2019 10 OKANE ETAL Potential Improvements Stockpile Construction Methods
2019 10 OKANE ETAL Potential Improvements Stockpile Construction Methods
2019 10 OKANE ETAL Potential Improvements Stockpile Construction Methods
to
Mine Rock Stockpile Construction Methods
O’Kane, M.1, Taylor, J.2, Robertson, J. 1, Pape, S. 2, Tremblay, G.3, Kelley, B.3
1: Okane Consultants, 2: Earth Systems, 3: INAP
BC MEND ML/ARD Annual Workshop
December 4-5, 2019
Essence of Project Proposal to INAP
• Project Timeline
• Project Scope (within 9 tasks)
• Opportunities
• Project Timeline
• Project Scope (within 9 tasks)
1. Framework for Communicating Risk
2. ML-ARD…
Why Focus on Mine Rock Stockpiles?
3. Conceptualization / Evaluation of:
Conventional MRS Performance
Alternative MRS Construction
Approaches
4. Communicating Opportunity using
Risk-Based Approach Supported by…
Literature Review and Case Studies
Semi-Quantitative Assessment
thermal / gas / water, and acidity
generation modelling
O’Kane et al, 2019: Improving MRS Construction Methods
BC MEND ML/ARD Annual Workshop • Opportunities 4
December 4, 2019
Project Timeline(s)
as a tool
Incremental Benefit…
…Alternative to Alternative
FMEA
Evaluating Question:
FMEA
Evaluating Timeframe:
Immediate-Term:
Permitting, planning, design,
construction and
the operation years
(assumed 10 years of rock
placement)
Short-Term:
Closure Period >10 years
Long-Term:
Post-Closure Period >100 years
FMEA
Evaluating Timeframe: Consequence Category
Failure Effects and Risk
Mode Pathways Likelihood #1 #2 #3 #4 Ranking
We developed
several (~20) ‘high-level’
Potential Failure Modes
FMEA
Evaluating Timeframe: Consequence Category
Failure Effects and Risk
Mode Pathways Likelihood #1 #2 #3 #4 Ranking
I-T FM #1 EP #1-1 High Minor Major Low Low High
FMEA
Evaluating Timeframe: Consequence Category
Failure Effects and Risk
Mode Pathways Likelihood #1 #2 #3 #4 Ranking
I-T FM #1 EP #1-1 High Minor Major Low Low High
Example, for:
Immediate-Term to Short-Term
Application of an Alternative MRS
Methodology
16 160
O2
14 140
12 120
10 100
8 80
Convective
6 Temp. Cell 60
& Airflow
4 Limited?? 40
Self
2 CO2 Heating 20
0 0
Mar-2
Nov-10
Apr-27
Oct-12
Aug-17
Sep-15
Dec-7
Jun-22
Jan-5
• Mine Rock…
S% ave. ~ 3%
~40% PAF (PAG)
• We should observe…
“Typical ML-ARD”
…. but we don’t
MRS
Two Approaches
1. “Conventional”… Ridgeline End-Dumping ‘high tip-head’
Two Approaches
1. “Conventional”… Ridgeline End-Dumping ‘high tip-head’
2. “Alternative”… Bottom Up End-Dumping ‘short tip-head’
1. “Conventional”
2. “Alternative”
• Project Timeline
• Project Scope (within 9 tasks)
1. Framework for Communicating Risk
2. ML-ARD…
Why Focus on Mine Rock Stockpiles?
3. Conceptualization / Evaluation of:
Conventional MRS Performance
Alternative MRS Construction
Approaches
4. Communicating Opportunity using
Risk-Based Approach Supported by…
Literature Review and Case Studies
Semi-Quantitative Assessment
thermal / gas / water, and acidity
generation modelling
O’Kane et al, 2019: Improving MRS Construction Methods
BC MEND ML/ARD Annual Workshop • Opportunities 38
December 4, 2019
Communicating Risk and Opportunity
• Unexpectedly high amounts of PAF would increase acidity generation (high likelihood)
• Environmental effects are assumed to be minor because we will treat the water
• Requirement of water treatment incurs higher consequence cost
Long-term: Catastrophic consequence cost due to treatment in perpetuity and
construction of
additional treatment plants (> $100 M)
• High confidence – there are many sites in this situation
• Very high risk rating – a key driver for this project
O’Kane et al, 2019: Improving MRS Construction Methods
39
BC MEND ML/ARD Annual Workshop
December 4, 2019
Communicating Risk and Opportunity
• Even if there is more PAF material than expected, the construction methods
result in ~80% of the MRS remaining suboxic (no re-supply of oxygen)
• The likelihood of the failure mode causing ‘the question’ is decreased
• I-T: Potential need for water treatment because suboxia does not occur immediately
• Short- and Long-Term: Suboxia established; the risk of the failure mode can be mitigated
• Low confidence in risk ranking – Generational Change; we require more full-scale data from
Purposeful MRS construction
• Moderate risk rating – decreased from a ‘very high’ risk rating
O’Kane et al, 2019: Improving MRS Construction Methods
40
BC MEND ML/ARD Annual Workshop
December 4, 2019
Communicating Risk and Opportunity
• Adding ‘true’ encapsulation (lateral gas transport), oxygen consuming layers, and sulfide
passivation
Strategic placement of NAF material around PAF material
Placement of alkalinity released materials of top of MRS
• If there was insufficient material for the engineered layers, it is unlikely that water treatment
needs would increase
• The risks are further mitigated by the presence of additional construction methods
• Project Timeline
• Project Scope (within 9 tasks)
1. Framework for Communicating Risk
2. ML-ARD…
Why Focus on Mine Rock Stockpiles?
3. Conceptualization / Evaluation of:
Conventional MRS Performance
Alternative MRS Construction
Approaches
4. Communicating Opportunity using
Risk-Based Approach Supported by…
Literature Review and Case Studies
Semi-Quantitative Assessment
thermal / gas / water, and acidity
generation modelling
O’Kane et al, 2019: Improving MRS Construction Methods
BC MEND ML/ARD Annual Workshop • Opportunities 43
December 4, 2019
Opportunities
45
“Alternative”… Bottom Up End-Dumping ‘short tip-head’
Environmental Imagination
Spoil Pile Oxidation – Convective Air Flow - Coupling of Water, Heat, Gas