Econometrics Report
Econometrics Report
Econometrics Report
ECONOMETRICS REPORT
DETERMINANTS OF VIETNAM’S TRADE
BALANCE IN THE PERIOD 1997 - 2019
List of members:
1. Nguyễn Mai Anh Thư (1701025830)
2. Phạm Nguyễn Thang Ngọc (1912215324)
3. Phan Nguyễn Thảo Phương (1912215410)
4. Ngô Trần Bảo Anh (1912215019)
5. Đào Phương Anh (1912255402)
Class: K58CLC1
Instructor: Lê Hằng Mỹ Hạnh
1
CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 5
1.1. Importance of study ........................................................................................................................................ 5
1.2. Subject for study ............................................................................................................................................. 5
1.3. Objectives of the study.................................................................................................................................... 6
1.4. Range of study ................................................................................................................................................ 6
1.5. Research methodology .................................................................................................................................... 6
1.6. Structure of study ............................................................................................................................................ 6
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................................................................ 7
2.1. Overview of related empirical studies in Viet Nam ........................................................................................ 7
2.2. Overview of related empirical studies in the world ........................................................................................ 8
CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................... 9
3.1. Type of research design .................................................................................................................................. 9
3.2. Model construction ......................................................................................................................................... 9
3.2.1. Dependent Variables (XM)..................................................................................................................... 9
3.2.2. Independent Variables ............................................................................................................................ 9
3.2.3. Description of variables ........................................................................................................................ 11
3.2.4 The model .............................................................................................................................................. 11
3.3 Research method ............................................................................................................................................ 12
3.4 Data collection ............................................................................................................................................... 12
CHAPTER 4: RESEARCH RESULTS ................................................................................................................. 13
4.1. Parameter Estimate - Original Regression Model ........................................................................................ 13
4.2. Regression Model Analyst ............................................................................................................................ 13
4.2.1. Testing the consistency of the model .................................................................................................... 13
4.2.2. Estimation in the presence of multi-collinearity. .................................................................................. 14
4.2.3. Auto-correlation testing ........................................................................................................................ 15
4.2.4. Heteroscedasticity testing ..................................................................................................................... 15
CHAPTER 5: OPPORTUNITIES, CHALLENGES AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................... 17
5.1. Opportunities................................................................................................................................................. 17
5.2. Challenges..................................................................................................................................................... 17
5.3. Recommendation .......................................................................................................................................... 18
5.4. Conclusion .................................................................................................................................................... 19
APPENDIX .............................................................................................................................................................. 20
REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................................................ 25
2
ABBREVIATIONS
Word Meaning
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Original model regression results .....................................................................................................21
Figure 2: Matrix of correlation coefficients .....................................................................................................21
Figure 3: Regression results of the model without GDP ..................................................................................21
Figure 4: Regression results of the model without REER ................................................................................22
Figure 5: Regression results of the model without CPI ....................................................................................22
Figure 6: Regression results of the model without FDI....................................................................................22
Figure 7: Breusch – Godfrey (BG) test at lagged value 1 ................................................................................23
Figure 8: Breusch – Godfrey (BG) test at lagged value 2 ................................................................................23
Figure 9: Breusch – Godfrey (BG) test at lagged value 3 ................................................................................23
Figure 10: Breusch – Godfrey (BG) test at lagged value 4 ..............................................................................23
Figure 11: Breusch – Godfrey (BG) test at lagged value 5 ..............................................................................24
Figure 12: Park test result .................................................................................................................................24
Figure 13: Regression model using Robust standard errors .............................................................................24
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Description of variables ......................................................................................................................11
Table 2: Parameter Estimate - Original Regression Model ..............................................................................13
Table 3: Regression model without GDP/REER/CPI/FDI ...............................................................................14
Table 4: Regression model after excluding GDP .............................................................................................14
Table 5: Auto-correlation testing ......................................................................................................................15
Table 6: Park test ..............................................................................................................................................15
Table 7: Regression model with robust standard errors ...................................................................................16
Table 8: Data used ............................................................................................................................................20
3
ABSTRACT
Balance of trade data shows the imports and exports of goods and how a country competes in a global
marketplace. However, Vietnam has faced trade deficits for a long time since opening the economy
in 1986 until 2012, and the last few years since 2012 with small surpluses. Improving trade balance
is one of the main objectives of Vietnam’s Government. This study’s objective is to analyse main
factors that affect trade balance in Vietnam from 1997 to 2019. The examined factors are Gross
domestic product (GDP), Foreign direct investment (FDI), Real effective exchange rate (REER),
Consumer price index (CPI).
The project will cover Theoretical Framework, Literature Review, Research Methodology (through
data collection, run and model testing), then choose the variables and factors that really affect
Vietnam's Trade Balance and propose feasible measures to improve this balance.
The research was conducted using the ordinary least squares method - OLS with data cited from the
General Statistical Office of Vietnam; ADB; IMF country report 2017, World Bank's World
Development Indicators, UNCTAD and other sources (to be mentioned in detail).
Key words: Trade balance, Gross domestic product (GDP), Foreign direct investment (FDI), Real
effective exchange rate (REER), Consumer price index (CPI).
4
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
It is notable that the trade balance of Vietnam has been persistently in deficit since 1990, except 1992
and the last few years since 2012 with small surpluses. The difference rose to its highest level in 2008,
deficit USD 13 billion, due to the impact of the world economic crisis came from the U.S. The trade
balance deficit increased despite the increase in exports, with an average annual growth rate of 15.6%
during 2000-2009. Since 2009, trade deficit has reduced as the economy has slowly recovered thanks
to the improvement policy of the Government and experienced a small surplus in 2012 until now. One
of the reasons for the trade surplus of Vietnam recently is due to the difficult period, many enterprises
downsized production, leading to lower import demand. A more significant contribution to the trade
surplus is the multinational corporations leading the global value chains recently withdrew from China
and Thailand to redirect investment into Vietnam. Foreign Information Technology Group,
Electronics and Telecommunications in Vietnam such as Canon, Sony, Nokia and Samsung recently
increased investment in Vietnam.
The fact that trade balance in Vietnam has been in a long-lasting deficit for 20 years (1993- 2011) is
obvious to be able to bring a negative impact to the economy. A long-lasting trade deficit can lead to
foreign debt, on which a country has to pay interests. If this debt is judged by market agents as
unsustainable, a currency crisis can erupt. Therefore, it is necessary to examine the situation of trade
balance in Vietnam. What are the main factors affecting trade balance and how to improve trade
balance in Vietnam.
There are many studies that have examined determinants of trade balance in other developing
countries. However, there are not many studies analyzing the main factors affecting trade balance in
Vietnam. This is the reason why our team decided to implement the research project. "Determinants
of Balance Trade in Vietnam"
6
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW
Nguyen Huu Tuan (2011) analyzed the impact of macroeconomic variables on Vietnam's trade
balance from 1999 to 2010. The results show that in the long run, the trade balance is positive with
real GDP and CPI of trading partners and negative with REER and FDI. Le Hoang Phong and Dang
Thi Bach Van (2016) also studied the impact of macroeconomic factors on Vietnam's trade balance
in the period 1986-2014 and found that in both the short run and the long run, GDP and exchange rate
have a positive impact on Vietnam's trade balance.
Do Thi Man (2017) concludes that the Real Effective Exchange Rate has an impact on Vietnam's trade
balance in the long run (with the lag of 5 periods). This conclusion is based on a study with a database
of bilateral nominal rates and CPI of 20 major trading partners of Vietnam Trade balance. Nguyen
Thi My Linh and Nguyen Thi Kim Lien (2020) also found that the volatility of the real effective
exchange rate with the lag of 2 reduced the trade balance in Vietnam. This is the particularity of
Vietnam – a country pursuing a floating exchange rate policy under the control of the government.
Besides, there are many studies on the impact of exchange rate on the trade balance. Pham Thi Nga
(2017) studied the impact of exchange rate on Vietnam's trade balance from 2000 to 2016 and found
that devaluation of the domestic currency does not contribute to the improvement of the national trade
balance. Nguyen Hung Dieu (2019) examined the impact of exchange rate on Vietnam's trade balance
in the period 2000 - 2018 and concluded there exists a long-term relationship between the exchange
rate and the trade balance in Vietnam. Huynh Thi Be Tu (2019) stated that there is an impact of the
real exchange rate on the trade balance of each commodity, but this effect is different for each
commodity.
Diep Gia Luat and Tran Trung Kien (2013) study the impact of foreign direct investment on Vietnam's
trade balance in the 1992-2012 period and the results show that FDI inflows have an impact on the
trade balance, especially export value but have not found the relationship between the value of
imported goods and the variables FDI. Dang Ngoc Huyen Trang and Duong Thi Thuy Linh (2017) by
using Johansen test to consolidate and then using the corrected error line, from some characteristics
of FDI, export and import values, they have found evidence that the trade balance is part of the reason
for the success in attracting FDI even in the short and long term.
7
2.2. Overview of related empirical studies in the world
Hasanov and Senhadji (2008) included REER and TOT in the current account model for Middle-East
economies and found that the regressions are only statistically significant for non-oil economies.
Accordingly, shocks that increase REER are associated with higher trade and current deficits. R.
Roosaleh Laksono and Mohd Haizam Mohd Saudi (2020) found in the study that “Analysis of the
factors affecting trade balance in Indonesia” that in the long term of 1980-2015, referring to all
independent variables (export value, import value, exchange rate and GDP) are inversely proportional
to trade balance. Selena Begović and Sead Kreso (2017) found that there is an adverse effect of the
REER on trade balance in European transition countries over the period 2000-2015. Mehmet E. Yaya
and Xiaoxia Lu (2012) analyzed the short-run relationship between the REER and the balance of trade
in China. The test suggests that in the short run balance of trade causes a change in effective exchange
rate but not vice versa.
Duasa (2007) studied the factors affecting the trade balance of Malaysia in the period 1974-2003.
Using the ARDL model, the study shows that there exists a long-run relationship between income,
money supply and trade balance and there is no relationship between exchange rate and trade balance.
Ray (2012) examined the long-run and short-run relationships of macroeconomic factors affecting the
trade balance. Research results indicate that FDI has a positive impact on the trade balance, domestic
consumption, and the real exchange rate has a negative impact on the trade balance. Osoro (2013)
studied the factors affecting the trade balance of Kenya in the period 1963-2012. The results show
that FDI, exchange rate, and government budget deficit have an impact on trade equity. Alhanom
(2016) studies on the factors of Jordan's trade balance. The study uses the ARDL model to estimate
the impact of factors affecting Jordan's trade balance in the period 1970-2010. The results show that
the real exchange rate has no impact on the trade balance in both the short run and the long run. Ali
(2017) studies on the factors affecting the trade balance of Sudan in the period 1970-2014. In the long
run, the exchange rate, inflation, and real GDP per capita have a negative impact on the trade balance.
Rahman (2008) shows that FDI has a negative effect on the trade balance, while the rebound pattern
has a positive effect in the new member countries of the European Union.
8
CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
In this paper, REER is expected to have a positive or negative impact on the balance of trade.
10
3.2.3. Description of variables
𝒀𝒊 = 𝜶𝒊 + ∑ 𝜷𝒋 𝑿𝒊𝒋 + 𝜺𝒊
𝒋=𝟎
Where:
Yi: Dependent variable of observation i
Xij: Independent variable
𝜶𝒊 : Coefficient of freedom
𝜷𝒊 : Regression coefficient
𝜺𝒊 : Regression error
Model application
According to chosen factors, the model estimating XM’s affecting factors in Vietnam is:
Where:
FDI: Foreign direct investment into Vietnam in year t
GDP: Total gross domestic product of Vietnam in year t
CPI: Consumer price index in year t
This study used regression with logarithmic form (ln) to determine the impact of three factors on the
trade balance.
Where:
- Y: dependent variable
- X2, X3, X4, X5: Independent or Explanatory variables
11
- 𝜷𝟐 , 𝜷𝟑 , 𝜷𝟒 , 𝜷𝟓 : some coefficients give a change in X2, X3, X4, X5 how much the expectation
of Y to change by.
The trade balance has positive or negative or equal to zero also. According to mathematical, negative
or zero value can’t calculate to logarithmic. In the other hand, using the ratio in the logarithmic form
will make Marshall Lerner – condition more exactly than approximately (Onafowora 2003, Colton
2012). The trade balance equation is as the following:
12
CHAPTER 4: RESEARCH RESULTS
As a result, the two independent variables, REER, and FDI, all have a p_value less than 0.05, meaning
that the two variables are statistically significant for the model. The regression model identified the
factors influencing the trade balance in Vietnam without prior testing is a model with two independent
variables, REER and FDI, affecting the dependent variable Y with a significance level of 0.05. The
model has an R-squared coefficient of 0.799 and an adjusted R-squared value of 0.7543. Thus, the
regression model accounts for nearly 80% of the dependent variable.
The original regression equation is presented as follows:
lnXM = -2.954 + 0.0895lnGDP + 0.834lnREER + 0.174lnCPI - 0.2453lnFDI
13
4.2.2. Estimation in the presence of multi-collinearity.
From the matrix of correlation coefficients (Figure 2), we find that the correlation coefficients between
the independent variables are all greater than 0.8. So it can be concluded that all three variables have
correlated phenomena.
So the authors choose to exclude the GDP variable from the original model. The model after excluding
GDP has the following regression result:
From the correlation coefficient matrix, we can see that the remaining three variables still have a slight
correlation with each other. This can be explained by considering that the data used is time-series data
with observations of 23 consecutive years, which are in line with the evolution of the economy.
14
4.2.3. Auto-correlation testing
At the significance level of 0.05, the Breusch – Godfrey (BG) test was used to test for auto-correlation.
Lags (𝛒) 1 2 3 4 5
From the above testing results, we found that all the Prob. Chi Square values in all cases of lagged
value are greater than 0.05. So we can conclude that the regression model does not occur
autocorrelation.
As both the p-value of the variables lnCPI and lnFDI less than significant level 0.05, there is
statistically significant relationship between the variables: ln(ui^2) and lnCPI, lnFDI.
Following the Park test, we conclude that the Heteroskedasticity exists in the error variance.
Correlation of Heteroscedasticity.
15
In order to resolve the Heteroscedasticity of the model, we regress the model with robust standard
errors and gain the following result:
lnXM= -2.901236+0.736411lnREER+0.3159862lnCPI-0.2263492lnFDI
Thus, in spite of multicollinearity, after the examination of the problem, it was found that there was
no need to abandon the variable because it did not mark expectations and lost statistical significance.
It can be concluded that: The model of regression confirms the statistical significance of the following
independent variables for Trade Balance in Vietnam:
16
CHAPTER 5: OPPORTUNITIES, CHALLENGES AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1. Opportunities
- REER is stable, interest rates are reduced, contributing to supporting businesses, stabilizing the
macro-economy.
- The average CPI in 2020 compared to 2019 is forecasted in the range of 3.5-3.8%, adjusted down
by about 1 percentage point compared to the forecast period in March 2020. Therefore, it is necessary
to continue to pay attention to and control inflation targets, contributing to stabilizing the
macroeconomy.
- The decline in registered and disbursed FDI has led to a decrease in import turnover and an increase
in export turnover, thus contributing to reducing the deficit of the trade balance.
- Vietnam faces opportunities from the shift of production and export orders in certain industries from
China to Vietnam due to the impact of US-China trade tensions.
- Currently, the situation of controlling and controlling the Covid-19 epidemic in China and Korea
has positive results; other countries are also making efforts to control the epidemic… so, import
demand from other countries is expected to gradually increase again in the near future.
- Opportunities from free trade agreements signed by Vietnam such as CTTPP, EVFTA, etc., open
great doors for Vietnam to enter the world market.
- The business areas of Vietnam that will continue to have opportunities for development are
agriculture, industry, and import and export. There are also markets such as finance, securities, real
estate, etc.
- Vietnam has pioneered in testing new technologies and models, fundamentally and comprehensively
innovating the management and administration activities of the Government, production and business
activities of enterprises, etc. The dual goal is to both develop digital government, digital economy,
and digital society, and form digital technology businesses with global capabilities.
5.2. Challenges
- Import turnover of the whole country and import prices will increase due to many countries
devaluing their domestic currencies, lowering basic interest rates, offering stimulus packages and huge
economic stimulus up to hundreds and trillions of USD. NEER caused REER to increase and increase
more strongly, because the inflation gap between Vietnam and 08 countries in the currency basket
widened. - The movement of REER shows that Vietnam's export goods have become more expensive
relative to the goods of 08 countries in the currency basket, which will negatively affect the trade
balance in the long run.
- FDI capital is forecasted to increase again from the second half of 2020 and 2021. FDI inflows
increase quite quickly, the nominal exchange rate between USD and VND, i.e. VND is appreciated
against USD. This will encourage imports, causing a deficit in the trade balance. Imports of the
foreign-invested sector decreased more deeply than that of the domestic sector.
- Currently, China is Vietnam's largest trading partner, and China's devaluation of the currency creates
great pressure on the movement of the VND. Along with that is the pressure to administer policies of
the State Bank to protect the competitive advantages of exported goods, as well as the production
capacity of domestic enterprises against imports from China. The strong increase in trade deficit from
17
China only partly stemmed from the devaluation of the CNY against the VND, the larger cause due
to the phenomenon of circumventing the origin of Chinese goods through Vietnam.
- Before the second wave of the COVID-19 epidemic may return, countries in the world in general
and especially in Asia around China in particular have applied measures to limit the spread. of the
epidemic such as canceling all domestic flights, restricting travel, and banning people from traveling
to prevent the disease. Governments and localities in the countries have conducted a review of the
origin, origin and quality of food products in the area, in which, strengthening the inspection of
documents such as quality standard certificates, certificates of origin and proof of purchase for
agricultural products used for food. Vietnam's exports to these markets will face certain difficulties.
- In order to develop, it requires changes in psychology, lifestyles of social classes, changes in
organization and management of the government system at all levels and branches.
- Vietnam's economy has not developed stably and sustainably. Public debt, long state budget deficit.
Domestic enterprises 95-96% are small enterprises with low technology level. The basic economy
also develops in breadth, relying on investment capital, natural resources, and unskilled labor.
5.3. Recommendation
Firstly, strictly control the import of non-essential consumer goods, food and food products that can
be produced domestically.
Second, in order to achieve the goal of a trade balance surplus, besides improving the quality and
design of export products, a significant devaluation of the currency is required to bring about
international trade advantages. in terms of price. Exchange rate adjustment has an influence on
domestic and international prices, so the exchange rate adjustment must be suitable for each different
stage of the economy.
Third, it is necessary to maintain an exchange rate policy in line with the economic development
strategy of each period. To do this, pay attention to the following issues:
Choose the right time to devalue the local currency. Success in currency devaluation is evident at the
time of devaluation and the level of exchange rate adjustment. For developing countries, a high growth
rate is often accompanied by a relatively large inflation rate compared to a group of developed
economies, which adversely affects the competitive advantage of exported goods. imports in terms of
price, so currency devaluation can solve this problem.
The exchange rate policy must always aim at the best support for the export policy, thereby improving
the international balance of payments and increasing foreign currency reserves, towards the goal of
sustainable economic development.
The exchange rate should be established on the basis of establishing a basket of foreign currencies
including strong foreign currencies to avoid shocks in the economy when a certain currency fluctuates.
Currently, in addition to the 4 strong foreign currencies in the IMF's foreign currency basket, which
are USD, British Pound, Euro, and Japanese Yen, China's yuan is being reserved in large quantities
by many countries.
Fourth, in order to regulate the exchange rate and control inflation, the central bank needs to be
assured of a certain independence from the Government in making decisions and operating monetary
policy. In addition, the central bank must have a system to closely monitor and supervise economic
18
conditions in the country, major economies and countries in the region, and promptly assess risks and
risks of loss of interest. stable to make appropriate policies.
Fifth, in terms of fiscal policy, Vietnam can increase non-tariff barriers for imports such as using
import licensing measures, tariff quotas (according to WTO accession commitments, Vietnam has
reserves the right to apply tariff quotas to four groups of goods: sugar, poultry eggs, tobacco leaves
and salt), surcharges, etc. However, the application of these measures must be considered. considered
in the context that Vietnam is already a member of the WTO and must comply with the committed
tax reduction schedule. Besides, controlling government spending and improving the efficiency of
public investment are also important measures to take into account.
Sixth, there should be policies to encourage partner enterprises to participate in the production of
export goods in Vietnam and then export them back to the partner market. This is the best way to both
ensure the quality of exports and increase the proportion of Vietnamese goods in the target market's
import turnover.
Seventh, reforming and modernizing customs procedures, shortening the time to conduct customs
procedures for export goods. Organize well implement the tax refund mechanism for raw material
importers to provide export goods manufacturers.
Eighth, reforming and perfecting financial institutions in the direction of focusing on input factors for
export production, export business and trade promotion, creating favorable conditions for improving
the competitiveness of foreign countries. export products; continue to improve taxes, fees and charges;
promote the business of insurance for property and goods in production, especially in agricultural
production.
5.4. Conclusion
Understanding the factors affecting Vietnam's trade balance in the period 1997-2019 is extremely
necessary in the context of the rapidly developing macro-economy and the competition between the
regions that directly affect it. to the current import and export activities. In the process of researching
the topic "Factors affecting Vietnam's trade balance in the period 1997 - 2019", our team went from
the theoretical basis of the trade balance, the consequences of the trade deficit and the factors affecting
it to the current trade balance, building a research model of factors affecting the trade balance of
Vietnam in the period 1997-2019 along with opportunities and challenges from outside.
Through this topic, the team wishes to bring a clearer view of the factors affecting Vietnam's trade
balance in the period 1997 - 2019 through a quantitative approach. From there, it will help identify
factors that need to be improved and improved to improve Vietnam's trade balance. Due to the writer's
limited knowledge and skills and limited research time, the final model has not yet included all the
factors that are significant to Vietnam's trade balance in the period 1997-2019. The group hopes that
the topic will be a useful reference source for future research.
19
APPENDIX
Data used
20
Stata results
21
Figure 4: Regression results of the model without REER
22
Figure 7: Breusch – Godfrey (BG) test at lagged value 1
23
Figure 11: Breusch – Godfrey (BG) test at lagged value 5
24
REFERENCES
1. Saiki, A. (2005). Asymmetric effect of currency union for developing countries. Open Economies
Review, 16(3), 227-247.
2. Do, Thi Man. (2017). Applying the vector autoregression (VAR) model to analyze the impact of
exchange rate on Vietnam's trade balance. Journal of Economics and Development, 242(2), 8-18.
3. Hasanov, F., & Senhadji, A. (2008). Macroeconomic balance approach and assessment of exchange
rate misalignments. In Assessment of Exchange Rates, Middle East and Central Asia Department,
International Monetary Fund.
5. Ali S.A.. The Determinants of Sudan's Trade Balance: An Empirical Investigation 1970-2014.
Journal of Business & Economic Statistics. 2017;18(1):10-17.
6. Tô Trung Thành. Các yếu tố tác động đến cán cân thương mại Việt Nam giai đoạn 1997-2015 -
Thực nghiệm từ mô hình VECM. Tạp chí Kinh tế & phát triển. 2016;(234):21-30.
7. Phạm Thị Nga. Đánh giá tác động của tỷ giá hối đoái tới cán cân thương mại Việt Nam. Tạp chí
Kinh tế Châu Á - Thái Bình Dương. 2017;(487):40-42.
8. Nguyễn Hữu Tuấn. Phân tích tác động của các biến số kinh tế vĩ mô đến cán cân thương mại Việt
Nam. Tạp chí Công nghệ Ngân hàng. 2011;(62):13-22.
9. Luật Diệp Gia, Kiên Trần Trung. Tác động của dòng vốn đầu tư trực tiếp nước ngoài đến cán cân
thương mại Việt Nam giai đoạn 1992-2012. Tạp chí Phát triển kinh tế. 2013;(276):14-24.
10. Mehmet E. Yaya and Xiaoxia Lu, 2012, The Short-Run Relationship between Real Effective
Exchange Rate and Balance of Trade in China, International Journal of Applied Economics, 9(1), 15-
27
11. Dang Ngoc Huyen Trang and Duong Thi Thuy Linh, 2017, Determining relationship between
foreign direct investment inflow and trade balance in vietnam , Journal of Science and Technology,
175(15): 165 – 170
12. Ngo Tuan Anh et al., (2020), Impact of different factors on Vietnam's trade balance, Growing
Science Journal, Accounting 6 (2020) 605–610
13. Phong L H, Vân Đ T B, 2016. Tác động của các nhân tố kinh tế vĩ mô đến cán cân thương mại tại
Việt Nam. Tạp chí Công nghệ Ngân hàng., (123):14-28.
25
14. Colton Christensen et al., (2012), The Effect of GDP & Exchange Rates on the Trade Balance
Between the United States and Mexico, Proceedings of the National Conferences On Undergraduate
Research (NCUR)
15. R. Roosaleh Laksono and Mohd Haizam Mohd Saudi (2020), International Journal of
Psychosocial Rehabilitation 24(02):3113-3120
16. Duasa J.. Determinants of Malaysian Trade Balance An ARDL Bound Testing Approach. Global
Economic Review. 2007;(36):89-102.
17. Ray S.. An Analysis of Determinants of Balance of Trade in India. Research Journal of Finance
and Accounting. 2012;3(1):73-83
18. Osoro K.. Kenya's foreign trade balance: An empirical investigation. European Scientific Journal.
2013;9(19):176-189.
19. Alhanom E.. Determinants of trade balance in Jordan. NG-Journal of Social Development.
2016;5(2):24-34.
20. Ali S.A.. The Determinants of Sudan's Trade Balance: An Empirical Investigation 1970-2014.
Journal of Business & Economic Statistics. 2017;18(1):10-17.
21. Những cơ hội và thách thức đối với phát triển kinh tế của Việt Nam (website hdll.vn)
22. Kiến nghị 5 nhóm nhiệm vụ, giải pháp lớn về kinh tế-xã hội (website baochinhphu.vn)
--------------------------------------------The end--------------------------------------------
26