Single Phase Grid Interconnected High Gain Boost Converter With Soft Switching Capability
Single Phase Grid Interconnected High Gain Boost Converter With Soft Switching Capability
Single Phase Grid Interconnected High Gain Boost Converter With Soft Switching Capability
Corresponding Author:
Bogimi Sirisha
Department of Electrical, University College of Engineering, Osmania University
Hyderabad, Telangana 500007, India
Email: [email protected]
1. INTRODUCTION
Over the previous two decades, electricity demand increased drastically. This eventually led to
excess consumption and depletion of non-renewable fuels. These served as a strong reason for the researchers
to shift to solar photovoltaic (PV) panels, wind energy, and other renewable energy sources. But they suffer
from major challenges such as, Because of the nonlinear features, efficient use of the source is critical. There
is a need to use a maximum power point tracker (MPPT) in order to observe the peak power of a PV module
[1]. They are generally operated at low output voltages (typically 30-50 V). As a result, using them for a
variety of applications such as grid-connected systems and stand-alone applications becomes challenging due
to the high voltage boosting requirement [2].
To increase the voltage level to the required level, a boost converter is required. However, there are
certain drawbacks in using traditional DC-DC converters, like, on the supply side, large peak current flows,
deteriorating magnetic components such as inductors, and eventually leading to substantial losses. Across the
switch, a high voltage appears. The switch on-state resistance is proportional to the square of the voltage
rating.
So due to high voltage, the on-state resistance of the switch also increases which increases the
conduction losses. Moreover, the operation of the converter at large duty cycles increases the losses in
parasitic resistances of components. To increase the voltage level, it is essential to design and study new high
gain, efficient boost converters. Some of the following methodologies are implemented to obtain high voltage
at converter output and are shown in Figures 1(a)-1(f).
Isolated converters (DC-DC) use high-frequency transformer which causes a large ripple in the
current due to leakage inductance and also spikes in voltage across the switch during turn on and are
comparatively bulky and costly [1]–[3]. Use of coupled inductors, they utilize the high reluctance core due to
air gap and store the energy in magnetizing inductance of the core and uses turns ratio. But they have high
leakage inductance increasing losses [4], [5]. Use of interleaved coupled inductor: They use comparatively
smaller values of inductances, reducing useful for applications requiring high power [6]. To restore the leakage
energy, the active clamp is used. But due to conduction losses in the power switch, generally passive clamp
network is preferred [7], [8]. Intermediate storage capacitors can be employed to store energy and transfer it to
load and resulting in boosting of voltage at moderate duty ratio values [9]–[11].
Figure 1. Topology converter output for (a) isolated DC-DC converter, (b) coupled inductor-based, (c)
coupled inductor in interleaved arrangement, (d) active clamp-based, (e) passive clamp-based, and (f) energy
storage buffer capacitor
Where L1 and L2 are inductances (primary and secondary) of a connected inductor. Passive clamp recovery of
L1 is denoted by Ccl and DCl. The output capacitor is Cout, and the output diode is Do. Vout is the voltage
across the load. On the secondary side, the buffer capacitor Cint and diode Dfb are connected.
Int J Adv Appl Sci, Vol. 11, No. 2, June 2022: 113-125
Int J Adv Appl Sci ISSN: 2252-8814 115
In mode-II, as shown in Figure 4, the magnetizing current flowing through the primary inductor L 1
charges the switch parasitic capacitance. The feedback diode D fb remains in forwarding bias, current flows
through supply, inductance (magnetizing), and parasitic capacitance of MOSFET switch.
Diodes DCl and Do become forward biased in mode-III. Dfb is reverse biased. The primary side
coupled inductor (L1) leakage energy is collected through DCl. and stored in the Ccl. Furthermore, as
illustrated in Figure 5.
In Figure 6, Mode-IV begins after the leakage energy from coupled inductor L 1 has been fully
recovered. While diode DCl gets reverse biased, diode Do remains forward biased. Current flows from input
to the load side through inductor L2, intermediate capacitor Cint, and then to the load.
Mode-V as seen in Figure 7, the magnetizing current energizes the leakage inductor, while the
switch parasitic capacitance discharges. Diodes, DCl, and Dfb, both are reverse biased. When the output diode
Do gets reverse biased and the current direction through inductor L2 reverses, this mode ceases shown in
Figure 7.
𝑉𝐿1 = 𝑉𝑆 (2)
Int J Adv Appl Sci, Vol. 11, No. 2, June 2022: 113-125
Int J Adv Appl Sci ISSN: 2252-8814 117
𝑉𝐿2
From gain ratio, 𝑉𝐿1 = (7)
𝑛
Voltage gain, a cross primary inductor L1, on applying voltage-second balance, we get: 𝑉𝐿1(𝑜𝑛) . 𝑑 +
(𝑉𝑠 +𝑛𝑉𝑠 −𝑉𝑜𝑢𝑡 )
𝑉𝐿1(𝑜𝑓𝑓) . (1 − 𝑑) = 0. Substituting (2) and (8), we get: 𝑉𝑠 . 𝑑 + (𝑛+1)
(1 − 𝑑) = 0.
𝑉𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑛+1
= (9)
𝑉𝑠 1−𝑑
𝐼𝑚𝑎𝑔 ∗𝑑𝑙𝑘
The minimum value of the clamp capacitor 𝐶𝑐𝑙 = (11)
∆𝑉𝑐𝑐𝑙 ∗𝑓𝑠
Single phase grid interconnected high gain boost converter with soft switching capability (Bogimi Sirisha)
118 ISSN: 2252-8814
The operation of the novel converter is compared with the boost converter in terms of parameters
given in Table 2. But in practical application circuits, the inductor in a conventional boost converter will not
be perfectly inductive with zero internal resistance due to which the maximum operating duty ratio of the
traditional boost converter will be restricted to (0.4-0.6). As a result, we can't operate at 0.9 duty cycle
practically, and thus can't obtain a large voltage gain using the traditional converter. The switch drops and
switching losses obtained are high. So, it causes high loss switching. Hence it is clear that the novel topology
is superior in performance.
Table 2. Comparsion with boost converter (Vs=35 V, Fsw=50 kHz, L=50 µH, C=4.7 µF)
Boost converter Proposed converter
(d=0.9, Ron=0.068 ohms) (d=0.5, Ron=0.0035 ohms)
Voltage gain 𝑉𝑜 1 𝑉𝑜 𝑛+1
= =350 v = = 350 v
𝑉𝑠 (1−𝑑) 𝑉𝑠 1−𝑑
2 (𝑛+1)𝐼𝑜𝑢𝑡 2
Switch loss 𝐼
𝑅𝑜𝑛 ∗ 𝑑 ∗ ( 𝑜𝑢𝑡 ) = 6.12 w 𝑅𝑜𝑛 ∗ 𝑑 ∗ ( ) =0.18 w
1−𝑑 1−𝑑
𝑉𝑠 𝑉𝑠
Current through inductor 𝑑𝑇𝑠 = 12.6 A 𝑑𝑇𝑠 = 7 A
𝐿 𝐿
𝑉𝑠 𝑉𝑠
Switch voltage drop = 35/1-0.9 = 350 v = 35/1-0.5 = 70 v
1−𝑑 1−𝑑
2 2
Leakage energy 1 𝑉𝑠 1 𝑉𝑠
𝐶( 𝑑) =0.23 w 𝐶( 𝑑) = 0.004 w
2 1−𝑑 2 1−𝑑
3. GRID SYNCHRONIZATION
The following Figures 8 and 9 depict the complete block diagram of the system with
synchronization and resistive load. The grid current is sensed and converted into two orthogonal signals 𝐼𝛼 , 𝐼𝛽
by introducing a transport delay of 90°.
𝐼𝛼 = 𝐴 sin(𝜔𝑡 + 𝜙) (15)
𝜋
𝐼𝛽 = 𝐴 sin (𝜔𝑡 + 𝜙 − ) = − 𝐴 cos(𝜔𝑡 + 𝜙) (16)
2
Int J Adv Appl Sci, Vol. 11, No. 2, June 2022: 113-125
Int J Adv Appl Sci ISSN: 2252-8814 119
Figure 9. Proposed control scheme for management of power flow of a grid connected PV system
The signals are transformed to dq reference frame to get corresponding current signals by using
parks transformation.
𝐼𝑑 sin 𝜔𝑡 − cos 𝜔𝑡 𝐼𝛼
𝐼𝑑𝑞 = [𝐼 ] = 𝑇 𝐼𝛼𝛽 = [ ][ ] (17)
𝑞 cos 𝜔𝑡 sin 𝜔𝑡 𝐼𝛽
𝜋
𝑖𝛼 = 𝐴 sin(𝜔𝑡 + 𝜙) sin 𝜔𝑡 + 𝐴 sin (𝜔𝑡 + 𝜙 − ) (− cos 𝜔𝑡) = 𝐴 cos 𝜙 (18)
2
𝜋
𝑖𝛽 = 𝐴 sin(𝜔𝑡 + 𝜙) cos 𝜔𝑡 + 𝐴 sin (𝜔𝑡 + 𝜙 − ) (sin 𝜔𝑡) = 𝐴 sin 𝜙 (19)
2
The grid voltage Vg is given as input to the phase-locked loop to get the corresponding phase angle. The
actual current signals are compared with current signals obtained from the grid reference current [12]–[25].
The obtained errors are minimized using proportional-integral controllers. The output signals are transformed
into a stationary frame using the inverse parks transform shown.
𝐼𝛼 sin 𝜔𝑡 cos 𝜔𝑡 𝐼𝑑
𝐼𝛼𝛽 = [𝐼 ] = 𝑇 −1 𝐼𝑑𝑞 = [ ][ ] (20)
𝛽 cos 𝜔𝑡 − sin 𝜔𝑡 𝐼𝑞
The output generates the required reference wave to the pulse width modulation (PWM) generator
and compared with the carrier wave and generates the switching pulses and thus controlling the output
voltage of the full-bridge inverter. Figure 10 shows the complete simulation model of the system with
detailed description parameters in Table 3.
Single phase grid interconnected high gain boost converter with soft switching capability (Bogimi Sirisha)
120 ISSN: 2252-8814
Int J Adv Appl Sci, Vol. 11, No. 2, June 2022: 113-125
Int J Adv Appl Sci ISSN: 2252-8814 121
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Figure 12. Waveforms of (a) gate to switch voltage, (b) switch voltage, (c) magnetizing current, and
(d) current through feedback diode
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 13. Waveforms of (a) voltage of clamp diode, (b) voltage of intermediate capacitor, and (c) voltage of
clamp capacitor
Filter inductance is designed based on limiting ripple in load current to 20% of the rated current.
𝑉𝑑𝑐
𝐿= = 1 mH (21)
4𝑓𝑠𝑤 ∆𝐼𝑝𝑝𝑚𝑎𝑥
Underrated conditions, the reactive power that can be absorbed must be restricted to 5% of rated power,
therefore filter capacitance is calculated accordingly.
𝑉2
𝑄= = 𝑉 2 . 2𝜋𝑓𝐶 (22)
𝑋𝑐
𝐶 = 5 µF (23)
Table 4 shows total harmonic distortion (THD) before and after the inductor and capacitor (LC)
filter. By employing the filter, the square wave output wave of the inverter is converted to a nearly sinusoidal
signal and higher-order harmonics are eliminated. THD obtained is 4.62%, and fast Fourier transform (FFT)
analysis is presented in Figure 15 and Figure 16.
Table 4. Total harmonic distortion (THD) before and after inductor and capacitor (LC) filter
Parameters THD
Before filter 52.08%
After filter 4.62%
The system is tested during both light load and overload conditions. During light load conditions,
the excess power output from the inverter is fed to the grid and hence the grid power appears as negative in
the waveform. During overload conditions, the inverter supplies a portion of the load's required power, while
the grid supplies the remaining active power, as indicated in Figure 17, Figure 18, and Figure 19. Table 5
shows the power balance between load and grid.
Int J Adv Appl Sci, Vol. 11, No. 2, June 2022: 113-125
Int J Adv Appl Sci ISSN: 2252-8814 123
Single phase grid interconnected high gain boost converter with soft switching capability (Bogimi Sirisha)
124 ISSN: 2252-8814
5. CONCLUSION
A boost converter with a large gain was implemented for low and medium-voltage source
applications. High voltage gain is obtained at lower duty cycles with minimum switching is obtained. The
converter is fed to a single-phase full-bridge inverter, which is then interconnected to the grid. The system is
synchronized to the grid by using d-q axis current control. The proposed converter's performance is verified
in a simulation environment, and the findings are presented. The switching pulses to the inverter are
generated from the pulse generator based on d-q axis control. Output voltages and power with and without
LC filter are observed at light load and overload conditions and THD is calculated.
REFERENCES
[1] B. Sirisha and S. Akhilesh, “High efficient and high gain boost converter with soft switching capability connected to grid using dq
axis current control,” Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 624–635, 2022, doi:
10.11591/eei.v11i2.3358.
[2] M. Prudente, L. L. Pfitscher, G. Emmendoerfer, E. F. Romaneli, and R. Gules, “Voltage multiplier cells applied to non-isolated
DC-DC converters,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 871–887, 2008, doi:
10.1109/TPEL.2007.915762.
[3] B. Sirisha and M. A. Nazeemuddin, “A novel five-level voltage source inverter interconnected to grid with srf controller for
voltage synchronization,” Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 50–58, 2022, doi:
10.11591/eei.v11i1.3274.
[4] P. Xuewei and A. K. Rathore, “Novel bidirectional snubberless naturally commutated soft-switching current-fed full-bridge
isolated DC/DC converter for fuel cell vehicles,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 2307–2315,
2014, doi: 10.1109/TIE.2013.2271599.
[5] A. F. Witulski, “Introduction to Modeling of Transformers and Coupled Inductors,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics,
vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 349–357, 1995, doi: 10.1109/63.388001.
[6] J. Xu, “Modeling and analysis of switching DC-DC converter with coupled-inductor,” China 1991 International Conference on
Circuits and Systems, pp. 717–720, 1991, doi: 10.1109/ciccas.1991.184459.
[7] F. S. Garcia, J. A. Pomilio, and G. Spiazzi, “Modeling and control design of the interleaved double dual boost converter,” IEEE
Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 3283–3290, 2013, doi: 10.1109/TIE.2012.2203770.
[8] A. D. Dwivedi, G. Srivastava, S. Dhar, and R. Singh, “A decentralized privacy-preserving healthcare blockchain for IoT,” Sensors
(Switzerland), vol. 19, no. 2, 2019, doi: 10.3390/s19020326.
[9] K. C. Tseng and C. C. Huang, “High step-up high-efficiency interleaved converter with voltage multiplier module for renewable
energy system,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 1311–1319, 2014, doi:
10.1109/TIE.2013.2261036.
[10] S. Lee, P. Kim, and S. Choi, “High step-up soft-switched converters using voltage multiplier cells,” IEEE Transactions on Power
Electronics, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 3379–3387, 2013, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2012.2227508.
[11] M. El malah, A. Ba-Razzouk, M. Guisser, E. Abdelmounim, and M. Madark, “Backstepping based power control of a three-phase
single-stage grid-connected PV system,” International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 4738–
4748, 2019, doi: 10.11591/ijece.v9i6.pp4738-4748.
[12] A. Rahnamaei and M. Salimi, “A Novel Grid Connected Photovoltaic System,” Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and
Informatics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 133–143, 2016, doi: 10.11591/eei.v5i2.523.
Int J Adv Appl Sci, Vol. 11, No. 2, June 2022: 113-125
Int J Adv Appl Sci ISSN: 2252-8814 125
[13] B. Sirisha, N. Susheela, and P. Satishkumar, “Three phase two leg neutral point clamped converter with output DC voltage
regulation and input power factor correction,” International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems, vol. 2, no. 2, pp.
138–150, 2012, doi: 10.11591/ijpeds.v2i2.226.
[14] I. Setiawan, M. Facta, Hermawan, T. Andromeda, M. H. Purnomo, and Taufik, “Sinusoidal Current Control Strategies for Single
Phase Grid-Connected Renewable Power Generation Systems,” 7th International Conference on Information Technology,
Computer, and Electrical Engineering, ICITACEE 2020 - Proceedings, pp. 241–246, 2020, doi:
10.1109/ICITACEE50144.2020.9239212.
[15] B. Sirisha and P. S. Kumar, “SVPWM Based Generalized Switching Schemes for Seven Level DCMLI Including over
Modulation Operation - FPGA Implementation,” IEEE Region 10 Annual International Conference, Proceedings/TENCON, vol.
2019-Octob, pp. 2135–2142, 2019, doi: 10.1109/TENCON.2019.8929380.
[16] B. Sirisha and P. S. Kumar, “A Simplified Space Vector Pulse Width Modulation Method Including Over Modulation Operation
for Five Level Cascaded H-bridge Inverter with FPGA Implementation,” International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive
Systems (IJPEDS), vol. 8, no. 3, p. 1203, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.11591/ijpeds.v8.i3.pp1203-1211.
[17] J. H. Lee, T. J. Liang, and J. F. Chen, “Isolated coupled-inductor-integrated DC-DC converter with nondissipative snubber for
solar energy applications,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 61, no. 7, pp. 3337–3348, 2014, doi:
10.1109/TIE.2013.2278517.
[18] Y. P. Hsieh, J. F. Chen, T. J. Liang, and L. S. Yang, “Novel high step-Up DC-DC converter for distributed generation system,”
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 1473–1482, 2013, doi: 10.1109/TIE.2011.2107721.
[19] M. Das and V. Agarwal, “A novel, high efficiency, high gain, front end DC-DC converter for low input voltage solar photovoltaic
applications,” IECON Proceedings (Industrial Electronics Conference), pp. 5744–5749, 2012, doi:
10.1109/IECON.2012.6389046.
[20] B.Sirisha, “A grid interconnected nested neutral point clamped inverter with voltage synchronization using synchronous reference
frame controller,” International Journal of Applied Power Engineering (IJAPE), vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 364–372, 2021, doi:
10.11591/ijape.v10.i4.pp364.
[21] M. Das and V. Agarwal, “Design and Analysis of a High-Efficiency DC-DC Converter with Soft Switching Capability for
Renewable Energy Applications Requiring High Voltage Gain,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 63, no. 5, pp.
2936–2944, 2016, doi: 10.1109/TIE.2016.2515565.
[22] B. Crowhurst, E. F. El-Saadany, L. El Chaar, and L. A. Lamont, “Single-phase grid-tie inverter control using DQ transform for
active and reactive load power compensation,” PECon2010 - 2010 IEEE International Conference on Power and Energy, pp.
489–494, 2010, doi: 10.1109/PECON.2010.5697632.
[23] R. Zhang, M. Cardinal, P. Szczesny, and M. Dame, “A Grid Simulator with control of single-phase power converters in D-Q
rotating frame,” PESC Record-IEEE Annual Power Electronics Specialists Conference, vol. 3, pp. 1431–1437, 2002, doi:
10.1109/PSEC.2002.1022377.
[24] A. B. Shitole et al., “Grid Interfaced Distributed Generation System with Modified Current Control Loop Using Adaptive
Synchronization Technique,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 2634–2644, 2017, doi:
10.1109/TII.2017.2665477.
[25] A. Hota, S. K. Bhuyan, and P. K. Hota, “Modeling Simulation of Photovoltaic System Connected to Grid using Matlab,”
Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Renewable Energy Integration into Smart Grids: A Multidisciplinary
Approach to Technology Modelling and Simulation, ICREISG 2020, pp. 16–21, 2020, doi:
10.1109/ICREISG49226.2020.9174192.
BIOGRAPHIES OF AUTHORS
Single phase grid interconnected high gain boost converter with soft switching capability (Bogimi Sirisha)