What Constitutes Insubordination SHRM
What Constitutes Insubordination SHRM
What Constitutes Insubordination SHRM
The order itself may take the form of a verbal directive, written
instructions, the duties as described in a job description and even an
implied set of duties where no formal job description exists. Employee
acknowledgments can be verbal, nonverbal (nodding) or even the
acceptance of a job offer. An employee's unwillingness to carry out a
directive can manifest itself as a verbal refusal, a nonverbal refusal
or an unreasonable delay in completing the work. Being verbally
disrespectful is not a requirement here, as simply refusing to punch a
time clock when directed to do so will constitute insubordination.
Employer policies prohibiting insubordination often go beyond
disobedience to include rude and disrespectful behaviors, best described
as insolence. These behaviors can include cursing, verbal or physical
intimidation, personal insults, eye rolling or mocking, as well as
speaking loudly or argumentatively in front of others. Over time,
insolent behaviors can also affect a manager's level of respect and ability
to manage, thereby enmeshing insolence and insubordination.
Employers can expect employees to show professionalism and respect
toward others and may discipline them when they don't.
There is one caveat: The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has
opined that Section 7 rights under the National Labor Relations Act
(NLRA) may be violated if an employer disciplines or terminates an
employee for cursing or other typically insolent behaviors while he or
she is engaged in a protected concerted activity. Therefore, employers
should protect themselves by seeking legal counsel before disciplining
in matters concerning the terms and conditions of employment.
In addition, when addressing insolent or insubordinate behavior, the
employer should consider the culture or circumstances in which an
incident took place. For example, if cursing is common "shop talk" in
the workplace, the employer would need to consider whether the
language used by the employee was unusual enough to be considered
abusive.
Lastly, a refusal to carry out an order may result from a
misunderstanding of instructions or a fear of unsafe work. In certain
circumstances, the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration protects workers who refuse to perform work if they
believe in good faith that performing the work would put employees in
imminent danger. An employee's refusal to do something that is illegal,
unethical or a violation of company policy would not be considered
insubordination.