http://www.natsca.

org

Care and Conservation of Natural History Collections

Title: Vertebrates
Author(s): Hendry, D.
Source: Hendry, D. (1999). Vertebrates. In: Carter, D. & Walker, A. (eds). (1999). Chapter 1: Care and
Conservation of Natural History Collections. Oxford: Butterwoth Heinemann, pp. 1 - 36.
URL: http://www.natsca.org/care-and-conservation

The pages that follow are reproduced with permission from publishers, editors and all contributors
from Carter, D. & Walker, A. K. (1999). Care and Conservation of Natural History Collections. Oxford:
Butterworth Heinemann.
While this text was accurate at the time of publishing (1999), current advice may differ. NatSCA are
looking to provide more current guidance and offer these pages as reference materials to be
considered alongside other sources.
The following pages are the result of optical character recognition and may contain misinterpreted
characters. If you do find errors, please email [email protected] citing the title of the document and
page number; we will do our best to correct them.
NatSCA supports open access publication as part of its mission is to promote and support natural
science collections. NatSCA uses the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ for all works we publish. Under CCAL authors retain
ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint,
modify, distribute, and/or copy articles in NatSCA publications, so long as the original authors and
source are cited.
 Plate 3 A traditional
mannikin bound with wood
wool. This technique was
used to mount most large
mammals in the UK prior to
1980 (Dick Hendry).

Plate 4 A mould being

removed from a mounted hog,
leaving the real hair
embedded in a fibreglass
body (Dick Hendry).

Plate 5 A plaster cast of a

toad being removed from a
dental alginate mould (Dick
Hendry).
1

Vertebrates
Dick Hendry
EXED, Exhibition and Educational Resources,
15A Botanic Crescent, Glasgow G20 8QJ, Scotland

formerly of the Conservation Department, Glasgow Museums, Scotland

Introduction Specimen preparation and

handling
Historically, there has been little serious
scientific research into methods for preparing, There are important health and safety issues
preserving and conserving dry vertebrate relating to the handling of dead vertebrate
collections. Techniques progressed because material. Richards (199-i) describes both the
they were faster, cheaper or resulted in legislation and hygiene precautions in this
aesthetically pleasing collections. The longterm area, and suggests a sensible code of practice
conservation of the specimen was often a for natural history departments. It is important
secondary consideration. There are many that all staff likely to come into contact with
reasons for this, all associated with the such material are made aware of the need to
perceived value of natural science collections. maintain a safe working environment.
In the past ten years, however, considerable
efforts have been made to explain the value of
such collections culminating in Duckworth et Primary specimen care
al. (1993), which opened up the debate and
suggested proposals for the way forward. Receiving specimens
The awakening of interest in the care of
natural science collections, led by the Society Museums usually receive whole vertebrate
for the Preservation of Natural History specimens either freshly dead or in a deep-
Collections (SPNHC) in North America, has frozen condition. Such material should be
resulted in a shift in the allocation of examined and dealt with in the laboratory area
resources. Much more emphasis is now being where the recommended hygiene precautions
placed on preventive conservation as a cost- may be observed.
effective way of providing collection care. External parasites are more easily observed
A preventive conservation strategy, however, on fresh specimens, and may be transferred,
should be supported by a parallel research on a fine artists' brush, into a container of 70%
programme investigating methodologies. A industrial methylated spirit (IMS). Dipping the
knowledge of how dry vertebrate collections brush tip into chloroform will help to pacify
were prepared in the past is essential to lively parasites, but this procedure must be
determine the efficacy of previous methods, and carried out within a fume cupboard.
to focus limited resources on the best Alternatively, with birds and mammals, the fur
techniques for safe handling and longterm or feathers may be brushed on to a sheet of
storage today. plain paper and the specimens collected using
a pooter aspirator.

1
2 Care and Conservation of Natural History Collections

Although Florian (1990) argues that freezing for mounts or study skins comes with
natural history specimens may reduce their experience, but there are simple indicators of
research potential, for most institutions this is decay. The skin around the eyes of birds and
an inevitable part of acquiring specimens in mammals is the first place to look. Gently
reasonable condition. If donated material is stroking this area will tell you if the specimen
likely to deteriorate, the best option is to wrap it has begun to deteriorate. If the fur or feathers
in polythene and deep-freeze it before transit. begin to come away (slipping), a little powdered
The freezer compartment of a domestic alum rubbed into the skin may prevent further
refrigerator will suffice for small specimens, loss. Any such damage, especially in the head
whilst a domestic deep-freezer will keep area, will make the specimen less suitable as an
wrapped specimens in good condition for many exhibition mount. Study skins, however, may be
months. Before dispatch it is preferable to prepared from all specimens which survive the
remove the polythene, wrap the specimens in skinning and cleaning processes relatively
sufficient absorbent paper to contain any fluid intact.
leakage during transit, and send in a stout Specimens, on arrival, may be soiled with
cardboard or polystyrene container. Specimens blood, usually from the bill, nose or throat.
sent this way are less likely to deteriorate than These areas should be plugged with cotton wool
those sent in polythene bags. If, however, the to prevent further soiling and the blood, if fresh,
specimen has started to deteriorate, is likely to removed at this stage. There is no consensus as
be delayed in transit, or is not wanted strictly to the best method. Hangay and Dingley (1985)
for taxidermy purposes, then it would be wise to recommend swabbing with cold water and
seal it in a polythene bag. Any documentation, adding a little ammonia for stubborn stains,
except a water-resistant, tie-on label, should be whilst Sutton (1916) and Clancey (1959) prefer
sent in a polythene wallet attached to the using warm and hot water respectively.
outside of the container. Donors should be Chemicals such as hydrogen peroxide or, as Dill
advised on when to send frozen material to (1957) suggests, oxalic acid should only be used
ensure that staff will be available to receive it. if it is imperative to remove the blood – and then
The receiving institution should have proce- try dilute solutions first (see also Cleaning bird
dures in place to deal with frozen material skins, p. 5).
efficiently. A well labelled area in a large freezer
or separate `recent acquisitions' freezer will help Specifications for a large freezer and
to ensure that specimens do not get lost, and storage
that the initial documentation procedures, If specifying for a walk-in freezer to hold all
including taking weight and standard types of vertebrate material, ensure that the
measurements, are carried out. internal temperature is at least -20°C. The door
The condition of the specimen when it arrives handle must be fitted with an internal
in the museum may determine its fate. If emergency release mechanism, and both visual
decomposition is at an advanced. stage, it may and audible high temperature alarms should be
still be possible to salvage osteological material installed, the latter linked to a telephone or
and samples for DNA analysis, a growing area security control. The telephone number of the
for the destructive use of museum specimens. 24-hour emergency maintenance firm should be
Such samples are best taken from areas of the clearly labelled on the freezer door. A large
body, such as subcutaneous muscle tissue, freezer will maintain an adequate internal
which are less likely to have been in contact temperature for at least 12 hours following a
with external contaminants. Freeze-drying is the breakdown. It is good practice, however, to
only option if it is imperative to dry-preserve the make a separate arrangement with an outside
material. Specimens required to be prepared by commercial freezer firm in the event of an
traditional taxidermy techniques, as either emergency. This should be part of any disaster
mounted specimens for exhibition or study plan.
skins for the reference collections, must be Shelving units in the freezer, such as those
reasonably fresh. Assessing the true condition of recommended by McConachie (1992), help
specimens which visually appear to be suitable
 Vertebrates 3

organize the space efficiently. For safety However, up to the mid 1960s writers such as
reasons, large frozen specimens should not be Anderson (1965) still reflected the earlier
stored on shelves above head height. They can perception that arsenic was merely a nuisance
be stored safely in strong polythene bags rather than a considerable hazard to health.
suspended from butchers' hooks in the walls There is no doubt that these chemicals did
and ceiling. Colour-coded polythene bags and work, at least in the short term. To suggest as
labels in industrial-weight plastic wallets Howie (1985) does, that their use is the reason
reduce the risk of specimens being discarded for the shortage of specimens over 100 years
with the refuse. old, is to misunderstand the problem. The
most important part of dry vertebrate speci-
Skin preservatives men care is not the preservative chemical but
the aftercare. Batty (1885) recognized the
Williams and Hawks (1987) have listed the prime importance of keeping pests away from
variety of chemicals used in the preparation of specimens by enclosing them in well sealed
mammals, alongside a list of their users. Their containers which he called `tight chests' — an
aims were to identify hazardous chemicals and early advocate of preventive conservation.
assess the suitability of certain collections for Although mercury fell out of favour in the
future research. Such lists are useful starting twentieth century (the British Musetun
points before embarking on the more sophis- Handbook for Collectors, anon., 1904,
ticated spot tests and microanalysis that Found suggested that it made bird skins brittle),
and Helwig (1995) have investigated. arsenic was popular and advocated in most
There appear to be no preservatives for standard textbooks, such as Mahoney (1973)
vertebrate skins which prevent insect attack in and Moyer (1979), until the late 1970s. It still
the long-term, and preventive measures are a has pockets of support today and, in a series
better solution. Over the past 200 years, of tests on mammal skin preservatives by
however, many different preservatives and Hanacziwskyj et al. (1991), it was found to be
combinations have been tried, a few achieving the only one which did not damage deer skin
world-wide usage. collagen. Morris (1982) showed that the
average lifespan of taxidermists using arsenic
A r s e n ic a n d m e r c u r y was not dramatically curtailed. Reports of its
Although, as Giitebier (1989) reports, arsenic possible carcinogenic risks, such as Haneke
(dry, white arsenic trioxide) was advocated for (1977), may see its demise as a specimen
use on specimens to deter attack from insects preservative.
as long ago as the seventeenth century, it was A useful spot test for the presence of arsenic
its rediscovery as arsenical soap in the middle on specimens can be found in Hawks and
of the eighteenth century that led to its univer- Williams (1986b).
sal use for the next 200 years. Farber (1987)
suggests that this discovery was a key element B o r a x a n d a lu m
in the development of ornithology. The most popular alternative to arsenic and
In the early days its strongest rival, and mercury compounds was borax (sodium
sometimes companion, was mercuric chloride tetraborate), strongly promoted as a moth
(corrosive sublimate). Browne (1886) and Davis deterrent by Pray (1943). Used on its own, or
(1907) describe the common practice of mixed with a variety of other chemicals, it
applying arsenical soap to the flesh side of the became the standard museum `safe' preserva-
skin and spraying the fur or feathers with the tive, recommended in popular texts such as
mercury-based compound. Such were its British Museum handbooks (anon., 1968) and
advocates that Rowley (1925) warned collectors Wagstaffe and Fidler (1968).
not to offer specimens to museums unless they Whether it is an effective long-term moth
were preserved with arsenic. deterrent is not clear. If used specifically as
The dangers of using such toxic chemicals directed by Pray (1943) — who later recom-
were well known and highlighted by many mended an improved formula with added
preparators including Ward (1906), Hasluck formaldehyde, (Pray, 1951) — it gained the
(1914) and, most vociferously, Pray (1943). credibility of experienced taxidermists such as
4 Care and Conservation of 'Natural History' Collections

Moyer (1981). Anderson (1965) even suggested results of a study by Arevard et al. (1981) on the
that mixing it with arsenic rendered the latter effectiveness of these chemicals were
`comparatively safe'. Whatever its inconclusive, for long-term preservation, more
insect-proofing qualities, it is still popular today promising results were obtained by Funk and
as a drying agent and absorbent in bird skin Sherfey (1975), Granqvist (1982) and Graf
preparation, although there is a growing group (1984).
of preparatory who prefer not to use any Techniques for their use are discussed in
preservation chemicals (see also Preparation of Namlik (1975), Philips (1980), Philips and
bird skins, p. 5). Philips (1981) and Septon (1987), and for
Potash alum (potassium aluminium sulphate) several years Eulan derivatives were seen to be
was and still is used for preserving small to the solution for controlling insect damage to
medium animal skins. Its astringent nature skins, mounted specimens and freeze-dried
makes it very useful for halting small local areas material. The USA has now phased out these
of decay. Both Ward (1906) and Anderson (1965) chemicals, as they were suspected of causing
maintain that this astringency makes it damage to fish stocks when entering river
unsuitable for the relatively thin skins of birds, systems. Eulan WBP, however, is still currently
causing them to dry so hard that subsequent available in the UK.
relaxation is very difficult. The chemical which may replace Eulan is
Mitan FF. Initial tests by Connelly and Rogers
Acids and tanning baths (1995) suggest that, when used at temperatures
Most large mammal skins used for exhibition compatible with bird and mammal skins, it does
mounts or in reference collections have either offer freeze-dried mammals some protection
been cured with salt and preserved in acid against dermestid beetle attack. In the same
pickling baths or subjected to a tanning process. experiment, freeze-dried birds proofed with
Phenol (carbolic acid) was one of the most widely Mitan FF fared no better than their unpreserved
used pickling acids, either on its own or together controls. The technique involves soaking skins
with salt, alum or saltpetre. in the chemical, at temperatures ranging from
Salt and sulphuric acid and salt and alum 100 to 140°C, for periods of up to an hour,
tanning were very popular methods for followed by immersion in acetic acid solution. It
preserving mammal skins for museum collec- is a very invasive technique and, because of the
tions. Today organic acids such as oxalic and danger of bird and mammal skins deteriorating
formic have largely replaced sulphuric which, by at these temperatures, probably only suitable
remaining in the skin, may cause long-term for use with very fresh material.
deterioration. Formaldehyde together with
Lancrolene oil was a well known basic tanning Colour changes in fur and feathers due
combination in the 1960s, and Mahoney (1973) to preservatives and preservation
recommended it, particularly for snake and techniques
lizard skins. Variations in the subtle colours of pelage and
According to Hawks et al. (1984) techniques plumage have been used in taxonomic studies,
are available to determine how a skin has been particularly at the subspecies level. Several
tanned. Although these procedures are expen- researchers, notably Howell (1937), Burns
sive, they may be essential in future to warn (1952) and Coetzee (1985), have suggested that
researchers of chemical preparation techniques preservative chemicals used during skin
which can degrade or destroy DNA ,and so avoid preparation may cause significant changes in
potentially unrewarding analysis. the colour of plumage and pelage. Indeed, Hall
(1937) emphasized the vital importance of
Proofing chemicals to prevent attack by documenting the preservatives used in museum
insects collections because of this problem.
Eulan U33 and Eulan BLS (Edolan), liquid In a comprehensive study of chemicals used
moth- and beetle-proofing chemicals (Per- for mammal skin preparation, Burns (1952)
methrin derivatives) used in the German wool found that a mixture of saltpetre and potash
and carpet industry, were first proposed by Rau alum was the least likely to affect the colour
(1968) for museum use. Although the
 Vertebrates 5

of fur. Chemicals not recommended were ventrally to avoid disturbing these patterns,
borax, mixtures of salt and alum, ethyl alcohol whilst Halford (1987) suggests case-skinning
and carbon tetrachloride. Borax was found to birds (see p. 8) for similar reasons. Ducks and
be satisfactory for fresh skin preparation but geese are usually skinned along the back to
unsuitable if the skin was later relaxed by help reduce feather soiling when removing fat
water, a finding which coincides with the work from the breast skin. Skinning techniques for
of Downing (1945). Most workers in this field non-traditional skin preparations are illustrated
agree that colours such as red/browns are in Rogers and Wood (1989).
particularly susceptible to change, but the There is a considerable difference in the
degree of change may vary with species. strength and thickness of fresh bird skins. The
Rogers and Daley (1988) point out that auk and crow families, for example, are very
whilst chemicals, such as those in Huber's robust whilst others such as thrushes, doves
fluid (see Formulae at the end of this chapter, and pigeons, are extremely delicate. This is
p. 36), have been criticized for over 150 years, important to consider when selecting skins for
they are still included in most of the standard educational purposes, where handling may be
texts. In a study on the preparation of bird an important element.
collections, they concluded that all
preservative chemicals tested caused some Cle a ni ng a nd d e g re a s i ng fre s h s k i ns
negative changes to either the colour or the Most preparators do not clean skins routinely
form of at least one feather type. Salted bird due to the danger of damage and/or colour
skins suffered less colour change than those change. It is good practice to clean when
dried with borax, and were considered easier necessary either to reveal identifying charac-
to relax. A petroleum spirit based thinner for teristics or remove material which might cause
paint and varnish sold in the USA as VM and long-term damage to the skin. The standard
P Naphtha (varnishmakers and painters' technique is to remove blood and dirt by
naphtha) was recommended as the most swabbing the soiled area with water (see
efficient, least toxic solvent, although it is Primary specimen care, p. 1) or by soaking the
suggested that the best practice is to entire skin in washing solution. This may be a
substitute solvents with detergent solutions dilute non-ionic detergent or, as suggested by
whenever practicable. Horie (1988), a more complex combination of
chemicals and detergent. Whatever is used, it
Preparation of bird skins must be completely removed by rinsing with
cold water.
Informative accounts of collecting, taking It is important to remove as much fat as
scientific measurements, ageing and sexing are practicable from the inside of the skin. Its
to be found in the standard scientific texts. subsequent seepage and oxidation (fat burn) is
Chapin (1940), Anderson (1965), Wagstaffe one of the most common causes of bird skin
and Fidler (1968), Harrison (1976) and Hangay deterioration. This is a particular problem with
and Dingley (1985) are the most comprehen- flat skins which easily lose feathers around the
sive. Skinning techniques are also illustrated in cut edges. File cards mounted on a wooden
these texts and in taxidermy manuals such as block or small wire brushes are efficient tools
Kish and Jonas (1976), Schmidt (1977) and for this purpose. They may be used in
Metcalfe (1981). conjunction with an absorbent powder such as
There are interesting variations in methods borax, magnesium carbonate or cornmeal.
of preparing bird skins, some of which have a A variety of chemicals have been used to
bearing on their long-term conservation. remove the remaining traces of fats and oils
from the skin. These include dilute ammonia.
Sk i nn i ng chlorinated solvents, white spirit, petrol and
Traditionally, most birds are skinned through industrial methylated spirit, although the last
an incision along the breast and abdomen or item has been specifically shown by Fry (1985)
under the wing. In Paulson (1989) it is recom- to affect the colour of some plumage (see also
mended that downy young and adults with Colour changes in fur and feathers, p. 1). The
complex feather patterns should be skinned ubiquitous 1,1,1-trichloroethane, favoured
6 Care and Conservation of Natural History Collections

because of its non-flammability, is no longer legs or, in the case of wire supports, on a
manufactured in most European countries projecting wire loop.
because of health and safety considerations. Cato (1986) suggests using the preparation
Several substitutes have come on to the market, technique advocated by Harrison and Cowles
but are very costly and require further (1970), which results in skins with flat backs.
evaluation. Gerwin (1989) finds hexane to be an This will prevent them rolling about in collection
effective degreasing agent whilst Rogers and drawers, thus causing feather damage.
Daley (1988) suggests abandoning solvents Flattened backs can also be achieved by gently
altogether in favour of detergent solutions. They compressing the skins whilst drying.
maintain that a small quantity of fat remaining Preparators use this technique routinely with
in skin will cause little damage, and this should larger skins to save on storage space.
be traded off against the potential hazards of Conversely, some researchers insist on skins
using solvents. with rounded hacks, as they more closely
If washing and/or solvent cleaning has been represent the living bird. Hangay and Dingley
used, the feathers can be brought back to their (1985) illustrate a wire-mesh drying rack
original condition (fluffing) by shaking in heavy specifically designed to achieve this end.
magnesium carbonate or hardwood sawdust. Before drying, the skin is wrapped with either
The excess can be removed by means of a jet of a thin sheet of cotton wool or a length
compressed air directed from head to tail. This
process must be carried out in a fume cupboard
or dust-retaining box. Horie (1988) suggests that
magnesium carbonate remaining in the feathers
may have an advantageous buffering action by
reacting with acids in the atmosphere to form
moderately stable salts. Its disadvantage,
according to Garrett (1989a), is that it may
obscure details of feather follicles in flat skins.
Hardwood sawdust is effective but also acidic,
and may remain in the skin. For these reasons
many preparators prefer not to use any powder
cleaners, and simply dry the skin with a hair-
dryer on a medium heat setting.

Trad itiona l r ound sk in p repara tion

In order to position the scapular feathers
neatly, Chapin (1940) recommended stitching
the feather tracks in a figure of eight pattern on
the inside of the skin. An alternative method is
to tie the humerus bones their normal width
apart, at the elbow. This latter method has the
added advantage of keeping the specimen
together if it later disintegrates. The skin may
be filled with a variety of materials such as
cotton wool, chopped tow, polyester batting
and wood fibre (wood wool). It may also be
supported with an internal wooden stick or
wire. In the case of small and medium sized
birds, this internal support is allowed to project
from the rear end of the skin, where it can be
used for handling and as a support for the
crossed legs. Labels are tied with thread either
around the stick and Figure 1.1 A nylon stocking can provide even
compression of round bird skins whilst they are drying.
 Vertebrates 7

of paper pinned around the breast. Larger

specimens can be inserted into cut lengths of
nylon stocking which will evenly compress the
skin (Fig. 1.1). Many European preparators
completely wrap their skins in wet tissue paper.
This results in a firm round skin but limits the
opportunity to inspect the specimen regularly
and correct distortion during drying. The bill
may be held closed with a ball of softened wax
or with pins. Van Tyne (1952) and Johnson et
al. (1984) warn against sewing the bill closed
with a thread through the nostrils, as this can
lead to inaccurate bill depth measurements.
Variations in the basic round skin technique
for dealing with larger birds such as herons are
well illustrated in Anderson (1965), and are
further discussed in Harrison and Cowles
(1970).

Non-traditional skins/skeletons or
combination specimens
Traditional round skins satisfied most research
requirements for many years. In practice, most
of the bird was discarded in favour of the well
prepared skin. Barlow and Flood (1983)
maintain that non-traditional skins were initially
introduced to fulfil the needs of specific research
projects. Norris (1961) is usually credited with
starting this trend. His technique of gluing flat Figure 1.2 A non-traditional bird skin preparation
which also preserves the whole skeleton.
skins to card suited his particular requirements
but, as a general method, it does limit access to
some parts of the bird.
· Flat skin with one boned wing and one
Increased communication between prepara-
boned leg, bill and leg remain with skeleton,
tors, collections managers and researchers over
one honed wing spread (Fig. 1.2).
the past ten years has fuelled a more general
· Complete skeleton with both boned wings
interest in preserving as much of the individual
spread.
specimen as possible, but there is no consensus
and techniques are still being debated. The advantages of these variations is that they
Since museums have begun routinely to provide more information from a single speci-
preserve both skin and skeleton (Spaw, 1989, men than traditional skins. They can be quicker
calls these combination specimens) good illus- and easier to prepare, and take up less storage
trated accounts such as Rogers and Wood space. Researchers will not, however, be able to
(1989) have become available. Apart from the check the standard measurements on a flat skin
flat skin with complete skeleton, the main or those prepared without bills.
variations are:
Preparation of mammal skins
· Round skin with one wing removed and
spread. Skinning
· Round skin with one boned wing and one There are various ways to skin a mammal
boned leg, bill and skull remain with depending on the end use of the skin. Most are
separate skeleton, one boned wing spread. illustrated in standard texts such as Anderson
(1965), Anon. (1968), Wagstaffe and Fidler
(1968), Hangay and Dingley (1985) and Morris
and Wroot (1987).
8 Care and Conservation of Natural History Collections

Figure 1.3 Round and flat

(cased) mammal skins.

Cleaning and degreasing fresh skins bones from elbow and knee remain in the skin
The same techniques are used as for birds (see and help support the fragile limbs, or the fore
Preparation of bird skins, p. 5). limb on one side and hind limb on the other
are removed and preserved with the rest of the
Preparation of round or `study' skins Small skeleton. The latter method has been adopted
to medium sized mammals may also be more recently, and reflects a general trend to
preserved as round or study skins (Fig. 1.3). An make more of the skeleton available for study.
artificial body made from cotton wool, tow or In both methods the tail and legs are tied to
synthetic fibre is inserted into the skin to the card with thread or fuse wire. Also favoured
provide both support and give it the approx- is the technique which involves the positioning
imate shape of the original body. of the limbs and ears of smaller mammals (i.e.
Supports inside the tail include wire fore feet glued in place, one palm up, the other
(Nagorsen and Peterson, 1980, explain how to palm clown and ears glued one forward, one
taper it), sharpened bamboo splints or stripped backward) so that both surfaces of the ear can
feather quills. A more flexible insert is thought be examined.
to make the tail less susceptible to handling The thin skins of rabbits and hares require
damage. Hangay and Dingley (1985) describe a special treatment. Dill (1950) and Thietje and
method using silicone rubber sealant to fill the Schrimpter (1967) use a solution of 50% indus-
tail, but caution that the technique still trial methylated spirit and 50% turpentine to
requires evaluation. preserve the skin. Anderson (1965) recom-
Preparing symmetrical round skins requires mends using stout wires from fore to hind limb
skill and practice, but many researchers prefer for support before inserting a thick card and
working with them. wooden rod on which to tie the hind legs. A
slightly modified version of this method, which
Preparation of flat or `card' skins involves removing a fore and hind limb for
Small to medium sized mammals can be skeletal preparation, is used by Nagorsen and
prepared as flat or card skins (Fig. 1.3) (also Peterson (1980).
referred to as `cased skins' because of the Advantages of flat skins lie in their speed and
skinning technique). The skin, either preserved ease of preparation, reduced storage
or unpreserved, is stretched over a shaped requirements, secure labels, and the opportu-
insert made of card, plastic, wood or wire and nity for retaining an almost complete skeleton.
then air-dried. If the card or plastic remains Disadvantages are possible hair loss through
inside the skin, it may double as both support handling where the skin meets the card and, if
and label. the specimen is not properly prepared, loss of
Two variations of this technique are also data through fat staining on the insert.
practised. Either both fore and both hind limb
 Vertebrates 9

As a word of caution, some researchers have available material may be a trade-off against
found it difficult to compare the pelage of flat deleterious long-term effects.
skins with those prepared in the round. Whenever possible, bird skins should be
handled by their supporting sticks or wires and
Tanned mammal skins special care taken with vulnerable areas such
In museum literature, tanning is often used as as the head and neck of birds and the ears,
the generic term for the process of preserving tails and feet of mammal skins. Researchers
mammal skins in a flexible condition. In the should also be made aware of any particular
commercial tanning industry, the word tanning problems with different collections. Some
is reserved for the process which produces preparators, for example, sew the wings of
flexible, dehaired leather, and flexible skins with round skins tightly to the body and the tails to
hair are said to be 'dressed'. the sticks.
In the past, many skins were tanned with Garrett (1989a) points out, from his obser-
alum and saltpetre or salt and sulphuric acid. vations, that flat bird skins stand up to
Although, as Reid (1985) explains, the detri- handling at least as well as traditional round
mental effect of sulphuric acid on mammal skins ones.
was reported as early as 1907, it was still Loans of prepared bird and mammal skins
recommended in standard taxidermy texts until from the reference collections are usually
the late 1970s. The work of Hanacziwskyj et al. packed for transit in either stout cardboard or
(1991) is the latest to confirm the potential wooden boxes. All materials used in such
long-term problem with this acid. In the last 20 packing should be of conservation quality.
years dressing agents such as Lutan F Previously used packing should be carefully
(aluminium chloride), together with organic examined for signs of infestation, dirt or
acids, have become a safer and more durable weaknesses before re-use. It is recommended
alternative. that small to medium sized skins should be
All dressing techniques are invasive and liable wrapped in tissue paper and packed in layers
to increase the deterioration of the protein in the of cotton wool or polyester batting. Some
skin. Florian (1986) suggests that skin dressing institutions also insert skins into cardboard
may be unnecessary and has more to do with tubes as an extra precaution. Hinshaw (1989)
ease of handling large skins than with their gives a detailed account of packing traditional
longevity. bird skins and skeletons. Her methods can be
adapted for most types of mammal skins.
Handling and packing bird and mammal
skins Osteological preparation techniques

Old collections in regular use should be tested Museum osteological collections have suffered
for levels of harmful chemicals using spot tests in the past because of tradition and practica-
such as those advocated by Found and Helwig bility. The traditional round skin was the
(1995), and workers should be supplied with the favoured component of most bird research
relevant protective equipment. It is recom- collections. The skeletal elements retained were
mended that gloves are worn when handling any beyond easy reach, inside the skin. In the case
skin collection, both for the protection of the of mammal collections, it was usually only the
handler and the specimen. If the skin is stored skull which was retained with the skin. To
in polythene tubing, it should only be removed some extent, this reflected the resource
for essential information which cannot be problems associated with preparing and
obtained otherwise. The long-term storage of transporting dry vertebrate material. If you have
skins in the same polythene tubing cannot be post-cranial material more than ten years old it
recognized as best practice. Polythene can is the exception, and should be valued as such.
degrade over time and, apart from splitting, the The lack of fish and reptile osteological
degradation products (which may appear as material in museum collections is to some
stickiness) can damage skins. It is recognized. extent due to the difficulty of preparing these
however, that the protection afforded by this groups.
cheap and readily
10 Care and Conservation of Natural History Collections

Vertebrate skeletons are composed of bone

and cartilage. Immature skeletons and those of
sharks, rays and some amphibians are mostly
or wholly composed of cartilage. As cartilage is
prone to shrink and distort on drying. these
groups are usually preserved as wet prepara-
tions. Wagstaffe and Fidler (1968) recommend
formalin for their storage, whilst Mahoney
(1973) suggests that they may be hardened in
formo alcohol and stored in industrial methy-
lated spirit. Knudsen (1966) describes in detail
the preparation of cartilaginous fish skeletons
(see also Chapter 5 on Fluid preservation).
There are only a limited number of methods
for preparing vertebrate skeletons, but individ-
ual variations are considerable. Historically, the
search for the ideal technique was based on
speed and good results. Today this list would be
headed with the technique which would result
in the least long-term damage.
It is essential for any preparator to become
familiar with the vertebrate skeleton through
anatomical texts such as Sissons and Grossman
(1975), Ellenberger et al. (1956) and Saunders
and Manton (1967), and from previously
prepared material. Unfamiliarity will lead to loss
or damage of bones (Fig. 1.4). Behrmann (1979),
when dissecting three whales, reported the
anatomy to be revealed in the first. considered
in the second and explored in the third — a
methodology to be recommended for all
unfamiliar groups. It is also essential to identify
material correctly before it is skeletonized, and
to document reasons for the identification.
The end use should be determined before a
skeleton is prepared. Research collections Figure 1.4 A photocopy of a dolphin 1 rib used as a
demand either complete disarticulation reference for rearticulation purposes.
(Matthiesen, 1989, considers this to be essential
for bird collections) or partial disarticulation
(ligamentary skeletons). Display exhibits are Labels for osteological work must be made of a
usually ligamentary or fully articulated. material that will survive the preparation
Thompsett (1958), Adams (1980) and Hangay processes. Matthiesen (1989) prefers embossing
and Dingley (1985) describe techniques for draft Mylar film, whilst Davis and Payne (1992)
articulating skeletons, and Behrmann (1979) use the same technique with aluminium foil
illustrates the ten most commonly observed (Fig. 1.5). Tyvek may also be permanently
errors in articulated cetacean skeletons. embossed with a hard instrument. A reusable
The bones and cartilage of embryos, small alternative reported by Trodd (1993) is to use
fish, amphibians, reptiles and small mammals numbered lead tags.
may also be prepared as stained preparations
and later embedded in clear plastic for display Dissection
and handling collections. These techniques are Ligamentary articulated skeletons of fish may be
fully described in Hangay and Dingley (1985). prepared by simple dissection. Konnerth (1965)
describes the technique and maintains that it
works best with pre-frozen material.
 Vertebrates 11

be used for gently disarticulating mammal

skull bones.
Before commencing any macerating proce-
dure the long bones of mammals may be
drilled to facilitate the removal of fat. Care
must be taken, however, to avoid damage to
diagnostic features. After maceration, fat
removal can be assisted with jets of water or
compressed air.
Matthiesen (1989) uses cold water macera-
tion to produce completely disarticulated post-
cranial bird skeletons after preliminary
treatment in a dermestarium (described
below). Final cleaning takes place in a heated
ultrasonic bath containing water and deter-
Figure 1.5 Tyvek and aluminium labels. gent, a technique also recommended by
Spence and Tonkinson (1969).
Glass jars and fish tanks are ideal for smaller
Burial specimens. For medium to large material
This technique is probably the oldest method Adams (1980) used a plastic water butt fitted
known and, with very large specimens, perhaps with a filter trap and hose pipes to service the
the only practicable solution, but it is slow. process hygienically.
Adams (1980) found that an elephant skull
took up to two years. Moreover, it is difficult to Warm water maceration/simmering
monitor and may result in significant This is a popular technique because of its
discolouration of the bones. speed, but it is still a smelly operation. Before
A variety of burying media have been proceeding, the brain should be broken up
suggested. Scharff (1911) worked with a large and removed either by suction or syringing
pit of beach sand, whereas Adams (1980) with a stream of cold water. This will prevent
prefers finer silver sand. Hounsome (1988) it swelling during maceration and damaging
suggests that mixing soil with sand will speed the elements of the skull. Coy (1980) also slits
up the process and Hendry (1993) discovered a the gums of mammals to prevent teeth being
museum in North America using cow manure! pulled out as the gum shrinks.
Davis and Payne (1992) have achieved good Adams (1980) uses macerating temperatures
results with well rotted leaf manure, burying ranging from 37 to 80°C depending on the
roughly fleshed carcasses in bags made from material being processed. Thompsett (1958)
parachute silk. insists that proper cleaning can only be
achieved by simmering between 60 and 65°C
Cold water maceration in order to destroy the periosteum. Most
This is commonly used to produce ligamentary preparators caution that the use of prolonged
skeletons for display and teaching purposes boiling will damage osteological material.
from roughly fleshed material. Thompsett Stainless steel or aluminium containers are
(1958) warns that if preliminary fleshing is not commonly used with this method. They may
thorough, adipocere (an insoluble by-product of be fitted with a grill to lift bones out of the
the decomposition of fat) may be formed during sediment and to prevent damage if the
subsequent cleaning and this is very difficult to container is left to evaporate completely.
remove.
Although slow and very smelly, cold water Chemical maceration
maceration is easy to monitor and very suitable Mahoney (1973) and Hangay and Dingley
for immature and cartilaginous skeletons. The (1985) describe the traditional technique of
smell can be reduced by using running water, adding a small quantity of washing soda to
frequently changing the water or by using agar, bones simmering in water. This may also help
as recommended by Hurlin (1918). Wiles (1932) remove some of the fats.
found that agar could also
12 Care and Conser vation of Natural History Collections

Sodium perborate was originally used by on its own. A relatively new enzyme is neutrase,
Roche (1954) at the Natural History Museum in a bacterial protease produced by a selected
Paris, and introduced to the UK in separate strain of Bacillus subtilis and widely used in the
papers by Chapman and Chapman (1969) and food and brewing industries. Davis and Payne
Coy (1975). Coy's description purports to follow (1992) are its main advocates and describe
closely the original method where boiling water techniques for its use.
is poured on to the bones and dry perborate A range of biological detergents has also been
before the container is sealed. A popular used and Howard (pers. comm., 1996) finds that
variation is simply to add a little sodium Persil is the most effective. The inclusion of
perborate to material simmering in water. Flesh sodium perborate in this product may
remaining on the bones turns to a jelly-like contribute to this conclusion.
consistency, and is quite easily removed. This All enzyme methods require the bones to he
technique considerably reduces the smell incubated at temperatures ranging from 37 to
associated with osteological work. Davis and 50°C. They are quick but invasive and very
Payne (1992) insist that the use of sodium smelly. Shelton and Buckley (1990) caution that
perborate must be carefully monitored as it can denaturing the enzyme at the end of the process
result in bones becoming soft and chalky. is problematic and may itself lead to hone
Hangay and Dingley (1985) describe a damage.
technique for preparing adult skulls using
sodium bicarbonate, ammonia and sodium Invertebrates
hypochlorite. Although quick, the skulls are Both adults and larvae of invertebrates have
subjected to prolonged boiling, a treatment been used to prepare vertebrate skeletons. Bolin
which Williams and Smith (1995) regard as the (1935) describes a technique for preparing fish
most destructive of osteological techniques. skeletons using marine isopod species, and
Green (1934), Harris (1959), Mahoney (1973) Hounsome (1988) has carried out osteological
and Hangay and Dingley (1985) describe experiments with freshwater ostracods. Banta
techniques using antiformin, a solution of (1961) lists variety of arthropods used for
sodium carbonate and calcium hypochlorite, for vertebrate skeletal preparation, and describes
preparing material previously preserved in his own work with clothes moth larvae (Tineidae
alcohol or formalin (see also Chapter 5 on Fluid species; see Chapter 8 on Pest management,
preservation). prevention and control). Both Allen and Neill
(1950) and Ilangay and Dingley (1985) have
Enzyme maceration experimented with mealworms (Tenebrio ntolitor
A variety of enzymes are used for skeletal or T. obscuruis).
preparation. Shelton and Buckley (1990), Dermestid beetles are the most widely used,
however, have pointed out that there has been and probably the most convenient for museum
little research on their effects on skeletal use. Laurie and Hill (1951) report that the
material and, although they are included here to smallest immature bat skull can be cleaned
demonstrate the range of techniques commonly without sutures opening or teeth falling out.
used, enzyme maceration may limit a collection's Williams (1992) recommends dermestaria
future research potential. together with vacuum cleaning as the least
Moyer (1979) and Fisher and McInnes (1981) invasive technique to prepare osteological
have both used pancreatin (Rowley's fluid), and material for research collections. This avoids the
used it for both skulls and post- cranial need to soak such material in water which
elements. Williams (1992) has found to damage mammal
Harris (1959) recommended normal saline for teeth. Williams and Smith (1995) also suggest
completely disarticulated skeletons, and combinations of these three techniques may
Mahoney (1973) notes that this is also useful for have an effect on the dimensions of mammal
preparing bones from owl pellets. Mahoney skulls. Using invertebrates such as dermestid
(1973) also suggests trypsin in sodium beetles may be the only technique which can he
carbonate for general osteological work, whilst recommended from a long-term conservation
Piechocki (1986) prefers pepsin standpoint. However, the location of the
 Vertebrates 13

laboratory, frequency of preparation and aller- of large quantities of leaked fat and the subse-
genic reactions to dermestids also have to be quent accumulation of dirt can destroy
considered. diagnostic features, obscure labelling and make
There is extensive literature on the construc- handling unpleasant. This process must be
tion and management of dermestaria, and it carefully monitored, as removing all the fat can
stresses the importance of the correct environ- lead to splitting of bone.
mental conditions for the survival of the It is cetacean material and large mammal
colonies. The best recent accounts are those by bones that are the most difficult to treat. Such
Storer (1988) and Matthiesen (1989) which also specimens may require degreasing in a
detail instructions for disarticulating and commercial vapour degreaser with an organic
fleshing birds for such colonies. Anderson solvent (see anon., 1989). These are expensive
(1965) and Hangay and Dingley (1985) provide to purchase and operate safely. However, most
similar instructions for disarticulating veterinary teaching institutions and some larger
mammals. museums operate them, and may process
Hendry (1993) reports that museums may use material for the cost of the solvent.
up to five species of dermestid beetles in mixed Acetone, trichloroethane, white spirit and
colonies, a practice which Hounsome (1988) petrol have been used for degreasing bones. All
recommends as it takes advantage of the differ- have their own problems with respect to
ent size, food preferences and optimal living flammability, toxicity and availability, and
conditions of the insects. If there is concern should only be used strictly with reference to
over the location of the colony within a their data sheets and health and safety regula-
museum, Marcon (1992) gives specifications for tions. Matthiesen (1989) found Stoddard's
a transportable dermestid colony building with solvent to be preferable to both carbon tetra-
environmental controls. Willard (1989) suggests chloride and acetone for bird skeletons.
that pheromone traps could be employed in the Other degreasing agents include sodium
rooms adjacent to dermestaria for trapping hydroxide, used by Knudsen (1966) as a 2%
escapee beetles (see also Chapter 8 on Pest solution and by Entwistle (1992), slightly
management, prevention and control). stronger, at 4.5%. Hendry (1993) reported 10%
Previously preserved skulls are not always ammonia being used in some North American
palatable to beetles. De la Torre (1951) suggests museums, and concentrations of this chemical
coating them with bacon fat, whilst Hooper up to 20% have been adopted by Jannett and
(1956) prefers to apply cod liver oil. Storer Davies (1989) for use with their skull degreas-
(1988) simply soaks skulls in ammonia ing apparatus. Although Anderson (1965)
overnight before treatment. Very dessicated suggested degreasing bones in 5—10% aqueous
skulls were successfully cleaned by Laurie and sodium bicarbonate, he warned that this
Hill (1951) after soaking in Marmite (a vegetable technique required careful monitoring to avoid
extract). Sommer and Anderson (1974) maintain damage. Matthiesen (1989) and Coy (1980),
that the unpalatability of formalin-treated both advocates of the sodium perborate
specimens can be used to advantage when technique, maintain that with this method
preparing ligamentary skeletons. Brushing further degreasing is usually unnecessary.
formalin on to joints ensures that they are not Martin (1964) suggests covering bones with a
eaten and so do not disarticulate. cloth during degreasing. The cloth prevents fat
After cleaning, a dilute solution of ammonia in coming into contact with the hones during
water (nine parts to one) can be used to remove removal of the material from the container.
remaining grease and, or dermestids. Freezing
is also commonly used for pest control, but Bleaching
Williams (1992) suggests that a period of This is not usually considered necessary for
quarantine and observation is the least invasive osteological research collections. Mitchell and
technique. Wynne Jones (1956) maintain that aqueous
solutions of hydrogen peroxide, the most
Degreasing commonly used bleach, are acidic and that this
It is necessary to remove most of the fats and may damage bone. Coy (1980) and Storer (1988)
oils from osteological material. The oxidation also caution against the use of peroxides.
14 Care and Conservation of Natural History Collections

If a bleach must be used, it should be Labelling (see also Appendix II on Papers,

reserved for exhibition specimens. Chloramine T inks and label conservation)
has been suggested as a substitute for peroxides
but it is known to be difficult to remove when Specimen labels should never be removed
used in paper conservation, where a very dilute unless their acidity is causing significant
solution of calcium hypochlorite is the damage to the specimen or they are themselves
recommended, less damaging, substitute. disintegrating.
Conversely, Davis and Payne (1992) stain Tie-on labels are usually attached to the legs
some of their bone material with strong tea in of both reference and mounted specimens or to
order to accentuate detail under the microscope. the antlers and horns of game heads. Good
quality linen and cotton thread are recom-
mended. The latter is reputed to he less liable to
Specimen documentation and rot in adverse conditions. It has become
labelling standard practice to loop the thread through the
eyelet and knot it a short distance from the
General procedures for documenting and specimen. This allows comfortable access to the
cataloguing natural history collections are information without undue stress on the
widely discussed in Davis (1994). Most insti- specimen. To avoid possible damage to the label,
tutions base their hard copy records on eyelets should be made of a non-corrosive
computer-friendly recording cards such as the material.
generic MDA natural history card or more There is general agreement, supported by
specialized in-house ones. Hawks and Williams (1986a), that a good paper
For information relating to specific dry for dry collections labels is 100% cotton stock
vertebrate groups see Williams et al. (1977), with a pH between 6.5 and 7.0.
Waddington and Rudkin (1986), Cato (1986), Hendry (1993) reported that Tyvek (spun-
bonded polyethylene), Byron Weston's Resistall
Genoways et at (1987) and Simmons (1987),
28# and 36# and Goatskin Parchment, used
and for documentation guidelines see Garrett
mainly for wet collections, also have their dry
(1989b).
collections advocates, and can be useful for
field-work and freezer labels. If Tyvek is used for
Conservation records tie-on labels it is advisable to protect the holes
with non-corrosive eyelets. Sometimes this
The importance of recording conservation
generally resilient material can be torn
information and procedures has been stressed
surprisingly easily with the tying thread.
by most writers in this field and is detailed in
Chapter 9 on Policies and procedures.
There is no universally set procedure but
Inks and pens (see also Appendix II on
Papers, inks and label conservation)
most workers agree that records begin with the
There have been a series of research projects on
death of the specimen. The cause of death, if
the most suitable inks and pens for labels,
known, should be recorded, together with any
store-boxes and polythene bags. Although inks
action or treatment which might affect the
are to be recommended for legibility, embossing
future research potential of the specimen.
labels may be a surer method of preserving
A clear and simple form has the best chance
documentation during some preparation
of being completed. Its most important feature
techniques.
is the specimen reference number which links
the specimen to the record card. This is
especially important when parts of a specimen Osteological collections
are divided into different storage areas in the Disarticulated osteological collections are
collections. usually numbered on the individual bones
Condition reports are mainly used for verte- where practicable. The inks recommended are
brates on loan or for assessment surveys. the same as for tie-on labels. Occasionally
Generic bird and mammal diagrams can speed bones are resistant to ink because of the
up the process considerably (see Chapter 9 on preparation technique, or it may bleed into
Policies and procedures). porous areas. The MDA (1995) maintain that
 Vertebrates 15

brushing on a layer of PVA or Paraloid B72 and

letting it dry will provide a surface suitable for
labelling. The ink may be coated with a further
layer of these materials to protect the
documentation.

Organization and storage of

collections
The best source for information on creating,
managing and monitoring stores and selecting
storage equipment is Moore and Williams
(1995). Mathias (1994) and anon. (1992a)
suggest useful guidelines for the organization of
storage areas (see also Chapter 7 on the
Collection environment).
Most dry vertebrate reference collections of
skins, skeletons, nests and eggs are stored in
taxonomic order and catalogued according to a
widely recognized phylogenetic system. See
Cato (1986) for bird systems and Williams et al.
(1977) for mammals.
Mounted specimens and other dry vertebrate
materials that have been collected or prepared
especially for educational handling projects are
usually stored separately from the reference
collections. It can be difficult to store these
collections in any way other than a notional
phylogenetic system because of the differences
in size and shape.
Scarce resources have focused debate on the
general use of more expensive, conservation
grade materials for the preparation and storage
of all types of natural science material.
Research is not yet available to settle these Figure 1.6 A round bird skin stored in polythene tubing
arguments and a pragmatic approach is usually sealed at each end. The risk of damage is limited as the
taken by collections managers. Adopting higher skin may exit and enter the tubing with the lie of the
feathers.
standards of care for dry vertebrates, however,
can only improve the general regard for these
collections. Their low status has often been the
root cause of neglect.
illustrates a variation of this method which
Traditional study skins ensures safe and easy access to the specimen.
Small skins may be stored in zip-top polythene
In collections with good standards of preventive bags. Preparators must ensure that skins are as
conservation, traditionally prepared study dry as possible before sealing in polythene.
skins may be stored in cabinets containing Air-drying is the safest method. Regularly
drawers lined with polyethylene foam or 100% monitoring such collections is vital and, as all
virgin polyester felt. As a second level of skins retain some moisture from the atmos-
protection or for cabinets which are not air- phere, there is the danger of a hostile micro-
tight, they may be stored in resealable climate developing inside the sealed polythene.
polythene tubing (Fig. 1.6). Mathias (1994) If this becomes a problem, one end of the
tubing should be left unsealed.
16 Care and Conservation of Natural History Collections

Flat skins Further protection, such as that suggested by

Fuller et al. (1992), may be necessary if the
Flat bird skins collection is regularly used. It is useful to
Large, flat bird skins may be folded and stored indicate on the cupboards the fragility of such
in polythene bags. Small and medium sized material.
ones may require additional support. Garrett
(1989a) uses sheets of heavyweight blotting Storage of osteological collections
paper, an easily replaced material which may
absorb any excess fat from the skin. The skins Where practicable all skeletal material should be
are stored in unsealed polythene bags. Foam housed in containers large enough to allow easy
board is a useful alternative to blotting paper for access without damage. Williams et al. (1977)
heavier skins. recommended environmental conditions of 21°C
and RH of 55% for this type of material.
Tanned mammal skins Most small skeletons may be stored in glass
Hawks et al. (1984) is the standard text on vials, clear polystyrene boxes, conservation
tanned mammal skins. Traditionally, these quality cardboard boxes or trays and translu-
skins have been hung from hooks in their eye cent polyethylene/polypropylene boxes inside
openings. This can put considerable strain on cabinets. Morgan (1991) points out that, whilst
the skin and it is recommended that all tanned polystyrene is not prone to deterioration
skins, where practicable, are best stored on flat through oxidation, it may yellow and craze if
shelves. This does present difficulties for
museums with large mammal skin collections,
and Hawks et al. (1984) describe an alternative
hanging system using polyethylene-foam
covered supporting tubes and recommend an
acceptable environment for cold room storage of
between 20 and 22°C with a relative humidity
(RH) of 50-60%, in conjunction with a
fumigation programme.
Pool (1997) suggests raising the temperature
of cold rooms to within 10°C below the
surrounding room temperature, to help reduce
condensation problems during specimen trans-
fers but stresses the importance of also imple-
menting an integrated pest management
strategy, monitoring RH and fitting alarms.

Eggs and nests

Tennant and Baird (1984) have reported that

birds eggs can suffer damage from the gases
released by some wooden storage cabinets. The
ideal solution is to store them in conservation
quality card trays, card boxes with a Mylar
window or polystyrene boxes, nestling them in
100% cotton. The use of metal cabinets is
becoming universally recommended as best
conservation practice. Kishinami (1992)
illustrates a cotton poncho technique which
eliminates movement of the eggs within the
drawers during use.
If loose, nests may be bound with cotton twill Figure 1.7 Separate parts of the same skeleton can be
stored in polythene bags fastened together with plastic
tape and stored on trays inside cabinets.
garment tags.
 Vertebrates 17

Figure 1.8 Tyvek-covered

giraffes in the basement of The
Natural History Museum,
London.

exposed to sunlight. For further information on Medium to large skeletons may be stored in
the choice of plastics for use in conservation see conservation quality cardboard boxes or hand-
Baker (1995). made polypropylene fluted-sheet boxes.
Matthiesen (1989) suggests zip-top plastic Tetreault and Williams (1992) and Schlichting
bags in clear plastic boxes as an economical (1994) describe methods for preparing the
alternative for avian skeletal material, and plastic variety. Techniques for housing,
promotes storage on open metal shelving as a cushioning and supporting fragile material can
sensible way of servicing such collections. be found in Rose and de Torres (1992). Large
Separate parts of the same skeleton may be skulls with horns or antlers attached to shields
stored together in polythene bags held together may be stored in the same way as game heads
with a nylon tag (Fig. 1.7). This system is useful or separately on shelves. Of all the materials
for a variety of purposes, including physically used to protect dried vertebrate specimens from
separating specimen and documentation in dust, Tyvek covers, being simple to make and
cases where the acidity of the label could cause easy to clean, are most to be recommended (Fig.
damage. 1.8).
18 Care and Conservation of Natural History Collections

Figure 1.9 Purpose-built

mobile cradles made of angle
iron allow large cetacean
skeletons to be moved by one
person.

Large bones can be very susceptible to attack angle iron (Fig. 1.9) and polyethylene foam or of
by insects, as they usually contain some metal and nylon webbing, as illustrated in
residual fats and oils. Hendry (1993) mentions a Potter and Heyning (1992).
museum with this particular problem having to
seal specimens into wooden crates using a glue
gun on the lids. If you have to use glue guns it Public display and teaching
has been recommended (anon., 1992b) that the
safest glues from a conservation standpoint are
collections
Taxidermy
3M 3764, Bostik 6363 and Evostik 7702.
Even the largest cetacean skeletons can be When commissioning taxidermy work for
made manageable on custom-built cradles of exhibition or teaching, it is important to obtain
good quality specimens mounted by profes-
 Vertebrates 19

Figure 1.10 Good (a) id had (b) taxidermy is not always as obvious as with the two mounted lions. eking professional
advice is good practice.

sional taxidermists. Judging the quality of a their proponents. Morris (1983, 1986) has
specimen requires experience and, if in doubt, found this to be useful when dating such
seek professional advice (Figs 1.10a and b). specimens by X-ray analysis. Additional dating
The best taxidermy will never be cheap, but it evidence may come from investigating the glass
will attract an audience beyond the purely eyes (Fig. 1.11), which Gutebier (1987) and
educational. Mildner (1988) show to have undergone
evolution in terms of their manufacture.
Birds Eventually, the method of skinning a bird
The earliest surviving mounted birds contained leaving the skull, leg and wing bones attached
much of the skeleton supported by an internal to the skin and wiring them into an artificial
wire framework. Illustrated accounts of early body became standard practice. This is
work can be found in Bullock (1817), Brown basically the technique favoured by taxider-
(1885) and Hornaday (1921). Specimens were mists today. The most popular material for bird
filled with a variety of soft fillings such as bodies has long been wood wool (chopped wood
sawdust, straw, cotton and tow. Gardner (1880) fibre) although carved balsawood and
points out that variations in this basic polyurethane foam are often used today.
technique were often named after
20 Care and Conservation of Natural History Collections

Most large mammals have been mounted by

variations of two basic techniques: direct
modelling and the dermoplastic or Akeley
method.

1. Direct modelling
This is the older method, and involved using
the cleaned limb bones, skull and pelvis. These
were attached to a wooden backboard with
bent metal rods which supported the whole
armature. Wood wool, bound to this
framework, produced the body and muscle
shape (Plate 3), and a layer of papier middle
was applied to smooth contours and add detail.
Several layers of shellac rendered the papier
mache waterproof. The preserved skin was
either pickled in a chemical bath or
commercially dressed, before being glued and
sewn around this mannikin.
Mammals such as elephants and giraffes
mounted by this technique can present real
problems with handling and floor loading as
well as skin splitting. Hendry (1989) reported
that experiments had been carried out to
remove the entire framework of these large
animals through an opening in their abdomen,
replacing the support with fibreglass and
Figure 1.11 The polyester resin (Fig. 1.12). Although successful,
type of glass eye used may provide useful information it will take time to monitor the long-term
when dating specimens.
effects of the fibreglass laminate on the skin.

Mammals 2. Dermoplastic or Akeley method

The evolution of mammal taxidermy methods This technique is justly named after its
is not so simple. Early attempts mirrored those foremost American proponent, the taxidermist
used for birds; Akeley (1923) recounts that the Carl Akeley – although, for the record, similar
preserved skin was wired and literally stuffed methods were used much earlier and with
with soft filling. Reports on the 1851 Crystal considerable success by taxidermists in Europe
Palace Exhibition (anon., 1982) show that a such as Karl Kusthadt and Leopold Martin
variety of methods were discovered, lost and (illustrated by Jahn, 1995).
rediscovered by the subsequent generation. At The armature was prepared in a similar way
the end of the nineteenth century, standard to the direct modelling method, although the
techniques had been developed that are still whole of the skeleton was sometimes used to
used by taxidermists today, albeit with new achieve greater accuracy. Modelling clay
materials. created every detail of the body form (Fig.
Small and medium sized mammals were 1.13). The clay model was moulded in plaster
usually prepared by binding their wired limb of Paris and cast in plaster, reinforced with
bones, skull and tail with wood wool to hessian. There were many variations of this
replace the muscles. Chopped wood wool was technique, especially the use of glue and paper
used to fill the skin and, although the to prepare the cast. The result was a strong,
technique sounds primitive, in the hands of a lightweight, hollow mannikin on which the skin
skilled and knowledgeable taxidermist, it was mounted (Fig. 1.14).
produced very credible results and is still Today both techniques are still in use but the
practised today. Akeley method is the one favoured by the
 Vertebrates 21

Figure 1.12 The most radical

technique to ease handling of
large mammals is to replace the
heavy internal armature with
fibreglass.

Figure 1.13 The clay

maquette technique is used to
assess the stance and muscle
structure before embarking on
the life-size mannikin.

Figure 1.14 A clouded

leopard mounted by the
Akeley method.
22 Care and Conservation of Natural History Collections

leading proponents and can result in excep- F i s h , a m p h i b i a a n d re p ti l e s

tional examples of the taxidermist's art. Jonas All members of these groups can be mounted
(1930) describes a more sophisticated variation by traditional taxidermy techniques using the
of this technique used to mount elephants. original skin. In many cases the resulting
Commercially produced mannikins made specimens are difficult to handle because of
from paper or polyurethane foam are now their fragility. Also, because of the technical
available for almost every common mammal difficulties of capturing the translucency and
from weasel to polar bear. Both polyester and depth of colour of the skin, they may be of only
epoxy resins have also been used in large moderate quality. For display or teaching
mammal taxidermy by museum and commer- purposes, it is usually preferable to make
cial taxidermists for over twenty years. We whole or partial reproductions (Plate 5).
should be concerned that materials such as Migdalski (1981) illustrates and describes
polyurethane foam and modern resins, which several techniques for reproducing fish.
form the internal support for so many museum There is a considerable history attached to
specimens today, have been used without the moulding and casting techniques with this
benefit of any published research on their group. Reproductions in museum collections
long-term suitability for this purpose. such as those by Walters (1925) have a value
The sparsely haired, thin skin on the hands, in themselves as part of this history.
feet and faces of mammals such as the large
apes has always been a problem for taxider- Freeze-drying
mists. Attempts to achieve the correct translu-
cency together with minimal shrinkage led to Freeze-drying is a method of preserving natural
the development of a technique, reported by history material by slowly extracting the water
Kaestner (1959), for replacing the skin with an from frozen specimens. Whole specimens may
artificial material. be freeze-dried (Fig. 1.15) and, unlike
The raw skin of a specimen was fitted over a traditional taxidermy, no skinning may be
clay-covered armature and modelled under the necessary. There are, however, many variations
skin to a finished state. Wax was sprayed over of freeze-drying methods, some including more
the fur followed by a plaster jacket in sections. traditional taxidermy techniques.
The skin was allowed to decay in a warm water Freeze-drying is usually carried out in
bath, leaving the hair embedded in the wax. commercially available freeze-dryers, although
The skin was replaced with coloured wax, and home-made systems have been described by
the mould eventually removed (Plate 4). The Kelly (1980). The basic unit consists of a deep-
resulting mounted specimen consisted of wax freeze chamber in which a vacuum can be
and hair only. In recent years taxidermists such maintained attached to a separate condenser.
as Mayer (1987) and Epping and Epping (1981) Under such conditions sublimation of the ice
have introduced modern rubbers and resins as within the specimen to vapour takes place.
a more permanent substitute for wax. This vapour is removed and refrozen, some
Specimens produced by this method, as well distance from the specimen, on the condenser.
as being extremely lifelike, are very resilient, as As the cellular structure at any point in time is
they do not have the problems of skin either frozen or dry, shrinkage is considerably
shrinkage or infestation usually associated reduced when compared to normal drying.
with a traditional skin mount. As a method, Eventually, all the ice is removed and although
however, it requires considerable skill, practice, the specimen, once removed from the
ingenuity and time, and is only one step away freeze-dryer, will absorb a certain amount of
from producing lifelike models in place of real water from the atmosphere, this is insufficient
specimens. Indeed, the work of Kung (1982) to cause decay.
has shown that it is possible to produce Although, as Sage (1984) reports, the process
convincing artificial models of rare species for has been known since 1890, it was not until
museum exhibition. However, they lack the the 1960s that equipment became available for
charisma of real specimens. use with whole specimens. Museums became
familiar with the technique through the work of
Meryman (1960, 1961),
 Vertebrates 23

Figure 1.15 Some examples of

freeze-dried specimens.

Harris (1964) and Hower (1979). Although However, evisceration and packing the body
freeze-dryers are still expensive to buy and cavity with soft filling will reduce the drying
maintain, their reliability has improved consid- time. The technique for larger mammals is to
erably relative to the earliest models. freeze-dry the raw skins after mounting them
Freeze-drying can be used to preserve all on artificial mannikins. In all cases glass, eyes
vertebrates but in practice its use is dictated are used to replace the originals. Many taxider-
by the size of specimens and their suitability mists also use their freeze-dryers to help dry
for the process. Time is also an important the fleshy parts of specimens mounted by
element as even medium size entire specimens traditional taxidermy techniques.
can take several weeks to dry. Reptiles, and to The quality of the finished product will still
a lesser extent amphibia and fish, can be depend on the knowledge and skill of the
successfully freeze-dried, but the preparation preparator: freeze-drying has never improved
is far more elaborate than for birds and the appearance of a specimen.
mammals. The colour of birds' legs and bills Although freeze-drying must be regarded as
fades with normal drying but with one of the least invasive preparation tech-
freeze-drying it can disappear completely, and niques, freeze-dried specimens may be more
they take on a bleached appearance. Hangay liable to insect attack than traditionally
and Dingley (1985) give the best practical prepared items. Insect-proofing chemicals such
account of freeze-drying procedures and detail as Eulan (Edulan U) and Mittel F have been
methods for all types of natural history used with freeze-dried material but evidence of
material. their long-term effectiveness is inconclusive
Freeze-drying is used mainly for display and (see also Proofing chemicals to prevent attack
teaching. The freeze-dried body provides its by insects, p. 4).
own internal support when dry, making it more Another disadvantage with freeze-drying is
robust than traditionally prepared specimens. that much of the fat within the specimen does
It is also widely used for the dry preservation of not freeze-dry. Hower (1979) maintains that
decaying specimens, which would otherwise this is not a problem for exhibition specimens
have to be preserved in fluid. Moreover, the if the fat is left undisturbed. Some freeze-
skills required for preparing freeze-dried study drying techniques, however, involve piercing
skins are easily acquired, unlike the depth of the specimen to speed up drying times. In such
knowledge and skills required of a trained cases fat can migrate to the surface of the skin
taxidermist. where it causes unsightly staining, before
Smaller bird and mammal mounts can be oxidizing to produce a damaging condition
prepared by setting up the entire specimen. known as fat burn.
24 Care and Cousert'ation of Natural History Collections

Furthermore the skeletons of entire freeze- economical option than several smaller ones.
dried specimens are preserved inside the speci- Glass showcases can be adapted and reused for
men and therefore not available for study. storage, but are difficult to keep air-tight. There
Florian (1990) has indicated that freeze-drying may be no alternative to storing large mammals
may enhance the deterioration of tissue and in areas where they are susceptible to dust
that such deterioration may continue during pollution. Covering them with polythene
storage. For all these reasons, there has been sheeting is the cheapest in but most depressing
little interest and much caution regarding the solution as it soon accumulates dust
use of freeze-drying for reference collections. electrostatically. The use of magnets to help-seal
Cole (pers. comm., 1996) maintains that there the polythene as suggested by Guynes (1992)
are very few museums making duplicate makes access relatively simple.
collections of freeze-dried material, although the A preferable but more expensive alternative is
idea of rehydrating chemically unpreserved to use custom-made Tyvek covers (see Fig 1.8)
material in the future seems an interesting which can be kept acceptably clean with a
option. clamp cloth. They can be made by sewing,
sealing with an impulse sealer, or stapling
Storage of mounted vertebrates together. White or unbleached cotton or cotton
polyester blends may also be used for this
Ramer (1989) has pointed out that mounted purpose, but make sure, as previously
vertebrates are more likely to be damaged by suggested (anon., 1992h), that harmful finishes
poor storage and handling techniques than any are washed out.
other agent of deterioration. This reflects both Game heads may be stored on wall-mounted
the low status of such collections in the past expanded metal or wire-meshed racks, and
and the considerable expense involved in their covered as described above. Swivel-spring billet
safe storage. Top of the list of poor storage hooks are a convenient way of attaching the
techniques must be the ubiquitous polythene wooden shields to the mesh (Fig. 1.17). Large
bag forced over mounted specimens on open horned or antlered heads may be given
shelving. supplementary support with elastic bungees
clipped to the wire. Horn has a tendency to split
Small and medium sized mounted and flake under clamp conditions, where
vertebrates Morgan (1991) reports that it is particularly
Small and medium sized vertebrate mounts susceptible to attack by weevils. He maintains
used for teaching and reference are best stored that the RH of areas with horned heads should
in cabinets. If space is available it is good not exceed 60% (see also Chapter 7 on the
practice to make the base either square or Collection environment).
rectangular and keep the mounted specimen
within the limits of the base. This will help Glass domes and cases
protect it when being handled, transported and Glass domes and all glass 'Ward style' cases
stored. may be simply stored on open shelves with loose
Steel (1970) describes a system for the dust covers bearing 'Fragile Glass' labels.
storage of mounted birds (although it can also Glass-fronted cases should be covered or
be adapted for mammals) similar to picture simply turned to face the wall if stored in areas
storage, where specimens are attached to sliding where daylight cannot be eliminated. With large
racks inside purpose-built cabinets. A modified collections, photographs of the contents may be
version of this method is to store mounted attached to the backs of turned cases for easy
specimens on both sides of static upright reference.
wooden panels within a polythene tent (Fig. Frost (1981, 1987) emphasizes that trade
1.16). It provides an economical temporary labels are part of the history of taxidermy and
solution, useful in an emergency. should be treated with the same care as other
natural sciences documentation. If cases with
Large mounted vertebrates trade labels are to be exhibited, they should be
Large mounts are best stored in large spaces. protected from light with hinged acid-free card.
One large space is a far safer and more If showing signs of damage, labels
 Vertebrates25

Figure 1.16 Keyhole plates used to support mounted specimens on display. Here they are used for upright storage.
26 Care and Conservation of Natural History Collections

Figure 1.17 Example

of dog-lead clips
(swivel-spring billet
hooks) which allow
easy access to game
heads. 'Bungees' can
provide additional
support.
 Vertebrates 27

should be removed completely, de-acidified (in

consultation with a paper conservator) stored
separately in Mylar envelopes (Fig. 1.18) and
cross-referenced with photographic records of
the case. Van der Reyden (1995) describes
techniques for storing archival documentation
and, Kishinami (1992) suggests methods for label
storage and repair.

Handling, packing, and transportation of

mounted vertebrates
Cased material and loan collections housed in
their own purpose-built containers pose no
particular handling problems. Glass cases
Figure 1.18 An original taxidermy trade label which should be taped, marked fragile and moved
was in danger of deteriorating, now stored in a Mylar either strapped and palleted, or, if too small or
envelope fragile for this, handled with gloves.

Figure 1.19 An example of

more than one specimen
securely fixed in the same box.
Always indicate the packing
method on the outside of the
container.
28 Care and Conservation of Natural History Collections

(a)

Figure 1.20 Specimens on their original bases should be secured to

their travelling container with straps stapeled over the bases.

Uncased specimens, however, are at their

most vulnerable during any handling
procedure. All such material should be
mounted on, and only handled by, a substantial
base. The most easily damaged parts of
mounted birds are their necks. The slightest
knock to the bill (b) when moving specimens in
and out of cupboards, for example, can cause
irreparable damage. The claws of birds of prey
are razor sharp, and should be carefully
wrapped if items are moved without a
supporting base.
Although the tails of mounted mammals will
contain an internal wire support, and the ears
either a modelling composition around a wire or
an artificial ear liner, they are nevertheless the
most vulnerable parts of such specimens.
For travel, small and medium sized birds and
mammals may be enclosed in a wooden or stout
cardboard box. The base should be attached to
the box with screws from the outside (Fig. 1.19)
or, if documentation, trade labels or the original
base are likely to be damaged, strapped and
stapled to the bottom (Fig. 1.20). Whatever
method is used, it is important to avoid further
packing around the animal unless absolutely
necessary. More damage has been inflicted on
mounted specimens by well-intentioned
supporting packing, especially around the
heads and tails, than anything else (Figs 1.21a,
b and c). If extra packing is essential, a Figure 1.21 Inappropriate packing around
combination of tissue- paper wads, as specimens can lead to damage during transit (a
illustrated in Pye (1992), and polyethylene foam and b) or whilst unpacking – additional supportive
packing such as the ubiquitous crumpled
will usually suffice. newspaper (c) is usually not necessary if the
specimen is firmly attached to its base
 Vertebrates 29

Figure 1.22 The underside of a specimen base showing a

recessed nut glued into the bottom. The base is secured to
its travelling box with a flat-headed bolt and wooden
washer. This simple repacking solution will help reduce
damage to specimens regularly on loan.

Packing of returned loan specimens is often

carried out by inexperienced people, and should
be made as foolproof as possible. Techniques
such as gluing a recessed not into the bottom of
the base and securing it with a flat-headed
countersunk bolt and washer will help define
the packing method (Fig. 1.22). Instructions
should be clearly indicated on the outside of the
box, in the appropriate language, together with
a description of the contents.
Large collections of uncased mounted speci-
mens on bases may be safely moved by securing
them to flat wooden boards with stapled paper
straps. The hoards (the larger they are, the more
stable they will be), will support themselves
during transportation, although their size will
be limited by access constraints.
If large mammals are regularly on loan, they
may require their own purpose-built mobile
container (Fig. 1.23). Horns or antlers are a
particular hazard and should be sheathed in
protective material such as polyethylene foam.
The fragile nature of the skins of mounted
reptiles, amphibia and fish makes them partic-
ularly susceptible to handling damage. Apart
from the larger reptiles, this group is often
represented by replicas in museum collections.
Mounted skins may be the exception, and
should be valued as such when assessing
storage priorities.

Figure 1.23 A purpose-built mobile container which

will ease the strain placed on the legs of some mounted
specimens during transportation.
30 Care and Conservation of Natural History Collections

ing old, dirty bird feathers, although ultrason-

Conservation ics used for cleaning ethnographic feathered
Research
items is worth investigating. Bent feathers may
The past ten years has seen an increase in the he straightened with steam, and broken ones
number of research papers in natural sciences repaired with bamboo splints.
conservation. Duckworth et al. (1993), however, Trodd (1992) recommends that very dirty
includes an extensive list of topics awaiting large mammals and game heads may be
investigation. At present it is still difficult to cleaned with a mild shampoo of pure soap-
make informed conservation decisions, let flakes. The fur must be rinsed with clean water
alone confident ones. Although we know which which is immediately removed using an
materials and techniques work in practice, we Aquavac-type vacuum cleaner. Some carpet
are still uncertain about long-term costs. If in cleaning systems which combine a fine spray
doubt, do nothing is a laudable approach but with a water vacuum may also be used on dirty
does not reflect the possibility that no action specimens that are otherwise in good
may mean no collection. The work of Williams condition. Aerosol foam upholstery cleaners
(1991) and Young (1992) on the shrinkage have been used successfully, but these leave a
temperature of collagen fibre as an indicator of powder on drying which must be removed by
skin deterioration is a promising avenue of gentle vacuuming. With all of these techniques
research. the skin must be kept as dry as possible
There are also ethical questions to be during cleaning.
considered. Should we improve upon the poor The Canadian Conservation Institute (anon.,
workmanship of the past, by remodelling 1983) suggests brushing fur (excluding deer)
mounted specimens to look more realistic, for with a mixture of shellac and methyl hydrate
example? Such decisions should not be made before drying and combing out. Perhaps less
purely on conservation arguments plucked invasive is the suggestion of Fenn (pers.
from the fine and decorative arts. Natural comm.. 1993), of warm cornmeal or bread-
science specimens in museum displays often crumbs made from Italian bread containing
fulfil a different function to those in other olive oil for cleaning fur skins. Horie (1988)
disciplines. Sensible decisions on treatments opposed the use of powdered eraser, a material
should reflect this. often used for ethnographical fur skin
Whatever decisions are taken, it is impera- collections.
tive that methods and materials are fully In study skin collections, fat burn caused by
recorded either on the specimen card or inadequate initial removal of fat is a prime
database, and cross-referenced. This evidence, cause of deterioration. Successful degreasing
so lacking in the past, is vital if we are to has been achieved by completely immersing
determine the effectiveness of today's method- specimens in organic solvents such as
ologies. trichloroethylene. Robbins (1989) prefers using
perchloroethylene, whereas Koch (1991)
Cleaning reports successfully degreasing bird skins with
a variety of fur-soaking chemicals. All such
B irds and mam ma ls work is hazardous for the preparator and
Horie (1988) discussed the ethics and science should only be carried out whilst wearing the
of cleaning vertebrate material and offered correct personal protective equipment and in
some practical suggestions. areas with adequate ventilation. The success of
The traditional method of cleaning dirty these methods will often depend on the
specimens is similar to that adopted for the thoroughness of the initial preparation and the
initial cleaning during preparation (see, type of skin being degreased (see also
Preparation of bird skins, p. 5). Garner (1988) Preparation of bird skins, p. 5). Injecting friable
suggests the progressive use of compressed air, skins with rubber latex, a traditional solution
mild detergents. organic solvents and dry for fragmenting skins, is not to be
powders to clean both fur and feathers. The recommended for their long-term conservation.
investigations of Rogers (1990a. b) conclude Latex is difficult to reverse safely and will itself
that there is no entirely safe method for clean deteriorate.
 Vertebrates 31

Reptiles, amphibia and fish been achieved with fibreglass tissue and
In the past, many reptiles, amphibia and fish polyvinyl acetate emulsion.
were coated with shellac to seal them and make In 1988 the Canadian Conservation Institute
cleaning easier. Shellac discolours badly with began a series of trials with Paralene, a modern
age and can be extremely difficult to remove. As polymer, to consolidate natural science
a very last resort Entwistle (1992) used a paint materials and make them easier to handle and
remover containing 4.5% sodium hydroxide. For clean. The advantages of coating fur and
practical purposes the technique was very feathers were minimal but, as Grattan and
successful, but the long-term effects have yet to Morris (1991) point out, it did help consolidate
be assessed. friable bone, strengthen bird eggs and improve
the handling possibilities of some reptile skins.
Osteological material However, its use may be limited in the
Adams (pers. comm., 1982) suggests that an conservation field by the irreversible nature of
ultrasonic bath containing 2% non-ionic deter- the process.
gent may be used for small skeletons. It requires
about thirty seconds for small-mammal sized Relaxing mounted specimens
specimens. Mounted rarities, mounted specimens with
Larger material may be cleaned with the same scientific data and large flying birds may be
solutions but this requires the pressure of a relaxed and prepared as cabinet skins in order
paint spray-gun to help remove ingrained dirt. to preserve them, or simply to save space. This
High pressure jets should be reserved for can be a damaging procedure, as the ability of a
worst-case exhibition material only. All speci- skin to relax depends largely on its initial
mens should be thoroughly rinsed with water preparation, and serious consideration should
after cleaning. be given to the consequences of such decisions.
Large skeletons can be successfully cleaned Wagstaffe and Fidler (1968), Summers (1979)
i i i s i n s with controlled cryogenesis (spraying with and Hangay and Dingley (1985) describe
dry ice), (anon., 1996). This technique is very techniques for relaxing skins and should be
much in its infancy but may, in the future, have consulted before proceeding.
some application in the natural science field. Many of the leading natural history museums
around the world recognize the popularity of
Restoration and consolidation mounted specimens, and have used
information technology and interactivity to
There has been little published work on the enhance the appeal of their displays. It would
restoration of dry vertebrates. The papers by be a mistake to confuse modernising displays
Rau (1993) and Hildebrand (1985) on the with the elimination of mounted vertebrates.
remounting of Quaggas at Mainz, Munich and Replacing them with two dimensional images
the South African Museum are a unique source only duplicates what can be found in other
of reference. The work was experimental and venues and ignores the interest engendered by
time will judge its success. real specimens, the heart of the museum
The traditional method of relaxing the split collections.
seams of mounted vertebrates with water and
restitching them can be successful, at least in
the short term. Horie (1988) advises caution Acknowledgements
with this technique, as wetting the skin can
result in increased stiffness on drying and I would like to thank the following for their kind
compound the problem. Howard (1989) does not help with information: Jeremy Adams, Booth
attempt restitching, preferring to cut away the Museum of Natural History, Brighton; Ronald
loose edges of split skin before filling and E. Cole, Davis Museum, California; Julia D.
retouching. Fenn, Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto; Velson
Cracks or splits in the skins of fish, reptiles Horie, The University Museum, Manchester;
and amphibia are very common. Entwistle Susanne J. Miller, Idaho National Engineering
(1992) reports that successful repairs have Laboratory, Idaho; Philip Howard, Royal
Museum of Scotland,
32 Care and Conservation of Natural History Collections

Edinburgh; Rowland O. Hower, Smithsonian Behrmann, G. (1979). Ein Beitrag zur Walprapäration. Der
Museum of Natural History, Washington; and Prapärator, 25, 89-94.
Stephen P. Rogers, Carnegie Museum of Natural Bolin, R.L. (1935). A method of preparing skeletons of small
vertebrates. Science, 82, 2132.
History, Pittsburgh. Thanks also go to: Don P. Brown, Captain T. (1885). The Taxidermist's Manual.
Sharp, Natural History Museum, Wollaton, Thomas C. Black, Edinburgh.
Nottingham; Peter Summers, Royal Museum of Browne. M. (1896). Artistic and Scientific Taxidermy and
Scotland, Edinburgh; and the photographers in Modelling. Adam and Charles Black, London.
the Creative Services Section of Glasgow Bullock, W. (1817). A concise and easy method ofpreserving
subjects of natural history, intended for use of sportsmen,
Museums for the photography.
travellers, etc. Brown and Conn, London.
Burns, W.J. Jr (1952). Effects of preservatives on the fur
colour of mammal specimens. Master of Science thesis,
References University of Idaho Graduate School.
Cato, P. (1986). Guidelines for Managing Bird Collections.
Adams, J. ( 1 9 8 0 ) . Osteological preparation techniques 2. Museology, Texas Tech University Press, Lubbock, Texas.
Guild of Taxidermists Newsletter, 5, 44–50. Chapin, J.P. (1940). The preparation of birds for study.
Akeley, C. (1923). In Brightest Africa. Doubleday, Page and American Museum of Natural History Guide Leaflet, 58,
Co., New York. 1-48.
Allen, E.R. and Neill, W.T. (1950). Cleaning mammal skele- Chapman, D.I. and Chapman, N. (1969). The use of sodium
tons with mealworms. Journal of Mammalogy, 31, 464. perborate tetrahydrate (NaBO3 4H20 ) in the preparation of
Anderson, R.M. (19.5). Methods of collecting and preparing mammalian skeletons. Journal of Zoology, 519, 522–523.
vertebrate animals, 4th edn. National Museum of Canada, Clancey, P.A. (1959). Removal of blood in bird and mammal
Biological Series 18, Bulletin 69. specimens. Bulletin of the South African Museums
Anon. (1904). Handbook of Instructions for Collectors, 2nd Association, 7, 65.
edn. British Museum (Natural History)/Longmans and Co., Coetzee, C.G. (1985). The influence of preservatives on coat
London. colour of small mammals. Acta Zoologica Fennica, 170,
Anon. (1968). Instructions for Collectors. 1. Mammals 67–68.
(Non-marine) 6th edn. British Museum (Natural Connelly, R. and Rogers, S. (1995). Evaluation of the new
History)/Trustees of The British Museum, London. bug proofing compound 'Bug Out' using freeze dried
Anon. (1982). Signor Comba – The father of modern specimens. BreakThrough, 43, 63–65.
taxidermy?? Guild of Taxidermists Newsletter, 9, 30. Coy, J. (1975). Preparation of modern comparative material
Anon. (1983). Care of mounted specimens and pelts. for archaeozoology. Department of the Environment,
Leather, skin and fur, paper 8/3. Canadian Conservation Faunal Remains Project, University of Southampton.
Institute, Ottawa. Coy, J. (1980). Osteological preparation techniques 1. Guild
Anon. (1989). A Manual of Vapour Degreasing. American of Taxidermists Newsletter, 5, 44–50.
Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia. Davis. P. (1994). Documentation of collections. In Manual of
Anon. (1992a). Standards in the Museum Care of Biological Natural History Curatorship (G. Stansfield et al. eds), pp.
Collections. Museum and Galleries Commission, London. 70-97. Museums and Galleries Commission, HMSO,
Anon. (1992b). Supplies and Materials for Museum London.
Collections. Society for the Preservation of Natural History Davis, S. and Payne, S. (1992). 101 ways to deal with a dead
Collections at The International Symposium and World hedgehog: notes on the preparation of disarticulated
Congress of the Preservation and Conservation of Natural skeletons for zoo-archaeological use. Circae. 2, 95-104.
History Collections, Madrid. Davis, W.J. (1907). Bird and Animal Preserving and
Anon. (1996). Cryogenesis. The art of cleaning with dry ice. Mounting. J. and. W. Davis, Dartford.
Trade Leaflet, Cryoscot, East Lothian, Scotland. de la Tone, L. (1951). A method for cleaning skulls of
Arevard, K., Bindel, B. and Hjorta, H. (1981). Erprobung specimens preserved in alcohol. Journal of Mammalogy,
verschiedener Methoden der Schutzbehandlung von 32, 231–232.
Vogelbälgen gegen Schadinsektenangriffe. Der Prapärator, Dill, H.R. (1950). Mounting of small and medium-sized
27, 1–21. animals. Museum News, 27, 6–7.
Baker. M.T. (1995). Synthetic polymers. In Storage of Dill, H.R. (1957). To wash and clean bird skins. Museum
Natural History Collections: A Preventative Conservation Graphic, 9, 31.
Approach (C.L. Rose et al., eds), pp. 305–323. Society for Downing, S.C. (1945). Colour changes in mammal skins
the Preservation of Natural History Collections, Iowa. during preparation. Journal of Mammalogy, 26, 128–132.
Banta, B.H. (1961). The use of clothes moth larvae to Duckworth. W.D., Genoways, H.H. and Rose, C.L. (1993).
prepare osteological specimens. Journal of Biology Preserving Natural Science Collections: Chronicle of our
(London), 19, 265–268. Environmental Heritage. National Institute for the
Barlow, J.C. and Flood, N.J. (1983). Research collections in Conservation of Cultural Property, Washington, DC.
ornithology – a reaffirmation. In Perspectives in Ellenberger, W., Baum, H. and Dittrich, H. (1956). An Atlas
Ornithology (A.H. Brush and G.A. Clark Jr, eds), pp. of' Animal Anatomy for Artists, 2nd edn. Dover
37-54. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Publications, Inc., New York.
Batty, J.H. (1885). Practical Taxidermy and Home
Decoration. Orange Judd Co., New York.
 Vertebrates 33

Entwistle. R. (1992). Conservation for the Victorian natural Grattan, D. and Morris, M. (1991). The potential of Paralene
history gallery. In Life After Death, The Practical for consolidating natural history specimens. In Natural
Conservation of Natural History Collections. (R. Entwistle History Conservation, Natural History Collections.
et al. eds), pp. 21–23, United Kingdom Institute for Working Group of the International Council of Museums,
Conservation. London. Issue No. 6. (R.R. Waller and C.V. Horie, eds), pp. 4–7,
Epping, O.M. and Epping, C.B. (1981). The ultimate Conservation Committee.
challenge: mounting a gorilla. American Taxidermist Green, H.L.H.H. (1934). A rapid method of preparing clean
Magazine, 14, 4–12. bone specimens from fresh or fixed material. Anatomical
Farber, P.L. (1987). The development of taxidermy and the Record, 61, 1–3.
history of ornithology. Isis, 68, 244. Gutebier, T. (1987). Künstliche Augen aus Betrachtung der
Fisher, C. and McInnes, G. (1981). An enzyme technique for historischen Zeitfolge. Der Präparator, 33, 121–123.
the rapid preparation of osteological specimens. Guild of Gutebier, T. (1989). Von Hohberg's Georgica Curiosa (1682).
Taxidermists Newsletter; 8, 18–20. Der Präparator, 35, 49–55.
Florian, M.-L. (1986). Ideas on how to better preserve Guynes, D. (1992). Plastic dust covers for steel shelving. In
collections of natural history. Collection Forum, 2, 2. Storage o f Natural History Collections: Ideas and
Florian, M.-L. (1990). The effects of freezing and freeze Practical Solutions (C.L. Rose and A.R. de Torres, eds), pp.
drying on natural history specimens. Collection Forum, 6, 129–130, Society for the Preservation of Natural History
45–52. Collection, Pittsburgh.
Found. C. and Helwig, K. (1995). The reliability of spot tests Halford. S.A. (1987). Cased bird skins – an alternative
for the detection of arsenic and mercury in natural history opening. Collections Forum, 3, 13.
collections: a case study. Collection Forum, 11, 6-15. Hall, R.E. (1937). Deleterious effects of preservatives on
Frost, C.C. (1981). Victorian Taxidermy: Its History and study skins of mammals. Journal of Mammalogy, 18, 359.
Finest Exponents. The Enchanted Aviary. Long Melford, Hanacziwskyj, P., Horie, C.V. and Shuttleworth, C.A. (1991).
Suffolk. Effect of taxidermy treatments on DSC behaviour of deer
Frost, C.C. (1987). A History of British Taxidermy. The skin collagen. In Leather: Its Composition and Changes
Enchanted Aviary, Sudbury, Suffolk. with Time. (C. Calnan and B. Haines, eds), pp. 56–59.
Fry, C.H. (1985). The effect of alcohol immersion on the Leather Conservation Centre, Northhampton.
plumage colours of bee eaters. Bulletin of the British Haneke, E. (1977). Arsenverbindungen – eine Gefahr für den
Ornithologists Club, 105, 78–79. biologischen Praparator. Der Präparator. 23, 133-137.
Fuller, T.A., Blount, A. and Bossert, C. (1992). Support Hangay, G. and Dingley. M. (1985). Biological Museum
systems for nests. In Storage of Natural History Methods. Vol. 1: Vertebrates. Academic Press, Sydney.
Collections: Ideas and Practical Solutions. (C.L. Rose,. and Harris, R.H. (1959). Small vertebrate skeletons. Museums
A.R. de Torres, eds) pp. 175–176. Society for the journal, 58, 223–224.
Preservation of Natural History Collections, Pittsburgh. Harris, R.H. (1964). Vacuum dehydration and freeze drying
Funk, F. and Sherfey, K. (1975). Uses of Edolan U in of entire biological specimens. Annals and Magazine,
museum preparation and conservation of zoological Natural History Series, 13 (7), 65–74.
material. Curator, 18, 68–76. Harrison, C.J.O. and Cowles G.S. (1970). Instructions for
Gardner, J. (1880). Taxidermy Made Easy, 5th edn. James Collectors, No. 2A. Trustees of the British Museum
Gardner, London. (Natural History), London.
Garner, R. (1988). Cleaning fur. In Conservation of Natural Harrison, J.M. (1976), Bird Taxidermy, 2nd edn. David and
History Specimens – Vertebrates. (C.V. Horie and R.G. Charles, Newton Abbot.
Murphy, eds), pp. 63–67. University of Manchester and Hasluck, P.N. (1914). Taxidermy: Comprising the Skinning,
The Manchester Museum. Stuffing and Mounting o f B i r d s , Mammals and Fish.
Garrett, K.L. (1989a). Collections management techniques Cassell and Co. Ltd, London.
for flat skins and other non-traditional skin preparations. In Hawks, C.A. and Williams, S.L. (1986a). Care of specimen
Notes From a Workshop on Bird Specimen Preparation. labels in vertebrate research collections. In Proceedings
(S.P. Rogers and D.S. Wood, eds), pp.31–40, Carnegie o f the 1985 Workshop on Care and 11ainteiicntce o f
Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh. Natural History Collections. (J. Waddington and D.M.
Garrett, K.L. (1989b). Documentation guidelines for the Rudkin, eds), pp. 105–108. Royal Ontario Museum Life
preparation of biological specimens. Collections Forum, 5, Sciences Miscellaneous Publications, Toronto.
47-51. Hawks, C.A. and Williams, S.L. (1986b). Arsenic in natural
Genoways, H.H., Jones, C. and Rossolimo, O.L. (1987). history collections. Leather Conservation News, 2, 1–4.
Mammal Collections Management. Texas Tech University Hawks, C.A., Williams, S.L. and Gardner, J.S. (1984). The
Press, Lubbock, Texas. Care o f Tanned Skins in Mammal Research Collections.
Gerwin, J.A. (1989). The use of hexanes for museum Museology, 6. Texas Tech University, Lubbock. Texas.
specimen preparation. In Notes From a Workshop on Bird Hendry, R. (1989). Renovating old specimens with fibreglass.
Specimen Preparation. (S.P. Rogers and D.S. Wood, eds), Guild conference 1988. Guild o f Taxidermists Newsletter.
pp. 47–52, The Carnegie Museum of Natural History, 19, 4.
Pittsburgh. Hendry, R. (1993). Notes on a natural history study tour of
Graf, E. (1984). Insektizider Schutz von Vogelbälgen. Der North America. Unpublished manuscript from the
Präparator, 30, 357-363. Conservation Unit, Museums and Galleries Commission,
Grangvist, E. (1982). Die Verwendung von Eulan als London.
Mottenschutzmittel im Zoologischen Museum der
Universität in Helsinki. Der Präparator, 28, 221–223.
34 Care and Conservation of Natural History Collections

Hildebrand, U. (1985). Die Neupräparation der Mainzer Küng, K. (1982). Bemerkungen zum Aufbau eines Flupferdes
Quaggas. Der Präparator, 31, 101—110. aus Kunstoff. Der Präparator, 28, 349—353.
Hinshaw, J. (1989). Procedures for packing bird specimens. Laurie, E.M.O. and Hill, J.E. (1951). Use of dermestid
The Bird Collection Newsletter, 2, 2-3. beetles for cleaning mammalian skeletons. Museums
Hooper. E.T. (1956). Selection of fats by dermestid beetles. Journal, 51, 206—207.
Journal of Mammology, 37, 125-126. Mahoney, R. (1973). Laboratory Techniques in Zoology, 2nd
Horie, C.V. (1988). Treatment for deteriorated specimens. In edn. Butterworths, London.
Conservation of Natural Histoiy Specimens — Vertebrates Marcon, P. (1992). A transportable building with environ-
(C.V. Horie and R.G. Murphy, eds), pp. 49-62. University mental control for housing dermestid colonies. Natural
of Manchester and The Manchester Museum. History Conservation 7. Newsletter of the Natural History
Hornaday, W.T. (1921). Taxidermy and Zoological Collecting, Collections Working Group of the International Council of
7th edn. Charles Scribner's Sons, New York. Museums, Conservation Committee, pp. 14—15.
Hounsome, M.V. (1988). Methods of bone preparation. In Martin, R.L. (1964). Skull degreasing technique. Turtox
Conservation of Natural History Specimens. (C.V. Horie, News, 42, 248-249.
and R.G. Murphy eds), pp. 16—19. University of Mathias, J. (1994). Housing and maintenance of collections.
Manchester and The Manchester Museum. In Manual of Natural History Curatorship ( G . Stansfield
Howard, P. (1989). Old specimens in a new display. In et al., eds), pp. 98-138. Museums and Galleries
Natural History Conservation, Natural History Collections, Commission, HMSO, London.
Issue 4 (C.V. Horie, ed.), pp. 5-6. Working Group of the Matthiesen, D.G. (1989). The curation of avian osteological
International Council of Museums, Conservation collections. In Notes from a Workshop on Bird Specimen
Committee. Preparation (S.P. Rogers and D.S. Wood, eds), pp.
Howell. A.H. (1937). A simple method of saving small 71—110. The Carnegie Museum of Natural History,
mammals in the field. Journal of Mammology, 18, 95. Pittsburgh.
Hower, R.O. (1979). Freeze- D r y i n g Biological Specimens: A Mayer, E. (1987). Erosion casting a pigs head. Guild of
Laboratory Manual. Smithsonian Institution Press, Taxidermists Newsletter, 17, 8—9.
Washington, DC. McConachie, J. (1992). Shelving for walk-in freezer units. In
Howie, F.M.P. (1985). Conserving natural history collections: Storage of Natural History Collections: Ideas and Practical
some present problems and strategies for the future. In Solutions. ( C . L . R o s e and A.R. de Torres, eds), pp.
Proceedings o f the 1985 Workshop on Care and 113—114. Society for the Preservation of Natural History
Maintenance of Natural History Collections. (J. Collections, Pittsburgh.
Waddington and D.M. Rudkin, eds), pp. 1-6. Royal Ontario MDA (1995). Labelling and marking museum objects.
Museum Life Sciences Miscellaneous Publication, Toronto. Museum Documentation Association Factsheet.
Hurlin, R.G. (1918). A note on the preparation of skeletons Meryman, H.T. (1960). The preparation of biological
by bacterial digestion. Science, 47, 22—23. museum specimens by freeze-drying. Curator, 3, 5—19.
Jahn, I. (1995). Zum Gedächtnis a t Karl Kaestner — Ein Meryman, H.T. (1961). The preparation of biological
Pionier der `Museumsdermoplastik', Leopold Martin museum specimens by freeze-drying, 2. Instrumentation.
(1815—1886). Der Präparator, 41, 53-62. Curator, 4, 153—174.
Jannett. F.J. Jr. and Davies, J.G. (1989). An inexpensive Metcalfe, J. (1981). Taxidermy: A Complete Manual. G .
apparatus for degreasing skulls. Curator 32, 88—90. Duckworth and Co. Ltd, London.
Johnson, K.K., Zink, R.M, Barrowclough, G.F. and Marten, Migdalski, E.C. (1981). Fish Mounts and Other Fish Trophies
J.A. (1984). Suggested techniques for modern avian — The Complete Book of Fish Taxidermy, 2nd edn. John
systematics. Wilson Bulletin, 96, 543-560. Wiley and Sons. New York.
Jonas, L. (1930). The mounting of an elephant group. The Mildner, P. (1988). Grundlagen zur Erarbeitung eines
American Association of Museums, New Series, No. 11, Augenkataloges der Saugetiere Europaes. Der Präparator.
Washington, DC. 36, 89—121.
Kaestner, K. (1959). Über die Anwendung der Mitchell, A.G. and Wynne-Jones, W.F.K. (1956). Behaviour
Paraffinierungmethode. Der Präparator, 5, 33-52. of mixtures of hydrogen peroxide and water 3. Ionic
Kelly. J. (1980). The construction of a low cost. high capacity products. Transactions of the Faraday Society, 52,
vacuum freeze-drying system. Studies in Conservation, 25, 824-830.
176-179. Moore, B.P. and Williams, S.L. (1995). Storage equipment. In
Kish, J. and Jonas, C. (1976). The Jonas Technique, Vol. I. Storage of Natural History Collections: A Preventative
Bird Mounting. Jonas Brothers, Inc., Denver. Conservation Approach (C.L. Rose et al., eds), pp.
Kishinami, C.H. (1992). Padding system for eggs in boxes. In 255-267, Society for the Preservation of Natural History
Storage of Natural History Collections: Ideas and Practical Collections, Iowa.
Solutions (C.L. Rose and A. de Torres, eds), pp. 177—179. Morgan, J.(1991). Conservation of Plastics: An Introduction.
Society for the Preservation of Natural History Collections, Museums and Galleries Commission, London.
Pittsburgh. Morris, P. (1982). On the supposed occupational hazards of
Knudsen, J.W. (1966). Biological Techniques. Harper and being a taxidermist. Guild of Taxidermists Newsletter, 9,
Row. New York. 36-38.
Koch, B. (1991). Eine Methode zur Umarbeitung alter Morris, P. (1983). Notes on some specimens prepared by
Vogelprapärate. Der Präparator. 37, 116—121. John Hancock. Guild o f Taxidermists Newsletter, 11,
Konnerth, A. (1965). Preparation of ligamentary articulated 5-7.
fish skeletons. Curator, 8, 325—332. Morris, P. (1986). John Hancock's taxidermy method. Guild
o f Taxidermists Newsletter, 16, 10—11.
 Vertebrates 35

Morris, P. and Wroot, S. (1987). The Preparation of Mammal Museum of Natural History. Pittsburgh.
Skins for Scientific, Educational and Display Purposes. Rogers, S.P. (1990a). Evaluating taxidermy chemicals: Part
Mammal Society, London 1. Their effect on feathers. Taxidermy Today, 12, 45-49.
Moyer, J.W.( 1 9 79). Practical Taxidermy. 2nd edn. John Rogers, S.P. (1990b). Evaluating taxidermy chemicals: Part
Wild and Sons. New York. 2. The effects of cleaners. Taxidermy Today, 12, 59-65.
Moyer, J. W. (1981). Leon Luther Pray (1882—1975) Rose, C.L. and de Torres, A.R. (eds) (1992). Storage of
T a x i d e r my Review, 9, 14—21. Natural History Collections: Ideas and Practical
Nagorsen, D.W. and Peterson, R.L (1980). Mammal Solutions. Society for the Preservation of Natural History
C o l l e c to r ’ s Manual. Royal Ontario Museum Life Sciences Collections, Pittsburgh.
Miscellaneous Publications. Toronto. Rowley, J. (1925). Taxidermy and Museum Exhibition. D.
Namlik, G. (1975). Freeze-dry preservation of trophies. A Appleton, London.
controversial method goes commercial. American Sage, J. (1984). Freeze drying — an introduction. Guild of'
Taxidermist Magazine, 9, 4—11. Taxidermists Newsletter, 13, 12—16.
Norris, R.A. (1961). A new method of preserving bird Saunders, J.T. and Manton, S.M. (1967). A Manual o f
specimens. Auk, 78, 436-440. Practical Vertebrate Morphology, 3rd edn. Oxford
Paulson, D.R. (1989). Bird-specimen collection and prepa- University Press, Oxford.
ration: a user's view. In Notes from a Workshop on Bird Scharff, R.F. (1911). On a dry system of macerating bones.
Specimen Preparation. (S.P. Rogers and D.S. Wood, eds), Museums Journal, 10, 198—200.
pp. 41—46. The Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Schlichting, C. (1994). Working with polyethylene foam and
Pittsburgh. fluted plastic sheet. Canadian Conservation Institute
Philips, A. (1980). Getting the bugs out! The freeze drier. Technical Bulletin, 1 4 , 1 9 .
Taxidermy Review, 8 , 36—37. Schmidt, R.H. (1977). H o w to Mount Birds, 2nd edn.
Philips, A. and Philips, B. (1981). The Art o f Freeze Dried Emporia State Press, Emporia, Kansas.
Taxidermy. Archie Philips, Fairfield. Alabama. Septon, G. (1987). Das Aufstellen alter Vogelbalde. Der
Piechocki, R. (1986). Makroskopische Präparationslechnik. Präparator, 33, 157—166.
Tell I. Wirbeltiere. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena. Shelton, S.Y. and Buckley, S. (1990). Observations on
Pool, M.A. (1997). Preliminary analysis of the effects of enzyme preparation effects on skeletal material.
cold storage on fur garments and mammal skins. Collections Forum, 6, 76—81.
Collection Forum, 13, 25—39. Simmons, J.E. (1987). Herpetological collecting and collec-
Potter, C. and Heyning, J. (1992). Support for fin whale tions management. Society for the Study of Amphibians
skulls. In Storage of .Natural History Collections: Ideas and Reptiles Herpetological Circular, no. 16.
and Practical Solutions. (C.L. Rose and A.R. de Torres, Sissons, S. and Grossman, J.D. (1975). The Anatomy o f
eds), pp. 99—100. Society for the Preservation of Natural Domestic Animals. (R. Getty, ed.). W.D. Saunders and Co.,
History Collections, Pittsburgh. Philadelphia.
Pray, L.L. (1943). Taxidermy. MacMillan Co., New York. Sommer, H.G. and Anderson, S. (1974). Cleaning skeletons
Pray, L.L. (1951). A progressive moth proofing technique for with dermestid beetles — two refinements in the method.
taxidermists. Museum N e ws , 28, 6. Curator, 17, 290—298.
Pye, E. (1992). Conservation and storage: archaeological Spaw, C. (1989). Combination specimens a la Burke
material. In Manual of Curatorship — A Guide to Museum Museum. In Notes From a Workshop on Bird Specimen
Practice, 2nd edn. (J.M.A. Thompson, ed.), pp. 392-426. Preparation (S. Rogers and D.S. Wood, eds), pp. 21—29.
Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford. The Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh.
Ramer. B. (1989). A Conservation Survey of Museum Spence, T.F. and Tonkinson, T. (1969). The application of
Collections in Scotland. Scottish Museums Council. ultrasonic cleaning in osteological studies. Journal of
Edinburgh. Science and Technology, 15(3), 4 7 .
Rau, R.E. (1968). Insecticides and the Eulan treatment. Steel, C.A.B. (1970). A system for the storage of mounted
South African Museums Association Bulletin, 9, 60—63. birds. Museums Journal, 7 0 , 10—12.
Rau, R.E. (1993). Remounting the Quagga. Breakthrough, Storer, R.W. (1988). Preparation of bird skeletons. Bird
34, 54-57. Collections Newsletter, 1, 1—5.
Reid, R. (1985). Preservation of hides and skins — The taxi- Summers. P. (1979). Relaxing and cleaning old cabinet bird
dermists approach. Guild of Taxidermists Newsletter, 14, skins. Gui1d of Taxidermists Newsletter, 4, 22—24.
18—20. Sutton, G.M. (1916). Blood stains. Oologist, 33, 60—61.
Richards, J.P. (1993t). Health and safety in natural history Tennant, N.H. and Baird, T. (1984). The deterioration of
museums. In Manual of Natural History Curatorship ( G . mollusca collections: identification of shell efflorescence.
Stansfield et al., eds), pp. 213—231. Museums and Studies in Conservation, 30, 73—85.
Galleries Commission, HMSO, London. Tetreault, J. and Williams, R.S. (1992). Materials for exhibit.
Robbins, M.B. (1989). Degreasing prepared study skins. T h e storage and packing. In A Systematic Approach to the
Bird Collection Newsletter, 2, 1—2. Conservation (Care) o f Museum Collections with
Roche, J. (1954). Préparation des pièces ostéologues. Technical Appendices (S. Michalski, ed.), pp. 1—13.
Mammalia, 18, 420—422. Canadian Conservation Institute, Ottawa, Ontario.
Rogers, S.P. and Daley, K. (1988). The Effects of Thietje, W.C. and Schrimpter, G.D. (1967). Laboratory
P r e p aration and Preservation Chemicals on Plumage techniques for mounting rabbits and other small
Colour and Condition. The Carnegie Museum of Natural mammals. Museum News, Technical Supplement, no. 16,
History, Pittsburgh. 00—00.
Rogers, S.P. and Wood. D.S. (eds) (1989). Notes From a Thompsett, D.H. (1958). The preparation of skeletons.
Workshop on Bird Specimen Preparation. The Carnegie Museums Journal, 57, 282—287.
36 Care and Conservation of Natural Ilislory Collections

Trodd, S. (1992). Work by the AMSSEE natural history

conservation/taxidermy, unit. In Life after Death: The Cole, R.E. (1989). Freeze drying vertebrate specimens. In
Practical Conservation of Natural History Collections (R. Notes From a Workshop on Bird Specimen Preparation
Entwistle et at., eds), pp. 17—20. The United Kingdom (S.P. Rogers and D.S. Woods, eds), pp. 65—70. The
Institute for Conservation, London. Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh.
Trodd, S. (1993). Notes on a natural history study tour of Dickinson, J. (1988). Recent developments in taxidermy. In
North America. Unpublished manuscript from the Conservation of Natural History Specimens —
Conservation Unit, Museums and Galleries Commission, Vertebrates (C.V. Horie, and R.G. Murphy, eds), pp.
London. 16-18. University of Manchester and The Manchester
Waddington, J. and Rudkin, D.M. (eds) (1986). Proceedings Museum.
of the 1985 Workshop on Care and Maintenance of Townsend, J.H. (1986). Lightfastness of marker pens.
Natural History Collections. Royal Ontario Museum Life Scottish Society for Conservation and Restoration.
Sciences Miscellaneous Publications, Toronto. Conservation News, 30, 6-7.
Wagstafe, R. and Fidler, J.H. (1968). The Preservation of
Natural History Specimens. Vol. 2. Vertebrates, Botany
aril Geology. H.F. Witherby, London.
Walters, L. (1925). New uses of celluloid and similar Suppliers
materials in taxidermy. Museum Technical Series, No. 2.
Field Museum of Natural Ilistory, Chicago. Leather Conservation Publications. The Leather
van der Reyden (1995). Piper documents. In Storage of Conservation Centre, 34 Guildhall Road, Northampton
Natural History Collections: A Preventative Conservation NHI 1EW, UK.
Approach (C.L. R o s e el at., eds), pp. 327—345. Society Squirrel Data Logger, Grant Instruments, Barrington,
for the Preservation of Natural History Collections, Iowa. Cambridge CB2 5QZ, UK.
Van Tyne, J. (1952). Principles and practices in collecting Taxidermy Supplies, Europe Eyes, 29 Greenford Close,
and taxonomic work. Auk, 69, 27—33. Orrell, Wigan, Lancashire WN5 8RH. UK.
Ward, R. (1906). The Sportsman's Handbook to Collecting, Lorne Taxidermy Supplies, Kilnhillock Cottages by
Preserving, and Setting Up Trophies and Specimens, 9th Cullen, Buckle, Banffshire AB56 2TB, UK.
edn. Rowland Ward Ltd, Piccadilly, London. Snowdonia Taxidermy Supplies, Llanrwst, Gwynedd, N.
Wiles, I.A. (1932). A method for the disarticulation of skull Wales LL26 OHU. UK.
bones. Science, 75, 516-517.
Willard, D.E. (1989). Review of the book `A Guide to Museum
Pest Control' by Zycherman, L.A. (ed.) (1988). The Bird
Collection Newsletter, 2, 4 . The Guild of Taxidermists
Williams, S.L. (1991). Investigation of the cause of structural
damage to teeth in natural history collections. Collections
Forum, 7, 13-25.
The Guild of Taxidermists was established in 1976 to raise
Williams, S.L. (1992). Methods of processing osteological
and maintain the status and standards of taxidermy in the
material for research value and long-term stability.
UK. Membership is open to all interested in the subject and
Collection Forum, 8, 15-21.
is not, in itself, a qualification. The Guild does offer its own
Williams, S.L. and Hawks, C.A. (1987). History of prepa-
qualifications based on quality of work and judged by a
ration materials used for recent mammal specimens. In
panel of experienced taxidermists. The basic qualification.
Mammal Collections Management (H. Genoways el al.,
Professional Membership, acknowledges a good standard of
eds), pp. 21-49. Texas Tech University Press, Lubbock,
work across the whole discipline. The Guild is a source of
Texas.
advice on all aspects of taxidermy and, for advice on
Williams, S.L. and Smith, H.C. (1995). Effect of osteological
commissions, will recommend the names of Professional
treatments on dimensions and moisture absorption
Members.
potential of rodent skulls. Collection Forum, 11, 46-57.
Williams, S.L. Laubach, R. and Genoways, H.H. (1977). A
Guide to The Management of Recent Mammal Collections.
Special publication, Carnegie Museum of Natural History,
Pittsburgh. Formulae
Young, G.S. (1992). Collagen fibre research at the Canadian
Conservation Institute. In Natur al History Conservation,
No.7 (C.V. node and R. Waller, eds). Natural History
Collections Working Group of the International Council of Huber's Fluid
Museums, Conservation Committee.

Petrol 10 litres
I.M.S. 630 ml
Turpentine 130 ml

Rowley's mixture for osteological work

Further reading Pancreatin 80g
Sodium sulphide 40g
Anthony, H.E. (1950). The capture and preservation of
small mammals for study. Scientific Guide Leaflet 61. Water 5 litres