Greenpeace in Germany and The U.S. - A Case Study in Non-Profit We

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 45

Claremont Mckenna College

Greenpeace in Germany and the U.S.: A Case Study in Non-Profit Web Design.

submitted to
Professor Hans Rindisbacher
and
Professor Friederike Schwerin-High

by
Maximilian Weirauch

for
Senior Thesis
Spring 2022
04-28-2022
Weirauch 2

Abstract: This thesis draws on Geert Hofstede’s cultural dimensions model, connects it to basic
principles of web design, and applies it to a website analysis of the global non-profit organization
Greenpeace. This case study of cultural dimensions in web design utilizes Hofstede’s framework
from 1974 throughout all its chapters and focuses on the cultural differences between Germany
and the U.S. My hypothesis that successful marketing materials such as websites must
communicate differently with their U.S.-American and German audiences is partially borne out.
But it is important to note that Hofstede’s cultural dimensions model cannot fully account for
certain intercultural dimensions of the internet and certainly not for the significant design changes
over time that my inquiry takes into consideration.

Keywords: cultural dimensions, web design, Hofstede, international marketing, Germany, U.S.
Weirauch 3

Table of Contents:
Chapter 1: Cultural Differences and Web Design
Chapter 2: International Marketing, NPOs, Web Design
Chapter 3: Current Trends and Conclusion
Weirauch 4

Introduction
When I moved to San Francisco from Hamburg in 2017 not only did my everyday language
change from German to English but I quickly noticed that peers communicate differently from
what I was used to in Germany. My first-hand understanding of values, norms, and culture
deepened. The academic field of cultural studies “traces the relationships among aesthetic,
anthropological, and political economic aspects of cultural production and reproduction.”1 My
interests in design, marketing, and communication inspired me to connect cultural dimensions
theory to web design. My passion for the environment and professional interest in global nonprofit
marketing were reasons for me to study this nexus further. This senior thesis therefore trains its
lens on the environmental organization Greenpeace in order to analyze its intercultural dimension
in depth.
Scholars in the international business/marketing field study how advertising materials
effectively interact with a target group that is oftentimes defined by a national culture and caters
to its specific features. In the following I first describe cultural differences between Germany and
the U.S. using Geert Hofstede’s cultural dimensions model. Simultaneously, I connect cultural
studies to web design and evaluate whether Hofstede’s pre-internet-developed model of cultures
can still be applied in 2022. A finding that I find particularly striking is how often the Greenpeace
U.S. “About Us” page uses group-oriented language such as ‘we,’ or ‘our’ compared to the German
Greenpeace site – a whopping total of 29 times against Greenpeace Germany’s self-representation
that uses ‘wir” or ‘uns’ only a total of 6 times in their official text. The self-understanding of
Greenpeace in the U.S. and Germany appear to differ. The German “About Us” text is more goal-
, task-, and issues-oriented compared to a community-focused and inclusivity-oriented U.S. site.
My research thus makes a meaningful contribution to the existing literature of cultural studies
between Germany and the U.S. with a focus on website design for international non-profit
organizations.

1
https://www.uwb.edu/cultural-studies/why/what
Weirauch 5

Chapter 1: Cultural Differences and Web Design


Cultural dimensions theory was coined by Geert Hofstede, who developed his original
model to evaluate the results of a worldwide survey of employee values conducted at IBM between
1967 and 1973. IBM tasked Hofstede to assess and quantify cultural differences and similarities
for the global technology organization. Because of concerns in credibility and representation of
IBM employees, Hofstede’s dimensions model has been refined since, but critics still point out
inconsistencies and shortcomings at a theoretical and methodological level. Nonetheless
Hofstede's six-dimension model is generally accepted as the most comprehensive framework for
studying national culture organization values. His theory has been widely used in various fields of
research as a paradigm, particularly in cross-cultural organizations, international management,
business, and communications. Nonetheless, Hofstede’s dimensions should be considered as
guidelines, not rules. Hofstede defines ‘culture’ in his landmark book Culture and Organizations:
Software of the Mind as “the collective programming of the mind that distinguishes the members
of one group or category of people from others.”2 Pattern of beliefs and expectations shared by
members of an organization result in norms that are particularly powerful in shaping group
behavior in the organization. Individuals gain their values from various domains which include
knowledge, faith, art, morality, laws, customs, cultural abilities, and habits. The following graphic
represents Hofstede’s analysis of culture and its Three Levels of Uniqueness in Mental
Programming.3

2
https://hi.hofstede-insights.com/models
3
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Three-levels-of-uniqueness-in-human-mental-programming-
Hof01_fig1_271135142
Weirauch 6

Figure 1 Hofstede's Three Levels of Uniqueness in Mental Programming adapted from Cultures and Organizations: Software of
the Mind.

Hofstede distinguishes three different levels: personality, culture, and human nature.
Human nature is universal and inherited whereas culture is learned and sets a group or category
apart from others. The top level, personality is specific to every individual and is partially inherited
and learned. The core of culture is learned through symbols, heroes, rituals, and values. Values lie
on a deep level of each person and are strongly correlated with their national values, which are
difficult to change over time and practically stay the same over decades. To demonstrate cultural
identifications, Hofstede developed a model of the six most essential dimensions of national
cultures which he categorized as the following:
● Power distance index (PDI)
● Individualism vs. collectivism (IDV)
● Uncertainty avoidance (UAI)
● Masculinity vs. femininity (MAS)
● Long-term orientation vs. short-term orientation (LTO)
● Indulgence vs. restraint (IND)
For his project, Hofstede collected data from more than 70 countries and applied statistical
methods to give each country a score for its cultural characteristic on an index out of 100. The
following figure demonstrates the scores of Germany and the USA, as extracted from Hofstede
Weirauch 7

studies. In the following I describe Hofstede’s six cultural dimensions in-depth and create
connections to modern web design with a focus on Germany and the U.S.
Germany and the U.S. analyzed through Hofstede’s six dimensions

Figure 2 Hofstede's cultural dimension scores for Germany and the USA

Power distance:
The power distance index is defined as "the extent to which the less powerful members of
organizations and institutions accept and expect that power is distributed unequally." 4 This
dimension deals with the fact that individuals in societies are not equal – it expresses the attitude
of the culture towards, for example, income inequalities, power dynamics, or hierarchy. This index
is important for understanding decision-making processes and communication structures. In
cultures with high power distances, structures run from top to bottom and power inequality is
accepted by people in lower positions. In cultures with low power distances, the structures are
participative. Scandinavian countries, Germany and Anglophone countries all have lower power
distance indexes. Germany and the U.S. have similar power distance scores with 35 and 40,
respectively and I expect to not notice major differences on their websites. I anticipate that
countries with a low power distance index have participative and engaging call-to-actions and a

4
Quote from https://www.tlu.ee/~sirvir/IKM/Leadership%20Dimensions/page_22.html
Weirauch 8

more open and direct communication compared to hierarchical websites designed for nations with
a high power distance index.

Individualism vs. collectivism:


This index explores "the degree to which people in a society are integrated into groups."5
Individualistic societies have loose ties that often only relate an individual to his/her immediate
family. They emphasize the ‘I’ versus the ‘we.’ Its counterpart, collectivism, describes a society
in which tightly integrated relationships bring extended families and others into groups. By being
part of an ‘in-group,’ the individual expects loyalty and support from the collective.
Individualism scores high in the US (91), Australia (90), and Great Britain (89). In contrast, Hong
Kong and Serbia (25), Malaysia (26), and Portugal (27) are collectivist.
German society is individualistic (score 67) but considerably less so than U.S.-American
participants, who score the highest of all countries on the individualism vs collectivism score. In
American organizations, “hierarchy is established for convenience, superiors are accessible, and
managers rely on individual employees and teams for their expertise.”6 Managers and employees
expect to be consulted and informed frequently. Communication is more informal, direct, and to a
certain degree participatory. “The society is loosely knit in which the expectation is that people
look after themselves and their immediate families only and should not rely (too much) on
authorities for support.”7 German organizations favor structure, rules, and directions. The
individualism vs collectivism score plays a massive role in the structure of NPOs and expectations
of members: Germany has strong governmental initiatives and institutions, which regulate social,
environmental, and cultural actions, on which citizens rely, making it hard for members of society
to engage and shape initiatives and projects. U.S.-Americans represent a highly individualistic
culture, and traditionally value personal freedom highly. Federal institutions are not expected to
constrain this freedom unless necessary. This leads to more local initiatives in social,
environmental, or other spheres of society, which are not regulated by the state or federal
government. The way people engage with each other to pursue goals is more direct, spontaneous,

5
https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison/germany,the-usa/
6
https://simplifiedtradesolutions.com/cultural-differences-and-international-trade/
7
https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country/the-usa/
Weirauch 9

and informal. People in the U.S. are more willing to donate and participate in local group activities
compared to Germans.8

Uncertainty avoidance:
The uncertainty avoidance index is defined as a society's tolerance for ambiguity, in which
people embrace or avert the occurrence of something unexpected, unknown, or away from the
status quo. Societies that score high on this index opt for stiff codes of behavior, guidelines, and
laws. Those cultures generally rely on an absolute truth that is oftentimes instated by a government.
A lower degree in this index indicates a higher acceptance of differing thoughts or ideas within a
society. There is no single truth and individuals are encouraged to share their own viewpoints and
opinions. Such a society tends to impose fewer regulations, acceptance of ambiguity is more
prevalent, and communication is freer flowing. The U.S. scores 46 on the uncertainty avoidance
dimension. Thus, U.S.-Americans share a fair degree of acceptance for new ideas, innovative
products, and a willingness to try something new or different, whether it pertains to technology,
business practices, music, or food. Americans tend to be more tolerant of ideas or opinions from
others and allow broad freedom of expression. At the same time, “Americans do not require a lot
of rules and are less emotionally expressive than higher-scoring cultures.”9 U.S.-Americans
appreciate personal freedom and diverging reactions to situations. Germany (65) scores higher
than the USA (46) on the uncertainty avoidance index. High scoring countries on this index, such
as Germany, favor structure and clear sets of values to achieve a societal norm. Hofstede finds
that:
“Most Germans, for example, favored structured learning situations with precise
objectives, detailed assignments, and strict timetables. They liked situations in
which there was one correct answer that they could find. They expected to be
rewarded for accuracy.” (Hofstede 463)

The uncertainty avoidance score indicates a strong preference for deductive rather than
inductive approaches. For Germans, details are equally important to macro-level initiatives to
create trust that a topic or project is well-thought-out. In combination with a low power distance,
Germans prefer to compensate for their uncertainty by strongly relying on experts. “The ideal
principle of control in organizations is a system of formal rules on which everybody can rely”

8
https://www.german-way.com/how-generous-are-the-germans/
9
https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country/the-usa/
Weirauch 10

(Hofstede 686). Based on those findings, Germans have a strong need to determine their future
and tend to avoid risk. U.S.-Americans are generally more willing to accept risks because they
have greater confidence in their individual ability to succeed. Hence, Germans are less comfortable
with uncertainty and more reluctant to take risks. In terms of discussion organization, Germans
tend to carefully analyze problems and critically evaluate possible alternatives, whereas U.S.-
Americans may spend less time analyzing problems and therefore may produce solutions more
quickly. Relating to websites, I expect to find more details, information, and specifications on the
German website compared to the U.S. site. I expect the U.S. Greenpeace site to feature more and
easier-to-access buttons for volunteers to get involved and become members. The German website
on the other hand I expect to be more analytical, structured, with easy-to-access guides, articles,
rules, and content for users.

Masculinity versus femininity:


This index explains societies that are male-centric as performance-oriented, heroic,
assertive, and providing material rewards for success. By contrast, societies with a female
orientation are more likely to prefer cooperation, modesty, caring for the weak, and quality of life.
Masculinity is extremely low in Nordic countries: Norway scores 8 and Sweden only 5. In contrast,
masculinity is very high in Japan (95). Masculinity in Germany (66) and the U.S. (62) does not
differ very much. “Germans and U.S.-Americans draw a lot of self-esteem from their tasks, a high
degree of assertiveness and determination is expected from managers.” (Link 2019)10 I expect to
not see differences in communication on websites targeting German or U.S. audiences due to the
masculinity versus femininity index.

Long-term orientation vs. short-term orientation:


This dimension connects the past with current and future actions/challenges. A lower
degree of this index (short-term) indicates that traditions are honored and kept. Societies with a
high degree in this index (long-term) view adaptation and circumstantial, pragmatic problem-
solving as a necessity. A poor country that is short-term oriented usually has little to no economic
development, while long-term oriented countries continue to develop to a level of prosperity.

10
https://www.amazon.com/Cultural-differences-between-Germany-Work-Life/dp/3668984735
Weirauch 11

High long-term orientation scores are typically found in East Asia, with South Korea
having the highest possible score of 100, Taiwan 93, and Japan 88. They are moderate in Eastern
and Western Europe. The United States scores a low score of 26 on this dimension. This is reflected
by the inclination to check new information frequently and to stay very practical with a short-term
“can-do” planning approach. U.S.-American culture oftentimes encourages a “fake it till you make
it” mentality and values rapid prototyping with a short-term focus. “American businesses measure
their performance on a short-term basis, with profit and loss statements being issued on a
quarterly basis.”11 These drive individuals to strive for quick results in their work. This category
shows the biggest difference between the United States (26) and Germany (83). Germans are long-
term oriented and tend to execute plans that have been developed by experts over an extended
period.
I expect that these findings have an influence on marketing strategy. Presumably, German
participants of Greenpeace will value good planning and deliberate organization, whereas
Americans are more likely to focus on “let's do it” “and “let’s try it out” approaches. Therefore,
marketing communication is likely to apply different messaging, images, and content to meet the
cultural expectations of Greenpeace members in those countries. I expect the Greenpeace U.S. site
to make bold short-term oriented statements compared to a more factual and long-term-oriented
language used by the German site. Especially with regards to environmental organizations, such
as Greenpeace, I expect to observe differences in timeframes of anticipated goals and projects: in
Germany, more long-term oriented initiatives compared to a focus on short-term goals for U.S.-
Americans.

Indulgence vs. restraint:


This dimension refers to the degree of freedom that societal norms give to citizens in
fulfilling their human desires. Indulgence is defined as "a society that allows relatively free
gratification of basic and natural human desires related to enjoying life and having fun."
(Hofstede, 1199) Its counterpart, restraint, is defined as "a society that controls gratification of
needs and regulates it by means of strict social norms" (Hofstede, 1205). Individuals in high score
indulgence cultures pursue their desires and impulses. Similarly, in a society that strives for
indulgence, the basic and natural needs become most important and associated with the joy of life

11
https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country/the-usa/
Weirauch 12

and fun. In contrast to this, “restraint stands for a society that suppresses the satisfaction of needs
and only does so by means of regularization through social norms” (Link, 2019). On this sixth
dimension, the United States (68) scores as an indulgent society. This is reflected by the following
contradictory slogan about attitudes behaviors: work hard and play hard. The low score of 40 on
this dimension for Germany indicates that German culture is restrained. Societies with a low score
in this dimension tend toward cynicism and pessimism. Also, in contrast to indulgent societies,
restrained societies do not put much emphasis on leisure time and control the gratification of
desires. People with this orientation have the perception that their actions are restrained by social
norms and feel that indulging themselves is somewhat wrong. The article Cultural differences –
indulgence versus restraint12 summarizes indulgence vs restraint as follows: “how freely can
people satisfy their basic needs and desires, how strict social norms are followed and gratification
suppressed and regulated.”13 Germans feel more comfortable with long-term responsibility,
deliberate resources planning, and informative communication to prepare actions and projects.
Americans prefer to follow their everyday desires and ideas. I expect the German website to give
the user agency through a website build-up that is complicated to navigate compared to a casual,
intuitive, simple-to-use, and straightforward designed website for the U.S. audience. I expect to
navigate the U.S. site freely and playful compared to a restrained German site.

Limitations of Hofstede’s cultural dimension model


Although Hofstede’s model is popular amongst researchers and gives valuable insight into
the dynamics of cross-cultural relationships, it has been challenged and criticized on a
methodological and executive level. Some researchers claim that the study is too old to be of any
modern value, particularly regarding the rapidly changing global environments and technological
development. Hofstede’s model does not consider the rise of interest in diversity, migration, and
women empowerment. There have been dramatic changes in national cultures since Hofstede’s
original research in 1970 and its surveyed IBM employees. The questionnaire was developed to
measure satisfaction of IBM employees and at first did not attempt to explore cultural values. It
can be seen as a stretch to transpose workplace attitudes (at IBM) to the general context of culture
of countries. Furthermore, although 117,000 questionnaires were administered, only the results

12
http://www.binschedler.com/2012/02/indulgence-restraint/
13
http://www.binschedler.com/2012/02/indulgence-restraint/
Weirauch 13

from 40 countries were used and only 6 countries had more than 1,000 respondents. In 15
countries, there were fewer than 200 respondents. Orr & Hauser (2008)14 criticize that Hofstede’s
research is mostly based on men because of IBM’s lack of female employees at the time.
Another point of critique is that the definition of culture itself is open to interpretation.
There are more than 160 definitions for ‘culture’ and Hofstede uses the definition “The collective
programming of the mind that distinguishes the members of one group or category of people from
others.”15 Hofstede’s assessment of culture is considered as too static as he argues that cultures are
heterogeneous within nations. This implies that citizens of a country do not have subcultures. It is
generally assumed that all individuals in a nation share the same culture. In essence, Hofstede’s
theory is challenged for its relevance because of its methodological shortcomings and disregard of
globalization, internal cultural diversity, and technology trends. Yet, Hofstede’s framework is
popular amongst researchers in cross-cultural studies to explain different interpretations of the
same action in different countries.

14
https://www.scribd.com/document/48602075/CritiqueHofstede-Orr-Hauser-2008
15
https://hi.hofstede-insights.com/models
Weirauch 14

Chapter 2: International Marketing, NPOs, Web Design


Hofstede’s six-dimension cultural model can be applied to international marketing.
Marieke de Mooij studied the application of Hofstede's findings in the field of global
branding, advertising, strategy, and consumer behavior and focuses on how companies can adapt
their products and services to local habits and cultural preferences. De Mooij holds a Doctorate in
Communications, is a retired professor of international advertising at the University of Navarre
(Spain), a consultant in cross-cultural communications, and author of various books including
Global Marketing and Advertising, Understanding Cultural Paradoxes,16 and Consumer Behavior
and Culture.17 She emphasizes that marketing materials vary from country to country because of
linguistic and cultural differences. For example, de Mooij finds that to market cars in a country
where uncertainty avoidance is high, a company is more likely to emphasize the cars’ safety,
whereas in countries with lower uncertainty avoidance indexes, advertisements focus more on
product features and accessories. Marketing is the action of promoting and selling products or
services, including market research and advertising.18 A large portion of marketing is to inform
the right audience with an appropriate tone/language, design, picture, and the overall experience
of a consumer good. Comparative research conducted by de Mooij demonstrates that culture plays
a decisive role in the world of marketing, advertising, and consumer behavior. Hence, successful
marketing materials need to utilize the strengths of local culture. As the U.S. and Germany have
differences, according to Hofstede and others, I expect to observe differences in websites designed
for the U.S. or German market. Based on Hofstede’s cultural dimensions model the main
differences are in individualism, uncertainty avoidance, long-term orientation, and indulgence.
Cultural differences should be considered and respected in creating culturally sensitive marketing
materials, including websites. Dianne Cyr, who is a professor of Management Information Systems
at the Beedie School of Business, points out in her paper “Localization of Web Design: An
Empirical Comparison of German, Japanese, and U.S. Website Characteristics,”19 that a well-
perceived website in a country should satisfy the following three main areas: social presence,
communication effectiveness, and communication interface. Localization is the process of
adapting a product or service to a particular language, culture, and desired local “look-and-feel.”

16
https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/global-marketing-and-advertising/book274128
17
https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/consumer-behavior-and-culture/book258835
18
Definition of marketing, https://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/what-is-marketing.
19
http://www.diannecyr.com/docs/localization_of_webdesign.pdf
Weirauch 15

Cyr’s research focuses on the design of websites and explores how design elements result in user
trust, satisfaction, and loyalty. Cyr underlines that if web design is not culturally sensitive, there is
the potential for exclusion of countries and populations based on accessibility to information that
is not culturally adjusted. Several marketing professionals working with German and American
organizations emphasize the importance of localization. For example, Florian Auckentaler, who
works with an international marketing agency, describes key differences for marketing materials
designed for the German and U.S. market in his blog article Marketing in the US vs Marketing in
Germany: Key Differences You Have to Know.20 Auckentaler summarizes his main findings in
the following table:

Figure 3 Marketing in the US vs Marketing in Germany: Key Differences You Have to Know summarized by Auckenthaler

In an analysis of advertising content between the U.S. and Germany, Auckenthaler finds
that German advertisements are more likely to feature product attributes (for example
performance, nutrition, safety, other senses than taste, price, and value) compared to American
advertisements which mainly focus on a product benefit. Auckenthaler comes to this conclusion
by counting cues in American and German advertisements, summarized by in the following table:

20
https://designingit.com/blog/marketing-in-the-us-vs-germany
Weirauch 16

Visual cues are design elements on web pages, ads, and other digital marketing channels which
help people to make sense of the information quickly.
The study Culture and German Advertising 21 by Michael Hager find among other things that:
- “German ads have greater use of information and details.
- From the American perspective, the German’s need for abundant information and an
extreme number of details appears to be overdone;
- For Americans the German ad can seem cluttered.
- Germans would have just the opposite impression of American ads, where the
perceived lack of details might seem trivial, simple-minded, or deceptively reticent.
- German ads are loaded with detailed information; products are described and
analyzed.”22

Numerous other studies focus on the impact of culture on marketing materials, such as web-
advertisements. While some methodologies follow a statistical approach, for example counting
cues on advertisements, others focus on the language of advertisement material and user
experience created. Like advertisements, website design should acknowledge and reflect cultural
differences for successful communication with country-specific audiences. The digital marketing
platform Hubspot broadly identifies the following elements when analyzing a website in their
article 9 Guidelines & Best Practices for Exceptional Web Design and Usability: simplicity, visual
hierarchy, navigability, consistency, responsibility, accessibility, conventionality, credibility, and
user-centricity. This aligns with other current online materials and blog articles focusing on best
practices for web design, most of which highlight the importance of language/tone, images, white
space, usability, text, links, and length.23 The Nielsen Norman Group, a self-proclaimed world
leader in research-based user experience, suggest in their paper How to Test Visual Design that
“when evaluating fonts, colors, and other visual details, assess both aesthetic impressions and
behavioral effects.”24 It is important to not only qualitatively analyze a website's color use, style
of typography, or number of images used but to also assess the visual design stimulus, for example
through a 5-second test25 aimed to capture the visitors’ ‘gut feeling.’
I will exemplify and illustrate my findings synchronically, with screenshots of Greenpeace
websites taken in April 2022, as well as by looking at past published sites, accessed through

21
https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1101&context=gbl
22
Summarized by Auckenthaler on his web article
23
‘Best practices in web design’ is a good search term on search engines.
24
https://www.nngroup.com/articles/testing-visual-design/
25
https://www.nngroup.com/videos/5-second-usability-test/
Weirauch 17

web.archive.org, to observe historical changes and differences in the Greenpeace online presence.
When analyzing the Greenpeace websites, I will take traditional website measures into account as
well as Nielsen Norman’s guide to visual design. While analyzing websites through statistics, for
example on bounce rate, traffic, conversions, average session duration, click-through rate, percent
of new sessions, traffic origin, or pages/session26 is helpful, for this paper, I focus on the first
overall impression of the websites.
Websites need to be easy to navigate, accessible, visually pleasing and communicating in
an appropriate tone and language. Cyr, de Mooij, and other industry experts and professionals
emphasize the importance of a website to not only speak to a target group as individuals but also
the culture of that targeted group as a whole nation. Elements, such as animations, typography,
color, images, interactive elements, and similar components influence the visual experience of
visitors and can differ for various nations to be effective. Types of information portrayed and
access to further resources from the homepage are determining the overall user experience of a
site. Auckenthaler and Cyr describe that Germans appreciate learning more in-depth information
on a website compared to Americans. On websites, this can be observed by the language used, the
amount of white space, and as the Nieman Group describes it, the ‘general feel of the visual
design.’27 Websites need to appear approachable, simple, and straightforward: The quicker a user
can understand the mission, idea, and credibility of an organization (or service or product) the
more likely the user is to engage with content. This table by the Nieman Group summarizes words
used by research participants to describe their feelings when interacting with various websites.

26
https://www.spinutech.com/digital-marketing/analytics/analysis/7-website-analytics-that-matter-most/
27
https://www.nngroup.com/articles/testing-visual-design/
Weirauch 18

Adopted from the Nieman Research design group: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/testing-


visual-design/

The words resulting from a positive design experience as described by the Nieman Group
are remarkable: simple, bold, professional, neat, corporate, elegant, human. 28 In their study “How
long do users stay on web pages?”29 conducted by the Nieman Group, the bottom-line answer is:
“Not very long: Users often leave web pages in 10–20 seconds, but pages with a
clear value proposition can hold people's attention for much longer. To gain
several minutes of user attention, you must clearly communicate your value
proposition within 10 seconds.”
The faster information can be conveyed by a website the more likely users are to explore
content for several minutes.

Bullet points and questions to ask to create a successful web-presence


- What is the primary goal (of my NPO)? What are the goals of my website?
- What other marketing channels do I want to entertain (social media, email newsletters)?
- With what designs are users most likely to engage/interact/donate to my nonprofit through
a website?

28 footnote about ‘simple’ also being considered as a negative experience.


29
https://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-long-do-users-stay-on-web-pages/
Weirauch 19

Consistency and appropriate color use, typography, images, storytelling, language/tone,


and call-to-action buttons are crucial for a successful web presence. Up-to-date content becomes
important to engage returning homepage visitors. A fast-loading, responsive, and easy-to-navigate
site is a must as well.

NPOs and Greenpeace


In 2018, 36% of Germans donated a total of 3.51 billion Euros to NPOs30. In the U.S., in
2021, 60% of American households participated in some sort of charitable giving, according to
The Philanthropy Roundtable.31 Giving USA, an organization that reports on the sources and uses
of charitable giving in the United States, reports that donations by individuals in the U.S. in 2018
totaled an estimated whopping $292.09 billion.32 Giving USA provides comprehensive charitable
giving data for over 40 years. This stark difference in charitable giving can be expected with
consideration of Hofstede’s individualism index score in which Germany scores 24 points less than
the U.S. (67 to 91, respectively). German culture expects that the government supports an NPO
and their initiatives. The Deutscher Fundraiser Verband says: “Die Annahme, dass Nonprofit-
Organisationen von Spenden leben, ist falsch. Der größte Teil der Einnahmen kommt aus
wirtschaftlichem Geschäftsbetrieb und von der öffentlichen Hand.” In his book, Die Relevanz von
Kennzahlen im Fundraising, Arne Heinemann emphasizes the low donation willingness of
Germans: “Im Vergleich zu anderen Ländern fällt in Deutschland besonders der geringe Anteil an
Spenden auf. Eine Erklärung für die geringe Spendenfinanzierung der NPOs liegt in den hohen
Zuwendungen der öffentlichen Hand.” This aligns with Hofstede’s expectation and analysis.
A nonprofit organization is mission-driven, which requires the management and board to
set objectives aimed at achieving the organization’s stated mission. Most, if not all, credible NPOs
have online presences in which an organization communicates its mission, goals, and a way for
people to engage or donate.33 Of the 1.8 million registered nonprofit organizations in the U.S., the
majority are designated as churches, schools, and foundations (40%). Whereas 15% are civil,

30
https://www.dfrv.de/fundraising-zahlen-und-fakten/
31
https://www.definefinancial.com/blog/charitable-giving-statistics/
32
https://givingusa.org/giving-usa-2019-americans-gave-427-71-billion-to-charity-in-2018-amid-complex-year-for-
charitable-giving/
33
https://yourbusiness.azcentral.com/purpose-board-directors-nonprofit-organizations-12770.html
Weirauch 20

social, and business engagement organizations, 7% are human services organizations and another
7% are cultural and humanities nonprofits.34
Greenpeace was founded in 1971 in Vancouver, Canada and today is a well-established
global non-government organization. Greenpeace's focus on environmental protection and
activism resonated with many people, and in 1975 more than 15 sister organizations were
chartered. By 1979 the independent organizations were combined and incorporated into
Greenpeace International. Since then, Greenpeace has been active in 40+ countries and is
committed to “ensuring the ability of the earth to nurture life in all its diversity.”35 Thereby,
Greenpeace’ main goals are to:
- “Protect biodiversity in all its forms
- prevent pollution and abuse of the earth’s ocean, land, air and fresh water
- end all nuclear threats
- promote peace, global disarmament and non-violence.”36
-

The goal of Greenpeace is engagement, participation, donation, actions, projects.

Analysis of Greenpeace’s German and U.S. website presence


In the following I will analyze the Greenpeace U.S. and Germany website with the help of
the previously mentioned Hubspot guide37 as well as the 5-second test described by the Nielsen

34
https://www.causeiq.com/insights/how-many-nonprofits-in-the-us/
35
https://www.greenpeace.org/international/explore/about/values/
36
https://www.greenpeace.org/international/explore/about/values/
37
https://blog.hubspot.com/blog/tabid/6307/bid/30557/6-guidelines-for-exceptional-website-design-and-
usability.aspx
Weirauch 21

Norman Group. Furthermore, I will attempt to draw conclusions based on Hofstede’s six cultural
dimensions. I analyze sites accessed through web.archive.org that have been the official
Greenpeace websites in 2004, 2010, 2016, and 2022. The current Greenpeace DE website can be
accessed through http://greenpeace.de. Greenpeace USA can be accessed under
https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/. I will consider the user experience and user interface when
evaluating the websites. “The user interface (UI) is the point of human-computer interaction and
communication in a device. This can include display screens, keyboards, a mouse and the
appearance of a desktop.”38 User interface focuses on choices and actions users are given on a
provided system, such as a website. User experience focuses on how users interact with materials.
“The user experience (UX or UE) is how a user interacts with and experiences a product, system
or service. It includes a person's perceptions of utility, ease of use, and efficiency.”39 Although I
was able to find some indicators that Hofstede’s findings can be transposed to Greenpeace U.S.
and German website, a larger sample size is needed to derive robust conclusions.
One key takeaway I conclude is that Greenpeace Germany and U.S. website have similar
themes and design elements during the same time and evolve in tandem over the years from
difficult to read news-sites to branded and easy-to-navigate resource centers with tangible
information on organizations impact and mission. Since 2004 landing pages got longer in scrolling
with more graphics and larger text headlines as well as easier to read body paragraphs. Greenpeace
DE and U.S. both re- and upcycled written content on their websites across design changes. The
Greenpeace Germany site from 2004 features a gradient blue background, small typography, a
news section, and then links to Greenpeace resources and initiatives, such as “Greenpeace
Energy,” “Greenpeace Magazine,” “Greenpeace Produkte.”

38
https://www.techtarget.com/searchapparchitecture/definition/user-interface-UI
39
https://quaffdigital.com/using-user-experience-to-outsell-competitors/
Weirauch 22

Figure 4 Greenpeace DE site from 2004 with a large feature of a blue background

The 2004 Greenpeace DE website furthermore features a cyclopedia organized by


keywords. Some of the letters are supported by icons to give a clue of what the section might
feature.

Figure 5 Focus on selection option given to users on the 2004 German Greenpeace site

An example of the sub-selections of the letter “G” can be seen here:


Weirauch 23

Figure 6 In-depth example of selection choices of the letter G

2022’s Greenpeace U.S. website counts 11 call-to-action buttons. The German website
counts 17 buttons. The German and U.S. sites from 2004 feature no buttons at all. Similarly, recent
published websites in Germany and the U.S. feature more images and graphics compared to plain
looking websites from 2004. Over the years and across the cultures the websites use more white
space and text got easier to read by bold headlines and more graphics compared to earlier sites.
The user experience on the recently published sites features more storytelling and an overall better
explanation of Greenpeace as an organization through visual cues and text.
The Greenpeace About Us Germany site from 2022 has bold headlines and the header
image is the iconic Greenpeace ship Arctic Sunrise. “Greenpeace stellt sich vor — Volle Kraft
voraus für die Umwelt” reads the sub-heading of the page. The future oriented tagline aligns with
Hofstede’s long-term vs. short-term orientation index in which Germany scores 83. The
Greenpeace USA About Us 2022 version uses ‘we’ 22 times throughout the written text. Germany
Weirauch 24

About Us 2022 text thereby has only a total of 2 ‘wir’ in the explanation text about the who
Greenpeace is and what they do. The second of the two ‘wir’ on the German About Us page reads
“Wir sind sehr viele Menschen aus der ganzen Welt, die im Umwelt-Schutz helfen.” A clearly
defined statement compared to a more casual use of ‘we’ on the U.S. website. It appears that the
English ‘we’ has a different annotation compared to ‘wir’ in the German language. ‘We’ is used
more casually and generously in the U.S. compared to ‘wir’ in German. ‘Uns’ is used 6 times on
the German Über Uns 2022 site. The counting of ‘uns’ on the German website includes variations,
such as ‘unsere’. On the Greenpeace USA About Us page ‘our’ is used a total of 29 times. The
following screenshots show the ‘our’ and ‘uns’ text look-up on the Greenpeace About Us 2022
sites in Germany and the U.S.

Figure 7 Greenpeace USA About Us text 2022. Focus on use of 'our' in the text
Weirauch 25

Figure 8 Greenpeace DE About Us text 2022. Focus on 'Uns' which includes variations such as 'unsere'

It appears that ‘our’ and ‘unser’ are used differently in the English and German language.
If ‘unser’ can be directly translated into ‘our’ from German into English and ‘wir’ into ‘we,’ then
there must be cultural differences in the appropriate use of language between Germany and the
U.S. Hofstede found that the U.S.-Americans emphasis the “I” over “we.” There are no “I” or
“ich” used portions on the about us pages of either chapter. Greenpeace USA About Us text uses
11 times more ‘we’ than ‘wir’ statements in their written text.
While some conclusions from observed differences between Greenpeace U.S. and
Greenpeace Germany sites can be drawn based on Hofstede’s categories, it appears that differences
in websites are more time sensitive. Some differences and trends align with Hofstede’s six cultural
Weirauch 26

dimensions but are also likely dependent on the web design team that designed and wrote the
Greenpeace DE and USA website. Some resources can be found online that explain how
Hofstede’s cultural dimensions can be observed in web design. Web design and culture change at
different paces over time. Web design must be analyzed in relation to other websites during the
same period, similarly to culture. Attached at the bottom of this document are screenshots of
Greenpeace Germany and USA website from 2004, 2010, 2017, and 2022.
There are several scholars and authors who were instrumental in transposing Hofstede’s
differences onto web design. In 2001 Marcus & Gould published the paper: “Cultural dimensions
and global web design: What? So what? Now what?” among other things the research team finds
that uncertainty avoidance may influence contrary aspects of user-interface and web design. High-
UA cultures would emphasize the following, according to Marcus & Gould:
• “Simplicity, with clear metaphors, limited choices, and restricted amounts of data
• Attempts to reveal or forecast the results or implications of actions before users act
• Navigation schemes intended to prevent users from becoming lost
• Mental models and help systems that focus on reducing “user errors”
• Redundant cues (color, typography, sound, etc.) to reduce ambiguity.”40

As noted above, the U.S. and Germany score significantly differently on indulgence, long-
term-orientation, and the individualism index. In her article “How to sell online to indulgent vs
restrained cultures,”41 Nathalie Nahai, author of “Webs of Influences: The Psychology of Online
Persuasion,”42 observes that for indulgent cultures (like the U.S.), fun (almost playful) interactions,
giveaways, use and encouragement of user-generated content, space for open discussions, and
loose gender roles will help to convert “tourists” or “browsers” to “residents” and “customers.”
For short-term oriented countries (like the USA) emphasis is placed on values and traditions that
can be communicated through quick results. Sabrina Idler, author of “How to Design for a cross-
cultural user experience”43 argues that short-term-oriented countries, can grab visitors attention
with something that they are already familiar with. Long-term oriented countries appreciate
outlooks on the future and detailed information on advantages of a product. The paper “Collectivist
and individualist influences on website design in South Korea and the U.S.: A cross-cultural

40
Summarized by Marcus & Gould
41
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/webs-influence/201308/how-sell-online-indulgent-vs-restrained-
cultures
42
https://www.amazon.com/Webs-Influence-Psychology-Online-Persuasion/dp/0273772953
43
https://www.getfeedback.com/resources/ux/designing-for-a-cross-cultural-user-experience-part1/
Weirauch 27

content analysis”44 focuses on differences observed solely based on clues that can be attributed to
individual vs. collectivist countries. Members of the highly individualistic U.S. culture emphasize
the ‘I’ over ‘we’, take initiatives, and are ready to make decisions. Collectivist cultures tend to act
in the interest of a group, rather than their own interest. Therefore, collectivist cultures appreciate
“most popular” toggles, testimonials, or social media sharing options to gather personal feedback
from friends.

44
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01454.x
Weirauch 28

Chapter 3: Current Trends and Conclusion


While cultures might have differing opinions about websites that are considered as “good”
and “effective,” globalization and digitalization are increasingly mitigating and decreasing cultural
differences by creating content accessible to international readerships. Nonprofit websites should
transport values, beliefs, and symbols of their organization and use localization to adopt them to
local cultures. Today, most people access large parts of their daily life from home and mainly
through the internet. The impact of COVID-19 and the stay-at-home orders increases the
importance of viable and effective websites. Because of the loose physical restrictions of the
internet, cultural differences between countries might diminish. As Hofstede’s cultural studies
model was developed before the internet, cultures at the time were more limited to their locations.
Now, users can access and stream TV shows and movies from anywhere in the world setting a new
pace for trends, ideals, and visions. The physical decentralization through the internet impacts
culture, language, and norms and due to processes of globalization cultures unify across nations.
Global companies, like Google, Meta, TikTok, and Netflix contribute to overcoming national
boundaries and create new global cultural trends. Whether Facebook’s Metaverse will be the next
evolution of social technology, as the company claims, remains to be seen. The fact, however, that
Meta is putting all its focus on augmented reality must be critically analyzed with the effect of the
future of digital spaces, in-person meetings, and the overall digital marketing field, of which Meta
and its sub-companies are part. In official videos published by Meta on their YouTube channel,
their digital spaces look underwhelming and oftentimes lack simplicity and pragmatics in 2022.
However, with Facebook pushing hard on the topic, it will be interesting to see changes that a large
player can have in the industry. We will see whether Meta’s new focus will pay off in a couple of
years from today in which meetings might take place through a VR setup in an online world as
realistic as our current, as Mark Zuckerberg likes to point out.
In conclusion, Hofstede’s research focuses on individual countries and was conducted
before the invention of the internet. Past research has expanded Hofstede’s cultural analyses onto
global marketing and with that, web design. Some differences in web design can be attributed to
regional user attributions and cultural preferences measured through Hofstede’s cultural dimension
model. Wherever cultural differences and boundaries are being mitigated by the abolition of time
and space in the world wide web or how culturally adjusted content is appropriated in effectively
communicating to a larger target audience remains open. The internet enables individuals to
Weirauch 29

quickly find sub-cultures and groups. Cross-cultural research indicates that some differences in
advertisements or other marketing materials, such as websites, can partially be explained by
Hofstede’s cultural dimension model. Communication using images and text is different in varying
cultures. The choices web developers give their users through the user interface determines the
feeling and interaction that a user possibly can have with a website. Because of globalization
organizations can speak to various cultures at the same time, effectively conveying a common
theme to users, this connects them across regional boundaries and is oftentimes manifested in the
mission and vision statements of an organization. With the internet and increase of digital
connectedness, physical and country-specific boundaries might become less important in a fairly
uncolonized and open access internet.
Weirauch 30

Works Referenced

https://www.spinutech.com/digital-marketing/analytics/analysis/7-website-analytics-that-matter-
most/. Accessed 15 Apr. 2022.

“80+ Charitable Giving Statistics & Demographics (2022).” Define Financial, 3 Jan. 2022,
https://www.definefinancial.com/blog/charitable-giving-statistics/.

Auckenthaler, Florian. “Marketing in the US vs Marketing in Germany: Key Differences You


Have to Know.” DesigningIT, 15 Apr. 2022, http://designingit.com/blog/marketing-in-the-us-vs-
germany.

“Country Comparison.” Hofstede Insights, https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-


comparison/. Accessed 15 Apr. 2022.

Cultural Differences – Indulgence versus Restraint (IVR) | Binschedler.Com.


http://www.binschedler.com/2012/02/indulgence-restraint/. Accessed 15 Apr. 2022.

Cultural Differences and International Trade. https://simplifiedtradesolutions.com/cultural-


differences-and-international-trade/. Accessed 15 Apr. 2022.

Cyr, Dianne. Localization of Web Design: An Empirical Comparison of German, Japanese, and
U.S. Website Characteristics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and
Technology, http://www.diannecyr.com/docs/localization_of_webdesign.pdf.

“Defining Company Culture.” Open Textbooks for Hong Kong, 2 Dec. 2015,
https://www.opentextbooks.org.hk/ditatopic/37216.

“Examples of Cultural Dimensions.” American Speech-Language-Hearing Association,


https://www.asha.org/practice-portal/professional-issues/cultural-competence/examples-of-
cultural-dimensions/. Accessed 15 Apr. 2022.

Experience, World Leaders in Research-Based User. 5-Second Usability Test (Video).


www.nngroup.com, https://www.nngroup.com/videos/5-second-usability-test/. Accessed 15 Apr.
2022.

“How Long Do Users Stay on Web Pages?” Nielsen Norman Group,


https://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-long-do-users-stay-on-web-pages/. Accessed 15 Apr.
2022.

“How to Test Visual Design.” Nielsen Norman Group,


https://www.nngroup.com/articles/testing-visual-design/. Accessed 15 Apr. 2022.

“How to Test Visual Design.” Nielsen Norman Group,


https://www.nngroup.com/articles/testing-visual-design/. Accessed 15 Apr. 2022.
Weirauch 31

Forsey, Caroline. What Is Marketing, and What’s Its Purpose?


https://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/what-is-marketing. Accessed 15 Apr. 2022.

“Fundraising: Zahlen und Fakten.” Deutscher Fundraising Verband,


https://www.dfrv.de/fundraising-zahlen-und-fakten/. Accessed 15 Apr. 2022.

Giving USA 2019 : Americans Gave $427.71 Billion to Charity in 2018 amid Complex Year for
Charitable Giving | Giving USA. 18 June 2019, https://givingusa.org/giving-usa-2019-
americans-gave-427-71-billion-to-charity-in-2018-amid-complex-year-for-charitable-giving/.

Hager, Michael. Culture and German Advertising. Global Business Languages,


https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1101&context=gbl.

Heinemann, Arne. Die Relevanz von Kennzahlen im Fundraising. GRIN Verlag, 2014.

Hofstede, Geert. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, Third Edition. 3rd edition,
McGraw Hill, 2010.

How Many Nonprofits Are in the US? | Cause IQ. https://www.causeiq.com/insights/how-many-


nonprofits-in-the-us/. Accessed 15 Apr. 2022.

How To Design For A Cross-Cultural User Experience (Part 1/2).


https://www.getfeedback.com/resources/ux/designing-for-a-cross-cultural-user-experience-
part1/. Accessed 15 Apr. 2022.

Insights, Hofstede. Our Models. https://hi.hofstede-insights.com/models. Accessed 15 Apr. 2022.

Juviler, Jamie. 9 Guidelines & Best Practices for Exceptional Web Design and Usability.
https://blog.hubspot.com/blog/tabid/6307/bid/30557/6-guidelines-for-exceptional-website-
design-and-usability.aspx. Accessed 15 Apr. 2022.

9 Guidelines & Best Practices for Exceptional Web Design and Usability.
https://blog.hubspot.com/blog/tabid/6307/bid/30557/6-guidelines-for-exceptional-website-
design-and-usability.aspx. Accessed 15 Apr. 2022.

Kim, Heeman, et al. “Collectivist and Individualist Influences on Website Design in South Korea
and the U.S.: A Cross-Cultural Content Analysis.” Journal of Computer-Mediated
Communication, vol. 14, no. 3, Apr. 2009, pp. 581–601. DOI.org (Crossref),
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01454.x.

Link, Annika. Cultural Differences between Germany and the United States in Terms of Work-
Life Balance. Grin Verlag, 2019.

Litt, Martin. Use User Experience to Charge More for the Same Products - QUAFF. 16 Nov.
2021, https://quaffdigital.com/using-user-experience-to-outsell-competitors/.
Weirauch 32

Marcus, Aaron. Cultural Dimensions and Global Web Design: What? So What? Now What?
https://laofutze.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/ama_cultdim.pdf.

Mooij, Marieke de. “Consumer Behavior and Culture.” SAGE Publications Inc, 10 Apr. 2022,
https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/consumer-behavior-and-culture/book258835.

“Global Marketing and Advertising.” SAGE Publications Inc, 7 Apr. 2022,


https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/global-marketing-and-advertising/book274128.

Nahai, Nathalie. How to Sell Online to Indulgent vs Restrained Cultures | Psychology Today.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/webs-influence/201308/how-sell-online-indulgent-
vs-restrained-cultures. Accessed 15 Apr. 2022.

Webs of Influence: The Psychology of Online Persuasion. 1st edition, Ft Pr, 2012.

“Nonprofit Fundraising Statistics [Updated for 2022].” Double the Donation,


https://doublethedonation.com/tips/matching-grant-resources/nonprofit-fundraising-statistics/.
Accessed 15 Apr. 2022.

Orr, Linda. “A Re-Inquiry of Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions: A Call for 21st Century Cross-
Cultural Research.” Scribd, https://www.scribd.com/document/48602075/CritiqueHofstede-Orr-
Hauser-2008. Accessed 15 Apr. 2022.

“Our Values.” Greenpeace International,


https://www.greenpeace.org/international/explore/about/values. Accessed 15 Apr. 2022.

Greenpeace International, https://www.greenpeace.org/international/explore/about/values.


Accessed 15 Apr. 2022.

“Purpose of a Board of Directors for Nonprofit Organizations.” Your Business,


https://yourbusiness.azcentral.com/purpose-board-directors-nonprofit-organizations-12770.html.
Accessed 15 Apr. 2022.

Uebelacker, Sven. “Figure 1: Three Levels of Uniqueness in Human Mental Programming


[Hof01].” ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Three-levels-of-uniqueness-in-
human-mental-programming-Hof01_fig1_271135142. Accessed 15 Apr. 2022.

“United States.” Hofstede Insights, https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country/the-usa/.


Accessed 15 Apr. 2022.

Virkus, Sirje. Leadership Dimensions: Culture and Leadership.


https://www.tlu.ee/~sirvir/IKM/Leadership%20Dimensions/page_22.html. Accessed 16 Apr.
2022.
Weirauch 33

“What Is User Interface (UI)?” SearchAppArchitecture,


https://www.techtarget.com/searchapparchitecture/definition/user-interface-UI. Accessed 15
Apr. 2022.
http://www.greenpeace.org/deutschland/ Go OCT NOV DEC ! ⍰❎
269 captures 30 f%
30 Oct 2002 - 14 Feb 2022 2003 2004 2005 ▾ About this capture

29.11.2004
Erneut auf Skandal-Patent gestoßen
Hamburg (mir) - Wieder einmal hat Greenpeace ein
skandalöses Patent auf ein menschliches Gen entdeckt. Das
Europäische Patentamt (EPA) in München hat es bereits im April 2004
erteilt. Inhaber ist die US-amerikanische
... mehr dazu >>

>>EU berät über Zulassung von


Gen-Pflanzen
>>Gen-Milch im Einkaufswagen
Cybercentre: Werkzeuge des Widerstands
>>Explosionsgefahr auf der
Energie, Meere, Wälder, Gentechnik, Landwirtschaft, Chemie, .... Nordsee gebannt
Greenteams und mehr >>Bundestag verabschiedet
Die Basis unserer Arbeit Gentechnikgesetz
Alles rund um Ihre Fördermitgliedschaft >>Kauf nix am Samstag - erhol
dich vom Konsum
Jetzt zu sauberem Strom wechseln!
Politik * Wirtschaft * Umwelt Mehr zu "N"
Starke Marke - hohe Standards Nachhaltige Wirtschaft
Gestalten Sie ein Stück Zukunft! News zu Greenpeace- und
Essen ohne Gentechnik - der Ratgeber Umweltthemen
Arche für alte Haustierrassen
Jugend für Solarenergie >>News
>>Presseerklärungen
>>Publikationen
http://www.greenpeace.org/deutschland/ Go APR JUN AUG ! ⍰❎
269 captures 30 f%
30 Oct 2002 - 14 Feb 2022 2003 2004 2005 ▾ About this capture

Greenpeace

Adressen Greenpeace weltweit


Bestellung Infomaterial
> HOME Bestellung Testamentsbroschüre
Bestellung
Autor/in: Greenpeace | 20.02.2004 | 296 Wörter Umweltstiftungsbroschüre
Greenpeace Schiffe
Gewaltfrei, unabhängig, international Greenpeace Statements
Greenpeace Versand
Seit 1971 setzt sich Greenpeace für den Schutz der Lebensgrundlagen ein. Greenpeace-Finanzen
Gewaltfreiheit ist dabei das oberste Prinzip. Die Organisation ist unabhängig Greenpeace-Gruppen
von Regierungen, politischen Parteien und wirtschaftlichen Interessengruppen.
Greenpeace-Kooperation mit
Greenpeace arbeitet international, denn Naturzerstörung kennt keine Grenzen. Tierpark Warder
Jahresrückblick 2003
Umweltschutz ist kein Luxus für Zeiten wirtschaftlichen Aufschwungs, im
Jobs bei Greenpeace
Gegenteil: Der ökologische Umbau der Industriegesellschaft schafft neue Jobs.
Greenpeace zeigt mit der Entwicklung von Alternativen, wie die Zukunft Musik goes Umweltschutz
aussehen könnte. Zum Beispiel der Greenfreeze, der erste FCKW- und FKW- Satzung des Greenpeace e. V.
freie Kühlschrank der Welt, hat 1993 den deutschen Markt umgekrempelt. Im Über uns
Jahre 2002 hielt er Einzug auf dem chinesischen Markt. Oder der Twingo >>Ältere Artikel zu
SmILE: Damit trat Greenpeace den Beweis an, dass Serienautos mit "Greenpeace"
halbiertem Benzinverbrauch realisierbar sind. Doch trotz Erfolgen bleibt viel zu
tun. Mehr zu "Greenpeace"
>>Links
Taten statt Warten >>Multimedia
Spektakuläre Aktionen haben Greenpeace weltweit bekannt gemacht. Die >>News
direkte Konfrontation mit Umweltsündern dient dazu, auf Missstände >>Presseerklärungen
aufmerksam zu machen. Greenpeace-Aktivisten setzen sich persönlich für ihr
>>Publikationen
Anliegen ein - dadurch erzeugen sie öffentlichen Druck auf Verantwortliche in
Politik und Industrie. Doch Greenpeace agiert nicht nur im Schlauchboot, auch Mehr zu "G"
die Lobbyarbeit trägt entscheidend zum Erfolg von Kampagnen bei. In
Gentechnik
langwierigen und zähen Verhandlungen versucht Greenpeace, die politischen
Globalisierung
Entscheidungen von Regierungen oder Kommissionen zu beeinflussen.
Greenfreeze
Greenpeace arbeitet zu den Themen Klimaveränderung, Artenvielfalt Greenpeace Infomaterial bestellen
(Ökosysteme der Wälder und Meere), Atomkraft/erneuerbare Energien, Erdöl, Greenpeace-Geschichte
Gentechnik, Landwirtschaft und Chemie. Eine Konzentration auf die gewählten Greenteams: Kinder bei
Kampagnen ist notwendig: Nur wenn die Organisation ihre Energien bündelt, Greenpeace
ist effektives und erfolgreiches Arbeiten möglich.

Greenpeace - ungemein nützlich: Erfolge für das Gemeinwohl (PDF, 1676


kb).

Generation Grün
Real Player 56k-Modems (1,1 Mb Dateigröße)
ISDN (2,3 Mb Dateigröße)
DSL oder Kabelmodem (10,2 Mb Dateigröße)

Windows
56k-Modems (1,3 Mb Dateigröße)
Player
ISDN (2,4 Mb Dateigröße)
DSL oder Kabelmodem (11,7 Mb Dateigröße)

Weitere Videos finden Sie gegebenenfalls unter dem Menüpunkt Multimedia.

Seitenanfang | Drucken | Versenden | Bookmark


http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/ Go NOV DEC FEB ! ⍰❎
12,713 captures 21 f%
30 Oct 2000 - 18 Mar 2022 2001 2004 2005 ▾ About this capture

Greenpeace Forests Global Warming & Energy Nuclear Toxics Oceans Genetic Engineering Donate Take Action Media Center

About Us Donate Jobs Volunteer Contact Us Multimedia Discussion Boards Greenpeace Syndication Go

Get Involved
Receive up-to-date info and join the action.

Email

subscribe

Oil Spill Devastates Alaska...Again Daily Grist


Fifteen years after the Exxon Valdez devastated the Alaskan coast, another oil spill is making headlines. A Malaysian freighter lost power to its main engine on December 7, 2004 and ran aground on the - The Whole Foods Shebang
west-side of Unalaska Island in the Aleutian Island chain. The ship was carrying 483,000 gallons of heavy bulk fuel and another 21,000 of diesel fuel. Read More>> - You've Got Whale
- Secret Agency Man

Polar Bears Dream of a White Christmas


Up in the far north, we're facing the prospect of an Arctic without ice. Polar bears extinct in the wild. Mass starvation of reindeer. And as a result of their snowy world melting, the possibility of a global
sea-level rise of devastating proportions. It sounds like a disaster film made for Hollywood, but unless we act quickly to stop global warming, it will be front-page news. Read More>>

Dioxin: Closer Than You Think


The deadly chemical dioxin has hit the headlines with the poisoning of Ukrainian opposition leader Viktor Yuschenko. What doesn't often make the news is the fact that dioxin pollution is widespread and
may be lurking in your own home. Find out where. Read More>>

Five Steps to a Greener Holiday Season


The holiday season is now upon us. It's the perfect time of year to gather together with family and friends and celebrate all of the wonderful things this season has to offer. But for many Americans, this
time of year has turned into a frenzy of shopping, wrapping, baking, decorating and traveling. If you think all those mad dashes to the mall takes a toll on you, just think of how these activities impact the
environment. Luckily, there are ways to enjoy the holidays and still be good to the Earth. Read More>>

Cold Season Got You Down? Try Ancient Forests


If you’re suffering during this year’s cold season, you may be reaching for that box of tissue more often than you’d like. And if you use Kleenex brand tissue products, you’re not only putting some
vigorous wear and tear on your nose – chances are you’re blowing away on Canada’s ancient forests. Read More>>

More features>>

Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Greenpeace RSS


Site published by Greenpeace, Inc.
Unless otherwise noted all copy, photos, graphics and other materials © Greenpeace, Inc.

Greenpeace, Inc. 702 H St NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20001


1-800-326-0959
http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/aboutus/ Go SEP OCT NOV ! ⍰❎
41 captures 20 f%
21 Sep 2004 - 7 May 2021 2003 2004 2005 ▾ About this capture

Greenpeace Forests Global Warming & Energy Nuclear Toxics Oceans Genetic Engineering Donate Take Action Media Center

About Us Donate Jobs Volunteer Contact Us Multimedia Greenpeace Worldwide Greenpeace Syndication Go

About Us

Greenpeace is the leading independent campaigning organization that uses non-violent direct action and creative communication to expose global environmental problems and to promote solutions that are essential to a green and
Stay Informed
Receive up-to-date info and join the action.
peaceful future.
e-mail:
Our Founding
country: United States
Greenpeace began in 1971, when a handful of determined activists departed for Amchitka Island, Alaska to protest U.S. nuclear weapons testing in the area. The crew of 11 men leased a fishing vessel, the Phyllis Cormack, and set sail
from Vancouver through the cold North Pacific waters. Their goal was to "bear witness" to the devastating activity. The notion of bearing witness involves going to the scene of an objectionable activity and registering opposition to it, subscribe
simply by being present there. The aging, 80-foot boat never reached the site of the test, but the activists brought worldwide attention to nuclear testing and its dangers. Shortly after the voyage, the team named themselves
"Greenpeace."

Our Work

For over 30 years, Greenpeace has tackled the most critical environmental issues. While we are best known for hanging banners and chasing whalers, much of our work is done behind the scenes in areas such as research and
consultation. Our expertise has earned us attendance at major international environmental policy and treaty meetings and we maintain consultative status to the United Nations. Our effective work for new laws and policies, has precluded
contributions to Greenpeace from being tax-deductible.

Today our work focuses on six major efforts: saving ancient forests, stopping global warming, exposing toxic pollutants, protecting the oceans, eliminating the threat of genetic engineering, and ending the nuclear age. There are more
than 40 Greenpeace offices around the world, with international coordination taking place through our headquarters in Amsterdam - making Greenpeace one of the few environmental groups that truly works globally on environmental
problems.

Our Ships

Since our inception, the history and mission of Greenpeace have been encapsulated in the icon of a ship. Our fleet of ships includes the Arctic Sunrise, the Esperanza and - our most famous - the Rainbow Warrior.

Defending the North Sea: View the weblog from the Esperanza.

2004 Pacific Fisheries Tour: View the weblog from the Rainbow Warrior.

The original Rainbow Warrior was sunk is 1985, when a French Secret Service agent planted two bombs onboard. In the tragedy, we lost a dear friend and talented photographer, Fernando Pereira.

Our Funding

Greenpeace does not accept contributions from government or corporations, nor will we endorse political candidates. Our 250,000 members in the United States and 2.5 million members worldwide provide virtually all of our funding Daily Grist
through individual contributions. Your support provides the backbone of our organization and is invaluable to our efforts. Please consider making a donation today. - Easter-Funny
- The Traffic Is Murder Out There
Our Financials
- You Can Fuel Some of the People Some of the Time ...
View Greenpeace's Annual Reports:

2003
2002

View Greenpeace Fund's form 990 for the year 2003.

View Greenpeace Inc.'s form 990 for the year 2003.

Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Greenpeace RSS


Site published by Greenpeace, Inc.
Unless otherwise noted all copy, photos, graphics and other materials © Greenpeace, Inc.

Greenpeace, Inc. 702 H St NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20001


1-800-326-0959
http://www.greenpeace.de/ Go OCT NOV DEC ! ⍰❎
3,710 captures 30 f%
3 Dec 1998 - 18 Mar 2022 go Suche 2009 2010 2011 ▾ About this capture

Themen Über uns Nachrichten Presse Video Publikationen Kontakt

Folgen Sie uns auf:

Klimaschutz ins Grundgesetz!


Warum ist Klimaschutz in unserer Verfassung bisher nicht verankert? 363.867 Unterschriften
hat Greenpeace dem Bundestag bereits übergeben. Online können Sie weiterhin Ihre Stimme
abgeben. Unterzeichnen Sie jetzt die ePetition Nr. 14724!

Wie es geht, steht hier!

Greenpeace aktuell

Fischratgeber Cancún-Blog Cancún Spendensammler Greencast

Greenpeace-Experte Martin Kaiser zur


Weltklimakonferenz
Werden in Cancún die notwendigen Schritte für ein
rechtsverbindliches Klimaschutz-Abkommen beschlossen
werden? Wird es gelingen, China und andere Schwellenländer
einzubinden? Martin Kaiser, Leiter Internationale Klimapolitik, ist
vor Ort. Er hält Sie im Greenpeace-Blog über seine Einschätzung
der Klimaverhandlungen auf dem Laufenden.

Blog am 29. November: Anzeichen für Teilnahme von


Staatschefs in Cancún – Europa muss Kurs aufnehmen!

mehr ...

Letzte Nachrichten

Bundesverfassungsgericht bestätigt Gentechnikgegner


24.11.2010 Gentechnik
Niederlage für Sachsen-Anhalt. Das Bundesverfassungsgericht in Karlsruhe hat heute die Klage der
Landesregierung gegen das Gentechnikgesetz abgelehnt. In seinem Urteil erinnert es an die
Verantwortung der Regierungen gegenüber zukünftigen Generationen.

Was ist drin in Thunfischdosen?


23.11.2010 Meere
Ob in Öl oder im eigenen Saft - Thunfisch in Dosen ist sehr beliebt. Laut Zutatenliste enthalten die
Konserven in der Regel Echten Bonito (Skipjack) aus dem Pazifik. Doch was ist wirklich drin in den
Dosen? Greenpeace hat in zwölf Ländern Stichproben untersuchen lassen. Das Ergebnis ist
ernüchternd.

Mexiko: Kletterer protestieren auf Ölplattform gegen Tiefseebohrungen


22.11.2010 Öl
Jetzt erst recht? Keine sieben Monate nach der Ölpest im Golf gerät die Debatte um das Risiko
Tiefseebohrungen wieder ins Hintertreffen. Grund genug für vier Greenpeace-Aktivisten, mit einer
Kletteraktion an die Gefahr zu erinnern, die die weltweite Gier nach Öl mit sich bringt: Etwa 100
Kilometer von der mexikanischen Küste entfernt haben sie die Plattform Centenario erklettert und ein
Banner entrollt: „Stoppt Tiefseebohrungen!“.

Weitere Nachrichten

20.11.2010 Die Regenbogenkrieger von Waiheke Island Über uns andere Greenpeace-
19.11.2010 Rote Karte für die Grünen in der Gorleben-Frage Atomkraft Websites

19.11.2010 Rettet den König der Meere! Meere Mitmach-Community


GreenAction
18.11.2010 Wird Deutscher Atommüll in russisches Erdreich gepumpt? Atomkraft
Greenpeace
18.11.2010 Aigner boykottiert Reform von EU-Agrarsubventionen Landwirtschaft Magazin/Shop

Alle Nachrichten auf www.greenpeace.de Greenpeace Energy


Umweltstiftung
Greenpeace

Greenpeace auf Flickr Tierpark Arche Warder


Greenpeace International

Mobile Apps:

Greenpeace auf Youtube

zum Anfang Seite weiterempfehlen drucken

Förderer-Service Spenden Greenpeace International


RSS-Feeds Übersicht Glossar Hilfe Suche
Kontakt Datenschutz Impressum Copyright
http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/ Go OCT DEC JAN ! ⍰❎
12,713 captures 02 f%
30 Oct 2000 - 18 Mar 2022 2009 2010 2011 ▾ About this capture

Media/Blogger Center Reports


Greenpeace USA
search

Home Take action Donate What we do News and Blogs Multimedia About Us Shop

The latest updates Home


Take action
News Images Videos Reports Media releases

Donate
any category
What we do
Broken Umbrella in Cancun News and Blogs
Blog by Kyle Ash | December 1, 2010
Multimedia
This blog was co-authored by Virginie Lambert-Ferry from Greenpeace Canada. In Cancun a
dominant theme seems to be cautious flexibility. True, signaling flexibility shows a good faith effort About Us
toward achieving agreement. Even... Read more >
Shop
Share 6 retweet

BP Delays Dangerous Liberty Project in Alaska’s Arctic


Ocean
Blog by Melanie Duchin | December 1, 2010 1 comment

On November 30, BP announced it was once again delaying drilling at its controversial
“Liberty” project on Alaska’s north coast. This is great news for the fragile Arctic
Ocean ecosystem and the wildlife... Read more >
Enter your E-mail address
Share 36 retweet Like 501

First name US Zip

YOU Can Save Them Today


Blog by Melanie Duchin | November 30, 2010 1 comment

In September, the sea ice in the Arctic plummeted to its third lowest level in recorded
history, following an alarming trend of decreasing summer sea ice caused by global
warming. Polar bears can’t survive without their... Read more >
Follow us on...
Share 12 retweet

Greenpeace Online Shop Opens


Blog by Sebastian Jannelli | November 30, 2010
Just in time for the holidays, Greenpeace is launching a new online shop through
CafePress! A portion of the proceeds from your purchase of eco-friendly Greenpeace
gift items will support our critical work to stop global warming,... Read more >

Share 18 retweet 4
Like
people
Spygate Media Roundup
Blog by Michelle Frey | November 30, 2010
Yesterday, Greenpeace filed a lawsuit against two major chemical companies, their PR
firms and several individuals for activities that amount to corporate espionage. Here's a
comprehensive list of the media coverage the lawsuit... Read more >

Share 15 retweet Like 37

Greenpeace Sues Dow, Sasol, Dezenhall for


Corporate Spying, RICO
Blog by Phil Radford | November 29, 2010 5 comments

Today, Greenpeace filed a lawsuit against Dow Chemical , Sasol North


America (which owns CONDEA Vista), and PR firms Dezenhall Resources and
Ketchum , for hiring private investigators to steal documents from
Greenpeace, tap... Read more >

Share 33 retweet 75
Like
people Join the conversation

Almost a Home Run for the Climate


Blog by Amy Larkin | November 29, 2010 1 comment

Today, some of the world’s biggest companies collectively made a huge commitment that could be
some of the best news to come out of Cancun during the week of climate talks. The Consumer
Goods Forum (CGF) -- an industry... Read more >

Share 28 retweet Like 176

Historic Indonesian forest protection deal at risk from


industry
Blog by Laura K. | November 23, 2010
Image: Will Rose / Greenpeace Norway and Indonesia are about to make history. A 1
billion USD forest protection deal between these two countries could help set Indonesia
on a low-carbon development pathway and become a... Read more >

Share 13 retweet Like 14

Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 Next

1 - 8 of 1999 results.

PolluterWatch ExxonSecrets Stop Greenwash Investigations

Greenpeace online Stay up-to-date Take action Donate Learn more

Facebook E-mail newsletter Get involved Renew your Global warming


membership
Myspace RSS Feeds Jobs and internships Oceans
Flickr Greenpeace Forests
Greenpeace Fund Greenpeace
Organizing Term
Twitter worldwide Toxics
Make a tax-deductible
Greenpeace Student
YouTube donation Nuclear
Network
Gift and estate Sustainable
planning Agriculture

About us Media/ Blogger Dig Deeper


Center
History Research
Press contacts Where are the ships?
Victories Polluter Watch
Experts Loading...
Ships ExxonSecrets Map Sat Ter

Jobs and internships Whistleblower


Copyright

View Larger Map

©2010GREENPEACE
Privacy statement Contact us 702 H Street, NW, Suite 300, Washington, D.C. 20001 (202) 462-1177
http://www.greenpeace.de/ Go OCT NOV DEC ! ⍰❎
3,710 captures 02 f%
3 Dec 1998 - 18 Mar 2022 2016 2017 2018 ▾ About this capture

# KONTAKT $ NEWS ABO % SOCIAL-RADAR " RSS &

THEMEN KAMPAGNEN ÜBER UNS PRESSE FÖRDERINNEN MITMACHEN BLOG ' ! JETZT SPENDEN

Wurstspieß auf einem Teller

FLEISCHSIEGEL – WAS BEDEUTEN


SIE? FRAGEN SIE UNSEREN
CHATBOT!
» Weiterlesen

Versenden Sie eine Protestmail Der Greenpeace Newsletter

18.452 haben bereits mitgemacht. Die wichtigsten News im Abo

Vorname Nachname E-Mail

! JETZT MITMACHEN » ALLES ZUR KAMPAGNE ! ABONNIEREN

Nachrichten » ALLE NACHRICHTEN "

LANDWIRTSCHAFT 01.11.2017 LANDWIRTSCHAFT 28.10.2017 KOHLE 26.10.2017

SAUEREI IM SCHWEINESTALL LIDL EINE KLEBEN! BEIM KLIMASCHUTZ VERKOHLT


Greenpeace-Aktivisten verwandelten die CDU- Eine Frage der Etikette: Greenpeace-Aktivisten in Deutschlands Treibhausgasemissionen sind so
( Zentrale zeitweilig in einen Saustall. Sie fordern: 56 deutschen Städten kennzeichnen Billigfleisch hoch wie vor acht Jahren, so eine Greenpeace-
Schluss mit Massentierhaltung! Eine Umfrage von Lidl mit grellgelben Warnaufklebern – „Mit Studie. Aktivisten fordern darum in Berlin: raus
) belegt: Die Parteibasis unterstützt das. Tierleid“ oder „Mit Antibiotika“. aus der Kohle – so schnell es geht.
*

Märchenherbst: Der Kellerwald ist UNESCO-Welterbe – viele andere Wälder sind nicht geschützt. Wälder

Kellerwald in Hessen: alte Buche mit buntem Herbstlaub

( ) *

Zwei Jahre benutzen und dann auf den Müll? Smartphones und ihre Umweltfolgen

Die Folgen von 10 Jahre Smartphone


Share

Greenpeace Social Radar

Transparent, offen und ehrlich für


die Umwelt

© © GREENPEACE DATENSCHUTZ SITEMAP KONTAKT IMPRESSUM

GREENPEACE ENERGY UMWELTSTIFTUNG GREENPEACE GREENPEACE MAGAZIN/SHOP


http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/ Go SEP OCT DEC ! ⍰❎
12,713 captures 31 f%
30 Oct 2000 - 18 Mar 2022 2016 2017 2018 ▾ About this capture

! " # $ Global & Donate


Close X

About Research
What We're Doing
Protecting Forests
Connect
Volunteer Stories & Victories Blog Search %
News & Media Contact
How It Works
arming Protecting
Take ActionOur Oceans
Get Involved
Promoting Sustainable Food
Internships
Give to Greenpeace

racy $25 Monthly & GIVE

Protect our communities,


coasts and climate: say NO to
seismic blasting!
take action

Greenpeace will never stop fighting for a


greener, healthier world for our oceans,
forests, food, climate, and democracy—no
matter what forces stand in our way.

30M
Number of supporters
worldwide

$0 55
Amount of money we've Number of countries in
accepted from corporations which we operate

Want to
We Need First Name* Last Name* volunteer or
join a local
Your Voice campaign?

Join Us!
Visit us at
Zip Code* Greenwire

Email* Mobile Phone*

Standard text messaging rates will apply. Greenpeace US may contact you by email or phone with campaign updates and other offers
of engagement. You can unsubscribe at any time.

sign up!

Protect our communities, Join us on the Arctic Power the resistance with a
coasts and climate. Say NO Sunrise to protect gift to Greenpeace.
to seismic blasting! communities, coasts, and
the climate!

take action donate


learn more

How It Works Investigate


We believe in the public’s right to know about
what’s happening to our planet. Our
investigations expose environmental crimes
and the people, companies and governments
that need to be held responsible.

Connect
Each one of us can make small changes in our lives,
but together we can change the world. Greenpeace
connects people from all over the globe. We bring
together diverse perspectives, and help
communities and individuals to come together.

Act
We have the courage to take action and stand up for our
beliefs. We work together to stop the destruction of the
environment using peaceful direct action and creative
communication. We don’t just identify problems, we create
solutions.

Stories & Victories view more stories

“ It is a reminder to America and to the world that an


unstoppable forces far beyond anything imaginable
are already in motion; their impact will be less
predictable and more difficult to control and
recover from. And it frightens me to wonder, is
there a way out of this mess?
Tina Solin, Greenpeace USA

Climate change and injustice made Hurricane Maria much worse. That’s why we
must stand with Puerto Rico for immediate and equitable relief efforts. Read more
...
! "

From the Environmentalist A place for breaking news and


commentary from Greenpeace
visit the blog

An Inside Look at the Our Power, Our Future: Puerto Stop It At Its Source: How We’re
Greenpeace Arctic Sunrise Rico’s Road to a #JustRecovery Going to Break Free From
#Instameet Ryan Schleeter Single-Use Plastics
Maïa Booker and Katie Camosy Ashley Thomas

check out
more photos
& videos

Want to learn more about Visit Greenpeace Fund , a nonprofit, 501(c)(3) charitable entity created
tax-deductible giving, donating to increase public awareness and understanding of environmental
stock and estate planning? issues through research, the media and educational programs.

702 H Street, NW, STE 300, Washington, D.C. 20001 | (202) 462-1177 take action donate

What We’re Doing How It Works Get Involved About News & Media Stories & Victories
Saving the Arctic Investigate Make a Donation Board Members Photos & Videos Research
Protecting Forests Connect Take Action Leadership News Releases Contact
Fighting Global Warming Act Volunteer Issue Experts Media Contacts
Protecting Our Oceans Frontline Jobs Publications
Living Toxic-Free Internship Opportunities Blog
! "
Promoting Sustainable Food
Defending Democracy
# $

Other Greenpeace USA Sites & Blogs


&
Copyright Privacy Policy
Suchen Presse Jobs Kontakt

Klimaschutz Biodiversität Frieden Spenden Engagieren Über uns Jetzt spenden

© GP Chemnitz; Mitja Braun / GP Ostfriesland; GP Weiden; GP Augsburg; GP Friedrichshafen; GP Tübingen; GP Lüneburg GP Eberswalde; Thomas Kuhn / GP SPO; GP
Erlangen; GP Jena; GP Böbl. Sindl.; GP Köln; Daniel Müller / Greenpeace

Am Sonntag, 6. März fanden in mehreren deutschen Städten Mahnwachen für den Frieden statt. Zusammen mit anderen setzten Greenpeace-Ehrenamtliche mit
hunderten Kerzen leuchten Zeichen gegen den völkerrechtswidrigen Krieg Russlands gegen die Ukraine.

#StopptdenKrieg-Demos in Hamburg und Berlin am


13. März

n Hamburg Hamburg
bei ihrer Rede auf der #StopptdenKrieg-Demo in Berlin 13.03.2022 10.000 Menschen demonstrieren für Frieden in der Ukraine am Hamburger Jungfernstieg. Aktivist:innen von Greenpeace in Hamburg demonstrieren gegen den Krieg in der Ukraine

© © Jan Zappner Bild 1 von 6 © Maria Feck / Greenpeace Bild 2 von 6 © Maria Feck / Greenpeace

Gegen russische Kohle- und Ölimporte


Der russische Präsident Wladimir Putin schockiert die Welt mit einen völkerrechtswidrigen Angri!skrieg in der Ukraine. Was
dabei schwer erträglich ist: Deutschland und die EU spülen über den Kauf von Öl, Kohle und Gas aus Russland tagtäglich rund
500 Millionen Euro in Putins Kriegskasse. Solange dieser Finanzstrom nicht versiegt, zeigen Sanktionen nicht die volle Wirkung.
Greenpeace fordert gemeinsam mit anderen Umweltverbänden in einem o!enen Brief, den Import fossiler Brennsto!e aus
Russland zu stoppen.

Zugleich hat Greenpeace unter dem Titel „Kein Öl für Krieg“ einen 10-Punkte-Plan verö!entlicht, der zeigt, dass Maßnahmen
wie ein Tempolimit oder einem beschleunigten Einbau von Wärmepumpen dafür sorgen können, dass Deutschland kurzfristig
weniger russisches Öl braucht. Ein Drittel der russischen Importe ließen sich sofort einsparen.

PETITION
https://act.greenpeace.de/kein-geld-fuer-putins-krieg

Kein Geld für Putins Krieg 98,2%


vom Ziel erreicht
Wie können wir den Menschen in der Ukraine helfen? Indem wir aufhören, Putins Krieg
mit dem Import von Öl, Gas und Kohle zu finanzieren. Fordern Sie mit uns von der
Bundesregierung einen Importstopp für Öl, Gas und Kohle aus Russland! 19635
haben mitgemacht

Hier unterschreiben

Ukraine-Krieg: Den
Kein Öl für Krieg Für einen Importstopp Menschen helfen
HINTERGRUND 09.03.2022 15.03.2022 ÜBERBLICK 03.03.2022

EU muss Importe von Öl, Gas und Kohle aus Greenpeace-Aktive demonstrierten im Die Hilfsbereitschaft gegenüber geflüchteten
Russland stoppen. Greenpeace-Report zeigt: Hamburger und im Bremer Hafen sowie im Menschen aus der Ukraine ist groß, allerdings
Sofortmaßnahmen können deutsche Ölimporte brandenburgischen Schwedt gegen russische auch die Verunsicherung: Wie helfe ich
aus Russland kurzfristig um ein Drittel senken. Öl- und Kohleimporte – für den Frieden, gegen sinnvoll? Wir haben einige Informationen
Milliardengeschäfte mit Russland. zusammengetragen.
mehr erfahren
mehr erfahren mehr erfahren

Atomkraftwerke in der Ukraine


In Tschernobyl war vorübergehend die Stromversorgung unterbrochen, das Atomkraftwerk Juschnoukrainsk scheint vor der
Übernahme durch die russische Armee zu stehen, und das AKW Saporischschja ist nach beängstigenden Kämpfen seit dem 4.
März in der Hand der russischen Streitkräfte.

Raketeneinschläge und Atomkraftwerke – diese Kombination macht nervös, die Internationale Energieagentur IAEA ebenso wie
viele Menschen auf der ganzen Welt. Inmitten des furchtbaren Angri!skrieges auf die Ukraine stellen die Atomreaktoren des
Landes eine weitere massive Bedrohung für das Land selbst, aber auch für Europa dar.

Greenpeace-Experten in Deutschland und weltweit haben die Entwicklungen in Blick. Hier finden Sie schnell aktuelle
Einschätzungen zu der Lage der 15 Atomreaktoren der Ukraine.

Ukraine-Krieg: bedrohliche
Lage für dortige
Atomkraftwerke
HINTERGRUND 14.03.2022

Inmitten des Angri!skrieges auf die Ukraine stellen


die 15 Atomreaktoren des Landes eine weitere
massive Bedrohung dar, für das Land und für den Rest
Europas.

mehr erfahren

Aktiv werden!

Schüler:innen für den


Lessons for Peace Frieden Fördermitglied werden
NACHRICHT 02.03.2022 Greenpeace sammelt Peace-Zeichen aus Dank der großen Gemeinschaft von
Handabdrücken. Jede Schule kann mitmachen. Fördermitgliedern kann sich Greenpeace
Greenpeace und der Public Climate School
Aus den eingeschickten Bildern wird eine große langfristig und wirkungsvoll für den
bieten Live-Unterricht zu Krieg und Frieden an.
Friedentaube gebaut, die an einem Umweltschutz und Frieden einsetzen.
Drei mal 45 Minuten können Schüler:innen mit
Heißluftballon in den Himmel steigt.
Expert:innen über brennende Fragen zur Jetzt Fördermitglied werden
Ukraine reden. Infos zu "Act for Peace"

mehr erfahren

Greenpeace aktuell

Klima und Arten


brauchen ein EU-Gesetz
Der Weg zum globalen Ressourcensparen am für weltweiten
Plastik-Vertrag Weltrecyclingtag Waldschutz
HINTERGRUND 18.03.2022 18.03.2022 NACHRICHT 17.03.2022

Die Umweltversammlung der Vereinten Macht es einen Unterschied, ob ich ein Ein starkes EU-Gesetz für weltweiten
Nationen hat o"ziell den Weg für ein globales Mobiltelefon ein Jahr länger nutze? Ja: Waldschutz ist dringend nötig, um gegen die
Plastikabkommen geebnet. Konsequent Ressourcensparen schützt die Umwelt – und Wald- und Naturzerstörung sowie die
umgesetzt könnte es die weltweite Plastikflut macht uns unabhängiger von Autokratien. Verletzung von Menschenrechten
stoppen. anzukämpfen.
mehr erfahren
mehr erfahren mehr erfahren

Im Fokus

Interview zum Krieg in Was bewirkt eine


der Ukraine Wärmewende Atombombe?
IM GESPRÄCH 03.03.2022 HINTERGRUND 23.02.2022 KURZ UND KNAPP 18.03.2022

Russlands Angri! hat Europa schockiert. Im Auch Gebäudewärme muss schnell Der Ukrainekrieg macht auch Angst vor
Interview spricht Greenpeace-Chef Martin klimaneutral erzeugt werden, wollen wir die Atombomben. Doch in welchem Radius würde
Kaiser über den Frieden, Hilfe für Geflüchtete, Klimaziele scha!en und unabhängig vom ein Atombombenabwurf über der Ukraine
atomare Bedrohung und nukleare Teilhabe. Import fossiler Energien werden. Eine welche Zerstörung anrichten? Kleine Übersicht
Wärmewende muss her, und Greenpeace sagt, über häufig gestellte Fragen.
mehr erfahren wie.
mehr erfahren
mehr erfahren

IPCC-Bericht zur Klimakrise


„Starkregen und Dürren nehmen in vielen Regionen zu, der Anstieg des Meeresspiegels beschleunigt sich, Ökosysteme drohen zu
kippen. Diese Entwicklungen verlaufen schneller, als es die Klimawissenschaft bislang erwartet hat“, kommentiert Karsten Smid,
Klimaexperte von Greenpeace, den diesjährigen Bericht des Weltklimarats.

„Der Bericht des Weltklimarats liefert handfeste ökologische Gründe für einen entschlossenen Ausbau der erneuerbaren
Energien, die dramatischen Ereignisse in der Ukraine nachdrückliche politische. Fest steht: Eine sichere Zukunft für alle gibt es
nur mit einem entschlossenen Umstieg von Kohle, Öl und Gas auf saubere Energien aus Sonne und Wind.“

Gemeinsam für Klimagerechtigkeit


Der neue IPCC-Bericht zu den Folgen der Klimakrise ist alarmierend: Fluten, Dürren,
Schmelzen der Polkappen - es ist höchste Zeit zu handeln! Wir kämpfen dafür, die
Auswirkungen der Klimakrise weltweit möglichst gering zu halten. Greenpeace wird
zu 100% von Privatpersonen finanziert. Bitte unterstützen Sie uns mit Ihrer
regelmäßigen Spende.

Ich unterstütze Greenpeace e.V. *

Monatlich Einmalig

mit einem Betrag von


Oder Betrag eintippen:

10€ 15€ 40€ Ihr Betrag

Jetzt spenden

Unsere Erfolge – eine Auswahl

rmärkte planen Umstieg auf bessere


ngsformen Warenvernichtung ist verboten Gorleben ist Geschichte
standen Greenpeace-Aktive vor Edeka-Filialen. Sie informierten Passant:innen über Fleisch aus Händler wie Amazon dürfen nicht länger neuwertige Ware vernichten, auf Druck von Greenpeace wurde das Ein Wunder ist geschehen: Am 28. September 2020 verkündete die Endlagersuchkommission; Das En
driger Haltung und forderten Edeka auf, kein Billigfleisch mehr zu verkaufen. Nun tut sich was: Kreislaufwirtschaftsgesetz dahingehend verändert. Gorleben ist vom Tisch. Weil der Salzstock kein sicherer Platz für Atommüll ist.
e erklärten, langfristig kein Frischfleisch der schlechtesten Haltungsformen mehr zu verkaufen.
Bild 1 von 4 © Daniel Müller Bild 2 von 4 © Bente Stachowske
© Insa Hagemann

Jetzt teilen:

Newsletter
Erhalten Sie Infos über aktuelle Kampagnen und
Aktionen von unseren Expert:innen

Jetzt abonnieren Spendenkonto


IBAN DE49 4306 0967 0000 0334 01 Bitte geben Sie - bei Überweisungen - Ihre vollständige Anschrift
an, so dass wir Ihnen eine Spendenbescheinigung zusenden
BIC/Swift-Code GENODEM1GLS
können.
GLS Gemeinschaftsbank eG

– Oder spenden Sie direkt online

! " # $ %
TV-Spots
Sitemap Datenschutzeinstellungen anpassen Datenschutz Impressum Folge uns:

gesehen? © GREENPEACE Umweltstiftung Greenpeace Greenpeace Magazin / Shop


Take Action Issues About ! " # $ Donate Sign Up

Give to Greenpeace
Stories & Victories Research Contact
% Search
$25 Monthly ( GIVE News & Media Blog Volunteer

President Biden:
Stop oil-fueled wars
with peaceful
renewable energy

Add Your Name

Take Action

Tell Pres. Biden to President Biden Support the Global President Biden:
Assist Ukraine by must declare a Ocean Treaty! Support a bold,
Accelerating the Climate Emergency! binding Global
Renewable Energy Plastic Treaty!
Transition

add your name add your name add your name Send Message

Let's Change The World Latest News


Recent press releases and commentary
How we are building on your acts of courage

U.S. Bans Russian Oil Imports &

Global plastics treaty: big, bold step to


end plastic pollution &

Greenpeace USA Names Labor and


Human Rights Leader Tefere Gebre as
Chief Program Officer &

READ MORE
Impossible Journey The Ends of the Earth

Research & Reports


Expert analysis and investigations

2021 Tuna Retailer Scorecard: The High


Cost of Cheap Tuna &

The Climate Emergency Unpacked: How


Consumer Goods Companies are Fueling
What President Biden Can How Tefere Gebre Is Leading
Big Oil’s Plastic Expansion &
Do Today to Cool the Fires of Greenpeace USA’s Evolution
War for Workers Rights and Greenpeace Report: Fossil Fuel Racism &
Climate Justice
READ MORE

READ MORE

Help power our work


In order to stay independent and do the important work we do, Greenpeace never takes any
money from corporations or government. We rely entirely on support from members like you!

$30 $80 $100 $250 $500

Make it Monthly

Pay with Card Pay with Bank Account

Our Work
We've been campaigning for a green
and peaceful future for 50 years —
and we're not stopping now. It's time
to rise up like never before and fight Climate Change Impacts Environmental Justice
for our climate and communities.

view our work

Freedom to Vote Fighting Plastic Pollution

Environmental Justice
Blog
How Environmental Justice Can
Unlock Black Health and Wellness
Tanya Brooks | February 25, 2022

Black and Brown people have been involved in every struggle and
pivotal moment in American history, even when we did not have
full equality before the...

Blog
3 Ways We’re Fighting for Climate
Justice this Black History Month (and
Every Month)
Ebony Twilley Martin | February 18, 2022

We will never create the green and peaceful future we all want if
racist systems continue to divide and exploit us. The powerful use
that division to ...

Blog
Farmworkers, Community Organizers,
and Latinx power: How Communities
are Fighting Against the Climate Crisis
in California
Valentina Stackl | January 11, 2022

Right now, millions of people in California are living with toxic oil
and gas drilling in their neighborhoods. Watch our new episode
of Planeta G to l...

Photos from Greenpeace

First Name* Last Name*


We Need
Your Voice. Zip Code*

Join Us!
Email* Mobile Phone*

Standard text messaging rates will apply. Greenpeace US may contact you by email or phone with campaign updates and
other offers of engagement. You can unsubscribe at any time.

sign up!

Greenpeace US may contact you by email or phone with campaign updates and
other offers of engagement. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our privacy
policy.

Want to learn more about Visit Greenpeace Fund , a nonprofit, 501(c)(3) charitable entity
tax-deductible giving, created to increase public awareness and understanding of
donating stock and estate environmental issues through research, the media and educational
planning? programs.

702 H Street, NW, STE 300, Washington, D.C. 20001 | 1-800-722-6995 Take action Donate

What We’re Doing How It Works Get Involved About News & Media Stories & Victories
Fighting Climate Chaos Investigate Make a Donation Board Members Photos & Videos Research
Protecting The Oceans Connect Take Action Leadership News Releases Contact
Environmental Justice Act Volunteer Issue Experts Media Contacts
Fighting Plastic Pollution Careers Blog
Defending Democracy Internship Opportunities
! "
Protecting Forests

' $

Other Greenpeace USA Sites & Blogs


(
Copyright Privacy Policy
Suchen Presse Jobs Kontakt

Klimaschutz Biodiversität Frieden Spenden Engagieren Über uns Jetzt spenden

Startseite Über uns

Greenpeace stellt sich


vor
Volle Kraft voraus für die Umwelt

Greenpeace setzt sich weltweit für den Schutz


der natürlichen Lebensgrundlagen von Mensch
und Natur und Gerechtigkeit für alle Lebewesen
ein.

© Will Rose / Greenpeace

Greenpeace wurde 1971 gegründet und ist mit nationalen und regionalen Büros in über 55 Ländern vertreten. Mehr als drei
Millionen Menschen unterstützen uns weltweit, davon mehr als 630.000 Fördermitglieder in Deutschland.

Die Greenpeace Büros setzen sich international mit direkten gewaltfreien Aktionen für den Schutz der natürlichen
Lebensgrundlagen von Mensch und Natur und Gerechtigkeit für alle Lebewesen ein.

Greenpeace klärt auf, recherchiert und konfrontiert. Die Organisation vertritt dabei die Interessen der Natur und der
umweltbewussten Menschen in Politik und Gesellschaft. Dabei geht sie Probleme hartnäckig an - auch gegen Widerstände und
über längere Zeiträume. Greenpeace lebt das Recht auf freie Meinungsäußerung, inklusive dem Recht auf
Demonstrationsfreiheit, und sucht dabei auch die ö!entliche Auseinandersetzung mit Politiker:innen, Konzernbetreiber:innen
oder Umweltzerstörer:innen. Durch das Ö!entlichmachen der Probleme wächst der Druck auf die Verantwortlichen in Politik und
Wirtschaft umzudenken und zu handeln.

Was Greenpeace einzigartig macht


Greenpeace steht für Unbestechlichkeit - weder Geld noch politischer Druck können die Organisation beeinflussen. Denn
Greenpeace lässt sich nicht sponsern: Wir arbeiten unabhängig von Regierungen, Parteien und wirtschaftlichen
Interessengruppen. Greenpeace lässt sich auch keine Projekte von der EU oder der UNO finanzieren. Das unterscheidet uns ganz
wesentlich von vielen anderen, die sich für Geld von Industrie oder Politik abhängig machen. Greenpeace legt sich auch mit den
größten Konzernen an - wer traut sich das heute noch?

In Zeiten zunehmender Globalisierung ist Internationalität unverzichtbar - und eine besondere Stärke von Greenpeace. Die
Organisation ist mittlerweile in 26 Ländern vertreten und in mehr als 55 Ländern aktiv. Die dafür notwendige finanzielle
Unabhängigkeit und politische Durchschlagskraft gewährleisten weltweit mehr als drei Millionen Unterstützer. Allein in
Deutschland sind es heute über 630.000 Menschen, die als Fördermitglieder regelmäßig an Greenpeace spenden.

Gewaltfreie Aktionen gegen


Umweltverbrechen
Um Probleme aufzuzeigen, auf Missstände aufmerksam zu machen und positive Veränderungen einzufordern und
herbeizuführen ist für Greenpeace die gewaltfreie direkte Aktion neben anderen Formen der Ö!entlichkeitsarbeit ein wichtiges
Mittel. Greenpeace konfrontiert mit gewaltfreien Aktionen diejenigen, die Umweltschäden verursachen oder zu verantworten
haben - wenn möglich am Ort des Umweltverbrechens. Der provozierende, kämpferische und wenn nötig konfrontative
Charakter, das kompromisslose, mutige aber stets gewaltfreie Vorgehen unter vollem persönlichen Einsatz und Risiko ist das
Ungewöhnliche an Greenpeace.

Aufdecken, Lösungen entwickeln,


verändern
Greenpeace bringt nicht nur Umweltskandale ans Licht der Ö!entlichkeit, sondern benennt Alternativen und entwickelt
Lösungen. So beweist die Organisation immer wieder, dass es anders geht - oftmals sehr zum Ärger der Industrie. Zwei von
vielen Beispielen:

1993 zeigt der „Greenfreeze“, dass sich Kühlschränke FCKW- und FKW-frei und somit ozon- und Klima schonend herstellen
lassen.
1996 präsentiert Greenpeace das Sprit-Sparauto „SmILE“, einen umgebauten serientauglichen Renault Twingo, mit einem
Verbrauch von unter drei Litern auf 100 Kilometer.

Greenpeace fördert die Weiterentwicklung der Gesellschaft weit über die Umweltproblematik hinaus. Die Organisation ist dabei
manchmal auch frech, aber doch ungemein nützlich. Immer wieder gibt es dafür anerkennendes Lob von namhafter Stelle,
beispielsweise der UNO, Weltbank oder Regierungen und Behörden. Und zu Recht steht Greenpeace nicht nur im Dienst der
Gemeinnützigkeit, sondern bekommt diese auch von staatlicher Seite anerkannt.

Sorgfältige Recherche und


Bewusstseinswandel
Die Basis der Greenpeace-Arbeit ist sorgfältige Recherche. So können Probleme - aber auch die Lösungen dafür - frühzeitig
aufgezeigt werden, damit sie rechtzeitig beachtet und bewältigt werden können. Greenpeace leistet deshalb auch eine
umfassende Aufklärungsarbeit im parlamentarischen Bereich und setzt sich kritisch mit dem Einfluss von Lobbygruppen auf die
Politik auseinander. Wichtiger Ort dafür ist die politische Vertretung von Greenpeace in Berlin.

Die Organisation inspiriert so auf vielen Ebenen der Gesellschaft zu mehr Verantwortung für den Planeten und treibt den
Bewusstseinswandel voran. Kooperationen mit Dritten sind dabei möglich, sofern dies tatsächlich hilft. Die Unabhängigkeit von
Greenpeace darf dadurch aber nicht berührt werden.

Rechte unserer Umwelt verteidigen


Für Natur und Umwelt gibt es nach wie vor keinen ausreichenden Rechtsschutz. Landschaftsverbrauch, nachhaltige
Umweltbelastungen und kurzfristige Wirtschaftsinteressen haben häufig noch Vorrang. Wo zum Schutz der hochrangigen
Rechtsgüter Menschenrechte und Umweltschutz kein e!ektiver Rechtsschutz zur Verfügung steht, dürfen diese Rechte
unmittelbar verteidigt werden. Für Greenpeace ist es Pflicht, fundamentale Lebensrechte und damit die Lebensgrundlagen auch
nachfolgender Generationen zu verteidigen und dabei notfalls in Konflikt mit bestehenden, untergeordneten Rechtsnormen zu
geraten. Greenpeace-Aktivisten sind deshalb nach sorgfältiger Abwägung bereit zu zivilem Ungehorsam.

Greenpeace nimmt die in o!enen demokratischen Gesellschaften anerkannten Konfliktrechte wahr, um Konflikte gegen
Regierungen und Unternehmen ö!entlich auszutragen. Die Organisation trägt durch dieses Vorgehen nicht unwesentlich zur
sogenannten Rechtsfortbildung, also zu positiven Veränderungen beim rechtlichen Schutz der Umwelt bei. Was Greenpeace
einst anprangerte, wird heute von Behörden als gesetzeswidrig verfolgt - etwa die Giftmüllentsorgung in Entwicklungsländer, die
Verwendung von hormonschädigenden Schi!sanstrichen und die Nicht-Kennzeichnung von Gen-Lebensmitteln.

40 Jahre Greenpeace
03.09.2020

16 | DIN A4

3.57 MB

Herunterladen

Greenpeace - ungemein nützlich


Einsatz und Verantwortung für Umwelt und Gesellschaft
21.12.2021

8 | Lang

326.67 KB

Herunterladen

Greenpeace: Fragen & Einfache Sprache: Über Signal für eine andere
Antworten uns Klimaaußenpolitik
KURZ UND KNAPP 01.06.2020 HINTERGRUND 09.02.2022 MEINUNG 09.02.2022

Wie arbeitet Greenpeace? Wie finanziert die Greenpeace ist eine sehr große Organisation. Jennifer Morgan, wird bei Annalena Baerbock
Organisation ihr Engagement für den Wir sind sehr viele Menschen aus der ganzen Sonderbeauftragte für Klimaaußenpolitik und
Umweltschutz? Wie kann man selbst aktiv Welt, die im Umwelt-Schutz helfen. Wir hat dafür ihr Amt als internationale
werden? Die wichtigsten Fragen und Antworten kämpfen aktiv und ohne Gewalt. Greenpeace-Geschäftsführerin niedergelegt.
im Überblick.
mehr erfahren mehr erfahren
mehr erfahren

Jetzt teilen:

Newsletter
Erhalten Sie Infos über aktuelle Kampagnen und
Aktionen von unseren Expert:innen

Jetzt abonnieren Spendenkonto


IBAN DE49 4306 0967 0000 0334 01 Bitte geben Sie - bei Überweisungen - Ihre vollständige Anschrift
an, so dass wir Ihnen eine Spendenbescheinigung zusenden
BIC/Swift-Code GENODEM1GLS
können.
GLS Gemeinschaftsbank eG

– Oder spenden Sie direkt online

Sitemap Datenschutzeinstellungen anpassen Datenschutz Impressum Folge uns: ! " # $ %

© GREENPEACE Umweltstiftung Greenpeace Greenpeace Magazin / Shop


Take Action Issues About ! " $ % Donate Sign Up

Give to Greenpeace
Stories & Victories Research Contact
& Search
$25 Monthly ( GIVE News & Media Blog Volunteer

What We’re About


Doing

! " #
How It Works

Greenpeace is a global network of independent campaigning organizations that use


Get Involved
peaceful protest and creative communication to expose global environmental
problems and promote solutions that are essential to a green and peaceful future.

We. Are. Greenpeace.

Today, as we celebrate over 50 years of action, Greenpeace USA is committed to rebuilding the
country’s unjust social, environmental, and economic systems from the ground up to address the
climate crisis, advance racial justice, and build an economy that puts people first.

Our Work

Our fight to save the planet and its people has grown more serious— devastating impacts of climate
change; an extractivist, racist, and inequitable economy; destruction of ancient forests; and the
deterioration of our oceans continue to loom large. In many ways, we’re in the fight of our lives. The
inequitable system laid bare by Covid-19 is the same one that landed us in a climate and extinction
crisis. Going back to normal is not an option. Greepeacers across the country and globe are fighting for
our climate and our communities. Learn more about our active campaigns and issue areas.

50 Years of Greenpeace

In 1971, a handful of determined activists leased a small fishing vessel, called the Phyllis Cormack, and
set sail from Vancouver for Amchitka Island in Alaska. Their mission was to protest U.S. nuclear testing
off the coast of Alaska with a brave act of defiance: to place themselves in harm’s way. Despite being
intercepted by the U.S. Coast Guard, these daring activists sailed into history by bringing worldwide
attention to the dangers of nuclear testing. These brave activists and those who supported them started
the movement that became the global network that Greenpeace is today.

Over the past 50 years, Greenpeace has indeed changed the world. Our committed activists and
supporters have come together to ban commercial whaling, convince the world’s leaders to stop
nuclear testing, protect Antarctica, and so much more.

We have grown from a small group of dedicated activists to an international organization with offices in
more than 50 countries. But our spirit and resolve remain the same:

We bear witness to environmental destruction in a peaceful, non-violent manner.


We use non-violent confrontation to raise the level and quality of public debate.
In exposing threats to the environment and finding solutions
solutions, we have no permanent allies or
adversaries.
We ensure our financial independence from political or commercial interests.

Our Commitment to Environmental Justice, Equity, Diversity,


and Inclusion

Greenpeace challenges the systems of power and privilege that destroy the environment and place
disproportionate burdens on the most marginalized communities. We know that building a greener and
more peaceful world for all requires a diverse, multicultural, people-powered force that centers the
most impacted and marginalized to ensure no one gets left behind. Environmental Justice requires that
we incorporate racial and socioeconomic justice into the way we fight for the protection of our planet
and challenges us to center the voices of those most impacted by environmental harm in the fight for
the protection of our planet.

We welcome, value, and rely on a diversity of people, cultural experiences, and perspectives. We learn
from one another. Through our campaigning, we create solutions that promote environmental
sustainability rooted in social justice.

Greenpeace USA Indigenous Peoples Policy


Greenpeace Endorses the Vision for Black Lives Platform

Our Volunteers

We work with thousands of volunteers across the country who power our campaigns and make wins
possible. Greenpeace volunteers take action in their own communities, organize locally, and host events
across the country. Whether you’ve been an activist for decades or you’re just starting and want to
learn how you can help, we have volunteer opportunities for you. Our volunteer platform outlines the
opportunities, time commitment, and steps you can take today to get involved — from joining our text
team to starting a Greenpeace Action Pod. Start your volunteer journey with Greenpeace today!

Our Funding

Greenpeace does not solicit contributions from government or corporations, nor will we endorse
political candidates. Over 3 million Greenpeacers like you provide virtually all of our funding through
individual contributions. Your support provides the backbone of our organization and is invaluable to
our efforts.

make a donation

Learn More

Board Members Leadership

Issue Experts Annual Reports


& Financial
Statements

Ships,
Inflatables &
Vehicles

Take Action

Tell Biden: Ban New Oil and Tell AT&T to stop funding
Gas Permits racist voter suppression

sign the petition add your name

We Need First Name* Last Name*

Your Voice.
Join Us! Zip Code*

Email* Mobile Phone*

By submitting your mobile number, you are agreeing to receive periodic text messages from Greenpeace. Reply "STOP" to
unsubscribe at any time or HELP for info. Message & data rates may apply. Privacy Policy

sign up!

Greenpeace US may contact you by email or phone with campaign updates and
other offers of engagement. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our privacy
policy.

Want to learn more about Visit Greenpeace Fund , a nonprofit, 501(c)(3) charitable entity
tax-deductible giving, created to increase public awareness and understanding of
donating stock and estate environmental issues through research, the media and educational
planning? programs.

702 H Street, NW, STE 300, Washington, D.C. 20001 | 1-800-722-6995 Take action Donate

What We’re Doing How It Works Get Involved About News & Media Stories & Victories
Fighting Climate Chaos Investigate Make a Donation Board Members Photos & Videos Research
Protecting The Oceans Connect Take Action Leadership News Releases Contact
Environmental Justice Act Volunteer Issue Experts Media Contacts
Fighting Plastic Pollution Careers Blog
Defending Democracy Internship Opportunities
! "
Protecting Forests

' %

Other Greenpeace USA Sites & Blogs


(
Copyright Privacy Policy

You might also like