Page 1 of 12

History of geometry
RESEARCHED & COMPILED
BY
PRABIR DATTA,LIFE FELLOW,IE(I)
MEMBER,PIANC INTL HQ,BELGIUM,
LIFE MEMBER,CONSULTING ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA(FIDIC AFFLTD)
 Page 2 of 12

PREFACE
This year-2019 is my 50th Anniversary year in the profession of Engineering,Science & Technology.A mile stone has
been reached.I thought to celebrate it with the publication of an article on the subject which was a terror to me in my
childhood.But,I am a born fighter and was a terribly attacking one from the front(now also) and sincerely
dilligent.So,I attacked it from the beginning and completed my graduation degree in Science and Engineering,with
MATHEMATICS althrough.
And,for last 50 years,a few lakhs of calculations were performed in the profession.May be some more.
The fall out is that I fell in deep love with the subject and hence,this article.
I am working on this 10 page document for last 8 to 9 years as I could not be satisfied with the materials I collected
from a no of books and articles and of course,with the help of internet webs.Everytime,I read a new
article/book,something is added or deleted.So,it was an endless task in addition to my other professional
commitments.
Finally,I was determined to publish the document in this 50th Anniversary year of professional integrity.
In compiling this document,as I said,a no of books,articles and internet web documents have been studied and
consulted.
The names of a few books are mentioned hereunder:-
1.ANCIENT EGYPT—GEORGE RAWLINSON.
2.BIRTH OF A THEOREM:A MATHEMATICAL ADVENTURE---CEDRIC VILLANI(ERSTWHILE TEACHER OF
SRI RAMANUJAM).
3.LIFE AND WORKS OF SRI SRINIVAS RAMANUJAM---BY A NO OF INDIAN AND FOREIGN AUTHORS.
4.HISTORY OF HINDU MATHEMATICS---B.B.DUTTA&AWADHESH SINGH.
5.THE WAY TO GEOMETRY---PETROS RAMUS
6.THE ANCIENT HISTORY OF THE
EGYPTIANS,CARTHAGINIANS,ASSYRIANS,BABYLONIANS,MEDES,LYDIANS----CHARLES ROLLINS.
7.THE WORKS OF ARISTOTLE,THE FAMOUS PHILOSOPHER-----ARISTOTLE.
8.SIR JAGADISH CHANDRA BOSE:HIS LIFE AND SPEECHES---SIR J.C.BOSE.
9.THE FRENCH REVOLUTION---THOMAS CARLYLE.
10.THE HISTORY OF THE DECLINE AND FALL OF ROMAN EMPIRE(6 VOLUMES—READ IN PART)—EDWARD
GIBBON.
11.INTERNET AND WEBS.
I am highly indebted to the writers and publishers of the above documents.
I humbly submit this document for everyone who are interested in and love MATHEMATICS.
For doing this work,I am highly thankful to my family members,to my wife in particular,who adjusted to my
moods,highs and lows,and always supported my cause to give me encouragement.
I shall gratefully acknowledge any omissions/errors,which I shall rectify immediately on receipt.
DON’T GET SCARED OF MATHEMATICS.LOVE IT DEEPLY AND IT WILL SING FOR YOU.
THANKS EVERYBODY.
PRABIR DATTA—E mail ID—[email protected] mobile no.send request through mail ID.
01/03/2019
KOLKATA/BANGALORE/HYDERABAD/GANGAVARAM/GOA/GOPALPUR/PARADIP/SHEVA/MUMBAI/NEW
DELHI/HALDIA/AHMEDABAD/KANDLA/CHENNAI/KARAIKAL/EGYPT/AUSTRALIA/ALEXANDRIA/SYDNEY/
SINGAPORE/KUALALAMPUR/BANGKOK/REDANG
ISLAND/PATTAYA/KODAIKANAL/KOCHI/MUNNAR/WAYNAD/ALLEPPUZHA/PALAKKAD/MYSORE/
 Page 3 of 12

HISTORY OF GEOMETRY
Geometry (from the Ancient Greek: geo- "earth", -metron "measurement") arose as the field of knowledge dealing with spatial
relationships. Geometry was one of the two fields of pre-modern mathematics, the other being the study of numbers
(arithmetic).
Classic geometry was focused in compass and straightedge constructions. Geometry was revolutionized by Euclid, who
introduced mathematical rigor and the axiomatic method still in use today. His book, The Elements is widely considered the
most influential textbook of all time, and was known to all educated people in the West until the middle of the 20th century.
In modern times, geometric concepts have been generalized to a high level of abstraction and complexity, and have been
subjected to the methods of calculus and abstract algebra, so that many modern branches of the field are barely recognizable
as the descendants of early geometry.

Early geometry
The earliest recorded beginnings of geometry can be traced to early peoples, who discovered obtuse triangles in the ancient
Indus Valley and ancient Babylonia from around 3000 BC. Early geometry was a collection of empirically discovered principles
concerning lengths, angles, areas, and volumes, which were developed to meet some practical need
in surveying, construction, astronomy, and various crafts. Among these were some surprisingly sophisticated principles, and a
modern mathematician might be hard put to derive some of them without the use of calculus. For example, both
the Egyptians and the Babylonians were aware of versions of the Pythagorean theorem about 1500 years
before Pythagoras and the Indian Sulba Sutras around 800 B.C. contained the first statements of the theorem; the Egyptians
had a correct formula for the volume of a frustum of a square pyramid;
Egyptian geometry
The ancient Egyptians knew that they could approximate the area of a circle as follows:
Area of Circle ≈ [ (Diameter) x 8/9 ]
Problem 30 of the Ahmes papyrus uses these methods to calculate the area of a circle, according to a rule that the area is equal
to the square of 8/9 of the circle's diameter. This assumes that π is 4×(8/9)² (or 3.160493...), with an error of slightly over 0.63
percent. This value was slightly less accurate than the calculations of the Babylonians (25/8 = 3.125, within 0.53 percent), but
was not otherwise surpassed until Archimedes' approximation of 211875/67441 = 3.14163, which had an error of just over 1 in
10,000.
Ahmes knew of the modern 22/7 as an approximation for π, and used it to split a hekat, hekat x 22/x x 7/22 = hekat; however,
Ahmes continued to use the traditional 256/81 value for π for computing his hekat volume found in a cylinder.
Problem 48 involved using a square with side 9 units. This square was cut into a 3x3 grid. The diagonal of the corner squares
were used to make an irregular octagon with an area of 63 units. This gave a second value for π of 3.111...
The two problems together indicate a range of values for π between 3.11 and 3.16.
Problem 14 in the Moscow Mathematical Papyrus gives the only ancient example finding the volume of a frustum of a pyramid,
describing the correct formula:

{ V={frac {1}{3}}h(x_{1}^{2}+x_{1}x_{2}+x_{2}^{2}).}
Babylonian geometry
The Babylonians may have known the general rules for measuring areas and volumes. They measured the circumference of a
circle as three times the diameter and the area as one-twelfth the square of the circumference, which would be correct if π is
estimated as 3. The volume of a cylinder was taken as the product of the base and the height, however, the volume of the
frustum of a cone or a square pyramid was incorrectly taken as the product of the height and half the sum of the bases.
The Pythagorean theorem was also known to the Babylonians. Also, there was a recent discovery in which a tablet used π as 3
and 1/8. The Babylonians are also known for the Babylonian mile, which was a measure of distance equal to about seven miles
today. This measurement for distances eventually was converted to a time-mile used for measuring the travel of the Sun,
[3]
therefore, representing time. There have been recent discoveries showing that ancient Babylonians may have discovered
astronomical geometry nearly 1400 years before Europeans did.
 Page 4 of 12

Vedic India

Rigveda manuscript in Devanagari.

The Indian Vedic period had a tradition of geometry, mostly expressed in the construction of elaborate altars. Early Indian texts
(1st millennium BC) on this topic include the Satapatha Brahmana and the Śulba Sūtras. According to (Hayashi 2005, p. 363),
the Śulba Sūtras contain "the earliest extant verbal expression of the Pythagorean Theorem in the world, although it had
already been known to the Old Babylonians."
The diagonal rope (akṣṇayā-rajju) of an oblong (rectangle) produces both which the flank (pārśvamāni) and the horizontal
(tiryaṇmānī) <ropes> produce separatelyThey contain lists of Pythagorean triples, which are particular cases of Diophantine
equations. They also contain statements (that with hindsight we know to be approximate) about squaring the circle and
"circling the square."
The Baudhayana Sulba Sutra, the best-known and oldest of the Sulba Sutras (dated to the 8th or 7th century BC) contains
examples of simple Pythagorean triples as well as a statement of the Pythagorean theorem for the sides of a square: "The rope
which is stretched across the diagonal of a square produces an area double the size of the original square." It also contains the
general statement of the Pythagorean theorem (for the sides of a rectangle): "The rope stretched along the length of the
diagonal of a rectangle makes an area which the vertical and horizontal sides make together." According to mathematician S. G.
Dani, the Babylonian cuneiform tablet Plimpton 322 written c. 1850 BC "contains fifteen Pythagorean triples with quite large
entries, including (13500, 12709, 18541) which is a primitive triple, indicating, in particular, that there was sophisticated
understanding on the topic" in Mesopotamia in 1850 BC. "Since these tablets predate the Sulba sutras period by several
centuries, taking into account the contextual appearance of some of the triples, it is reasonable to expect that similar
understanding would have been there in India." Dani goes on to say:
"As the main objective of the Sulvasutras was to describe the constructions of altars and the geometric principles involved in
them, the subject of Pythagorean triples, even if it had been well understood may still not have featured in the Sulvasutras. The
occurrence of the triples in the Sulvasutras is comparable to mathematics that one may encounter in an introductory book on
architecture or another similar applied area, and would not correspond directly to the overall knowledge on the topic at that
time. Since, unfortunately, no other contemporaneous sources have been found it may never be possible to settle this issue
satisfactorily." In all, three Sulba Sutras were composed. The remaining two, the Manava Sulba Sutra composed
by Manava (fl. 750-650 BC) and the Apastamba Sulba Sutra, composed by Apastamba (c. 600 BC), contained results similar to
the Baudhayana Sulba Sutra.
Greek geometry
Classical Greek geometry
For the ancient Greek mathematicians, geometry was the crown jewel of their sciences, reaching a completeness and
perfection of methodology that no other branch of their knowledge had attained. They expanded the range of geometry to
many new kinds of figures, curves, surfaces, and solids; they changed its methodology from trial-and-error to logical deduction;
they recognized that geometry studies "eternal forms", or abstractions, of which physical objects are only approximations; and
they developed the idea of the "axiomatic method", still in use today.
 Page
P 5 of 12

Thales and Pythagoras

2 2 2
Pythagorean theorem: a + b = c
Thales (635-543 BC) of Miletus (now in southouthwestern Turkey), was the first to whom deduction in mathema ematics is attributed.
There are five geometric propositions forr wh which he wrote deductive proofs, though his proofs have not
survived. Pythagoras (582-496 BC) of Ionia, ia, aand later, Italy, then colonized by Greeks, may have been a student
stud of Thales, and
traveled to Babylon and Egypt. The theorem rem that bears his name may not have been his discovery, but he was w probably one of
the first to give a deductive proof of it. Hee ga
gathered a group of students around him to study mathematics, tics, music, and
philosophy, and together they discovered dm most of what high school students learn today in their geometry
etry courses. In addition,
they made the profound discovery of incomm ommensurable lengths and irrational numbers.
Plato
Plato (427-347 BC) is a philosopher that is highighly esteemed by the Greeks. There is a story that he had inscr
nscribed above the
entrance to his famous school, "Let none ign ignorant of geometry enter here." However, the story is considere
idered to be
untrue. Though he was not a mathematician cian himself, his views on mathematics had great influence. Mathematicians
Mathe thus
accepted his belief that geometry should use no tools but compass and straightedge – never measuring instrumentsins such as a
marked ruler or a protractor, because these ese were a workman’s tools, not worthy of a scholar. This dictum m led
le to a deep study of
possible compass and straightedge construct tructions, and three classic construction problems: how to use these
thes tools to trisect an
angle, to construct a cube twice the volume me of a given cube, and to construct a square equal in area to a given
giv circle. The proofs
of the impossibility of these constructions, s, fi
finally achieved in the 19th century, led to important principles
les regarding
r the deep
structure of the real number system. Aristotl
stotle (384-322 BC), Plato’s greatest pupil, wrote a treatise on methods
meth of reasoning
used in deductive proofs which was not sub substantially improved upon until the 19th century.
Hellenistic geometry
Euclid
 Page 6 of 12
Statue of Euclid in the Oxford University Museum of Natural History.
Euclid (c. 325-265 BC), of Alexandria, probably a student at the Academy founded by Plato, wrote a treatise in 13 books
(chapters), titled The Elements of Geometry, in which he presented geometry in an ideal axiomatic form, which came to be
known as Euclidean geometry. The treatise is not a compendium of all that the Hellenistic mathematicians knew at the time
about geometry; Euclid himself wrote eight more advanced books on geometry. We know from other references that Euclid’s
was not the first elementary geometry textbook, but it was so much superior that the others fell into disuse and were lost. He
was brought to the university at Alexandria by Ptolemy I, King of Egypt.
The Elements began with definitions of terms, fundamental geometric principles (called axioms or postulates), and general
quantitative principles (called common notions) from which all the rest of geometry could be logically deduced. Following are
his five axioms, somewhat paraphrased to make the English easier to read.
Any two points can be joined by a straight line.
Any finite straight line can be extended in a straight line.
A circle can be drawn with any center and any radius.
All right angles are equal to each other.
If two straight lines in a plane are crossed by another straight line (called the transversal), and the interior angles between the
two lines and the transversal lying on one side of the transversal add up to less than two right angles, then on that side of the
transversal, the two lines extended will intersect (also called the parallel postulate).
Concepts, that are now understood as algebra, were expressed geometrically by Euclid, a method referred to as Greek
geometric algebra.
Archimedes
Archimedes (287-212 BC), of Syracuse, Sicily, when it was a Greek city-state, is often considered to be the greatest of the Greek
mathematicians, and occasionally even named as one of the three greatest of all time (along with Isaac Newton and Carl
Friedrich Gauss). Had he not been a mathematician, he would still be remembered as a great physicist, engineer, and inventor.
In his mathematics, he developed methods very similar to the coordinate systems of analytic geometry, and the limiting process
of integral calculus. The only element lacking for the creation of these fields was an efficient algebraic notation in which to
express his concepts.
After Archimedes
After Archimedes, Hellenistic mathematics began to decline. There were a few minor stars yet to come, but the golden age of
geometry was over. Proclus (410-485), author of Commentary on the First Book of Euclid, was one of the last important players
in Hellenistic geometry. He was a competent geometer, but more importantly, he was a superb commentator on the works that
preceded him. Much of that work did not survive to modern times, and is known to us only through his commentary. The
Roman Republic and Empire that succeeded and absorbed the Greek city-states produced excellent engineers, but no
mathematicians of note.
The great Library of Alexandria was later burned. There is a growing consensus among historians that the Library of Alexandria
likely suffered from several destructive events, but that the destruction of Alexandria's pagan temples in the late 4th century
was probably the most severe and final one. The evidence for that destruction is the most definitive and secure. Caesar's
invasion may well have led to the loss of some 40,000-70,000 scrolls in a warehouse adjacent to the port (as Luciano
Canfora argues, they were likely copies produced by the Library intended for export), but it is unlikely to have affected the
Library or Museum, given that there is ample evidence that both existed later.
Civil wars, decreasing investments in maintenance and acquisition of new scrolls and generally declining interest in non-
religious pursuits likely contributed to a reduction in the body of material available in the Library, especially in the 4th century.
The Serapeum was certainly destroyed by Theophilus in 391, and the Museum and Library may have fallen victim to the same
campaign.
Classical Indian geometry
In the Bakhshali manuscript, there is a handful of geometric problems (including problems about volumes of irregular solids).
The Bakhshali manuscript also "employs a decimal place value system with a dot for zero." Aryabhata's Aryabhatiya (499)
includes the computation of areas and volumes.
Brahmagupta wrote his astronomical work Brāhma Sphuṭa Siddhānta in 628. Chapter 12, containing 66 Sanskrit verses, was
divided into two sections: "basic operations" (including cube roots, fractions, ratio and proportion, and barter) and "practical
[19]
mathematics" (including mixture, mathematical series, plane figures, stacking bricks, sawing of timber, and piling of grain). In
the latter section, he stated his famous theorem on the diagonals of a cyclic quadrilateral:
Brahmagupta's theorem: If a cyclic quadrilateral has diagonals that are perpendicular to each other, then the perpendicular
line drawn from the point of intersection of the diagonals to any side of the quadrilateral always bisects the opposite side.
Chapter 12 also included a formula for the area of a cyclic quadrilateral (a generalization of Heron's formula), as well as a
complete description of rational triangles (i.e. triangles with rational sides and rational areas).
Brahmagupta's formula: The area, A, of a cyclic quadrilateral with sides of lengths a, b, c, d, respectively, is given by

{ A={\sqrt {(s-a)(s-b)(s-c)(s-d)}}}
 Page 7 of 12

where s, the semiperimeter, given by:

Brahmagupta's Theorem on rational triangles: A triangle with rational sides and rational area is of the form:

{ a={\frac {u^{2}}{v}}+v,\ \ b={\frac {u^{2}}{w}}+w,\ \ c={\frac {u^{2}}{v}}+{\frac {u^{2}}{w}}-(v+w)}

Chinese geometry

The Nine Chapters on the Mathematical Art, first compiled in 179 AD, with added commentary in the 3rd century by Liu Hui.

Haidao Suanjing, Liu Hui, 3rd century.

The first definitive work (or at least oldest existent) on geometry in China was the Mo Jing, the Mohist canon of the early
philosopher Mozi(470-390 BC). It was compiled years after his death by his followers around the year 330 BC. Although the Mo
Jing is the oldest existent book on geometry in China, there is the possibility that even older written material existed. However,
due to the infamous Burning of the Books in a political maneuver by the Qin Dynasty ruler Qin Shihuang (r. 221-210 BC),
multitudes of written literature created before his time were purged. In addition, the Mo Jing presents geometrical concepts in
 Page 8 of 12
mathematics that are perhaps too advanced not to have had a previous geometrical base or mathematic background to work
upon.
The Mo Jing described various aspects of many fields associated with physical science, and provided a small wealth of
information on mathematics as well. It provided an 'atomic' definition of the geometric point, stating that a line is separated
into parts, and the part which has no remaining parts (i.e. cannot be divided into smaller parts) and thus forms the extreme end
of a line is a point. Much like Euclid's first and third definitions and Plato's 'beginning of a line', the Mo Jing stated that "a point
may stand at the end (of a line) or at its beginning like a head-presentation in childbirth. (As to its invisibility) there is nothing
similar to it." Similar to the atomists of Democritus, the Mo Jing stated that a point is the smallest unit, and cannot be cut in
half, since 'nothing' cannot be halved. It stated that two lines of equal length will always finish at the same place, while
providing definitions for the comparison of lengths and for parallels, along with principles of space and bounded space. It also
described the fact that planes without the quality of thickness cannot be piled up since they cannot mutually touch. The book
provided definitions for circumference, diameter, and radius, along with the definition of volume. The Han Dynasty (202 BC-220
AD) period of China witnessed a new flourishing of mathematics. One of the oldest Chinese mathematical texts to
present geometric progressions was the Suàn shù shū of 186 BC, during the Western Han era. The mathematician, inventor,
and astronomer Zhang Heng (78-139 AD) used geometrical formulas to solve mathematical problems. Although rough
estimates for pi (π) were given in the Zhou Li (compiled in the 2nd century BC), it was Zhang Heng who was the first to make a
concerted effort at creating a more accurate formula for pi. Zhang Heng approximated pi as 730/232 (or approx 3.1466),
although he used another formula of pi in finding a spherical volume, using the square root of 10 (or approx 3.162) instead. Zu
355
Chongzhi (429-500 AD) improved the accuracy of the approximation of pi to between 3.1415926 and 3.1415927, with ⁄113 (
22
Milü, detailed approximation) and ⁄7 (Yuelü, rough approximation) being the other notable approximation. In comparison to
later works, the formula for pi given by the French mathematician Franciscus Vieta (1540-1603) fell halfway between Zu's
approximations.
The Nine Chapters on the Mathematical Art
The Nine Chapters on the Mathematical Art, the title of which first appeared by 179 AD on a bronze inscription, was edited and
commented on by the 3rd century mathematician Liu Hui from the Kingdom of Cao Wei. This book included many problems
where geometry was applied, such as finding surface areas for squares and circles, the volumes of solids in various three-
dimensional shapes, and included the use of the Pythagorean theorem. The book provided illustrated proof for the
Pythagorean theorem, contained a written dialogue between of the earlier Duke of Zhou and Shang Gao on the properties of
the right angle triangle and the Pythagorean theorem, while also referring to the astronomical gnomon, the circle and square,
as well as measurements of heights and distances. The editor Liu Hui listed pi as 3.141014 by using a 192 sided polygon, and
then calculated pi as 3.14159 using a 3072 sided polygon. This was more accurate than Liu Hui's contemporary Wang Fan, a
142
mathematician and astronomer from Eastern Wu, would render pi as 3.1555 by using ⁄45. Liu Hui also wrote of
mathematical surveying to calculate distance measurements of depth, height, width, and surface area. In terms of solid
geometry, he figured out that a wedge with rectangular base and both sides sloping could be broken down into a pyramid and
a tetrahedral wedge. He also figured out that a wedge with trapezoid base and both sides sloping could be made to give two
tetrahedral wedges separated by a pyramid. Furthermore, Liu Hui described Cavalieri's principle on volume, as well as Gaussian
elimination. From the Nine Chapters, it listed the following geometrical formulas that were known by the time of the Former
Han Dynasty (202 BCE–9 CE).
Areas for the
Square Rhomboid
Rectangle Trapezoid
Circle Double trapezium
Isosceles triangle Segment of a circle
Annulus ('ring' between two concentric
circles)
Volumes for the
Parallelepiped with two square surfaces Cube Frustum of a wedge of the second type
Parallelepiped with no square surfaces Prism (used for applications in engineering)
Pyramid Wedge with rectangular base and both Cylinder
Frustum of pyramid with square base sides sloping Cone with circular base
Frustum of pyramid with rectangular base Wedge with trapezoid base and both sides Frustum of a cone
of unequal sides sloping Sphere
Tetrahedral wedge
Continuing the geometrical legacy of ancient China, there were many later figures to come, including the famed astronomer
and mathematician Shen Kuo (1031-1095 CE), Yang Hui(1238-1298) who discovered Pascal's Triangle, Xu Guangqi (1562-1633),
and many others.
 Page 9 of 12
Islamic Golden Age
By the beginning of the 9th century, the "Islamic Golden Age" flourished, the establishment of the House of
Wisdom in Baghdad marking a separate tradition of science in the medieval Islamic world, building not only Hellenistic but also
on Indian sources.
Although the Islamic mathematicians are most famed for their work on algebra, number theory and number systems, they also
made considerable contributions to geometry, trigonometry and mathematical astronomy, and were responsible for the
development of algebraic geometry.
Al-Mahani (born 820) conceived the idea of reducing geometrical problems such as duplicating the cube to problems in
algebra. Al-Karaji(born 953) completely freed algebra from geometrical operations and replaced them with
the arithmetical type of operations which are at the core of algebra today.
Thābit ibn Qurra (known as Thebit in Latin) (born 836) contributed to a number of areas in mathematics, where he played an
important role in preparing the way for such important mathematical discoveries as the extension of the concept of number to
(positive) real numbers, integral calculus, theorems in spherical trigonometry, analytic geometry, and non-Euclidean geometry.
In astronomy Thabit was one of the first reformers of the Ptolemaic system, and in mechanics he was a founder of statics. An
important geometrical aspect of Thabit's work was his book on the composition of ratios. In this book, Thabit deals with
arithmetical operations applied to ratios of geometrical quantities. The Greeks had dealt with geometric quantities but had not
thought of them in the same way as numbers to which the usual rules of arithmetic could be applied. By introducing
arithmetical operations on quantities previously regarded as geometric and non-numerical, Thabit started a trend which led
eventually to the generalisation of the number concept.
In some respects, Thabit is critical of the ideas of Plato and Aristotle, particularly regarding motion. It would seem that here his
ideas are based on an acceptance of using arguments concerning motion in his geometrical arguments. Another important
contribution Thabit made to geometry was his generalization of the Pythagorean theorem, which he extended from special
right triangles to all triangles in general, along with a general proof.
Ibrahim ibn Sinan ibn Thabit (born 908), who introduced a method of integration more general than that of Archimedes, and al-
Quhi (born 940) were leading figures in a revival and continuation of Greek higher geometry in the Islamic world. These
mathematicians, and in particular Ibn al-Haytham, studied optics and investigated the optical properties of mirrors made
from conic sections.
Astronomy, time-keeping and geography provided other motivations for geometrical and trigonometrical research. For
example, Ibrahim ibn Sinan and his grandfather Thabit ibn Qurra both studied curves required in the construction of
sundials. Abu'l-Wafa and Abu Nasr Mansur both applied spherical geometry to astronomy.
A 2007 paper in the journal Science suggested that girih tiles possessed properties consistent with self-
similar fractal quasicrystalline tilings such as the Penrose tilings.
 Page 10 of 12
Renaissance

An engraving by Albrecht Dürerfeaturing Mashallah, from the title page of the De scientia motus orbis (Latin version with
engraving, 1504). As in many medieval illustrations, the compass here is an icon of religion as well as science, in reference to
God as the architect of creation
The transmission of the Greek Classics to medieval Europe via the Arabic literature of the 9th to 10th century "Islamic Golden
Age" began in the 10th century and culminated in the Latin translations of the 12th century. A copy of Ptolemy's Almagest was
brought back to Sicily by Henry Aristippus (d. 1162), as a gift from the Emperor to King William I (r. 1154–1166). An anonymous
student at Salerno travelled to Sicily and translated the Almagest as well as several works by Euclid from Greek to Latin.
Although the Sicilians generally translated directly from the Greek, when Greek texts were not available, they would translate
from Arabic. Eugenius of Palermo (d. 1202) translated Ptolemy's Optics into Latin, drawing on his knowledge of all three
languages in the task. The rigorous deductive methods of geometry found in Euclid's Elements of Geometry were relearned, and
further development of geometry in the styles of both Euclid (Euclidean geometry) and Khayyam (algebraic geometry)
continued, resulting in an abundance of new theorems and concepts, many of them very profound and elegant.
Advances in the treatment of perspective were made in Renaissance art of the 14th to 15th century which went beyond what
had been achieved in antiquity. In Renaissance architecture of the Quattrocento, concepts of architectural order were explored
and rules were formulated. A prime example of is the Basilica di San Lorenzo in Florence by Filippo Brunelleschi (1377–1446).
In c. 1413 Filippo Brunelleschi demonstrated the geometrical method of perspective, used today by artists, by painting the
outlines of various Florentine buildings onto a mirror. Soon after, nearly every artist in Florence and in Italy used geometrical
perspective in their paintings,notably Masolino da Panicale and Donatello. Melozzo da Forlì first used the technique of upward
foreshortening (in Rome, Loreto, Forlì and others), and was celebrated for that. Not only was perspective a way of showing
depth, it was also a new method of composing a painting. Paintings began to show a single, unified scene, rather than a
combination of several.
As shown by the quick proliferation of accurate perspective paintings in Florence, Brunelleschi likely understood (with help
from his friend the mathematician Toscanelli), but did not publish, the mathematics behind perspective. Decades later, his
friend Leon Battista Albertiwrote De pictura (1435/1436), a treatise on proper methods of showing distance in painting based
on Euclidean geometry. Alberti was also trained in the science of optics through the school of Padua and under the influence
of Biagio Pelacani da Parma who studied Alhazen's Optics'.
Piero della Francesca elaborated on Della Pittura in his De Prospectiva Pingendi in the 1470s. Alberti had limited himself to
figures on the ground plane and giving an overall basis for perspective. Della Francesca fleshed it out, explicitly covering solids
in any area of the picture plane. Della Francesca also started the now common practice of using illustrated figures to explain the
mathematical concepts, making his treatise easier to understand than Alberti's. Della Francesca was also the first to accurately
draw the Platonic solids as they would appear in perspective.
Perspective remained, for a while, the domain of Florence. Jan van Eyck, among others, was unable to create a consistent
structure for the converging lines in paintings, as in London's The Arnolfini Portrait, because he was unaware of the theoretical
breakthrough just then occurring in Italy. However he achieved very subtle effects by manipulations of scale in his interiors.
Gradually, and partly through the movement of academies of the arts, the Italian techniques became part of the training of
artists across Europe, and later other parts of the world. The culmination of these Renaissance traditions finds its ultimate
synthesis in the research of the architect, geometer, and optician Girard Desargues on perspective, optics and projective
geometry.
 Page
Pa 11 of 12
The Vitruvian Man by Leonardo da Vinci(c.(c. 11490) depicts a man in two superimposed positions with his arms
arm and legs apart and
inscribed in a circle and square. The drawing
ing is based on the correlations of ideal human proportions with
ith geometry
g described
by the ancient Roman architect Vitruvius in B Book III of his treatise De Architectura.
The 17th century

Discourse on Method by René Descartes

In the early 17th century, there were two o imimportant developments in geometry. The first and most importa ortant was the creation
of analytic geometry, or geometry with coor oordinates and equations, by René Descartes (1596–1650) and Pierre Pie de
Fermat (1601–1665). This was a necessary ry pr
precursor to the development of calculus and a precise quantita titative science
of physics. The second geometric developme pment of this period was the systematic study of projective geome ometry by Girard
Desargues (1591–1661). Projective geometry etry is the study of geometry without measurement, just the study tudy of how points align
with each other. There had been some early arly work in this area by Hellenistic geometers, notably Pappus (c. 340). The greatest
flowering of the field occurred with Jean-Vic Victor Poncelet (1788–1867).
In the late 17th century, calculus was develo veloped independently and almost simultaneously by Isaac Newton wton (1642–1727)
and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646–1716). 16). This was the beginning of a new field of mathematics now called calle analysis. Though
not itself a branch of geometry, it is applicab
licable to geometry, and it solved two families of problems thatt had long been almost
intractable: finding tangent lines to odd curv
curves, and finding areas enclosed by those curves. The methods ds of
o calculus reduced
these problems mostly to straightforward dm matters of computation.
The 18th and 19th centuries
Non-Euclidean geometry
The very old problem of proving Euclid’s Fifth Postulate, the "Parallel Postulate", from his first four postulat tulates had never been
forgotten. Beginning not long after Euclid, d, m many attempted demonstrations were given, but all were later ter found
f to be faulty,
through allowing into the reasoning somee pr principle which itself had not been proved from the first four postulates.
pos Though
Omar Khayyám was also unsuccessful in prov proving the parallel postulate, his criticisms of Euclid's theoriess of parallels
p and his
proof of properties of figures in non-Euclidealidean geometries contributed to the eventual development of non-Euclidean
non
geometry. By 1700 a great deal had been n dis
discovered about what can be proved from the first four, and what wha the pitfalls were in
attempting to prove the fifth. Saccheri, Lamb ambert, and Legendre each did excellent work on the problem in the t 18th century, but
still fell short of success. In the early 19th
h cen
century, Gauss, Johann Bolyai, and Lobatchewsky, each independ endently, took a
different approach. Beginning to suspectt tha that it was impossible to prove the Parallel Postulate, they set out to develop a self-
consistent geometry in which that postulate late was false. In this they were successful, thus creating the first
rst non-Euclidean
n
geometry. By 1854, Bernhard Riemann, a stu student of Gauss, had applied methods of calculus in a ground-br breaking study of the
intrinsic (self-contained) geometry of all smo smooth surfaces, and thereby found a different non-Euclidean geometry.
geo This work of
Riemann later became fundamental for Einst Einstein's theory of relativity.
It remained to be proved mathematicallyy tha that the non-Euclidean geometry was just as self-consistent ass Euclidean
Eu geometry,
and this was first accomplished by Beltrami mi in 1868. With this, non-Euclidean geometry was established on an equal
mathematical footing with Euclidean geome metry.
While it was now known that different geom eometric theories were mathematically possible, the question remained,
rem "Which one of
these theories is correct for our physical spacspace?" The mathematical work revealed that this question must ust be
b answered by
 Page 12 of 12
physical experimentation, not mathematical reasoning, and uncovered the reason why the experimentation must involve
immense (interstellar, not earth-bound) distances. With the development of relativity theory in physics, this question became
vastly more complicated.
Introduction of mathematical rigor
All the work related to the Parallel Postulate revealed that it was quite difficult for a geometer to separate his logical reasoning
from his intuitive understanding of physical space, and, moreover, revealed the critical importance of doing so. Careful
examination had uncovered some logical inadequacies in Euclid's reasoning, and some unstated geometric principles to which
Euclid sometimes appealed. This critique paralleled the crisis occurring in calculus and analysis regarding the meaning of infinite
processes such as convergence and continuity. In geometry, there was a clear need for a new set of axioms, which would be
complete, and which in no way relied on pictures we draw or on our intuition of space. Such axioms, now known as Hilbert's
axioms, were given by David Hilbert in 1894 in his dissertation Grundlagen der Geometrie (Foundations of Geometry). Some
other complete sets of axioms had been given a few years earlier, but did not match Hilbert's in economy, elegance, and
similarity to Euclid's axioms.
Analysis situs, or topology
In the mid-18th century, it became apparent that certain progressions of mathematical reasoning recurred when similar ideas
were studied on the number line, in two dimensions, and in three dimensions. Thus the general concept of a metric space was
created so that the reasoning could be done in more generality, and then applied to special cases. This method of studying
calculus- and analysis-related concepts came to be known as analysis situs, and later as topology. The important topics in this
field were properties of more general figures, such as connectedness and boundaries, rather than properties like straightness,
and precise equality of length and angle measurements, which had been the focus of Euclidean and non-Euclidean geometry.
Topology soon became a separate field of major importance, rather than a sub-field of geometry or analysis.
The 20th century
Developments in algebraic geometry included the study of curves and surfaces over finite fields as demonstrated by the works
of among others André Weil, Alexander Grothendieck, and Jean-Pierre Serre as well as over the real or complex numbers. Finite
geometry itself, the study of spaces with only finitely many points, found applications in coding theory and cryptography. With
the advent of the computer, new disciplines such as computational geometry or digital geometry deal with geometric
algorithms, discrete representations of geometric data, and so forth.