WHO 2021 PMCT Global Guideline

GUIDANCE
GLOBAL GUIDANCE ON
CRITERIA AND PROCESSES FOR VALIDATION:
MONITORING AND EVALUATION

ELIMINATION OF
MOTHER-TO-CHILD
TRANSMISSION OF
HIV, SYPHILIS AND
HEPATITIS B VIRUS
2021
GLOBAL GUIDANCE ON
CRITERIA AND PROCESSES FOR VALIDATION:
ELIMINATION OF
MOTHER-TO-CHILD
TRANSMISSION OF
HIV, SYPHILIS AND
HEPATITIS B VIRUS
2021
Global guidance on criteria and processes for validation: elimination of mother-to-child
transmission of HIV, syphilis and hepatitis B virus
This publication is the update of the document published in 2017 entitled “Global guidance on criteria and
processes for validation: elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV and syphilis, second edition”.
ISBN 978-92-4-003936-0 (electronic version)
ISBN 978-92-4-003937-7 (print version)
© World Health Organization 2021
Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-
ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo).
Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial
purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should
be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO
logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent
Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer
along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization
(WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition
shall be the binding and authentic edition”.
Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation
rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization (http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/mediation/rules/).
Suggested citation. Global guidance on criteria and processes for validation: elimination of mother-to-
child transmission of HIV, syphilis and hepatitis B virus. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. Licence:
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
Cataloguing-in-Publication (CIP) data. CIP data are available at http://apps.who.int/iris.
Sales, rights and licensing. To purchase WHO publications, see http://apps.who.int/bookorders. To submit
requests for commercial use and queries on rights and licensing, see https://www.who.int/copyright.
Third-party materials. If you wish to reuse material from this work that is attributed to a third party, such
as tables, figures or images, it is your responsibility to determine whether permission is needed for that
reuse and to obtain permission from the copyright holder. The risk of claims resulting from infringement of
any third-party-owned component in the work rests solely with the user.
General disclaimers. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication
do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WHO concerning the legal status
of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or
boundaries. Dotted and dashed lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not
yet be full agreement.
The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are
endorsed or recommended by WHO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters.
All reasonable precautions have been taken by WHO to verify the information contained in this publication.
However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or
implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event
shall WHO be liable for damages arising from its use.
Layout by ACW
iii
CONTENTS
FOREWORD iv 6. GUIDANCE ON SPECIAL POPULATIONS 41
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vi AND SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES
ESSENTIAL WHO EMTCT RESOURCES viii 6.1. SPECIAL POPULATIONS 41
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ix
GLOSSARY x 6.2. SELECTING TARGETS FOR EMTCT OF HIV 41
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY xiii IN BREASTFEEDING AND NON-
BREASTFEEDING POPULATIONS
1. INTRODUCTION 1 6.3. COUNTRIES WITH SMALL NUMBERS OF 42
1.1. MOTHER-TO-CHILD TRANSMISSION IN THE 1 HIV-, SYPHILIS- AND HBV-POSITIVE
HIV, SYPHILIS AND HBV EPIDEMICS PREGNANT WOMEN
1.2. TRIPLE ELIMINATION OF MOTHER-TO-CHILD 3 6.4. ASSESSING ANC EMTCT SERVICE 45
TRANSMISSION AND ITS VALIDATION COVERAGE IN NON-PUBLIC SETTINGS
1.3. STANDARD CRITERIA AND PROCESSES 4
7. THE VALIDATION PROCESS 46
2. RATIONALE FOR STANDARDIZED CRITERIA 7 7.1. VALIDATION STRUCTURES 46
AND PROCESSES FOR EMTCT OF HIV,
SYPHILIS AND HBV 7.2. STEPS IN THE VALIDATION PROCESS 47
2.1. QUALIFYING REQUIREMENTS FOR EMTCT 7 8. MAINTENANCE OF VALIDATION 50
OF HIV, SYPHILIS AND HBV 8.1. PROCESS OF APPLYING FOR 51
2.2. STANDARDIZED CRITERIA USED IN EMTCT 8 MAINTENANCE OF VALIDATION
OF HIV, SYPHILIS AND HBV
REFERENCES 53
3. INDICATORS AND TARGETS FOR VALIDATION 10 ANNEXES 60
OF EMTCT OF HIV, SYPHILIS AND HBV
ANNEX 1. CLINICAL FOLLOW-UP OF INFANTS 60
3.1. IMPACT INDICATORS AND TARGETS FOR 12 AND YOUNG CHILDREN EXPOSED
VALIDATION OF EMTCT TO HIV, SYPHILIS OR HBV
3.2. PROCESS INDICATORS FOR VALIDATION 22 A1.1. CLINICAL FOLLOW-UP OF INFANTS AND 60
OF EMTCT OF HIV, SYPHILIS AND HBV YOUNG CHILDREN EXPOSED TO HIV
4. FOUNDATIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF EMTCT 27 ANNEX 2. MEASUREMENT OF INDICATORS 64
VALIDATION AND TARGETS FOR VALIDATION
4.1. DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT 27 OF EMTCT OF HEPATITIS B VIRUS
4.2. LABORATORY QUALITY ASSESSMENT 28 A2.1. MEASUREMENT OF CHILDHOOD 64
4.3. PROGRAMME ASSESSMENT 30 PREVALENCE OF HBSAG IN ≤5-YEAR-OLDS
4.4. HUMAN RIGHTS, GENDER EQUALITY 31 A2.2. USING MATHEMATICAL MODELLING 66
AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT ALONGSIDE EMPIRICAL DATA TO
ASSESSMENT DETERMINE ATTAINMENT OF THE
ELIMINATION TARGETS
5. PATH TO ELIMINATION: RECOGNIZING 36
PROGRESS TOWARDS EMTCT IN COUNTRIES WEB ANNEXES 67
WITH A HIGH BURDEN OF HIV, SYPHILIS
AND HBV
5.1. RATIONALE FOR SELECTING CRITERIA 38
FOR THE PTE
iv
FOREWORD
The global community has committed to eliminating mother-to-child transmission (EMTCT), also
known as vertical transmission, of HIV and syphilis as a public health priority. In 2014 the World
Health Organization (WHO) released the first edition of the Global guidance on criteria and
processes for validation: elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV and syphilis. In 2015 the
Global Validation Advisory Committee for EMTCT was established and that same year the first country,
Cuba, was validated. The second edition of the guidance, published in 2017, captured the learning
from validation efforts, making it more relevant for high burden countries, expanding the capacity
of maternal and child health services to address vertical transmission of communicable diseases.
This third version includes guidance for validation of elimination of vertical transmission of hepatitis B
virus (HBV), within the Triple Elimination Initiative (EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV).
We support the renewed focus to end the epidemics of HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmitted
infections (STIs) by making sustained investments in disease responses and leveraging health
system resources more strategically. The five-year Start Free, Stay Free, AIDS Free framework
launched in 2016 by the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) and the US
President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) accelerated efforts to prevent and treat HIV
among children and adolescents and young women. The new global health sector strategies on HIV,
viral hepatitis and STIs (2022–2030) further advance these efforts, leveraging universal health care,
primary health care and health systems strengthening to ensure an integrated approach.
We welcome the revitalized global interest in addressing maternal, newborn and child health issues
as well as the strong political will shown by countries in support of the United Nations Secretary
General’s Global Strategy for Women’s, Children’s and Adolescent’s Health and their determination
to dedicate significant resources and attention to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals
(SDGs) for health. These goals provide a powerful unifying vision for how to achieve unprecedented
gains in human well-being.
We are grateful to our United Nations partners – UNAIDS, the United Nations Children’s Fund
(UNICEF) and the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) – as well as our other partners,
including networks of women living with HIV, for their support in preparing this guidance
document and their consistent efforts to achieve global EMTCT. While achieving validation of
EMTCT is a tremendous accomplishment, maintaining this status is equally important and will
require sustained, broad programme efforts to prevent new infections in infants, children
and adults.
In all countries success depends on the combined efforts of advocates, policy-makers, health care
providers and community representatives. WHO and partners will continue to support countries in
strengthening the capacity of health systems to provide comprehensive services that respect and
protect the human rights of women living with HIV or HBV and to ensure the involvement of women
in service planning and delivery to see that services are non-coercive and the human rights of
women, children and families affected by HIV, syphilis and hepatitis are protected.
Foreword v
This third version of the EMTCT global validation guidance document provides standardized
processes and consensus-developed criteria to validate EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV and to
recognize high burden countries that have made significant progress on the Path to Elimination.
The guidance strongly emphasizes country-led accountability, rigorous analysis, intensive
programme assessment and multilevel collaboration, including the involvement of communities
of women living with HIV or HBV. A harmonized approach to triple elimination is encouraged, but,
depending on readiness, countries may choose to pursue validation of single, dual or triple EMTCT.
We are convinced that setting the bar high will result in the best results for all and, in particular,
for women and children at risk for HIV, syphilis and HBV. WHO is pleased with the progress of this
elimination initiative and anticipates ongoing success by countries and regions in achieving the
elimination targets.
Dr. Meg Doherty,

Director
Global HIV, Hepatitis and STIs Programmes
World Health Organization
vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This guidance document is the result of collaboration between the WHO Global HIV, Hepatitis
and STI Programmes, led by their Director, Meg Doherty, the Global Validation Advisory Committee
for elimination of mother-to-child transmission (GVAC) members and observers, WHO counterpart
programmes at the regional and country levels, and contributing member states.
Many professionals from a range of backgrounds and specialties have contributed to the development
of this guidance. WHO is sincerely grateful for their time and support. The third version was developed
through three virtual consultation meetings with more than 50 experts, including staff and advisors
from WHO headquarters and all six WHO regions, members and observers of the Global Validation
Advisory Committee for elimination of mother-to-child transmission (EMTCT) of HIV, syphilis and
hepatitis B virus (HBV). Collaborators also reviewed and provided detailed written contributions
throughout the drafting process to inform this update to the validation criteria and processes.
Contributors to the guidance revision included both past and current members of the World Health
Organization (WHO) EMTCT Global Validation Advisory Committee (GVAC):
Angela Mushavi (chair), Annette Sohn (co-chair), Shabbir Argaw, Benjamin Cowie, Merceline
Dahl Regis (former chair), Sandra Dudareva, Sarah Hawkes, Monir Islam, Mary Kamb, Bakita
Kasadha, Eszter Kismodi, Lorraine Misquith, Michele Montandon, Lillian Mworeko, Lori
Newman, Natalya Nizova, Rosanna Peeling, Genesis Samonte, Nathan Shaffer, Melanie
Taylor, Rania Tohme, Fatima Tsiouris, Deborah von Zinkernagel, Su Wang, Valerie Wilson,
Clement Zeh.
The following United Nations (UN) observers contributed to the development of the revised
document: The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS): Jane Batte, McPherlain
Chungu, Mary Mahy, Mianko Ramaroson. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF): Dorothy
Mbori-Ngacha. United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA): Timothy Sladden. International
Organization for Migration (IOM): Carlos van der Laat
GVAC observers Sophie Brion (ICW Global) and Aditi Sharma (GNP+) were the technical writers
for the section on human rights, gender equality and community engagement, representing
organizations of affected communities and people with lived experience.
Experiences from the countries and territories validated for EMTCT – in chronological order, Cuba,
Thailand, Belarus, Republic of Moldova (syphilis only), Armenia (HIV only), Anguilla, Montserrat,
Cayman Islands, Bermuda, Antigua and Barbuda, St Christopher and Nevis, Malaysia, Maldives,
Sri Lanka and Dominica – have been instrumental in updating this third version of the global
guidance. We also acknowledge the contribution of the Botswana experience and all who supported
the strengthening of the process for certification on the Path to Elimination.
WHO particularly thanks the national programme managers, country-level WHO and other UN staff,
health care providers, the community of women living with HIV and hepatitis B virus (HBV), and
women affected by syphilis, who have enabled countries to advance towards a generation free of
HIV, syphilis and HBV.
Acknowledgements vii
Past and current advisors and EMTCT focal points from the six WHO regions contributed to
the guidance revision based on the experiences from national and regional EMTCT validation
committees, secretariats and teams. African Region: Francoise Bigirimana, Innocent Nuwagira.
Region of the Americas: Sandra Jones, Leandro Sereno, Massimo Ghidinelli. South-East Asia
Region: Mukta Sharma, B.B. Rewari. European Region: Nicole Seguy, Elena Vovc, Antons
Mozalevskis. Eastern Mediterranean Region: Joumana George Hermez, Bridget Akora
Mugisa. Western Pacific Region: Naoko Ishikawa, Anne Brink, Po-Lin Chan.
At headquarter level, past and present colleagues from the WHO Global HIV, Hepatitis and STIs
Programmes, the WHO Departments of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research (SRHR),
Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals (IVB) and Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health
and Ageing (MCA) contributed to revision of this guidance.
The following WHO consultants were a core part of the guidance revision team: Maura Laverty,
Caitlin Quinn and Nicholas Walsh.
The United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the United States
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the US Agency for International Development
(USAID) contributed to funding this guidance revision.
viii
ESSENTIAL WHO EMTCT RESOURCES

Additional information on EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV, including updated tools and other
guidance, are available on the WHO websites:
Triple elimination initiative of EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV

https://www.who.int/initiatives/triple-elimination-initiative-of-mother-to-child-transmission-of-hiv-
syphilis-and-hepatitis-b/validation
EMTCT validation processes and tools

https://www.who.int/initiatives/triple-elimination-initiative-of-mother-to-child-transmission-of-hiv-
syphilis-and-hepatitis-b/validation/process-and-tools
Regional EMTCT websites

WHO Regional Office for Africa
http://www.afro.who.int/health-topics/hivaids/emtct
Pan American Health Organization
www.paho.org/emtct
WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific
https://www.who.int/westernpacific/activities/eliminating-mother-to-child-transmission-of-hiv-
hepatitis-syphilis
Essential complementary documents and guidance on validation of EMTCT of HIV,

syphilis and HBV
Governance guidance for the validation of elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV and
syphilis
https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/governance-guidance-for-validation-of-emtct-syphilis-hiv
Interim guidance for country validation of viral hepatitis elimination
https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240028395
ix
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

ABOs adverse birth outcomes MIPA meaningful involvement of people
living with HIV/AIDS
ANC antenatal care
ART antiretroviral therapy
MTCT mother-to-child transmission
ARV antiretroviral NASBA nucleic acid sequence-based

amplification
CDC United States Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention NAT nucleic acid test
CHB chronic hepatitis B NVC national validation committee
CS congenital syphilis NVS national validation secretariat
CSF cerebrospinal fluid NVTF national validation task force
EID early infant diagnosis PAHO Pan American Health Organization
EMTCT elimination of mother-to-child PCR polymerase chain reaction

transmission
PMTCT prevention of mother-to-child
EQA external quality assurance transmission
FPC finite population correction PTE Path to Elimination
GAM UNAIDS Global AIDS Monitoring PVST post-vaccination serological
GHSS global health sector strategy testing (of HBsAg in infants)
GIPA greater involvement of people RDT rapid diagnostic test

living RPR rapid plasma reagin
with HIV/AIDS
SRH sexual and reproductive health
GMEF Global Multi-disease Elimination
Framework STIs sexually transmitted infections
HBeAg hepatitis B e antigen TRUST toluidine red unheated serum test
HBIg hepatitis B immune globulin UHC Universal Health Coverage
HBsAg hepatitis B surface antigen UN United Nations
HBV hepatitis B virus UNAIDS Joint United Nations Programme
HepB3 three doses of hepatitis B vaccine on HIV/AIDS
(infant vaccination) UNFPA United Nations Population Fund
HepB-BD hepatitis B birth dose vaccine UNGA United Nations General Assembly
HIV human immunodeficiency virus UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund
HTS HIV testing services
VDRL Venereal Disease Research
M&E monitoring and evaluation Laboratory
MCH maternal and child health WHO World Health Organization
x
GLOSSARY
The following glossary definitions are sourced from current relevant WHO guidelines (1-5).
Adequate treatment of syphilis: The treatment of seropositive women with at least one
dose of intramuscular benzathine penicillin G at least 30 days prior to delivery is the minimum time
necessary to prevent transmission of syphilis to the infant. Ideally, maternal treatment should be
given in the first trimester, or as early as possible if antenatal care (ANC) is started later.
Early infant diagnosis: The testing of HIV-exposed infants before two months of age, to
establish timely diagnosis and access to life-saving HIV treatment.
Elimination as a public health problem: Reduction of disease incidence, prevalence,

morbidity or mortality as a result of deliberate efforts to reduce below a level at which the public
health burden is considered negligible. The target level for a particular disease is generally defined
globally by WHO. When reached, continued action is required to maintain the reduced level. In
this document the term “elimination as a public health threat”, as used in the global health sector
strategies on HIV, sexually transmitted infections and viral hepatitis (2016–2021), is considered
equivalent to “elimination as a public health problem”.
Exposed infants: Infants born to mothers with HIV, syphilis or HBV.
External quality assurance (EQA): Inter-laboratory comparison to determine if the testing

services can provide correct test results and diagnosis. Sample panels are usually provided by an
external reference laboratory.
Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg): Viral protein found in the high replicative phase of HBV. HBeAg is
usually a marker of high levels of replication with wild-type virus but is not essential for viral replication.
Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg): HBV envelope protein often produced in excess [of
normal] and detectable in the blood in acute and chronic HBV infection.
HIV testing services (HTS): A term that embraces not only HIV testing itself but also the full
range of services that should be provided together with HIV testing. This includes counselling
(brief pre-test information and post-test counselling); linkage to appropriate HIV prevention, care
and treatment services and other clinical and support services; and coordination with laboratory
services to support quality assurance.
HIV status: This is the final interpretation of the client’s disease state and is based on a collection
of testing results generated from one or more assays. HIV status may be reported as HIV-positive,
HIV-negative or HIV-inconclusive.
Infant diagnosis: The testing of infants and young children to determine their HIV status
following possible exposure to HIV during pregnancy, delivery and postpartum. Infant diagnosis
should be performed using molecular (nucleic acid) technologies at younger than 18 months;
serological assays can be used for children older than 18 months of age.
Informed consent: People receiving testing services must give informed consent to be tested
and counselled. (Verbal consent is sufficient; written consent is not required.) They should be
informed of the process for testing and counselling and of their right to decline testing.
Glossary xi
Integrated service delivery: Health services that are managed and delivered in a way that
ensures that people receive a continuum of health promotion, infection prevention, diagnosis,
treatment, disease management, rehabilitation and palliative care services at the different levels
and sites of care within the health system and according to their needs throughout the life-course.
Integration: The co-location and sharing of services and resources across different health
service delivery areas. This may include the provision of HIV, syphilis and HBV testing, prevention,
treatment and care services alongside other health services, including general medical services as
well as those focused on tuberculosis (TB), sexually transmitted infections (STIs) or hepatitis B/C,
antenatal care (ANC), vaccination, contraception and other family planning services, and screening
and care for other conditions, including non-communicable diseases.
Key populations: Groups that have a high risk and disproportionate burden of HIV in all
epidemic settings. They frequently face legal and social challenges that increase their vulnerability
to HIV, including barriers to accessing HIV prevention, diagnosis, treatment and other health and
social services. Key populations include men who have sex with men, people who inject drugs,
people in prisons and other closed settings, sex workers and transgender people.
Maintenance of validation: The confirmation that a country has sustained the systems
and responses for long-term prevention of new paediatric infections and maintained the health
of mothers by continuing to meet all criteria for validation.
Meaningful engagement of women living with HIV: Based on the “greater involvement
of people living with HIV/AIDS” (GIPA) and “meaningful involvement of people living with HIV/
AIDS” (MIPA) principles that promote people’s right to participate in decision-making processes
that affect their lives. It states, “As active participants in the health system, the perspectives
of women in communities are a key influence on how services and interventions are delivered
to respond to their priorities, concerns and rights.” Governments first committed to this principle
in 1994 and since then in subsequent UN Political Declarations on HIV/AIDS.
Non-treponemal testing (syphilis): Serological tests for syphilis that are indirect markers
measuring host immune response to infections, including rapid plasma reagin (RPR), Venereal
Diseases Research Laboratory (VDRL) and the toluidine red unheated serum test (TRUST). These
tests are able in most cases to detect current syphilis infection, but, should be used in the context
of a diagnostic testing strategy as they are not 100% sensitive or 100% specific. Non-treponemal
tests are also used to monitor response to treatment.
Nucleic acid testing (NAT): A molecular technology, for example, polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) or nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA), that can detect very small quantities
of viral nucleic acid (DNA or RNA), either qualitatively or quantitatively.
Path to Elimination (PTE): A set of criteria for recognition of substantial progress in high-
burden countries toward EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV.
Policy: An institutional statement to guide the action of an institution or a sector in a particular

domain.
Quality assurance: Part of quality management focused on providing confidence among

stakeholders that quality requirements will be met.
Quality control: Verifies that the product meets quality requirements. It is a mechanism to identify
product defects and to formally reject a defective product.
xii Criteria and processes for validation: EMTCT of HIV, Syphilis and Hepatitis B virus
Quality management system: A system to direct and control an organization with regard
to quality. Systematic and process-oriented efforts are essential to meet quality objectives.
Rapid diagnostic test (RDT): Immunoassays that detect antibodies or antigens and can give a
result in less than 30 minutes. Most RDTs can be performed with capillary whole blood collected by
finger-stick sampling and some, by oral fluid sampling.
Testing algorithm: When specific products are populated into a testing strategy. A specific
product is defined with a product name, product code(s), a manufacturing site and regulatory
version. The testing algorithm is likely to change depending on which specific products are verified
for use together and are procured.
Testing strategy: A sequence of tests conducted on assays to achieve a specific objective, such
as screening for infection or diagnosing infection.
Treponemal testing (syphilis): Serological tests for syphilis that measure antibodies to
infection including Treponema pallidum haemagglutination assay (TPHA), Treponema pallidum
particle agglutination assay (TPPA) and fluorescent treponemal antibody absorbed (FTA-ABS).
Treponemal tests identify any lifetime infection. This test is not able to differentiate between a
person who is currently infected or one who has been cured.
Validation: An independent confirmation of elimination as a public health problem/threat that

attests and documents that a country has successfully met the criteria for elimination of mother-
to-child transmission of HIV, syphilis and HBV.
xiii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The global community has committed to the elimination of mother-to-child transmission (MTCT),
also referred to as vertical transmission, of HIV, syphilis and hepatitis B virus (HBV) as a public health
priority. The global commitment to EMTCT was established due to the continued high global burden
of mother-to-child (MTCT), or vertical transmission, of these infections. The purpose of the elimination
goal is to ensure the availability of quality reproductive and maternal and child health (MCH) services
to reduce and control the transmission of HIV, syphilis and HBV between mothers and their offspring
and to provide the best available treatment to the mother, such that incidence is reduced to a very low
level and ceases to be a public health concern.
Achieving and maintaining elimination requires strong political and public health commitment to
resilient health systems that (i) ensure continued and unimpaired access to services that deliver
quality primary prevention and treatment for women and girls and their newborns (or young
children), through the life-course; (ii) deliver services respecting and protecting human rights
and ensuring gender equality and community engagement; and (iii) have functional surveillance
systems with the ability to comprehensively identify and monitor women living with or at risk of
infection and infant outcomes. Strengthening the health system to address vertical transmission
serves to improve a broad range of MCH services and outcomes. This directly contributes to
Sustainable Development Goals 3, 5 and 10, which aspire to ensure health and well-being for all,
achieve gender equality, empower women and girls and reduce inequalities in access to services
and commodities (6) .
The similarity of the critical interventions necessary to prevent transmission adds to the feasibility
and benefit of an integrated approach to EMTCT of all three infections (7) . Building on an integrated
MCH platform, WHO has moved to operationalize universal health coverage (UHC) in the context
of integrated communicable disease prevention. The UHC model facilitates bringing together the
EMTCT efforts for HIV, syphilis and HBV as part of triple elimination. WHO regions have advanced
strategies for triple elimination and have supported Member States. The Pan American Health
Organization (PAHO) has developed the “EMTCT Plus” strategy, which includes EMTCT of the three
conditions and of congenital Chagas infection (8). The WHO Western Pacific Regional Office has
developed the Regional Framework for Triple Elimination of Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV,
Hepatitis B and Syphilis in Asia and the Pacific, 2018–2030 (9).
Efforts to establish criteria for validation of EMTCT began in 2007, based on the foundation of quality
MCH services that supported the Millennium Development Goals and the launch of the WHO-led
initiative for the elimination of congenital syphilis (CS). This was followed by WHO consultations on
the EMTCT of HIV, the Global plan towards the elimination of new HIV infections among children by
2015 and keeping their mothers alive, WHO recommendations for treatment for all persons living with
HIV and the adoption by the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) of a strategy to
end the AIDS epidemic as a public health threat by 2030. Most recently, the WHO 2016–2021 three
global health sector strategies (GHSS) on HIV, sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and viral hepatitis
call for Member States and WHO to work together towards the goals of zero new HIV infections in
infants and young children by 2030, elimination of CS and viral hepatitis as public health threats by
2030 and ≤0.1% prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) among children ≤5 years of age
by 2030 (10-12).
xiv Criteria and processes for validation: EMTCT of HIV, Syphilis and Hepatitis B virus
In 2014 WHO led a global consultation that resulted in the first edition of Global guidance on
criteria and processes for validation: elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV and syphilis,
also known as the “Orange Book”. This guidance document supported the standardization and
formal approach to EMTCT validation, including criteria, indicators and targets to be achieved.
These formed the basis for foundational requirements for validation in the four areas of (i) data,
(ii) laboratory, (iii) programme and (iv) human rights, gender equality and community engagement.
A second edition was published in 2017. It established revised validation criteria and guidance on
how to assess countries with small numbers of HIV- or syphilis-positive pregnant women, as well as
criteria for the recognition of progress in countries with a high burden of HIV and/or syphilis, known
as the Path to Elimination (PTE). The second edition also included expanded descriptions of case
definitions, data reporting for exposed infants and young children, the selection of low-performing
subnational administrative units for review and evaluation of special populations as well as clearer
determination of targets for breastfeeding and non-breastfeeding populations.
As of November 2021, the 15 countries or territories validated for EMTCT of HIV and syphilis, in
chronological order are: Cuba, Thailand, Belarus, Armenia (HIV only), Republic of Moldova (syphilis
only), Anguilla, Montserrat, Cayman Islands, Bermuda, Antigua and Barbuda, St Christopher and
Nevis, Malaysia, Maldives, Sri Lanka and Dominica. In addition, Botswana is the first country which
has applied for Path to Elimination and been reviewed at the global level for certification.
This third version of Global guidance on criteria and processes for validation of elimination of
mother-to-child transmission of HIV, syphilis and hepatitis B virus brings together the package of
interventions and metrics to support the integrated management and monitoring of mother-to-child
transmission, also known as vertical transmission, of these major communicable diseases across
a wide range of epidemiological and programmatic contexts. Table 1 summarizes the impact and
process/programmatic targets for EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV.
Executive summary xv
Table 1. S ummary of impact and process/programmatic targets

for EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV
Elimination targets HIV EMTCT Syphilis EMTCT HBV EMTCT
2030 WHO GHSS (8, Zero new infections ≤50 cases of CS per 95% reduction in
10, 11) and UNGA among infants and young 100 000 live births in incidence of chronic HBV
political declaration children and achievement 80% of countries infections
(13) aspirational of the 95-95-95 targets
targets
EMTCT impact targets A population case rate A case rate of CS of ≤50 ≤0.1% prevalence* HBsAg
of new paediatric HIV per 100 000 live births in children ≤5 years olda,b
infections due to MTCT
of ≤50 cases per 100 000
live births
MTCT rate of HIV of <2% Additional target ≤2%

in non-breastfeeding MTCT rate (for countries
populations OR <5% using targeted timely
in breastfeeding HepB-BD)
populations
EMTCT process/ ANC coverage (at least ANC coverage (at least Countries with universal
programmatic targets one visit (ANC-1)) of one visit (ANC-1)) of timely HepB-BD
≥95% ≥95% ≥90% HepB3 vaccine
Coverage of HIV Coverage of syphilis coverage
testing of pregnant testing of pregnant ≥90% HepB-BD coveragec
women of ≥95% women of ≥95% among
ART coverage of those who attended at Countries with
pregnant women living least one ANC visit targeted timely HepB-
with HIV of ≥95% Adequate syphilis BD or without universal
treatment (see Box 3.6) timely HepB-BD
of syphilis-seropositive ≥90% HepB3 vaccine
pregnant women of coverage
≥95%
≥90% HepB-BD coverage
≥90% coverage of
maternal HBsAg testing
≥90% coverage with
antivirals for eligible
HBsAg-positive pregnant
womend
HBV=hepatitis B virus; GHSS=global health sector strategy; CS=congenital syphilis; EMTCT=elimination of mother-to-
child transmission; MTCT=mother-to-child transmission; ANC=antenatal care; ART=antiretroviral therapy; HepB3=three
doses of hepatitis B vaccine (infant vaccination); HepB-BD=hepatitis B birth dose vaccine; HBsAg=hepatitis B surface
antigen; UNGA=United Nations General Assembly
a Childhood prevalence is a proxy for HBV incidence.
b The ≤0.1% HBsAg prevalence can be measured among either 5 year olds, 1 year olds or those aged 1–5 years,
according to existing country surveillance and data collection activities. For those regions and countries with a long
history of high hepatitis B vaccination coverage (e.g. WHO Region of the Americas), and that already conduct school-
based serosurveys, there could be flexibility to conduct serosurveys in older children >5 years.
c Timely birth dose (HepB-BD) is defined as within 24 hours of birth.
d In accordance with national policies or WHO 2020 guidelines on use of antiviral prophylaxis on PMTCT of HBV
xvi Criteria and processes for validation: EMTCT of HIV, Syphilis and Hepatitis B virus
Changes, clarifications and new guidance in this third version address the following topics areas:
1. inclusion of validation criteria and processes for EMTCT of HBV (section 3.1.3), including
criteria for the recognition of progress in countries with a high burden of HBV (PTE) (section 5);
2. revision of laboratory quality standards, including external quality assurance (EQA) for
validation (section 4.2);
3. expansion of guidance on selection of low-performing subnational administrative units and
inclusion of subpopulations with the lowest coverage or access to services (section 4.3.1);
4. inclusion of further guidance on assessing countries with small numbers of HIV-, HBV-
or syphilis-positive pregnant women (section 6.3);
5. provision of step-by-step guidance on meaningful engagement of women to ensure that
human rights, gender equality and community engagement are well integrated into
validation assessments from planning through implementation (section 4.4);
6. revision of guidance on maintenance of validation assessment and reporting, including:
a. revision of time intervals for assessing maintenance of validation (section 8)
b. revision of details on maintenance of validation for countries with small numbers of
pregnant women with HIV, syphilis or HBV, including specific time intervals for small
countries and territories (section 6.3);
7. inclusion of assessment and reporting of EMTCT validation components provided by the
entire health sector, comprising the public and non-public (for example, private, faith-
based) sectors (section 6.4).
8. addition of details on the decentralization of Global Validation Advisory Committee
functions to the regional structures, where appropriate (section 8.1.2);
In addition, tools and checklists for end users of the guidance in the areas of assessment of (i) data and
surveillance systems, (ii) laboratory services, (iii) programme and (iv) human rights, gender equality and
community engagement have been updated and are available as online supplements to the guidance.
The third version was developed by WHO and the Global Validation Advisory Committee. It is intended
for use by national, regional and global validation committees as they prepare or review national
and regional submissions for validation of EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV. A harmonized approach
to triple elimination (EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV) is encouraged, but, depending on readiness,
countries may choose to pursue validation of single, dual or triple EMTCT of any of the three
infections (as determined by the WHO region).
This document summarizes the validation process, but further details on the standardized structure
and processes used to validate EMTCT can be found in the Governance guidance for the validation of
elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV and syphilis (14). That guidance provides an overview
of the validation structures and roles and responsibilities at national, regional and global levels.
The document is being revised and will be available at the link provided above.
The validation processes are aligned with the Global Multi-disease Elimination Framework (GMEF),
which is currently under development by WHO and which seeks to harmonize and standardize
elimination concepts, terminology and validation processes. The GMEF establishes a framework for
planning for future elimination strategies, and it promotes greater standardization, alignment and
coordination across existing disease elimination processes. WHO believes that this third version of the
EMTCT global guidance will further standardize and catalyse regional and country progress towards
achieving the validation of EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV as public health priorities.
1
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. M
other-to-child transmission in the HIV, syphilis and HBV
epidemics
Mother-to-child transmission (MTCT), or “vertical transmission”, is a significant contributor to
the HIV pandemic, accounting for 9% of new infections globally in 2017 (15) . The Joint United
Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) reported that, globally, in 2020 an estimated 150 000
children newly acquired HIV, and an estimated 1.8 million children were living with HIV (16, 17).
Although this is still a large number of new infections, at the peak of the HIV epidemic in 2000
there were close to 470 000 children acquiring HIV through MTCT each year (18) . HIV can be
transmitted from a woman living with HIV to her baby during pregnancy, labour or delivery, or
after delivery through breastfeeding. Globally, an estimated 1.3 million women living with HIV
become pregnant every year (19-21) . Without treatment, approximately 15–30% of infants born
to women living with HIV will acquire HIV during gestation and delivery, with a further 5–15%
acquiring HIV through breastfeeding (22) . Without treatment, HIV infection in infants and young
children results in early mortality for many or creates a lifelong chronic condition that greatly
increases morbidity, shortens life expectancy, imposes a great burden on the child and the family
and contributes to substantial human, social and economic costs.
Box 1.1. Terminology

Women living with HIV and their advocates have promoted use of the phrase “vertical
transmission” as an alternative to “mother-to-child transmission” in an effort to avoid
language that places mothers at the center of HIV transmission. To reduce stigma felt by
women living with HIV, ‘vertical transmission’ is considered neutral and is consistent with
other disease elimination language. There are ongoing consultations about mainstreaming
the phrase ‘vertical transmission’ in HIV programmes, while recognizing previous discussions
on the topic and views from a broad network of civil society members and technical
partners. In this document the two terms are used interchangeably.
The strict definition of the medical term “vertical transmission” does not include transmission
through breastfeeding (23) , but, for the purposes of this document, we use the term to include
transmission both during pregnancy and during the breastfeeding period. In addition, women
in all their diversity may access and utilize services for the prevention of vertical transmission.
Noting that trans and gender diverse persons can in some cases become pregnant, and involve
risk for vertical transmission, this guidance also applies to this group.
Interventions that contribute to the prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) of HIV,

and, thereby, reduce maternal and child morbidity and mortality include:
• primary prevention of incident HIV infections;
• prevention of unintended pregnancies and provision of other sexual and reproductive health
(SRH) services;
2 Criteria and processes for validation: EMTCT of HIV, Syphilis and Hepatitis B virus
• universal and equitable access to HTS for pregnant and breastfeeding women;
• initiation of lifelong triple antiretroviral therapy (ART) for pregnant women living with HIV,
with support for adherence;
• retention in care and viral suppression for pregnant and postpartum women and girls living with HIV;
• safe delivery practices;
• optimal infant-feeding practices;
• access to postnatal antiretroviral (ARV) prophylaxis for HIV-exposed infants; and
• access to HTS for early infant diagnosis (EID) and determination of final outcome, and early
treatment for infants and young children diagnosed with HIV.
The World Health Organization estimates that 19.3 million women were living with HIV globally in 2020,
and 660 000 women were newly infected. In 2020, 1.7 million children were living with HIV (10).
With the global shift to highly effective and simplified interventions based on lifelong maternal
ART and infant prophylaxis, risk of infection in the population of infants born to women living with
HIV has fallen from approximately 30% to <5% (or <2% if no breastfeeding). It is now feasible to
virtually eliminate new HIV infections in infants and young children, while assuring the health of
the mother (19, 21) .
Syphilis is caused by the Treponema pallidum bacterium, renowned for its invasiveness. It can
be transmitted via sexual exposure or vertically from mother to child during pregnancy (in utero
infection). If the infection remains untreated, adverse pregnancy outcomes are frequent. Over half
of the pregnancies among women with active syphilis result in stillbirth, early neonatal death,
a preterm or low-birth-weight infant or serious neonatal infection (24). Screening for maternal
syphilis early in pregnancy, using recommended point-of-care tests with single or dual HIV/syphilis
rapid tests in antenatal care (ANC) (25) , and prompt treatment of seropositive women (at least four
weeks prior to delivery with intramuscular benzathine penicillin G, a long-acting penicillin) cures
syphilis in both mother and fetus and prevents most complications associated with MTCT of syphilis
and can prevent congenital syphilis (CS) when there is high ANC coverage (5).
In 2019 (using 2016 data), WHO estimated that over 900 000 pregnant women were infected with
syphilis. The total number of CS cases was estimated at 661 000 [538 000–784 000], including
355 000 (290 000–419 000) adverse birth outcomes (ABOs) and 306 000 (249 000–363 000)
non-clinical CS cases (infants without clinical signs born to untreated mothers). The ABOs
included 143 000 early fetal deaths and stillbirths, 61 000 neonatal deaths, 41 000 preterm or
low-birth weight births and 109 000 infants with clinical CS. Of these ABOs, 203 000 (57%)
occurred in pregnant women who had attended ANC but were not screened for syphilis; 74 000
(21%) in mothers not enrolled in ANC, 55 000 (16%) in mothers screened but not treated and
23 000 (6%) in mothers enrolled, screened and treated (26).
The viral hepatitis epidemic takes a heavy toll on lives, communities and health systems. Globally,
it is responsible for an estimated 1.1 million deaths per year from acute infection and hepatitis-
related liver cancer. In 2019, 820 000 deaths were attributed to hepatitis B infection-related causes.
The African and South East Asia Regions account for 83% of new hepatitis B infections (10).
Globally, the main routes of HBV transmission are mother-to-child and early childhood transmission,
which can be prevented with effective infant and timely hepatitis B birth dose vaccination.
Childhood infections also account for most of the chronic infections, which can result in the
complications of liver cancer and cirrhosis. While infections can occur in adults through exposure to
blood (through unsafe injections or sharing of needles or syringes) and through sexual transmission,
1. Introduction 3
this leads to chronic disease much less often. WHO recommends universal immunization of infants
with at least three doses of the hepatitis B vaccine and timely hepatitis B birth dose (HepB-BD)
vaccination (as soon as possible after birth, preferably within 24 hours) (27).
1.2. T riple elimination of mother-to-child transmission and its

validation
In public health elimination is generally defined as reduction to zero of the incidence of a disease or
infection in a defined geographical area (28). However, because HIV, syphilis and HBV remain public
health issues and prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) measures are highly but not 100%
effective, it is not feasible in most settings to reduce MTCT to “zero” new infections, as proposed in
the vision of the global health sector strategy for HIV (10, 11). The goal of EMTCT programmes is to ensure
that MTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV is controlled and incidence is reduced to a very low level, such that
these infections cease to be a public health concern. The same principle has been applied to elimination
programmes for several other diseases, including leprosy (29) , onchocerciasis (30) , lymphatic
filariasis (31) , dracunculiasis (32) and maternal and neonatal tetanus (33). It is also currently being
considered for the WHO Global Multi-Disease Elimination initiative, which is under development.
Triple elimination targets can be achieved only when access to quality services for SRH and maternal
and child health (MCH) is assured and all women, children and their families use these services.
Achievement of elimination requires strong political and public health commitment, including the
adoption of enabling legal and policy frameworks that maintain primary prevention, care and
treatment programmes and services. It also requires a strong surveillance system to capture incident
cases and to monitor performance indicators over time.
Successful prevention of MTCT of HIV depends on detecting maternal infection early and initiating
and sustaining lifelong treatment for all women and girls of childbearing age living with HIV,
as well as prevention and care programmes for male partners. Similarly, prevention of MTCT of
syphilis requires early detection of and cure for women and their partners diagnosed with syphilis
and, when eligible, treatment for women with HBV. All infants and young children exposed to HIV
or HBV should be provided with prevention and care services, including appropriate prophylaxis,
routine immunization, follow-up and treatment where indicated.
Strengthening the health system to address vertical transmission of HIV, syphilis and HBV serves
to improve a broad range of MCH services and outcomes. This achievement directly contributes to
Sustainable Development Goals 3, 5 and 10, which aspire to ensure health and well-being for all,
achieve gender equality and empower women and girls, as well as to reduce inequalities in access
to health services and commodities (6). Additionally, the similarity of the critical interventions
necessary to prevent transmission of HIV, syphilis, and HBV in pregnancy adds to the feasibility
and benefit of an integrated approach to EMTCT of all three infections (7) .
Building on an integrated MCH platform, WHO headquarters and several WHO regions have moved
to “triple elimination” by incorporating PMTCT of HBV into the EMTCT framework. The Pan American
Health Organization (PAHO) is promoting a strategy of “EMTCT Plus”, which includes the EMTCT of HBV
and Chagas disease (in countries where it is endemic), in addition to the dual EMTCT of HIV and syphilis
(8). The WHO Western Pacific Regional Office supports Member States to achieve EMTCT of HIV, syphilis
and HBV through a coordinated approach outlined in the Regional Framework for Triple Elimination of
Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV, Hepatitis B and Syphilis in Asia and the Pacific, 2018–2030 (9).
“Validation” is a term used to attest that a country has successfully met the criteria for EMTCT of
HIV and/or syphilis and/or HBV. A unique consideration for validation of EMTCT is that elimination
must be achieved while protecting and respecting human rights. It must also include the meaningful
involvement of women, particularly those living with HIV or HBV, as well as affected communities
in all interventions, including planning and designing programmes, implementation and monitoring
and evaluation (M&E).
These standards include human rights in relation to equitable access to SRH services and antenatal
care (ANC); pregnant women’s autonomy in decision-making; informed consent for HIV, syphilis and
HBV testing and treatment; respect for privacy and confidentiality; adequately addressing violence,
abuse and coercive practices; decriminalization of HIV, syphilis and HBV transmission; and ensuring
meaningful participation of people living with HIV and/or HBV in the design and delivery of
programmes. As syphilis is curable, it may not be practical to expect the participation
of communities of women living with syphilis.
Gender equality considerations are particularly pertinent in the context of vertical transmission,
as gender norms and practices can significantly affect women’s sexual and reproductive health and
the realization of their rights, as well as health outcomes for their children. Promoting and ensuring
gender equality can significantly improve opportunities for people to access necessary information
and services, to make autonomous decisions about their sexuality and reproduction and to protect
themselves against HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs).
The processes and criteria to validate EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV described in this guidance were
developed to apply across a wide range of epidemiological and programmatic contexts. They have
been further elaborated in the Governance guidance for the validation of elimination of mother-to-
child transmission of HIV and syphilis (14) , first published in July 2020, to support standardization
of the governance process and in the 2021 Interim guidance for country validation of viral hepatitis
elimination (3). They also seek to ensure that representatives of civil society, including women living
with HIV and HBV, are fully involved in the assessment and validation efforts (3).
1.3. Standard criteria and processes

A harmonized and integrated approach to EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV is encouraged. However,
depending on the progress of national EMTCT efforts and regional preferences, countries may
choose to validate the EMTCT of one infection, two infections, or, ideally, HIV, syphilis and HBV.
WHO and the Global Validation Advisory Committee revised this document to clarify and update
existing guidance and advice, update assessment checklists and tools and integrate EMTCT of HBV
(Box 1.2). The document is intended for use by national, regional and global validation committees
and secretariats as they prepare or review national or regional submissions for validation of EMTCT
of HIV, syphilis and/or HBV. It is intended to be used in conjunction with the Governance guidance
for the validation of elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV and syphilis (14) and the
Interim guidance for country validation of viral hepatitis elimination (3). In updating the document,
WHO and the Global Validation Advisory Committee considered the input of national programmes,
national validation structures, regional validation structures, subject matter experts and civil society
representatives. WHO collated the revisions recommended by these groups.
The first edition of the global EMTCT guidance, released in 2014, outlined the minimum global processes
and criteria that countries should address to achieve validation of EMTCT of HIV and syphilis.
The second version included changes, clarifications and new guidance in criteria and processes.
1. Introduction 5
Box 1.2. What’s new in the third version

This third version includes changes, clarifications and new guidance on criteria and
processes for validation, including the following:
1. inclusion of validation criteria and processes for EMTCT of HBV (section 3.1.3),
including criteria for the recognition of progress in countries with a high burden of
HBV (PTE) (section 5);
2. revision of laboratory quality standards, including external quality assurance (EQA) for
validation (section 4.2);
3. expansion of guidance on selection of low-performing subnational administrative
units and inclusion of subpopulations with the lowest coverage or access to services
(section 4.3.1);
4. inclusion of further guidance on assessing countries with small numbers of HIV-, HBV-
or syphilis-positive pregnant women (section 6.3);
5. provision of step-by-step guidance on meaningful engagement of women to ensure that
human rights, gender equality and community engagement are well integrated into
validation assessments from planning through implementation (section 4.4);
6. revision of guidance on maintenance of validation assessment and reporting,
including:
a. revision of time intervals for assessing maintenance of validation (section 8)
b. revision of details on maintenance of validation for countries with small numbers
of pregnant women with HIV, syphilis or HBV, including specific time intervals for
small countries and territories (section 6.3);
7. inclusion of assessment and reporting of EMTCT validation components provided by the
whole health sector, comprising the public and non-public (for example, private, faith-
based) sectors (section 6.4).
8. addition of details on the decentralization of Global Validation Advisory Committee
functions to the regional structures, where appropriate (section 8.1.2);
1.3.1. Revisions in criteria

In the second edition (2017), which still focused on HIV and syphilis and did not address HBV, WHO
included criteria for certification of three levels of achievement – bronze, silver and gold – on
the PTE for countries with a high burden of maternal HIV or syphilis that had demonstrated
significant and sustained progress towards elimination.
In many of these countries, the high background prevalence of HIV-positive or syphilis-positive

pregnant women makes it very difficult to reach the full validation targets for elimination despite
sustained efforts over many years. These countries were encouraged to apply for validation in
this new category, added specifically to recognize the substantial accomplishments of high-
burden countries in markedly reducing their MTCT rates and the numbers of infants and children
acquiring HIV and syphilis by vertical transmission each year.
Also revised in the second edition were the (i) criteria for evaluation of human rights, gender
equality and community engagement, (ii) surveillance case definition of CS, which was expanded,
(iii) maintenance of validation requirements and (iv) guidance on special circumstances and
special populations.
This third version now moves to triple elimination by including HBV. The key changes include
clarifications and new guidance on inclusion of validation criteria for EMTCT of HBV, details
on maintenance of validation for countries with small numbers of HIV-, syphilis- and HBV-
positive pregnant women and revision of laboratory quality standards, including external quality
assurance (EQA) for maintenance of validation.
In this guidance WHO also proposes criteria for validation of three levels of achievement –
bronze, silver and gold – on the PTE of HBV, as milestones for countries with a high burden of
maternal HBV. As with validation of EMTCT of HIV and syphilis, key considerations consistent
with international, regional and national human rights standards include equitable access
to immunization services, decriminalization of HBV transmission and ensuring meaningful
participation of people living with HBV in the design and delivery of programmes.
1.3.2. Revisions in processes

The second edition included changes, clarifications and new guidance in processes: (i) how to
assess countries with small numbers of HIV- or syphilis-positive pregnant women, (ii) selection of
low-performing subnational administrative units, (iii) defining and evaluating special populations,
including transient, marginalized and vulnerable populations, (iv) selecting breastfeeding
versus non-breastfeeding HIV MTCT targets, (v) assessment and reporting in the non-public (for
example, private, faith-based) sector and (vi) data reporting on infants and young children who
have been exposed to HIV and syphilis.
In addition, tools and checklists for use by validation teams in the four areas of (i) data, (ii)
laboratory, (iii) programme, and (iv) human rights, gender equality and community engagement
have been periodically revised and made available as online supplements to the second edition.
This third version includes changes, clarifications and further guidance on how to assess countries
with small numbers of HIV-, HBV- or syphilis-positive pregnant women as well as guidance for
countries on assessing and reporting on maintenance of validation.
This third version also provides step-by-step processes for meaningful engagement of women to
ensure that human rights, gender equality and community engagement are well-integrated into
validation assessments from planning to implementation. Meaningful engagement and participation
of women living with HIV and HBV, in particular in the formulation of health laws, policies,
programmes and M&E systems that affect them, results in better, more effective programmes.
It also helps to ensure that women living with HIV or HBV and women infected with syphilis get the
treatment they need to keep themselves well and their children free from infection.
Since the validation of the first country, Cuba, by the then newly established Global Validation
Advisory Committee in 2015, 15 countries and territories have been validated for EMTCT of HIV
and/or syphilis as of November 2021. Many countries are preparing to submit applications for
validation or for certification on the PTE, with Botswana being the first country to successfully
apply for PTE. WHO hopes that this third version will further standardize the EMTCT global
guidance and catalyse regional and country progress towards achieving the validation of EMTCT
of HIV, syphilis and HBV as public health concerns.
7
2. RATIONALE FOR STANDARDIZED

CRITERIA AND PROCESSES FOR
EMTCT OF HIV, SYPHILIS AND HBV
2.1. Qualifying requirements for EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV
Before initiating the validation process, countries should be confident that they can meet the global
minimum criteria listed below. They are advised to complete the Checklist for country preliminary
assessment of EMTCT and Path to Elimination criteria (34) (Web Annex A), which is currently
being updated to include EMTCT of HBV. Any country that feels it has met the qualifying global
requirements, as well as any additional regional requirements, is encouraged to apply for validation.
[1] National-level evidence of achievement of the EMTCT validation process indicator targets for
HIV and syphilis for two consecutive calendar years and achievement and maintenance of
validation impact indicator targets for at least one year, including the most recent year, within
the period being assessed. However, in the case of countries applying for triple elimination,
since impact indicators for EMTCT of HBV are measured only every five years (see section 3.1.3),
the HBV EMTCT data demonstrating achievement should overlap the period in which the HIV
and syphilis data are being assessed. Countries should ensure that indicators are clearly defined
in their M&E frameworks and surveillance tools and that there are standard instructions on how
to capture these data. Data to be used for validation should have been verified and reported
through global reporting mechanisms, such as the UNAIDS Global AIDS Monitoring (GAM)
system (35) or the Global Reporting System for Hepatitis (GRSH) (36). Indicators that are not
captured in the GAM should be reported directly to the regional validation secretariat through
the WHO country office.
[2] Evidence that EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and/or HBV has been adequately addressed in the lowest-
performing subnational administrative units and has been attended to in subpopulations with the
lowest coverage or least access to services. The lowest-performing subnational administrative
units are those known to perform poorly on relevant health indicators (for example, those with the
highest disease burden, lowest levels of service coverage or an estimated MTCT rate of HIV and/or
CS and an HBV rate that may not meet the global EMTCT validation targets). This helps to ensure
that the validation process addresses equity in health service coverage. Where specific populations
are important contributors to MTCT, for example, key and marginalized populations, assessment of
EMTCT efforts for these groups should be part of the process and documented in the national and
regional validation reports.
Countries are encouraged to work with the regional validation structures to determine an
appropriate process for selecting the lowest performing subnational administrative unit.
This is described further in section 4.3.
[3] Existence of an adequate national monitoring and surveillance system that can capture process
data from the whole health sector, comprising both the public and non-public health sectors,
and can detect a majority of the cases of MTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV. Data from this system
can be used for modelling infant HIV, syphilis and HBV case numbers (see sections 3.1 and 4.1
and Annex 2). Monitoring and surveillance must be supported by a strong laboratory system.
[4] Validation criteria must have been met in a manner consistent with basic human rights
considerations and with the engagement of civil society, including women living with HIV
and HBV, from the beginning of the assessment (see section 4.4).
2.2. Standardized criteria used in EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV

The ability to achieve EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV in a particular country will depend on a
number of factors: political and public health commitment; the prevalence of the infections;
the extent of antenatal and other SRH and MCH service coverage; available financial, human
and other resources; availability of appropriate diagnosis and treatment; access to infant HBV
immunizations; and whether women who belong to marginalized, vulnerable or key populations
with high transmission risk can, and do, access health care. Successful national-level EMTCT of
HIV, syphilis and HBV is possible only where there are sustained improvements and innovation
in national and subnational public health systems and services, including updated policies
and interventions consistent with WHO guidelines, adequate infrastructure, well-trained and
sufficient staff, quality-assured testing services, funding to procure commodities and high-quality
monitoring and surveillance systems (37, 38) .
Standardized criteria for validation of EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV are needed for the
following reasons:
• To provide national EMTCT programmes and participating stakeholders with a clear and
consistent set of measures for evaluating and monitoring programme achievements;
• To measure global progress toward EMTCT goals;
• To ensure:
o achievement of EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV in accordance with agreed upon minimum
standards;
o adequate coverage and quality of HIV, syphilis and HBV interventions (including
immunizations) within MCH services, including postpartum follow-up of mother–infant
pairs and exposed infants and young children through to the final diagnosis;
o reliable national routine data collection and programme monitoring systems;
o quality testing services, including quality-assured laboratory services;
o the promotion of quality HBV programming integrated with HIV and syphilis EMTCT efforts;
o gender equality and the protection of human rights of women living with HIV or HBV;
o meaningful involvement of communities of people living with HIV and HBV, particularly
women, in programme design, monitoring and implementation.
2. Rationale for standardized criteria and processes for EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV 9
The criteria selected for measuring EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV take into account the
following aspects of HIV, syphilis and HBV epidemiology and available prevention interventions,
treatment and care:
• HIV, syphilis and HBV infection can very often be asymptomatic in adults and infants or young
children, meaning that detection is frequently delayed, and it depends on the initiative of
the individual and the capacity of the health system to promote and facilitate access to and
utilization of testing services for early detection.
• To date, there is no cure for HIV or chronic HBV infection. However, antiretroviral therapy
(ART) and resulting viral suppression can prolong and improve the quality of life and greatly
reduce the risk of transmission, including vertical transmission.
• Syphilis infection in pregnant women and their infants and young children can be easily cured
with timely intramuscular injection of benzathine penicillin G. Congenital syphilis and its
related ABOs can be prevented if maternal treatment with benzathine penicillin G is given as
early as possible in pregnancy.
The following strategies are important components of successful elimination programmes:
• sustained interruption of vertical transmission through quality ANC and prevention services
that provide timely identification and treatment of pregnant women with HIV, syphilis or HBV,
their sexual partners and their exposed infants and young children;
• reduction in the number of HIV, syphilis and HBV infections among pregnant and
breastfeeding women through:
– primary prevention of new infections in women and girls of reproductive age and their
sexual partners;
– promotion of a healthy reproductive life, including prevention of unintended pregnancies,
support for safer conception among women living with HIV and access to other SRH
interventions;
– control of HIV, syphilis and HBV in general and in key populations, and a decrease in
prevalence of these infections;
– access to testing and treatment for pregnant women with HIV, syphilis or HBV for their
health and to prevent vertical transmission;
• infant HBV vaccination: the most important intervention for reducing vertical transmission of
HBV; high coverage of universal and timely HBV birth dose vaccination and completion of the
infant HBV vaccine series are critical to achieving elimination goals;
• promotion and protection of the human rights and gender equality of women living with HIV
and HBV;
• greater engagement of women living with HIV and HBV in related decision-making, programming
and service delivery.
10
3. INDICATORS AND TARGETS FOR

VALIDATION OF EMTCT OF HIV,
SYPHILIS AND HBV
Validation indicators and targets are used to monitor achievement of EMTCT over a defined
period of time. The processes in place for validation assess the quality and ability of the national
monitoring and surveillance systems to detect the large majority of MTCT cases, in both public
and non-public health facilities. Also, there should be assessment of the capacity of national
programmes and health systems to sustain and maintain the EMTCT target and indicators levels
following validation and to promote transparent reporting of transmission events and use these
data for programmatic improvement (for example, to assess factors contributing to transmissions).
Countries may apply for single, dual or triple elimination of HIV, syphilis or HBV validation. Countries
applying for single or dual validation of EMTCT or for reaching a level on the PTE will be required to
report indicator data on all three infections, even if triple validation is not sought. This is to ensure
that activities promote triple elimination (Table 3.1).
Table 3.1. Country options for applications for single, dual or

triple validation of EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV
HIV Syphilis HBV
Single validation
*
Dual validation
Triple validation
*Single validation for HBV is done at the regional level (3). Upon special request from the regional validation secretariat or
committee, single validation for HBV may be reviewed at the global level and will include reporting on HIV and syphilis.
3. Indicators and targets for validation of EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV 11
Box 3.1. Summary of required impact and process targets for

global validation of EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV
EMTCT IMPACT TARGETS
(Must be the most recent verified data and must be achieved for at least one year)
• MTCT rate of HIV of <2% in non-breastfeeding populations OR <5% in breastfeeding
populations (see section 6.2)
• a population case rate of new paediatric HIV infections due to MTCT of ≤50 cases per
100 000 live births
• a case rate of CS of ≤50 per 100 000 live births
• hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) prevalence of ≤0.1% in the ≤5-year-old birth cohort
(and older children) a
• In countries that provide targeted timely HepB-BD, an additional impact target
of HBV MTCT rate of ≤2% should be utilized.
EMTCT PROCESS TARGETS

(Must be the most recent verified data and must be achieved for two consecutive years)
Maternal ANC and testing coverage
• ≥95% ANC coverage (at least one visit) (ANC-1)
• ≥95% coverage of HIV testing of pregnant women
• ≥95% coverage of syphilis testing of pregnant women in ANC
• ≥90% coverage of HBsAg antenatal testing among pregnant women.
MATERNAL TREATMENT
• ≥95% ART coverage of pregnant women living with HIV
• ≥95% adequate treatment of syphilis-seropositive pregnant women (see Box 3.6)
• ≥90% coverage with antivirals for eligible HBsAg-positive pregnant women with high
viral loads (plus coverage of HBV-exposed babies with hepatitis B immune globulin
(HBIg), where available).
INFANT HBV VACCINATION

• ≥90% coverage with three doses of HBV infant vaccinations (HepB3) b
• ≥90% HepB timelyc birth dose coverage (with universal programme) or infants at-riskd
(with targeted timely HepB-BD).
a
hildhood prevalence is a proxy for HBV incidence. The ≤0.1% HBsAg prevalence can be measured among
C
either 5-year-olds, 1-year-olds or those ages 1–5 years, according to existing country surveillance and data
collection practices. For regions and countries with a long history of high hepatitis B vaccination coverage
(for example, the WHO Region of the Americas) and those that already conduct school-based serosurveys,
there could be flexibility to conduct serosurveys in older children, >5 years of age.
b
Generally for vaccination, a five-year period of sustainability is required to be able to measure impact via
serosurveys (39).
c
Timely birth dose (HepB-BD) is defined as within 24 hours of birth.
d
At-risk infants are neonates of HbsAg-positive mothers.
3.1. Impact indicators and targets for validation of EMTCT

3.1.1 Impact indicators and targets for validation of EMTCT of HIV
Prior to submission of the application for validation, countries are required to have achieved and
maintained for at least one year both of the following impact targets for validating EMTCT of HIV:
• an HIV MTCT rate of <5% (breastfeeding populations) OR <2% (non-breastfeeding

populations) and
• a population case rate of new paediatric HIV infections due to MTCT of ≤50 per 100 000 live
births (Boxes 3.2 and 3.3).
According to WHO guidance, HIV testing of infants and young children, which is the basis
of infant diagnosis, is conducted with nucleic acid testing at birth, at 4–6 weeks (or as soon
after as possible before two months of age) and at nine months, and final status serological
testing is conducted at 18 months (or three months after the end of breastfeeding, whichever
is later) (19, 21).
The case rate calculation (Box 3.2) will allow a country to estimate how close it is to the case rate
of ≤50 per 100 000 live births by using prevalence data from the antenatal clinic programme and a
population-level MTCT rate.
Box 3.2. C alculation of population case rate and MTCT rate

of new HIV infections due to vertical transmission
per 100 000 live births
The population case rate due to vertical transmission per 100 000 live births is calculated as:
(Annual new vertical HIV infections

annual live births) * 100 000
The MTCT rate is calculated as:
Annual number of new HIV infections due to vertical transmission

annual births to women living with HIV
High HIV burden countries (countries applying for PTE; see Chapter 5) with access to
modelled population-level estimates of the final MTCT rate can also calculate the case rate
as follows:
Case rate per 100 000 live births = % HIV prevalence in pregnant women
* MTCT rate * 100 000
This is useful when the number of births or the number of new vertical HIV infections is not
readily available.
The MTCT rate measures vertical transmission (that is, the percentage of vertical infections among births to
women living with HIV) and specifically measures the impact of treatment programmes for preventing vertical
infections. The MTCT rate is closely related to the case rate but does not capture all of the interventions required
to reach EMTCT (Box 3.3).
With effective interventions and a high level of maternal treatment coverage, the MTCT rate of HIV can be reduced to
levels below 5% in breastfeeding settings and below 2% in non-breastfeeding settings. Therefore, in countries where
mothers living with HIV breastfeed, a target MTCT rate of <5% at the population level at the end of breastfeeding
should be achieved for validation of EMTCT of HIV. In contrast, in countries with policies discouraging women living
with HIV from breastfeeding, a target MTCT rate of <2% at six weeks postpartum or later must be achieved for
validation. (See section 6.2 on selecting targets for breastfeeding and non-breastfeeding populations.) In keeping
with revised WHO guidelines on infant feeding in the context of HIV, the period of breastfeeding, as determined by
national policy, may be up to 24 months or longer, which can be done safely only if the HIV-positive breastfeeding
woman is on suppressive triple ART (40).
Box 3.3. R ationale for use of a case rate of new paediatric

HIV infections due to vertical transmission
The use of a case rate as a standard metric has three advantages:
1. Presenting the case rate as per 100 000 births allows for a measure that is comparable
across different country population sizes.
2. It considers maternal seroprevalence and reflects both reduction in the number of
pregnant women living with HIV (through primary prevention of HIV and reducing
unintended pregnancies among women with HIV) and the effectiveness of the programme
in identifying and treating pregnant women living with HIV and, thus, preventing MTCT.
3. It is a standardized measure that can be applied across all countries regardless of
their starting point. For example, the reason that we do not use a percentage reduction
in new child infections as a target for validation, such as the 90% reduction target
used under the Global Plan (41) , is that, for a very high-burden country, this can still
amount to a large number of infant HIV infections, constituting a sizeable public health
challenge. By contrast, a 90% reduction in a very low-burden country may be nearly
impossible to achieve, but the remaining cases represent a small public health concern.
4. We calculate this case rate at the population level rather than at the programme level
to ensure the outcomes of women who are not receiving services are included.
Both the annual vertical transmission case rate and the MTCT rate must be measured at the
population level to reflect all pregnant women in the country and must not be limited to those
women accessing the health system. The case rate and MTCT rate will likely be higher than
the rates derived from health information systems (“programme rates”) if access to services is
limited due to high levels of stigma, geographical or financial barriers or gaps in coverage.
Acceptable methods of measuring impact indicators
To qualify for validation of elimination, countries need to ideally have monitoring and surveillance
systems that can accurately monitor and identify all new child infections in the full population.
There are two key requirements for this:
• These systems need to identify mothers who might have acquired HIV while pregnant or
breastfeeding, recognizing the challenges of monitoring postpartum seroconversion among
women and related new paediatric infections until at least three months after the cessation
of breastfeeding. Women who seroconvert while breastfeeding have a 26% probability of
transmission to their breastfeeding child (42) . In countries with high ART coverage among
pregnant women living with HIV, transmission due to seroconversion during pregnancy or
breastfeeding periods can often account for almost half of new vertical infections. Countries
that are not able to monitor postpartum transmission through breastfeeding do not meet the
criteria of having adequate monitoring systems for EMTCT.
• The indicators and targets are specifically set as population-level indicators. Thus, they should
be measured among the entire population of pregnant women living with HIV and not just
those who attend health facilities in the public or non-public sectors, and they should include
migrants and members of key populations at increased risk to HIV.
HIV transmission and case rates derived from studies (including household surveys) should be carefully
reviewed to ensure that the following limitations do not apply:
• They miss women outside of the PMTCT programme.

• They miss vertical infections due to a woman seroconverting during pregnancy or breastfeeding.
• They miss children who died between birth and the study reference period.
• They miss mother–infant pairs who are lost to follow-up.
• They determine the rate before the end of breastfeeding.
Using modelled estimates of population level HIV case rates and MTCT rates can address most of
these limitations (Box 3.4). Modelled estimates of HIV vertical transmission are available in most
countries. However, modelled estimates may have limited reliability in countries with low overall HIV
prevalence but an epidemic concentrated among key populations. This pattern is often due to stigma
and discrimination against members of key populations and, thus, low uptake of services. In addition,
modelled estimates are not available in most countries with populations under 250 000 people
(UNAIDS does not have the capacity to support the production of estimates in these countries.)
Box 3.4. U sing and understanding Spectrum HIV estimates

Mathematical models, such as the Spectrum AIDS Impact Model, can be used to estimate
the population-level transmission rate and case rate. Spectrum estimates are produced by
over 170 countries (including all high HIV burden countries) with support from UNAIDS.
Countries teams, usually led by the Ministry of Health or National AIDS Coordination
office, as well as development partners and UNAIDS, produce the Spectrum estimates
every year to estimate the impact of HIV on populations. More information on the use
of Spectrum for estimating vertical transmission can be found in the annual Global AIDS
Reports at https://www.UNAIDS.org, and the model itself, at https://avenirhealth.org.
Spectrum uses demographic data from 1970 through to the current year, including age-
specific fertility, mortality and international migration patterns, derived from the United
Nations Population Division’s World Population Prospects 2019 to produce estimates of
child HIV infection. Countries can update the assumptions if they have recent census or
survey data that have not yet been included in World Population Prospects data.
Fertility data combined with data on HIV prevalence among pregnant women (either from
antenatal programme data or from sentinel surveillance) are used to estimate the number
of births to women living with HIV. Country teams enter into the model the number of
pregnant women on different ART regimens, the timing of starting the specific regimen
and retention on those regimens.
Breastfeeding duration determines the exposure of children during the postnatal period.
The breastfeeding duration is based on household survey data for the country, or the
region, for women living with HIV. The probability of transmission to the infant is applied
based on the treatment regimen the mother received and when she started ART (before
the pregnancy, during the pregnancy or late in the pregnancy).
box continued on next page

The model estimates the number of children acquiring HIV during pregnancy, delivery or
breastfeeding. The modelled estimates are captured at the population level and, thus, include
new child infections that occurred among women not in the PMTCT programme or not attending
health facilities. The Spectrum model also incorporates seroconversions among mothers during
pregnancy and breastfeeding and, thus, include the resulting vertical transmissions.
The model depends heavily on the programme data entered for the number of pregnant women
on ART and retained on treatment. If the programme data double-count women or include
women who were not retained on ART, the estimated number of women with a suppressed viral
load and risk of vertical transmission will be incorrectly estimated.
More information specifically on the child models can be found in the AIDSFree toolkit (43) at
https://www.who.int/tools/aids-free-toolkit.
The Spectrum PMTCT stacked bar analysis can provide proportional estimates of the causes
of new child HIV infections in a given country or region. It uses programmatic and modelled data
to estimate new child HIV infections and attributes those infections to one of six groups: mothers
who newly acquired HIV, mothers who received no antiretroviral prophylaxis or treatment,
mothers who previously started ART but stopped, mothers who started ART just before delivery,
mothers who started ART during pregnancy and mothers who started ART before pregnancy.
It can be used to identify missed opportunities at the national and, where possible, subnational
levels. The stacked bar analysis can be found at https://aidsinfo.unaids.org.
3.1.2. I mpact indicator and target for validation of EMTCT of syphilis
Countries are required to have achieved and maintained for at least one year the following impact
target for validating EMTCT of syphilis:
• a case rate of CS of ≤50 per 100 000 live births.
Indicators of EMTCT of syphilis use a surveillance case definition for CS rather than a clinical case
definition. A surveillance case definition, which is presumptive, provides a uniform set of criteria to
define a condition for public health surveillance purposes. Use of a surveillance case definition permits
public health programmes to classify and count cases consistently across jurisdictions and countries.
A surveillance case definition may not always be consistent with a clinical case definition, and in the
case of CS it is not intended to be used by health care providers for making a clinical diagnosis or for
determining treatment. Unlike with HIV, infant testing is not required for meeting the surveillance
definition for CS. However, adequacy of maternal treatment is an important factor.
Depending on the clinical context, either of the two following options for the surveillance case
definition of CS may be used (38) :
[1] a live birth or fetal death at >20 weeks of gestation or >500 g (including stillbirth) born to a
woman with positive syphilis serology and without adequate syphilis treatment (4)
OR
[2] a live birth, stillbirth or child <2 years of age born to a woman with positive syphilis serology
or with unknown serostatus and with laboratory and/or radiographic and/or clinical evidence
of syphilis infection (regardless of the timing or adequacy of maternal treatment).
Box 3.5. R ationale for use of the surveillance case

definition for CS
CS is underreported for many reasons:
• Laboratory and radiographic testing may not be available in some countries or clinical
settings.
• Congenital infections that result in spontaneous abortion or stillbirth may not be
recognized or reported. Stillbirths are often not delivered in health facilities, and care
providers may not realize that stillbirths are the most common adverse pregnancy
outcome caused by maternal syphilis.
• To make a diagnosis, health care providers must rely on a combination of suggestive
history, maternal and infant tests and clinical findings. However, these findings may be
non-specific, subtle and easily overlooked; providers require training and a high level
of skill to recognize them.
A series of consultations convened by WHO, as discussed in The global elimination of

congenital syphilis: rationale and strategy for action (44) , reached consensus on a simplified
global surveillance case definition for CS that is intended to promote standardization and
improve the sensitivity of case reporting. While in some settings the surveillance case
definition may overestimate cases, for monitoring the control and elimination of CS, the
surveillance case rate is the single impact measure that is collected to address the adverse
health outcomes of syphilis infection in pregnancy.
The surveillance case rate for CS is an important measure for programmes to monitor in
order to identify failures of programmes to detect and treat pregnant women with syphilis
early enough to prevent adverse outcomes in the fetus and infant. Even if the exposed infant
is not diagnosed clinically as having CS, if either of the two surveillance definitions is met,
the case should be counted.
However, an infant born to a woman with a documented history of adequate treatment for
syphilis prior to and during the current pregnancy and who has no physical or laboratory
evidence of reinfection (for example, increasing maternal non-treponemal titre) can be
excluded from the country counts of CS cases.
Rationale for use of live births as the denominator for CS case rate calculation
Stillbirth is the most common adverse birth outcome resulting from MTCT of syphilis. Although
an estimate of the number of pregnancies would account for both stillborn infants as well as
live-born infants with CS, methodologies for estimating the number of pregnancies vary widely
by country and change over time. In 2015, based on expert consensus, it was decided that the
denominator of live births would be used in the calculation of CS to align the infant case rate
of CS with that of MTCT of HIV (38).
Laboratory and radiographic evidence consistent with a diagnosis of CS includes any of the
following:
a. demonstration by dark-field microscopy or fluorescent antibody detection of Treponema

pallidum in the umbilical cord, placenta, nasal discharge or skin lesion material or autopsy
material of a neonate or stillborn infant;
b. analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is reactive for the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory
(VDRL) test, or elevated CSF cell count or protein;
c. long bone radiographs suggestive of CS (for example, osteochondritis, diaphyseal osteomyelitis,
periostitis);
d. infant with a reactive non-treponemal serology titre four-fold or more than that of the mother;
e. infant with a reactive non-treponemal serology titre less than four-fold or more than that of the
mother but that remains reactive ≥6 months after delivery;
f. infant with a reactive non-treponemal serology test of any titre AND any of the clinical signs
listed below who is born to a mother with positive or unknown serology, independent of
treatment (5) ;
g. in settings where a non-treponemal titre is not available, an infant born to a mother with
positive or unknown serology, independent of treatment, and whose 6-month examination
demonstrates any of the clinical signs of CS listed below;
h. for stillborn infants, maternal syphilis serostatus should be determined. Any case with a reactive
maternal test should be considered a CS case (that is, a syphilitic stillbirth).
Clinical signs associated with CS
Early clinical signs that may be present in an infant with CS include non-immune hydrops,
hepatosplenomegaly, rhinitis (snuffles), skin rash, pseudoparalysis of an extremity or failure to
thrive or to achieve developmental milestones. An older infant or child may develop additional signs
or symptoms, such as frontal bossing, notched and pegged teeth (Hutchinson teeth), clouding of
the cornea, blindness, bone pain, decreased hearing or deafness, joint swelling, sabre shins and
scarring of the skin around the mouth, genitals and anus. Note that these clinical signs are not
applicable to the surveillance case definition (5).
Estimating congenital syphilis case rate for validation
In 2018 WHO published the Congenital Syphilis Estimation Tool (Web Annex B) to support countries
in assessing their progress toward obtaining validation of EMTCT of syphilis. It contributes to the
estimation of impact indicators for CS particularly in countries without adequate syphilis data.
The tool estimates case rates, project progress, treatment doses needed and prevention of ABOs
due to treatment scale-up (Fig. 3.1). Using pre-loaded estimates from the Global AIDS Monitoring
system and user-selected treatment and testing parameters, the tool can inform practical steps
towards reaching targets for validation of EMTCT of syphilis.
Fig. 3.1. K ey strengths of the WHO Congenital Syphilis

Estimation Tool
Estimates case rates Evaluates progress
which is often difficult due which is needed to assess

to limited or no reporting improvements in ANC-1 testing
1 2 and treatment coverage targets
Demonstrates prevention 4 3 Estimates amount of

benzathine penicillin needed
of congenital syphilis and
adverse birth outcomes due to to treat maternal syphilis and
testing and treatment scale-up prevent congenital syphilis
Box 3.6. M
anagement of maternal syphilis
The WHO guideline on syphilis screening and treatment for pregnant women (45) provides
updated recommendations for syphilis screening and treatment for pregnant women as
well as details of the test types and recommendations for presumptive treatment without
confirmatory tests.
Adequate maternal treatment is defined as at least one injection of 2.4 million units
of intramuscular benzathine penicillin G at least 30 days prior to delivery.
WHO recommendations for treatment of maternal syphilis

In pregnant women with early syphilis, the WHO STI guideline recommends benzathine
penicillin G 2.4 million units once intramuscularly. In pregnant women with late syphilis
(more than two years’ duration) or unknown stage of syphilis, the WHO STI guideline
recommends benzathine penicillin G 2.4 million units intramuscularly once weekly for three
consecutive weeks (4).
A woman with a history of past syphilis diagnosis and for whom previous syphilis treatment
can be confirmed should be evaluated for risk of reinfection but does not automatically require
re-treatment. However, women living in high-prevalence settings (>1%) or whose own or
partner’s behaviours places them at risk, or whose partners were not treated for syphilis,
may warrant evaluation for reinfection later in pregnancy and in subsequent pregnancies.
Those without physical signs (for example, ulcer, unexplained rash) or laboratory evidence
of syphilis (increasing non-treponemal titre) need not be classified as having current syphilis.
3.1.3. Impact indicators and targets for validation of EMTCT of HBV
The goal of programmes for the EMTCT of HBV is to ensure that MTCT of hepatitis B is prevented or
reduced to a very low level.
To achieve validation of EMTCT of HBV, it is necessary to demonstrate the attainment of a set of impact
and programmatic targets (Boxes 3.7-3.9).
Box 3.7. I mpact targets for validation of EMTCT of HBV

Countries that provide universal timely HepB-BD to all neonates should have achieved the
following impact target for validation of EMTCT of HBV:
• ≤0.1% HBsAg prevalence among the ≤5-year-old birth cohort.a
Countries that provide targeted timely HepB-BD b should have achieved additional impact
targets for validation of EMTCT of HBV: c
• ≤0.1% HBsAg prevalence among the ≤5-year-old birth cohorta
AND
• HBV MTCT rate of ≤2%.

a
The ≤0.1% HBsAg prevalence can be measured among either 5-year-olds, 1-year-olds or those ages 1–5
years, according to existing country surveillance and data collection activities. For regions and countries
with a long history of high HBV vaccination coverage (for example, the WHO Region of the Americas) and
that already conduct school-based serosurveys, there could be the flexibility to conduct serosurveys in
older children, >5 years.
b
W HO does not recommend a targeted birth-dose strategy. See Box 3.9.
c
ountries that provide targeted HepB-BD, or countries with a low HBsAg prevalence where vertical
C
transmission continues to occur due to specific populations of pregnant women with a high HBsAg prevalence
(for example, indigenous populations or other higher-risk vulnerable populations) are required to show both
≤0.1% HBsAg prevalence among ≤5-year-old children and an MTCT rate of ≤2%.
Box 3.8. R ationale for HBV impact targets

Universal HepB-BD: HBsAg prevalence ≤0.1% in ≤5-year-olds (and older children
in certain circumstances)
In the absence of preventive interventions, MTCT of HBV at the time of, or shortly after,
birth accounts for most of the global burden of chronic hepatitis B infection (CHB) because
about 90% of these perinatal infections lead to chronic infection. The prevalence of HBsAg
in children ≤5 years old captures new infections from both these vertical transmissions as
well as early horizontal transmission routes and is, therefore, a proxy for the true incidence
of CHB infection. There is flexibility for countries to include age grouping of those 1–5 years
of age or 1-year-old children1 to measure this indicator using representative serosurveys.
It is also recognized that conducting surveys in ≤5-year-old children may be challenging
in certain countries. Since many countries already conduct school-based hepatitis B
serosurveys (for example, in the WHO Western Pacific Region) or among vaccinated cohorts
across a wider age range (for example, in the WHO European Region), there could be
flexibility to use these existing serosurveys in children >5 years of age (as well as ≤5 years),
especially if there is a long history and programmatic evidence of high infant vaccination
coverage maintained over several years (for example, in the WHO Region of the Americas).
This will also capture the impact on both vertical and horizontal transmission.
The GHSS of viral hepatitis proposes the elimination of viral hepatitis as a public health
problem by 2030 (1, 10) , defined as a 90% reduction in the incidence of new cases (95%
for HBV) and a 65% reduction in deaths compared with the 2015 baseline. The GHSS 2030
targets of 95% reduction in new chronic HBV infections is equivalent to ≤0.1% prevalence
of HBsAg in ≤5-year-olds based on modelled outputs (global and from China) (46).
Attainment of this impact target is feasible: In 2020, for example, based on modelled data
from the Center for Disease Analysis, 52 of 119 countries evaluated (47, 48) were estimated
to be already at ≤0.1% HBsAg prevalence (one country in the WHO African Region, 13 in the
Region of the Americas, 10 in the Eastern Mediterranean Region, 23 in the European Region,
five in the Western Pacific Region (48-50) and are, therefore, candidates for validation
of EMTCT of HBV. Based on serosurvey data, there are eight countries/territories in the
Western Pacific Region and one country in the South-East Asia Region that have an HBsAg
prevalence ≤0.1% (49).
1
T esting for HBsAg in infants <9 months of age is not accurate and may result in false negatives due to
transmitted maternal antibodies. Hence, WHO recommends post-vaccination serological testing (PVST) in
those at least nine months of age. For the purpose of these guidelines, we have rounded the age to 1 year.
Box 3.9. R ationale for HBV impact targets when provision of

HepB-BD is targeted
Targeted HepB-BD: HBsAg prevalence ≤0.1% in ≤5-year-olds and MTCT rate of ≤2%
The HBV MTCT rate of ≤2% is an additional target for countries that provide targeted timely
Hep B-BD or for countries with a low HBsAg prevalence but where there is still continuing
higher prevalence in specific subpopulations of pregnant women with high HBsAg
(for example, among indigenous populations or migrant populations from high HBsAg-
prevalence countries). Targeted HepB-BD is defined as providing hepatitis B birth dose
only to infants born to mothers who tested positive for HBsAg.
The HBV MTCT rate measures the proportion of HBsAg-positive infants (numerator) among
those infants exposed (denominator), that is, infants of HBsAg-positive mothers. Calculation
of this transmission rate requires both high levels of coverage (>95%) of antenatal HBsAg
testing to identify positive mothers and of PVST of exposed infants at 9–12 months of age
to identify infants who have acquired HBV. It is recognized that some countries providing
targeted timely HepB-BD that do not currently have the required data collection systems
and linkages between programmes in place to capture this target will require WHO support.
The HBV MTCT target threshold of ≤2%was modelled on the MTCT rates from two countries,
China and Thailand, who have high vaccination coverage and provide HBIg, making this an
achievable target (51). Although the MTCT target of ≤2% was not specified in the GHSS
targets for 2030 (10) , it was included in the 2015 WHO Regional Action Plan for Viral Hepatitis
in the Western Pacific (52).
3.2. P rocess indicators for validation of EMTCT of HIV, syphilis

and HBV
This section summarizes process indicators, also referred to as programmatic indicators, for all
three conditions. HIV and syphilis process indicators for EMTCT are similar and presented together
in section 3.2.1. For EMTCT of HBV, targets for immunization and maternal testing and treatment
indicators are pertinent only in selected situations. They are detailed in section 3.2.2.
3.2.1. HIV and syphilis process indicators
Countries should have achieved the following process indicator targets for at least two years for
validation of EMTCT of HIV and/or syphilis:
• Population-level ANC-1 coverage (at least one visit) of ≥95%

• Coverage of HIV testing among pregnant women of ≥95% (population-based data)
• Coverage of syphilis testing among pregnant women in ANC of ≥95%.
Box 3.10. R ationale for maternal HIV and syphilis testing

coverage
Near-universal testing for HIV and syphilis in early pregnancy is necessary to identify
women living with HIV who will benefit from services to prevent MTCT. Testing remains
an entry point for providing prevention, treatment and care services to women for their
own health as well as for their families and to prevent MTCT. ANC attendance and testing
coverage also measure the strength of MCH services. WHO recommends that all pregnant
women be tested for HIV and syphilis.
Box 3.11. R ationale for use of the denominator of pregnant

women attending ANC to calculate service
coverage of syphilis testing
While historically the HIV community has used the estimated number of live births as the
denominator for calculating the proportion of pregnant women tested for HIV, the calculation
of the service coverage indicators for maternal syphilis uses the number of pregnant women
attending ANC-1 as the denominator, since there was no historical precedent and it was
decided by expert opinion that use of ANC-1 would be a better measure of the health care
delivery system performance.
Indicator for HIV treatment
• ART coverage of pregnant women living with HIV of ≥95%.
Box 3.12. Rationale for HIV treatment coverage

The risk of MTCT of HIV can be significantly reduced through the provision of maternal
ART, ideally prior to conception or as early as possible during pregnancy. All women living
with HIV, including pregnant and breastfeeding women, should receive lifelong ART with
treatment monitoring according to current WHO HIV treatment guidelines (1, 19).
Indicator for syphilis treatment
• Adequate treatment coverage of syphilis-seropositive pregnant women of ≥95%.

Box 3.13. Rationale for syphilis treatment coverage

When treating seropositive pregnant women with at least one dose of intramuscular
benzathine penicillin G, 30 days prior to delivery is the minimum time needed to prevent
transmission of syphilis to the infant. Ideally, maternal treatment should be given in the first
trimester, or as early as possible if the first ANC is delayed. Pregnant women with syphilis
should receive treatment according to WHO syphilis treatment guidelines (4, 5).
Note: Countries should follow WHO-recommended processes and algorithms for HIV (2) and
syphilis testing (4) among pregnant women. Newer technologies such as dual HIV/syphilis rapid
diagnostic tests (RDTs) can be considered in ANC settings to improve testing coverage and reduce
missed opportunities for timely treatment (25).
3.2.2. HBV process indicators
The timely delivery (within 24 hours of birth) of the hepatitis B vaccine birth dose should be a
performance measure for all immunization programmes, and reporting and monitoring systems
should be strengthened to improve the quality of data on the birth dose. To monitor accurately the
delivery of doses given within 24 hours of birth, these doses should be recorded as “timely birth dose”
of hepatitis B vaccine to differentiate them from birth doses given later (“late birth dose”) (27).
Indicators for universal timely HepB-BD provision
Countries that provide timely HepB-BD to all neonates, in addition to HepB3 vaccinations, should have
achieved and maintained both of the following programmatic targets for at least two years.
• ≥90% coverage of HepB3 vaccination

• coverage of timely HepB-BD.
Note: A target of ≥80% coverage of timely HepB-BD and HepB3 in all provinces or subnational
areas can support evidence of equity of EMTCT of HBV in countries with universal timely HepB-BD,
but it is not required for validation of elimination.
Indicators for targeted timely HepB-BD provision
Countries that provide only targeted timely HepB-BD to neonates of HBsAg-positive mothers should
have achieved and maintained all four of the following programmatic targets for at least two years.
• ≥90% coverage of HepB3 vaccination

• ≥90% coverage of infants at risk (neonates of HbsAg-positive mothers) with targeted timely
HepB-BD
• ≥90% coverage of HBsAg antenatal testing among pregnant women
• ≥90% coverage with antivirals for eligible HBsAg-positive pregnant women with high viral
loads1 (in addition to reporting coverage of HBV-exposed babies with HBIg, if available).
1 High viral load is defined as an HBV DNA level >200 000 IU/mL or, where PCR testing is not available, HBeAg positivity.
Box 3.14. R ationale for programmatic targets for EMTCT

of HBV
The GHSS on viral hepatitis sets programme coverage targets not only for the most
important preventive interventions (≥90% of infants with three or more doses of
vaccination and ≥90% of neonates who receive HepB-BD vaccination within 24 hours of
birth), but also for diagnosis of 90% of people with HBV and ART for 90% of people with
HBV who are eligible for treatment especially for countries using targeted timely HepB-BD.
Global models have estimated that achievement of these programme coverage targets in
vaccination, testing and treatment in the applicable birth cohort would likely result in a
country achieving the impact targets.
Universal timely HepB-BD
Achievement of ≥90% HBV third-dose infant vaccination coverage and ≥90% timely
HepB-BD vaccination coverage are aligned with the GHSS global programmatic targets
(10) based on modelling of the coverage required to reach the impact targets. These
targets are also consistent with the Global Vaccine Action Plan ending in 2020 and the
new Immunization Action Plan (53, 54) . These vaccine coverage indicators are annually
estimated by WHO and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), based on assessment
of the Joint Reporting Form (55) , as a core hepatitis indicator (56) . By 2019, 51 of 95
countries (where data were available) were estimated to have ≥90% timely HepB-BD
coverage, and 117 of 186 countries (where data were available) were estimated to have
coverage of the HepB3 vaccine dose of ≥90%, with 75 of these countries at ≥95% (57) .
The WHO regions of the Americas and the Western Pacific have set regional timely
HepB-BD and HepB3 coverage targets at ≥95%.
An important implementation consideration is achievement of ≥80% coverage of HepB3
vaccination in all provinces or subnational areas, which is consistent with the Global
Vaccine Action Plan coverage goal for 2020 and equitable immunization coverage in the
Immunization Agenda 2030 (53, 54) . Because of heterogeneity in coverage and population
distribution, a country can achieve 90% nationally but fail to reach remote populations.
By ensuring 80% coverage at subnational levels, the immunization programme aims to
achieve equity throughout the country.
Targeted timely HepB-BD
If the national policy is targeted timely HepB-BD, countries are additionally required to meet
coverage targets for newborn vaccination (HepB-BD and HepB3), maternal HBsAg testing
and antivirals for those eligible.
For the offspring of HBsAg-positive mothers, the same ≥90% coverage of HepB3 and HepB-
BD applies as for universal timely HepB-BD.
The ≥90% coverage of HBsAg testing of pregnant women is an essential programmatic
target only in countries that offer targeted timely HepB-BD to infants of mothers with
high risk. The high coverage serves to ensure the identification of mothers with high
risk and exposed infants for interventions and is broadly consistent with the >95% testing
coverage required for EMTCT of HIV and syphilis, which lack vaccination as an intervention
to prevent MTCT.
box continued on next page

The ≥90% coverage of use of antivirals in eligible HBsAg-positive pregnant women with
a high HBV DNA level (>200 000 IU/mL) or hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positivity is an
additional indicator based on the 2020 WHO PMTCT recommendations for the use of antivirals
in HBsAg-positive pregnant women (58).
The treatment coverage indicator for HBV is lower than the coverage levels set for
ART and syphilis treatment for HIV and syphilis elimination, respectively, because for
HBV administration of vaccines (HepB-BD and infant vaccination) is the most effective
intervention for PMTCT of HBV.
3.2.3. Other indicators and targets for EMTCT validation
In addition to careful documentation of the required indicators, countries should review the
foundational requirements to support validation of EMTCT of HIV syphilis and HBV in Chapter 4.
Tools and checklists to assist in conducting these assessments can be found in the online EMTCT
validation tools (34).
It is important to have a robust MCH information system that can monitor other indicators
– for example, HIV incidence among women of reproductive age and syphilis seropositivity
among pregnant women – to gauge the effectiveness of primary prevention programmes. Other
programme indicators to monitor include maternal viral load testing to monitor viral suppression,
early initiation of ANC, family planning and contraceptive use and teenage pregnancy rates.
In addition, programmes should monitor follow-up care and treatment of infants born to HIV-,
syphilis- or HBV-seropositive women (see Annex 1) (37, 38) .
Regions may identify and apply additional indicators that provide important information for the
regional programme review and validation process. These additional regional indicators are not
required for global validation purposes but could help provide a regional context.
27
4. FOUNDATIONAL REQUIREMENTS
OF EMTCT VALIDATION
A standardized approach to providing evidence that demonstrates whether a country has achieved
EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV across a wide range of epidemiological and programmatic contexts
goes beyond achievement of numerical targets. To achieve and maintain elimination, foundational
requirements must ensure that quality diagnostics and primary prevention and treatment services
are available to and accessed by pregnant and postpartum women and that there is a strong health
information system that can effectively capture and monitor cases. In addition, validation requires
respect and protection of human rights, gender equality and community engagement to ensure
continued and unimpaired access to services for EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV.
The foundational requirements are assessed by in-country exercises that are completed using the
online EMTCT validation tools on data quality, laboratory services, programme and human rights,
gender equality and community engagement assessments (34). Depending on the context, regional
validation exercises can be completed in-person or virtually by the regional review team with
national-level cooperation (see section 7.2 for the steps of the validation process). Findings from
the country assessment exercises are compiled in a validation report (Web Annex C).
4.1. Data quality assessment
Box 4.1. Key requirements for data quality assessment

1. Review service delivery and outcome data from the public and non-public sectors
2. Review the functionality of information systems
3. Review indicator definitions and measurement
4. Examine population-level estimates (see section 3.1.1 for further information)
5. Complete the data quality assessment and verification tool (Web Annex D).
A country should have a functional system for monitoring and surveillance that can accurately assess
intervention coverage (maternal and infant testing, treatment of all those eligible, determination of
infant outcomes for infants exposed to HIV and syphilis and infant HBV vaccination) and can detect
the majority of cases of MTCT of HIV, syphilis, and HBV in a timely manner. It should be able to
capture service delivery and outcome data from both the public and non-public health sectors
and minimize sources of error. As part of meeting this standard, systems should:
• apply standardized case definitions

• have in place and implement standards for data privacy and confidentiality
• make data available for national and subnational administrative units and disaggregation for
relevant subpopulations (for example, adolescents, migrants, internally displaced, immigrants,
non-citizen residents and indigenous/aboriginal populations).
Similar to what is required for most other disease elimination or eradication initiatives, the monitoring
and surveillance system must be in place for the country to be eligible for validation of elimination or
being on the PTE of HIV, syphilis and HBV.
Data quality for each of the required global EMTCT validation impact and process indicators should
be assessed by the country for completeness, accuracy, consistency and timeliness using the Data
Quality Assessment and Verification tool. For example, underreporting of paediatric HIV and HBV
infections and CS is a recognized problem and should be reviewed to determine if the country has
a system that adequately assesses intervention coverage and can detect the great majority
of cases of MTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV in a timely manner.
Data quality standards for validation should build on existing protocols and tools used in countries
and regions for EMTCT within the MCH platform and those used to strengthen health reporting
systems and improve overall data quality. WHO guidance is available for impact measurement
of EMTCT of HIV (59) and syphilis (38) . Operational tools and a checklist to ensure a minimum
standard for information systems and data quality for the impact and process indicators have been
developed to assist in documenting data quality (34).
Population-level estimates of HIV (UNAIDS Spectrum estimates, where available), of CS (WHO

Congenital Syphilis Estimation Tool) (Web Annex B) (60) and of HBV among pregnant women and
exposed infants (from periodic surveys) should be used, where applicable, to complement country-
level programme data on process and impact indicators. Population data are available through
nationally representative surveys, models or other mechanisms and should be used to adjust
programme data to reflect women who are not captured in health programme data, including
women who do not attend ANC or otherwise do not have access to HIV, syphilis and HBV testing,
where applicable (see sections 3.1.1 and 3.1.3 and Annexes 1 and 2).
4.2. Laboratory quality assessment
Box 4.2. K ey requirements for laboratory quality assessment

1. Summarize the quality management system
2. Review testing algorithms and strategies and assess the quality of tests and testing
3. Report on internal quality assurance and control
4. Participate in and report on EQA programme
5. Complete the laboratory quality validation assessment and verification tool (Web Annex E)
Meeting laboratory standards is critical to the validation process and review, and it draws from
existing WHO guidance for laboratory audits, the laboratory quality improvement and accreditation
guidance of PAHO and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15189 standards.
4. Foundational requirements of EMTCT validation 29
Laboratories that contribute data to the surveillance and clinical monitoring systems should:
[1] have a quality management system in place with sufficiently supportive leadership and
governance;
[2] ensure the quality of test kits and procedures: that tests are procured, stored and used
according to international standards, such as WHO pre-qualification or other regulatory
equivalent;
[3] ensure the quality of testing: personnel performing the tests who have been trained in
accordance with nationally recommended algorithms; and
[4] have a laboratory quality assurance mechanism that is routinely and consistently applied and
verified through participation in both external and internal quality assurance programmes for
HIV, syphilis and HBV testing.
Laboratory quality assurance, including EQA, is a mandatory requirement for validation of EMTCT
of these infections. An example of an overall internal laboratory quality assurance programme
for testing is the Stepwise Laboratory Quality Improvement Process Towards Accreditation
(61) . An example of an EQA programme for syphilis testing is the WHO/US Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) Syphilis Serology Proficiency Programme (62) . CDC also provides
international assistance in EQA for HIV testing (63) . Countries should consistently achieve scores
>80 percentile in the EQA.
When point-of-care tests are used, the quality and diagnostic performance of the test kits should
be verified in accordance with international standards set by stringent regulators such as the WHO
prequalification programme. National reference laboratories should oversee and monitor procurement
and storage of the tests and perform routine lot testing to verify satisfactory test kit performance.
Laboratory quality management systems should include proficiency testing of clinical, laboratory
and other staff to ensure the quality of testing and monitor compliance with approved algorithms.
Overall, laboratory assessment has four components.
[1] Laboratory quality management. This is an assessment of the general organization and
functioning of the national HIV, syphilis and HBV laboratory programme. In line with existing
WHO laboratory guidance, the assessment covers leadership and governance, including the
policy framework, structure and coordination, management and supervision of the laboratory
network for EMTCT. It also assesses service delivery, including organization of services,
roles and responsibilities, and quality control of HIV, syphilis and HBV testing among pregnant
women. Other aspects assessed are supply chain management, including the availability of HIV,
syphilis and HBV testing materials during pregnancy, labour and delivery and postpartum.
[2] Quality of tests. This is an assessment of tests to evaluate whether they have acceptable
operational characteristics as specified by international and national organizations such as WHO,
UNICEF, the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria and relevant government health
and regulatory agencies. HBV tests should be verified in accordance with international standards
by stringent regulatory authorities or WHO’s prequalification programme. This assessment
includes areas such as the existence of national HIV, syphilis and HBV testing algorithms in
accordance with WHO-recommended or international practices that are appropriate, as well
as the choice of sufficiently performing tests that are suitable for the country’s maternal and
child health service settings.
[3] Quality of testing. This is an assessment of staff competence in general through

professional licensure as technologists or appropriate training of other health care workers
as well as of staff proficiency in performing the tests used.
[4] Laboratory data management. This is an assessment of the laboratory’s information

management. It focuses specifically on a functional laboratory information system for
recording HIV, syphilis and HBV test results and processes for the timely return of results.
4.3. Programme assessment
Box 4.3. K ey requirements for EMTCT programme assessment

1. Review relevant national policies, plans, guidelines and protocols
2. Assess evidence that services exist in both public and non-public sectors
3. Complete the programme validation assessment and verification tool (Web Annex F),
including review of low-performing administrative units and coverage of relevant
subpopulations.
The elements that should be reviewed for programme assessment include national policy, plans,
guidelines and protocols, which should be in line with current WHO recommendations. These
guide implementation of interventions aimed at elimination of vertical transmission. Programme
components pertinent to the elimination strategy include comprehensive maternal, newborn
and child health services (including ANC, maternity care, postnatal care and newborn, child
and adolescent health services). Services specific to EMTCT include maternal and infant HIV,
syphilis and HBV testing and treatment; comprehensive care for exposed infants; and follow-up
for pregnant and postpartum women with HIV, syphilis and/or HBV, their infants, young children
and partners. These elements should be reviewed to verify the relevance and scope of national
guidance.
To verify whether services are sufficient in scope, accessibility and quality to sustain the EMTCT
targets, these elements should be reviewed during country and regional assessments using the
programme assessment tool (34) . Programme assessment for HBV is ideally integrated with HIV
and syphilis testing, treatment and care for pregnant and postpartum women and with birth-
dose vaccination of their newborns against HBV. WHO’s Expanded Programme on Immunization
regularly assesses national immunization programme quality, including those for HBV birth dose
and infant vaccination. Priority should be placed on leveraging these existing efforts, as well as
assessments of the national immunization programme, which could inform HBV immunization-
related activities, avoid duplication of efforts and further develop interprogrammatic relations
at the national level.
To achieve validation of EMTCT, countries must provide evidence that high-quality services for
PMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV occur in both the public and non-public health sectors.
4.3.1. Assessment of low-performing units and of subpopulations with lowest coverage

and access to services
Countries must also provide evidence that, even in the lowest-performing subnational
administrative units and among subpopulations with the lowest coverage and the least access
to services, there is a concerted effort to deliver high-quality services for PMTCT of HIV, syphilis
and/or HBV to women. Lowest-performing subnational administrative units may be identified
using subnational data and defined in a number of ways. Examples include regions or areas in the
country (identified by national or regional validation teams or working groups):
• that perform poorly on relevant health indicators

• with the highest disease burden
• with marginalized or vulnerable populations of women and girls (see Chapter 5)
• where some or all of the impact and/or process indicators have not been met.
Countries are encouraged to work with the regional validation committee or regional validation
secretariat to determine an appropriate process to identify the lowest-performing subnational
administrative units. To be eligible for validation, a country does not have to meet elimination
targets in the lowest performing subnational units, but there must be evidence that performance
in subnational units has been reviewed and that substantial efforts are being made to
address and improve service delivery in these units. These efforts should include outreach to
impoverished, remote or marginalized communities and evidence that PMTCT services are being
offered, accessed and have achieved success that can be maintained.
4.4. H uman rights, gender equality and community engagement

assessment
Box 4.4. K ey requirements for human rights, gender equality

and community engagement assessment
1. Desk review of laws, policies and reports
2. Interviews with key stakeholders
3. Organize independent consultation with women using relevant services
4. Organize multistakeholder consultation and facilitated dialogue to review the findings
5. Complete validation assessment and verification tool (Web Annex G) for human rights,
gender equality and community engagement.
A foundational requirement for validation of a country for eliminating vertical transmission

of HIV, syphilis and HBV is that the programme and interventions must have been implemented
in a manner that is consistent with international, regional and national standards on:
• human rights
• gender equality
• community engagement.
The concepts of no one left behind and health equity are central to the WHO global health sector
strategies and the broader WHO mission (10-12) . Prevention of vertical transmission of HBV,
new to this guidance, also values the principles of human rights, gender equality and community
engagement as fundamental to countries’ ability to effectively address viral hepatitis (64, 65).
4.4.1. Human rights
Governments have an obligation to respect, protect and fulfil human rights, including sexual
and reproductive health and rights in the provision of health care, including programmes and
interventions to prevent vertical transmission of HIV, syphilis and HBV. Among the basic human
rights (66) that must be respected in this context are the rights to:
• equality and non-discrimination

• confidentiality
• information
• informed consent
• have a family and to decide freely the number, spacing and timing of children
• make decisions concerning reproduction free of discrimination, coercion and violence
• bodily integrity
• autonomy
• health
• justice
• freedom from violence.1
Despite advances in prevention science, including efforts to prevent vertical transmission of HIV,
syphilis and HBV, women, particularly women living with HIV, continue to face a range of obstacles
to achieving their right to the highest attainable standard of health and to fully realizing their sexual
and reproductive health and rights, including in health care settings. Stigma from health care workers
based on HIV or HBV status, gender or belonging to a key population (who are often criminalized) is at
the root of many of these obstacles and manifests itself in the form of discrimination and other human
rights violations.
Violations of human rights in health care settings can have a damaging impact on an individual
woman’s health and are counterproductive to public health goals and efforts to prevent vertically
transmitted infections. There is global consensus that a human rights-based approach is essential
to the success of efforts to end vertical transmission of HIV, syphilis and HBV and to ensure that
all women can enjoy their right to the highest standard of health, including their sexual and
reproductive health and rights (67) .
1 This list is not exhaustive; it is possible that the validation processes may identify other human rights that ought to be addressed.
4.4.2. Gender equality
Gender inequality and harmful gender norms and practices in a country can obstruct women’s
exercise of their rights, including their sexual and reproductive health and rights. In the context of
preventing vertical transmission of HIV, syphilis and HBV, promoting gender equality is critical, as it
influences the opportunities that women and girls have to access relevant information and services,
to make autonomous decisions about their sexuality and reproduction and to protect themselves
from STIs (68).
The human rights, gender equality and community engagement assessment and verification tool
employs three key markers to determine how well countries are promoting gender equality. These are
efforts to prevent and respond to gender-based violence, to ensure the meaningful engagement of
women in decision-making and to promote the right to equality and non-discrimination for all women.
4.4.3. Community engagement
Meaningful engagement, especially of the women and communities most affected, is a right
and essential to achieving public health goals (69) . In this context, “communities” refers to all
groups of women with shared interests using these services, including women living with HIV or
HBV, those affected by syphilis and those from key and other populations who are marginalized
because of intersecting inequalities. These inequalities may include, but are not limited to,
socio-economic status, migration status, sexuality, gender identity, disability, race or ethnicity.
Networks of people living with HIV have successfully campaigned for governments and United
Nations (UN) agencies to commit to the principle of meaningful involvement to realize their right
to participate in decision-making processes that affect their lives.
In the context of programmes to prevent vertical transmission of HIV, syphilis and HBV, it
is essential that all women are involved in all aspects of EMTCT – from developing policies,
designing and delivering services to monitoring programmes and policies and advocating
improvements. Assuring this involvement includes involving women in the decision-making
spaces and processes of validating countries in their efforts to end vertical transmission of HIV,
syphilis and HBV.
4.4.4. Using the human rights, gender equality and community engagement tool
The human rights, gender equality and community engagement assessment tool (Web Annex G)
is designed to gather data that will help validation committees to determine whether the country’s
interventions and programmes to end vertical transmission of HIV, syphilis and HBV have been implemented
in a way that meets the human rights, community engagement and gender equality requirements.
The assessment must include an examination of existing laws, policies and services and of their
implementation. For each issue, specific questions address both policy and practice, and together
they aim to answer three overarching questions:
• Do the programmes and interventions respect, promote and fulfil human rights?
• Do the programmes and interventions promote gender equality?
• Do the programmes and interventions meaningfully engage women with HIV, syphilis or HBV?
The validation assessment should be carried out by people with expertise in the relevant areas
and must include representatives of networks of women living with HIV and other human rights
and gender experts (Box 4.5).
Box 4.5. W
ho should be engaged in the assessment?
• Legal and policy experts in human rights, particularly sexual and reproductive health
and rights, gender equality and health
• Women with experience using the relevant health services
• Members of communities of women living with HIV and HBV and of other communities
of women, depending on the country’s context.
The questions in the tool are qualitative in nature, and the data collection and assessment process
necessarily involve consultations with a range of stakeholders, in particular with communities of
women who use the relevant health services. Women who use the programmes know how current
laws and policies affect their lives and how these may be put into practice in health care settings,
and they can both identify challenges as well as propose potential solutions to improve
the programme and help the country achieve validation.
The networks and organizations that represent communities of women living with or affected by HIV,
syphilis and HBV must also have the opportunity to monitor policy and practice relating to preventing
vertical transmission and to report on any gaps in implementation or concerns regarding the promotion
and protection of human rights, gender equality and community engagement. In countries that seek
only syphilis or HBV validation but do not have networks or organizations that represent either of these
two affected populations, opportunities should be provided for an organized group of women that
represents at least one affected community to monitor and participate as previously described.
The evidence and information needed for the validation assessment should be gathered and
analysed in a consultative manner, involving all key stakeholders. This serves as an opportunity
for dialogue between communities and governments on how to improve health care services and
ensure that women enjoy their right to the highest attainable standard of health.
The process of gathering and analysing the information is spelled out in detail in the tool (Web
Annex G) and in the accompanying analysis guide (Web Annex H).
In summary, it includes:
• desk review of laws, policies and reports

• interviews with identified key stakeholders
• independent consultation with women who use the relevant services
• multi-stakeholder consultation and facilitated dialogue to review the findings.
Throughout the data gathering and analysis processes, the confidentiality and safety of
participants, and particularly women’s safety, must be the first consideration and priority.
Table 4.1. Key steps for human rights, gender equality and
community engagement in the validation assessment
Phase Roles and responsibilities Responsible entity
1 Ensure that validation structures include representatives of networks National validation

of women living with HIV and HBV. structures
Review and understand the human rights, community engagement
and gender equality criteria and tool.
Select an independent focal point/consultant with human rights,

community engagement and gender expertise to support the process.
Identify and engage with networks of women living with HIV or

HBV and other relevant community organizations and provide any
technical/financial support needed for their engagement from the
beginning of the validation process.
2 Review and understand the human rights, community engagement Independent

and gender equality criteria, methodology and tool. consultant or focal
point
Conduct a literature/desk review to respond to questions in all sections.
Develop and implement a plan to consult/interview relevant

stakeholders, including government officials and officers, service
providers, civil society organizations, human rights and gender
experts and communities of women.
Coordinate with networks of women living with HIV, HBV and other
women’s organizations to support them in organizing and facilitating
an independent consultation with women who use services in order
to prepare independent feedback for the tool.
Triangulate and analyse data to draft a report that includes the

different perspectives as part of the assessment.
3 Organize a multi-stakeholder forum to review key findings of the National validation

assessment. structures
Support facilitation of a dialogue to review findings and build
consensus on gaps and possible solutions in readiness for validation.
Follow up on recommended actions from the multistakeholder forum.
Provide feedback to all stakeholders consulted, including networks

and organizations of women
36
5. PATH TO ELIMINATION:
RECOGNIZING PROGRESS
TOWARDS EMTCT IN COUNTRIES
WITH A HIGH BURDEN OF HIV,
SYPHILIS AND HBV
Most countries in sub-Saharan Africa have reported a maternal HIV seroprevalence of >2% and a
maternal syphilis seroprevalence of >1%. Many countries in East and Southern Africa have maternal
HIV prevalence of >15%, with some as high as 25%. Even if the MTCT rate of <5% is reached, high HIV
burden countries have been unable to achieve EMTCT validation due to their elevated HIV prevalence
among pregnant women, which results in a case rate of new infections in children that remains above
the threshold of 50 per 100 000 live births. Similarly, countries with a high syphilis burden (maternal
syphilis >1%) are unable to reach elimination thresholds, even if they achieve 95% maternal treatment,
as each untreated pregnancy results in a surveillance case of CS. Countries in these situations that
are making progress toward elimination can obtain certification of their progress through the Path
to Elimination (PTE) and its three levels of achievement – bronze, silver and gold (Box 5.1).
Box 5.1. Country prevalence requirements for eligibility

to apply for PTE
• Maternal HIV prevalence >2%
• Maternal syphilis prevalence >1%
• HBsAg prevalence >1% among ≤5-year-olds and/or general population prevalence >5%.
There is also considerable global heterogeneity in the epidemiology of HBV and the implementation and
coverage of key prevention interventions, especially HBV vaccination. Since the HBV vaccine first became
available almost 30 years ago, uptake of both birth-dose and infant HBV vaccination has varied because
of resource constraints and varying political will and/or community awareness. Many high-burden
countries (HBsAg prevalence >1% among ≤5-year-olds and/or general population prevalence >5%)
have made considerable progress in the scale-up of infant HBV vaccination, with or without birth-dose
vaccination. However, there are also many countries with high HBV burden that face major challenges
in achieving and validating the 2030 goal of ≤0.1% HBsAg prevalence in ≤5-year-olds.
Table 5.1 shows the impact and process indicators for achieving each of the three tiers (or levels)
on the PTE. These indicators mirror those for full EMTCT validation. As countries advance from
bronze to gold, targets for achievement of each tier reflect higher service coverage (process
indicators) and progressively lower case rates (impact indicators).
5. Path to elimination: recognizing progress towards EMTCT in countries with a high burden of HIV, syphilis and HBV 37
A country seeking certification on the PTE for HIV and syphilis follows the same procedure as
a country requesting validation of EMTCT. See Chapter 7 and the Governance guidance for the
validation of elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV and syphilis (14) for details on
the validation process.
Table 5.1. Prevalence requirements, indicators and targets for

certification on the PTE of MTCT of HIV, syphilis, and/
or HBV
Tier Infection Impact indicators for at Process/programme indicators for at least two
least one year years
Bronze HIV • MTCT of HIV rate of <2% • ≥90% ANC coverage (at least one visit) (ANC-1)
tier in non-breastfeeding • ≥90% HIV testing coverage in pregnant women
populations OR <5% in
• ≥90% ART coverage in pregnant women living
breastfeeding populations
with HIV
• A case rate of new
paediatric HIV infections
due to MTCT of ≤750
cases per 100 000 live
births
Syphilis • A case rate of CS of ≤750 • ≥90% ANC coverage (at least one visit) (ANC-1)
per 100 000 live births • ≥90% syphilis testing coverage in pregnant
women attending ANC
• ≥90% treatment coverage in syphilis-seropositive
pregnant women
HBVb • Not required • ≥90% coverage of HepB3 infant vaccination
• Implementation of universal timely HepB-BD
policy
Silver HIV • MTCT of HIV rate of <2% • ≥90% ANC coverage (at least one visit) (ANC-1)
tier in non-breastfeeding • ≥90% HIV testing coverage in pregnant women
populations OR <5% in
• ≥90% ART coverage in pregnant women living
with HIV
• A case rate of new
paediatric HIV infections
due to MTCT of ≤500
cases per 100 000 live
births
Syphilis • A case rate of CS of ≤500 • ≥90% ANC coverage (at least one visit) (ANC-1)
per 100 000 live births • ≥90% syphilis testing coverage in pregnant
women attending ANC
• ≥90% treatment coverage of syphilis-seropositive
pregnant women
• ≥50% coverage of universal timely HepB-BD
• Availability of antenatal HBsAg testing in the
public sector
Table continued on next page
Tier Infection Impact indicators for at least Process/programme indicators for at least two years
one year
Gold tier HIV • MTCT of HIV rate of <2% in • ≥95% ANC coverage (at least one visit) (ANC-1)
non-breastfeeding populations • ≥95% HIV testing coverage in pregnant women
OR <5% in breastfeeding
populations • ≥95% ART coverage in pregnant women living with HIV
• A case rate of new paediatric
HIV infections due to MTCT of
≤250 cases per 100 000 live
births
Syphilis • A case rate of CS of ≤250 per • ≥95% ANC coverage (at least one visit) (ANC-1)
100 000 live births • ≥95% HIV testing coverage in pregnant women attending
ANC
• ≥95% treatment coverage for syphilis-seropositive pregnant
women
• ≥90% coverage of universal timely HepB-BD
• >30% coverage of antenatal HBsAg testing
Countries are required to achieve high coverage at the district level, as follows: ≥90% coverage in all districts for HepB3 in all
tiers and ≥80% coverage in all districts for HepB-BD in gold tier and ≥50% for targeted timely HepB-BD in all districts for the
silver tier.
5.1. Rationale for selecting criteria for the PTE

5.1.1. HIV and syphilis
Many high-burden countries have made substantial progress in preventing new infections of HIV,
syphilis and HBV in children. In some countries new cases of HIV in children have been reduced
by more than 80% over the past few years, and several high-burden countries have achieved HIV
MTCT rates of <5% (70). However, due to the successful scale-up of ART for women living with HIV,
resulting in improved health and fertility in women living with HIV, and also due to continued new
maternal infections, prevalence rates among pregnant women are likely to remain stable in the near
term. Similarly, high prevalence rates of syphilis among pregnant women preclude achievement of
EMTCT CS case rate targets in some countries despite high maternal service coverage of syphilis
testing and treatment.
WHO, in collaboration with the Africa Regional Validation Secretariat and with the input of
the Global Validation Advisory Committee, coordinated development of a set of criteria for
recognition of the impressive achievements of high-burden countries as they progress along the
PTE. This approach and the defining criteria were developed over a series of consultations with
multiple countries in the WHO African Region, which took place in late 2016 and early 2017.
Countries selected a three-tier system that recognizes stages of progress on the PTE. Each tier
requires progressively increasing levels of service coverage for pregnant women and progressively
lower HIV and syphilis case rates of new infections in children per 100 000 live births. Moving to
a higher tier brings a country closer to elimination (Table 5.1). Table 5.2 shows scenarios that,
when achieved, qualify as PTE in countries with high ANC prevalence but which have strong
programmes to reduce MTCT rates. These same principles apply to the PTE milestones for HBV.
5. Path to elimination: recognizing progress towards EMTCT in countries with a high burden of HIV, syphilis and HBV 39
Table 5.2. S cenarios of prevalence, indicators and targets

for certification on the PTE of MTCT of HIV
HIV HIV MTCT Expected Applicable
prevalence rate HIV infant tier
in ANC case
rate/100 000
Certification of PTE: 5.0% <5.0 <250 Gold
for countries with strong
7.0% <5.0 <350 Silver
programmes but high ANC
prevalence, which makes 9.0% <5.0 <450 Silver
it virtually impossible
11.0% <5.0 <550 Bronze
to achieve the case rate
criterion for validation 15.0% <5.0 <750 Bronze
Validation of EMTCT: for 1.0% <5.0 50 Not
countries with indicator applicable
2.0% 2.5 50
thresholds consistent with
other public health control 5.0% 1.0 50
programmes and low
enough to affirm elimination
of new paediatric infections
resulting from MTCT as a
“public health problem”
5.1.2. HBV
The PTE for HBV seeks to recognize high burden countries that have implemented key HBV
vaccination interventions but may not yet be able to achieve the elimination impact goal of ≤0.1%
HBsAg prevalence in ≤5-year-olds. This may be because of a current high HBsAg prevalence.
Countries with an estimated HBsAg prevalence in 5-year-olds of ≥1% and/or general population
prevalence exceeding 5% can be considered eligible for PTE (Table 5.1).
As noted, there is considerable heterogeneity in the epidemiology of HBV across different countries
and in the implementation and coverage of key interventions for PMTCT, especially timely HepB-BD
and infant vaccination interventions. Many high-burden countries have made considerable progress
in scaling up infant hepatitis B vaccination for PMTCT of HBV, with or without HepB-BD vaccination.
Hepatitis B vaccination is highly efficient in preventing MTCT of HBV and will result in countries
being able to achieve elimination in future years. Of note, there is the opportunity for low-income
countries to access funding for introduction of timely HepB-BD through the investment strategy of
Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance (71).
The WHO African Region, for example, is characterized by high endemicity of HBV infection,
suboptimal coverage of routine infant vaccination, low coverage of timely HepB-BD and limited
availability of diagnostics and treatment. In addition, as recently as 2019, about 60% of pregnant
women delivered in a health care facility, compounding challenges in delivering the timely HepB-BD
(72). A number of Pacific Island countries of the WHO Western Pacific Region also have a high HBV
prevalence, a general lack of health infrastructure, and supply chain issues, including difficulties
with cold chain management for effective vaccine delivery.
If a country uses a targeted timely HepB-BD strategy and qualifies for the PTE, there are national
and district-level requirements for high coverage that must be met:
• ≥80% coverage in all districts for HepB3 in all tiers

• ≥80% coverage in all districts for timely HepB-BD in the gold tier
• ≥50% for targeted timely HepB-BD in all districts for the silver tier.
An overview of the approach for HBV can be found in Interim guidance for country validation of viral
hepatitis elimination (3). A country seeking certification as being on the PTE for HBV will have the
opportunity to be recognized for their HBV EMTCT efforts to date and participate in a consultative
process to further develop the national strategy to achieve elimination in the coming years. While
validation of elimination is documented at the global level, recognition of PTE for HBV is completed
only at the regional level, unless the region specifically requires that this be raised to the global level
for higher-level advocacy to accelerate national response.
Box 5.2. R ationale for the PTE for HBV

A key principle is that each tier of the PTE represents a milestone in progress towards
elimination, where validation of elimination is the ultimate goal. The indicators for PTE
reflect the critical role of timely HepB-BD and infant vaccination in eliminating MTCT of HBV.
• The bronze level recognizes that a country has implemented a universal timely
HepB-BD policy as a first critical step towards EMTCT.
• The silver level of timely HepB-BD coverage of ≥50% recognizes the attainment of the
2020 milestone target for BD coverage in the GHSS (10) .
• The gold level of timely HepB-BD coverage of ≥90% recognizes the attainment of the
2030 service coverage target for timely HepB-BD coverage in the GHSS (10) ; it further
introduces the importance of HBsAg testing in pregnant women within the triple
elimination framework.
The cost of measurement of the impact indicator HBsAg prevalence in ≤5-year-olds through
a national survey could be an impediment to monitoring progress towards elimination.
Therefore, the PTE criteria require only achieving programmatic coverage targets. Other
programmatic indicators are not included in the PTE process to maintain the simplicity
of using routinely measured indicators that can be captured in most countries.
41
6. GUIDANCE ON SPECIAL
POPULATIONS AND SPECIAL
CIRCUMSTANCES
6.1. Special populations
Most countries face challenges with delivery of health care services to members of key and
vulnerable populations (including migrants, the internally displaced, immigrants, non-citizen
residents, indigenous/aboriginal/First Nation people, members of other mobile populations and
adolescent girls and young women). Women and their partners belonging to these groups may
be at higher risk for HIV, syphilis and HBV and may have relatively poorer access to health care.
Vulnerable populations such as these may be disproportionately represented among pregnant
women with late or no ANC. Follow-up in health facilities or the community, including contact
tracing, may be challenging, as some women may leave the country during the pregnancy or just
after birth.
The national validation report should identify these vulnerable populations; describe the
relevance of these populations to the epidemiology of HIV, syphilis and HBV in the country;
describe policies related to EMTCT services for members of these populations who are pregnant
or breastfeeding; and describe how the country programme addresses health care access for
them. In addition to migrants, countries should report on their undocumented and non-citizen
immigrants/residents in terms of access to health care services. In principle, WHO recognizes
that countries have a duty to promote and protect the health of all populations living within their
borders, including legal and illegal migrants, displaced persons and other vulnerable populations.
Rates of service coverage may be lower in these populations; there should be concerted and
demonstrated efforts to address gaps and improve outreach. Similar to the principle of providing
equitable services in lower-performing subnational units, the country should give evidence of
equitable EMTCT services provided to mobile, marginalized and vulnerable populations.
6.2. S electing targets for EMTCT of HIV in breastfeeding and non-

The target HIV MTCT rates for any country applying for validation should be based on that
country’s national policy for breastfeeding versus non-breastfeeding among mothers living with
HIV in order to account for the longer period of exposure to HIV transmission in breastfed infants
and young children (Box 6.1). The national validation report should include information on the
national breastfeeding policies and protocols, including dates and extent of implementation. The
report on ANC, peri- and postpartum programme evaluation should include what choices women
are given and if they are counselled on the risks and benefits of breastfeeding with and without
ART, and how their autonomy and freedom of choice are ensured.
Box 6.1. Targets depending on country breastfeeding policies

• Non-breastfeeding policy countries: MTCT rate <2%
• Breastfeeding policy countries: MTCT rate <5%.
The national validation report should provide testing data for infants and HIV-exposed children
at 6–8 weeks of age and at the end of 18 months (or three months after the end of breastfeeding,
if longer than 18 months). This schedule should ensure that all possible cases of infants and young
children who acquire HIV are captured and recorded. Countries that are designated as non-
breastfeeding must still consider each mother’s choice of infant and young child feeding practice
and apply the appropriate clinical follow-up.
The additional and most recent verified data to be provided are as follows:
1) For non-breastfed infants and young children, data from direct programme reporting or
modelled/estimated data to validate the 6-week and final status (that is, available 18-month
antibody data).
2) For breastfed infants and young children, a combination of programme data and modelled or
estimated data can be used, which should include EID testing (for example, polymerase chain
reaction (PCR) testing at birth or at six weeks) and final antibody testing at 18 months (or
three months after the end of breastfeeding).
6.3. C ountries with small numbers of HIV-, syphilis- and HBV-positive

pregnant women
For countries defined as having small populations, such as certain Small Island Developing States,1
and/or countries with small numbers of pregnant women with HIV, syphilis and HBV per year,
validation structures may elect to use alternative strategies to assess the HIV, syphilis and HBV impact
and process indicators. When there are cases of MTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV, de-identified data
should be available to assess the circumstances surrounding the case(s).
Validation in countries with small populations or small numbers of pregnant women

with HIV or syphilis
Countries with small numbers of HIV- and syphilis-positive pregnant women may pool data for the
four most recent consecutive years to provide more stable estimates of the impact and process
indicators. Table 6.1 describes the effect of pooling of data on MTCT rates and population case rates
in countries with small populations. However, even with pooling of data, these countries/territories
may not meet the impact targets for elimination, despite having strong EMTCT programmes.
A process has been developed to flexibly assess whether these countries can be validated for
EMTCT of HIV and syphilis, as in the situations below. Regional validation structures should
evaluate and verify this information during the country mission.
1 There is no formal definition of Small Island Development States, but there is a list which includes countries that participate in the main political group, Alliance of Small
Island States: https://www.aosis.org/.
6. Guidance on special populations and special circumstances 43
1. Cases determined not to be a failure of the programme or services. If cases are

determined at the regional and global reviews not to result from failure of the programme
or services, they may be removed from the numerator, with subsequent recalculation of
screening and treatment coverage and case rates. Criteria for assessing these cases are
as follows.
• At the discretion of the regional validation committee and, ultimately, the Global Validation
Advisory Committee, individual case reports can be reviewed to assess if there are gaps in
utilization of ANC services, including maternal testing or treatment, determination of infant
outcomes and social issues affecting access or uptake. When infant infection has occurred,
it should be determined whether the programme and services had provided all appropriate
measures to prevent infant infection.
• If it is documented that, despite application of all appropriate PMTCT measures, a
transmission still occurred, the regional validation committee and the Global Validation
Advisory Committee may decide not to count the case against a country during evaluation
of achievement of EMTCT.
• In situations of recorded infant transmission, two members of the Global Validation
Advisory Committee will be asked to perform an independent review of the case(s) and
present each case review to the Global Validation Advisory Committee for discussion and
final decision.
2. Countries with a small number of cases. Validation reports should include a section
describing how many infants and young children were exposed and followed-up, providing their
final outcome status and case studies, while maintaining data anonymity. Web Annex I provides
a sample case study form. These data should be provided to and confirmed by national and
regional validation teams or working groups.
Table 6.1. Scenarios for HIV MTCT rate and infant case rate of HIV
and CS in countries with small populations of pregnant
women
HIV MTCT rate for small countries Population case rate of new infant and young
child HIV infections due to MTCT, or infant and
young child case rate for syphilis for small
countries
Number of Number Annual 4-year Number of Number of 1-year 4-year

pregnant of infant MTCT rate pooled pregnant infant cases infant case pooled
women cases in (%) MTCT rate women in (HIV or rate/100 infant case
with HIV in one year (%)* one year syphilis) in 000 LB rate*
one year one year
10 1 10% 2.5 500 1 200 50

10 2 20% 5 600 1 167 42
20 1 5% 1.3 700 1 143 36
20 2 10% 2.5 1000 2 200 50
30 1 3% 0.8 1500 2 133 33
30 2 7% 1.7 2000 2 100 25
40 2 5% 1.3 2500 3 120 30
40 3 8% 1.9 3000 3 100 25
50 2 4% 1.0 3500 3 86 21
50 3 6% 1.5 4000 4 100 25
LB=live births; MTCT=mother-to-child transmission

*Pooled MTCT rate calculations and pooled infant case rate calculations assume no additional infant cases are identified
other than those presented for the 1-year period. These 4-year pooled estimates are calculated by multiplying the value
in the first column (for example, number of pregnant women with HIV/year or number of live births/year) of each table
by four and recalculating the MTCT rate and infant case rate.
Validation in countries with small populations or small numbers of pregnant women

with HBV
Countries with a small population size may have a birth cohort insufficient to be able to measure
prevalence accurately through a serosurvey. In such instances an appropriate finite population
correction factor is utilized for assessment of the main impact target (see section 3.1.3), and an
additional impact target for the MTCT rate of ≤2%1 can be utilized. 2
1 Achieving this rate will require high coverage levels of antenatal HBsAg testing coverage (that is, >80%) to be valid.
2 Countries with targeted birth dose strategies are required to show both ≤0.1% HBsAg prevalence among ≤5-year-old children and an MTCT rate of ≤2%.
6. Guidance on special populations and special circumstances 45
6.4. A ssessing ANC EMTCT service coverage in non-public settings

In addition to public sector health services, PMTCT services may be provided by private,
nongovernmental organizations, faith-based organizations, non-health sector institutions, such
as health services in correctional facilities and some other non-public entities. Ideally, national
programme monitoring systems should include data from the non-public sectors. Thus, public and
non-public data should not be separately reported for achievement of validation criteria. However,
there should be evidence in the report that non-public data are included.
In some countries, it is also common for pregnant women to seek ANC and/or delivery care in both
the public and non-public sectors. While it is often harder to capture data outside of the public
sector, or to properly account for women who utilize services in both the public and non-public
sectors (mixed usage), it is expected that data on the performance of these service indicators be
provided to validation teams for assessment, if available. Evaluation of EMTCT services in the non-
public sector should be part of the programme assessment. This includes services such as ANC, HIV,
syphilis and HBV testing, prevention and treatment. Evaluation should assess access, delivery and
payment and how it compares with the public sector.
46
7. THE VALIDATION PROCESS

Achieving EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV requires a public health approach based on
strengthening the health system to provide the maximum health benefit within the available
resources while realizing rights to health, participation and gender equality. The validation
approach sets the standards for quality and accessible interventions and services, with a focus on
integration, person-centred care and community engagement within each country’s context.
Before initiating the EMTCT validation process (or certification on the PTE), countries should
be reasonably confident that they have met the global minimum criteria (see Chapters 3 and 4)
as well as any specific regional requirements. Countries may also embark on pre-assessments,
utilizing the Checklist for country preliminary assessment of EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV and
Path to Elimination criteria (Web Annex A) (34) to better assess their status, what specific issues
need attention and whether to move forward with the certification or validation process.
This chapter summarizes the various structures and processes governing EMTCT validation. As
a supplement to this publication, the Governance guidance for the validation of elimination of
mother-to-child transmission of HIV and syphilis (14) provides further detail on the standardized
structures and processes used in the country review and validation process for EMTCT of HIV
and syphilis. The governance document comprehensively covers operations, detailed steps in the
validation process, roles and responsibilities at each level of validation, suggested membership on
validation committees, terms of reference for each committee, required components of the national
and regional validation reports and other pertinent information to assist in the validation process.
For additional detail on processes and operations for validation of EMTCT of HBV, the Interim
guidance for country validation of viral hepatitis elimination (3) serves as the primary reference
for EMTCT of HBV as part of validation of triple elimination.
7.1. Validation structures

Validation of EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV occurs at national, regional and global levels.
Each level is composed of secretariats, committees and teams, which function together with
relevant partners to complete key activities for validation of EMTCT (Fig. 7.1).
• Validation secretariats have the overall responsibility for providing technical support for
validation of country achievement of EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and/or HBV and PTE criteria, and they
serve as the focal points for communication between the validation structures and key partners.
• Validation committees or task forces are composed of independent experts engaged in
efforts to achieve EMTCT, including civil society and communities of women living with HIV.
Committees review, evaluate and endorse the evidence that a country has met or maintained
the minimum global criteria for validation of EMTCT.
• Validation teams/working groups, which may be assembled at the national or regional
levels, undertake a mission to collect data or verify the information contained in the country
report. These teams use the set of standardized EMTCT assessment tools for data, laboratory,
programme and human rights, gender equality and community engagement.
7. The validation process 47
7.1.1. Key partners in validation of EMTCT
Guiding principles for the process of validation of EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV or progress on
the PTE involve aligning the process with relevant national and global strategies and engaging
relevant stakeholders in a multisectoral approach. Relevant United Nations partners, such as
UNAIDS, UNICEF and UNFPA, and other international and national implementing partners that
are involved in the efforts to achieve EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV may also participate in the
national, regional and global validation structures. Importantly, the country’s health ministry
initiates the validation work at the country level and leads the National Validation Committee.
Civil society and communities of women living with HIV and HBV play a key role within
validation structures at each of the national, regional and global levels, and they must be
meaningfully involved in the work to validate countries for EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV
(see sections 4.4 and 7.2).
7.1.2. Operations and activities of validation
The work of the national and regional validation structures is to develop validation reports,
which are then submitted for the next step in the validation process. The reporting templates and
tools for EMTCT validation used by the validation structures can be found at: https://www.who.
int/initiatives/triple-elimination-initiative-of-mother-to-child-transmission-of-hiv-syphilis-and-
hepatitis-b/validation/process-and-tools.
7.2 Steps in the validation process

The steps in the validation process for EMTCT, or certification on the PTE, at the national,
regional and global levels are summarized below and illustrated in Fig. 7.1. Details are available
in the Governance guidance for the validation of elimination of mother-to-child transmission of
HIV and syphilis: an overview of structures and responsibilities at national, regional and global
levels (14) . For HBV EMTCT validation, steps are outlined in the Interim guidance for country
validation of viral hepatitis elimination (3) .
From the beginning of the validation process, there must be meaningful engagement of
communities of women living with HIV and HBV (73) . Community engagement is a process
of developing relationships that enable stakeholders to work together to address health-related
issues and promote positive health impacts and outcomes (74) . The validation process represents
an important opportunity for dialogue with and feedback from communities, and the information
required to evaluate a country’s readiness for validation cannot be gathered without this
involvement. The engagement of women in validation efforts should be multidimensional
and be initiated as early as possible in the process of preparing for validation.
7.2.1. Steps at the national level
[1] Request for validation. The Ministry of Health initiates a letter of request for validation
of EMTCT, which is typically sent to the WHO country office representative for forwarding
to the regional level.
[2] Establishment of the national validation committee or national validation task force.
The Ministry of Health establishes a national validation committee or task force and,
optionally, a validation team or working group.
[3] Completion of the preliminary assessment. The national validation committee, task force,
team or working group completes the Checklist for country preliminary assessment of EMTCT
of HIV, syphilis and HBV and Path to Elimination criteria (34) , a tool designed to assist countries
in the stage of planning for application for validation (Web Annex A). This can be considered a
preliminary, draft self-assessment, which can then be reviewed (and further completed/updated)
during an EMTCT orientation/training and external technical assistance mission (if needed).
[4] Data collection and completion of the national report. The national validation committee
or task force uses the checklist as the basis for further collection of information to develop the
national validation report. Using a standard template, they describe the basic structure and
functions of the national programme, including the four foundational components of validation
(data, laboratory, programme and human rights, gender equality and community engagement).
7.2.2. Steps at the regional level
[5] Establishment of regional validation structures. The WHO regional director or regional
validation secretariat establishes and convenes a regional validation committee or task force.
Any of these groups can convene and manage a regional validation team or working group,
consisting of experts addressing the different components of validation assessment, to perform
selected functions of the regional validation secretariat, as per the governance document (14).
[6] Completion of validation assessment. Members of the regional validation team/working

group carry out verification of the country validation assessment in four areas:
a. data
b. programme
c. laboratory
d. h uman rights, gender equality and community engagement.
[7] Regional review and submission. The regional validation team, working group or
committee will then:
a. present a draft regional validation report and key findings to the regional validation
committee;
b. complete and submit the regional validation report.
7.2.3. Steps at the global level
[8] Validation report review. The regional validation secretariat submits the regional
validation report to the global validation secretariat at WHO. The global validation
secretariat initiates the global review process, which includes a preliminary review before
the report is sent to the Global Validation Advisory Committee for validation review. This
committee reviews the regional validation report and advises WHO whether the candidate
country has reached elimination targets and should be validated or certified for PTE.
7. The validation process 49
[9] Official validation. If a country is successfully validated, the Director-General of WHO signs
a certificate recognizing the candidate country’s achievement of validation of EMTCT. The
certificate and recommendations for follow-up actions related to the validation review and
for maintenance of EMTCT validation status accompany a letter from the Director General
that is sent to the WHO Regional Office for transmission to the country.
Fig. 7.1. Process for validation of EMTCT or PTE certification,

including the responsibilities of the health ministry,
committees and secretariats at the national, regional
and global levels
1. The health ministry sends a request for validation to the WHO country office or
national validaton secretariat.
Health 2. The health ministry establishes the national validation committee or task force
ministry for collecting the evidence and reporting on efforts to achieve EMTCT. It may also
create a team or working group responsible for data collection and preparation of
the final report.
3. The national validation committee or task force conducts a preliminary assessment.

National
4. The national validation committee or task force prepares an initial national report
validation to apply for validation and submits it to the WHO regional director or regional
committee/ validation secretariat.
task force and

secretariat
5. The WHO regional director or regional validation secretariat establishes and

Regional convenes a regional validation committee or task force. Any of these entities can
create a regional team or working group.
validation
6. The assigned regional validation structure undertakes a desk review of the
committee/ elements in the national validation report and conducts the regional validation
task force and assessment (via in-country mission or virtual assessment).
secretariat 7. The regional validation team, working group or committee submits the regional
validation report to the regional validation secretariat.
8. The regional validation secretariat submits the regional validation report to the
global validation secretariat, which reviews the report before sending it to the Global
Global Validation Advisory Committee.
Validation The Global Validation Advisory committee reviews the regional report and advises
WHO whether the country has reached elimination targets and should be validated or
Advisory certified for PTE.
Committee 9. The Director-General of WHO signs a certificate recognizing the country’s
and secretariat achievement of elimination. The certificate and recommendations for follow-up
actions are sent with a letter from the Director-General to the WHO Regional Office
for transmission to the country.
50
8. MAINTENANCE OF VALIDATION
The experience of elimination programmes has shown that, to sustain elimination of a disease
at such a level that it is no longer a public health problem, a country requires a monitoring and
surveillance system that can accurately assess intervention coverage and detect the majority of
cases of MTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV in a timely manner (including among vulnerable and key
populations at risk of acquiring HIV and STIs). For MTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV, these systems
provide ongoing monitoring of the prevalence of disease in pregnant women and the coverage
and effectiveness of treatment and infant care, including HBV vaccinations and follow-up of
HIV-exposed infants and young children through to final diagnosis. Reviews for maintenance
of validation ensure that countries sustain the systems and responses for long-term prevention
of new infections in infants and young children and maintain the health of mothers. (Table 8.1
shows the assessment time intervals.) Countries are expected to provide data sequential to that
provided at the last review without omitting any years.
Table 8.1. Time intervals for assessing maintenance of validation
Maintenance review
Type of country Validation request
time interval
Standard (HIV/syphilis) Single or dual 3 years
Standard (HBV) Single 5 years
3 years (HIV/syphilis)
Country applying for triple 6 years (HBV – reviewed
Triple
elimination (HIV/syphilis/HBV) at every other
maintenance review)
Small population, low burden
Single or dual 4 years
country (HIV/syphilis)
Small population, low burden
Triple 5 years
country (HIV/syphilis/HBV)
See Chapter 3 for options for combining validation requests
The service delivery coverage (process indicators) and impact indicator targets must remain steady
within the eligibility range or improve to maintain validation status. Countries that fail to maintain
these, maintain the quality of achievement of the four foundational requirements of validation as
described in Chapter 4 (data, laboratory, programme, human rights, gender equality and community
engagement) and effectively implement recommendations made at validation, can lose their
validation status. For substantial, sustained disruptions, like the COVID-19 pandemic, WHO may
consider deferrals or extensions for maintenance.
8. Maintenance of validation 51
8.1. Process of applying for maintenance of validation

The global secretariat maintains a list of countries that have achieved validation and have
maintained validation criteria and standards over time. The global secretariat is responsible for
notifying regional-level structures of the maintenance review schedules for countries. Countries
should prepare reports on maintenance of validation using the maintenance report template in
Web Annex J.
The national report should be prepared using the national component of the report template
in Web Annex J and submitted to the regional secretariat. The national validation secretariat
then submits the report to the regional validation secretariat, which convenes a meeting of the
regional validation committee to determine whether the country has maintained the criteria
for validation. The regional secretariat will then submit the report to the global secretariat with
a written endorsement, using the regional component of the report template in Web Annex J.
8.1.1. Country report on maintenance of validation
In the report, countries are required to summarize significant changes to the EMTCT
programme(s) since the previous review, update mandatory data tables with process and impact
indicators for the period of review and report on progress made on recommendations
(see maintenance report template in Web Annex J). Maintenance reports should include important
new or emerging issues identified and addressed during the current period of review as follows:
[1] A
summary of the health system and services for EMTCT should indicate and briefly describe
any significant changes to the health system within the four foundational areas
of assessment since the last review:
• Data quality: Demonstrate maintenance or improvement of quality or strength of the system.
• L aboratory: Demonstrate maintenance or improvement of quality assurance [EQA/proficiency

testing] and provide updates on the relevant laboratory tests used.
• P rogramme: Update on any key changes in national guidelines and service delivery.
• H uman rights, gender equality and community engagement: Reassess for any changes
at the national level in collaboration with the community of women living with HIV or HBV in
the country to ensure that there are no worsening violations or negative changes in laws since
the last validation review.
[2] Required data for maintenance of validation in required data tables:
• A s for the validation process, data to be assessed for the maintenance review should have been
verified and reported through global reporting mechanisms, such as the UNAIDS GAM system
or the Global Hepatitis Reporting System. Indicators that are not captured in the GAM should be
reported directly to the regional validation committee through the WHO country office.
[3] Potential risks to sustaining EMTCT:
• T he report should also include a succinct narrative on any changes in the EMTCT programmes
or environment that may affect the maintenance of targets. An example would be a description
of service disruptions due to a major event, such as the COVID-19 pandemic or a natural disaster,
and the resulting issues and interventions to address them.
[4] R
esponses to recommendations and updates on requests for information made by the Global
Validation Advisory Committee in the previous review.
The regional validation committee reviews the maintenance report to determine whether the
country has maintained validation. The regional validation secretariat then submits the report to
the global validation secretariat, accompanied by a separate regional endorsement document for
maintaining validation or otherwise, along with relevant comments and recommendations from
the regional review. Refer to the Governance guidance for the validation of elimination of mother-
to-child transmission of HIV and syphilis (14) and Web Annex J for details.
8.1.2. T ransfer to regions of reviews of continued maintenance of validation

reviews
The Global Validation Advisory Committee recognizes the strong commitment and expertise
of the regional validation structures. To that end, after two rounds of reviews of maintenance
of validation reports by the Global Validation Advisory Committee, countries may be transferred
to the regional level for continued reviews if the countries have continued to meet targets for
maintenance of EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV.
The decision to transfer a country from the global to the regional level for continuation of validation
of maintenance reviews will be initiated and determined by the global validation secretariat,
informed by a vote of the Global Validation Advisory Committee. The vote for transfer will occur
preferably at the same time as completion of the maintenance review.
Reasons that the Global Validation Advisory Committee may vote to postpone or deny transfer
of validation processes to the regional level may include:
• The country has not satisfactorily addressed major recommendations from the prior
maintenance review.
• Issues in human rights and gender equality and lack of engagement of communities of women
living with HIV remain uncorrected.
• The country’s maintenance of validation was deferred pending additional information and
clarifications from the country.
• The country has single validation only, and the Global Validation Advisory Committee would
like to encourage dual or triple elimination.
Single validation of EMTCT of HBV is normally conducted at the regional level. However, in special
circumstances where regions make requests for single validation of HBV EMTCT assessments at
the global level, the process of evaluating maintenance will be carried out at the regional level.
Once responsibility for maintenance of validation has been transferred to the regional level,
the Regional Validation Secretariat will be required to inform the global validation secretariat
of the determination of the regional validation committee on whether the country has maintained
the criteria for validation. If the need arises, the global secretariat can decide whether the next
maintenance review should revert to the global level. Details of the process of transferring countries
can be found in the Governance guidance for the validation of elimination of mother-to-child
transmission of HIV and syphilis (14).
53
REFERENCES
1. C
onsolidated guidelines on HIV prevention, testing, treatment, service delivery and monitoring:
recommendations for a public health approach. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021
(https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/342899, accessed 8 August 2021).
2. C
onsolidated guidelines on HIV testing services. Geneva: World Health Organization.
(https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/978-92-4-155058-1, accessed 24 March 2021).
3. Interim guidance for country validation of viral hepatitis elimination. Geneva: World Health
Organization; 2021 (https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240028395, accessed 18
August 2021).
4. W
HO guideline on syphilis screening and treatment for pregnant women. Geneva: World
Health Organization; 2017 (https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/rtis/
syphilis-ANC-screenandtreat-guidelines/en/, accessed 24 March 2021).
5. W
HO guidelines for the treatment of Treponema pallidum (syphilis). Geneva: World Health
Organization; 2016 (http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/rtis/syphilis-
treatment-guidelines/en/, accessed 24 March 2021).
6. T ransforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: United
Nations; 2015 (https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld,
accessed 24 March 2021).
7. Cohn J, Owiredu MN, Taylor MM, Easterbrook P, Lesi O, Francoise B et al. Eliminating mother-
to-child transmission of human immunodeficiency virus, syphilis and hepatitis B in sub-
Saharan Africa. Bull World Health Organ. 2021;99:287-95. doi: 10.2471/BLT.20.272559
8. Elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV, syphilis, perinatal hepatitis B, and

congenital chagas disease [webpage]. Washington (DC): Pan American Health Organization;
2021 (https://www.paho.org/en/topics/elimination-mother-child-transmission-hiv-syphilis-
perinatal-hepatitis-b-and-congenital, accessed 24 March 2021).
9. E liminating mother to child transmission of HIV, hepatitis & syphilis [webpage]. Manila: WHO
Regional Office for the Western Pacific; 2021 (https://www.who.int/westernpacific/activities/
eliminating-mother-to-child-transmission-of-hiv-hepatitis-syphilis, accessed 18 August 2021).
10. G
lobal progress report on HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmitted infections, 2021. Geneva:
World Health Organization; 2021 (https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240027077,
accessed 20 November 2021).
11. G
lobal health sector strategy on HIV, 2016–2021. Towards ending AIDS. Geneva: World
Health Organization; 2016 (https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/246178, accessed 18
August 2021).
12. G
lobal health sector strategy on sexually transmitted infections, 2016–2021. Geneva: World
Health Organization; 2016 (https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/rtis/ghss-
stis/en/, accessed 28 July 2021).
13. P olitical declaration on HIV and AIDS: ending inequalities and getting on track to end AIDS
by 2030. Geneva: United Nations General Assembly; 2021 (https://www.unaids.org/sites/
default/files/media_asset/2021_political-declaration-on-hiv-and-aids_en.pdf, accessed 24
August 2021).
14. G
overnance guidance for the validation of elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV
and syphilis: an overview of structures and responsibilities at national, regional and global
levels. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020 (https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/hand
le/10665/332488/9789240006614-eng.pdf?ua=1, accessed 24 March 2021).
15. Ending AIDS: progress towards the 90–90–90 targets. Global AIDS update 2017. Geneva:
Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS); 2017 (http://www.unaids.org/sites/
default/files/media_asset/Global_AIDS_update_2017_en.pdf, accessed 24 March 2021).
16. 2021 UNAIDS Global AIDS Update — Confronting inequalities — Lessons for pandemic
responses from 40 years of AIDS. Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS
(UNAIDS); 2021 (https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/documents/2021/2021-global-aids-
update, accessed 28 July 2021).
17. UNAIDS data 2020. Global AIDS update. Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/
AIDS (UNAIDS); 2020 (https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/documents/2020/unaids-data,
18. S eizing the moment: tackling entrenched inequalities to end epidemics. UNAIDS. Global
AIDS update 2020. Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS); 2020
(https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/2020_global-aids-report_en.pdf,
19. C
onsolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV
infection. Recommendations for a public health approach, second edition. Geneva: World
Health Organization; 2016 (https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/208825, accessed 24
March 2021).
20. T he Gap Report 2014. Children and pregnant women living with HIV. Geneva: Joint United
Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS); 2014 (http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/
media_asset/09_ChildrenandpregnantwomenlivingwithHIV.pdf, accessed 18 August 2021).
21. H
IV diagnosis and ARV use in HIV-exposed infants: a programmatic update. Geneva: World
Health Organization; 2018 (https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/273155/WHO-
CDS-HIV-18.17-eng.pdf, accessed 6 April 2021).
22. D e Cock KM, Fowler MG, Mercier E, de Vincenzi I, Saba J, Hoff E et al. Prevention of mother-
to-child HIV transmission in resource-poor countries: translating research into policy and
practice. JAMA. 2000;283:1175-82. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.9.1175
23. UNAIDS’ terminology guidelines. Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS
(UNAIDS); 2008 (https://lk.one.un.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/UNAIDS-Terminology-
Guidelines.pdf, accessed 29 September 2021).
24. G
omez GB, Kamb ML, Newman LM, Mark J, Broutet N, Hawkes SJ. Untreated maternal syphilis
and adverse outcomes of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bull World Health
Organ. 2013;91:217-26. doi: 10.2471/blt.12.107623.
25. D ual HIV/syphilis rapid diagnostic tests can be used as the first test in antenatal care:
policy brief. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019 (https://apps.who.int/iris/
handle/10665/329965, accessed 6 April 2021).
References 55
26. Korenromp EL, Rowley J, Alonso M, Mello MB, Wijesooriya NS, Mahiané SG et al. Global
burden of maternal and congenital syphilis and associated adverse birth outcomes—
Estimates for 2016 and progress since 2012. PLOS ONE. 2019;14:e0211720. doi: 10.1371/
journal.pone.0211720.
27. W
orld Health Organization. Hepatitis B vaccines: WHO position paper, July 2017
recommendations. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2017;92:369-92.
28. D
owdle WR. The principles of disease elimination and eradication. Bull World Health Organ.
1998;76 Suppl 2:22-5.
29. Leprosy (Hansen’s disease) [webpage]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021 (http://
www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs101/en/, accessed 29 September 2021)
30. O
nchocerciasis [webpage]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019 (http://www.who.int/
mediacentre/factsheets/fs374/en/, accessed 24 March 2021).
31. G
lobal programme to eliminate lymphatic filariasis: progress report, 2019. Geneva: World
Health Organization; 2019 (https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/who-wer9543,
accessed 3 Nov 2021).
32. D
racunculiasis (guinea-worm disease) [webpage]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020
(http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs359/en/, accessed 24 March 2021).
33. M
aternal and neonatal tetanus elimination (MNTE) [webpage]. Geneva: World Health
Organization; 2021 (https://www.who.int/initiatives/maternal-and-neonatal-tetanus-
elimination-(mnte), accessed 24 March 2021).
34. Validation process & tools [webpage]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021 (https://
www.who.int/initiatives/triple-elimination-initiative-of-mother-to-child-transmission-of-hiv-
syphilis-and-hepatitis-b/validation/process-and-tools, accessed 24 March 2021).
35. Global AIDS monitoring [webpage]. Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS
(UNAIDS); 2021 (https://www.unaids.org/en/global-aids-monitoring, accessed 13 August 2021).
36. G
lobal reporting system on hepatitis [webpage]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021
(https://www.who.int/hepatitis/GRSH-Data_entry_manual.pdf, accessed 13 August 2021).
37. Global monitoring framework and strategy for the global plan towards the
elimination of new HIV infections among children by 2015 and keeping their
mothers alive. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015 (http://apps.who.int/iris/
bitstream/10665/75341/1/9789241504270_eng.pdf, accessed 24 March 2021).
38. Methods for surveillance and monitoring of congenital syphilis elimination within
existing systems. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011 (https://www.who.int/
reproductivehealth/publications/rtis/9789241503020/en/, accessed 29 September 2021).
39. D ocumenting the impact of hepatitis B immunization: best practices for

conducting a serosurvey. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011 (https://
apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/70808/WHO_IVB_11.08_eng.
pdf;jsessionid= 4C0A7CC8826C5DBF85BF4BD4DBA8CB8E, accessed 30 June 2021).
40. G
uideline: updates on HIV and infant feeding: the duration of breastfeeding, and
support from health services to improve feeding practices among mothers living
with HIV. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016 (http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstre
am/10665/246260/1/9789241549707-eng.pdf, accessed 24 March 2021).
41. Countdown to zero. Global plan towards the elimination of new HIV infections amoung
children by 2015 and keeping their mothers alive. 2011-2015. Geneva: Joint United Nations
Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS); 2011 (https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/
media_asset/20110609_JC2137_Global-Plan-Elimination-HIV-Children_en_1.pdf, accessed
21 September 2021).
42. S tover J, Glaubius R, Mofenson L, Dugdale CM, Davies M-A, Patten G et al. Updates to the
Spectrum/AIM model for estimating key HIV indicators at national and subnational levels.
AIDS. 2019;33:S227.
43. A IDSFree Toolkit [webpage]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021 (https://www.who.
int/tools/aids-free-toolkit, accessed 17 June 2021).
44. T he global elimination of congenital syphilis: rationale and strategy for action.
Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007 (https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/
handle/10665/43782/9789241595858_eng.pdf, accessed 21 September 2021).
45. W HO guideline on syphilis screening and treatment for pregnant women. Geneva: World
Health Organization. (https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/rtis/syphilis-
ANC-screenandtreat-guidelines/en/, accessed 24 March 2021).
46. L iu Z, Li M, Zhao Q, Wang Y, Wang Y, Wang W. Impact and cost-effectiveness of a national

hepatitis B immunisation programme in China: a modelling study. Lancet. 2020;396:S11.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32431-4.
47. R
azavi-Shearer D GI, Nguyen MH, Chen D-S, Van Damme P, Abbas Z, et al. The case
for simplifying and using absolute targets for viral hepatitis elimination goals. Lancet
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;3:383-403.
48. R
azavi-Shearer D, Gamkrelidze I, Nguyen MH, Chen D-S, Van Damme P, Abbas Z et al. Global
prevalence, treatment, and prevention of hepatitis B virus infection in 2016: a modelling
study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;3:383-403.
49. H
epatitis B control: country profile 2017 [webpage]. Manila: WHO Regional Office for the Western
Pacific; 2018 (https://iris.wpro.who.int/handle/10665.1/14180, accessed 29 September 2021)
50. Woodring J, Pastore R, Brink A, Ishikawa N, Takashima Y, Tohme RA. Progress toward
hepatitis B control and elimination of mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B virus –
Western Pacific Region, 2005–2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68:195-200. doi:
10.15585/mmwr.mm6808a2
51. N
ayagam S, Chan P, Zhao K, Sicuri E, Wang X, Jia J et al. Investment case for a
comprehensive package of interventions against hepatitis B in China: applied modeling to
help national strategy planning. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72:743-52. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa134
52. Regional action plan for viral hepatitis in the Western Pacific 2016–2020: a priority action
plan for awareness, surveillance, prevention and treatment of viral hepatitis in the Western
Pacific Region. Manila: WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific; 2016 (https://apps.
who.int/iris/handle/10665/208337, accessed 30 June 2021).
References 57
53. Global Vaccine Action Plan 2011–2020. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013 (https://
www.who.int/teams/immunization-vaccines-and-biologicals/strategies/global-vaccine-
action-plan, accessed 26 March 2021).
54. Immunization Agenda 2030: a global strategy to leave no one behind. Geneva: World Health
Organization. (https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/immunization-agenda-2030-a-
global-strategy-to-leave-no-one-behind, accessed 30 June 2021).
55. W HO UNICEF Joint Reporting Form: estimates of DPT3 coverage. Geneva: World Health
Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund; 2020 (http://apps.who.int/immunization_
monitoring/globalsummary/timeseries/tswucoveragedtp3.html, accessed 29 September 2021).
56. C
onsolidated strategic information guidelines for viral hepatitis: planning and tracking
progress towards elimination. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019 (http://apps.who.
int/iris/handle/10665/310912, accessed 26 March 2021).
57. Immunization: immunization coverage by antigen (country, regional, and global trends).
WUENIC 2019 revision. UNICEF, editor. Geneva: United Nations Children’s Fund; 2021
(https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-health/immunization/, accessed 30 June 2021).
58. P revention of mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B virus: guidelines on antiviral

prophylaxis in pregnancy. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020 (https://apps.who.int/
iris/bitstream/handle/10665/333391/9789240002708-eng.pdf, accessed 30 June 2021).
59. A
short guide on methods: measuring the impact of national PMTCT programmes: towards
the elimination of new HIV infections among children by 2015 and keeping their mothers
alive. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012 (http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/
handle/10665/75478/9789241504362_eng.pdf, accessed 24 March 2021).
60. T he WHO congenital syphilis estimation tool: structure and methods. Geneva: World Health
Organization; 2020 (https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/congenital-syphilis/methods-
for-congenital-syphilis-estimation-tool.pdf, accessed 13 Aug 2021).
61. Stepwise Laboratory Quality Improvement Process Towards Accreditation (SLIPTA) checklist,
version 2. Brazzaville: WHO Regional Office for Africa; 2015 (http://apps.who.int/iris/
bitstream/10665/204423/1/slipta-checkist0711.pdf, accessed 24 March 2021).
62. W HO/CDC Syphilis Serology Proficiency Programme. In WHO/Sexual and reproductive

health [website]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021 (https://www.who.int/
reproductivehealth/congenital-syphilis/spt-program/en/, accessed 22 September 2021).
63. G
lobal HIV/AIDS: international laboratories. Washington (DC) and Atlanta: U.S. President’s
Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief and U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2012
(https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/21846/cdc_21846_DS1.pdf, accessed 22 September 2021).
64. G
uidelines for the prevention, care and treatment of persons with chronic hepatitis B
infection. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015 (https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/
handle/10665/154590/9789241549059_eng.pdf, accessed 13 Aug 2021).
65. G
uidelines on hepatitis B and C testing. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017
(https://www.who.int/hepatitis/publications/HEP17001_WEB11.pdf, accessed 13 Aug 2021).
66. International guidelines on HIV/AIDS and human rights. Geneva: Office of the United
Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and the Joint United Nations Programme on
HIV/AIDS; 2006 (https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/HIVAIDSGuidelinesen.pdf,
accessed 14 July 2021).
67. H
uman rights and health [webpage]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017 (https://
www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/human-rights-and-health, accessed 14 July 2021).
68. T echnical Brief. HIV, human rights, and gender equality. Geneva: The Global Fund to Fight
AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria; 2019 (https://www.theglobalfund.org/media/6348/core_
hivhumanrightsgenderequality_technicalbrief_en.pdf?u= 637166001220000000, accessed
21 September 2021).
69. P romising practices in community engagement for elimination of new HIV infections
among children by 2015 and keeping their mothers alive. Geneva: Joint United Nations
Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS); 2012 (https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/
documents/2012/20120628_JC2281_PromisingPracticesCommunityEngagements, accessed
14 July 2021).
70. O
n the fast track to an AIDS-free generation. Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme
on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS); 2016 (http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/
GlobalPlan2016_en.pdf, accessed 24 March 2021).
71. V
accine Investment Strategy. Report to the Board 28–29 November 2018. Geneva: Gavi,
the Vaccine Alliance; 2018 (https://www.gavi.org/our-alliance/strategy/vaccine-investment-
strategy, accessed 30 June 2021).
72. Global delivery care coverage and trends. Geneva: United Nations Children’s Fund; 2019
(https://data.unicef.org/topic/maternal-health/delivery-care/, accessed 30 June 2021).
73. T he greater involvement of people living with HIV (GIPA). Policy brief. Geneva: Joint
United Nations Programme for HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS); 2007 (http://data.unaids.org/pub/
briefingnote/2007/jc1299_policy_brief_gipa.pdf, accessed 24 March 2021).
74. W HO community engagement framework for quality, people-centred and resilient health
services. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017 2017(https://apps.who.int/iris/
handle/10665/259280, accessed 18 August 2021).
75. Consolidated HIV strategic information guidelines: driving impact through programme
monitoring and management. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020 (https://www.who.
int/publications/i/item/9789240000735, accessed 23 September 2021).
76. Monitoring & evaluation framework for antiretroviral treatment for pregnant and
breastfeeding women living with HIV and their infants. IATT option B/B+ M&E framework.
New York: The Interagency Task Team; 2015 (http://www.childrenandaids.org/sites/
default/files/2017-05/IATT-Framework-Monitoring-Evaluation-Framework-for-ART-Treat.pdf,
77. S exually transmitted infections treatment guidelines. Atlanta: United States Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention; 2021 (https://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment-guidelines/
congenital-syphilis.htm, accessed 13 Aug 2021).
78. R
ios-Hincapié C WA, Ropero AM, Bertha Gómez B, Tohme R, Diana Librado D et al. Evaluating
progress towards the elimination of hepatitis B in children in Colombia: a two-phase study.
(https://www.profamilia.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/WHO-meeting-Developing-
guidance-for-verifying-hepatitis-B-elimination.pdf, accessed 30 June 2021).
79. Vaccination coverage cluster surveys: reference manual. Geneva: World Health Organization;
2018 (https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/272820, accessed 30 June 2021).
References 59
80. Patel MK, Wannemuehler K, Tairi R, Tutai R, Moturi E, Tabwaia B et al. Progress towards
achieving hepatitis B control in the Cook Islands, Niue, Tokelau, and Kiribati. Vaccine.
2016;34:4298-303. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.06.083
81. Breakwell L, Anga J, Cooley G, Ropiti L, Gwyn S, Wannemuehler K et al. Seroprevalence

of chronic hepatitis B virus infection and immunity to measles, rubella, tetanus and
diphtheria among schoolchildren aged 6-7 years old in the Solomon Islands, 2016. Vaccine.
2020;38:4679-86. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.05.029
82. Spectrum [website]. Glastonbury (CT), USA: Avenir Health; 2021 (https://avenirhealth.org/
software-spectrum.php, accessed 30 June 2021).
60
ANNEXES
ANNEX 1. CLINICAL FOLLOW-UP
OF INFANTS AND YOUNG
CHILDREN EXPOSED TO
HIV, SYPHILIS OR HBV
A1.1. Clinical follow-up of infants and young children exposed
to HIV
The diagnosis of HIV infection in HIV-exposed infants and young children is complicated by the
variable sensitivities of assays, ongoing HIV exposure (in utero, intrapartum and postpartum via
breastfeeding) and the presence of maternal antibody for up to 12–15 months. For EMTCT, HIV-
exposed infants and young children should be followed for an appropriate period to determine
their final infection status.
Annex 1. C linical follow-up of infants and young children exposed to HIV, syphilis or HBV 61
Fig. A1. S implified infant diagnosis algorithm from WHO’s

Consolidated guidelines on HIV prevention, testing,
treatment, service delivery and monitoring (1)
HIV-exposed infant or child

HIV-exposed newborn (0-2 days)
(4-6 weeks to 18 months)
Conduct NAT b
Consider NATa,b Negative
(at 4-6 weeks or at the earliest
opportunity thereafter)
Positive Negative
Infant/child is infected HIV infection not detected but if

infant/child is breastfed the risk of
acquiring HIV infection remains until
complete cessation of breastfeeding d
Immediately start ART c
Repeat NAT to confirm infection
Regular clinical monitoring
Conduct NAT b
(at 9 months)
Negative Positive
HIV unlikely unless Infant/child is

still breastfeding e infected
Antibody testing at 18 months

of age or 3 months after Immediately start ART c
cessation of breastfeeding, Repeat NAT to confirm infection
whichever is later f
a
The addition to the existing testing algorithm of NAT at birth can be considered.
b
Point-of-care NAT can be used to diagnose HIV infection as well as to confirm positive results.
c
Start ART without delay. At the same time, retest to confirm infection. As maternal treatment is scaled up and MTCT
transmission rates decrease, false-positive results are expected to increase: retesting after a first positive NAT is hence
important to avoid unnecessary treatment, particularly in settings with lower transmission rates. If the second test is negative,
a third NAT should be performed before interrupting ART.
d
For children who were never breastfed, additional testing following a negative NAT at 4–6 weeks is included in this algorithm
to account for potential false-negative NAT results.
e
The risk of HIV transmission remains as long as breastfeeding continues. If the 9-month test is conducted earlier than 3 months
after cessation of breastfeeding, infection acquired in the last days of breastfeeding may be missed. Retesting at 18 months or
3 months after cessation of breastfeeding (whichever is later) should be carried out for final assessment of HIV status.
f
If breastfeeding extends beyond 18 months, the final diagnosis of HIV status can only be assessed at the end of breastfeeding. If
breastfeeding ends before 18 months, the final diagnosis of HIV status with antibody testing can only be assessed at 18 months.
Antibody testing should be undertaken at least 3 months after cessation of breastfeeding (to allow for development of HIV
antibodies). For infants younger than 18 months of age NAT should be performed to confirm infection. If the infant is older than
18 months, negative antibody testing confirms that the infant is uninfected; positive antibody testing confirms infant is infected.
• For HIV-exposed infants, ruling out HIV infection is based on the algorithm in Fig. A1 (1) .
• Nucleic acid testing is highly sensitive and specific to identify infection at any age. In infants
it should be used to both diagnose and confirm infection (19, 21) .
• F or HIV-exposed infants, high infant HIV testing coverage at stipulated time points and birth
cohort monitoring are needed to provide sufficient data on infant outcomes to determine
the MTCT and population case rates. While there is no specified level of HIV-exposed infant
testing coverage required to meet validation criteria per se, the data on infant outcomes
should be robust and provide reasonable certainty for the impact indicators.
• F or small-population and low HIV prevalence countries with strong health systems (see
section 6.3), it is reasonable to expect EID testing coverage to be >95%. For high prevalence
countries, it is reasonable to expect EID testing (or EID and final antibody testing) to be
>80%. These data, although programmatic and not included as process indicators for EMTCT
validation, can be used to characterize the outcome of exposure in the infants and young
children tested, and they can be triangulated with maternal treatment data to estimate
outcomes in the additional infants not tested. For MTCT and population case rates, a birth
cohort estimation method is recommended. For breastfeeding infants, the cohort method
needs to allow for follow-up through 18 months due to ongoing risk of transmission (75, 76) .
A1.2. C linical follow-up of infants and young children exposed

to syphilis
The surveillance case definition of CS should be used to calculate the case rate (see section
3.1.2). For the purpose of clinical follow-up, all syphilis-exposed infants should receive treatment
when recommended according to WHO syphilis treatment guidelines (5) and managed and
monitored as follows:
• Infants born to inadequately treated mothers should receive treatment for CS and have a
non-treponemal test with titre at delivery as well as at six months post-treatment to evaluate
treatment response (77) .
• Infants born to adequately treated mothers with no signs of maternal reinfection do not
require treatment or follow-up non-treponemal titres, but they should be evaluated for clinical
signs suggestive of CS at delivery. If such clinical signs are identified, these infants should
receive testing, recommended treatment and follow-up.
ny previously undiagnosed and untreated infant ≥6 months of age who has a reactive
• A
non-treponemal titre should be considered a case of CS and receive treatment according to
WHO syphilis treatment guidelines. These cases should be counted towards the CS case rate
if not previously included.
A1.3. Clinical follow-up of infants exposed to HBV

Follow-up of HBV-exposed infants, including PVST testing (anti-HBs with or without HBsAg),
is important to identify children with, and to protect children from, HBV infections. For validation,
PVST is part of the calculation of the MTCT rate for HBV; it is an additional impact indicator required
for countries that provide targeted timely HepB-BD only (see section 3.1.3 and Annex 2).
Annex 1. C linical follow-up of infants and young children exposed to HIV, syphilis or HBV 63
The WHO policy on hepatitis B vaccination recommends that, where needed, PVST in exposed
infants should be carried out at least 1–2 months after administration of the last dose of the
hepatitis B vaccine series, when the antibody response is greatest (27) . Routine PSVT testing for
immunity (anti-HBs) is not necessary, as the primary 3-dose series induces protective antibody
concentrations in >95% of healthy infants, but can be done in the context of HBV elimination
in countries with targeted timely HepB-BD and in countries with low-prevalence settings, where
it serves as a tool to confirm immunity against hepatitis B among infants of HBsAg-positive
mothers (27) .
Several scenarios may affect clinical follow-up of HBV-exposed infants. The exposed infant may be:
• i nfected with HBV (HBsAg-positive). The infant will need to be clinically followed during
childhood and early adulthood for assessment to rule out progression to liver disease, with
the possibility of treatment or eventual spontaneous HBsAg clearance. In infants and children,
whether treatment is needed is a clinical decision. It is indicated in cirrhosis as well as for
those with active hepatitis with high viral loads (58) .
• u
ninfected (HBsAg-negative and anti-HBs-positive) and have responded adequately to the
HBV vaccine series. No clinical follow-up is required.
• u
ninfected, but may not have responded to the HBV vaccine (HBsAg-negative and anti-
HBs-negative). These infants need to be revaccinated. This group is usually a small percentage
(<5%) of the vaccinated cohort.
64
ANNEX 2. MEASUREMENT OF
INDICATORS AND TARGETS
FOR VALIDATION OF EMTCT
OF HEPATITIS B VIRUS
A2.1. Measurement of childhood prevalence of HBsAg in
≤5-year-olds
A2.1.1. P referred approach: measurement of childhood HBsAg prevalence in
≤5-year-olds
The preferred approach is to directly measure a proxy for chronic HBV incidence (that is, HBsAg
prevalence in ≤5-year-olds) with national-level biomarker surveys among young children. This is
the gold standard recommended by WHO in ≤5-year-olds for monitoring progress towards HBV
control targets, but it requires large sample sizes in settings that have low prevalence (39) .
The focus should be on obtaining the best possible representative prevalence estimates with
narrow confidence intervals in the 0–5-year-old age cohort.
The advantage of measuring HBsAg prevalence in ≤5-year-olds is that it captures the effects of
interventions on MTCT as well as early horizontal transmission. However, a limitation is that it
reflects the impact of an intervention five years earlier. There is, therefore, flexibility for countries
to include, for convenience, an age group of 1–5 years or a narrower age range such as one
year of age to measure this indicator using representative serosurveys. This would capture the
impact of recent interventions, although it would not reflect sustainability. However, there are
logistical and cost constraints in undertaking serosurveys in a younger cohort of one year of age,
given the requirement for household surveys and venous sampling. Conducting such surveys in
≤5-year-olds also may be challenging in certain countries. Since many countries already conduct
school-based HBV serosurveys or serosurveys among vaccinated cohorts across a wider age range,
there could be flexibility to use these existing serosurveys in older children (>5 years as well as ≤5
years), especially if there is a long history and programmatic evidence of high sustained birth dose
and infant vaccination coverage (for example, in the WHO Region of the Americas and in western
Europe). This approach will capture the impact on both vertical and horizontal transmission.
The technical challenges of conducting a nationally representative biomarker survey can be

minimized by complementing it with other, more focused surveys that:
1) t arget high-risk geographical areas or subpopulations likely to have a higher prevalence

(for example, children from particular racial/ethnic groups or migrant communities);
2) a re based on programmatic indictors such as HepB3 and HepB-BD and prevalence in pregnant
women or women of reproductive age through multiphase methodology serosurveys (78,
79) (to reduce the required sample size and increase the power of the serosurvey to confirm
elimination); or
Annex 2. M
easurement of indicators and targets for validation of EMTCT of hepatitis B virus 65
3) integrate into existing national surveys for other disease areas (which are often performed using
dried blood spot testing), such as the Demographic and Health Surveys and AIDS Indicator Surveys.
For countries with a small population size, such as the islands in the Pacific, their size need not
be a hindrance to conducting a serosurvey to verify elimination, as it may be actually easier to
conduct the survey and validate elimination. A finite population correction (FPC) factor can be
calculated when estimating the required sample size. Even for verification of the control, an FPC
factor can be applied to generate the sample size (80, 81) .
A2.1.2. A dditional approach: measurement of the MTCT rate through follow-up

of HBV-exposed infants in settings using targeted timely HepB birth dose
vaccination
Measurement of the additional indicator and target of an MTCT rate of ≤2% may be indicated in
low-HBsAg prevalence countries (low both in the overall population and in ≤5-year-olds). Also, this
may be done in countries using targeted timely HepB-BD where there are subpopulations with still
high prevalence and so continuing vertical MTCT of HBV (for example, among Indigenous populations
or migrant populations from high-HBsAg prevalence countries). It may also be considered in settings
where population-based serosurveys may not be feasible.
The MTCT rate is calculated as the proportion of infants with CHB infection, that is, the number
of HBsAg-positive infants (numerator) among those infants exposed, that is, infants of HBsAg-
positive mothers (denominator). Calculation of this transmission rate requires both high-level
coverage (≥90%) of antenatal HBsAg testing to identify positive mothers and PVST of exposed
infants at 9–12 months of age to identify infected infants. Some countries, such as China,
recommend PVST at 7–9 months of age.
Thus, countries providing targeted timely HepB-BD will need to have strong data collection
systems and linkages between programmes in place to capture the data for calculation of the
transmission rates.
A2.2. U sing mathematical modelling alongside empirical data

to determine attainment of the elimination targets
Modelling is not a substitute for the collection of data, but it can be a tool for using existing
data to yield new insights and identify data gaps. Where national empirical data are of sufficient
quality and coverage, mathematical models1 using existing in-country data as well as previously
published literature may be useful to assess the progress of countries towards the achievement
of the impact targets for perinatal and horizontal HBV elimination. They can also be used to
project the potential impact of additional preventive (including immunization) and treatment
interventions for CHB infections on progress towards the 2030 targets.
To determine if a country has achieved elimination, modelling could be used in the following specific
applications:
• to set country-specific targets for programmatic coverage that can be used to guide a
strategic response.
• u sing programmatic data, to determine whether it is likely that elimination has been achieved
in any particular place. This could also inform the commissioning of a biomarker survey. The
general assumption is that, where global targets for programmatic coverage indicators have
been reached, it is also likely that elimination has been achieved. However, this assumption
relies, in turn, on assumptions made in the course of various modelling exercises that may not
apply to all epidemiological contexts. In addition, this methodology depends on high-quality
programmatic data and robust reporting systems.
• to establish whether measurement of the MTCT rate alone may be sufficient to establish
whether elimination has been achieved and whether measurement of MTCT may be converted
to an estimate of the likely incidence rate for the whole population.
• t o establish the required design of a biomarker survey and to convert a measure of HBV prevalence
into an estimate of the likely incidence rate for the whole population. The standards for the
calculation of these indicators for the EMTCT of HBV, comparable to the approach used by the
Spectrum model for HIV (82) , remain to be determined.
1 Mathematical models employed in the process should be independent and peer reviewed, as the regional validation task force will review inputs, assumptions, analysis
and outputs in detail during its review of the national validation report. In addition, the models used might vary across countries.
67
WEB ANNEXES
The following web annexes will be published in 2022. The current tools can be found at: https://
www.who.int/initiatives/triple-elimination-initiative-of-mother-to-child-transmission-of-hiv-
syphilis-and-hepatitis-b/validation/process-and-tools.
Web Annex A. C hecklist for preliminary assessment of EMTCT

validation
Web Annex B. C ongenital syphilis estimation tool
Web Annex C. I nitial validation or Path to Elimination report
template
Web Annex D. D ata assessment and verification tool
Web Annex E. L aboratory assessment and verification tool
Web Annex F. P rogramme assessment and verification tool
Web Annex G: Human rights, gender equality and community
engagement assessment and verification tool
Web Annex H. A nalysis guidance for human rights, gender equality
and community engagement in validation of EMTCT
Web Annex I. S ample case study form
Web Annex J. M
aintenance of validation or Path to Elimination
report template
For more information, contact:
World Health Organization

Department of HIV/AIDS
20, avenue Appia
1211 Geneva 27
Switzerland
E-mail: [email protected]
www.who.int/hiv

WHO 2021 PMCT Global Guideline

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

WHO 2021 PMCT Global Guideline

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

WHO 2021 PMCT Global Guideline

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

GUIDANCE

MONITORING AND EVALUATION

Dr. Meg Doherty,

ESSENTIAL WHO EMTCT RESOURCES

Triple elimination initiative of EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV

EMTCT validation processes and tools

Regional EMTCT websites

Pan American Health Organization

WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific

Essential complementary documents and guidance on validation of EMTCT of HIV,

Interim guidance for country validation of viral hepatitis elimination

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

ARV antiretroviral NASBA nucleic acid sequence-based

CHB chronic hepatitis B NVC national validation committee

CS congenital syphilis NVS national validation secretariat

CSF cerebrospinal fluid NVTF national validation task force

EID early infant diagnosis PAHO Pan American Health Organization

EMTCT elimination of mother-to-child PCR polymerase chain reaction

GIPA greater involvement of people RDT rapid diagnostic test

Elimination as a public health problem: Reduction of disease incidence, prevalence,

Exposed infants: Infants born to mothers with HIV, syphilis or HBV.

External quality assurance (EQA): Inter-laboratory comparison to determine if the testing

Policy: An institutional statement to guide the action of an institution or a sector in a particular

Quality assurance: Part of quality management focused on providing confidence among

Validation: An independent confirmation of elimination as a public health problem/threat that

Table 1. S ummary of impact and process/programmatic targets

Elimination targets HIV EMTCT Syphilis EMTCT HBV EMTCT

MTCT rate of HIV of <2% Additional target ≤2%

Box 1.1. Terminology

Interventions that contribute to the prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) of HIV,

1.2. T riple elimination of mother-to-child transmission and its

1.3. Standard criteria and processes

Box 1.2. What’s new in the third version

1.3.1. Revisions in criteria

In many of these countries, the high background prevalence of HIV-positive or syphilis-positive

1.3.2. Revisions in processes

2. RATIONALE FOR STANDARDIZED

2.2. Standardized criteria used in EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV

The following strategies are important components of successful elimination programmes:

3. INDICATORS AND TARGETS FOR

Table 3.1. Country options for applications for single, dual or

HIV Syphilis HBV

Box 3.1. Summary of required impact and process targets for

EMTCT PROCESS TARGETS

INFANT HBV VACCINATION

3.1. Impact indicators and targets for validation of EMTCT

• an HIV MTCT rate of <5% (breastfeeding populations) OR <2% (non-breastfeeding

Box 3.2. C alculation of population case rate and MTCT rate

(Annual new vertical HIV infections

The MTCT rate is calculated as:

Annual number of new HIV infections due to vertical transmission

Box 3.3. R ationale for use of a case rate of new paediatric

Acceptable methods of measuring impact indicators

• They miss women outside of the PMTCT programme.

Box 3.4. U sing and understanding Spectrum HIV estimates

box continued on next page

3.1.2. I mpact indicator and target for validation of EMTCT of syphilis

• a case rate of CS of ≤50 per 100 000 live births.

Box 3.5. R ationale for use of the surveillance case

A series of consultations convened by WHO, as discussed in The global elimination of

ARV antiretroviral NASBA nucleic acid sequence-based

EMTCT elimination of mother-to-child PCR polymerase chain reaction

GIPA greater involvement of people RDT rapid diagnostic test

Table 1. S ummary of impact and process/programmatic targets

Box 1.1. Terminology

1.2. T riple elimination of mother-to-child transmission and its

2.2. Standardized criteria used in EMTCT of HIV, syphilis and HBV

Table 3.1. Country options for applications for single, dual or

Box 3.1. Summary of required impact and process targets for

3.1. Impact indicators and targets for validation of EMTCT

Box 3.2. C alculation of population case rate and MTCT rate

Box 3.3. R ationale for use of a case rate of new paediatric

Box 3.4. U sing and understanding Spectrum HIV estimates

3.1.2. I mpact indicator and target for validation of EMTCT of syphilis

Box 3.5. R ationale for use of the surveillance case

Fig. 3.1. K ey strengths of the WHO Congenital Syphilis

3.1.3. Impact indicators and targets for validation of EMTCT of HBV

Box 3.7. I mpact targets for validation of EMTCT of HBV

Box 3.8. R ationale for HBV impact targets

Box 3.9. R ationale for HBV impact targets when provision of

3.2. P rocess indicators for validation of EMTCT of HIV, syphilis

Box 3.10. R ationale for maternal HIV and syphilis testing

Box 3.11. R ationale for use of the denominator of pregnant

Box 3.12. Rationale for HIV treatment coverage

Box 3.14. R ationale for programmatic targets for EMTCT

Box 4.1. Key requirements for data quality assessment

Box 4.2. K ey requirements for laboratory quality assessment

Box 4.3. K ey requirements for EMTCT programme assessment

4.3.1. Assessment of low-performing units and of subpopulations with lowest coverage

4.4. H uman rights, gender equality and community engagement

Box 4.4. K ey requirements for human rights, gender equality

Box 5.1. Country prevalence requirements for eligibility

Table 5.1. Prevalence requirements, indicators and targets for

Table 5.2. S cenarios of prevalence, indicators and targets