Grund - Et - Al. 2019 Jicable Proceedings C3 6 Integral Sensing of HV Cable Joints
Grund - Et - Al. 2019 Jicable Proceedings C3 6 Integral Sensing of HV Cable Joints
Grund - Et - Al. 2019 Jicable Proceedings C3 6 Integral Sensing of HV Cable Joints
Integral sensing of HV cable joints – monitor operation and predict failures early
Ruben GRUND, Jens HOHLOCH; Pfisterer, (Germany/Switzerland), [email protected],
[email protected]
Rosalie ROGERS, Anja KAMMLER, Clemens POHL; AP Sensing (United Kingdom/Germany),
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Henrik ROLAND; Energinet, (Denmark), [email protected]
The second key result from the data analysis is being able
to identify correctly when and where the hipot tests are
taking place. Figure shows the start and end times of the
hipot test represented by two white horizontal lines.
From this figure, the FOC outside the joint shows higher
levels of noise in frequencies of 80 Hz and above compared
to the internal FOC. Additionally, the external FOC shows
no clear difference between the strain-frequency response
before and during the hipot test.
Comparatively, the FOC inside the joint demonstrates
notably less noise compared to the external FOC at both
low and high frequencies. Secondly, there is a clear
spectral difference between the strain-frequency response
before and during the hipot test, as during the test the
signal was approximately 5 dB higher at low frequencies
and showed a sharp increase of approximately 30–40 dB
at 40–45 Hz.
The final finding from the DAS data analysis is that all
successful hipot tests produced the same frequency levels
which are only present during the hipot test. Figure 1 below
illustrates this by showing strain-frequency data for the
FOC running inside the second joint (L2) and the third joint Figure 12: Strain-frequency for FOC inside joints.
(L3). Data for both before and during the hipot tests for both
circuit phases were analysed to enable a direct comparison
between the different frequencies produced. Both hipot DTS
tests on either circuit phase showed an increase to 70 dB The temperature measurements by the DTS didn’t show
around 40-45 Hz. This frequency is not present when there any temperature variations during the hipot tests, neither
is no hipot test happening for either joint, concluding that on the fibre running in parallel to the power cable nor on the
this is due to the hipot tests. Additionally, this is very similar fibre installed directly in the three Smart Joints. This was
to the expected frequency to be produced which is 44 Hz. more or less expected as a hipot test applies only voltage
Figure 12 shows the same graph but zoomed in to the area on a power cable, no load. Below, Figure 3 shows the
of interest, showing that the DAS detects frequencies of 44 measurement results from the fibre directly installed inside
Hz which was expected. the Smart Joints. The variations at the beginning and at the
end are from the feeding fibre lengths and coming from
changing ambient temperatures. There is no temperature
change due to no load. In real operation temperature
increase are to be expected in relation to the load condition.
At the point of the hipot tests, the cable was not in
operation.
REFERENCES
[1] IEC 60840, Ed. 4.0, 2011, “Power cables with extruded
insulation and their accessories for rated voltages
above 30 kV (Um = 36 kV) up to 150 kV (Um = 170 kV)
– Test methods and requirements”
[2] IEC 62067, Ed. 2.0, 2011, “Power cables with extruded
insulation and their accessories for rated voltages
above 150 kV (Um = 170 kV) up to 500 kV (Um = 550
kV) – Test methods and requirements”
[3] IEC 61238, Ed. 1.0, 2018, “Compression and
mechanical connectors for power cables”
[4] Zhengqing Pan, Kezhen Liang, Qing Ye, Haiwen Cai,
Figure 13: DTS measurements from FOC inside joints. Ronghui Qu, Zujie Fang, "Phase-sensitive OTDR
system based on digital coherent detection," Proc.
SPIE 8311, Optical Sensors and Biophotonics III,
83110S (29 November 2011)
CONCLUSIONS
[5] Cao, C., Fan, X. Y., Liu, Q. W., & He, Z. Y. (2015).
Usually FOCs for acoustic and thermal measurements are “Practical Pattern Recognition System for Distributed
laid parallel to cables, but cable accessories are not Optical Fiber Intrusion Monitoring System Based on
included. In a pilot project now some cable joints were Phase-Sensitive Coherent OTDR” Asia
included. During the commissioning test several Communications and Photonics Conference 2015,
measurements and comparisons were carried out, which ASu2A.145.
show promising results. Since the main purpose of the https://doi.org/10.1364/ACPC.2015.ASu2A.145
commissioning test is to prove a certain withstand level of [6] G. Cedilnik, G. Lees, P. E. Schmidt, S. Herstrøm and T.
the electrical insulation, high AC voltage is applied but no Geisler, "Pushing the Reach of Fiber Distributed
power is transmitted. Therefore no significant current flows Acoustic Sensing to 125 km Without the Use of
and no significant thermal effects are to be expected. Thus, Amplification," in IEEE Sensors Letters, vol. 3, no. 3,
further investigations of the DAS and DTS measuring pp. 1-4 (March 2019)
system must be carried out under different (including
extreme) load conditions.
The value of injoint monitoring have been proven by
comparing external FOC and internal FOC both during
hipot testing and without test voltages. There is a clear
advantage in having the FOC inside the joint from a data
analysis point of view, as temperatures and cable faults can
be more accurately located. Additionally, it is possible to
detect hipot tests from frequencies alone, as they are
expected to produce a frequency of around 44 Hz which is
evident from the data analysis. We have sensitive detection
means as well as potential to create an early warning
system for degrading joints, this is to be proven and will be
completed in future projects.