03 Task Performance 1
03 Task Performance 1
03 Task Performance 1
ACTIVITY
Innovative MCI Unit Finds Culture Shock in Colorado Springs
Convinced that a spectacular setting of a new location for his business would inspire his workers, Richard
Liebhaber figured “build it, and they will come.” In 1991, the chief technology officer of MCI
Communications Corp. decided to relocate MCI’s brain trust—the 4,000-employee Systems Engineering
division that created numerous breakthrough products—from MCI’s Washington, D.C., headquarters to
Colorado Springs. An avid skier, he believed the mountains, low crime rate, healthy climate, and rock-
bottom real-estate prices would be “a magnet for the best and brightest” computer software engineers.
He rejected warnings from at least half a dozen senior executives that Colorado Springs’ isolated and
politically conservative setting would actually repel the extensive, ethnically diverse engineers MCI hoped
to attract. Mr. Liebhaber argued that new hires would jump at the chance to live in ski country, while
veterans would stay longer, reducing MCI’s more than 15% annual turnover rate in Washington. The
move, he contended, would also save money by cutting MCI’s facilities, labor, and recruiting costs.
Besides, four other high-tech companies—including Digital Equipment Corp. and Apple Computer Inc.—
had recently moved there. “One of the things that gave me more comfort was the fact that these other
guys had selected Colorado Springs,” Mr. Liebhaber says. He was mistaken. While many rank-and files MCI
employees were retained by generous relocation packages, after making the move, numerous key
executives and engineers, and hundreds of the divisions 51% minority population, said no, or fled
Colorado Springs soon after relocating.
“It was like living in a loaf of Wonder Bread,” says James Finucane MCI’s top engineer until he took a job
with a competitor back east in 1994. “There’s no culture, no diversity, no research university, no vitality or
resiliency to the job market.” The move isolated MCI’s engineers from top management and marketing
colleagues at headquarters, undermining the spontaneous collaborations that had generated some of the
company’s most innovative products. Meanwhile, the professionals Mr. Liebhaber hoped to recruit more
engineers, pushing the move’s total cost to about $200 million or 10 billion pesos—far more than MCI
officials anticipated. “Most of the savings we had hoped for never materialized,” says Leroy Pingho, a
senior executive who oversaw the relocation.
When the move was announced, many rank-and-file workers were enthusiastic. MCI’s relocation policy
paid for every expense imaginable. Costing an average of $100,000 or five (5) million pesos per employee,
it included up to six (6) months of temporary housing and living expenses, private-school tuition for
workers’ children and a full month’s pay for miscellaneous expenses. And there were exceptional housing
bargains. Thousands of workers—far more than Mr. Liebhaber expected—took advantage of the offer,
undercutting his plans to recruit lower cost employees in Colorado. But there was far less enthusiasm
among senior managers. James Zucco, Mr. Ditchfield’s successor and the head of Systems Engineering,
stayed behind and eventually left to join AT&T Corp. Also staying put was Gary Wiesenborn, the division’s
No. 2 executive, who later moved to Bell Atlantic Corp. Mr. Pingho, who oversaw the division’s financial
planning and budgeting, declined to move and quit in 1993. There was also significant fallout among the
division’s minority population. Although MCI declines to provide specific numbers, it confirms there was
a reduction. According to former employees who had access to Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission data, there were roughly 1,300 African-Americans on Systems Engineering’s staff and a
combined 700 Asians and Hispanics before the relocation. Since the relocation, minority representation
has been cut almost in half, to about 600 African-Americans and a combined 500 Asians and Hispanics. “It
was a disaster for diversity,” Mr. Ditchfield says. But MCI officials say that despite the reduction, its
Colorado division is still more ethnically diverse than other local companies.
Use the suggested outline below in answering the case study following the correct formats.
Font Calibri
Font size 12
Margins 1”
Line spacing Double space
I. Background
a. It must include a brief summary of the case study.
II. Statement of the Problem
a. What is/are the available location planning option/s for MCI Communications Corp.?
b. What is/are the risk/s associated in the location decision of MCI Communications Corp.?
c. What is/are the consideration/s of MCI Communications Corp. in choosing a business
location, based on the general procedure for making location decisions?
d. How will MCI Communications Corp. avoid its organizational problem by choosing a
different option for location planning?
III. Areas of Consideration
a. It must include details and facts from the case, which support the answers to the first,
second, and third question under the statement of the problem.
IV. Alternative Courses of Action
a. It must contain at least two (2) courses of action, which answer the fourth question under
the statement of the problem. It must also present the advantages and disadvantages of
each course of action.
V. Recommendation
a. It must present the best course of action among the presented alternatives.
VI. Management Lessons Learned
a. It must discuss the personal learnings or takeaways from the case study.
Reference:
Stevenson, W. (2012). Operations management (11th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.