Internet Protocol Multicast
Internet Protocol Multicast
Internet Protocol Multicast
to thousands of corporate recipients and homes. Applications that take advantage of multicast include videoconferencing, corporate communications, distance learning, and distribution of software, stock quotes, and news. Guide Contents Internetworking Basics LAN Technologies WAN Technologies Internet Protocols Bridging and Switching Routing Network Management Voice/Data Integration Technologies Wireless Technologies Cable Access Technologies Dial-up Technology Security Technologies Quality of Service Networking Network Caching Technologies IBM Network Management Multiservice Access Technologies
Contents
1 Background 1.1 Figure: Multicast Transmission Sends a Single Multicast Packet Addressed to All Intended Recipients 2 Multicast Group Concept 3 IP Multicast Addresses 3.1 IP Class D Addresses 3.2 Reserved Link Local Addresses 3.2.1 Table: Link Local Addresses 3.3 Globally Scoped Address 3.4 Limited Scope Addresses 3.5 Glop Addressing 3.6 Layer 2 Multicast Addresses 3.6.1 Figure: IEEE 802.3 MAC Address Format 3.7 Ethernet MAC Address Mapping 3.7.1 Figure: Mapping of IP Multicast to Ethernet/FDDI MAC Address 3.7.2 Figure: MAC Address Ambiguities 4 Internet Group Management Protocol 4.1 IGMP Version 1 4.1.1 Figure: IGMP Version 1 Packet Format 4.2 IGMP Version 2 4.2.1 Figure: IGMPv2 Message Format 5 Multicast in the Layer 2 Switching Environment 5.1 Cisco Group Management Protocol
06/09/11
Internet_Protocol_Multicast 5.1.1 Figure: Basic CGMP Operation 5.2 IGMP Snooping 6 Multicast Distribution Trees 6.1 Source Trees 6.1.1 Figure: Host A Shortest Path Tree 6.2 Shared Trees 6.2.1 Figure: Shared Distribution Tree 7 Multicast Forwarding 7.1 Reverse Path Forwarding 7.1.1 RPF Check 8 Protocol-Independent Multicast 8.1 PIM Dense Mode 8.2 PIM Sparse Mode 8.3 Sparse-Dense Mode 9 Multiprotocol Border Gateway Protocol 10 Multicast Source Discovery Protocol 10.1 Figure: MSDP Example 10.2 Anycast RP-Logical RP 10.2.1 Figure: Anycast RP 10.3 Multicast Address Dynamic Client Allocation Protocol 10.4 Multicast-Scope Zone Announcement Protocol 10.5 Reliable Multicast-Pragmatic General Multicast 11 Review Questions 12 For More Information
Background
IP Multicast delivers source traffic to multiple receivers without adding any additional burden on the source or the receivers while using the least network bandwidth of any competing technology. Multicast packets are replicated in the network by Cisco routers enabled with Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) and other supporting multicast protocols resulting in the most efficient delivery of data to multiple receivers possible. All alternatives require the source to send more than one copy of the data. Some even require the source to send an individual copy to each receiver. If there are thousands of receivers, even low-bandwidth applications benefit from using Cisco IP Multicast. High-bandwidth applications, such as MPEG video, may require a large portion of the available network bandwidth for a single stream. In these applications, the only way to send to more than one receiver simultaneously is by using IP Multicast. Figure: Multicast Transmission Sends a Single Multicast Packet Addressed to All Intended Recipients demonstrates how data from one source is delivered to several interested recipients using IP multicast.
Figure: Multicast Transmission Sends a Single Multicast Packet Addressed to All Intended Recipients
06/09/11
Internet_Protocol_Multicast
IP Multicast Addresses
Multicast addresses specify an arbitrary group of IP hosts that have joined the group and want to receive traffic sent to this group.
IP Class D Addresses
The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) controls the assignment of IP multicast addresses. It has assigned the old Class D address space to be used for IP multicast. This means that all IP multicast group addresses will fall in the range of 224.0.0.0 to 239.255.255.255.
Note: This address range is only for the group address or destination address of IP multicast traffic. The source address for multicast datagrams is always the unicast source address.
06/09/11
Internet_Protocol_Multicast
Usage All systems on this subnet All routers on this subnet OSPF routers OSPF designated routers DHCP server/relay agent
Glop Addressing
RFC 2770 proposes that the 233.0.0.0/8 address range be reserved for statically defined addresses by organizations that already have an AS number reserved. The AS number of the domain is embedded into the second and third octets of the 233.0.0.0/8 range. 06/09/11 4
Internet_Protocol_Multicast For example, the AS 62010 is written in hex as F23A. Separating out the two octets F2 and 3A, we get 242 and 58 in decimal. This would give us a subnet of 233.242.58.0 that would be globally reserved for AS 62010 to use.
This bit indicates that the frame is destined for an arbitrary group of hosts or all hosts on the network (in the case of the broadcast address, 0xFFFF.FFFF.FFFF). IP multicast makes use of this capability to transmit IP packets to a group of hosts on a LAN segment.
06/09/11
Internet_Protocol_Multicast
Because the upper 5 bits of the IP multicast address are dropped in this mapping, the resulting address is not unique. In fact, 32 different multicast group IDs all map to the same Ethernet address (see Figure: MAC Address Ambiguities).
IGMP Version 1
RFC 1112 defines the specification for IGMP Version 1. A diagram of the packet format is found in Figure: IGMP Version 1 Packet Format.
06/09/11
Internet_Protocol_Multicast
Figure: IGMP Version 1 Packet Format
In Version 1, there are just two different types of IGMP messages: Membership query Membership report Hosts send out IGMP membership reports corresponding to a particular multicast group to indicate that they are interested in joining that group. The router periodically sends out an IGMP membership query to verify that at least one host on the subnet is still interested in receiving traffic directed to that group. When there is no reply to three consecutive IGMP membership queries, the router times out the group and stops forwarding traffic directed toward that group.
IGMP Version 2
RFC 2236 defines the specification for IGMP Version 2. A diagram of the packet format follows in the following figure.
In Version 2, there are four types of IGMP messages: Membership query Version 1 membership report Version 2 membership report Leave group IGMP Version 2 works basically the same as Version 1. The main difference is that there is a leave group message. The hosts now can actively communicate to the local multicast router their intention to leave the group. The router then sends out a group-specific query and determines whether there are any remaining hosts interested in receiving the traffic. If there are no replies, the router times out the group and stops forwarding the traffic. This can greatly reduce the leave latency compared to IGMP Version 1. Unwanted and unnecessary traffic can be stopped much sooner.
06/09/11
Internet_Protocol_Multicast
06/09/11
Internet_Protocol_Multicast
IGMP Snooping
IGMP snooping requires the LAN switch to examine, or snoop, some Layer 3 information in the IGMP packets sent between the hosts and the router. When the switch hears the IGMP host report from a host for a particular multicast group, the switch adds the host's port number to the associated multicast table entry. When the switch hears the IGMP leave group message from a host, it removes the host's port from the table entry. Because IGMP control messages are transmitted as multicast packets, they are indistinguishable from multicast data at Layer 2. A switch running IGMP snooping examine every multicast data packet to check whether it contains any pertinent IGMP must control information. If IGMP snooping has been implemented on a low-end switch with a slow CPU, this could have a severe performance impact when data is transmitted at high rates. The solution is to implement IGMP snooping on high-end switches with special ASICs that can perform the IGMP checks in hardware. CGMP is ideal for low-end switches without special hardware.
Source Trees
The simplest form of a multicast distribution tree is a source tree whose root is the source of the multicast tree and whose branches form a spanning tree through the network to the receivers. Because this tree uses the shortest path through the network, it is also referred to as a shortest path tree (SPT). Figure: Host A Shortest Path Tree shows an example of an SPT for group 224.1.1.1 rooted at the source, Host A, and connecting two receivers, hosts B and C.
06/09/11
Internet_Protocol_Multicast
The special notation of (S,G), pronounced "S comma G," enumerates an SPT in which S is the IP address of the source and G is the multicast group address. Using this notation, the SPT for the example in Figure 43-7 would be (192.1.1.1, 224.1.1.1). The (S,G) notation implies that a separate SPT exists for each individual source sending to each group, which is correct. For example, if Host B is also sending traffic to group 224.1.1.1 and hosts A and C are receivers, then a separate (S,G) SPT would exist with a notation of (192.2.2.2,224.1.1.1).
Shared Trees
Unlike source trees that have their root at the source, shared trees use a single common root placed at some chosen point in the network. This shared root is called the rendezvous point (RP). Figure: Shared Distribution Tree shows a shared tree for the group 224.2.2.2 with the root located at Router D. When using a shared tree, sources must send their traffic to the root, and then the traffic is forwarded down the shared tree to reach all receivers.
06/09/11
10
Internet_Protocol_Multicast
In this example, multicast traffic from the source hosts A and D travels to the root (Router D) and then down the shared tree to the two receivers, hosts B and C. Because all sources in the multicast group use a common shared tree, a wildcard notation written as (*, G), pronounced "star comma G," represents the tree. In this case, * means all sources, and the G represents the multicast group. Therefore, the shared tree shown in the figure would be written as (*, 224.2.2.2). Both SPT and shared trees are loop-free. Messages are replicated only where the tree branches. Members of multicast groups can join or leave at any time, so the distribution trees must be dynamically updated. When all the active receivers on a particular branch stop requesting the traffic for a particular multicast group, the routers prune that branch from the distribution tree and stop forwarding traffic down that branch. If one receiver on that branch becomes active and requests the multicast traffic, the router dynamically modifies the distribution tree and starts forwarding traffic again. Shortest path trees have the advantage of creating the optimal path between the source and the receivers. This guarantees the minimum amount of network latency for forwarding multicast traffic. This optimization does come with a price, though: The routers must maintain path information for each source. In a network that has thousands of sources and thousands of groups, this can quickly become a resource issue on the routers. Memory consumption from the size of the multicast routing table is a factor that network designers must take into consideration. Shared trees have the advantage of requiring the minimum amount of state in each router. This lowers the overall memory requirements for a network that allows only shared trees. The disadvantage of shared trees is that, under certain circumstances, the paths between the source and receivers might not be the optimal paths-which might introduce some latency in packet delivery. Network designers must carefully consider the placement of the RP when implementing an environment with only shared trees.
06/09/11
11
Internet_Protocol_Multicast
Multicast Forwarding
In unicast routing, traffic is routed through the network along a single path from the source to the destination host. A unicast router does not really care about the source address-it only cares about the destination address and how to forward the traffic towards that destination. The router scans through its routing table and then forwards a single copy of the unicast packet out the correct interface in the direction of the destination. In multicast routing, the source is sending traffic to an arbitrary group of hosts represented by a multicast group address. The multicast router must determine which direction is upstream (toward the source) and which direction (or directions) is downstream. If there are multiple downstream paths, the router replicates the packet and forwards the traffic down the appropriate downstream paths-which is not necessarily all paths. This concept of forwarding multicast traffic away from the source, rather than to the receiver, is called reverse path forwarding.
RPF Check When a multicast packet arrives at a router, the router performs an RPF check on the packet. If the RPF check is successful, the packet is forwarded. Otherwise, it is dropped. For traffic flowing down a source tree, the RPF check procedure works as follows: 1. Router looks up the source address in the unicast routing table to determine whether it has arrived on the interface that is on the reverse path back to the source. 2. If packet has arrived on the interface leading back to the source, the RPF check is successful and the packet is forwarded. 3. If the RPF check in Step 2 fails, the packet is dropped. Figure: RPF Check Fails shows an example of an unsuccessful RPF check.
06/09/11
12
Internet_Protocol_Multicast A multicast packet from source 151.10.3.21 is received on interface S0. A check of the unicast route table shows that the interface that this router would use to forward unicast data to 151.10.3.21 is S1. Because the packet has arrived on S0, the packet will be discarded. Figure: RPF Check Succeeds shows an example of a successful RPF check.
This time the multicast packet has arrived on S1. The router checks the unicast routing table and finds that S1 is the correct interface. The RPF check passes and the packet is forwarded.
Protocol-Independent Multicast
Protocol-independent multicast (PIM) gets its name from the fact that it is IP routing protocol-independent. PIM can leverage whichever unicast routing protocols are used to populate the unicast routing table, including EIGRP, OSPF, BGP, or static routes. PIM uses this unicast routing information to perform the multicast forwarding function, so it is IP protocol-independent. Although PIM is called a multicast routing protocol, it actually uses the unicast routing table to perform the reverse path forwarding (RPF) check function instead of building up a completely independent multicast routing table. PIM does not send and receive multicast routing updates between routers like other routing protocols do.
06/09/11
13
Internet_Protocol_Multicast
Sparse-Dense Mode
Cisco has implemented an alternative to choosing just dense mode or just sparse mode on a router interface new IP. This was necessitated by a change in the paradigm for forwarding multicast traffic via PIM that became apparent during its development. It turned out that it was more efficient to choose sparse or dense on a per group basis rather than a per router interface basis. Sparse-dense mode facilitates this ability. Network administrators can also configure sparse-dense mode. This configuration option allows individual groups to be run in either sparse or dense mode, depending on whether RP information is available for that group. If the router learns RP information for a particular group, it will be treated as sparse mode; otherwise, that group will be treated as dense mode.
06/09/11
14
Internet_Protocol_Multicast Two path attributes, MP_REACH_NLRI and MP_UNREACH_NLRI have been introduced in BGP4+. These new attributes create a simple way to carry two sets of routing information-one for unicast routing and one for multicast routing. The routes associated with multicast routing are used to build the multicast distribution trees. The main advantage of MBGP is that an internet can support noncongruent unicast and multicast topologies. When the unicast and multicast topologies are congruent, MBGP can support different policies for each. MBGP provides a scalable policy based interdomain routing protocol.
06/09/11
15
Internet_Protocol_Multicast
MDSP was developed for peering between Internet Service Providers (ISPs). ISPs did not want to rely on an RP maintained by a competing ISP to service their customers. MSDP allows each ISP to have their own local RP and still forward and receive multicast traffic to the Internet.
Anycast RP-Logical RP
A very useful application of MSDP is called anycast RP. This is a technique for configuring a multicast sparse-mode network to provide for fault tolerance and load sharing within a single multicast domain. Two or more RPs are configured with the same IP address on loopback interfaces-say, 10.0.0.1, for example (refer to Figure: Anycast RP). The loopback address should be configured as a 32 bit address. All the downstream routers are configured so that they know that their local RP's address is 10.0.0.1. IP routing automatically selects the topologically closest RP for each source and receiver. Because some sources might end up using one RP and some receivers a different RP, there needs to be some way for the RPs to exchange information about active sources. This is done with MSDP. All the RPs are configured to be MSDP peers of each other. Each RP will know about the active sources in the other RP's area. If any of the RPs fail, IP routing will converge and one of the RPs will become the active RP in both areas.
Note: The Anycast RP example above uses IP addresses from RFC 1918. These IP addresses are normally blocked at interdomain borders and therefore are not accessible to other ISPs. You must use valid IP addresses if you want the RPs to be reachable from other domains.
Figure: Anycast RP
06/09/11
16
Internet_Protocol_Multicast
Note:
The RPs are used only to set up the initial connection between sources and receivers. After the last-hop routers join the shortest path tree, the RP is no longer necessary.
06/09/11
17
Internet_Protocol_Multicast The PGM Reliable Transport Protocol itself is implemented on the sources and the receivers. The source maintains a transmit window of outgoing data packets and retransmits individual packets when it receives a negative acknowledgment (NAK). The network elements (routers) assist in suppressing an implosion of NAKs (when a failure does occur) and aids in efficient forwarding of the retransmitted data just to the networks that need it. PGM is intended as a solution for multicast applications with basic reliability requirements. The specification for PGM is network layer-independent. The Cisco implementation of PGM Router Assist supports PGM over IP. Today, the specification for PGM is an Internet draft that can be found on the IETF web site (http://www.ietf.org) under the name "PGM Reliable Transport Protocol."
Review Questions
Q - What is the range of available IP multicast addresses? A - 224.0.0.0 to 239.255.255.255. Q - What is the purpose of IGMP? A - IGMP is used between the hosts and their local multicast router to join and leave multicast groups. Q - What is an advantage of IGMPv2 over IGMPv1? A - IGMPv2 has a leave group message that can greatly reduce the latency of unwanted traffic on a LAN. Q - What is a potential disadvantage of IGMP snooping over CGMP on a low-end Layer 2 switch? A - IGMP snooping requires the switch to examine every multicast packet for an IGMP control message. On a low-end switch, this might have a severe performance impact. Q - What is an advantage of shortest path (or source) trees compared to shared trees? A - Source trees guarantee an optimal path between each source and each receiver, which will minimize network latency. Q - What is an advantage of using shared trees? A - Shared trees require very little state to be kept in the routers, which requires less memory. Q - What information does the router use to do an RPF check? A - The unicast routing table. Q - Why is protocol-independent multicast called "independent"? A - PIM works with any underlying IP unicast routing protocol-RIP, EIGRP, OSPF, BGP or static routes. Q - What is the main advantage of MBGP? 06/09/11 18
Internet_Protocol_Multicast A - Providers can have noncongruent unicast and multicast routing topologies. Q - How do RPs learn about sources from other RPs with MSDP? A - RPs are configured to be MSDP peers with other RPs. Each RP forwards source active (SA) messages to each other. Q - What is the purpose of the anycast RP? A - Load balancing and fault tolerance.
06/09/11
19