Gingival Recession - Causes and Management: Paul Baker
Gingival Recession - Causes and Management: Paul Baker
Gingival Recession - Causes and Management: Paul Baker
PAUL BAKER
Prim Dent J. 2019;8(4):40-47
Gingival Recession –
causes and management
ABSTRACT
Gingival recession of varying extent and severity is increasingly encountered
in general dental practice. This paper outlines the aetiology of recession and
discusses management strategies, both conservative and complex. It also
highlights when to intervene and what outcomes may be expected.
40 p r i m a r y d e n ta l j o u r n a l
a beagle dog study, which showed that
whilst there may be more clinical signs of
inflammation in sites without keratinised
tissue, the underlying histologic
inflammation was the same5. The current
belief is that treating for the sole purpose
of increasing the width of keratinised
tissue cannot be justified. The decision
to treat should be based on the status of
the tissues and the ability or not to control
inflammation.
42 p r i m a r y d e n ta l j o u r n a l
Figure 11: Recession extended Figure 12: An associated
to the depth of the vestibule fraenal attachment
Theoretically, movement in a lingual There are two key indications for resist further progression. Knowing if
direction could lead to a reduction active intervention, if the patient has this is the case is not straightforward.
in recession if the root surface is kept aesthetic concerns, or for the prevention Certainly, the presence of persistent
clean. What is more likely, however, of continued recession. Whilst inflammation would be a risk factor
is an improvement in the local tissue surgical procedures for root surface for progression, but there are no good
type to reduce the risk of recession coverage have been advocated for the predictors for whether the recession
progressing. If labial movement is management of persistent sensitivity or has reached a stable position or is
planned in a patient with a thin tissue shallow root caries, there are clearly likely to progress. Often recession sites
biotype, then supportive maintenance less aggressive ways to manage these need to be monitored. The taking and
and control of the local factors is conditions. recording of measurements, similar to
essential. If recession develops or measuring pocket depth, is an obvious
cannot be maintained, then orthodontic Resolution of inflammation way, allowing for comparison over a
movement should be stopped and and oral hygiene instruction period long enough to allow measurable
gingival grafting may be Whether monitoring, active change. Measuring recession in this
considered. management or complex treatment is way is remarkably subjective, and an
indicated, the first stage of treatment unreliable measurement over prolonged
It should also be remembered that is to try to achieve periodontal health. periods. Clinical photographs provide
fixed orthodontic treatment may This would include the removal of a better way to detect a true change.
be accompanied by the two main any local factors, such as calculus or
aetiological factors in the formation of restoration overhangs, followed by Management for
recession, plaque retention due to the providing oral hygiene instruction to the prevention of
orthodontic hardware, or the risk of ensure and maintain an adequate level continued recession
overcompensation and developing a of plaque control. In patients with a The decision to undertake surgical
more traumatic cleaning regime. thin tissue biotype who are prone to procedures to prevent continued gingival
recession, the tooth brushing technique recession should be based on concern
The management should be ‘effective, yet atraumatic’. This that the recession has resulted in an
of gingival recession may involve ensuring that the patient area that can no longer be maintained
By the nature of the local anatomy, does not ‘scrub’ across the gingiva. A by the patient. This may be because
most gingival recession is self-limiting. softer toothbrush or sensitive head may the recession has extended to the depth
As the recession progresses up the root be required, but patients should be of the vestibule, such as in Figure 11,
surface in the maxilla, or down in the reviewed to make sure that the plaque where the patient is unable to clean
mandible, the gingival tissues tend to is being adequately removed. The properly. Figure 12 shows an associated
become thicker and therefore more absence of marginal inflammation fraenal attachment making cleaning
resilient. The decision to intervene is should indicate a consistently good difficult. The gingival tissues may just
not a clear-cut one as there are no level of dental cleaning. prove too uncomfortable of difficult for
specific predictors of sites at risk of the patient to maintain adequately.
progressing. It is often reasonable to Monitoring
give preventive advice and considering As previously mentioned, gingival In situations such as this, the aim
monitoring for progress before deciding recession often progresses to a point of treatment is to produce a robust,
whether intervention is justified. where the soft tissues are able to preferably keratinised, thicker tissue
biotype that will allow the patient to sharp dissection (Figure 13b), then a
clean the area thoroughly. Coverage of matching sized piece of graft 1.5-2mm
the recession may be secondary factor thick is harvested from the plate (Figure
that is unimportant. Figure 13 outlines 13c). This is then secured in place and
the stages involved in a free gingival allowed to heal (Figure 13d). In the
graft in an orthodontic patient with immediate post-operative period, the
significant localised recession. A free graft survives by ‘plasmatic circulation’,
graft is one that has been removed from diffusion of the nutrients from the
its blood supply and transferred to a underlying recipient bed. Areas of graft
remote site. A recipient site is prepared over the root surface will not receive
locally by means of a split thickness much in the way of nutrients and risk
44 p r i m a r y d e n ta l j o u r n a l
becoming necrotic. For this reason, and smile line play a role in whether
free gingival grafts are excellent for this is noticeable. The ability to cover
producing attached, keratinised tissue recession depends on how much
apical to the recession, and creating interproximal tissue loss has occurred.
a thick, robust tissue type (Figure 13e); There are still no techniques that can
they are not good for achieving root predictably recreate lost interdental
surface coverage. papillae, but our ability to cover labial
recession is also dependent on their
This is one of a number of techniques being good interproximal tissues.
that can be used but it is out of the
scope of this article to explain the When choosing a suitable technique
decision-making process. Where for aesthetic recession coverage, the
the tissues are more robust, other decision will be based on achieving
techniques may provide the coverage a predictable high percentage of
needed to replace the tissue that post-operative root surface coverage
has been lost and produce a better and a good tissue match for colour
aesthetic result. Figure 14 shows a and consistency. For this reason,
tunnel procedure, which undermines pedicle flaps are more likely to be
the adjacent tissue to allow it to be the procedure of choice. Pedicle
moved, being used in conjunction flaps are raised from the adjacent
with a connective tissue graft. tissue and retain a blood supply to
improve the healing. Figure 15 shows
Recession coverage a coronally positioned flap being
for aesthetics raised and coronally moved down
Patients may find gingival recession the tooth to give an aesthetically
aesthetically unacceptable for a variety satisfactory result. Coronally
of reasons. Generalised labial recession positioned flaps are often used in
can create unnaturally long looking conjunction with a connective tissue
teeth, or expose root surfaces that can graft sandwiched underneath to
be of different colour to the crown of improve the tissue quality. Pedicle flap
the tooth. Recession can affect teeth to procedures can also be used to cover
varying degrees causing asymmetry. multiple recession defects in a single
Of course, the patient’s lip line at rest procedure, as shown in Figure 16.
FGDP
Membe (UK)
5
rs rec
0% of eive
Dementia-Friendly all ou
r
and gu
f
stand
ards
public idance
Dentistry
ations
available now
in print & online
Offering clear, evidence-based and practical information for dental
professionals and other care providers, the new book contains more
than 50 recommendations for practitioners, categorised using the
FGDP(UK)’s ‘ABC’ grading system.
“Dentists have a crucial role to play in the community for people with dementia.
These guidelines are an important step to helping more people live well with their condition,
and we hope that dentists across the UK will put them into practice” Alzheimer’s Society
46 p r i m a r y d e n ta l j o u r n a l
Where the interproximal tissue loss is times, however, where gingival recession
more extensive, periodontal surgery can progress to a point where tooth loss
cannot improve it. If resin composite will occur or periodontal pocketing will
restorations can be placed to improve start to progress apically or laterally.
the aesthetic aspect, they must be done Timely intervention can often prevent
in a way that does not inhibit oral this. Clinicians should be able to assess
hygiene, as this is likely to exacerbate the presence of recession and whether
the gingival issue. In extreme cases, the marginal inflammation can be
a gingival veneer can be provided, controlled. Where there is uncertainty
either in acrylic or silicone, to give or concern, referral to a periodontics
the patient an aesthetically pleasing specialist, or a periodontics or restorative
prosthetic solution (Figure 18). dentistry consultant may be appropriate.
references extent of gingival recession. between the width of keratinized to mechanical non-surgical
J Periodontol. 1992 Jun;63(6):489-95. gingiva and gingival health. therapy: a review. J Periodontol.
1 Proceedings of the 1996 World 3 Rupprecht RD., Horning GM, Nicoll J Periodontol. 1972;43(10):623-7. 1992 Feb;63(2):118-30.
Workshop in Periodontics. Ann BK, Cohen ME. Prevalence of 5 Wennstrom J, Lindhe J, Role of 7 Gargiulo AW, Wentz FM, Orban
Periodontol. 1996 Nov;1(1):1-947. dehiscences and fenestrations attached gingiva for maintenance B. Dimensions and relations of the
2 Löe H, Anerud A, Boysen H. The in modern American skulls. of periodontal health, J Clin Dent. dentogingival junction in humans.
natural history of periodontal disease J Periodontol. 2001;72(6):722-729. 1883;10(2):206-221. J Periodontol. 1961;32:261-7.
in man: prevalence, severity, and 4 Lang NP, Löe H. The relationship 6 Greenstein G. Periodontal response