Paper 2 Markscheme
Paper 2 Markscheme
Paper 2 Markscheme
November 2021
Edexcel and BTEC qualifications are awarded by Pearson, the UK’s largest awarding body.
We provide a wide range of qualifications including academic, vocational, occupational and
specific programmes for employers. For further information visit our qualifications websites
at www.edexcel.com or www.btec.co.uk. Alternatively, you can get in touch with us using the
details on our contact us page at www.edexcel.com/contactus.
Pearson aspires to be the world’s leading learning company. Our aim is to help everyone
progress in their lives through education. We believe in every kind of learning, for all kinds
of people, wherever they are in the world. We’ve been involved in education for over 150
years, and by working across 70 countries, in 100 languages, we have built an international
reputation for our commitment to high standards and raising achievement through
innovation in education. Find out more about how we can help you and your students at:
www.pearson.com/uk
November 2021
Question Paper Log Number 66781
Publications Code 1GB0_02_2111_MS
All the material in this publication is copyright
© Pearson Education Ltd 2021
General Marking Guidance
More bedding planes/joints (1) so more access for water etc. (1)
Allow 736.1
Climate change has led to more extreme events which includes graeter
storminess (1) which delivers more rain in shorter periods leading to
flooding as ground becomes a saturated (1)
AO3 (4 marks)
• The general relationship is largely explained by the impact of altitude
on climate and the thermal growing season
• Exacerbated by poorer soils which are in many areas partly ..
• ..a function of their glacial history as in the Highlands of Scotland
and Wales
• Lowland densities reflect soil fertility at a local level but also
accessibility and human factors.
• These last include the impact of the industrial revolution and
accessibility
• Coastlines are also important for a trading nation
AO4 (4 marks)
• There is a close relationship between topography and population
density
• In all the >600metre areas population density is very low –
frequently between 0 and 0.2 per hectare
• That is also true for some (100 – 600 metres) lower altitudes e.g.
Dartmoor and Exmoor are clearly visible on the pop density map
• However, the relationship is not so clear at low altitudes and
certainly not at <100 metres
• There are many low latitude areas with minimal relief that have low
population density – examples are most obvious in East Anglia and
Lincolnshire
• Others have very high density
Level Mark Descriptor
0 No rewardable material.
(1+1) +
Increasing jobs in some sectors (1) because of inward (1+1)
investment e.g. Nissan, Tata (1)
One mark for correct result – one for legitimate working. (1+1)
It has changed the ethnic diversity of the city given contrasts (1+1+1)
with resident population (1) and so introduced many different +1
cultures (1) such as Brick Lane’s many changes over recent
years (1)
It has led to rapid population growth with many new arrivals (1)
leading to some strain on services (1) such as education and
transport (1)
AO4 (4 marks)
• South-east has largest footprint, especially transport
• Industrial and commercial very uneven across the regions
• North-east has high ind/comm but very low domestic and transport
• York and Humber has highest ind/commerce; nearly double its
domestic ‘footprint
• Ind and comm highest on 9 of these regions
• Transport highest in the other three; south-west and south-east and
west Midlands
• Some negatives/improvements i.e. creation of carbon sinks by land
use changes (forestry).
• Fall over time largely fuel changes in electricity generation
• Not much further tio go with these; see coal data
• Transport dominant user of oil
Level Mark Descriptor
0 No rewardable material.
It has some areas that are protected by groynes and others not
(1) allowing a comparison to be made (1)
The beach is roughly the same width at all three locations (1)
allowing a fair comparison of gradient and sediment (1)
There are groynes at two locations but not Profile 1 (1) which
allows a comparison to be made (1)
There is a wave cut platform below the cliff at the western end
of the map (1) suggesting that cliff erosion is reducing as the
cliff retreats (1)
AO3
• Census data is old -2011 so may not be reliable
• Evidence suggests that Area A is changing (graduates etc) –
maybe both studentification and gentrification
• Presence of university supports above idea(s) as does number of
‘professionals’
• Many inner cities have changed in recent years and 9/10 years
since Census data released
• We have no idea about the quality of the four-bed houses
• Many inner city houses large terraced houses maybe subdivided
• Conclusion is not reliable – ‘always’ an obvious problem
• Causation not tested = better environment because….
• Plausible that better environments attract better off people
• Only certain aspects of environment were measured by students in
their primary data so limited scope and thus conclusion is highly
partial
AO4
• Census data is mixed but Area A has much higher scores for
owner-occupation and 4-bedroomed houses
• Less of a difference in terms of professional jobs
• Area A much younger but also better qualified academically
• Area A has much more varied land-use
• Area B above national averages in all categories
• Area B appears to be commuter suburb
• Primary data is divided into five categories and all score better in
Area B
Level Mark Descriptor
0 No rewardable material.
AO3
• Census data is old -2011 so may not be reliable
• Evidence suggests that Village A is changing (graduates, elderly
etc) – maybe both second home owners and retirement
• Many coastal villages have changed in recent years and 9/10 years
since Census data released
• Presence of restaurants and bars relatively high number of
‘professionals’
• We have no idea about the quality of the four-bed houses
• Many older village houses may be large terraced houses, maybe
subdivided
• Conclusion is not reliable – ‘always’ an obvious problem
• Causation not tested = better environment because….
• Plausible that better environments attract better off people
• Only certain aspects of environment were measured by students in
their primary data so limited scope and thus conclusion is highly
partial
AO4
• Census data is mixed but Village A has much higher scores for
owner-occupation and 4-bedroomed houses
• Less of a difference in terms of professional jobs
• Village A much older but also better qualified academically
• Village A has much more varied land-use
• Village B above national averages in all categories
• Village B appears to be commuter community
• Contrasting services in the two locations – closure of pub and shop
in Village B
• Primary data is divided into five categories and all score better in
Village B
Level Mark Descriptor
0 No rewardable material.