Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 56 views

    Rubric (Essay)

    Uploaded by

    Roxanne
    This document provides a rubric to evaluate essay responses. It evaluates essays on language usage and mechanics (Language score) and on content and ideas (Content score). For both, it provides descriptors to distinguish between scores from 1 to 7, with 7 being "Outstanding" and 1 being "Not achieved". Language is evaluated on elements like vocabulary, sentence structure, tone, and errors. Content is evaluated on elements like interpretation, ideas, details, and critical awareness. Scores are converted to a scale of 20 by dividing the raw score by 2.5.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Rubric (Essay)

    Uploaded by

    Roxanne
    56 views1 page
    This document provides a rubric to evaluate essay responses. It evaluates essays on language usage and mechanics (Language score) and on content and ideas (Content score). For both, it provides descriptors to distinguish between scores from 1 to 7, with 7 being "Outstanding" and 1 being "Not achieved". Language is evaluated on elements like vocabulary, sentence structure, tone, and errors. Content is evaluated on elements like interpretation, ideas, details, and critical awareness. Scores are converted to a scale of 20 by dividing the raw score by 2.5.

    Original Description:

    english rubric

    Original Title

    Rubric (essay)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides a rubric to evaluate essay responses. It evaluates essays on language usage and mechanics (Language score) and on content and ideas (Content score). For both, it provides descriptors to distinguish between scores from 1 to 7, with 7 being "Outstanding" and 1 being "Not achieved". Language is evaluated on elements like vocabulary, sentence structure, tone, and errors. Content is evaluated on elements like interpretation, ideas, details, and critical awareness. Scores are converted to a scale of 20 by dividing the raw score by 2.5.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    56 views1 page

    Rubric (Essay)

    Uploaded by

    Roxanne
    This document provides a rubric to evaluate essay responses. It evaluates essays on language usage and mechanics (Language score) and on content and ideas (Content score). For both, it provides descriptors to distinguish between scores from 1 to 7, with 7 being "Outstanding" and 1 being "Not achieved". Language is evaluated on elements like vocabulary, sentence structure, tone, and errors. Content is evaluated on elements like interpretation, ideas, details, and critical awareness. Scores are converted to a scale of 20 by dividing the raw score by 2.5.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Essay (50)

    Outstanding Meritorious Substantial Adequate Moderate Elementary Not achieved


    LANGUAGE 7 LANGUAGE 6 LANGUAGE 5 LANGUAGE 4 LANGUAGE 3 LANGUAGE 2 LANGUAGE 1
    *Language, punctuation *Language, punctuation *Language, punctuation *Language, simplistic, *Language, ordinary and *Language and punctuation *Language and punctuation
    effectively used. Uses figurative correct, and able to use mostly correct. punctuation adequate. punctuation often flawed. seriously flawed.
    language appropriately. figurative language correctly. *Choice of words suited *Choice of words inaccurately used. *Choice of words limited. *Choice of words
    *Choice of words highly *Choice of words varied and to text. adequate. *Choice of words basic. *Sentences, paragraphs inappropriate.
    appropriate. correctly used. *Sentences, paragraphs *Sentences, paragraphs *Sentences, paragraphs constructed at an elementary *Sentences, paragraphs
    *Sentences, paragraphs coherently *Sentences, paragraphs well constructed. might be faulty in places, faulty, but ideas can be level. muddled, inconsistent.
    constructed. logical, varied. *Style, tone, register but essay still makes sense. understood. *Style, tone, and register *Style, tone, and register
    *Style, tone, register highly suited *Style, tone, register suited to topic in most *Style, tone, register *Style, tone, and register inappropriate. flawed in all aspects.
    to topic. appropriately suited to topic. of the essay. generally consistent with lacking in coherence. *Text error-ridden despite *Text error-ridden and
    *Text virtually error-free *Text largely error-free *Text largely error-free topic requirements. *Text contains several errors proofreading, editing. confused following
    following proofreading, editing. following proofreading, following proofreading, *Text largely error-free following proofreading, *Length too long/short. proofreading, editing.
    *Length in accordance with editing. editing. following proofreading, editing. *Length far too long/short.
    requirements of topic. *Length correct. *Length correct. editing. *Length too long/short.
    *Length correct.
    CONTENT 7 CONTENT 6 CONTENT 5 CONTENT 4 CONTENT 3 CONTENT 2 CONTENT 1
    *Content shows a sound *Content: an adequate
    *Content shows impressive *Content shows thorough *Content: ordinary. Gaps in
    interpretation of topic. interpretation of topic. *Content: not always clear, lacks
    insight to the topic. interpretation of topic. coherence.
    *Ideas: interesting, *Ideas: ordinary, lacking coherence.
    *Ideas: thought-provoking, *Ideas: imaginative, *Ideas: mostly relevant.
    convincing. depth. *Ideas: few ideas, often *Content: irrelevant. No
    mature. interesting. Repetitive.
    *Several relevant details *Some points, necessary repetitive. coherence.
    *Coherent development of topic. *Logic development of *Some necessary points
    developed. details developed. *Sometimes off topic. General *Ideas: repetitive, off topic.
    Vivid detail. details. Coherent. evident.
    *Critical awareness of *Some awareness of line of thought difficult to *Non-existent
    *Critical awareness of impact of *Critical awareness of impact *Limited critical language
    language evident. impact of language. follow. planning/drafting.
    language. of language. awareness.
    *Evidence of planning *Evidence of planning *Inadequate evidence of *Essay poorly presented.
    Evidence of planning and/or *Evidence of planning and/or *Evidence of planning and/or
    and/or drafting has and/or drafting has planning and/or drafting. *Essay
    drafting has produced a virtually drafting has produced a well drafting has produced a
    produced a presentable produced a satisfactorily not well presented.
    flawless, presentable essay. crafted, presentable essay. moderately presentable essay.
    and very good essay. presented essay.

    RATING
    CODE Language 7 Language 6 Language 5 Language 4 Language 3 Language 2 Language 1
    Content 7 40 – 50 38 – 42 35 – 39 /50 ÷ 2.5
    Content 6 38 – 42 35 – 39 33 – 37 30 – 34 = /20
    Content 5 35 – 39 33 – 37 30 – 34 28 – 32 25 – 29
    Content 4 30 – 34 28 – 32 25 – 29 23 – 27 20 – 24
    Content 3 25 – 29 23 – 27 20 – 24 18 – 22 15 – 19
    Content 2 20 – 24 18 – 22 15 – 19 03 – 17
    Content 1 15 – 19 03 – 17 00 – 14

    You might also like