Anti-Roll Bar Design and Material Selection For TH

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Published by : International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)

http://www.ijert.org ISSN: 2278-0181


Vol. 9 Issue 07, July-2020

Anti-Roll Bar Design and Material Selection for


the Torsion Member for A Formula Student
Vehicle
Dhruv Pathak
School of mechanical engineering,
Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology,
Bhubaneshwar, India

Abstract - The following study will be dealing with the design Roll Analysis - Here the first which needs to be calculated
procedure, constraints, and limitations that were dealt with is the COG height of the sprung mass.
during the design of the Anti-roll bar system of a formula which can be calculated using the following expression -
student vehicle. Also, simulations with proper forces for torsion Here, hs= sprung COG ht., h=COG ht., Wuf=Unsprung
on the torsional member to select the best possible material for
the torsion member was done.

Keywords- FSAE, Anti-roll bar, Roll, Formula student

INTRODUCTION –
Anti-roll bar sometime also known as a stabilizer bar or
sway bar is used for the purpose of controlling the roll
motion of the vehicle. It provides better stability during wt. Front,
corning. Roll motion referred as to the motion in the lateral RLf= Tire loaded radius(Static) front, Wur=Unsprung wt.
direction on the Y-axis during which the vehicle rolls around Rear
the central axis of the vehicle. RLr=Tire loaded radius(Static) Rear
Image Courtesy- RHD-JAPAN Sprung Wt. distribution = Sprung wt front/Total sprung
Anti- Rollbar increases overall roll stiffness of the vehicle, mass.
thus providing a number of advantages to the vehicle and its Rolling Moment (lever Arm) =
performance. ( Sprung mass cog ht.)-[Front Roll Centre ht+(Rear Roll
One of the major advantages is that it provides better traction Centre ht.-Front Roll Centre ht.)(1-sprung mass wt.
during cornering the vehicle. distribution)]
Rolling moment per g lateral acceleration =
METHOD USED –
The calculations were done in the following syntax -
RIDE RATES - ROLL ANALYSIS - ARB DIMENSIONS
AND MATERIAL SELECTION

Ride rates were calculated by first determining the desired


Natural frequencies of the front as well as rear but separately.
Here, Hrm= Rolling moment (lever arm) -------------
These values were chosen using the general values which
---- Calculated above
have validated after years of experimentation and
Now, dividing this value with the desired roll gradient will
observation.
give us the Roll Rate required(KΦ).
Natural frequency for the front suspension = 2 Hz
Roll gradient should be taken between 1.5 - 3deg/g for an fs
Natural frequency for the rear suspension = 2.5Hz
vehicle.
The reason behind aiming for higher natural frequency in the
rear is to compensate for the response delay, since its always
Now calculate available Front spring roll rate by using the
the front suspension which has to act first.
following expression -
Then, the ride rates were calculated for the front and rear
individually using the following expression-

Here, Krf= Ride Rate


front wF=Natural
Frequency Front
Wsf= Sprung mass
front

IJERTV9IS070675 www.ijert.org 1523


(This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.)
Published by : International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)
http://www.ijert.org ISSN: 2278-0181
Vol. 9 Issue 07, July-2020

Here, KΦsf = Front spring roll rate Multiply this with %load transfer X 100 to get front/rear
Krf = Ride rate front (calculated during ride analysis) load transfer.
Tf = Track width front Front Roll Stiffness (Kфf) =
Similarly, by using adequate value, the available rear spring
roll rate(KΦsr) can be determined.
Adding both the front and rear roll rates will give us the
total available roll rate.
So, arb must provide = Required roll rate - available roll
rate
Now, to size the front and rear bars, we need to calculate
this requirement based on the weight distribution of the
vehicle. Here, ф= Roll Gain ( 0.5 - 1 for non-aero fs vehicles)
From here, it can be calculated that the rear arb must provide

Here, TLT/Ay = Total load transfer during lateral the difference between the total, rear, and that provided by
acceleration. the rear springs.
Tave= Average of Front and Rear track width Kф(arb)rear = Kф - Kфf - Kфsr

IJERTV9IS070675 www.ijert.org 1524


(This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.)
Published by : International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)
http://www.ijert.org ISSN: 2278-0181
Vol. 9 Issue 07, July-2020

Divide this by the Linkage ratio(rear) to get the final


requirement.
For the front,
Kф(arb)front = (Kфf - Kфsf)/linkage ratio(front)
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION FOR THE METHOD
The whole calculation was done by preparing a spreadsheet
to facilitate the calculations. For which the results are
shown as followed -

It can be seen that the required stiffness for the rear comes
out to be negative, which symbolizes that the rear
suspension is stiff enough and does not require an arb
setup.

With dimensions OD= 35mm


MATERIAL SELECTION ID= 15mm
The following materials were considered-
Mild steel - AISI 1020 80 GPa shear CONCLUSION -
modulus Anti-roll bar torsion member with outer diameter of 35mm
Aluminum - AL-7075 T6 26.9 GPa shear and inner diameter 15mm was designed to provide roll
modulus stiffness of 760.4731927 Nm/mm.
Magnesium alloy - AZ31B 17 GPa shear modulus
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Although magnesium alloy provides great weight reduction Biswajit Sahoo, School of mechanical engineering, Kalinga
advantage it is expensive and also for the same thickness, Institute of Industrial Technology
withstands lower stress than aluminum. Chandraneel Pal, School of mechanical engineering,
Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology
After running simulations aluminum was considered as the Piyush Nanda, School of mechanical engineering, Kalinga
optimal choice as it provided enough durability, is Institute of Industrial Technology
lightweight, and cheaper than magnesium alloy. Softwares Used - CAD Modelling - Solidworks 2020
Simulation - Ansys R17.2
The size was determined by comparing the required area
moment of inertial to the area moment of inertia of the arb REFERENCES
system torsion bar with desired dimensions. Racecar vehicle dynamics, William F. Millikan; Douglas
Required area moment of inertia = [(Required Roll stiffness Millikan
X Length of tube)/Shear Modulus]
Area moment of inertia for cylindrical tube = [π(𝐷4 −
𝑑 4 )]/32
The following simulation was done by applying 650N on
both ends in torsion that sums up to 1300N in total.

IJERTV9IS070675 www.ijert.org 1525


(This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.)

You might also like