1 Chapter 6 The Practice of Pre-Therapy: Behavioral Expression

1 Chapter 6 The Practice of Pre-Therapy ....................................................................................
1
1.1 PRACTICE OBSERVATIONS........................................................................................1
2 PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTACT ........................................................................................... 13
1 Chapter 6 The Practice of Pre-Therapy
Thus far, I have described Pre-Therapy in terms of philosophical psychology and as a theoretical
system. This chapter will focus on clinical practice, presenting materials from the treatment of
schizophrenics and mentally retarded/dual-diagnosed clients.
1.1 PRACTICE OBSERVATIONS
Pietrzak notes that for Pre-Therapy, the "techniques are simple, but the practice is difficult." 1 These
practice observations are added to the techniques to enhance their usage.
Since Rogers emphasizes empathy as one of the core conditions, Pre-Therapy emphasizes
"empathic contact." However, this empathic contact has a different focus than the client's frame of
reference. The focus of empathy is the client's regressed, incoherent efforts at pre-expressive
communication. The therapist does not know the client's frame of reference. The empathy is for the
client's effort at developing coherent experience and expression, perhaps a form of concretizing the
self-formative tendency during these primitive phases of therapy.
A second level of empathy concerns the concreteness of pre-expressive behavior. The contact
reflections need to be extraordinarily concrete. They are not focused on the generalized "essence" of
meaning, but on the literal expressive behavior. The empathy is for the concrete particularity of
behavioral expression.
A third level of empathy concerns the increase of psychotic expression as a function of Pre-
Therapy. The client needs to get worse before she can get better. The therapist needs to be empathic
to an increase in delusional and hallucinatory expression, as well as to an increase in bizarre
communication (strange body postures, language disturbances, etc.). This means being empathic to
the lived experience of the psychosis itself. This is, of course, the opposite of behavioral or
chemical management.
Other empathic concerns involve temporality and spatiality ( Binswanger, 1958). Often, experiences
of time and space are altered. One client reports being terrified of time stopping. Another client
reports being horrified by her experience of a room shrinking. The phenomenology of time is
slowed during depression and accelerated for manic episodes. The spatial phenomenology is often
altered in hallucinatory states because the hallucination occupies a literal space ( Havens, 1962).
Empathy for temporal and spatial experience is very important in approaching chronic regressed
clients. Very often they are frightened of contact. Spatiality becomes a sensitive dimension. One
forward step too close can be overwhelming and disrupt relationship formation.
The tempo of contact is also a sensitive dimension. Rapidly given reflections may overwhelm the
client. Multiple reflections, given at one time, can also alienate the client. Conversely, too few
reflections, expressed too slowly, may cause the loss of contact. It is important to understand that
D:\A_Healing081808\PracticeofPreTherapy.doc 1 of 29
Created with Print2PDF. To remove this line, buy a license at: http://www.software602.com/
the therapist is entering a phenomenological "world" and that one needs to be empathic to the
experiential structures of that world.
CLIENTS
The first case history concerns a young, catatonic, schizophrenic male who had been treated with
electro-shocks, as well as multiple chemical interventions. The treatment vignette is drawn from a
12-hour period during which the therapist was able to restore verbal communication.
The second case history involves a mentally retarded, schizophrenic young woman. The description
is about the resolution of a psychotic episode and presents Pre-Therapy as a form of crisis
intervention.
The third case is about an institutionalized, severely retarded young man who was also diagnosed as
depressed. Although the case did not evolve into psychotherapy, as we classically understand it,
improvements were sufficient to maximize institutional services. This illustrates another application
of Pre-Therapy.
CATATONIA
Prouty and Kubiak ( 1988a) describe the application of Pre-Therapy to a catatonic schizophrenic
client. 2 The client was a 22-yearold Caucasian male who had had several hospitalizations.
Vignette
The client was one of 13 children. His parents were farmers of Polish ethnicity. His mother had
been hospitalized several times for schizophrenic problems. Family observation revealed at least
one sibling who, although not hospitalized, displayed psychotic symptoms. The family brought the
client to the United States for evaluation. A preliminary observation confirmed that the client was
potentially responsive to Pre-Therapy.
According to psychiatric documents, the client had been described as: "mute," "autistic,"
"catatonic," "making no eye contact," "exhibiting trance-like behavior," "stuporous," "confused,"
"not establishing rapport," "delusional," "paranoid," and finally, "experiencing severe thought
blocking."
He had been diagnosed variously as: manic-depressive, hysterical reaction, hebephrenic

schizophrenic, paranoid schizophrenic, catatonic schizophrenic, profound schizophrenic,
schizophrenic, affective type. He had received six electro-shock treatments, as well as numerous
chemical interventions including Stelazine, Diazepam, Imipramine, Chlorpromazine, Anafranil,
Phenothiazine, Haldol, and Trifluoperazine.
The client was returned to his home for several months while plans for residential care and legal
details were arranged. My associate therapist arrived and found that the client, kept at home for
several months, had deteriorated into psychosis. The parents had not rehospitalized him. He was in
a severe catatonic state, having withdrawn to the lower portion of the three-story home. He did not
eat meals with the family, only creeping out at night to use the family refrigerator. He had lost
considerable weight and his feet were blue from being cramped and stiffened due to his lack of
movement and circulation.
The contact work. This vignette describes segments of a 12-hour process that illustrates the
application of contact reflections, the successful resolution of the catatonic state, and the
development of communicative contact (without medication).
The patient was sitting on a long couch, very rigid, with arms outstretched and even with his
shoulders. His eyes were straight ahead, his face was mask-like, and his hands and feet were
bluegray.
The therapist sat on the opposite side of the couch, giving no eye contact to the patient. Reflections
were given five to ten minutes apart.
Segment I (approximately 2:00 P.M.)

Therapist: SR I can hear the children playing.
Therapist: SR It is very cool down here.
Therapist: SR I can hear people talking in the kitchen.
Therapist: SR I'm sitting with you in the lower level of your house.
Therapist: SR I can hear the dog barking.
Therapist: BR Your body is very rigid.
Therapist: BR You are sitting very still.
Therapist: BR You are looking straight ahead.
You are sitting on the couch in a very upright posi-
Therapist: BR
tion.
Therapist: BR Your body isn't moving. Your arms are in the air.
Client: [No response, no movement.]
She brought a chair and sat in it directly in front of the patient and mirrored his body exactly as she
saw it.
Segment II (approximately 3:30 P.M.)

Your body is very rigid. You are sitting on the couch
Therapist: BR
and not moving.
(approximately 15-20 minutes later)
I can no longer hold my arms outstretched. My arms
Therapist:
are tired.
Client: [No response, no movement.]
Therapist: BR Your body is very stiff.
Therapist: BR Your arms are outstretched.
Therapist: BR Your body isn't moving.
[Put his hands on his head, as if to hold his head, and
Client:
spoke in a barely audible whisper.] My head hurts
Segment II (approximately 3:30 P.M.)
me when my father speaks.
Therapist: WWR My head hurts me when my father speaks.
Therapist: BR [Therapist put her hands as if to hold her head.]
Therapist: RR/WW My head hurts when my father speaks.
Client: [Continued to hold head for two to three hours.]
(approximately 8:00 P.M.)

Segment III
It's evening. We are in the lower level of your home.
Therapist: SR
Therapist: BR Your hands are holding your head.
Therapist: RR/WW My head hurts when my father speaks.
[Immediately dropped his hands to his knees and
Client:
looked directly into therapist's eyes.]
You've taken your hands from your head and placed
Therapist: BR them on your knees.
You are looking right into my eyes.
Client: [Sat motionless for hours.]
You dropped your hands from your head to your
Therapist: RR/BR
knees.
Therapist: SR You are looking straight into my eyes
[Immediately, he speaks in a barely audible whisper.]
Client:
Priests are devils.
Therapist: WWR Priests are devils.
Therapist: BR Your hands are on your knees
Therapist: SR You are looking right into my eyes.
[He speaks in a barely audible whisper.] My brothers
Client:
can't forgive me.
Therapist: WWR My brothers can't forgive me.
Client: [Sat motionless for approximately an hour.]
Segment IV (approximately 1:45 A.M.)
Therapist: SR It is very quiet.
Therapist: SR You are in the lower level of the house.
Therapist: SR It is evening.
[Immediately, in slow motion, put his hand over his
Client:
heart and talks.] My heart is wooden.
Therapist: BR/WW In slow motion, put her hand over her heart and
Segment IV (approximately 1:45 A.M.)
talks.] My heart is wooden.
Client: [Feet start to move.]
Therapists: BR Your feet are starting to move.
Client: [More eye movement.]
The therapist took the patient's hand and lifted him to stand. They began to walk. The patient
walked with the therapist around the farm and in a normal conversational mode spoke about the
different animals. He brought the therapist to newborn puppies and lifted one to hold. The client had
good eye contact. The client continued to maintain communicative contact over the next four days
and was able to transfer planes and negotiate with Customs officers on the way to the United States.
He was able to sign himself into the residential treatment facility, where he underwent classical
Person-Centered/Experiential psychotherapy.
This vignette illustrates the function of Pre-Therapy, which is to restore the client's psychological
contact enabling treatment. Very clearly, this client's reality and communicative contact were
improved sufficiently to enter psychotherapy.
-54-
Pre-Expressive Verbal Communication
It should be reported that apparently meaningless statements, in the psychotic processing, proved to
be very germane to the etiology of the psychosis.
"My head hurts when my father speaks": This statement became clarified when anger about
physical and emotional abuse emerged in therapy.
"Priests are devils": This meaning became clearer when it was discovered that the family priest
made homosexual overtures toward the client. This was the event that precipitated the psychosis.
"My brothers can't forgive me": This referred to a homicidal attempt on his brother's life. The client
ran over his brother with a farm tractor. He had a delusional belief that his brother was a
Communist.
These non-explicated, out-of-context, highly relevant statements illustrate the pre-expressive nature
of psychotic communication.
CRISIS
Prouty and Kubiak ( 1988b) report the use of Pre-Therapy as a form of crisis intervention. The
client was a mentally retarded female, diagnosed as hebephrenic schizophrenic. She lived in a
residential treatment facility. The para-professional therapist (now a professional counselor and
college instructor) was taking a group of clients on a community visit. The psychotic reaction
occurred while they were driving in a van.
The Vignette
The client was one of seven on an outing from a halfway house. She was seated in the rear seat of
the van. As I looked in the rear-view mirror, I observed the client crouched down into the seat with
one arm outstretched above her head. The client's face was filled with terror and her voice began to
escalate in screams.
I pulled the van off the road and asked the volunteer to take the others out of the van. I sat next to
the client, sharing the same
seat. The client's eyes were closed and she was wincing with fear.
Client: [In rising voice.] It's pulling me in.

Therapist: WWR It's pulling me in.
[Continuing to slip farther down into the seat, with
Client:
left arm outstretched. Eyes still closed.]
Your body is slipping down into the seat. Your arm
Therapist: BR
is in the air.
Therapist: SR We are in the van. You are sitting next to me.
Client: [Screaming.]
Therapist: FR You are screaming, Carol.
Client: It's pulling me in.
Therapist: WWR It's pulling you in.
Therapist: SR Carol, we are in the van. You are sitting next to me.
Therapist: FR Something is frightening you. You are screaming.
Client: [Patient screaming.] It's sucking me in.
Therapist: WWR It's sucking you in.
We are in the van, Carol. You are sitting next to me.
Therapist: SR/BR
Your arm is in the air.
[Beginning to sob very hard. Arms dropped to lap.]
Client:
It was the vacuum cleaner.
Therapist: WWR It was the vacuum cleaner.
[Direct eye contact.] She did it with the vacuum
cleaner. [Continued in a normal tone of voice.] I
thought it was gone. She used to turn on the vacuum
Client: cleaner when I was bad and put the hose right on my
arm. I thought it sucked it in. [Less sobbing. It should
be noted that daily, this patient would kiss her arm
up to her elbow and stroke it continually.]
Your arm is still here. It didn't get sucked into the
Therapist: WWR
vacuum cleaner.
Client: [Smiled and was held by therapist.]
in a psychologically beneficial manner without medications. The client was able to experience how
her symptoms of arm kissing and stroking related to a negative childhood emotional trauma of her
mother threatening her with a vacuum cleaner. In addition, the client was able to use this newly
integrated material as a basis for further therapy concerning her mother.
PROFOUND RETARDATION AND DEPRESSION
Psychiatric treatment of the severely depressed and retarded has been achieved with lithium
carbonate ( Sovner and Hurley, 1983). Prouty and Cronwall ( 1990) report a successful
psychological treatment utilizing Pre-Therapy.
The Vignette
Client X was a 21-year-old male and a custodial resident of a state institution. He was diagnosed as
profoundly retarded on the basis of Stanford Binet testing. His mental age was two years and four
months. His IQ was 13.
Because of the severity of symptoms, he was not eligible for vocational or educational training. In
addition, he was ineligible for field trips or cottage activities. His symptoms included crying,
psychomotor retardation, mood swings, and obsessive stereotypic grass pulling.
Medical records indicate the client had minor cerebral palsy and a history of slow motor
development, sitting up at 14 months and walking at 22 months. The parents were of lower
socioeconomic status. The father, an alcoholic, physically and emotionally abused the boy during
his first five years of life. This resulted in divorce and the boy being placed in the institution. The
mother remained in good contact with the youngster and became involved in parent advocacy at the
state facility.
The case is significant because the psychological treatment was completed without medications,
thus allowing a clearer assessment. The client had previously been treated with Prolixin, Thorazine,
Mellaril, and Vistaril. All medications were stopped at the beginning of Pre-Therapy.
As a result of treatment, symptoms decreased and the client exhibited more realistic
communication. This increase in realistic communication was confirmed by objective data, and the
client became eligible for programmatic services within the institution.
Early Treatment: Autistic Phase--Therapist Report. Treatment sessions were 30 minutes, twice
weekly. "During our first sessions, X would come loping into the room, sit down in a chair, and
start driving an imaginary car. He would hold his hands and arms as on a steering wheel. (I later
introduced a toy steering wheel.) He made clicking noises (turn signals) and engine noises
("Vroom") over and over during the session. He would pretend to turn the wheel and bend sideways
until he was touching the floor with his hand, shoulder, or arm. Sometimes he would make great
crashing noises and say, "Beep-beep." He drove continually and constantly during sessions for
approximately the first year. There was very little eye contact during this time.
Typical Session
Therapist: Hi, X.
Therapist: SR You're looking at the steering wheel.
Therapist: SR X is sitting in the chair, holding the steering wheel.
Typical Session
Therapist: SR We're both sitting in brown chairs.
Client: Vroom.
Therapist: WWR Vroom.
Client: Click, click.
Therapist: WWR Click, click.
Therapist: SR X is turning the steering wheel.
Therapist: BR Arms crossing. [Crosses arms.]
Therapist: BR Body bending in chair. [Bends.]
Client: Vroom, vroom.
Therapist: WWR Vroom, vroom.
Therapist: SR Our heads are touching the floor.
Therapist: BR We are bending over.
Therapist: FR You are looking.
Therapist: SR You are looking at the steering wheel.
Client: Eee, kruss, sss.
Therapist: WWR Eee, kruss, sss.
Therapist: SR You're making crashing noises.
Client: Click, click.
Therapist: WWR Click, click.
Therapist: SR You're making signal noises.
Therapist: SR We're sitting in a big room.
Therapist: SR The sun is shining.
Therapist: BR We're facing each other.
Therapist: BR Your arms are turning.
Therapist: BR [Hands on steering wheel.]
Therapist: BR You do, I do.
Therapist: FR X is smiling.
Therapist: SR X has been driving for a long time.
Therapist: RR Last time we were together, we were in a small room.
Therapist: FR You look sad.
Therapist: SR You are making crashing sounds.
Client: Beep beep.
Therapist: WWR Beep beep.
Therapist: RR Last time we were together, you had a red shirt on.
Therapist: SR Today you have a yellow shirt.
Typical Session
Mid Treatment: Relatedness Phase--Therapist Report. Gradually, the client became aware that I
was reflecting his verbalizations and body movements. As we started to make contact, he would
drive, giving me eye contact and smiling as I did contact reflections. He would contort his body so
his head was on the floor; however, he was seated in the chair, making driving sounds and actions.
He would look to be sure I was giving contact reflections. We spent a
lot of time driving, turning corners so that our upper bodies were almost on the floor, while our
backsides remained in the chairs.
As the driving behaviors slowly decreased he would play with cars and other toys. I brought a large
unbreakable mirror to the sessions. He would make faces into it and simultaneously watch his
image while watching my reflections of his facial expressions. We played with a toy whose
different shapes fit into holes of the same shape. At first, he played only with the basic toy and he
had trouble fitting the shapes successfully. From there he moved to fitting the shapes in easily and
then became uninterested in the toy altogether. He liked to draw and continued to enjoy playing
with cars. His crying behavior was diminishing in the cottage. During all this time I used only Pre-
Therapy contact reflections.
Therapist: Hi, X.
Client: Hi, Mimi.
Therapist: SR You looked at Mindy when you said hi.
Therapist: SR You sit in chair.
Therapist: SR You're looking for the steering wheel.
Therapist: FR You look all around.
Therapist: SR You picked up steering wheel.
Therapist: FR You're smiling.
Therapist: FR You watch Mindy.
Therapist: SR The big mirror is on the table.
Therapist: FR You stick out your tongue.
Therapist: RR You do, I do.
Therapist: FR You smile when Mindy sticks out her tongue.
Therapist: SR We are both looking in the mirror.
Therapist: BR X and Mindy are sitting next to each other.
Therapist: SR X and Mindy look in the mirror.
Therapist: FR X smiles.
Therapist: FR You smile, I smile.
Therapist: FR Your lips are turned down.
Therapist: SR You are looking at X in the mirror.
Therapist: FR X is frowning.
Client: Here.
Therapist: WWR Here.
Therapist: FR Now your lips turned up.
Therapist: FR You do, I do.
Therapist: FR X is smiling.
Therapist: SR You pick up the steering wheel.
Therapist: SR You look in mirror.
Therapist: RR You used to drive all the time.
Therapist: SR Now you drive sometimes.
Therapist: SR You pick up the red and blue toy.
Therapist: SR You're turning the toy around in your hands.
Therapist: SR You hand me the toy.
Client: Open.
Therapist: FR You look.
Therapist: FR You look at Mindy.
Therapist: SR You want to take the shapes out of the toy.
Therapist: FR You watch.
Therapist: RR Last time we were sitting in the chairs.
Therapist: RR Last time it was raining.
Therapist: SR Today the sun is shining.
Therapist: RR Before, X said, "Open."
Client: Here.
Therapist: WWR Here.
Therapist: SR You want the triangle in the hole.
Therapist: FR X smiles.
Ending Treatment: Expressive Phase--Therapist Report. In the ending phase of therapy, X's
driving behavior was extinct, as was his crying behavior. He no longer tore up the grass and he took
part in a pre-vocational program. He went home from our sessions without the aid of staff. During
our sessions he was more verbal and more assertive, expressing higher self-esteem. He would walk
around the room and ask basic questions. He would express emotions appropriately and knew when
he was happy or sad. He was able to attend field trips. He would even talk about other people,
showing much improved reality contact and social communication.
Therapist: Hi, X.
Client: Fine.
Therapist: How are you today?
Client: Fine.
Therapist: WWR Fine.
Therapist: SR You're taking off your coat.
Therapist: SR You are looking at Mindy.
Client: Hang up?
Therapist: WWR Hang up?
You want to know what to do with your coat. You
Therapist: SR
can put it over there.
Therapist: SR You put your coat on the chair.
Therapist: SR You're walking across the room.
Therapist: BR You sit down.
Therapist: SR You put your arms on the table.
Therapist: SR You reach in the bag.
Therapist: SR X takes out the green car.
Therapist: SR X pushes the car off the table.
Therapist: SR It flies across the room.
Therapist: FR X laughs.
Therapist: BR X stands up.
Therapist: SR X pushes chair back.
Therapist: SR X picks up car.
Therapist: SR You're walking to the candy machine
Therapist: SR You're rattling the handle.
Client: Candy.
Therapist:
Candy.
WWR
Client: Candy (louder).
Therapist:
Candy.
WWR
Therapist: SR X wants candy.
Therapist: SR No candy now, X.
Therapist: SR You're looking at Mindy.
Therapist: BR You're walking.
Therapist: SR You're looking at the stuff on the counter.
Client: Plates.
Therapist:
Plates.
WWR
Client: Napkins.
Therapist:
Napkins.
WWR
Client: Party?
Therapist:
Party.
WWR
You want to know if there is going to be a
Therapist: SR
party?
Therapist: SR Christmas is coming.
Client: Santa.
Therapist:
Santa.
WWR
Therapist: SR Santa comes at Christmas.
Therapist: What are you doing for Christmas?
Client: Going home in car.
Therapist:
Going home in car.
WWR
Client: See Mom.
Therapist:
See Mom.
WWR
You'll see Mom when you go home for
Therapist: RR
Christmas.
Before you laughed when you pushed the car
Therapist: RR off the
table.
Therapist: FR You smiled when Mindy says that.
Is someone coming to take you back to your
Therapist:
house?
Client: No.
Therapist: Good-bye, X.
Client: Good-bye, Mimi.
A four-year follow-up review showed a stabilized and improved adjustment. The client was still
without psychiatric medications. Institutional records indicate the client's accessibility to
programmatic services. He participates in vocational, educational, and social activities. However,
records also indicate instances of crying and verbal aggression.
An interview with his mother revealed her impressions: "He's improved a lot. . . . I really think it
helped him a lot. . . . We can bring him home now for longer periods of time without as much
stress. . . . It worked great."
Most interestingly, she reported, "It helped him see himself." His mother also wished the treatment
could have continued longer if circumstances could have permitted.
NOTES
1. Ms. Pietrzak served as Pre-Therapy pilot study coordinator. She had primary responsibility for
organizing and supervising the project.
2. This case history was presented at a symposium with Carl Rogers, Eugene Gendlin, Natalie
Rogers, and Nathaniel Raskin at the University of Chicago in September 1986. The videotape
is available at the Institute for the Study of the Person, La Jolla, California.
2 PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTACT
Pre-Therapy is a theory of psychological contact. It is rooted in Rogers' conception of psychological

contact as the first condition of a therapeutic relationship. It is also rooted in Perls' ( 1969)
conception of ego as a "contact function." Pre-Therapy is the development or restoration of the
functions necessary for a therapeutic relationship and Experiencing. Pre-Therapy, described in
general terms, develops the necessary psychological capacities for psychotherapy. It assists those
clients who are impaired in the psychological functions required for treatment to occur.
Psychological contact, as a theoretical system, is described as: contact reflections, contact functions,
and contact behaviors ( Peters , 1986b); Leijssen and Roelens, 1988).
Contact reflections refer to counselor technique. They represent evolution in the Person-
Centered/Experiential method (see Chapters 1 and 2). Reflection for Rogers embodied the attitude;
reflection for Gendlin facilitates the Experiencing process. Reflection for Pre-Therapy develops
psychological contact.
Contact functions refer to the internal psychological functions of the client. They are an evolution in
Perls' concept of psychological contact as an ego function. 1 They are described as reality contact,
affective contact, and communicative contact.
Contact behaviors refer to specific behaviors to be measured so as to illustrate the outcome of Pre-
Therapy. Reality, affective and communicative contact are the emergent behaviors that represent
changes in contact.
Contact Reflections
Contact reflections have the theoretical function of developing psychological contact between
therapist and client when the client is incapable of reality, affective, or communicative contact.
They are applied when there is not sufficient contact to implement psychotherapy.
Contact reflections are concrete in that they are extraordinarily literal and duplicative. They are
empathic to the specific concrete particularity of the client's regressed efforts at expression and
communication. This is the core empathy.
There are five contact reflections ( Karon and Vanderbos, 1981): situational reflections (SR), facial
reflections (FR), word-for-word reflections (WWR), body reflections (BR), and reiterative
reflections (RR).
Situational contact refers to reflections at the client's situation, environment, or milieu. For example,
a therapist may situationally reflect:"Tom is playing with the red ball." Another situational
reflection may be: "You are holding the chair." These types of reflections help make reality contact.
They facilitate existential contact with the world.
Facial contact describes reflections of facial affect. Many psychotic and retarded clients, due to
psychosocial isolation, overmedication, and institutionalization, do not experience themselves as the
locus of emotion or feeling. They often exist in a state of emotional autism, numbness, or absence.
Often, the feeling exists in a pre-expressive form in the face. Arthur Burton ( 1973) suggests that the
face has the phylogenetic function of emotional expressivity It has evolved through mammalian
biological development for that purpose.
Facial reflections may be demonstrated by the following: "You look sad," or "You look scared."
Another example might be: "Your face looks happy." The therapist is "inter-humanizing" the
emotion or feeling with the client. Facial contact or reflections have the theoretical function of
developing affective contact or existential contact with the self.
Word-for-word contact or reflections mean the literal "welcoming" repetition of singular words,
multiple word fragments, or fragments of meaning that the client expresses. Many schizophrenic
clients, due to their use of neologisms, word-salads, and
echolalia, are often incoherent. The same difficulties occur with the retarded/psychotic, only these
difficulties are compounded communicatively by mental retardation. In either case, the client's
speech seems to flow coherently, then incoherently, coherently, incoherently, and so on. For
example, the client may say: "[incoherent word, incoherent word], house, [incoherent word,
incoherent word], tree." The therapist would selectively reflect "house," then "tree." This word-for-
word reflection reinforces the client sense of self as a communicator. This is perhaps a poetic
empathy as reflected in Buber's "Response" of "I" to "Thou." Word-for-word reflections develop
communicative contact or existential contact with the other.
Body contact refers to reflections of the client's body. Schizophrenic and retarded/psychotic clients
manifest echopraxia, catatonia, and bizarre body posturing. The significance of the body in the
psychotherapy of schizophrenia was researched by Mauerer- Groeli ( 1976). From the
psychoanalytic perspective, that author found improved ego functions as a result of body therapy
with a large number of psychotic clients.
In Pre-Therapy, there are two kinds of body reflections. The first is an empathic body duplication
by the therapist. This is illustrated by Prouty and Cronwall ( 1990). Cronwall describes a depressed
and profoundly retarded client whose major behavior in therapy was to "make-believe" he was
turning the steering wheel of a car. There was no language or contact with the therapist. The client
only drove his imaginary steering wheel. The therapist's body reflected this by turning her own
steering wheel and duplicating the body movements of the client.
The second body reflection in Pre-Therapy is verbal. For example, a therapist may reflect catatonic
posturing: "Your arm is in the air. Your body is very rigid." These kinds of body or verbal
reflections help assist the client experience his body as a "me" or self-experience. This can be the
resolution of a very primitive trauma or lack of development.
Re-contact or reiterative reflections refer not to a specific technique, but to a principle. The
principle is: If a specific reflection succeeds in making psychological contact, repeat it. Repeating
the psychological contact maximizes the opportunity to develop a relationship or to facilitate
Experiencing.
There are two types of re-contact: immediate and longer term. An example of immediate re-contact
is drawn from Prouty and Cronwall ( 1990). A profoundly retarded client, who had no contact with
the therapist, utters a word: "Candy." The therapist immediately re-contacts or reiterates "Candy."
The client then responds, more intentionally, louder, "Candy." The client then gradually says,
"Napkin,""Plates,""Party." By reiterating "Candy," the client's communication expanded. Van
Werde ( 1990) describes a therapeutic sequence with a psychotic, mentally retarded girl who was
diagnosed as schizo-affective. The therapist performed a longer-term, reiterative re-contact. The
therapist, earlier in the session, had body reflected: "You touched your forehead." Some minutes
later, the therapist made a reiterative reflection: "You touched your forehead." The client then
proceeded to say, "Grandma." This interchange evolved into the client expressing genuine and
congruent feeling about her grandmother.
Pre-Therapy, by using contact reflection, tends to reduce psychotic expression and facilitate more
realistic communication embodying the world, self, or other (reality, affective, and communicative
contact).
Contact Functions
The contact functions, in psychological terms, represent an expansion of Perls' concept of "contact
as an ego function." They are conceived as awareness functions and described as reality, affective,
and communicative contact.
The development or restoration of the contact functions is the necessary pre-condition for
psychotherapy. They function as the theoretical goals of a Pre-Therapy.
Reality contact. Reality contact (world) is defined as the awareness of people, places, things, and
events. If we describe the world as we concretely experience it, we see that we live with things. Our
world is an infinite thematic field of things. Things are part of our living existence. We turn
handles, we throw balls, we smell flowers, we touch stones, we use toasters, we see by electric light
bulbs. Things are a definite part of our reality sense.
Even if we do not have intimate relationships, our world is peopled. Everywhere, there are people.
We live with people. Peo-
ple are on the bus, in the airplane, at the physician's office, on the island of Tahiti, and so on. Again,
there is an infinite thematic of people. Even if we live alone on an island, there are people in our
heads. We would talk to them. People are a concrete part of our reality sense.
Mankind is spatially constructed. We live "in" space. Spatiality is a concrete part of our reality.
Things and people are bound up with space. The ball is here. The ball is there. I am here. You are
there. These are the meanings of place. Place is a deep part of our reality sense. Spatiality is also an
infinite thematic.
Mankind is also temporally constructed. We live "in" time. Time is also a concrete part of our
reality. Things, people, and places have their occurrence in time. This is the concrete meaning of
event. I am here now. You are there now. We were there then. We will be married in November.
Time is an infinite thematic.
People, places, things, and events are the concrete, yet infinite thematics of our "being-in-the-
world."
Affective contact. Affective contact (self) is our response to the world or other. Affective contact is
defined as awareness of moods, feelings, and emotions. Moods, feelings, and emotions are different
phenomenological and concrete forms of affect.
Mood is affect that is subtle, diffuse, and general. Often, a mood is background sensing. It is a
coloring of events. I can go to a football game and experience an anxious or depressed mood that
feels separate from the current reality. The mood also has a low intensity to it. It often lacks direct
focus.
Feeling is more pronounced affect. A feeling is clearer and it has a specific locus. It is in response to
the event itself. I feel this or that about this or that. The intensity of feeling is stronger than that of a
mood. It is not as subtle; it is more articulated as an affective experience. Instead of being
background, it is more foreground about the event. I feel sad that my grandmother is deceased and
is no longer here to care about me.
Emotion is affect that is considerably more intense and more clearly linked to an event. It is sharp,
clear, and more detailed. Emotion has the psychological quality of being totally foreground. My
emotional reaction is rage if you are attacking my child or my wife.
-41-
Moods, feelings, and emotions are an infinite thematic of our contact with existence.
Communicative contact. Communicative contact is defined as the symbolization of reality (world)

and affect (self) to others.
Communicative contact is more than the transmission of information. It is the meaningful

expression of our perceived world and self to others. It conveys denotative and connotative
meanings from our experiential universe. It reveals to the other. It enables psychological contact
with the other.
Communicative contact primarily refers to social language. We concretely live in language. It is an
infinite thematic of our beingin-the-world. We think in language. We speak in language. We create
in language. We even die in language, as on tombstones. One merely has to experience living in a
culture with a different language to experience the psychological significance of language.
The Contact Functions In Therapy
A therapeutic vignette illustrates contact reflections resulting in the restoration of the contact
functions in a chronic schizophrenic woman. It also illustrates the restoration of psychological
contact as a pre-condition of relationship.
Dorothy is an old woman who is one of the more regressed women on X ward. She was mumbling
something [as she usually did]. This time I could hear certain words in her confusion. I reflected
only the words I could clearly understand. After about ten minutes, I could hear a complete
sentence. (For a therapist reflection key, see page 38.)
Client: Come with me.

Therapist: WWR Come with me.
[The patient led me to the corner of the day room.
We stood there silently for what seemed to be a very
long time. Since I couldn't communicate with her, I
watched her body movements and closely reflected
these.]
Client: [The patient put her hand on the wall.] Cold.
[I put my hand on the wall and repeated the word.]
Therapist: WW-BR
Cold.
She had been holding my hand all along, but when
I reflected her, she would tighten her grip. Dorothy
began to mumble word fragments. I was careful to
reflect only the words I could understand. What she
was saying began to make sense.]
I don't know what this is anymore. [Touching the
Client: wall: reality contact.] The walls and chairs don't
mean anything anymore. [Existential autism.]
[Touching the wall.] You don't know what this is
Therapist: WW-BR anymore. The chairs and walls don't mean anything
to you anymore.
[The patient began to cry: affective contact.
After a while she began to talk again. This time she
Client:
spoke clearly: communicative contact.] I don't like it
here. I'm so tired . . . so tired.
[As I gently touched her arm, this time it was I who
tightened my grip on her hand. I reflected.] You're
Therapist: WWR
tired, so tired.
Client: [The patient smiled and told me to sit in a chair
directly in front of her and began to braid my hair.]
This vignette begins to express Pre-Therapy as a therapeutic theory and

philosophy. It illustrates the use of contact reflections to facilitate the contact
functions (reality, affect, communication).
In existential/phenomenological terms, this vignette illustrates a resolution of

existential autism (loss of contact with the world, self, and other) and the
development of existential contact (contact with the world, self, and other.
Clearly, the existential structures of consciousness are reintegrated with
existence. This case also illustrates another dimension of Pre-Therapy It shows
the movement from a pre-expressive mode of communication to an expressive
mode of communication.
Contact Behaviors
Contact behaviors are the emergent behavioral changes that result from the
facilitation of the contact functions through the use of contact reflections. They
are the operationalized aspect of psychological contact.
-43-
Reality contact (world) is operationalized as the client's verbalization of people, places, things, and
events.
Affective contact (self) is operationalized as the body or facial expression of affect. For example, a
bodily expression of affect may be: "John angrily kicks the chair." A facial expression of affect may
be: "John looks sad." Affective contact may also be operationalized through the use of feeling
words. The client may use affective language such as "sad," "angry," "happy," and so on.
Communicative contact (other) is operationalized as the client's verbalization of social words or

sentences.
What is being measured is the expression of reality, affect, and communication. On a clinical level,
the measurement reflects the shift in a client from a pre-expressive to an expressive level. In
addition, we are measuring the client's increased expression about the world, self, or other.
NOTE
1. Peris F. S., R. Hefferline, and P. Goodman. ( 1951). Gestalt Therapy: Excitement and Growth.
New York: Julian Press, p. 229. In a structural sense, Perls sees the dynamic units constituting
the system self as a form of contact (p. 224). Perls then goes on to say that reality is given in
moments of good contact--a unity of awareness, motor response and feeling (p. 372). Perls
further describes a definition of perceptual contact as a sequence of figures forming against
grounds (p. 403); Perls F. S. ( 1976). The Gestalt Approach and Eyewitness to Therapy. New
York: Bantam Edition, p. 17. Perls describes a functional relationship between a human being
and his environment in terms of a contact boundary. It is at the contact boundary that
psychological events take place. Perls further states that our thoughts, acts and emotions are
our way of experiencing and meeting these boundary events (p. 17); Polster E., and M. Polster.
( 1974). Gestalt Therapy Integrated. New York: Vintage Books, p. 103. According to the
Polsters, the contact boundary is the point at which one experiences the "me" in relation to the
"not me." Through contact, both are more clearly experienced (p. 103
Chapter 8
Afterthoughts and Future Possibilities
AFTERTHOUGHTS
Gestalt Theory
Some leading Client-Centered therapists ( Tausch, 1988) suggest integration with other
theoretical orientations. In this book there are three such attempts involving the Gestalt
approach.
First, in Chapter 5, Pre-Therapy acknowledges the influence of Fritz Perls' concept of

contact as an ego function. Perls did not elaborate the meaning of this concept; thus, Pre-
Therapy evolved the conceptions of reality, affective, and communicative contact. These
formulations were then described theoretically as the contact functions.
The second attempt at fusion with the Gestalt approach occurs in Chapter 7. In Gestalt
therapy, the dream is considered an aspect of self to be integrated. It is a parallel
interpretation that the hallucination is a self-fragment to be integrated. This view is
confirmed by Pre-Symbolic case studies.
The next point of theoretical integration concerns the language and concept of extrojection.
I defined extrojection as the hallucination being experienced beyond the self-boundary.
This language is consistent with the Gestalt tradition of what I call the "psychodynamics of
experiencing": introjection, projection, retroflection, deflection, and confluence ( Frew,
1986).
The consequence of developing the concept of extrojection is that it points at the split
between self and self-fragment. It amplifies the "psychic distance" not conveyed by Freud's
concept of projection. Freud's term does not differentiate between dream and hallucination.
I hope that these theoretical influences have been assimilated in a manner that does not alter
the form or function of the PersonCentered/ Experiential approach but, rather, strengthens
its contributions.
Psychoanalysis
The hallucination is a mode of symbolization that embodies the positive, expressive thrust
of the organism to signify experience. This primitive intentionality is foundational to the
concept of self-intentionality. This "proactive" sense of symbols allows sharp comparison
with the regressive conception of symbols developed by psychoanalysis ( Freud, 1935;
Jones, 1938).
The regressive interpretation of psychotic expression is also confronted by the concept of

pre-expressive. In Chapter 6, case material is presented that describes psychotic expression
as latently coherent and reality-based meaningfulness. A regressive model simply lacks the
capacity to illuminate this positive drive to realistic meaning.
FUTURE POSSIBILITIES
Pre-Therapy: A Psychiatric Word Model
Van Werde ( 1993) describes the use of psychological contact as the central organizing
concept for a psychiatric ward milieu that services the broad range of semi-acute to semi-
chronic psychotic clients. As he states: "Contact, which is seen as antidote for psychotic
alienation from which all residents suffer, is the key word of the whole approach."
He goes on to say: "The aim of such an approach is to restore the ineffective contact
functions so that basic contact with reality, affect, and communication becomes possible
again. This all happens within a Person-Centered framework."
Van Werde ( 1993) indicates that there can be a polarity between ward structure and
individual psychotic process. He resolves this by the use of contact reflections. An example
of this follows:
In a ward meeting, Chantel suddenly stands up, points at the window and says, "I see them
moving again." I reflected, word for word, and also, her anxious facial expression. This
intervention seems to anchor her. She looks around, becomes aware of the group again, sits
down and we all can continue with the ward meeting. . . .
The group is relieved that she's with us again and that a possible psychotic episode doesn't
automatically lead to repressive interaction, but instead is dealt with in a very accepting and
containing manner.
Van Werde further relates: "In these meetings, we offer a great deal of opportunity to work
with reality, affect, and communication, be it in this group setting. It is clear that we are not
a psychotherapeutic group since processing of individual themes isn't done."
Another application of contact in the ward milieu concerns work therapy. Staff responses
had usually been rather productfocused ("It looks good; when will this be ready?"). This
was changed to a process-focused response that is consistent with the client's level of
functioning: for example, "You're using a yellow pencil" (situational reflection). Another
example would be, "You are drawing a face; yesterday you drew a face" (reiteractive
reflection). Still another example is "You look sad today" (facial reflection). Further, "You
say it is difficult for you to sit there" (word-for-word reflection). Psychological space and
contact with the patient are established, drawing them out of a non-responsive autistic
world.
Contact was also utilized as a social work intervention. Schizophrenia was explained to
parents as a contact impairment. Clients were described as having loss of contact with the
world, self, or other
Van Werde ( 1993) continues:
Basic in all this thinking about the translation of the contact paradigm into the
establishing of a Person-Centered milieu is that we try not to deny psychosis, nor hide
it, nor paternalize the client. We see psychotic behavior as Pre-Expressive behavior.
That means we see such behavior as a way of expressing meanings that are there, but
not yet fully in process, nor available to the person.
Van Werde also describes the use of psychiatric medications. He says:
Since we work in a medical hospital, medication is one of the treatment ingredients. We

try to promote the attitude of working with psychosis as a Pre-Expressive structure. For
reasons of a personal or ward-life nature, we might propose that tranquilizers are used
rather than the very incisive neuroleptics. This is less inhibiting of the person's proactive
forces.
He concludes by saying: "Frequently, progress translates itself in an increased quality of

life; a more 'being in contact' and more living in the 'here and now.' In alliance with the
strengthened Contact Functions, maybe the therapist and client can approach
psychotherapy."
Van Werde's description of the ward milieu is certainly a genuine example of Pre-
Therapy.
Pre-Therapy and "Voices"
During lectures concerning visual hallucinations, I have often been asked about
"voices." Generally, I have answered by indicating that my methods would be
applicable. However, at that time, there was no clinical evidence. The following is a
recent vignette that illustrates the use of contact reflections with audio hallucinations, in
the context of a psychodrama session.
The client was a young woman who had previously lived in a foreign country. At age 12
she was sexually abused. Her abusers told her that if she disclosed the abuse, she and
her family would not be allowed to emigrate to the United States.
-96-
During the process of a psychodrama session at a mental health facility, the client reported
hearing voices.
Client: The voices. [Client puts hands on head.]

Therapist: BR Your hands are on your head.
Client: [Moves hands to cover her eyes.]
Therapist: FR Your hands cover your eyes.
Therapist: BR You're breathing deeply.
[The client removes her hands from her eyes and
Client:
looks at the floor.]
Therapist: SR You're looking at the floor.
Therapist: SR There is a green carpet in this room.
Client: [No response.]
Therapist: SR We're standing here together.
Therapist: BR You're breathing easier now.
Client: [The client looks directly at the therapist.]
Therapist: SR You looked directly at me.
[The client puts her hands on the side of her head
Client:
and then over her ears.] I hear voices.
Therapist: WWR You hear voices.
Client: The voice says, "You die, you should kill yourself."
Therapist: WWR The voice says, "You die. You should kill yourself."
Looking directly at the therapist, the client began her story about the actual abuse scene.
Reality contact had been established.
Therapist: RR You said earlier that you heard voices.
Communicative contact about the voices had been developed by the use of Pre-Therapy.
The therapist then changed to classical psychodramatic technique, that is, developing the
roles for the drama and setting the scene.
Therapist: Is it one voice or many?

Client: One.
Therapist: Male or female?
Client: Male. . . . My brother.
Choose someone in the group to be your
Therapist:
brother.
The therapist states:
Further evidence for Reality Contact is indicated by the client's ability to choose a group
member to be in the role of her brother. As the psychodrama continued, the client was able
to release her rage at her brother for his inability to protect her during the abuse. In
addition, the client was able to process the guilt and anger over these feelings. These
feelings were the origin of the voice: "You should die, you should kill yourself."
This vignette illustrates the use of voices as a therapeutic access, and the use of Pre-
Therapy as an adjunctive method of contact to enable therapy.
Pre-Therapy for the Profoundly Retarded
Profoundly retarded clients are often severely impaired in terms of their social and
communicative capacities. Contact reflections have been used as a form of recreational
social development for these clients. A pre-vocational workshop reports this application:
The counselor is trained in the use of the contact reflections; it is combined with a playful
attitude. The counselor "plays" contactfully with the profoundly retarded during scheduled
recreation times. The overt purpose is "play" and "entertainment." The clients learn to enjoy
themselves through such a form of human contact. . . .
A further evolution of this recreational aspect of Pre-Therapy can be carried into the home
so that parents may have more human contact with their profoundly retarded children.
Again, it is taught to the parent as a form of "play," but obviously it is a form of human
bonding or relationship building. Parents report that this diminishes the isolation of both
parties with each other. This is especially true with non-verbal clients.
Pre-Therapy and Social Autism
Pre-Therapy can be applied to additional populations. At the suggestion of Dr. Henriette

Morato of the University of Sao Paulo, Brazil, Pre-Therapy may have relevance for
children who are culturally deprived or "socially autistic." These children have lost contact
due to psychological trauma associated with severe poverty. As indigenous populations
migrate to populated urban areas, family disorganization and family stress occur. This
results in loss of self-sense and withdrawal from others, as well as withdrawal from reality
itself. These are the "beggar children" of Sao Paulo.
References
Arieti S. ( 1955). Interpretation of Schizophrenia. New York: Robert Brunner.
Badelt I. ( 1990). "Client-centered psychotherapy with mentally handicapped adults". In G.

Lietaer, J. Rombauts, & R. Van Balen (Eds.), Client-Centered and Experiential
Psychotherapy in the Nineties (pp. 671-681). Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press.
Berger D. M. ( 1987). Clinical Empathy. Northvale, N.J.: Jason Aronson.
Binswanger L. ( 1958). "The existential analysis school of thought". Existence: A New

Dimension in Psychiatry and Psychology (p. 194). New York: Basic Books.
Boss M. ( 1963). "A patient who taught the author to see and think differently".
Psychoanalysis and Daseinsanalysis. (pp. 5-27). New York: Basic Books.
_____. ( 1980). Personal communication.
Brodley B. ( 1990). "Client-centered and experiential: Two different therapies". In G.

Lietaer, J. Rombauts, & R. Van Balen (Eds.), ClientCentered and Experiential
Psychotherapy in the Nineties (pp. 87-107). Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press.
Buber M. ( 1964). "Elements of the interhuman". In Friedman (Ed.), The Worlds of

Existentialism (pp. 229, 547). New York: Random House.
Burton A. ( 1973). "The presentation of the face in psychotherapy". Psychotherapy, Theory

and Research, 10( 4), 301.
-101-
Cassirer E. ( 1955). Man: An animal symbolicum. In D. Runes (Ed.), Treasury of

Philosophy (pp. 227-29). New York: Philosophical Library.
Christensen L. B. ( 1991). Experimental Methodology, 5th edn. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Cohen J. ( 1968). "Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled
disagreement or partial credit". Psychological Bulletin, 70, 213-20.
De R. Vre ( 1992). Prouty's pre-therapié. Master's Thesis. Ghent, Belgium: Department of

Psychology, University of Ghent.
Don N. ( 1977). "The transformation of conscious experience and its EEG correlates".
Journal of Altered States of Consciousness, 3( 2), 147-68.
Dosen A. ( 1983). Autism and disturbances of social contact in mentally retarded children.
Vienna, Austria: Paper presented to the VII World Congress of Psychiatry.
Farber M. ( 1959). "Consciousness and natural reality". Naturalism and Subjectivism, p. 87.
Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
____. ( 1967). "Descriptive philosophy". Phenomenology and Existence: Toward a

Philosophy within Nature, (pp. 14-37). New York: Harper Torchbooks.
Freud S. ( 1935). A General Introduction to Psychoanalysis. New York: Liverwright Co.
Frew J. E. "The functions and patterns of occurrence of individual contact styles during the
developmental phases of the Gestalt group". The Gestalt Journal, Spring 1986, pp. 55-70.
Gendlin E. T. ( 1964). "A theory of personality change". In P. Worchel & D. Byrne (Eds.),
Personality Change (pp. 102-48). New York: J. Wiley & Sons.
_____. ( 1968). "The experiential response". In E. Hammer (Ed.), Use of Interpretation in

Treatment (pp. 208-28). New York: Gruen and Stratton.
_____. ( 1969). Focusing. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 6(1), 4-15.
_____. ( 1970). "Research in psychotherapy with schizophrenic patients and the nature of
that illness." In J. T. Hart & T. M. Tomlinson (Eds.), New Directions in Client-Centered
Therapy (p. 288). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
_____. ( 1973). "Experiential psychotherapy". In R. Corsini (Ed.), Current Psychotherapies

(pp. 317-52). Itasca, Ill.: F. E. Peacock Publishers.
_____. ( 1974). Client-centered and experiential psychotherapy. In D. Wexler & L. Rice

(Eds.), Innovations in Client-Centered Therapy (pp. 211-16). New York: J. Wiley & Sons.
_____. ( 1978). Focusing. New York: Everest House.
_____. ( 1979). "Experiential psychotherapy". In R. Corsini (Ed.), Current

Psychotherapies, 2nd edn. (pp. 340-73). Itasca, Ill.: F. E. Peacock Publishers.
_____. ( 1981). Focusing, rev. edn. New York: Bantam Books.
_____. ( 1986). Let Your Body Interpret Your Dreams. Wilmette, Ill.: Chiron
Publications.
Gendlin E. T., & Berlin J. ( 1961). "Galvanic skin response correlates: Different modes
of experiencing". Journal of Clinical Psychology, 17, 73-77.
Gurswitch A. Gelb-Goldstein's concept of concrete and categorical attitude and the

phenomenology of ideation. In J. Wild (Ed.), Studies in Phenomenology and Psychology
(pp. 359-89). Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.
Hart J. T. ( 1970). "The development of client-centered therapy". In J. T. Hart & T. M.

Tomlinson (Eds.), New Directions in Client-Centered Therapy (pp. 3-22). Boston:
Houghton Mifflin Co.
Havens L. ( 1962). "The placement and movement of hallucinations in space,

phenomenology and theory". International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 43, 426-35.
Hendricks M. ( 1986). "Experiencing level as a therapeutic variable". PersonCentered

Review 1( 2), 141-62.
Jaspers K., ( 1971). Philosophy, Vol. 3. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jones E. ( 1938). "The theory of symbolism". Papers on Psychoanalysis (p. 183).

Baltimore: W. Wood and Co.
Karon B., & Vanderbos G. ( 1981). Psychotherapy of Schizophrenia. New York:

Aaronson.
Laing R. D. ( 1990). "Minkowski and schizophrenia". In K. Hoeller (Ed.), Readings in

Existential Psychology and Psychiatry. (Special issue of Review of Existential
Psychology and Psychiatry.) Seattle, Wash.: 195-98.
Langer S. K. ( 1961). Philosophy in a New Key. New York: Mentor Books.
Leijssen M., & Roelens L. ( 1988). Herstel Van Contactfuncties Bij Zwaar Gestoorde
Patienten Door Middel Van Prouty's Pre-Therapie (The contact functions of Prouty's
Pre-Therapy) (pp. 21-34). Belgium: Tijdschrift Klinische Psychologie.
Maher A. ( 1992). "Discovery oriented psychotherapy research: Rationale, aims and

methods". In R. B. Miller (Ed.), The Restoration of Dialogue: Readings in the
Philosophy of Clinical Psychology (pp. 57084). Washington, D.C.: American
Psychological Association.
Makkreel R. A. ( 1986). Dilthey and universal hermeneutics: The status of the human
sciences. In S. Glynn (Ed.), European Philosophy andthe Human Sciences
the Human Sciences (p. 3). Hampshire, England, Gower Publishing.
Mallin S. B. ( 1979). Merleau-Ponty's Philosophy. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Maurer-Groeli Y. A. ( 1976). "Korperzentrierte Gruppenpsychotherapie bei akut schizophren Erkrankten" Arch. Psychiat.
Nervenkr. 221, 259-71.
Mearns D., & Thome B. ( 1990). Person-Centered Counselling in Action. London: Sage Publications.
Merleau-Ponty M. ( 1962). "The phenomenal field". In T. Honderich (Ed.), The Phenomenology of Perception (p. 60).
London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Minkowski E. ( 1970). "Schizophrenia". In J. Wild (Ed.), Lived Time (pp. 281-82). Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University
Press.
Perls F. S. ( 1969). The ego as a function of the organism. Ego, Hunger and Aggression (p. 139). New York: Vintage Books.
_____. ( 1976). The Gestalt Approach and Eyewitness to Therapy. New York: Bantam Edition.
Peters H. ( 1981). Luisterend Helpen: Poging Tot een Beter Omgaan Met de Zwakzinnige Medemes. Lochem/Gent,
Netherlands: De Tijdstroom.
_____. ( 1986a). "Client-Centered Benaderingswijzen in de Zwakzinningenzorg". In R. Van Balen, M. Leijssen, & G. Lietaer
(Eds.), Droom en Werkelijkheid (pp. 205-20). Belgium: Acco Press.
_____. ( 1986b). "Prouty's pré-therapie methode en de behandeling van hallucinaties een verslag" (Prouty's Pre-Therapy
methods and the treatment of hallucinations) (pp. 26-34). Netherlands: RUIT (Maart).
_____. ( 1992). Psychotherapie Bij Geestelijk Gehandicapten. Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.
Polster E.,& Polster M. ( 1974). Gestalt Therapy Integrated. New York: Vintage Books.
Portner M. "Client-centered therapy with mentally retarded persons: Catherine and Ruth". In G. J. Rombauts Lietaer, & R.
Van Balen (Eds.), Client-Centered and Experiential Psychotherapy in the Nineties (pp. 559-69). Leuven, Belgium: Leuven
University Press.
Prouty G. ( 1966). Unpublished tape recording: Psychotherapy with a Psychotic Retardate. Recorded at the Lt. J. P. Kennedy
School for Exceptional Children, Palos Park, Ill.
_____. ( 1976). "Pre-therapy, a method of treating pre-expressive psychotic and retarded patients". Psychotherapy:
Theory, Research and Practice, 13(Fall), 290-94.
_____. ( 1977). "Protosymbolic method: A phenomenological treatment of schizophrenic hallucinations". Journal of Mental
Imagery, 1(2 Fall), 339-42.
_____. ( 1983). "Hallucinatory contact: A phenomenological treatment of schizophrenics". Journal of Communication

Therapy, 2( 1), 99-103.
_____. ( 1985). The development of reality, affect and communication in psychotic retardates. Unpublished manuscript.
_____. ( 1986). "The pre-symbolic structure and therapeutic transformation of hallucinations". In M. Wolpin, J. Shorr & L.
Kreuger (Eds.), Imagery, Vol. 4 (pp. 99-106). New York: Plenum Press.
_____. ( 1990). "Pre-therapy: A theoretical evolution in the person-centered/experiential psychotherapy of schizophrenia

and retardation". In G. Lietaer, J. Rombauts, & R. Van Balen (Eds.), Client-Centered and Experiential Psychotherapy in the
Nineties (pp. 645-58). Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press.
_____. ( 1991). "The pre-symbolic structure and processing of schizophrenic hallucinations: The problematic of a non-
process structure". In Lois Fusek (Ed.), New Directions in Client-Centered Therapy: Practice with Difficult Client Populations
(pp. 1-18). Chicago: Chicago Counseling and Psychotherapy Research Center.
_____. ( 1992). Mental health lectures. Chicago Heights, Ill.: Prairie State College.
Prouty G., & Cronwall M. ( 1990). Psychotherapy with a depressed mentally retarded adult: An application of pre-therapy. In
A. Dosen & F. Menolascino (Eds.), Depression in Mentally Retarded Children and Adults (pp. 281-93). Leiden, Netherlands:
Logan Publications.
Prouty G., & Kubiak M. ( 1988a). "The development of communicative contact with a catatonic schizophrenic". Journal of
Communication Therapy, 4( 1), 13-20.
_____. ( 1988b). "Pre-therapy with mentally retarded/psychotic clients". Psychiatric Aspects of Mental Retardation Reviews,
7( 10), 62-66.
Prouty G., & Pietrzak S. ( 1988). "Pre-therapy method applied to persons experiencing hallucinatory images". Person-
Centered Review, 3( 4), 426-41.
Riepe D. ( 1973). "Marvin Farber and the program of naturalistic phenomenology". Phenomenology and Natural Existence
(pp. 26-48). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Rogers C. ( 1942). Counseling and Psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
_____. ( 1957). "The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change". Journal of Consulting
Psychology, 21( 2), 95103.
_____. ( 1959). "A theory of therapy, personality and interpersonal relationships as developed in the client-centered
framework". In E. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A Study of a Science, Vol. 3 (p. 251). New York: McGraw-Hill.
_____. ( 1961). A process conception of psychotherapy. On Becoming a Person (pp. 125-59). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
_____. ( 1963). "The actualizing tendency in relation to motives and to consciousness". In M. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska
Symposium on Motivation (pp. 1-24). Lincoln, Neb.: University of Nebraska Press.
_____. ( 1966). "Client-centered therapy". In S. Arieti (Ed.), American Handbook of Psychiatry, Vol. 3 (p. 104). New York:
Basic Books.
_____. ( 1975). "Empathic: An unappreciated way of being". The Counseling Psychologist, 5( 2), 2-10.
_____. ( 1977). Carl Rogers on Personal Power: Inner Strength and Its Revolutionary Impact. London: Constable and Co.
_____. ( 1978). "The formative tendency". Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 18, 23-26.
_____. ( 1989). A therapist view of the good life: The fully functioning person. In H. Kirschenbaum (Ed.). The Carl Rogers
Reader (pp. 409-20). Boston, Mass.: Houghton Mifflin.
Rogers C., Gendlin E. T., Kiesler D. J., & Truax C. B. ( 1967). The findings in brief. In C. Rogers (Ed.), The Therapeutic
Relationship and Its Impact: A Study of Psychotherapy with Schizophrenics (pp. 7393). Madison, Wis.: University of
Wisconsin Press.
Roy Barbara C. ( 1991). A client-centered approach to multiple personality and dissociative process. In L. Fusek (Ed.), New
Directions in Client-Centered Therapy: Practice with Difficult Client Populations (pp. 18-40). Chicago: Chicago Counseling
and Psychotherapy Research Center.
Ruederich S., & Menolascino F. ( 1984). "Dual diagnosis of mental retardation: An overview". In F. Menolascino & J. Stark
(Eds.), Handbook of Mental Illness in the Mentally Retarded (p. 70). New York: Plenum Press.
Rychlak J. ( 1971). "Applied phenomenology: The client-centered psychology of Carl Rogers". Introduction To Personality
and Psychotherapy (p. 410). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Sarbin T. R., & Juhass J. ( 1967). "The historical background of the concept of hallucinations". Journal of the History of
Behavioral Sciences, 4( 3), 339-58.
Sartre J. P. ( 1956). Being and Nothingness. New York: Washington Square Press.
Sasche R. ( 1990). "Acting purposefully in client-centered therapy". In J. Drenth , J. Sergeant, & R. Takens (Eds.), European
Perspectives inPsychology
Psychology, Vol. 2 (pp. 65-79). West Essex, England: Wiley & Son.
Scheler M. ( 1953). "Phenomenology and the theory of cognition". Selected Philosophical Essays. Evanston, Ill.:
Northwestern University Press.
Sovner R., & Hurley A. ( 1983). "Do the mentally retarded suffer from affective illness?" Archives of General Psychiatry, 40,
61-67.
Spiegelberg H. ( 1972). "Phenomenology in psychology and psychiatry". In J. Wild (Ed.). Northwestern University Studies in
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (p. 226). Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.
_____. ( 1978). The pure phenomenology of Edmund Husserl. The Phenomenological Movement: A Historical Introduction,
Vol. 1, 2nd edn. (p. 107). Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 1978.
Spinelli E. ( 1989). The Interpreted World: An Introduction to Phenomenological Psychology. London: Sage Publications.
Stikkers K. W. ( 1985). "Phenomenology as psychic technique of non-resistance". In W. Hamrick (Ed.), Phenomenology in

Practice and Theory (pp. 129-52). London: Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht.
Szasz T. S. ( 1961). The Myth of Mental Illness: Foundations of a Theory of Personal Conduct. New York: Paul B. Hoeber.
Tausch R. ( 1988). The supplementation of client-centered communication-therapy with other validated therapeutic
methods: A client-centered necessity. Hamburg, Germany: Psychologisches Institut III, University of Hamburg. Plenary
address, International Conference on Client-Centered and Experiential Psychotherapy, University Leuven/ Belgium,
September 12-16.
Van R. Balen ( 1991). On Rogers' and Gendlin's theory of personality change. Private circulation. Stirling, Scotland: 2nd
International Conference on Person-Centered/Experiential Psychotherapy (pp. 817).
Van H. Belle ( 1980). Basic Intent and Therapeutic Approach of Carl R. Rogers. Toronto, Canada: Wedge Publishing
Foundation.
Van D. Werde ( 1990). "Psychotherapy with a retarded schizo-affective woman: An application of Prouty's pre-therapy". In
A. Dosen, A. Van Gennep , & G. Zwanikken (Eds.), Treatment of Mental Illness and Behavioral Disorder in the Mentally
Retarded: Proceedings of International Congress, May 3rd and 4th, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (pp. 469-77). Leiden, The
Netherlands: Logon Publications.
_____. ( 1993). The Translation of the Contact-Paradigm into a Ward-Approach. Personal communication.
Warner M. S. ( 1991). "Fragile process". In L. Fusek (Ed.), New Directions in Client-Centered Therapy. Practice with Difficult
Client Populations (pp. 41-58). Chicago: Chicago Counseling and Psychotherapy Research Center.
Watson N. ( 1984). "The empirical status of Rogers' hypotheses of the necessary and sufficient conditions for effective
psychotherapy". In R. Levant & J. Shlien (Eds.), Client-Centered Therapy and the Person-Centered Approach (pp. 17-40).
New York: Praeger.
Whitehead A. N. ( 1927). Symbolism. New York: Capricorn Books.
Zimring F., & Raskin N. ( 1992). "Carl Rogers and client/person-centered therapy". In D. Freedman (Ed.), History of
Psychotherapy: A Century of Change (pp. 629-56). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Zucconi A. ( 1984). "Stress intervention for helping professionals". In A. Segrera (Ed.), Proceedings of the First International
Forum of the Person-Centered Approach. Oaxtepec Morelos, Mexico: University Ibero Americana.

1 Chapter 6 The Practice of Pre-Therapy: Behavioral Expression

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

1 Chapter 6 The Practice of Pre-Therapy: Behavioral Expression

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

1 Chapter 6 The Practice of Pre-Therapy: Behavioral Expression

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

1 Chapter 6 The Practice of Pre-Therapy ....................................................................................

1 Chapter 6 The Practice of Pre-Therapy

1.1 PRACTICE OBSERVATIONS

He had been diagnosed variously as: manic-depressive, hysterical reaction, hebephrenic

Segment I (approximately 2:00 P.M.)

Segment II (approximately 3:30 P.M.)

(approximately 8:00 P.M.)

Pre-Expressive Verbal Communication

Client: [In rising voice.] It's pulling me in.

PROFOUND RETARDATION AND DEPRESSION

Pre-Therapy is a theory of psychological contact. It is rooted in Rogers' conception of psychological

Communicative contact. Communicative contact is defined as the symbolization of reality (world)

Communicative contact is more than the transmission of information. It is the meaningful

The Contact Functions In Therapy

Client: Come with me.

This vignette begins to express Pre-Therapy as a therapeutic theory and

In existential/phenomenological terms, this vignette illustrates a resolution of

Communicative contact (other) is operationalized as the client's verbalization of social words or

First, in Chapter 5, Pre-Therapy acknowledges the influence of Fritz Perls' concept of

The regressive interpretation of psychotic expression is also confronted by the concept of

Van Werde also describes the use of psychiatric medications. He says:

Since we work in a medical hospital, medication is one of the treatment ingredients. We

He concludes by saying: "Frequently, progress translates itself in an increased quality of

Pre-Therapy and "Voices"

Client: The voices. [Client puts hands on head.]

Therapist: RR You said earlier that you heard voices.

Therapist: Is it one voice or many?

The therapist states:

Pre-Therapy and Social Autism

Pre-Therapy can be applied to additional populations. At the suggestion of Dr. Henriette

Arieti S. ( 1955). Interpretation of Schizophrenia. New York: Robert Brunner.

Badelt I. ( 1990). "Client-centered psychotherapy with mentally handicapped adults". In G.

Berger D. M. ( 1987). Clinical Empathy. Northvale, N.J.: Jason Aronson.

Binswanger L. ( 1958). "The existential analysis school of thought". Existence: A New

_____. ( 1980). Personal communication.

Brodley B. ( 1990). "Client-centered and experiential: Two different therapies". In G.

Buber M. ( 1964). "Elements of the interhuman". In Friedman (Ed.), The Worlds of

Burton A. ( 1973). "The presentation of the face in psychotherapy". Psychotherapy, Theory

Cassirer E. ( 1955). Man: An animal symbolicum. In D. Runes (Ed.), Treasury of

De R. Vre ( 1992). Prouty's pre-therapié. Master's Thesis. Ghent, Belgium: Department of

____. ( 1967). "Descriptive philosophy". Phenomenology and Existence: Toward a

Freud S. ( 1935). A General Introduction to Psychoanalysis. New York: Liverwright Co.

_____. ( 1968). "The experiential response". In E. Hammer (Ed.), Use of Interpretation in

_____. ( 1973). "Experiential psychotherapy". In R. Corsini (Ed.), Current Psychotherapies

_____. ( 1974). Client-centered and experiential psychotherapy. In D. Wexler & L. Rice

_____. ( 1978). Focusing. New York: Everest House.

_____. ( 1979). "Experiential psychotherapy". In R. Corsini (Ed.), Current

_____. ( 1981). Focusing, rev. edn. New York: Bantam Books.

Gurswitch A. Gelb-Goldstein's concept of concrete and categorical attitude and the

Hart J. T. ( 1970). "The development of client-centered therapy". In J. T. Hart & T. M.

Havens L. ( 1962). "The placement and movement of hallucinations in space,

Hendricks M. ( 1986). "Experiencing level as a therapeutic variable". PersonCentered

Jaspers K., ( 1971). Philosophy, Vol. 3. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Jones E. ( 1938). "The theory of symbolism". Papers on Psychoanalysis (p. 183).

Karon B., & Vanderbos G. ( 1981). Psychotherapy of Schizophrenia. New York:

Laing R. D. ( 1990). "Minkowski and schizophrenia". In K. Hoeller (Ed.), Readings in

Langer S. K. ( 1961). Philosophy in a New Key. New York: Mentor Books.

Maher A. ( 1992). "Discovery oriented psychotherapy research: Rationale, aims and

the Human Sciences (p. 3). Hampshire, England, Gower Publishing.