Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 293 views

    Application For Cancellation Po Deepak Sharma

    Uploaded by

    Darshan Singh
    1. Deepak Sharma has applied to cancel a Proclamation Order declaring him a proclaimed offender in a case of alleged fraud. 2. He claims the case was falsely filed against him in collusion with police by a complainant with whom he had financial disputes involved in separate cheque bounce cases. 3. Sharma argues he was not aware of the fraud case as the police made no attempts to contact or trace him, and seeks to have the Proclamation Order dropped in the interest of justice.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Application For Cancellation Po Deepak Sharma

    Uploaded by

    Darshan Singh
    293 views8 pages
    1. Deepak Sharma has applied to cancel a Proclamation Order declaring him a proclaimed offender in a case of alleged fraud. 2. He claims the case was falsely filed against him in collusion with police by a complainant with whom he had financial disputes involved in separate cheque bounce cases. 3. Sharma argues he was not aware of the fraud case as the police made no attempts to contact or trace him, and seeks to have the Proclamation Order dropped in the interest of justice.

    Original Description:

    po cancell

    Original Title

    Application for Cancellation Po Deepak Sharma

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1. Deepak Sharma has applied to cancel a Proclamation Order declaring him a proclaimed offender in a case of alleged fraud. 2. He claims the case was falsely filed against him in collusion with police by a complainant with whom he had financial disputes involved in separate cheque bounce cases. 3. Sharma argues he was not aware of the fraud case as the police made no attempts to contact or trace him, and seeks to have the Proclamation Order dropped in the interest of justice.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    293 views8 pages

    Application For Cancellation Po Deepak Sharma

    Uploaded by

    Darshan Singh
    1. Deepak Sharma has applied to cancel a Proclamation Order declaring him a proclaimed offender in a case of alleged fraud. 2. He claims the case was falsely filed against him in collusion with police by a complainant with whom he had financial disputes involved in separate cheque bounce cases. 3. Sharma argues he was not aware of the fraud case as the police made no attempts to contact or trace him, and seeks to have the Proclamation Order dropped in the interest of justice.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 8

    IN THE COURT OF SH. DEEPAK KUMAR-I, LD.

    ACMM,
    ROHINI COURTS, DELHI

    IN THE MATTER OF:

    STATE VS DEEPAK SHARMA


    FIR NO. 105/2018
    U/S 420/406 IPC
    P.S. MAURYA ENCLAVE

    APPLICATION FOR CANCELLING/SETTING ASIDE THE PO


    ORDER UNDER SECTION 82 OF CR.PC VIDE ORDER
    DATED 03.03.2022 AGAINST THE APPLICANT/ACCUSED
    DEEPAK SHARMA.

    MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

    1. That the applicant/accused is a law abiding and peace-loving

    citizen of India and have full faith in the administration of

    law.

    2. That the applicant /accused has been falsely implicated in the

    present case and the accused has nothing to do with the

    alleged offence.

    3. That the complainant in the above-mentioned FIR and the

    applicant/accused were known to each other and having

    financial transactions between them.


    4. That the complainant filed three complaint cases against the

    applicant/accused under section 138 NI Act which are

    pending before the Hon’ble court of Sh. Vaibhav Chaurasia,

    Ld.MM, Rohini Court, Delhi which are fixed for 02.09.2022

    and 14.10.2022 respectively.

    5. That the applicant/accused has been regularly appearing in all

    the above-mentioned complaint cases and contesting all the

    cases as the same has been filed on the basis of false and

    vague ground.

    6. That the applicant/accused is a teacher by profession and he

    use to teach chemistry subject to the students of higher

    secondary school and NEET/JEE aspirants. It is pertinent to

    mention here that being a teacher the applicant/accused

    understands the social and moral responsibility and he is a

    responsible citizen of India.

    7. That the present FIR has been registered with collusion of

    police officials of PS MAURYA ENCLAVE as the contents


    of the FIR itself discloses the facts that does not amounts to

    any sort of criminal action.

    8. That the applicant has been in touch with the complainant

    even prior to registration of the present FIR as the applicant

    had filed the above-mentioned complaint cases prior to

    registration of the present FIR.

    9. That the IO of the case recently went to the permanent

    address of the applicant which he obtained from the

    complaint cases under section 138 NI Act, as the same has

    been filed by the applicant during the pendency of the

    complaint case. It is pertinent to mention here that the

    applicant/accused came to know about the present

    complaint/FIR only when the IO last visited to his permanent

    address.

    10.That after the recent visit of the IO to the permanent address

    of the applicant/accused, applicant/accused found out the

    details in respect of the present FIR and the applicant came to

    know that the present FIR has been registered in the year
    2018. It is pertinent to mention here that since the filing of

    the complaint with the police station the IO never contacted

    or tried to trace out the applicant but IO intentionally and

    deliberately with the connivance of the complainant got

    issued the NBW’s and initiated the proceedings under section

    82 Cr.PC just to get declare the applicant/accused PO. It is

    further pertinent to mention here that the complainant knew

    everything about the applicant/accused and he is also having

    the contact number of the applicant/accused and moreover

    the applicant/accused use to appear in the complaint cases

    filed by the complainant.

    11.That the applicant/accused is not absconding in the present

    FIR, in fact the applicant/accused was not even aware about

    the registration of the present FIR against him.

    12.That it is pertinent to mention here that the IO and process

    server did not provide the actual and real facts in their report

    before the Ld. Predecessor of this Hon’ble court and in this


    way both of them misguided the Ld. Predecessor of this

    Hon’ble court just to get declare the applicant PO.

    13.That since the day one of the complaint filed by the

    complainant to the police station the complainant was very

    much aware about the phone number and address of the

    applicant as the complainant and applicant/accused earlier

    known to each other through one of the colleague teacher

    friends of the applicant, therefore under these circumstances

    the absconding of the applicant is impossible but on the

    contrary its purely a conspiracy against the applicant/accused

    just to get him declared PO.

    14.That the Ld. Predecessor of this Hon’ble court was misguided

    by the IO of the case just to get the applicant declare PO and

    resultantly the Ld. Predecessor of this Hon’ble was pleased to

    declare the applicant PO vide its order dated 03.03.2022.

    15.That the applicant/accused is not a previous convict nor

    having the criminal background and has clean and clear

    antecedents.
    16.That the applicant/accused is ready to join the investigation

    as and when required by the investigation agency and non-

    appearance of the applicant/accused in the present case is

    neither deliberately nor intentional but due to the reason

    mentioned above.

    PRAYER:

    It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that the Hon’ble Court

    may kindly be pleased to allow the present application of the accused

    and order to drop the proceedings u/s 82/83 Cr.Pc and cancel the PO

    declaration order of dated 03.03.2022, in the interest of justice.

    Delhi Applicant/Accused

    Dated Through
    DARSHAN SINGH & ASSOCIATES
    IN THE COURT OF SH. DEEPAK KUMAR-I, LD. ACMM,
    ROHINI COURTS, DELHI

    IN THE MATTER OF:

    STATE VS DEEPAK SHARMA


    FIR NO. 105/2018
    U/S 420/406 IPC
    P.S. MAURYA ENCLAVE

    INDEX

    S.NO. PARTICULARS PAGES C.FEE

    1. Application for
    Cancelling/Setting Aside
    the PO Order Under Section
    82 Of Cr. Pc Vide Order
    Dated 03.03.2022

    2. Copy of the complaint


    cases under section 138
    filed by the complainant
    against the
    applicant/accused

    3. Vakalatnama

    Delhi Applicant/Accused

    Dated Through
    DARSHAN SINGH & ASSOCIATES

    You might also like