Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 79 views

    What Is Systemic-Functional Linguistics?: The Theory

    Uploaded by

    Mourad English

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    What Is Systemic-Functional Linguistics?: The Theory

    Uploaded by

    Mourad English
    79 views3 pages

    Original Title

    Defining SFL

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    79 views3 pages

    What Is Systemic-Functional Linguistics?: The Theory

    Uploaded by

    Mourad English

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 3

    What is Systemic-Functional Linguistics?

    For a good introductory article by Matthiessen and Halliday, see: here.

    Other introductory descriptions are available:

    Some notes on Systemic-Functional linguistics, by Carol A. Chapelle


    Systemic Functional Theory. From the Systemic Modelling Group at Macquarie University.
    Annabelle Lukin's Lectures introducing Systemic Functional Grammar.

    The Theory

    Systemic-Functional Linguistics (SFL) is a theory of language centred around the notion of language function.
    While SFL accounts for the syntactic structure of language, it places the function of language as central (what
    language does, and how it does it), in preference to more structural approaches, which place the elements of
    language and their combinations as central. SFL starts at social context, and looks at how language both acts
    upon, and is constrained by, this social context.

    A central notion is 'stratification', such that language is analysed in terms of four strata: Context, Semantics,
    Lexico-Grammar and Phonology-Graphology.

    Context concerns the Field (what is going on), Tenor (the social roles and relationships between the
    participants), and the Mode (aspects of the channel of communication, e.g., monologic/dialogic,
    spoken/written, +/- visual-contact, etc.).

    Systemic semantics includes what is usually called 'pragmatics'. Semantics is divided into three components:

    Ideational Semantics (the propositional content);

    Interpersonal Semantics (concerned with speech-function, exchange structure, expression of attitude,


    etc.);

    Textual Semantics (how the text is structured as a message, e.g., theme-structure, given/new,
    rhetorical structure etc.

    The Lexico-Grammar concerns the syntactic organisation of words into utterances. Even here, a functional
    approach is taken, involving analysis of the utterance in terms of roles such as Actor, Agent/Medium, Theme,
    Mood, etc. (See Halliday 1994 for full description).

    Formalism

    Central to SFL is the use of 'system networks', an inheritance network used to represent the choices present
    in making an utterance. The 'choices' in this network are called 'features'. e.g., a simplified lexico-
    grammatical network.

    The choices on each stratum are constrained by those on others. Thus the decision to use a nominal-group
    (= noun-phrase), rather than a clause, to express a semantic 'process' will be determined by both the textual
    /
    structure of the text as a whole, and also by the social context (e.g., nominalisation is more functional in a
    science text than in casual conversation).

    Each feature is also associated witht the structural consequences of that choice, e.g., the feature 'finite'
    might have realisations: +Subject; +Finite; Subject: [nominal-group]; Finite: [finite-verb], meaning a
    Subject and Finite element are required, the Subject is filled by a nominal group, and the Finite by a finite-
    verb. Further selections in the clause network will more tightly constrain the fillers of these roles, and specify
    the presence, fillers, and ordering of these elements. E.g.,

    History of Systemics

    SFL grew out of the work of JR Firth, a British linguist of the 30s, 40s, and 50s, but was mainly developed by
    his MAK Halliday, who studied under him. He developed the theory in the early sixties (seminal paper,
    Halliday 1961), based in England, and moved to Australia in the Seventies, establishing the department of
    linguistics at the University of Sydney. Through his teaching there, SFL has spread to a number of institutions
    throughout Australia, and around the world. Australian Systemics ('Australian Genre Theory'), developed by
    Jim Martin, Joan Rothery, Fran Christie and others, is especially influential in areas of language education.
    Another school centres around Macquarie University where Ruqaiya Hasan was based.

    SFL teaching and research also continued in the UK, with main proponents including Margaret Berry, Dick
    Hudson (before moving on), Chris Butler, Robin Fawcett, and many others. A second generation has evolved,
    including Geoff Thompson (Liverpool) and Tom Bartlett (Cardiff),

    Another branch was established in Toronto, Canada, under Michael Gregory (a British colleague of Halliday),
    and later Jim Benson, Michael Cummings, and Bill Greaves.

    Christian Matthiessen has become one of the leading figures in the field, and is now in Hong Kong.

    SFL teaching is now taught around the globe (click here for details).

    Child Language Development

    Some of Halliday's early work involved the study of his son's developing language abilities. This study in fact
    has had a substantial influence on the present systemic model of adult language, particularly in regard to the
    /
    metafunctions. This work has been followed by other child language development work, especially that of
    Clare Painter. Ruqaia Hasan has also performed studies of interactions between children and mothers. See an
    attached annotated bibliographyby Peter Fries.

    Systemics & Computation

    SFL has been prominent in computational linguistics, especially in Natural Language Generation (NLG).
    Penman, an NLG system started at Information Sciences Institute in 1980, is one of the three main such
    systems, and has influenced much of the work in the field. John Bateman (currently in Bremen, Germany)
    has extended this system into a multilingual text generator, KPML. Robin Fawcett in Cardiff have developed
    another systemic generator, called Genesys. Mick O'Donnell has developed yet another system, called WAG.
    Numerous other systems have been built using Systemic grammar, either in whole or in part.

    One of the earliest and best-known parsing systems is Winograd's SHRDLU, which uses system networks and
    grammar as a central component. Since then, several systems have been developed using SFL (e.g., Kasper,
    O'Donnell, O'Donoghue, Cummings, Weerasinghe), although this work hasn't been as central to the field as
    that in NLG.

    References

    Halliday, M.A.K. 1961. Categories of the theory of grammar. Word 17. Reprinted in Bertil Malmberg (ed), .... .
    Abridged version in Halliday (1976).

    Halliday, M.A.K. 1994 Introduction to Functional Grammar, Second Edition, London: Edward Arnold.

    Martin, James R. 1992 English Text: system and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    You might also like