Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 24 views

    T Test

    Uploaded by

    mikee jane sabillo
    Two groups of rats were given different doses of tranquilizer and the time it took for them to fall asleep was recorded. A t-test was conducted to determine if there was a significant difference between the doses on sleep time. The t-test results showed no significant difference, so the null hypothesis that dosage does not affect sleep time was accepted. Therefore, the dosage of tranquilizer did not have an effect on how long it took the rats to fall asleep.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    T Test

    Uploaded by

    mikee jane sabillo
    24 views20 pages
    Two groups of rats were given different doses of tranquilizer and the time it took for them to fall asleep was recorded. A t-test was conducted to determine if there was a significant difference between the doses on sleep time. The t-test results showed no significant difference, so the null hypothesis that dosage does not affect sleep time was accepted. Therefore, the dosage of tranquilizer did not have an effect on how long it took the rats to fall asleep.

    Original Title

    T TEST

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Two groups of rats were given different doses of tranquilizer and the time it took for them to fall asleep was recorded. A t-test was conducted to determine if there was a significant difference between the doses on sleep time. The t-test results showed no significant difference, so the null hypothesis that dosage does not affect sleep time was accepted. Therefore, the dosage of tranquilizer did not have an effect on how long it took the rats to fall asleep.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    24 views20 pages

    T Test

    Uploaded by

    mikee jane sabillo
    Two groups of rats were given different doses of tranquilizer and the time it took for them to fall asleep was recorded. A t-test was conducted to determine if there was a significant difference between the doses on sleep time. The t-test results showed no significant difference, so the null hypothesis that dosage does not affect sleep time was accepted. Therefore, the dosage of tranquilizer did not have an effect on how long it took the rats to fall asleep.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 20

    Two groups of experimental rats were injected with tranquilizer at 1.0 mg and 1.5 mg.

    dose
    respectively. The time given in seconds that took them to fall asleep is hereby given. Test the
    null hypothesis at 0.01 level of significance.
    Solving by Stepwise method

    I. PROBLEM

    Is there a significant difference brought by the


    dosages on the length of time it took for the rats to
    fall asleep ?

    II. HYPOTHESIS
    Ho: There is no significant difference brought by the
    dosages on the length of time it took for the rats to
    fall asleep.

    H1: There is no significant difference brought by the


    dosages on the length of time it took for the rats to
    fall asleep.
    Solving by Stepwise method

    III. LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE

    α = 0.01
    Df = N1 + n2 - 2
    = 11 + 9 – 2
    = 18

    t.01 = ± 2.88
    Solving by Stepwise method

    III. LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE

    α = 0.01
    Df = N1 + n2 - 2
    = 11 + 9 – 2
    = 18

    t.01 = ± 2.88

    III. STATISTICS

    T test for independent samples


    1.0 mg dose ( X1 ) 1.5 mg dose ( X2 )
    X1 X12 X2 X22
    9.8 96.4 120 144.00
    13.2 174.24 7.4 54.76
    11.2 125.44 9.8 96.04
    9.5 90.25 11.5 132.25
    13.0 169.00 13.0 169.00
    12.1 186.41
    12.5 156.25
    9.8 96.04
    9.8 96.04
    12.3 151.29
    10.5 110.25
    7.9 62.41
    10.2 104.04 13.5 182.25
    9.7 94.09 ΣX2=100 ΣX12 = 1140.84
    ΣX1=118.7 ΣX12 = 1309.25
    N1 = 11 N2 = 9
    x̄1 = 10.79 x̄2 = 11.11
    ΣX1=118.7 ΣX12 = 1309.25 ΣX2=100 ΣX22 = 1140.84
    N1 = 11 N2 = 9
    x̄1 = 10.79 x̄2 = 11.11

    (118.7)2 (100)2
    𝑺𝑺𝟏 = 1309.25 − 𝑺𝑺𝟐 = 1140.84 −
    11 9
    𝑺𝑺𝟏 = 28.37 𝑺𝑺𝟐 = 29.73

    10.79−11.11
    T=
    28.37+29.73 1 1
    ( )( + )
    11−9−2 11 9

    T= -0.40
    V. DECISION

    If the T computed value is greater


    than the T tabular value, reject Ho

    VI. CONCLUSION

    Since the T computed value of -0.40 is within the T tabular value of 2.88 at 0.01
    level of level of significance within 18 degrees of freedom, the null hypothesis is
    accepted. This means that there is no significant difference between the dosage
    and the length of time took the rats to fall asleep. This implies that the dosage of the
    injection of tranquilizer does not affect the length of time it took the rats to fall
    asleep.
    PRETEST POSTEST
    PRETEST POSTEST D D2

    ΣD = - 81 ΣD2 = 947
    D-bar = -4.05 N = 20
    ΣD = - 81 ΣD2 = 947
    D-bar = -4.05 N = 20
    Solving by Stepwise method

    I. PROBLEM

    Is there a significant difference between the


    students pretest and the posttest score on the use
    of programmed materials in English ?

    II. HYPOTHESIS
    Ho: There is no significant difference between the
    students pretest and the posttest

    H1: The postest result is higher than the pretest


    result.
    Solving by Stepwise method

    III. LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE

    α = 0.05
    Df = N-1
    = 20-1
    = 19

    t.05 = 1.729
    Solving by Stepwise method

    III. LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE

    α = 0.05
    Df = N-1
    = 20-1
    = 19

    t.05 = -1.729

    III. STATISTICS

    T test for correlated samples


    V. DECISION

    If the T computed value is greater than or beyond


    the T tabular value, reject Ho

    VI. CONCLUSION

    The t computed value of -3.17 is beyond the


    t-critical value of -1.729 at .05 level of
    significance with 19 degrees of freedom, the
    null hypothesis is therefore rejected in favor of
    the research hypothesis. This means that the
    posttest result is higher than the pretest result. It
    implies that the use of the programmed
    materials in English is effective.

    You might also like