Postcolonial Poems
Postcolonial Poems
Postcolonial Poems
ARUN KOLATKAR
Audacious is the first word that comes to mind when reading an Arun Kolatkar poem. He wasn’t the most popular
poet in Maharashtra, but much of his fame can be credited to the liberal use of expletives in his work.
Born in 1932, in Kolhapur, Maharashtra, Kolatkar grew up in a home that he described as “a house of cards — the
rooms had mud floors which had to be plastered with cow dung every week to keep them in good repair”. He
enrolled in the JJ School of Arts in 1949 and finished his diploma in 1957.
A graphic designer by profession, he earned his reputation in the advertising world and it wasn’t until the 1960s
that he began to write. Kolatkar, with his ‘two-headed pencil’, was one of the pioneers of modern poetry in India.
His work is reflective of other contemporary poets such as Vilas Sarang, Dilip Chitre and Vinda Karandikar. A
critique of a post-colonial India, combined with a dark humour, was an unmatched skill he possessed.
On his 15th death anniversary, ThePrint revisits Kolatkar’s starkly riveting poetic landscape.
Kolatkar’s work stems purely from observation as he sat for 15 years, every Thursday afternoon at Wayside Inn
Cafe in the Kala Ghoda area of Mumbai. A prolific writer in both Marathi and English, he was a recluse and while
he wrote many poems, most of them saw the light of day only towards the end of his life. For the longest time,
Jejuri was his only publicly available collection.
Jejuri was described by academic Anjali Nerlekar as an “amazing series of poems on the temple town in
Maharashtra where the poet rips apart the hypocrisy and cant of the powerful Brahmins with their vice-like hold
on the religion and underscores the anachronism of this religion in the modern world”.
He was diagnosed with cancer in the late 1990s, following which he released four more books in the final two
years of his life. In 2003, he released Bhijki Vahi and Chirimiri in Marathi — the former won him the Sahitya
Akademi Award in 2004. The following year he released Dron, also in Marathi, along with Sarpa Satra and Kala
Ghoda Poems in English.
It works.
The bus is no more just a thought in the head.
It's now a dot in the distance
INTRODUCTION
Arun Kolatkar is the poet of the poem, “An Old Woman.” The poem is about encountering clinging old women
when visiting a shrine or religious place. This poem depicts an old woman in a totally different vision, as the poet
discovers her with a unique outlook owing to the woman’s demeanour and her words.
He comes across this woman, fragile yet fierce in her gaze. For a fifty paise coin, she asks him to take her service
to tour around the horseshoe shrine. Though the speaker first wants to dismiss her, she persists, and he finally
recognizes her strong desire to earn a respectful life on her own. Eventually, his perspective shifts.
THEME
In this poem, the visitor’s impression of the woman as someone who just pestered the tourists for money has
transformed. He realizes that despite witnessing a catastrophe, this woman prefers to earn her life on her own.
The poem ends on a note that, no one can be taken for granted.
STRUCTURE
The poem is structured into 11 stanzas that are made up of irregular tercets. A tercet is a three-line stanza which
may or may not consist of a rhyming pattern. The length of the lines may contain a single word or multiple words.
There is no particular rhyme pattern in the poem “An Old Woman.” However, in stanza 10, the words crone and
alone create a rhyme.
An old lady grabs the sleeve of a tourist and follows him. A ‘fifty paise coin’ is what she wants. She promises to
show him ‘the horseshoe shrine’ in exchange for the coin. The traveller walks away since he has already seen the
shrine. The elderly woman ‘tightens her grip’ and ‘hobbles’ along, refusing to give up. She is determined. She
clings to him like a prickly seed pod that clings to clothing, a ‘burr.’
STANZA 5- 7
You turn around and face her
with an air of finality.
You want to end the farce.
When you hear her say,
‘What else can an old woman do
on hills as wretched as these?’
Annoyed by her persistence, the traveller chooses to ‘end the farce’ with an ‘air of finality,’ declaring that he would
not submit to her and, as a result, putting an end to the ‘farce.’ He believes that his hard-headed response will
drive her off. But the old woman’s statement – ‘what else could an old woman do to survive on these wretched
hills’ – hits the narrator like a flash of light. The narrator is able to ‘see’ her up close because of the harsh truth
that confronts him. He is taken aback when he turns to gaze at her face. He discovers that his eyes are like deep
‘bullet holes.’
STANZA 8-11
And as you look on,
the cracks that begin around her eyes
spread beyond her skin.
Her skin is wrinkly, and cracks around her eyes and her skin appeared to grow. Everything seemed to be
crumbling around him. The atmosphere then undergoes a tremendous change. A disaster has occurred. The sky
descends as the hills collapse, the temples break. The old woman, on the other hand, stands as a symbol of all-
around deterioration.
The pilgrim undergoes an emotional transfiguration at the very same moment when the woman stands alone. He
is embarrassed. He has been reduced to a smidgen (tiny bit) of change in the heartland. His self-esteem is
diminished as a result of this understanding. The image of the woman as someone who is only harassing the
tourists for money has altered in the mind of the speaker.
He now realizes that this woman is strongly determined and prefers to earn her life on her own. His spiritual
awakening to the ‘real’ world makes him feel ‘insignificant,’ much like the penny in her palm. The end of the poem
asserts that not a single person must be judged or taken for granted.
what is god
and what is stone
the dividing line
if it exists
is very thin
at jejuri
and every other stone
is god or his cousin
there is no crop
other than god
and god is harvested here
around the year
and round the clock
out of the bad earth
and the hard rock
scratch a rock
and a legend springs
Yeshwant Rao,
mass of basalt,
bright as any post box,
the shape of protoplasm
or king size lava pie
thrown against the wall,
without an arm, a leg
or even a single head.
Yeshwant Rao.
He's the god you've got to meet.
If you're short of a limb,
Yeshwant Rao will lend you a hand
and get you back on your feet.
Yeshwant Rao
Does nothing spectacular.
He doesn't promise you the earth
Or book your seat on the next rocket to heaven.
But if any bones are broken,
you know he'll mend them.
He'll make you whole in your body
and hope your spirit will look after itself.
He is merely a kind of a bone-setter.
The only thing is,
as he himself has no heads, hands and feet,
he happens to understand you a little better.
A.K. RAMANUJAN
Poet, translator, folklorist, and philologist A.K. Ramanujan was born in Mysore, India. He earned degrees at the
University of Mysore and Deccan College in Pune and a PhD from Indiana University. Ramanujan wrote in both
English and Kannada, and his poetry is known for its thematic and formal engagement with modernist
transnationalism. Issues such as hybridity and transculturation figure prominently in such collections as Second
Sight (1986), Selected Poems (1976), and The Striders (1966). The Collected Poems of A.K. Ramanujan (1995)
received a Sahitya Akademi Award after the author’s death.
As a scholar, Ramanujan contributed to a range of disciplines, including linguistics and cultural studies. His essay
“Is There an Indian Way of Thinking?” proposed a notion of “context-sensitive” thinking based in complex
situational understandings of identity that differed significantly from Western thought and its emphasis on
universal concepts and structures. Context-sensitive thinking influenced Ramanujan as a folklorist as well. His
works of scholarship include A Flowering Tree and Other Oral Tales from India (1997), Folktales from India: A
Selection of Oral Tales from Twenty-Two Languages (1991), and The Interior Landscape: Love Poems from a
Classical Tamil Anthology (1967).
For much of his career, Ramanujan taught at the University of Chicago, where he helped develop the South Asian
studies program. In 1976, the Indian government honored him with the title Padma Shri, the fourth-highest civilian
award in the country. Ramanujan also received a MacArthur Fellowship. The South Asia Council of the
Association for Asian Studies awards the A.K. Ramanujan Book Prize for Translation in honor of his contributions
to the field.
Images consult
one
another
a conscience
stricken
jury
and come
slowly
to a sentence.
The whole process of poetic creation is presented in such lean and striking linguistic space.
At the source and core of the poetic process, the poet enshrines the intimate conclave of
consulting images. This personal and core experience for the poet is one of severe
ideological, aesthetic and moral conflicts as the second stanza implies. But, as each of the
"images" in the poetic "jury" arrives at the value judgment and linguistic consensus, they
narrow down on their choices. That forces the "jury" into the verdict of a linguistic necessity
and finality of grammatical sentence in the final line.
This can also be a kind of final judgment in the sense of sentencing. This resolution and
closure of the poetic process for practical as well as linguistic purposes becomes a judgment
close to a capital punishment for Ramanujan's persona. And that is what the readers are told
boldly in the title, although the thrust of the poem seems to argue a different perspective on
the birth and status of a poem. A poem in a tidy grammatical sentence as an art object is a
dead poem, if it does not open up without closure for others to share in, contribute and
deviate from. In a way, Ramanujan's text may be trying to contest the exclusive authority and
privilege either of the critical discerner in the poet or of the advocate for the institution of
critical hegemony. This way Ramanujan may be exploring the possibility of a much more
process-oriented non-canonical and thereby secular as well as democratic practice and theory
of poetry. Because, as Bruce King observes, "such completeness kills the experience of the
images operating on each other15." It is as if Ramanujan wants to hold and propose the view
that "The poem is a process of images operating upon each other before being given a fixed
order and interpretation."
Here the persona of Ramanujan plays the devil's advocate. 'On the Death of a Poem' can be a
poetic warning to the politics of linguistic hegemony taming and taking over a possible
secular poetic process. Instead of sanitizing, the poet problemetises the complicity and the
politics of linguistic choices in the context of the poetic form. So a secular aesthetics would
seem to need a continual commitment to a language that does not leave the street of constant
contact with the subaltern and the changing times.
However, Ramanujan did not ridicule poor Indian cousins the way Nissim Ezekiel did in his
Very Indian Poems in Indian English. It is also true that in Second Sight he has not taken the
focused political stand of an Arun Kolatkar in favour of the dispossessed and the exploited as
the true "masters" of "the city". In Kala Ghoda Poems, Kolatkar's poetic persona, the Pi-dog's
ironic and Tiresian vision admirably and justifiably locates the heart and soul of the city of
Mumbai in the subaltern and secular communion of the underdogs representing every
possible colour, gender, caste, and race living off the street and on the street.
Nevertheless, in 'On the Death of a Poem' Ramanujan did "things with the syntax" and
imagery that brought his poetic language "alive in rich and strange ways". In that sense at
least, the language used in his poetry has contributed in some measure to a different level of
"biriyanization", to go back to Ali's metaphor.
The the critical exegesis of these two poems substantiates the secular possibilities of
Ramanujan's use of poetic language. As Ramanujan himself has sarcastically put it, the
Kamasutra, "literally a grammar of love", declines and conjugates "men and women as one
would nouns and verbs in different genders, voices, moods and aspects." In a similar way, the
grammar of a secular aesthetics can inflect and inform the sources of Ramanujan's poetic
themes and concerns, the dynamics of his poetic language and imagery, the dialectics of his
voices and visions. So the quality of his poetic language adds also to the overall strength of
the secular aesthetics imagination Ramanujan's poetry aims at in terms of its worldview,
political charge and authorial process. Theoretically speaking, in the context of Indian Poetry
in English, Ramanujan's Secular aesthetic has subverted and exposed the orientalist and the
upper-class predilections of a Sanskritic aesthetic tradition predicated on the primacy of the
classical Indian ethos or the 'Great Tradition'; it can also challenge and withstand the
formalist and urban-centric linguistic standard and the consequent exclusions of a
"Sacramental" aesthetic trend of a supposedly globalised literary taste and global English.
Moreover, the Secular Aesthetic model emerging from Ramanujan's poetry can make poetry
appreciation and criticism much more relevant to the Indian context and can provide one of
the meaningful pedagogic alternatives for literature studies. It is relevant to our cultural and
political context today, where native / regional literatures, subaltern literatures, Dalit and
Women's writings have claimed their mainstream presence.
surprises himself
by having on his hands
a tiger's skeleton,
when the second man
looks flayed
though it has never known a skin
makes a tiger, a tiger,
fire and velvet,
Now, there!
stood a tiger on all fours
on the forest floor, shawled
with the dotted shade,
The most of his poems have been written in America where has stayed
for forty years. Memory is real in the poem-Retuning,but the same memory is
a means of exploring of his self in this poem. Ramanujan has turned most of
his autobiographical elements into a vivid creative art. . While exploring many
facets of love in his poems he tries to establish his concept of man-woman
relationships.
KOFI AWOONOR
Kofi Awoonor was born George Awoonor-Williams in Wheta, Ghana, to Ewe parents. He was a poet, literary critic,
professor of comparative literature and served as an ambassador for Ghana. Awoonor earned a BA from
University College of Ghana, an MA from University College, London, and a PhD in comparative literature from
SUNY Stony Brook. He is the author of novels, plays, political essays, literary criticism, and several volumes of
poetry, including Rediscovery and Other Poems (1964), Night of My Blood (1971), Ride Me, Memory (1973), The
House by the Sea (1978), The Latin American and Caribbean Notebook (1992), and a volume of collected
poems, Until the Morning After (1987).
Awoonor’s grandmother was an Ewe dirge singer, and the form of his early poetry draws from the Ewe oral
tradition. He translated Ewe poetry in his critical study Guardians of the Sacred Word and Ewe Poetry (1974).
Other works of literary criticism include The Breast of the Earth: A Survey of the History, Culture, and Literature of
Africa South of the Sahara (1975).
In the early 1970s, Awoonor served as chairman of the Department of Comparative Literature at SUNY Stony
Book. He returned to Ghana in 1975 to teach at University College of Cape Coast. In Ghana, he was arrested and
tried for suspected involvement in a coup. He was imprisoned without trial and was later released; he wrote
about his time in jail in The House by the Sea. Awoonor resumed teaching after his sentence was remitted. In the
1980s, he was the Ghanaian ambassador to Brazil and Cuba and served as ambassador to the United Nations
from 1990 to 1994; in 1990 he published Ghana: A Political History from Pre-European to Modern Times.
Awoonor is author of the novels This Earth, My Brother… (1971) and Comes the Voyager at Last: A Tale of Return
to Africa (1992). He died in the Westgate shopping mall attack in Kenya in September 2013.
Introduction
Kofi Awonoor, a late Ghanaian poet, wrote a post-colonial poem titled “The Weaver Bird.” It uses the weaver bird
as a symbol to signify the arrival of colonists in Africa. A deeper meaning is effectively communicated despite
the language’s simplicity. It portrays the colonizer’s invasion as well as the plight of the colonized people.The
colonizer established itself on the African continent, leaving them with little, as evidenced by phrases like “And
lay its eggs on our only tree” and “ancient temples soiled by the weaver’s dung.” The phrase “excrement” conveys
a tone of bitterness and resentment, demonstrating how Africans do not value the Western ways that are being
imposed upon them as superior.
To portray Africa during independence, Ghanaian poet and author Kofi Awoonor mixed the lyrical traditions of his
own Ewe people with modern and religious symbolism. In addition to publishing under the name Kofi Nyidevu
Awoonor, he began writing under the pen name George Awoonor-Williams.The University of Ghana was where he
taught African literature. While attending the Storymoja Hay Festival in Nairobi, Kenya, in September 2013,
Professor Awoonor was among those slain in the attack at the Westgate shopping mall.
Stanza 1
Stanza 2
After the weaver bird felt comfortable, he started claiming ownership of the African lands. The first line of this
stanza reminds us of the period in which Europeans in their various explorations were in search of precious
resources. It highlights the fact that after these Europeans found what they were looking for on the African
continent. They retained the guise of the owner to pre-salvation to the African People.This means that the
Europeans use religion as a tool for the African mind to enslave them as people and take ownership of their lands
and resources. The poet then again emphasizes the weaver bird’s tricks in preaching the gospel, introducing the
doctrine of salvation to the African people, and also predicting the future of African lives by using messages from
its book.The last line of this stanza shows us the limits of the African’s new horizon, this means that the Africans
have experienced a new culture and their new experiences are only limited by the laws and practices put in place
by these Europeans. This stanza reveals the duality in the character of the Europeans who disguise themselves
as the preachers of the world only to reveal their ulterior motive as time by to colonize mother Africa.
Stanza 3
Here there is a total rejection of the Europeans will by the African people. The Africans in this stanza are
displaying a tone of anger and bitterness towards the ways of the Europeans as they are unable to relate well
with their messages of salvation and peace. They deem it hypocritical of the weaver bird to preach two different
messages at the same time.They cannot, therefore, join the prayers and answers of the communicants. Towards
the end of the poem, a speaker delves deeper into the dilemma of the current African who is faced with the
European religion as well as African traditional religion. The Africans whose one new home has been claimed by
the Europeans continue to search for new homes every day.The final lines of this poem emphasize how the
African traditional religion has suffered rejection in modern times because of the influence of the weaver bird.
The establishment of schools, churches, and other European institutions are seen to be factors behind the
development of the African shrines by the weaver.Even though the shrines of the Africans have been defiled by
the Europeans, they will not relent, they will continue to look for new homes every day and rebuild new altars. The
poet in this final line sends a message of hope to Africans. He claims that Africans still have opened their stage
for lost shrines and can’t strive to rebuild new altars.
I.
II.
“Song of Sorrow 1 and 2 is a pessimistic poem. It is a dirge in which the living blame the ancestors for the
hardship and difficulties that their departure has left behind. Much of this meaning is conveyed through several
important images used in the poem.
The desolation and helplessness that has occurred is presented right at the beginning of the Song of Sorrow 1 in
the form of “chameleon faeces”. The image is appropriate as it conjures up the picture of something that cannot
be wiped away or made clean. It is this catastrophe that is emphasized by the use of this image.
A series of other images closely associated with desolation, destruction and even death, is used in successive
parts of the poem: References can be made to the images like the “Sun and rain” that “burn” and beat
respectively; the sun that can no longer be fired because there are no sons; other plants and animal image such
as “the sharp stumps, the falling “tree” which also symbolizes the death of Agosu, an important family elder, the
“broken fence; the “snake” the “cow” and the “vultures” which are all destructive creatures. The “wilderness” is
not spared in reference to its desolation.
The overwhelming feeling in the poem is that nothing has gone right since the departure of the ancestors and
only suffering remains for survivors including the persona. Even those who travel and return have to confront a
miserable life. An entire civilization or way of life represented by “Kpeti’s great household” is no more. What are
left are the broken fences now taken over by entire strangers.”
Senegalese poet, writer, and statesman Léopold Sédar Senghor was born near Dakar in the town of Joal to a
Fulbe mother and a Serer trader father. He was educated at the École Nationale de la France d’Outre-Mer in Paris,
where he became friends with Aimé Césaire and future French president George Pompidou. After earning his
French citizenship, Senghor taught in Tours and Paris. He joined the French army during World War II and spent
18 months in a German prison camp. After serving successive terms representing Senegal in the French National
Assembly, Senghor returned to his native land, where he led his nation’s independence movement in 1960. He
eventually became Senegal’s first democratically elected president, a post which he held for the next twenty
years.
Senghor’s political and literary careers were inextricably linked. Residing part-time in France, he wrote poems of
resistance in French which engaged his Catholic spirituality even as they celebrated his Senegalese heritage.
Senghor is the author of several collections of poetry, including Chants d’ombre (1945), Nocturnes (1961), and
The Collected Poetry (1991, translated by Melvin Dixon). He also edited an anthology of work by African poets in
French colonies, Anthologie de la Nouvelle Poésie Négre et Malagache (1945, with an introduction by Jean-Paul
Sartre). His nonfiction work includes numerous volumes on politics, philosophy, sociology, and linguistics.
Senghor co-founded, with Aimé Césaire, the Négritude movement, which promotes distinctly African cultural
values and aesthetics, in opposition to the influence of French colonialism and European exploitation. He also co-
founded the journal Presence Africaine with Alione Diop. Senghor, the first African invited to join the Académie
Française, was awarded honorary doctorates from 37 universities, in addition to many other literary honors.
Senghor died at his home in France at the age of 95.
It’s Sunday.
I’m afraid of the crowd that looks like me with its stone faces.
From my glass tower crowded with migraines and impatient Ancestors
I muse over the rooftops and hills in the mist
In the calm—the chimneys are serious and naked.
At their feet my dead are sleeping; all my dreams deeds—dust
All my dreams, needless blood spilled down the streets, mixing with the blood of butcher shops.
And now, from this observation post, as if from the outskirts of the city
I muse over my dreams walking distractedly down the streets, sleeping at the foot of the hills,
Like the drovers of my race on the banks of the Gambia and the Saloum
And now the Seine, at the foot of the hills.
Let me think about my dead!
Yesterday was All Saints, the Sun’s solemn birthday
And all the cemeteries were empty of memories.
Oh my Dead, who always refused to die, who were able to keep Death at bay
Away from the Sine, away from the Seine, and in my fragile veins, my indomitable blood
Protect my dreams as you protected your migratory sons with their skinny legs.
Oh my dead! defend the Paris rooftops in the Sunday fog
The rooftops that protect my dead.
Let me leave my dangerously safe tower and walk down to the street
With my brothers who have blue eyes
And rough hands.
This is the hour of the stars and of the Night that dreams reclining on that range of clouds, draped in its long gown
of milk.
The roofs of the huts gleam gently. What are they so confidently telling to the stars?
Inside, the hearth extinguishes in the intimacy of bitter and sweet scents.
Woman, light the lamp of butterclear oil, let the Ancesters, like their parents, talk the children in bed.
Let’s listen to the voice of the Ancients of Elissa. Exiled as we are they did not want to die, their seminal flood is
lost in the sand.
Let me hear, in the smoky which I visit, a reflection of propitious souls
Let my head on your breast, warm as a dang taken from the fire and smoking.
Let me inhale the smell of our Dead, let me collect and repeat their living voice, let me learn
To live before I sink, deeper than the diver, into the lofty depth of sleep.
Leopold Sedar Senghor was an African poet, who contributed much to the Negritude movement, started by the
French-speaking black intellectuals that looked at accepting the fact that one was black and that the fact came
with its own history, values and culture and sought to acquaint all people of African descent with freedom and
dignity.
In the poem, “Night in Sine”, Senghor looks at the subtleties of his culture and embodies them in the image of
womanhood, with soft hands, singing a song, not quite a lullaby. Throughout the poem, Senghor emphasizes on
the darkness around, in blood, the night that caresses him, in the smoke-filled hut and in the great depths of
sleep, but he speaks of these in honor of what his heritage is, that what is dark may also be good. He reveals
affection for Africa in his articulation of the magnificence of Negritude.
Senghor uses repetition as a powerful force to drive his imagery home. He continually looks at how
important ‘listening’ is and how each one is cradled in a ‘rhythmic silence’ because that is how they have been
conditioned in their subjugation – to not fight back, to accept, to go on within the circle of life. But Senghor
sparks a ray of hope in his poetry by pointing to how though the attempts to crush their spirits have been many,
yet, the beats of Africa still run in their ‘dark blood’, pulsing though much seems lost. He uses vivid imagery to
entice the senses, right from the beginning of the poem to capture his audience and keep them engaged. The
poem is never just a string of words, but one that is built to make you feel like you’re there within the experience
of the speaker. The weary moon and its slack seabed, reinforce the pattern of behavior and its familiarity. The
speaker talks of how even the storyteller, generally one to be found most enthusiastic or teeming with life,
quietens with the mother’s touch.
He paints a magnificent picture of the roofs having conversations with the stars as they reflect light
tenderly, pointing to the Negritude of his culture and how all can take pride in it. The speaker wishes to go back to
the voices of the ancestors, heeding their wisdom and not wanting their lineage to fall short of glory. It becomes
a give and take relationship between what is now and what had been before, where the former chooses to
become the sustenance for the latter, and the latter becomes the basis on which what is may build and claim
value in.
Throughout this piece, we see a celebration of African culture and ancestry, and an anger towards all that
colonized its beauty. A violence towards the violation and exploitation, a metaphorical death of Africanness. He
ends the piece with the speaker asking to be allowed to learn to live, to discover what it truly is before it was
contaminated.
GRACE NICHOLS
Grace Nichols is a poet whose work has been central to our understanding of the important cultural Caribbean-
British connection for nearly 3 decades. From her first collection, I Is a Long Memoried Woman (1983), to her
more recent work such as Picasso, I Want My Face Back (2009), she has uncovered with a disquieting lyricism
and humour the various facets of life as a woman and as an immigrant living in the UK.
Nichols was born in Guyana in 1950, and moved to live in the UK in 1977. Her work is influenced by the history
and culture of her homeland, in particular the oral story-telling tradition with its fantastic folk tales, the landscape
and its rural tasks and the history of enslavement (particularly relating to women). ‘To My Coral Bones’ from
Startling the Flying Fish (2006) explores the importance of Nichols’ Caribbean heritage, suggesting she has
‘alwayscarried deepthese islands’.
On arrival in the UK, Nichols’ work began to respond to the contemporary situation. She was one of a number of
West-Indian poets, including Linton Kwesi-Johnson and John Agard, whose work also touched on racial tensions
at a time when immigration was at the centre of the political debates under Margaret Thatcher’s government.
Poems from her 1984 collection The Fat Black Woman’s Poems are an arresting and humourous riposte,
presenting the unfettered thoughts of the heroine in the bath or at the shops. A later poem, ‘Hurricane Hits
England’, expresses the connection between cultures, when a hurricane reminds her that ‘the earth is the earth is
the earth’.
Her poetry is characterized not just by the themes above, but by an acute attention to the language which carries
the poems. Her work marries the Creole of her homeland with standard English, creating new possibilities for
rhythm and rhyme. As such, while reading her poetry on the page offers fascinating insights to the potential for
linguistic hybridity, it is when spoken aloud that her techniques sing most powerfully.
In her reading for the Archive, Nichols’ voice brings the poems to life, giving free reign to the infectious lyrical
sweep of her verse. For example, in ‘Praise Song for My Mother’ (which is on the current GCSE syllabus), there is
a true harmony in the blend of the vibrant imagery, ‘the fish’s red gill’ and ‘the flame tree’s spread’, the haunting
recollection of the past tense ‘You were’, and the forward movement of the repeated stanza structure and end-
rhymes.
Her poetry for children is characterized by the same rhythms as her other poetry, although the subjects are
designed to appeal to a younger audience. ‘Cat-Rap’, included here, proves that Nichols herself is ‘The meanest
cat-rapper you’ll ever see Number one of the street-sound galaxy’.
This compelling piece written by Grace Nichols deals with a variety of different themes such as freedom and
motherhood. This blog post will explore these two themes to the poem. To begin with, an exploration of what the
poem is about will be made. Then, the poetic devises will be analysed along with the poetic structure and the
message of the poem.
This poem is about a slave woman who gave birth to a child. A ‘mullato’ which is a term referring to children with
white and black ancestry. We can infer that this child is a ‘bastard’ which illustrates how the child was not born to
the woman’s husband but perhaps to a slave master. To further support this interpretation, we can deduce that
the child may be born on a plantation field or in a similar surrounding where there are ‘dry plantain leaves’ for the
mother to squat over and give birth.
Despite the harsh conditions in which the child is born, we can infer a mother’s prayer for the child’s safety. She
prays the following:
This is a prayer because of the use of the word ‘let’ which helps her forbid the conditions that her child may go
through. These phrases can be taken as literal events which the child could go through or a figurative speech of
the harms and dangers in the world in which a mother doesn’t want their child to go through. The use of the
repetition helps emphasise the mother’s awareness of the cruelty of the world.
Structure
This poem is written as a free verse which means that it doesn’t follow a particular rhyming pattern or stanza
structure. This poem is written as a free verse to illustrate that the woman is free to be herself with her child. This
is the only moment in which she experiences freedom. Alternatively, it could be seen as an irony in her situation
where she may never experience freedom and the poem is her freedom.
Poetic Devices
Repetition: The use of repetition such as ‘my bastard fruit/my seedling/my sea grape/my strange mullato/ my
little bloodling’ helps illustrate the negative, neutral and endearing feeling all simultaneously in which the mother
feels about the child. We are aware of the conditions in which the child is born, therefore, this repetition
materialises all her feeling in one short stanza.
Alliteration: In the beginning of the poem the use of alliteration in the line ‘belly…an arc
of black moon’. This alliteration helps consolidate the beautiful imagery of pregnancy and the ‘b’ sound helps
illustrate how brave the woman is.
Message
This poem helps illustrate that a mother’s nurture, guidance and prayer can take you to a certain point. At that
point, there will be a moment in time where it is ‘for you to swim’ even if your mothers efforts, hardships and
guidance has ‘pooled’ the ‘tears’.
OF COURSE WHEN THEY ASK
FOR POEMS ABOUT THE 'REALITIES'
OF BLACK WOMEN BY GRACE NICHOLS
A mother-of-sufferer
trampled, oppressed
they want a little black blood
undressed
and validation
for the abused stereotype
already in their heads
Cruching out
with each dancing step
the twisted self-negating
history
we've inherited
Crushing out
with each dancing step
You were
water to me
deep and bold and fathoming
You were
moon's eye to me
pull and grained and mantling
You were
sunrise to me
rise and warm and streaming
You were
the fishes red gill to me
the flame tree's spread to me
the crab's leg the fried plantain smell
replenishing replenishing
Praise Song For My Mother is a free verse poem of 5 stanzas, 3 tercets, a pentain (5 lines) and the final single line
stanza.
The lack of punctuation reflects the loose form of the original praise songs - sung or chanted or spoken - and
reinforces the idea of a free flowing yet rhythmically creative work.
Stanza 1
Mother is water, a metaphor for purity of love, deep and peaceful and understanding. The element water also
heals and cleanses and is essential for life. Note the structure of this stanza, repeated throughout the poem. The
first line is a simple two syllables...You were...the speaker looking back and celebrating the mother. As the poem
progresses the lines become relatively complex, a step by step kind of form developing, reflecting the
relationship between the two.
Stanza 2
The mother is the moon, again a metaphorical device, which is a symbol of all things feminine, emotion,
spirituality. This is the eye of a goddess, a calming influence over blood and tides. Mantling is an unusual word
which means covering, protecting.
Stanza 3
In contrast mother is also the sun rising each day, a symbol of renewed energy, warmth, growth and all round well
being. And of course without the sun there'd be no light.
Stanza 4
The longest stanza with 5 lines is full of images of nature - so mother is all things natural, specifically red gills
which allow the fish to breathe. She is the flame tree, a gorgeous red tree that fills the day with passion. The
crab's leg and fried plantain are foods, crab meat tastiest from the leg plantain wholesome when fried. So mother
is provider, nourisher, refilling life, renewing energy.
Stanza 5
A single line which shoots off at a tangent to the rest. Here is mother actually speaking, telling the speaker (and
the rest of the young family) to spread their wings and leave the home to experience their own lives. They have to
live their own life, away from mother. This is the conclusion drawn following all of the metaphorical stanzas -
love, spirituality, energy and nourishment mean nothing if the young ones cannot take what they have gained
from the mother out into the big wide world.
JAMES REANEY
James Crerar Reaney, OC FRSC (September 1, 1926 – June 11, 2008) was a Canadian poet, playwright, librettist,
and professor, "whose works transform small-town Ontario life into the realm of dream and symbol. "Reaney won
Canada's highest literary award, the Governor General's Award, three times and received the Governor General's
Award for Poetry or Drama for both his poetry and his drama.
Reaney was born on a farm in Easthope near Stratford, Ontario to James Nesbitt Reaney and Elizabeth Henrietta
Crerar. Almost all of Reaney's poems, stories, and plays are articulations of where he grew up. At a young age he
was interested in theatre, and created a puppet show for children while in his early teens.
Reaney's complex symbolic and poetic regional drama defies categorizing. Reaney's plays are a combination of
symbol, metaphor, chant, poetic incantation, choral speaking, improvisation, miming, and child play. Reaney
depends on the concept that we, the audience, are all "children of an older growth" and his audience have
responded to this expectation. The symbolic quest as the children search for truth and end in reconciliation with
the adult world are the basis of Reaney's plays. Critics have called him a colonial, a rationalist and
internationalist, a rabid nationalist, a symbolist, and a poet with the myth of coherence who is yet able to say
something in an age of the random.
Of his poetry, The Canadian Encyclopedia says: "Reaney's poetry, collected in Poems (1972), has earned him a
reputation as an erudite poet at once deriving structures from metaphor, mythology, and a cosmopolitan literary
tradition while deeply rooted in a regional sense of place."
Reaney's fiction of the 1940s and 1950s (collected in the 1994 book The Box Social and Other Stories, was
"influential in establishing the style of writing that has since become known as ‘Southern Ontario Gothic’.
Margaret Atwood has remarked that ‘without "The Bully", my fiction would have followed other paths'.... Playing
sophisticated games by switching voice, he achieves a kind of ‘magic realism’, often through the distorted
perspective and sense of disproportion of his child narrators."
MAPS
BY JAMES REANEY (1926-2008)
Whenever we sing
'In days of yore'
We think of the New World's crown.
The green Northwest with its quaint inlets.
The brown Yukon.
Ungava Bay and Newfoundland
Pink fevered Saskatchewan
and purple Alberta.
GEORGE BOWERING
Born in Penticton, British Columbia, Canadian poet, novelist, and editor George Bowering earned a BA and an MA
at the University of British Columbia and completed graduate coursework at the University of Western Ontario. He
served as an aerial photographer for the Royal Canadian Air Force from 1954 to 1957. Bowering’s unadorned lyric
poems often engage the matter of daily and literary life. In a 2007 interview with Rachel Loden for Jacket
Magazine, Bowering discussed how his approach to writing shifts based on the form he is working in, stating,
“The different forms offer somewhat different good feelings. I like the dance of syllables when poetry is the thing.
I squirm in my chair. I like the daily advance of the story or novel or essay. Writing an essay is a lot like writing a
story. The sentence is what you want, the sentence that is very clear but mysterious at the same time.” On
shortlisting Changing on the Fly for the 2005 Griffin Poetry Prize, the judge’s citation notes, “In George Bowering’s
flight changes, lyric takes to the air – with spareness, resiliency and irrepressible humour. … Bowering is the poet
of delight in earthly matters, of bemusement at the self. His lyrics turn out the streetlights (who needs them!) and
light up the stars. And his lines try to understand what it is to exist, in the face of fears we all have, ‘fears that I
may cease to be.’”
Bowering has published more than 80 books. His poetry collections include Urban Snow (1991), George Bowering
Selected: Poems 1961–1992 (1993), Blonds on Bikes (1997), Changing on the Fly: The Best Lyric Poems of
George Bowering (2004), and Teeth (2013). Bowering has also published poetry under the pen name Ellen Field.
He is the author of the short story collection The Rain Barrel (1994) and collaborated with Ryan Knighton on the
short story collection Cars (2002) and with Angela Bowering, David Bromige, and Michael Matthews on the novel
Piccolo Mondo (1998). Bowering edited the short story anthologies Likely Stories: A Post-Modern Sampler (1992,
coedited with Linda Hutcheon) and And Other Stories (2001). His novels include Burning Water (1980) and
Caprice (1987); his historical nonfiction includes Bowering’s B.C.: A Swashbuckling History (1996) and Egotists
and Autocrats: The Prime Ministers of Canada (1999). Bowering’s writing has been translated into Spanish,
Italian, French, German, Chinese, and Romanian.
A founding editor of the avant-garde poetry journal TISH, Bowering also edited the Imago and has served as a
contributing editor for Open Letter. Canada’s first parliamentary poet laureate, Bowering has received the
Governor General’s Literary Award in both Poetry and Fiction, the Canadian Authors Association Award for
Poetry, and the Stephen Leacock Medal for Humour. He is an officer of the Order of Canada and of the Order of
British Columbia. Selections of his papers are held at the Queen’s University archives, the University of British
Columbia library, and the University of Calgary. Bowering has taught at the University of Calgary, the University of
Western Ontario, and Simon Fraser University. He lives in Vancouver, BC.