1) Petitioners applied for and obtained Philippine citizenship under RA 9225 after previously acquiring foreign citizenship. They sought to register as overseas absentee voters for the 2004 elections but COMELEC denied them, saying RA 9189 did not apply to them.
2) The Supreme Court ruled that those who regain Philippine citizenship under RA 9225 may exercise absentee voting rights under RA 9189. No proof of residence in the Philippines is required.
3) The Constitution allows overseas voting by qualified Filipinos abroad, and the intent of the law is to enfranchise Filipino citizens overseas who have not abandoned their domicile of origin in the Philippines.
1) Petitioners applied for and obtained Philippine citizenship under RA 9225 after previously acquiring foreign citizenship. They sought to register as overseas absentee voters for the 2004 elections but COMELEC denied them, saying RA 9189 did not apply to them.
2) The Supreme Court ruled that those who regain Philippine citizenship under RA 9225 may exercise absentee voting rights under RA 9189. No proof of residence in the Philippines is required.
3) The Constitution allows overseas voting by qualified Filipinos abroad, and the intent of the law is to enfranchise Filipino citizens overseas who have not abandoned their domicile of origin in the Philippines.
1) Petitioners applied for and obtained Philippine citizenship under RA 9225 after previously acquiring foreign citizenship. They sought to register as overseas absentee voters for the 2004 elections but COMELEC denied them, saying RA 9189 did not apply to them.
2) The Supreme Court ruled that those who regain Philippine citizenship under RA 9225 may exercise absentee voting rights under RA 9189. No proof of residence in the Philippines is required.
3) The Constitution allows overseas voting by qualified Filipinos abroad, and the intent of the law is to enfranchise Filipino citizens overseas who have not abandoned their domicile of origin in the Philippines.
1) Petitioners applied for and obtained Philippine citizenship under RA 9225 after previously acquiring foreign citizenship. They sought to register as overseas absentee voters for the 2004 elections but COMELEC denied them, saying RA 9189 did not apply to them.
2) The Supreme Court ruled that those who regain Philippine citizenship under RA 9225 may exercise absentee voting rights under RA 9189. No proof of residence in the Philippines is required.
3) The Constitution allows overseas voting by qualified Filipinos abroad, and the intent of the law is to enfranchise Filipino citizens overseas who have not abandoned their domicile of origin in the Philippines.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
Nicolas-Lewis vs COMELEC, GR. No. 162759, Congress enacted R.A.
9189 - the OAVL -
August 4, 2006 identifying in Section 4 who can vote under it and in the following section who cannot and in Section 5 of the Disqualifications. F: 1. Petitioners are successful applicants for Philippine citizenship under R.A. 9225. For the 2004 National and Local Elections, they sought The affidavit required in Section 5(d) is not only registration and certification as "overseas proof of the intention of the immigrant or absentee voters" but COMELEC stated they no permanent resident to go back and resume right to vote in such elections owing to their residency in the Philippines, but more lack of the one-year residence requirement significantly, it serves as an explicit expression prescribed by the Constitution. that he had not in fact abandoned his domicile of origin. With that being said, it does not have conflict with Sec 1 Art 5 of the Constitution. 2. COMELEC in their clarification stated that OAVL was not enacted for them and they are considered as regular voters who have to meet Congress enacted R.A. 9225 the requirements of residency, among others under Section 1, Article 5 of the Constitution. SEC. 2. Declaration of Policy. – It is hereby declared the policy of the State that all 3. With COMELEC’s refusal to include them in Philippine citizens who become citizens of the National Registry of Absentee Voters, another country shall be deemed not to have petitioner Nicolas-Lewis et al., they filed this lost their Philippine citizenship under the petition for certiorari and mandamus. conditions of this Act.
SEC. 3. Retention of Philippine Citizenship. –
Any provision of law to the contrary SC Ruling: Instant petition is granted. SC rules notwithstanding, natural-born citizens of the and so holds that those who retain or re-acquire Philippines who have lost their Philippine Philippine citizenship under Republic Act No. citizenship by reason of their naturalization as 9225, the Citizenship Retention and Re- citizens of a foreign country are hereby deemed Acquisition Act of 2003, may exercise the right to have re-acquired Philippine citizenship upon to vote under the system of absentee voting in taking the following oath of allegiance to the Republic Act No. 9189, the Overseas Absentee Republic: Voting Act of 2003. Successful application for recognition of Philippine citizenship under R.A. 9189, Section 1 prescribes residency requirement as a petitioners now invoke their right to enjoy … general eligibility factor for the right to vote. political rights, specifically the right of suffrage, pursuant to Section 5 thereof. Sec 2 Art 5 of the Constitution provides: Those intending to exercise their right of SEC 2. The Congress shall provide … a system for suffrage must meet the requirements under Sec absentee voting by qualified Filipinos abroad. 1, Article V of Constitution, RA 9189, otherwise known as “Oversees Absentee Voting Act Act 2003” and other existing laws
COMELEC argues that duals must first establish
their domicile/residence in PH – Court disagrees.
No provision in the dual citizenship law - R.A.
9225 - requiring "duals" to actually establish residence and physically stay in the Philippines first before they can exercise their right to vote. On the contrary, R.A. 9225, an implicit acknowledgment that "duals" are most likely non-residents, grants under its Section 5(1) the same right of suffrage as that granted an absentee voter under R.A. 9189.
Constitutional Commission that [it] intended to
enfranchise as much as possible all Filipino citizens abroad who have not abandoned their domicile of origin and even intended to extend to young Filipinos who reach voting age abroad whose parents’ domicile of origin is in the Philippines, and consider them qualified as voters for the first time.
Constitutional Commission provided for an
exception to the actual residency requirement of Section 1 with respect to qualified Filipinos abroad and declared that qualified Filipinos who are not in the Philippines may be allowed to vote even though they do not satisfy the residency requirement in Section 1, Article V of the Constitution.