Case Digest Nicolas Lewis Vs COMELEC

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Nicolas-Lewis vs COMELEC, GR. No. 162759, Congress enacted R.A.

9189 - the OAVL -


August 4, 2006 identifying in Section 4 who can vote under it
and in the following section who cannot and in
Section 5 of the Disqualifications.
F: 1. Petitioners are successful applicants for
Philippine citizenship under R.A. 9225. For the
2004 National and Local Elections, they sought The affidavit required in Section 5(d) is not only
registration and certification as "overseas proof of the intention of the immigrant or
absentee voters" but COMELEC stated they no permanent resident to go back and resume
right to vote in such elections owing to their residency in the Philippines, but more
lack of the one-year residence requirement significantly, it serves as an explicit expression
prescribed by the Constitution. that he had not in fact abandoned his domicile
of origin. With that being said, it does not have
conflict with Sec 1 Art 5 of the Constitution.
2. COMELEC in their clarification stated that
OAVL was not enacted for them and they are
considered as regular voters who have to meet Congress enacted R.A. 9225
the requirements of residency, among others
under Section 1, Article 5 of the Constitution.
SEC. 2. Declaration of Policy. – It is hereby
declared the policy of the State that all
3. With COMELEC’s refusal to include them in Philippine citizens who become citizens of
the National Registry of Absentee Voters, another country shall be deemed not to have
petitioner Nicolas-Lewis et al., they filed this lost their Philippine citizenship under the
petition for certiorari and mandamus. conditions of this Act.

SEC. 3. Retention of Philippine Citizenship. –


Any provision of law to the contrary
SC Ruling: Instant petition is granted. SC rules
notwithstanding, natural-born citizens of the
and so holds that those who retain or re-acquire
Philippines who have lost their Philippine
Philippine citizenship under Republic Act No.
citizenship by reason of their naturalization as
9225, the Citizenship Retention and Re-
citizens of a foreign country are hereby deemed
Acquisition Act of 2003, may exercise the right
to have re-acquired Philippine citizenship upon
to vote under the system of absentee voting in
taking the following oath of allegiance to the
Republic Act No. 9189, the Overseas Absentee
Republic:
Voting Act of 2003.
Successful application for recognition of
Philippine citizenship under R.A. 9189,
Section 1 prescribes residency requirement as a petitioners now invoke their right to enjoy …
general eligibility factor for the right to vote. political rights, specifically the right of suffrage,
pursuant to Section 5 thereof.
Sec 2 Art 5 of the Constitution provides:
Those intending to exercise their right of
SEC 2. The Congress shall provide … a system for suffrage must meet the requirements under Sec
absentee voting by qualified Filipinos abroad. 1, Article V of Constitution, RA 9189, otherwise
known as “Oversees Absentee Voting Act Act
2003” and other existing laws

COMELEC argues that duals must first establish


their domicile/residence in PH – Court
disagrees.

No provision in the dual citizenship law - R.A.


9225 - requiring "duals" to actually establish
residence and physically stay in the Philippines
first before they can exercise their right to vote.
On the contrary, R.A. 9225, an implicit
acknowledgment that "duals" are most likely
non-residents, grants under its Section 5(1) the
same right of suffrage as that granted an
absentee voter under R.A. 9189.

Constitutional Commission that [it] intended to


enfranchise as much as possible all Filipino
citizens abroad who have not abandoned their
domicile of origin and even intended to extend
to young Filipinos who reach voting age abroad
whose parents’ domicile of origin is in the
Philippines, and consider them qualified as
voters for the first time.

Constitutional Commission provided for an


exception to the actual residency requirement
of Section 1 with respect to qualified Filipinos
abroad and declared that qualified Filipinos who
are not in the Philippines may be allowed to
vote even though they do not satisfy the
residency requirement in Section 1, Article V of
the Constitution.

"domicile" is the intent to return to one's home

You might also like