater financing charges than anticipated on future refinancing.
Decreased Capital Availability: Lender evaluation of creditworthiness may change and
thereby make financing impossible or less favorable by virtue of increased rates and/or less
favorable terms.
2.2.2 Advantages
Decreased Interest Rate Risk: For the borrower, long-term financing locks in an interest
rate over a long period, thereby reducing the exposure to fluctuations in rates.
Increased Capital Availability: Securing long-term debt guarantees financing over a long
period and reduces the company's exposure to any risk that refinancing might be denied or
modified with less favorable terms.
2.2.3 Disadvantages
Decreased Profitability: Higher financing costs reduce profitability.
Increased Financing Costs: Long-term debt generally carries a higher interest rate given
the longer duration of the financing instruments.
Interest Rate Risk: Lender's Perspective
For the lenders, a higher interest rate is charged for longer-term debt because the
likelihood that interest rates will change over the period of the loan increases as
the term of the loan increases. Higher financing charges compensate the lender for
increased interest rate risk. Therefore, the lenders recognize their exposure to interest
rate risk with long-term financing and charge a premium to the borrower in the form of
higher rates.
Interest Rate Risk: Borrower's Perspective
The borrowers, on the other hand, lock themselves into a long-term interest rate to
reduce their exposure to interest rate risk, and pay a premium to do so.
© Becker Professional Education Corporation. All rights reserved. Module 5 2–79 B.4. Workin
5 B.4. Working Capital Management: Part 1 PART 2 UNIT 2
3 Cash Management
(continued)
(continued)
Solution: The cash budget for the three months of April, May, and June is as follows:
Cash Disbursements
Cash purchases $60,000 $70,000 $75,000
Rent expense $7,500
Wages and salaries $8,000 $8,000 $8,000
Cash dividend distribution $10,000
Purchase a new car $7,000
Interest payment $4,500
Tax payment $5,000
Total cash disbursements $75,500 $89,500 $98,000
Expected change in cash $(5,000) $(11,000) $(5,500)
Beginning cash balance $6,000 $5,000 $5,000
Expected ending cash balance
before borrowings $1,000 $(6,000) $ (500)
Funds to be borrowed $4,000 $11,000 $5,500
Ending cash balance $5,000 $5,000 $5,000
Companies hold cash to make routine payments for business transactions, to repay loans and
other financing costs, to maintain compensating balances for banks, to prepare for future
uncertainties, and to prepare for future opportunities. Motives for holding cash include:
Transaction Motive: A company may hold cash to meet payments arising from the ordinary
course of business.
Speculative Motive: Cash may be needed to take advantage of temporary opportunities.
Precautionary Motive: It is important to have enough cash on hand to maintain a safety
cushion to meet unexpected needs.
© Becker Professional Education Corporation. All rights reserved. Module 5 2–81 B.4. Workin
5 B.4. Working Capital Management: Part 1 PART 2 UNIT 2
Cash
payment
for
purchases
Collection
of sales
Purchase Sale proceeds
Operating cycle
1. Operating Cycle
Days sales
Days in
Operating cycle = + in accounts
inventory
receivable
Average inventory
Days in inventory =
Cost of goods sold / 365
Facts: ABC Computers has annual sales of $36 million. On average, the company carries
$5 million in inventory, $3 million in accounts receivable, and $3 million in accounts payable.
Required: If the annual cost of goods sold for ABC is $27 million, what is the length of the
operating cycle and cash conversion cycle for the firm?
Solution:
$5,000,000
Days in inventory = = 67.6 days
$27,000,000 / 365
$3,000,000
Days sales in accounts receivable = = 30.4 days
$36,000,000 / 365
$3,000,000
Days of payables outstanding = = 40.6 days
$27,000,000 / 365
Cash conversion cycle = 67.6 days + 30.4 days − 40.6 days = 57.4 days
© Becker Professional Education Corporation. All rights reserved. Module 5 2–83 B.4. Workin
5 B.4. Working Capital Management: Part 1 PART 2 UNIT 2
360 Discount
APR of quick payment discount = ×
Pay period − Discount period 100 − Discount %
Facts: Terranova Company's main vendor offers a quick payment discount of 1/10, net 30
to its customers.
Required: Assuming a 360-day year, calculate the annual cost to Terranova of not taking
advantage of the discount.
Solution:
360 1% 360 1%
× = × = 18.2%
30 − 10 100% − 1% 20 99%
Although a company may earn additional interest income by using a lockbox system, the
system also involves a service fee paid to a bank. Management must calculate the cost of this
service and compare this cost to the benefit derived from expediting cash collections using the
following process:
1. Calculate the average daily collection by multiplying the average number of daily payments
by the average payment amount.
2. Calculate the increase in cash balances resulting from the use of the lockbox system by
multiplying the average daily collections from the first step by the number of days saved
using the system.
3. Calculate the benefit the company will receive each year from interest on additional cash
balances by multiplying the additional cash balance from the previous step by the annual
interest rate on cash balances.
4. Calculate the annual cash net savings by comparing the benefits with the annual fee
charged for the service by the banks.
Facts: A company collects an average of 500 payments from its customers every day. The
average amount of each payment is approximately $600. It takes five days to process the
payments internally, two more days to send the payments to the bank for deposit, and
another two days for payments to be deposited to the company's bank account and be
available for use.
A local bank offered a lockbox service to the company that will expedite collections and
reduce the time needed for payments to clear the bank by six days. This service is offered
by the bank for $30,000 per year. The bank pays the company a 2.5 percent annual interest
rate on the company's checking account.
Required: Calculate the annual benefit of using the lockbox system.
Solution:
1. Calculate the average daily collections:
Average daily collections = 500 payments × $600 average payment amount = $300,000
2. Calculate the increase in cash balance resulting from the use of the lockbox system:
Increase in cash balance = $300,000 per day × 6 days saved = $1,800,000
3. Calculate the benefit the company will receive each year from the interest on the
additional cash balance:
Total annual benefit = $1,800,000 × 2.5% = $45,000
4. Calculate the cash savings from using the lockbox system:
Cash savings = $45,000 (annual benefit) − $30,000 (annual bank charges) = $15,000
© Becker Professional Education Corporation. All rights reserved. Module 5 2–85 B.4. Workin
5 B.4. Working Capital Management: Part 1 PART 2 UNIT 2
Marketable securities typically provide lower returns than operating assets but higher returns
than cash deposited in savings accounts. Each type of marketable security has features relating
to safety, marketability, yield, maturity, and taxability.
Marketable securities are investments that can be easily traded. These types of investments can LOS 2B4o
be debt securities (bonds) or equity securities (stocks). They are called marketable securities
because of the ease of selling at a low transaction cost. LOS 2B4p
© Becker Professional Education Corporation. All rights reserved. Module 5 2–87 B.4. Workin
5 B.4. Working Capital Management: Part 1 PART 2 UNIT 2
Companies often hold marketable securities because they can be converted to cash on short
notice. Because marketable securities yield higher returns than cash, many firms will hold
marketable securities in lieu of large cash balances.
Liquidity Motives
When cash outflows exceed inflows, companies can liquidate marketable securities to
increase cash balances.
Precautionary Motives
Marketable securities may be held as a precaution against possible shortages of bank credit
in times of cash need.
Question 1 MCQ-12679
Zolta Co. grants cash discounts to its customers to accelerate cash collections. The credit
terms are 2/10, n/45. Beta Co., one of the customers of Zolta, is reluctant to pay within the
cash discount period and claims that the cash discount is too low and not feasible. Beta
has no cash available to make a payment. Beta's incremental borrowing rate is 12 percent.
What should Beta's financial manager advise? Assume a 360-day year.
a. Not to pay within the discount period; the discount rate is low compared with the
incremental borrowing rate.
b. Borrow enough funds at 12 percent to pay Zolta within the discount period.
c. Postpone the payment of the liabilities to Zolta until cash becomes available
to pay.
d. Borrow funds at a cost of debt higher than the cash discount.
Question 2 MCQ-12680
A retailer buys products for resale. A unit of product is sold at cost plus a percentage
markup. Which of the following statements is correct regarding the effect of selling on
credit that unit of product?
a. Working capital will increase.
b. Working capital will decrease.
c. Working capital will not be affected.
d. Working capital is not affected unless the sale was made for cash.
© Becker Professional Education Corporation. All rights reserved. Module 5 2–89 B.4. Workin
5 B.4. Working Capital Management: Part 1 PART 2 UNIT 2
Question 3 MCQ-12681
A company has a current ratio of 2 before settling current liabilities by paying cash. What is
the effect on the current ratio when the current liability is paid?
a. No effect
b. Current ratio increases
c. Current ratio decreases
d. Current ratio cannot be determined from the given information
This module covers the following content from the IMA Learning Outcome Statements.
CMA LOS Reference: Part 2—Section B.4. Working Capital Management: Part 2
© Becker Professional Education Corporation. All rights reserved. Module 6 2–91 B.4. Workin
6 B.4. Working Capital Management: Part 2 PART 2 UNIT 2
Pass Key
Stricter credit terms (i.e., shorter credit periods and higher credit standards) generally lead
to lower sales volume, lower accounts receivable, and lower working capital, but also lower
levels of uncollectible accounts. More generous credit terms (i.e., longer credit periods and
lower credit standards) generally lead to higher sales volume, higher accounts receivable,
and higher working capital, but may also lead to higher levels of uncollectible accounts.
Factoring accounts receivable entails turning over the collection of accounts receivable to a
third-party factor in exchange for a discounted short-term loan. Cash is collected from the factor
immediately rather than from the customer according to the credit terms.
Example 1 Factoring
Facts: Radon Technologies enters into an agreement with a firm that will factor the company's
accounts receivable. The factor agrees to buy the company's receivables, which average
$50,000 a month, and have an average collection period of 30 days. The factor will advance up
to 80 percent of the face value of receivables at an annual rate of 12 percent and charge a fee
of 2 percent on all receivables purchased. The controller of the company estimates that the
company would save $10,000 in collection expenses over the year. Fees and interest are not
deducted in advance. Assuming a 360-day year, what is the annual cost of financing?
Required: Assuming a 360-day year, compute the annual cost of financing.
Solution:
× (Days in year /
AR × Fee days in period) Subtotals
AR submitted $50,000 2% 360 / 30 $ 12,000
Amount withheld (20%) (10,000)
Amount subject to interest 40,000 12% / 12 360 / 30 4,800
Cost to company 16,800
Less expense saved (due to
(10,000)
outsource of collections)
Net cost $ 6,800
Net cost / average amount advanced = $6,800 / $40,000 = 17% (APR)
LOS 2B4v
Inventory management balances the cash requirements of the firm with the product delivery
requirements of its customers. This means having adequate product in the right place at the
right time to meet consumer demand without incurring excessive or unnecessary inventory
carrying costs.
© Becker Professional Education Corporation. All rights reserved. Module 6 2–93 B.4. Workin
6 B.4. Working Capital Management: Part 2 PART 2 UNIT 2
Pass Key
The lower the carrying costs of inventory, the more inventory companies are willing to carry.
Reorder point = Safety stock + (Lead time × Sales during lead time)
Facts: Worldwide Widgets sells 8,000 widgets per year, manufactures widgets in groups of
1,500, and requires five weeks of lead time for widget production. Worldwide also maintains an
absolute minimum safety stock of 1,200 widgets.
Required: Assuming a 50-week year and constant demand, compute Worldwide's reorder point
for widgets.
Solution: Worldwide sells an average of 160 widgets per week (8,000 widgets per year / 50 weeks).
Reorder point = Safety stock + (Lead time × Sales during lead time)
Reorder point = 1,200 widgets + (5 weeks × 160 widgets per week) = 2,000 widgets
Worldwide will manufacture additional widgets when its inventory of widgets falls to 2,000 units.
Order Cost: Assuming all other things are equal, as cost per order goes up, the
purchasing manager is willing to purchase more units in one order.
Annual Demand: As annual demand for an item increases, assuming all other variables
are constant, the EOQ will also increase.
Carrying Cost per Unit: When carrying cost per unit goes up, the purchasing manager
will not be interested to have too much inventory sitting around in a warehouse. This
results in a lower EOQ.
2.5.1 Assumptions
EOQ assumes that demand is known and is constant throughout the year, so EOQ does not
consider stockout costs, nor does it account for costs of safety stock. EOQ also assumes that
carrying costs per unit and ordering costs per unit are fixed.
2SO
E =
C
© Becker Professional Education Corporation. All rights reserved. Module 6 2–95 B.4. Workin
6 B.4. Working Capital Management: Part 2 PART 2 UNIT 2
Example 3 EOQ
Facts: Maximus Company incurs carrying costs of $50 a month and each order costs the
firm $5,625.
Required: Calculate Maximus' economic order quantity if Maximus goes through 100 units of
inventory monthly.
Solution:
2SO
E=
C
2 × 100 × $5 ,625
E=
$50
E = 150 units
When Maximus orders inventory, it should order 150 units to minimize total ordering costs and
carrying costs.
Note: Although the formula calls for annual sales and carrying costs, using monthly sales in the
numerator and monthly carrying costs in the denominator will produce the same result.
LOS 2B4x 2.7 Relationship Between Inventory Turnover and Gross Margin
The relationship between turnover and gross margin is important. An entity with high gross
margin and/or high inventory turnover will be more profitable. If gross margin declines,
inventory turnover will need to increase in order to maintain profitability. Conversely, if
inventory turnover declines, gross margin will need to increase to maintain profits.
Entities unable to satisfy current asset acquisitions with cash on hand often finance them with
short-term credit instruments (loans).
A variety of short-term financial instruments, each with their own risk characteristics, are
available to financial managers for various short-term financing needs.
Facts: A company borrows $1,000,000 for one year from a local bank at an annual interest rate
of 10 percent. The bank requires a 15 percent compensating balance as a security amount.
Required: Calculate the effective interest rate on the funds borrowed.
Solution:
$1,000,000
10%
funds borrowed
$1,000,000 Compensating
$1, 000, 000
funds borrowed balance of 15%
$100,000
11.76%
$850,000
The compensating balance requirements cause the effective interest rate paid on the
borrowed funds to increase from 10 percent to 11.76 percent because the company is
unable to use the full amount of the $1,000,000 funds borrowed.
© Becker Professional Education Corporation. All rights reserved. Module 6 2–97 B.4. Workin
6 B.4. Working Capital Management: Part 2 PART 2 UNIT 2
Determining the appropriate level of current assets and the best method to finance those assets
is a matter of management's judgment and risk appetite. If management is risk-aggressive,
the company may employ short-term financing sources to fund acquisitions of long-term
assets. Risk-averse managers, however, may prefer the use of current liabilities to acquire
current assets.
Facts: A new financial manager is hired at Home Office Furnishings Inc., a small
manufacturer of metal office furniture, and is asked to develop a sound working capital
policy while maintaining a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.
Three potential policies are identified:
1. An aggressive policy, which calls for a minimum amount of current assets (30 percent
of sales);
2. A conservative policy, which calls for a substantial amount of current assets (70 percent
of sales); and
3. A moderate policy, which falls between the aggressive and conservative policies and
calls for a moderate amount of current assets (50 percent of sales).
(continued)
(continued)
The financial manager forecasts a balance sheet for each scenario based on $4 million of
estimated sales, as follows (in thousands):
Home Office Furnishings Inc.
December 31, Year 1
Balance Sheet
Aggressive Moderate Conservative
(Current assets (Current assets (Current assets
= 30% of sales) = 50% of sales) = 70% of sales)
Current assets $1,200 $2,000 $2,800
Net fixed assets 600 600 600
Total assets 1,800 2,600 3,400
Short-term debt (8.00%) $ 900 $ 650 $ 0
Long-term debt (10.00%) 0 650 1,700
Common equity 900 1,300 1,700
Total liabilities and equity $1,800 $2,600 $3,400
Variable costs will account for 60 percent of forecasted sales, regardless of the policy
adopted. Fixed costs will increase as more current assets are held due to increased inventory
storage fees and higher insurance premiums. Annual fixed costs would be $1,000,000
under an aggressive policy, $1,050,000 under a moderate policy, and $1,100,000 under a
conservative policy. The tax rate is 40 percent.
Required:
1. Draft a report that shows the return on equity under each of the working policies
described above.
2. Describe how a firm that is willing to take relatively high risks in the hope of earning high
returns would make such a decision using the scenario above.
Solution:
1. The expected return on equity under each of the working capital policies described is
calculated as follows:
Aggressive Moderate Conservative
Sales (given) $4,000 $4,000 $4,000
Variable cost (60% of sales) (2,400) (2,400) (2,400)
Fixed cost (given) (1,000) (1,050) (1,100)
EBIT $600 $550 $500
Interest on short-term debt (8%) (72) (52) -
Interest on long-term debt (10%) – (65) (170)
EBT $ 528 $ 433 $ 330
Taxes (40%) (211) (173) (132)
NI $ 317 $ 260 $ 198
ROE 35% 20% 12%
2. With an aggressive working capital policy, a firm would hold minimal safety stock and have
a restrictive credit policy to minimize costs. This results in low levels of current assets. To
achieve a debt-to-equity ratio of 1:1, the company borrowed $900,000 in short-term debt.
This strategy resulted in a current ratio of 1.33 ($1,200 ÷ $900), indicating the liquidity risk the
company is taking. Return on equity (ROE) is the highest in this aggressive case (35 percent).
© Becker Professional Education Corporation. All rights reserved. Module 6 2–99 B.4. Workin
6 B.4. Working Capital Management: Part 2 PART 2 UNIT 2
Question 1 MCQ-12682
Question 2 MCQ-12683
A company produces spools of nylon thread. Management estimates the annual demand
to be approximately 120,000 units. The ordering cost is $250 per order and the carrying
cost is $2.40 per unit per year. What is the optimal number of units per order?
a. 5,000 units
b. 3,356 units
c. 1,444 units
d. 48 units
Question 3 MCQ-12684
Zelfo Co. spends an average of $35,000 annually to collect its receivables. Management
can factor the company's receivables and eliminate the collection costs. The accountant
accumulated the following information:
yyAverage accounts receivable balance per month is $400,000 with an expected collection
period of 30 days.
yyA factor charges a 1 percent fee on all receivables factored each month.
yyThe factor advances 75 percent of the accounts receivable factored each month and
charges annual interest of 8 percent.
What is the net annual cost of factoring the receivables?
a. $24,000
b. $37,000
c. $48,000
d. $72,000
Question 4 MCQ-12685
Malki Co. is currently evaluating two suppliers. The payment terms offered by each supplier
are as follows:
Supplier Terms
Supplier A 1/10, net 30
Supplier B 2/20, net 80
Other than this difference in payment terms, both suppliers provide identical products,
quality, and service. Which of the following statements is correct?
a. Supplier B offers a 2 percent discount for early payments and Supplier A offers
only a 1 percent discount for early payment; therefore, Supplier B's products are
more costly.
b. Supplier B is a better choice because the annual savings resulting from paying
Supplier B during the discount period are higher than the annual savings resulting
from paying Supplier A.
c. Malki cannot use the presented information for any decision.
d. Both suppliers are offering identical products; therefore, Malki is indifferent when
dealing with either supplier.
© Becker Professional Education Corporation. All rights reserved. Module 6 2–101 B.4. Workin
6 B.4. Working Capital Management: Part 2 PART 2 UNIT 2
NOTES
B.5. Corporate
Restructuring
Part 2
Unit 2
This module covers the following content from the IMA Learning Outcome Statements.
In business combinations, two or more companies combine to create a new, larger company
that potentially expands its production capabilities, workforce, market share, and/or access to
new markets. Companies combine because they think they can be more valuable as one entity,
reduce duplicative functions (e.g., accounting and other administrative departments) and/or
combine advanced technological capabilities.
An entity can expand its operations by entering into a business combination. The four primary
types of combinations include horizontal, vertical, circular, and diagonal combinations.
Transactions include mergers, acquisitions, consolidations, tender offers, purchases of assets,
and management acquisitions.
Heinz and Kraft Foods, both in the business of selling processed food to consumers, merged
into one company—the Kraft Heinz Company—in 2015. The expectation at the time of the
merger was that the new company would become one of the largest food and beverage
companies in both the United States and the world. The new company projected annual
revenues of approximately $28 billion, along with an expected $1.5 billion in cost savings.
In 1996, Time Warner Inc. merged with Turner Broadcasting to create a massive, worldwide
entertainment conglomerate. This merger provided Time Warner access to many of the
basic cable television channels (and historical films) that were owned previously by Turner.
Federal Trade Commission concerns about the merger's effect on competition in the cable
industry kept the deal in limbo for months.
Pharma Inc. is a leading company in the U.S. pharmaceuticals industry. In order to expand
its business within its current consumer market and to take advantage of potential cost
reductions, it acquires Letson Watson—a company specializing in building residential real
estate for adult communities 55 and older.
Landbright Farms breeds organic livestock and sells the meat to high-end grocery
stores. Fresh Meats Inc. transports Landbright's products to market in refrigerated
trucks. If Landbright were to merge with Fresh Meats, this would be an example of a
diagonal combination.
1.2 Transactions
A company acquiring another company has several options to complete the transaction:
completing a merger with the target company, purchasing the assets of the target company,
or purchasing enough of the target company's voting shares to exercise control. Local laws,
including antitrust laws, govern each of these transactions. Attempts to monopolize a market
are illegal in many countries. Complying with laws in multiple countries complicates business
combinations.
1.2.1 Merger
In a merger, two (or more) entities combine to form a single new corporation, with the stocks
of all merging companies surrendered and replaced with new stock in the name of the new
company. Mergers often involve the combination of like-sized companies. The boards of
directors of both companies initiate and approve the plan, and notice is given to all shareholders
of the companies to attend a meeting and approve the plan. Most countries require a
supermajority vote (over two-thirds of the votes) in favor of the merger to be able to complete it.
Illustration 5 Merger
A merger generally results in a new company that is the combination of two or more
companies. The Dow Chemical Company and E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company
("DuPont") was successfully completed on Sept. 1, 2017, when shares of DowDuPont began
trading on the New York Stock Exchange. Upon completion of the merger, DowDuPont
became the second largest chemical company in the world.
1.2.2 Acquisition
In an acquisition, the acquirer purchases majority ownership of the acquired company. The
acquisition of one company by another involves no new company. Only the acquirer remains
after the acquisition. The acquired firm, which is generally smaller than the acquiring firm, may
retain its legal structure and name, or it may be subsumed by the acquirer and cease to exist.
Illustration 6 Acquisition
In 2017, Amazon and Whole Foods Market Inc. entered into an agreement under which
Amazon acquired Whole Foods Market for $42 per share in an all-cash transaction valued
at approximately $13.7 billion, which included Whole Foods Market's net debt.
Biltmore Inc. offers $13 per share to buy the stock directly from the shareholders of
Alexander Co. (the target company). Alexander stock is currently selling at $11 per share,
making the Biltmore offer very attractive to the target's shareholders. Assuming that the
majority of shareholders agree to the terms, Biltmore will provide $13 per share. This is an
example of a tender offer.
Lox Industries enters into an asset purchase agreement with Bright Star Inc. to purchase
approximately 80 percent of the latter's buildings and equipment. As part of the
agreement, Lox agrees to assume the liabilities associated with mortgages outstanding on
the buildings and capital leases on the equipment purchased.
The chief executive officer of a publicly traded corporation purchases all of the
corporation's voting shares of stock. By the officer's action, the company is now a private
company acquired by management.
Companies enter into business combinations with the premise that such combinations will
result in synergies. Synergies are realized when the value of the merged company exceeds
the combined value of the separate companies before the combination. Synergies can be
categorized into three common types: revenue, cost, and financial.
Takeover is the term used to describe one company (or a group of owners) assuming control of
another company. The term may be used to describe any merger or consolidation, but a hostile
takeover is a takeover that is not negotiated or approved by the directors of the target company.
A hostile takeover occurs when a buyer attempts to control another entity (the target) without
the consent of the target's board of directors (or management). During a hostile takeover
attempt, the buyer may approach shareholders and initiate a tender offer or may ask to control
the shareholders' proxies in a proxy fight (a proxy is the authority to represent shareholders in
voting). Several methods can be used as defenses against hostile takeovers.
2.7 Greenmail
Similar to the term blackmail, greenmailing refers to when an acquirer buys enough stock to
threaten a target with a hostile acquisition and then resells it to the target at a substantial
premium to prevent the takeover.
3.1 Sell-off
A sell-off is an outright sale of a subsidiary because, for example, the subsidiary's core
competencies do not align with the overall company's or because there is a lack of synergy
between the company and its subsidiary. Legal action stemming from anticompetitive or
antitrust practices may also require a sell-off.
Illustration 10 Sell-off
Management and shareholders of BeckCo Industries think that its ownership of Blended
Ltd. is causing the overall entity to be undervalued from a market perspective. As a result,
the company sells the assets and liabilities of Blended to another entity in the hopes that
investors will react favorably to the sale, which will lead to an increase in the stock price.
3.2 Spin-off
A spin-off creates a new, independent company by separating a subsidiary business from a parent
company. A spin-off can be completed by distributing stock in the new entity as a stock dividend
to existing shareholders or by offering shareholders stock in the new company in exchange for
their stock in the parent company. Spin-offs typically occur when a unit is less profitable and/or
unrelated to the core parent business. The assumption is that the operations of the unit after a
spin-off are expected to have more value than they did as part of the larger operation.
Shares are distributed to shareholders in the same proportion as their previous ownership in
the original corporation. For example, a shareholder owning 10 percent of the shares of the
original company will receive 10 percent of the shares of the new company.
Illustration 11 Spin-off
In 1994, Eli Lilly and Company (a large, U.S.-based global pharmaceutical company) shifted
its focus purely to pharmaceuticals and other similar businesses. As a result, Lilly spun off
its medical devices division, which went public later that year under the name Guidant.
Guidant focused on cardiovascular medical products, such as artificial pacemakers, stents,
and cardioverter-defibrillators.
3.3 Split-up
In a split-up, the parent company is broken into two or more entirely new entities. Unlike sell-offs
and spin-offs, in which the parent company survives, the parent company does not survive a split-up.
Illustration 12 Split-up
In 2018, United Technologies was split into three new companies: United Technologies, Otis
Elevator Company, and Carrier. United Technologies remains the name of one of the new
companies, but it is an entirely new company.
Sony Corp. resolved at a meeting of its board of directors in May 2001 to issue shares of
subsidiary tracking stock, the economic value of which was intended to be linked with
the economic value of Sony Communication Network Corp., a wholly owned Japanese
subsidiary engaged in the provision of Internet-related services.
After the buyer identifies the target that it wishes to acquire, the value of the target must be
estimated using a discounted cash flow method.
Note that the starting point for FCF is after-tax earnings before deducting interest paid by the
target company. Interest expense is not included in order to ascertain the value of the company
as if there were no debt to service. If the target company had no debt, the value of the target
equals the value of the assets, which equals the preset value of all after-tax future cash flows
without the effect of interest expense. If the buyer assumes the liabilities of the target, the
market value of the liabilities will reduce the cash or stock consideration the buyer will pay in
order to purchase the target.
Where:
Rce = Required rate of return on common equity
Rf = Risk-free rate of return
β = Beta of the security
Rm = Market return
Under the CAPM formula, the [Rm − Rf—] term is also known as the market risk premium.
If the target company is expected to generate varying after-tax cash flows for several years
followed by after-tax cash flows that grow at a constant growth rate into the future, the acquirer
can use the two-stage Gordon growth model (GGM). In the GGM, cash flows in the early years
are discounted at the required rate of return and the long-term cash flows projected into
perpetuity are discounted based on a constant growth rate. Adding the present value of the
cash flows in the early years with the present value of the cash flows into perpetuity results in an
estimate of the maximum price the buyer is willing to pay.
Big Company has identified Small Company as a target for acquisition and wants to
determine the maximum price Big Company should pay for the purchase using the
following data (in thousands of dollars) regarding the free cash flows of Small Company for
the next four years. Small Company's annual tax rate is 40 percent.
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
EBIT $115 $292 $277 $283
EBIT × (1 – 40%) 69 175 166 170
+ Noncash expense (depreciation) 15 18 20 22
− Increase in working capital (10) (15) (8) (4)
− Capital expenditures (50) (85) (82) (86)
Free cash flow (FCF) $ 24 $93 $96 $102
The management of Big Company expects that beginning in Year 5, Small Company's
free cash flow will continue to grow indefinitely at a rate of 5 percent. Big Company has a
required rate of return of 14 percent.
Required:
1. Calculate the estimated value of Small Company assuming that it has no debt.
2. What is the maximum price Big Company will pay if the liabilities of Small Company
are $500,000?
Solution:
1. This analysis is a two-step model using the Gordon growth model. The first four years
have a specified free cash flow, while in Year 5 and beyond, FCF will continue to grow
indefinitely at a constant rate of 5 percent.
The first step is to calculate the present value of the FCF identified for the first four
years:
PV of FCF for Years 1–4 = [$24 ÷ 1.14] + [$93 ÷ (1.142)] + [$96 ÷ (1.143)] + [$102 ÷ (1.144)]
= $21 + $72 + $65 + $60 = $218
The second step is to use the Gordon growth model to calculate the present value of
the FCF expected after Year 4:
FCF expected in Year 5 = FCF of Year 4 × 1.05 = $102 × 1.05 = $107.1
The end of Year 4 present value of all post-Year 4 FCF = FCF at end of Year 5 ÷
(Required rate of return − Growth rate) = $107.1 ÷ (0.14 − 0.05) = $1,190
Present value of all cash flows into perpetuity starting in Year 5 = $1,190 ÷ (1.144) = $705
The third step is to calculate the FCF for all years, which is the value of Small Company,
assuming that it has no debt:
FCF = Present value of the FCF for each of the first four years + Present value of all
post-Year 4 FCF = $218 + $705 = $923.
2. The maximum price Big Company will pay if it assumes that the liabilities of Small
Company are $923 – $500 = $423 (in hundreds of thousands).
While some analysts focus solely on quantitative factors when evaluating business combinations,
qualitative factors must also be considered in evaluations to gain a complete picture of what is
best for the company.
Ratio of exchange = Offer price per share ÷ Market price of the acquiring entity
This ratio is then multiplied by the number of the acquiree's shares being acquired, resulting
in the number of the acquirer's shares to issue.
Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA): A non-GAAP
measure, EBITDA is important because it evaluates cash flows generated by the company
without interest paid to finance the assets generating returns; taxes paid, which can be
manipulated through targeted tax planning; and the noncash charges of depreciation and
amortization. Analyzing both companies' pre-and post-merger EBITDA can lead to more
successful business combinations because it removes some of the income statement line
items that are not a result of current performance.
Post Balance Sheet Debt and Net Assets: The acquiring company should consider the
debt load it is assuming when purchasing another company because it will be responsible
for paying off that debt. The company being acquired must consider any debt it will take
on if the acquirer decides to assume post-acquisition debt. Evaluating net assets as a
percentage of total assets can help in this determination.
Multiples: Multiples are used in valuations for deciding whether a company is a good
acquisition target. These include multiples of revenue, assets, EBITDA, and other figures
(e.g., Price of the company = 1.5 × EBITDA). These numbers will change after the acquisition
and should be evaluated prior to the combination. Lower consolidated numbers may be
acceptable if they are expected to improve in the long run.
Facts: Big Company is planning to purchase Small Company's outstanding common stock
for $120 per share in a stock-for-stock acquisition. The current market price per share of
the target company is $70, and the market price of the common stock of Big Company is
$80. Small Company's total number of shares issued and outstanding is 25,000 shares.
Before the acquisition, the companies reported the following:
1. Earnings $ 720,000
2. Number of common shares (150,000 + 37,500) ÷ 187,500
3. EPS (1. ÷ 2.) $ 3.84
Shareholders of Big Company will suffer a decline in EPS from $4.00 originally to $3.84.
Equity Swaps: In a debt-for-equity swap, debtholders are requested to convert their debt
to equity, which effectively deleverages the company. This also frees up cash that was being
used for debt payments.
Access to Short-Term Capital: Companies may opt for short-term loans or rely more
heavily on lines of credit for liquidity in times of a cash crunch. This is an alternative to
taking out long-term debt or significantly altering a company's capital structure.
Sale-Leasebacks: A sale-leaseback involves a company selling assets to get cash from the
buyer, and then the buyer leasing those assets back to the seller. This provides liquidity,
giving the seller access to cash as well as use of the assets over the lease term.
Illustration 15 Restructuring
General Auto Co. has historically been the best seller of sport utility vehicles and passenger
vans in the United States. General was concerned about other auto manufacturers entering
the market with newer, more fuel-efficient technology, and decided that it would initially
lower prices to attract buyers while it worked on competing technology to implement in
new vehicles. The lower prices led to less revenue, straining the company financially, so
General decided to expand its business by opening a consumer and business financing
unit. Instead of consumers financing through a dealer or a bank, they would finance the
purchase through General Auto. This new service allowed General to make up lost revenue
with interest charged over the life of the customers' loans.
Entering New Geographic Markets: Some companies are concentrated in specific regions
in the world and could expand their market reach by entering new geographic markets.
Along with the basic, logistical setup in a new country, companies must also consider
cultural differences when marketing, building, and delivering products in a new location.
Selling Assets: Additional funds to support operations can be obtained by selling assets
that are idle due to a decline in demand, a cut in production, or a decision to exit a
product class.
Automating Functions: Adding new technology is often a way to lower costs in the long run
and increase efficiency.
Poultry Plus Inc. has a labor-intensive meat processing facility that requires employees
on the manufacturing line to work in close proximity to other employees. Due to a
recent public health crisis, employees now must work farther apart, which slows the
deboning process, significantly decreasing profits and pushing the company to the brink
of bankruptcy.
Poultry Plus decides to simultaneously downsize its operations and replace human labor
with automated technology. It invests in modern robotic deboning equipment, which
doubles the carcass production line's capacity and reduces the number of employees
needed by half, restoring sustainability through the crisis and beyond.
Question 1 MCQ-12686
Zeno Co. is planning to expand its operations through the acquisition of Alpha Co. The
management of Zeno has the following information about the financial performance
of Alpha:
Average net income per year for the last five years = $120,000
Expected after-tax cash flows from operations for each of the coming five years, the
estimated life of Alpha, are:
Year 1 $150,000
Year 2 $170,000
Year 3 $180,000
Year 4 $190,000
Year 5 $150,000
If Zeno has a weighted average cost of capital of 12 percent, what is the expected value of
Alpha using the discounted cash flow model?
a. $432,573
b. $603,434
c. $1,144,151
d. $1,250,000
Question 2 MCQ-12687
At the beginning of this year, Zeno Co. is planning to expand its operations through the
acquisition of Alpha Co. Management of Zeno has received the following information
regarding the financial performance of Alpha:
Alpha's average net income per year for the last five years = $120,000
The estimated amount of after-tax cash flows from operations for the current year is
$150,000, and this amount is expected to grow at a rate of 3 percent into perpetuity.
If Zeno has a weighted average cost of capital of 12 percent, what is the expected value of
Alpha Co. if Zeno Co. uses the discounted cash flow model?
a. $1,250,000
b. $1,333,333
c. $1,666,667
d. $5,000,000
B.6. International
Finance
Part 2
Unit 2
This module covers the following content from the IMA Learning Outcome Statements.
A company with excess funds opens a factory in a foreign country to produce one of the
company's main products. The company invests $10 million for the design and construction
of the facilities and for installing and testing the needed equipment to begin production in
that country.
Exchange rates express the price of one currency in terms of another; that is, the rate at which
two currencies will be exchanged at equal value. The exchange rate may be expressed as using
either the direct or indirect method. The direct method is the domestic price of one unit of another
currency and the indirect method is the foreign price of one unit of the domestic currency.
If a U.S. company can exchange $1.00 for 0.77 British pounds (£), then the direct exchange
rate is $1.30/£1.00 and the indirect exchange rate is £0.77/$1.00.
If the United States imports goods from Mexico, demand for the Mexican peso increases
because U.S. importers require pesos to pay for the imports from Mexico to the U.S. The
following graph shows how the equilibrium exchange rate in dollars per peso is set based
on the demand and supply for pesos.
Currency Market
Supply of pesos
Y2
Exchange rate
($ per peso)
Pe
Y1
Demand of pesos
Qe Quantity of peso
When the value of the peso is low relative to the U.S. dollar, U.S. citizens are willing to buy
more Mexican goods and services because Mexican goods are cheaper for U.S. consumers.
2B_Currency Market
When the value of the peso is high, however, Mexicans are willing to use their strong
currency to buy more U.S. goods and services.
Circumstances that give rise to changes in exchange rates are generally divided between
trade-related factors (including differences in inflation, income, and government regulation) and
financial factors (including differences in interest rates and restrictions on capital movements
between companies).
Assume that the U.S. dollar is relatively stable while the Mexican peso is suffering from
sudden inflationary pressures. As the Mexican peso buys less in the domestic Mexican
economy, Mexicans and their banking institutions seek the safe haven of the U.S. dollar
to maintain the purchasing power of their liquid resources. The demand for U.S. dollars
created by Mexicans buying them with Mexican pesos makes the U.S. dollar more valuable
in terms of the peso and drives up the exchange rate. The U.S. dollar commands more
pesos in an exchange of currency.
The income level in the United States increases significantly in the second quarter.
Americans flock to Mexico City on vacation to buy piñatas. The increased supply of
American dollars seeking to buy pesos to purchase Mexican goods causes the value of the
American dollar to fall in relation to a stated number of pesos. The exchange rate is thus
affected by relative income levels and the associated demand for foreign currency created
by higher domestic income.
A tariff on imported piñatas would have the effect of discouraging the purchase of imports,
thereby reducing demand for the peso and maintaining the exchange rate.
Assume that returns on institutional investments in Mexico skyrocket in the third quarter
while returns on comparable institutional investments remain significantly lower in the
United States. U.S. investors find the opportunity to earn high returns with similar risks
in Mexican financial institutions irresistible. The demand for pesos increases as American
investment increases. The exchange rate changes as the peso commands more U.S dollars.
Trade-Related Factors
Relative inflation rates Demand/
Demand for
Relative income levels supply of
goods
Government controls currency
(Trade restrictions)
Exchange rate
If the direct exchange rate for the British pound has increased from $1.30/£1.00 to
$1.39/£1.00, the pound has appreciated relative to the dollar (i.e., the pound is relatively
more expensive and costs more dollars to purchase). In this case, the appreciation of the
pound in terms of dollars is equal to:
1.39 – 1.30
Appreciation rate = = 0.0692 = 6.92%
1.30
Pass Key
To help remember appreciation versus depreciation, think in terms of weight lifting. Assume
that yesterday's exchange rate was $1 USD to 2 pesos and that today's exchange rate is $1
USD to 3 pesos. This means that yesterday it took $1 to "lift" 2 pesos and today $1 can now lift
3 pesos. So, the dollar has gotten stronger (appreciated). Similarly, yesterday, 2 pesos could lift
$1, but today it takes 3 pesos to lift $1. So, the peso has gotten weaker (depreciated).
Facts: Following are the indirect exchange rates of the U.S. dollar (USD) relative to the euro
(EUR) at the beginning and end of the accounting period:
January 1: 1 USD = 0.891 EUR
December 31: 1 USD = 0.902 EUR
Required:
1. Determine whether the U.S. dollar appreciated or depreciated relative to the euro
during the period.
2. Calculate the respective appreciation and depreciation rates for the USD and the EUR
over the period.
Solution:
1. The dollar has appreciated (strengthened) relative to the euro because at the end of
the year, 1 USD can purchase more euros compared with the beginning of the year.
Conversely, the euro has depreciated (weakened) over the year relative to the USD.
At the end of the year, more euros are needed to purchase 1 USD compared with the
beginning of the year.
2. The appreciation rate of the USD = 0.902 − 0.891 / 0.891 = 1.23%
To calculate the depreciation rate of the euros, first determine the value of the euro
in dollars:
January 1, Year 1: 1 euro = 1 / 0.891 USD = $1.122
December 31, Year 1: 1 euro = 1 / 0.902 USD = $1.109
The depreciation rate of the euro = 1.109 − 1.122 / 1.122 = (1.16%)
Note that the 1.16% depreciation rate of the euro is different from the 1.23% appreciation
rate of the USD. The rates will always be different; this is just a function of the math.
Domestic International Inc. has no foreign subsidiaries but is deeply involved in exporting
to neighboring countries. Global International Inc. has 12 foreign subsidiaries, which
combined make up 65 percent of consolidated revenues. Domestic International has less
translation exposure than Global International because it has no foreign subsidiaries.
Domestic's international business exposes the company to exchange rate risks, however, in
terms of both transaction and economic exposure.
Because of Global International's extensive foreign operations, the parent company
has significant exposure to foreign currency translation exposure, and depending on
the entity's export/import activity, Global International may also be exposed to foreign
exchange transaction and economic risks.
Illustration 11 Hedging
Worldwide Sweet Peaches buys shipping crates for its product from Mexico. The company
incurs liabilities denominated in pesos that it satisfies in pesos bought with U.S. dollars at the
time of transaction settlement. The company incurs a significant liability in pesos at a spot
rate of $0.10. Worldwide management expects that the peso will strengthen to $0.20 by the
time the bill is due and thereby double its cost. To mitigate this perceived transaction risk, the
company decides to hedge its position by locking in the current peso spot rate of $0.10.
Worldwide Sweet Peaches buys crates from Mexico. On the date that Worldwide Sweet
Peaches buys crates and incurs a significant liability in pesos, the spot rate is $0.10.
Because the company fears that the peso will strengthen to $0.20 by the time the bill is
due in 30 days, the company enters into a futures contract that will allow it to purchase the
pesos needed to pay the liability for $0.10 per peso in 30 days.
Duffy's Discount Piñatas has a payable due to its Mexican suppliers in the amount of
1,000,000 pesos in 90 days. The current exchange rate is $0.08 per peso and Mexican
interest rates are 16 percent. Duffy has $100,000 in excess cash and elects to use a money
market hedge to mitigate transaction exposure to exchange rate risk. Duffy performs the
following steps:
1. Determine the required investment in pesos at Mexican interest rates:
1,000,000 / 1.04 = 961,538.
Note: A 16 percent annual interest rate for 90 days is equal to approximately 4 percent.
2. Purchase 961,538 pesos with $76,923 (961,538 pesos × 0.08).
3. Invest pesos at Mexican interest rates and satisfy payables upon maturity
of the investment.
Duffy has secured the satisfaction of its current $80,000 payable for $76,923.
Duffy's Discount Piñatas has a payable due to its Mexican suppliers in the amount
of 1,000,000 pesos in 90 days. The current exchange rate is $0.08 per peso, Mexican
interest rates are 16 percent, and U.S. interest rates are 6 percent. Duffy computes that
it must borrow $76,923 to use a money market hedge to mitigate transaction exposure
to exchange rate risk consistent with the first money market hedge example, but has no
excess cash. Duffy borrows the needed amount for 90 days in the United States.
Duffy has secured the satisfaction of its current $80,000 payable for $78,077
(76,923 × 1.015 or 6% for 90 days).
Duffy's Discount Piñatas has a receivable from a Mexican customer in the amount of
1,000,000 pesos due in 90 days. The current exchange rate is $0.08 per peso and Mexican
interest rates are 16 percent. Duffy needs available cash and cannot wait to receive $80,000
in 90 days. Because Duffy needs the money now, the company elects to use a money
market hedge technique to expedite collection and mitigate any transaction exposure to
exchange rate risk.
Duffy computes that it can borrow 961,538 pesos and convert them to $76,923 consistent
with the first money market hedge example. Duffy borrows the pesos from Mexican
financial institutions.
Duffy will be able to meet whatever its current cash requirements are in the United
States with the $76,923, and when the 90-day discounted note for 961,538 pesos
matures for 1,000,000 pesos, Duffy will satisfy it with the collections from the foreign
accounts receivable.
Facts: Gearty International owes its Mexican supplier 1,000,000 pesos due in 30 days.
Although the peso is currently exchanged for the U.S. dollar at $0.08, the company is fearful
that the Mexican peso will strengthen in comparison to the dollar before the settlement
to as much as $0.10. Gearty International pays a $0.005 option premium to secure a call
option to buy 1,000,000 pesos in 30 days for $0.08/peso.
Required: Compute Gearty's net savings, assuming that Gearty is correct in its assessment
of international exchange rates and the exchange rate at the time of the settlement (the
spot rate) increases as predicted.
Solution:
Spot Rate at Option Total Settlement Cost
Settlement Price Premium Option for 1,000,000 Pesos
$0.10 – – – $100,000
– $0.08 $0.005 $0.085 (85,000)
Net savings $ 15,000
Gearty's consideration for the option, the $0.005 option premium, is $5,000 and is
paid regardless of whether the option is exercised. The gross savings of $20,000
[(0.10 − 0.08) × 1,000,000 pesos] is reduced by the $5,000 option premium to reflect a
$15,000 net savings. Because the option premium is a sunk cost, it does not affect the
company's decision to exercise the call option.
Facts: Same as above
Required: Calculate Gearty's loss, assuming that Gearty is incorrect in its assessment of
international exchange rates, the exchange rates stay constant at $0.08, and the company
allows its option to expire.
Solution:
Exercising the option is actually equal to simply settling the transaction at the spot
rate. Gearty will likely buy pesos at the spot rate regardless of the loss associated with
the premium.
The business has the option (not the obligation) to sell the collected amount of the foreign
currency from the receivable at the option (strike or exercise) price. The business evaluates
the relationship between the option price and the exchange rate at the settlement date.
Generally, if the option price is more than the exchange rate at the time of settlement, the
business will exercise its put option. If the put option price is less than the exchange rate at
the time of settlement, the business will allow the put option to expire. Although premiums
are used to compute any net preserved value associated with option transactions, they are a
sunk cost and irrelevant to the decision to exercise the options.
Facts: Gearty International is owed 1,000,000 pesos due in 30 days from its Mexican
customer. Although the peso is currently exchanged for the U.S. dollar at $0.08, the
company is fearful that the Mexican peso will weaken in comparison to the dollar before
the settlement to as little as $0.06. Gearty International pays a $0.005 put premium to
secure a put option to sell 1,000,000 pesos in 30 days for $0.08.
Required: Compute the net preserved value assuming that Gearty is correct in its
assessment of international exchange rates and the exchange rate at the time of the
settlement (the spot rate) decreases.
Solution:
Gearty's consideration for the put option, the $0.005 put premium, is $5,000 and is paid
regardless of whether the put option is exercised. The gross value "preserved" of $20,000
[(0.08 − 0.06) × 1,000,000 pesos] is reduced by the $5,000 put premium paid to reflect a
net $15,000 preserved receivable value. Because the put premium is a sunk cost, it is not
included in the decision to exercise the option.
Facts: Same as above
Required: Calculate Gearty's loss, assuming that Gearty is incorrect in its assessment of
international exchange rates, the exchange rates stay constant at $0.08, and Gearty allows
the put option to expire.
Solution:
Exercising the put option would actually be equal to simply settling the transaction at the
spot rate when the receivables are received. Gearty will likely sell pesos at the spot rate
regardless of the loss associated with the premium.
Facts: In order to hedge its future raw material purchases for its operations, in Poland, a
U.S. manufacturing firm (U.S. counterparty) agrees to enter into a currency swap with a
Polish multinational firm (foreign counterparty) whereby the U.S. counterparty agrees to
provide the following quarterly notional amounts in U.S. dollars to the foreign counterparty
in exchange for the following quarterly notional amounts in Polish zlotys.
Quarter End U.S. Counterparty Receives Foreign Counterparty Receives
1 1,500,000 zloty 500,000 USD
2 900,000 zloty 300,000 USD
3 750,000 zloty 250,000 USD
4 1,800,000 zloty 600,000 USD
Assume that the exchange rates are 3.25 zloty/1.0 USD and 2.85 zloty/1.0 USD at the end of
quarter 1 and quarter 2, respectively.
Required: Calculate the U.S. manufacturing firm's foreign currency gain or loss recorded at
the end of the first and second quarters on the currency swap.
(continued)
(continued)
Solution: The U.S. manufacturing firm (U.S. counterparty) entered into a fixed notional
amount currency swap with a foreign counterparty when the exchange rates were 3.0
zloty/1.0 USD. Because the contractual quarterly payments made in U.S. dollars to the
Polish firm are fixed at that exchange rate throughout the swap, any movement up or
down of these two exchange rates will result in a foreign currency gain or loss.
In the first quarter, the U.S. dollar appreciates versus the Polish zloty, so the U.S.
counterparty incurs a foreign currency loss. Under the terms of the currency swap, the U.S.
counterparty pays 500,000 U.S. dollars and receives 1,500,000 zloty (based on an exchange
rate of 3.0 zloty/1.0 USD). The 1,500,000 zloty received are worth only 461,538 U.S. dollars
based on the end of quarter exchange rate of 3.25 zloty/1.0 USD:
1,500,000 / 3.25 = 461,538 USD
Paying 500,000 U.S. dollars and receiving zloty worth only 463,538 U.S. dollars represents a
loss of 38,462 U.S. dollars:
500,000 – 461,538 = 38,462 USD
In the second quarter, the U.S. dollar depreciates versus the Polish zloty. As a result of
the swap, the U.S. counterparty incurs a foreign currency gain. The U.S. counterparty pays
300,000 U.S. dollars and receives 900,000 zloty. The value in U.S. dollars of 900,000 zloty
based on the end of quarter exchange rate of 2.85 zloty/1.0 USD is 315,789 U.S. dollars.
900,000 / 2.85 = 315,789
Paying 300,000 U.S. dollars and receiving zloty worth 315,789 U.S. dollars represents a gain
of 15,789 in U.S. dollars:
315,789 – 300,000 = 15,789 USD
4.7.2 Cross-Hedging
The technique known as cross-hedging involves hedging one instrument's risk with a different
instrument by taking a position in a related derivatives contract. This is often done when there is
no derivatives contract for the instrument being hedged, or when a suitable derivatives contract
exists but the market is highly illiquid.
Businesses have various methods of managing the economic and translation exposure
associated with exchange rate risks. Generally, the use of organization-wide solutions related to
the entity itself and related reporting requirements are included in the approach.
Pete's Primo Piñatas manufactures piñatas in Mexico. The company's expenses paid to
local suppliers are denominated in the peso. The company exports nearly 80 percent of
its product to the United States and receives revenues denominated in U.S. dollars from
upscale Mexican theme-party planners. If the peso were to strengthen in relation to the
dollar, then import revenues could be significantly less than domestic expenses. Pete's
Primo Piñatas would suffer economic losses as a result of its economic exposure to
exchange rate risk.
5.2.1 Restructuring
Economic exposure to currency fluctuations can be mitigated by restructuring the sources of
income and expense to the consolidated entity.
Decreases in Sales
A company fearful of a depreciating foreign currency used by a foreign subsidiary may elect
to reduce foreign sales to preserve cash flows.
Increases in Expenses
A company anticipating a depreciating foreign currency may elect to increase reliance
on those suppliers to take advantage of paying for raw materials or supplies with
cheaper currency.
6.4 Forfaiting
Forfaiting represents a credit facility for importers of higher-priced capital goods that may be
financed over several years. Forfaiting transactions share the characteristics of factoring and use
the transaction mechanics of letters of credit.
Importers that purchase capital goods from exporters (generally in excess of $500,000) may do
so by issuing a promissory note payable over a three- to five-year period. The exporter's default
risk increases as the payment terms are extended. Forfaiting mitigates the extra risk from the
extended payment terms.
The seller (exporter) sells the promissory note to a forfaiting bank (essentially a factor) for
discounted proceeds and thereby assures both cash collection and cash flows to the exporter.
The forfaiting bank, in turn, seeks collection from the importer through a prearranged,
collateralized agreement that uses bank guarantees or letters of credit issued by the importer's
bank to ensure collection of the purchased promissory note by the forfaiting bank.
6.5 Countertrade
A countertrade refers to the mutual exchange of goods in bartering arrangements
or the purchase of goods through clearing houses with either partial or full
compensation arrangements.
Bartering involves the exchange of goods without monetary compensation. Agricultural
products from Canada (such as wheat) might be exchanged for seafood harvested in Peru in a
bartering transaction.
Compensation arrangements represent the guaranteed purchase of goods paid for with
currency. In full compensation transactions, agricultural products from Canada might be
purchased by a Peruvian company with the full understanding that the Canadian company will
purchase either an equal (full compensation) or different (partial compensation) amount of
seafood products from a Peruvian company.
Question 1 MCQ-12689
Big Company, located solely in the United States, purchased items from a supplier located
in the United Kingdom for £100,000 in early December Year 1. Big reported a payable
for that purchase on the date of purchase for $130,336. On December 31, the end of the
accounting period, the payable was not yet settled. The exchange rate was 1 USD = £0.75
on December 31, Year 1, and was 1 USD = £0.73 on the date the payable was settled in
February Year 2. What is the amount of gain (loss) that Big needs to report on its income
statement for December Year 1 as a result of foreign exchange rate fluctuation? Round to
the nearest dollar.
a. $2,997 loss
b. $2,997 gain
c. $6,650 gain
d. $6,650 loss
Question 2 MCQ-12690
A company located in the United Kingdom purchased materials from an Italian company
for €200,000 when the exchange rate was €1.00/£0.90. Before year-end, the British
company settled its liabilities when the exchange rate was €1.00/£0.93. What is the effect
on the British company's operating income as a result of this transaction? Assume that the
exchange rate at the end of the accounting period was €1.00/£0.95.
a. Loss of £6,000.
b. Gain of £6,000.
c. Loss of £10,000.
d. No gain or loss is reported because the settlement of the liability took place in the
same accounting period.
Question 3 MCQ-12691
Romeo Co. is an Italian company that owes its Mexican supplier 1,000,000 pesos. The
amount is due in two months. The current exchange rate is 1 Mexican peso = €0.040.
Romeo Co. holds a call option to buy 1,000,000 Mexican pesos at an exercise price of
€0.041 per peso. The premium paid for the option is €0.002 per peso. Upon maturity, the
exchange rate was 1 Mexican peso = €0.045. What is the amount of gain or loss that the
Italian company will record for the year as a result of this transaction?
a. Loss of €5,000.
b. Loss of €1,000.
c. Loss of €3,000.
d. Gain of €3,000.
UNIT 2
Unit 2, Module 1
1. MCQ-12661
Choice "b" is correct. The capital asset pricing model (CAPM) is used to determine a required
rate of return for any risky asset. To accept a given amount of systematic risk for an individual
security, the investor requires a return equal to the risk-free rate added to the asset's risk
premium, which is β(Rm – Rf).
The required return is equal to 11.68 percent, calculated as follows:
R = Rf + β(Rm – Rf)
R = 0.03 + 1.24 (0.10 – 0.03) = 0.1168 = 11.68%
Choice "a" is incorrect. This answer choice does not include the risk-free rate of 3 percent added
to the risk premium of 8.68 percent.
Choice "c" is incorrect. The risk-free rate of 3 percent is omitted (twice) from the CAPM
calculation.
Choice "d" is incorrect. The risk-free rate of 3 percent is not subtracted from the market risk
premium component of the CAPM calculation.
2. MCQ-12662
Choice "b" is correct. The correlation coefficient measures the statistical relationship between
two variables. The correlation coefficient between two securities' historical returns can be used
to identify securities ideal for effectively diversifying a portfolio. Negative correlations reduce
overall portfolio risk without compromising expected portfolio return; finding two stocks with a
negative correlation to one another is critical.
Based on the data provided in the correlation matrix, the largest negative correlation is –0.25
between ALK and CMN. By adding these two stocks to a portfolio, the unsystematic risk and,
thus, the overall risk of the portfolio will decline.
Choice "a" is incorrect. ALK and DLE have a correlation of 0.58, which will not reduce
unsystematic risk and, thus, overall portfolio risk as much as combining ALK and CMN, because
ALK and DLE are highly correlated whereas ALK and CMN are negatively correlated.
Choice "c" is incorrect. While BTY and DLE have a negative correlation of –0.04, this combination
will not be as beneficial to reduce unsystematic risk as combining ALK and CMN which have a
negative correlation of –0.25.
Choice "d" is incorrect. BTY and CMN have a positive correlation of 0.16, which is not as
beneficial to reducing portfolio risk as adding ALK and CMN which have a negative correlation
of –0.25.
Unit 2, Module 2
1. MCQ-12663
Choice "c" is correct. The value of a bond is equal to the present value of its future interest and
principal payments. Because the bond's coupon rate is greater than the market rate at the time
of issuance, the bond will be issued at a premium (above $1,000 per bond).
The calculation is performed quickly on a financial calculator, but the manual calculation of the
bond price is shown below:
Year 1 payment: $42.50 / 1.04 = $40.865
Year 2 payment: $42.50 / (1.04)2 = $39.294
Year 3 payment: $42.50 / (1.04)3 = $37.782
Year 4 payment: ($42.50 + $1,000) / (1.04)4 = $891.133
Total value: $40.865 + $39.294 + $37.782 + $891.133 = $1,009.07.
Note that $42.50 is the yearly interest payment: 4.25% stated rate × $1,000 face (par) value of
the bond.
Choice "a" is incorrect. An issuance price below par means that the bond would have been
issued at a discount. A bond is sold at a discount if the market rate is higher than the stated rate.
In this case the market rate of 4.00 percent is less than the 4.25 percent stated rate. So, the bond
is selling at a price greater than par value.
Choice "b" is incorrect. An issuance price below par means that the bond would have been
issued at a discount. A bond is sold at a discount if the market rate is higher than the stated rate.
In this case the market rate of 4.00 percent is less than the 4.25 percent stated rate. So, the bond
is selling at a price greater than par value.
Choice "d" is incorrect. This answer choice incorrectly adds $4.25 each year for four years to the
face value of $1,000. To determine the current value (price) of the bond, take the present value
of all cash flow amounts using the 4.00 percent market rate.
2. MCQ-12664
Choice "d" is correct. The intrinsic value of a stock is the price an investor should pay to purchase
a share of stock. The inputs to the calculation include the current dividend, the growth rate, and
the required return.
D0 (1 +g)
Pt =
r–g
The required return is calculated using the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), shown below:
r = rf + β(rm – rf)
For this stock, Reynolds' required return is equal to 6.4%:
r = 0.02 + 1.10(0.06 – 0.02) = 0.064 = 6.4%
Based on the intrinsic value equation above, the price that Reynolds should pay for the stock is
$49.83 per share:
$1.15 (1 + 0.04)
Pt = = $49.83.
0.064 – 0.04
Choice "a" is incorrect. $18.69 is the value if the growth rate is omitted from the denominator of
the calculation.
Choice "b" is incorrect. $29.90 is the value if the required return is omitted from the
denominator of the calculation.
Choice "c" is incorrect. $47.92 is the value if the dividend in the numerator is not multiplied by
1 + g.
Unit 2, Module 3
1. MCQ-12665
Choice "c" is correct.
The risk-free interest rate is one of the inputs into the Black-Scholes option valuation model. As
interest rates in the marketplace change, the values of both calls and puts change. If the risk-
free interest rate increases, the value of a call option increases, and the value of a put option
decreases. Conversely, if the risk-free interest rate decrease, the value of a call option decreases
and the value of a put option increases.
A lower risk-free interest rate results in lower earnings on cash holdings, which means having
more cash on hand is not necessarily beneficial. The alternative to buying a put option is to short
sell the underlying stock. Short selling provides immediate cash up front, which in a low interest
rate environment is not as beneficial. Having the right to sell at a point in the future therefore
provides more value than holding cash now, which is why the put increases in value. Call options
represent the call option holder's right to buy the underlying asset at the specified strike price.
The alternative to buying a call option is to buy the stock outright. Lower interest rates are not
beneficial for call option holders because waiting to buy (versus buying right away) means more
cash is on hand—cash that is earning a lower interest rate.
Choice "a" is incorrect. The value of the put will be higher, not lower, with decreases in
interest rates.
Choice "b" is incorrect. The value of the call will be lower, not higher, with decreases in
interest rates.
Choice "d" is incorrect. When interest rates increase (not decrease), the value of the put is lower,
and the value of the call is higher.
2. MCQ-12666
Choice "b" is correct. Forward commitments allow the holder to lock in a price today to buy
or sell the underlying asset at some point in the future. There are three types of forward
commitments: forwards, futures, and swaps. A forward contract is a customized agreement
between two parties in which the buyer will purchase an underlying asset from the seller later
at a fixed price specified in the contract when the contract is signed. A futures contract is an
agreement to buy or sell a predetermined quantity of a specified asset on a future date for a
specified price. Forward contracts are not bought and sold on organized exchanges; futures
contracts are bought and sold on organized exchanges.
Both parties to a forward contract and to a futures contract are obligated by the terms of the
contract. Unlike with options where the long position has the right, but not the obligation, to act,
forwards and futures are commitments in which both sides are obligated to act.
Choice "a" is incorrect. Credit risk is mitigated in a futures contract (not forward contract) due to
the presence of a clearinghouse.
Choice "c" is incorrect. Futures (not forwards) require posting initial margin, which serves
as collateral for the transaction. Forwards do not have a collateral requirement unless that
requirement is negotiated and becomes part of the contract.
Choice "d" is incorrect. Futures contracts have standardized terms; forward contracts have
negotiated terms for each contract.
3. MCQ-12667
Choice "d" is correct. An investor takes a long position in a forward contract when the investor
expects the price of the underlying asset to increase. Generally, a long position means that
the investor is required to purchase the underlying asset at some future, specified date for
a specified price. An investor takes a short position in a forward contract when the investor
expects the price of the underlying asset to decrease.
Generally, a short position means that the investor is required to sell the underlying asset at
some future, specified date for a specified price.
The investor here has a short position and will record a gain (or a loss) if the price of the
underlying asset, the wheat, decreases (or increases). In this fact pattern the investor is required
to sell the wheat, the underlying asset, for $5.20 per bushel. The investor will collect $5.20 per
bushel from the other party to the forward contract. On September 1, the investor could buy
that wheat at $4.70 per bushel, deliver that wheat to the other party (the buyer) to the forward
contract, and collect from that buyer $5.20. As such, the investor has a $0.50 profit per bushel:
$5.20 per bushel that the investor will collect from the other party to the forward contract minus
$4.70 per bushel, which the investor will have to pay to acquire the wheat for delivery to the
other party to the forward contract.
The total value of the forward contract is $1,250: $0.50 profit per bushel × 5 contracts × 500
bushels per contract = $1,250.
Choice "a" is incorrect. There would be a loss if, for this investor, the contract were a long (rather
than a short) position. Furthermore, because there are five contracts, the loss on the long
position is –$1,250: 5 contracts x $250 loss per contract.
Choice "b" is incorrect. The gain per contract is $250, but there are five contracts.
Choice "c" is incorrect. There would be a loss if, for this investor, the contract were a long (rather
than a short) position.
Unit 2, Module 4
1. MCQ-12668
Choice "c" is correct. Market efficiency refers to how well current market prices reflect all
available and relevant information. If a market is efficient, then no single investor can make
abnormal profits based on information the investor has because everybody trading in the
market has that information, and all of that information is already reflected in the market price.
If the stock market is inefficient, information will take time to affect the market prices
of securities.
Choice "a" is incorrect. Availability of information usually affects market price either immediately
if the market is efficient or with some delay when the market is inefficient.
Choice "b" is incorrect. Given the information in the question, the trajectory of the stock price
cannot be predicted.
Choice "d" is incorrect. Given the information in the question, changes in the direction of
demand for the stock cannot be determined.
2. MCQ-12669
Choice "b" is correct. The term market efficiency refers to how well current market prices reflect
all available and relevant information. In an efficient market, information is available at low costs
to all market participants who are rational and react quickly to new information.
The efficient market theory does not discuss the manner or the fashion in which the information
is generated.
Choice "a" is correct. In efficient markets, information is inexpensive or free, and is widely
available.
Choice "c" is incorrect. In efficient markets, there are rational participants in the market.
Choice "d" is incorrect. In efficient markets, market participants react quickly and fully to new
information.
3. MCQ-12670
Choice "a" is correct. Dividends are first paid to preferred shareholders and then to common
shareholders. When preferred shares are cumulative, all preferred share dividends in arrears
(prior year dividends not yet paid) are paid to preferred shareholders, followed by the current
year preferred share dividends. Only after the preferred shareholders received dividends in
arrears and current dividends would the common shareholders receive dividend payments.
Dividends to common shareholders in Year 4 are $130,000, calculated as follows:
Preferred shareholders' dividends in arrears for Year 3 = $100 par value per share × 20,000
shares × 8% stated rate = $160,000
Preferred shareholders' dividends for Year 4 = $100 par value per share × 20,000 shares × 8%
stated rate = $160,000
Total allocated to preferred shareholders = $160,000 for Year 3 + $160,000 for Year 4 = $320,000
dividend allocated to preferred shareholders.
The remainder allocated to common shareholders = $450,000 total dividend declared – $320,000
portion of total dividend declared to be paid to preferred shareholders = $130,000 dividend to
be paid to common shareholders.
Choice "b" is incorrect. $320,000 are the dividends allocated to preferred shareholders, not
common shareholders.
Choice "c" is incorrect. $160,000 is the annual dividend payment to preferred shareholders per
the contract.
Choice "d" is incorrect. If the preferred stock were noncumulative (only current year dividends
paid) then $290,000 would be allocated to common shareholders.
Unit 2, Module 5
1. MCQ-12679
Choice "b" is correct. Offering payment discounts can result in improved cash collections
because discounts forgone generally represent a higher cost than the cost of a short-term bank
loan. The formula for calculating the annual cost (APR) of a quick payment discount is as follows:
360 Discount
APR of quick payment discount = ×
Pay period – Discount period 100 – Discount %
360 2%
The annualized rate in this question = × = 21%
45 – 10 98%
This annualized rate is higher than the annual borrowing cost (12 percent); Beta should borrow
funds from the bank to take advantage of the cash discount. The 21 percent annualized cost of
not taking the discount is greater than the 12 percent annual cost of borrowing from the bank.
Choice "a" is incorrect. It is wrong to compare the discount rate with the annual borrowing
rate. The correct comparison is annualized rate with respect to the discount versus the annual
borrowing rate.
Choice "c" is incorrect. Postponing the payment of liabilities is not a good option. In this case,
Beta should not extend payment beyond the allowable 45 days. Doing so reflects negatively on
the relationship with Beta's suppliers.
Choice "d" is incorrect. Funds should be borrowed if they can be borrowed at a cost that is
lower than the annualized cash discount savings. Although a 12 percent borrowing rate is
higher than the 2 percent cash discount, the appropriate comparison is the 12 percent annual
borrowing rate versus the 21 percent APR of the quick payment discount (annualized cash
discount savings).
2. MCQ-12680
Choice "a" is correct. Working capital is defined as the difference between current assets (CA)
and current liabilities (CL). On the one hand, when a sale occurs, inventory will be removed from
inventory at cost. On the other hand, either cash or a receivable will be recognized at the selling
price. If the selling price is greater than the cost of the inventory sold, then the cash or receivable
increase will be greater than the inventory decrease and working capital will increase in an
amount equal to the amount of the selling price in excess of the cost of the inventory sold.
In this question, the selling price is higher than cost; so, the increase in accounts receivable
exceeds the decrease in inventory by the markup amount, and there is an increase in
working capital.
Choices "b" and "c" are incorrect. When selling price exceeds cost, working capital will increase
as a result of a sale.
Choice "d" is incorrect. Working capital will be affected if a sale takes place at a profit even if the
sale was on credit.
3. MCQ-12681
Choice "b" is correct. The current ratio (CA divided by CL) measures the number of times current
assets exceed current liabilities and is a way of measuring short-term solvency. This ratio
demonstrates a firm's ability to generate cash to meet its short-term obligations.
Using cash to pay a current liability is an equal deduction from current assets in the numerator
and current liabilities in the denominator. Because the current ratio was greater than 1 before
current assets were used to settle the current liability, the ratio will increase after current assets
are used to settle the current liability.
Exam-taking suggestion: For any question asking for a number result but not providing any
numbers, use your own numbers to make the question less abstract and more concrete. For
example, in this question, you could assume that (i) current assets are $20; (ii) current liabilities
are $10 (so that the current ratio before settlement of the liability is 2); and (iii) the cash paid
to settle the current liability is $2. After settlement, current assets are now $18, and current
liabilities are now $8; so, the current ratio is now $18 / $8 = 2.25, which is greater than 2.
Only if the current ratio were 1 prior to the use of current assets to settle the current liability will
the current ratio continue to be 1 after the use of current assets to settle the current liability.
Choice "a" is incorrect. The current ratio is not affected by using current assets to settle a current
liability only when the current ratio was initially equal to 1. Example: Assume current assets and
current liabilities are each $30 (so that the current ratio is 1: $30 current assets / $30 current
liabilities). Further assume that $4 of current assets are used so settle current liabilities. After
settlement, current assets and current liabilities are each $26, and the current ratio is still 1: $26
current assets / $26 current liabilities.
Choice "c" is incorrect. Because the current ratio was greater than 1 before the settlement of
the current liability, the ratio will not decrease when settlement takes place; rather, the ratio will
increase when settlement takes place.
Choice "d" is incorrect. The information provided is sufficient to determine the current ratio
effect resulting from settlement of a current liability.
Unit 2, Module 6
1. MCQ-12682
Choice "b" is correct. The reorder point is the level of inventory that is in stock when the
company issues an order for additional quantities of inventory. This level is equal to the
sum of the need for inventory during the lead time plus the safety stock, as is shown in the
following formula:
Reorder point = Units consumed during lead time + Safety stock
The annual demand is 120,000 units, which is 10,000 units per month. Assuming that a month
comprises approximately four weeks, then the weekly demand is estimated to be 2,500 units.
Because the company receives the goods one week after the goods are ordered, sells 2,500
units of inventory each week, and always wants to have at least 400 units of inventory on hand,
the company needs to reorder when there are 2,900 units remaining on hand: 2,500 units that
will be sold from the time the replacement inventory is ordered until the time the replacement
inventory will arrive + 400 units of safety stock.
Choice "a" is incorrect. 10,000 units represents the monthly quantity demanded.
Choice "c" is incorrect. The weekly demand is 2,500 units. This number is not the reorder point.
Choice "d" is incorrect. The safety stock is 400 units. This number does not represent the
reorder point.
2. MCQ-12683
Choice "a" is correct. The economic order quantity (EOQ) inventory model attempts to minimize
ordering and carrying costs. The use of the model helps management determine the optimal
quantity to be ordered in an attempt to minimize the sum of order costs and carrying costs.
Choice "b" is incorrect. Omitting 2 from the numerator incorrectly results in 3,536 units.
Choice "c" is incorrect. Using the monthly demand of 10,000 units rather than the annual
demand of 120,000 units in the numerator results in 1,444 units.
Choice "d" is incorrect. Incorrectly transposing the carrying cost and the order cost results in
48 units.
3. MCQ-12684
Choice "b" is correct. Factoring accounts receivable entails turning over the collection of
accounts receivable to a third-party factor in exchange for a discounted short-term loan.
According to the credit terms, cash is collected from the factor immediately rather than later
from the customer. The cost of this service includes the fees and the interest charged by the
factor. By factoring receivables, a company can save all relevant collection costs but will incur
loan borrowing costs.
The net cost of this service is $37,000, calculated as follows:
Factoring fees = $400,000 × 1% × 12 months = $48,000
Interest = $400,000 × 75% × 8% = $24,000
Total cost of buying this service = $48,000 + $24,000 = $72,000
Savings because of eliminating collection service = $35,000
Net cost of the factoring service = $72,000 – $35,000 = $37,000.
Choice "a" is incorrect. $24,000 represents the annual interest charged on cash advances when
the company factors the receivables, but the question asks for the net annual cost of using a
factor in lieu of incurring collection costs of $35,000.
Choice "c" is incorrect. $48,000 represents the annual factoring fee only, rather than adding that
amount to the interest charged and then subtracting the eliminated collection services fees to
arrive at the net cost of factoring.
Choice "d" is incorrect. The total cost of the factoring service is $72,000, but the question asks for
the net annual cost, which requires the subtraction of the $35,000 in collection service costs that
were eliminated.
4. MCQ-12685
Choice "b" is correct. Offering a cash discount for prompt payment is a tool used by sales
managers to accelerate cash collections. To determine the cost to the customer of the
customer's not taking the discount (savings from paying within the window), the customer's
management must always annualize the rate using the following formula:
Discount % / (100% – Discount %) × 360 / (Pay period – Discount period)
The annualized rate for Supplier A is 18.18% = [(1% / 99%) × (360 / 20)]. That is, Supplier A is
offering an 18.18% APR discount if Malki pays within the first 10 days. In order to compare
Supplier B's annualized rate to Supplier A's, the time periods must be identical. To make the
comparison, use Supplier A's time periods but with Supplier B's discount rate. The annualized
rate for Supplier B is 36.73% = [(2% / 98%) × (360 / 20)]. So, Malki benefits more by selecting
Supplier B to realize a greater annualized rate savings.
Choice "a" is incorrect. If, for example, Malki purchases on credit from Supplier A a $100 item
and pays within 10 days, Malki will pay only $99. If, however, Malki purchases on credit from
Supplier B a $100 item and pays within the same 10 days, Malki will pay only $98. So, Malki
should buy from Supplier B rather than from Supplier A and pay less.
Choice "c" is incorrect. The information presented is useful for decision making.
Choice "d" is incorrect. The comparison between the two suppliers is based on cash payment
terms that are different for each supplier. Because the cash payment terms are different, Malki
is not indifferent with respect to both suppliers.
Unit 2, Module 7
1. MCQ-12686
Choice "b" is correct. To determine the value of a target company, the buyer must calculate
the present value of the future after-tax cash flows. If the expected after-tax cash flows are
specified for the initial period and if a constant growth rate is specified for later years, the use
of the Gordon growth model would be a two-stage calculation. However, in this question the
operations terminate after five years, so use of the Gordon growth model is neither necessary
nor appropriate.
The value of Alpha Co. is estimated at $603,434, calculated as follows:
[$150,000 ÷ (1.12)1] + [$170,000 ÷ (1.12)2] + [$180,000 ÷ (1.12)3] + [$190,000 ÷ (1.12)4] +
[$150,000 ÷ (1.12)5] = $603,434
Choice "a" is incorrect. The $432,573 is the present value of the average net income. When
calculating the value of a company, use after-tax cash flows from operations, not accounting
net income.
Choice "c" is incorrect. The $1,144,151, is the present value of the sum of the average net income
and the annual, after-tax cash flows. When calculating the value of a company, use only after-tax
cash flows, not accounting income.
Choice "d" is incorrect. The $1,250,000 is the beginning of the Year 5 present value of $150,000 if
$150,000 did not grow into perpetuity: $150,000 ÷ 0.12. However, the $150,000 is not estimated
to continue into perpetuity but is a single-year amount.
2. MCQ-12687
Choice "c" is correct. To determine the value of a target company, the buyer must calculate
the present value of the future after-tax cash flows. If a constant growth rate is expected for
future years, then the buyer can use the Gordon growth model to determine the value of the
target company.
The value of Alpha Co. is $1,666,667, calculated as follows:
Value = End-of-year after-tax cash flow divided by the difference between the required rate of
return and the constant growth rate.
$150,000
Value = = $1,666,667
12% − 3%
Choice "a" is incorrect. The $1,250,000 is the value if no growth in cash flows is expected.
Choice "b" is incorrect. The $1,333,333 is the value based on the annual net income of $120,000
rather than the after-tax cash flows.
Choice "d" is incorrect. The $5,000,000 is the value if the rate of return is 3% with no
expected growth.
Unit 2, Module 8
1. MCQ-12689
Choice "a" is correct. When importing items from a foreign supplier in a transaction
denominated in a foreign currency, a gain will result when the foreign currency depreciates
relative to the domestic currency. A loss will result when the foreign currency appreciates
relative to the domestic currency.
In early December, the date of the transaction, each USD could purchase £0.767
(£100,000/$130,336). On December 31, Year 1, the USD could purchase only £0.75. This smaller
number is an indicator of a weaker USD. On December 31, the payable liability is now $133,333:
£100,000 ÷ £0.75/$1.00. Because the payable amount recorded in early December was only
$130,336 and because the December 31 payable amount is $133,333, the company must
increase (credit) the payable in the amount of $2,997: $133,333 December 31 payable amount –
$130,336 early December recorded payable amount. This $2,997 is a loss (debit) to be recorded
as a reduction to operating income.
Choice "b" is incorrect. Because the USD is weaker on December 31, Year 1, the result is a loss,
not a gain. In early December, the date of the transaction, each USD could purchase £0.767
(£100,000/$130,336). On December 31, Year 1, the USD could purchase only £0.75. This smaller
number is an indicator of a weaker USD. On December 31 the payable liability is now $133,333:
£100,000 ÷ £0.75/$1.00. Because the payable amount recorded in early December was only
$130,336 and because the December 31 payable amount is $133,333, the company must
increase (credit) the payable in the amount of $2,997: $133,333 December 31 payable amount –
$130,336 early December recorded payable amount. This $2,997 is a loss (debit), not a gain, to
be recorded as a reduction to operating income.
Choice "c" is incorrect. The USD is weaker at the end of the accounting period and results in
a loss due to the increase in the value of the payables. The $6,650 results from the difference
in exchange rates from the date of the transaction in early December, Year 1, up to the date
of settlement in February Year 2. Specifically, while the payable amount recorded in early
December was $130,336, the amount of cash (U.S. dollars) the company will expend on the
February Year 2 settlement date will be $136,986: £100,000 ÷ £0.73/$1.00 Hence, the cumulative
(early December Year 1 through February Year 2) loss, not gain, is $6,650: $136,986 amount
of cash (U.S. dollars) the company will expend on the February Year 2 settlement date minus
the $130,336 payable amount recorded in early December Year 1. Also, note that the foreign
exchange rate fluctuation gain or loss to be reported in the income statement for December
Year 1 is calculated based on the change in the exchange rate through December 31, Year 1, not
through the settlement date in the subsequent year.
Choice "d" is incorrect. The $6,650 results from the difference in exchange rates from the date
of the transaction in early December Year 1 up to the date of settlement in February Year 2.
Specifically, while the payable amount recorded in early December was $130,336, the amount
of cash (U.S. dollars) the company will expend on the February Year 2 settlement date will be
$136,986: £100,000 ÷ £0.73/$1.00. Hence, the cumulative (early December Year 1 through
February Year 2) loss is $6,650: $136,986 amount of cash (U.S. dollars) the company will expend
on the February Year 2 settlement date minus the $130,336 payable amount recorded in
early December Year 1. Also, note that the foreign exchange rate fluctuation gain or loss to
be reported in the income statement for December Year 1 is calculated based on the change
in exchange rate up through December 31, Year 1, not through the settlement date in the
subsequent year.
2. MCQ-12690
Choice "a" is correct. When importing items from a foreign supplier in a transaction
denominated in a foreign currency, a company will recognize a gain when the foreign currency
depreciates relative to the domestic currency. A loss will result when the foreign currency
appreciates relative to the domestic currency.
The euro appreciated by £0.03 against the pound. As such, using euros of €200,000 became
more expensive. The increase in cost is £0.03/1.00€ × €200,000 = £6,000 (loss).
Choice "b" is incorrect. The euro appreciates in value relative to the British pound. This
appreciation results in a loss to the British company because it now needs more British pounds
to purchase the required euros to settle (pay) the payable.
Choice "c" is incorrect. Even though the liability is settled before year-end, the British company
computes its foreign exchange rate fluctuation gain or loss by comparing the exchange rate
when the transaction took place (the payable was generated) with the exchange rate when the
payable is settled in euros.
Choice "d" is incorrect. Foreign exchange rate fluctuation gains and losses from foreign currency
transactions are determined when a liability is settled (paid), regardless of whether settlement
happens during the same year or in a later year.
3. MCQ-12691
Choice "c" is correct. A call option (an option to buy) is the currency option hedge used to
mitigate the transaction exposure associated with exchange rate risk for payables. The option is
in the money when the exercise price is lower than the market price on the date of exercise.
It is better for Romeo Co. to exercise the option to buy the pesos at €0.041 per peso rather than
purchasing pesos at the market price of €0.045. The total cost is therefore €0.041 + €0.002 =
€0.043 per peso. That is €0.003 higher than the spot rate when the transaction originated. This is
a loss of €0.003 × 1,000,000 pesos = €3,000.
Choice "a" is incorrect. The loss would be €5,000 if Romeo did not exercise the option and paid
the current exchange rate for the peso, but because the exercise price is less than the current
rate, Romeo would exercise the option instead.
Choice "b" is incorrect. The loss is €1,000 only if buying the option did not cost a premium.
Choice "d" is incorrect. Because the cost to buy 1 peso increased, the result is a loss.