DPR Anandanagar - 2
DPR Anandanagar - 2
DPR Anandanagar - 2
for
Anandanagar (Wd-59) Jalpara (Wd-59) and Garden Reach-I (Wd-138)
CONTENTS
Chapter 1 ................................................................................................. 3
INTEGRATED HOUSING AND SLUM DEVELOPMENT ........... 3
1.1 Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM) ...................... 3
1.2 Checklist for Preparation/Appraisal of DPR in Basic Services to The Urban
Poor (BSUP) Project ................................................................................................... 4
1.3 Technical Checklist ........................................................................................... 8
Chapter 2 .............................................................................................. 11
KOLKATA CITY– A BRIEF INTRODUCTION.............................. 12
2.1 Demographic Characteristics .......................................................................... 12
2.2 Economic Characteristics ............................................................................... 13
2.3 Water Supply .................................................................................................. 14
2.4 Solid Waste Management................................................................................ 16
2.5 Sewerage and Sanitation ................................................................................. 17
2.6 SLUMS IN KOLKATA ................................................................................. 19
2.6.1 Definition of a Slum ................................................................................ 19
2.6.2 Classification of Slums ............................................................................ 19
2.6.3 Slum Characteristics ................................................................................ 20
2.7 Kolkata Municipal Corporation .................................................................. 26
Chapter 3 .............................................................................................. 27
THE PROPOSED PROJECT AREA ................................................. 27
3.1 Project Area ................................................................................................... 27
3.2 Unique features .............................................................................................. 27
3.3 Criteria for identification of beneficiaries ........................................................ 27
3.4 Details of physical, socio-economic survey carried out ................................... 28
3.5 Convergence with other Govt. Programs i.e. NOAPS, NFBS, NMBS,
Annapurna, Antyodaya Anna Yojana ........................................................................ 28
3.6 Objectives ...................................................................................................... 28
Chapter 4 .............................................................................................. 30
THE PROPOSED PROJECT............................................................. 30
Integrated Housing and Slum Development of Rajarghat-Kacharipara-Hatgachia of
Ward 58 KMC .......................................................................................................... 30
4.1 Housing Infrastructure ................................................................................... 30
4.1.1 Objective ................................................................................................ 30
4.1.2 Identification of Beneficiaries .................................................................. 30
4.1.3 Town Planning Norms ............................................................................ 30
4.1.4 Involvement of Beneficiaries ................................................................... 31
4.1.5 Environment improvement and Open / Green Spaces ........................... 31
4.1.6 Scheme Proposed .................................................................................... 31
4.1.7 Cost estimate........................................................................................... 31
1
4.1.8 Outcome ................................................................................................. 32
4.2 Physical infrastructure .................................................................................... 32
4.2.1 Water Supply .......................................................................................... 32
Proposal .................................................................................................................. 32
4.2.2 Drainage & Sewerage ............................................................................. 32
Proposal .................................................................................................................. 32
Outcome .................................................................................................................. 33
4.2.3 Roads ..................................................................................................... 33
Proposal .................................................................................................................. 33
Outcome .................................................................................................................. 33
4.2.4 Street Light ............................................................................................ 34
Proposal .................................................................................................................. 34
Internal Electrical Works ........................................................................................... 35
Outcome .................................................................................................................. 35
4.2.5 Solid Waste Management ....................................................................... 35
Proposal .................................................................................................................. 35
Outcome .................................................................................................................. 35
4.2.6 Social Infrastructure ............................................................................... 35
Socio-Economic Condition ................................................................................... 35
Education ............................................................................................................. 36
Social Security ....................................................................................................... 36
4.3 Temporary Relocation .................................................................................... 36
Chapter 5 .............................................................................................. 37
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR PROJECT
IMPLEMENTATION ........................................................................ 37
5.1 Execution of the Scheme ................................................................................ 37
5.2 Operation & Maintenance .............................................................................. 37
Chapter 6 .............................................................................................. 38
MANAGEMENT OF THE PROJECT .............................................. 38
Chapter 7 .............................................................................................. 39
RESOURCE MOBILIZATIONS AND BUDGETARY
ALLOCATION .................................................................................... 39
Chapter 8 .............................................................................................. 40
MONITORING MECHANISM ......................................................... 40
Chapter 9 .............................................................................................. 43
REFORMS ........................................................................................... 43
9.1 Mandatory reform Undertaken at the ULB level ............................................. 43
Chapter 10 ............................................................................................. 52
TOTAL PROJECT COST AND PROJECT CONTRIBUTION ..... 52
Annexures .................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.
Socio Economic Survey of the Beneficiaries .............. Error! Bookmark not defined.
Abstract of Cost Estimate ......................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
Drawings................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
2
Chapter 1
INTEGRATED HOUSING AND SLUM
DEVELOPMENT
Access to good housing and basic amenities like safe drinking water, toilets and
sanitation, solid waste management and roads are some of the important factors to lead a
quality life. The poor in the slums may not poor with respect to income needed for
consuming the basic minimum calorie of 2400 kcal per day, but may be poor in term of
access to infrastructure. Several programmes have been going on to provide basic
amenities to the lsum dwellers, but most are individual initiatives addressing only one
sector rather than addressing them in an integrated way.
Under this Mission share of Central and State/ULB/Parastatal would be 50:50 including
12% of the beneficiary contributrion. Under this Mission housing shall be provided with
beneficiary contribution of 12% and in case of SC/St/OBC/PH it shall be 10%.
3
1.2 Checklist for Preparation/Appraisal of DPR in Basic Services to
The Urban Poor (BSUP) Project
1. Name of the State West Bengal
4
10. Whether elected Local Body is in place? Yes
11. Total urban population of the city 4,580,544
12. Total slum population of the city 1,490,811
13. Is the DPR in accordance with the CDP? Yes
14. Is DPR an integrated housing & infrastructure Yes
project?
[If not, proper justification]
15. Has the contribution from the beneficiaries been Beneficiry
collected? contribution
shall be
collected as
soon as the
project is
snanctioned.
16. Has the State share been deposited in a separate State share
account? shall be
deposited as
soon as the
project is
snanctioned.
17. Is the DPR for in situ development? Yes
18. Is the DPR for relocation? NA Temporary
relocation
of the
people is
not
envisaged
since the
houses shall
be
contstructed
in the
playground
located near
the slum
settlement.
Til the time
the houses
are
constructed
the
beneficiaries
shall reside
in their
respective
dwellings.
19. In case of relocation, whether all basic amenities NA
have been provided for in the new site in the DPR?
20. Is the new site in proximity to the original NA
site/work-place?
21. In case of in situ, whether provision for basic Yes
5
services has been provided for in the DPR ?
22. Housing Yes
e) Whether density of population norms has been
observed in the DPR with reference to city as
per the byelaws?
c) Whether plotted area, setbacks and coverage of
plot are as per byelaws?
d) Whether maximum FAR utilization has been
considered in the DPR to ensure efficient use of
land?
e) Whether the cost of the dwelling units and
infrastructure has been worked out in terms of
State’s schedule of rates?
f) Whether security of tenure/patta has been
provided to the beneficiaries, as per guidelines,
preferably women?
g) Whether the floor area of dwelling unit is equal
or more than 25 sq mtrs?
h) Whether each dwelling unit comprises two
rooms, kitchen and a toilet?
23. Infrastructure facilities Yes
Whether provisioning for the following has been
made in the DPR:
I. Water supply
II. Sewerage
III. Solid waste disposal
IV. Development of roads/paths/
footpaths/pavements
V. Storm water drains
VI. Street lighting
24. Community facilities Yes
Whether provisioning for the following has been
made in the DPR:
I. Community Centre
II. Community Primary Health Care Centre
III. Primary Education Centre
IV. Parks and open spaces
25. Whether there is provisioning for convergence of Yes
the Central and State Government schemes in the
following sectors in the DPR:-
I. Health
II. Education
III. Social security including accidental and
medical insuranc, old age pension, old age
homes, etc.
26. Whether cost of land has been included in the No
project cost where private land has been acquired?
[Applicable only to the State of J&K, Uttaranchal,
Himachal Pradesh and North Eastern States
including Sikkim]
27. Whether a separate provisioning for upkeep and Yes
6
maintenance of public assets to be created through
this project has been made by the State
Government/ULB/Parastatal?
[This provisioning will not be funded under the
Scheme]
28. Whether DPR is a PPP Project? No
29. Whether the area/beneficiaries covered under DPR No
had previously benefited in any Central/State
Government Scheme?
[If so, details thereof]
30. Is the DPR in accordance with the BSUP Yes
guidelines?
If not, indicate deviations and provide justifications.
31. Any other information relevant to the DPR
Name:
Designation:
Office Address:
7
1.3 Technical Checklist
1 Name of the State West Bengal
2 Name of the City KOLKATA
3 I) Nodal Agency KMDA
8
Density (DU/acre)
a) Anandanagar 157.02 (Revised)
11 i)
b) Jalpara 256.79
c) Garden Reach-I 281.93
ii) Whether proposed
density adheres to the
Yes
Master Plan of the area?
9
of water supply system
proposed?
10
If in the vicinity,
iv)
distance from the site
Methodology adopted
vi) Through beneficiary participation
for convergence
19.B Social Security
Details of social security Detailed mentioned in DPR Chapter
provisions available like "The Proposed Project "
I)
medical insurance,
pension schemes etc.
Expenditure involved,
ii)
itemwise
Methodology adopted
iii)
for convergence
Provision of other civic
19.C NIL
amenities (if any)
Details of Environmental
Detailed mentioned in DPR in Chapter
20 Impact Assessment (EIA)
Environmental Impact Assesment
done.
Methodology adopted for Detailed mentioned in DPR in
21.A maintenance of assets thus Chapter " Institutional Setup for
created. Implementation of the Project"
Mechanism for sustainable
21.B
management of services.
…………………………………………………………………………………
Signature of the State Level Nodal Officer
Name:
Designation:
Office Address:
Tel No./Fax No.:
11
Chapter 2
KOLKATA CITY– A BRIEF INTRODUCTION
As per 2001 census West Bengal has a urban population of 22.42 million of which 4.11
million or 18.35% are slum population. Of the total slum population within the State of
West Bengal, Kolkata accounts for 35.9% of the slum population. Thus more than one
fourth of the slum population is concentrated within Kolkata indicating the urgent need
to focus on the slums in Kolkata.
12
Table 3 - Growth of Population within KMC Wards, 2001
Growth Growth Rate in the Wards
Total Population
Year Rate in
(in lakhs) 1-100 101-141
KMC
1971 31.49 - - -
1981 33.05 10.73 4.96 -
1991 43.99 6.61 2.22 -
2001 45.81 4.11 1.34 23.89
Source: Census of India, 2001, Series 20, West Bengal
The total number of ‘main worker in the KMC registered an annual exponential growth
of around 0.5 per cent. The growth rate of main workers in Kolkata is significantly low
compared to that of West Bengal Urban area (1.04 per cent per annum).
The total marginal 1worker in Kolkata registered an abnormally high annual exponential
growth rate of 10.76 per cent during the next decade (male marginal workers and female
marginal workers grew at the rate 10.22 per cent per annum and 12.07 per cent per
annum respectively). In fact the rate of growth of marginal workers in Kolkata is even
greater than that West Bengal urban area estimated at 9.93 per cent per annum. Such a
high growth rate of marginal workers indicates marginalization of the employment opportunities. These
marginals workers are mainly engaged in unorganized sector activities like daily wage jobs, construction
jobs, small shops, vendors, housemaids, drivesr, guards etc and add to the growth of the slum population
within the city.
1
Defined as a person who has worked for less than 6 months, including even for a single day.
13
2.3 Water Supply
Kolkata water supply system is one of the oldest in the country with a perennial source
of surface water which is Hooghly. Table 7.3 gives zone-wise distribution of Boroughs
and the pumping stations.
In addition to the potable water supply, KMC has an arrangement for supplying raw
water of 80 MGD. This unfiltered water is supplied through street hydrants. The number
of such hydrants is 1000 as per KMC’s Annual Report 2005-06. The distribution network
of water supply of the city consists of individual pipeline connections and public access
system through Stand Posts at different nodal points. The number of domestic pipeline
connection was 2.50 lakh in year 2005-06 and the same for industrial and commercial
purposes in the same year was 24100. In 2005-06, the number of stand posts in the city
was recorded as 17019. According to the latest available information from KMC, total
supply of potable water is 296 MGD (against the capacity of 364 MGD). The difference
between the capacity and supply may be explained in terms of ‘unaccounted for water’
(willful and un-willful loss of water). The average per capita availability of potable water
in the city is thus estimated to be 200 liter per day.
A large section of the city population lives in the slums (As per 2001 census, 32.53 per
cent). The arrangement for supply of water for the slums is distinctly different from the
other part of the city. The slum dwellers generally collect ‘potable water’ from the stand
posts which are not sufficient in numbers. Moreover the supply of water to them is
14
highly limited in terms of time also. Hence the slum dwellers are compelled to use
unfiltered water from the several water bodies and hand pumps. As a whole slum
dwellers are the worst affected section of the society both in terms of quantity and
quality of water supply. Moreover, they are to spend a long time to collect their water,
thus the opportunity cost of water collection for slum dweller obviously is high.
The project prepared by Western International and others for Kolkata Municipal
Corporation estimated in 2001 that total demand for 15 boroughs under KMC in the
year 2006 will be 339.35 MGD. The break-up of domestic, Industrial-Commercial-
Institutional (ICI), other demands and various losses as projected in this report for the
year 2006 are shown in Table-7.
However KMC has yet to attain this figure from surface water supply system. It has
adopted various schemes to boost up the supply in the near future.
KMC has decided to take up two-booster pumping station projects – One of 3.0
MGD capacity as Daspara in ward no. 124 (Added Area) and the other of 2.0
MGD at Siriti Park, Behala in ward no. 116 (Added Area).
Redressing of bottleneck of bringing water through dedicated main from the
Garden Reach Water Works to some parts of South Kolkata through Majherhat
railway Terminal with the technical collaboration from M/S RITES G.O.I.
New mega water project by KMC of capacity 30 MGD water treatment Plant at
Dhapa for augmenting water supply to the eastern fringes of Kolkata.
Assistance for implementing the Phase III of Garden Reach Water Works of
KMW&SA for 60 MGD water treatment plant.
Extension of transmission and distribution grids.
Assisting KMW&SA in acquiring land at Gandhi Maidan in Metiabruz for the
installation of a booster pumping station.
To ensure treated surface water to at least 95 per cent of the households in the
city within five years.
Reduction on the dependence of ground water supply as far as possible.
15
2.4 Solid Waste Management
Solid Waste Management (SWM) is one of the most important services provided b y
KMC. SWM involves collection, transportation and disposal of domestic, industrial and
bio-medical waste generated in the city in an environmentally sound manner.
In a vast city like Kolkata, management of solid wastes is a crucial civic issue. In the
jurisdiction of KMC, there are 6 lakh households, 252 markets generating on an average
3000 M.T. of solid waste daily, which amounts to 450 gms/capita per day. Of the total
waste generated 55 per cent comes from the domestic sources and remaining 45 per cent
from commercial sources.
KMC is the only metropolitan city corporation, which has introduced primary collection
at household level by amending the KMC Act. The mazdoors collect solid waste directly
from every household in most places with their handcarts and alert them with their
whistles so that they can put their wastes into the handcarts. The wastes that are collected
from house to house are ultimately put in secondary collection points of municipal vats
or dumper placer containers for onward transmission to the disposal ground.
However, the primary and secondary collection systems have several deficiencies. The
KMC’s Master Plan for Solid Waste Management under the KMC project notes that
sweeping and collection of wastes is not done in the added areas as regularly or efficiently
as it is done in the core city area. As a result the household and market wastes are thrown
on open places or open drains. There are 664 such collection points of which 388 are
open vats and the rest are in the form of bulk containers or direct loading. However, a
large number of municipal vats are without any cover, which is unhygienic, and most of
the vats are in dilapidated conditions needing repair and maintenance. The chain of
activities from primary collection, transfer of wastes and then secondary collection also
results in loss of productivity.
KMC introduced direct loading system in some areas where KMC uses specially designed
handcarts with four containers in each handcart. The mazdoors take the household
wastes directly to the truck waiting for the disposal. This not only saves time but also
restricts pollution from the solid wastes. Very recently KMC introduced mechanical
sweeping system in a few pockets. But there is not any elaborate system of segregation of
wastes in recyclable and non-recyclable parts at the primary collection point.
16
5 Refuse collector 4 2.5 M.T. nos. are
6 Tri-Cycle 200 purchased
7 Pay Loader 11 against
8 G. I. Handcart 6000 condemn of
9 Carcass Vehicle 7 said nos.
10 Mechanical Sweeper 1
11 Street Washing Vehicle
Source: Department of SWM I, KMC.
The waste is disposed through crude dumping and landfilling at Dhapa and Garden
Reach. The former is in operation since 1863. Here, out of 2100 acres of land, only 400
acres are left for use. The rest have already been filled up. At the present rate of
utilization it can sustain only 30-40 years of waste dumping which seems to be a matter
of great concern. Apart from these, a number of low-lying areas in Tollygaunge, Behala,
and Jadavpur etc. are also being used for dumping of wastes. The city requires 75 acres
of land per year for this purpose.
Kolkata being a mega city has only 60 per cent of its area under the underground
sewerage system. In addition to this, nearly 10 per cent of total area under KMC is not
yet covered by ‘drainage system’. The following table shows the status of drainage system
in Kolkata in a brief.
17
Table 10 - Brief Status of Drainage System in Kolkata
No. of drainage Percentage of area covered by Percentage of area
pumping station Under ground Surface drainage not covered by any
in Kolkata drainage system system form of drainage
system
23 60 per cent 30 per cent 10 per cent
Source: KMC, 2007
Table 11 provides a summary of the catchments area of the individual system to cover
the area under ward 7 to ward 100.
Table 11 - Summary of the Catchments Area of the Individual System under ward
7 to ward 100.
Sl. Name of the Area Covered Name of Area Capacity
No. System Pumping of of
Station Basin Pumping
(sq, Station
km) (cfs)
1 Town System Central part of the city PBPS 19.13 1720
2 Subarban Southern part of the BDPS 25.69 1275
System city
3 Maniktala Eastern part of the DLPS 8.91 480
System city.
4(a) Topsia Basin E.M.Bypass on the Topsia PS 2.48 221
east, Park circus
Connector on the
south and circular
canal on the north and
Eastern Railway line
on the west
4(b) Chingrighata Chingrighata 0.89 100
PS
4© Pagaldanga Pagaldanga PS 0.68 69
4(d) Kuila Tangra Kuila Tangra 0.90 34
PS
4(e) China town To SWF 0.22
Basin Channel from
PBPS
5(a) Tolly’s Nallah To Tolly’s 4.00
Basin Nallah
5(b) Panchannagra Chowbhaga PS 32.00 1450
m Basin
6. Bagjola basin Bagjola PS 6.07
Note: PBPS- Palmer Bridge Pumping Station, BDPS- Ballygunge Drainage Pumping
Station, DLPS- Dhapa Lock Gate Pumping Station
Source: KMC, 2007
However, there is no sewage treatment plant. The raw sewage is stabilized in an aerobic
way in the East Kolkata basin where fish cultivation is done. But, these outfall channels
are gradually dying down because of excessive human habitation and unlimited
construction activity. The whole 55 to 60 per cent area of the city that are covered by
18
underground sewerage system comes under the core city area. The remaining uncovered
40 percent are falling in the added area of the city.
As per the Calcutta Municipal Act of 1951, the Bustee is defined as “an area of land
occupied by or for the purpose of any collection of huts, standing on a plot of land not
less than 10 cottahs in area (approximately one sixth of an acre). Hut means any building,
no substantial part of which including the walls up to a height of 18 inches from floor
level and is constructed of masonry, reinforced concrete, steel, iron or other metal”.
The Slum Areas (Improvement & Clearance) Act of 1956 defines slum “as a cluster of
hutments comprising several rooms, constructed with temporary building
materials, where each room is inhabited by a family sharing a common latrine
and having no arrangements for water supply, drainage or the disposal of solid
waste and garbage within the cluster boundaries”.
According to the Thika Tenancy Act, 1981, the bustees are legalized entities having a
three-tier tenancy system – (i) the absentee landowner (ii) the Thika Tenant, who has
taken lease of the land from the landowner and (iii) the Bharatia or the tenant, who has
taken the huts on rent. The right of the Thika tenants as well as the tenants or hutment
dwellers is well protected by law. They can neither be evicted nor can the rents be raised
under normal circumstances. The landowner has little interest in the land, as he cannot
terminate the lease to his advantage. Consequently none of the groups in the three-tier
system are interested in any investment for improvement, either for quality of structure
or for environmental condition of the bustees, which, as a natural outcome, have gone
from bad to worse in course of time.
(i) Authorised - those that are officially authorised are called bustees.
(ii) Unauthorised Slums - large number of squatter settlements, which are not
authorised. These squatter settlements have grown up by the side of canals, large
drains, garbage dumps, railway tracks and roads. The living conditions of the people
living in these shanties are the worst. They do not have proper access to any basic
amenities such as sanitation or water.
Authorised Slums
The first kind of slums existed during the British period when middlemen took land
from the landowners usually for a long term and built hut type settlements which
19
they let out to migrants. As mentioned earlier these migrants needed a place to live
and had no alternative but to accept accommodation without basic amenities.
There is another type of slum called “thika tenant slums” where the slum dwellers
have taken possession at a fixed rent and have constructed their houses.
A third type of slums is those constructed by zaminders (landowners) themselves and
let out to the slum dwellers. These types of slums are locally called bustees.
The fourth type of slums is Refugee Resettlement Colonies (locally called udbastu
colonies) where land has been leased out for 99 years to the refugees from present-
day Bangladesh by the government at nominal prices.
Unauthorised Slums
Among the unauthorised slums types are those which are simply encroachments on the
roadside (locally called jhupri), canals (called khaldhar), or any vacant place (called udbastu)
by the poor people either displaced from the city itself or retrenched from their work
place.
Another survey conducted by the KMC in 2002 reports that 15.24 lakhs slum people live
in 5072 registered slums in 141 wards in KMC. In Table 12 we see that Kolkata has the
second highest percentage of slum population among the four metropolises.
These slums cover 24.28 sq. km. area or almost 13 per cent of the whole city area. In
addition, a large number of people are living in the unauthorized slums. According to
KMDA estimate, there were about 55000 pavement dwellers in the city in early 1990s.
2 KUNDU , 2003
3 THE SUDDEN DECLINE IN THE PERCENTAGE OF SLUM POPULATION IN 1991 CAN BE ATTRIBUTED TO THE ADDITION OF NEW WARDS WITHIN THE KMC
AREA AND HENCE HAS TO BE ANALYSED CAREFULLY .
20
Table 13 - Total Population and Slum Population in Four Metropolises – 2001
Municipal Total Slum % of Slum % of No. of
Corporation Population Population Population Slum Slums,
(in lakh) (in lakh) Area Slum
Clusters
Chennai 42.16 7.47 17.72
Delhi 98.17 18.55 18.89
Kolkata 45.80 14.90 32.53 13 (24.28 5072
Sq Km)
Mumbai 119.14 58.23 48.87
Source: Census of India, 2001
The major cause of the growth of slums in Kolkata is migration. Different ethnic groups
migrated to Kolkata at different time periods. They included not only people from the
neighbouring states like Bihar, Orissa and Assam but also from the distant states like
Punjab, Rajasthan, Tamilnadu, Kerala and others. Even a large number of Chinese,
Nepalese and other groups have been accommodated in the city. These ethnic groups
mainly came to the city in search of jobs. The first massive migration took place in
Kolkata in the beginning of 1905 due to the partitioning of Bengal province. The second
wave of migration occurred after the partition in 1947. More than 2.5 lakh new
immigrants arrived in 1947, the number increased to almost six lakh in 1948. Table 14
illustrates the trend in the migration in Kolkata Urban Agglomeration during the last 90
years.
From Table 14 we can observe that though the total number of migrants was highest in
2001 but their share in the total population was highest in 1951. We can see that in 1951
and 1961 more than half of city’s populations were outsiders. Since 1971 the percentage
of migrants had been steadily declining till 1991. Though in 2001 the percentage has
increased the new arrivals have mainly settled beyond the KMC boundary. While the
population growth rate of KMC area was less than four per cent, KMA experienced
more than 19 per cent population growth between 1991 and 2001.
Population density in the slums is extremely high averaging around 19 people per katha
(2,812 people per ha). There is an acute shortage of space often with one room being
rented to one family with the veranda being rented to another. In most of the slums
recognised by the KMC, slum dwellers pay land tax and have secured tenancy or
ownership rights.
21
Spatial Variations
Spatial Variations in slum population is an important indiactor of the concentration of
the lsum population as well as important tool for a targeted approach towards provision
of basic services.the data reveals that more than 60- 70% of the slums are located within
borough 3,15 and 7. These areas are the old areas providing economic opportunities for
the lsum people. One important aspect of the slum concentration is as we go towards the
fringe areas of the city the concentration is declining.
22
Table 16 - Borough Wise Details of Slum Clusters in KMC
BR No Total % in KMC Total % in Total % in KMC No. of % in No of No. of slum % in KMC
Bustee Area Total Dwellers KMC Hutment Total families KMC Families clusters Total Slum
(sq m) Bustee (No) Total (No) Hutment Total /Hutment Clusters
in'000 Area Dewellers families
I 2162.72 6.98 119701 7.14 10815 6.85 30610 8.05 2.83 104 6.91
II 2382.58 7.69 208545 12.45 13591 8.61 43011 11.31 3.16 81 5.39
III 5011.41 16.17 326495 19.49 24427 15.48 69573 18.3 2.85 82 5.46
IV 824.95 2.66 60197 3.59 4156 2.63 13853 3.64 3.33 74 4.92
V 1271.15 4.1 50431 3.01 6984 4.42 15605 4.1 2.23 66 4.39
VI 2185.27 7.06 89790 5.36 10229 6.48 23329 6.14 2.28 115 7.65
VII 2716.49 8.77 153427 9.16 15696 9.94 35395 9.31 2.26 178 11.84
VIII 5025.09 16.22 173096 10.33 18736 11.87 41656 10.96 2.22 210 13.97
IX 3256.61 10.51 141924 8.47 16330 10.35 29957 7.88 1.83 119 7.92
X 1618.41 5.22 84247 5.03 9069 5.75 16982 4.47 1.87 84 5.59
XI 729.72 2.36 28651 1.71 3568 2.26 8389 2.2 2.35 49 3.26
XII 979.9 3.16 44100 2.63 5927 3.76 11004 2.89 1.86 82 5.46
XIII 533.34 1.72 29924 1.79 3887 2.46 7933 2.09 2.04 80 5.32
XIV 663.24 2.14 51494 3.07 7397 4.68 10695 2.81 1.44 86 5.72
XV 1612.18 5.2 113454 6.77 6996 4.43 22146 5.83 3.16 93 6.19
Total 30973.06 1675476 157808 380138 2.35 1503
Source: KMC Survey 2002
Economic Characteristics
Majority of the slum dwellers are engaged in the informal sector, with average monthly
earnings of between Rs 500 and Rs 1700 and a household size of five to six persons,
some three-quarters of the Kolkata slum population are below the poverty line.
The sample survey of KMA carried out during 1997 showed that the proportion of
urban poor in total population was around 19% by income criterion. However if urban
poverty is looked at as a composite index covering various factors including access to
basic infrastructure and services, the percentage of urban poor in total population will be
higher than the same by income criteria. Even though all slum dwellers may not be
categorized as “income – poor”, but slum dwellers do lack the basic infrastructure
facilities and services. As the developmental interventions strive to be “inclusive’ in
23
nature, urban poor does merit priority treatment in design of such developmental
activities. The slum people work in a wide range of occupations such as:
Servicing the urban middle classes
Working in small business
Handicraft production units
Manual labourers
The self employed men are among the better off section of the slums, with manual
labourers such as rickshaw pullers and construction labourers being the lowest paid. The
higher income groups tend to be factory workers whose wages are low but income is
regular and secure. On the basis of the socio economic survey conducted in the year
1996 – 97 it is estimated that about 19% of the population in KMA area may be termed
as the urban poor. The number of urban poor in KMA area has however gone down as
the overall urban poverty in Urban West Bengal has fallen to 15% in 1999-2000 from
23% in 1993 – 94, as per the 55th Round NSSO Survey.
Housing Characteristics
Predominant structure types in the slum areas are pukka, semi-pukka and kutcha (crude
or imperfect). The percentages of these structural types in Kolkata are pucca (85.1 per
cent), semi-pucca (12.8 per cent), and kuccha (2.1 per cent). There are houses with roofs
made of tiles and asbestos which have floors which are kutcha or pukka both. The
census also reveals that:
90 per cent of these slum dwellers have one room per family.
Usually each slum consists of 9 ““hutments”” and each “hutment” consists of 5 huts.
In the CMA, there are at least 225,000 huts, where one room is shared by at least
13.4 people (on average)
Most of these bustees were developed by thika tenants during the process of
industrialisation.
24
Table 17 - Physical Amenities in Slum Clusters of KMC
Latrine
of road
Drains
source
Types
Water
No of Street Lights
Borough No
No. of slum
clusters
Stand posts
Unsewered
Unsewered
Total road
tube wells
total Spot
Dugwells
Kachcha
Sanitary
sources
kachch
Others
length
Hand
paccc
water
roads
latrin
l (m)
l (m)
l (m)
l(m)
(no)
(no)
(no)
(no)
(no)
(m)
I 81 1541 51696.2 614 51082 7427 3073 773 512 4358 19887.1 1051
II 82 1572 28384.8 262 28122.8 9927 2671 253 266 3190 14312.5 1612
III 74 4283 106295 5669 100626 16328 11689 743 589 13021 44144.7 3618
IV 66 608 28986 0 28986 3036 2432 893 1448 4773 3462.6 0
V 115 1780 32730.8 344 32386.8 4817 1393 156 90 1639 15319 326
VI 178 2673 86447.7 290 86157.7 7326 3511 349 367 4227 16001 802
VII 210 6062 213857.3 18218 195639.3 9906 5571 741 554 6866 19581.7 2858.5
VIII 119 1874 56105.5 78 56027.5 12521 5697 798 919 7414 21165.5 2178
IX 84 1668 69771 293 69478 10966 5095 609 1128 6832 13842.1 1343
X 49 1812 44382.7 2103 42279.7 6408 3045 261 766 4072 5311 60
XI 82 1816 85018.2 5321 79697.2 2502 862 268 527 1657 6481 598
XII 80 3392 160754.6 16767 143987.6 3268 1136 188 194 1518 13999.5 696.5
XIII 86 357 49486 3091 46395 2201 1126 84 117 1327 6364.5 429
XIV 93 431 61763.1 18915 42848.1 2716 1001 114 136 1251 7148.3 166
XV 1503 0 48746 9037 39709 4187 1431 435 164 2030 4195 285
KMC Total 29869 1124424.9 81002 1043422.7 103536 49733 6665 7777 64175 211215.5 16023
Source- KMC Survey 2002
Access to Social Amenties
Table 18 - Borough - wise Social Indicators in Slum Clusters of KMC
Total Education % in KMC Total Average distance from Average spot
Average area/
Borough No Institutions Educational nearest education inst. water sources
family in sq m
(No) Institution (Km) /100 families
25
2.7 Kolkata Municipal Corporation
The Calcutta Municipal Corporation Act 1980 came into force on January 1984. It
extended the boundaries of Calcutta by including the Municipalities of South Suburban,
Garden Reach and Jadavpur within Calcutta. The number of wards of the Corporation
was raised from 100 to 141.The provisions relating to Bustees were modified. A major
amendment was introduced in 1984 to remove certain procedural difficulties in the
matters of assessment and valuation of lands and buildings, recovery of taxes etc. Most
significant was the introduction of "Mayor-in-Council", with all the attributes of the
Cabinet form of government. This was a unique step in the area of Municipal
administration in India.
The objective of the new Act was to make the Corporation more efficient and effective.
The change in the Municipal Authority ensured that there would be three authorities:
1) The Corporation
2) The Mayor-in-Council, and
3) The Mayor.
The number of members of the Calcutta Municipal Corporation was to be 141 which
elected Councillors from the 141 wards. The Corporation as the apex body discharges its
function through the Mayor-in-Council, consisting of the Mayor, Deputy Mayor and 10
other elected members of the CMC. The Mayor and the Chairman would be elected by
the members who would hold office for 5 years.
The Corporation would group the wards of the Corporation into Boroughs. Each
Borough should have a Committee consisting of the Councillors elected from the
respective wards of the Borough. The Councillors would elect one of them as the
chairperson of the said Borough. The Borough Committees should be subject to the
general supervision of the Mayor-in-Council, and look after functions such as water
supply, drainage, collection and removal of solid waste, disinfection and health
immunisation, bustee services, lighting, repairs of certain categories of roads,
maintenance of parks, drains and gullies.
The Act of 1980 thus formed the framework of the modern Corporation with the
Municipal Commissioner as the Principal Executive Officer subject to the control and
supervision of the Mayor as the Chief Executive Officer. He is assisted by a group of
Senior Civil Officers comprising Joint Municipal Commissioners, Deputy Municipal
Commissioners, Chief Engineers, Controller of Municipal Finance and Accounts, Chief
Municipal Auditor and Municipal Secretary.
The 74th Constitutional Amendment, 1992 makes provision for appropriate and
adequate representation of all elements of society. The Amendment provided
reservation of seats for the scheduled castes and tribes and for women. By the same
Amendment, the State Legislatures would endow the CMC with the power to draw up
plans for economic development and social justice. It was given the responsibility to
plan for economic development and for improvement, upgradation and promotion of
the social, cultural, educational and aesthetic aspects of life for the citizens of the
City. Subsequent to the renaming of the city in 2001, the Corporation is now known
as the Kolkata Municipal Corporation.
26
Chapter 3
THE PROPOSED PROJECT AREA
3.1 Project Area
As seen in Figure 1, Borough VII has more than 70% of the population living in the
slums. Present project areas of Anandanagar and Jalpara slums are falling in Ward 59
and 58 respectively in this Borough VII with 99.7 percent slum dweller as shown in
the Census Data 2001 (Annexure I). The Garden Reach-I is situated in Ward 138 of
Borough XV having borough slum density of 63.1 %- third highest of the city..
Most of the dwellers of Anandanagar and Jalpara and Garden Reach-I are from
SC/ST/OBC and other weaker sections and are below poverty line. This is a unique
scheme of rehousing of project where people below poverty line are being provided with
safe, dignified and long term settlement dovetailing GoI, GoWB, KMC funds with
beneficiaries' contribution. (The Map showing project area is given in Annexure)
Under KMC’s Anandanagar, Jalpara and Garden Reach-I housing program, 2500
numbers of dwellers will be provided dwelling units as per guideline under the scheme.
2. Facilitating and providing land holding support through NGOs to the project
affected people for forming user groups for Self-Help groups for O & M for the
residential complex & the basic civic services.
3. Title of the flat given in the name of the women head of the family.
27
3.4 Details of physical, socio-economic survey carried out
All of them are peri- urban settlements with rural characteristics, heterogeneous populations
and the poor living in single bamboo mat rooms with tiled roofed. The Anandanagar and
Jalpara settlement is on the service land of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation or vacant
factory land. The Garden Reach-I slum dwellers lost their factory jobs and were evicted from
their factory land and now settled in a scattered manner along the street side shanties, river
bank slums etc. The Kolkata Municipal Corporation aquired a portion of the vacated land at
250, Garden Reach Road and prepared this scheme for rehousing of the evicted slum dwellers.
Earlier a plot having an area of 6.73 Acres of land acquired under the Urban Land Ceiling Act
with a portion occupied by the slum dwellers was identified for accommodating the proposed
Housing for the Anandanagar Cluster. After sanctioniong of the project by the Central
Sanctioning and Monitoring Committee under the JnNURM on 9th January 2008 initiative was
taken to start the work at site. But demand was raised by the local people to reserve a portion
of the land for a big play ground out of the said 6.73 acres of land. To mitigate the problem,
another plot of land (Anandangar- II), situated nearby within the same Ward 59 and having an
area of 2145.45 sq. mt. (0.53 Acre) has been purchased by the Kolkata Municipal Corporation
to accommodate a portion of the dweling units out of the 1140 dwelling units sanctioned for
the Anandanagar.
Most of the dwellers of the Anandanagar, Jalpara and Garden Reach-I are now rickshaw
pullers, pavement hawkers, porters, cart pullers or ragpickers or daily or unskilled labourers
engaged on workers of building sites, roads, or any kind of unskilled local work.
The dwellers, most of them ragpickers, collect materials from the nearby waste disposal site of
the KMC and the hawkers with very little capital selling plastic items or a variety of low end
products for the poor and lower middle class local markets or on the pavements of Kolkata.
Very few are venders and rickshaw pullers.
Majority of the women of the slums are ragpickers or domestic helpers in the city. Their
monthly family income is below Rs.2 000.00, with a family size of minimum 5 members, and
maximum 10 members. 91% are ragpickers and rest 9% hawkers, venders, rickshaw pullers etc.
(Details of socio economic surveys carried out in the slum is given in Annexure)
3.6 Objectives
The Project will ensure that those losing structures, livelihoods, and other resources are
assisted in improving or at least regaining their former level of living at almost no cost to
them. To achieve this goal, the Project will:
(i) To provide good housing at affordable cost with access to basic amenities like
safe drinking water, sanitation, toilets, and solid waste management.
28
(ii) To provide security of tenancy.
(iii) To provide assistance for in-situ rehabilitation of the slum dwellers that generally
improves or at least restores the social and economic base of the slum people.
(iv) Provide convergence with other Govt programs like NOAPS, NFBS, NMBS,
Annapurna, and Antyodaya Anna Yojana.
(v) To improve the overall socio economic conditions of the slum dwellers.
The apartments will be provided with such conveniences as water and electricity
connections. The design of apartments has been done to keep preferences of the slum
dwellers in view. This is reflected in locating the toilets in balconies, outside the
apartment.
These flats come with legal titles for occupants, turning informal dwellers on government
lands to legal owners of well-built apartments. The legal titles will be in the name of
women, and thus the Project will help promote the empowerment of women. The
allotment of units will be on 99-year non-saleable lease in the name of the female head of
the family and her male counterpart/kin as nominee.
29
Chapter 4
THE PROPOSED PROJECT
Integrated Housing and Slum Development of Anandanagar
(Ward 59), Jalpara (ward 58) and Garden Reach-I (Ward 138)
of KMC
For the housing the slum dwellers of Anandanagar, Jalpara and Garden Reach-I it is
proposed to construct two rooms flat with attached toilet and kitchen and running water
facilities in the locations as detailed below. Each block will be four-storied RCC frame
structure containing multiple tenaments. Estimated cost of each flat was earlier Rs 1.55
lacs (approx) excluding infrastructural cost but after the eprice escalation immediate after
the sanction of the project by the CS&MC the estimated cost of each Dwelling Unit is Rs
2.26 Lacs (Rupees two lacs twenty six thousand only). The beneficiaries will contributes
Rs 30000.00 (Rupees thirty thousand only) of the building cost, GOI 50%, 30% will be
borne by State Govt. and the balance to be borne by the ULB.
Sl Location No of % of No of
No. Beneficiaries Economically Units
Weaker Sections
1. Anandanagar (I & II) 5700 100 1140
2 Jalpara 5200 100 1040
4.1.1 Objective
The objective of housing scheme is primarily to provide shelter for people living in the
slum area of Anandanagar, Jalpara and Garden Reach-I. Most of these are living
below the poverty line. The objective is also to provide the slum dwellers with a better
housing facility with basic infrastructures and enabling urban environment, to help them
to come out of their poverty level. To this end, there is need to dovetail HOUSING
SCHEME with other schemes to ensure that shelter delivery, environment improvement
and income up-gradation for the urban poor are synergized.
The houses will be five-storied RCC frame structure with brick walls including plaster on
both sides. The finishing will be IPS flooring and white wash on inside walls and cement
paint on outside walls. The windows will be glazed steel windows. Separate WC & Bath
has been proposed in the DU. The kitchen will be provided with cooking platform and
storage space. The stair lobby space shall be available for use of all the beneficiaries and
shall also be useful as fire evacuation space in case of any major fire hazard.
Total 2500
31
4.1.8 Outcome
After construction of houses, the habitable condition of the slum dwellers will improve
which will ultimately improve their personal health and hygiene and thus remove their
anxiety for basic minimum needs of shelter.
The total cost involvement will be Rs.692.78 lakhs detailed in the Annexure, Abstract of
Cost Estimate.
OHR Revised Length of Revised Revised
Sl Amount
Location Capacity OHR Pipeline Length of Amount
No. (Lakhs)
Capacity Pipeline (Lakhs
Anandanagar 450 KL 850 1666 mt 1757 mt 186.57 333.37
1.
2. Jalpara 450 KL 850 750 mt 1530 mt 181.83 245.57
3. Garden reach-I - 108 KL 285 mt 1420 mt 92.50 113.84
Total 2301 460.90 692.78
Outcome
After resettlement it will not only reduce substantially the inconvenience for
procurement of water from a distance place but also provide them with timely and safe
drinking water.
32
The total cost involvement for Drainage will be Rs.208.75 lakhs as detailed in the chapter
of Cost Estimate.
Outcome
After construction of the proposed Drainage & Sewerage system it will be able to
provide relief to the Anandanagar, Jalpara and Garden Reach-I by means of efficient
and effective disposal of storm water and sanitary waste. Further with the construction of
underground sewerage system overall hygiene conditions within the slum will improve.
This project will by and large enhance the quality of civic life by way of promotion and
safeguarding the public health.
4.2.3 Roads
Proposal
Considering the various aspects of maintenance and erection Bitumenous Macadam
Road with a coat of Pre-mix Carpet is proposed in the revised estimate for all the
housing colonies. To ensure a minimum maintenance free system paved road with
cement concrete precast paver block will be provided for Jogging Track and to ease the
movement of pedestrians and light vehicles.
The total cost involvement for Road will be Rs.68.28 lakhs and for Jogging Track will be
Rs 35.23 Lacs as detailed in the chapter of Cost Estimate.
Outcome
Completion of this project is intended to ease the movement of the residents of
Anandanagar, Jalpara and Garden Reach-I to their workplaces and smooth flow of
pedestrian and light vehicle. This will enhance the quality of civic amenities in the
housing colonies. As a result, the quality of life will also improve substantially.
33
the earlier approach of land stabilization was changed and piling in poor quality soil area
was proposed. Thus the Land Development Cost is revised with major added cost. The
total Park and Open Space Area is 10912 Sq. M.
Outcome
Completion of this project is intended to provide space for recreational and cultural
space for the residents of Anandanagar, Jalpara and Garden Reach-I. This will
enhance the quality of civic amenities in the housing colonies. As a result, the quality of
life will also improve substantially.
Transformer with H.T/L.T. and Switch in adequate numbers and capacity to be provided
for power supply to the proposed housing clusters. The entire installations are done by
the Calcutta Electric Supply Corporation (CESC). The KMC will have to pay as may be
estimated by the CESC. However based on the trend of their demand for various
installations of the city the estimate is made by the Electrical Department of the KMC on
Lum Sum basis.
34
No of Revised
Sl.
Location Dwelling Amount
No.
Units (Lakhs)
Anandanagar 1140 90.91
1.
86.61
2. Jalpara 1040
24.25
3. Garden reach-I 320
201.77
Total 220
The total cost involvement will be Rs. 201.77 lakhs for installation of Transformer etc as
detailed in the chapter of Cost Estimate.
Internal Electrical Works It is proposed to provide electrical connection to all units from
the electrical sources of CESC Ltd. Electrical connection will be provided in each unit
from the supply source of CESC Ltd. each unit will be provided with light points one
each at living room and toilet. The common passage area and the staircase will also have
the light points.
Outcome
Successful implementation of this scheme will remove prevailing darkness in the colony
area after sunset. This will ultimately alleviate inconvenience faced by the Anandanagar,
Jalpara and Garden Reach-I in the night and make it a safe zone free of crime.
Outcome
Completion of this scheme will remove inconvenience and nuisance faced by the
Anandanagar, Jalpara and Garden Reach-I and other public using the street. Thus,
this will improve general environmental condition in the slum colony as a whole.
Socio-Economic Condition
Upgradation of socio-economic conditions is an essential part to bring about harmonic
and integrated development of the areas in general. The following infrastructure schemes
are proposed in the development package:
35
Education and Community Building
Provision has been made for construction of two combined Adult Education &
Community Centre building at the cost of Rs. 511.25 lakhs within the scheme. There are
two such building blocks at Anandanagar (557.54 sqm) and Jalpara (416.38 sqm) of
varying building area and one such building at Garden Reach I(188.30 sqm). The Kolkata
Municipal Corporation will maintain these two buildings.
SSA : ‘Sarba Siksha Abhijan’ - a scheme meant for ‘education for all’
SSK : ‘Sishu Siksha Kendra’ – Mainly aimed at offering free primary education to the
poorer section of the community.
Mid-day Meal : A program initiated to curtail the drop out rates, has been found
success since its initiation.
Social Security
The following Social Security Schemes under State Plan are proposed to be integrated
with the current program.
Thrift and Credit Society : For easier Credit and Finance availability.
Annapurna : To provide food stock at reduced price to the poorer section of the
community.
Antyoday Anna Yojana: To provide food stock free of cost to the older section of the
community.
36
Chapter 5
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR PROJECT
IMPLEMENTATION
Kolkata Municipal Corporation will implement the proposed Project of low cost housing
under the BSUP. The Town Planning Department along with the Bustee Cell will take up
the implementation works. JMC (Dev) will delegate his functions through the Director
General (Town Planning)
Self Help Groups (SHGs) are formed to inculcate savings habit and to provide linkage
with the financial institutions and Banks which will enable them to start micro-
enterprise. It will help them to empower both socially and economically.
Housing co-operatives will be formed amongst Slum development Groups for operation
and maintenance of flats and infrastructure like water supply, sewerage/drainage,
electrical including streetlights with the contribution from the flat owners
37
Chapter 6
MANAGEMENT OF THE PROJECT
The overall management of the Project shall lie with the Municipal Commissioner of the
KMC who shall delegate his functions through the Board of Directors. Joint Municipal
Commissioner (Revenue), Joint Municipal Commissioner (General), Joint Municipal
Commissioner (Development) Director General (Town Planning), Director General
(Bustee), Chief Manager (Property Tax), Chief Municipal Finance and Accounts shall be
in the Board of Directors who will be in charge of the overall management of the
project, sanctioning of funds for the project, selection of consultant, approval of the
tender documents, and the detailed project report.
There will be an implementing agency headed by the JMC (Dev) who will delegate his
functions through one EE/AEE who shall in in charge of the overall implementation of
the project, selection of the beneficiaries, day to day management of the project, and
liasoning with the beneficiaries. One accounts officer shall also be part of the
implementing agency dealing with the accounts and finance part of the project,
disbursement of funds for project purpose and day to day project activities.
38
Chapter 7
RESOURCE MOBILIZATIONS AND
BUDGETARY ALLOCATION
Under Sub-Mission on Basic Services to the Urban Poor (BSUP), the financing of
projects under the Mission would be as under:-
Included in
Livelihood Centre /
6 29.67 Community
Work shed
Centre
Jogging Track & Cart 35.23
7 10.89 17.62 10.57 7.05
parking Area
Parks & open Space
8 with area land 105.51 2862.45 1431.23 858.74 572.49
development
Community Building
9 and Child and Adult 78.19 511.25 255.63 153.38 102.25
Education Centre
39
Chapter 8
MONITORING MECHANISM
Kolkata Municipal Corporation shall monitor the progress of the project regularly
through its Engineers and Executive Engineers. The Engineers from the Project
Implementation Units shall send regular updates and quarterly progress reports to the
PMU on the physical and financial progress of the project. Utilization Certificate on a
quarterly basis shall be send by the Accounts officer to the PMU through the Board of
Directors. Officers of Nodal Agency/Implementing Agency dealing with housing
scheme will visit the site regularly and ascertain through field visits whether the
programme is being implemented satisfactorily and whether the construction of houses is
in accordance with the prescribed norms. The periodic evaluation studies on the
implementation and housing scheme will be conducted on a regular basis.
40
2. Campaign regarding
temporary relocation.
3. Getting consent from the
beneficiaries for
relocation and cost
contribution.
II Design
Selection of the 1. Floating of the tender.
Consultants 2. Inviting sealed bids from
contractors.
3. Finalisation of the
Consultant based on the
highest bidder.
4. Approval of the DPR
Identification of 1. Survey of alternate sites
alternate site for for relocation.
temporary 2. Ensuring access to basic
relocation amenities in the alternate
site.
3. Ensuring that the site is
not very far from their
work place to reduce the
cost of commuting.
4. Mobilising the
beneficiaries to relocate
temporarily.
III Construction 1. Construction of the
houses.
2. Ensuring strict adherence
to the minimum norms
for kichen, toilet and
room sizes.
3. Ensuring strict adherence
to use of quality materials
for construction.
4. Ensuring access to basic
amenities like water
supply, toilets and solid
waste management and
roads.
5. Coordinating with other
departments of KMC for
the basic amenities.
IV Implementation 1. Shifting the beneficiaries
to the new houses.
2. Ensuring proper
disbursement of the funds
towards payment for the
construction.
V Monitoring Feedback survey of the
beneficiaries. The results of
41
the said project maynot be
quantified as improvement in
the quality of life involves so
many factors and
dimensions.However
following indictaors can be
taken:
1. Improvement in the quality
of health.
2. A sense of security.
3. Access to tapped water
connection, toilets.
4. Improvement in the
overall hygiene of the
surroundings.
5. Quality of materials used
for construction.
6. Room sizes.
The monitoring mechanism for the Project shall be based on the Program Evaluation and Review
Technique (PERT) and Critical Path Method (CPM). One external monitoring agency at the state
level shall be appointed to evaluate the progress of the project at regular intervals.
42
Chapter 9
REFORMS
9.1 Mandatory reform Undertaken at the ULB level
REFORM SL REFORM PRESENT STATUS TARGET YEARS (as agreed between GoI, GoWB and KMC.)
TYPE NO. ACTIVITY
43
REFORM SL REFORM PRESENT STATUS TARGET YEARS (as agreed between GoI, GoWB and KMC.)
TYPE NO. ACTIVITY
5. Use of GIS based One contractor - agency was selected and Consultant Full migration
property tax system activities had been initiated, but the agency selection
has since withdrawn itself. Fresh short listing
of firms has been initiated.
6. Next revision of √
guidance values
7. Fix periodicity of This system is in place. Every five years
revision of guidance revaluation of properties and their values is
values done.
44
REFORM SL REFORM PRESENT STATUS TARGET YEARS (as agreed between GoI, GoWB and KMC.)
TYPE NO. ACTIVITY
45
REFORM SL REFORM PRESENT STATUS TARGET YEARS (as agreed between GoI, GoWB and KMC.)
TYPE NO. ACTIVITY
46
REFORM SL REFORM PRESENT STATUS TARGET YEARS (as agreed between GoI, GoWB and KMC.)
TYPE NO. ACTIVITY
47
REFORM SL REFORM PRESENT STATUS TARGET YEARS (as agreed between GoI, GoWB and KMC.)
TYPE NO. ACTIVITY
1. Go/legislation/modi Done √
III. fication of rules for
MUNICIPAL migration to double
ACCOUNTIN entry accounting
G REFORM system
2. Appointment of Completed √
consultants for
development of state
manual
3. Completion and Completed and adopted. Already completed √
adoption of annual for the year 1993-94 to 2005-06
accounts.
4. Commence training 1. Completed and Ongoing. √
of personnel
2. Training Manual published.
5. Appointment of Completed √
field level consultant
for implementation
at the city level
6. Notification of cut Completed √
off data for
migration to the
double entry
accounting system
7. Business process re- Substantially Completed √
engineering
8. Valuation of assets Completed √
and liabilities
9. Drawing up of Since 1970 KMC is preparing balance Sheet
opening balance
sheet (OBS)
10. Full migration to Completed √
double entry
accounting system
48
REFORM SL REFORM PRESENT STATUS TARGET YEARS (as agreed between GoI, GoWB and KMC.)
TYPE NO. ACTIVITY
49
REFORM SL REFORM PRESENT STATUS TARGET YEARS (as agreed between GoI, GoWB and KMC.)
TYPE NO. ACTIVITY
50
REFORM SL REFORM PRESENT STATUS TARGET YEARS (as agreed between GoI, GoWB and KMC.)
TYPE NO. ACTIVITY
51
Chapter 10
TOTAL PROJECT COST AND PROJECT
CONTRIBUTION
The project should be financed in such a way that it is viable. The objective of this
project is socio-economic upliftment of the slum dwellers through integrated
development of the slum. Government of India has set a special fund from which 50%
of the project cost is given as grant to the implementing agency. The balance amount is
proposed to be shared between State Government, ULB and the beneficiaries.
Included in
Livelihood Centre /
6 29.67 Community
Work shed
Centre
Jogging Track & Cart 35.23
7 10.89 17.62 10.57 7.05
parking Area
Parks & open Space
8 with area land 105.51 2862.45 1431.23 858.74 572.49
development
Community Building
9 and Child and Adult 78.19 511.25 255.63 153.38 102.25
Education Centre
52
ESTIMATE
53