Natural Fruits
Natural Fruits
Natural Fruits
The rule in Article 441 is not absolute inasmuch as there are cases where the owner is not entitled to the
fruits of his property. The exceptions to the rule are the following:
a.) in usufruct
It is the essence of usufruct that the usufructuary199 is entitled not only to the enjoyment of the
property subject matter thereof but also to its fruits. Thus, Article 566 of the New Civil Code provides:
“Art. 566. The usufructuary shall be entitled to all the natural, industrial and civil fruits of the property in
usufruct.
With respect to hidden treasure which may be found on the land or tenement, he shall be considered a
stranger.”
In lease of rural land, the lessee is entitled to the natural and industrial fruits of the thing leased while
the lessor is entitled to civil fruits in the form of the rent paid by the lessee.200
c.) in antichresis
By the contract of antichresis the creditor acquires the right to receive the fruits of an immovable of his
debtor, with the obligation to apply them to the payment of the interest, if owing, and thereafter to the
principal of his credit.
According to Article 544 of the New Civil Code, a possessor in good faith is entitled to the fruits received
by him before his possession is legally interrupted.
According to Article 681 of the New Civil Code, fruits naturally falling upon adjacent land belong to the
owner of the said land and not to the owner of the tree.
Natural fruits are the spontaneous products of the soil, and the young and other products of animals.
a) The spontaneous products of the soil -those that appear without the intervention of
human labor, such as the wild fruits in the forest, herbs, and common grass; and
b.) The young and other products of animals such as milk, hair, wool, horn, hide, eggs, and
animals dung or manure.
With respect to the natural fruit of the first kind, it is required that the same must be spontaneous
product of the soil. In other words, it is necessary that there must be no human labor which has
intervened in its generation. If human labor intervenes in the production of the fruit, the same is
classified as an industrial fruit. Trees which grew spontaneously on the soil and adhering thereto are not
considered as natural fruits in contemplation of the first paragraph of Article 442 because they are
themselves immovables. Trees may, however, be exceptionally considered as fruits if they are being
exploited for an industry
With regard to the natural fruit of the second kind, there may be a situation where the young or
offspring is a product of animals belonging to different owners. Note that our Civil Code is silent with
respect to the ownership of the young if the male and female parents belonged to different owners.
There is no problem if the mating of the parentanimals is agreed upon by their respective owners and
they provided for the ownership of the offspring. In the absence of any agreement to settle the
ownership of the offspring, the rule is that “the young belongs to the owner of the female parent.” This
is the rule enunciated by the Supreme Court in the early case of US v. Caballero205 in consonance with
the express provisions of the Partidas based on the maxim partus sequitur ventrem — the offspring
follows the condition of the mother.