Peer Review Form For Reaction Essay

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Peer Review Form for Reaction Essay

Reviewer's Name_________________________ Writer's Name___________________


This peer review form is derived from the rubric your instructor will use to grade your
argumentative essay. Be sure to address each of the main categories listed on the form.

3 2 1 0
INTRODUCTION Introduction is concise Introduction introduces Introduction Introduction does not
Hook/ Background and catches the reader's topic but is does not attempts to introduce topic. The
information /Thesis statement attention. The entice the reader to introduce topic. background information
background read on. The Following sentences include the
(10) information sentences background points are not title, the author, and the
includes the title, the information sentences obvious. The general subject of the
author, and the general include most of the background reading. Thesis and/or
information of the following: the title, the information the theme is vague or
reading. author, and the general sentences do unclear.
. Thesis clearly states a subject of the reading. not include the
significant and Thesis clearly states the title, the author,
compelling theme. thesis. and the general
subject of the
reading. Thesis
states the
theme.
Does the essay include these three items in the introductory paragraph:

• Hook
• background information:
a summary to help the reader to understand what happened in the story.
a Sentence including the title, author, and the publication.
• a clear thesis statement stating the theme

3 2 1 0
Paragraph begins with Paragraph begins with Paragraph No supporting points or
Body Paragraphs a topic sentence that is a topic sentence that begins with a details are provided.
Topic sentence, Supporting related the story’s that is related the topic sentence Conclusion does not
sentences theme. Details are story’s theme. Details that is related summarize main points.
Conclusion included and fully are included, but may the story’s Commentary is not
support not fully support theme. Details present.
(20) points. Conclusion points.. Conclusion are inadequate
effectively wraps up effectively summarizes or are not
and goes beyond topics. Commentary is strong enough
restating the present. to support the
thesis. Commentary is topic.
logical, and well Conclusion is
thought out. not adequate in
summarizing
main points.
Commentary is
in adequate .
• Does the following Body paragraphs contain:
• a topic sentence with a detailed supporting information
• a conclusion summarizing the paper's main points
• Writer’s point of view are included in conclusion

Dr.Reem Aloud
3 2 1 0
ORGANIZATION Logical progression of Logical progression of Organization is No discernable
Structure ideas with a clear ideas. Transitions are clear. Transitions organization. Transitions
Transitions structure that enhances present equally throughout are present. are not present.
the thesis. Transitions essay.
(10) are mature and graceful.

• is the organizational pattern clear?

Comments:
3 2 1 0

MECHANICS AND Writing is smooth, Writing is clear and Writing is clear, Writing is confusing, hard to
STYLE skillful, sentences have varied but sentences may follow. Contains fragments
Sentence flow, variety coherent. Sentences are structure. Diction is lack and/or run-on sentences.
Diction strong and expressive consistent. Punctuation, variety. Diction is Inappropriate diction.
Spelling, punctuation, with varied structure. spelling, capitalization are appropriate. A Distracting errors in
capitalization Diction is consistent generally correct, with few few errors in punctuation, spelling,
and words well errors. (1-2) punctuation, capitalization.
(20) chosen. Punctuation, spelling,
spelling, capitalization capitalization. (3-
are correct. No errors 4)
in grammar.
Circle the grammatical, punctuation, capitalization, and spelling errors

Overall, what is good about the essay?

What needs more work?

Dr.Reem Aloud

You might also like