Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 25 views

    DBM 30033

    Uploaded by

    Syamimi Aqila
    The document provides a rubric for assessing a case study on the topic of statistics and probability in an engineering mathematics course. It outlines 5 criteria for evaluation: new ideas and information presented as a group, the written report, self-learning through calculations, reflection and conclusions, and self-involvement in meeting progression and deadlines. Scores are provided on a scale from 1 to 4 for each criterion based on the level of quality demonstrated. The total possible score is 15%.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    DBM 30033

    Uploaded by

    Syamimi Aqila
    25 views8 pages
    The document provides a rubric for assessing a case study on the topic of statistics and probability in an engineering mathematics course. It outlines 5 criteria for evaluation: new ideas and information presented as a group, the written report, self-learning through calculations, reflection and conclusions, and self-involvement in meeting progression and deadlines. Scores are provided on a scale from 1 to 4 for each criterion based on the level of quality demonstrated. The total possible score is 15%.

    Original Title

    Dbm 30033

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document provides a rubric for assessing a case study on the topic of statistics and probability in an engineering mathematics course. It outlines 5 criteria for evaluation: new ideas and information presented as a group, the written report, self-learning through calculations, reflection and conclusions, and self-involvement in meeting progression and deadlines. Scores are provided on a scale from 1 to 4 for each criterion based on the level of quality demonstrated. The total possible score is 15%.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    25 views8 pages

    DBM 30033

    Uploaded by

    Syamimi Aqila
    The document provides a rubric for assessing a case study on the topic of statistics and probability in an engineering mathematics course. It outlines 5 criteria for evaluation: new ideas and information presented as a group, the written report, self-learning through calculations, reflection and conclusions, and self-involvement in meeting progression and deadlines. Scores are provided on a scale from 1 to 4 for each criterion based on the level of quality demonstrated. The total possible score is 15%.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 8

    DBM30033 - ENGINEERING MATHEMATICS 3

    CASE STUDY MARKS


    PROGRAMME : _______DMB 3B______
    STUDENT'S NAME 1. NUR SYAMIMI AQILA 2. MUHAMMAD 3. NORDIANA BINTI 4. KHAIRUN NADZIRAH
    BINTI MASRI ASYRAAF AKMAL NOR HASNI BINTI KAMAROL BAHRIL
    BIN AHMAD
    STUDENT'S REG.
    NUMBER 09DMB21F1009 09DMB21F1013 09DMB21F1024 09DMB21F1040

    CRITERION SCORE
    1. NEW IDEA &
    INFORMATION (GROUP)

    2. WRITTEN REPORT
    Communicate ideas

    3. SELF LEARNING
    Calculation

    4. REFLECTION
    Conclusion
    5. SELF INVOLVEMENT
    (INDIVIDUAL)
    Case study Progression

    TOTAL
    TASK DESCRIPTION
    RUBRIC CASE STUDY
    JABATAN PENDIDIKAN POLITEKNIK
    DAN KOLEJ KOMUNITI,
    KEMENTERIAN PENGAJIAN TINGGI

    CODE & COURSES DBM30033 ENGINEERING MATHEMATICS 3

    ASSESSMENT CASE STUDY

    CLO INSTRUMENT DETAILS DURATION


    CLO 3 (A3, CLS 3b) Rubric Topic 1: Statistics and Probability. t Week :3-6
    1.2 Compute of central tendency and dispersion. o
    Use mathematical
    expression in describing real Write a complete report of a case study for subtopic
    engineering problems central of tendency and dispersion related sustainable
    precisely, concisely and technologies.
    logically. 1. Assessment in a group. Maximum member of
    students per group is 4.
    2. Implement at the end of subtopic 1.2
    3. Submission: week 6
    (2 weeks F2F discussion with lecturer)
    (2 weeks NF2F)
    4. Valuation is based on given rubric.

    Format
    1. Report must be typing except graph
    2. Cover page
    3. Times new roman, font 12
    4. Spacing: 1.5
    RUBRIC OF CASE STUDY DBM30033 (15%)

    CRITERIA VERY GOOD GOOD WEAK VERY WEAK (1 WEIGHT STUDENT SCORE
    (4 MARKS) (3 MARKS) (2 MARKS) MARK) AGE MARKS

    NEW IDEA & Provides Provides non- Provides a very Provides an Example:
    INFORMATION adequate and specific generic inappropriate 5% (3÷4) x
    (GROUP) relevant background background to background 5%
    information to information that the case and/or was very
    the case does not tie in VWXG\¶V difficult to read
    VWXG\¶V topic. well to the case topics. and/or
    VWXG\¶V understand.
    topics.

    WRITTEN Report is totally Report have few Report have Report shown
    REPORT x free of grammar spelling or several spelling many spelling 5%
    Communicate and spelling grammatical or grammatical errors and
    ideas errors. Clear, errors. Most errors. Some grammatical
    concise, and ideas are ideas are mistakes. Ideas
    creative clearly clearly are hard to
    presentation of presented, and presented. follow.
    ideas and references are References are References are
    properly used. sporadic or not not used.
    referenced. used.
    Report have:
    Report have: 1. Table of Report have:
    1. Table of content. 1. Table of
    content. 2. List of content.
    2. List of reference.
    reference.
    CRITERIA SCORE
    VERY GOOD (4 GOOD WEAK VERY WEAK (1 WEIGHT STUDENT
    MARKS) (3 MARKS) (2 MARKS) MARK) AGE MARKS

    SELF Case study Case study Case study Case study


    LEARNING comply with all comply with comply with comply with
    x Calculation these points: any 3 points: any 2 only 1
    points: point:
    1. Apply correct 1. Apply correct
    mathematica mathematical 1. Apply correct 1. Apply correct 20%
    l expression expression in mathematical mathematical
    in measuring expression in expression in
    measuring central measuring measuring
    central tendency and central central
    tendency and dispersion. tendency tendency and
    dispersion. 2. Answer and dispersion.
    2. Answer related to dispersion. 2. Answer
    related to real- 2. Answer related to
    real- engineering related to real-
    engineering problems. real- engineering
    problems. 3. Correct engineering problems.
    3. Correct calculation problems. 3. Correct
    calculation steps with 3. Correct calculation
    steps with graph. calculation steps with
    graph. 4. Provide table steps with graph.
    4. Provide table of group graph 4. Provide table
    of group data. 4. Provide table of group
    data. of group data.
    data.
    CRITERIA SCORE
    VERY GOOD GOOD WEAK VERY WEAK WEIGHT STUDENT
    (4 MARKS) (3 MARKS) (2 MARKS) (1 MARK) AGE MARKS

    REFLECTION Case is Case is Case is Case


    x Conclusion thoroughly summarized, summarized superficially 15%
    summarized, conclusions are and summarized or
    conclusions are drawn, and conclusions are incomplete
    drawn, theoretical drawn conclusions
    theoretical calculation drawn
    calculation method are
    method are also
    also summarized.
    summarized
    and reference
    is effectively
    made to the
    support the
    calculation
    idea.
    SELF Plan ahead Plan ahead but Meets Failure to plan
    INVOLVEMENT and follow the unable to follow deadline, but results in failure 5%
    (INDIVIDUAL) x plan timely. the plan timely. inadequate to meet due
    Case study Allowing Meets deadline time for date.
    Progression multiple drafts and have time editing or
    and editing. for editing or revision.
    Plan is revision.
    achieved and
    deadlines are
    met.
    TOTAL SCORE

    You might also like